Has Invisalign improved? A prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign

Accuracy of clear aligners in the orthodontic rotational movement using different attachment configurations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of dental rotational movements using clear aligners with different attachment configurations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analysed 212 teeth from 89 patients undergoing Invisalign treatment. Digital models were analysed after the virtual treatment plan (ST1) and after the first treatment phase (ET1) to evaluate the effective clinical rotational movement. The rotational movements of incisors, canines, and bicuspids were measured using data from the Clincheck Movements Table. ST1 and ET1 were compared to determine the actual rotational movement achieved (ST1-ET1). The presence or absence of attachments (rectangular or optimized) on teeth was analysed. The accuracy of rotational movements among attachment types was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multiple linear regressions were conducted with accuracy as the dependent variable and tooth type, gender, and age as predictors.

RESULTS

Optimized attachments had the highest median accuracy (70%), followed by rectangular (65%), and without attachment (63%), with no significant differences (p = .5). There were no significant differences across age groups, genders, or tooth types. Baseline accuracy was 68.62% (95% CI: 56.03-81.20, p < .001). Age was a significant predictor (estimate = -0.30, 95% CI: -0.58 - -0.03, p = .032), indicating decreased accuracy with increasing age. The model's R2 was 0.046, with an adjusted R2 of 0.003, indicating minimal variance explained.

CONCLUSION

The addition of attachment configurations to clear aligners improves rotational accuracy, but not significantly. Further advancements in these configurations are needed to enhance the performance of the aligners.

How accurate is predicted root movement achieved in four first-premolar extraction cases with Invisalign?

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the achieved and predicted root movements in adults after four first-premolar extractions and Invisalign treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive adults (22 Class I, 9 Cusp-to-cusp Class II and 2 Cusp-to-cusp Class III) from a single clinical division who completed the first series of aligners after premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomography model was registered onto the pretreatment surface-scanned dental model (SSDM) to locate the pretreatment root apices of the whole dentition. These were copied and transferred to the predicted and achieved post-treatment SSDMs to acquire the locations of the predicted and achieved post-treatment root apices. The differences between predicted and achieved root movements (DPARMs) were tested using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

In the anteroposterior direction, posterior root movements of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were poorly achieved (3.24-5.74 mm DPARMs, p < .05). In the vertical direction, roots of maxillary anterior teeth achieved greater intrusion (0.70-0.93 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of mandibular incisors achieved less intrusion (0.57-0.65 mm DPARMs, p < .05) than predicted. In the mediolateral direction, lateral incisor roots did not move distally (-0.65 to -0.96 mm DPARMs, p < .05), while those of canines did not move buccally, compared with the prediction (-0.75 mm DPARMs, p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the four first-premolar extraction treatments with Invisalign, root movements were not achieved as predicted, particularly for anterior teeth in the anteroposterior direction.

Effects of aging on the tensile strength and surface condition of orthodontic aligners: a comparative study of five models

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the effect of aging on tensile strength and surface condition of orthodontic aligners on days 0, 1, 5, 7, 10, and 14.

MATERIALS/METHODS

The total sample of 80 aligners included five brands (Accusmile®, Angel®, GRAPHY®, Invisalign® and Suresmile®) were placed in a thermocycler to imitate the temperature variations of the oral cavity and accelerate aging for 50, 250, 350, 500, and 700 cycles. The mechanical tensile properties (Young's modulus E, yield strength YS, maximum elastic stress MES, Ultimate Tensile Strength UTS, and maximum stress MS) were measured by Universal Testing Machine at a rate of 5 mm of deformation per minute for 4 minutes. Microscopic observations were made under a voltage of 10 kV at magnifications times 50, 250, 500, 1000, and 2500 after cleaning with ethanol and ultrasound then metallization with gold.

RESULTS

YS and MES of Angel® aligners are statistically reduced after five days of aging (P = .003). Aligners from the most rigid to the most flexible are (decreasing E): Accusmile® > GRAPHY® > Suresmile® > Invisalign® > Angel®. Surface conditions also deteriorated with aging (appearance of scratches, porosity, cracks, etc.). GRAPHY® aligners are more heterogeneous and weaker than others.

LIMITS

In vitro study.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical properties of Accusmile®, GRAPHY®, Invisalign®, and Suresmile® were not affected by aging. YS and MES were reduced from day 5 for Angel® aligners. Surface conditions are also altered by aging.

Age-stratified assessment of orthodontic tooth movement outcomes with clear aligners

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the achieved tooth movement to that predicted in the preliminary simulated digital treatment plan between adults and teenagers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records of 60 patients (30 adults; mean age: 36.6 ± 11.36 years, and 30 teenagers; mean age: 16.23 ± 2.25 years) were randomly selected. Initial and predicted models were obtained from the initial simulated treatment plan. The first model of the refinement scan was labeled as achieved. SlicerCMF software (version 3.1; https://www.slicer.org ) was used to superimpose the achieved and predicted digital models over the initial ones with regional superimposition on relatively stable first molars. 600 teeth were measured in each group for horizontal, vertical, angular movements, and transverse dimensions. Accuracy was defined as the achieved amount of movement minus predicted and was calculated for each individual and compared between teens and adults.

RESULTS

The mandibular inter-canine width accuracy was statistically significant between groups (p = 0.050). Significant under-correction in horizontal movements was noted for mandibular first premolars in teenagers compared to adults (p = 0.037). There was considerable over-correction in horizontal movements for mandibular central and lateral incisors between groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between groups in the vertical plane. Rotations were underachieved for maxillary first premolars, more in adults than teenagers (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of achieved versus predicted tooth movement between adults and teenagers was significant for the inter-canine width. Mandibular central and lateral incisors showed significantly greater over-correction in adults in the horizontal plane. The accuracy of rotations and vertical movements was comparable.

Analysis of predicted and achieved root angulation changes in teeth adjacent to maxillary premolar extraction sites in patients treated with the Invisalign appliance

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the expression of root angulation in canine, premolar, and first molar teeth adjacent to first and second premolar extraction sites in the maxilla after treatment with an initial series of Invisalign aligners (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif).

METHODS

Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with at least 1 first and/or second premolar extraction in the maxilla and satisfying strict selection criteria were evaluated. Digital models representing pretreatment, predicted, and posttreatment were obtained from Align Technology's digital interface, ClinCheck. The Geomagic Control X (version 2017.0.3; 3D systems, Rock Hill, NC) software facility was used to determine and compare the root angulation of adjacent canine, premolar, and first molar teeth at different time points.

RESULTS

The predicted angulation of teeth was significantly different (P <0.02) than that achieved in most patients. When adjacent teeth roots were planned to tip away from the extraction site, there was an overexpression of the movement. When teeth roots were planned to tip into the extraction site, underexpression occurred, and movement was in the opposite direction in some instances. There was no difference in root angulation outcomes according to the prescribed number of aligners, 1- or 2-week wear protocols, and sex (P >0.05). Attachments were influential in controlling angulation in first-premolar extractions (P = 0.05), but optimized attachments were not any more effective than conventional attachments (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The achieved root angulation in teeth adjacent to premolar extraction sites in the maxilla after treatment with an initial series of Invisalign aligners differed significantly from that predicted. Attachments play a minor role in the predictability of root angulation outcomes.

An Evaluation of the Estimated Aligners Needed to Correct Malocclusion Traits Using Invisalign ClinCheck™ Pro Software: A Retrospective Study

Background: This study evaluated the number of aligners that Invisalign ClinCheck™ Pro Software estimates for correcting different malocclusion traits. Methods: This retrospective study included 157 non-extraction patients over the age of 12 years old with easy to mild malocclusions who were treated with Invisalign aligners. The Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) was used to evaluate the malocclusion complexity level. The number of aligners (upper, lower, and total) required to correct the malocclusion was compared based on sex, ICON level, molar and canine class, occlusal asymmetry, overbite, overjet, crowding, incisor inclination, and Bolton discrepancy. A Mann-Whitney U test (for comparisons between two groups) or a Kruskal-Wallis test (for comparisons between three or more groups) (p < 0.05) was used to evaluate differences in the number of aligners across variable categories. Results: ICON, molar class, overbite, and overjet presented significant differences (p < 0.05) in the number of aligners (upper, lower, and total) required to correct a malocclusion. Canine class and lower dental crowding showed significant differences in the lower and total number of aligners (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The number of aligners increases when the malocclusion presents any of the following elements: the absence of molar or canine class I, an altered overjet or overbite, severe lower crowding, or a higher complexity level. The clinician should consider these malocclusion traits when estimating the number of aligners needed for correction.

Mesiodistal tip expression of mandibular anterior teeth in patients with mandibular incisor extraction treated with Invisalign aligners

INTRODUCTION

Extraction of a single mandibular incisor may be prescribed in conjunction with clear aligner orthodontic treatment. The accuracy of therapeutic mesiodistal tooth positioning for the remaining mandibular anterior teeth for such patients has not been comprehensively evaluated. This retrospective study compared the predicted and achieved mesiodistal tooth movements in the mandibular anterior region for patients treated with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif), along with the influence of aligner attachments and the frequency of aligner change.

