Predictors of asthma exacerbation among patients with poorly controlled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment

Impact of Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers on Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire Exacerbation Prediction Ability

BACKGROUND

Complex models combining impairment-based control assessments with clinical characteristics and biomarkers have been developed to predict asthma exacerbations. The composite Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ) with adjustments for demographics (age, sex, race, and body mass index) predicts 12-month exacerbation occurrence similarly to these more complex models.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether AIRQ exacerbation prediction is enhanced when models are adjusted for a wider range of clinical characteristics and biomarkers.

METHODS

Patients aged 12 years and older completed monthly online surveys regarding exacerbation-related oral corticosteroid use, emergency department or urgent care visits, and hospitalizations. Univariate logistic regressions to predict exacerbations were performed with sociodemographics, comorbidities, exacerbation history, lung function, blood eosinophils, IgE, and FeNO. Significant (P ≤ .05) variables were included in multivariable logistic regressions with and without AIRQ control categories to predict 12-month exacerbations (log odds ratio [95% Wald confidence interval]). Model performances were compared.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, 1,070 patients (70% female; mean [SD] age, 43.9 [19.4] years; 22% non-White; body mass index [SD], 30.6 [8.7]) completed one or more survey (mean [SD], 10.5 [2.8] surveys). In the multivariable analysis, AIRQ control category adjusted for significant clinical characteristics and biomarkers was predictive of one or more exacerbations: odds ratio (95% CI) not well-controlled versus well-controlled: 1.93 (1.41-2.62), very poorly controlled versus well-controlled: 3.81 (2.65-5.47). Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for this more complex model of exacerbation prediction (AUC = 0.72) did not differ from AIRQ (AUC = 0.70). Models with AIRQ performed better than those without AIRQ (AUC = 0.67; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Costly and time-consuming complex modeling with clinical characteristics and biomarkers does not enhance the strong exacerbation prediction ability of AIRQ.

[Burden and management of severe asthma in Russia: results from international observational study]

AIM

To assess clinical and demographic characteristics of severe asthma (SA) patients and their management in Russian Federation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This publication provides data for Russian part of population of the international observational study. In Phase I, retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with SA was performed with assessment of clinical and demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, treatment approaches and healthcare utilization. Phase II was a cross-sectional collection of patient-reported outcomes: level of asthma control assessed by ACT (Asthma Control Test) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Phase I patients were enrolled into Phase II if they signed a written consent form.

RESULTS

A total of 315 patients were included in Phase I of the study, 106 (33.6%) of them entered Phase II. Majority of study participants were either obese (n=103; 39.8%) or overweight (n=94; 36.3%). The most common comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (n=217; 71.4%), followed by chronic respiratory diseases (n=198; 68.8%). There were 268 (85.1%) patients who had at least one exacerbation during last 12 months. Data for blood eosinophil count were available in 176 patients; 81.3% of them (n=143) had only one test in the last 12 months. The mean (SD) last available blood eosinophil count was 161.2 (181.2) cells/mm3. Serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) value was known for 88 patients, and the mean (SD) last measured IgE value was 254.3 (249.7) ng/mL. Only 4.7% of Phase II participants had ACT scores indicative of controlled asthma (>20). As much as 74.5% had scores ≤15 suggesting uncontrolled disease. Most patients also had impaired HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Most SA patients had poor disease control with frequent exacerbations and high number of comorbidities. Blood eosinophils and IgE level measurements were not evaluated routinely which might be a barrier for appropriate phenotyping and treatment selection.

Identifying asthma-related risks during hospitalization using the child asthma risk assessment tool

Objective: The Child Asthma Risk Assessment Tool (CARAT) identifies risk factors for asthma morbidity. We hypothesized that CARAT-identified risk factors (using a CARAT adapted for inpatient use) would be associated with future healthcare utilization and would identify areas for intervention.Methods: We reviewed CARAT data collected during pediatric asthma admissions from 2010-2015, assessing for risk factors in environmental, medical, and social domains and providing prompts for inpatient (specialist consultation or social services engagement) and post-discharge interventions (home care visit or home environmental assessment). Confirmatory factor analysis identified groups of CARAT-identified risk factors with similar effects on healthcare utilization (latent factors). Structural equation models then evaluated relationships between latent factors and future utilization.Results: There were 2731 unique patients admitted for asthma exacerbations; 1015 (37%) had complete CARAT assessments and were included in analyses. Those with incomplete CARAT assessments were more often younger and privately-insured. CARAT-identified risk factors across domains were common in children hospitalized for exacerbations. Risks in the environmental domain were most common. Inpatient asthma consults by pulmonologists or allergists and home care referrals were the most frequent interventions indicated (62%, 628/1015, and 50%, 510/1015, respectively). Two latent factors were positively associated with healthcare utilization in the year after index stay - social stressors and known/suspected allergies (both p < 0.05). Stratified analyses analyzing data just from those children with prior healthcare utilization also indicated known/suspected allergies to be positively associated with future utilization.Conclusions: Inpatient interventions to address social stressors and allergic profiles may be warranted to reduce subsequent asthma morbidity.

