The burden of illness in patients with hereditary angioedema

Garadacimab for hereditary angioedema attack prevention: long-term efficacy, quality of life, and safety data from a phase 2, randomised, open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Garadacimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting activated factor XII. This study evaluated long-term efficacy, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety data for garadacimab in adults with hereditary angioedema.

METHODS

This global phase 2 study comprised a treatment period 1 (TP1: 12 weeks, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and a treatment period 2 (TP2: ≥44-week open-label extension). Patients aged 18-65 years with clinically confirmed hereditary angioedema were eligible. In TP1, 32 patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous garadacimab (75 mg, 200 mg, or 600 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks (once monthly). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology via block randomisation (block sizes 1-4). Subsequently, six additional patients in TP1 were assigned to open-label garadacimab 400 mg every 2 weeks. At the start of TP2, patients were re-randomised (if receiving placebo, garadacimab 75 mg, or garadacimab 400 mg) or continued to receive garadacimab 200 mg or garadacimab 600 mg once monthly. After a protocol amendment on March 20, 2020, patients originally assigned to the 600 mg dose were down-titrated to 200 mg at their next visit. The primary endpoint (published previously) was monthly attack rate for patients receiving 200 mg or 600 mg garadacimab in TP1 in the intention-to-treat population. Here, we assessed the impact of garadacimab on patient-reported and investigator-reported outcomes and HRQoL as well as long-term efficacy and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03712228, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Of 54 patients screened between Oct 29, 2018, and Aug 28, 2019, 32 randomised and six open-label patients completed TP1 and entered TP2 (20 in the garadacimab 200 mg group; 18 in the garadacimab 600 mg group; total 38 patients). Median age was 39·0 years (IQR 27·0-53·0), and 21 patients (55%) were female and 17 (45%) were male. In TP2, the median garadacimab exposure was 87·9 weeks (IQR 50·0-106·6) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 44·1 weeks (24·1-56·1) in the garadacimab 600 mg group. Median monthly attack rates were 0·0 (IQR 0·0-0·1) in the garadacimab 200 mg group and 0·1 (0·0-0·4) in the garadacimb 600 mg group. Median reduction in monthly attack rate versus run-in was 100% (IQR 98-100) with garadacimab 200 mg. HRQoL improvements observed during TP1 with garadacimab were sustained throughout TP2. TP2 safety signals were consistent with TP1. Two patients experienced serious adverse events of diverticular perforation and asthma (not garadacimab-related). Treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. The most common adverse events were headache (nine of 38, 24%) and abdominal pain (seven of 38, 18%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Once-monthly garadacimab for more than 2 years in patients with hereditary angioedema was well tolerated and efficacious in reducing monthly attack rate and improving HRQoL. These results reveal the potential of long-term prophylactic treatment with 200 mg once-monthly garadacimab towards complete disease control of patients with hereditary angioedema.

FUNDING

CSL Behring.

Neurologic and Psychiatric Manifestations of Bradykinin-Mediated Angioedema: Old and New Challenges

Neurologic manifestations have been occasionally described in patients with bradykinin-mediated angioedema. The existing literature is currently limited to case series and case reports mainly described in the hereditary forms (HAE) concerning central nervous system (CNS) involvement. On the contrary, very little is known about peripheral and autonomic nervous system manifestations. CNS involvement in HAE may present with symptoms including severe headaches, visual disturbance, seizures, and various focal and generalized deficits. In addition, a stroke-like clinical picture may present in HAE patients. In turn, some drugs used in patients with cardiovascular and neurologic disorders, such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), may produce medication-induced angioedema, resulting in a diagnostic challenge. Finally, most patients with HAE have higher levels of psychological distress, anxiety, and depression. With this review, we aimed to provide an organized and detailed analysis of the existing literature on neurologic and psychiatric manifestations of HAE to shed light on these potentially invalidating symptoms and lay the foundation for further personalized diagnostic pathways for patients affected by this protean disease.

The Price of a Life: Unveiling the Struggle of Living With Hereditary Angioedema

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, potentially life-threatening genetic condition characterized by recurrent episodes of localized swelling in various body tissues. Despite advancements in the management and prevention of HAE, high costs limit accessibility to these medications and remain a significant hurdle for many patients. This case report illustrates the implications and life-threatening consequences of the affordability crisis associated with HAE medications. To the authors' knowledge, this case also highlights the first reported case of cocaine serving as an HAE trigger.

Efficacy and safety of garadacimab, a factor XIIa inhibitor for hereditary angioedema prevention (VANGUARD): a global, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disease that is associated with kallikrein-kinin system dysregulation. Garadacimab (CSL312), a novel, fully-human monoclonal antibody that inhibits activated factor XII (FXIIa), is being studied for the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-monthly subcutaneous administrations of garadacimab as prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema.

METHODS

VANGUARD was a pivotal, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that recruited patients (aged ≥12 years) with type I or type II hereditary angioedema across seven countries (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, the Netherlands, and the USA). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive garadacimab or placebo for 6 months (182 days) by an interactive response technology (IRT) system. Randomisation was stratified by age (≤17 years vs >17 years) and baseline attack rate (1 to <3 attacks per month vs ≥3 attacks per month) for the adult group. The randomisation list and code were kept by the IRT provider during the study, with no access by site staff and funding representatives. All patients and investigational site staff, and representatives from the funder (or their delegates) with direct interaction with the study sites or patients, were masked to treatment assignment in a double-blind fashion. Randomly assigned patients received a 400-mg loading dose of subcutaneous garadacimab as two 200-mg injections or volume-matched placebo on day 1 of the treatment period, followed by five additional self-administered (or caregiver-administered) monthly doses of 200-mg subcutaneous garadacimab or volume-matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed time-normalised number of hereditary angioedema attacks (number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month) during the 6-month treatment period (day 1 to day 182). Safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of garadacimab or placebo. The study is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2020-000570-25 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04656418.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 27, 2021, and June 7, 2022, we screened 80 patients, 76 of whom were eligible to enter the run-in period of the study. Of 65 eligible patients with type I or type II hereditary angioedema, 39 were randomly assigned to garadacimab and 26 to placebo. One patient was randomly assigned in error and did not enter the treatment period (no dose of study drug received), resulting in 39 patients assigned to garadacimab and 25 patients assigned to placebo being included. 38 (59%) of 64 participants were female and 26 (41%) were male. 55 (86%) of 64 participants were White, six (9%) were Asian (Japanese), one (2%) was Black or African American, one (2%) was Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and one (2%) was listed as other. During the 6-month treatment period (day 1 to day 182), the mean number of investigator-confirmed hereditary angioedema attacks per month was significantly lower in the garadacimab group (0·27, 95% CI 0·05 to 0·49) than in the placebo group (2·01, 1·44 to 2·57; p<0·0001), corresponding to a percentage difference in means of -87% (95% CI -96 to -58; p<0·0001). The median number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month was 0 (IQR 0·00-0·31) for garadacimab and 1·35 (1·00-3·20) for placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper-respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, and headaches. FXIIa inhibition was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding or thromboembolic events.

INTERPRETATION

Monthly garadacimab administration significantly reduced hereditary angioedema attacks in patients aged 12 years and older compared with placebo and had a favourable safety profile. Our results support the use of garadacimab as a potential prophylactic therapy for the treatment of hereditary angioedema in adolescents and adults.

FUNDING

CSL Behring.

A narrative review of recent literature of the quality of life in hereditary angioedema patients

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder that causes unpredictable and debilitating cutaneous and submucosal edema and can lead to death. HAE can impair patients' ability to perform daily activities, proportional to pain severity, with patients reporting lower productivity, missed time from work or school and potentially resulting in missed career and educational opportunities. Many patients with HAE experience a significant psychological burden, including anxiety and depression. Available treatment aims to prevent and/or treat HAE attacks as they occur, to reduce morbidity and mortality and, finally, to improve health-related quality of life. Two different validated specific angioedema instruments are available to assess patients' quality of life. The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) examines diagnosed patients' quality of life but is not specific for HAE. The disease-specific questionnaire is the Hereditary Angioedema Quality of Life (HAE-QoL), and the first used for hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitors (C1-INH) deficiency. These quality-of-life instruments are helpful to the HAE patients' assessment and to the development of better therapeutic strategies as clinical tools, as defined by international guidelines. Considering this context, this review was conducted to compare the effects of acute vs. long-term prophylaxis on HAE patients' health-related quality of life. In addition, the prevalence of anxiety and depression among these individuals was also reviewed.

A review of berotralstat for the treatment of hereditary angioedema

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) imposes a significant disease burden on patients and their families. Unpredictable episodes of angioedema, which can lead to life-threatening conditions, have a significant impact on the quality of life of the patient. The fundamental aim of the treatment of C1-INH-HAE is to ensure that patients can lead a normal life. The most effective way to do this is to prevent the onset of angioedema attacks.

