The DRESS syndrome: a literature review

Hemodialysis treatment of vancomycin-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in a patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), is a severe drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction with 10% mortality. To date, there is insufficient evidence regarding the association between DRESS/DIHS and serum levels of vancomycin (VCM). Here, we report the case of a 46-year-old woman undergoing peritoneal dialysis who developed VCM-induced DRESS/DIHS. She was hospitalized for peritonitis with abdominal pain and treated with VCM. On day 10 of hospitalization, her abdominal symptoms improved; however, fever, skin rash, lymphadenopathy, eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes, and liver and renal dysfunction developed. Based on the clinical course and laboratory findings, we diagnosed the patient with DRESS/DIHS due to VCM. Since her serum VCM concentration was high at 39.8 μg/mL, hemodialysis (HD) was performed to remove VCM, which caused her symptoms to improve. However, serum levels of VCM rebounded and the same symptoms recurred. Therefore, we re-performed HD; no further relapse occurred. This clinical course showed that increased serum VCM levels were associated with DRESS/DIHS onset and severity, suggesting that it is a blood level-dependent disease and that removal of VCM by HD is a potential therapeutic option.

Demystifying drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): a review of the literature and guidelines for management

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe, adverse drug reaction that is notoriously complex in both its presentation and treatment. Although early diagnosis and cessation of the causative agent are universally accepted as the initial interventions for DRESS, the subsequent management lacks a standardized approach. Historically, systemic steroids have been used as first-line treatment, but there is debate about the optimal dosing and route of administration, and evidence persists on the long-term complications associated with steroid use. Novel treatment approaches with targeted therapy, cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis have been gaining interest as alternative mono- and adjuvant therapies, but their use has yet to be supported by clinical trials. This narrative review provides a summary of the current knowledge of DRESS, with a focus on clinical management. The various mono- and adjuvant therapy options are discussed, with literature-supported suggestions for their optimal use in clinical practice. The risks for relapses, viral reactivation, and long-term complications are also considered. The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for articles on DRESS, published between January 1, 2008, and May 1, 2023. 334 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the literature, a DRESS management tool with step-by-step guidance is provided. Further suggestions for management are woven throughout this review, giving clinicians a toolbelt of resources with which to approach diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

A prospective observational study validating the CET score as a screening tool in suspected DRESS syndrome

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is an idiosyncratic severe cutaneous adverse reaction that may be potentially life-threatening. Recently, a simple scoring system for the early screening of DRESS patients was derived by combining hsCRP levels, the eosinophil count, and the total body surface area (CET score). The objectives of this study were validating the CET score, and calculating its lead time advantage and cost-benefits compared to RegiSCAR scoring.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational case-control study, where 110 consecutive patients diagnosed with drug-induced maculopapular exanthema (MPE) were recruited during the 18 months of the study period. Patients were classified as cases (DRESS) and controls (MPE) using RegiSCAR score cut-off 2 (possible DRESS). They were also simultaneously screened using the CET score, based on which patients were classified as positive or negative. They were subsequently followed up on Day 15 for a second comparison and assessment of lead time and at 3 and 6 weeks to evaluate clinical response.

RESULTS

Seventy cases and 40 controls were recruited. At a cut-off of >2.12, the CET score had a sensitivity of 94.3%, a specificity of 60%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.5%, and a negative predictive value (PPV) of 85.7%. The median delay in diagnosing DRESS using RegiSCAR was around 14.5 hours. There was a median cost benefit of 12.1 USD in favor of the CET score.

CONCLUSIONS

The CET score had good diagnostic performance in screening DRESS patients with a lead time of 14.5 hours and fewer costs incurred.

Case report: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) induced by ceftazidime in a connective tissue disease (CTD) patient

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) with high mortality. Antibiotics are the most frequent causative agents related to DRESS. However, it is rarely reported in cephalosporins, especially for ceftazidime. Here, we reported a case of ceftazidime-induced DRESS with HLA genotypic polymorphism as a risk factor. A 58-year-old woman with connective tissue disease was intravenously infused with ceftazidime for the treatment of pneumonia and intestinal infection, followed by the presence of fever, rash, and hematologic and hepatic laboratory abnormalities. DRESS was diagnosed and the positive polymorphism in HLA-B*15:02 was found. Our case illustrated the necessity to clarify the patho-mechanism and the use of pretreatment HLA analysis to prevent ceftazidime-related DRESS may be a valuable option soon.

Antipsychotic-Related DRESS Syndrome: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

INTRODUCTION

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is gaining attention in pharmacovigilance, but its association with antipsychotics, other than clozapine, is still unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a case/non-case study with disproportionality analysis based on the World Health Organization (WHO) global spontaneous reporting database, VigiBase®. We analyzed individual case safety reports of DRESS syndrome related to antipsychotics compared to (1) all other medications in VigiBase®, (2) carbamazepine (a known positive control), and (3) within classes (typical/atypical) of antipsychotics. We calculated reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian information component (IC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Disproportionate reporting was prioritized based on clinical importance, according to predefined criteria. Additionally, we compared characteristics of patients reporting with serious/non-serious reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 1534 reports describing DRESS syndrome for 19 antipsychotics were identified. The ROR for antipsychotics as a class as compared to all other medications was 1.0 (95% CI 0.9-1.1). We found disproportionate reporting for clozapine (ROR 2.3, 95% CI 2.1-2.5; IC 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3), cyamemazine (ROR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.5; IC 1.2, 95% CI 0.5-1.7), and chlorpromazine (ROR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1; IC 0.6, 95% CI 0.1-1.0). We found 35.7% of cases with co-reported anticonvulsants, and 25% with multiple concurrent antipsychotics in serious compared to 8.6% in non-serious cases (p = 0.03). Fatal cases were 164 (10.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from the expected association with clozapine, chlorpromazine and cyamemazine (sharing an aromatic heteropolycyclic molecular structure) emerged with a higher-than-expected reporting of DRESS. Better knowledge of the antipsychotic-related DRESS syndrome should increase clinicians' awareness leading to safer prescribing of antipsychotics.

Advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not affect ability to utilize lymphadenopathy in assessment of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome in HIV and tuberculosis: Prospective comparative study

Background

RegiSCAR validation criteria for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) includes lymphadenopathy, a frequent feature of both tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). TB is the most common HIV-associated coinfection. Advanced HIV is associated with lymph node (LN) fibrosis. It is not clear if this negatively affects case validation in HIV-associated DRESS. To answer this question, we designed a prospective descriptive study to assess lymphadenopathy in various combinations of comorbid HIV, TB, and DRESS.

Objectives

We sought to describe the prevalence of DRESS-associated lymphadenopathy and characterize LN quality, size, and distribution in a high HIV-TB burden setting over time.

Methods

We prospectively and systematically examined LN in 25 consecutive acute DRESS cases hospitalized at a South African tertiary-care center and 10 hospitalized non-DRESS HIV-TB coinfected controls.

Results

Fourteen (56%) of 25 patients were HIV infected, with a median (interquartile range) CD4 count of 254 (66-478) cells/mm³, and 7 of 14 were coinfected with TB. Using RegiSCAR criteria, 12 (46%) of 25 were definite DRESS cases, 8 (31%) of 25 probable, and 5 (23%) of 25 possible. Possible cases were excluded in the analysis. Fifteen (75%) of 20 subjects had LN in ≥2 anatomic sites, including all 7 patients with HIV-TB coinfection. In contrast, 1 (20%) of 5 hospitalized non-DRESS HIV-TB coinfected controls had LN. Cervical LN, in 15 (88%) of 17, was most common, followed by axillary (76%) and inguinal (59%). Cervical LN ranged between 1 and 2 cm in size. Among the 8 (32%) of 25 subjects with follow-up data, LN had regressed in all within 6 weeks of stopping the offending drug and initiating TB treatment. There was no correlation with CD4 cell count and LN.

Conclusion

Lymphadenopathy is a common feature of acute DRESS, even among HIV-TB-coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression.

Antibiotic-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions: a single-center retrospective study over ten years

Objective

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare but life-threatening, with antibiotics being the main cause. This retrospective study from a single center was designed to analyze the culprit drugs, clinical features and treatment outcomes of antibiotic-induced SCARs.

Methods

We analyzed cases of antibiotic-induced SCARs in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2013 and January 2024, including Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) overlap, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Descriptive analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, treatment and prognosis were carried out.

Results

Among 354 cases of SCARs, 63 validated antibiotic-related cases were included. Cephalosporins (31.7%), penicillins (25.4%), and quinolones (19.0%) were the most common triggers for SCARs. Overall, liver (50.8%), lungs (31.7%), and kidneys (23.8%) were the most frequently affected organ in SCARs cases. Eight patients (28.6%) in the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group and 8 patients (80.0%) in the TEN group received combination therapy of corticosteroids and IVIG. Patients with SCARs caused by penicillins or cephalosporins could receive alternative treatments such as lincomamides, quinolones, and tetracyclines. The mortality rate in the TEN group was the highest at 20.0%, followed by the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group (7.1%), and no deaths were observed in the DRESS and AGEP groups.

Conclusion

The identification of the culprit antibiotics and the application of alternative antibiotic therapies are crucial for the management of antibiotic-induced SCARs. If complicated underlying conditions and complications like advanced age, cancer and pneumonia coexist with SCARs, patients might be more at risk for mortality.

A diagnostic dilemma: distinguishing a sulfasalazine induced DRESS hypersensitivity syndrome from a CD30 + lymphoma in a young patient

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe hypersensitivity reaction characterized by cutaneous rash, lymphadenopathy, fever, eosinophilia, leukocytosis, and life-threatening organ dysfunctions. We describe the case of a 26 year old patient admitted to the Emergency Department for DRESS syndrome after sulfasalazine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in the right knee. Whole body computer tomography showed multiple neck, chest, and abdominal lymphadenopathy with splenomegaly, massive ascites and severe hepatic cytolysis. Serology results for Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), influenza, measles, rubella, hepatitis A and B were negative. The histologic analysis of skin, lymph node and bone marrow biopsies could not indicate a classical Hodgkin's Disease or iatrogenic immunodeficiency/EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD), Hodgkin type. The relatively small caliber of the CD30 + immunoreactive blastoid cells in the lymph nodes suggested reactive immunoblasts rather than Hodgkin cells. The morphologic aspects of the lymph node biopsies with predominance of T-cells were compatible with the diagnosis of a sulfasalazine-induced DRESS syndrome as the patient had a high RegiSCAR score for DRESS. [DRESS Syndrome Foundation: Diagnosis and Treatment. (2023)] The patient's complex clinical course, marked by two hospital admissions, highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing DRESS. This case underscores the need for individualized care, close patient monitoring, and further research to better understand DRESS's underlying mechanisms and optimal therapeutic strategies.