Sociodemographic inequities in unscheduled asthma care visits among public assistance recipients in Japan: additional risk by household composition among workers

BACKGROUND

Public assistance programs aim to prevent financial poverty by guaranteeing a minimum income for basic needs, including medical care. However, time poverty also matters, especially in the medical care adherence of people with chronic diseases. This study aimed to examine the association between the dual burden of working and household responsibilities, with unscheduled asthma care visits among public assistance recipients in Japan.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included public assistance recipients from two municipalities. We obtained participants' sociodemographic data in January 2016 from the public assistance database and identified the incidence of asthma care visits. Participants' unscheduled asthma visits and the frequency of asthma visits were used as the outcome variables. Unscheduled visits were defined as visits by recipients who did not receive asthma care during the first three months of the observation period. Participants' age, sex, household composition, and work status were used as explanatory variables. Multiple Poisson regression analyses were performed to calculate the cumulative incidence ratio (IR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of unscheduled visits across the explanatory variables. The effect of modification on the work status by household composition was also examined.

RESULTS

We identified 2,386 recipients at risk of having unscheduled visits, among which 121 patients (5.1%) had unscheduled visits. The multivariable Poisson regression revealed that the working recipients had a higher incidence of unscheduled visits than the non-working recipients (IR 1.44, 95% CI 1.00-2.07). Among working recipients, the IRs of unscheduled visits were higher among recipients cohabiting with adults (IR 1.90 95% CI 1.00-3.59) and with children (IR 2.35, 95% CI 1.11-4.95) than for recipients living alone. Among non-working recipients, the IRs of unscheduled visits were lower for recipients living with family (IR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.35) and those living with children (IR 0.50, 95% CI 0.20-1.23). A higher frequency in asthma visits was observed among working recipients living with family.

CONCLUSIONS

Working adults cohabiting with children are at the greatest risk of unscheduled visits among adults receiving public assistance. To support healthy lifestyles of public assistance recipients, medical care providers and policymakers should pay special attention to the potentially underserved populations.

Understanding the Clinical Implications of Individual Patient Characteristics and Treatment Choice on the Risk of Exacerbation in Asthma Patients with Moderate-Severe Symptoms

INTRODUCTION

The assessment of future risk has become an important feature in the management of patients with asthma. However, the contribution of patient-specific characteristics and treatment choices to the risk of exacerbation is poorly understood. Here we evaluated the effect of interindividual baseline differences on the risk of exacerbation and treatment performance in patients receiving regular maintenance doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS/long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) combination therapy.

METHODS

Exacerbations and changes to asthma symptoms 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) were simulated over a 12-month period using a time-to-event and a longitudinal model developed from phase III/IV studies in patients with moderate-severe asthma (N = 16,282). Simulations were implemented to explore treatment performance across different scenarios, including randomised designs and real-world settings. Treatment options included regular dosing with ICS monotherapy [fluticasone propionate (FP)] and combination therapy [fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR)]. Exacerbation rate was analysed using the log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events was summarised stratified by treatment.

RESULTS

Being a woman, smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and body mass index (BMI) and lower forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) are associated with increased exacerbation risk (p < 0.01). This risk is bigger in winter because of the seasonal variation effect. Across the different scenarios, the use of FP/SAL resulted in a 10% lower annual incidence of exacerbations relative to FP or regular dosing BUD/FOR, independently of baseline characteristics. Similar differences in the annual incidence of exacerbations were also observed between treatments in obese patients (BMI ≥ 25-35 kg/m2) (p < 0.01) and in patients who do not achieve symptom control on FP monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual baseline characteristics and treatment choices affect future risk. Achieving comparable levels of symptom control whilst on treatment does not imply comparable risk reduction, as shown by the lower exacerbation rates in FP/SAL vs. BUD/FOR-treated patients. These factors should be considered as a basis for personalised clinical management of patients with moderate-severe asthma.

Association of comorbidities and medications with risk of asthma exacerbation in pediatric patients: a retrospective study using Japanese claims data

Asthma exacerbation impairs the quality of life of pediatric patients and negatively impacts future respiratory function and health economics. Several risk factors associated with exacerbations have been identified; however, most studies report the risk of each factor. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risk of each factor and a combination of factors. We performed a retrospective cohort study using Japanese claims data and extracted factors associated with exacerbations using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and stepwise method. Risk scores were then calculated from the extracted factors and validated by tenfold cross validation. Of the 1,748,111 asthma patients in the database, the data of 14,980 were extracted, and 1988 (13.3%) had exacerbation. Factors associated with asthma exacerbation were age of 3–5 years, exacerbation history before cohort entry date, allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, otitis externa, blepharitis, upper respiratory infections, urticaria, LTRA prescription, were determined. A four-level risk score was calculated from 9-factors and the AUC derived from cross validation was 0.700. Most factors extracted in our study are consistent with those of previous studies. We showed that combining each factor is more helpful in assessing the increased risk of asthma exacerbation than assessing each factor alone.

