1
|
Skains RM, Koehl JL, Aldeen A, Carpenter CR, Gettel CJ, Goldberg EM, Hwang U, Kocher KE, Southerland LT, Goyal P, Berdahl CT, Venkatesh AK, Lin MP. Geriatric Emergency Medication Safety Recommendations (GEMS-Rx): Modified Delphi Development of a High-Risk Prescription List for Older Emergency Department Patients. Ann Emerg Med 2024; 84:274-284. [PMID: 38483427 PMCID: PMC11343681 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Half of emergency department (ED) patients aged 65 years and older are discharged with new prescriptions. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions contribute to adverse drug events. Our objective was to develop an evidence- and consensus-based list of high-risk prescriptions to avoid among older ED patients. METHODS We performed a modified, 3-round Delphi process that included 10 ED physician experts in geriatrics or quality measurement and 1 pharmacist. Consensus members reviewed all 35 medication categories from the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria and ranked each on a 5-point Likert scale (5=highest) for overall priority for avoidance (Round 1), risk of short-term adverse events and avoidability (Round 2), and reasonable medical indications for high-risk medication use (Round 3). RESULTS For each round, questionnaire response rates were 91%, 82%, and 64%, respectively. After Round 1, benzodiazepines (mean, 4.60 [SD, 0.70]), skeletal muscle relaxants (4.60 [0.70]), barbiturates (4.30 [1.06]), first-generation antipsychotics (4.20 [0.63]) and first-generation antihistamines (3.70 [1.49]) were prioritized for avoidance. In Rounds 2 and 3, hypnotic "Z" drugs (4.29 [1.11]), metoclopramide (3.89 [0.93]), and sulfonylureas (4.14 [1.07]) were prioritized for avoidability, despite lower concern for short-term adverse events. All 8 medication classes were included in the final list. Reasonable indications for prescribing high-risk medications included seizure disorders, benzodiazepine/ethanol withdrawal, end of life, severe generalized anxiety, allergic reactions, gastroparesis, and prescription refill. CONCLUSION We present the first expert consensus-based list of high-risk prescriptions for older ED patients (GEMS-Rx) to improve safety among older ED patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Skains
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Birmingham VAMC, Birmingham, AL
| | - Jennifer L Koehl
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Cameron J Gettel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, NY
| | - Keith E Kocher
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Pawan Goyal
- Quality Division, American College of Emergency Physicians, Irving, TX
| | - Carl T Berdahl
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Michelle P Lin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vandenberg AE, Hwang U, Das S, Genes N, Nyamu S, Richardson L, Ezenkwele U, Legome E, Richardson C, Belachew A, Leong T, Kegler M, Vaughan CP. Scaling the EQUIPPED medication safety program: Traditional and hub-and-spoke implementation models. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:2184-2194. [PMID: 38259070 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQUIPPED (Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Adults Discharged from the Emergency Department) medication safety program is an evidence-informed quality improvement initiative to reduce potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed by Emergency Department (ED) providers to adults aged 65 and older at discharge. We aimed to scale-up this successful program using (1) a traditional implementation model at an ED with a novel electronic medical record and (2) a new hub-and-spoke implementation model at three new EDs within a health system that had previously implemented EQUIPPED (hub). We hypothesized that implementation speed would increase under the hub-and-spoke model without cost to PIM reduction or site engagement. METHODS We evaluated the effect of the EQUIPPED program on PIMs for each ED, comparing their 12-month baseline to 12-month post-implementation period prescribing data, number of months to implement EQUIPPED, and facilitators and barriers to implementation. RESULTS The proportion of PIMs at all four sites declined significantly from pre- to post-EQUIPPED: at traditional site 1 from 8.9% (8.1-9.6) to 3.6% (3.6-9.6) (p < 0.001); at spread site 1 from 12.2% (11.2-13.2) to 7.1% (6.1-8.1) (p < 0.001); at spread site 2 from 11.3% (10.1-12.6) to 7.9% (6.4-8.8) (p = 0.045); and at spread site 3 from 16.2% (14.9-17.4) to 11.7% (10.3-13.0) (p < 0.001). Time to implement was equivalent at all sites across both models. Interview data, reflecting a wide scope of responsibilities for the champion at the traditional site and a narrow scope at the spoke sites, indicated disproportionate barriers to engagement at the spoke sites. CONCLUSIONS EQUIPPED was successfully implemented under both implementation models at four new sites during the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating the feasibility of adapting EQUIPPED to complex, real-world conditions. The hub-and-spoke model offers an effective way to scale-up EQUIPPED though a speed or quality advantage could not be shown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann E Vandenberg
- Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center GRECC, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Shamie Das
- Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nicholas Genes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sylviah Nyamu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lynne Richardson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ugo Ezenkwele
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Legome
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher Richardson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam Belachew
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Traci Leong
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michelle Kegler
- Department of Behavioural, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Camille P Vaughan
- Division of Geriatrics & Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee S, Skains RM, Magidson PD, Qadoura N, Liu SW, Southerland LT. Enhancing healthcare access for an older population: The age-friendly emergency department. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2024; 5:e13182. [PMID: 38726466 PMCID: PMC11079440 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.13182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Healthcare systems face significant challenges in meeting the unique needs of older adults, particularly in the acute setting. Age-friendly healthcare is a comprehensive approach using the 4Ms framework-what matters, medications, mentation, and mobility-to ensure that healthcare settings are responsive to the needs of older patients. The Age-Friendly Emergency Department (AFED) is a crucial component of a holistic age-friendly health system. Our objective is to provide an overview of the AFED model, its core principles, and the benefits to older adults and healthcare clinicians. The AFED optimizes the delivery of emergency care by integrating age-specific considerations into various aspects of (1) ED physical infrastructure, (2) clinical care policies, and (3) care transitions. Physical infrastructure incorporates environmental modifications to enhance patient safety, including adequate lighting, nonslip flooring, and devices for sensory and ambulatory impairment. Clinical care policies address the physiological, cognitive, and psychosocial needs of older adults while preserving focus on emergency issues. Care transitions include communication and involving community partners and case management services. The AFED prioritizes collaboration between interdisciplinary team members (ED clinicians, geriatric specialists, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, and social workers). By adopting an age-friendly approach, EDs have the potential to improve patient-centered outcomes, reduce adverse events and hospitalizations, and enhance functional recovery. Moreover, healthcare clinicians benefit from the AFED model through increased satisfaction, multidisciplinary support, and enhanced training in geriatric care. Policymakers, healthcare administrators, and clinicians must collaborate to standardize guidelines, address barriers to AFEDs, and promote the adoption of age-friendly practices in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangil Lee
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of MedicineIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Rachel M. Skains
- University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamAlabamaUSA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical CenterBirmingham VA Medical CenterBirminghamAlabamaUSA
| | | | - Nadine Qadoura
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of MedicineIowa CityIowaUSA
| | - Shan W. Liu
