Resection of peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerve compared to conventional posterior neurectomy in severe allergic rhinitis

Neurectomy for allergic rhinitis in Japan: Increasing trends and surgeon preferences

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus on the optimal surgical technique for allergic rhinitis (AR). Furthermore, the appropriateness of surgical intervention in children and older individuals remains debatable. This study aimed to analyze trends and patterns in the surgical management of AR in Japan, focusing on parasympathetic neurectomy.

METHODS

Using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), we conducted a comprehensive review of procedures performed between April 2014 and March 2022. In addition, a cross-sectional survey targeting otolaryngologists across Japan was conducted to gather insights into surgical preferences and practices.

RESULTS

The NDB data showed an increasing trend in neurectomies, with the most frequent age group being 25-29 years; the procedure was also performed in pediatric and older patients. The survey among otolaryngologists indicated that 58.2 % of surgeons preferred peripheral branch neurectomy of the posterior nasal nerve. The findings of this study also indicated a cautious approach toward conducting these procedures in children, with 51.2 % of surgeons considering patients less than 18 years of age unsuitable for the procedure.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted a shift toward simple and minimally invasive surgical methods, such as peripheral branch neurectomy, in Japan. However, further research is needed to understand the long-term outcomes and refine the surgical techniques. The findings of this study also emphasized the need for age-specific considerations when treating pediatric and older patients with AR.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Inferior Turbinate Reduction and Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common condition that is frequently associated with atopic inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH) resulting in nasal obstruction. Current guidelines support the use of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) when patients fail pharmacologic management. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the role of inferior turbinate reduction (ITR), a treatment that we hypothesize is cost-effective compared with other available treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the following treatment combinations over a 5-year time horizon for AR patients presenting with atopic nasal obstruction who fail initial pharmacotherapy: (1) continued pharmacotherapy alone, (2) allergy testing and SCIT, (3) allergy testing and SCIT and then ITR for SCIT nonresponders, and (4) ITR and then allergy testing and SCIT for ITR nonresponders. Results were reported as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

For patients who fail initial pharmacotherapy, prioritizing ITR, either by microdebrider-assisting submucous resection or radiofrequency ablation, before SCIT was the most cost-effective strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that prioritizing ITR before SCIT was the most cost-effective option in 95.4% of scenarios. ITR remained cost-effective even with the addition of concurrent septoplasty.

CONCLUSION

For many AR patients who present with nasal obstruction secondary to atopic inferior turbinate hypertrophy that is persistent despite pharmacotherapy, ITR is a cost-effective treatment that should be considered prior to immunotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA - Laryngoscope, 2023 Laryngoscope, 134:1572-1580, 2024.

A Novel Approach to Posterior Lateral Nasal Neurectomy

Background Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a major health concern throughout the world. By severing the parasympathetic supply to the lateral wall of the nose, posterior lateral nasal neurectomy (PLNN), a form of highly selective vidian neurectomy, decreases nasal allergy symptoms. This study attempts to characterize the demographic and surgical characteristics of study participants in relation to PLNN, as well as to identify the risk factors associated with these characteristics. Methodology A five-year, cross-sectional study was undertaken among patients diagnosed with AR at a tertiary care center in Tamaka, Kolar. Case sheets accessible in the department of medical records were used to compile a list of 50 study patients. SPSS version 21 was used for data analysis (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The study revealed that the average age of the sample population was 30.4 years. The majority of the study participants were less than or equal to 30 years old (54%). In our study, the majority of the participants were male (60%). This study revealed that around 46% of the surgeries were independent PLNNs and that most of them (76%) were observed to have four nerves following surgery. The average intraoperative blood loss during PLNN surgery was 43.14 mL. The mean hemoglobin levels before and after surgery were 13.11 and 12.78 g/dL, respectively. The average duration of the surgical procedure was 62 minutes. The average duration of PLNN surgery in females was 52.75 minutes, whereas the average duration in males was 68.33 minutes. According to an independent t-test (p = 0.045), this difference in mean was statistically significant. Approximately 85% of female study participants were identified with four nerves during PLNN surgery compared to 70% of male study participants. According to the chi-square test (p = 0.018), this proportional difference was statistically significant. Conclusions The majority of the participants in this study were male and younger. The typical PLNN surgical procedure lasted one hour. Males and females require different amounts of time, with females requiring less time. During PLNN surgery, most females detected four nerves, as opposed to most males.

Comparing The Effects of Botulinum toxin-A and multiple surgical parasympathectomy on treatment of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common disease with a recent increasing in prevalence. Traditional treatment strategies of AR, sometimes, show limited effectiveness and side effects. Intranasal injection of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and multiple postganglionic parasympathectomy of pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG) are among the increasingly used alternative treatment options of AR. In this study, we compared the early efficacy of BTX-A and multiple surgical parasympathectomy (MSP) on treatment of uncontrolled AR.

