Tongue retaining devices for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effects of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on the Cardiovascular System: A Comprehensive Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an increasingly relevant cause of cardiovascular morbidity worldwide. Although the association between OSA and the cardiovascular system is well-known, the extent of its effects is still a topic of interest, including pathophysiologic mechanisms, cardiovascular sequelae, and OSA therapies and their effects. Commonly described mechanisms of cardiovascular etiologies revolve around sympathetic activation, inflammation, and intermittent hypoxia resulting from OSA. Ultimately, these effects lead to manifestations in the cardiovascular system, such as arrhythmias, hypertension, and heart failure, among others. The resulting sequelae of OSA may also have differential effects based on gender and age; several studies suggest female gender to have more susceptibility to cardiovascular mortality, as well as an increase in age. Furthermore, several therapies for OSA, both established and emerging, show a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and may even reduce cardiovascular burden. Namely, the establishment of CPAP has led to improvement in hypertension and cardiac function in patients with heart failure and even reduced the progression of early stages of atherosclerosis. Effective management of OSA decreases abnormal neural sympathetic activity, which results in better rhythm control and blood pressure control, both in waking and sleep cycles. With newer therapies for OSA, its effects on the cardiovascular system may be significantly reduced or even reversed after long-term management. The vast extent of OSA on the cardiovascular system, as well as current and future therapeutic strategies, will be described in detail in this review.

Predicting the Outcomes of Oropharyngeal Surgery in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Tongue-Retaining Devices

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of a tongue-retaining device (TRD) in predicting the outcomes of oropharyngeal surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) before surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective case-control study.

SETTING

A single tertiary medical center.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-severe OSA who underwent both uvulopalatopharyngoplasty and tongue base suspension between January 2022 and July 2022 were included. Each patient underwent a series of 3 overnight polysomnography. Objective outcomes include apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), minimal oxygen saturation, and reduction rate of AHI. The correlation between the reduction rate of AHI with TRD and surgery was analyzed with linear regression.

RESULTS

The reduction rates of AHI were significantly different between the group using TRD (44 ± 24%) and the postoperative group (55 ± 21%). The cross-tabulation revealed a strong association between a positive response to TRD treatment and a positive response to surgery. The use of TRD to evaluate surgical response demonstrated a positive predictive value of 90% and a negative predictive value of 70%. A strong correlation between the decrease in AHI was observed in both TRD and surgery groups, which was demonstrated by a steep slope in the scatter plot and a significant simple linear regression line.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative TRD response is an accurate tool for predicting the success of oropharyngeal surgery in managing OSA patients before surgical treatment. Furthermore, a quantifiable positive linear correlation exists between the efficacy of preoperative TRD treatment and surgery.

Compliance and side effects of tongue stabilizing device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, compliance, and side effects of tongue stabilizing devices (TSDs).

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients were followed up after 12 and 30 months. The subjective effectiveness was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10), the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ), and a sleep-related quality of life questionnaire (QoL). Compliance and side effects were assessed.

RESULTS

At 12-months, 35.9% of patients confirmed continuing the therapy, compared to only 15.4% of patients at 30 months. At 30 months, a significant average improvement of ESS (2.0 ± 2.8) was observed compared to baseline levels in six patients. Six patients demonstrated an average increase in blood pressure. The most frequently reported side effects were mouth dryness and excessive salivation. The 3D analysis revealed small tooth movements.

CONCLUSION

The TSD therapy demonstrated a good long-term subjective effectiveness against OSA but had a relatively low treatment acceptance rate.

Effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and the impact of different body positions on treatment： A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mandibular advancement device (MAD) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and explore the effect of different positions on MAD for OSA.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies evaluating the effect of MAD on the treatment of OSA from database inception to November 2022. The Bayesian random-effects mode was used to calculate the pooled outcome. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were applied to investigate the heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies enrolling 643 patients were eligible for further analysis. MAD treatment led to improvements in total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) for both positional OSA(POSA) and Non-POSA groups, but there was no significant difference in the effect of MAD on Non-POSA and POSA (MD = -1.46,95%CI [-4.89,1.97], P = 0.40). In the supine position, AHI improvement after MAD treatment in POSA group was more than that in Non-POSA group by 15 events/hour in average (MD = 14.82, 95%CI [11.43,18.22], P＜0.00001), while in the non-supine position, the change of AHI in Non-POSA group was significantly better than that in POSA group by approximately 8 events/hour (MD = -7.55,95%CI[-10.73,-4.38],p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

MAD is more suitable for POSA compared to Non-POSA in patients with habitual sleep in the supine or supine predominant position. While for patients with habitual sleep in the non-supine position, MAD is an effective treatment option for Non-POSA.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Control of Tongue Position in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Concept and Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

We hypothesize that the control of tongue position using a newly developed tongue position retainer, where the tongue is held in a protruded position (i.e., intervention A) or in its resting position (i.e., intervention B), is effective for maintaining upper airway patency in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) compared with no control of tongue position. This is a randomized, controlled, non-blinded, crossover, and two-armed trial (i.e., sequence AB/BA) in 26 male participants (i.e., sample size) who are scheduled to undergo a dental operation under intravenous sedation with OSA (10 ≤ respiratory event index < 30/h). Participants will be randomly allocated into either sequence by a permuted block method, stratified by body mass index. Under intravenous sedation, participants will undergo two interventions, separated by a washout period after receiving intervention A or intervention B using a tongue position retainer after baseline evaluation, before each intervention is provided. The primary outcome is the abnormal breathing index of apnea as determined by the frequency of apnea per hour. We expect that, compared with no control of tongue position, both intervention A and intervention B will improve the abnormal breathing events with superior effects achieved by the former, offering a therapeutic option for OSA.

A Scoping Review of Sleep Apnea: Where Do We Stand?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a condition in which there is a recurrent collapse of the upper airway while sleeping, is a widespread disease affecting 5% to 10% people worldwide. Despite several advances in the treatment modalities for OSA, morbidity and mortality remain a concern. Common symptoms include loud snoring, gasping for air during sleep, morning headache, insomnia, hypersomnia, attention deficits, and irritability. Obese individuals, male gender, older age (65+), family history, smoking, and alcohol consumption are well recognized risk factors of OSA. This condition holds the ability to increase inflammatory cytokines, cause metabolic dysfunction, and increase the sympathetic output, all of which exacerbate OSA due to their effect on the cardiovascular system. In this review, we discuss its brief history, risk factors, complications, treatment modalities, and the role of clinicians in curbing its risk.

The relationship between mandibular advancement, tongue movement, and treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea

Study Objectives

To characterize how mandibular advancement enlarges the upper airway via posterior tongue advancement in people with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and whether this is associated with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment outcome.

Methods

One-hundred and one untreated people with OSA underwent a 3T magnetic resonance (MRI) scan. Dynamic mid-sagittal posterior tongue and mandible movements during passive jaw advancement were measured with tagged MRI. Upper airway cross-sectional areas were measured with the mandible in a neutral position and advanced to 70% of maximum advancement. Treatment outcome was determined after a minimum of 9 weeks of therapy.

Results

Seventy-one participants completed the study: 33 were responders (AHI&lt;5 or AHI≤10 events/hr with &gt;50% AHI reduction), 11 were partial responders (&gt;50% AHI reduction but AHI&gt;10 events/hr), and 27 nonresponders (AHI reduction&lt;50% and AHI≥10 events/hr). Responders had the greatest naso- and oropharyngeal tongue anterior movement (0.40 ± 0.08 and 0.47 ± 0.13 mm, respectively) and oropharyngeal cross-sectional area enlargement (6.41 ± 2.12%) per millimeter of mandibular advancement. A multivariate model that included tongue movement and percentage of airway enlargement per millimeter of mandibular advancement along with baseline AHI correctly classified 69.2% (5-fold cross-validated 62.5%, n = 39) of participants in response categories when the jaw was advanced in the range that would usually be regarded as sufficient for clinical efficacy (&gt; 4 mm). In comparison, a model using only baseline AHI correctly classified 50.0% of patients (5-fold cross-validated 52.5%, n = 40).

