Efficacy of lianhuaqingwen granules in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps

Research Progress of Hydrogen on Chronic Nasal Inflammation

Chronic nasal mucosal inflammatory disease is a common nasal disease, which is involved by inflammatory cells and a variety of cytokines. Its main pathological features are inflammatory reaction, increased secretion, mucosal swelling and thickening of nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses.It mainly includes chronic rhinitis (divided into allergic rhinitis, non-allergic rhinitis), chronic sinusitis (divided into with nasal polyps, without nasal polyps type), etc.The main symptoms of chronic rhinitis are nasal itching, sneezing, runny nose, and nasal congestion. The main symptoms of chronic sinusitis are nasal congestion, purulent or sticky nasal discharge, headache, and reduced sense of smell. They are a type of disease with a high incidence rate and seriously affect the quality of human life.Although the etiology and treatment of this type of disease have been extensively studied, there are still many aspects that are unclear.Currently, oxidative stress is believed to be an important link in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases of the nasal mucosa. Therefore, anti-oxidative stress is a direction of research for the treatment of chronic nasal mucosal inflammatory diseases.Hydrogen, as a medically therapeutic gas, has been extensively studied for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-damage properties, and has been used in the treatment of various diseases.Although there are relatively few studies on the use of hydrogen for nasal inflammation, its positive effects have also been found. This article systematically summarizes the relevant research on the use of hydrogen to improve chronic nasal mucosal inflammation, with the aim of clarifying the ideas and indicating the direction for further research in the future.

Herbal Medicines for Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To analyze and compare the effects of herbal medicines (HMs) for treating different forms of rhinosinusitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Forty-seven randomized controlled trials evaluating 18 HMs in six different rhinosinusitis populations were included in the network meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. For the common cold, Pelargonium sidoides offered the most beneficial effect on symptom improvement (moderate certainty of evidence). For acute post-viral rhinosinusitis, Cineole and Pelargonium sidoides were the most effective treatments for controlling symptoms (moderate certainty), while Spicae aetheroleum was most effective for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) improvement (moderate certainty). For chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), Origanum vulgare was the most beneficial treatment for improving symptoms and HRQoL (low certainty). Evidence of HMs for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and unclassified chronic rhinosinusitis was restricted to a limited number of studies. Adverse events should be of concern in some HMs, such as Spicae aetheroleum or Mytorl. Several HMs improved patient-important outcomes, above minimal clinically important differences, in treating common cold, acute post-viral rhinosinusitis, and CRSsNP. Further studies with adequate sample sizes and long-term follow-ups are warranted to support the current evidence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: CRD42022328265 May 10, 2022.

Chinese herbal therapy in the management of rhinosinusitis-A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review aims to assess the effects and safety of Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) in the management of rhinosinusitis (RS); inform clinicians of the current state of the evidence; identify the best available evidence; and suggest further directions for research. Five English and four Chinese language databases, and four clinical trial registries were searched. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Participants were diagnosed with RS based on established criteria. Test interventions were CHMs administered orally and/or nasally, excluding injections and displacement techniques. Control interventions included placebos, no additional treatment, and conventional non-invasive treatments including pharmacotherapies and/or nasal irrigation, and/or inhalations. Polyposis and post-surgical recovery were excluded. Outcomes were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT), visual analogue scales (VAS), Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (LM), Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic score (LK), Mucociliary transport time (MTT), Mucociliary transport rate (MTR), quality of life and adverse events (AEs). Risk of bias used the Cochrane tool. Meta-analysis in Review Manager 5.4.1 used random effects for mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed as I2. Thirty-four RCTs were included, 30 of chronic RS (CRS) and four of acute RS (ARS). These enrolled 3,752 participants. Five RCTs blinded participants. For CRS, comparisons with placebo showed greater improvements in the CHM groups for SNOT-20 and VAS-TNS (total nasal symptoms). Blinded comparisons with pharmacotherapies showed no differences between groups in the degree of improvement for SNOT-20, VAS-TNS, and LM, suggesting these CHMs had similar effects, at least in the short term. In ARS, pooled results found improved scores on VAS-TNS and LK suggesting a benefit for combining these CHMs with pharmacotherapies. Limitations included inadequacies in study design and methodological reporting, and insufficient reporting of AEs. Heterogeneity in some pooled results precluded strong conclusions. Further well-designed studies are needed to test whether the results are replicable. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42019119586).