Rash caused by lurasidone in old chinese patient with bipolar disorder: case-based review

BACKGROUND

Rash is one of common adverse drug reaction and which have been reported in typical and atypical antipsychotics. Reports of lurasidone induced skin reactions are sparse. In this study, we report a case of rash caused by lurasidone.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old man with bipolar disorder (BD) who is treated by lurasidone. However, the patient presents a rash all over after lurasidone dose increasing from 40 mg/day to 60 mg/day. With the diagnosis of drug induced rash, lurasidone was discontinued, and the rash complete disappears within 2 weeks. In addition, all case reports about antipsychotics associated rash were reviewed by searching English and Chinese database including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang database. A total of 139 articles contained 172 patients were included in our study. The literature review and our case suggest that the cutaneous adverse events caused by antipsychotic drugs should not be ignored, particularly for the patient who was first use or at dose increasing of antipsychotic.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we report a case of lurasidone related rash and review rash caused by antipsychotics. Psychiatrists should be alert to the possibility of the rash caused by antipsychotics, especially the patient was first use of antipsychotics or the antipsychotic dose was increasing.

Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DReSS) in Children: A Scoping Review

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) is known to cause mortality and long-term sequelae in the pediatric population, however there are no established clinical practice guidelines for the management of pediatric DReSS. We conducted a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the currently available data on treatment, mortality, and long-term sequelae of DReSS in children (aged 0-18 years). Data from 644 individuals revealed that various treatment strategies are being used in the management of pediatric DReSS, and strategies were often used in combination. The diversity in treatment approaches cannot be solely attributed to age or disease severity and reflects the lack of evidence-based management guidelines for DReSS. Children are also at risk of developing autoimmune sequelae following DReSS, most commonly thyroid disease and type 1 diabetes mellitus. We found that the eventual development of autoimmune disease was more often associated with DReSS caused by antibiotics, especially minocycline and sulfamethoxazole, in comparison with individuals who did not develop sequelae. In this study, we identify strengths and weaknesses in the currently available literature and highlight that future prospective studies with structured and long-term follow-up of children with DReSS are needed to better understand potential risk factors for mortality and development of sequelae after DReSS.

Penicillin Allergy: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management

Allergy to penicillin can occur via any of the 4 types of Gel-Coombs hypersensitivity reactions, producing distinct clinical histories and physical examination findings. Treatments include penicillin discontinuation, and depending on the type of reaction, epinephrine, antihistamines, and/or glucocorticoids. Most beta-lactams may be safely used in penicillin-allergic patients, with the possible exception of first-generation and second-generation cephalosporins. Penicillin testing includes skin testing, patch testing, and graded challenge. The selection of the type of testing depends on the clinical setting, equipment availability, and type of hypersensitivity reaction. Desensitization may be used in some cases where treatment with penicillins is essential.

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome: A Case Report From South India

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome usually presents two to six weeks after treatment with a drug implicated in this disorder. However, in some cases, it can present more than eight weeks after the initiation of an implicated medication. This is a type 4 drug hypersensitivity reaction in which any internal organ may be involved. While the liver is commonly involved, cardiac involvement is not unheard of. Comorbidities and multiorgan involvement may obscure the diagnosis, and Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) criteria are a useful diagnostic aid. It is best treated by withdrawing the offending agent and administering systemic steroids. Oxidative stress is high in DRESS syndrome. Hepatoprotection is a priority in all patients and yields a better prognosis.

Drug Rash With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Due to Multiple Anti-Epileptic Drug Hypersensitivity

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare type of hypersensitivity reaction with an incidence in the general population of one case per 10,000, which may lead to life-threatening complications with a mortality rate of 3.8% to 10%. This condition has been characterized by the following symptoms: skin rash, febrile episodes, lymph node enlargement, and involvement of internal organs, specifically the liver. Common medications associated with these reactions are aromatic anticonvulsants and antibiotics. In this paper, we report a case of a 41-year-old female presenting with head-turning to the right and stiffening of the right upper and lower extremities, with subsequent involvement of the left upper and lower extremities secondary to a left frontal lobe glioma. She had a hypersensitivity reaction to five anticonvulsant medications and was treated with prednisone pulse therapy. This case showed that DRESS syndrome may also manifest with newer non-aromatic anticonvulsants such as levetiracetam and that steroid pulse therapy is effective in resolving the elevated blood parameters as well as skin lesions of patients with DRESS syndrome. The patient's epilepsy responded well to gabapentin without any recurrence of seizure episodes or hypersensitivity reactions.

