Harmful effects of NSAIDs among patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease

Trends in Prescribing of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Medications in the US Ambulatory Care Setting From 2006 to 2016

While opioid prescribing has significantly decreased from a peak in 2012, less is known about the national utilization of non-opioid analgesics such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen (APAP) in the context of the opioid crisis. The objective of this study is to characterize the prescribing trends of NSAIDs and APAP in the US ambulatory care setting. We conducted repeated cross-sectional analyses using the 2006-2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. NSAID-involved visits were defined as patient visits among adults in which NSAIDs were ordered, supplied, administered, or continued. We used similarly-defined APAP visits as a referent group for context. After excluding aspirin and other NSAID/APAP combination products containing opioids, we calculated the annual proportion of NSAID-involved visits among all ambulatory visits. We conducted trend analyses using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for years, patient, and prescriber characteristics. From 2006 to 2016, there were 775.7 million NSAID-involved visits and 204.3 million APAP-involved visits. Most NSAIDs-involved visits were from patients aged 46-64 years (39.6%), female (60.4%), White (83.2%), and having commercial insurance (49.0%). There were significant increasing trends for the proportion of NSAID-involved visits (8.1-9.6%) and APAP-involved visits (1.7-2.9%) (both P < .0001). We observed an overall increase in NSAID and APAP-involved visits in US ambulatory care settings from 2006 to 2016. This trend may be attributed to decreasing opioid prescribing and raises safety concerns related to acute or chronic NSAID and APAP use. PERSPECTIVE: This study shows an overall increasing trend in NSAID use reported in nationally representative ambulatory care visits in the United States. This increase coincides with previously reported significant decreases in opioid analgesic use, particularly after 2012. Given the safety concerns related to chronic or acute NSAID use, there is a need to continue monitoring the use trends of this class of medication.

An inhibitor of interaction between the transcription factor NRF2 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase adapter β-TrCP delivers anti-inflammatory responses in mouse liver

It is widely accepted that activating the transcription factor NRF2 will blast the physiological anti-inflammatory mechanisms, which will help combat pathologic inflammation. Much effort is being put in inhibiting the main NRF2 repressor, KEAP1, with either electrophilic small molecules or disrupters of the KEAP1/NRF2 interaction. However, targeting β-TrCP, the non-canonical repressor of NRF2, has not been considered yet. After in silico screening of ∼1 million compounds, we now describe a novel small molecule, PHAR, that selectively inhibits the interaction between β-TrCP and the phosphodegron in transcription factor NRF2. PHAR upregulates NRF2-target genes such as Hmox1, Nqo1, Gclc, Gclm and Aox1, in a KEAP1-independent, but β-TrCP dependent manner, breaks the β-TrCP/NRF2 interaction in the cell nucleus, and inhibits the β-TrCP-mediated in vitro ubiquitination of NRF2. PHAR attenuates hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative stress and, in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophages, it downregulates the expression of inflammatory genes Il1b, Il6, Cox2, Nos2. In mice, PHAR selectively targets the liver and greatly attenuates LPS-induced liver inflammation as indicated by a reduction in the gene expression of the inflammatory cytokines Il1b, TNf, and Il6, and in F4/80-stained liver resident macrophages. Thus, PHAR offers a still unexplored alternative to current NRF2 activators by acting as a β-TrCP/NRF2 interaction inhibitor that may have a therapeutic value against undesirable inflammation.

Sinapicacid Inhibits Group IIA Secretory Phospholipase A2 and Its Inflammatory Response in Mice

Human Group IIA secreted phospholipase A₂ (sPLA₂-IIA) enzyme plays a crucial role in several chronic inflammatory diseases such asasthma, atherosclerosis, gout, bronchitis, etc. Several studies showed that the antioxidants exert an anti-inflammatory function by inhibiting the sPLA₂-IIA enzyme. Hence, the present study evaluated an antioxidant molecule, sinapic acid, for sPLA₂-IIA inhibition as an anti-inflammatory function. Initially, the antioxidant efficacy of sinapic acid was evaluated, and it showed greater antioxidant potency. Further, sinapic acid inhibited 94.4 ± 4.83% of sPLA₂-IIA activity with an IC₅₀ value of 4.16 ± 0.13 µM. The mode of sPLA₂-IIA inhibition was examined by increasing the substrate concentration from 30 to 120nM and the calcium concentration from 2.5 to 15 mM, which did not change the level of inhibition. Further, sinapic acid altered the intrinsic fluorescence and distorted the far UltraViolet Circular Dichroism (UV-CD) spectra of the sPLA₂-IIA, indicating the direct enzyme-inhibitor interaction. Sinapic acid reduced the sPLA₂-IIA mediated hemolytic activity from 94 ± 2.19% to 12.35 ± 2.57% and mouse paw edema from 171.75 ± 2.2% to 114.8 ± 1.98%, demonstrating the anti-inflammatory efficiency of sinapic acid by in situ and in vivo methods, respectively. Finally, sinapic acid reduced the hemorrhagic effect of Vipera russelli venom hemorrhagic complex-I (VR-HC-I) as an anti-hemorrhagic function. Thus, the above experimental results revealed the sinapic acid potency to be an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-hemorrhagic molecule, and therefore, it appears to be a promising therapeutic agent.

