Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and increased bleeding risk: are we missing something?

Use of Antidepressants and the Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: A Case-control Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between the use of antidepressants and the risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB).

METHODS

A Case-control study was conducted in a Brazilian hospital complex. Cases were defined as patients with a diagnosis of UGIB and controls as patients admitted for reasons unrelated to gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric concerns, or complications associated with low-dose aspirin (LDA) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use. Sociodemographic and clinical data, comorbidities, drug therapy in use (long-term use and self-medication), and lifestyle habits were recorded through face-to-face interviews. Two groups were defined: use of antidepressants in general and use of antidepressants according to their affinity for serotonin transporters. The presence of synergism between the concomitant use of antidepressants and LDA or NSAIDs on the risk of UGIB was also explored.

FINDINGS

A total of 906 participants were recruited (200 in the case group and 706 in the control group). The use of antidepressants was not associated with the risk of UGIB (odds ratio [OR] = 1.503; 95% CI, 0.78-2.88) or the use of antidepressants with high affinity for serotonin receptors (OR = 1.983; 95% CI, 0.81-4.85). An increased risk of UGIB was observed in concomitant users of antidepressants and LDA (OR = 5.489; 95% CI, 1.60-18.81) or NSAIDs (OR = 18.286; 95% CI, 3.18-105.29). Despite the lack of significance, the use of antidepressants appears to be a positive modifier of UGIB risk in LDA and NSAID users.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings indicate an increased risk of UGIB in concomitant users of antidepressants and LDA or NSAIDs, suggesting the need to monitor antidepressant users, especially those most likely to develop UGIB. In addition, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

Bioactive lipid regulation of platelet function, hemostasis, and thrombosis

Platelets are small, anucleate cells in the blood that play a crucial role in the hemostatic response but are also implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. It is widely appreciated that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) play an integral role in the function and regulation of platelets. PUFAs are substrates for oxygenase enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX), 12-lipoxygenase (12-LOX) and 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX). These enzymes generate oxidized lipids (oxylipins) that exhibit either pro- or anti-thrombotic effects. Although the effects of certain oxylipins, such as thromboxanes and prostaglandins, have been studied for decades, only one oxylipin has been therapeutically targeted to treat cardiovascular disease. In addition to the well-known oxylipins, newer oxylipins that demonstrate activity in the platelet have been discovered, further highlighting the expansive list of bioactive lipids that can be used to develop novel therapeutics. This review outlines the known oxylipins, their activity in the platelet, and current therapeutics that target oxylipin signaling.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Concurrent Use of NSAID and SSRI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used over-the-counter medications that can increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding through antiplatelet effects and loss of GI protection. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), commonly used for mental and behavioral health, are another group of medications that can cause platelet dysfunction. Previous literature has shown a possible increased risk of GI bleeding with concurrent use of SSRIs and NSAIDs. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing NSAIDs, SSRIs, and combined SSRI/NSAIDs to assess the risk of GI bleeding.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO, KCI, and Cochrane database. All comparative studies, i.e., case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trials were included. Direct and network meta-analysis was conducted using DerSimonian-Laird approach and random effect. For binary outcomes, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and p value were calculated.

RESULTS

After a comprehensive search through November 10th, 2021, 15 studies with 82,605 patients were identified. 11 studies reported higher rates of GI bleeds in SSRI/NSAID than SSRI users (36.9% vs 22.8%, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.52-3.02, p < 0.001, I² = 86.1%). 10 studies compared SSRI/NSAID to NSAID users with higher rates of bleeds in SSRI/NSAID group (40.9% vs 34.2%, OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.84, p < 0.001, I² = 68.8%). The results were consistent using network meta-analysis as well.

CONCLUSION

Given higher risk of bleeding with concurrent NSAIDs and SSRIs, prescribers should exercise caution when administering NSAIDs and SSRIs concurrently especially in patients with higher risks of GI bleeding.

Effect of body weight on bleeding events of aspirin in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Bleeding is the most common adverse reaction to aspirin and can lead to drug discontinuation or even be life-threatening in the secondary prevention of stroke or transient ischemic attack. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for bleeding adverse reaction of aspirin in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients treated with aspirin (100 mg) as a secondary prevention for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The bleeding events that occurred during the first year were collected, including gastrointestinal, skin, nasal cavity, gum, and urinary tract bleeding events. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent factors associated with bleeding events of aspirin.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 578 patients were enrolled in this study, and 58 patients developed bleeding during the first year of secondary prevention. Body weight and combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found to be significant risk factors for overall bleeding (p = 0.025 and 0.012). Body weight below 60 kg was a risk factor for overall bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding events.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Patients weighing less than 60 kg were at increased risk of bleeding with 100 mg aspirin for secondary prevention of cerebral infarction transient ischemic attack.

No rebound effect after a course of clopidogrel in patients with acute TIA or minor stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous studies demonstrated that discontinuation of clopidogrel in patients after ACS was associated with a rebound increase in risk of recurrent events. In this study, we aimed to investigate the rebound effect after discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy in patients with TIA or stroke.

METHODS

All patients with minor stroke or TIA were recruited from the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who discontinued clopidogrel and switched to aspirin therapy   (Clopidogrel Discontinuation Group) and patients who continued one mono-antiplatelet therapy (non-Clopidogrel Discontinuation Group) during 90-180  days. The outcomes included risks of recurrent ischemic stroke, recurrent TIA, and composite events during 90-180  days. The prevalence of each outcome was compared between two groups for every 30 days. Further subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with and without CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles.

RESULTS

Among the 3456 patients included, a total of 10 patients in the Clopidogrel Discontinuation Group and 11 patients in the non-Clopidogrel Discontinuation Group presented ischemic stroke recurrence during the 90-180-day period. The inter-group comparisons were not significant in each 30 days. Similar results were found for recurrent stroke, recurrent TIA, and composite events in these two groups, which were also found in CYP2C19 subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

No rebound increase in the risk of ischemic stroke and composite events was found during the 90 days after discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy in patients with TIA or minor stroke in the CHANCE trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979589.

Update on Management of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patient on Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been the cornerstone for the treatment of depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and panic disorder for a wide spectrum of age groups. Although the beneficial therapeutic properties are well recognized by the medical community, it also possesses many undesirable adverse effects with clinical manifestations. Some of the effects can be severe. This chapter highlights use of SSRIs, the mechanism of action, medication dosages, common drug to drug interactions, and recommendations on management of the oral and maxillofacial surgery patient on SSRIs.