Current unmet needs and potential solutions to uncontrolled asthma

Despite the availability of effective inhaled therapies, many patients with asthma have poor asthma control. Uncontrolled asthma presents a significant burden on the patient and society, and, for many, remains largely preventable. There are numerous reasons why a patient may remain uncontrolled despite access to therapies, including incorrect inhaler technique, poor adherence to treatment, oversight of triggers and suboptimal medical care. Shared decision-making, good patient–clinician communication, supported self-management, multidisciplinary patient education, new technology and risk stratification may all provide solutions to this major unmet need in asthma. Novel treatments such as biologics could benefit patients’ lives, while the investigations into biomarkers, non-Type 2 asthma, treatable traits and disease modification give an exciting glimpse into the future of asthma care.

Despite effective therapies, many patients with asthma have poor asthma control, which is preventable. The benefits of shared decision-making, supported self-management, risk stratification and novel treatments in transforming patient care are reviewed.https://bit.ly/3A386Nm

Patient characteristics, biomarkers, and exacerbation risk in severe, uncontrolled asthma

BACKGROUND

Greater precision in asthma exacerbation risk prediction may improve outcomes. We sought to identify clinical characteristics and biomarkers associated with elevated exacerbation risk in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

Data were pooled from seven similarly designed Phase II and III randomized controlled clinical trials of biologic therapies for the treatment of severe, uncontrolled asthma that enrolled comparable patient populations. Annualized asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) for patients randomized to placebo were assessed by baseline clinical characteristics and by biomarker concentrations at baseline and over the study duration.

RESULTS

The AAER for the 2016 patients in the combined placebo group was 0.91 (95% CI 0.84‒0.98). Baseline characteristics associated with greater AAER were frequent or severe exacerbations within the prior 12 months, nasal polyposis, maintenance oral corticosteroid use, Asian race, and Asian or Western European region. AAER increased with baseline blood eosinophil counts and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration, with the greatest AAER occurring for patients with eosinophils ≥300 cells·μL^-1 and FeNO ≥50 ppb. No relationship was observed between baseline serum immunoglobulin E concentration and AAER. Combining type 2 inflammation criteria for eosinophils and FeNO had greater prognostic value than either biomarker alone. Persistent eosinophil and FeNO elevations throughout the study period were associated with greater AAER.

CONCLUSIONS

Exacerbation history, maintenance corticosteroid use, nasal polyposis, Asian race, geographic region, and elevations in blood eosinophil counts and FeNO concentrations (particularly when combined and/or persistently achieving type 2 inflammation criteria) were associated with increased exacerbation risk in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

Predictors of Asthma Control and Exacerbations: A Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Achieving optimal asthma control and minimizing the risk of exacerbation are the main goals of asthma treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the predictors of poor asthma control and asthma exacerbations within a population of moderate to severe asthmatic patients treated in a tertiary-care center.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study assessing 738 patients enrolled in the Quebec registry in respiratory health (RESP) with a diagnosis of asthma confirmed by a respirologist and treated in a tertiary care center from April 2010 to March 2016. Sociodemographic and clinical data, including Asthma Control Questionnaire score, were collected at enrollment in the registry (ie, cohort entry) and patients were followed for a 2-year period thereafter. The information regarding exacerbations that occurred during follow-up was collected in administrative databases (Régie d l'assurance médicale du Québec [RAMQ], Maintenance et exploitation des données pour l'étude de la clientèle hospitalière [MED-ECHO], and medication data registry [reMed]).

RESULTS

We assessed 738 subjects (64% women). Psychological distress (odds ratio [OR] 1.91; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.21-3.02), smoking (OR 3.72; 95% CI 1.72-8.05]), and poor lung function, forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 50% (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.48-11.34]) appeared as significant factors associated with uncontrolled asthma. Occurrence of previous asthma exacerbations (hazard ratio [HR] 6.25; 95% CI 4.01-9.75]), poor asthma control (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.07-2.38]), forced expiratory volume in 1 second between 50% and 80% (HR 2.25; 95% CI 1.58-3.34]), and older age (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.37-3.74]) were associated with asthma exacerbations. Adherence to asthma treatment was very low in patients with (44.4% ± 34.4%) and without asthma exacerbations (37.5% ± 33.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological distress and current smoking are modifiable factors that need to be addressed in tailored behavioral interventions to improve asthma control. Asthma exacerbations are mostly associated with the intrinsic severity of the disease.

Exploratory research on asthma exacerbation risk factors using the Japanese claims database and machine learning: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Analytical studies of risk factor assessment using machine learning have recently been reported. We performed an exploratory detection study of asthma exacerbation-related factors using health insurance claims data and machine learning to explore risk factors that have high generalizability and can be easily obtained in daily practice.