Blood Pressure Assessment and Treatment in the Observation Unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the management of hypertension. Given the paucity of literature regarding the role of the observation unit in the management of hypertension, we will provide our recommendations based on our experience working in an observation unit.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many patients have limited access to primary care, and hypertension diagnosis often relies on office-based measurements. We will describe situations where that is not necessary to make the diagnosis. We will discuss the current non-pharmacologic treatment guidelines, the education of which should be provided to patients both in the emergency department and observation units. We will provide the current recommendations on what anti-hypertension medications can be initiated in the emergency department and observation units. Hypertension is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA. The utility of an observation unit in the diagnosis and management of patients with hypertension is beneficial particularly for those with risk factors for atherosclerotic disease. An observation unit stay provides the opportunity to diagnosis hypertension, initiate lifestyle education and pharmacologic treatment if indicated, and help to arrange appropriate follow-up for ongoing management and treatment in individuals with limited access to care.

Group IIA secreted phospholipase A2 inhibition by elemolic acid as a function of anti-inflammatory activity

Human group IIA secreted phospholipase A2 (GIIA) is a key enzyme in inflammatory reactions, worsening the condition of several chronic inflammatory diseases. The natural inhibitors of GIIA potentially block the production of inflammatory mediators. In the present study, elemolic acid, a triterpenoid from Boswellia serrata inhibited the GIIA enzyme in a concentration-dependent manner with IC50 value of 5.70 ± 0.02 µM. The mode of GIIA inhibition was studied by increasing the concentration of the substrate from 30 to 120 nM, and calcium from 2.5 to 15 mM, the level of inhibition was not changed. The inhibitor-enzyme interaction was examined by fluorimetry and Circular Dichroism (CD) studies; elemolic acid altered intrinsic fluorescence intensity and shifted far UV- CD spectra of GIIA enzyme, suggesting the direct interaction with GIIA. Elemolic acid neutralized the GIIA mediated indirect hemolytic activity from 94.5 to 9.8% and reduced GIIA induced mouse paw edema from 171.75 to 113.68%. Elemolic acid also reduced the hemorrhagic effect of GIIA along with Vipera russelii neurotoxic non-enzymatic peptide -VNTx-II (VR-HC-I). Thus, the elemolic acid has been proven as a potent inhibitor of GIIA enzyme and modulated the GIIA induced inflammatory response by in situ and in vivo methods.

Vascular Inflammation in Hypertension: Targeting Lipid Mediators Unbalance and Nitrosative Stress

Arterial hypertension is a worldwide public health threat. High Blood Pressure (BP) is commonly associated with endothelial dysfunction, nitric oxide synthases (NOS) unbalance and high peripheral vascular resistance. In addition to those, inflammation has also been designated as one of the major components of BP increase and organ damage in hypertension. This minireview discusses vascular inflammatory triggers of high BP and aims to fill the existing gaps of antiinflammatory therapy of hypertension. Among the reasons discussed, enhanced prostaglandins rather than resolvins lipid mediators, immune cell infiltration and oxidative/nitrosative stress are pivotal players of BP increase within the inflammatory hypothesis. To address these inflammatory targets, this review also proposes new concepts in hypertension treatment with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), nitric oxide-releasing NSAIDs (NO-NSAIDs) and specialized proresolving mediators (SPM). In this context, the failure of NSAIDs in hypertension treatment seems to be associated with the reduction of endogenous NO bioavailability, which is not necessarily an effect of all drug members of this pharmacological class. For this reason, NO-releasing NSAIDs seem to be safer and more specific therapy to treat vascular inflammation in hypertension than regular NSAIDs.

U.S. trends in prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among patients with cardiovascular disease, 1988-2016

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events prompting labeling revisions cautioning their use among patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, little is known regarding long-term trends in real-world prescribing of NSAIDs within the CVD population. We aimed to characterize the use of prescription NSAIDs among U.S. adults with CVD from 1988 to 2016.

METHODS

We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cross-sectional data from 1988-1994 and 19992016 to identify participants aged greater than or equal to 18 years with hypertension (defined by self-report, mean blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg, or antihypertensive medication use), or aged greater than or equal to 20 years with self-reported congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary heart disease (CHD), angina, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. Prevalence of prescription NSAID use was analyzed in 6-year examination periods. Weighted logistic regression was performed to test time trends in prescription NSAID use.

RESULTS

Overall, prescription NSAID use declined among all CVD populations. The highest prevalence of overall prescription NSAID use was observed during the 1999-2004 examination years, thereafter declining through the 2005-2010 and 2011-2016 examination years: in patients with hypertension (13.9% [1999-2004] to 8.5% [2011-2016]), CHF (14.6%-8.5%), CHD (16.3%-7.4%), angina (17.6%-8.5%), MI (16.1%-9.0%), and stroke (15.7%-7.9%). Decreased use of COX-2-selective inhibitors was observed during the same period; whereas, nonselective NSAID use remained relatively stable. Trends in prescription NSAID use were reflective of the general adult population.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription NSAID use among patients with CVD appears to have declined from 1988 to 2016, primarily due to reduced COX-2-selective inhibitor use. Nonetheless, the prevalence of prescription NSAIDs has persisted among a subset of high-risk CVD populations.

