Is the treatment of CIN 2 always necessary in women under 25 years old?

Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and its association with high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision in women with negative excision margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) may represent a risk factor for disease recurrence after cervical treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on whether endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade CIN on the excised cervical specimen is associated with high-grade histopathological recurrence during the follow-up of women after cervical excisional treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Medline, Scopus, Central, and Clinical Trials.gov databases from inception till May 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies that reported on women with a single cervical treatment with any method of excision for CIN2 or CIN3 lesion, negative excision margins, and whose recurrence was defined histopathologically were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently evaluated study eligibility. We used the fixed effects model for meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

There were 4 eligible studies included in the present systematic review that evaluated 1088 women treated with either large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) or with cold knife conization (CKC). We found no significant association of endocervical crypt involvement by CIN2-3 with high-grade histopathological recurrence at follow-up after cervical excision (OR 1.93; 95% CI 0.51-3.35). The subgroup analysis of women with LLETZ cervical excision showed again no significant association with high-grade histopathological recurrence at follow-up (OR 2.00; 95% CI 0.26-3.74).

CONCLUSION

Endocervical crypt involvement by high-grade CIN does not seem to be a risk factor for high-grade histopathological recurrence after cervical excision with negative excision margins.

Active expectancy as alternative to treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women aged 25 to 30 years: ExCIN2-a prospective clinical multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

The management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 is a clinical dilemma. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 is considered a cancer precursor and is always treated with excision. Most of the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 cases regress spontaneously, and it is internationally mostly monitored with expectant management. Surgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia entails increased risk of preterm birth in future pregnancies. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women aged under 25 years is quite well-studied; the regression rate is high and the cervical cancer risk is low. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women aged 25 years and above, in whom the risk of occult cancer is higher, has been less studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the natural course, over 2 years, of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women aged 25 to 30 years and its association with human papillomavirus 16.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was conducted as a prospective longitudinal multicenter clinical study during February 2017 to June 2021 at 5 colposcopy clinics managing referrals after abnormal cervical screening in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. The per protocol group comprised 127 women, aged 25 to 30 years, with fully visible squamocolumnar junction and histologically verified cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2. The patients were followed up for 2 years with colposcopy, cytology, human papillomavirus tests, and at least 2 cervical biopsies every 6 months until progression or regression. The main outcome measures were the rates of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in cases with human papillomavirus 16 and those without human papillomavirus 16. The secondary outcomes were persistence and progression.

RESULTS

In the per protocol analysis, partial or total regression during the 2-year period was found in 72% of patients (95% confidence interval, 63-79). In patients with human papillomavirus 16, the regression rate was 51% (95% confidence interval, 36-66) and the progression rate was 47% (95% confidence interval, 32-62). In the human papillomavirus-non-16 group, 83% (95% confidence interval, 73-90) regressed and 16% (95% confidence interval, 9-26) progressed. Most of the regression and progression in both the groups occurred within 15 months. The difference in regression between human papillomavirus 16 and human papillomavirus-non-16 cases was statistically significant (P value=.0001), as was the difference in progression (P=.0002).

CONCLUSION

The regression rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 is high, and human papillomavirus 16 is a strong determinant of the natural course. Patients aged 25 to 30 years with a fully visible squamocolumnar junction and without human papillomavirus 16 should generally be recommended active surveillance for 15 months, whereas immediate treatment should be considered in cases with human papillomavirus 16.

Absence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in conization specimens from patients with colposcopic biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Retrospective study of 1695 cases

Few studies have investigated the absence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in excised specimens, and sample sizes of these studies were limited. This study retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics of 1695 patients with CIN 2/3 to determine the incidence rate and relative factors of CIN 1 or less in conization specimens from patients with colposcopic biopsy-confirmed CIN 2/3. The study group comprised 430 cases of CIN 1 or less in conization specimens, and the control group comprised 1142 cases with high-grade CIN lesions in conization specimens. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were established to evaluate relative factors. The 1–9 years follow-up data were analyzed to determine the persistence/recurrence rate. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients aged 18–24 years (OR (95% CI) = 2.224 (1.014, 4.877)); with a negative hrHPV test result (OR (95% CI) = 3.210 (1.627, 6.331)); a cytology test result of normal (OR (95% CI) = 5.184 (3.138, 8.563)), ASC-US (OR (95% CI) = 3.420 (2.102, 5.564)), LSIL (OR (95% CI) = 2.588 (1.475, 4.541)), or ASC-H (OR (95% CI) = 2.434 (1.306, 4.539)); an indication of CIN 2 on biopsy (OR (95% CI) = 2.290 (1.694, 3.096)), and no glandular involvement (OR (95% CI) = 1.616 (1.205, 2.169)) were more likely to have an absence of high-grade dysplasia in conization specimens. There was no difference in the persistence/recurrence rate between the two groups (x2 = 1.55, P = 0.46). An age of 18–24 years, a negative hrHPV test result, a non-HSIL cytology test result, an indication of CIN 2 on biopsy, and no glandular involvement were relative factors for an absence of high-grade dysplasia in conization specimens. For patients with relative factors, especially young women, informed follow-up should be considered.

Burden of CIN2+ diagnoses and conizations in women aged 18-45 years-a retrospective secondary data analysis of German statutory health insurance claims data

Purpose

High grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) may progress to cervical cancer. They may be detected by screening and are usually treated by conization. This study aimed at assessing annual proportions of screening, prevalent and incident CIN2+ diagnoses, as well as proportions of (re-)conizations during 24 months follow-up after conization in Germany.

Methods

A descriptive retrospective claims data analysis of the years 2013–2018 was conducted using the InGef Research Database. Women aged 18–45 years with CIN2+ diagnoses were identified by ICD-10-GM codes (N87.1, N87.2, D06.-, and C53.-). Cervical conizations were identified by OPS codes (5–671.0* or 5–671.1*). Screening participation was identified by EBM codes (01730, 01733, 32819 or 32820). Annual proportions were calculated as women with the respective documented codes divided by all women in the respective age group per calendar year.

Results

Overall annual proportions of screened women spanned from 60.01 to 61.33% between 2013 and 2018. The overall annual prevalence of CIN2+ diagnoses (regardless of screening participation) ranged from 0.72 to 0.84% between 2013 and 2018, with highest proportions observed in women aged 27–45 years. Also, CIN2+ incidence was highest in women 27–45 years. Annual proportion of women undergoing conization was 0.24% in 2013 and 0.21% in 2018. During a 24-month follow-up period after conization, 2.91% of women underwent a re-conization 3 months or later after the initial conization.

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates a considerable burden of CIN2+, conizations and re-conizations in Germany, especially in women aged 27–45 years. This highlights the need for intensified prevention efforts such as expanding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-022-06548-7.

Comparison of Expectant and Excisional/Ablative Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2) in the Era of HPV Testing

Objective

To investigate conservative and excisional/ablative treatment outcomes for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) following introduction of virological test of cure.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data at a teaching hospital colposcopy unit. 331 sequential biopsy-proved CIN2 cases were involved. CIN2 cases diagnosed between 01/07/2014 and 31/12/2017 were either conservatively managed or treated with excision/ablation and then were followed up until discharge from colposcopy clinic and then using the national cervical cytology database. Outcomes were defined: cytological/histological regression was absence of high-grade CIN on biopsy and/or high-grade dysplasia; virological regression was cytological/histological regression and negative human papillomavirus testing; persistence was biopsy-proven CIN2 and/or moderate dyskaryosis; progression was biopsy-proven CIN3+ and/or severe dyskaryosis.

Results

Median follow-up was 22.6 months (range: 1.9–65.1 months). Among 175 (52.9%) patients initially managed conservatively, 77.3% (133/172) regressed, 13.4% (23/172) persisted, 9.3% (16/172) progressed to CIN3+, and 97 (56.4%) patients achieved virological regression. 156 (47.1%) patients underwent initial excision/ablation, with an 89.4% (110/123) virological cure rate. After discharge, 7 (4.0%) and 3 (1.9%) patients redeveloped CIN in the conservative and treatment groups, respectively, during a median period of 17.2 months.