AREAS COVERED

This review gives a brief overview of the safety and efficacy of the oral kallikrein inhibitor berotralstat in C1-INH-HAE disease. It provides a comprehensive synopsis of the results of the first clinical trials with a targeted oral kallikrein inhibitor (APeX-1 [NCT02870972]; ZENITH-1 [NCT03240133]; APeX-2 [NCT03485911]; APeX-S [NCT03472040]; APeX-J [NCT03873116]), reviewing evidence on the efficacy and safety of the drug, and placing berotralstat on the spectrum of long-term prophylactic therapeutic options.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of the first targeted oral prophylactic drug, the kallikrein inhibitor berotralstat, in 2021, is a milestone in the treatment of patients with hereditary angioedema.

Icatibant use in Brazilian patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) type 1 or 2 and HAE with normal C1-INH levels: findings from the Icatibant Outcome Survey Registry Study

Background

Hereditary angioedema can be caused by C1-Inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency and/or dysfunction (HAE-1/2) or can occur in patients with normal C1-INH (HAE nC1-INH).

Methods

The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; NCT01034969) registry monitors the safety and effectiveness of icatibant for treating acute angioedema.

Objective

Present findings from Brazilian patients with HAE-1/2 and HAE nC1-INH participating in IOS.

Results

42 patients were enrolled (HAE-1/2, n = 26; HAE nC1-INH, n = 16). Median age at symptom onset was significantly lower with HAE-1/2 vs. HAE nC1-INH (10.0 vs. 16.5y, respectively; p = 0.0105), whereas median age at diagnosis (31.1 vs. 40.9y; p = 0.1276) and the median time between symptom onset and diagnosis (15.0 vs. 23.8y; p = 0.6680) were numerically lower vs. HAE nC1-INH, respectively. One icatibant dose was used for > 95% of HAE attacks. Median (range) time-to-event outcomes were shorter for patients with HAE nC1-INH vs. HAE-1/2, including time to first administration (0.5 [0–96.0] vs. 1.0 [0–94.0]h, respectively), time from first administration to complete resolution (1.0 [0–88.0] vs. 5.5 [0–96.0]h, respectively), and total attack duration (7.0 [0.3–99.0] vs. 18.5 [0.1–100.0]h, respectively). Mean (SD) time from attack onset to resolution was significantly shorter for patients with HAE nC1-INH vs. HAE-1/2 (9.8 [18.7] vs. 19.6 [24.0]h, respectively; p = 0.0174). 83 adverse events (AEs) in 42 patients were reported; most were mild (66.3%) or moderate (13.3%) and non-serious (75.9%). The most common icatibant-related AE was injection site erythema (HAE-1/2, 34.6%; HAE nC1-INH, 18.8%).

Study limitations

This was an observational study without a treatment comparator and that relied on patient recall.

Conclusions

Findings demonstrate effectiveness and tolerability of icatibant in Brazilian HAE patients.

Long-term prophylaxis with lanadelumab for HAE: authorization for temporary use in France

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is associated with a heavy burden of illness.

Objective

To evaluate use of lanadelumab in a French Authorization for Temporary Use (ATU) program.

Methods

ATU requests were made between October 12, 2018, and March 13, 2019; patients were followed through September 23, 2019. At entry, patients received lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks. HAE attack characteristics were evaluated at day (D) 0 and months (M) 3 and 6. Patients completed the Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) questionnaire at initiation and monthly and the Angioedema Activity Score questionnaire daily in 28 day cycles (AAS28).

Results

In total, 77 patients received ≥ 1 lanadelumab dose; 69 had ≥ 1 quarterly follow-up visit (analyzed population). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) lanadelumab exposure was 240.4 (53.7) days. Lanadelumab dose was modified in 12 patients (mostly to every 4 weeks). For the analyzed population, compared with attacks/month (mean [SD]) within 6 months before ATU (2.68 [2.54]), fewer attacks occurred between initiation and first visit (0.16 [0.42]; P < 0.001) or last visit (0.16 [0.42]; P < 0.001); D15 and last visit (0.15 [0.41]); and D70 and last visit (0.17 [0.70]). AE-QoL total and domain scores were significantly higher at initiation versus M3 and M6; 55% and 65% of patients, respectively, achieved a minimal clinically important difference from D0 to M3 and D0 to M6. Proportion of patients with AAS28 of 0 was higher during M3 (90%) and M6 (83%) than initiation (59%). The most frequently reported adverse events included headache (7.3%) and injection site pain (6.3%).

Conclusions

Lanadelumab reduced attack rates, improved quality of life, and was generally well tolerated.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13223-022-00664-4.

Long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks with lanadelumab: The HELP OLE Study

Background

The aim was to evaluate long‐term effectiveness and safety of lanadelumab in patients ≥12 y old with hereditary angioedema (HAE) 1/2 (NCT02741596).

Methods

Rollover patients completing the HELP Study and continuing into HELP OLE received one lanadelumab 300 mg dose until first attack (dose‐and‐wait period), then 300 mg q2wks (regular dosing stage). Nonrollovers (newly enrolled) received lanadelumab 300 mg q2wks from day 0. Baseline attack rate for rollovers: ≥1 attack/4 weeks (based on run‐in period attack rate during HELP Study); for nonrollovers: historical attack rate ≥1 attack/12 weeks. The planned treatment period was 33 months.

Results

212 patients participated (109 rollovers, 103 nonrollovers); 81.6% completed ≥30 months on study (mean [SD], 29.6 [8.2] months). Lanadelumab markedly reduced mean HAE attack rate (reduction vs baseline: 87.4% overall). Patients were attack free for a mean of 97.7% of days during treatment; 81.8% and 68.9% of patients were attack free for ≥6 and ≥12 months, respectively. Angioedema Quality‐of‐Life total and domain scores improved from day 0 to end of study. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (excluding HAE attacks) were reported by 97.2% of patients; most commonly injection site pain (47.2%) and viral upper respiratory tract infection (42.0%). Treatment‐related TEAEs were reported by 54.7% of patients. Most injection site reactions resolved within 1 hour (70.2%) or 1 day (92.6%). Six (2.8%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs. No treatment‐related serious TEAEs or deaths were reported. Eleven treatment‐related TEAEs of special interest were reported by seven (3.3%) patients.

Conclusion

Lanadelumab demonstrated sustained efficacy and acceptable tolerability with long‐term use in HAE patients.

Preventive Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema: A Review of Phase III Clinical Trial Data for Subcutaneous C1 Inhibitor and Relevance for Patient Management

PURPOSE

Hereditary angioedema (HAE), most often caused by a genetically mediated deficiency in the activity of C1 inhibitor (C1INH) protein, is characterized clinically by recurrent episodes of localized swelling without wheals. HAE attacks can be painful, debilitating, and even fatal, resulting in physical discomfort, emotional stress, and interruptions of work, school, and/or social activities, all of which can affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Subcutaneous C1INH (C1INH[SC]) is recommended as a first-line option for long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in HAE. This narrative review provides a concise but comprehensive overview of all published data generated from the pivotal Phase III Clinical Study for Optimal Management of Preventing Angioedema With Low-Volume Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor Replacement Therapy (COMPACT) study program, which evaluated the use of C1INH(SC) as LTP.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed using the search terms subcutaneous C1 inhibitor plus COMPACT with no filters, and another search was performed using the term subcutaneous C1 inhibitor, with output limited to clinical trial data only. All publications that reported data generated during the Phase III COMPACT study were included. Data presentation focused on the US Food and Drug Administration-approved dose of 60 IU/kg.

FINDINGS

The search strategy identified a total of 11 publications that reported data and analyses from the Phase III COMPACT study. Publications reported overall findings from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover COMPACT study and a subsequent long-term open-label extension (OLE) study. Other published analyses included pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data, HRQoL assessments, and findings in patient subgroups including women, pediatric patients, and patients ≥65 years of age. Subgroup analyses reported good safety and efficacy profiles among age-based subgroups from the COMPACT OLE, including pediatric patients, patients ≥65 years of age with comorbidities, and among female patients, despite a tendency for HAE to be more severe in women. A number of significant HRQoL improvements were noted with C1INH(SC) use, including better overall health status, less anxiety, and less work- and activity-related impairment versus placebo (double-blind study), and compared with baseline (OLE).

IMPLICATIONS

This review provides a concise overview of all published COMPACT study data with C1INH(SC). The data reviewed here portray a high level of efficacy and tolerability with C1INH(SC), even during periods of treatment that exceed 2 years, which does not appear to vary based on patient age or sex. Clinically relevant improvements in multiple facets of HRQoL were also reported, including better overall HRQoL, less anxiety and depression, and less disruptions in work attendance and productivity. These data should be useful for assessing the appropriateness of C1INH(SC) therapy for individual patients.

Optimization of care for patients with hereditary angioedema living in rural areas

OBJECTIVE

People living in rural areas of the United States experience greater health inequality than individuals residing in urban or suburban locations and encounter several barriers to obtaining optimal health care. Health disparities are compounded for patients with rare diseases such as hereditary angioedema (HAE), an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by recurrent, severe abdominal pain and lifethreatening oropharyngeal/laryngeal swelling. The objective of this review is to explore the challenges of managing HAE patients in rural areas and suggest possible improvements for optimizing care.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched for articles on patient care management, treatment challenges, rural health, and HAE.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Relevant articles were selected and reviewed.