Current Concepts in the Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Narrative Review

Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture and can increase morbidity and mortality. To date, the guidelines for managing osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are limited in quantity and quality, and there is no gold standard treatment for these fractures. Conservative treatment is considered the primary treatment option for OVFs and includes pain relief through shortterm bed rest, analgesics, antiosteoporotic drugs, exercise, and braces. Studies on vertebral augmentation (VA) including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty have been widely reported, but there is still debate and controversy regarding the effectiveness of VA when compared with conservative treatment, and the routine use of VA for OVF is not supported by current evidence. Although most OVFs heal well, approximately 15%-35% of patients with unstable fractures, chronic intractable back pain, severely collapsed vertebra (leading to neurological deficits and kyphosis), or chronic pseudarthrosis frequently require surgery. Given that there is no single technique for optimizing surgical outcomes in OVFs, tailored surgical techniques are needed. Surgeons need to pay attention to advances in osteoporotic spinal surgery and should be open to novel thoughts and techniques. Prevention and management of osteoporosis is the key element in reducing the risk of subsequent OVFs. Bisphosphonates and teriparatide are mainstay drugs for improving fracture healing in OVF. The effects of bisphosphonates on fracture healing have not been clinically evaluated. The intermittent administration of teriparatide significantly enhanced spinal fusion and fracture healing and reduced mortality risk. Based on the current literature, there is still a lack of standard management strategies for OVF. There is a need for greater efforts through multimodal approaches including conservative treatment, surgery, osteoporosis treatment, and drugs that promote fracture healing to improve the quality of the guidelines.

A patients' view of OA: the Global Osteoarthritis Patient Perception Survey (GOAPPS), a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Globally, osteoarthritis (OA) is the third condition associated with disability. There is still poor treatment in OA but science holds the key to finding better treatments and a cure. It is essential to learn what's important to patients from them to implement the most effective OA management. The OA Patients Task Force, conducted the Global OA Patient Perception Survey (GOAPPS)-the first global survey made by patients to analize the quality of life (QoL) & patient perceptions of care. The goal was to collect data on OA patients' perception of OA to understand patients' needs and expectations to improve OA management.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional study by online survey data collection from six countries, translated into three languages. The questionnaire was comprised of 3 sections: patient demographics and clinical symptomology characteristics; relationship with physicians: perception of attention, treatment, and information provided; and OA impact on daily activity and QoL. The results of the survey were evaluated using the Limited Data Set. The survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics to characterize the patients' answers. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha was calculated to determine internal consistency validity.

RESULTS

A total of 1512 surveys were completed in 6 countries. 84.2% of respondents reported pain/tenderness and 91.1% experienced limitations to physical activities. 42.3% of patients were not satisfied with their current OA treatment. 86% had comorbidities, especially hypertension, and obesity. 51.3 and 78% would like access to additional drug or additional non-drug/non-surgical treatments respectively. 48.2% of patients perceived their QoL to be affected by OA. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.61.

CONCLUSIONS

OA has a significant impact on patients' daily activities and their desire to play an active role in managing this disease. Patients are seeking additional treatments, especially no pharmacological/no surgical treatments stressing the need for investing in clinical research, implementing OA preventive measures, and managing interventions to improve the healthcare value chain in OA.

Evaluation of the modulatory effects of Piper guineense leaves and seeds on egg albumin-induced inflammation in experimental rat models

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Inflammation processes are implicated in many degenerative diseases. Piper guineense, a West African spice belonging to the Piperaceae family has been reported to contain anti-inflammatory agents.

AIM OF STUDY

This study determined the modulatory effects of methanolic extracts of Piper guineense leaves and seeds on egg albumin-induced inflammation in rats.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Inflammation in the hind paw was induced by injecting 0.1ml egg albumin subcutaneously. Treatments including diclofenac were given orally. Rectal temperature and paw size were monitored hourly for the first 3 h' post-induction of inflammation and then at the 6th and 24th hour. Serum levels of CRP, MDA, LDH and GGT activities were determined at these hours.

RESULTS

Results showed that egg albumin-induced inflammation caused a significant (p < 0.05) increase in paw size and rectal temperature. It further showed that treatment with the leaves and seed extracts reversed the effect of inflammation on serum levels of CRP and MDA, and on LDH and GGT activities similar to diclofenac in rats.

CONCLUSION

Extracts of the Piper guineense seed and leaves have potentials of being used as an anti-inflammatory agent but further studies need to be done to determine their toxicity and effects on immunological markers of inflammation.

Patient's Knowledge and Use of Oral Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in a Rheumatology Clinic

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the knowledge of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including their dosage, side effects, contraindications, and drug interactions among the patients in an outpatient rheumatology clinic.

METHODS

Patients in a rheumatology clinic completed a short survey assessing their knowledge of over-the-counter NSAIDs.

RESULTS

The survey was provided to 400 participants and 275 (68.5%) were using over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs. The majority of the participants identified their commonly used NSAID. Almost a third were unaware of the contraindication of NSAIDs such as peptic ulcer disease, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Nearly 53.9% participants denied having any discussion of OTC medications with their providers. Two-thirds of the respondents reported seeing only the medication packaging for the dose determination (67.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The gap in patient knowledge of the potential side effects and the lack of discussion of OTC medications by the providers may be predisposing the patients to preventable side effects from NSAIDs.

Cardiac toxicity of coxibs: mechanisms of development and their prevention

Development of highly selective COX-2 inhibitors – coxibs has proved a decreased risk of gastrointestinal toxicity, which was typical for non-selective NSAIDS, according to the evidence-based medicine. But such situation caused an imbalance in the impact on the synthesis of arachidonic acid metabolites: inhibition of COX-2 vasodilatatory prostacyclins and activation of thromboxane synthesis by platelets, which is accompanied by the increase in the frequency of thrombotic complications – myocardial infarctions and strokes. Some meta-analyses have proved this association: the higher is COX-2 inhibitors selectivity – the higher are CV-risks and cardiovascular toxicity of coxibs. Discontinuation or limitation of indications of coxibs, assessment of risk / benefit ratio is recommended in the conditions of comorbidity of CVS pathology, pain syndromes in rheumatology. Drugs of choice are moderately selective COX-2 inhibitors = meloxicam and nimesulide.

