Omalizumab therapy for refractory allergic fungal rhinosinusitis patients with moderate or severe asthma

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a common inflammatory condition, with subtypes like aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and central compartment atopic disease sharing a common type 2 inflammatory pathway. Respiratory biologic therapies have been developed that target type 2 inflammation. In this article, we discuss the use of respiratory biologic therapies for nasal polyposis in general, as well as within the various subtypes of nasal polyps. Further, we discuss future roles of novel biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in nasal polyposis.

The Effectiveness of Biological Agents on Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis in Patients with Comorbid Asthma: A Multicenter Real-Life Study from Türkiye

Background and Objectives: Real-life data on the efficacy of biologic agents (BAs) on asthma-comorbid CRSwNP are needed. Our primary goal is to investigate the effects of BAs on CRSwNP symptoms, as well as endoscopic and tomography scores. Our secondary goal is to show a reduction in the frequency of acute sinusitis exacerbations and the need for surgery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, real-life study. We screened the patients with asthma-comorbid CRSwNP treated with omalizumab or mepolizumab. A total of 69 patients (40 F/29 M; omalizumab n = 55, mepolizumab n = 14) were enrolled. We compared the visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal congestion score (NCS), Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (LMS), and total endoscopic polyp scores (TPS) before and after BAs. We evaluated the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) frequencies separately, according to the BAs. Results: The overall median (min-max) age was 43 (21-69) years. The median (min-max) of biologic therapy duration was 35 (4-113) months for omalizumab and 13.5 (6-32) for mepolizumab. Significant improvements were seen in VAS, SNOT-22, and NCS with omalizumab and mepolizumab. A significant decrease was observed in TPS with omalizumab [95% CI: 0-4] (p < 0.001), but not with mepolizumab [95% CI: -0.5-2] (p = 0.335). The frequency of ESS and AECRS were significantly reduced with omalizumab [95% CI: 2-3] (p < 0.001) and [95% CI: 2-5] (p < 0.001); and mepolizumab [95% CI: 0-2] (p = 0.002) and [95% CI: 2-8.5] (p < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in LMS with either of the BAs. Conclusions: Omalizumab and mepolizumab can provide a significant improvement in the sinonasal symptom scores. BAs are promising agents for CRSwNP patients with frequent exacerbations and multiple surgeries.

Emerging Therapies in the Medical Management of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

A non-invasive type of chronic sinusitis named allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), which is a variant of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with nasal obstruction, was first described in 1976. The goal of this article was to provide an overview of various treatment approaches and how they can be used to control AFRS. Since this is an inflammatory disease rather than an invasive fungal infection, the treatment tries to modulate inflammation and reduce disease burden. A comprehensive treatment strategy must incorporate medicinal, surgical, biological, and immunological techniques. Owing to the chronic nature of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and its high propensity for flare-ups and recurrence, multiple procedures are frequently required. The most likely method of establishing a long-term disease control for AFRS is a comprehensive management strategy that integrates medical, surgical, and immunological care. However, there are still disagreements regarding the exact combinations. In this review, we have mentioned different modalities in the management of AFRS, such as monoclonal antibodies, probiotic Manuka honey, and aPDT among others, some of which are promising but require further research.

Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: The Role and Expectations of Biologics

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a noninvasive subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) that usually develops in immunocompetent atopic individuals and is more common in geographic regions characterized by warm temperatures and high humidity, conducive to higher environmental fungal presence. Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis usually presents with unique computed tomography findings and significant polyp burden, yet patients often report minimal sinus symptoms. Patients with AFRS often have extremely elevated serum total and fungal-specific IgE levels. Treatment almost always requires surgery, in which adjuvant medical therapy is critical to success. However, until recently the choice of adjuvant therapy has consisted primarily of either oral and/or topical steroids. Although oral corticosteroids decrease recurrence after surgery, data for the effectiveness of other adjunctive pharmacologic agents, including topical and oral antifungal agents and immunotherapy, have remained unclear and hence are not recommended in recent guidelines including the International Consensus of Allergy and Rhinology. Three biologics, omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab, have recently been approved for treating CRSwNP in general, but clinical trials to date with these biologics did not involve AFRS patients. Recently published case reports and smaller prospective studies have shown good efficacy of these biologics on the AFRS subgroup of patients. This article provides an overview of the understanding of the pathophysiology of AFRS, implications of this understanding on the possible role of biologics, and clinical reports on the use of biologics in treating AFRS. Because biologics are indicated for treating CRSwNP, follow up real-world evidence studies are needed for AFRS.