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee S, Frediani G, Lund BC, Kennelty K, Jeffery MM, Carnahan RM. A Nationwide Emergency Department Data Analysis to Predict Beers List Medications Use Among Older Adults. J Emerg Med 2024; 66:e704-e713. [PMID: 38734547 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is considered an important quality indicator for older adults seen in the ambulatory care setting. STUDY OBJECTIVES To evaluate the pattern of potentially inappropriate medication (PIMs) use as specified in the Beers Criteria, for older adults during emergency department (ED) visits in the United States. METHODS Using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) we identified older adults (age 65 or older) discharged home from an ED visit in 2019. We defined PIMs as those with an 'avoid' recommendation under the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) 2019 Beers Criteria in older adults. Logistic regression models were used to assess demographic, clinical, and hospital factors associated with the use of any PIMs upon ED discharge. RESULTS Overall, 5.9% of visits by older adults discharged from the ED included administration or prescriptions for PIMs. Among those who received any PIMs, 25.5% received benzodiazepines, 42.5 % received anticholinergics, 1.4% received nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics, and 0.5% received barbiturates. A multivariable model showed statistically significant associations for age 65 to 74 (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.39-2.62 vs. age >=75), dementia (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.95), lower immediacy (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.56-3.84 vs. higher immediacy), and Northeastern rural region (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.55 vs. Midwestern rural). CONCLUSION We found that younger age and lower immediacy were associated with increased prescriptions of PIMs for older adults seen, while dementia and Northeastern rural region was associated with reduced use of PIMs seen and discharged from EDs in United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangil Lee
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
| | - Gabrielle Frediani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Brian C Lund
- Center for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation and Department of Pharmacy Practice, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Korey Kennelty
- Division of Health Service Research, College of Pharmacy, Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Molly Moore Jeffery
- Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, Division of Health Care Delivery Research and Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ryan M Carnahan
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Atey TM, Peterson GM, Salahudeen MS, Wimmer BC. The impact of partnered pharmacist medication charting in the emergency department on the use of potentially inappropriate medications in older people. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1273655. [PMID: 38026998 PMCID: PMC10664652 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1273655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A process redesign, partnered pharmacist medication charting (PPMC), was recently piloted in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital. The PPMC model was intended to improve medication safety and interdisciplinary collaboration by having pharmacists work closely with medical officers to review and chart medications for patients. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the impact of PPMC on potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use. Methods: A pragmatic concurrent controlled study compared a PPMC group to both early best-possible medication history (BPMH) and usual care groups. In the PPMC group, pharmacists initially documented the BPMH and collaborated with medical officers to co-develop treatment plans and chart medications in ED. The early BPMH group included early BPMH documentation by pharmacists, followed by traditional medication charting by medical officers in ED. The usual care group followed the traditional charting approach by medical officers, without a pharmacist-collected BPMH or collaborative discussion in ED. Included were older people (≥65 years) presenting to the ED with at least one regular medication with subsequent admission to an acute medical unit. PIM outcomes (use of at least one PIM, PIMs per patient and PIMs per medication prescribed) were assessed at ED presentation, ED departure and hospital discharge using Beers criteria. Results: Use of at least one PIM on ED departure was significantly lower for the PPMC group than for the comparison groups (χ2, p = 0.040). However, PIM outcomes at hospital discharge were not statistically different between groups. PIM outcomes on ED departure or hospital discharge did not differ from baseline within the comparison groups. Discussion: In conclusion, PIM use on leaving ED, but not at hospital discharge, was reduced with PPMC. Close interprofessional collaboration, as in ED, needs to continue on the wards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mohammed S. Salahudeen
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kegler MC, Rana S, Vandenberg AE, Hastings SN, Hwang U, Eucker SA, Vaughan CP. Use of the consolidated framework for implementation research in a mixed methods evaluation of the EQUIPPED medication safety program in four academic health system emergency departments. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:1053489. [PMID: 36925898 PMCID: PMC10012623 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1053489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Adults Discharged from the Emergency Department (EQUIPPED) is an effective quality improvement program initially designed in the Veterans Administration (VA) health care system to reduce potentially inappropriate medication prescribing for adults aged 65 years and older. This study examined factors that influence implementation of EQUIPPED in EDs from four distinct, non-VA academic health systems using a convergent mixed methods design that operationalized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Fidelity of delivery served as the primary implementation outcome. Materials and methods Four EDs implemented EQUIPPED sequentially from 2017 to 2021. Using program records, we scored each ED on a 12-point fidelity index calculated by adding the scores (1-3) for each of four components of the EQUIPPED program: provider receipt of didactic education, one-on-one academic detailing, monthly provider feedback reports, and use of order sets. We comparatively analyzed qualitative data from focus groups with each of the four implementation teams (n = 22) and data from CFIR-based surveys of ED providers (108/234, response rate of 46.2%) to identify CFIR constructs that distinguished EDs with higher vs. lower levels of implementation. Results Overall, three sites demonstrated higher levels of implementation (scoring 8-9 of 12) and one ED exhibited a lower level (scoring 5 of 12). Two constructs distinguished between levels of implementation as measured through both quantitative and qualitative approaches: patient needs and resources, and organizational culture. Implementation climate distinguished level of implementation in the qualitative analysis only. Networks and communication, and leadership engagement distinguished level of implementation in the quantitative analysis only. Discussion Using CFIR, we demonstrate how a range of factors influence a critical implementation outcome and build an evidence-based approach on how to prime an organizational setting, such as an academic health system ED, for successful implementation. Conclusion This study provides insights into implementation of evidence-informed programs targeting medication safety in ED settings and serves as a potential model for how to integrate theory-based qualitative and quantitative methods in implementation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C. Kegler
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Shaheen Rana
- School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | | | - Ula Hwang
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nightingale G, Scopelliti EM, Casten R, Woloshin M, Xiao S, Kelley M, Chang AM, Hollander JE, Leiby BE, Peterson AM, Pizzi LT, Rising KL, White N, Rovner B. Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Blacks with Diabetes Mellitus Presenting to the Emergency Department. J Aging Health 2021; 34:499-507. [PMID: 34517775 DOI: 10.1177/08982643211045546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background: Medication-related problems in older Blacks with diabetes mellitus (DM) are not well established. Objectives: To describe the frequency of medication-related problems in older Blacks with DM presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods: The study was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a randomized controlled trial evaluating Blacks aged ≥60 years of age presenting to the ED. Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use, and anticholinergic score were evaluated. Results: Of 168 patients (median age = 68, range 60-92), most (n = 164, 98%) were taking ≥5 medications, and 67 (39.9%) were taking a PIM. A majority (n = 124, 74%) were taking a medication with an anticholinergic score ≥1. Number of medications was correlated with number of PIMs (r = .22, p = .004) and anticholinergic score (r = .50, p < .001). Conclusion: Polypharmacy and PIM use was common in older Blacks with DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ginah Nightingale
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily M Scopelliti
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robin Casten
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Monica Woloshin
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shu Xiao
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Megan Kelley
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anna Marie Chang
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Judd E Hollander
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin E Leiby
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew M Peterson
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Laura T Pizzi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kristin L Rising
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neva White
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Barry Rovner