METHODS

Sixty patients who were diagnosed with uncontrolled AR, were recruited to the study. Participants randomly underwent either intranasal injection of BTX-A (45 IU in each nostril) (Group A) or bilateral MSP (Group B). All patients were evaluated in terms of nasal hypersecretions, congestion and sneezing with visual analogue scale prior to treatment and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 6 months during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the degree of nasal hypersecretions and sneezing could be identified in both groups before and after the interventions. Although the significant efficacy on sneezing was documented in group A and B only in the first 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, such efficacy on nasal hypersecretions extended for 12 weeks in group A and throughout the follow-up period in group B. Nasal congestion did not differ significantly in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both BTX-A and MSP, in patients with uncontrolled AR, may be a long-lasting therapeutic option for the treatment of nasal hypersecretions, but not as effective as for sneezing and nasal congestion.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023

BACKGROUND

In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document.

METHODS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work.

RESULTS

ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost.

CONCLUSION

The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.

Posterior nasal neurectomy for intractable rhinitis: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Rhinitis affects up to 40% of the population worldwide and can significantly reduce quality of life. Some patients remain symptomatic despite maximal medical therapy. In refractory cases, posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN-the endoscopic division of the intranasal nerve branches containing postganglionic parasympathetic fibres) is postulated to reduce symptom burden.

OBJECTIVES OF REVIEW

To establish whether PNN is effective and safe in the management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis.

TYPE OF REVIEW

Systematic review.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane. The inclusion criteria were: studies published in English, studies where PNN was performed either with or without additional procedures, and where measures of objective/subjective outcomes and/or complications were reported. Extracted data included study type, sample size, surgical technique, study population characteristics, follow-up period, outcome measures, complications of surgery, and symptom outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 23 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria studying in total 2282 patients. Sample size ranged from 8 to 1056. There were 3 randomised controlled trials, 3 case-control studies, and the remaining 17 were case series using both objective and subjective outcome measures. All but one study found improved patient-reported outcomes following PNN. Complications were reported in 14 studies-epistaxis was the most common complication and was observed in 30 patients (1.5% of subjects).

CONCLUSIONS

PNN had a low rate of complications. Although most studies reported significant symptomatic improvement, their heterogeneity, level of evidence, study design, and/or quality was not sufficient to draw any firm conclusions on the effectiveness of the procedure. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to clarify its role in the management of difficult-to-treat rhinitis.

Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Neurectomy Really a Ray of Hope for the Patients of Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis significantly affects the quality of life, it contributes to missed or unproductive time at school or work, disturbed sleep pattern and day time somnolence. Rhinitis is defined clinically as having two or more symptoms of anterior or posterior rhinorrhoea, sneezing, nasal blockage and/or itching of the nose during two or more consecutive days for more than 1 h on most days (International rhinitis management working group, 1994). Allergic rhinitis is diagnosed when these symptoms are caused by allergen exposure leading to an IgE mediated reaction. Nerve irritation causes sneezing and itching, the loss of mucosal integrity causes causes rhinorrhoea and the vascular engrogment leads to nasal blockage. Medical modalities are symptomatically effective in mild cases, with temporary relief and addressable adverse effects. Prolonged treatment with allergy immunotherapy causes a sustainable financial burden while remaining inaccessible at smaller towns. Posterior nasal nerve neurectomy is short, easy and effective alternative. The basic procedure is to selectively cut nerve bundles at the level of the sphenopalatine foramen (SPF) with a trans nasal approach. By denervating the nasal mucosa one renders it unresponsive to any sorts of allergen or allergic reaction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of posterior nasal nerve neurectomy in cases of severe allergic rhinitis by assessing its impact on the total nasal symptom score. The study is a hospital based prospective study, conducted on 15 patients who presented to the ENT department of Mahatma Gandhi Hospital from march 2021 to October 2021 (6 months) suffering from allergic rhinitis and did not show any satisfactory improvement even after 1 year of medical treatment. Adult patients in the age group of 20-45 yrs. diagnosed with allergic rhinitis were enrolled into the study after obtaining a due written consent. These included patients having 2 or more symptoms of allergic rhinitis and refractoriness to medical therapy for > 1 year along with significantly affected quality of life and elevated IgE level. Patients with drug induced & hormonal causes of rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis and any anatomical feature which precipitates to rhinitis such as deviated nasal septum, hypertrophied turbinates, blocked osteomeatal unit, polypoidal nasal mucosa and sinonasal polyposis were excluded from the study. During our study period from march 2021-September 2021, 15 patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients were followed up at 2nd and 6th month postoperatively. Amongst these patients, there were 11 females (73.34%) and 4 were male (26.67%)The mean age of patients was 35.2 years. Subjective nasal symptoms of all 15 patients improved over the period of 6 months. The mean TNSS improved from 12.067 preoperatively to 8.66 at the end of 2nd month, i.e., 23.1% improvement. By the end of the 6th postoperative month there was a consistent reduction in the tnss, which further reduced to a mean of 3.4 (70.2% reduction) indicating a further improvement in symptoms with time. With the advancement & popularity of endoscopic sinus surgery in the past decade, endoscopic resection of the posterior nasal nerve is emerging as a safe and less invasive technique with long standing results. Medical treatment usually provides mild and symptomatic relief with long duration of treatment period. Thus, PNN is safer, economical & easier alternative to current trend of treatment of allergic rhinitis, proving to be highly efficient in cases of intractable allergic rhinitis.