RESULTS

Challenges in managing HAE in the rural setting were identified including obtaining a diagnosis of HAE, easy access to a physician with expertise in HAE, continuity of care, availability of telemedicine services, access to approved HAE therapies, patient education, and economic barriers to treatment. Ways to improve HAE patient care in rural areas include health care provider recognition of the undiagnosed HAE patient, development of individualized management plans, expansion of telemedicine, effective care at the local level, appropriate access to HAE medication, and increased awareness of patient support and advocacy groups.

CONCLUSION

For HAE patients living in rural areas, optimal care is complicated by health disparities. Given the scarcity with which these topics have been covered in the literature to date, it is intended that this article will serve as the impetus for a range of further initiatives focused on improving access to care.

Variability of disease activity in patients with hereditary angioedema type 1/2: longitudinal data from the Icatibant Outcome Survey

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-1/2) is a chronic and debilitating disease. The unpredictable clinical course represents a significant patient burden.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse longitudinal registry data from the Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS) in order to characterize temporal changes in disease activity in patients with HAE-1/2.

METHODS

Icatibant Outcome Survey (NCT01034969) is an international observational registry monitoring the clinical outcomes of patients eligible for icatibant treatment. The current analyses are based on data collected between July 2009 and July 2019. Retrospective data for attacks recorded in the 12 months prior to IOS enrolment and for each 12-month period up to 7 years were analysed.

RESULTS

Included patients reported angioedema attacks without long-term prophylaxis (LTP; n = 315) and with LTP (n = 292) use at the time of attack onset. Androgens were the most frequently used LTP option (80.8%). At the population level, regardless of LTP use, most patients (52-80%) reporting <5 attacks in Year 1 continued experiencing this rate; similarly, many patients (25-76%) who reported high attack frequency continued reporting ≥10 attacks/year. However, year on year, 31-51% of patients experienced notable changes (increase/decrease of ≥5 attacks) in annual attack frequency. Of patients who reported an absolute change of ≥10 attacks from Year 1 to 2, 17-50% continued to experience a change of this magnitude in subsequent years.

CONCLUSION

At the population level, attack frequency was generally consistent over 7 years. At the small group level, 28.8-34.5% of patients reported a change in attack frequency of ≥5 attacks from Year 1 to Year 2; up to half of these patients continued to experience this magnitude of variation in disease activity in later years, reflecting high intra-patient variability.

Impact of anxiety, stress and depression related to COVID-19 pandemic on the course of hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks can be provoked with psychological factors. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of anxiety, depression and stress related to COVID‐19 pandemic on disease activity of HAE patients during the quarantine period (QP) and the return to normal period (RTNP).

Methods

This study was conducted between March 2020 and September 2020 in four allergy centres. Demographic, clinical features and mental health status were evaluated in QP (from March to the beginning of June) and RTNP (from June to the beginning of September) applied by the government. The 10‐point visual analogue scale (VAS10) was used to define the severity of HAE attacks. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales‐21 (DASS‐21) and Fear of COVID‐19 (FC‐19) scale were performed to assess mental health status.

Results

139 HAE patients were included in the study. In QP, median attack numbers and median VAS10 scores were 5 (min‐max: 0–45) and 6 (min‐max: 0–10), respectively. HAE attack numbers, DASS‐21 stress, anxiety, depression and total DASS‐21 scores, and FC‐19 scores were higher in QP than RTNP (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). However, there was no difference in attack severity scores between the two periods (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

This study revealed that the restriction measures during COVID‐19 outbreak cause an increase in the number of HAE attacks in relation to anxiety, depression, stress and fear of COVID‐19 pandemic. Therefore, it is important to provide psychological support to HAE patients during the pandemic.

The importance of recognizing and managing a rare form of angioedema: hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency

The majority of angioedema cases encountered in clinical practice are histamine-mediated (allergic); however, some cases are bradykinin-related (non-allergic) and do not respond to standard anti-allergy medications. Among bradykinin-related angioedema, hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, but chronic and debilitating condition. The majority of HAE is caused by deficiency (type 1) or abnormal function (type 2) of the naturally occurring protein, C1-inhibitor (C1-INH)-a major inhibitor of proteases in the contact (kallikrein-bradykinin cascade), fibrinolytic pathway, and complement systems. Failure to recognize HAE and initiate appropriate intervention can lead to years of pain, disability, impaired quality of life (QoL) and, in cases of laryngeal involvement, it can be life-threatening. HAE must be considered in the differential diagnosis of non-urticarial angioedema, particularly for patients with a history of recurrent angioedema attacks, family history of HAE, symptom onset in childhood/adolescence, prodromal signs/symptoms before swellings, recurrent/painful abdominal symptoms, and upper airway edema. Management strategies for HAE include on-demand treatment for acute attacks, short-term prophylaxis prior to attack-triggering events/procedures, and long-term or routine prophylaxis for attack prevention. Patients should be evaluated at least annually to assess need for routine prophylaxis. HAE specific medications like plasma-derived and recombinant C1-INH products, kallikrein inhibitors, and bradykinin B2 receptor antagonists, have improved management of HAE. While the introduction of intravenous C1-INH represented a major breakthrough in routine HAE prophylaxis, some patients fail to achieve adequate control and others have psychological barriers or experience complications related to intravenous administration. Subcutaneous (SC) C1-INH, SC monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapies, and an oral kallikrein inhibitor offer effective alternatives for HAE attack prevention and may facilitate self-administration. HAE management should be individualized, with QoL improvement being a key goal. This can be achieved with broader availability of existing options for routine prophylaxis, including greater global availability of C1-INH(SC), mAb-based therapy, oral treatments, and multiple on-demand therapies.

Angioedema with severe acute abdominal pain: Think of hereditary angioedema

Angioedema can be either mast cell-(histamine-)mediated or bradykinin-mediated. Treatment approaches for the two types are very different, making differential diagnosis critical. Severe acute abdominal pain caused by intestinal angioedema is commonly misdiagnosed, especially when associated with bradykinin-mediated angioedema. After describing a typical clinical scenario and diagnostic journey of a patient with recurrent, undiagnosed abdominal pain due to hereditary angioedema (HAE), a rare variant of bradykinin-mediated angioedema, we delve into the classification and differential diagnosis of the various types of angioedema and provide an overview of appropriate management with an emphasis on the bradykinin-mediated types. Bradykinin-induced angioedema may be inherited or acquired and is infrequent compared to mast cell-mediated angioedema. HAE is a rare disease characterized by recurrent attacks of non-urticarial, nonpruritic edema usually affecting the face, respiratory tract, extremities, gastrointestinal tract, and genitalia. Unlike mast cell-mediated angioedema, painful abdominal symptoms are prevalent in bradykinin-mediated angioedema and are sometimes the only manifestation of an attack, increasing the likelihood of initial misdiagnosis as appendicitis or other forms of acute abdomen. It is important for gastroenterologists to be vigilant for the possibility of angioedema pathology in patients presenting with undiagnosed, recurrent, abdominal symptoms to facilitate accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

Psychosocial burden of type 1 and 2 hereditary angioedema: a single-center Canadian cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare but serious disorder associated with a multifaceted burden of illness including a high prevalence of psychiatric symptoms and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite recent efforts to clarify the psychosocial implications of HAE, important gaps still remain. The aim of this study was to characterize the psychosocial burden associated with HAE types 1 and 2.

METHODS

Type 1 or 2 HAE patients (n  =  17), aged 19 years or older, completed the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the DSM-5 cross cutting measures to identify psychiatric symptomatology, Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) and the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) to assess disease-related and generic HRQoL respectively, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) to measure impact on work productivity and daily activities. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software (Version 25.0; IBM, Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize continuous demographics and clinical characteristics and outcomes of interest while frequency distributions were used for categorical variables. T tests were used to compare SF-36v2 domain scores to Canadian norms and sex differences in scale scores.

RESULTS

Depression [DASS-21 score  =  6.8  ±  10.2; n  =  12 (71%)] anxiety [DASS-21 score  =  6.2  ±  8.2; n  =  13 (76%)] and stress [DASS-21 score  =  10  ±  10.2; n  =  13 (76%)] were prevalent. Other psychiatric symptoms warranting inquiry included mania (n  =  14, 82.4%), anger (n  =  14, 82.4%), sleep disturbances (n  =  13, 76.5%), somatic symptoms (n  =  11, 64.7%) and impaired personality functioning (n  =  9, 52.9%). Mean AE-QoL score was 39  ±  18.2. Mean SF-36v2 domain scores were significantly lower than Canadian normative data for the entire sample (p  <  0.05). Impairment in work productivity was minimal; mean activity impairment was 20.6%  ±  21.1% [n  =  11 (64.7%)]. Female participants reported significantly greater HAE-related stress [DASS; t(15)  =   - 2.2, p  =  0.04], greater HAE-related fears [AEQoL; t(5.6)  =   - 2.7, p  =  0.04), and lower SF-36v2 domain scores than male patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings offer specific, valuable insight into the psychosocial burden of HAE with the potential to improve clinical management of HAE. Best practices for effective management of HAE should include providing holistic care to address the psychosocial and mental health of HAE patients.

[Impact of disease on daily activities, emotions and quality of life of patients with hereditary angioedema]

INTRODUCTION

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by recurrent attacks of swelling of various locations and severity. An impaired quality of life of patients with HAE has been reported by several studies. We aimed at examining the overall impact of the disease in patients followed for type I HAE, particularly its impact on daily life activities, emotions and quality of life.

