Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18, 13 and the common sex chromosome aneuploidies from maternal blood using massively parallel genomic sequencing of DNA

Comparison of the performance of NIPT and NIPT-plus for fetal chromosomal aneuploidy and high Z-score increases the positive predictive value

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-plus) for detecting aneuploidies at different sequencing depths and assess Z-score accuracy in predicting trisomies 21, 18, 13, 45X, and 47XXX.

METHODS

Pregnancies with positive NIPT or NIPT-plus results detected at the prenatal diagnosis center of Nanfang Hospital were included in this retrospective study, between January 2017 and December 2022. Invasive prenatal diagnostic results were collected. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the relationship between Z-score and positive predictive value (PPV). Optimal cut-off values were obtained based on receiver operating characteristic analysis, and PPVs were calculated in different groups.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1348 pregnant women with positive results, including 930 reported by NIPT and 418 reported by NIPT-plus. NIPT reported significantly more rare chromosomal aneuploidies (RCAs), and NIPT-plus had a significantly higher PPV for trisomy 21 (T21). Logistic regression analyses showed a significant association (P < 0.001) between Z-score and PPVs for T21 and trisomy 18 (T18). A linear relationship was observed between fetal fraction (FF) and Z-values in the true positive cases of T21 and T18.The high Z-score group had significantly higher PPVs than the low Z-score group for T21, T18, trisomy 13, and 47XXX, but not for 45X.

CONCLUSION

The Z-score is helpful in assessing NIPT or NIPT-plus results. Therefore, we suggest including the Z-score and FF in the results. By combining the Z-score, FF, and maternal age, clinicians can interpret NIPT results more accurately and improve personal counsel to reduce patients' anxiety.

Maternal Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy Identified through Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: Clinical Profile and Patient Experience

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) may incidentally identify maternal aneuploidies that have health implications. We evaluated patients' experience with counseling and follow-up diagnostic testing after NIPS flags a potential maternal sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA).

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent NIPS at two reference laboratories between 2012 and 2021 and had test results that were consistent with possible or probable maternal SCA were contacted with a link to an anonymous survey. Survey topics included demographics, health history, pregnancy history, counseling, and follow-up testing.

RESULTS

A total of 269 patients responded to the anonymous survey, and 83 of these individuals also completed one follow-up survey. Most received pretest counseling. A total of 80% were offered fetal genetic testing during the pregnancy, and 35% of patients completed diagnostic maternal testing. Monosomy X-related phenotypes such as short stature or hearing loss prompted follow-up testing that led to a diagnosis of monosomy X in 14 (6%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up counseling and testing after a high-risk NIPS result suggestive of maternal SCA is heterogenous in this cohort and may be frequently incomplete. Health outcomes may be affected by these results and additional research could improve the provision, delivery, and quality of posttest counseling.

KEY POINTS

· NIPS results showing potential SCA could have maternal health implications.. · Variations in counseling and testing after NIPS were observed for women with suspected SCA.. · Comprehensive counseling and diagnostic testing strategies are critical for these patients..

Performance of noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies in a cohort of 116,862 pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) has shown good performance in screening common aneuploidies. However, its performance in detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) needs to be evaluated in a large cohort.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this retrospective observation, a total of 116,862 women underwent NIPS based on DNA nanoball sequencing from 2015 to 2022. SCAs were diagnosed based on karyotyping or chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Among them, 2,084 singleton pregnancies received karyotyping and/or CMA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of NIPS for fetal SCAs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 97.7% (95%CI, 87.7-99.9), 87.3% (95% CI, 76.5-94.4), 96.1% (95%CI, 86.5-99.5), and 95.7% (95% CI, 78.1-99.9), the PPV was 25.8% (95%CI, 19.2-33.2), 80.9% (95%CI, 69.5-89.4), 79.0% (95%CI, 66.8-88.3), and 53.7% (95%CI, 37.4-69.3) for 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX, and 47,XYY, respectively. The specificity was 94.1% (95%CI, 93.0-95.1) for 45,X, and more than 99.0% for sex chromosome trisomy (SCT). The NPV was over 99.0% for all.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS screening for fetal SCAs has high sensitivity, specificity and NPV. The PPV of SCAs was moderate, but that of 45,X was lower than that of SCTs. Invasive prenatal diagnosis should be recommended for high-risk patients.

Cell-free DNA screening in twin pregnancies

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for fetal aneuploidies is clinically available and exhibits better performance than conventional serum screening tests. However, data on the clinical performance of cfDNA screening in twin pregnancies are limited. In this review, we summarized the clinical performance and evaluated the feasibility of cfDNA screening in twin pregnancies based on recent studies and recommendations. The performance of cfDNA screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies is similar to that in singleton pregnancies. Specifically, cfDNA screening has a higher detection rate and lower false-positive rate compared with conventional serum screening. Consequently, recent international guidelines from several academic communities have recommended that cfDNA screening for aneuploidy in twin pregnancies could be considered. Moreover, twin pregnancies can present with specific conditions, such as different zygosities and vanishing twins; therefore, individualized counseling and management are required. Further clinical studies with more twin pregnancies are required for a more accurate analysis.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Fetal Zygosity in Twin Pregnancies Involving a Binary Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms

Twin pregnancy constitutes significant risks for maternal and fetal health, which is usually detected by ultrasound examination at early gestation. However, the imaging-based approach may not accurately identify all twins confounded by practical or clinical variables. The analysis of fetal cell-free DNA in noninvasive prenatal screening assays can completement the ultrasound method for twin detection, which differentiates fraternal or identical twins based on their distinct genotypes. Here, a new noninvasive prenatal screening employing high-coverage next-generation sequencing for targeted nucleotide polymorphisms was developed for detection of zygosity and determination of fetal fraction in twin pregnancies. This method utilizes a binary analysis of both the number and allelic fraction of fetus-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms to infer the zygosity. In 323 samples collected from 215 singleton, 90 dizygotic, and 18 monozygotic twin pregnancies, all 90 dizygotic twins were correctly detected, with a 100% sensitivity and a 100% specificity. In addition, this method can detect complex pregnancies, such as egg donors, contamination, and twins with complete hydatidiform mole. The fetus-specific fetal fraction change was monitored in nine dizygotic twin pregnancies, which demonstrated highly variable dynamics of fetal cell-free DNA turnover up to 7 weeks after twin reduction. Overall, this study provides a new noninvasive prenatal screening strategy for the accurate identification of twin zygosity and quantification of fetal fraction, which has important clinical implications for the management of twin pregnancies.

Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions

Non-invasive prenatal testing was first discovered in 1988; it was primarily thought to be able to detect common aneuploidies, such as Patau syndrome (T13), Edward Syndrome (T18), and Down syndrome (T21). It comprises a simple technique involving the analysis of cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) obtained through maternal serum, using advances in next-generation sequencing. NIPT has shown promise as a simple and low-risk screening test, leading various governments and private organizations worldwide to dedicate significant resources towards its integration into national healthcare initiatives as well as the formation of consortia and research studies aimed at standardizing its implementation. This article aims to review the reliability of NIPT while discussing the current challenges prevalent among different communities worldwide.