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, 114062Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hammouda N, Vargas-Torres C, Doucette J, Hwang U. Geriatric emergency department revisits after discharge with Potentially Inappropriate Medications: A retrospective cohort study. Am J Emerg Med 2021; 44:148-156. [PMID: 33621716 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) prescribed in an academic emergency department (ED) are associated with increased ED revisits in older adults. METHODS A retrospective chart review of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older, discharged from an academic ED (January 2012 - November 2015) with any PIMs versus no PIMs. PIMs were defined using Category 1 of the 2015 Updated Beers criteria. Primary outcomes, obtained from a Medicare database linked to hospital ED subjects, were ED revisits 3 and 30 days from index ED discharge. Adjusted multiple logistic regression was used with entropy balance weighted covariates: Age in years, Gender, Race, Number of discharge medications, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, Emergency Severity Index scores (ESI), Chief Complaint, Medicaid status, and prior 90 Day ED visits. RESULTS Over the study period, there were a total of 7,591 Medicare beneficiaries 65+ discharged from the ED with a prescription; 1,383 (18%) received one or more PIMs. ED revisits in 30 days were fewer for the PIMs cohort (12% PIMs vs 16% no PIMs, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 - 0.95, P value <0.005). Hospital admissions in 30 days were fewer for the PIMs cohort (4 PIMs vs 7% no PIMs, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56 - 1.00, P value <0.005). In addition to PIMs, covariate risk factors associated with ED revisits in 30 days included comorbidity severity, history of prior ED revisits, chief complaint, and Medicaid status. Risk factors associated with hospitalization in 30 days included those plus age and emergency severity index, but not race nor ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS Patients discharged from the ED receiving potentially inappropriate medications as defined by Category 1 of the 2015 updated Beers criteria had lower odds of revisiting the ED within 30 days of index visit. Sociodemographic factors such as gender and race did not predict ED revisits or hospital admissions. Clinical characteristics predicted ED revisits and hospital admissions, the strongest risk being increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index score followed by triage acuity and chief complaint. Future studies are needed to delineate the implications of our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nada Hammouda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, USA.
| | - Carmen Vargas-Torres
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, USA
| | - John Doucette
- Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim K, Jung J, Kim H, Kim JT, Oh JM, Kim H. Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions to Older Patients in Emergency Departments in South Korea: A Retrospective Study. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2021; 17:173-181. [PMID: 33642859 PMCID: PMC7903959 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s291458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of the administration of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and the potential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs) in older patients in emergency departments (EDs) over a 12-month period and to identify the factors associated with the administration of PIMs. Patients and Methods This retrospective study was conducted using the electronic medical records from two university-affiliated teaching hospitals in South Korea. ED visit cases of patients aged 65 and older from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, were included in the analysis. Among the medications administered in ED, PIMs or pDDIs were identified using a drug utilization review program available in Korea. Results During the study period, a total of 13,002 ED visit cases were reported from 10,686 patients. The proportion of ED visit cases with any PIM was 79.2% and the average number of PIMs was 2.7 (range, 1–17). The most commonly administered PIMs that were contraindicated or should have been used with caution were ketorolac (41.3%) and metoclopramide (10.3%), respectively. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that female patients (p = 0.012), patients with more than six drugs in the ED (p < 0.001), and visits longer than 300 minutes (p = 0.026) were significantly associated with PIM administration in the ED. Potential DDIs between the medications administered in EDs were observed in 20.5% of total visit cases, with ketorolac being the most frequently reported drug in contraindicated drug combinations. Conclusion This study demonstrated a high incidence of the administration of PIMs and medications with pDDIs in older patients in EDs and revealed the characteristics that are significantly associated with an increased risk of PIM administration. Healthcare providers in EDs should consider the risk of administering PIMs or medications with pDDIs, especially when treating older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungim Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinyoung Jung
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Haesook Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, Gang Neung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Tae Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Mi Oh
- College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunah Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Drug Information Research Institute, College of Pharmacy, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vandenberg AE, Kegler M, Hastings SN, Hwang U, Wu D, Stevens MB, Clevenger C, Eucker S, Genes N, Huang W, Ikpe-Ekpo E, Nassisi D, Previll L, Rodriguez S, Sanon M, Schlientz D, Vigliotti D, Vaughan CP. Sequential implementation of the EQUIPPED geriatric medication safety program as a learning health system. Int J Qual Health Care 2020; 32:470-476. [PMID: 32671390 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To present the three-site EQUIPPED academic health system research collaborative, which engaged in sequential implementation of the EQUIPPED medication safety program, as a learning health system; to understand how the organizations worked together to build resources for program scale-up. DESIGN Following the Replicating Effective Programs framework, we analyzed content from implementation teams' focus groups, local and cross-site meeting minutes and sites' organizational profiles to develop an implementation package. SETTING Three academic emergency departments that each implemented EQUIPPED over three successive years. PARTICIPANTS Implementation team members at each site participating in focus groups (n = 18), local meetings during implementation years, and cross-site meetings during all years of the projects. INTERVENTION(S) EQUIPPED provides Emergency Department providers with clinical decision support (education, order sets, and feedback) to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications to adults aged 65 years and older who received a prescription at time of discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Implementation process components assembled through successive implementation. RESULTS Each site had clinical and environmental characteristics to be addressed in implementing the EQUIPPED program. We identified 10 process elements and describe lessons for each. Lessons guided the compilation of the EQUIPPED intervention package or toolkit, including the EQUIPPED logic model. CONCLUSIONS Our academic health system research collaborative addressing medication safety through sequential implementation is a learning health system that can serve as a model for other quality improvement projects with multiple sites. The network produced an implementation package that can be vetted, piloted, evaluated, and finalized for large-scale dissemination in community-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Kegler
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | - Ula Hwang
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Daniel Wu
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | | - Stephanie Eucker
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Nick Genes
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Wennie Huang
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Denise Nassisi
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Laura Previll
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Sandra Rodriguez
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Martine Sanon
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schuster S, Singler K, Lim S, Machner M, Döbler K, Dormann H. Quality indicators for a geriatric emergency care (GeriQ-ED) - an evidence-based delphi consensus approach to improve the care of geriatric patients in the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28:68. [PMID: 32678052 PMCID: PMC7364502 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00756-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In emergency care, geriatric requirements and risks are often not taken sufficiently into account. In addition, there are neither evidence-based recommendations nor scientifically developed quality indicators (QI) for geriatric emergency care in German emergency departments. As part of the GeriQ-ED© research project, quality indicators for geriatric emergency medicine in Germany have been developed using the QUALIFY-instruments. METHODS Using a triangulation methodology, a) clinical experience-based quality aspects were identified and verified, b) research-based quality statements were formulated and assessed for relevance, and c) preliminary quality indicators were operationalized and evaluated in order to recommend a feasible set of final quality indicators. RESULTS Initially, 41 quality statements were identified and assessed as relevant. Sixty-seven QI (33 process, 29 structure and 5 outcome indicators) were extrapolated and operationalised. In order to facilitate implementation into daily practice, the following five quality statements were defined as the GeriQ-ED© TOP 5: screening for delirium, taking a full medications history including an assessment of the indications, education of geriatric knowledge and skills to emergency staff, screening for patients with geriatric needs, and identification of patients with risk of falls/ recurrent falls. DISCUSSION QIs are regarded as gold standard to measure, benchmark and improve emergency care. GeriQ-ED© QI focused on clinical experience- and research-based recommendations and describe for the first time a standard for geriatric emergency care in Germany. GeriQ-ED© TOP 5 should be implemented as a minimum standard in geriatric emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Schuster
- Faculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Emergency Department, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
- Institute for Nursing Research, Gerontology and Ethics, Lutheran University of Applied Sciences - Evangelische Hochschule Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Singler
- Institute for Biomedicine of Ageing, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
- Geriatric Department - Medizinische Klinik 2, Geriatrie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Stephen Lim
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Southampton, UK
| | - Mareen Machner
- Charité – University of Medicine, Public Health Academy, Berlin, Germany
- Charité – University of Medicine, Lernzentrum, Medical Skills Lab, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Döbler
- Competence Center Quality Management in Health Care, MDK Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Harald Dormann
- Faculty of Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Emergency Department, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Moss JM, Bryan WE, Wilkerson LM, King HA, Jackson GL, Owenby RK, Van Houtven CH, Stevens MB, Powers J, Vaughan CP, Hung WW, Hwang U, Markland AD, Sloane R, Knaack W, Hastings SN. An Interdisciplinary Academic Detailing Approach to Decrease Inappropriate Medication Prescribing by Physician Residents for Older Veterans Treated in the Emergency Department. J Pharm Pract 2019; 32:167-174. [PMID: 29277130 PMCID: PMC6533068 DOI: 10.1177/0897190017747424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of an academic detailing intervention delivered as part of a quality improvement project by a physician-pharmacist pair on (1) self-reported confidence in prescribing for older adults and (2) rates of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed to older adults by physician residents in a Veteran Affairs emergency department (ED). METHODS This quality improvement project at a single site utilized a questionnaire that assessed knowledge of Beers Criteria, self-perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing in older adults, and self-rated confidence in ability to prescribe in older adults which was administered to physician residents before and after academic detailing delivered during their emergency medicine rotation. PIM rates in the resident cohort who received the academic detailing were compared to residents who did not receive the intervention. RESULTS Sixty-three residents received the intervention between February 2013 and December 2014. At baseline, approximately 50% of the residents surveyed reported never hearing about nor using the Beers Criteria. A significantly greater proportion of residents agreed or strongly agreed in their abilities to identify drug-disease interactions and to prescribe the appropriate medication for the older adult after receiving the intervention. The resident cohort who received the educational intervention was less likely to prescribe a PIM when compared to the untrained resident cohort with a rate ratio of 0.73 ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION Academic detailing led by a physician-pharmacist pair resulted in improved confidence in physician residents' ability to prescribe safely in an older adult ED population and was associated with a statistically significant decrease in PIM rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M. Moss
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA
| | - William E. Bryan
- Pharmacy Service, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Loren M. Wilkerson
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Heather A. King
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - George L. Jackson
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ryan K. Owenby
- Pharmacy Service, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H. Van Houtven
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Melissa B. Stevens
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta/Decatur, GA, USA
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta/Decatur, GA, USA
| | - James Powers
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Camille P. Vaughan
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta/Decatur, GA, USA
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta/Decatur, GA, USA
| | - William W. Hung
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Richard Sloane
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Duke Aging Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - William Knaack
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Susan Nicole Hastings
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chukwulebe SB, Kim HS, McCarthy DM, Courtney DM, Lank PM, Gravenor SJ, Dresden SM. Potentially Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions for Older Adults with Painful Conditions and Association with Return Emergency Department Visits. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:719-725. [PMID: 30687938 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the frequency and risk of return visit to the emergency department (ED) by older adults after prescription of any of four potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) classes included in the 2015 Beers Criteria commonly used for the relief of acute pain in the ED. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Large urban academic ED from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015. PARTICIPANTS Patients age 65 and older discharged from the ED with an initial pain score of 1 or higher (11 822 visits). MEASUREMENTS Prescriptions for PIM classes were collected from the medical record: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants, and opioids. The proportion of patients with ED returns within 9 days were compared by medication class and pain severity (mild, moderate, or severe). Multivariable logistic regression was performed for each pain category to determine adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of ED return. RESULTS Of 11 822 included patients, PIMs were prescribed in 3392 (28.7%): 2550 (21.6%) opioids, 826 (7.0%) NSAIDs, 277 (2.3%) benzodiazepines, and 68 (0.6%) nonbenzodiazepine skeletal muscle relaxants. Total 9-day ED returns were 1125 (9.5%): mild 7.0%, moderate 8.3%, and severe pain 11.7%. Opioids were not associated with more frequent ED returns for mild or moderate pain, and they were associated with less frequent ED returns for severe pain (9.2% vs 12.7%; p < .001; aOR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-0.87). Benzodiazepines were associated with more frequent ED returns for patients with moderate pain (15.5% vs 8.2%; p < .01; aOR = 2.01; 95%CI = 1.10-3.70). CONCLUSIONS These results are consistent with recommendations to limit benzodiazepine prescriptions for older adults and that among older adults with severe pain, opioid prescribing is associated with less frequent ED visits within 9 days of discharge. However, this study was not designed to evaluate safety, adverse events, or other important patient-centered outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:719-725, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve B Chukwulebe
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Howard S Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Danielle M McCarthy
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - D Mark Courtney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Patrick M Lank
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephanie J Gravenor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Scott M Dresden
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chang CB, Lai HY, Hwang SJ, Yang SY, Wu RS, Liu HC, Chan DC. Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication to older patients presenting to the emergency department: a nationally representative population study. Sci Rep 2018; 8:11727. [PMID: 30082816 PMCID: PMC6078949 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30184-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) was associated with adverse clinical outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization among older patients. In order to investigate the prevalence of PIM use based on three different sets of criteria and their associated factors among older patients in the emergency department (ED) in Taiwan. The National Health Insurance Research Database was used for this cross-sectional study. Older patients who visited the ED at least once in 2009 were enrolled. PIMs were identified based on the Beers Criteria, PIM-Taiwan criteria, and PRISCUS criteria. Average patient age was 76.7 ± 7.4 years and patients visited the ED 1.8 ± 2.1 times in 2009. The prevalence and frequency of being prescribed at least one PIM at each visit were high according to all three sets of criteria. Performance of the PIM-Taiwan criteria was only inferior to that of the Beers Criteria. The most important factor associated with PIM was the number of medications prescribed in the ED, and PIM use was associated with higher annual health resource utilization in the ED. PIM use was a significant issue and was associated with higher annual emergency care resource utilization in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirn-Bin Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Chu-Tung Branch, Hsin-Chu County, Taiwan.,Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Yun Lai
