Bridging the lab to field divide: Advancing oil spill biological effects models requires revisiting aquatic toxicity testing

Mind the gap - Relevant design for laboratory oil exposure of fish as informed by a numerical impact assessment model

Laboratory experiments provide knowledge of species-specific effects thresholds that are used to parameterize impact assessment models of oil contamination on marine ecosystems. Such experiments typically place individuals of species and life stages in tanks with different contaminant concentrations. Exposure concentrations are usually fixed, and the individuals experience a shock treatment being moved from clean water directly into contaminated water and then back to clean water. In this study, we use a coupled numerical model that simulates ocean currents and state, oil dispersal and fate, and early life stages of fish to quantify oil exposure histories, specifically addressing oil spill scenarios of high rates and long durations. By including uptake modelling we also investigate the potential of buffering transient high peaks in exposure. Our simulation results are the basis for a recommendation on the design of laboratory experiments to improve impact assessment model development and parameterization. We recommend an exposure profile with three main phases: i) a gradual increase in concentration, ii) a transient peak that is well above the subsequent level, and iii) a plateau of fixed concentration lasting ∼3 days. In addition, a fourth phase with a slow decrease may be added.

Effects of aromatic hydrocarbons and evaluation of oil toxicity modelling for larvae of a tropical coral

Application of oil toxicity modelling for assessing the risk of spills to coral reefs remains uncertain due to a lack of data for key tropical species and environmental conditions. In this study, larvae of the coral Acropora millepora were exposed to six aromatic hydrocarbons individually to generate critical target lipid body burdens (CTLBBs). Larval metamorphosis was inhibited by all six aromatic hydrocarbons, while larval survival was only affected at concentrations >2000 μg L-1. The derived metamorphosis CTLBB of 9.7 μmol g-1 octanol indicates larvae are more sensitive than adult corals, and places A. millepora larvae among the most sensitive organisms in the target lipid model (TLM) databases. Larvae were also more sensitive to anthracene and pyrene when co-exposed to ecologically relevant levels of ultraviolet radiation. The results suggest that the application of the phototoxic TLM would be protective of A. millepora larvae, provided adequate chemical and light data are available.

Changes in Temperature Alter the Toxicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds to American Lobster (Homarus americanus) Larvae

Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) present in the water column are considered to be one of the primary contaminant groups contributing to the toxicity of a crude oil spill. Because crude oil is a complex mixture composed of thousands of different compounds, oil spill models rely on quantitative structure-activity relationships like the target lipid model to predict the effects of crude oil exposure on aquatic life. These models rely on input provided by single species toxicity studies, which remain insufficient. Although the toxicity of select PACs has been well studied, there is little data available for many, including transformation products such as oxidized hydrocarbons. In addition, the effect of environmental influencing factors such as temperature on PAC toxicity is a wide data gap. In response to these needs, in the present study, Stage I lobster larvae were exposed to six different understudied PACs (naphthalene, fluorenone, methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene, dibenzothiophene, and fluoranthene) at three different relevant temperatures (10, 15, and 20 °C) all within the biological norms for the species during summer when larval releases occur. Lobster larvae were assessed for immobilization as a sublethal effect and mortality following 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of exposure. Higher temperatures increased the rate at which immobilization and mortality were observed for each of the compounds tested and also altered the predicted critical target lipid body burden, incipient median lethal concentration, and elimination rate. Our results demonstrate that temperature has an important influence on PAC toxicity for this species and provides critical data for oil spill modeling. More studies are needed so oil spill models can be appropriately calibrated and to improve their predictive ability. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:2389-2399. © 2023 SETAC.