Composition of Three Common Chinese Herbal Medicines and the Influence of Preparation Types on the Bioaccessibility of Trace Elements

The high concentration of trace elements in Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is an important research topic for quality control. This study investigated the total concentration of trace elements in three herbs used as both medicine and supplementary food, including Astragalus membranaceus, Glycyrrhiza, and Isatidis. Further, the effects of different preparation ways, such as decoct, granule, and oral liquid, on the bioaccessibility of trace elements in CHM were disclosed. Results indicated that the total concentrations of trace elements in these three herbs were lower than the medical standards, but the concentrations of As and Pb in CHMs were higher than the standards for supplementary food. Different preparations ways affect bioaccessibility. Powder and oral liquid show a high bioaccessibility possibly because of the grinding process and the repeated extraction with ethanol. Among the three different CHMs, Isatidis showed higher bioaccessibility of As, which may be related to the sulfur fumigation process of this CHM. The three investigated CHMs were found to be safe as medicine but presented risks as supplementary food. The apparent influence of preparation procedures on the bioaccessibility of trace elements indicated that it is necessary to appropriately regulate preparation processes for CHMs.

Herbal medicine for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a disease with a high prevalence and a high socioeconomic burden. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review to update the evidence on the use of herbal medicine (HM) for CRS treatment.

Methods: A total of 14 electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of HM on the treatment of CRS were searched for articles published before July 2021. The primary outcome was CRS severity post-treatment, measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Total Effective Rate (TER). The risk of bias of the included studies and the quality of evidence of the main findings were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool.

Results: A total of 80 RCTs were included. Compared to placebo, HM significantly improved CRS severity as measured by TER and VAS. When HM was compared with conventional treatment (CT) as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy, CRS severity measured by TER and VAS, quality of life, Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score, Lund-Mackay computed tomography score, and nasal mucociliary function were significantly improved in the HM group. No serious adverse events associated with HM were reported. The risk of bias was generally unclear, and the quality of evidence ranged from moderate to low.

Conclusion: This review found some limited clinical evidence that HM or HM combined with CT may be more effective and safer than CT alone in treating CRS. However, the methodological quality of the included studies was generally low, and the quality of the evidence needs to be improved.

Positive effects of Lianhuaqingwen granules in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study of 248 cases

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Lianhuaqingwen (LHQW) is a Chinese medicine, developed from appropriate addition and reduction of combined traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Yinqiao San and Maxing Shigan decoction. LHQW has been used in routine influenza treatment for decades and plays a role in a broad-spectrum therapy on various influenza viruses.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

The therapeutic effects of LHQW in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not been fully elucidated. A retrospective study was conducted in patients with COVID-19 to evaluate the influence of LHQW on laboratory results related to the disease, and to provide evidence for the clinical practice of TCM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected 248 patients who met the moderate type COVID-19 diagnostic criteria, and received treatment in Tongji Hospital. Patients were divided into control (158 cases, standard treatment) and LHQW treatment (90 cases, standard treatment combined with LHQW) groups according to the different treatments administered. All laboratory data were obtained after 5-7 days' treatment.

RESULTS

In this study, the average patient age was 58.95 years and 131 patients were male. The two groups were comparable in demographic characteristics, symptoms, and treatment. Compared with in the control group, D-dimer and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significantly lower in the LHQW treatment group (2.47 ± 4.67 vs. 1.68 ± 3.61; 44.47 ± 30.24 vs. 35.39 ± 27.43; both P < 0.05). Lymphocyte counts, albumin and hemoglobin levels were higher in the LHQW treatment group than those in the control group (1.00 ± 0.46 vs. 1.13 ± 0.5; 34.39 ± 5.2 vs. 35.71 ± 4.76; 127.03 ± 16.58 vs. 131.11 ± 14.66; both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that LHQW significantly improved laboratory results of patients with COVID-19 and could be effectively applied alongside standard treatment of patients with moderate type COVID-19, providing preliminary clinical research evidence for the use of TCM in treatment of this disease.

The mechanisms and clinical application of Traditional Chinese Medicine Lianhua-Qingwen capsule

Lianhua-Qingwen capsule (LQC) is a commonly used Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in China and has 11 herb components. The main active ingredient can target specific molecules and perform many clinic treatment roles. LQC has been authorized by National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) of China to treat severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002-2003, type A influenza virus HIN1 pandemic in 2009, H7N9, H3N2 and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) in 2020. It is also widely used to treat common cold with wind-heat syndrome, chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), amygdalitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This article summarizes the advanced research progress of LQC in clinical application, mechanisms and provides new clues in the clinical application of LQC.

Baicalin Ameliorates Inflammatory Response in a Mouse Model of Rhinosinusitis via Regulating the Treg/Th17 Balance

OBJECTIVE

Rhinosinusitis is a global health problem affecting millions of people around the world. Baicalin is a bioactive compound isolated from medicinal plant Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. The present study aims to investigate potential effects of baicalin on clinicopathological changes in nasal/sinus mucosa in a mouse model.

METHODS

A mouse model of sinonasal inflammation induced by high dose of ovalbumin was applied to evaluate effects of baicalin. Rhinosinusitis symptoms, histopathological features, levels of histamine, immunoglobulin E (IgE), IL-17A, IL-10, and balance of regulatory T cell (Treg)/T-helper 17 (Th17) responses were examined.