METHODS

A dataset of asthma patients during May 2014-April 2019 from Japanese health insurance claims database, MediScope® (DB) was used. Patient characteristics and disease information were extracted, and association with occurrence of asthma exacerbation was evaluated to comprehensively search for exacerbation risk factors. Asthma exacerbations were defined as the co-occurrence of emergency medical procedures, such as emergency transport and intravenous steroid injections, with asthma claims, which were recorded in the database.

RESULTS

In total, 5,844 (13.7%) subjects had exacerbations in 42,685 eligible cases from the DB. Information on approximately 3,300 diseases was subjected to a machine learning, and 25 variables were extracted as variable importance and targeted for risk assessment. As a result, sex, days without exacerbation from cohort entry date at look-back period, Charlson Comorbidity Index, allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, acute airway disease (upper airway), acute airway disease (lower airways), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/chronic bronchitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and hypertension were significantly associated with exacerbation. Dyslipidemia and periodontitis were detected as associated factors of reduced exacerbation risk.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive analysis of claims data using machine learning showed asthma exacerbation risk factors mostly consistent with those in previous studies. Further examination in other fields is warranted.

Uncontrolled asthma across GINA treatment steps 2 - 5 in a large US patient cohort

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in treatment, asthma remains uncontrolled in many patients, with increased risk of exacerbation and associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). We describe patient characteristics, exacerbations, asthma control, and HCRU using GINA treatment step (GS) as a proxy for asthma severity. .

METHODS

Using a large, US, health-claims database, 4 longitudinal cohorts of 517,738 patients in GS2-5, including a subgroup of patients with baseline eosinophil (EOS) counts, were analyzed retrospectively (study period 2010 - 2016). Index for each cohort was patients' first time entering the GS, determined by first claim of first regimen. Uncontrolled asthma was defined according to published criteria as a multi-dimensional measure that includes number of exacerbations. Key variables including, baseline characteristics, post-index exacerbations, and HCRU (all-cause and asthma-specific events) are summarized by descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was reported in 19.8% patients in GS2, 44.8% in GS3, 49.3% in GS4, and 58.6% in GS5. Annualized mean (SD) rates of exacerbation 12 months post-index generally increased across GS2-5 (0.26 [0.86], 0.32 [0.79], 0.36 [0.83], 0.29 [0.86], respectively). HCRU also increased with increasing GS, with higher HCRU among the uncontrolled cohort within each GS. In patients with EOS ≥300 cells/µL, uncontrolled asthma also increased with increasing GS (21.8%, 43.9%, 50.5%, 67.2% for GS2-5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This large database study provides real-world evidence of the substantial degree of uncontrolled asthma in US clinical practice across GS, supporting calls for better asthma management. Healthcare burden tends to increase with lack of control in all groups, highlighting the need for improved patient education, adherence, access, and treatment optimization.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Asthma attacks in children are always preceded by poor asthma control: myth or maxim?

Some, but not all, asthma exacerbations in children are preceded by poor asthma control https://bit.ly/3muIy6h.

Effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide for asthma management in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a noninvasive strategy for diagnosing and managing asthma, but limited evidence is available for the effects of FENO-guided asthma management in children. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of FENO for asthma management in children.

METHODS

In total, six databases were searched, and 23 randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of FENO-guided asthma management with those not using FENO in pediatric asthma were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data for relevant endpoints were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis of the effectiveness of FENO for asthma management in children showed that FENO-guided asthma management helped reduce the numbers of children with asthma exacerbations (risk ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI:] 0.63-0.84; P < .0001) and the exacerbation frequency (standardized mean difference: -1.57; 95% CI: -2.25 to -0.88; P < .00001). Furthermore, it improved the predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 minute (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 3.67; 95% CI: 0.91-6.43; P = .009) and was also found to be associated with an increase of daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose (WMD: 64.17 μg; 95% CI: 53.59-74.75; P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that the FENO-guided asthma management strategy could partially improve the outcomes of pediatric asthma at the expense of increased ICS use.

Comparison of fractional exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, and Asthma Control Test, in predicting asthma exacerbations: A prospective cohort study

Context

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive test for airway inflammation in asthma. The usefulness of FeNO in predicting exacerbations is uncertain.

Aims

The study aims to assess and compare the ability of FeNO, spirometry, and asthma control test (ACT) in predicting future exacerbations of asthma and their correlation with each other.

Settings and Design

This prospective, cohort study was conducted at the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal.

Materials and Methods

Adult asthma patients of age 18-65 years were included. Patients with a smoking history of >10 pack-years and those in whom spirometry was contraindicated were excluded. Patients who consented underwent FeNO and spirometry. The control of asthma was assessed using the ACT questionnaire. We captured the number of exacerbations in the follow-up period of 4 months.

Statistical Analysis Used

Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the utility of FeNO, spirometry, ACT in predicting exacerbations and Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to ascertain the correlation among them.