METHODS

A sample of 83 subjects who had undergone Invisalign treatment with a single mandibular incisor extraction was collected from an existing database. The pretreatment tooth positions, the predicted mesiodistal tooth movement, and the achieved outcomes were measured for the remaining mandibular anterior teeth using Geomagic Control X metrology software (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). The predicted and achieved mesiodistal tip movements were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Regression analysis revealed significant differences (P <0.001) between the predicted and achieved mesiodistal tooth positioning for incisors and canines. For every degree of predicted incisor mesiodistal tip, 78.89% of this tip was achieved (R2 = 0.4901). For every degree of predicted canine tip, 54.16% was clinically expressed (R2 = 0.5965). The accuracy of mesiodistal tip expression was not significantly affected by the prescribed number of aligners, 1-week vs 2-week aligner change protocols, or the presence of attachments (P >0.05). In addition, incisors were less likely to express the correct direction of the mesiodistal tip predicted than canines (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

A shortfall between the predicted and clinically achieved expression of mesiodistal tooth movement with Invisalign was found for the anterior teeth after a mandibular incisor extraction. The number of aligners, duration of aligner wear, and specific attachment designs were not found to significantly influence the accuracy of the achieved mesiodistal tip movements.

Descriptive analysis of the cases published in the Align® Global Gallery

INTRODUCTION

Social media enhanced access to information, making it easier to share dental treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to conduct a descriptive analysis of the clinical cases published on the Align® Global Gallery platform.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study of 1,582 cases was conducted, data extracted referred to the following basic information: case number; patient's age; reported gender; Invisalign® package modality; treatment time; aligner exchange protocol; total number of aligners per arch; type of retainers, and inclusion of initial and final panoramic and cephalometric radiographs.

RESULTS

The majority were young (mean age 24.6 years, SD = 11.6), female patients (69.1%) with Class I malocclusion (39.4%) and crowding (77.9%). Comprehensive treatment was common (66.5%), with an average treatment time of 18 months (SD = 8.56; 95% CI = 17.6-18.5), with the most frequently reported aligner exchange protocol being 7 days (49.5%), with an average of 50.6 aligners in the upper arch (SD = 26.9; 95% CI = 49.2-51.9), and 48.7 in the lower arch (SD = 26.1; 95% CI = 47.4-50.0). Arch expansion (66.9%) and interproximal reduction (59.7%) were common approaches, while extractions were rare (4.3%). In most cases, initial lateral cephalometric (80.4%) and panoramic (93.3%) radiographs were presented. However, the final radiograph count dropped, with lateral cephalometric at 69.2%, and panoramic at 82.2% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Cases in the Align®Global Gallery mostly feature Class I patients with crowded teeth, treated with expansion and interproximal reduction. The absence of standardized information and post-treatment data restricts the applicability of these findings to broader Invisalign® treatment trends.

Quality of occlusal outcome in adult Class II patients treated with completely customized lingual appliances and Class II elastics compared to adult Class I patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether Class II malocclusion in adult patients can be successfully corrected using a completely customized lingual appliance (CCLA) in combination with Class II elastics.

METHODS

In order to detect differences in the final treatment outcome, two groups were matched for age and gender. Treatment results of 40 adult orthodontic patients with a Class I malocclusion (Group 1) were compared to 40 adults with a Class II malocclusion (Group 2). All patients had completed treatment with a CCLA (WIN, DW Lingual Systems, Bad Essen, Germany) without known centric occlusion-centric relation discrepancies, issues of compliance, or overcorrection in the individual treatment plan which was defined by a target set-up. In order to compare the treatment results of the two groups, 7 measurements using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System (ABO MGS) and linear measurements for anterior-posterior (AP) and vertical dimensions were assessed at the start of lingual treatment (T1), after debonding (T2B) and compared to the individual target set-up (T2A).

RESULTS

A statistically significant AP correction was achieved in Group 2 which represented 95% of the planned amount. The planned overbite correction was fully achieved in the Class I and Class II group. In both groups, there was a statistically significant improvement in the ABO scores, with no significant difference between the two groups at T2. 100% of the patients in Group 2 and 92.5% in Group 1 would meet the ABO standards after CCLA treatment.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation of this study is that only patients who were wearing the elastics as prescribed were retrospectively included. Therefore, the results of this study may have limited generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Completely customized lingual appliances in combination with Class II elastics can correct a Class II malocclusion successfully in adult patients. The final treatment outcome can be of a similar high quality in Class I and Class II patients.

Evaluating Dental Monitoring effectiveness compared with conventional monitoring of clear aligner therapy using the Peer Assessment Rating index

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Dental Monitoring (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) compared with conventional monitoring (CM) during active orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate the pretreatment and posttreatment records of 51 patients, with 26 in the CM group and 25 in the DM group. The change in weighted PAR was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of treatment.

RESULTS

The chi-square test revealed that the CM group had a higher percentage of patients in the great improvement category compared with the DM group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.192). A repeated measures general linear model demonstrated significant improvement over time (P <0.001), with no statistically significant group differences noted between CM and DM (P = 0.181) and no statistically significant time-by-group interaction (P = 0.299).

CONCLUSIONS

Both CM and DM showed significant improvements in weighted PAR scores, but no statistically significant difference is present between the 2 groups.

Efficacy of planned moderate to severe torque changes in maxillary central incisors with the Invisalign appliance: A retrospective investigation

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference between the planned and achieved lingual root torque of the maxillary central incisors in patients treated with an initial series of Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) aligners in which >10° change in the inclination of these teeth was prescribed via the ClinCheck facility.

METHODS

The pretreatment, planned, and the digital models after wear of the initial series of aligners regarding adult patients who satisfied selection criteria and were treated using the Invisalign appliance were measured using the Geomagic Control X software (version 2017.0.3; 3D systems, Rock Hill, SC).

RESULTS

A sample of 63 patients with 126 maxillary central incisors satisfied the inclusion criteria. The mean accuracy of the planned torque change of the maxillary central incisors that was achieved was 41.9%. A clinically significant shortfall (≥5°) was detected in 78.6% of the incisors, with the majority showing an underexpression between 10°-15°. Linear regression analyses indicated that weekly or biweekly wear protocols or the presence or absence of power ridges did not influence the accuracy of planned torque expression (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in torque expression with an initial series of Invisalign aligners were less than half of what was planned in patients in which at least a 10° change in lingual root torque of these teeth was prescribed. The presence of power ridges and the aligner change protocol did not appear to significantly affect the accuracy of maxillary central incisor torque expression.

Orthodontic finishing errors detected in board-approved cases: common types and prediction

OBJECTIVE

To report and rank orthodontic finishing errors recorded in the clinical phase of the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) examination and correlate pretreatment case complexity with orthodontic treatment outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center cross-sectional survey collected retrospective data from the clinical phase of BBO examinations between 2016 and 2023. The quality of orthodontic clinical outcomes of each case was assessed by means of the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CRE), while case complexity was evaluated using the Discrepancy Index (DI), both tools provided by the American Board of Orthodontics. Survey items were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a correlation analysis between total CRE and DI scores (p<0.05) was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 447 orthodontic records was included. Orthodontic finishing errors were often observed, and no case was completely perfect. In the total CRE score, an average of 15 points was discounted for each case. Most frequently found issues involved problems with alignment, buccolingual inclination, marginal ridge, and occlusal relationship. The median DI score for initial case complexity was 22.0 (range 10.0 - 67.0). There was no significant correlation between the DI and CRE scores (p=0.106).

CONCLUSION

Orthodontic finishing errors are inevitable, even in well-finished board-approved cases. Rotation, excessive buccolingual inclination, and discrepancies in marginal ridges are the most frequently observed areas of concern, in that order. Moreover, while case complexity, determined by DI, can impact orthodontic planning and pose challenges for clinicians, the study did not consider it a determining factor in predicting treatment outcomes.

Assessment of patients' knowledge and preferences for the use of orthodontic aligners

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the knowledge and preference of patients treated at a Dental School in Jaraguá do Sul, Brazil, about using aligners and the reasons for choosing this device as a treatment option.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 82 participants aged 18-45 years recruited at a screening clinic.

METHODS

A questionnaire was completed in person using a tablet with digital forms.

RESULTS

Almost half of the participants (49%) knew about aligners; 40% were aged 18-24 years, and 77% were female. When observing the images of the types of orthodontic appliances, the aligners had an acceptance rate of 80%. Among the reasons that led to the preference for choosing aligners, 68% cited aesthetics and 42% comfort.