Conclusion

Conservative management is a reasonable and effective management strategy in appropriately selected women with CIN2. High rates of histological and virological regression should be expected. The previously mentioned data provide useful information for deciding management options.

Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years

BACKGROUND

A number of retrospective and prospective studies have documented substantial rates of regression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 lesions in young women. Initial observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 is increasingly accepted as appropriate for women under 25 years of age with screen-detected abnormalities and is included in a number of clinical guidelines. However, there has been a paucity of large prospective studies on observational management with strict inclusion criteria. A number of important questions remain, specifically regarding the clinical variables that are associated with the risk of progression or persistence of disease. To investigate these factors and to ensure that young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 undergoing observational management were being managed in a well-monitored and an appropriately informed fashion, we conducted a large, multicenter prospective study on observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the regression rates and clinical, cytologic, and pathologic predictors of regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years undergoing observational management over 24 months.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was a multicenter prospective study on observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (ie, repeat colposcopy, cytology, and cervical biopsy every 6 months) for up to 24 months. A total of 615 consenting women under 25 years with newly-diagnosed, biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 were recruited (from 2010 to 2016) through 16 hospital-based colposcopy units in New Zealand and Australia.

RESULTS

At completion, 326 women had confirmed regression, 156 had persistent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 or adenocarcinoma in situ, and 24 had unconfirmed regression (ie, first regression at the 24-month follow-up). A total of 109 women did not complete the protocol (41 because of delayed follow-up, 41 lost to follow-up, 22 elected treatment, 4 refused a biopsy, and 1 died of an unrelated cause). Confirmed regression was observed in 53% (326 of 615) of all women enrolled in the study and, when missing data were imputed, it was estimated that 64% of women (95% confidence interval, 60%-68%) would have experienced regression. Similarly, lesions regressed in 64% (326 of 506) of women who completed the observational protocol. Based on a multivariable analysis, detection of human papillomavirus 16 in a liquid-based cytology sample at the time of initial colposcopy decreased the chance of regression by 31% (risk ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.86; P<.001). In addition, at initial colposcopy, low-grade or normal colposcopic impression, later year of diagnosis, low-grade or normal cytology, and being a nonsmoker were all independently associated with an increased chance of regression.

CONCLUSION

More than half of women under 25 years with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 will regress to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or normal within 24 months without destructive treatment. The absence of human papillomavirus 16 is the most important predictor of regression.

Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the cytology, colposcopic, and pathological factors associated with the absence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3 lesion on loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens in women with high-grade cytology and/or HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy and the risk of disease persistence/recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-center retrospective study of women undergoing LEEP for high-grade cervical disease between January 2014 and December 2019. Clinical, cytology, colposcopy, and pathology results were evaluated to identify independent predictive factors associated with CIN 1/negative LEEP results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed. Follow-up data was evaluated to assess the risk of HSIL/CIN 2-3 persistence/recurrence.

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-nine of 801 women (79.8%) had high-grade cytology and 631 (78.8%) HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy. High-risk human papillomavirus test was positive in 98% of women. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen showing CIN 1 or less was found in 27%-31%. Normal/low-grade colposcopy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17, CI = 1.39-3.39, p = .001) and CIN 1/negative biopsy (OR = 3.25, CI = 2.12-4.99, p < .001) were predictors of negative/CIN 1 LEEP result in women with high-grade cytology. Normal/low-grade cytology (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.19-2.64, p = .005), normal/low-grade colposcopy (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.11-2.49, p = .013), and CIN 2 biopsy (OR = 2.75, CI = 1.73-4.39, p < .001) were predictors in women with HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy. Women with a negative/CIN 1 LEEP had lower recurrence/persistence than those with confirmed HSIL/CIN 2-3(1 vs 31, p = .002). Positive endocervical margin (OR = 2.85, CI = 1.10-7.36, p = .03) and high-risk human papillomavirus persistence (OR = 41.3, CI = 16-106.7, p < .01) were predictors of HSIL/CIN 2-3 persistence/recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

A CIN 1/negative LEEP specimen in women with high-grade cytology and/or HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy is associated with negative/low-grade cytology, normal/low-grade colposcopic findings and CIN 2 biopsy result before treatment. The HSIL/CIN 2-3 disease persistence/recurrence is low when LEEP specimen does not confirm HSIL/CIN 2-3.

Predictor factors for conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: Cytology and HPV genotyping

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of HPV genotyping and previous cytology result to predict the evolution of CIN2 histological lesions managed conservatively.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted at Hospital del Mar in Barcelona from January 2012 to May 2017. Women with new diagnosis of CIN2 were invited to undergo conservative management for 24 months. Complete regression, partial regression, persistence and progression to CIN3 were defined as final outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses combining HPV genotyping and cytology were used to establish progression predictors of CIN2.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were included in the study, and 291 patients completed the 24-months follow-up. Of them, 214 patients (73.5%) showed regression; 43 (14.8%) persistence to CIN2, and 34 (11.7%) progression to CIN3. In multivariable analysis, HPV-16 infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.13-3.43]) and previous HSIL cytology (OR 3.46, [95% CI 1.99-6.02]) significantly increased the risk of persistence or progression (CIN2+) of CIN2 lesions. In contrast, all HPV-negative lesions regressed (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The regression rate of CIN2 lesions supports conservative management in selected patients regardless of their age. Patients with a CIN2 biopsy and negative HPV test had a high rate of regression and should be offered follow-up without excisional treatment. In contrast, patients with HPV-16 and HSIL cytology had an increased risk of CIN2+, their treatment should be individualized and excisional treatment should be considered. The age may not be considered a criterion to decide the best management. New markers may help in the future to select the best management of CIN2.

The Natural History of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 1, 2, and 3: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to obtain an updated overview of regression, persistence, and progression rates of conservatively managed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN 1)/CIN 2/CIN 3.

METHODS

Data sources were MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (January 1, 1973-April 14, 2020). Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. To estimate outcome rates, we pooled proportions of the individual study results using random-effects meta-analysis, resulting in point estimates and corresponding 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was quantified by the I2 and τ2 measures.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine studies were included, 63 studies on CIN 1 (n = 6,080-8,767), 42 on CIN 2 (n = 2,909-3,830), and 7 on CIN 3 (n = 245-351). The overall regression, persistence, and progression to CIN 2 or worse and CIN 3 or worse rates for women with conservatively managed CIN 1 were 60% (95% CI = 55-65, I2 = 92%), 25% (95% CI = 20-30, I2 = 94%), 11% (95% CI = 8-13, I2 = 89%), and 2% (95% CI = 1-3, I2 = 82%), respectively. The overall regression, persistence, and progression rates for CIN 2 were 55% (95% CI = 50-60, I2 = 85%), 23% (95% CI = 19-28, I2 = 83%), and 19% (95% CI = 15-23, I2 = 88%), respectively. Finally, for CIN 3, these were 28% (95% CI = 17-41, I2 = 68%), 67% (95% CI = 36-91, I2 = 84%), and 2% (95% CI = 0-25, I2 = 95%), respectively. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 regression was significantly higher in women 30 years or younger and high-risk human papillomavirus-negative women (66%, 95% CI = 62-70, I2 = 76%; 94%, 95% CI = 84-99, I2 = 60%). Only 2/7,180 (0.03%) and 10/3,037 (0.3%) of the CIN 1 and CIN 2 cases progressed to cervical cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Most CIN 1/CIN 2 will regress spontaneously in less than 24 months, with the highest rates in high-risk human papillomavirus-negative and young women, whereas progression to cancer is less than 0.5%. Conservative management should be considered, especially in fertile women and with expected high compliance. Given the heterogeneity in regression rates of high-grade histology, this should be classified as CIN 2 or CIN 3 to guide management.