Cutaneous adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AED) are widely used in therapy. They are mainly indicated in the treatment of epilepsy and some psychiatric pathologies as well as for their analgesic action. Their cutaneous adverse effects (CAE) are common, often mild but sometimes serious. The aim of this work was to study the epidemiological and clinical features of CAE occurring in adults and elderly patients (aged over 20 years-old) and to identify the most implicated AED. We conducted a descriptive retrospective study over a period of five years from January 2017 to December 2022 about CAE of AED in adults and elderly patients notified to The National Center Chalbi Belkahia of Pharmacovigilance (Tunis,Tunisia). All cases were analyzed according to the updates French methods of imputability. We collected 71 cases of patients aged over 20 years old who presented CAE to AED. The age ranged from 20 to 79 years (mean age=44.8 years). The sex ratio F/M was 0.7. AED were indicated for neurological pathology in 70.5% of cases, for psychiatric pathology in 15.9% of cases and for their analgesic action in 12.9% of cases. Epilepsy was the first indication (51.1% of cases). The most notified CAE in our study were drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome; 34% of cases), maculopapular exanthema (MPE; 26% of cases), erythematous rash (8% of cases) and photosensitivity in 5% of cases. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions were accounted for 37% of all CAE. The most implicated AED were carbamazepine (52%), phenobarbital (24%) and lamotrigine (18%). However, further study with a larger number of patients and in collaboration with prescribing physicians are needed to better clarify features of CAE associated with AED intake and specify the risk factors, specific to our Tunisian population.

Immediate hypersensitivity reaction to levetiracetam: a case report study

BACKGROUND

Anticonvulsant drugs are one of the most common causes of delayed hypersensitivity reactions, such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). These reactions are more prevalent with aromatic anticonvulsant drugs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine. However, immediate hypersensitivity reactions such as urticaria, angioedema, and anaphylaxis with anticonvulsant drugs are rare. We describe a 51-year-old woman who developed spreading skin rashes on her wrists with urticaria and pruritus 24 h after receiving intravenous levetiracetam.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of immediate hypersensitivity reactions with intravenous levetiracetam.

The association between HLA-B variants and amoxicillin-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions in Chinese han population

Background

Amoxicillin (AMX) is among the most prescribed and the best tolerated antimicrobials worldwide. However, it can occasionally trigger severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) with a significant morbidity and mortality. The genetic factors that may be relevant to AMX-induced SCAR (AMX-SCAR) remain unclear. Identification of the genetic risk factor may prevent patients from the risk of AMX exposure and resume therapy with other falsely implicated drugs.

Methodology

Four patients with AMX-SCAR, 1,000 population control and 100 AMX-tolerant individuals were enrolled in this study. Both exome-wide and HLA-based association studies were conducted. Molecular docking analysis was employed to simulate the interactions between AMX and risk HLA proteins.

Results

Compared with AMX-tolerant controls, a significant association of HLA-B*15:01 with AMX-SCAR was validated [odds ratio (OR) = 22.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68-1275.67; p = 7.34 × 10-3]. Moreover, 75% carriers of HLA-B*15:01 in four patients with AMX-SCAR, and the carrier frequency of 10.7% in 1,000 control individuals and 11.0% in 100 AMX-tolerant controls, respectively. Within HLA-B protein, the S140 present in all cases and demonstrated the strongest association with AMX-SCAR [OR = 53.5, p = 5.18 × 10-4]. Molecular docking results also confirmed the interaction between AMX and S140 of the HLA-B protein, thus eliminating the false-positive results during in association analysis.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that genetic susceptibility may be involved in the development of AMX-SCAR in Han Chinese. However, whether the HLA-B variants observed in this study can be used as an effective genetic marker of AMX-induced SCAR still needs to be further explored in larger cohort studies and other ethnic populations.

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome to Hemodialysis Polysulfone Membrane

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction. Although commonly associated with specific drugs, there have been no reports of DRESS syndrome caused by medical devices. We report a unique case of DRESS syndrome linked to a particular hemodialysis membrane during treatment. An 83-year-old man on hemodialysis exhibited fever, rash, and elevated eosinophils. Despite medication changes and consultations with specialists, his condition persisted. A drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test revealed a positive response to the dialysis membrane. His symptoms and lab results met DRESS syndrome diagnostic criteria. After substituting the membrane and administering glucocorticoids, the patient displayed early improvement. Diagnosing DRESS syndrome is complex due to its varied presentation and lack of specific benchmarks. This instance underscores the need to consider medical devices as potential DRESS syndrome triggers. Enhanced physician awareness can facilitate prompt detection and proper management, ultimately refining patient outcomes.

[Hydroxychloroquine-not always a harmless drug for off label use in dermatology]

Hydroxychloroquine is used for treatment of inflammatory diseases. It is considered to have few adverse effects. We report on a woman who developed a severe skin rash after intake of hydroxychloroquine, which she received for treatment of her lichen planopilaris. Based on the clinical, laboratory and histological findings the diagnosis of a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)-like drug reaction was established. Our case illustrates that hydroxychloroquine can lead to severe adverse effects in rare cases and that patients receiving this drug must be thoroughly informed.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), which include Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption, are life-threatening conditions. The pathogenesis of SCARs involves T cell receptors recognizing drug antigens presented by human leukocyte antigens, triggering the activation of distinct T cell subsets. These cells interact with keratinocytes and various immune cells, orchestrating cutaneous lesions and systemic manifestations. Genetic predisposition, impaired drug metabolism, viral reactivation or infections, and heterologous immunity influence SCAR development and clinical presentation. Specific genetic associations with distinct SCAR phenotypes have been identified, leading to the implementation of genetic screening before prescription in various countries to prevent SCARs. Whilst systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunomodulators have been the primary therapeutic agents, evolving strategies, including biologics and small molecules targeting tumour necrosis factor, different cytokines, or Janus kinase signalling pathways, signify a shift towards a precision management paradigm that considers individual clinical presentations.