CONCLUSION

Recently, clear aligners have become a popular choice for orthodontic treatment, particularly among adults. Despite their popularity and effectiveness, many patients still need more information about aligner treatment. Over half of the respondents did not know what orthodontic aligners were. Younger participants had more knowledge about aligners than older participants. Patients still need more knowledge about the types of appliances available for orthodontic treatment. When presented with images of the kinds of devices available, almost 80% of participants showed greater satisfaction with aligners.

Treatment of absent maxillary lateral incisors: orthodontic space closure and associated procedures

Missing maxillary lateral incisors can be treated either with orthodontic space closure or preservation of the edentulous space for tooth replacement. Orthodontic space closure coupled with non-invasive post-orthodontic cosmetic dentistry is a compelling option compatible with optimal function, favourable aesthetics, and periodontal health in the long-term. We present the rationale for space closure and detail contemporary clinical strategies underpinning interdisciplinary treatment planning and excellence in finishing.

Evaluating the efficacy and predictability of distalization protocols for maxillary molars in Class II treatment with clear Aligners: A narrative review

Introduction

Clear aligner therapy (CAT) has become a popular orthodontic treatment option for adolescent and adult patients for its aesthetic, patient's comfort, and convenient features. It involves a programmed and simulated virtual planning, tracking, and quantifying of tooth movement to target positions. Over the years, the therapeutic scope of CAT has increased dramatically to include a wider range of malocclusions with the aid of orthodontic auxiliaries as adjunctive biomechanics. This narrative review aims at summarizing and evaluating current practices, efficacy and predictability of sequential distalization protocol for maxillary molars in class II treatment using CAT.

Methods

A systematic search for this review included electronic literature databases of MEDLINE via Pubmed, Web of Science, ProQuest and Embase to include all available published articles including systematic reviews, books, cases reports, and narrative literature reviews.

Results

Most published studies are retrospective examining small sample size. Current literature should be interpreted carefully as studies differ in their outcome measurement process and timing. Although reports show 2-3 mm of molar distalization is possible, a distinguish between bodily movement and molar tip back should be made. There is a discrepancy between computer-assisted predicted outcome and actual clinical outcome reported in literature.

Conclusion

Molar distalization using CAT is possible. However, randomised trials with large sample size are necessary to draw more definitive conclusion about its efficacy and predictability. Due to the discrepancy between computer-assisted predicted outcome and actual clinical outcome, case refinement and possible altered treatment duration should be discussed with the patient in the planning stage. Since the process of molar distalization using CAT involves undesirable reaction force, it is essential to reinforce anchorage with suitable auxiliaries like composite attachments, class II/III elastics, and TADs.

Clinical audit of an artificial intelligence (AI) empowered smile simulation system: a prospective clinical trial

Smile aesthetics is an important factor to consider during orthodontic treatment planning. The aim of the present study is to assess the predictability of Invisalign SmileView for digital AI smile simulation in comparison to actual smile treatment outcomes, using various smile assessment parameters. A total of 24 adult subjects (12 females and 12 males; mean age 22 ± 5.2 years) who chose to be treated using Invisalign were prospectively recruited to have their pretreatment smiles captured using the Invisalign SmileView to simulate their new smiles before treatment was started. Patients were then treated using upper and lower Invisalign aligners with average treatment time of 18 ± 6 months. Full post-treatment records were obtained and full smile frame images of simulated smile and actual final smile of each subject were evaluated by an independent examiner using an objective assessment sheet. Ten smile variants were used to assess the characteristics of the full smile images. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. The ICC for the quantitative parameters showed that there was an overall excellent & good internal consistency (alpha value > 0.7 & > 0.9). The Independent t test was performed amongst the quantitative variables. The P value was not significant for all except maxillary inter canine width (P = 0.05), stating that for the five variables namely; philtrum height, commissure height, smile width, buccal corridor and smile index, actual mean values were similar to the simulation mean values. For the qualitative variables, the Kappa value ranged between 0.66 and - 0.75 which showed a substantial level of agreement between the examiners. Additionally, the Chi square test for the qualitative variables, revealed that the P value was found to be significant in all except lip line. This implies that only the lip line values are comparable. More optimal lip lines, straighter smile arcs and more ideal tooth display were achieved in actual post treatment results in comparison to the initially predicted smiles. Five quantitative smile assessment parameters i.e., philtrum height, commissure height, smile width, buccal corridor, and smile index, could be used as reliable predictors of smile simulation. Maxillary inter canine width cannot be considered to be a reliable parameter for smile simulation prediction. A single qualitative parameter, namely the lip line, can be used as a reliable predictor for smile simulation. Three qualitative parameters i.e., most posterior tooth display, smile arc, and amount of lower incisor exposure cannot be considered as reliable parameters for smile prediction.Trial Registration number and date: NCT06123585, (09/11/2023).

Deep overbite reduction in adolescent patients treated with Invisalign: A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding the efficacy of deep overbite correction with clear aligner therapy in adolescent patients are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of deep overbite reduction in adolescent patients treated with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) aligners.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated a sample of 102 patients aged 10-17 years from a large database. All patients had completed wear of a prescribed series of Invisalign aligners with planned overbite reduction on a nonextraction basis. The predicted, pretreatment, and posttreatment overbite measurement values were obtained from Align Technology's ClinCheck digital facility. Linear modeling, with Bland-Altman plots, was used to compare the effect of age, the use of bite ramps, and the adoption of the eighth-generational (G8) protocol on the difference between predicted and achieved overbite measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients with a mean ± standard deviation age of 13.94 ± 1.53 years satisfied the selection criteria. A mean ± standard deviation of 41.38 ± 30.43% of the predicted overbite reduction was achieved. There were no differences in the predictability of overbite reduction between patients who were aged <14 years or those aged 14-17 years (P = 0.73), between patients prescribed and not prescribed bite ramps (P = 0.25), or between patients prescribed the G8 protocol and not prescribed the G8 protocol (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

The average achieved overbite was less than half of what was planned by the orthodontists via the ClinCheck facility. The age grouping, the provision of bite ramps, and the G8 protocol appear to have little influence on the efficacy of overbite reduction in adolescent patients.

Does Invisalign Outperform Fixed Appliance in Treating Vertical Discrepancies?

Aligners became popular among adult patients for their superior aesthetics and comfort in comparison to conventional fixed appliances. It has undergone numerous enhancements over time, allowing it to address more complex malocclusions. Many researchers argued that managing vertical discrepancies is more challenging than addressing anteroposterior issues. This complexity arose from the mechanical requirements for treatment and the required mechanics to prevent relapse. Studies assessing the treatment outcome of anterior open bite closure using clear aligners have yielded conflicting results regarding the mechanisms of bite closure. Proposed mechanisms included extrusion of upper or lower incisors, lingual tipping of upper or lower incisors, intrusion of upper or lower molars, counterclockwise rotation of the mandible, or various combinations of these mechanisms. The research highlighted the biomechanical challenges associated with using aligners for the treatment of deep bites as mandibular incisor intrusion and leveling the curve of Spee remain among the least predictable movements. Given the widespread use of aligners, it is imperative to rigorously assess the effectiveness of clear aligners in achieving overbite correction to ensure they deliver the desired outcome. This review aimed to assess the performance of Invisalign in the management of vertical discrepancies. It sought to identify the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners in addressing deep bite and anterior open bite cases, understand the mechanisms behind overbite correction, and provide a comprehensive overview of the existing research on this topic.

Effects of different tooth movement patterns and aligner thicknesses on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners: a three-dimensional finite element study

Objectives

The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of different tooth movement patterns and aligner thicknesses on teeth and periodontal tissues during maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners, to facilitate more precise and efficient clinical orthodontic treatments.

Methods

Three-dimensional models including teeth, maxilla, periodontal ligament, and aligner were constructed and subjected to finite element analysis. Tooth displacement trends and periodontal ligament stresses were measured for seven tooth displacement patterns (divided into three categories including overall movement of premolars and molars with gradually increasing molar expansion in each step; distributed movement of premolars and molars; and alternating movement between premolars and molars at intervals) and two aligner thicknesses (0.5 mm and 0.75 mm) during maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners.

Results

When expanding the maxillary arch with clear aligners, the effective expansion of the target teeth mainly showed a tilting movement trend. Increasing the amount of molar expansion increased the buccal displacement of the first molar but decreased the buccal displacement of the premolars. The mean buccal displacement of the target teeth was greater in the posterior teeth interval alternating movement group (0.026 mm) than in the premolar/molar distributed movement group (0.016 mm) and the overall movement group (0.015 mm). Increasing aligner thickness resulted in greater buccal displacement of the crowns and increased stress on the periodontal ligaments.

Conclusion

Increasing the amount of molar expansion reduces the efficiency of premolar expansion. Alternating movement of premolars and molars at intervals achieves a higher arch expansion efficiency, but attention should be paid to the anchorage of adjacent teeth. Increasing the thickness of the aligner increases the expansion efficiency but may also increase the burden on the periodontal tissues.