Analgesic Effect of 5-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxy-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)penta-2,4-dien-1-one in Experimental Animal Models of Nociception

Curcuminoids derived from turmeric rhizome have been reported to exhibit antinociceptive, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. We evaluated the peripheral and central antinociceptive activities of 5-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-hydroxy-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)penta-2,4-dien-1-one (DHHPD), a novel synthetic curcuminoid analogue at 0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg (intraperitoneal), through chemical and thermal models of nociception. The effects of DHHPD on the vanilloid and glutamatergic systems were evaluated through the capsaicin- and glutamate-induced paw licking tests. Results showed that DHHPD significantly (p < 0.05) attenuated the writhing response produced by the 0.8% acetic acid injection. In addition, 1 and 3 mg/kg of DHHPD significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the licking time spent by each mouse in both phases of the 2.5% formalin test and increased the response latency of mice on the hot-plate. However, the effect produced in the latter was not reversed by naloxone, a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist. Despite this, DHHPD decreased the licking latency of mice in the capsaicin- and glutamate-induced paw licking tests in a dose response manner. In conclusion, DHHPD showed excellent peripheral and central antinociceptive activities possibly by attenuation of the synthesis and/or release of pro-inflammatory mediators in addition to modulation of the vanilloid and glutamatergic systems without an apparent effect on the opioidergic system.

Evaluation of Bloodletting Cupping Therapy in the Management of Hypertension

Background

Bloodletting cupping therapy (Hijama) is a traditional alternative medicine practiced in different cultures. Claims about the therapeutic efficacy of Hijama in hypertension are contradictory. The aim of this project was to determine if Hijama therapy is beneficial in the treatment of patients with hypertension.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective study, 60 files for patients treated for hypertension, aged 40-60 years and whose systolic blood pressure (SBP) is at least 140mm Hg, were used. The data from 30 patient files were obtained from three licensed Hijama centers (study group), whereas data from the rest of 30 patient files were collected from a hospital (control group). The data from Hijama centers included age, date of Hijama therapy, and blood pressure measured before each Hijama session. Both diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and SBP data were obtained over 3-month period.

Results

The results showed a significant reduction in SBP (P value < 0.01) over three sessions of wet cupping (from 149.2 to 130.8mm Hg), but this was not significant for DBP over three sessions (P = 0.074). The study also found that the mean SBP in the study group was 9.6mm Hg less than that in the control group (130.8 vs. 140.4mm Hg, P = 0.019), whereas there was no significant difference in DBP between the study group and the control group (87.0 vs. 86.0mm Hg, P = 0.75).

Conclusions

Our study shows clear relationship between Hijama and the reduction and control of SBP in patients with hypertension. Therefore, Hijama can be used as an adjunct to conventional therapy, which may allow downtitration of given doses of antihypertensive drugs. The possible association of SBP reduction by Hijama and pain reduction needs an investigation.

Physicians' communication of risks from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and attitude towards providing adverse drug reaction information to patients

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently prescribed for orthopaedic conditions, therefore this study aimed to explore orthopaedic physicians' perceptions of their role in NSAID-risk communication, their attitudes towards the necessity of informing patients about adverse drug reactions (ADR), and factors associated with these.

METHODS

Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to all 206 orthopaedic physicians working at hospitals in Northeastern Thailand. Attitudes were assessed using 17 statements and total scores classed as poor, moderate and good attitude.

RESULTS

Sixty-six questionnaires were returned (32.04%). The responses showed that 75% of physicians claimed to communicate NSAID ADR information, more frequently about gastrointestinal (GI) complications, than about renal and cardiovascular (CVS) complications. ADR management (36%) and monitoring (30%) were not frequently communicated. The time spent with patients was associated with provision of ADR and monitoring advice. Renal function was the risk factor of greatest concern for prescribing any NSAID, followed by history of GI complications, and allergy for non-selective NSAIDs, and history of CVS diseases and age for selective COX-2 NSAIDs. Most physicians (41) had moderate attitude towards providing information and 24 good attitude. Fewer physicians working in tertiary hospitals than general and community hospital physicians considered that time limitations prevented counseling and that patient information leaflets offered easily accessible information. Additionally, more physicians who did not inform patients about ADRs agreed that ADR communication can lead to anxiety and discontinuing treatment.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that, although orthopaedic physicians had positive attitudes towards providing ADR information to patients, improvement is needed in communicating NSAID risk information.

Patient Comprehension and Compliance Survey to Assess Postoperative Pain Regimens in the Orthopaedic Trauma Population

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the groups of patients who are at risk for noncompliance and misunderstanding of their pain regimen.

DESIGN

Survey-based cohort study.

