Incidence of severe renal dysfunction among individuals taking warfarin and implications for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants

Association between changes in renal function and clinical outcomes in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients with marginal renal function. A nationwide observational cohort study

Background

Renal function is one of the crucial components for determining the dose and type of oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, and is also closely associated with the risks of stroke and bleeding. This study aimed to assess renal function changes and their impact on clinical outcomes in anticoagulated AF patients with marginal renal function.

Methods

From a Korean claims database, patients with AF on anticoagulants and a baseline eGFR of 45 to <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were studied. Patients were grouped by changes in renal function over two years-maintained, improved (eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m2), or worsened (eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2)-the study analyzed outcomes including ischemic stroke, major bleeding, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), all-cause death, and a composite of clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 5,126 patients were included in the study: 2,170 (42.3%) in the maintained group, 2,276 (44.4%) in the improved group, and 680 (13.1%) in the group with worsened renal function. The worsened group was older and had more prevalent comorbidities than other groups. After multivariable adjustment, the worsened group was associated with significantly higher risks of major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval; 1.46, 1.03-2.07, p = 0.035), ESRD (1.49, 1.24-1.80, p < 0.001), all-cause death (9.29, 4.92-17.6, p < 0.001), and the composite outcome (1.57, 1.36-1.83, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In anticoagulated AF patients with marginal renal function, a substantial proportion of patients experienced renal function decline below eGFR 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 within 2 years. Renal function decline was associated with higher risks of major bleeding, ESRD, all-cause death, and the composite outcome compared to those who maintained their baseline renal function.

The impact of anticoagulation therapy on kidney function in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are closely related. These diseases share common risk factors and are associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events. Choosing the appropriate oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) in patients with AF and CKD is challenging. Deterioration of renal function is common in patients with AF treated with OACs, although not all OACs affect the kidneys equally.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge of the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with AF and CKD, focusing on the impact of specific OAC agents on renal function.

EXPERT OPINION

Consideration of OAC use is mandatory in patients with AF and CKD who are at increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism. Available evidence suggests that the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is associated with slower deterioration of renal function in comparison to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Hence, a NOAC should be used in preference to VKAs in all NOAC-eligible patients with AF and CKD. Regarding patients with end-stage renal dysfunction and those on dialysis or renal replacement therapy, the use of NOAC should be considered in line with locally relevant formal recommendations.

Characterization of baseline clinical factors associated with incident worsening kidney function in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry

Evidence suggests that atrial fibrillation (AF) could increase the risk of worsening kidney function (WKF) which is linked to an increased risk of stroke, bleeding, and death in AF patients. However, limited data exist regarding the factors that could lead to WKF in these patients. Therefore, we sought to identify the potential factors associated with the development of WKF in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF). We analyzed prospectively recruited 1122 NVAF patients [men 71.9%, median age 73.0 years (interquartile range: 66.0-79.0)] with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73 m² from the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry. The primary outcome was incident WKF, defined as the %eGFR change from the baseline ≥ 30% during the follow-up period. We evaluated the association between baseline variables and incident WKF using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. We also evaluated the non-linear association between the identified factors and incident WKF. During a median follow-up period of 3.0 years (interquartile range: 2.7-3.3), incident WKF was observed in 108 patients (32.6 per 1000 person-years). Compared to the patients without incident WKF, the patients with incident WKF were older and had a higher prevalence of heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), and vascular disease at baseline. Those who experienced incident WKF also had higher diastolic blood pressure, lower hemoglobin, lower eGFR, higher B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and used warfarin more frequently. Upon multivariate analysis, age ≥ 75 years, HF, DM, and anemia were independently associated with incident WKF. Additionally, age and hemoglobin were linearly associated with the risk of incident WKF, whereas a J- or U-shaped association was observed for HbA1c and BNP. Age ≥ 75 years, HF, DM, and anemia were associated with the development of WKF in Japanese patients with NVAF. In patients with these risk factors, a careful monitoring of the kidney function and appropriate interventions may be important when possible.