Single-cell whole-genome sequencing, haplotype analysis in prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases

Monogenic inherited diseases are common causes of congenital disabilities, leading to severe economic and mental burdens on affected families. In our previous study, we demonstrated the validity of cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing (cbNIPT) in prenatal diagnosis by single-cell targeted sequencing. The present research further explored the feasibility of single-cell whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and haplotype analysis of various monogenic diseases with cbNIPT. Four families were recruited: one with inherited deafness, one with hemophilia, one with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS), and one with no disease. Circulating trophoblast cells (cTBs) were obtained from maternal blood and analyzed by single-cell 15X WGS. Haplotype analysis showed that CFC178 (deafness family), CFC616 (hemophilia family), and CFC111 (LVAS family) inherited haplotypes from paternal and/or maternal pathogenic loci. Amniotic fluid or fetal villi samples from the deafness and hemophilia families confirmed these results. WGS performed better than targeted sequencing in genome coverage, allele dropout (ADO), and false-positive (FP) ratios. Our findings suggest that cbNIPT by WGS and haplotype analysis have great potential for use in prenatally diagnosing various monogenic diseases.

The accuracy of prenatal cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities is increasingly used in clinical practice, its diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the performance of cell-free DNA in the detection of sex chromosome abnormalities.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022 for articles relating to cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Original articles, randomized control trials, conference abstracts, cohort and case-control studies, and case series with more than 10 cases with diagnostic confirmation were considered for inclusion.

METHODS

Quality assessment of each included publication was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The positive predictive value was calculated as the proportion of true positive cases among those who tested positive and underwent diagnostic testing. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was produced using bivariate models that included studies that had diagnostic confirmation for high- and low-risk women.

RESULTS

The search identified 7553 results. Of these, 380 proceeded to the full-text screening, of which 94 articles were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1,531,240 women tested. All studies reported a confirmatory genetic test. The pooled positive predictive value was 49.4% (95% confidence interval, 45.8-53.1). The pooled positive predictive value was 32.0% (95% confidence interval, 27.0%-37.3%) for monosomy X, 67.6% (95% confidence interval, 62.5%-72.5%) for XXY, 57.5% (95% confidence interval, 51.7%-63.1%) for XXX, and 70.9% (95% confidence interval, 63.9%-77.1%) for XYY. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of cell-free DNA for sex chromosome abnormalities were 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 90.8%-96.3%) and 99.5% (95% confidence interval, 99.0%-99.7%), respectively, with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.934 (95% confidence interval, 0.907-0.989).

CONCLUSION

Although the sensitivity and specificity of cell-free DNA for sex chromosome abnormalities are high, the positive predictive value was approximately 50%. The positive predictive value was higher for sex chromosome abnormalities with a supernumerary Y chromosome and lower for monosomy X. Clinicians should inform couples about these findings when offering cell-free DNA for sex chromosome abnormalities.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of cell-free DNA testing for detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the accuracy of cell-free DNA testing (cfDNA) for detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in singleton pregnancies.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess cfDNA accuracy for prenatal detection of 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX and 47,XYY. Inclusion was restricted to studies published between January 2010 and December 2021 reporting both cfDNA and confirmatory diagnostic test results.

RESULTS

For 45,X, the sensitivity was 98.8% (95%CI 94.6%-100%), specificity 99.4% (95%CI 98.7%-99.9%) and positive predictive value (PPV) 14.5% (95%CI 7.0%-43.8%). For 47,XXY, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 99.6%-100%), specificity 100% (95%CI 99.9%-100%) and PPV 97.7% (95%CI 78.6%-100%). For 47,XXX, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 96.9%-100%), specificity 99.9% (95%CI 99.7%-100%) and PPV 61.6% (95%CI 37.6%-95.4%). For 47,XYY, the sensitivity was 100% (95%CI 91.3%-100%), specificity 100% (95% CI 100%-100%) and PPV 100% (95%CI 76.5%-100%). All four SCAs had estimated negative predictive values (NPV) exceeding 99.99%, though false negatives were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that cfDNA is a reliable screening test for SCA, though both false negatives and false positives were reported. These estimates of test performance are derived from pregnancies at high pretest risk for aneuploidy, limiting the generalisability to average risk pregnancies.

Residual risk of noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the residual risk (RR) of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for the mothers with fetal ultrasound abnormalities.

METHODS

880 pregnant women with fetal ultrasound abnormalities accepted prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) after amniocentesis. Furthermore, the detection efficiency of NIPS was evaluated and calculated based on our previous studies and other literatures. The RR of the chromosome abnormality results was then analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 103 cases were confirmed as fetal chromosome abnormalities, including 65 (63.1%) of aneuploidies and 38 (36.9%) of clinical significant copy number variations (CNVs). Of which, based on the estimated NIPS efficacy, 87 cases could also be detected by NIPS. The detection rate (DR) was 84.5%, while 16 cases would be missed. The total of RR of NIPS in the fetuses with ultrasound anomalies was 2.0% (16/793), approximately one in 51. The top three RR of fetal ultrasound abnormalities were echogenic bowel (5.9%), multiple systems of structural anomalies (4.5%), and nervous system anomalies (4.2%).

CONCLUSION

The overall residual risk of NIPS in the fetuses with ultrasound anomalies was approximately 2.0%, especially in echogenic bowel, multiple systems of structural anomalies and nervous system anomalies.

Cell-free DNA in maternal blood and artificial intelligence: accurate prenatal detection of fetal congenital heart defects

BACKGROUND

DNA cytosine nucleotide methylation (epigenomics and epigenetics) is an important mechanism for controlling gene expression in cardiac development. Combined artificial intelligence and whole-genome epigenomic analysis of circulating cell-free DNA in maternal blood has the potential for the detection of fetal congenital heart defects.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to use genome-wide DNA cytosine methylation and artificial intelligence analyses of circulating cell-free DNA for the minimally invasive detection of fetal congenital heart defects.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective study, whole-genome cytosine nucleotide methylation analysis was performed on circulating cell-free DNA using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array. Multiple artificial intelligence approaches were evaluated for the detection of congenital hearts. The Ingenuity Pathway Analysis program was used to identify gene pathways that were epigenetically altered and important in congenital heart defect pathogenesis to further elucidate the pathogenesis of isolated congenital heart defects.

RESULTS

There were 12 cases of isolated nonsyndromic congenital heart defects and 26 matched controls. A total of 5918 cytosine nucleotides involving 4976 genes had significantly altered methylation, that is, a P value of <.05 along with ≥5% whole-genome cytosine nucleotide methylation difference, in congenital heart defect cases vs controls. Artificial intelligence analysis of the methylation data achieved excellent congenital heart defect predictive accuracy (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, ≥0.92). For example, an artificial intelligence model using a combination of 5 whole-genome cytosine nucleotide markers achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.0) with 98% sensitivity and 94% specificity. We found epigenetic changes in genes and gene pathways involved in the following important cardiac developmental processes: "cardiovascular system development and function," "cardiac hypertrophy," "congenital heart anomaly," and "cardiovascular disease." This lends biologic plausibility to our findings.

CONCLUSION

This study reported the feasibility of minimally invasive detection of fetal congenital heart defect using artificial intelligence and DNA methylation analysis of circulating cell-free DNA for the prediction of fetal congenital heart defect. Furthermore, the findings supported an important role of epigenetic changes in congenital heart defect development.