Sulfasalazine-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) coinfected with COVID-19 complicated by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a case report

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) is characterized by a widespread maculopapular rash, lymphadenopathy, fever, and multisystem involvement. Conversely, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an infrequent yet critical condition presenting with fever, hepatosplenomegaly, cytopenias, coagulation abnormalities, and elevated inflammatory markers. The overlapping clinical and laboratory features between DRESS and HLH poses a significant diagnostic challenge. Secondary HLH (sHLH) typically occurs in adults triggered by viral infections, malignancies, rheumatologic diseases, or immune deficiencies. Recently, COVID-19 has also been identified as one of the triggers for sHLH. Herein, we present a case of Sulfasalazine-induced DRESS coinfected with COVID-19 that subsequently progressed into HLH. Our patient exhibited common hepatorenal and splenic involvement along with rare cholecystitis and appendicitis. However, a significant improvement was observed upon the addition of etoposide and azathioprine. We hypothesize that excessive activation of the immune system and cytokine storm due to DRESS combined with COVID-19 infection led to more extensive systemic damage resulting in HLH development. This highlights the potential for severe consequences when DRESS coincides with HLH during a COVID-19 infection.

Severe DRESS with myocarditis secondary to naproxen/esomeprazole

A man in his 60s presented with a widespread erythematous rash and associated chills, paraesthesia and haematuria. He had recently commenced naproxen/esomeprazole. Blood tests showed hypereosinophilia (0.73×109/L) and moderate acute kidney injury. Histology revealed parakeratosis, mild spongiosis with eosinophils. He developed acute coronary syndrome with rapid atrial fibrillation. Coronary angiogram was non-obstructive. Cardiac MRI (CMR) revealed acute myocarditis secondary to Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS). Naproxen/esomeprazole was discontinued, and he was supported with oral corticosteroids. A repeat CMR 3 months later showed resolution of myocarditis. Naproxen/esomeprazole is not a common offending drug. DRESS is a rare drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction with a mortality rate of 10%. The objective of this case report is to highlight the significant but rare cardiac complications that can ensue from DRESS, which warrant prompt recognition and withdrawal of the causative drug.

A Rare Pediatric Case of Allopurinol-Induced Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Successfully Treated With Intravenous Immunoglobulins

Allopurinol-induced drug reaction syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (A-DRESS) is a well-described condition in adults, whereas it is uncommon among children. We describe a case of A-DRESS in a 16-year-old male with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. He presented a life-threatening clinical course with persisting fever, skin rash, eosinophilia, lymphadenopathy, distributive shock, and herpesvirus 6 detection. The withdrawal of allopurinol and a combination of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) and systemic corticosteroids led to the patient's recovery without sequelae. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in pediatrics is rare and can present in a severe form. Early diagnosis and timely treatment are critical for prognostic purposes. This report suggests the potentially crucial role of IVIG in the treatment of patients with A-DRESS.

DRESS syndrome with multiorgan involvement and HHV-6 reactivation in the absence of a drug trigger

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe drug reaction where patients present with fever, morbilliform rash and multiorgan manifestations, which may include acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome and eosinophilic myocarditis. We present a case of a 60-year-old woman with acute heart failure, DRESS syndrome features and human herpesvirus 6 reactivation in the absence of a drug trigger. She was diagnosed with eosinophilic myocarditis and successfully treated with corticosteroid therapy.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to omeprazole-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): Case report and review of the literature

Eosinophilia in not an uncommon findings in the intensive care unit (ICU); however, DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) syndrome, which is characterized by a hypersensitivity reaction to drugs and manifests as eosinophilia, systemic involvement and maculopapular erythematous rash 2-6 weeks after exposure to the offending drug, is an exceptional occurrence. We present the first case described in the literature of DRESS syndrome with pulmonary involvement in the form of interstitial pneumonitis and persistent adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The patient made a good recovery after withdrawal of the offending drug and long-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids. We also present a systematic review of all cases of DRESS with pulmonary involvement in the form of interstitial pneumonitis and cases of PPI-induced DRESS published to date; none of these describe pulmonary involvement.

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DReSS) in Children: A Scoping Review

Effective treatment of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) requires early diagnosis and close monitoring. Diagnosing DReSS is especially challenging in children due to a low incidence rate, heterogeneous clinical presentation, and a lack of (pediatric) diagnostic criteria and clinical practice guidelines. We performed a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the clinical presentation and diagnostic process of DReSS in children (aged 0-18 years). Data from 644 individuals showed that DReSS manifests differently in children compared to adults. Children have a higher number of organs involved, including higher rates of cardiac and respiratory involvement compared to adults. Children < 6 years of age appear more prone to develop neurologic symptoms. Conversely, eosinophilia, edema, and kidney involvement are less frequently observed in children. Anti-seizure medications are by far the most common causative drug class, but the range of implicated drugs increases as children get older. This study highlights that children with DReSS not only differ from adults but also that differences exist between children of different ages. As such, there is a need to establish pediatric-specific diagnostic criteria. These efforts will promote earlier diagnosis of DReSS and likely lead to improved clinical care offered to children and their families.