Results

Of 154 study patients, 28% had exacerbations. We found that there was no significant difference in FeNO in patients with and without exacerbations. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) FEV1% in the patients with and without exacerbations were 68 (55-79) and 75 (65-88), respectively (P = 0.013). The median (IQR) ACT score in patients with exacerbations was 12 (10-16) which was significantly lower than in those without exacerbation in whom it was 16 (14-18) (P = 0.003). There was a negative correlation of ACT with FeNO (Correlation coefficient: -0.167, P = 0.038). The median (IQR) FeNO level (ppb) was lower in patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) than in the other group values being 22 (14-38) and 30 (17-58), respectively (P = 0.05).

Conclusions

In our study, FEV1% and ACT score could predict exacerbations of asthma whereas FeNO could not. FeNO level correlated inversely with ACT score. FeNO level decreased with inhaled corticosteroid usage.

Effects of short- and long-acting beta-agonists on asthma exacerbations: a prospective cohort

BACKGROUND

In asthma, short- and long-acting β-agonists (SABAs and LABAs) should be used together with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and regular use is inappropriate.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between patterns of use of therapy and asthma exacerbations (AEx).

METHODS

Patients with asthma (6-40 years) were enrolled in France and the United Kingdom. Prescribing data, computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATIs), and text messages assessed medication use and AEx over a maximum period of 24 months. Generalized linear mixed models provided AEx risks associated with therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 908 patients (median age: 20.0 years, 46.6% women, 24.5% children) answering a total of 4248 CATIs over 486 (±235) days, regular (ie, daily) use was more frequent for single LABAs and fixed dose combinations (FDCs) than for single ICS (75.6%, 70.1%, and 65.4% of investigated periods of use, respectively). Regular (ie, daily or almost daily) SABA use was observed for 21.1% of periods of use. Altogether, 265 patients (29.2%) experienced 1 or more AEx. The ORs for AEx risk related to regular vs no use of FDCs, single ICS, and single LABAs were 0.98 (95% CI = [0.73-1.33]), 0.90 (95% CI = [0.61-1.33]), and 1.29 (95% CI = [0.76-2.17]), respectively, after adjustment for cotherapy, sociodemographic, and disease characteristics. The OR was 2.09 (95% CI = [1.36-3.21]) in regular SABA users.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled corticosteroids and FDCs were often used intermittently, whereas SABAs and LABAs could be used regularly, and exacerbations were frequent. Compared with non-users, the risk of exacerbation increased moderately under regular use of single LABAs, whereas it doubled, significantly, in regular SABA users, likely in relationship with poor overall asthma control.

Risk Factors for Asthma Exacerbation and Treatment Failure in Adults and Adolescents with Well-controlled Asthma during Continuation and Step-Down Therapy

RATIONALE

Although national and international guidelines recommend reduction of asthma controller therapy or "step-down" therapy in patients with well-controlled asthma, it is expected that some individuals may experience worsening of asthma symptoms or asthma exacerbations during step-down. Characteristics associated with subsequent exacerbations during step-down therapy have not been well defined. The effect of environmental tobacco smoke exposure on risk of treatment failure during asthma step-down therapy has not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To identify baseline characteristics associated with treatment failure and asthma exacerbation during maintenance and guideline-based step-down therapy.

METHODS

The present analysis uses data collected from a completed randomized controlled trial of optimal step-down therapy in patients with well-controlled asthma taking moderate-dose combination inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists. Participants were 12 years or older with physician-diagnosed asthma and were enrolled between December 2011 and May 2014.

RESULTS

An emergency room visit in the previous year was associated with subsequent treatment failure (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.21). For every 10% increase in baseline forced expiratory volume in one second percent predicted, the hazard ratio of treatment failure was 14% lower (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.99). There was no difference in the risk of treatment failure between adults and children, nor was the duration of asthma associated with the risk of treatment failure. Age of asthma onset was not associated with an increased risk of treatment failure. Unexpected emergency room visit in the previous year was the only risk factor significantly associated with subsequent asthma exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. Time to treatment failure or exacerbation did not differ in participants with and without self-report of environmental tobacco smoke exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings can help clinicians identify adults and adolescents with asthma who are more likely to develop treatment failure and exacerbations and who may therefore require closer monitoring during asthma step-down treatment. Those with reduced pulmonary function, a history of exacerbations, and early-onset disease, even if otherwise well controlled, may require closer observation to prevent treatment failures and asthma exacerbations. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01437995).

Investigation of the Effect of Asthma on Mortality and Morbidity After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

OBJECTIVES

No studies have been specifically conducted on asthma patients undergoing cardiac surgery for assessing mortality and morbidity. Distinct effects of cardiac surgery lead to negative effects on respiratory functions, putting patients with existing lung diseases under an increased risk. We aimed to investigate whether asthma patients are under higher risk for mortality and possible complications after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery than patients without asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included patients who underwent elective CABG surgery at our hospital between November 2014 and November 2015. Patients with a history of asthma were verified with physical examination and spirometric measurements by a single. The asthma group was compared with the controls in terms of mortality and morbidities.