Sixty cases of refractory allergic rhinitis treated by vidian trunk or branch neurectomy: A single-center observational study

To investigate the effect of vidian trunk neurectomy and selective vidian branch neurectomy on treating moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis. Sixty patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic rhinitis treated at Zhejiang Hospital of Integrative Medicine participated in this study from June 2018 to June 2020. The patients in the observation group (n = 40) underwent a vidian trunk neurectomy. The patients in the control group (n = 20) underwent a vidian branch neurectomy. The patients in both groups were followed up after 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of surgery. The efficacy was evaluated based on the AR diagnostic and the efficacy assessment criteria. The 4 symptoms of sneezing, runny nose, nasal congestion, and nasal itch were scored as efficacy indices before and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Nasal endoscopy or sinus CT was performed to assess the postoperative inferior turbinate swelling. The postoperative tear secretion was followed up in both groups, and patients with dry eyes were counted in combination with ocular symptoms. The data recorded before and after surgery and between the 2 groups were analyzed statistically. The observation group had signs of 2.73 ± 0.452 before surgery, 1.20 ± 0.405 6 months after surgery, 1.25 ± 0.494 1 year after surgery, and 1.30 ± 0.564 2 years after surgery. The control group had signs of 2.75 ± 0.444 before surgery, 1.45 ± 0.686 6 months after surgery, 1.75 ± 0.716 1 year after surgery, and 1.90 ± 0.852 2 years after surgery. The between-subjects effect test between the groups showed an overall significant difference (P < .05). The overall effective rate 2 years postoperatively was 38/40 (95.0%) in the observation group and 10/20 (50%) in the control group. Fisher's exact test showed a significant difference between the groups. No patient in either group had dry eyes 1.5 years after surgery. Both vidian trunk neurectomy and selective vidian branch neurectomy have good immediate therapeutic effects, and vidian trunk neurectomy has higher long-term efficacy than selective vidian branch neurectomy.

A Comparative Study of Symptom Scores in Patients Undergoing Posterior Lateral Nasal Neurectomy with Medical Management for Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis is an IgE mediated reaction against inhaled allergens. Patients not responding to medical treatment require surgery. Most surgical procedures reduce erectile tissue of inferior turbinates. Vidian neurectomy reduces nasal hyperreactivity and secretions by reducing parasympathetic supply, but results in loss of lacrimation. Transnasal posterior nasal neurectomy is more selective denervation procedure which preserves lacrimation. There are few studies documenting the outcome of posterior lateral nasal neurectomy. Posterior lateral nasal neurectomy can be good treatment option for perennial allergic rhinitis. To assess and compare the symptom scores in patients undergoing posterior lateral nasal neurectomy and medical management for allergic rhinitis. This prospective study included 50 patients diagnosed as perennial allergic rhinitis as per the ARIA guidelines. 25 patients underwent posterior lateral nasal neurectomy and 25 patients underwent medical management using fluticasone nasal spray and Montelukast with Levocetirizine. Pre and post-treatment Total nasal symptom scores and mini rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire scores were compared. Symptoms reduced significantly in both surgery and medical management group. However in surgery group, more patients showed more than 50% improvement in symptoms. Posterior lateral nasal neurectomy is minimally invasive treatment for patients with perennial allergic rhinitis not responding to or not complying with medical treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-021-02930-0.

Effects of Surgical Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis on Sleep and Mental Health in Adolescents

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic condition that is usually treated medically. Adolescents form a unique population in which AR-associated symptoms are greater than those in adults or children, and are closely related to sleep and mental disorders. In the current study, a retrospective analysis was performed to illustrate the surgical effects of AR symptoms on sleep and mental disorders in adolescents. In 81 adolescents with AR symptoms refractory to medical management, the severity of the AR symptoms was correlated with that of sleep or mental disorders. As a standard surgical procedure, submucosal bony resection of inferior turbinates with posterior nasal neurectomy was performed and half of the subjects underwent septoplasty due to severe deviation of the nasal septum. The degree of improvement in AR-associated symptoms by surgical treatment was correlated with that of mental disorders in adolescent patients who had sleep and mental disorders preoperatively. Considering the impact of AR symptoms on the quality of life of adolescents, surgical treatment can be a potent option for the treatment of AR refractory to medical management in this population.

Latent Myofascial Trigger Points Injection Reduced the Severity of Persistent, Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) injection has been effectively used for the management of chronic painful diseases. Latent MTrPs can induce autonomic nerve phenomena. In our clinic, we observed that allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms significantly improved when latent MTrPs injection was performed for migraine. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between latent MTrPs injection and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with persistent, moderate to severe AR. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted with 112 patients with AR. Patients were randomized to receive SLIT (n = 56) or latent MTrPs injection. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, n = 56), nasal symptoms, medication days, and adverse events were evaluated during the 9 months follow-up period after treatment in both groups. Results: Latent MTrPs injection significantly reduced TNSS to a greater level from baseline (from 8.36 ± 1.96 to 4.43 ± 2.18) than SLIT (from 8.66 ± 2.31 to 7.80 ± 2.47) at week 1 (P < 0.001), and sustained the improvement in symptoms throughout to month 9. Latent MTrPs showed statistically significant differences vs. SLIT for the TNSS reduction both at month 2 (6.59 ± 2.37 vs. 2.64 ± 2.38; p < 0.001) and month 3 (4.59 ± 2.77 vs. 2.62 ± 2.43; p <0.001). Latent MTrPs also showed a better improvement in the onset time of efficacy compared with SLIT. Adverse reactions were few and non-serious in both treatment groups. Conclusions: Latent MTrPs injection significantly improved symptoms and decreased symptom-relieving medication use in patients with AR and was well tolerated. Clinical Trials Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900020590. Registered 9 January 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Cryotherapy for treatment of chronic rhinitis: 3-month outcomes of a randomized, sham-controlled trial

Background

The purpose of this study was to test whether cryotherapy is superior to a sham procedure for reducing symptoms of chronic rhinitis.