SETTING

Suburban Level-I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 171 patients between the ages of 18-89 years who underwent surgical fixation of fractures involving the pelvis, long bones, or periarticular regions of the knee, ankle, elbow, and wrist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patients who cannot accurately reproduce their prescribed pain medication list and patients who modify this pain medication regimen were analyzed by age, employment status, income level, education level, time between surgery and follow-up, and whether pain interfered with activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Overall, 147 patients completed the survey. Seventy percent (n = 114) of patients could not accurately reproduce their pain medication regimen, regardless of age, employment status, income level, education level, time between surgery and follow-up, and whether pain interfered with activities of daily living. Patients (61.2%; n = 90), regardless of the 6 aforementioned demographic factors, also admitted to modifying their pain medication regimen with non-prescribed medications, with 55.8% (n = 82) of patients adding over-the-counter medications to surgeon-prescribed narcotic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Misunderstanding and noncompliance of surgeon-prescribed pain regimens are prevalent across all patient demographics. Knowledge of the potential effects these augmentative medications can have on fracture healing and any drug-drug interactions that may arise is an important aspect of patient postoperative care. Surgeons must be wary of these trends and screen for any unintended side effects a patient's pain regimen may have.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors: latest evidence and clinical implications

Observational studies and meta-analyses have shown that the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), especially when prescribed at high doses for long periods of time, can potentially increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. The increased thrombotic risk related to the use of NSAIDs is mainly due to their cyclooxygenase 2 selectivity. The dosage use, the formulation selected and the duration of the therapy are other factors that can significantly impact on the cardiovascular risk. In order to minimize the risk, prescription of the right drug based on the patient's features and the different safety profiles of several NSAIDs that are available on the market is key for their appropriate administration. Despite the baseline cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk of each patient, monitoring of patients is suggested for increases in blood pressure, development of edema, deterioration of renal function, or gastrointestinal bleeding during long-term treatment with NSAIDs.

Clinical Pharmacology and Cardiovascular Safety of Naproxen

The voluntary withdrawal of Vioxx (rofecoxib) from the market in 2004, as well as the 2005 and 2014 US FDA Advisory Committee meetings about non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cardiovascular risk, have raised questions surrounding the use of NSAIDs in at-risk populations. This paper discusses the cardiovascular safety profile of naproxen in the context of the NSAID class. The balance of evidence suggests that cardiovascular risk correlates with cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selectivity, and the low COX-2 selectivity of naproxen results in a lower cardiovascular risk than that of other NSAIDs. The over-the-counter (OTC) use of naproxen is expected to pose minimal cardiovascular risk; however, the benefit-risk ratio and appropriate use should be considered at an individual patient level, particularly to assess underlying conditions that may increase the risk of events. Likewise, regulatory authorities should revisit label information periodically to ensure labeling reflects the current understanding of benefits and risks.

Impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cardiovascular risk: Is it the same in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis?

Although large-scale population studies have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of myocardial infarction, this is not confirmed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Herein, we review the litterature on the differential effects of NSAIDs on cardiovascular risk in osteoarthritis (OA) versus RA and discuss possible explanations for this discrepancy. To assess a potential additive effect of age in non-RA populations, we compared weighted mean age between RA patients and unselected NSAID users included in cohort and case-control studies that estimate the cardiovascular risk of NSAIDs, assuming that the main indication for NSAID usage in elderly populations is OA. Our hypothesis that advanced age in osteoarthtitis compared to RA patients confounds the effect of NSAIDs on cardiovasular risk was not confirmed. Several other hypotheses that can be proposed to explain this counterintuitive effect of NSAIDs on the cardiovascular risk of RA patients are discussed. We conclude that patients with RA have a lower cardiovascular disease risk associated with the use of NSAIDs, probably due to the nature of their disease per se, until further research indicates differently.

NSAIDs and Cardiovascular Diseases: Role of Reactive Oxygen Species

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used drugs worldwide. NSAIDs are used for a variety of conditions including pain, rheumatoid arthritis, and musculoskeletal disorders. The beneficial effects of NSAIDs in reducing or relieving pain are well established, and other benefits such as reducing inflammation and anticancer effects are also documented. The undesirable side effects of NSAIDs include ulcers, internal bleeding, kidney failure, and increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Some of these side effects may be due to the oxidative stress induced by NSAIDs in different tissues. NSAIDs have been shown to induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in different cell types including cardiac and cardiovascular related cells. Increases in ROS result in increased levels of oxidized proteins which alters key intracellular signaling pathways. One of these key pathways is apoptosis which causes cell death when significantly activated. This review discusses the relationship between NSAIDs and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and the role of NSAID-induced ROS in CVD.

Sedentary behavior and blood pressure control among osteoarthritis initiative participants

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between sedentary behavior and blood pressure (BP) among Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) participants.

DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the OAI 48-month visit participants whose physical activity was measured using accelerometers. Participants were classified into four quartiles according to the percentage of wear time that was sedentary (<100 activity counts per min). Users of antihypertensive medications or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were excluded. Our main outcomes were systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) and "elevated BP" defined as BP ≥ 130/85 mm Hg.

RESULTS

For this study cohort (N = 707), mean BP was 121.4 ± 15.6/74.7 ± 9.5 mm Hg and 33% had elevated BP. SBP had a graded association with increased sedentary time (P for trend = 0.02). The most sedentary quartile had 4.26 mm Hg higher SBP (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-7.82; P = 0.02) than the least sedentary quartile, adjusting for age, moderate-to-vigorous (MV) physical activity, and other demographic and health factors. The probability of having elevated BP significantly increased in higher sedentary quartiles (P for trend = 0.046). There were no significant findings for DBP.

CONCLUSION

A strong graded association was demonstrated between sedentary behavior and increased SBP and elevated BP, independent of time spent in MV physical activity. Reducing daily sedentary time may lead to improvement in BP and reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in chronic pain conditions with special emphasis on the elderly and patients with relevant comorbidities: management and mitigation of risks and adverse effects

PURPOSE

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently used drugs, and this widespread use is complicated by safety issues.

METHOD

A Literature review was conducted.