Clinical Challenges in Managing Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2: A Report From a Cross-sectional Survey

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to determine the management strategies offered to women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN 2) and the attitude of colposcopists toward its histological diagnosis and to identify the criteria used to select women for conservative management.

METHODS

Colposcopists working in Spain were invited to participate in an online questionnaire via the Spanish Gynecology and Colposcopy Societies. The survey included 42 questions covering the 3 objectives of the study. One hundred eighty-two colposcopists representing all autonomous regions in Spain responded. The response rate was 26.2%, considering the total number of members.

RESULTS

Most colposcopists offer conservative management in selected cases (153/182). The preferred follow-up interval is 6 months (65%), followed by 3-4 months (30%). Observation was considered no longer appropriate after 24 months (29.5%) and 12 months (26.3%), and 24.3% expressed that it depended on women's plan to conceive. During conservative management, 93.9% always perform a cytology, 62.7% human papillomavirus testing, 96.8% colposcopy, 47.9% cervical biopsy, and 28.1% endocervical curettage. Forty-five percent consider that CIN 2 merely represents a misclassified CIN 1 or CIN 3, whereas 46.2% think that CIN 2 lesions are unlikely to regress. Most respondents considered that age older than 40 years (81.3%), human papillomavirus 16 infection (62.1%), HIV infection (76.8%), positive p16 immunostaining (60.2%), a large lesion occupying more than 50% of the cervix (87%), endocervical involvement (91.6%), and previous treatment for CIN 2-3 (77%) are contraindications for conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of CIN 2 remains challenging for colposcopists, and a lack of consensus still exists in clinical practice. A better understanding of the natural history of CIN 2 and its clinical outcomes is still necessary to guide clinicians in its management.

Screening for Cervical Cancer

The most effective strategy for cervical cancer prevention involves vaccination to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections during adolescence followed by screening to detect HPV infections during adulthood. HPV vaccination before sexual debut can prevent HPV infections, precancers, and cancers. HPV vaccination of sexually active populations does not prevent cancer. Screening with HPV testing is the most effective method of detecting precancers and cancers between ages 25 and 65. Ensuring adequate screening around the age of menopause may be the key to preventing cervical cancer among elderly women. Most cervical cancers at all ages occur among unscreened or underscreened women.

Evaluation of guidelines for observational management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 in young women

BACKGROUND

A high rate of regression in young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 has been recorded. However, there are few prospective data by which to evaluate management guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology recommendations for follow-up of young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 using data created by a large prospective multicenter study of observational management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were 616 women under 25 years with biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 following a referral to colposcopy for an abnormal smear with no previous high-grade abnormality. The protocol included colposcopy, cytology, and colposcopically directed biopsy at the initial visit and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups visits, and these data were analyzed. Histology from the corresponding cervical biopsy was treated as the reference diagnostic test. For young women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, we aimed to determine the following: (1) the ability of colposcopy to identify women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or worse at 6 months; and (2) the ability of colposcopy, cytology, and a combination of cytology and colposcopy to identify residual high-grade abnormalities at 12 months. In addition, although not specified in the guidelines, we investigated the ability of high-risk human papillomavirus positivity alone or with cytology as a co-test to identify residual high-grade abnormalities at 12 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3+ colposcopic appearance identified only 28% (95% confidence interval, 18-40%) of women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3. At 12 months, a high-grade colposcopic appearance identified only 58% (95% confidence interval, 48-68%) of women with residual histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. At 12 months, high-grade cytology identified only 58% (95% confidence interval, 48-68%) of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or 3. However, the combination of either high-grade cytology or colposcopic appearance proved substantially more sensitive (81%; 95% confidence interval, 72-88%). High-risk human papillomavirus positivity at 12 months was a sensitive (96%; 95% confidence interval, 89-99%) indicator of persisting high-grade histology. However, this sensitivity came at the expense of specificity (52%; 95% confidence interval, 45-58%). A co-test of high-risk human papillomavirus positivity or high-grade cytology at 12 months provided a high sensitivity (97%; 95% confidence interval, 90-99%) but low specificity (51%; 95% confidence interval, 45%-58%).

CONCLUSION

Colposcopy and cytology are limited in their ability to exclude persistent high-grade abnormality for young women undergoing observational management for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2. We recommend biopsy for all women at 12 months. High-risk human papillomavirus positivity is a sensitive indicator of persistent abnormality and should be considered in those not having a biopsy.

Expression of p16 and HPV E4 on biopsy samples and methylation of FAM19A4 and miR124-2 on cervical cytology samples in the classification of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

The decision to treat a cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) relies heavily on a colposcopy-directed biopsy showing high-grade (H)SIL. Diagnosis is often supported by p16, an immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarker of high-risk (hr)HPV E7 gene activity. Additional potential markers include methylation of tumor suppressor genes FAM19A4/miR124-2 in cervical cytology for advanced transforming HSIL and the IHC marker HPV E4 for productive, potentially regressing lesions. In 318 women referred for colposcopy, we investigated the relationship between staining patterns of p16 and E4 IHC in the worst biopsy, and the relation of these to FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation status in cytology. E4-positive staining decreased with increasing SIL/CIN grade from 41% in LSIL to 3% in HSIL/CIN3. E4 positivity increased with grade of p16 when p16 expression was limited to the lower two third of the epithelium (r = 0.378), but fell with expression over. Loss of E4 expression in the worst lesion was associated with the methylation of FAM19A4/miR124-2. We also examined whether these biomarkers can predict the histological outcome of the LEEP biopsy in a subgroup of 119 who underwent LEEP treatment. About 85% of women with ≥lower two third p16 staining/E4-negative HSIL biopsies and 65% with limited p16 staining/E4-positive HSIL biopsies had ≥HSIL in the LEEP specimen (P = .025). p16 expression in a biopsy is related both to viral production and transformation, while decreased E4 expression relates to methylation, indicating advanced HSIL. p16 expression in ≥2/3 of the epithelium and absent E4 indicate likely HSIL on a subsequent LEEP specimen.

Evaluation of uterine cervical cancer in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the prevalence and the regression rate of cytological alteration in pregnant patients below the recommended age by the Brazilian Guidelines for the Screening of Uterine Cervical Cancer Guideline in the prenatal service of Maternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

STUDY DESIGN

We included the cytopathological exams of all pregnant patients that attended on the outpatient from January 2010 to May 2016. For the identification of the pregnant women, the Management and Integrated System and the Uterine Cervical Cancer Information System of the institution were used. We performed X² test. The level of significance was 0.05.

RESULTS

The study totaled 5825 cytopathological exams, of which 1822 were from pregnant patients ≤ 24 years of age. Only 4.06 % (74/1822) of altered results were found (p < 0.05). The most frequent change was low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with a prevalence of 1.92 % (35/1822) whereas high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion had 0.16 % (3/1822). The regression rate in pregnant patients ≤24 years of age was 34,32 %.

CONCLUSION

There was a low prevalence of cytological abnormalities in pregnant patients ≤ 24 years, low frequency of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion among the altered cytologies and a high spontaneous regression rate, therefore screening is not recommended before the age determined by the Brazilian Guideline.

Three-Tiered versus Two-Tiered Classification of Squamous Dysplasia in Cervical Cytology: Results of a Follow-Up Study

OBJECTIVE

Regarding cytological findings of squamous dysplasia, a comparison was made between a three-tiered classification - low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade SIL/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (HSIL/CIN2), and HSIL/CIN3 - and a two-tiered classification - LSIL and HSIL. The respective risk for CIN2+ and CIN3+ was calculated to make decisions regarding management.