RESULTS

Asthma patients were extubated later than control patients (p=0.028); however, prolonged intubation (longer than 24 h) frequency was not different (p>0.05). Asthma patients required longer stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) (p=0.003) than controls. The incidence of perioperative asthma exacerbations was significantly lower in patients in whom asthma was previously well-controlled. The incidence of postoperative sibilant rhonchi was lower in patients in whom asthma was under control than in those in whom asthma was partially controlled (p=0.020).

CONCLUSION

Asthma is associated with longer ICU stay and asthma-related pulmonary complications after CABG surgery. Preoperative evaluation of asthma patients scheduled for CABG surgery requires consideration of the control status of asthma. Studies with more controls are needed to provide further evidence on the topic.

Association of elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide concentration and blood eosinophil count with severe asthma exacerbations

Background

Blood eosinophil count (BEC) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration are established biomarkers in asthma, associated particularly with the risk of exacerbations. We evaluated the relationship of BEC and FeNO as complementary and independent biomarkers of severe asthma exacerbations.

Methods

This observational study included data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Asthma patients (18–80 years) with valid continuous data for 1 year before FeNO reading, ≥ 1 inhaled corticosteroid prescription, and BEC recorded ≤ 5 years before FeNO reading were separated into cohorts. Categorisation 1 was based on the American Thoracic Society criteria for elevated FeNO concentration (high: ≥ 50 ppb; non-high: < 25 ppb) and BEC (high: ≥ 0.300 × 10⁹ cells/L; non-high: < 0.300 × 10⁹ cells/L). Categorisation 2 (FeNO concentration, high: ≥ 35 ppb; non-high: < 35 ppb) was based on prior research. Reference groups included patients with neither biomarker raised.

Results

In categorisation 1, patients with either high FeNO or high BEC (n = 200) had a numerically greater exacerbation rate (unadjusted rate ratio, 1.31 [95% confidence interval: 0.97, 1.76]) compared with patients in the reference group. Combination of high FeNO and high BEC (n = 27) resulted in a significantly greater exacerbation rate (3.67 [1.49, 9.04]). Similarly, for categorisation 2, when both biomarkers were raised (n = 53), a significantly greater exacerbation rate was observed (1.72 [1.00, 2.93]).

Conclusion

The combination of high FeNO and high BEC was associated with significantly increased severe exacerbation rates in the year preceding FeNO reading, suggesting that combining FeNO and BEC measurements in primary care may identify asthma patients at risk of exacerbations.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13601-019-0282-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Documentation of asthma control and severity in pediatrics: analysis of national office-based visits

Objective: To evaluate the extent of documentation of asthma control and severity and associated characteristics among pediatric asthma patients in office-based settings. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the 2012-2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). Patients aged 6-17 years with a diagnosis of asthma were included. Weighted descriptive analysis examined the extent of documentation and uncontrolled asthma; while logistic regression evaluated associated characteristics. Results: Overall, there were 2.47 million (95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 2.04-2.90) average annual visits with asthma as a primary diagnosis. Asthma control and severity was documented in only 36.1% and 33.8% of the visits, respectively. An established patient (odds ratio, OR = 3.81), Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 2.10), chronic sinusitis (OR = 5.59), and visits in the Northeast (OR = 2.12) and Midwest (OR = 2.25) regions had higher odds of documented asthma control status, whereas undocumented asthma severity (OR = 0.02), and visits in spring (OR = 0.34), had lower odds. Osteopathic doctors (OR = 0.18), visits in the Northeast region (OR = 0.23), chronic sinusitis (OR = 0.08), and undocumented asthma control status (OR = 0.03) had lower odds of documented asthma severity, whereas visits in spring (OR = 3.88) and autumn (OR = 3.32) had higher odds. Moderate/severe persistent asthma (OR = 15.35) had higher odds of uncontrolled asthma (as compared to intermittent asthma), while visits in the summer (OR = 0.14) had lower odds. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest a critical need to increase the documentation of asthma severity and control to improve quality of asthma care in children.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Asthma in Nonpregnant Women

Asthma is a common condition affecting 8.3% of the adult population in the United States. The disease is characterized by chronic airway inflammation that leads to airway hyperresponsiveness and obstruction that results in coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, and a feeling of chest tightness. The diagnosis and classification of asthma is based on reported symptoms, physical examination findings, and spirometry. Pharmacologic therapy is prescribed using a stepwise approach that begins with inhaled short-acting beta₂ -agonists for intermittent asthma with the addition of daily inhaled corticosteroids for more persistent cases. Individuals with asthma are reevaluated on a regular basis to monitor symptoms, and pharmacologic treatments are adjusted as needed. Familiarity with the stepwise approach for asthma management and confidence in the efficacy and safety profiles of inhaled medications will assist clinicians in successful management of asthma in the primary care setting.