Methods

This study was a prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized, sham‐controlled, patient‐blinded trial. The predetermined sample size was 61 participants per arm. Adults with moderate/severe symptoms of chronic rhinitis who were candidates for cryotherapy under local anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were required to have minimum reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSSs) of 4 for total, 2 for rhinorrhea, and 1 for nasal congestion. Follow‐up visits occurred at 30 and 90 days postprocedure. Patient‐reported outcome measures included the rTNSS, standardized Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire [RQLQ(S)], and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaires. Adverse events were also recorded. The primary endpoint was the comparison between the treatment and sham arms for the percentage of responders at 90 days. Responders were defined as participants with a 30% or greater reduction in rTNSS relative to baseline.

Results

Twelve US investigational centers enrolled 133 participants. The primary endpoint analysis included 127 participants (64 active, 63 sham) with 90‐day results. The treatment arm was superior at the 90‐day follow‐up with 73.4% (47 of 64) responders compared with 36.5% (23 of 63) in the sham arm (p < 0.001). There were greater improvements in the rTNSS, RQLQ(S), and NOSE scores for the active arm over the sham arm at the 90‐day follow‐up (p < 0.001). One serious procedure‐related adverse event of anxiety/panic attack was reported.

Conclusion

Cryotherapy is superior to a sham procedure for improving chronic rhinitis symptoms and patient quality of life.

Underwater posterior nasal neurectomy compared to resection of peripheral branches of posterior nerve in severe allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Several surgical procedures for posterior nasal neurectomy have been reported, but no conclusion has been reached about which procedure is best.

OBJECTIVES

The aim is to evaluate the improvement in symptom medication scores for resection of the posterior nasal nerve trunk in an underwater environment, with submucous inferior turbinectomy, without injuring the sphenopalatine artery (SPA) in severe allergic rhinitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Improvements in symptom medication scores were retrospectively compared between 27 consecutive cases who underwent resection of the posterior nasal nerve trunk with turbinoplasty in an underwater environment without injuring the SPA (Underwater group) and, as a historical control, 16 consecutive cases who underwent resection of peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerve with turbinoplasty (Control group).

RESULTS

The improvements in symptom medication scores in the Underwater group were significantly better than in the Control group (3.07 vs. 1.96, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

By using underwater posterior nasal neurectomy, we can easily and safely resect the posterior nasal nerve trunk under a clear surgical view without injuring the SPA. This technique with submucous inferior turbinectomy may, more than resection of peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerve, be able to reduce the medication score and symptom medication score.

The role of CT and endoscopy in the evaluation of patients referred for intranasal Cryoablation

BACKGROUND

Cryoablation (CA) of the posterior nasal nerves has garnered increasing interest as an office-based procedure for chronic rhinitis (CR). Standardized preoperative evaluation, specifically the role of computed tomography (CT) and nasal endoscopy, has yet to be defined. We report a series of patients who underwent CT and endoscopy as part of CR work-up in patients referred for CA.

OBJECTIVE

Highlight the importance of both nasal endoscopy and CT scan in the evaluation of CR given significant overlap of symptoms and common occurrence of related sinonasal conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients referred to a single tertiary rhinology practice for CA was performed.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were sent for CA by medical allergists. Five patients were deemed CA candidates, and 1 patient received only medical CR treatment. Four patients had evidence of incomplete prior sinus surgery and/or continued chronic rhinosinusitis on endoscopic exam. These 4 patients received a combination of medical and surgical management with either complete resolution or improvement in CR symptoms. In 3 patients, CT confirmed chronic rhinosinusitis that was not apparent on endoscopy, and received a combination of medical and surgical management with symptom improvement. In the last two patients, final diagnoses were nasal valve collapse and recurrent acute rhinosinusitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Referrals for CA are becoming more common and the optimal preoperative work up remains unclear. In this limited retrospective review, 67% of patients had diagnoses other than CR and thus were not deemed candidates for CA. Both CT and endoscopy are complementary to a detailed history and physical examination and can aid in CA candidate selection.

Surgical Treatment for the Refractory Allergic Rhinitis: State of the Art

Nasal obstruction is a frequent disorder that interferes with the daily patient’s quality of life. The key element in the pathophysiology of the disorder is the inferior turbinate hypertrophy related to multiple conditions such as allergic rhinitis (AR). Many patients are managed using conventional drug therapies such as antihistamines, decongestants, and intranasal steroid sprays, anticholinergic agents, mast cell stabilizers, and desensitizing vaccines. When traditional therapy failed to relieve AR symptoms, surgical inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) is indicated. A vast variety of surgical techniques have been reported in the literature for AR such as resectioning, coagulating, and laser procedures. We aimed to revise all surgical options in AR management. We confirm that no ideal standard technique for turbinate reduction has been developed so far regarding the multitude of different surgical procedures. Furthermore, no prospective and comparable long-term studies are present in the literature; it is challenging to recommend evidence-based surgical techniques.