METHODS

A total of 2,949 women with first-time cytologic findings of squamous dysplasia (LSIL, HSIL/CIN2, or HSIL/CIN3) between January 2013 and June 2016 were enrolled. Subsequent cytological findings and histological diagnoses were evaluated until August 2018. For each category of findings, the risk for CIN2+ and CIN3+ was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates. The differences in risk between the cytological categories were checked for significance using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

For the categories LSIL, HSIL/CIN2, and HSIL/CIN3, the risk for CIN2+ after 12, 24, and 60 months was 3.4, 9.4, and 23.3%; 35.2, 44.8, and 59.8%; and 95.5, 97.8, and 98.9%, respectively. For CIN3+ the risk was 2.0, 5.5, and 13.5%; 28.6, 35.6, and 48.3%; 91.3, 95.6, and 97.9%, respectively. The differences in risk between the categories are highly significant, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A three-tiered classification of squamous dysplasia such as the Munich Nomenclature III for cytology is suitable for risk-adapted clinical management, especially to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Low proportion of unreported cervical treatments in the cancer registry of Norway between 1998 and 2013

BACKGROUND

Accurate information about treatment is needed to evaluate cervical cancer prevention efforts. We studied completeness and validity of reporting cervical treatments in the Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified 47,423 (92%) high-grade cervical dysplasia patients with and 3983 (8%) without recorded treatment in the CRN in 1998-2013. We linked the latter group to the nationwide registry of hospital discharges in 1998-2015. Of patients still without treatment records, we randomly selected 375 for review of their medical history. Factors predicting incomplete treatment records were assessed by multiple imputation and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Registry linkage revealed that 10% (401/3983) of patients received treatment, usually conization, within one year of their initial high-grade dysplasia diagnosis. Of those, 11% (n = 44) were missing due to unreporting and 89% (n = 357) due to misclassification at the CRN. Of all cases in medical review, patients under active surveillance contributed almost 60% (223/375). Other reasons of being without recorded treatment were uncertain dysplasia diagnosis, invasive cancer or death. Coding error occurred in 19% (73/375) of randomly selected cases. CRN undercounted receipt of treatment by 38% (n = 1526) among patients without recorded treatment which translates into 97% overall completeness of treatment data. Incomplete treatment records were particularly associated with public laboratories, patients aged 40-54 years, and the latest study years.

CONCLUSIONS

CRN holds accurate information on cervical treatments. Completeness and particularly validity can be further improved through the establishment of new internal routines and regular linkage to hospital discharges.

Reliable identification of women with CIN3+ using hrHPV genotyping and methylation markers in a cytology-screened referral population

Cervical screening aims to identify women with high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2‐3 (HSIL/CIN2‐3) or invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Identification of women with severe premalignant lesions or ICC (CIN3+) could ensure their rapid treatment and prevent overtreatment. We investigated high‐risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detection with genotyping and methylation of FAM19A4/miR124‐2 for detection of CIN3+ in 538 women attending colposcopy for abnormal cytology. All women had an additional cytology with hrHPV testing (GP5+/6+‐PCR‐EIA+), genotyping (HPV16/18, HPV16/18/31/45), and methylation analysis (FAM19A4/miR124‐2) and at least one biopsy. CIN3+ detection was studied overall and in women <30 (n = 171) and ≥30 years (n = 367). Positivity for both rather than just one methylation markers increased in CIN3, and all ICC was positive for both. Overall sensitivity and specificity for CIN3+ were, respectively, 90.3% (95%CI 81.3–95.2) and 31.8% (95%CI 27.7–36.1) for hrHPV, 77.8% (95%CI 66.9–85.8) and 69.3% (95%CI 65.0–73.3) for methylation biomarkers and 93.1% (95%CI 84.8–97.0) and 49.4% (95%CI 44.8–53.9) for combined HPV16/18 and/or methylation positivity. For CIN3, hrHPV was found in 90.9% (95%CI 81.6–95.8), methylation positivity in 75.8% (95%CI 64.2–84.5) and HPV16/18 and/or methylation positivity in 92.4% (95%CI 83.5–96.7). In women aged ≥30, the sensitivity of combined HPV16/18 and methylation was increased (98.2%, 95%CI 90.6–99.7) with a specificity of 46.3% (95%CI 40.8–51.9). Combination of HPV16/18 and methylation analysis was very sensitive and offered improved specificity for CIN3+, opening the possibility of rapid treatment for these women and follow‐up for women with potentially regressive, less advanced, HSIL/CIN2 lesions.

What's new?

Reliable triage of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is of high priority as not all lesions progress to invasive carcinoma. Here the authors show that combining the methylation status of tumor suppressor genes FAM19A4 and miR124‐2 with genotyping for high‐risk human papillomavirus results in a highly sensitive and moderately specific triage strategy that identifies women with CIN lesions likely to need rapid treatment. The authors recommend clinical evaluation of the strategy in prospective studies.

Justifying conservative management of CIN2 in women younger than 25 years - A population-based study

OBJECTIVE

In 2012, the joint clinical practice guideline from the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) changed from immediate treatment to a more conservative management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 in young women. In this study, the outcomes before and after this management change were reviewed in Nova Scotia, Canada.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study was performed among women younger than 25 years with biopsy-proven CIN2, who were diagnosed in one of the colposcopy clinics in Nova Scotia between 2010 and 2014. Regression and progression rates were compared pre- and post-guideline changes.

RESULTS

Of the 636 women included in the study, 286 women were diagnosed with CIN2 before and 350 women after the management in Nova Scotia was changed. After implementation of the 2012 guidelines patients were more likely to receive conservative management (78.6% versus 44.1%; p < 0.001); which differs from the patients who underwent treatment during follow-up prior to the change in guidelines (73.4% versus 38.9%; p < 0.001). Regression occurred in 73.1% of all women, but women seen in the post-guideline change period had a higher regression rate and lower progression rate (p < 0.05). Histologic results from treatment specimen did not show a significant difference in low-grade or high-grade lesions before or after the guideline had been changed (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

Conservative management seems a safe and justified approach for women younger than 25 years with CIN2.

Outcomes of Conservative Management of High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in Young Women

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine regression rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 in women younger than 24 years, followed conservatively for up to 24 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of colposcopy patients in clinic database based on the following: (1) younger than 24 years at first visit; (2) first visit January 1, 2010, to May 31, 2013, and at least 1 follow-up visit after diagnosis; (3) histologic diagnosis of CIN2+; and (4) optimal conservative management (observation for up to 24 months or to 24 years, whichever occurred first). Patient information and clinical/pathologic data were extracted from charts to examine patient characteristics and treatment outcomes, CIN2+ regression rates, median times to regression for CIN2 versus CIN3 (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis), and predictors of regression (multivariate logistic regression analysis).

RESULTS

A total of 154 women met criteria. The most severe histological diagnoses were CIN2 in 99 (64.3%), CIN3 in 51 (33.1%), and adenocarcinoma in situ in 4 (2.6%). Adenocarcinoma in situ was immediately treated. In follow-up, CIN2 regressed to CIN1 or negative in 74 women (74.7%)-median time to regression, 10.8 months. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 regressed in 11 women (21.6%)-median time to regression not reached (last follow-up censored at 52.7 months). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 on biopsy, low grade referral Pap, and younger age predicted regression. Overall, 49 women (31.8%) were treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative management should continue to be recommended to young women with CIN2. Rigorous retention mechanisms are required to ensure that these women return for follow-up.

Toll-like receptors: Important immune checkpoints in the regression of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia 2

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are innate immune defenders thought to be critical for the clearance of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections hence preventing the development of HPV-associated high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN2 or 3), a potential cervical cancer precursor. However, the role of TLRs in the regression of established cervical lesions, such as CIN2, is hindered by a lack of prospective design studies. Using SYBR green real-time PCR assays, we have examined the gene expression of TLR2, TLR3, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9, in cytobrush collected endocervical cells of 63 women diagnosed with CIN2 at study entry (baseline) and followed over a 3-year period. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to examine the association between TLR expression levels, measured at baseline, and CIN2 outcome (regression vs. persistence/progression) over time. HPV genotyping was performed using Roche Linear Array Assay detecting 37 HPV types. Women with CIN2 regression showed significantly higher baseline levels of TLR2 (p = 0.006) and TLR7 (p = 0.007), as well as a non-significant trend for a higher TLR8 expression (p = 0.053) compared to women with CIN2 persistence/progression. Six women with CIN2 regression, who presented with an HR-HPV DNA-negative CIN2 lesion at study entry, had significantly higher baseline levels of TLR2 (p = 0.005), TLR7 (p = 0.013) and TLR8 (p = 0.012), compared to women with CIN2 persistence/progression, suggesting their role in clearance of HPV prior to clearance of the lesion. Our results confirm a key role of TLRs in regression of CIN2 and support the potential use of TLR-agonists for treatment of these lesions.