Patient-reported outcomes in asthma clinical trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review provides an overview of the results of asthma clinical trials published in peer review journals in the last 18 months that evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 10 years, health care moved toward a patient-centered approach, which includes patients' perspectives reflecting the impact of a disease and its treatment.

SUMMARY

Surprisingly, among the almost 300 clinical trials published in the last one and a half year, PRO evaluation was performed in only 20 studies, and none of them held in a real-life setting. The effort of applying the scientific methods of PRO investigations in asthma clinical trials following a rigorous and systematic approach needs to be highly improved to allow better understanding of patient reported factors. Some recommendations are drawn particularly about PRO assessment in personalized medicine research. The ability of an individual PRO to evaluate choice of treatment and its effectiveness remains to be achieved.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus twice-daily inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (ICS/LABA) in patients with uncontrolled asthma: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A variety of different fixed-dose combinations of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β₂-agonists (ICS/LABA) are available for the treatment of asthma. The aim of this 24-week, open-label, multicenter, Phase IIIb randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI; 100/25 or 200/25 μg) compared with twice-daily fixed combinations of ICS/LABA (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol [FP/S] and budesonide/formoterol [BUD/F]) as maintenance therapy in patients with uncontrolled asthma treated with ICS alone.

METHODS

Adult patients with documented physician-diagnosed asthma ≥1 year with an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score ≥15 and < 20 were included. The primary study endpoint was change from baseline in ACT total score at Week 12.

RESULTS

Overall, 423 patients were randomized to receive study medication in France and Germany. The least-squares mean change (standard error) in ACT total score at Week 12 was 3.6 units with FF/VI and 2.8 with usual ICS/LABA, giving a treatment difference of 0.8 (95% confidence interval 0.1, 1.5; p = 0.033). Non-inferiority of FF/VI to usual ICS/LABA was confirmed at Weeks 6, 18 and 24. The observed safety profile for FF/VI in this study was in line with previous experience with FF/VI.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, in a tightly controlled randomized controlled trial setting, once-daily FF/VI provides similar asthma control over 24 weeks to usual, twice-daily ICS/LABA in patients with asthma that is uncontrolled on ICS alone. FF/VI was well tolerated.

At-risk children with asthma (ARC): a systematic review

Introduction

Asthma attacks are responsible for considerable morbidity and may be fatal. We aimed to identify and weight risk factors for asthma attacks in children (5–12 years) in order to inform and prioritise care.

Methods

We systematically searched six databases (May 2016; updated with forward citations January 2017) with no language/date restrictions. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Weighting was undertaken by an Expert Panel who independently assessed each variable for degree of risk and confidence in the assessment (based on study quality and size, effect sizes, biological plausibility and consistency of results) and then achieved consensus by discussion. Assessments were finally presented, discussed and agreed at a multidisciplinary workshop.

Results

From 16 109 records, we included 68 papers (28 cohort; 4 case-control; 36 cross-sectional studies). Previous asthma attacks were associated with greatly increased risk of attack (ORs between 2.0 and 4.1). Persistent symptoms (ORs between 1.4 and 7.8) and poor access to care (ORs between 1.2 and 2.3) were associated with moderately/greatly increased risk. A moderately increased risk was associated with suboptimal drug regimen, comorbid atopic/allergic disease, African-American ethnicity (USA), poverty and vitamin D deficiency. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure, younger age, obesity and low parental education were associated with slightly increased risk.

Discussion

Assessment of the clinical and demographic features identified in this review may help clinicians to focus risk reduction management on the high-risk child. Population level factors may be used by health service planners and policymakers to target healthcare initiatives.

Trial registration number

CRD42016037464.

Predictors of future exacerbations in a multi-ethnic Asian population with asthma

OBJECTIVE

Exacerbations are important outcomes in asthma. Risk factors for exacerbations may differ in different populations. Although various demographic and clinical variables were examined in previous studies on exacerbation risks in asthma, important variables such as ethnicity, adherence, and medication titration were not included. This study examined independent predictors of future exacerbations in a multi-ethnic asthma population in Asia, while including the variables of ethnicity, medication adherence, and medication change in our analysis.

METHODS

We recruited patients with physician-diagnosed asthma in a tertiary hospital in Singapore over a one-year period. Exacerbations requiring ≥3 days of systemic corticosteroids one year prior to study enrolment (previous exacerbations) and the year following enrolment (future exacerbations) were recorded from electronic medical records. Medication adherence was based on pharmacy refill. An increase or a decrease in the Global Initiative for Asthma treatment steps were considered to be medication up- and down-titration, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to determine independent predictors of future exacerbations.