RESULTS

NSAIDs are a leading cause of drug-related morbidity, especially in the elderly and patients with comorbidities. Most adverse effects are related to generalized inhibition of the major targets of NSAIDs: cyclooxygenases I and II. These enzymes are not only involved in pain and inflammation pathogenesis but are also required in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract for mucosal protection and gut motility, and in the kidneys for functional integrity. Thus, the mechanisms of NSAID toxicity are well understood, but the consequences are largely uncontrolled in clinical practice. GI ulcers, including bleeding ulcers, may occur in several percent of all chronic unprotected, high-dose NSAID users. Renal side effects may precipitate renal failure, resulting in acute dialysis and chronic retention. This includes sodium retention, resulting in arterial hypertension, heart failure, and atherosclerotic events. Cardiovascular risk may be tripled by chronic high-dose NSAID use in long-term clinical trials though "real-life studies" indicate lower risk ratios. Off-target side effects include allergic reactions, drug-induced liver injury, and central nervous system effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of pain and inflammation must consider those risks and find alternative drugs or approaches to limit the negative impact of NSAIDs on mortality and morbidity. Alternative drugs, low-dose/short-term use, but especially non-pharmacologic approaches, such as physiotherapy, exercise, neurophysiologic measures, and local therapies, need to be further utilized. The appalling equation "less pain-more deaths/morbidity" ultimately necessitates treatment optimization in the individual patient.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiovascular outcomes in women: results from the women's health initiative

BACKGROUND

Conclusive data about cardiovascular toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are sparse. We hypothesized that regular NSAID use is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women, and that this association is stronger with greater cyclooxygenase (cox)-2 when compared with cox-1 inhibition.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative were classified as regular users or nonusers of nonaspirin NSAIDs. Cox regression examined NSAID use as a time-varying covariate and its association with the primary outcome of total cardiovascular disease defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary analyses considered the association of selective cox-2 inhibitors (eg, celecoxib), nonselective agents with cox-2>cox-1 inhibition (eg, naproxen), and nonselective agents with cox-1>cox-2 inhibition (eg, ibuprofen) with the primary outcome. Overall, 160 801 participants were available for analysis (mean follow-up, 11.2 years). Regular NSAID use at some point in time was reported by 53 142 participants. Regular NSAID use was associated with an increased hazard for cardiovascular events versus no NSAID use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.15; P<0.001). Selective cox-2 inhibitors were associated with a modest increased hazard for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.13; 1.04-1.23; P=0.004 and celecoxib only: HR, 1.13; 1.01-1.27; P=0.031). Among aspirin users, concomitant selective cox-2 inhibitor use was no longer associated with increased hazard for cardiovascular events. There was an increased risk for agents with cox-2>cox-1 inhibition (HR, 1.17; 1.10-1.24; P<0.001 and naproxen only: HR, 1.22; 1.12-1.34; P<0.001). This harmful association remained among concomitant aspirin users. We did not observe a risk elevation for agents with cox-1>cox-2 inhibition (HR, 1.01; 0.95-1.07; P=0.884 and ibuprofen only: HR, 1.00; 0.93-1.07; P=0.996).

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of selective cox-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs with cox-2>cox-1 inhibition showed a modestly increased hazard for cardiovascular events. Nonselective agents with cox-1>cox-2 inhibition were not associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000611.

Influence of celecoxib on the vasodilating properties of human mesenteric arteries constricted with endothelin-1

The mitogenic and vasoconstrictive properties of the vascular system are attributed to endothelin-1 (ET-1). ET-1 serum concentration increases in a number of pathological conditions, particularly in those associated with blood vessel constriction. ET-1 is also associated with the underlying pathomechanisms of primary pulmonary hypertension, arterial hypertension and eclampsia. The aim of this study was to compare the vasodilating properties of selected phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors and celecoxib in human mesenteric arteries constricted with ET-1, and investigate the role of the endothelium in relaxation. Perfused human mesenteric arteries were collected and stored under the same conditions as organs for transplantation. The mesenteric arteries (with and without the endothelium) were constricted by the addition of ET-1 and treated with one of the following: sildenafil (PDE5 inhibitor), zaprinast (PDE5 and 6 inhibitor), rolipram (PDE4 inhibitor) and celecoxib [cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor]. Based on the observed changes of the perfusion pressure, concentration response curves (CRCs) were prepared for the respective inhibitors and the EC₅₀ (concentration causing an effect equal to half of the maximum effect), pD₂ (negative common logarithm of EC₅₀) and relative potency (RP) were calculated. The results suggested that all the inhibitors triggered a concentration-dependent decrease in the perfusion pressure in isolated human superior mesenteric arteries with endothelium constricted by the addition of ET-1. In the arteries without endothelium, CRCs for celecoxib and rolipram were shifted to the right without a significant decrease in the maximum dilating effect. Moreover, CRCs for sildenafil and zaprinast were shifted to the right with a simultaneous significant decrease in the maximum dilating effect and with an increased inclination angle in reference to the concentration axis. In the presence of the endothelium, all of the evaluated PDE inhibitors, as well as celecoxib, reduced the reactivity of the mesenteric arteries caused by ET-1. Sildenafil indicated the lowest efficacy in the presence of the endothelium, but showed a higher potency compared to that of the other compounds. Removing the endothelium significantly reduced the vasodilating efficacy of PDE5 and 6 inhibitors and a statistically significant influence on the vasodilating efficacy of PDE4 inhibitor and celecoxib was observed. The high vasorelaxing efficacy of celecoxib at the background of the PDE inhibitors was observed, not only in the presence, but also in the absence of the endothelium and may be evidence for the relaxation induced by this COX-2 inhibitor in the cAMP- and cGMP-dependent pathways.