Dupilumab: An emerging therapy in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a highly resistant disease and is challenging to treat. Patients with recurrent attacks of the disease despite surgical management can benefit from biologics as adjunct therapies. Dupilumab has shown promising endpoints in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This case series reports 4 patients with resistant AFRS concomitant with asthma, for which dupilumab therapy was administered. Long-term follow-ups showed that dupilumab improved the symptoms and improved the results of objective tools such as imaging and pulmonary function test.

Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in Saudi Arabia: A Review of Recent Literature

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) has been considered an enigma since it was first described four decades ago. Previous research has found that AFRS has multiple definitions and a poorly understood pathogenesis because it overlaps with other conditions and necessitates meticulous work and multiple diagnostic modalities to confirm the diagnosis. However, despite the expansion of medical and surgical treatments, recurrence still occurs. In this review, the recent literature on AFRS cases in Saudi Arabia with relevance to its epidemiology, diagnosis, and management was studied and compared with international data. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched for original research and review articles with local data. There is an evident paucity and contradiction between local studies regarding the epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and management of AFRS. Hence, well-defined randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed for the treatment of this chronic recurrent disease.

Pediatric allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: optimizing outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a debilitating condition for children. Despite there being several reviews on this topic in the adult population, there is a paucity of reviews of AFRS in the pediatric literature. This article reviews the recent evidence of pediatric AFRS with the aim to optimize outcomes of pediatric patients with this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

AFRS is clinically characterized by nasal polyposis, a type I hypersensitivity to fungal epitopes, very thick eosinophilic mucin, and peripheral eosinophilia. Pediatric AFRS has similar clinical characteristics to that in adults but is thought to have a more aggressive nature, with higher serum immunoglobulin E and more frequently bone erosion and malformation of facial bones. Diagnosis of pediatric AFRS is made by using the Bent and Kuhn's criteria developed for adult AFRS. The mainstay of treatment is surgery followed by postoperative corticosteroids. Adjunctive therapies, including topical/oral antifungal agents, allergen immunotherapy and biologics may improve outcomes in pediatric AFRS, but to date the current evidence is limited.

SUMMARY

To optimize the outcome of pediatric AFRS, adequate and early diagnosis and treatment are essential. Appropriate and comprehensive endoscopic sinus surgery to open the sinuses, remove the fungal burden of disease and improve access of the sinuses to postoperative topical corticosteroid remains the standard of care.

Guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Brazil

•

The use of immunobiologicals is an option for the management of patients with chronic rinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) refractory to conventional treatment.

•

The guideline lists the main drugs currently available in Brazil, their indications, and recommendations for use.

Introduction

Severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps has a negative impact on an individual’s quality of life. Therefore, new biologics have emerged for use in specific phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis, changing the paradigms of its treatment.

Objective

To review the current status of biologic treatment indications in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Methods

The Brazilian Academy of Rhinology brought together different specialists to suggest a course of action, considering its particularities and aspects related to the national reality.

Results

Of particular interest for decision making will be the identification of subgroups of patients refractory to pre-existing treatment options and the construction of a strategy that improves their quality of life, with the best cost-benefit ratio.

Conclusion

The use of biologics is a valid option for treatment in more severe cases. This strategy must be better understood and improved in the future, with more studies and greater clinical experience.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document.

METHODS

ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.

RESULTS

ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided.

CONCLUSION

This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Economic considerations on the usage of biologics in the allergy clinic

The advent of biologic therapies has transformed care for severe atopic disorders but their high cost poses new challenges with regard to long-term sustainability and fair allocation of resources. This article covers the basic concepts of cost-utility analyses and reviews the available literature on cost utility of biologic drugs in atopic disorders. When used within their limits as part of a multi-dimensional assessment, economic analyses can be extremely useful to guide decision-making and prioritization of care. Despite the good quality of most cost-utility analyses conducted for the use of biologics in asthma and other atopic diseases, their conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness are extremely variable. This is mainly due to the use of inconsistent estimates of health utility benefit with therapy. Development of reliable and validated instruments to measure disutility in atopic disorders and measure of indirect costs in atopic disease are identified as a priority for future research.

Optimal Management of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

Introduction

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a chronic disorder with significant morbidity and a high recurrence rate needing long-term follow-up. Even after its first description many decades ago, there is still considerable uncertainty about the management of this condition.

Description

In this chapter, we breakdown the topic “Optimal management of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis” into sub-headings in order to discuss the latest research and available literature under each topic in great detail. Every attempt has been made to incorporate the highest level of evidence that was available at the time of writing.