RESULTS

Baicalin significantly relieved rhinosinusitis symptoms in mice, reduced histopathological changes, and suppressed serum levels of histamine and IgE in a dose-dependent manner. In lymphocytes of mice, baicalin modulated balance of Treg/Th17 proportions by attenuating Th17 cells and enhancing Treg cells, respectively. The serum IL-17A was decreased and IL-10 was increased in mice treated by baicalin. In addition, baicalin promoted levels of Smad protein 3 (p-Smad3) and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) to promote Treg cells while suppressed levels of p-Stat3 and retineic-acid-receptor-related orphan nuclear receptor γt (RORγt) to inhibit Th17 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that baicalin effectively ameliorates sinonasal inflammation in a mouse model by recovering the immunological balance of Treg/Th17 responses. Our finding highlights the potential value of baicalin for the treatment of rhinosinusitis.

Efficacy of Lianhua Qingwen Compared with Conventional Drugs in the Treatment of Common Pneumonia and COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis

METHODS

Seven English and Chinese databases were used to search for qualified experimental studies as of July 27, 2020. All data were extracted directly from the included studies, and no special conversion formula was used. The weighted mean difference (WMD), 95% confidence interval (CI), and odds ratio (OR) were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies involving 3793 subjects met the qualification criteria. For common pneumonia, a short duration of flu-like symptoms (WMD = -1.81, 95% CI = -2.12 to -1.50, P < 0.001), sputum (WMD = -1.10, 95% CI = -1.50 to -0.70, P < 0.001), pulmonary rale (WMD = -2.03, 95% CI = -2.74 to -1.31, P < 0.001), pulmonary imaging improvement (WMD = -1.88, 95% CI = -2.28 to -1.47, P < 0.001), curative effect (OR = 3.65, 95% CI = 2.81 to 4.76, P < 0.001), and healing period (WMD = -1.68, 95% CI = -2.62 to -0.74, P < 0.001) were associated with the Lianhua Qingwen group; subgroup analysis based on flu-like symptoms showed statistically significant improvements in fever and cough. For COVID-19 pneumonia, improvements in flu-like symptoms (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 2.36 to 4.29, P < 0.001), shortness of breath (OR = 10.62, 95% CI = 3.71 to 30.40, P < 0.001), curative effect (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.76 to 3.53, P < 0.001), healing period (WMD = -2.06, 95% CI = -3.36 to -0.75, P = 0.002), and conversion of severe cases (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.77, P = 0.003) were associated with the Lianhua Qingwen group; subgroup analysis indicated statistically significant improvements of fever, cough, fatigue, and muscle pain in the Lianhua Qingwen group compared to the conventional drug group. Regarding adverse reactions, no significant difference was detected for common pneumonia (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.54 to 1.05, P = 0.097).

CONCLUSIONS

Lianhua Qingwen combined with conventional drugs may be a promising therapy for treating common pneumonia and COVID-19 pneumonia.

Antiviral mechanisms of candidate chemical medicines and traditional Chinese medicines for SARS-CoV-2 infection

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly become a global pandemic. Up to now, numerous medicines have been applied or approved for the prevention and control of the virus infection. However, the efficiency of each medicine or combination is completely different or still unknown. In this review, we discuss the types, characteristics, antiviral mechanisms, and shortcomings of recommended candidate medicines for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as perspectives of the drugs for the disease treatment, which may provide a theoretical basis for drug screening and application.

Nasal nebulization inhalation of budesonide for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps (CRNP) is a common public health concern for general population, and is thought to negatively impact their quality of life. Although previous studies have reported that nasal nebulization inhalation of budesonide (NNIB) can benefit patients with such condition, its conclusions are still inconsistent. Thus, this study will assess the efficacy and safety of NNIB for the treatment of CRNP.

METHODS

To identify any associated studies, we will comprehensively and systematically search Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. We will search all electronic databases from inception to the present with no limitations of language and publication status. Two independent reviewers will undertake selection of study, data collection, and study quality evaluation, respectively. Another reviewer will help to settle down any different opinions between both of them. Study quality will be checked using Cochrane risk of bias tool, and statistical analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of NNIB for the treatment of CRNP through assessing primary outcomes of nasal symptoms and polyp sizes, and secondary outcomes of serum cortisol levels, health-related quality of life, and any expected and unexpected adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study will summarize the up-to-date evidence on assessing the efficacy and safety of NNIB for the treatment of CRNP.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202040108.

The potential insights of Traditional Chinese Medicine on treatment of COVID-19

Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) broke out in 2019 and spread rapidly around the world. There is still no specific antiviral therapy to the current pandemic. In China, historical records show that Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is effective in prevention and enhancing the resistance to pandemic with unique insights. To fight with COVID-19, National Health and Commission of PRC has recommended some TCM in the guideline, such as HuoxiangZhengqi, LianhuaQingwen ShufengJiedu and XueBijing, and actually displayed a remarkable effect in clinical treatment strategic for COVID-19. We review studies to provide an in-depth understanding into the effect of TCM, and also introduce the possible mechanism involved in COVID-19 treatment.