Risk of stroke associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), both cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-selective and nonselective agents, have been associated with the increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The majority of studies have focused on myocardial infarction as the primary cardiovascular outcome. However, the association between NSAIDs and the risk of stroke events is not as clear, although an understanding of this association is important since stroke continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Various factors may contribute to an association between NSAIDs and stroke, including hypertension and thrombosis. Additionally, the risk may vary with different NSAID types. In this review, we discuss the relevant literature assessing the possible association between NSAID use and stroke events, along with the potential mechanisms and the possible directions for future study.

NSAID use and association with cardiovascular outcomes in outpatients with stable atherothrombotic disease

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) other than aspirin have been linked to heart failure, salt retention, adverse ventricular remodeling, and thrombosis. We therefore sought to assess their impact on cardiovascular events in outpatients with stable atherothrombotic disease.

METHODS

We analyzed 44,095 patients in the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry with information on NSAID use and 4-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models, including NSAID use as a time-dependent covariate, were constructed and adjusted for key baseline characteristics. End points of interest included multivariate adjusted: cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke/ischemic hospitalizations; cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke; hospitalization for heart failure; and individual components of the composite end points.

RESULTS

Compared with NSAID nonusers (n = 39,675), NSAID users (n = 4420) were older (70 vs 68 years), more frequently female and white, and had more baseline heart failure and atherosclerotic risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, reduced creatinine clearance) (all P < .001). NSAID use was associated with an increased hazard for cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke/ischemic hospitalizations (adjusted hazard ratio [adj. HR] 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.21; P = .003) and for cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke (adj. HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.30; P = .02). There also was a higher risk of myocardial infarction (adj. HR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.12-1.68; P = .002), stroke (adj. HR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.45; P = .048), heart failure hospitalizations (adj. HR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34; P = .013), and ischemic hospitalizations (adj. HR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with stable atherothrombosis, NSAID use is associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalizations for both ischemia and heart failure.

The relation between total joint arthroplasty and risk for serious cardiovascular events in patients with moderate-severe osteoarthritis: propensity score matched landmark analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee reduces the risk for serious cardiovascular events in patients with moderate-severe osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Propensity score matched landmark analysis.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

2200 adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis aged 55 or more at recruitment (1996-98) and followed prospectively until death or 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rates of serious cardiovascular events for those who received a primary total joint arthroplasty compared with those did not within an exposure period of three years after baseline assessment.

RESULTS

The propensity score matched cohort consisted of 153 matched pairs of participants with moderate-severe arthritis. Over a median follow-up period of seven years after the landmark date (start of the study), matched participants who underwent a total joint arthroplasty during the exposure period were significantly less likely than those who did not to experience a cardiovascular event (hazards ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.74, P<0.001). Within seven years of the exposure period the absolute risk reduction was 12.4% (95% confidence interval 1.7% to 23.1%) and number needed to treat was 8 (95% confidence interval 4 to 57 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a propensity matched landmark analysis in a population cohort with advanced hip or knee osteoarthritis, this study found a cardioprotective benefit of primary elective total joint arthroplasty.

Relative cardiovascular and gastrointestinal safety of non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors: implications for clinical practice

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used in clinical practice, and are considered a first-line option for pain management. However, non-selective NSAIDs (nsNSAIDs) and new generation NSAIDs named cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (coxibs) are very different from one another and their cardiovascular and gastrointestinal safety profiles may influence prescribing. This article resulted from a search of MEDLINE/Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Bandolier, Medscape and Trip database, up to June 2011. Key words included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, coxib and safety, with the purpose of reviewing the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety issues of NSAIDS and the main aspects that differentiate both classes. Selective coxibs are associated with a more favourable gastrointestinal safety profile than nsNSAIDs. In terms of the risk of cardiovascular events, there seems to be a class effect for all NSAIDs with the possible exception of naproxen. The proper usage guidelines for NSAIDs detail the importance of risk factors for each patient in addition to the differences between classes. Patients with high cardiovascular or gastrointestinal risk should avoid using NSAIDs. These medications should be used at the minimum effective dose and for the shortest time possible in all patients.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in collegiate football players

OBJECTIVE

To determine prevalence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in college football players and whether positions sustaining the most contact would use NSAIDs more frequently.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

American college football programs.

PATIENTS

An anonymous survey was given to 211 college football players before the season.

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

Use of NSAIDs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The dependent variables are the different patterns in NSAID usage among positions and the frequency of NSAID use before and after the season.

RESULTS

Of the athletes surveyed, 95.7% had or were using NSAIDs. Athletes first used NSAIDs in junior high school (45.6%), high school (48.5%), or college (5.8%). Athletes were separated into high (daily or weekly) or low (monthly or rarely) utilizers of NSAIDs. High utilization of NSAIDs was more frequent during the season (50.0%) than in the off-season (14.6%), P < 0.001. High NSAID utilization among all players was more prevalent after than before games (32.7% vs 10.9%, P = 0.002). Players with a higher body mass index (BMI; >28) were significantly higher utilizers of NSAIDs, reporting higher rates of use in season compared with other players (57.4% vs 39.5%, P = 0.011, OR = 2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NSAIDs in collegiate football players is common. It is concerning that those athletes with the highest cardiovascular risk (ie, elevated body mass index) use greater amounts of NSAIDs. Further investigation is needed to delineate the short-term and long-term consequences of NSAID utilization in young athletes.