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu City, Taiwan
| | - Shinn-Jang Hwang
- Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Yu Yang
- College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ru-Shu Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-Cheng Liu
- Taipei City Psychiatry Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ding-Cheng Chan
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Superintedent Office, National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung Branch, Hsin-Chu County, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Komagamine J. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications at admission and discharge among hospitalised elderly patients with acute medical illness at a single centre in Japan: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021152. [PMID: 30030316 PMCID: PMC6059264 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at admission and discharge among hospitalised elderly patients with acute medical illness in Japan. DESIGN A retrospective single-centre cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS Hospitalised patients aged 65 years or older admitted for pneumonia, heart failure, ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, gastrointestinal bleeding, urinary tract infection or epilepsy from September 2014 to June 2016 who were still alive at discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the proportion of patients taking at least one PIM at admission and discharge. PIMs were defined based on the 2015 American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria. Temporal changes in the proportion of patients taking at least one PIM from admission to discharge were also evaluated. RESULTS During the study period, 689 eligible patients were identified. The median patient age was 82.0 years (IQR 76.0-88.0), 348 (50.5%) were men and the median number of medications at admission was 5.0 (IQR 3.0-8.0). The proportions of patients taking any PIMs at admission and discharge were 47.9% (95% CI 44.2% to 51.6%) and 25.1% (95% CI 21.9% to 28.4%), respectively. The proportion of patients taking any PIMs was significantly lower at discharge than at admission (reduction rate 0.48, 95%, CI 0.41 to 0.53). CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of hospitalised elderly patients with acute medical illness took PIMs at admission and discharge. These findings should be confirmed at other hospitals in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junpei Komagamine
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organisation Tochigi Medical Centre, Utsunomiya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vandenberg AE, Vaughan CP, Stevens M, Hastings SN, Powers J, Markland A, Hwang U, Hung W, Echt KV. Improving geriatric prescribing in the ED: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to clinical decision support tool use. Int J Qual Health Care 2017; 29:117-123. [PMID: 27852639 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Quality problem or issue Clinical decision support (CDS) may improve prescribing for older adults in the Emergency Department (ED) if adopted by providers. Initial assessment Existing prescribing order entry processes were mapped at an initial Veterans Administration Medical Center site, demonstrating cognitive burden, effort and safety concerns. Choice of solution Geriatric order sets incorporating 2012 Beers guidelines and including geriatric prescribing advice and prepopulated order options were developed. Implementation Geriatric order sets were implemented at two sites as part of the multicomponent 'Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Veterans Discharged from the Emergency Department' quality improvement initiative. Evaluation Facilitators and barriers to order sets use at the two sites were evaluated. Phone interviews were conducted with two provider groups (n = 20), those 'EQUiPPED' with the interventions (n = 10, 5 at each site) and Comparison providers who were only exposed to order sets through a clickable option on the ED order menu within the patient's medical record (n = 10, 5 at each site). All providers were asked about order set 'use' and 'usefulness'. Users (n = 11) were asked about 'usability'. Lessons learned Order set adopters described 'usefulness' in terms of 'safety' and 'efficiency', whereas order set consultants and order set non-users described 'usefulness' in terms of 'information' or 'training'. Provider 'autonomy', 'comfort' level with existing tools, and 'learning curve' were stated as barriers to use. Conclusions Quantifying efficiency advantages and communicating safety benefit over preexisting practices and tools may improve adoption of CDS in ED and in other settings of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann E Vandenberg
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 S. 19th St, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.,Department of Medicine, Emory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Camille P Vaughan
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 S. 19th St, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.,Department of Medicine, Emory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Melissa Stevens
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 S. 19th St, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.,Department of Medicine, Emory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Durham VA GRECC and HSR&D Center, Durham VA Medical Centre, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705, USA.,Center for the Study of Aging and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center 3710, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - James Powers
- Tennessee Valley VA GRECC, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, 1310 24th Avenue S, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA.,Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 7159 Vanderbilt Medical Center East, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Alayne Markland
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 S. 19th St, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Ula Hwang
- James J Peters VA Medical Center GRECC, 130 West Kingsbridge Road, GRECC, 4A-17, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.,Departments of Emergency Medicine and Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - William Hung
- James J Peters VA Medical Center GRECC, 130 West Kingsbridge Road, GRECC, 4A-17, Bronx, NY 10468, USA.,Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Katharina V Echt
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Atlanta VA Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033, USA.,Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 S. 19th St, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.,Department of Medicine, Emory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stevens M, Hastings SN, Markland AD, Hwang U, Hung W, Vandenberg AE, Bryan W, Cross D, Powers J, McGwin G, Fattouh N, Ho W, Clevenger C, Vaughan CP. Enhancing Quality of Provider Practices for Older Adults in the Emergency Department (
EQU
i
PPED
). J Am Geriatr Soc 2017; 65:1609-1614. [DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Stevens
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC Atlanta Georgia
- Emory University Atlanta Georgia
| | - Susan N. Hastings
- Durham VA GRECC and HSR&D Durham North Carolina
- Duke University Durham North Carolina
| | - Alayne D. Markland
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC Birmingham Alabama
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama
| | - Ula Hwang
- Bronx VA GRECC Bronx New York
- Mount Sinai Hospital New York New York
| | - William Hung
- Bronx VA GRECC Bronx New York
- Mount Sinai Hospital New York New York
| | - Ann E. Vandenberg
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC Atlanta Georgia
- Emory University Atlanta Georgia
| | | | | | - James Powers
- Tennessee Valley VA GRECC Nashville Tennessee
- Vanderbilt University Nashville Tennessee
| | - Gerald McGwin
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC Birmingham Alabama
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama
| | - Noor Fattouh
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center Bronx New York
| | - William Ho
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center Bronx New York
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC Atlanta Georgia
- Emory University Atlanta Georgia
| | - Camille P. Vaughan
- Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC Atlanta Georgia
- Emory University Atlanta Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Komagamine J, Miyatake S. Lack of awareness among emergency physicians of potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients at EDs. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34:1888-90. [PMID: 27358045 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Junpei Komagamine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tochigi Medical Center, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 3208580, Japan.