Predicting Outcome in Clear Aligner Treatment: A Machine Learning Analysis

Background/Objectives: Machine learning (ML) models predicting the risk of refinement (i.e., a subsequent course of treatment being necessary) in clear aligner therapy (CAT) were developed and evaluated. Methods: An anonymized sample of 9942 CAT patients (70.6% females, 29.4% males, age range 18-64 years, median 30.5 years), as provided by DrSmile, a large European CAT provider based in Berlin, Germany, was used. Three different ML methods were employed: (1) logistic regression with L1 regularization, (2) extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and (3) support vector classification with a radial basis function kernel. In total, 74 factors were selected as predictors for these methods and are consistent with clinical reasoning. Results: On a held-out test set with a true-positive rate of 0.58, the logistic regression model has an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.67, an average precision (AP) of 0.73, and Brier loss of 0.22; the XGBoost model has an AUC of 0.67, an AP of 0.74, and Brier loss of 0.22; and the support vector model has a recall of 0.61 and a precision of 0.64. The logistic regression and XGBoost models identify predictors influencing refinement risk, including patient compliance, interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) and certain planned tooth movements, for example, lingual translation of maxillary incisors being associated with the lowest risk of refinement and rotation of mandibular incisors with the highest risk. Conclusions: These findings suggest moderate, well-calibrated predictive accuracy with both regularized logistic regression and XGBoost and underscore the influence the identified factors have on the risk of refinement in CAT, emphasizing their importance in the careful planning of orthodontic treatment and the potential for shorter treatment times, less patient discomfort, and fewer clinic visits. Identification of at-risk individuals could support tailored clinical decision-making and enable targeted interventions.

Accuracy of arch expansion with two thermoplastic materials in Invisalign® patients: EX30® and SmartTrack®

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare accuracy of arch expansion using two different thermoplastic materials in Invisalign aligners: EX30® (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol, or PETG) and SmartTrack® (polyurethane).

METHODS

The study sample comprised 65 adult patients consecutively treated with Invisalign from two private practices: group 1 - treated with EX30® (358 teeth) and group 2 - treated with SmartTrack® (888 teeth). Six hundred and twenty-three measurements were assessed in three digital models throughout treatment: model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted tooth position, and model 3 - achieved position. Sixteen reference points per arch were marked and, after best alignment, 2 points per tooth were copied from one digital model to another. Linear values of both arches were measured for canines, premolars, and first molars: on lingual gingival margins and cusp tips of every tooth. Comparisons were performed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Both termoplastic materials presented significant differences between predicted and achieved values for all measurements, except for the lower molar cusp tip in the SmartTrack® group. There is no statistical difference in the accuracy of transverse expansion between these two materials. Overall accuracy for EX30® aligners in maxilla and mandible were found to be 37 and 38%, respectively; and Smarttrack® presented an overall accuracy of 56.62% in the maxilla and 68.72% in the mandible.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not possible to affirm one material expands better than the other. Further controlled clinical studies should be conducted comparing SmartTrack® and EX30® under similar conditions.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the optimal mechanical design for maximum inward movement of the anterior teeth with clear aligners

This study aims to refine clinical designs within clear aligner therapy, exploring the appropriate ratio of anterior tooth retraction to intrusion under maximum anchorage. Using a three-dimensional finite element model and evaluating 19 load scenarios with first premolar extraction, the research identifies the optimal force angle for anterior tooth retraction as 45 to 55°. For clinical planning, it is recommended to design a retraction of 0.19 mm combined with an intrusion of 0.16 mm to achieve anterior tooth retraction. This investigation is crucial for enhancing understanding of biomechanical principles in clear aligner orthodontics, offering significant insights for effective treatments.

Effects of different intrusion patterns during anterior teeth retraction using clear aligners in extraction cases: an iterative finite element analysis

Background

Overtreatment design of clear aligner treatment (CAT) in extraction cases is currently primarily based on the clinical experience of orthodontists and is not supported by robust evidence on the underlying biomechanics. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of overtreatment strategies involving different maxillary anterior teeth intrusion patterns during anterior teeth retraction by CAT in extraction cases.

Materials and methods

A finite element model of the maxillary dentition with the first premolar extracted was constructed. A loading method of clear aligners (CAs) based on the initial state field was proposed. The iterative method was used to simulate the long-term orthodontic tooth movement under the mechanical load exerted by the CAs. Three groups of CAs were utilized for anterior teeth retraction (G0: control group; G1: incisors intrusion group; G2: anterior teeth intrusion group). Tooth displacement and occlusal plane rotation tendency were analyzed.

Results

In G0, CAT caused lingual tipping and extrusion of the incisors, distal tipping and extrusion of the canines, mesial tipping, and intrusion of the posterior teeth. In G1, the incisors showed minimal extrusion, whereas the canines showed increased extrusion and distal tipping tendency. G2 showed the smallest degree of posterior occlusal plane angle rotation, while the inclination tendency of the canines and second premolars decreased.

Conclusion

1. In CAT, tooth displacement tendency may change with increased wear time. 2. During anterior teeth retraction, the incisor intrusion pattern can provide effective vertical control for the lateral incisors but has little effect on the central incisors. Anterior teeth intrusion patterns can alleviate the inclination of canines and second premolars, resulting in partial relief of the roller-coaster effect.

Efficacy of clear aligner wear protocols in orthodontic tooth movement-a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Different expedited aligner wear protocols are currently in practice. This review was undertaken to systematically appraise the available evidence on the comparative efficacy of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) across the different wear protocols.

SEARCH METHODS

Two assessors conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Directory of Open Access Journals, Cochrane Library, OpenGrey, and Clinical Trial Registry, till 18 February 2024. Titles and abstracts were independently screened.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective or retrospective studies comparing expedited wear protocols with the conventional 14-day protocol were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A pre-piloted data extraction form was used. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment employed the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for non-RCTs. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Pro tool.

RESULTS

Six studies, including 3 RCTs and 3 non-RCTs, were selected from 9076 records. Four studies (two RCTs and two retrospective cohort) found no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in the OTM efficacy between expedited and conventional protocols. Two studies (one RCT and one prospective cohort) found greater efficacy (P < 0.05) with the 14-day protocol, with the RCT reporting greater efficacy for certain movements, such as maxillary posterior intrusion, maxillary posterior distal tipping and buccal torquing, and mandibular posterior intrusion and extrusion. One RCT reported statistically insignificant difference (P > 0.05) in pain perception between the 10-day and 14-day protocols. Two studies demonstrated low RoB, two moderate, and two high RoB. The evidence level was very-low for OTM efficacy and high for pain perception. Meta-analysis was precluded due to significant heterogeneity among the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the study, the 7-day, 10-day, and 14-day protocols did not show any significant difference in OTM efficacy, except for certain movements that exhibited superior outcomes with the 14-day wear. Hence, a 'hybrid aligner-wear protocol', based on clinical judgement, might serve a better alternative in complex situations.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021288179.

Clear aligner therapy practice among orthodontists in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland: A cross-sectional survey of the British Orthodontic Society membership

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clear aligner therapy (CAT) practice among orthodontists in the British Orthodontic Society (BOS).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional online survey.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to members of the BOS in 2022. The survey comprised questions regarding respondent demographics, general use of CAT, the choice of proprietary CAT appliances, CAT planning, case selection, treatment protocols and orthodontist-reported CAT problems.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 233 (19.5%) respondants with the majority (n = 121, 53.1%) being female. Most respondents reported practising in England (n = 171, 74.7%). The majority (n = 177, 77.3%) indicated that they used CAT in their practice, with 48.1% (n = 81) treating 1-20 patients with CAT annually. The most frequently prescribed CAT system was Invisalign (n = 138, 81.2%). One to three changes to the initial digital treatment plan were made by 72.9% (n = 121) with final tooth positions being the most common reason for adjustment (64.4%). Most (n = 97, 60.3%) rarely or never performed premolar extractions with CAT. Of the respondents, 23 12.7%) reported that they always or mostly used a remote monitoring system in conjunction with CAT, with a wide range of aligner change protocols reported. The median number of months required to complete non-extraction CAT reported by the respondents was 12. Most respondents (n = 77, 51.7%) did not feel that CAT provides superior outcomes compared with fixed appliance therapy.

CONCLUSION

CAT practice varied widely among the surveyed orthodontists. A predilection for the use of Invisalign and utility in less severe cases was noted.

Does crown, root, and bone visualization in a clear aligner virtual setup impact treatment decisions?

INTRODUCTION

Clear aligner technology based on a machine learning algorithm is currently available for orthodontic treatment. Treatment planning on the basis of 3-dimensional crown, root, and bone imaging is claimed to provide accurate diagnosis and better treatment outcomes for adult patients with complex needs. This study aimed to answer the following questions: (1) would practitioners modify their original treatment plan once provided with the crown, root, and bone view? and (2) does practitioner satisfaction regarding treatment outcomes change once the crown, root, and bone view is provided?