Phenytoin Induced Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome: A Clinical Case Report

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction with cutaneous presentation and internal organ involvement. We herein present a case of phenytoin induced DRESS syndrome in a 56- year-old male who presented with high-grade fever and chills, cough with expectoration and generalized maculopapular rash. Laboratory findings revealed eosinophilia, leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis and elevated inflammatory markers. Further clinical, radiological and histopathological assessments confirmed the diagnosis. Phenytoin was discontinued, and patient was started on intravenous dexamethasone, which was later switched to oral prednisone. Rapid resolution of fever, eosinophilia and progressive improvement in skin rash and liver dysfunction was observed. Our report highlights the importance of prompt recognition of DRESS syndrome and the need for a guideline directed therapy for the management of this adverse drug reaction.

Fatal Case of Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia (PJP) During Treatment for Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an acute, rare and potentially fatal drug reaction. To date, limited studies have reported secondary Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) infection during the treatment of DRESS syndrome. A 53-year-old man was admitted to the hospital due to a persistent fever lasting for 5 days. He had a medical history of hypertension, psoriasis, urticaria, and had recently been treated with carbamazepine for nerve spasm two weeks ago. After admission, the patient presented with a high fever accompanied by chills, abdominal pain, bilateral upper limb muscle pain, and generalized lymph nodes enlargement. Laboratory tests revealed elevated eosinophils and atypical lymphocytes. Subsequently, the patient developed multiple internal organ complications, including oliguria, elevated serum creatinine, liver enzymes, and cardiac troponin I. Based on diagnostic criteria, the patient was diagnosed with DRESS syndrome. To manage the DRESS syndrome, the patient was successively or simultaneously prescribed methylprednisolone, cyclosporin and intravenous immunoglobulin, resulting in an improvement of the condition. However, during the treatment, the patient was infected with Pneumocystis jirovecii. Despite targeted therapy with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, primaquine and clindamycin successively, no remission was observed. Chest CT scans exhibited multiple exudations in both lungs, indicative of interstitial pneumonia. Unfortunately, the patient's oxygenation progressively declined, leading to his untimely demise. This rare case further highlights the need for clinicians to be aware of the risk of Pneumocystis jirovecii infection in DRESS syndrome patients treated with long-term and high-dose glucocorticoid therapy.

Omeprazole Induced Rapid Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia, Systemic Symptoms, and Cross-Reactivity in Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Associated with Proton-Pump Inhibitors: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is a widely used and generally safe agent for treating acid-related gastrointestinal conditions. However, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESSs) syndrome has been reported.

Objectives

To report a case of omeprazole-induced rapid DRESS syndrome and to review the literature.

Methods

Descriptive analysis of one new case and a case series from literature review.

Results

We report a case of 82-year-old woman presenting with rapid-onset of DRESS syndrome. The condition was initially suspected to be caused by antibiotic, but the definite diagnosis was eventually omeprazole-induced DRESS syndrome as suggested by the enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot) assay along with the clinical picture. Previous literatures regarding cases of PPI-induced DRESS syndrome were pooled for descriptive analysis. Among 21 PPI cases pooled, esomeprazole was the most commonly implicated PPI (52.4%), followed by pantoprazole (19.1%), and omeprazole along with lansoprazole (both 14.3%). The issue of cross-reactivities amongst PPIs remains uncertain. Nonetheless, in situations in which a PPIs are deemed necessary, a prudent approach could be considering a switch to an alternative agent with distinct chemical structure.

Conclusion

PPI is commonly used safely as an agent for acid-related gastrointestinal conditions. However, PPI-induced rapid DRESS syndrome can occur, particularly with prior exposure history. ELISpot is an in vitro test, useful in identifying the culprit agent in patients with delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction.

Characteristics of DRESS Syndrome in the Elderly: A Comparative Study of 55 Patients

Background: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare drug reaction characterized by a skin rash, eosinophilia, and organ involvement. Objective: Our purpose is to focus on the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of DRESS in the elderly and to identify the incriminated drugs. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients, hospitalized for DRESS with a RegiSCAR ≥4. The population was divided into 2 groups according to age: 65 years or older (G1) and <65 years (G2). The statistical study was performed using the comparative and multivariate analysis. Results: We included 55 patients (30.9% G1 and 69.1% G2). Skin manifestations were comparable in both groups. Lymphadenopathy was less common in G1 with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.012). Renal impairment was more frequent in the elderly with a statistically significant result (P = 0.005). DRESS in the elderly group was significantly associated with the occurrence of sepsis (P = 0.008). Allopurinol was the most common culprit associated with DRESS in G1 (P = 0.001). Relapses and recurrences were comparable in both groups (P = 0.71). Conclusions: DRESS in the elderly is associated with a high risk of complications, mainly kidney involvement and sepsis. Allopurinol is the most incriminated drug.

Vancomycin-Induced Liver Injury, DRESS, and HLA-A∗32:01

BACKGROUND

Intravenous vancomycin therapy can cause liver injury as well as "drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms" (DRESS) syndrome. This study aimed to better define the clinical features and HLA associations of vancomycin-induced liver injury.

OBJECTIVE

To describe clinical, biochemical, and temporal characteristics of vancomycin-induced liver injury.

METHODS

Cases of liver injury with recent exposure to vancomycin who were enrolled in the US Drug-induced Liver Injury Network between 2004 and 2020 were assessed. Sequencing of HLA alleles was performed on stored blood samples.