| | - Satoru Miyatake
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 3210974, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Evaluation of the heterogeneity of studies estimating the association between risk factors and the use of potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the elderly: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 71:1037-50. [PMID: 26111636 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-015-1891-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was conducted to evaluate the heterogeneity of studies estimating the association between risk factors (age, gender, and polypharmacy) and the use of potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the elderly (PIDT). METHODOLOGY This study is a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science databases were reviewed. The following data were extracted from the included studies: country, type of study, characteristics of the sample, practice scenarios, instruments to evaluate potentially inappropriate drug therapy for the older adults, and patient-related variables. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles (17 cross-sectional and 12 cohort) were included. The majority of the studies were conducted in Europe. Regarding the study durations, 3 to 18 months was necessary to perform the research. As for the sample characteristics, all the studies analyzed involved the older adults and included anywhere from 96 patients to 33,830,599 outpatient consultations. Of the variables analyzed, only polypharmacy presented a positive association with the use of PIDT. All meta-analysis studies showed high heterogeneity, indicating the lack of a methodological standardization of the studies included, among other factors.
Collapse
|
20
|
Stevens MB, Hastings SN, Powers J, Vandenberg AE, Echt KV, Bryan WE, Peggs K, Markland AD, Hwang U, Hung WW, Schmidt AJ, McGwin G, Ikpe-Ekpo E, Clevenger C, Johnson TM, Vaughan CP. Enhancing the Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Veterans Discharged from the Emergency Department (EQUiPPED): Preliminary Results from Enhancing Quality of Prescribing Practices for Older Veterans Discharged from the Emergency Department, a Novel. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63:1025-9. [DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa B. Stevens
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Medicine; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| | - Susan Nicole Hastings
- Department of Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Durham North Carolina
- Health Services Research and Development Center; Durham North Carolina
- Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Durham North Carolina
- Department of Medicine; Duke University; Durham North Carolina
| | - James Powers
- Department of Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Nashville Tennessee
- Tennessee Valley Veterans Affairs Health System; Nashville Tennessee
- Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt University; Nashville Tennessee
| | | | - Katharina V. Echt
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Medicine; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| | | | - Kiffany Peggs
- Tennessee Valley Veterans Affairs Health System; Nashville Tennessee
- Department of Medicine; Vanderbilt University; Nashville Tennessee
| | - Alayne D. Markland
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Medicine; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham Alabama
| | - Ula Hwang
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Bronx New York
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York New York
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York New York
| | - William W. Hung
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Bronx New York
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; New York New York
| | | | - Gerald McGwin
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Epidemiology; University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham Alabama
| | - Edidiong Ikpe-Ekpo
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- School of Nursing; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| | - Theodore M. Johnson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Medicine; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| | - Camille P. Vaughan
- Department of Veterans Affairs Birmingham; Birmingham, Alabama/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Atlanta Georgia
- Department of Medicine; Emory University; Atlanta Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Santos APAL, Silva DT, Alves-Conceição V, Antoniolli AR, Lyra DP. Conceptualizing and measuring potentially inappropriate drug therapy. J Clin Pharm Ther 2015; 40:167-76. [PMID: 25682702 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 12/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Elderly people are the principal consumers of prescription drugs. The more the medication used by the patient, the greater the likelihood there is of the patient being subjected to potentially inappropriate drug therapy (PIDT). PIDT has been measured in the literature with both implicit and explicit tools. The purpose of this review was to assess the use of tools to detect PIDT in various studies and to determine which terms are used to refer to PIDT in practice. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the following steps: the first was identification. In this step, studies were selected from different combinations of the descriptors 'aged', 'elderly', 'inappropriate prescribing' and 'drug utilization' in three different languages, using the Embase, Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Second, the papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria for data extraction were carefully examined by three evaluators to determine the tools used and terms that referred to PIDT. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION From the combinations of keywords, 8610 articles were found. At the end of the selection process, 119 of the articles complied with the specified criteria. The degree of agreement among evaluators was moderate for the study titles (κ1 = 0·479) and substantial for abstracts (κ2 = 0·647). With respect to the PIDT evaluation criteria used by the studies, 27·7% used two criteria. Of the 27 evaluation criteria identified, the Beers criteria were used by 82·3% of the studies. More than 50 different terms to identify PIDT were found in the literature. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION This review is the first study to conceptualize and discuss terms that refer to PIDT. At present, there is no consensus regarding terms used to refer to PIDT, with over 50 different terms currently in use. This review shows an increase in the number of articles aimed at evaluating PIDT using implicit and explicit tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A P A L Santos
- Laboratory of Teaching and Research in Social Pharmacy (LEPFS), Pharmacy College, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 63:e7-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Revised: 02/06/2014] [Accepted: 02/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
23
|
Hogan TM, Olade TO, Carpenter CR. A profile of acute care in an aging America: snowball sample identification and characterization of United States geriatric emergency departments in 2013. Acad Emerg Med 2014; 21:337-46. [PMID: 24628759 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2013] [Revised: 09/06/2013] [Accepted: 09/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aging of America poses a challenge to emergency departments (EDs). Studies show that elderly patients have poor outcomes despite increased testing, prolonged periods of observation, and higher admission rates. In response, emergency medicine (EM) leaders have implemented strategies for improved ED elder care, enhancing expertise, equipment, policies, and protocols. One example is the development of geriatric EDs gaining in popularity nationwide. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first research to systematically identify and qualitatively characterize the existence, locations, and features of geriatric EDs across the United States. OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to determine the number, distribution, and characteristics of geriatric EDs in the United States in 2013. METHODS This was a survey with potential respondents identified via a snowball sampling of known geriatric EDs, EM professional organizations' geriatric interest groups, and a structured search of the Internet using multiple search engines. Sites were contacted by telephone, and those confirming geriatric EDs presence received the survey via e-mail. Category questions included date of opening, location, volumes, staffing, physical plant changes, screening tools, policies, and protocols. Categories were reported based on general interest to those seeking to understand components of a geriatric ED. RESULTS Thirty-six hospitals confirmed geriatric ED existence and received surveys. Thirty (83%) responded to the survey and confirmed presence or plans for geriatric EDs: 24 (80%) had existing geriatric EDs, and six (20%) were planning to open geriatric EDs by 2014. The majority of geriatric EDs are located in the Midwest (46%) and Northeast (30%) regions of the United States. Eighty percent serve from 5,000 to 20,000 elder patients annually. Seventy percent of geriatric EDs are attached to the main ED, and 66% have from one to 10 geriatric beds. Physical plant changes include modifications to beds (96%), lighting (90%), flooring (83%), visual aids (73%), and sound level (70%). Seventy-seven percent have staff overlapping with the nongeriatric portion of their ED, and 80% require geriatric staff didactics. Sixty-seven percent of geriatric EDs report discharge planning for geriatric ED patients, and 90% of geriatric EDs had direct follow-up through patient callbacks. CONCLUSIONS The snowball sample identification of U.S. geriatric EDs resulted in 30 confirmed respondents. There is significant variation in the components constituting a geriatric ED. The United States should consider external validation of self-identified geriatric EDs to standardize the quality and type of care patients can expect from an institution with an identified geriatric ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresita M. Hogan