Conclusions

Tongue advancement and upper airway enlargement with mandibular advancement in conjunction with baseline AHI improve treatment response categorization to a satisfactory level (69.2%, 5-fold cross-validated 62.5%).

Berlin and Epworth Surveys to Predict Obstructive Sleep Apnea for Adults on Biomimetic Oral Appliance Therapy: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Background

Two questionnaires (Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)) are the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common form of sleep-disordered breathing. The biomimetic oral appliance therapy (BOAT) offers an alternative nonsurgical method, which can improve symptoms and indices of OSA on objective sleep testing.

Aim

To describe testing the ability of BQ and EES for prediction of BOAT outcomes during OSA.

Methods

Seventeen adults (9 males, 8 females; age, mean (SD): 45.76 (10.31), BMI mean (SD): 33.5(13.43)) who underwent an overnight sleep study were diagnosed by a sleep specialist physician. The BQ and EES were recorded before and after BOAT treatment. Subjects with mild-to-moderate OSA had 2 months of follow-up visits and underwent a final overnight sleep study to measure apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). The subjects were asked to wear the appliance for 10–12 hours/day and at night. Findings were analyzed statistically using paired t-tests.

Result

As per sleep test results, pre-BOAT AHI measures versus post-BOAT AHI measures showed significant improvement. Comparing the BQ before versus after treatment showed that at the pretreatment stage, 66.0% of patients had high-risk score, whereas 34% had low-risk score. After treatment, 66.0% of patient had low-risk scores, whereas 34% had high-risk scores. As for the ESS, treatment resulted in significant reduction of total score from 10.43 ± 6.32 to 5.00 ± 5.20 (P < 0.01, paired t-test). Finally, there was a mild negative correlation between AHI and each of the BQ and ESS scores that was not statistically significant (r = −0.420, N = 26, P > 0.05, and r = −0.41, N = 26, P > 0.05, respectively).

Conclusion

The BOAT device may provide a useful form of therapy to improve OSA-related PSG parameters such as AHI. Both BQ and ESS were predictive to improvements detected by the sleep study during BOAT device use.

Long-term benefits of a new oral appliance on adult snoring: a trend analysis

Background: Snoring constitutes a worldwide public health concern that may be associated with daytime fatigue, endothelial dysfunction, vascular injury, stroke, cardiovascular diseases, and diabetes among female patients. This study explored the effects of the so-called Lin Oral Appliance (LOA) on Taiwanese adults’ snoring rates.Methods: A time series analysis was conducted to examine the associations between LOAs’ tongue compressors of different lengths, and snoring rates were calculated using the SnoreClock app. The LOA comprises 2 components: custom-made dental braces and tongue compressors of adjustable lengths; different versions had different-length compressors.Results: Our multiple linear regression time-series model revealed the effects of the LOA on snoring rates. The results indicated the following: i) LOA tongue compressor lengths of 1 and 2.5 cm (LOA-1 and LOA-2.5, respectively) were associated with reduced snoring rates; ii) sleep durations of 5.5-7.5 h and daytime sleepiness were associated with increased snoring rates; and iii) among participants with snoring rates above 10%, the snoring rates observed 1-7 days before a given day constituted a significant factor influencing snoring rates on the given day.Conclusions: We discovered that the LOA could reduce snoring rates and that the 2.5-cm compressor length in the LOA produced the best results.