RESULTS

Among 1697 cases of drug-induced liver injury identified between 2004 and 2021, 9 (0.5%) were attributed to intravenous vancomycin. The 9 cases included 6 men, median age 60 years (range, 23-85 days), and treatment for 26 days (range, 1-34 days). The clinical presentation was DRESS syndrome in 8 patients, of whom 6 received corticosteroids. Liver injury varied from hepatocellular to cholestatic and from mild (n = 5) to fatal (n = 1). In survivors, liver injury and DRESS syndrome ultimately resolved. HLA typing demonstrated the HLA-A∗32:01 allele in 7 vancomycin cases (78%, all with DRESS syndrome), versus 1 of 81 cases (1.2%) exposed but not attributed to vancomycin, and 113 of 1708 cases (6.6%) without vancomycin exposure. The allele frequency in vancomycin cases was 0.44 compared with less than 0.04 in US populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin-induced liver injury is commonly associated with DRESS syndrome and linked to HLA-A∗32:01. HLA-A∗32:01 testing could be considered early to risk-stratify patients using long-term intravenous vancomycin therapy.

Retrospective study on the association of human herpesvirus reactivation with severe DRESS: A description of blood and skin reactivations

BACKGROUND

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) is a severe adverse event (mortality of 10%). Its pathophysiology involves herpesviruses, particularly HHV-6, but the exact mechanisms are still poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To describe severe cases of DRESS and especially their association with herpesvirus reactivation.

METHODS

This study was a multicentre case series conducted between 2007 and 2021 at five University Hospital Centres in France. The study included patients who had severe DRESS, which was defined as death, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), or severe damage to internal organs. We excluded patients without blood PCR sample, without a drug formally attributed or with RegiSCAR score < 6. We collected data on severity, causative drug, associated visceral damage and results of viral blood PCRs. HHV-6 reactivation was studied in skin biopsies by detection of small non-coding transcripts (HHV-6 miR-aU14) and a late viral protein (GP82/105).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included (29 female, median age 62, interquartile range (IQR) [37;72]). Eight patients (15%) died, 13 (27%) were admitted to ICU. Most patients (n = 34; 65%) had multisystem involvement: most frequent was liver (n = 46; 88%), then renal failure (n = 24; 46%). Forty patients (77%) had at least one blood viral reactivation among HHV-6, EBV or CMV, of which 21 (53%) had at least two. Median time of blood HHV-6 reactivation was 24 days (IQR [20;35]). HHV-6 reactivation was demonstrated in 15 out of 20 skin biopsies, with a median time of 11 days [9;17].

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the high rate of HHV-6 reactivation in severe DRESS and demonstrated cutaneous HHV-6 reactivation using small non-coding transcripts (HHV-6 miR-aU14), which preceded viral PCR positivity in blood. These results suggest that HHV-6 reactivation during DRESS may start in skin. Furthermore, search for miR-aU14 in skin biopsy could become a useful diagnostic tool for early detection of HHV-6 reactivation.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in a paediatric population: Interest of skin tests

BACKGROUND

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug reaction. It is uncommon in the paediatric population and can be difficult to diagnose as its initial symptoms may mimic a viral infection.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the features of paediatric DRESS and to evaluate the interest of skin tests in identifying the causative drugs.

METHODS

It is a retrospective analysis (2004-2021) of DRESS cases diagnosed in paediatric patients. The DRESS diagnosis was defined using the RegiSCAR scoring. The skin tests were performed according to the ENDA recommendations.

RESULTS

We included 19 cases of DRESS occurred in 18 patients. Common clinical symptoms were exanthema and fever in 94.7% of cases each. The most commonly affected organ was the liver (84.2%). Among the implicated drugs, 16 were tested and skin tests were positive in 75%. To assess cross-reactivity and co-sensitization, skin tests with related and/or co-administered drugs were performed in eight patients. Among them, only one child had positive results.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of DRESS and discontinuation of the incriminated drug might reduce the incidence of mortality in the paediatric population. Skin tests could be a safe and useful tool to identify the causative drug and assess cross-reactivity.

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome Induced by Primary Anti-tubercular Medication: A Case Report

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic syndrome (DRESS) is a life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction of the skin and visceral organs caused by exposure to certain drugs, often with a latency period of two to eight weeks. A 20-year-old man, previously diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) one month ago and receiving treatment with isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE regimen), presented with symptoms including a maculopapular rash, fever, elevated transaminase levels, an increased white blood cell count with eosinophilia, hepatomegaly, and lymphadenopathy. The patient experienced recovery upon cessation of drug use and was administered corticosteroids and supportive therapeutic interventions. Individuals diagnosed with pulmonary TB who are undergoing treatment with first-line anti-tubercular medications have a heightened susceptibility to DRESS. The timely identification and cessation of the offending agent can effectively mitigate mortality.

DRESS and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Overlap Secondary to Allopurinol in a 50-Year-Old Man-A Diagnostic and Treatment Challenge: Case Report

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a drug reaction commonly related to eosinophilia, from uncertain epidemiology, and without consensus for diagnosis and treatment globally. It presents a great challenge in its management and is characterized by fever, lymphadenopathy, skin rash, and multisystemic involvement. An aggressive and difficult-to-manage clinical case is presented in a 50-year-old man with chronic kidney disease due to diabetes mellitus type 2 and systemic arterial hypertension, who developed an unusual variant similar to DRESS and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) overlap secondary to allopurinol, with skin manifestations without eosinophilia, but fulfilling clinical and laboratory criteria for DRESS and SJS syndrome.