Influence of age on histologic outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during observational management: results from large cohort, systematic review, meta-analysis

Aim of this study was to investigate the histologic outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during observational management. Consecutive women with histologically verified CIN and observational management were included. Histologic findings of initial and follow-up visits were collected and persistence, progression and regression rates at end of observational period were assessed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis was performed. In 783 women CIN I, II, and III was diagnosed by colposcopically guided biopsy in 42.5%, 26.6% and 30.9%, respectively. Younger patients had higher rates of regression (p < 0.001) and complete remission (< 0.001) and lower rates of progression (p = 0.003). Among women aged < 25, 25 < 30, 30 < 35, 35 < 40 years, and > 40 years, regression rates were 44.7%, 33.7%, 30.9%, 27.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. Pooled analysis of published data showed similar results. Multivariable analysis showed that with each five years of age, the odds for regression reduced by 21% (p < 0.001) independently of CIN grade (p < 0.001), and presence of HPV high-risk infection (p < 0.001). Patient's age has a considerable influence on the natural history of CIN - independent of CIN grade and HPV high-risk infection. Observational management should be considered for selected young patients with CIN.

Clinical evaluation of human papillomavirus 16/18 oncoprotein test for cervical cancer screening and HPV positive women triage

HPV-16 and -18 account for about 80% of cervical cancers. We evaluated the performance of HPV-16/18 oncoprotein to predict precancer and cancer in corresponding tissue biopsy specimens. 1,008 women attending cervical cancer screening program and 638 women referred to colposcopy with biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) from 4 hospitals were recruited (1,646 in total). All women were tested OncoE6 (AVC), Liquid-Based Cytology (Hologic) and cobas HPV test (Roche). Colposcopy was performed on women with any abnormal results. The final diagnoses were based on a consensus panel review of the histology. There were 919 normal, 69 CIN1, 53 CIN2, 91 CIN3,474 squamous cell carcinoma(SCC) and 40 adenocarcinoma (ADC) cases, the prevalence of OncoE6 was 1.7%, 10.1%, 13.2%, 44.0%, 80.4% and 65.0%, respectively. The percent positive for cobas was higher than that of OncoE6 in detection of HPV16/18 in entire population (p < 0.001). However, the disparity of positive rate between these two tests became tiny among cervical cancer patients (CIN2: 26.4% vs. 13.2%, CIN3: 73.6% vs. 44.0%, SCC: 84.0% vs. 80.4%, ADC: 67.5% vs. 65.0%). OncoE6 was less sensitive than cobas (73.9% vs. 93.6%, p < 0.001), but more specific (97.1% vs. 75.4%, p < 0.001) for CIN3+ in entire population; OncoE6 yielded a sensitivity of 77.7% and a specificity of 91.0% for CIN3+ among cobas positive women, which can reduce nearly half of the colposcopy referral numbers. OncoE6 can be considered as a useful tool for cervical cancer screening and a potential powerful biomarker for HPV positive triage.

Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the regression, persistence, and progression of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) lesions managed conservatively as well as compliance with follow-up protocols.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from 1 January 1973 to 20 August 2016.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting on outcomes of histologically confirmed CIN2 in non-pregnant women, managed conservatively for three or more months.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random effects model was used to calculate pooled proportions for each outcome, and heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of regression, persistence, or progression of CIN2 and default rates at different follow-up time points (3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months).

RESULTS

36 studies that included 3160 women were identified (seven randomised trials, 16 prospective cohorts, and 13 retrospective cohorts; 50% of the studies were at low risk of bias). At 24 months, the pooled rates were 50% (11 studies, 819/1470 women, 95% confidence interval 43% to 57%; I²=77%) for regression, 32% (eight studies, 334/1257 women, 23% to 42%; I²=82%) for persistence, and 18% (nine studies, 282/1445 women, 11% to 27%; I²=90%) for progression. In a subgroup analysis including 1069 women aged less than 30 years, the rates were 60% (four studies, 638/1069 women, 57% to 63%; I²=0%), 23% (two studies, 226/938 women, 20% to 26%; I²=97%), and 11% (three studies, 163/1033 women, 5% to 19%; I²=67%), respectively. The rate of non-compliance (at six to 24 months of follow-up) in prospective studies was around 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most CIN2 lesions, particularly in young women (<30 years), regress spontaneously. Active surveillance, rather than immediate intervention, is therefore justified, especially among young women who are likely to adhere to monitoring.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014406.

Clinical Outcomes after Conservative Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 (CIN2) in Women Ages 21-39 Years

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) frequently regresses, is typically slow-growing, and rarely progresses to cancer. Some women forgo immediate treatment, opting for conservative management (heightened surveillance with cytology and colposcopy), to minimize overtreatment and increased risk of obstetric complications; however, there are limited data examining clinical outcomes in these women. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of younger women diagnosed with initially untreated CIN1/2, CIN2 and CIN2/3 lesions at Kaiser Permanente Northern California between 2003 and 2015. Clinical outcomes were categorized into five mutually exclusive hierarchical groups: cancer, treated, returned to routine screening, persistent high-grade lesion, or persistent low-grade lesion. Median follow-up for the 2,417 women was 48 months. Six women were diagnosed with cancer (0.2%), all with history of high-grade cytology, and none after a negative cotest. Thirty percent of women were treated, and only 20% returned to routine screening; 50% remained in continued intensive follow-up, of which 86% had either low-grade cytology/histology or high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity, but not necessarily persistence of a single HPV type. No cancers were detected after a single negative cotest in follow-up. Almost half of initially untreated women did not undergo treatment, but remained by protocol in colposcopy clinic for 2 or more years in the absence of persisting CIN2⁺ Their incomplete return to total negativity was possibly due to sequential new and unrelated low-grade abnormalities. The prolonged colposcopic surveillance currently required to return to routine screening in the absence of persisting CIN2⁺ might not be necessary after a negative cotest.Significance: Many younger women under conservative management following an initial CIN2 result remain in a clinical protocol of prolonged intensified surveillance without a subsequent diagnosis of CIN2 or more severe diagnoses. More research is needed to determine whether such prolonged management might be unnecessary following a negative cotest for those women with an initial CIN2 but otherwise only low-grade findings. Cancer Prev Res; 11(3); 165-70. ©2018 AACR.

Conservative management of CIN2: National Audit of British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology members' opinion

There is no doubt that organised cervical screening programmes have significantly reduced the rates of cervical cancer by detection and treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2, CIN3). National UK guidelines do not differentiate between CIN2 and CIN3 as separate entities and recommend treatment for both, although a degree of uncertainty exists regarding the natural history of CIN2. This national survey of British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology members aimed to assess attitudes towards conservative management (CM) of CIN2 in the UK and identify potential selection criteria. In total, 511 members responded (response rate 32%); 55.6% offered CM for selective cases; 12.4% for all cases; 16.4% had formal guidelines. Most agreed age group was >40yrs (83%), HPV 16/18 positive (51.4%), smoking (60%), immuno-compromise (74.2%), and large lesion size (80.8%) were relative contraindications for CM. 75.9% favoured six-monthly monitoring, with 80.2% preferring excisional treatment for persistent high-grade disease. Many UK colposcopists manage CIN2 conservatively without formal guidelines. Potential selection criteria should be investigated by a multicentre study. Impact statement Although anecdotally some colposcopists manage many women with CIN2 conservatively, this National Audit of British Society for Colposcopy and Cytopathology members, we believe, is the first time this has been formally recorded. The survey assesses current attitudes towards conservative management (CM) of CIN2 and seeks to identify potential selection criteria that could be used to identify suitable women. It received over 500 responses and significantly, identified many colposcopists recommending CM of CIN2 for patients despite the lack of any formal guidance regarding this approach. The greater majority of respondents were keen to consider participating in a multicentre trial on CM of CIN2 targeting the UK screening population (25-64 years). The paper has international relevance as ACOG and ASCCP have recently changed their guidance for the management of CIN2 in younger women and now recommend CM with monitoring rather than first line ablative or excisional treatment due to concerns regarding overtreatment, especially in women who have not yet completed their family.