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to patients consulting for type I HAE, collecting demographics, disease characteristics, impact on professional life, Hospital Anxiety and Depression score (HAD), SF-36 score and the McMaster Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR).

RESULTS

The 33 patients included reported an average of 5.17 attacks over the last year. Stress was the main trigger A long-term treatment was reported by 58% of patients, 72% received specific treatment in the event of a serious attack. Sick days were reported by 33% of patients during their studies, and by 34% during work. One patient suffered from depressive symptoms and ten from anxious symptoms, according to the HAD score. The areas most impacted on the SF-36 score were general health and vitality. The mean score for MACTAR was low.

CONCLUSION

HAE still has a significant impact on the daily and emotional lives of patients, despite the availability of prophylactic and crisis treatments.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of berotralstat for hereditary angioedema: The open-label APeX-S study

BACKGROUND

Berotralstat (BCX7353) is an oral, once-daily inhibitor of plasma kallikrein recently approved for prevention of angioedema attacks in adults and adolescents with hereditary angioedema (HAE). The objective of this report is to summarize results from an interim analysis of an ongoing long-term safety study of berotralstat in patients with HAE.

METHODS

APeX-S is an ongoing, phase 2, open-label study conducted in 22 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03472040). Eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1-INH) were centrally allocated to receive berotralstat 150 or 110 mg once daily. The primary objective was to determine long-term safety and the secondary objective was to evaluate effectiveness.

RESULTS

Enrolled patients (N = 227) received berotralstat 150 mg (n = 127) or 110 mg (n = 100) once daily. The median (range) duration of exposure was 342 (11-540) and 307 (14-429) days for the 150-mg and 110-mg groups, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 91% (n = 206) of patients. The most common TEAEs across treatment groups were upper respiratory tract infection (n = 91, 40%), abdominal pain (n = 57, 25%), headache (n = 40, 18%), and diarrhea (n = 31, 14%) and were mostly mild to moderate. Fifty percent (n = 113) of patients had at least one drug-related adverse event (AE; 150 mg, n = 57 [45%]; 110 mg, n = 56 [56%]), and discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 19 (8%) patients (150 mg, n = 13 [10%]; 110 mg, n = 6 [6%]). Three (1.3%) patients experienced a drug-related serious TEAE. Among patients who received berotralstat through 48 weeks (150 mg, n = 73; 110 mg, n = 30), median HAE attack rates were low in month 1 (150 mg, 1.0 attacks/month; 110 mg, 0.5 attacks/month) and remained low through 12 months (0 attacks/month in both dose groups). Mean HAE attack rates followed a similar trend, and no evidence for patient tolerance to berotralstat emerged. In both dose groups, angioedema quality of life scores showed clinically meaningful changes from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, both berotralstat doses, 150  and 110 mg once daily, were generally well tolerated. Effectiveness results support the durability and robustness of berotralstat as prophylactic therapy in patients with HAE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03472040).

Oral berotralstat for the prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema attacks in patients in Japan: A phase 3 randomized trial

Background

With no approved treatments in Japan for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, there is a significant unmet need for long‐term prophylactic therapies for Japanese patients with HAE. Berotralstat (BCX7353) is an oral, once‐daily, highly selective inhibitor of plasma kallikrein in development for prophylaxis of angioedema attacks in HAE patients.

Methods

APeX‐J is a phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, 3‐part trial conducted in Japan (University Hospital Medical Information Network identifier, UMIN000034869; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03873116). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of type 1 or 2 HAE underwent a prospective run‐in period of 56 days to determine eligibility, allowing enrollment of those with ≥2 expert‐confirmed angioedema attacks. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) and stratified by baseline attack rate (≥2 vs. <2 expert‐confirmed attacks/month between screening and randomization) to receive once‐daily berotralstat 110 mg, berotralstat 150 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the rate of expert‐confirmed angioedema attacks during dosing in the 24‐week treatment period.

Results

Nineteen patients were randomized to receive once‐daily berotralstat 110 mg (n = 6), berotralstat 150 mg (n = 7), or placebo (n = 6). Treatment with berotralstat 150 mg significantly reduced HAE attacks relative to placebo (1.11 vs. 2.18 attacks/month, p = .003). The most frequently reported treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in berotralstat‐treated patients (n = 13) were nasopharyngitis (n = 4, 31%), abdominal pain, cough, diarrhea, and pyrexia (n = 2 each, 15%).

Conclusions

Orally administered, once‐daily berotralstat 150 mg significantly reduced the frequency of HAE attacks and was safe and well tolerated, supporting its use as a prophylactic therapy in patients with type 1 or 2 HAE in Japan.

Assessment and management of disease burden and quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema: a consensus report

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disease characterized by unpredictable, potentially life-threatening attacks, resulting in significant physical and emotional burdens for patients and families. To optimize care for patients with HAE, an individualized management plan should be considered in partnership with the physician, requiring comprehensive assessment of the patient's frequency and severity of attacks, disease burden, and therapeutic control. Although several guidelines and consensus papers have been published concerning the diagnosis and treatment of HAE, there has been limited specific clinical guidance on the assessment of disease burden and quality of life (QoL) in this patient population. Practical guidance is critical in supporting effective long-term clinical management of HAE and improving patient outcomes. The objective of this review is to provide evidence-based guidelines for an individualized assessment of disease burden and QoL in patients with HAE.

METHODS

A consensus meeting was held on February 29, 2020, consisting of 9 HAE experts from the United States and Europe with extensive clinical experience in the treatment of HAE. Consensus statements were developed based on a preliminary literature review and discussions from the consensus meeting.

RESULTS

Final statements reflect the consensus of the expert panel and include the assessment of attack severity, evaluation of disease burden, and long-term clinical management of HAE caused by C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency. Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing HAE attack severity and frequency are available and valuable tools; however, attack frequency and severity are insufficient markers of disease severity unless they are evaluated in the broader context of the effect on an individual patient's QoL. QoL assessments should be individualized for each patient and minimally, they should address the interference of HAE with work, school, social, family, and physical activity, along with access to and burden of HAE treatment. Advances in HAE therapies offer the opportunity for comprehensive, individualized treatment plans, allowing patients to achieve minimal attack burden with reduced disease and treatment burden.

CONCLUSION

This consensus report builds on existing guidelines by expanding the assessment of disease burden and QoL measures for patients with HAE.

Impact of lanadelumab on health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema in the HELP study

Background

An objective of the phase 3 HELP Study was to investigate the effect of lanadelumab on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE).

Methods

Patients with HAE‐1/2 received either lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4wks; n = 28), 300 mg q4wks (n = 29), 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2wks; n = 27), or placebo (n = 41) for 26 weeks (days 0–182). The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE‐QoL) was administered monthly, consisting of four domain (functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, nutrition) and total scores. The generic EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire was administered on days 0, 98, and 182. Comparisons were made between placebo and (a) all lanadelumab‐treated patients and (b) individual lanadelumab groups for changes in scores (day 0–182) and proportions achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, −6) in AE‐QoL total score.

Results

Compared with the placebo group, the lanadelumab total group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in AE‐QoL total and domain scores (mean change, −13.0 to −29.3; p < 0.05 for all); the largest improvement was in functioning. A significantly greater proportion of the lanadelumab total group achieved the MCID (70% vs 37%; p = 0.001). The lanadelumab 300 mg q2wks group had the highest proportion (81%; p = 0.001) and was 7.2 times more likely to achieve the MCID than the placebo group. Mean EQ‐5D‐5L scores at day 0 were high in all groups, indicating low impairment, with no significant changes at day 182.

Conclusion

Patients with HAE‐1/2 experienced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL measured by AE‐QoL following lanadelumab treatment in the HELP Study.

Decreasing Attacks and Improving Quality of Life through a Systematic Management Program for Patients with Hereditary Angioedema

INTRODUCTION

Prevention of attacks is a major goal in management of patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE). We aimed to investigate the effects of a systematic intervention for HAE patients.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with HAE with C1-inhibitor deficiency, belonging to a single family, participated in a management program coordinated by an allergist/immunologist. Angioedema attacks before intervention were ascertained by interviews and emergency room charts and recorded prospectively by patients or caregivers after enrollment. Mean number of attacks/month was compared at 12 months preintervention and 8 and 14 months within intervention. Patient-reported outcome instruments were used to assess quality of life, including HAE Quality of Life (HAE-QoL) questionnaire, psychological conditions, and work impairment, at baseline and 8 and 14 months within intervention. Data were stored in REDCap platform and analyzed by adjusted Bayesian models of double Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Mean number of attacks/month significantly decreased (95% credible interval [CrI] excluding 0) from 1.15 preintervention to 0.25 and 0.23, 8 and 14 months within intervention, with mean decreases of -0.89 (95% CrI: -1.21 to -0.58) and -0.92 (95% CrI: -1.22 to -0.60), respectively. HAE-QoL scores showed mean total increases of 15.2 (95% CrI: 1.23-29.77) and 26 (95% CrI: 14.56-39.02) at 8 and 14 months within the study, as compared to baseline, revealing marked improvement in quality of life. Significant increase in role-emotional and reduction of depression, stress, and anxiety were observed at 14 months.