Adverse Events Associated With ClariFix Posterior Nasal Nerve Cryoablation: A MAUDE Database Analysis

Posterior nasal nerve (PNN) cryoablation is a novel surgical technique used to address chronic rhinitis. The purpose of this study is to review the medical device reports (MDRs) submitted to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Device Facility Experience (MAUDE) database to identify adverse events related to the use of ClariFix, a device designed for office-based cryosurgical ablation of the PNN. A total of 12 adverse events associated with ClariFix from January 2017 to August 2020 were identified and analyzed. The most common adverse events associated with ClariFix PNN cryoablation include epistaxis and nasal swelling. Further studies are needed to clarify whether PNN cryoablation is associated with epistaxis in certain populations.

Evaluation of In-Office Cryoablation of Posterior Nasal Nerves for the Treatment of Rhinitis

Background

Chronic rhinitis is a common condition generally treated with medical therapies. However, 10-22% of patients are refractory to medical therapies. A cryotherapy handheld device targeting the postganglionic nerve fibers of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) now serves as an additional option for therapy. This study evaluates the efficacy of the cryosurgical ablation device of the PNN in the clinic setting.

Methods

This was a prospective single-arm trial of 24 adult patients at seven locations within a large health maintenance organization. Patients with chronic rhinitis that failed medical therapy were offered an in-office cryoablation of PNN. Patients completed the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) questionnaire consisting of 5 items reported based on the previous 12 hours and 2 weeks at the following time points: pre-treatment, 30 days, 90 days and 1 year post-treatment.

Results

Following cryoablation of the PNN, the TNSS 12-hour symptom score improved from 6.92 (±2.9) to 3.17 (±2.4, P < 0.001) at 30 days, 2.92 (±1.4, P < 0.001) at 90 days and 3.08 (±2.6, P < 0.001) at 1 year post treatment. Similar results were noted for the 2 weeks scores improving from 7.75 (±3.1) to 3.79 (±2.1, P < 0.001) at 30 days, 3.88 (±1.9, P < 0.001) at 90 days and 3.76 (±2.1, P < 0.001) at 1 year post-treatment. 64.7% of respondents stated the procedure decreased or eliminated nasal sprays.

Conclusions

Our independent evaluation of cryoablation of the PNN shows improvement in nasal symptoms over a 1 year period and is consistent with other published data.

Long-term effectiveness, safety, and quality of life outcomes following endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy with submucosal turbinectomy for the treatment of intractable severe chronic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

In recent decades, posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) with submucosal inferior turbinectomy (ST) has been increasingly used for the treatment of intractable severe rhinitis; however, to the best of our knowledge, there have been few studies regarding its long-term therapeutic effects or its influence on patient quality of life (QOL). Therefore, this study examined the long-term therapeutic effects in patients who underwent PNN with ST, as well as their QOL and medication use after surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study initially included 16 consecutive patients who underwent PNN with ST from January 2010 to December 2011. Ten of the 16 patients participated in a paper-based survey questionnaire between June 2018 and November 2018; the responses of these 10 patients were used for analysis in this study. To clarify the effects of surgical treatment on symptoms, QOL, and medication status, data recorded before and 3 months after surgery were compared with data recorded at 8 years after surgery using the Japan Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire No. 1 and Classification of the Severity of Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms I and II.

RESULTS

Nasal symptoms including runny nose and nasal congestion, medication score, respective total symptoms medication scores (i.e., combined average total symptoms score and medication score), and the scores of troubles with daily life and total QOL were significantly improved at 3 months and 8 years after surgery, compared with before surgery; scores were not significantly worsened at 8 years after surgery, compared with 3 months after surgery. In addition, there were no adverse events requiring treatment after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that PNN with ST is effective and safe for long-term treatment of severe chronic rhinitis symptoms, as well as reduction of medication use and improvement of QOL.

ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.

Newer Surgical Options for Nasal Allergy

Allergic rhinitis is a common disorder that affects several patients annually and the hallmark symptoms are nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea and sneezing which significantly impacts the quality of life. Many surgical options exist for the treatment of allergic rhinitis which is directed primarily addressing the nasal obstructive component. The purpose of this review article  is to highlight newer surgical options in the management of patients with nasal allergy. Surgical modalities such as endoscopic resection of the posterior nasal nerve and senior author's own mini inferior turbinoplasty tunnelling technique for patients with nasal allergy is described here. Most of the literature has focused on medical management for patients with allergic rhinitis. Endoscopic Posterior Nasal neurectomy combined with mini inferior turbinoplasty has good overall significant improvement in nasal allergy symptom scores by 60-80%. Although no single modality has evolved as the gold standard for the surgical management of allergic rhinitis. The main stay of surgical intervention targets the inferior turbinate and posterior nasal nerve which is the parasympathetic supply to the nose causing rhinorrhea. This combined technique provides consistent, robust results with long-term relief of nasal symptoms due to allergic and vasomotor rhinitis without additional risk of complication.

The effects of resection of the peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerves in the inferior turbinate, with special focus on olfactory dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

There are few detailed studies about peripheral branch resection of the posterior nasal nerves in the inferior turbinate; thus, this study aimed to investigate this.