Vertebral compression fractures: a review of current management and multimodal therapy

Vertebral compression fractures are a prevalent disease affecting osteoporotic patients. When symptomatic, they cause significant pain and loss of function and have a high public health impact. In this paper we outline the diagnosis and management of these patients, with evidence-based review of treatment outcomes for the various therapeutic options. Diagnosis involves a clinical history focusing on the nature of the patient’s pain as well as various imaging studies. Management is multimodal in nature and starts with conservative therapy consisting of analgesic medication, medication for osteoporosis, physical therapy, and bracing. Patients who are refractory to conservative management may be candidates for vertebral augmentation through either vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Acute myocardial infarctions, strokes and influenza: seasonal and pandemic effects

The incidence of myocardial infarctions and influenza follow similar seasonal patterns. To determine if acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) and ischaemic strokes are associated with influenza activity, we built time-series models using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. In these models, we used influenza activity to predict the incidence of AMI and ischaemic stroke. We fitted national models as well as models based on four geographical regions and five age groups. Across all models, we found consistent significant associations between AMIs and influenza activity, but not between ischaemic strokes and influenza. Associations between influenza and AMI increased with age, were greatest in those aged >80 years, and were present in all geographical regions. In addition, the natural experiment provided by the second wave of the influenza pandemic in 2009 provided further evidence of the relationship between influenza and AMI, because both series peaked in the same non-winter month.

ACTH as first line treatment for acute gout in 181 hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) for the treatment of acute gout in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our inpatient consultation records and identified 181 cases of gout where ACTH was used as first line treatment. The hospital medical records of these patients were fully reviewed. A total of 181 patients were treated with 1mg of synthetic ACTH intramuscularly.

RESULTS

A response was seen in 77.90% of patients and was evident the day following ACTH injection. The majority of non-responders (87.50%) were treated once more with ACTH the day following the first injection; 82.85% of these patients responded. A relatively small percentage of responders suffered a second gouty attack (11.34%) at a median of four days from the initial attack. They were retreated with a single ACTH course and all responded. Blood pressure and potassium levels remained stable 24 and 48 hours following ACTH administration. Diabetic patients showed an increase in fasting glucose levels 24 hours following the injection compared to baseline but this increase was not evident at 48 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that ACTH is effective and safe for the treatment of gout in hospitalized patients. ACTH is an attractive therapeutic option for hospitalized patients since the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, steroids or colchicine in this patient population may be problematic.

Pheidippides redux: reducing risk for acute cardiac events during marathon running

Prolonged strenuous exercise such as marathon running transiently increases the absolute and relative risk for sudden cardiac death. A 17-fold increase in the latter over resting baseline in previously sedentary middle-aged men is reduced due to cardioprotection from training in experienced marathon runners. Exertional rhabdomyolysis as a common occurrence during the race is accompanied by neutrophilia and elevated biomarkers of inflammation, including interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein. A hemostatic imbalance with prothrombotic effects includes in vivo platelet activation during the race. Suggesting a pathogenic role for these findings, plaque rupture due to atherothrombosis triggers acute exertional cardiac events, including sudden death, in low-risk runners as in high-risk patients such as those with diabetes mellitus. Strategies including prophylactic aspirin are considered to decrease the risk for acute cardiac events.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and their effects in the elderly

Management of chronic pain can often be a challenging task, especially in the elderly. Patients over the age of 65 years have altered metabolism and pharmacodynamics that increase their susceptibility to adverse side effects. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a common component of pain management in this population. Nonselective NSAIDs as well as selective Cox-2 inhibitors have been associated with side effects, including renal dysfunction, heart failure, gastrointestinal toxicity and increased risk of cardiovascular side effects. These adverse effects are particularly important in the elderly, and thus use of NSAIDs in this population must be scrutinized carefully. If NSAIDs are utilized, they should be tailored to the individual patient and administered in the lowest dose and for the shortest duration possible. It is hoped that future studies will provide further insight into the safety of these agents in elderly patients.

5-Lipoxygenase metabolic contributions to NSAID-induced organ toxicity

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-1, COX-2, and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) enzymes produce effectors of pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis (OA) and many other diseases. All three enzymes play a key role in the metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA) to inflammatory fatty acids, which contribute to the deterioration of cartilage. AA is derived from both phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) conversion of cell membrane phospholipids and dietary consumption of omega-6 fatty acids. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the COX enzymes, but show no anti-5-LOX activity to prevent the formation of leukotrienes (LTs). Cysteinyl LTs, such as LTC(4), LTD(4), LTE(4), and leukoattractive LTB(4) accumulate in several organs of mammals in response to NSAID consumption. Elevated 5-LOX-mediated AA metabolism may contribute to the side-effect profile observed for NSAIDs in OA. Current therapeutics under development, so-called "dual inhibitors" of COX and 5-LOX, show improved side-effect profiles and may represent a new option in the management of OA.

Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are an increasing public health problem. Recently, randomised controlled trials on the use of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of these fractures have been published, but no definitive conclusions have been reached on the role of these interventions. The major problem encountered when trying to perform a meta-analysis of the available studies for the use of cementoplasty in patients with a VCF is that conservative management has not been standardised. Forms of conservative treatment commonly used in these patients include bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and bracing.

In this review, we report the best evidence available on the conservative care of patients with osteoporotic VCFs and associated back pain, focusing on the role of the most commonly used spinal orthoses. Although orthoses are used for the management of these patients, to date, there has been only one randomised controlled trial published evaluating their value. Until the best conservative management for patients with VCFs is defined and standardised, no conclusions can be drawn on the superiority or otherwise of cementoplasty techniques over conservative management.