False-positive fecal immunochemical test results in colorectal cancer screening and gastrointestinal drug use

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine the influence of drug treatments (proton pump inhibitors [PPIs] combined with other drugs) on the false-positive (FP) rate in the fecal immunochemical test (FIT).

METHODS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy in the setting of a CRC screening program due to a positive FIT result were included prospectively. Demographic data and drug intake of PPIs, antiplatelet therapy (APA), anticoagulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were collected. An FP FIT result was considered normal colonoscopy or with nonneoplastic pathology (NNP). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the effect of these drugs on the rate of FP FIT results.

RESULTS

We included 515 patients, and 59% (304/515) were males. The rate of FP FIT results was 48% (249/515). Study drug use was higher in patients > 60 years old and females than in those < 60 years old and males (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that female sex (OR = 2.7 95% CI 1.9-3.9), NNP (OR = 1.5 95% CI 1.1-2.2), and the use of any of the study drugs (OR = 1.4 95% CI 0.9-2.0) were independent risk factors for FP FIT results. The risk of FP FIT results was significantly higher in PPI users than in nonusers (OR = 1.8 95% CI 1.1-2.9), specifically when PPIs were combined with other drugs (OR = 2.01 95% CI 1.1-3.6) only in men.

CONCLUSION

Female sex, NNP, and PPIs combined with other drugs in males were identified as independent risk factors for FP FIT results.

The Impact of Serotonin Transporter Binding Affinity on the Risk of Bleeding Related to Antidepressants

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

The alleged primary mechanism underlying bleeding events associated with antidepressants is inhibition of serotonin uptake in platelets resulting in reduced platelet aggregability and activity, and prolonged bleeding time. There is some evidence that a substance's degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition in terms of its binding affinity to the serotonin transporter (SERT) affects the magnitude of bleeding risk increase.

METHODS/PROCEDURE

To test this hypothesis, we performed data mining in the worldwide largest pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) and conducted pharmacodynamically informed quantitative signal detection. Reporting odds ratios related to the standardized Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities query term "haemorrhages" and 24 antidepressants were calculated, and SERT binding affinities (pKi) were obtained and correlated (Pearson correlation).

FINDINGS/RESULTS

A strong and statistically significant correlation between substance-related reporting odds ratios and SERT binding affinities was found (r = 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.82; P = 0.00097).

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

Our findings strengthen the hypothesis that inhibition of serotonin uptake contributes to the antidepressant-related bleeding risk and suggest an association between the degree of the SERT binding affinity and the bleeding risk. This supports the preferential use of antidepressants with low or no SERT binding affinity in depressed patients at risk of bleeding.

Experimental Evaluation of Anxiolytic and Analgesic Properties of a New Linear Methoxyphenyltriazaalkane Derivative with Cardiotropic Activity

The anxiolytic and analgesic properties of compound ALM-802, a cardiotropic linear methoxyphenyltriazaalkane derivative, combining pharmacophore elements of p-FOX inhibitors trimetazidine and ranolazine were studied in vivo. In the elevated plus-maze test, ALM-802 after acute intraperitoneal administration in doses of 1-8 mg/kg dose-dependently prevented the development of anxiety in BALB/c mice. Chronic intraperitoneal administration of ALM-802 in a dose of 2 mg/kg to alcohol-preferring rats attenuated anxiogenesis induced by ethanol withdrawal. ALM-802 demonstrated antinociceptive activity in C57BL/6 mice during thermal stimulation of nociceptors in the hot plate test and during modeling of visceral pain in the acetic acid writhing test. Thus, ALM-802 exhibits anxiolytic and analgesic properties in the dose range corresponding to its anti-ischemic and antiarrhythmic effects.

Which SSRI is safest for patients with CVD and major depressive disorder?

ABSTRACT

Major depressive disorder is a common mood disorder and presents increased morbidity and mortality risks for patients with comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a cornerstone of treatment for major depressive disorder, given their relative safety and affordability compared with other antidepressant classes, and SSRIs frequently are used in patients with CVD. However, clinicians should carefully weigh safety considerations before prescribing SSRIs in these patients. This article reviews the safety of SSRIs in patients with CVD and discusses SSRI selection.

Interactions between Antidepressants and Warfarin: A Review

Background:

Since warfarin has a very narrow therapeutic index, the interaction between warfarin and antidepressants is very critical and has potentially severe consequences. It is unclear whether clinicians have sufficient knowledge about the risk of bleeding when warfarin and antidepressants are used concomitantly.

Objective:

In this systematic review, we discuss the main considerations when using warfarin with antidepressants.

Methods:

The information about warfarin-antidepressant interactions was obtained from Google Scholar®, PubMed/MEDLINE® and a hand search of the published literature. The following research terms which were systematically combined with each other to find articles: warfarin, anticoagulant, interactions, antidepressant (and each antidepressant name individually), SSRI, SNRI, TCA, MAOI.

Results:

Several possible mechanisms that can cause bleeding when antidepressants and warfarin are used concomitantly, have been discussed. According to the available data, sertraline and citalopram/ escitalopram are safer antidepressants to use with warfarin, whereas fluoxetine and fluvoxamine have a higher interaction potential with warfarin. The remaining antidepressants appear to lie somewhere in between and have little empirical data to guide the clinicians.

Conclusion:

It is recommended that when an antidepressant is prescribed to a patient using warfarin, patient’s international normalized ratio (INR) level should be checked regularly. In this review, the interaction between warfarin and antidepressants, including new ones, were evaluated inclusively and in detail.

[Updating in prescription of proton pump inhibitors. What to do and what not to do]

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most prescribed pharmacological subgroup of the National Health System and their use has been related to possible potentially serious adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current indications for treatment with PPIs as well as the data related to their safety, in order to promote their adecuate use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the literature focused on the following topics has been carried out: a) molecules and mechanism of action; b) current indications for treatment and adherence to them; c) adverse effects related to its use; d) drug interactions; e) alternatives in deprescription.

RESULTS

The current indications have not changed substantially in recent years and are well established, however, there is a high percentage of inappropriate prescription, mainly in individuals with low or no risk.

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs are safe drugs and generally well tolerated and their benefits are higher than possible adverse effects. Adhering to evidence-based recommendations represents the only rational approach to safe and effective therapy.