- The Section of Emergency Medicine; Department of Medicine; University of Chicago School of Medicine; Chicago IL
| | | | - Christopher R. Carpenter
- The Division of Emergency Medicine; Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine; St. Louis MO
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Development and dissemination of a statewide system to minimize use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs). Med Care 2013; 50:993-6. [PMID: 23047789 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31826ecfdc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug safety and adverse drug reactions in the community are of concern in the geriatric population. To help decrease the number of adverse drug reactions, the New Mexico Prescription Improvement Coalition created a consensus panel, the Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIMs) Advisory Board. OBJECTIVE To develop consensus guidelines that would promote decreasing the use of PIMs, as defined by the Beers' criteria, through the promotion of safer alternative therapies and strategies. METHODS A consensus panel of clinical pharmacists, geriatricians, nurses, managed care specialists, and consumers evaluated the Beers' criteria and created clinical guidelines addressing the use of PIMs in older adults and disease state alternative treatment recommendations and strategies. The guidelines were distributed and made available electronically to health care providers. In addition, educational sessions were provided to health care providers throughout the state. Since development of the guidelines in 2009, they have been distributed to over 7500 practitioners and 140 pharmacists throughout New Mexico. RESULTS The PIMs clinical guidelines were endorsed by 27 state-level health care organizations and have been promoted through several managed care organizations. The Web-based version of the guidelines have been viewed an average of 163 times per month and the alternative treatment recommendations and strategies was viewed an average of 407 times per month. CONCLUSIONS Use of a consensus process to develop and promote guidelines that include alternative treatment recommendations and strategies can increase awareness of the use of medications that require caution in the elderly and promote safer prescribing practices.
Collapse
|
25
|
Luo R, Scullin C, Mullan AMP, Scott MG, McElnay JC. Comparison of tools for the assessment of inappropriate prescribing in hospitalized older people. J Eval Clin Pract 2012; 18:1196-202. [PMID: 21883716 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01758.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED RATIONAL, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the ease of use and the capability of four approaches [Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), the Beers' criteria 2003, the Improved Prescribing in the Elderly Tool (IPET) and Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS)] in assessing changes in medication appropriateness in elderly patients over a period of hospitalization. METHODS A retrospective observational study in two hospitals in Northern Ireland using the four measures was undertaken, involving a cohort of 192 patients (aged > 65 years). Medication appropriateness assessments were made at three stages during the patients' hospital 'journey', that is, at admission, during their inpatient stay and at discharge. The identifying rates of inappropriate prescribing in elderly patients in hospital used validated screening tools: MAI, the Beers' criteria 2003, the IPET and HEDIS. RESULTS The MAI was the most comprehensive approach but was also the most time consuming to apply. Data derived using the MAI indicated clearly that there was improved medication appropriateness over the three hospital stay stages (P < 0.001). Although this trend was also significant for the Beers' criteria 2003 (P < 0.05) and the IPET (P < 0.05) approaches, the HEDIS was unable to differentiate changes in appropriateness over time. There was a good correlation between data derived using the MAI and the Beers' criteria 2003 and the IPET approaches; this correlation was not evident for the HEDIS. CONCLUSIONS The MAI is the most convincing tool in evaluating medication appropriateness, but is very time consuming to apply. Beers' criteria 2003 and the IPET perform to an acceptable standard within the clinical setting and are more practical in their application. The HEDIS, although simplest to apply, does not have the sensitivity to measure change in appropriateness over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruoyin Luo
- Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University, Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Polypharmacy is generally defined as the use of 5 or more prescription medications on a regular basis. The average number of prescribed and over-the-counter medications used by community-dwelling older adults per day in the United States is 6 medications, and the number used by institutionalized older persons is 9 medications. Almost all medications affect nutriture, either directly or indirectly, and nutriture affects drug disposition and effect. This review will highlight the issues surrounding polypharmacy, food-drug interactions, and the consequences of these interactions for the older adult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roschelle Heuberger
- Department of Human Environmental Studies, Central Michigan University, Mt Pleasant, Michigan 48859, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schnitker L, Martin-Khan M, Beattie E, Gray L. Negative health outcomes and adverse events in older people attending emergency departments: A systematic review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aenj.2011.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
28
|
Carpenter CR, Heard K, Wilber S, Ginde AA, Stiffler K, Gerson LW, Wenger NS, Miller DK. Research priorities for high-quality geriatric emergency care: medication management, screening, and prevention and functional assessment. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18:644-54. [PMID: 21676064 PMCID: PMC3117251 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01092.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geriatric adults represent an increasing proportion of emergency department (ED) users and can be particularly vulnerable to acute illnesses. Health care providers have recently begun to focus on the development of quality indicators (QIs) to define a minimal standard of care. OBJECTIVES The original objective of this project was to develop additional ED-specific QIs for older patients within the domains of medication management, screening and prevention, and functional assessment, but the quantity and quality of evidence were insufficient to justify unequivocal minimal standards of care for these three domains. Accordingly, the authors modified the project objectives to identify key research opportunities within these three domains that can be used to develop QIs in the future. METHODS Each domain was assigned one or two content experts who created potential QIs based on a systematic review of the literature, supplemented by expert opinion. Candidate QIs were then reviewed by four groups: the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Geriatric Task Force, the SAEM Geriatric Interest Group, and audiences at the 2008 SAEM Annual Meeting and the 2009 American Geriatrics Society Annual Meeting, using anonymous audience response system technology as well as verbal and written feedback. RESULTS High-quality evidence based on patient-oriented outcomes was insufficient or nonexistent for all three domains. The participatory audiences did not reach a consensus on any of the proposed QIs. Key research questions for medication management (three), screening and prevention (two), and functional assessment (three) are presented based on proposed QIs that the majority of participants accepted. CONCLUSIONS In assessing a minimal standard of care by which to systematically derive geriatric QIs for medication management, screening and prevention, and functional assessment, compelling clinical research evidence is lacking. Patient-oriented research questions that are essential to justify and characterize future QIs within these domains are described.