Summary

Pre-operative diagnosis and further management prior to surgery is important. Steroids help in reducing inflammation and help improve the surgical field. Surgery remains the mainstay in the management of this condition along with long-term medical management. Oral steroids are reserved for acute flare-ups in the background of associated lung concerns. Oral and topical antifungal agents have no role in the control of the disease. Biological agents are being prescribed predominantly by respiratory physician colleagues, mainly for the control of the chest-related issues rather than for sinus disease. Immunotherapy as an adjunct with surgery is promising.

Conclusion

AFRS is a disease with many variables and a wide range of symptomatic presentation. It takes a keen clinician to identify the disease and subsequently manage the condition. Treatment involves long-term follow-up with early detection of recurrence or flare-ups. Any of the mentioned modalities of management may be employed to effectively control the condition, and treatment protocols will have to be tailor-made to suit each individual patient. Various medications and drugs such as Manuka honey, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, hydrogen peroxide and betadine rinses appear to be promising. More robust studies need to be undertaken to ascertain their routine use in clinical practice.

Subcutaneous Mepolizumab Injection: An Adjunctive Treatment for Recalcitrant Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Patients With Asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a non-invasive fungal disease that results from chronic allergic inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa. Failure to respond to mainstay medical therapies and sinus surgery leaves AFRS patients with limited alternatives and a decreased quality of life. Mepolizumab is a known IL-5 antagonist for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the efficacy of mepolizumab on improving Modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK) endoscopic scores in recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 27 recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma receiving a monthly mepolizumab injection between January 2017 and July 2019. Patients were evaluated endoscopically at baseline and at each follow-up visit every 6-8 weeks until their third visit. Secondary outcomes included SNOT-22 scores, serum eosinophil counts and the rate of prednisone rescues required in patients receiving mepolizumab compared to a retrospective control arm.

RESULTS

Total median MLK scores improved significantly for all patients over three follow-up visits (6[4,7], 4[2,6], 5[2,6], 3.5[2.25,5]; p = 0.04). Amongst patients with a baseline polyposis score of 1 or more, combined MLK edema and polyposis sub-scores significantly improved (6[5.25,6], 3.5[2.25,5,75], 4[2.75,5.25], 4[3,4]; p = 0.02) versus patients with no polyposis (4[3,4], 3[1,4], 4[2,4], 3[0,4]; p = 0.90). Total SNOT-22 scores (56 vs 43; p = 0.04) and eosinophil counts (0.40 × 10⁹/L vs 0.00 × 10⁹/L; p < 0.01) decreased significantly when comparing baseline to last follow up. There was no significant difference in rate of prednisone rescues per 1000 person-days when comparing control to Mepolizumab population (1.19 vs 1.23; p = 1).

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab injections administered once monthly as an adjunctive treatment for recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma appear to significantly reduce endoscopic signs of inflammation, patient-reported symptomatology and serum eosinophil levels. Patients with evidence of more severe endoscopic inflammation appear to benefit the most. Adjunctive treatment with mepolizumab does not reduce the need for prednisone rescues.

Phenotypes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogenous disease process affecting a significant proportion of the population and impacting quality of life and productivity. Historically, CRS has been classified broadly into CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Increased understanding regarding unique presentations of CRS subsets and their underlying inflammatory profiles has led to a new system for classifying CRS phenotypes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Consideration of CRS phenotypes has traditionally been a key factor in determining treatment paradigms. Under a new phenotype classification system, physical findings will continue to drive treatment decisions, but with more precision. Recent rapidly accumulated knowledge indicates that the broad categorization of CRSwNP or CRSsNP is no longer clinically useful. Reorganization of CRS phenotypes and their underlying endotypes will lead to more targeted and efficacious therapy.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subset of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) characterized by antifungal IgE sensitivity, eosinophil-rich mucus (ie, allergic mucin), and characteristic computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in paranasal sinuses. AFRS develops in immunocompetent patients, with occurrence influenced by climate, geography, and several identified host factors. Molecular pathways and immune responses driving AFRS are still being delineated, but prominent adaptive and more recently recognized innate type 2 immune responses are important, many similar to those established in patients with other forms of CRSwNP. It is unclear whether AFRS represents merely a more extreme expression of pathways important in patients with CRSwNP or whether there are other disordered immune responses that would define a distinct endotype or endotypes. Although AFRS and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis share some analogous immune mechanisms, the 2 conditions do not occur commonly in the same patient. Treatment of AFRS almost always requires surgical debridement of the involved sinuses. Oral corticosteroids decrease recurrence after surgery, but other adjunctive pharmacologic agents, including topical and oral antifungal agents, do not have a firm evidence basis for use. There is good rationale for use of biologic agents that target eosinophilic inflammation or other type 2 responses, but studies in patients with AFRS are required.