Who Needs Gastroprotection in 2020?

Purpose of review

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a recognized complication of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Stress ulcers are a concern for intensive care unit (ICU) patients; PUD is also an issue for patients taking anticoagulation. Helicobacter pylori test and treat is an option for patients starting NSAID therapy, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce PUD in NSAID patients and other high-risk groups.

Recent findings

There are a large number of trials that demonstrate that Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces PUD in NSAID patients. PPI is also effective at reducing PUD in this group and is also effective in ICU patients and those on anticoagulants. The effect is too modest for PPI to be recommended in everyone, and more research is needed as to which groups would benefit the most. Increasing age, past history of PUD, and comorbidity are the most important risk factors.

Summary

H. pylori test and treat should be offered to older patients starting NSAIDS, while PPIs should be prescribed to patients that are at high risk of developing PUD and at risk of dying from PUD complications.

Convalescent Plasma Coupled With Medications for the Treatment of a Severe COVID-19 Patient: Drugs Analysis and Pharmaceutical Care Based on the Newly Established Guidelines for COVID-19 Remedy

Given the extreme importance of the current pandemic caused by COVID-19 and due to the fact that scientists agree that there is no identified treatment, this paper analyzes in detail the treatment of a severe COVID-19 patient with convalescent plasma and drugs based on current guidelines for COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment. This can provide a reference for other medical institutions on rational drug use and pharmaceutical care for severe COVID-19 patients.

Drug-Drug Interactions with Direct Oral Anticoagulants

A large body of evidence suggests that not only direct anticoagulant effects but also major bleeding events and stroke prevention depend on plasma concentrations of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Concomitant drugs that cause drug–drug interactions (DDIs) alter DOAC exposure by increasing or decreasing DOAC bioavailability and/or clearance; hence, they might affect the efficacy and safety of DOAC therapy. Patients with renal impairment already receive smaller DOAC maintenance doses because avoidance of elevated DOAC exposure might prevent serious bleeding events. For other causes of increased exposure such as DDIs, management is often less well-defined. Considering that DOAC patients are often older and have multiple co-morbidities, polypharmacy is highly prevalent. However, the effect of multiple drugs on DOAC exposure, and especially the impact of DDIs when concurring with drug–disease interactions as observed in renal impairment, has not been thoroughly elucidated. In order to provide effective and safe anticoagulation with DOACs, understanding the mechanisms and magnitude of DDIs appears relevant. Instead of avoiding drug combinations with DOACs, more DDI trials should be conducted and new strategies such as dose adjustments based on therapeutic drug monitoring should be investigated. However, dose adjustments based on concentration measurements cannot currently be recommended because evidence-based data are missing.

Fluoxetine and Risk of Bleeding in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older Using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database: A Case/Noncase Study

BACKGROUND

Depression, the leading cause of nonfatal disease burden, has a strong correlation with suicide and affects approximately 7% of the general elderly population. Adverse drug reactions in older patients are particularly important because of reduced drug metabolism, polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, and drug-disease interactions. Fluoxetine is the first representative selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor but is associated with the possibility of hemorrhage based on its mechanism of action. Serious cases of gastrointestinal bleeding and cerebral hemorrhage have been reported, raising concerns about the safety of this drug.

METHODS

We detected signals of bleeding risk associated with fluoxetine in an elderly population using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database. Reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 16,517 adverse events related to antidepressants were reported. The reporting odds ratios for fluoxetine were 2.34 (95% CI, 1.03-5.34) for total bleeding, 4.41 (95% CI, 1.60-12.15) for major bleeding, 2.06 (95% CI, 0.28-15.03) for gastrointestinal bleeding, and 6.12 (95% CI, 2.14-22.60) for brain hemorrhage compared with those of all other antidepressants.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected safety signals with total bleeding, major bleeding, and brain hemorrhage related to fluoxetine. For patients with a high risk of bleeding, such as the elderly population, prescribing antidepressants other than fluoxetine can be considered. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence of a relationship between fluoxetine and hemorrhage but have wide 95% CIs. Further pharmacoepidemiological studies will be needed to confirm the risk of bleeding associated with fluoxetine.

Concomitant Anticoagulant and Antidepressant Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients and Risk of Stroke and Bleeding

We aimed to quantify the effects of antidepressant (AD) use in oral anticoagulant (OAC)-treated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Using the Stockholm Healthcare database, we analyzed AF patients initiated with an OAC. Outcomes were severe bleeds and strokes and were analyzed using Cox models. We included 17,210 patients claiming warfarin and 13,385 claiming a non-vitamin K OAC. The number of patients that claimed an AD during follow-up was 4,303. Concomitant OAC and AD use was associated with increased rates of severe bleeds (4.7 vs. 2.7 per 100 person-years) compared with OAC treatment alone (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.42, confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.80), but not significantly associated with increased stroke rates (3.5 vs. 2.1 per 100 person-years, aHR 1.23, CI: 0.93-1.62). No significant differences in risks were observed between different OAC classes or different AD classes. In conclusion, concomitant use of an OAC and an AD is associated with an increased bleeding risk.

SSRI/SNRI Therapy is Associated With a Higher Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in LVAD Patients

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is common in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Serotonin release from platelets promotes platelet aggregation, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) therapy inhibits the transporter responsible for re-uptake.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of LVAD (HeartMateII™, Abbott Medical, Lake Bluff, IL, USA and Heartware™, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) patients at the Medical University of South Carolina and Johns Hopkins Hospital between January 2009 and January 2016. After exclusions, 248 patients were included for analysis. After univariate analysis, logistic regression multivariate analysis was performed to adjust for any demographic, cardiovascular, and laboratory data variables found to be associated with GI bleeding post-LVAD.