CONCLUSION

A systematic approach integrating HAE-specific care with effective handling of psychological issues decreased the number of attacks and improved quality of life, targets for best practice in HAE.

Clinical characteristics and burden of illness in patients with hereditary angioedema: findings from a multinational patient survey

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare, debilitating, genetic disease characterized by unpredictable, recurrent, and potentially fatal swelling of the skin and mucous membranes. We conducted a noninterventional, cross-sectional, web-based survey of patients with a self-reported diagnosis of HAE type 1/2 in Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom to gain a comprehensive real-world understanding of the characteristics of HAE and its burden from the perspective of the patient. The survey included questions on clinical and demographic characteristics, burden of disease, and treatment. Instruments used to measure patient-reported outcomes included the Angioedema Quality of Life questionnaire (AE-QoL), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12v2), Angioedema Control Test (AECT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Work Productivity and Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

A total of 242 patients (67.4% female; mean [range] age 43.8 [18–92] years) completed the survey. The mean (SD) age at first symptoms was 11.5 (8.9) years, while diagnosis occurred at 20.8 (13.2) years. Patients reported a mean (SD) of 12.5 (14.1) attacks in the past 6 months. The most recent attack occurred within the past month in 79.7% of patients; most were of moderate severity, 6.6% affected the larynx, 21.9% lasted ≥ 3 days, and 76.4% were treated with on-demand medication. Hospitalizations and emergency/urgent care visits were highest for patients with more attacks. At the time of the survey, 62.4% of patients were using long-term prophylaxis, including 34.4% using androgens. Moderate to severe anxiety and depression were reported in 38.0% and 17.4% of patients, respectively, as measured using the HADS. The severity of anxiety and depression was associated with poorer quality of life and productivity, measured using the AECT (mean overall score 8.00 [moderate perceived disease control]), AE-QoL, WPAI, and SF-12v2. Scores for AECT, AE-QoL, and WPAI were also worse with a higher number of attacks.

Conclusions

This survey study of a broad international sample of patients with HAE showed that despite the availability of on-demand treatment and long-term prophylaxis for the prevention of attacks, patients across a wide geographical area continue to have high disease activity, likely due to restrictions in the availability of medications or incorrect use. Subsequently, significant disease burden, including impaired quality of life and mental health and decreased productivity, was evident. Increased patient education and access to newer, more effective therapies are needed.

Long-term health-related quality of life in patients treated with subcutaneous C1-inhibitor replacement therapy for the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks: findings from the COMPACT open-label extension study

Background

Long-term prophylaxis with subcutaneous C1-inhibitor (C1-INH[SC]; HAEGARDA, CSL Behring) in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) was evaluated in an open-label extension follow-up study to the international, double-blind, placebo-controlled COMPACT study. The current analysis evaluated patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from 126 patients in the open-label extension study randomized to treatment with C1-INH(SC) 40 IU/kg (n = 63) or 60 IU/kg (n = 63) twice weekly for 52 weeks. HRQoL was evaluated at the beginning of the open-label study and at various time points using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI), and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication. The disease-specific Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) and HAE quality of life questionnaire (HAE-QoL) instruments were administered in a subset of patients. Statistical significance was determined by change-from-baseline 95% confidence intervals (CIs) excluding zero. No adjustment for multiplicity was done.

Results

Mean baseline EQ-5D scores (Health State Value, 0.90; Visual Analog Scale, 81.32) were slightly higher (better) than United States population norms (0.825, 80.0, respectively) and mean HADS anxiety (5.48) and depression (2.88) scores were within “normal” range (0–7). Yet, patients using C1-INH(SC) 60 IU/kg demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to end-of-study on the EQ-5D Health State Value (mean change [95% CI], 0.07 [0.01, 0.12] and Visual Analog Scale (7.45 [3.29, 11.62]). In the C1-INH(SC) 60 IU/kg group, there were significant improvements in the HADS anxiety scale (mean change [95% CI], − 1.23 [− 2.08, − 0.38]), HADS depression scale (− 0.95 [− 1.57, − 0.34]), and WPAI-assessed presenteeism (mean change [95% CI], − 23.33% [− 34.86, − 11.81]), work productivity loss (− 26.68% [− 39.92, − 13.44]), and activity impairment (− 16.14% [− 26.36, − 5.91]). Clinically important improvements were achieved in ≥ 25% of patients for all domains except WPAI-assessed absenteeism (which was very low at baseline). Mean AE-QoL total score by visit ranged from 13.39 to 17.89 (scale 0–100; lower scores = less impairment). Mean HAE-QoL global scores at each visit (115.7–122.3) were close to the maximum (best) possible score of 135.

Conclusions

Long-term C1-INH(SC) replacement therapy in patients with C1-INH-HAE leads to significant and sustained improvements in multiple measures of HRQoL.

Trial registration A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneously Administered C1-esterase Inhibitor in the Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema, NCT02316353. Registered December 12, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02316353.

Quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema in Canada

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is associated with decreased quality of life (QoL), which has typically been measured using a generic non-disease-specific questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the QoL in patients with HAE type I and II in Canada using a previously validated HAE-specific questionnaire.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was sent to the members of two Canadian HAE patient groups to collect data on demographics, HAE clinical course, and QoL scores. All patients 18 years of age or older with HAE type I or II were eligible. The impact of the available clinical factors on the QoL scores was evaluated. Multiple linear regression was performed using clinically relevant factors to predict HAE QoL outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 72 patients in the study, the mean total HAE QoL score was 102 (±23) (SD) on a scale of 25 to 135, with higher scores indicating better QoL. Although the total QoL scores correlated positively with patients' level of satisfaction and perceived control (P < .001 for both), it correlated negatively with the number of acute attacks (P = .03). Yet, the types of treatment did not have an impact on the QoL. Predictors, including sex, comorbidities, and the number of attacks, only explained 12% of the variance in the total QoL scores.

CONCLUSION

HAE continues to impair QoL in Canadian patients despite receiving recommended treatment. Although the frequency of attacks affects QoL, patients' experience with their HAE care also affects QoL substantially. The study highlights the importance of considering patients' experience with their HAE care as physicians develop an appropriate management plan.

Psychology and hereditary angioedema: A systematic review

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is caused by mutations in the C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) gene Serpin Family G Member 1(SERPING1), which results in either the decreased synthesis of normal C1-INH (C1-INH-HAE type I) or expression of unfunctional C1-INH (C1-INH-HAE type II). In recent studies, emotional stress was reported by patients as the most common trigger factor for C1-INH-HAE attacks. Moreover, patients reported considerable distress over the significant variability and uncertainty with which the disease manifests, in addition to the impact of physical symptoms on their overall quality of life. Objective: We did a systematic review of the literature to shed light on the advancements made in the study of how stress and psychological processes impact C1-INH-HAE. Methods: All of the articles on C1-INH-HAE were analyzed up to December 2019. Both medical data bases and psychological data bases were examined. The keywords (KWs) used for searching the medical and psychological data bases were the following: "hereditary angioedema," "psychology," "stress," "anxiety," and "depression." Results: Of a total of 2549 articles on C1-INH-HAE, 113 articles were retrieved from the literature search by using the related KWs. Twenty-one of these articles were retrieved, examined, and classified. Conclusion: Although the literature confirmed that stress may induce various physical diseases, it also warned against making simplistic statements about its incidence that did not take into account the complexity and multicausality of factors that contribute to C1-INH-HAE expression.

Management of hereditary angioedema in Japan: Focus on icatibant for the treatment of acute attacks

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is characterized by unpredictable, recurring and painful swelling episodes that can be disabling or even life-threatening. Awareness of HAE has progressively grown worldwide, and options for treatment of acute attacks and prevention of future attacks continue to expand; however, unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment remain. In Japan, recognition of HAE within the medical community remains low, and numerous obstacles complicate diagnosis and access to treatment. Importance of timely treatment of HAE attacks with on-demand therapies is continually demonstrated; recommended agents per the WAO/EAACI treatment guidelines published in 2018 include C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate, ecallantide, and icatibant. In Japan, multiple factors contribute to delayed HAE treatment (potentially leading to life-threatening consequences), including difficulties in finding facilities at which C1-INH agents are readily available. Recognition of challenges faced in Japan can help promote efforts to address current needs and expand access to effective therapies. Icatibant, a potent, selective bradykinin B₂ receptor antagonist, has demonstrated inhibition of various bradykinin-induced biological effects in preclinical studies and has shown efficacy in treating attacks in various clinical settings (e.g. clinical trials, real-world studies), and HAE patient populations (e.g. with C1-INH deficiency, normal C1-INH). Icatibant was approved in Japan for the treatment of HAE attacks in September 2018; its addition to the HAE treatment armamentarium contributes to improved patient care. In Japan, disease awareness and education campaigns are warranted to further advance the management of HAE patients in light of the unmet needs and the emerging availability of modern diagnostic approaches and therapies.

Recognition and Differential Diagnosis of Hereditary Angioedema in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Angioedema (AE) is a clinical syndrome marked by localized swelling of the subcutaneous layer of the skin or the submucosal layer of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tracts. While AE is commonly mediated by histamine (allergic AE), some types result from excessive bradykinin activity, including hereditary AE (HAE), acquired AE, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced AE. These are less common but important to consider given different treatment requirements and potentially serious outcomes, including death from laryngeal swelling.