Obstructive sleep apnea therapy for cardiovascular risk reduction-Time for a rethink?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent and underdiagnosed medical condition, which is associated with various cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. The current mainstay of therapy is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); however, CPAP is known to be poorly accepted and tolerated by patients. In randomized controlled trials evaluating CPAP in cardiovascular outcomes, the average usage was less than 3.5 hours, which is below the 4 hours per night recommended to achieve a clinical benefit. This low adherence may have resulted in poor effectiveness and failure to show cardiovascular risk reduction. The mandibular advancement device (MAD) is an intraoral device designed to advance the mandible during sleep. It functions primarily through alteration of the jaw and/or tongue position, which results in improved upper airway patency and reduced upper airway collapsibility. The MAD is an approved alternative therapy that has been consistently shown to be the preferred option by patients who are affected by OSA. Although the MAD is less efficacious than CPAP in abolishing apnea and hypopnea events in some patients, its greater usage results in comparable improvements in quality-of-life and cardiovascular measures, including blood pressure reduction. This review summarizes the impact of OSA on cardiovascular health, the limitations of CPAP, and the potential of OSA treatment using MADs in cardiovascular risk reduction.

The efficacy of a titrated tongue-stabilizing device on obstructive sleep apnea: a quasi-experimental study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short-term efficacy and self-reported outcomes of tongue-stabilizing device (TSD) therapy as compared to those of mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy in an adult population diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

This study is a parallel, nonrandomized clinical trial of the TSD and MAD therapies. The efficacy of both interventions was evaluated objectively by level 3 home sleep apnea testing and by self-report using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, the Chalder Fatigue Scale, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Adherence and adverse effects were self-reported.

RESULTS

Of the 39 patients who received TSD therapy, 27 managed to adapt and complete the trial and were matched with 26 patients who received MAD therapy. At the 2-month follow-up, the acceptance rate of the TSD therapy was 53.8%. Both patients receiving TSD therapy and patients receiving MAD therapy showed significant improvements in their respiratory event index (P < .05), with no difference between the treatments (P > .05). In those receiving TSD therapy (n = 27), the only self-reported efficacy measure that significantly improved with TSD therapy was the Chalder Fatigue Scale (P < .05). In contrast, all 4 self-reported measures (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and Chalder Fatigue Scale) showed a significant improvement with MAD therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed similar improvements in apneas and oxygen saturation between TSD and MAD therapies. Whereas MAD therapy was a better treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in terms of daytime sleepiness and quality-of-life improvements, TSD therapy had a low treatment acceptance rate.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: The Efficacy of Tongue Stabilizing Device in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02329925; Identifier: NCT02329925; and Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Adherence and Preference of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Mandibular Advancement Splints in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Trial (CHOICE); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02242617; Identifier: NCT02242617.

CITATION

Alshhrani WM, Hamoda MM, Okuno K, et al. The efficacy of a titrated tongue-stabilizing device on obstructive sleep apnea: a quasi-experimental study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(8):1607-1618.

Oral Appliances in the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a multifactorial condition, and an interdisciplinary approach to diagnosis forms the basis for effective treatment planning. Craniofacial structure and attached soft tissues and muscles play a central role in OSA. Evidence-based studies demonstrate the effectiveness of oral appliances for mandibular advancement and tongue stabilization in managing OSA, and current clinical standards of practice recommend the use of oral appliances to treat OSA when patients cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although effective, oral appliances are less predictable in managing OSA compared with CPAP therapy. Measures can be taken to improve predictability of oral appliance treatment.

Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) represents a significant global health burden, with impact on cardiometabolic health, chronic disease, productivity loss and accident risk. Oral appliances (OA) are an effective therapy for OSA and work by enlarging and stabilising the pharyngeal airway to prevent breathing obstructions during sleep. Although recommended in clinical guidelines for OSA therapy, they are often considered only as second-line therapy following positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy failure. There has been a long-standing barrier to selecting OA over PAP therapy due to the inability to be certain about the level of efficacy in individual OSA patients. A range of methods to select OSA patients for OA therapy, based on the outcome of a single sleep study night, have been proposed, although none has been widely validated for clinical use. Emergent health outcome data suggest that equivalent apnoea–hypopnea index reduction may not be necessary to produce the same health benefits of PAP. This may be related to the more favourable adherence to OA therapy, which can now be objectively verified. Data on longer term health outcomes are needed, and there are additional opportunities for device improvement and combination therapy approaches. OAs have an important role in precision care of OSA as a chronic disorder through a multi-disciplinary care team. Future studies on real-world health outcomes following OA therapy are needed.