RESULTS

Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 85 patients (35%) with 55% of GIBs due to arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Of the total cohort, 105 patients received an SSRI or SNRI during LVAD support. Forty-four (44) SSRI/SNRI (41.9%) and 41 non-SSRI/SNRI (28.7%) patients had a GIB (RR 1.46, p = 0.03). Twenty-six (26) (24.8%) of the SSRI/SNRI patients had a GIB due to AVMs versus 21 (14.7%) of the non-SSRI/SNRI patients (RR 1.69, p = 0.05). In fully-adjusted multivariate regression analysis, SSRI/SNRI therapy was independently associated with GIB (OR 1.78, p = 0.045). For GIB, the number needed to harm (NNH) was 7.6.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, SSRI/SNRI therapy is independently associated with an increased risk of GIB in LVAD patients.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for functional recovery after stroke: similarities with the critical period and the role of experience-dependent plasticity

There has been a growing interest in the potential for plasticity-inducing pharmacological interventions to enhance post-stroke recovery. One group of drugs that continues to garner a great deal of attention in this regard is a class of antidepressants called the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Here we propose a model for the mechanism by which these drugs may enhance plasticity after ischemic brain injury. First, we review the research in animal models demonstrating how selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors reopen the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity in adulthood. We then compare this period of heightened plasticity to the cellular and biochemical milieu of perilesional tissue after an ischemic event in the adult brain. We argue that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors administered acutely after an ischemic stroke alter excitatory-inhibitory balance in perilesional tissue and reinstate a type of plasticity reminiscent of the critical period in development. Finally, we discuss opportunities for future research in this area in both the preclinical and clinical realms.

Depression and Anxiety in Heart Failure: A Review

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:• Identify the relationships between depression, anxiety, and heart failure (HF).• Assess methods for accurately diagnosing depression and anxiety disorders in patients with HF.• Evaluate current evidence for treatment of anxiety and depression in patients with HF.

BACKGROUND

In patients with heart failure (HF), depression and anxiety disorders are common and associated with adverse outcomes such as reduced adherence to treatment, poor function, increased hospitalizations, and elevated mortality. Despite the adverse impact of these disorders, anxiety and depression remain underdiagnosed and undertreated in HF patients.

METHODS

We performed a targeted literature review to (1) identify associations between depression, anxiety, and HF, (2) examine mechanisms mediating relationships between these conditions and medical outcomes, (3) identify methods for accurately diagnosing depression and anxiety disorders in HF, and (4) review current evidence for treatments of these conditions in this population.

RESULTS

Both depression and anxiety disorders are associated with the development and progression of HF, including increased rates of mortality, likely mediated through both physiologic and behavioral mechanisms. Given the overlap between cardiac and psychiatric symptoms, accurately diagnosing depression or anxiety disorders in HF patients can be challenging. Adherence to formal diagnostic criteria and utilization of a clinical interview are the best courses of action in the evaluation process. There is limited evidence for the efficacy of pharmacologic and psychotherapy in patients with HF. However, cognitive-behavioral therapy has been shown to improve mental health outcomes in patients with HF, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear safe in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression and anxiety disorders in HF patients are common, underrecognized, and linked to adverse outcomes. Further research to improve detection and develop effective treatments for these disorders in HF patients is badly needed.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use and Risk of Gastrointestinal and Intracranial Bleeding

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most commonly prescribed medications in the United States. Although SSRIs are highly tolerable relative to other antidepressants, they are associated with a number of adverse effects, including increased gastrointestinal tract bleeding and intracranial bleeding. Mechanisms include increased gastric acid secretion and inhibition of serotonin entrance into platelets. Patients with other bleeding risk factors, such as warfarin, clopidogrel, or aspirin use, may be at heightened risk of these adverse effects. The purpose of this article is to review the incidence of gastrointestinal tract bleeding or intracranial bleeding associated with concomitant SSRI use, the proposed mechanisms of, and the potential pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interactions with anticoagulants and antiplatelets. Given the prevalence of SSRI use in the ambulatory setting, osteopathic physicians should be aware of potential drug-drug interactions and the clinical implications of SSRI-associated bleeding risk.

Gastrointestinal bleeding risk of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors by level of kidney function: A population-based cohort study

Aim

To estimate the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) by level of kidney function.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics. We identified patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml min^–1 1.73 m^–2 for ≥3 months), and a comparison group of patients without it. Patients with CKD were further classified as stage 3a (eGFR 45–59 ml min^–1 1.73 m^–2), 3b (30–44 ml min^–1 1.73 m^–2) and 4/5 (<30 ml min^–1 1.73 m^–2). We excluded prevalent SSRI users at cohort entry. Exposure was time‐dependent SSRI prescription and outcome was first hospitalization for GI bleeding. We estimated adjusted rate ratio (aRR) and rate difference (aRD) of GI bleeding comparing periods with and without SSRI prescription at each level of kidney function.

Results

The aRRs and aRDs were: (i) no CKD (n = 202 121) aRR: 1.66 (95%CI 1.37–2.01), aRD: 2.0/1000 person–years (5.5 vs. 3.5/1000 person–years in period with and without SSRIs); (ii) CKD stage 3a (n = 153 316) aRR: 1.86 (1.62–2.15), aRD: 4.2/1000 person–years (8.3 vs. 4.1/1000 person–years); (iii) CKD stage 3b (n = 46 482) aRR: 1.61 (1.27–2.04), aRD: 4.8/1000 person–years (9.9 vs. 5.1/1000 person–years); and (iv) CKD stage 4/5 (n = 11 197) aRR: 1.84 (1.14–2.96), aRD: 7.9/1000 person–years (15.3 vs. 7.4/1000 person–years). While there was no evidence of increase in the aRR (P = 0.922), there was strong evidence that the aRD increased as kidney function deteriorated (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

While the relative risk was constant, the excess risk of GI bleeding associated with SSRIs markedly increased among patients with decreased kidney function.

SSRI-reduced platelet reactivity in non-responding patients with life-long Recurrent Depressive Disorder: Detection and involved mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Adverse effects with bleeding disorders are often associated with the administration of SSRI in depression, although the exact mechanisms remain contradicting. This study is aimed at detecting and exploring the mechanisms of SSRI-induced changes in platelet reactivity in non-responding patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder (RDD) and life-long exposure to antidepressants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients and thirty-one healthy controls were included in the study. A comprehensive approach which includes evaluation of peripheral markers and microscopic analyses of platelet morphology changes has been used.