RESULTS

The study cohort of 340 patients comprised mainly of Chinese (53.2%), Malay (32.9%), and Indian (9.7%) ethnicities. After multivariate analysis, only Indian ethnicity (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.077-13.051, p = 0.038), Asthma Control Test score (OR 0.913, 95% CI 0.839-0.995, p = 0.037), and the number of previous exacerbations (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.416-2.391, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of future exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

There are ethnic differences in exacerbation risk in Asian populations. Each incremental worsening of the asthma symptom control score and each additional exacerbation also increases the risk of future exacerbations.

Assessing health outcomes, quality of life, and healthcare use among school-age children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

Asthma affects six million children in the United States. Most people can control their asthma symptoms with effective care, management, and appropriate medical treatment. Information on the relationship between asthma control and quality of life indicators and health care use among school-age children is limited.

METHODS

Using the 2006-2010 combined Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call-back Survey child data, we examined asthma control and asthma attack status among school-age (aged 5-17 years) children with asthma from 35 states and the District of Columbia. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess if having uncontrolled asthma and having ≥1 asthma attacks affect quality of life (activity limitation and missed school days) and healthcare use (emergency department [ED] visits and hospitalizations).

RESULTS

About one-third (36.5%) of the 8,484 respondents with current asthma had uncontrolled asthma and 56.8% reported ≥1 asthma attack in the past year. Having uncontrolled asthma and having ≥1 asthma attack were significantly associated with activity limitation (aPR = 1.43 and 1.74, respectively), missed school (1.45 and 1.68), ED visits (2.05 and 4.78), and hospitalizations (2.38 and 3.64). Long-term control (LTC) medication use was higher among respondents with uncontrolled asthma (61.3%) than respondents with well-controlled asthma (33.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Having uncontrolled asthma is associated with reduced quality of life and increased health care use. However, only 61.3% of respondents with uncontrolled asthma use LTC medications. Increasing use of LTC medications among children with uncontrolled asthma could help improve quality of life and reduce health care use.

Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment

Guideline-based management of asthma focuses on disease severity and choosing the appropriate medical therapy to control symptoms and reduce the risk of exacerbations. However, irrespective of asthma severity and often despite optimal medical therapy, patients may experience acute exacerbations of symptoms and a loss of disease control. Asthma exacerbations are most commonly triggered by viral respiratory infections, particularly with human rhinovirus. Given the importance of these events to asthma morbidity and health care costs, we will review common inciting factors for asthma exacerbations and approaches to prevent and treat these events.

A phase III randomized controlled trial of tiotropium add-on therapy in children with severe symptomatic asthma

BACKGROUND

Studies in adults and adolescents have demonstrated that tiotropium is efficacious as an add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) with or without other maintenance therapies in patients with moderate or severe symptomatic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily tiotropium Respimat add-on therapy to high-dose ICS with 1 or more controller medications, or medium-dose ICS with 2 or more controller medications, in the first phase III trial of tiotropium in children with severe symptomatic asthma.

METHODS

In this 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, 401 participants aged 6 to 11 years were randomized to receive once-daily tiotropium 5 μg (2 puffs of 2.5 μg) or 2.5 μg (2 puffs of 1.25 μg), or placebo (2 puffs), administered through the Respimat device as add-on to background therapy.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, tiotropium 5 μg, but not 2.5 μg, add-on therapy improved the primary end point, peak FEV₁ within 3 hours after dosing (5 μg, 139 mL [95% CI, 75-203; P < .001]; 2.5 μg, 35 mL [95% CI, -28 to 99; P = .27]), and the key secondary end point, trough FEV₁ (5 μg, 87 mL [95% CI, 19-154; P = .01]; 2.5 μg, 18 mL [95% CI, -48 to 85; P = .59]). The safety and tolerability of tiotropium were comparable with those of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily tiotropium Respimat 5 μg improved lung function and was well tolerated as add-on therapy to ICS with other maintenance therapies in children with severe symptomatic asthma.

Machine learning approaches to personalize early prediction of asthma exacerbations

Patient telemonitoring results in an aggregation of significant amounts of information about patient disease trajectory. However, the potential use of this information for early prediction of exacerbations in adult asthma patients has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to explore the utility of telemonitoring data for building machine learning algorithms that predict asthma exacerbations before they occur. The study dataset comprised daily self-monitoring reports consisting of 7001 records submitted by adult asthma patients during home telemonitoring. Predictive modeling included preparation of stratified training datasets, predictive feature selection, and evaluation of resulting classifiers. Using a 7-day window, a naive Bayesian classifier, adaptive Bayesian network, and support vector machines were able to predict asthma exacerbation occurring on day 8, with sensitivity of 0.80, 1.00, and 0.84; specificity of 0.77, 1.00, and 0.80; and accuracy of 0.77, 1.00, and 0.80, respectively. Our study demonstrated that machine learning techniques have significant potential in developing personalized decision support for chronic disease telemonitoring systems. Future studies may benefit from a comprehensive predictive framework that combines telemonitoring data with other factors affecting the likelihood of developing acute exacerbation. Approaches implemented for advanced asthma exacerbation prediction may be extended to prediction of exacerbations in patients with other chronic health conditions.