Early colposcopic reassurance and discharge to routine recall does not increase subsequent high-grade referral or treatment rates

BACKGROUND

The Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit identified that between 1st April 2014 and 31st March 2015 the number of women referred with high-grade dyskaryosis and the number of women undergoing treatment increased by 21% and 19%, respectively. There was concern that referral and treatment rates were increasing because we were now seeing women, previously discharged to routine recall with prior low-grade cytology hrHPV positive, re-enter the system for their second round of screening. The aim of this study was to assess the reasons for our significant increase in referral and treatment rates.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study performed between 1st April 2012 and 30th June 2015 at the Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit, Sheffield, UK.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1765 women underwent large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ), of whom 1517 were referred with high-grade dyskaryosis. Fifty-six (4%) women undergoing treatment; and four untreated high-grade referrals were seen in the previous 3-5 years with low-grade cytology hrHPV positive and discharged to routine recall. There were no cases of invasive disease in the previously discharged groups. There was, however, a significantly higher likelihood of a negative LLETZ (P=.0066) in those women previously discharged to routine recall, and lower rates of CIN2 or worse identified.

CONCLUSION

Prior discharge to routine recall does not have any major influence on treatment rates or high-grade referrals. The finding of no invasive disease; lower rates of CIN2 or worse; and a significantly higher likelihood of a negative LLETZ in those women previously discharged to routine recall is reassuring and further reinforces the safety of HPV triage pathways.

Initial observation of CIN2 does not appear to reduce quality of life in women under 25 years of age

BACKGROUND

Although the patient perspective is implicit in the practice of medicine, research evaluating this remains scarce. In a climate where clinicians and policy-makers constantly strive to achieve more patient-centred models of care, this omission warrants attention.

AIM

To assess health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in women under 25 years of age with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) receiving conservative management (colposcopy follow-up, with treatment if necessary) compared with those receiving immediate excisional treatment with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).

METHODS

An observational study evaluating HrQoL was conducted at Christchurch Women's Hospital, New Zealand. Women undergoing conservative management for CIN2 were compared with those undergoing immediate excisional treatment in an age-matched sample. The Short Form Health Survey 12 version 2 (SF-12v2) was used to evaluate HrQoL. Secondary outcomes of anxiety and sexual function were also assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and four women with CIN2 participated in the study. Of these, 63 (60%) received conservative management and 41 (40%) received immediate excisional treatment with LLETZ. We found no significant difference in HrQoL between the groups in a multivariate regression analysis adjusted for parity, smoking and socioeconomic status. There were also no significant differences in sexual function or anxiety.

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in HrQoL by management strategy. Conservative management of CIN2 in women under 25 is unlikely to have an adverse impact on self-reported HrQoL, anxiety or sexual functioning compared with conventional management.

Does CIN2 Have the Same Aggressive Potential As CIN3? A Secondary Analysis of High-Grade Cytology Recurrence in Women Treated with Cold-Coagulation Cervical Treatment

Introduction To determine whether women with CIN2 versus CIN3 on pretreatment cervical punch biopsy have less high-grade cytology recurrence following cold-coagulation cervical treatment. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study of women having had cold coagulation between 2001-2011 in our colposcopy unit. Women with previous cervical treatment were excluded. Results We identified 402 women with 260 (64.7 %) cases of CIN2 and 142 (35.3 %) cases of CIN3 on pretreatment cervical punch biopsy. In the total sample, the mean age of women was 27.5 years (SD = 4.9), 75.1 % were nulliparous and 36.6 % were smokers. Referral cytology and pretreatment colposcopic appearance were high-grade in 62.7 % and 57.1 %. The mean follow-up period was 2.8 years (SD = 2.1). Women with CIN2 on pretreatment cervical biopsy when compared to those with CIN3 had less frequently high-grade referral cytology and high-grade pretreatment colposcopic appearances, and had less pretreatment cervical biopsies taken. During the follow-up period, women with CIN2 on pretreatment cervical biopsy had less high-grade cytology recurrence when compared to those women with CIN3 (1.9 vs. 5.6 %, p = 0.046). Multiple stepwise Cox regression analysis showed that women with CIN3 on pretreatment cervical biopsy had 3.21 times greater hazard for high-grade cytology recurrence (HR = 3.21, 95 % CI: 1.05-9.89; p = 0.041) in comparison with CIN2 cases. Conclusion We found that women with CIN2 on pretreatment cervical punch biopsy had less high-grade cytology recurrence following cold-coagulation treatment in comparison to those with CIN3. This finding lends support to the theory that CIN2 even though a high-grade abnormality might not have the same aggressive potential as CIN3.

Usefulness of p16INK4a staining for managing histological high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions

p16^INK4a (p16) tumor-suppressor protein is a biomarker of human papillomavirus (HPV) oncogenic activity that has revealed a high rate of positivity in histological high-gade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (HSIL/CIN2) lesions. However, there is a paucity of data regarding p16 status as a surrogate marker of HSIL/CIN2 evolution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of HSIL/CIN2 patients followed up without treatment for 12 months according to p16 immunohistochemical staining. Patients diagnosed with HSIL/CIN2 colposcopy-directed biopsy, were recruited prospectively between December 2011 and October 2013. p16 staining was performed in all HSIL/CIN2 diagnostic biopsies. Follow-up was conducted every 4 months by cytology, colposcopy and biopsy if suspicion of progression and once the 12 months of follow-up completed. Complete regression, partial regression, persistence, and progression rates of HSIL/CIN2 were defined as a final outcome. A total of 96 patients were included in the analysis. The rate of spontaneous regression was 64%, while 28% had persistent disease, and 8% progressed at 12 months of follow-up. p16 was positive in 81 (84%) initial HSIL/CIN2 biopsies. Regression was observed in all 15 p16 negative cases and in 46 of 81 (57%) p16 positive cases (P=0.001). In conclusion, patients with p16 negative HSIL/CIN2 biopsy had a high rate of regression during first 12 months of follow-up. Status of p16 staining could be considered for HSIL/CIN2 management.

The Association Between Unwanted Sexual Experiences and Early-Onset Cervical Cancer and Precancer by Age 25: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

We examined the association between unwanted sexual experiences and cervical cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, diagnosed ≤25 years of age.

METHODS

A case-control study of women ≤55 years who attended gynecological hospitals in Australia between 1983 and 2007. Cases were ≤25 years when diagnosed with disease, control group 1 were "older women" >25 years at diagnosis; control group 2 were "well women" ≤25 years attending preventive health clinics. A self-administered postal survey was utilized. The main outcome measures were prevalence of childhood sexual abuse (<16 years) and unwanted adolescent sexual experiences (between 16 and 18 years) in cases compared to controls.