RESULTS

RDD SSRI patients have shown blunted aggregatory responses towards collagen and epinephrine. Evident differences in the microscopic evaluation of platelet morphology were observed between the groups, with inherent absence of micro-aggregates and platelet shape changes within the patients; after quantification, the sensitivity and specificity of this method were assessed as high. The abnormalities were found in association with lower platelet serotonin content and high fluctuations of free plasma serotonin levels. Changes in the levels of CRP, fibrinogen and nitric oxide were not observed. Macroplatelets were also detected within RDD SSRI patients via increased MPV, PDW and P-LCR, which were associated with discoid shape and without procoagulant activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The microscopic evaluation might be useful as a simple method for detection of SSRI-reduced platelet function for research purposes or systematic correlations with other biochemical parameters. The mechanisms involved in SSRI-reduced platelet function in non-responding RDD patients are complex, including combined effects of lower platelet serotonin content, high fluctuations in plasma serotonin concentration and abnormal α-AR function.

Risk factors for intracranial lesions and mortality in older patients with mild traumatic brain injuries

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for intracerebral lesion (ICL) in older adults with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) and evaluate the influence of comorbidities on outcomes.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Information was gathered on clinical history/examination, cranial computed tomography, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, analytical and coagulation findings, and mortality at 1 week post-discharge. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, calculating odds ratios for ICL with 95% confidence interval. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Data were analyzed on 504 patients with mean±SD age of 79.37 ± 8.06 years. Multivariate analysis showed that traffic accident, GCS score of 14/15, transient consciousness loss, nausea, and receipt of antiplatelets were predictors of ICL, while SRRI and/or benzodiazepine intake was a protective factor. A score was assigned to patients by rounding OR values, and a score ≥1 indicated moderate/high risk of ICL.

CONCLUSIONS

MTBI management should be distinct in over-60 year-olds, who may not present typical symptoms, with frequent comorbidities. Knowledge of risk factors for post-MTBI ICL, associated with higher mortality, is important to support clinical decision-making. Further research is warranted to verify our novel finding that benzodiazepines and/or SSRI inhibitors may act as neuroprotectors.

Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Outcome After Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients Using Selective Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) impair platelet function and have been linked to a higher risk of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage-an association that may be augmented by oral anticoagulants (OAC). We aimed to assess whether preadmission treatment with SSRIs in patients with acute ischemic stroke is associated with post-thrombolysis symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and functional outcome.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted in prospective registries of patients treated by thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of stroke onset. The association between preadmission treatment with SSRIs and sICH (ECASS II definition [European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study]) or unfavorable 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2) was assessed by logistic regression, taking into account potential interaction with concomitant use of antithrombotics.

RESULTS

Six thousand two hundred forty-two patients were included (mean age, 70.1±14.0 years; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 9 [5-16]). Preadmission treatment with SSRIs was present in 4.3% (n=266) of patients. Overall, SICH rate was 3.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5%-4.4%; n=244), and SSRI use was not significantly associated with sICH in unadjusted (odds ratio [OR], 1.28; 95% CI, 0.72-2.27) or adjusted (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.71-2.40) analysis. However, there was a significant interaction of concomitant use of OACs (international normalized ratio <1.7) and SSRI for occurrence of sICH (P=0.01). SICH was significantly more frequent in patients taking both OAC and SSRI (23.1%; 95% CI, 8.2%-50.3%) than in patients taking OAC but not SSRI (adjusted OR, 9.04; 95% CI, 1.95-41.89). Preadmission use of SSRI was associated with unfavorable 3-month outcome (unadjusted OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46; adjusted OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.15-2.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Preadmission treatment with SSRIs was not significantly associated with an increased risk of post-thrombolysis sICH in this cohort study. However, subgroup analysis suggested an increased risk of sICH in patients taking both SSRI and OAC. Preadmission treatment with SSRIs was associated with unfavorable outcome, which may reflect the prognostic significance of prestroke depression.

Risk of Bleeding in Patients on Full-Dose Enoxaparin With Venous Thromboembolism and Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are very commonly prescribed agents that are also potent antiplatelet agents.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed compare the rate of major bleeding events between patients who were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) on SSRIs and those not on chronic SSRI therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 575 patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of an acute VTE initiated on full-dose enoxaparin with or without an SSRI between October 1, 2009, and October 1, 2014, in a 443-bed, single tertiary care referral county teaching hospital.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the incidence of major bleeding in the SSRI versus non-SSRI group (19.6% vs 17.0%, P = 0.548). Ad hoc analysis demonstrated an elevated risk of major bleeding in patients on escitalopram compared with those on any of the other SSRIs (46.2% vs 15.2%, P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that escitalopram use-OR (95% CI) = 18.85 (1.84-193.6)-was associated with increased major bleeding, and acid suppressive therapy-0.24 (0.07-0.90); P = 0.014-was associated with decreased major bleeding in patients reporting alcohol use.

CONCLUSION

No difference was found in the incidence of major bleeding in patients on LMWH and SSRIs versus those on LMWH but not on SSRIs. However, ad hoc findings showed a significantly higher rate of major bleeding events in patients who received escitalopram and alcohol among patients on full-dose enoxaparin for VTE. These findings merit further exploration.

Anxiety Disorders and Cardiovascular Disease

Anxiety and its associated disorders are common in patients with cardiovascular disease and may significantly influence cardiac health. Anxiety disorders are associated with the onset and progression of cardiac disease, and in many instances have been linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including mortality. Both physiologic (autonomic dysfunction, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, changes in platelet aggregation) and health behavior mechanisms may help to explain the relationships between anxiety disorders and cardiovascular disease. Given the associations between anxiety disorders and poor cardiac health, the timely and accurate identification and treatment of these conditions is of the utmost importance. Fortunately, pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic interventions for the management of anxiety disorders are generally safe and effective. Further study is needed to determine whether interventions to treat anxiety disorders ultimately impact both psychiatric and cardiovascular health.

Improving the management of behaviour that challenges associated with dementia in care homes: protocol for pharmacy-health psychology intervention feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The inappropriate use of antipsychotics in people with dementia for behaviour that challenges is associated with an estimated 1800 deaths annually. However, solely focusing on antipsychotics may transfer prescribing to other equally dangerous psychotropics. Little is known about the role of pharmacists in the management of psychotropics used to treat behaviours that challenge. This research aims to determine whether it is feasible to implement and measure the effectiveness of a combined pharmacy-health psychology intervention incorporating a medication review and staff training package to limit the prescription of psychotropics to manage behaviour that challenges in care home residents with dementia.