Invasive and Non-Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis-A Review and Update of the Evidence

Fungal infections are a subset of infectious processes that an otolaryngologist is required to be familiar with. They can be encountered in otology, rhinology and head and neck surgery. The presence of fungal rhinosinusitis is well recognised by otolaryngologists, but the classifications and appropriate management are not so well understood. The prevalence of fungal sinus disease is thought to be have been increasing in recent decades There is speculation that this may be due to increased awareness, antibiotic overuse and increased use of immunosuppressant medications. Added to this, there has been a large amount published on the role of fungi as a causative organism in chronic rhinosinusitis. Given the importance of fungal rhinosinusitis in clinical practice, we aim to review the classification and current management strategies based on up-to-date literature.

Biologic Agents for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a complex inflammatory disorder, which is often recalcitrant to medical and surgical management. Recently, biologic agents have been studied as an adjunct treatment for this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine the role of biologic agents for chronic rhinosinusitis patients by reviewing literature and clinical trials.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of literature and clinical trials-both recently completed and ongoing-was undertaken to examine up-to-date evidence of current biologic therapy and its role in chronic rhinosinusitis patients-including anti-IgE, anti-IL-4, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-13, and GATA-3 DNAzyme.

RESULTS

Specific biologic agents discussed include omalizumab, reslizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and Hgd40/SB010. Risks, side effects, and administration information are also reviewed. An algorithm for the use of biologics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is proposed.

CONCLUSION

These treatments have promising results and may prove to be an important adjunct for patients with recalcitrant sinus disease.

Current understanding of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Studying the pathophysiology of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) has proved challenging. While this clinical entity is easily distinguishable based on the clinical criteria set forth by Bent and Kuhn twenty-five years ago, studies examining type 2 inflammatory profiles in AFRS can make it seem more alike other CRS subtypes than it is different. Still, evolving research seems to clearly delineate this subtype from others in CRS. This review will critically evaluate the evolution of research examining the pathophysiology of AFRS and will conclude with a summary of the special considerations in the management of this fascinating disease.

Diagnosis, classification, and therapeutic interventions for sinopulmonary Aspergillosis

INTRODUCTION

Sinopulmonary aspergillosis represents a diverse collection of allergic, invasive, and chronic sinus and respiratory conditions. These diseases can affect patients with and without immune impairment and in some cases may be life-threatening. Areas covered: We review the diagnosis, classification, and therapeutic options available to treat sinopulmonary aspergillosis and look ahead to emerging diagnostic and therapeutic options that may soon play an important role in clinical practice. Expert commentary: Histopathology and tissue culture remain the gold standard for the diagnosis of invasive sinopulmonary aspergillosis, but several new molecular detection methods have recently emerged, including various PCR-based platforms, MALDI-TOF, and lateral flow assays. We examine these methodologies as well as the barriers associated with the standardization, validation, and implementation. We also explore the pipeline of antifungal agents in development to treat sinopulmonary aspergillosis.

Allergic Aspergillus Rhinosinusitis

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a unique variety of chronic polypoid rhinosinusitis usually in atopic individuals, characterized by presence of eosinophilic mucin and fungal hyphae in paranasal sinuses without invasion into surrounding mucosa. It has emerged as an important disease involving a large population across the world with geographic variation in incidence and epidemiology. The disease is surrounded by controversies regarding its definition and etiopathogenesis. A working group on "Fungal Sinusitis" under the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM) addressed some of those issues, but many questions remain unanswered. The descriptions of "eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis" (EFRS), "eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis" (EMRS) and mucosal invasion by hyphae in few patients have increased the problem to delineate the disease. Various hypotheses exist for etiopathogenesis of AFRS with considerable overlap, though recent extensive studies have made certain in depth understanding. The diagnosis of AFRS is a multi-disciplinary approach including the imaging, histopathology, mycology and immunological investigations. Though there is no uniform management protocol for AFRS, surgical clearing of the sinuses with steroid therapy are commonly practiced. The role of antifungal agents, leukotriene antagonists and immunomodulators is still questionable. The present review covers the controversies, recent advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of AFRS.