Cardiorenal Outcomes Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Oral Anticoagulants

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have progressively replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). DOACs cause fewer bleeding complications, but their other advantages, particularly related to kidney outcomes, remain inconclusive. We studied the risks of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and acute kidney injury (AKI) after DOAC and VKA administration for nonvalvular AF.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Cohort study of Swedish patients enrolled in the Stockholm Creatinine Measurements (SCREAM) project with a diagnosis of nonvalvular AF during 2011-2018.

EXPOSURE

Initiation of DOAC or VKA treatment.

OUTCOME

Primary outcomes were CKD progression (composite of >30% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline and kidney failure) and AKI (by diagnosis or KDIGO-defined transient creatinine elevations). Secondary outcomes were death, major bleeding, and the composite of stroke and systemic embolism.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Propensity score weighted Cox regression was used to balance 50 baseline confounders. Sensitivity analyses included falsification end points, subgroups, and estimation of per-protocol effects.

RESULTS

We included 32,699 patients (56% initiated DOAC) who were observed for a median of 3.8 years. Their median age was 75 years, 45% were women, and 27% had an eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m². The adjusted HRs for DOAC versus VKA were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) for the risk of CKD progression and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.97) for AKI. HRs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.89) for major bleeding, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78-1.11) for the composite of stroke and systemic embolism, and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.95-1.14) for death. The results were similar across subgroups of age, sex, and baseline eGFR when restricting to patients at high risk for thromboembolic events and when censoring follow up at treatment discontinuation or change in type of anticoagulation.

LIMITATIONS

Missing information on time in therapeutic range and treatment dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with nonvalvular AF treated in routine clinical practice compared with VKA use, DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of CKD progression, AKI, and major bleeding but a similar risk of the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or death.

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in CKD: Role of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a close bidirectional relationship between the two entities. The presence of CKD in AF increases the risk of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF until recently, with confirmed benefits in AF patients with stage 3 CKD. However, the risk-benefit profile of VKA in patients with AF and stages 4-5 CKD is controversial due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Treatment with VKA in CKD patients has been associated with conditions such as poorer anticoagulation quality, increased risk of bleeding, faster progression of vascular/valvular calcification and higher risk of calciphylaxis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown equal or greater efficacy in stroke/systemic embolism prevention, and a better safety profile than VKA in post-hoc analysis of the pivotal randomized controlled trials in patients with non-valvular AF and stage 3 CKD, yet evidence of its risk-benefit profile in more advanced stages of CKD is scarce. Observational studies associate DOACs with a good safety/effectiveness profile compared to VKA in non-dialysis CKD patients. Further, DOACs have been associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury and CKD development/progression than VKA. This narrative review summarizes the evidence of the efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF at different CKD stages, as well as their effects on renal function, vascular/valvular calcification and bone health.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Provide Less Adverse Renal Outcomes Than Warfarin In Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis

Background

Non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have better pharmacologic properties than warfarin and are recommended in preference to warfarin in most patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. Besides lower bleeding complications, other advantages of NOACs over warfarin particularly renal outcomes remain inconclusive.

Methods and Results

Electronic searches were conducted through Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, and ClinicalTrial.gov. Randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies reporting incidence rates and hazard ratio (HR) of renal outcomes (including acute kidney injury, worsening renal function, doubling serum creatinine, and end‐stage renal disease) were selected. The random‐effects model was used to calculate pooled incidence and HR with 95% CI. Eighteen studies were included. A total of 285 201 patients were enrolled, 118 863 patients with warfarin and 166 338 patients with NOACs. The NOACs group yielded lower incidence rates of all renal outcomes when compared with the warfarin group. Patients treated with NOACs showed significantly lower HR of risk of acute kidney injury (HR, 0.70, 95% CI, 0.64–0.76; P<0.001), worsening renal function (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73–0.95; P=0.006), doubling serum creatinine (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41–0.82; P=0.002), and end‐stage renal disease (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78–0.86; P<0.001).