METHODS

Patients who underwent submucosal turbinoplasty with or without resection of the peripheral branches of posterior nasal nerves in the inferior turbinate were included.

RESULTS

The resection of the posterior nasal nerves with turbinoplasty significantly reduced detection and recognition thresholds on olfactory testing. The rhinorrhoea severity, detection threshold and recognition threshold were significantly lower after resection of the posterior nasal nerves with turbinoplasty than after turbinoplasty alone, although there were no significant differences between the two groups before surgery.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to show that the resection of the peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerves in the inferior turbinate with turbinoplasty more effectively inhibits allergic symptoms compared with turbinoplasty alone. It also showed that the resection of the peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerves can inhibit olfactory dysfunction.

Cryosurgical ablation for treatment of rhinitis: A prospective multicenter study

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of cryoablation of the posterior nasal nerve (PNN) for treatment of chronic rhinitis.

Methods

This was a prospective single‐arm trial of 98 adult patients at six U.S. centers with chronic allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. PNN cryoablation was performed in‐office under local anesthesia using a handheld device. Patients discontinued use of intranasal ipratropium 3 days prior to treatment and throughout the study period. Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was measured at pretreatment baseline and posttreatment at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months. The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) was completed at pretreatment and 3 months posttreatment. Adverse effects and postprocedure medication usage were recorded.

Results

Ninety‐eight procedures (100%) were successfully completed. rTNSS significantly improved over pretreatment baseline (6.1 ± 1.9) at 1 month (2.9 ± 1.9, P < 0.001), 3 months (3.0 ± 2.3, P < 0.001), 6 months (3.0 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), and 9 months (3.0 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) postprocedure. Nasal congestion and rhinorrhea subscores improved significantly at all time points (P < 0.001). Both allergic and nonallergic rhinitis subcohorts showed improvement (P < 0.001), with a comparable degree of improvement between groups. RQLQ significantly improved over pretreatment baseline (3.0 ± 1.0) at 3 months (1.5 ± 1.0, P < 0.001), and all RQLQ subdomains demonstrated improvement. Of 54 patients using intranasal medication at baseline, 19 (35.2%) were able to discontinue use. Twenty‐nine adverse effects were reported, including headache, epistaxis, and sinusitis.

Conclusion

Cryoablation of the PNN for chronic rhinitis is safe and can result in relief of nasal symptoms and improvements in quality of life.

Level of Evidence

4 Laryngoscope, 130: 1877–1884, 2020

Endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy

Background

Surgical techniques for resistant chronic rhinitis (rhinorrhoea) vary, ranging from vidian neurectomy to post-nasal neurectomy. The techniques vary mainly on the basis of instrumentation, and the avoidance of post-operative epistaxis, transient hypoesthesia of the soft palate and dryness of the eye. Endoscopic visualisation, and cauterisation or resection of posterior nasal nerve branches, can prevent such complications.

Method

The technique and surgical steps of endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy are presented.

Results

The critical steps include: bilateral sphenopalatine nerve blocks, transnasally or transorally via the greater palatine foramen; vertical incisions made behind the posterior fontanelle; and elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap. The sphenopalatine foramen and artery is identified. The posterior nasal nerve is located 4–5 mm inferior to the sphenopalatine artery, and is resected or cauterised. The flaps are repositioned back into place. No post-operative nasal packing is required. The same procedure is performed on the opposite side for effective results.

Conclusion

This technique provides consistent, robust results, with long-term relief of allergic and vasomotor rhinitis related nasal symptoms, without risk of complication.

Chinese Society of Allergy Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem that causes major illnesses and disabilities worldwide. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of AR has increased progressively over the last few decades in more developed countries and currently affects up to 40% of the population worldwide. Likewise, a rising trend of AR has also been observed over the last 2-3 decades in developing countries including China, with the prevalence of AR varying widely in these countries. A survey of self-reported AR over a 6-year period in the general Chinese adult population reported that the standardized prevalence of adult AR increased from 11.1% in 2005 to 17.6% in 2011. An increasing number of Journal Articles and imporclinical trials on the epidemiology, pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnosis, management and comorbidities of AR in Chinese subjects have been published in international peer-reviewed journals over the past 2 decades, and substantially added to our understanding of this disease as a global problem. Although guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AR in Chinese subjects have also been published, they have not been translated into English and therefore not generally accessible for reference to non-Chinese speaking international medical communities. Moreover, methods for the diagnosis and treatment of AR in China have not been standardized entirely and some patients are still treated according to regional preferences. Thus, the present guidelines have been developed by the Chinese Society of Allergy to be accessible to both national and international medical communities involved in the management of AR patients. These guidelines have been prepared in line with existing international guidelines to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of AR in China.

Surgical Management of Nonallergic Rhinitis

Nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) describes chronic symptoms of nasal congestion, obstruction, and rhinorrhea unrelated to a specific allergen based on skin or serum testing. Vasomotor rhinitis is the most frequent subtype of NAR. Although medical management is the first-line treatment of NAR, there is a role for surgical therapy when medications fail to improve symptoms. Surgical options for NAR include inferior turbinate reduction and botulinum toxin injection as well as more directed targeting of the autonomic nerve supply to the nasal cavity through vidian neurectomy, posterior nasal neurectomy, and cryoablation of the posterior nerve.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR.