OBJECTIVE

This review describes the pathophysiology and clinical features of AE as well as the diagnosis and treatment of AE in the emergency department (ED).

DISCUSSION

Bradykinin-mediated AE does not respond to antihistamines and corticosteroids. By contrast, several targeted, effective therapies are available, including C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrates, which replace the missing protein activity underlying some bradykinin-mediated AE, and medications that directly lessen bradykinin activity (eg, ecallantide and icatibant). Urticaria is generally absent in bradykinin-mediated AE and serves as a primary differentiating factor in the clinical diagnosis. Relevant laboratory assessments may include C1-INH levels, C1-INH function, and C4 complement. Patients with HAE or a family member can communicate their known diagnosis when presenting to the ED, and some may even bring their own medication(s) with them. Patients newly diagnosed with HAE in the ED should be referred for specialized outpatient care upon ED discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a great need for ED clinicians to be aware of HAE, its differential diagnosis, and appropriate treatment to ensure that patients receive optimal and timely treatment.

Hereditary angioedema: Long-term prophylactic treatment

Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a potentially life-threatening condition. With episodic, unpredictable swelling, HAE negatively affect the quality of life for those affected individuals. To reduce the morbidity and mortality of HAE are the primary goal for the disease management. In addition to have access to therapeutic drugs for their acute HAE attacks, many patients require long term prophylaxis (LTP) to reduce their attack frequency and severity. Preventing HAE attack by regular administration of medicine has become an important part of HAE disease management. Over the past few years, growing number of therapeutic options for the HAE LTP have made it possible for physicians to choose the most appropriate and effective treatment for individual patients. C1 INH concentrate and plasma kallikrein inhibitors (IV or SC) have largely replaced the oder modality of treatment consisting different androgen derivatives or antifibrinolytics. Additional options, such as oral kallikrein inhibitor, antisense RNA/plasma kallikrein, anti-Factor 12a, bradykinin receptor blocker or future gene therapy are under clinical investigation. The significant cost and the uncertainty of its long term safety may be the primary limiting factors for its clinical application. The limited data for young children and pregnant women pose additional challenge for physicians to assess the risk and benefit when considering LTP treatment.

Lanadelumab demonstrates rapid and sustained prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks

Background

Lanadelumab demonstrated efficacy in preventing hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in the phase 3 HELP Study.

Objective

To assess time to onset of effect and long‐term efficacy of lanadelumab, based on exploratory findings from the HELP Study.

Methods

Eligible patients with HAE type I/II received lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4wks), 300 mg q4wks, 300 mg q2wks, or placebo. Ad hoc analyses evaluated day 0‐69 findings using a Poisson regression model accounting for overdispersion. Least‐squares mean monthly HAE attack rate for lanadelumab was compared with placebo. Intrapatient comparisons for days 0‐69 versus steady state (days 70‐182) used a paired t test for continuous endpoints or Kappa statistics for categorical endpoints.

Results

One hundred twenty‐five patients were randomized and treated. During days 0‐69, mean monthly attack rate was significantly lower with lanadelumab (0.41‐0.76) vs placebo (2.04), including attacks requiring acute treatment (0.33‐0.61 vs 1.66) and moderate/severe attacks (0.31‐0.48 vs 1.33, all P ≤ .001). More patients receiving lanadelumab vs placebo were attack free (37.9%‐48.1% vs 7.3%) and responders (85.7%‐100% vs 26.8%). During steady state, the efficacy of lanadelumab vs placebo was similar or improved vs days 0‐69. Intrapatient differences were significant with lanadelumab 300 mg q4wks for select outcomes. Lanadelumab efficacy was durable—HAE attack rate was consistently lower vs placebo, from the first 2 weeks of treatment through study end. Treatment emergent adverse events were comparable during days 0‐69 and 70‐182.

Conclusion

Protection with lanadelumab started from the first dose and continued throughout the entire study period.

Current medical management of hereditary angioedema: Follow-up survey of US physicians

BACKGROUND

Physician surveys on hereditary angioedema (HAE) management in 2010 and 2013 revealed important trends in HAE care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current HAE management and the impact of new treatment options on physician practice patterns over time.

METHODS

During June and July 2019, 5382 physicians were contacted by means of postal mail to complete a 47-question survey; 177 responded (3%).

RESULTS

Across the 3 surveys, the home replaced the emergency department as the most typically reported setting for HAE attack treatment (54.3% vs 11.6% in 2010 and 32.5% in 2013; P < .001). Physicians reported C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) as the most typically prescribed long-term prophylactic treatment (LTP) (60.0% vs 20.4% in 2010 and 56.7% in 2013; P < .001). Subcutaneous LTP medications were most typically prescribed over intravenous (C1-INH, 41.4%; subcutaneous lanadelumab, 21%; intravenous C1-INH, 18.6%). Danazol, the most frequently prescribed LTP treatment, dropped to 6.4% (55.8% in 2010 and 23.4% in 2013; P < .001). The strongest nonefficacy factor influencing clinician treatment choice changed over time, with cost and (or) insurance coverage increasing to 43.7% (from 24.4% in 2010 and 40.5% in 2013; P = .001), whereas the concern over adverse effects dropped to 16.2% (from 55.8% in 2010 and 29.5% in 2013; P < .001). Physician-reported patient satisfaction remains high, with only 1.5% of physicians indicating patients are not satisfied with treatment.

CONCLUSION

The US physician survey data reflect improvements in the HAE management in recent years. Therapeutic advances in HAE have led to reported higher rates of home treatment of HAE attacks, reduced concern for adverse treatment effects, and high levels of patient satisfaction.

US HAEA Medical Advisory Board 2020 Guidelines for the Management of Hereditary Angioedema

Scientific and clinical progress together with the development of effective novel therapeutic options has engendered multiple important changes in the diagnosis and management of hereditary angioedema (HAE). We now update and extend the 2013 United States Hereditary Angioedema Association Medical Advisory Board guidelines for the treatment and management of HAE. The guidelines are based on a comprehensive literature review with recommendations indicating both the strength of our recommendation and the quality of the underlying evidence. Guidelines are provided regarding the classification, diagnosis, on-demand treatment, prophylactic treatment, special considerations for women and children, development of a comprehensive management and monitoring plan, and assessment of burden of illness for both HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency and HAE with normal C1 inhibitor. Advances in HAE treatment now allow the development of management plans that can help many patients with HAE lead a normal life. Achieving this goal requires that physicians be familiar with the diagnostic and therapeutic transformations that have occurred in recent years.

Development of the Angioedema Control Test-A patient-reported outcome measure that assesses disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema

BACKGROUND

Recurrent angioedema (AE) is an important clinical problem in the context of chronic urticaria (mast cell mediator-induced), ACE-inhibitor intake and hereditary angioedema (both bradykinin-mediated). To help patients obtain control of their recurrent AE is a major treatment goal. However, a tool to assess control of recurrent AE is not yet available. This prompted us to develop such a tool, the Angioedema Control Test (AECT).

METHODS

After a conceptional framework was developed for the AECT, a list of potential AECT items was generated by a combined approach of patient interviews, literature review and expert input. Subsequent item reduction was based on impact analysis, inter-item correlation, additional predefined criteria for item performance, and a review of the item selection process for content validity. Finally, an instruction section was generated, and an US-American-English version was developed by a structured translation process.

RESULTS

A 4-item AECT with recall periods of 4 weeks and 3 months was developed based on 106 potential items tested in 97 patients with mast cell mediator-induced (n = 49) or bradykinin-mediated recurrent AE (n = 48). Eighty-four items were excluded based on impact analysis. The remaining 22 items could be further reduced by a method-mix of inter-item correlation, additional predefined criteria for item performance and review for content validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The AECT is the first tool to assess disease control in recurrent AE patients. Its retrospective approach, its brevity and its simple scoring make the AECT ideally suited for clinical practice and trials. Its validity and reliability need to be determined in future independent studies.

Self-Management Plans in Patients with Hereditary Angioedema: Strategies, Outcomes and Integration into Clinical Care

Chronic conditions, whether genetic or acquired, impose a significant burden on health care systems with high utilisation of hospital and emergency department resources. Self-management is increasingly recognised as one of the pillars in models of care for those with long-term medical conditions. Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion. It is characterised by the occurrence of unpredictable attacks of swelling (angioedema) affecting many body parts including subcutaneous tissues, the gut mucosa and the upper airway. For those affected, it is associated with a high burden of illness and poor quality of life as a result of its unpredictability and the threat of asphyxiation from upper airway oedema or severe pain from abdominal involvement. Prompt recognition and appropriate treatment are necessary to avoid the pain and suffering associated with attacks and to manage life-threatening laryngeal swellings that around 50% of HAE patients will experience in their lifetime. Since the early 2000s, a number of very effective, albeit expensive, treatment options have become available, at least in some countries. Utilisation of these options within a written patient self-management plan provides the most satisfactory treatment outcomes and improves patient quality of life. Successful self-management depends on a productive partnership between patient and health care professional, with patient education the cornerstone of a successful outcome. This is a dynamic process, particularly in a condition such as HAE where frequency and severity of attacks may vary given different life circumstances.