METHODS

An online questionnaire was emailed to members of the American Association of Orthodontists (n = 2300) and the Virginia Orthodontic Education and Research Foundation (n = 211). The survey consisted of videos of 4 patients shown in 2 presentations: crown-only and crown, root, and bone views, generated by artificial intelligence-driven treatment planning software (3D Predict aligner system; 3D Predict, New York, NY). Respondents were asked to answer treatment-related questions and rate the treatment outcomes using a visual analog scale. Statistical analyses were completed to determine the significance of crown, root, and bone view on treatment planning with clear aligners.

RESULTS

A total of 70 orthodontists participated in the survey. There were significant differences in responses when viewing patients in crown-only and crown, root, and bone presentations. Across the 4 patients, 33%-43% of practitioners changed their sentiment toward the treatment plan (P <0.001). When rating satisfaction on the 100-point scale, average ratings changed by 10.6 to 21.0 points; both increases and decreases in satisfaction were seen across the patients (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When given 3-dimensional information on the position of a patient's crowns, root, and bone coverage, orthodontists are likely to change their clear aligner treatment plan. This study showed that a confirmation of dehiscence and fenestrations using the root and bone view resulted in practitioner dissatisfaction despite an initial satisfaction with the crown-only view.

Molar Distalization by Clear Aligners with Sequential Distalization Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

With the popularity of clear aligners, the sequential distalization protocol has been more commonly used for molar distalization. However, the amount of molar distalization that can be achieved, as well as the accompanying side effects on the sagittal dimension, are unclear.

METHODS

Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447211), relevant original studies were screened from seven databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Elsevier [SCOPUS], Cochrane, LILACS [Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature], and Google Scholar) supplemented by a manual search of the references of the full-reading manuscripts by two investigators independently. A risk of bias assessment was conducted, relevant data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed using RStudio.

RESULTS

After the screening, 13 articles (11 involving maxillary distalization, two involving mandibular distalization) met the inclusion criteria. All studies had a high or medium risk of bias. The meta-analysis revealed that the maxillary first molar (U6) mesiobuccal cusp was distalized 2.07 mm [1.38 mm, 2.77 mm] based on the post-distalization dental model superimposition, and the U6 crown was distalized 2.00 mm [0.77 mm, 3.24 mm] based on the post-treatment lateral cephalometric evaluation. However, the U6 mesiobuccal root showed less distalization of 1.13 mm [-1.34 mm, 3.60 mm], indicating crown distal tipping, which was validated by meta-analysis (U6-PP angle: 2.19° [1.06°, 3.33°]). In addition, intra-arch anchorage loss was observed at the post-distalization time point (U1 protrusion: 0.39 mm [0.27 mm, 0.51 mm]), which was corrected at the post-treatment time point (incisal edge-PTV distance: -1.50 mm [-2.61 mm, -0.39 mm]).

CONCLUSION

About 2 mm maxillary molar distalization can be achieved with the sequential distalization protocol, accompanied by slight molar crown distal tipping. Additional studies on this topic are needed due to the high risk of bias in currently available studies.

Accuracy of Invisalign® aligners in adult patients: a retrospective study of angular tooth movements

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to assess the predictability of Invisalign® aligners regarding rotational, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip movements.

METHODS

Two materials were included in the analysis - EX30, used until 2013; and SmartTrack, in current use. The study comprised 56 adult patients treated with Invisalign Comprehensive. Data sample were assessed on three sets of digital models; model 1 - initial, model 2 - predicted, and model 3 - achieved. Sixty reference points were marked in each dental arch, and two reference planes assisted the superimposition. The degree of rotation, mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip was obtained via trigonometric calculations, through a previously published validated method. The accuracy of outcomes was compared according to the types of tooth movement and teeth groups,and the influence of predetermined variables on movement accuracy was also investigated.

RESULTS

Rotation and mesio-distal tip did not present any significant difference when comparing EX30 and SmartTrack groups. Only buccal-lingual tip presented a significant difference, incisor and canine groups treated with EX30 aligners presented an increase in accuracy (p= 0.007 and p = 0.007, respectively). For each additional degree planned for rotation movements, there was an increase of 0.35° in the discrepancy, and an increase of 0.40° and 0.41° for mesio-distal and buccal-lingual tip, respectively. EX30 and SmartTrack discrepancies were compared by multilevel linear regression.

CONCLUSION

EX30 aligners reached higher accuracy for buccal-lingual tip in anterior teeth. However, for rotation and mesio-distal tip, SmartTrack and EX30 are similarly accurate. The total amount of planned movement has a significant impact on accuracy rates, with a decrease in accuracy for every additional degree.

Predictability of tooth rotations in patients treated with clear aligners

Clear aligners are employed daily for the treatment of several malocclusions. Previous clinical studies indicated low accuracy for the correction of tooth rotations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictability of tooth rotations with clear aligners. The sample comprised 390 teeth (190 mandibular; 200 maxillary), measured from the virtual models of 45 participants (21 men, 24 women; mean age: 29.2 ± 6.6 years old). For each patient, pre-treatment (T0) digital dental models (STL files), virtual plan (T1) and post-treatment digital dental models (T2) of both the mandibular and maxillary arches were imported onto Geomagic Control X, a 3D metrology software which allows angular measurements. Rotations were calculated by defining reproducible vectors for all teeth in each STL file and superimposing both T0 with T1 to determine the prescribed rotation, and T0 with T2 to determine the achieved rotation. Prescribed and achieved rotations were compared to assess movement's accuracy. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test were used to assess differences between the prescribed and achieved movements (P < 0.05). The overall predictability of rotational movement was 78.6% for the mandibular arch and 75.0% for the maxillary arch. Second molar accuracy was the lowest in both arches. Clear aligners were not able to achieve 100% of the planned movements.

Vertical Control in Molar Distalization by Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Molar distalization is used to correct molar relationships or to create space for mild anterior crowding. However, whether clear aligners can provide proper vertical control with the sequential distalization strategy has been highly debated. Thus, the current study aimed to systematically review the amount of dentoskeletal changes in the vertical dimension that results from sequential molar distalization in clear aligner therapy without temporary anchorage devices (TADs). Methods: Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447211), relevant original studies were screened from seven databases and supplemented by a manual search by two investigators independently. Articles were screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a risk of bias assessment was conducted for each included article. Relevant data were extracted from the included articles and meta-analysis was performed using RStudio. Results: Eleven articles (nine for maxillary distalization and two for mandibular distalization) were selected for the final review. All studies have a high or medium risk of bias. For maxillary molar distalization, the meta-analysis revealed 0.26 mm [0.23 mm, 0.29 mm] of maxillary first molar intrusion based on post-distalization dental model analysis, as well as 0.50 mm [-0.78 mm, 1.78 mm] of maxillary first molar intrusion and 0.60 mm [-0.42 mm, 1.62 mm] of maxillary second molar intrusion based on post-treatment lateral cephalometric analysis. Skeletally, there was a -0.33° [-0.67°, 0.02°] change in the SN-GoGn angle, -0.23° [-0.30°, 0.75°] change in the SN-MP angle, and 0.09° [-0.83°, 1.01°] change in the PP-GoGn angle based on post-treatment lateral cephalometric analysis. There was insufficient data for meta-analysis for mandibular molar distalization. Conclusions: No significant changes in vertical dimension were observed, both dentally and skeletally, after maxillary molar distalization with a sequential distalization strategy. However, further studies on this topic are needed due to the high risk of bias in the currently available studies.

Biomechanics of clear aligner therapy: Assessing the influence of tooth position and flat trimline height in translational movements

OBJECTIVE

The present clear aligner therapy (CAT) research focuses on isolating and reporting the biomechanical performance for three separate teeth, three translational movements and two flat trimlines at different heights. By identifying key patterns, the research seeks to inform the development of improved aligner designs, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of clinical orthodontic treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an in vitro setting using the Orthodontic Force Simulator (OFS), the biomechanical response of 30 aligners was investigated on three different teeth of a straight symmetric maxillary dentition (central incisor, canine and first molar). Each tooth was tested under two flat trimline conditions (trimmed at gingival margin, TL0; extended 2.0 mm below, TL2) and for three types of translational movements (palatal translation, mesial translation and intrusion). Forces and moments were reported at the centre of resistance for each displaced tooth as well as the two neighbouring teeth, evaluating a total of 18 distinct scenarios.

RESULTS

Findings indicate significant variability in the biomechanical responses based on tooth location in the arch, trimline height and movement performed. For palatal translations, the palatal force required to perform the movement was observed highest in molar cases, followed by canine and incisor cases, with a notable difference in the distribution of side effects, indicating a strong influence of tooth anatomy and position in the arch. Similarly, in mesial translations and intrusions molars experienced greater forces and moments than the corresponding movements applied on canines and incisors, but uniquely dispersed for each configuration tested. Regarding the shape of the aligner, TL2 consistently showed improved control over orthodontic movements compared to TL0. Neighbouring teeth frequently displayed compensatory reactions up to about half of the intensity observed on the tooth being moved, with notable variations from case to case.