RESULTS

Of 400 contactable subjects, 251 participated (62.8%). Prevalence of childhood sexual abuse in cases (26.6% [25/94]) was similar to other groups. Prevalence of childhood genital contact abuse in cases with cervical cancer was 45.5% [5/11], compared to older women (20% [10/50], p = 0.08) and well women (13.8% [8/58], p = 0.01), and was marginally more common compared to well women when adjusted for other lifestyle factors (odds ratio [OR]: 4.7 [1.0-22.6], p = 0.05). Prevalence of unwanted adolescent sexual experiences in cases was 28.9% [33/114]. Prevalence of adolescent penile-genital contact experiences in cervical cancer cases was 46.7% [7/15], compared to older women (9.4%, [6/64], p < 0.001) and well women (13.7%, [10/73], p = 0.003), and was more common compared to well women when adjusted for lifestyle (OR: 5.9 [1.4-24.9], p = 0.02) and sexual health risk factors (OR: 5.6 [1.4-22.1] p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Unwanted sexual experiences with genital contact were a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer ≤25 years, likely due to a complex interplay of biological and environmental factors.

A prediction model for spontaneous regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2, based on simple clinical parameters

This study aims to develop a prediction model for spontaneous regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN 2) lesions based on simple clinicopathological parameters. The study was conducted at Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The prediction model was developed in a retrospective cohort of 129 women with a histologic diagnosis of CIN 2 who were managed by watchful waiting for 6 to 24months. Five potential predictors for spontaneous regression were selected based on the literature and expert opinion and were analyzed in a multivariable logistic regression model, followed by backward stepwise deletion based on the Wald test. The prediction model was internally validated by the bootstrapping method. Discriminative capacity and accuracy were tested by assessing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and a calibration plot. Disease regression within 24months was seen in 91 (71%) of 129 patients. A prediction model was developed including the following variables: smoking, Papanicolaou test outcome before the CIN 2 diagnosis, concomitant CIN 1 diagnosis in the same biopsy, and more than 1 biopsy containing CIN 2. Not smoking, Papanicolaou class <3, concomitant CIN 1, and no more than 1 biopsy containing CIN 2 were predictive of disease regression. The AUC was 69.2% (95% confidence interval, 58.5%-79.9%), indicating a moderate discriminative ability of the model. The calibration plot indicated good calibration of the predicted probabilities. This prediction model for spontaneous regression of CIN 2 may aid physicians in the personalized management of these lesions.

Spontaneous regression of CIN2 in women aged 18-24 years: a retrospective study of a state-wide population in Western Australia

INTRODUCTION

CIN2 has a high rate of spontaneous regression in young women and may be managed conservatively in appropriately selected patients. This study aimed to investigate health outcomes in women aged 18-24 years with biopsy-confirmed CIN2.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of Western Australian women aged 18-24 years diagnosed with CIN2 on cervical biopsy from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2010. Women who had not received treatment at ≥4 months following CIN2 diagnosis were classified as managed 'conservatively'. Subsequent cervical cytology and/or biopsy test results were used to report lesion regression (absence of dysplasia or an epithelial lesion of lower grade than CIN2) and disease persistence (CIN2, CIN3 or ACIS).

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available for 2417 women of whom 924 (38.2%) were 'conservatively' managed. In all, 152 (16.4%) conservatively managed women had a lesion more severe than CIN2 detected within 24 months of initial diagnosis, of which 144 were CIN3 and eight were ACIS. There was no statistically significant association between rates of regression and patient age, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas or Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia indices. The 2-year regression rate for CIN2 was estimated to be 59.5% (95%CI 0.5-0.6) in this cohort of women.

CONCLUSION

In conservatively managed young women with CIN2 there was a high rate of spontaneous disease regression. Thus, excisional or ablative treatments may be avoided in selected patients who receive appropriate counseling and who are able to comply with more intensive and prolonged follow-up requirements.

Clinical outcomes of abnormal cervical cytology and human papillomavirus-related lesions in patients with organ transplantation: 11-year experience at a single institution

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical outcomes of abnormal cervical cytology and newly diagnosed human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease after organ transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records from July 2004 to August 2015 were reviewed, and thirteen patients were identified who had been newly diagnosed with HPV-related disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] and cervical cancer) after organ transplantation. The median transition time to the aggravation of cervical cytology and the spontaneous regression rate of CIN were evaluated. Clinical outcomes of CIN1 and CIN2 were compared between the general population and patients with organ transplantation. We also reviewed the current literature regarding the incidence of HPV infection, Pap smear abnormality and/or CIN after organ transplantation.

RESULTS

The cervical cytology aggravated in nine of the 13 patients (69 %). In seven of the 13 cases (54 %), treatments such as cervical conization, laser vaporization, or radiation therapy, were conducted. HPV-related disease disappeared after treatment in only three of the seven actively treated cases (43 %). In contrast, the lesions persisted in three (43 %) cases after treatment. One patient died from cervical cancer. The spontaneous regression rate of the HPV-related diseases, if left untreated, was 0 %. There was a statistically significant difference in the clinical outcomes of CIN1 and CIN2 between the general population and patients with organ transplantation (p = 0.0026 and 0.0315, respectively; chi-squared test).

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-related lesions that are newly diagnosed after organ transplantation do not seem to regress as spontaneously as in the general population. Physicians should recognize the importance of close monitoring and long-term follow-up.

Cervical cancer screening in young and elderly women of the Xingu Indigenous Park: evaluation of the recommended screening age group in Brazil

Objective

To analyze the occurrence of atypia in the cytology/histology examinations of young women under the age of 25 years and of elderly women aged over 64 years, in the Xingu Indigenous Park and to evaluate, in a subjective manner, if the age range for screening established by the Ministry of Health and the Instituto Nacional de Câncer is appropriate for this population.

Methods

The Xingu/UNIFESP Project, in partnership with the Center for Gynecological Disease Prevention, develops programs to prevent cervical cancer. The exploratory, retrospective and descriptive study of cytological and histopathological examinations of young (12-24 years) and elderly (aged 64 and over) women of the Xingu Indigenous Park, between 2005 and 2011.

Results

There was low occurrence of cytological atypia in the elderly female population, but there were occasional high-grade lesions in the indigenous youth.

Conclusion

Interrupting screening at the limit age of 64 years, as established by the Ministry of Health and the Instituto Nacional de Câncer is justified. However, screening of young women should begin at an earlier age.

Recurrence of high-grade cervical abnormalities following conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2

OBJECTIVE

Conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 in women younger than 25 years may reduce overtreatment. However, long-term efficacy remains uncertain. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the rate of recurrence of high-grade abnormalities among young women with a history of CIN 2 that spontaneously regressed within 2 years and compare this with the rate of high-grade abnormality in similar women with an initial diagnosis of CIN 1.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified all women aged younger than 25 years who were diagnosed with CIN 1 or CIN 2 between January 2005 and August 2009 within 2 colposcopy units. Follow-up data from the National Cervical Screening Programme were obtained to identify those women who developed recurrent high-grade lesions before October 2012. Comparisons were made using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 683 women were included: 106 with CIN 2 that spontaneously regressed, 299 with treated CIN 2, and 278 with conservatively managed CIN 1. Median follow-up was 4 years. There was no significant difference in the risk of development of high-grade abnormalities after 2 years between the spontaneously regressing CIN 2 and CIN 1 groups (P = .83). Women with treated CIN 2 had a significantly lower risk of recurrence than women with untreated CIN 2 (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

CIN 2 that has spontaneously regressed appears to behave as a low-grade lesion. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence that careful observation of CIN 2 is an efficacious and appropriate initial management option for women aged younger than 25 years at diagnosis.

The natural history of cervical cancer in chinese women: results from an 11-year follow-up study in china using a multistate model

BACKGROUND

It is important to understand the natural history of cervical cancer, which has implications for cancer prevention and management. However, a dearth of studies on the long-term development of cervical cancer exists in China.

METHODS

We investigated the natural history of cervical cancer in Chinese women by creating a multistate model using 11 years of follow-up data from the Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study I conducted from 1999 to 2010. In 1999, a total of 1,997 eligible women, ages 35 to 45 years, were enrolled in Xiangyuan County, Shanxi Province. Participants were followed up in 2005 and 2010, respectively.