Experience with Intravenous Plasma-Derived C1-Inhibitor in Pregnant Women with Hereditary Angioedema: A Systematic Literature Review

Consensus guidelines recommend plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) as first-line treatment in pregnant women with hereditary angioedema (HAE). We conducted a systematic review of the literature that describes experience with plasma-derived C1-INH during pregnancy. A literature search of PubMed was conducted in November 2018 using variants of "hereditary angioedema" and "pregnancy." English language articles that presented original data about the use of plasma-derived C1-INH during pregnancy were selected for data extraction. The search returned 253 unique records, of which 40 described the use of C1-INH during pregnancy (91 patients, 136 pregnancies). When the number of doses was reported, a total of 1562 doses were administered ranging from 500 to 3000 IU. Infusions were administered during all 3 trimesters and were most commonly administered during the third trimester. Overall, 1,490,500 IU of plasma-derived C1-INH were administered during pregnancy. Of the 128 fetuses for which outcomes were reported, 3 (2%) resulted in spontaneous abortion, 1 (1%) was stillborn, and 1 (1%) was a vanishing twin. Use of plasma-derived C1-INH in women with HAE during pregnancy has been widely reported in the scientific literature and has a favorable safety profile, supporting treatment guideline recommendations.

Validation of the Angioedema Control Test (AECT)-A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Assessing Angioedema Control

BACKGROUND

Recurrent angioedema (RA) is an important clinical problem in routine care and emergency medicine. As of recently, the only validated tools to specifically assess disease status in patients with RA were diary-type activity assessments and angioedema-related quality-of-life questionnaires. Although these tools are particularly helpful in clinical studies, they were not designed to determine disease control or to guide treatment decisions. To close this gap, the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) was published recently.

OBJECTIVE

To test the AECT for its validity and reliability, and to identify a cutoff value to aid treatment decisions.

METHODS

Two AECT versions with a recall period of 4 weeks (AECT-4wk) and 3 months (AECT-3mo) were tested for their internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity as well as screening accuracy in 81 patients with RA with bradykinin-mediated angioedema, mast cell mediator-mediated angioedema, or idiopathic angioedema.

RESULTS

Both AECT versions showed excellent internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach alpha value of more than 0.85 and test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.9. The convergent validity of both AECT versions was high. Both tools showed strong correlations with anchors of disease control, angioedema frequency, and health-related quality of life. A stratification of AECT scores into different levels of disease control together with a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested a cutoff value of 10 or more points to identify patients with well-controlled RA versus less than 10 points to identify patients with poorly controlled disease for both AECT versions.

CONCLUSIONS

The AECT is the first valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure to assess disease control in patients with RA.

Patient-reported burden of hereditary angioedema: findings from a patient survey in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1-inhibitor deficiency is associated with painful, potentially fatal attacks affecting subcutaneous or submucosal tissues.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate HAE burden from the patients' perspective.

METHODS

This was a noninterventional survey of patients with HAE in the United States, conducted from March 17 to April 28, 2017. Patients were recruited through the US Hereditary Angioedema Association. Key eligibility criteria included the following: (1) aged 18 years and older, (2) self-reported physician diagnosis of HAE type I or II, (3) 1 or more HAE attacks or prodromal symptoms within the last year, and (4) receipt of HAE medication for an attack within the last 2 years. Descriptive analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 445 patients completed the survey. Most patients (92.8%) were aged 18 to 64 years with HAE type I (78.4%) and had a positive family history (78.4%). Mean (SD) ages at symptom onset and diagnosis were 12.5 (9.1) and 20.1 (13.7) years, respectively. Most patients (78.7%) experienced an attack within the past month. The abdomen (58.0%) and extremities (46.1%) were commonly affected sites; pain (73.9%) and abdominal (57.0%) and nonabdominal (55.1%) swelling were frequently reported symptoms. Most patients (68.5%) had received or were currently receiving long-term prophylaxis. Most patients (88.8%) reported visiting allergists or immunologists, whereas 9.2% visited emergency departments or urgent care clinics. Per the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 49.9% and 24.0% of respondents had anxiety and depression, respectively. Mean Hereditary Angioedema-Quality of Life scores were generally lower with higher attack frequency. General health was "poor" or "fair" for 24.8% of patients. Mean (SD) percentage impairments were 5.9% (14.1%) for absenteeism, 23.0% (25.8%) for presenteeism, 25.4% (28.1%) for work productivity loss, and 31.8% (29.7%) for activity impairment.

CONCLUSION

Despite treatment advances, patients with HAE in the United States continue to have a high burden of illness.

The impact of hereditary angioedema on quality of life and family planning decisions

Objective

Hereditary angioedema is a serious disease with unpredictable attacks. It has an impact on patients’ health-related quality of life. This study aimed to assess the quality of life of the hereditary angioedema patients and to investigate the relationship between quality of life and demographic, clinical, laboratory, and psychiatric parameters.

Method

A semistructured face-to-face interview, Hamilton depression rating scale, and Hamilton anxiety rating scale were performed by a psychiatrist. Participants completed Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, Revised Form of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3, and Adult Separation Anxiety Questionnaire. Patients’ complement results were recorded, and clinical data obtained by interview were cross-checked from patients’ files.

Results

In 33 hereditary angioedema patients, subscales of the Study Short Form-36, except for physical functioning, vitality, and mental health were significantly lower compared with population norms. Quality of life scores were found to be correlated with depression, anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, separation anxiety, perceived social support, perceived discrimination, perceived limitation, treatment naïve C1-Inhibitor function, and C1q level. Physical role functioning scores were better in the patients using attenuated androgens (p = 0.006, t = −3.027). Hereditary angioedema contributed to the marital problems and childbearing decisions of the patients.

Conclusion

Hereditary angioedema results in significant impairment in quality of life of the patients and has an impact on family life and life style of the patients. In case of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms, patients should be referred to psychiatrists for better quality of life. Higher levels of C1-inhibitor function and C1q seem to correlate with better quality of life; these needs to be further studied.

Elderly versus younger patients with hereditary angioedema type I/II: patient characteristics and safety analysis from the Icatibant Outcome Survey

Background

Hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is characterized by recurrent swelling in subcutaneous or submucosal tissues. Symptoms often begin by age 5-11 years and worsen during puberty, but attacks can occur at any age and recur throughout life. Disease course in elderly patients is rarely reported.

Methods

The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS) is an observational study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of icatibant. We conducted descriptive analyses in younger (age < 65 years) versus elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years). Here, we report patient characteristics and safety-related findings.

Results

As of February 2018, 872 patients with C1-INH-HAE type I/II were enrolled, of whom 100 (11.5%) were ≥ 65 years old. Significant differences between elderly versus younger patients, respectively, were noted for median age at symptom onset (17.0 vs 12.0 years), age at diagnosis (41.0 vs 19.4 years), and delay between symptom onset and diagnosis (23.9 vs 4.8 years) (P ≤ 0.0001 for all). Median age at diagnosis was significantly higher in elderly patients regardless of family history (P < 0.0001). Throughout the study, icatibant was used to treat 6798 attacks in 574 patients, with 63 elderly patients reporting 715 (10.5%) of the icatibant-treated attacks. No serious adverse events (SAEs) in elderly patients were judged to be possibly related to icatibant, whereas two younger patients reported three possibly related SAEs. Excluding off-label use and pregnancy (evaluated for regulatory purposes), the percentage of patients with at least one possibly/probably related AE was similar for elderly (2.0%) versus younger patients (2.7%). No deaths linked to icatibant treatment were identified. All related events in elderly patients were attributed to general disorders/administration site conditions, whereas related events in younger patients occurred across various system organ class designations.

Conclusions

Elderly patients with C1-INH-HAE were significantly older at diagnosis and had greater delay in diagnosis than younger patients. Elderly patients contributed to approximately 10% of the icatibant-treated attacks. Our analysis found similar AE rates (overall and possibly/probably related) in icatibant-treated elderly versus younger patients, despite the fact that elderly patients had significantly more comorbidities and were receiving a greater number of concomitant medications. Our analysis did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns.

Gene therapy for C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency in a Murine Model of Hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a life-threatening, autosomal dominant disorder characterized by unpredictable, episodic swelling of the face, upper airway, oropharynx, extremities, genitalia, and gastrointestinal tract. Almost all cases of HAE are caused by mutations in the SERPING1 gene resulting in a deficiency in functional plasma C1 esterase inhibitor (C1EI), a serine protease inhibitor that normally inhibits proteases in the contact, complement, and fibrinolytic systems. Current treatment of HAE includes long-term prophylaxis with attenuated androgens or human plasma-derived C1EI and management of acute attacks with human plasma-derived or recombinant C1EI, bradykinin, and kallikrein inhibitors, each of which requires repeated administration. As an approach to effectively treat HAE with a single treatment, we hypothesized that a one-time intravenous administration of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene transfer vector expressing the genetic sequence of the normal human C1 esterase inhibitor (AAVrh.10hC1EI) would provide sustained circulating C1EI levels sufficient to prevent angioedema episodes.

METHODS

To study the efficacy of AAVrh.10hC1EI, we used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to create a heterozygote C1EI-deficient mouse model (S63±) that shares characteristics associated with HAE in humans including decreased plasma C1EI and C4 levels. Phenotypically, these mice have increased vascular permeability of skin and internal organs.