CONCLUSIONS

This research supports fundamental factors impacting CAT: Characteristic patterns in the direction and intensity of forces and moments are associated with each of the three translational movements tested. Tooth anatomy and arch location significantly influence the biomechanical performance of aligners, with an observed trend for molars to display higher forces and moments over canines and incisors, but distributed differently. The height of a flat trimline, specifically TL2, shows enhanced control over orthodontic movements. Additional findings revealed a compensatory activity of neighbouring teeth, which varies based on tooth region and movement type. It potentially could influence CAT outcomes negatively and merits attention in future investigations. These results support a tailored CAT method that improves aligner design for better force application. This method needs to be used alongside, and confirmed by, clinical knowledge. Future research should extend these findings to a wider range of clinical conditions for greater applicability in the day-to-day orthodontic practice.

Accuracy of Digital Orthodontic Treatment Planning: Assessing Aligner-Directed Tooth Movements and Exploring Inherent Intramaxillary Side Effects

Background: The attainment of precise posterior occlusion alignment necessitates a deeper understanding of the clinical efficacy of aligner therapy. This study aims to determine whether the treatment goals defined in the virtual planning of aligner therapy are effectively implemented in clinical practice, with a particular focus on the influence of distalization distances on potential vertical side effects. Methods: In this retrospective, non-interventional investigation, a cohort of 20 individuals undergoing Invisalign® treatment was examined. Pre- and post-treatment maxillary clinical and ClinCheck® casts were superimposed utilizing a surface-surface matching algorithm on palatal folds, median palatine raphe, and unmoved teeth as the stable references. The effectivity of planned versus clinical movements was evaluated. Groupings were based on distalization distances, planned vertical movements, and Class II elastic prescription. Statistics were performed with a two-sample t-test and p-value < 0.05. Results: Clinically achieved distalization was significantly lower than virtually planned distalization, regardless of additional vertical movements, where a lack of implementation was contingent upon the extent of distalization, with no mitigating effects observed with the application of Class II elastics. Intriguingly, no adverse vertical side effects were noted; however, the intended intrusions or extrusions, as per the therapeutic plans, remained unattainable regardless of the magnitude of distalization. Conclusions: These findings underscore the imperative for future investigations to delve deeper into the intricacies surrounding translational mesio-distal and vertical movements, thereby enhancing predictability within orthodontic practice. To facilitate successful clinical implementation of vertical and translational movements via aligners, the incorporation of sliders emerges as a promising strategy for bolstering anchorage reinforcement.

Aligner biomechanics: Where we are now and where we are heading for

Aligner orthodontics has gained significant popularity as an alternative to traditional braces because of its aesthetic appeal and comfort. The biomechanical principles that underlie aligner orthodontics play a crucial role in achieving successful outcomes. The biomechanics of aligner orthodontics revolve around controlled force application, tooth movement, and tissue response. Efficient biomechanics in aligner orthodontics involves consideration of attachment design and optimized force systems. Attachments are tooth-colored shapes bonded to teeth, aiding in torque, rotation, and extrusion movements. Optimized force systems ensure that forces are directed along the desired movement path, reducing unnecessary strain on surrounding tissues. Understanding and manipulating the biomechanics of aligner orthodontics is essential for orthodontists to achieve optimal treatment outcomes. This approach requires careful treatment planning, considering the mechanics required for each patient's specific malocclusion. As aligner orthodontics continues to evolve, advances in material science and treatment planning software contribute to refining biomechanical strategies, enhancing treatment efficiency, and expanding the scope of cases that can be successfully treated with aligners.

[Fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligner system: a comparative review]

One of the biggest controversies in current orthodontics is determining the appliance to use, since today patients seek better results in shorter times, in addition to putting aesthetics first.

OBJECTIVE

compare the benefits and disadvantages that arise when using fixed orthodontic appliances and transparent aligners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An investigation and compilation of specialized bibliographic information on the topic was carried out in scientific search engines such as PubMed, SciElo and Web of Science between the years 1991 to 2023, focused on research work related to the effects of the use of orthodontic appliances. fixed compared to clear aligners.

RESULTS

The review was carried out based on 53 articles found that met the selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

Fixed orthodontic appliances are better in complex cases, they are more precise and less likely to relapse; Transparent aligners are more aesthetic, hygiene is more affective and the bone density of the mandibular condyle decreases.

Clear Aligners in the Growing Patient: A Systematic Review

Mixed dentition represents a critical phase in the oral development of pediatric patients, characterized by the simultaneous presence of primary and permanent teeth. This article proposes a comprehensive systematic review of the application of aligners as an innovative methodology in managing mixed dentition. The primary objective is to explore the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of this emerging orthodontic technology in the evolving age group. This systematic review focuses on randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and observational studies investigating the use of aligners in patients with mixed dentition. Clinical, radiographic, and psychosocial parameters will be considered to assess the overall impact of aligner therapy in this critical phase of dental development. An in-depth analysis of such data aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential of this technology in pediatric orthodontics. Expected outcomes may contribute to outlining practical guidelines and targeted therapeutic strategies for orthodontists involved in managing mixed dentition. Furthermore, this article aims to identify gaps in the current research and suggest future directions for studies exploring the use of transparent aligners in patients with mixed dentition, thereby contributing to the ongoing evolution of evidence-based orthodontic practices.

Does aligner refinement have the same efficiency in deep bite correction?: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Refinements are very common in clear aligner treatments. The aim of this study is to assess whether the predictability of deep overbite correction is similar over several refinements using clear aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) and examine the accuracy of vertical movement and inclination change of individual teeth.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 20 deep bite patients (7M and 13F; 32.63 ± 11.88 years old; an initial overbite of 5.09 ± 0.98 mm), consecutively treated from September 2016 and March 2023, who completed at least two sets of aligners, including refinements. The initial, predicted, and achieved models were exported from ClinCheck or OrthoCAD (Cadent Inc, Carlstadt, NJ) and superimposed via best-fit surface-based registration using SlicerCMF (version 4.9.0; cmf.slicer.org). We also examined 15 out of 20 patients who completed treatments. The overbite correction and changes in vertical movement and inclination for individual teeth were measured. Descriptive statistics and a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean accuracy of overbite correction was 37.63% after 1st set, followed by 11.19%, 6.32%, and 13.80% (2nd-4th sets), respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the predicted and achieved vertical movements and inclination changes for all teeth for the 1st and 2nd sets. For the completed cases, the mean overbite correction was 38.54% compared to the initially planned overbite correction, which is similar to one of the 1st set. Still, the vertical movements and inclination changes of all teeth present statistically significant differences between the initially planned and finally achieved movements except for maxillary lateral incisor torque.

CONCLUSIONS

The most overbite correction occurs during the 1st set of aligners, and refinement treatment does not significantly improve the deep bite correction.

Clear aligner treatment assisted by mini screw for an adult with Class II division 2 malocclusion and a right upper canine completely outside of the dental arch: A case report

This case report describes a 19-year-old man presented with a 5.7-mm deep overbite, Class II division 2 malocclusion with the right upper maxillary canine completely buccal ectopia, deviated midline in the upper arch, severe crowding and retroclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors. The patient was treated with clear aligners to correct the Class II relationship and the deep overbite. A series of clear aligners were used to move bilateral maxillary molars distally with unilateral mini-screw anchorage. The final results showed that clear aligners with mini-screws could effectively achieve the required upper distal molar movement thanks to a reasonable design of the stages and anchorage. The treatment was completed in 19 months and the patient was satisfied with the treatment outcome in this context of mild to moderate Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Comparison of labio-palatal incisor movement between two wear protocols: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the accuracy of the Invisalign appliance in achieving predicted angular tooth movement of the maxillary central incisors, to locate the center of rotation in a labio-palatal direction, and to investigate any difference between 1-weekly and 2-weekly wear protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved a retrospective sample of two groups of 46 Class I adult subjects treated non-extraction with different protocols of 1-weekly and 2-weekly wear. The pretreatment, predicted outcome and achieved outcome digital models were superimposed and measured using metrology software. Angular and center-of-rotation measurements in the sagittal plane for the maxillary right central incisor were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between predicted and achieved angular measurements (P < .005) for labial tooth movements regardless of wear protocol. For palatal movements, no statistically significant difference was observed (P > .05). A small amount of overexpression was observed in some cases. Regarding crown and root control, uncontrolled tipping was the most predictable. No statistically significant difference was found between predicted and achieved center of rotation, but the confidence interval was wide. No statistically significant difference (P > .05) was found between the two wear protocols for the parameters measured.

CONCLUSIONS

For maxillary central incisors, labial angular movements were not as accurate as palatal movements. Overcorrection could be recommended with careful clinical monitoring due to the possibility of overexpression. Control of root movements may be unpredictable, and further research is required to draw stronger conclusions. For the parameters measured in this clinical sample, there was no difference between the two wear protocols.