Cell-Free Fetal DNA and Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomopathies and Pediatric Monogenic Diseases: A Critical Appraisal and Medicolegal Remarks

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) analysis is a non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test with a fundamental role for the screening of chromosomic or monogenic pathologies of the fetus. Its administration is performed by fetal DNA detection in the mother's blood from the fourth week of gestation. Given the great interest regarding its validation as a diagnostic tool, the authors have set out to undertake a critical appraisal based on a wide-ranging narrative review of 45 total studies centered around such techniques. Both chromosomopathies and monogenic diseases were taken into account and systematically discussed and elucidated. Not surprisingly, cell-free fetal DNA analysis for screening purposes is already rather well-established. At the same time, considerable interest in its diagnostic value has emerged from this literature review, which recommends the elaboration of appropriate validation studies, as well as a broad discourse, involving all stakeholders, to address the legal and ethical complexities that such techniques entail.

The accuracy and feasibility of noninvasive prenatal testing in a consecutive series of 20,626 pregnancies with different clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) according to the results of NIPT and pregnancy outcomes with different indications.

METHODS

Between October 2014 and December 2020, 20,626 pregnant women who received NIPT were included in this study. The positive predictive value (PPV) of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 (T21, T18, T13), sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs), other chromosomal aneuploidies, and chromosomal microdeletion/microduplication were calculated. The positive results of NIPT were confirmed by amniocentesis, Karyotype analysis, and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA).

RESULTS

In total, 263 positive cases (263/20,626, 1.28%) were detected by NIPT, of which T21, T18, and T13 were 69, 26, and 9 cases, respectively. Sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs), other chromosomal aneuploidies, and copy number variants (CNVs) were 69, 12, and 38 cases, respectively. There were true positive in 49 of T21, 13 of T18, 1 of T13, 32 of SCAs, 1 of other chromosomal aneuploidies, and 15 of CNVs. The NIPT sensitivity of T21, T18, T13, SCAs, other chromosomal aneuploidies, and CNVs was all 100%, the specialty was 99.90%, 99.94%, 99.96%, 99.82%, 99.95%, 99.89%, and the PPV was 71.01%, 50.00%, 11.11%, 46.38%, 8.33%, 39.47%, respectively. The PPV was high in T21, moderate in T18 and SCAs, and low in T13 and other chromosomal abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

NIPT has high accuracy, specificity and and can effectively avoid the occurrence of birth defects, but it cannot replace prenatal diagnosis. The accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of NIPT in detecting sex chromosomes, chromosome microdeletion/microduplication, and other chromosomal abnormalities should be improved.

A Critical Evaluation of Validation and Clinical Experience Studies in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Monosomy X

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X is widely utilized with massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS), digital analysis of selected regions (DANSR), and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses being the most widely reported methods. We searched the literature to find all NIPT clinical validation and clinical experience studies between January 2011 and January 2022. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects and univariate regression models for estimating summary performance measures across studies. Bivariate meta-regression was performed to explore the influence of testing method and study design. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses evaluated factors that may have led to heterogeneity. Based on 55 validation studies, the detection rate (DR) was significantly higher for retrospective studies, while the false positive rate (FPR) was significantly lower for prospective studies. Comparing the performance of NIPT methods for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 combined, the SNP method had a higher DR and lower FPR than other methods, significantly so for MPSS, though not for DANSR. The performance of the different methods in the 84 clinical experience studies was consistent with validation studies. Clinical positive predictive values of all NIPT methods improved over the last decade. We conclude that all NIPT methods are highly effective for fetal aneuploidy screening, with performance differences across methodologies.

Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies

BACKGROUND

A fast adoption of a non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in clinical practice is a global tendency last years. Firstly, in Russia according a new regulation it was possible to perform a widescale testing of pregnant women in chromosomal abnormality risk. The aim of the study-to assess efficiency of using NIPT as a second-line first trimester screening test in Moscow.

METHODS

Based on the first trimester combined prenatal screening results 12,700 pregnant women were classified as a high-risk (cut-off ≥ 1:100) and an intermediate-risk (cut-off 1:101 - 1:2500) groups followed by whole genome NIPT. Women from high-risk group and those who had positive NIPT results from intermediate-risk group were considered for invasive prenatal diagnostic.

RESULTS

258 (2.0%) samples with positive NIPT results were detected including 126 cases of trisomy 21 (T21), 40 cases of T18, 12 cases of T13, 41 cases of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) and 39 cases of rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) and significant copy number variations (CNVs). Statistically significant associations (p < 0.05) were revealed for fetal fraction (FF) and both for some patient's (body mass index and weight) and fetus's (sex and high risk of aneuploidies) characteristics. NIPT showed as a high sensitivity as specificity for common trisomies and SCAs with an overall false positive rate 0.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity. As a second-line screening test it has shown a high efficiency in detecting fetus chromosomal anomalies as well as it could potentially lower the number of invasive procedures in pregnant women.

Systematic analysis of the causes of NIPS sex chromosome aneuploidy false-positive results

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the underlying causes of false positives in NIPT of fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidies using fetal cell-free DNA from maternal plasma.

METHODS

In the present study, we focus on a cohort of 23,984 pregnancy cases with NIPT. Karyotyping and FISH analysis were employed to verify the NIPT detected false-positive results of fetal sex chromosomal aneuploidies, and a comparative CNV sequencing on positive and negative NIPT cases was uniquely performed to elucidate the underlying causes.

RESULTS

A total of 166 cases (0.69%) were identified as fetal sex chromosomal abnormalities, while 84 cases were found to be false-positive results possibly associated with maternal X chromosomal aneuploidies (n = 8), maternal X chromosomal structural abnormalities (n = 1), maternal CNVs (n = 4) as well as known placental mosaicism (n = 1). Furthermore, our study showed that the maternal chromosome CNV between 1-1.6 Mb was associated with false-positive NIPT results in sex chromosomal abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Our research demonstrated the spectrum of factors causing false positives in NIPT of fetal sex chromosomal abnormalities based on a large cohort. The effective maternal CNV size cut-off identified in our study could integrate into bioinformatics algorithms for reducing the false-positive rate, however, further investigation is necessary to confirm this.

Comparison of the Fetal Fraction of Cell-Free DNA in In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Versus Natural Conception Evaluation of the Fetal Fraction With IVF Parameters

Background

As the offspring of assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) have become a substantial proportion of the population, increased attention has been placed on the safety of ART. Investigators have focused on identifying a tool that combines molecular or biological tests that can predict the outcomes of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and the resulting pregnancy after ART-mediated embryo implantation. This study aimed to answer the following questions: is there a difference between natural conception and IVF pregnancies regarding fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal age, birth weight, gender, and gestational age? Is there a difference between FF concentration regarding the parameters of IVF as possible predictive factors affecting the outcomes of IVF?

Methodology

This study included 31 women with singleton pregnancies conceived via IVF who underwent cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening for trisomy 13, 18, and 21; sex determination; and FF. The control group included 55 women who experienced natural conception. For all women, anthropometric characteristics such as age, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. For the IVF group, early follicular phase values of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, anti-müllerian hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and estradiol were recorded.

Results

The natural conception and IVF groups were similar regarding maternal age, BMI of the mother, gender, birth weight, and gestational age. FF was not significantly different between the natural conception and IVF groups (10 (3.8) vs. 9 (2.6); p = 0.144). The results were similar after adjusting for maternal age via regression analysis. cfDNA was not associated with maternal age, birth weight, gender, or gestational age in the entire study sample or separately for the natural conception and IVF groups. No significant correlation was found between cfDNA and IVF parameters.