Oral Appliances in the Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a multifactorial condition, and an interdisciplinary approach to diagnosis forms the basis for effective treatment planning. Craniofacial structure and attached soft tissues and muscles play a central role in OSA. Evidence-based studies demonstrate the effectiveness of oral appliances for mandibular advancement and tongue stabilization in managing OSA, and current clinical standards of practice recommend the use of oral appliances to treat OSA when patients cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although effective, oral appliances are less predictable in managing OSA compared with CPAP therapy. Measures can be taken to improve predictability of oral appliance treatment.

Long-term Results for Maxillomandibular Advancement to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis

Objective

To examine outcomes in the intermediate term (1 to <4 years), long term (4 to <8 years), and very long term (≥8 years) for maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) as treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Data Sources

The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and PubMed/MEDLINE.

Review Methods

Three authors systematically reviewed the international literature through July 26, 2018.

Results

A total of 445 studies were screened, and 6 met criteria (120 patients). Thirty-one patients showed a reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from a mean 48.3 events/h (95% CI, 42.1-54.5) pre-MMA to 8.4 (95% CI 5.6, 11.2) in the intermediate term. Fifty-four patients showed a reduction in AHI from a mean 65.8 events/h (95% CI, 58.8-72.8) pre-MMA to 7.7 (95% CI 5.9, 9.5) in the long term. Thirty-five showed a reduction in AHI from a mean 53.2 events/h (95% CI 45, 61.4) pre-MMA to 23.1 (95% CI 16.3, 29.9) in the very long term. Improvement in sleepiness was maintained at all follow-up periods. Lowest oxygen saturation improvement was maintained in the long term.

Conclusion

The current international literature shows that patients with OSA who were treated with MMA maintained improvements in AHI, sleepiness, and lowest oxygen saturation in the long term; however, the mean AHI increased to moderate OSA in the very long term. Definitive generalizations cannot be made, and additional research providing individual patient data for the intermediate term, long term, and very long term is needed.

Thirty-five alternatives to positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: an overview of meta-analyses

INTRODUCTION

Positive airway pressure (PAP) devices are generally considered to be the first-line treatment of choice for most adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, there are several alternatives. It is important for patients and their sleep providers to be aware of the most up-to-date information regarding the current international literature. Areas covered: The objective is to provide an overview of the meta-analyses evaluating non-PAP treatments for OSA. Four authors searched four databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE through 30 November 2017, for meta-analyses evaluating non-PAP therapies as treatment for OSA. Thirty-five non-PAP treatments were identified and were categorized based on the following anatomical subsites: (1) nose, (2) palate and oropharynx, (3) tongue, (4) skeletal surgery and jaw repositioning, and (5) other surgical and medical interventions. Treatments identified included surgeries, drugs, behavior modifications, nonsurgical weight loss, medical devices, body positioning, and oxygen treatment. Expert commentary: The 35 treatments described vary in their effectiveness in treating OSA in adults. In general, isolated nasal treatments are the least effective, whereas treatments that bypass the upper airway, significantly open the upper airway, and/or address multiple levels of the upper airway are more effective in improving apnea-hypopnea index and lowest oxygen saturation.

Sleep devices: wearables and nearables, informational and interventional, consumer and clinical

The field of sleep is in many ways ideally positioned to take full advantage of advancements in technology and analytics that is fueling the mobile health movement. Combining hardware and software advances with increasingly available big datasets that contain scored data obtained under gold standard sleep laboratory conditions completes the trifecta of this perfect storm. This review highlights recent developments in consumer and clinical devices for sleep, emphasizing the need for validation at multiple levels, with the ultimate goal of using personalized data and advanced algorithms to provide actionable information that will improve sleep health.