METHODS/ANALYSIS

6 care homes within the West Midlands will be recruited. People with dementia receiving medication for behaviour that challenges, or their personal consultee, will be approached regarding participation. Medication used to treat behaviour that challenges will be reviewed by the pharmacist, in collaboration with the general practitioner (GP), person with dementia and carer. The behavioural intervention consists of a training package for care home staff and GPs promoting person-centred care and treating behaviours that challenge as an expression of unmet need. The primary outcome measure is the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH). Other outcomes include quality of life (EQ-5D and DEMQoL), cognition (sMMSE), health economic (CSRI) and prescribed medication including whether recommendations were implemented. Outcome data will be collected at 6 weeks, and 3 and 6 months. Pretraining and post-training interviews will explore stakeholders' expectations and experiences of the intervention. Data will be used to estimate the sample size for a definitive study.

ETHICS/DISSEMINATION

The project has received a favourable opinion from the East Midlands REC (15/EM/3014). If potential participants lack capacity, a personal consultee will be consulted regarding participation in line with the Mental Capacity Act. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

A happy valve in a happy patient? Serotonergic antidepressants and the risk of valvular heart disease (SERVAL). A case-control study

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to investigate the risk of valvular heart disease in humans in relation to the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors.

DESIGN

A case-control study. We conducted a case-control study within this cohort in which patients with newly diagnosed cardiac valve regurgitation were age-matched to controls. Patient demographics, their cardiovascular risk factors and medication use were extracted in both series. Use of SSRIs, serotonin and noradreline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and other pro-serotonergic agents, their dose and treatment duration were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to establish the strength of the association between SSRI/SNRI use and valvular heart disease.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic of the cardiology department at the Ghent University Hospital, East-Flanders in Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

Total of 2911 persons 21-58 years of age who had undergone an echocardiogram in the period 2006-2010 and had no known cardiovascular disease or previous cardiac intervention. Two hundred and six echocardiographically proven cases of valvular regurgitation and 195 matched controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Odd ratio of valvular disease associated with intake of serotonergic drugs.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients with newly diagnosed cardiac valve regurgitation, 11.6% were exposed to serotonergic agents compared to 4.1% in the 195 control patients, leading to an odds ratio of 3.08 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35-7.04). The analysis of doses and treatment durations revealed a dose-relationship pattern between SSRI/SNRI use and prevalent valvular heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, use of serotonergic antidepressants was associated with an increased rate of valvular regurgitation in humans.

Partially Defective Store Operated Calcium Entry and Hem(ITAM) Signaling in Platelets of Serotonin Transporter Deficient Mice

BACKGROUND

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamin, 5-HT) is an indolamine platelet agonist, biochemically derived from tryptophan. 5-HT is secreted from the enterochromaffin cells into the gastrointestinal tract and blood. Blood 5-HT has been proposed to regulate hemostasis by acting as a vasoconstrictor and by triggering platelet signaling through 5-HT receptor 2A (5HTR2A). Although platelets do not synthetize 5-HT, they take 5-HT up from the blood and store it in their dense granules which are secreted upon platelet activation.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the molecular composite of the 5-HT uptake system in platelets and elucidate the role of platelet released 5-HT in thrombosis and ischemic stroke.

METHODS

5-HT transporter knockout mice (5Htt-/-) were analyzed in different in vitro and in vivo assays and in a model of ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

In 5Htt-/- platelets, 5-HT uptake from the blood was completely abolished and agonist-induced Ca2+ influx through store operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), integrin activation, degranulation and aggregation responses to glycoprotein VI (GPVI) and C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (CLEC-2) were reduced. These observed in vitro defects in 5Htt-/- platelets could be normalized by the addition of exogenous 5-HT. Moreover, reduced 5-HT levels in the plasma, an increased bleeding time and the formation of unstable thrombi were observed ex vivo under flow and in vivo in the abdominal aorta and carotid artery of 5Htt-/- mice. Surprisingly, in the transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) model of ischemic stroke 5Htt-/- mice showed nearly normal infarct volume and the neurological outcome was comparable to control mice.

CONCLUSION

Although secreted platelet 5-HT does not appear to play a crucial role in the development of reperfusion injury after stroke, it is essential to amplify the second phase of platelet activation through SOCE and plays an important role in thrombus stabilization.

Severe potential drug-drug interactions in older adults with dementia and associated factors

OBJECTIVE

To identify the main severe potential drug-drug interactions in older adults with dementia and to examine the factors associated with these interactions.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional study. The enrolled patients were selected from six geriatrics clinics of tertiary care hospitals across Mexico City. The patients had received a clinical diagnosis of dementia based on the current standards and were further divided into the following two groups: those with severe drug-drug interactions (contraindicated/severe) (n=64) and those with non-severe drug-drug interactions (moderate/minor/absent) (n=117). Additional socio-demographic, clinical and caregiver data were included. Potential drug-drug interactions were identified using Micromedex Drug Reax 2.0® database.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients were enrolled, including 57 men (31.5%) and 124 women (68.5%) with a mean age of 80.11±8.28 years. One hundred and seven (59.1%) patients in our population had potential drug-drug interactions, of which 64 (59.81%) were severe/contraindicated. The main severe potential drug-drug interactions were caused by the combinations citalopram/anti-platelet (11.6%), clopidogrel/omeprazole (6.1%), and clopidogrel/aspirin (5.5%). Depression, the use of a higher number of medications, dementia severity and caregiver burden were the most significant factors associated with severe potential drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Older people with dementia experience many severe potential drug-drug interactions. Anti-depressants, antiplatelets, anti-psychotics and omeprazole were the drugs most commonly involved in these interactions. Despite their frequent use, anti-dementia drugs were not involved in severe potential drug-drug interactions. The number and type of medications taken, dementia severity and depression in patients in addition to caregiver burden should be considered to avoid possible drug interactions in this population.

Differential impact of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet response to clopidogrel: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), fluvoxamine and citalopram, that markedly differ in their level of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 inhibition, on the laboratory response to clopidogrel, a prodrug requiring metabolism by the CYP system, and especially CYP2C19, to produce its active form.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

SETTING

Clinical research unit of an academic medical center.

SUBJECTS

Fifteen healthy male volunteers.