Conclusions

In non‐valvular atrial fibrillation, patients treated with NOACs have a lower risk of both acute kidney injury and end‐stage renal disease when compared with warfarin.

The Impairment in Kidney Function in the Oral Anticoagulation Era. A Pathophysiological Insight

The need for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is fundamental to prevent thromboembolic events. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) recently demonstrated to be superior, or at least equal, to Warfarin in reducing the risk for stroke/systemic embolism and preventing major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhages. The AF population often suffers from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Indeed, the relationship between AF and renal function is bidirectional: AF can trigger kidney failure, while kidney impairment can promote alterations able to enhance AF. Therefore, there are concerns regarding prescriptions of anticoagulants to patients with AF and CKD. The worsening in kidney function can be effectively due to anticoagulants administration. Warfarin has been recognized to promote acute kidney injury in case of excessive anticoagulation levels. Nevertheless, further mechanisms can induce the chronic worsening of renal function, thus leading to terminal kidney failure as observed in post-hoc analysis from registration trials and dedicated observational studies. By contrast, DOACs seem to protect kidneys from injuries more efficiently than Warfarin, although they still continue to play a role in promoting some kidney lesions. However, the exact mechanisms remain unknown. This narrative review aimed to discuss the influence of oral anticoagulants on renal impairment as well as to overview potential pathophysiological mechanisms related to this clinical complication.

Factors Associated with a Large Decline in Renal Function or Progression to Renal Insufficiency in Hospitalized Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Early-Stage CKD

Clinicians must consider renal function when administering anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF). Determination of risk factors for renal function decline may enable identification of patients who require closer monitoring. We investigated the characteristics associated with renal function decline in patients with AF. The study cohort consisted of 631 AF patients who had at least one readmission during the follow-up period and stages 1-3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary outcome measure was large renal function decline (≥30% decrease from baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]). The secondary outcome measure was a final eGFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m² for those with a baseline eGFR above this level. The mean eGFR was 74.4 ± 18.5 mL/minute/1.73 m², and the mean follow-up time was 30.2 ± 13.2 months. The primary outcome occurred in 155 patients (24.6%) and was associated with congestive heart failure (CHF), proteinuria, type of AF, and left atrial diameter (LAD) ≥ 45 mm. Among 478 patients with a baseline eGFR ≥ 60 mL/minute/1.73 m², 137 (28.7%) progressed to renal failure (eGFR < 60 mL/minute/1.73 m²). A decreasing eGFR was associated with age ≥ 75 years, CHF, lower baseline eGFR, and LAD ≥ 45 mm. CHF, proteinuria, type of AF, and LAD ≥ 45 mm were associated with eGFR decline ≥ 30% in AF patients with CKD stages 1-3. Advanced age, CHF, lower baseline eGFR, and LAD ≥ 45 mm were associated with progression to renal insufficiency. These results should be considered when identifying patients who require more frequent monitoring of eGFR.

Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease

The role of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established. However, none of the randomized controlled trials included patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) leaving a lack of evidence in this large, challenging and unique patient group. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) with AF have additional risk factors for stroke due to vascular comorbidities, HD treatment, age, and diabetes. Conversely, they are also at increased risk of major bleeding due to uremic platelet impairment. Anticoagulants increase bleeding risk in patients with ESRD and HD up to 10-fold compared with non chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on warfarin. There are conflicting data and recommendations regarding use of OACs in ESRD which will be reviewed in this article. We conclude by proposing a modified strategy for OAC use in ESRD based on the latest evidence.

Renal function in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves : Long-term effects of anticoagulation and over-anticoagulation with warfarin

BACKGROUND

Warfarin-related nephropathy (WRN) is a complication of warfarin over-anticoagulation that is associated with acute and/or chronic renal dysfunction and increased mortality. The long-term effects of warfarin on renal function has not been adequately studied in patients with a mechanical prosthetic valve (MPV).

AIM

To study the time-dependent effects of over-anticoagulation on renal function in patients with a MPV.