CONCLUSION

This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.

Management of Intractable Nasal Hyperreactivity by Selective Resection of Posterior Nasal Nerve Branches

The posterior nasal nerves emerge from the sphenopalatine foramen and contain sensory and autonomic nerve components. Posterior nasal neurectomy is an effective method to remove pathological neural networks surrounding the inferior turbinate that cause unregulated nasal hypersensitivity with excess secretion in patients with severe allergic rhinitis (AR). We describe the sophisticated endoscopic surgical procedure that allows feasible access to the confined area and selective resection of the nerve branches with the preservation of the sphenopalatine artery (SPA). We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 23 symptomatic severe AR patients who failed to respond to standard medical treatment and underwent surgery. There have been no major complications after surgery including nasal bleeding or transient numbness of the upper teeth. The mean total nasal symptom scores (TNSS) were decreased by 70.2% at 12 months after the procedure. Our comparison of the clinical effectiveness based on the number of severed nerve branches revealed that the improvement of the TNSS was significantly higher in patients with >2 branches. We conclude that this minimally invasive technique that preserves the SPA is clinically useful and decreases the rate of postoperative complications. This trial is registered with UMIN000029025.

Cryosurgical posterior nasal tissue ablation for the treatment of rhinitis

Background

Endoscopic posterior nasal nerve (PNN) resection has been described as an efficacious surgical treatment of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, but the requirement for surgery under general anesthesia has limited its acceptance. We report the first series of patients treated for chronic rhinitis using a novel device designed for office‐based cryosurgical ablation of the PNN.

Methods

Twenty‐seven patients with chronic rhinorrhea and/or nasal congestion for >3 months were recruited (allergic or nonallergic rhinitis), with minimum rhinorrhea and/or congestion subscores of 2 as part of the Total Nasal Symptom Score [TNSS]). Under local anesthesia, the cryotherapy device was applied endoscopically to the posterior middle meatus and was used to freeze the PNN region bilaterally. Patients were followed up after 7, 30, 90, 180, and 365 days to assess TNSS.

Results

The procedure was successfully completed in 100% of patients, with no complications; 74% reported no or mild discomfort by the first postprocedure day. TNSS was reduced significantly at 30 days (mean ± standard deviation: 6.2 ± 0.5 at baseline, 2.6 ± 0.3 at 30 days, n = 27, p < 0.001), with continued reduction at 90 (2.7 ± 0.4, n = 24, p < 0.001), 180 (2.3 ± 0.5, n = 21, p < 0.001), and 365 days (1.9 ± 0.3, n = 15, p < 0.001). Both rhinorrhea and congestion subscores decreased significantly at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Allergic and nonallergic subcohorts both appeared to benefit from treatment.

Conclusion

Office‐based cryotherapy of the PNN region is safe and well tolerated. Symptom scores were significantly decreased by 7 days postprocedure and remained lower at 30, 90, 180, and 365 days.

Original study. Effectiveness of endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy for the treatment of intractable rhinitis

BACKGROUND. Chronic rhinitis is a clinical condition affecting more than 20% of the world population. The standard treatment strategy is medical. Surgical management can be considered in patients with intractable rhinitis. Various surgical techniques have been documented with varying success rates, but none of them is considered as a gold standard. Hence, we are studying the effectiveness of posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) in patients who have intractable rhinitis, refractory to maximum medical therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. A prospective study was conducted in the ENT Department, Padmavathy Medical Foundation, Kollam, Kerala, India, from January 2015 to February 2016. Adult patients, in the age group of 20 to 60 years, diagnosed with chronic rhinitis, presenting two or more symptoms of rhinitis, refractory to maximum medical therapy for a period of at least 3 or more years and whose quality of life was significantly affected were enrolled and PNN was done for them.

RESULTS. We observed a statistically significant improvement in subjective symptoms and patient quality of life at the end of 6 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSION. PNN is a safe and less invasive procedure, which can provide a significant relief in symptoms of intractable rhinitis. Fewer complications and better results make it superior over vidian neurectomy.

The effect of compound nasal surgery on obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

BACKGROUND

Nasal surgery often fails to ameliorate the symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). We developed a compound nasal surgery (CNS) method that consists of septoplasty combined with submucosal inferior turbinectomy and posterior nasal neurectomy to ensure low nasal resistance during sleep.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the effect of CNS on OSAS, pre- and postoperative changes in sleep-related events were studied by using polysomnography, the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), the visual analog scale for snoring, and health-related quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients with OSAS and with nasal problems underwent CNS. Three months later, the postoperative effect on OSAS was assessed by using polysomnography findings, daytime sleepiness by the ESS, nasal allergy symptoms, and health-related QOL. Snoring was assessed by the family by using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The indices of apnea, apnea-hypopnea, oxygen desaturation, and arousal; the ESS; allergic symptom score; health-related QOL; and snoring on a visual analog scale were all significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

CNS improves OSAS events without any pharyngeal surgical procedure in selected patients. If high nasal resistance associated with OSAS is present, then CNS should thus be considered.