In vitro effects of antimicrobial properties and shear bond strength of different concentrations of Emodin nanoparticles incorporated orthodontic composites

OBJECTIVE

Fixed appliances used in orthodontic treatment are accompanied by some drawbacks, including the development of white spots or enamel demineralization in the vicinity of the brackets and bonding failures. This study aims to evaluate the effect of combining different wt.% of Emodin nanoparticles (ENPs) with orthodontic adhesives to attain adhesives with improved antimicrobial and mechanical properties.

METHODS

ENPs were synthesized and added to orthodontic composite at different concentrations (0.5%, 1%, and 2%). The distribution of ENPs within the composite was evaluated using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). A total of 216 disks were prepared, with 144 subjected to an eluted components test, 36 used for disk agar diffusion (DAD) test, and 36 for biofilm inhibition test. These tests aimed to assess the antimicrobial activity of the composites against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Candida albicans. Additionally, the bond strength between stainless-steel brackets and teeth was evaluated using the shear bond strength (SBS) test, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was determined. One-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyse the SBS and ARI, respectively. For pairwise group comparison concerning the biofilm inhibition, DAD, and eluted components tests, the Tamhane and Games-Howell tests for data with unequal variances and the post-hoc Tukey's HSD and Scheffe tests for data with equal variances were used.

RESULTS

The FESEM results confirmed the synthesis and even distribution of ENPs in the composite. Only the 2% group showed significant biofilm inhibition against all microorganisms studied (P<0.05). The DAD test revealed that a 1% concentration of ENPs is sufficient to inhibit growth for all microorganisms. The eluted components test demonstrated that the 2% concentration of ENPs performed significantly better against S. mutans compared to the control group (P<0.05). The highest mean SBS was observed with the 0.5% ENP concentration, while no significant differences in SBS and ARI were found among the groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This in vitro study showed that the 2% concentration of ENP produced significantly improved antimicrobial activity without adversely affecting SBS and ARI score. This would support the addition of 2% ENP to orthodontic adhesives.

Does age influence deep overbite correction with Invisalign? A prospective study evaluating mandibular incisor intrusion in adolescents vs adults

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of mandibular incisor intrusion with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) in adolescents to that in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective clinical study included 58 patients treated with either Invisalign Teen or Invisalign Full. Mandibular central and lateral incisors were measured on digital models created from intraoral scans. Predicted values were determined by superimposing the initial and final ClinCheck models, and achieved values were determined by superimposing the initial ClinCheck models and the digital models from the final scans. Individual teeth were superimposed with a best-fit analysis and measured using Compare software (version 8.1; GeoDigm, Falcon Heights, Minn).

RESULTS

The mean accuracies of mandibular incisor intrusion were 63.5% in adolescents and 45.3% in adults, and this difference was statistically significant. The amounts of achieved intrusion were 1.7 mm in adolescents and 0.9 mm in adults, and this difference was also statistically significant. Overall, there was a weak negative correlation between age and accuracy; as age advanced, the accuracy of mandibular incisor intrusion diminished slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

Mandibular incisor intrusion with Invisalign is significantly more accurate in adolescents than in adults. Orthodontists could contemplate reducing the degree of overcorrection for mandibular incisor intrusion in adolescents with deep overbites undergoing Invisalign Teen but still implementing the reverse curve of Spee mechanics.

Predictability of Orthodontic Space Closure Using Invisalign Clear Aligners: A Retrospective Study

Introduction Clear aligners have demonstrated success in achieving complex tooth movements. However, orthodontists have faced challenges related to the predictability of clear aligners. This retrospective study aimed to assess the predictability of ClinCheck® accuracy in space closure before and after Invisalign® treatment and to identify factors associated with the need for refinement. Methods Patient records from one private clinic in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, were analyzed, and a sample of 55 adult patients who had spacing and underwent Invisalign treatment were included. Data on demographic and orthodontic variables were collected, and a chi-square test was conducted to examine the association between the requirement for refinement and demographic as well as clinical/orthodontic factors. Furthermore, the initial and final space measurements were compared using paired t-tests across various demographic and clinical/orthodontic variables. Results After completing the treatment, 70.9% (N=39) of the cases did not require any orthodontic refinement. The mean final space measurement was higher for males compared to females (0.7 mm and 0.4 mm, respectively), individuals who received treatment in the upper compared to lower arch (0.5 and 0.4 mm, respectively), those with moderate compared to mild spacing (0.5 and 0.1 mm, respectively), and those with class III compared to class I Angle classification (0.9 and 0.3 mm, respectively). Additionally, patients with severe spacing had a significantly higher probability of requiring refinement compared to patients with mild spacing (adjusted odds ratio = 20.9; p < 0.05). Conclusion The study emphasizes the significance of careful patient selection and treatment planning, suggesting that orthodontists should consider overcorrecting in space closure when using clear aligners, especially in cases with more significant spacing.

Civil liability of orthodontists and aligner manufacturers in the treatment with orthodontic aligners

INTRODUCTION

The use of clear aligners as an alternative to fixed orthodontic appliances has become popular due to the aesthetic demands of adult patients seeking orthodontic treatment. However, orthodontists' lack of knowledge about the legal consequences of their activities, and the lack of solid scientific evidence raise concerns regarding civil liability in this type of treatment. Marketing campaigns of manufacturing companies often exaggerate promises of results, and ignore the lack of scientific evidence. Patients, as consumers, are protected by the Consumer Protection Code, whereas orthodontists are considered treatment providers. Therefore, they can be held liable for damage caused to patients, whether by subjective or objective fault.

OBJECTIVE

This article aims to identify the civil responsibilities of orthodontists and aligner manufacturing companies, by means of a literature review, providing basic legal guidance to help professionals protect themselves from possible lawsuits related to treatment with orthodontic aligners.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the importance of knowledge of legal notions in treatments with orthodontic aligners by orthodontists, who should legally safeguard themselves through individual written contracts, avoiding obligation of results. In addition, in cases of legal claims, it is possible that the manufacturing companies are jointly and severally liable for possible damages claimed by the patient.

Effects of different patterns of movement for correcting a deep curve of Spee with clear aligners on the anterior teeth: a finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the anterior teeth effects of clear aligners on five different patterns of mandibular molar movement and to define the most effective configuration to be implemented with clear aligners through finite element analysis.

METHODS

A three-dimensional mandibular model with a deep overbite in the mandible was constructed using cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) data. The model included the mandibular dentition, mandibular periodontal ligaments, attachments, and aligners. Five models were created: (1) configuration A: second molar distalization (0.25 mm); (2) configuration B: second molar distalization (0.25 mm), first molar extrusion (0.15 mm); (3) configuration C: second molar distalization (0.25 mmm), first and second premolar extrusion(0.15 mm); (4) configuration D: second molar distalization (0.25 mm), first molar and first/second premolar extrusion(0.15 mm); and (5) configuration E: second molar distalization (0.25 mm), first molar and first/second premolar extrusion (0.15 mm), first molar and first/second premolar expansion (0.15 mm).

RESULTS

In all configurations, the anterior teeth exhibited labial tipping and the mandibular central incisor of configuration E showed the highest labial tipping. Configuration E demonstrated a relatively minor impact on mandibular molars distalization compared with configuration A. Configuration A showed the highest distal displacement value, and configuration E produced the lowest displacement value. Configuration E caused the highest periodontal ligament (PDL) pressure of the central and lateral incisors. The differences in the canines between configurations C and D,were not significant, and the stress distribution differed among the five groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All patterns utilizing clear aligners facilitated mandibular molar distalization. Extruding the premolars and second molar distalization at the same time had little impact on second molar distalization; When expansion and extrusion were simultaneously performed during the distalization of mandibular molars, our prime consideration was the alveolar bone on the labial side of the anterior teeth to prevent the occurrence of gingival recession, dehiscence, and fenestration. Due to the lack of consideration for periodontal tissues in this study, clinical protocols should be designed based on the periodontal status of the mandibular anterior teeth.

An evaluation of the Invisalign® Aligner Technique and consideration of the force system: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Since its introduction 25 years ago, the Invisalign® system has undergone multiple digital and biomechanical evolutions and its effectiveness is often compared to traditional systems without considering the many differences which characterize them. The main aim of this systematic review is to look at the literature dealing with studies on teeth movements using the Invisalign® system and the management of these movements through digital planning and artificial intelligence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, and CENTRAL. Unpublished studies were searched on ClinicalTrials.gov, the National Research Register, and Pro-Quest Dissertation Abstracts and Thesis database.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (15 retrospective, 5 prospective, 2 pilot, and 2 case-control) were included. The results of the analysis carried out on the available literature show that the Invisalign® system is recognized to be a valid alternative to conventional orthodontic treatment in no-extraction cases. The results are influenced by the methods for assessing the effectiveness of this technique and by the comparison bias of the traditional system with the innovative digital system.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the introduction of SmartForce and SmartTrack material, the efficacy of the treatment has improved. There is still a shortage of high-quality evidence concerning the treatment modality. In order to make the treatment with the aligners more efficient, a correct management of the ClinCheck® software and a proper use of the biomechanics are necessary. The aligned force-driven system should be taken into account when developing the digital planning.