Collapse
|
29
|
Graf CE, Zekry D, Giannelli S, Michel JP, Chevalley T. COMPREHENSIVE GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58:2032-3. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03090.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
30
|
Abstract
The definition of "polypharmacy" ranges from the use of a large number of medications; the use of potentially inappropriate medications, which can increase the risk for adverse drug events; medication underuse despite instructions to the contrary; and medication duplication. Older adults are particularly at risk because they often present with several medical conditions requiring pharmacotherapy. Cancer-related therapy adds to this risk in older adults, but few studies have been conducted in this patient population. In this review, we outline the adverse outcomes associated with polypharmacy and present polypharmacy definitions offered by the geriatrics literature. We also examine the strengths and weaknesses of these definitions and explore the relationships among these definitions and what is known about the prevalence and impact of polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald J Maggiore
- Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Meurer WJ, Potti TA, Kerber KA, Sasson C, Macy ML, West BT, Losman ED. Potentially inappropriate medication utilization in the emergency department visits by older adults: analysis from a nationally representative sample. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17:231-7. [PMID: 20370754 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00667.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to determine the frequency of administration of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) to older emergency department (ED) patients and to examine recent trends in the rates of PIM usage. METHODS The data examined during the study were obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). This study utilized the nationally representative ED data from 2000-2006 NHAMCS surveys. Our sample included older adults (age 65 years and greater) who were treated in the ED and discharged home. Estimated frequencies of PIM-associated ED visits were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to assess demographic, clinical, and hospital factors associated with PIM administration and to assess temporal trends. RESULTS Approximately 19.5 million patients, or 16.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=16.1% to 17.4%) of eligible ED visits, were associated with one or more PIMs. The five most common PIMs were promethazine, ketorolac, propoxyphene, meperidine, and diphenhydramine. The total number of medications prescribed or administered during the ED visit was most strongly associated with PIM use. Other covariates associated with PIM use included rural location outside of the Northeast, being seen by a staff physician only (and not by a resident or intern), presenting with an injury, and the combination of female sex and age 65-74 years. There was a small but significant decrease in the proportion of visits associated with a PIM over the study period. CONCLUSIONS Potentially inappropriate medication administration in the ED remains common. Given rising concerns about preventable complications of medical care, this area may be of high priority for intervention. Substantial regional and hospital type (teaching versus nonteaching) variability appears to exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Meurer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, the University of Michigan Medical School, and the Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Terrell KM, Perkins AJ, Dexter PR, Hui SL, Callahan CM, Miller DK. Computerized Decision Support to Reduce Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing to Older Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57:1388-94. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02352.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
33
|
|
34
|
Chen YC, Hwang SJ, Lai HY, Chen TJ, Lin MH, Chen LK, Lee CH. Potentially inappropriate medication for emergency department visits by elderly patients in Taiwan. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009; 18:53-61. [PMID: 19111015 DOI: 10.1002/pds.1684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The potential for adverse drug events caused by potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in elderly patients at emergency department (ED) visits is a growing concern. The objects of this study were to determine the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of PIM use among elderly ED visits in Taiwan. METHODS The nationwide computerized claims database of elderly ED visits under the National Health Insurance (NHI) in Taiwan during 2001-2004 was accessed. PIM, independent of diseases diagnoses or conditions and should be generally be avoided in elderly people, was evaluated using the updated 2003 Beers criteria. RESULTS Between 2001 and 2004, 14.7% of total 1 429 463 elderly ED visits with prescriptions had PIM, and 19.3% of elderly people who visited ED received at least one PIM annually. Odds ratio for PIM prescriptions to ED elderly was higher for visits at which more drugs were prescribed, visits at local community hospital, female and older physicians, patients aged 65-69 years and female patients. Common PIM categories were short acting nifedipine, muscle relaxants and anti-spasmodics, antihistamines and ketorolac. When health care resource utilization was compared in 2004, subjects receiving PIM at ED visit had significantly more mean ambulatory care visits, ED visits and hospital admissions than subjects who did not receive PIM. CONCLUSIONS About one fifth of elderly people who visited ED received PIM annually in Taiwan. The public and physicians should be educated, and a computerized drug surveillance system might be needed to avoid PIM prescriptions to the ED elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chun Chen
- Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nixdorff N, Hustey FM, Brady AK, Vaji K, Leonard M, Messinger-Rapport BJ. Potentially inappropriate medications and adverse drug effects in elders in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26:697-700. [PMID: 18606325 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2007] [Revised: 12/22/2007] [Accepted: 12/27/2007] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential adverse drug effects (ADEs) in older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED). This was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of adults 65 years and older presenting to the ED at an urban, tertiary care hospital. Potentially inappropriate medications were defined according to 2003 Beers criteria. Potential ADEs were defined as either (1) a potential drug-drug interaction, (2) alternative medication likely to cause toxicity or drug interactions, or (3) toxic doses of vitamins or minerals. Of 174 eligible patients, 124 were enrolled. The mean number of medications used per patient was 8.6 (range, 0-20). Thirty six patients (29%, 95% confidence interval, 27%-37%) presented to the ED with at least one PIM. Eight PIMs were prescribed in the ED, representing 16% of all prescriptions in the ED. Potential ADEs meeting the defined criteria were found in 26.6% of patients. A subanalysis of a random sample of charts revealed significant discordance between medication lists obtained by the research assistants and that of the health care providers. Older ED patients are at high risk for use of potentially inappropriate medications and ADEs. This problem may be magnified by inaccurate medication lists obtained by ED providers. A larger multicenter study may help to better define the scope of this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Nixdorff
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hustey FM. Beers criteria and the ED: an adequate standard for inappropriate prescribing? Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26:695-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2008] [Accepted: 01/27/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
37
|
Resnick B. The Dread of Any Clinician: Potentially Troublesome Medications. Geriatr Nurs 2008; 29:155-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
38
|
Heard K, Wilber S, Shah MN. Inappropriate prescribing in elderly ED patients. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26:372-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2007] [Accepted: 10/14/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|