Denervation of nasal mucosa induced by posterior nasal neurectomy suppresses nasal secretion, not hypersensitivity, in an allergic rhinitis rat model

The posterior nasal nerve is the dominant source of the parasympathetic, sympathetic, and sensory fibers that innervate the nasal respiratory mucosa. Therefore, a posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) is thought to induce denervation of the nasal mucosa and relieve the nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis. However, the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic action of PNN remain unknown. To investigate the impact of PNN-induced denervation of the nasal mucosa on allergic rhinitis, we developed a rat model of PNN and examined the effects of PNN on allergic rhinitis in ovalbumin-sensitized rats. This rat model of PNN was characterized by the depletion of nerve fibers, choline acetyltransferase, and neuropeptides (eg, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and neuropeptide Y) in the nasal respiratory mucosa. These animals exhibited nasal gland and goblet cell hypertrophy in the septal mucosa and atrophy of the submucosal gland in the lateral nasal wall, as well as reduced nasal secretion due to deficient acetylcholine synthesis. In an ovalbumin-sensitized model of allergic rhinitis, PNN also induced the depletion of nerve fibers, choline acetyltransferase, and neuropeptides in the nasal mucosa and suppressed nasal secretion. However, PNN did not affect mucosal thickening, eosinophil and mast cell infiltration, interleukin-4 and interferon-γ mRNA expression, and allergic symptoms (ie, sneezing and nasal scratching). These results suggest that the peripheral nerves and corresponding neuropeptides regulate nasal secretion, but not hypersensitivity, in allergic rhinitis, and that allergic rhinitis-related mucosal reactions occur in a highly denervated mucosa after PNN. Posterior nasal neurectomy may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of hyperrhinorrhea, but not allergic rhinitis hypersensitivity.

A systematic review of the evidence base for vidian neurectomy in managing rhinitis

Background:

Vidian neurectomy has been proposed as a surgical option for rhinitis refractory to medical treatment. However, the evidence base for its benefit remains controversial.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed. Studies reporting original data on patients with rhinitis treated by vidian neurectomy were included. Patient-reported outcome measures were the primary outcome investigated; specific peri-operative morbidities were the secondary outcome.

Results:

A total of 1012 articles fulfilled the search criteria, 32 of which were included in the study. Patient-reported outcome measures were compared before and after surgery in eight studies. There were 529 patients represented in these trials. Significant improvement in rhinorrhoea was reported in all eight studies. Temporary dry eyes was reported in 24.63 per cent of cases (272 out of 1104 cases). There was no report of cranial nerve deficit or eye movement disturbance.

Conclusion:

Endoscopic vidian neurectomy does have a role in the surgical management of refractory rhinitis, particularly in patients with non-allergic rhinitis, but a well-designed cohort trial would be advantageous to clarify long-term outcomes.

Surgical Management of Vasomotor Rhinitis: A Systematic Review

Background

Vasomotor rhinitis (VMR) is one of the most prevalent forms of nonallergic rhinitis. In the past, when maximal medical therapy failed, surgical options were limited. Vidian neurectomy (VN) was one option; however, it was fraught with complications and limited success. The advent of endoscopic sinus surgery revitalized interest in surgical procedures for VMR. This study was designed to review the available literature and assess the safety and efficacy of surgery on the vidian and posterior nasal nerves for treatment of VMR and when possible, compare the different approaches to one another in regard to safety and efficacy.

Methods

A systematic review was performed of English language articles using Ovid and PubMed. Search terms included “endoscopic vidian neurectomy,” “vidian neurectomy,” “endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy” (EPNN), and “posterior nasal neurectomy.” Only clinical trials performed on humans with safety and or efficacy data were included. Independent extraction of articles by two authors using predefined data fields was performed. Safety defined by complication rates and efficacy defined as objective improvement on outcomes scores along with the overall length of benefit were the primary measures of treatment effect. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement for reporting systematic reviews was followed.

Results

In comparison with open VN, endoscopic techniques were not associated with any long-term sequelae. Rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction were shown to improve after endoscopic VN (EVN) and the benefits were maintained for several years after surgery.

Conclusion

EVN is well tolerated, safe, and effective in a majority of patients. Overall, the literature has shown that the endoscopic approach is associated with less morbidity than the traditional transantral approach. Currently, no literature exists on the effect of EPNN in patients with vasomotor rhinitis and further study is needed to elucidate the efficacy of this procedure in this subset of patients.

Endoscopic microdebrider-assisted inferior turbinoplasty with and without posterior nasal neurectomy

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic microdebrider-assisted inferior turbinoplasty (EMAIT) has been recognized as an efficient surgical technique in the management of hypertrophied inferior turbinate. In an attempt to further increase surgical successful outcomes, posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) was developed. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to assess the position of PNN in the surgery of hypertrophied turbinate.

METHODS

Seventy patients were assigned to the two treatment groups: Group A (EMAIT) and Group B (EMAIT and PNN). Subjective outcomes were represented by symptom score and quality of life scores (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire - RQLQ). Objective outcomes were nasal resistance, saccharin transit time and acoustic rhinometry parameters.

RESULTS

The survey demonstrated that symptoms and objective parameters improved postoperatively in both groups, with no statistical significant differences in objective and subjective outcomes between the surgical groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of PNN appears to offer no additional benefit in the subjective and objective outcome related with surgery of hypertrophied inferior turbinate. However, longer follow-up studies and larger number of patients are required in order to validate our results.