RESULTS

The average time a subject spent in CIN1 before transiting into another state was 1.4693 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1215-1.9251] and the average time a subject spent in CIN2 was 2.9822 years (95% CI: 1.9790-4.4938). A subject's transition probability from CIN1 to normal increased with time. However, the transition probability from CIN1 to CIN2 was relatively lower, with 3-, 5-, and 10-year transition probabilities of 0.1415, 0.1066, and 0.0437. Comparison of 5-year transition probabilities between CIN2 to normal/CIN1 and CIN2 to CIN3(+) yielded a ratio of 2.74.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with CIN1 had a substantial tendency for regression. Similarly, women with CIN2 had a higher probability of regression to normal/CIN1 than progression to CIN3(+). Findings in this study may have significant implications for the development and evaluation of formal cervical cancer preventive strategies in China.

IMPACT

This study may serve as a valuable reference to future research on other multistate cancer processes.

HPV E6/E7 RNA in situ hybridization signal patterns as biomarkers of three-tier cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade

Cervical lesion grading is critical for effective patient management. A three-tier classification (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 1, 2 or 3) based on H&E slide review is widely used. However, for reasons of considerable inter-observer variation in CIN grade assignment and for want of a biomarker validating a three-fold stratification, CAP-ASCCP LAST consensus guidelines recommend a two-tier system: low- or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL or HSIL). In this study, high-risk HPV E6/E7 and p16 mRNA expression patterns in eighty-six CIN lesions were investigated by RNAscope chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Specimens were also screened by immunohistochemistry for p16INK4a (clone E6H4), and by tyramide-based CISH for HPV DNA. HPV genotyping was performed by GP5+/6+ PCR combined with cycle-sequencing. Abundant high-risk HPV RNA CISH signals were detected in 26/32 (81.3%) CIN 1, 22/22 (100%) CIN 2 and in 32/32 (100%) CIN 3 lesions. CIN 1 staining patterns were typified (67.7% specimens) by abundant diffusely staining nuclei in the upper epithelial layers; CIN 2 lesions mostly (66.7%) showed a combination of superficial diffuse-stained nuclei and multiple dot-like nuclear and cytoplasmic signals throughout the epithelium; CIN 3 lesions were characterized (87.5%) by multiple dot-like nuclear and cytoplasmic signals throughout the epithelial thickness and absence/scarcity of diffusely staining nuclei (trend across CIN grades: P<0.0001). These data are consistent with productive phase HPV infections exemplifying CIN 1, transformative phase infections CIN 3, whereas CIN 2 shows both productive and transformative phase elements. Three-tier data correlation was not found for the other assays examined. The dual discernment of diffuse and/or dot-like signals together with the assay's high sensitivity for HPV support the use of HPV E6/E7 RNA CISH as an adjunct test for deciding lesion grade when CIN 2 grading may be beneficial (e.g. among young women) or when 'LSIL vs. HSIL' assignment is equivocal.

Is the low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion category associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2?

OBJECTIVE

A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently called LSIL, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (LSIL/ASC-H). Previous studies have shown that LSIL/ASC-H and ASC-H are both equivocal for HSIL and have a high risk of underlying HSIL. However, in researching the literature only two studies were found which rendered the results as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 separately. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of biopsy results for CIN2 and CIN3 in patients with ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL/ASC-H.

STUDY DESIGN

Between January 2005 and December 2011, cervicovaginal smears (98,594) with a diagnosis of ASC-H, LSIL, LSIL/ASC-H, or HSIL were re-evaluated to determine the prevalence of future lesion development.

RESULTS

A total of 252 patients who had histologic follow-up within a year were selected. Among these, LSIL/ASC-H (31.7%) had the highest prevalence of CIN2 between LSIL (9.3%), ASC-H (10%), and HSIL (16%). All differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Because of the high predictive value of CIN2, LSIL/ASC-H may have further importance, especially in women of different age groups.

Updating the natural history of human papillomavirus and anogenital cancers

This chapter addresses the natural history of anogenital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Cervical infections are the best understood HPV infection. Cervical HPV persistence is the known necessary event for the development of cervical cancer. New infections appearing at any age are benign unless they persist. Several long-term natural history studies have now shed light on the very low risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3+ in women past the peak of HPV acquisition (e.g., 30 or older) who are HPV-negative or clear their HPV. Although data on transmission of HPV are finally emerging, rates of transmission between heterosexual couples vary widely among studies. Factors that affect the calculations of these rates include a) intervals between testing points, b) rates of concordance or discordance at baseline, and c) difficulty in defining established infections versus contamination. Both cervix to anus and anus to cervix autoinoculation in the same woman appears to be quite common. Whether either site serves as a long-term reservoir is unknown. Studies show that anal infections in women and in men who have sex with men are quite common with cumulative rates up to 70-90%. Similarly, clearance of anal HPV is also common, with few individuals showing persistence unless they are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected. HIV strongly influences the development of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). The few studies on the natural history of AIN in HIV-infected men suggest that high-grade AIN is a precursor to invasive anal cancer. Although no natural history studies of AIN are available in women, women with other HPV-associated lesions, including CIN3+ and vulvar cancer, have higher rates of anal cancer. Data on the natural history of HPV of the male genitalia are also emerging, although penile intraepithelial neoplasia is poorly understood. Cumulative rates of HPV are extremely high in men and risks are associated with sexual behavior. Unlike women, prevalence rates are steady across all ages, suggesting that men do not develop protection against reinfection. This article forms part of a special supplement entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012.

Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States

OBJECTIVE

All national organizations now recommend that women be screened for cervical cancer beginning at age 21 years, regardless of age of sexual initiation; however, studies have shown that providers continue to screen much earlier than recommended. Two federal cancer surveillance systems were used to quantify the burden of invasive cervical carcinoma among women younger than 40 years of age.

METHODS

We examined combined data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program covering 92% of the U.S. population. We calculated the age-adjusted incidence of cervical carcinoma among women younger than age 40 years by age, race, ethnicity, and histology for the time period of 1999-2008.

RESULTS

For women younger than age 40 years, 78% of the cervical cancer cases were diagnosed in women aged 30-39, 21% were diagnosed in women 20-29 years of age, and 1% was diagnosed in women younger than age 20 years. There was an average of 3,063 cases of invasive cervical carcinomas annually from 1999 through 2008, with an average of 14 carcinomas per year (rate of 0.15 per 100,000 females) among those aged 15-19 years, and 125 carcinomas per year (rate of 1.4 per 100,000 females) among those aged 20-24 years.

CONCLUSION

Cervical cancer is very rare in young women. Widespread implementation of Pap testing over the past four decades has detected very few cases of cervical cancer in women younger than 25 while potentially causing harm with unnecessary follow-up interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Adherence to conservative management recommendations for abnormal pap test results in adolescents

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines for conservative management of minimally abnormal Pap test results (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, human papillomavirus-positive, and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and moderate dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2) in adolescents 1) resulted in fewer colposcopies and loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEPs) in adolescents or 2) resulted in unintended treatment changes in older age groups.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 1,806 women aged 18 years and older attending one of six community health centers who were diagnosed with abnormal Pap test results between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2008. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine treatment differences in women with minimally abnormal Pap test results before and after guideline changes. Variables included date of abnormality, site of care, race or ethnicity, language, and insurance type. We used Fisher exact tests to examine rates of LEEP in patients with moderate dysplasia before and after guideline publication.

RESULTS

Among 206 women aged 18-20 years, rates of colposcopy after a minimally abnormal Pap test result decreased from 78% (n=102) to 45% (n=34) after guideline changes (P<.001). Colposcopy among women over age 21 (n=1,542) remained unchanged (greater than 90%). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that both date of abnormality and site of care were associated with colposcopy referral. After guideline changes, management of moderate dysplasia with LEEP in women aged 18-23 decreased from 55% to 18% (P=.04); rates remained stable in women ages 24 and older (70% compared with 74%; P=.72).

CONCLUSION

Health care providers quickly adopted new conservative management guidelines for low-income, minority adolescents, which may reduce preterm deliveries in these high-risk populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.