Conclusions

The FF is an important factor for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) accuracy. Several studies have found a reduction in FF in pregnancies following ART compared with natural conception, while other studies have presented no differences in the FF. All researchers agree on the importance of NIPT; however, knowledge on how the FF is affected in ART pregnancies compared with naturally conceived pregnancies is very limited. In this study, no difference in FF for the IVF group compared with natural conception women was observed. The cffDNA concentrations in maternal serum do not appear to be affected in IVF conception. We suggest that FF is an independent factor compared with IVF parameters.

The vanishing twin: Diagnosis and implications

Vanishing twin syndrome (VTS), defined by first-trimester spontaneous loss of a twin, is a common phenomenon with a reported prevalence of 15-35% of twin pregnancies. The etiology of VTS is obscure. Still, several risk factors have been identified, including an increased number of embryos transferred in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization, an initial increased number of gestational sacs and advanced maternal age. The effect of VTS on obstetric and perinatal outcomes is controversial. Several studies have reported that pregnancies with VTS were associated with increased risk for preterm birth and small for gestational age neonates compared to singleton pregnancies, while others showed no difference in perinatal outcomes. The prevalence of placental vascular and anatomic abnormalities such as small placentas was higher in VTS. These findings lay an essential foundation for understanding how this phenomenon affects obstetric and perinatal outcomes of the surviving pregnancy.

Clinical Application of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Central China

BACKGROUND

The relatively high incidence and the clinical symptoms of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) make prenatal screening of SCAs an attractive option for pregnant women. However, limited studies have assessed the clinical performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for screening SCAs. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT for SCAs in singleton pregnancies in central China.

METHODS

Noninvasive prenatal testing was performed using next-generation sequencing. Standard Z-score analysis was used to identify fetal SCAs. NIPT-positive results were confirmed by invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD).

RESULTS

A total of 42,164 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies were recruited in this study. They were divided into the following five groups with different clinical indications: with ultrasound soft index abnormalities (9.23%, 3,892/42,164); with advanced maternal age (22.14%, 9,336/42,164); with high risk for maternal serum screening (MSS) (18.35%, 7,738/42,164); with an intermediate risk for MSS (26.6%, 11,215/42,164); and with low risk (23.68%, 9,983/42,164). In all, 223 women had a high risk for SCAs by NIPT with a positive rate of 0.53%. There was no significant difference associated with the five groups in the positive rate. Of all of the positive results, 89 were 45,X (39.91%), 38 were 47,XXX (17.04%), 31 were 46,XY,del(X) (13.90%), 50 were 47,XXY (22.42%,), and 15 were 47,XYY (6.73%). Finally, 147 participants (65.92%) chose to undergo IPD, and 47 cases were confirmed. The combined positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for SCA was 31.97% (47/147). PPV was high for 47,XYY (100%, 11/11), moderate for 47,XXX (42.86%, 9/21) and 47,XXY (45.45%, 15/33), but low for 45,X (16.13%, 10/62) and 46,XY,del(X) (10%, 2/20). The termination rates of Turner syndrome and 47,XXY syndrome were higher than 47,XXX and 47,XYY syndromes.

CONCLUSION

In this relatively large cohort, we evaluated the value of NIPT for SCAs. Our data showed that with informed consent and subsequent professional genetical consulting, NIPT can be a useful method to screen SCAs.

Nanostructures in non-invasive prenatal genetic screening

Prenatal screening is an important issue during pregnancy to ensure fetal and maternal health, as well as preventing the birth of a defective fetus and further problems such as extra costs for the family and society. The methods for the screening have progressed to non-invasive approaches over the recent years. Limitations of common standard screening tests, including invasive sampling, high risk of abortion and a big delay in result preparation have led to the introduction of new rapid and non-invasive approaches for screening. Non-invasive prenatal screening includes a wide range of procedures, including fetal cell-free DNA analysis, proteome, RNAs and other fetal biomarkers in maternal serum. These biomarkers require less invasive sampling than usual methods such as chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis or cordocentesis. Advanced strategies including the development of nanobiosensors and the use of special nanoparticles have provided optimization and development of NIPS tests, which leads to more accurate, specific and sensitive screening tests, rapid and more reliable results and low cost, as well. This review discusses the specifications and limitations of current non-invasive prenatal screening tests and introduces a novel collection of detection methods reported studies on nanoparticles' aided detection. It can open a new prospect for further studies and effective investigations in prenatal screening field.

Calculation of Fetal Fraction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing

Estimating the fetal fraction of DNA in a pregnant mother’s blood is a risk-free, non-invasive way of predicting fetal aneuploidy. It is a rapidly developing field of study, offering researchers a plethora of different complementary methods. Such methods include examining the differences in methylation profiles between the fetus and the mother. Others include calculating the average allele frequency based on the difference in genotype of a number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Differences in the length distribution of DNA fragments between the mother and the fetus as well as measuring the proportion of DNA reads mapping to the Y chromosome also constitute fetal fraction estimation methods. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these main method types are discussed. Moreover, several well-known fetal fraction estimation methods, such as SeqFF, are described and compared with other methods. These methods are amenable to not only the estimation of fetal fraction but also paternity, cancer, and transplantation monitoring studies. NIPT is safe, and should aneuploidy be detected, this information can help parents prepare mentally and emotionally for the birth of a special needs child.

More attention should be paid to pregnant women who fail non-invasive prenatal screening

OBJECTIVE

We discuss how to handle failure of first-pass non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and investigate the pregnancy outcomes after second-pass failure.

METHODS

A total of 35,187 pregnant women underwent NIPS in a single center. Those who failed first-pass NIPS were re-tested after a repeat blood draw. Those who failed again were offered genetic counseling. We recorded antenatal data and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 273 (0.78%) women failed the first test. On re-testing, 220 (80.59%) yielded reliable results and 53 failed the test again. Women with higher total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels evidenced a lower NIPS success rate (40%) and a higher incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most women who failed first-pass NIPS yielded reliable results on repeat testing, especially those with lower fetal fraction. Higher concentrations of cfDNA in maternal plasma were associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes. Such women require special attention, thus early medical intervention, to avoid an adverse prognosis.

Clinical management of pregnancies with positive screening results for rare autosomal aneuploidies at a single center

Objective

To review our experiences on clinical management of pregnancies with positive noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results for rare autosomal aneuploidies (RAAs) at a single center.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study and reviewed data from 18,016 pregnancies undergoing NIPT at a single center in China from March 2017 to February 2020. Depending on the patient’s choice, women with positive screening results for RAAs underwent chromosomal microarray analysis for invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Results

Thirty-three positive cases for RAAs were identified, with a positive screening rate of 0.18%. The most common RAA was trisomy 7 (33.3%), while trisomies for other chromosomes were less frequent. Monosomies involving chromosomes 16, 14, and 22 were observed. Twenty-eight cases of RAAs underwent invasive diagnosis. Abnormal pregnancy outcomes were observed in four cases, including true fetal mosaicism (n=1), partial uniparental disomy (n=1), miscarriage (n=1), and structural anomalies on ultrasound (n=1).

Conclusions

RAAs at NIPT might be associated with fetal uniparental disomy, mosaic aneuploidy, and poor pregnancy outcomes, but most positive cases have normal pregnancy outcomes. For RAAs, genetic counseling on the potential risks of abnormal NIPT results, as well as on benefits and limitations of invasive prenatal diagnosis, might help guide clinical management.

Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies

To evaluate the clinical efficiency of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal aneuploidies in low-risk and twin pregnancies, patients who received NIPS in a tertiary university hospital were enrolled, and their clinical data, NIPS results and pregnancy outcomes were collected. Patients were divided into singleton and twin pregnancies, and then those with singleton pregnancies were divided into low- and high-risk pregnancies. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated. Comparisons were made on the clinical efficiency of NIPS between singleton and twin pregnancies, as well as between low- and high-risk pregnancies. Of 66,172 patients enrolled, 59,962 were eligible for analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and NPV were ≥ 99% in singleton and twin pregnancies. The PPVs were 90.4, 56.6, and 13.0% in singleton pregnancies, while 100, 33.3, and 0% in twin pregnancies for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13), respectively (P > 0.05 for all). The PPVs were 97.4 and 90.0% in high-risk pregnancies, while 78.6 and 16.7% in low-risk pregnancies for T21 and T18, respectively (P < 0.05 for all). In summary, the performance of NIPS in singleton pregnancies was similar to that in twin pregnancies. NIPS can be recommended for all pregnancies regardless of the risks.

Clinical value for the detection of fetal chromosomal deletions/duplications by noninvasive prenatal testing in clinical practice

Objective

This study was to report the experiences on the clinical value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the screening of fetal chromosomal deletions/duplications.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 20,439 pregnancies undergoing NIPT from March 2017 to September 2020 at a single center. Patients with positive NIPT results for fetal chromosomal deletions or duplications had options of invasive diagnostic testing or no further testing. The data were complied from all cases with positive NIPT results for chromosomal deletions/duplications. The positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated from tabulated data.

Results

In this cohort, positive NIPT results for fetal chromosomal deletions/duplications were found in 60 pregnant women. Of the positive samples, further invasive testing was performed in 39 cases, in which 9 cases were found to be true positive. The overall PPV for chromosomal deletions/duplications was 23.1%. In addition, fetal structural anomaly was found by ultrasound examination in three cases, in which the chromosomal deletions/duplications of three cases were not verified. Moreover, an unexpected pathogenic 8p23.3 deletion was identified by invasive testing in 1 fetus with a false positive NIPT screen for 3q27.3q29 duplication.

Conclusions

In summary, positive NIPT results of chromosomal deletions/duplications were not uncommon in clinical practice, whereas the PPV for the testing was low. Hence, potential risks and high percentage of false positives for these abnormal NIPT results might be informed to pregnant women before the choice made of invasive testing.

Expanded noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy and copy number variations and parental willingness for invasive diagnosis in a cohort of 18,516 cases

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been wildly used to screen for common aneuplodies. In recent years, the test has been expanded to detect rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs) and copy number variations (CNVs). This study was performed to investigate the performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (expanded NIPT) in screening for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal aneuploidies (RATs), and copy number variations (CNVs) and parental willingness for invasive prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese prenatal diagnosis center.

METHODS

A total of 24,702 pregnant women were retrospectively analyzed at the Women and Children's Hospital from January 2013 to April 2019, among which expanded NIPT had been successfully conducted in 24,702 pregnant women. The high-risk expanded NIPT results were validated by karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis. All the tested pregnant women were followed up for pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 24,702 cases, successful follow-up was conducted in 98.77% (401/446) of cases with common trisomies and SCAs, 91.95% (80/87) of RAT and CNV cases, and 76.25% (18,429/24,169) of cases with low-risk screening results. The sensitivity of expanded NIPT was 100% (95% confidence interval[CI], 97.38-100%), 96.67%(95%CI, 82.78-99.92%), and 100%(95%CI, 66.37-100.00%), and the specificity was 99.92%(95%CI, 99.87-99.96%), 99.96%(95%CI, 99.91-99.98%), and 99.88% (95%CI, 99.82-99.93%) for the detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13, respectively. Expanded NIPT detected 45,X, 47,XXX, 47,XXY, XYY syndrome, RATs, and CNVs with positive predictive values of 25.49%, 75%, 94.12%, 76.19%, 6.45%, and 50%, respectively. The women carrying fetuses with Trisomy 21/Trisomy 18/Trisomy 13 underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis and terminated their pregnancies at higher rates than those at high risk for SCAs, RATs, and CNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the expanded NIPT detects fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13 with high sensitivity and specificity. The accuracy of detecting SCAs, RATs, and CNVs is still relatively poor and needs to be improved. With a high-risk expanded NIPT result, the women at high risk for common trisomies are more likely to undergo invasive prenatal diagnosis procedures and terminate their pregnancies than those with unusual chromosome abnormalities.

Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies

INTRODUCTION

Sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) are among the most common chromosome abnormalities observed in humans. Manifestations include low fertility, infertility, delayed language development, and dysfunction in motor development. Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) based on cell-free fetal DNA from the peripheral blood of pregnant women is increasingly used for the screening of fetal chromosome abnormalities, including screening for fetal gender and fetal sex chromosome aneuploidy. A systematic review of the literature about NIPS for SCAs is needed.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluated a vast array of published studies focusing on the clinical significance, detection methods, performance of NIPS for SCAs, and the management of positive SCA results following screening with the aim of facilitating a comprehensive and systematic understanding of NIPS for SCAs.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Looking forward, NIPS is expected to become the primary screening test for common aneuploidies as well as other chromosome abnormalities, including some micro-deletions and micro-duplications, with the potential to transition from a screening test to a prenatal diagnosis method. Ultimately, the goal is to provide a safe and accurate method for increasing early diagnosis to improve long-term outcomes for the SCA patients and families by well- informed health care providers.

Adoption of a non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in prenatal screening in Moscow: first results

The objective — To assess the effectiveness of including NIPT in the structure of prenatal diagnostics in Moscow. Material and Methods — Totally 5,181 pregnancies undergoing screening for fetal trisomy using NIPT during the period from 01.04.2020 to 30.09.2020 in Russia. According to the results of biochemical blood test, the patients were divided into two groups: group of high risk (cut-off ≥1:100) (n=208) and group of intermediate risk (cut-off 1:101 – 1:2500) (n=4,973). Patients at high-risk cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were offered an invasive procedure, followed by genetic analysis (cytogenetic or molecular karyotyping). Results — Among the analysed samples, 117 (2.3%) had a high risk of the following common fetal chromosome abnormalities by NIPT: trisomy 21 in 50 cases, trisomy 18 in 17 cases, trisomy 13 in 5 cases, and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) in 22 cases. Additionally, rare autosomal trisomies and/or subchromosomal arrangements were revealed in 23 cases. We found associations between cfDNA concentration and high risk of aneuploidies (particularly trisomy 21) and fetal sex and between low fetal fraction (FF) and body mass index (BMI) as well as maternal weight. Additionally, a high risk of trisomy 21 was associated with the term gestation. Conclusion — The effectiveness of technological resources that are based on cfDNA testing for detecting abnormal fetal chromosome numbers and other chromosomal anomalies is high and reduce rates of false positive results. Therefore, NIPT should be more widely used as a first-line screening method.

Non-invasive prenatal testing for the prenatal screening of sex chromosome aneuploidies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

Background

There is little evidence on the performance of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for the detection of fetal sex chromosomal imbalances. In this review, we aimed to appraise and synthesize the literature on the performance of NIPT for the prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies.

Methods

We performed our literature search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CADTH. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. There were no restrictions on the study population. Meta‐analyses were performed with “R” software. Pooled sensitivities and specificities with their 95% CI were estimated using a random‐effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by a Q test.