Unraveling the complexities of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): Insights into clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic features of a case series from an Italian tertiary center

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe and potentially life-threatening drug hypersensitivity reaction. The diagnosis and management of DRESS are complicated due to its heterogeneous clinical and pathologic presentations, delayed onset of signs and symptoms, and unpredictable outcome. This retrospective study aimed to analyze cases of DRESS from a single Italian referring tertiary hospital center (Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy) with a focus on clinical features, causative drugs, histopathologic findings, and treatment. We have included 18 of 32 patients with a probable or definite diagnosis of DRESS. The study observed a slight predominance of women, with antimicrobials and allopurinol identified as the main causative drugs. Clinical manifestations varied, with a monomorphic maculopapular eruption being the most common, whereas facial edema and mucosal involvement were less frequently observed. Multiple organs were commonly affected, with liver and kidney involvement being prominent. Cardiac involvement was associated with the severity of eosinophilia. Laboratory evaluations showed elevated eosinophil levels and increased eosinophil cationic protein levels, supporting the role of eosinophils in DRESS pathogenesis. Histopathologic analysis revealed various patterns often coexisting in the same biopsy in 83% of cases, with interface dermatitis being the most frequent, followed by the perivascular pattern and the spongiotic/eczematous pattern. We observed eosinophils in the biopsy samples in about 50% of patients, and the relationship between peripheral eosinophilia and eosinophils in skin biopsies was not significant. In addition to the RegiSCAR score, age may play a role in predicting disease severity, as older patients with lower scores had poorer outcomes. The prognosis of DRESS depended on early identification, discontinuation of the causative agent, and appropriate therapy. Systemic corticosteroids were the primary treatment option.

Fatal eosinophilic myocarditis and submassive hepatic necrosis in lamotrigine induced DRESS syndrome

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare but severe and sometimes fatal adverse drug reaction that is known to occur with a number of antiepileptic drugs. It often follows a prolonged clinical course, which can worsen even after discontinuing the causative drug and administering steroid treatment. Failure to promptly identify the delayed involvement of vital organs, such as the heart and liver, may result in irreversible organ failure and death. We report a case of a presumed sudden death of a young woman who had a documented history of a protracted intermittent hypersensitivity reaction to lamotrigine. Postmortem examination revealed the presence of eosinophilic myocarditis and submassive hepatic necrosis diagnostic of fatal DRESS syndrome that progressed despite early discontinuation of the medication and improvement of dermatologic and hematologic symptoms following steroid therapy.

Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Co-Trimoxazole-Induced Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

BACKGROUND

Co-trimoxazole has been reported as a common culprit drug for various cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). However, information on genotypic and phenotypic characteristics is still limited. We aimed to study clinical characteristics, genetic suitability, laboratory findings, and treatment outcomes in patients with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR and determine variables associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs).

METHODS

The medical records of all patients diagnosed with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR during October 2015 and October 2021 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and laboratory investigation with an emphasis on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and HLA-DRB1 results linked to subtypes of cutaneous adverse reactions were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients diagnosed with co-trimoxazole-induced CADR were included in the study. Mean age at diagnosis was 38.0 ± 14.6 years old, and 72% were female. Subtypes of reactions included maculopapular eruption (MPE; 56.9%), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS; 23.6%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS; 12.5%), fixed drug eruption (4.2%), and urticaria (2.8%). Characteristics that were significantly associated with SCARs included male gender (OR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.04-8.75), HIV infection (OR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.13-10.75), prophylactic use of co-trimoxazole (OR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.54-15.57), and co-trimoxazole administration longer than 10 days (OR = 7.65, 95% CI: 2.57-22.78). HLA-B*38:02 was associated with co-trimoxazole-induced SJS, while HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, and HLA-DRB1*12:01 were associated with co-trimoxazole-induced DRESS. HLA-B*52:01 was associated with co-trimoxazole-induced MPE.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-trimoxazole could induce various phenotypes of CADRs. Genotypic and phenotypic factors that may potentially predict co-trimoxazole-induced SCARs include male gender, HIV infection, prophylactic and prolonged drug use, as well as the presence of HLA-A*11:01, HLA-B*13:01, HLA-B*38:02, or HLA-DRB1*12:01 alleles.

Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome/Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms: Predictive Score and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

We previously developed a drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) severity (DDS) score that may predict DIHS/DRESS-associated complications (DACs), including myocarditis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To externally confirm the predictive accuracy of the DDS score, clarify its ability to identify patients at high risk of DACs and fatal outcome, and determine which treatments might reduce or increase the risk.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in which we followed 48 patients with DIHS/DRESS at 5 university hospitals in Japan for 1 year after onset. Patients were divided into mild, moderate, and severe DIHS/DRESS groups depending on their early DDS score.

RESULTS

Eight cases had DACs in the severe group (n = 17); no DACs were observed in the mild group (n = 12). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a cutoff DDS score of ≥4.0 and ≤2.0 could differentiate patients who would and would not develop DACs, respectively. In the moderate-to-severe disease groups, DACs occurred only in patients who received corticosteroids and not in those who received supportive care. None of the patients who received early treatment for cytomegalovirus developed DACs. Autoimmune DACs were significantly more common in patients who received pulse corticosteroid therapy. Four deaths occurred within the 1-year follow-up; all were in patients with infectious DACs who received systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Our scoring system allows early identification of patients at increased risk for DACs. Risk factors for DACs include systemic or pulse corticosteroid therapy.