METHODS

A total of 193 patients who underwent MPV implantation and were followed up in this study were eligible for inclusion. Time above therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) range (TATR) was calculated by dividing the number of INR measurements above target in a year by the total number of INR measurements within a year. Patients were divided into quartiles according to average TATR at 60 months.

RESULTS

At 60 months more patients within the 4th quartile had a ≥20% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, 25.0%, p = 0.04) and chronic kidney disease (CKD, 33.0%, p = 0.07) compared to patients within the 1st quartile. High TATR remained a significant determinant for reduction in eGFR (odds ratio OR: 7.50, 95% confidence interval CI:1.55-36.32) and CKD (OR:5.15, 95% CI: 1.26-20.62) after adjusting for other variables. Longitudinal analysis revealed that the change in eGFR was related to the duration of warfarin use (p < 0.001) and the interaction between the duration of warfarin use and TATR (p = 0.03). Similar findings were observed in patients without CKD at baseline, but not in those with CKD before the index operation.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation over targeted INR values is associated with a steeper decline in eGFR and an increased frequency of CKD in patients with a MPV.

Distribution characteristics and factors influencing oral warfarin adherence in patients after heart valve replacement

PURPOSE

Oral warfarin anticoagulation is a long-term treatment that is required after heart valve replacement. This treatment can prevent serious complications, such as embolism, thereby increasing patients' postoperative survival rates and quality of life. Patients treated with artificial mechanical heart valve replacement were followed up over the phone at different times after the procedure, which is an effective method for preventing accidents related to postoperative oral warfarin anticoagulation. Our goal was to determine a method for providing theoretical guidance to patients on oral warfarin anticoagulation following heart valve replacement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The participants of this study were patients who received artificial mechanical heart valve replacements and were followed up for 2 years after the procedure. Patient adherence to medical advice was calculated, and the distribution characteristics of adherence to prescribed timing, prescribed dose, and regular clinical follow-up among patients of both sexes and of different ages, regions, and educational levels attained were compared.

RESULTS

Univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the factors influencing adherence. Our analyses showed that adherence to oral warfarin anticoagulation in patients after heart valve replacement is influenced by sex, age, residential location, and educational attainment. The medication habits of patients can be evaluated accordingly via phone follow-up. As such, dose adjustment recommendations can be provided, significantly increasing the adherence to oral warfarin anticoagulation in patients after heart valve replacement.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to oral warfarin anticoagulation among patients after heart valve replacement is affected by sex, age, type of residence, and educational level, as well as adherence to clinical follow-up over the phone. The follow-up sessions help establish good doctor-patient communication, which is critical for timely medication guidance, thus shortening medication administration delays and decreasing the overall length of therapy.

Evaluation of Apixaban for the Treatment of Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation With Regard to Dosing and Safety in a Community Hospital

Background: Apixaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Apixaban’s compelling safety and efficacy data, combined with minimal laboratory monitoring, make it an attractive anticoagulant. Objectives: To characterize and evaluate the dosing and safety of apixaban for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at a community hospital. Design/Patients: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients ≥18 years of age who received at least 2 consecutive doses of apixaban from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2016. Patients with multiple admissions were evaluated for each hospitalization. Patients were excluded if height, weight, or serum creatinine was not documented during hospital admission. Patients who received apixaban for the treatment or prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism were excluded. Prescribing patterns were characterized based on FDA-approved dosing regimens and patient demographics. Safety outcomes included incidences of major, clinically relevant nonmajor, and minor bleeding. Results: Of the 707 patients evaluated, 82% received an FDA-approved apixaban regimen. Of the 127 patients (18%) who received an unapproved regimen, 5.5% (7 patients) received an unapproved frequency and 94.5% (120 patients) received an unapproved dose. The majority (98 patients, 81.7%) were underdosed. Composite bleeding rates were 2.7%, with 1.8% major bleeds, 0.7% clinically relevant nonmajor bleeds, and 0.1% minor bleeds. Conclusions: The use of apixaban must be monitored in order to ensure FDA-approved dosing regimens are being prescribed and patients are not being underdosed.