INTERVENTION

All subjects received clopidogrel as a 300-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 75 mg/day on days 2 and 3. Platelet function was tested at baseline and then after clopidogrel treatment on day 3. After a washout period of 2 weeks, subjects were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive either citalopram 20 mg/day or fluvoxamine 100 mg/day for 7 days. On day 5, platelet function was tested while receiving the SSRI treatment alone; then, a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose was administered, followed by clopidogrel 75 mg/day on days 6 and 7. Platelet function was then reassessed on day 7 while receiving the combination of the SSRI and clopidogrel. The treatment protocol was then repeated after a washout period of 2 weeks in all subjects with the other SSRI.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The antiplatelet effects of fluvoxamine and citalopram and their interactions with clopidogrel were assessed. The response to these three drugs was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, reporting P2Y12 receptor reactivity. Both fluvoxamine and citalopram tended to reduce adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation: 80.8 ± 3.4% at baseline, 67.3 ± 6.3% while receiving citalopram, and 65.8 ± 6.4% while receiving fluvoxamine. All subjects had a good laboratory response to clopidogrel, with a mean aggregation of 23.5 ± 3.2% and a mean platelet reactivity index of 47.7 ± 3.9% (p<0.001 compared with baseline for both methods). Laboratory response to clopidogrel was significantly attenuated in the presence of fluvoxamine compared with the response in the presence of citalopram as tested both by aggregometry (32.3 ± 4.2% vs 23.4 ± 3%, p=0.04) and by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (52.7 ± 5.1% vs 35.9 ± 4.2%, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Fluvoxamine attenuated the laboratory response to clopidogrel, possibly through inhibition of CYP2C19, whereas citalopram did not affect this response. These potential drug interactions should be taken into consideration in the selection of the appropriate antidepressant agent for patients who are treated with clopidogrel.

Association between haemorrhages and treatment with selective and non-selective serotonergic antidepressants: Possible implications of quantitative signal detection

Inhibition of serotonin uptake in platelets seems to be the crucial mechanism underlying SSRI-associated haemorrhages. This effect is also present in antidepressants featuring non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (non-SSRI). Impact of selectivity of serotonin reuptake and/or affinity to the serotonin reuptake transporter on the bleeding risk have not yet been studied sufficiently. We retrieved country- and SSRI-/non-SSRI-specific data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre and used a case/non-case approach to calculate substance-specific reporting odds ratios (ROR) to evaluate the statistical association of treatment with SSRI/non-SSRI and haemorrhages. Country-specific analysis revealed no clear trends towards an increased risk of bleeding related to particular agents of group SSRI/non-SSRI (sporadically ROR>1 for citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, St. John's wort). There was a clear trend in the total dataset towards a "reduced protective effect" (suggested by ROR<1) on the development of haemorrhages with agents featuring comparatively high affinity to the 5-HTT and/or selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (as with escitalopram, citalopram, duloxetine or venlafaxine) in comparison to agents with lower affinity or non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibition (as with mirtazapine or doxepin). Comparison of group-specific aggregated data (SSRI vs. non-SSRI) revealed significant differences regarding the "protective effect" on the development of haemorrhages between groups SSRI vs. non-SSRI in favour of non-SSRI in nearly all countries as well as in the total dataset. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that agents with increased affinity to the 5-HTT and/or selective serotonin reuptake inhibition may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding.

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and post-gastrostomy bleeding: reevaluating the link

Introduction

Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed classes of medications with a relatively safe side-effect profile. However, SRIs are being increasingly reported to be associated with bleeding complications in patients undergoing invasive procedures resulting from inhibition of serotonin reuptake by platelets and impaired platelet aggregation. The aim of our study was to determine whether there is an increased risk of post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) bleeding in patients exposed to SRIs after controlling for other mediations known to increase the risk of bleeding and major comorbidities.

Methods

This was a single-center cohort study that included who underwent PEG tube placement by standard pull-guidewire technique from July 2006 to June 2014. Patients were categorized into groups based on the medications (SRIs, aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anticoagulants) administered during the index hospitalization. The incidence of post-PEG bleeding was noted in two distinct post-procedure periods: within 48 hours, and between 48 hours and 14 days.

Results

A total of 637 PEG tube placements were done on 570 patients during the study period. There were 107 patients (18.8%) with major bleeding within 48 hours of PEG and 79 patients (13.9%) with major bleeding between 48 hours and 14 days. There was no significant increase in the post-PEG bleeding in patients taking a combination of an SRI along with aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients on subcutaneous heparin for prophylaxis against thromboembolic events were more likely to have oozing at the PEG site requiring blood transfusion.

Conclusion

We did not notice an increase in post-PEG bleeding in patients on SRIs. However, in view of the limitation that our study is retrospective and that there are no known significant side effects of withdrawal of SRIs for a short duration, withholding SRIs could be a safe clinical option in patients undergoing PEG tube placement.

Adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions with over-the-counter NSAIDs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen have a long history of safe and effective use as both prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics/antipyretics. The mechanism of action of all NSAIDs is through reversible inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including gastrointestinal bleeding as well as cardiovascular and renal effects have been reported with NSAID use. In many cases, ADRs may occur because of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between the NSAID and a concomitant medication. For example, DDIs have been reported when NSAIDs are coadministered with aspirin, alcohol, some antihypertensives, antidepressants, and other commonly used medications. Because of the pharmacologic nature of these interactions, there is a continuum of risk in that the potential for an ADR is dependent on total drug exposure. Therefore, consideration of dose and duration of NSAID use, as well as the type or class of comedication administered, is important when assessing potential risk for ADRs. Safety findings from clinical studies evaluating prescription-strength NSAIDs may not be directly applicable to OTC dosing. Health care providers can be instrumental in educating patients that using OTC NSAIDs at the lowest effective dose for the shortest required duration is vital to balancing efficacy and safety. This review discusses some of the most clinically relevant DDIs reported with NSAIDs based on major sites of ADRs and classes of medication, with a focus on OTC ibuprofen, for which the most data are available.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Although the incidence of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) has been decreasing worldwide, nonvariceal UGIB continues to be a significant problem. Even with the advent of advanced endoscopic procedures and potent medications to suppress acid production, UGIB carries significant morbidity and mortality. Some of the most common risk factors for nonvariceal UGIB include Helicobacter pylori infection, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and other antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications. In patients with cardiovascular disease and kidney disease, UGIB tends to be more severe and has greater morbidity. Many of the newer NSAIDs have been removed from the market.