Results

Based on 11 studies in high prior risk pregnancies, including 116 affected fetuses in aggregate, Massively Parallel Shotgun Sequencing (MPSS) had a sensitivity of 93.9% (95% CI 84.1%, 97.8%) and a specificity of 99.6% (95% CI 98.7%, 99.9%) for the detection of 45,X. Based on four studies in high‐risk pregnancies, with 83 affected fetuses in aggregate, Targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing (TMPS) had a sensitivity of 83.2% (95% CI 49.6%, 96.2%) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI 98.3%, 100%) for the detection of 45,X. In mixed‐risk pregnancies, the sensitivity of TMPS for the detection of 45,X was 90.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 70%, 97.7%) and specificity 99.9% (2 studies; 95% CI 99.4%, 100%); MPSS data were not available in such pregnancies. Based on smaller numbers of studies, and small numbers of affected fetuses in either high‐risk or mixed‐risk pregnancies (using either MPSS or TMPS), the sensitivities and specificities were equal to or greater than 76.2% for 47,XXX, 47,XXY and 47, XYY. The test failures for SCAs were 0.2% (95% CI 0%, 13.6%) for MPSS and 5.6% (95% CI 3.7%, 8.4%) for TMPS.

Conclusion

High‐quality studies are still desirable in order to estimate the performance of NIPT for the detection of sex chromosome imbalances.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening and Diagnostic Testing from Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine: (1) Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening

In 2019, the Korean Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine developed the first Korean clinical practice guidelines for prenatal aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing. These guidelines were developed by adapting established clinical practice guidelines in other countries that were searched systematically, and the guidelines aim to assist in decision making of healthcare providers providing prenatal care and to be used as a source for education and communication with pregnant women in Korea. This article delineates clinical practice guidelines specifically for maternal serum screening for fetal aneuploidy and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening. A total of 19 key questions (12 for maternal serum and 7 for cfDNA screening) were defined. The main recommendations are: 1) Pregnant women should be informed of common fetal aneuploidy that can be detected, risks for chromosomal abnormality according to the maternal age, detection rate and false positive rate for common fetal aneuploidy with each screening test, limitations, as well as the benefits and risks of invasive diagnostic testing, 2) It is ideal to give counseling about prenatal aneuploidy screening and diagnostic testing at the first prenatal visit, and counseling is recommended to be given early in pregnancy, 3) All pregnant women should be informed about maternal serum screening regardless of their age, 4) cfDNA screening can be used for the screening of trisomy 21, 18, 13 and sex-chromosome aneuploidy. It is not recommended for the screening of microdeletion, 5) The optimal timing of cfDNA screening is 10 weeks of gestation and beyond, and 6) cfDNA screening is not recommended for women with multiple gestations. The guideline was reviewed and approved by the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Temporal persistence of residual fetal cell-free DNA from a deceased cotwin after selective fetal reduction in dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVES

To determine the temporal persistence of the residual cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of the deceased cotwin in maternal circulation after selective fetal reduction and evaluate its long persistence in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

METHODS

Dichorionic diamniotic twins (N = 5) undergoing selective fetal reduction because of a trisomy were recruited. After informed consent, maternal blood was collected immediately before reduction and periodically after reduction until birth. The plasma cfDNA of each sample was sequenced and analyzed for fetal aneuploidy and fetal fractions.

RESULTS

In all pregnancies, the fetal fraction of the cfDNA of the deceased fetus increased to peak at 7-9 weeks after fetal reduction, and subsequently decreased gradually to almost undetectable during the late third trimester. The NIPT T-scores persistently reflected the detection of fetal trisomy up to 16 (median 9.5) weeks after fetal reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual cfDNA from the deceased cotwin after selective reduction at 14-17 gestational weeks led to the persistent generation of false-positive NIPT results for up to 16 weeks postdemise. Thus, providing NIPT for pregnancies with a cotwin demise in early second trimester is prone to misleading results and not recommended.

An online tool for fetal fraction prediction based on direct size distribution analysis of maternal cell-free DNA

The discovery of circulating fetal DNA in the plasma of pregnant women has greatly promoted advances in noninvasive prenatal testing. Screening performance is enhanced with higher fetal fraction and analysis of samples whose fetal DNA fraction is lower than 4% are unreliable. Although current approaches to fetal fraction measurement are accurate, most of them are expensive and time consuming. Here we present a simple and cost-effective solution that provides a quick and reasonably accurate fetal fraction by directly evaluating the size distribution of circulating DNA fragments in the extracted maternal cell-free DNA. The presented approach could be useful in the presequencing stage of noninvasive prenatal testing to evaluate whether the sample is suitable for the test or a repeat blood draw is recommended.

Fetal Sex Results of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Differences With Ultrasonography

A high proportion of observed fetal sex discordances between single-nucleotide polymorphism–based noninvasive prenatal screening tests and prenatal or newborn examinations are attributable to disorders of sexual development.

To assess the causes of reported discordance between noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and ultrasound or other clinical information.

Application value of NIPT for uncommon fetal chromosomal abnormalities

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal chromosomal deletion, duplication, and sex chromosome abnormalities.

Methods

The study included 6239 pregnant women with singletons in the first and second trimester of pregnancy who received NIPT from December 2017 to June 2019. For pregnant women at high risk of deletion, duplication, and sex chromosome abnormalities indicated by NIPT, amniocentesis was recommended for karyotype analysis and chromosome copy number variation detection to verify the NIPT results and analyze chromosome abnormalities. Women at low risk and with no other abnormal results continued with their pregnancies.

Results

Among the 6239 pregnant women who received NIPT, there were 15 cases of chromosomal deletion (12 cases confirmed by amniocentesis), 16 cases of chromosomal duplication (9 cases confirmed by amniocentesis), and 17 cases of sex chromosome abnormalities (11 cases confirmed by amniocentesis). Of these cases, 32 were finally confirmed by amniotic fluid cell karyotype analysis. The coincidence rate was 66.7% (32/48). There were no abnormalities found for the remaining low risk pregnant women during follow-up.

Conclusion

NIPT has good application value in predicting fetal chromosomal deletion, duplication, and sex chromosome abnormalities. It can improve the detection rate of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, but further prenatal diagnosis is needed.

Should vanishing twin pregnancies be systematically excluded from cell-free fetal DNA testing?

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in vanishing twin (VT) pregnancies in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Our study included 24 874 singleton and 206 VT consecutive pregnancies. Cell-free DNA was analyzed by massively parallel sequencing. Both aneuploidy analysis (chromosomes 13,18, 21, X, and Y) and fetal fraction estimation were performed according to an Illumina algorithm. Contaminant DNA contribution from the demised co-twin was studied in detail.

RESULTS

VT pregnancies exhibited a higher prevalence of screen-positive cases (5.8% vs 2.5%), sex discrepancies (10.2% vs 0.05%), and false positive rates (FPR) (2.6% vs 0.3%) than singleton pregnancies. However, their incidence was significantly lower in tests performed after the 14th week (screen-positive cases: 3.1%; sex discrepancies: 7.8%; and FPR: 0.8%). Among the 12 cases in which cfDNA was performed at two time points, fading of contaminating cfDNA was observed in four cases with a sex discrepancy and in one false positive for trisomy 18, resulting in a final correct result.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest VT pregnancies could be included in cfDNA testing as long as it is applied after the 14th week of pregnancy. However, future studies to validate our findings are needed before including VT cases in routine clinical practice. Once established, unnecessary invasive procedures could be avoided, mitigating negative emotional impact on future mothers.