Predicted and achieved overjet and overbite measurements with the Invisalign appliance: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether achieved outcome regarding overjet and overbite matched the predicted outcome following treatment with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) aligner appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data including pretreatment, predicted and achieved overjet, and overbite measurements provided by Align's digital treatment facility, ClinCheck Pro, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum intraclass correlation (ICC) test results were calculated.

RESULTS

From an initial sample of 600, 355 adult patients satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. ICC scores for data input were excellent. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 30.14 (23.33, 39.92) years and most (n = 259; 72.95%) were women. Almost one-third (n = 101; 28.45%) had undergone extraction as part of their treatment. More aligners were prescribed in the initial digital treatment plan for patients (median, 44; IQR: 35, 51.5; minimum, 17; maximum, 92) undergoing extractions as part of their orthodontic treatment than those who were not (median, 24; IQR: 18.25, 32; minimum, 13; maximum, 85) (P < .0001). Planned changes in overjet differed significantly from achieved outcomes (P < .001). Planned increases in overbite resulted in up to more than twice (222.72%) as much increase than predicted. Planned reduction of overbite achieved 8.69% of its predicted reduction in extraction cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieved overjet and overbite measurements differed significantly from the predicted outcomes at the end of an initial sequence of aligners. Planned increases in overbite resulted in greater overbite correction than predicted, particularly in extraction cases. Planned overbite reduction was challenging, especially in patients with extractions.

Influence of maxillary molar distalization with clear aligners on three-dimensional direction: molar distal movement, intrusion, distal tip and crown buccal torque

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distal movement, vertical movement, distal tipping and crown buccal torque of maxillary molars after the completion of distalization by comparing the predicted movement with the achieved movement using palatal rugae registration.

METHODS

The study included 22 clear aligner patients (7 males and 15 females), and 79 molars were measured. Two digital models were generated before treatment and after molar distalization and were superimposed after selecting the palatal rugae area for registration in GOM inspect suite software 2022 (GOM; Braunschweig, Germany). The predicted and achieved movements of molar distalization, intrusion, distal tip and crown buccal torque were measured and compared.

RESULT

The achieved distalization (1.25 ± 0.79 mm vs. 2.17 ± 1.03 mm, P < 0.001; 1.41 ± 1.00 mm vs. 2.66 ± 1.15 mm, P < 0.001), intrusion (0.47 ± 0.41 mm vs. 0.18 ± 0.54 mm, P < 0.01; 0.58 ± 0.65 mm vs. 0.10 ± 1.12 mm, P < 0.01), distal tip (5.30 ± 4.56° vs. 1.53 ± 2.55°, P < 0.001; 4.87 ± 4.50° vs. - 1.95 ± 4.32°, P < 0.001) and crown buccal torque (1.95 ± 4.18° vs. - 1.15 ± 4.75°, P < 0.001; 0.43 ± 4.39° vs. - 4.27 ± 6.42°, P < 0.001) were significantly different from the predicted values in the two groups (first molar, second molar). Significant regression relationships were found between the achieved distal movement and deviational intrusion (R2 = 0.203, P < 0.0001), distal tip (R2 = 0.133, P < 0.001) and crown buccal torque (R2 = 0.067, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the deviational movements of intrusion and the distal tip (R = 0.555, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 2 mm maxillary molar distalization was achieved in this study. Deviational movement of intrusion, distal tip and crown buccal torque beyond the clear aligner virtual design appeared to a certain degree after distalization. Thus, more attention should be given to molar intrusion and distal tip and crown buccal torque as the designed distalization increases.

Predictability of Dental Distalization with Clear Aligners: A Systematic Review

The current review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence relating to the effectiveness of treatment with clear aligners (CAs) in controlling distalization orthodontic tooth movement. "Orthodontics, aligners" and "distalization" were the search terms used on the Scopus, Web of Science and Pubmed databases with the Boolean operator "AND". The results of the last ten years of research were 146 studies; of these, 19 publications were included for this review. The distalization movement is possible with invisible masks alone, but the risk of losing anchorage in the anterior sectors is very probable. The stability of the results and the reduction of unwanted effects can be guaranteed by the use of skeletal anchoring devices and interproximal enamel reduction (IPR), with which compensations are obtained to reduce the initial overjet. Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) can be used to manage posterior anchorage after distalization of maxillary molars with aligners. This hybrid approach has demonstrated the greatest orthodontic success. TADs are useful aids to provide direct and indirect skeletal anchorage. The opposite effect must be considered when planning dental distalization, especially of the molars, in patients with large overjet, and corrective measures or the use of auxiliaries may be necessary to prevent midcourse corrections. This systematic review provides a critical evidence-based assessment of the predictability of dental distalization with CAs, an ever-evolving orthodontic technique.

Assessment of clear aligner accuracy of 2 clear aligners systems

INTRODUCTION

This study compared treatment efficacy for specific tooth movements between 2 clear aligner systems (Clarity [3M Oral Care Solutions, St Paul, Minn] and Invisalign [Align Technology, San Jose, Calif]).

METHODS

The study sample included 47 patients (7 males, 40 females; mean age, 36.57 ± 15.97 years) treated with Invisalign and 37 (4 males, 33 females; mean age, 34.30 ± 16.35 years) treated with Clarity aligners who completed their first set of aligners and had an initial refinement scan. Initial and predicted models were obtained from the initial simulated treatment plan. The first model of the refinement scan was labeled as achieved. SlicerCMF software (version 3.1; http://www.slicer.org) was used to superimpose the achieved and predicted digital models over the initial ones with regional superimposition on the relatively stable first molars. Nine hundred forty teeth in the Invisalign system were measured for horizontal, vertical, and angular movements and transverse width and compared with similar measurements of 740 teeth for the Clarity aligners. The deviation from the predicted was calculated and compared between both systems.

RESULTS

The deviation achieved from the predicted was significant between the groups for the mandibular interpremolar and intercanine widths (P <0.05). Clarity aligners significantly undercorrected rotations compared with Invisalign for the mandibular first premolars, mandibular canines, maxillary canines, and maxillary central incisors. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the achieved vs predicted movements in the horizontal and vertical planes (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of clear aligner therapy systems (Clarity and Invisalign) in treating mild and moderate malocclusions was comparable. Deviation of the achieved movements from the predicted was greatest for rotational and vertical movements.

Impact of Invisalign G-series Updates on Improving Predicted Outcomes: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Understanding the real-world implications of periodic changes to orthodontic appliances can provide valuable insights for future treatment strategies and patient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the latest updates added to the G7 and G8 Invisalign series on actual versus predicted outcomes and the percentage accuracy of the treatment.

METHOD

This retrospective study was conducted in private orthodontic practices in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Orthodontists carried out Invisalign® treatment using the latest updates added to the G7 and G8 Invisalign series. The study group comprised patients with different malocclusion types who received non-extraction Invisalign treatment. The Invisalign treatment plan was provided by the ClinChecks program (Invisalign, San Jose, United States) for patients treated throughout the years (2016-2022). Different dimensions were assessed to record predicted and actual treatment outcomes with the aid of iTero® (Align Technology, San Jose, United States) and ClinCheck® (Invisalign, San Jose, United States). The percentage accuracy was determined using the formula (100%-((Predicted-Actual)/Predicted) *100%).

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients (male = 34 (31.5%) and female = 74 (68.5%)) treated with Invisalign G7 and G8 series were considered in this study. The overall mean and standard deviation values of vertical distance (2.91±1.42), intermolar distance in the lower arch (52.68±3.15), overjet (2.71±1.06), and inter-incisal angle (138.24±12.18) were higher than the predicted model. However, the predicted model showed higher mean and standard deviation values for intercanine distances in the upper (36.94±1.57) and lower arches (28.48±1.40) and upper intermolar distances (57.21±2.91). The G7 versus G8 intercanine distance in lower (61.28±47.67 vs. 80.51±38.32), intermolar distance in upper (61.72±47.67 vs. 69.95±44.11), and intermolar distance in lower (100.68±3.80 vs. 100.89±2.52) were relatively higher in the G8 series than the G7. The accuracy percentage was higher with the G8 series than with the G7 regarding the intercanine distance in the upper arch. In contrast, the G7 series showed a higher mean percentage accuracy of vertical distance (91.11±84.83 vs. 76.76±65.45), overjet (58.44±35.17 vs. 53.71±45.87), and inter-incisal angle (34.47±44.06 vs. 27.53±37.98) than the G8 series.

CONCLUSION

The percentage accuracy of aligner therapy administered using the Invisalign G7 and G8 series demonstrated no significant variation.