Effects of long-term sertraline treatment and depression on coronary artery atherosclerosis in premenopausal female primates

OBJECTIVES

Major depressive disorder and coronary heart disease often co-occur in the same individuals. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed for depression and other disorders, but their effects on coronary heart disease risk remain unclear. We determined the effects of an SSRI on coronary artery atherosclerosis (CAA) in an established nonhuman primate model used to clarify the association between depression and CAA.

METHODS

Forty-two adult female cynomolgus macaques consuming a Western diet were characterized during an 18-month pretreatment phase and assigned to SSRI (sertraline hydrochloride 20 mg/kg, per os, once a day) or placebo balanced on pretreatment depression, body weight (BW), and iliac artery atherosclerosis extent measured via biopsy. After 18 months, CAA extent was measured using histomorphometry.

RESULTS

Before and during treatment, depressed monkeys had lower BW, body mass index, and plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and higher heart rates during the pretreatment (p < .01) but not the treatment phase (p = .17). There were no pretreatment differences between the sertraline and placebo groups. Sertraline reduced anxious behavior but had no effect on BW, body mass index, heart rate, plasma lipids, or depression. CAA, analyzed by a 2 (depressed, nondepressed) × 2 (placebo, sertraline) × 3 (coronary arteries) analysis of covariance adjusted for pretreatment iliac atherosclerosis, was greater in depressed than in nondepressed monkeys (p < .036), and in sertraline than in placebo-treated monkeys (p = .040). The observed CAA extent in depressed monkeys treated with sertraline was 4.9 times higher than that in untreated depressed monkeys, and 6.5 times higher than that in nondepressed monkeys, on average.

CONCLUSIONS

Depressed animals developed more CAA, and long-term treatment with sertraline resulted in more extensive CAA.

Treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy impairs quality of life and can be difficult to treat.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss current treatment recommendations for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature discussing treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Existing treatment guidelines were studied and compared.

RESULTS

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy occurs in about one in six people with diabetes. This condition impairs quality of life and increases healthcare costs. Treatment recommendations exist, but individual patient therapy can require a trial-and-error approach. Many treatment options have adjuvant benefits or side effects which should be considered prior to initiating therapy. Often, a combination of treatment modalities with various mechanisms of action is required for adequate pain control. Adequate medication titration and a reasonable trial period should be allowed.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy can be challenging, but effective management can improve patient's quality of life.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy impairs quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Many treatment options have adjuvant benefits or side effects which should be considered prior to initiating therapy. Often, a combination of treatment modalities with various mechanisms of action is required for adequate pain control.

Milnacipran treatment and potential biomarkers in depressed patients following an initial SSRI treatment failure: a prospective, open-label, 24-week study

BACKGROUND

We assessed the effect of switching patients with major depressive disorder to milnacipran following an initial selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment failure, and explored potential biomarkers in their blood.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, open-label, 24-week trial. Depression was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Patients showing a ≥50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to final visit were considered responders. Regarding adverse effects (AEs), moderate-to-severe AEs were specifically identified as effects that required any medical treatment or that induced treatment withdrawals. We also measured blood levels of various molecules including inflammatory cytokines.

RESULTS

Of the 30 participants who enrolled, 17 completed this study. The responder rate was 30% (n=10). Baseline serum levels of interleukin-6 (Z=-2.155; P=0.031) and interleukin-8 (Z=-2.616; P=0.009) were significantly higher when moderate-to-severe AEs were present (n=13 patients with moderate-to-severe AEs). Serum levels of macrophage inflammatory protein-1β showed a significant continuous decrease from the baseline level (Friedman's test: χ (2)=23.9, df=4, P<0.001) only in non-responders.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and macrophage inflammatory protein-1β as potential blood biomarkers could be utilized to identify the responsiveness of patients to serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor like milnacipran, or to identify those patients who may experience AEs strong enough to warrant discontinuation of treatment.

Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with or without concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There is emerging concern that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may be associated with an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and that this risk may be further increased by concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medications. Previous reviews of a relatively small number of studies have reported a substantial risk of upper GI bleeding with SSRIs; however, more recent studies have produced variable results. The objective of this study was to obtain a more precise estimate of the risk of upper GI bleeding with SSRIs, with or without concurrent NSAID use.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials (through April 2013), and US and European conference proceedings were searched. Controlled trials, cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies that reported the incidence of upper GI bleeding in adults on SSRIs with or without concurrent NSAID use, compared with placebo or no treatment were included. Data were extracted independently by two authors. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain odds ratio (OR) of the risk of upper GI bleeding with SSRIs +/- NSAID, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The main outcome and measure of the study was the risk of upper GI bleeding with SSRIs compared with placebo or no treatment.

RESULTS

Fifteen case-control studies (including 393,268 participants) and four cohort studies were included in the analysis. There was an increased risk of upper GI bleeding with SSRI medications in the case-control studies (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.44,1.92) and cohort studies (OR=1.68, 95% CI=1.13,2.50). The number needed to harm for upper GI bleeding with SSRI treatment in a low-risk population was 3,177, and in a high-risk population it was 881. The risk of upper GI bleeding was further increased with the use of both SSRI and NSAID medications (OR=4.25, 95% CI=2.82,6.42).

CONCLUSIONS

SSRI medications are associated with a modest increase in the risk of upper GI bleeding, which is lower than has previously been estimated. This risk is significantly elevated when SSRI medications are used in combination with NSAIDs, and physicians prescribing these medications together should exercise caution and discuss this risk with patients.

Antidepressants relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgical practice

Background:

Depression is commonly associated with a high-carbohydrate diet, lack of interest in proper oral hygiene and xerostomia connected to the use of antidepressants. Patients often consult their dentists as a result of changes affecting the hard dental substance and the soft-tissues.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to identify adverse drug interactions between the antidepressants and medications commonly administered in dentistry in order to give practicing dentists an overview of the scientific literature.

Objective:

The objective is to identify the adverse drug interactions between antidepressants and medication commonly administered in dentistry.

Study Design:

The literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane and the specific search items. The review (1984-2009) focused on medicines used in dental practice (vasoconstrictors, non-opioid analgesics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, antifungals and benzodiazepines).

Results:

There are various drug interactions between antidepressants and medicines used in dentistry. When two or more drugs are co-administered, a drug interaction must always be anticipated though many of the interactions are potential problems, but do not seem to be real clinical issues.

Conclusion:

The probability of a drug interaction can be minimized by careful history-taking, skillful dose adjustment and safe administration of the therapeutic agent.