Impact of cell-free DNA screening on parental knowledge of fetal sex and disorders of sex development

OBJECTIVE

Discrepancies between cfDNA and ultrasound predicted fetal sex occur, possibly indicating disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs). Among expectant/recent parents, this study assessed cfDNA knowledge/use, fetal sex determination attitudes/behaviors, general knowledge of DSD, and possible psychological impact of discrepancy between fetal sex on cfDNA and ultrasound.

METHOD

Parents were surveyed about fetal sex determination methods, knowledge of cfDNA and DSD, distress related to possible cfDNA inaccuracy.

RESULTS

Of 916 respondents, 44% were aware of possible discrepancy between cfDNA and ultrasound, 22% were aware of DSD. 78% and 75% would be upset and worried, respectively, with results showing fetal sex discrepancy. Most (67%) revealed predicted fetal sex before delivery. 38% were offered cfDNA. Of those revealing fetal sex, 24% used cfDNA results, 71% ultrasound, and 7% both. cfDNA users were more frequently aware of possible discrepancy between cfDNA and ultrasound (76% vs 41%, P < .0001), but not of DSD (29% vs 23%, P = .29).

CONCLUSION

Fetal sex determination is favored, and cfDNA is frequently used for predicting fetal chromosomal sex. Many parents are unaware of possible discrepancies between cfDNA and ultrasound, and potential for DSD. Most would be distressed by discordant results. Accurate counseling regarding limitations cfDNA for fetal sex determination is needed.

A retrospective analysis the clinic data and follow-up of non-invasive prenatal test in detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in more than 40,000 cases in a single prenatal diagnosis center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the detection of chromosomal aneuploidy according to the follow-up information from a single prenatal diagnosis center.

METHODS

A total of 40,311 cases were retrospectively reviewed. The screening was performed using a BGI protocol, pre-test and post-test genetic counseling was provided, and the pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The results of NIPT and clinical follow-up data were analyzed together with the pregnancy outcomes, confirmatory testing results, and ultrasound findings.

RESULTS

Of the 40,311cases were includes in the study, successful follow-up was conducted in 468 (1.16%) cases with high risk, 225 (0.56%) cases with rare autosomal trisomy (RAT) and copy number variation (CNV). 39,572 (98.17%) cases with low risk and 623 (1.57%) cases of which were confirmed with adverse pregnancy outcomes. 46 (0.1%) cases with failed tests. Among them, 398 (84.7%) cases with high-risk results chose invasive testing, revealing 198 true positive cases. In cases with RAT and CNV results, 189 cases underwent invasive testing, revealing 5 cases RAT and 4 pathogenic CNVs.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPT appears to be effective in detecting the fetal chromosomal aneuploidies T21, T18 and SCAs, but it exist false positive/negative cases, unconfirmed high-risk cfDNA results, and the high false positive rate in cases with RAT and CNV results implied the limitations of this screening method. Our study showed the importance to associate cfDNA screening results with clinical follow-up data and provided information that may help with result interpretation, genetic counseling and the decision making in clinic.

The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications

Background

Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing for pregnant women with different diagnostic indications.

Methods

In eight counties and districts of Yancheng, we studied 13,149 pregnant women with different indications who were offered NIPT for fetal screening, including for sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), and subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs). The purpose was to compare the detection of positive predictive values (PPVs) of different indications with the use of NIPT. The results were validated by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), or follow-up of pregnancy outcomes.

Results

13,149 maternal plasma samples were sequenced, among which 28 samples (0.2%) failed the sequencing quality control. The remaining 13,121 samples were analyzed, and birth follow-up missed 2,192 samples (16.7%). The PPVs of NIPT results for trisomy 21 (T21) and trisomy 18 (T18) and SCAs were 96.67, 63.64, and 31.34%, respectively. Among the advanced maternal age (AMA), serum screening high risk (SSHR), serum screening intermediate risk (SSIR), and voluntary screening (VS) groups, the PPVs for the common trisomies were 81.25, 85.71, 100, and 70%, respectively; the PPVs for total chromosomal abnormalities were 55.82, 65.22, 23.08, and 36.59%, respectively.

Conclusion

NIPT for T21 and T18 and SCAs screening were ideal, and the PPVs for trisomy 13 (T13), RATs, and CNVs were low. For the AMA and VS groups, NIPT could be used as a first-line screening program; for SSHR and SSIR groups, NIPT could be used as a second-line supplementary screening program.

Clinical Service Delivery of Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis by Relative Haplotype Dosage for Single-Gene Disorders

A relative haplotype dosage (RHDO)-based method was developed and implemented into routine clinical practice for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of multiple single-gene disorders: spinal muscular atrophy, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies, and cystic fibrosis. This article describes the experiences of the first 152 pregnancies to have NIPD by RHDO as part of a routine clinical service. Provision of results within a clinically useful time frame (mean, 11 calendar days) was shown to be possible, with a very low failure rate (4%), none being due to a technical failure. Where follow-up confirmatory testing was performed for audit purposes, 100% concordance was seen with the NIPD result, and no discrepancies have been reported. The robust performance of the assay, together with high sensitivity and specificity, demonstrates that NIPD by RHDO is feasible for use in a clinical setting.

Clinical experience regarding the accuracy of NIPT in the detection of sex chromosome abnormality

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to determine the accuracy (Z-value) of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results for sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Among a cohort of 12505 pregnant females, maternal plasma samples collected from our hospital were utilized for SCA analysis by NIPT detection. The positive samples were validated through an invasive procedure and karyotyping analysis. The predictive value from positive samples in sex chromosomes was compared to analyze the accuracy of the Z-value.

RESULTS

There were 65 females with sex chromosome abnormalities within 12,505 pregnant females in the NIPT detection, which was validated by karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid puncture through sequencing, as well as bioinformatics analysis, with 18 true-positive samples. The true-positive results with 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX and 47,XYY karyotypes predicted by NIPT were 14.29%, 50.00%, 66.67% and 71.43%, respectively. Among sex chromosome cases, the findings indicated that positive NIPT results with Z ≥ 9 show a higher accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study demonstrate that the positive predictive value of NIPT for sex chromosome abnormalities is distinctive. The positive predictive value was highest for 47,XYY and lowest for 45,X. Additionally, the Z-value results are considered to be correlated with the accuracy of NIPT, although further studies need to be made.

Gene Copy Number Quantification of SHOX, VAMP7, and SRY for the Detection of Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Neonates

Aims: To explore the feasibility of detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) by means of gene copy number quantification of short stature homeobox (SHOX), vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 (VAMP7), and SRY in newborns. Materials and Methods: Gene doses of SHOX, VAMP7, and SRY were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using DNA obtained from dried blood samples from newborns. Relative quantification values were obtained. An aneuploidy profile was established according to cutoff values. Samples with ≥2 gene doses (out of range) were reanalyzed, and those with aneuploidy profiles were confirmed by karyotyping. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were obtained. Results: A total of 10,033 samples were collected (4945 females and 5088 males). Of 244 (2.43%) samples with ≥2 gene doses that were retested, 20 cases were confirmed. The overall incidence of SCAs was 1 in 500 live newborns. There were six cases of Turner syndrome (1/824), 3 cases of XXX (1/1648), 7 cases of Klinefelter syndrome (1/726), and 4 cases of of XYY (1/1272). The sensitivity was 0.952 (95.42%); the specificity was 0.975 (97.56%); the positive predictive value was 0.909 (90.91%) and the negative predictive value was 0.987 (98.77%). Conclusions: Gene copy number analyses of the VAMP7, SHOX, and SRY genes by qPCR from blood samples spotted onto filter paper is a highly reliable method for the early detection of male and female SCAs.