RESULTS

Systemic administration of AAVrh.10hC1EI to the S63± mice resulted in sustained human C1EI activity levels above the predicted therapeutic levels and correction of the vascular leak in skin and internal organs.

CONCLUSION

A single treatment with AAVrh.10hC1EI has the potential to provide long-term protection from angioedema attacks in affected individuals.

Lanadelumab for the Prophylactic Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema with C1 Inhibitor Deficiency: A Review of Preclinical and Phase I Studies

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare disease characterized by diminished levels or dysfunctional activity of C1-INH, leading to dysregulated plasma kallikrein activity within the kallikrein-kinin pathway. Symptoms manifest as painful, potentially life-threatening swelling of subcutaneous tissues throughout the body and/or submucosal edema in the upper airway or gastrointestinal tract. Attacks recur with unpredictable frequency, intensity, and duration, placing a heavy burden on patients' daily lives. Despite improved availability of medications for on-demand treatment during attacks and prophylaxis of future attacks, unmet needs remain. Lanadelumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, may help address some of the limitations of existing prophylactic options (e.g., the need for intravenous administration or frequent dosing). Preclinical studies demonstrate that it is highly potent and specifically inhibits plasma kallikrein, and findings from phase Ia and Ib studies suggest this agent is well tolerated and provides sustained inhibition of plasma kallikrein, allowing for less frequent dosing. The phase III HELP Study (NCT02586805) evaluating the efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in preventing HAE attacks has been completed, and its open-label extension (NCT02741596) is ongoing. Lanadelumab is now approved in the USA and Canada for prophylaxis to prevent attacks of HAE in patients aged ≥ 12 years. This review provides an overview of the discovery and clinical development of lanadelumab, from preclinical through phase Ib studies, characterizing its safety/tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. It also highlights how this agent may positively impact clinical care of patients with C1-INH-HAE.

Fixed-Dose Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor Liquid for Prophylactic Treatment of C1-INH-HAE: SAHARA Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH) is characterized by swelling of subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissues.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy/safety of fixed-dose subcutaneous plasma-derived C1-INH (pdC1-INH) liquid for HAE attack prevention (NCT02584959).

METHODS

Eligible patients were ≥12 years with ≥2 monthly attacks prescreening or pre-long-term prophylaxis. In a partial crossover design, 80% of patients were randomized to placebo or pdC1-INH liquid for 14 weeks and crossed over from active to placebo or vice versa for another 14 weeks. The remainder were randomized to pdC1-INH liquid for 28 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was normalized number of attacks (NNA) versus placebo. Key additional endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving NNA reduction ≥50%, attack severity, number of attack-free days, and safety.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were randomized and 58 (77%) completed the study. Mean age 41 years; 88% HAE type I. Least-squares means of NNA were reduced from 3.9 with placebo to 1.6 with pdC1-INH (from day 1; P < .0001). Most patients had ≥50% NNA reduction with pdC1-INH (from day 1, 78%). A total of 8.8% of placebo-treated patients were attack-free and 5.3%, 22.8%, and 63.2% had mild, moderate, and severe attacks, respectively; 37.5% of pdC1-INH-treated patients were attack-free and 8.9%, 26.8%, and 26.8% had mild, moderate, and severe attacks, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were similar between groups (52% vs 56% for pdC1-INH crossover vs placebo, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed-dose subcutaneous pdC1-INH liquid was superior to placebo in preventing HAE attacks and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.

Training patients for self-administration of a new subcutaneous C1-inhibitor concentrate for hereditary angioedema

AIMS

The aim of this study was to provide recommendations for training patients with hereditary angioedema, based on nursing clinical trial experience, to self-administer subcutaneous C1-INH (C1-INH[SC]) used as routine prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND

A volume-reduced, subcutaneous C1-INH concentrate (C1-INH(SC); HAEGARDA®; CSL Behring) was recently FDA-approved for the routine prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks. Nurses will play an important role in patient training.

DESIGN

Review of a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial of C1-INH(SC) (COMPACT) and summary of recommendations for training patients based on nurses' "hands-on experience."

METHODS

A panel of nurses with clinical trial experience provided recommendations for patient training.

RESULTS

Practical suggestions and guidelines were compiled regarding patient selection, product reconstitution and administration and patient follow-up. Successful patient self-administration of C1-INH(SC) can be greatly facilitated by qualified nursing intervention. The information provided in this paper will be useful to nurses anywhere who have an opportunity to interact with patients dealing with hereditary angioedema.

Real-world outcomes in hereditary angioedema: first experience from the Icatibant Outcome Survey in the United Kingdom

Background

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a potentially life-threatening, bradykinin-mediated disease, often misdiagnosed and under-treated, with long diagnostic delays. There are limited real-world data on best-practice management of HAE in the UK.

Objectives

To characterize the clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with HAE type I and II from three specialist centres in the UK using data from the Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; Shire, Zug, Switzerland), an international observational study monitoring safety and effectiveness of icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist.

Methods

We performed retrospective analyses of IOS data for patients with HAE type I and II from three centres in the UK and compared UK data with pooled IOS data from 10 countries (48 centres).

Results

Analyses included 73 UK and 579 non-UK patients with HAE type I or II. Median diagnostic delay was 6.2 and 5.9 years, respectively. Analysis of data collected from February 2008 to July 2016 included 286 icatibant-treated attacks in 58 UK patients and 2553 icatibant-treated attacks in 436 non-UK patients (median of 3.0 attacks per patient in both groups). More attacks were treated by icatibant self-administration in UK patients (95.8%) than in non-UK patients (86.8%, p < 0.001). Time to icatibant treatment, time to resolution and attack duration were not significantly different in the UK versus non-UK patients.

Conclusion

UK patients from the specialist centres studied report similar diagnostic delay and similar icatibant treatment outcomes to their non-UK counterparts. However, improvements in the timely diagnosis of HAE are still required.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01034969

Long-term prophylaxis therapy in patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency

OBJECTIVE

To review the criteria for long-term prophylaxis therapy in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), describe how these criteria have evolved over time, and anticipate how criteria may change in the future with the availability of new C1-INH-HAE treatment options.

DATA SOURCES

Treatment guidelines, consensus statements, and expert reviews.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Manuscripts that described long-term prophylaxis therapy in patients with C1-INH-HAE were selected.

RESULTS

Historically, patients with C1-INH-HAE were considered to be candidates for long-term prophylaxis therapy if they had at least 1 attack per month, had at least 5 days of disability per month because of C1-INH-HAE, or did not sufficiently respond to on-demand treatment. More recently, guidelines and reviews state that thresholds of number of attacks or days of disability are arbitrary and that treatment plans should be individualized to the patient's needs. Furthermore, all patients should have a comprehensive management plan that is reviewed periodically and should have at least 2 doses of on-demand treatment available. Prophylaxis therapy should be discussed as a potential treatment option for each patient; however, the decision for its use will depend on the patient's individual needs and the course of their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The criteria for long-term prophylaxis therapy in C1-INH-HAE have changed with the recognition that treatments should be individualized to the patient's needs and with the availability of new medications that have more favorable benefit-risk profiles, are easier to use, and improve patients' quality of life.

Clinical Features of Hereditary Angioedema in Korean Patients: A Nationwide Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a genetically heterogeneous autosomal dominant disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of nonpruritic, nonpitting edema increasing after puberty. It can be fatal due to laryngeal or gastrointestinal (GI) involvement with varied and changing frequency of mortality according to studies published from the Western countries. Epidemiological and clinical data of HAE in Asian countries are sparse. We sought to examine the clinical characteristics of HAE patients in Korea.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HAE at 15 tertiary hospitals across the country until 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients diagnosed with HAE by 2016 were identified. The prevalence of HAE was estimated at 1.3/1,000,000 in Korea. Of the 65 patients, 21 (32.3%) were males. A total of 90.8% patients had type I HAE, while the remaining 9.2% patients had type II HAE. The first symptom developed after 20 years in 73.8% of patients, with a mean age 28.4 ± 14.1 years. The age at diagnosis was 36.5 ± 15.8 years, with a mean time delay of 7.8 ± 10.5 years. While the face (82.3%) and extremities (upper 71.0%, lower 62.9%) were the most frequently involved, the GI tract was affected in 40.5% of Korean HAE patients. Prophylaxis was maintained in 62.5% of patients. There was no reported case of death from HAE so far.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical manifestation and severity of HAE may vary according to ethnicity. HAE is more infrequent and GI involvement is less likely in Korea compared with Western countries.

Burden of Illness and Quality-of-Life Measures in Angioedema Conditions

Burden of illness studies and evaluation of health-related quality of life using validated questionnaires have become an important task in the comprehensive management of angioedema conditions, mainly angioedema associated with chronic spontaneous urticaria and hereditary angioedema caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency. A review of the principal tools and studies is presented. Both diseases present a higher proportion of psychiatric disorders, impair work and studies productivity, and produce high direct and indirect costs. These assessments also have been useful to evaluate the positive impact of new drugs and interventions. More studies are desirable, especially in other types of angioedema disorders, such as hereditary angioedema with normal C1 inhibitor.