Decisional regret in women receiving high risk or inconclusive prenatal cell-free DNA screening results

Objectives: This study examined the experiences of women receiving high-risk cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, with particular focus on decisional satisfaction after receiving high-risk, false, or inconclusive results. It is already known that cell-free DNA screening is rapidly expanding in the clinical practice. A growing number of women are offered cfDNA screening for an increasingly broad range of chromosomal and microdeletion syndromes. However, research shows that the very low false positive rate attributed to cfDNA screening for trisomy 21 does not apply to other conditions.Methods: As a part of the larger study on patient experiences, 40 semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with women who were, or had recently been, pregnant and received high-risk (n = 15), false positive/negative (n = 20), or inconclusive (n = 5) results from cfDNA screening.Results: One third of participants would not elect to have cfDNA screening in a future pregnancy, and another third would only have the screen under particular circumstances or if the scope of the panel was limited. Many women reported feeling misled by the information they received prior to accepting cfDNA screening or receiving their results.Conclusions: Study participants described issues with the clinical dialog when cfDNA screening is offered; when results are returned; and problems with the availability of information about the existence of false positives. These reports suggest that inadequate pretest discussion contributes to women's experience of decisional regret after receiving high-risk, false positive, or inconclusive results. Given the confusion about cfDNA screening accuracy, the prevalence of follow-up invasive tests, and the number of women who reported that they regretted choosing cfDNA screening, the mode of offering cfDNA should be reassessed.

Sequencing Shorter cfDNA Fragments Decreases the False Negative Rate of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing

Circulating fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is generally shorter than maternal cfDNA. Size selection of shorter cfDNA in total cfDNA could significantly increase the fetal fraction, but there are few reports of using this method to decrease the false negative rate for NIPT. In this study, nine false negative cases were retrospectively analyzed by NIPT retesting and E-gel based size-selection NIPT and the fetal cfDNA fraction in maternal total cfDNA was evaluated by calculating the proportion of reads from chromosome Y. Fetal placenta karyotypes were confirmed by CNVplex assays to analysis the reasons for false negative cases. Of the 81,601 pregnancies who underwent NIPT, nine false negative cases (0.01%) were found. Of eight retested cases, two (25%) had positive NIPT retest results, and five (62.5%) had positive size-selection NIPT results. For fetal cfDNA fraction, 100% cases had improvement after size-selection NIPT compared with the initial NIPT and retest results, and the fetal cfDNA fraction growth ratio ranged from 99 to 359%. For one twin pregnancy with one T18 fetus, size selection improved the fetal cfDNA fraction to 23.10%, and successfully detected the T18 fetus in NIPT. Placental tissue analysis results for two cases indicated both had confined placental mosaicism (CPM), which was confirmed with size-selection NIPT. In conclusion, size selection can significantly enrich the fetal cfDNA fraction and decrease the false negative rate of NIPT, especially for CPM and twin pregnancies.

Cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome aneuploidies by non-invasive prenatal testing in maternal plasma

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been confirmed as the most accurate screening test for trisomies 21, 18, and 13. However, reports on NIPT performance in sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) based on real clinical data are still limited.

METHODS

High-throughput massively parallel genomic sequencing (MPS) technique was used to screen for fetal SCAs as part of the research to determine the potential value of NIPT in detecting fetal SCAs in the second trimester. A number of 12,243 consecutive cases from a single center were included in this study.

RESULTS

The positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT in the present study was 57.6%, which was divided and categorized by individual SCAs as follows: 21.4% for Turner syndrome (45,X), 75.0% for Triple X syndrome (47,XXX), 90.9% for Klinefelter syndrome (47,XXY), and 75.0% for XYY syndrome (47,XYY).

CONCLUSION

The NIPT-based SCA test cannot be used as a diagnostic method, and performing an invasive confirmation test on NIPT-based SCA-positive cases is strongly recommended.

Understanding attitudes and behaviors towards cell-free DNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT): A survey of European health-care providers

Cell-free DNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (cfDNA) is a relatively new screening tool that analyzes cfDNA circulating in maternal plasma to screen for aneuploidies. Since its introduction, cfDNA has been rapidly adopted by health care providers (HCPs). This rapid adoption, as well as progressive developments in the technology, requires professional societies to continuously update their guidelines to indicate the broadening scope both in terms of test indications and patient populations for whom it has become the appropriate primary test. CfDNA testing, initially applied to high-risk patients, is now largely considered an option for all patients. For HCPs, the rapid introduction of cfDNA into clinical practice has come with the requirement to stay up-to-date and accurately informed. We performed a survey to understand the current practices and views of European HCPs on the use of cfDNA. European HCPs were surveyed on several topics such as familiarity with cfDNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), current usage, patient counseling, test menu expansion, and future perspectives. The results of this survey demonstrate increasing usage and awareness of cfDNA-based NIPT in five European countries (UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy). Major barriers to implementation include cost and a lack of physician education on NIPT.

Nicht invasive Pränataldiagnostik mittels molekulargenetischer Tests (NIPT) zur Erkennung der Trisomien 13, 18 und 21

Hintergrund

Molekulargenetische Tests (NIPT) auf Trisomie sind längst Teil der nicht invasiven Pränataldiagnostik (NIPD). In Deutschland wird derzeit geprüft, ob und für wen diese Tests von den gesetzlichen Krankenkassen künftig bezahlt werden sollen.

Fragestellung

(I) Diagnostische Eigenschaften der NIPT zur Entdeckung der Trisomien 13, 18 und 21 und (II) hypothetische Berechnung der möglichen Anwendung der NIPT in verschiedenen Gruppen.

Methoden

(I) Systematische Recherche nach Primärliteratur und systematischen Übersichten in MEDLINE und vier weiteren Datenbanken. Einschlusskriterien: Studien mit schwangeren Frauen, Indextest: NIPT mittels molekulargenetischer Analyse von cffDNA im mütterlichen Blut zur Bestimmung des Trisomie-Risikos; Referenztest: zytogenetische Diagnostik oder postnatale klinische Untersuchung. (II) Orientierende Recherche. Hypothetische Berechnungen für (1) alle schwangeren Frauen nach aktuellem Vorgehen ohne NIPT am Beispiel von Ersttrimesterscreening (ETS), (2) Anwendung bei schwangeren Frauen mit erhöhtem Risiko, z. B. nach vorgeschaltetem auffälligem ETS und (3) NIPT in einer Population mit und ohne erhöhtes Risiko für eine Trisomie.

Ergebnisse

Bei 22 eingeschlossenen Studien lagen die Sensitivität und die Spezifität zur Erkennung der Trisomie 21 bei 99,13 % (95 %-KI: [97,39 %; 99,72 %]) und 99,95 % (95 %-KI: [99,88 %; 99,98 %]). Der mögliche Einfluss von Testversagern blieb bei den Berechnungen unberücksichtigt, womit die Sensitivität oder die Spezifität der NIPT möglicherweise überschätzt wurde. Für die Erkennung der Trisomien 13 und 18 konnte jeweils die Sensitivität nicht robust geschätzt werden.

Diskussion

Bei Frauen mit erhöhtem Risiko können NIPT die Zahl der invasiven Tests und damit der testbedingten Fehlgeburten vermutlich verringern.