Recommendations for advancing media preparation methods used to assess aquatic hazards of oils and spill response agents

Laboratory preparation of aqueous test media is a critical step in developing toxicity information needed for oil spill response decision-making. Multiple methods have been used to prepare physically and chemically dispersed oils which influence test outcome, interpretation, and utility for hazard assessment and modeling. This paper aims to review media preparation strategies, highlight advantages and limitations, provide recommendations for improvement, and promote the standardization of methods to better inform assessment and modeling. A benefit of media preparation methods for oil that rely on low to moderate mixing energy coupled with a variable dilution design is that the dissolved oil composition of the water accommodation fraction (WAF) stock is consistent across diluted treatments.  Further, analyses that support exposure confirmation maybe reduced and reflect dissolved oil exposures that are bioavailable and amenable to toxicity modeling.  Variable loading tests provide a range of dissolved oil compositions that require analytical verification at each oil loading. Regardless of test design, a preliminary study is recommended to optimize WAF mixing and settling times to achieve equilibrium between oil and test media. Variable dilution tests involving chemical dispersants (CEWAF) or high energy mixing (HEWAF) can increase dissolved oil exposures in treatment dilutions due to droplet dissolution when compared to WAFs. In contrast, HEWAF/CEWAFs generated using variable oil loadings are expected to provide dissolved oil exposures more comparable to WAFs. Preparation methods that provide droplet oil exposures should be environmentally relevant and informed by oil droplet concentrations, compositions, sizes, and exposure durations characteristic of field spill scenarios. Oil droplet generators and passive dosing techniques offer advantages for delivering controlled constant or dynamic dissolved exposures and larger volumes of test media for toxicity testing. Adoption of proposed guidance for improving media preparation methods will provide greater comparability and utility of toxicity testing in oil spill response and assessment.

Recommendations for the advancement of oil-in-water media and source oil characterization in aquatic toxicity test studies

During toxicity testing, chemical analyses of oil and exposure media samples are needed to allow comparison of results between different tests as well as to assist with identification of the drivers and mechanisms for the toxic effects observed. However, to maximize the ability to compare results between different laboratories and biota, it has long been recognized that guidelines for standard protocols were needed. In 2005, the Chemical Response to Oil Spills: Ecological Effects Research Forum (CROSERF) protocol was developed with existing common analytical methods that described a standard method for reproducible preparation of exposure media as well as recommended specific analytical methods and analyte lists for comparative toxicity testing. At the time, the primary purpose for the data collected was to inform oil spill response and contingency planning. Since then, with improvements in both analytical equipment and methods, the use of toxicity data has expanded to include their integration into fate and effect models that aim to extend the applicability of lab-based study results to make predictions for field system-level impacts. This paper focuses on providing a summary of current chemical analyses for characterization of oil and exposure media used during aquatic toxicity testing and makes recommendations for the minimum analyses needed to allow for interpretation and modeling purposes.

Improving the design and conduct of aquatic toxicity studies with oils based on 20 years of CROSERF experience

Laboratory toxicity testing is a key tool used in oil spill science, spill effects assessment, and mitigation strategy decisions to minimize environmental impacts. A major consideration in oil toxicity testing is how to replicate real-world spill conditions, oil types, weathering states, receptor organisms, and modifying environmental factors under laboratory conditions. Oils and petroleum-derived products are comprised of thousands of compounds with different physicochemical and toxicological properties, and this leads to challenges in conducting and interpreting oil toxicity studies. Experimental methods used to mix oils with aqueous test media have been shown to influence the aqueous-phase hydrocarbon composition and concentrations, hydrocarbon phase distribution (i.e., dissolved phase versus in oil droplets), and the stability of oil:water solutions which, in turn, influence the bioavailability and toxicity of the oil containing media. Studies have shown that differences in experimental methods can lead to divergent test results. Therefore, it is imperative to standardize the methods used to prepare oil:water solutions in order to improve the realism and comparability of laboratory tests. The CROSERF methodology, originally published in 2005, was developed as a standardized method to prepare oil:water solutions for testing and evaluating dispersants and dispersed oil. However, it was found equally applicable for use in testing oil-derived petroleum substances. The goals of the current effort were to: (1) build upon two decades of experience to update existing CROSERF guidance for conducting aquatic toxicity tests and (2) to improve the design of laboratory toxicity studies for use in hazard evaluation and development of quantitative effects models that can then be applied in spill assessment. Key experimental design considerations discussed include species selection (standard vs field collected), test substance (single compound vs whole oil), exposure regime (static vs flow-through) and duration, exposure metrics, toxicity endpoints, and quality assurance and control.

Advances to the CROSERF protocol to improve oil spill response decision making

The Chemical Response to Oil Spills: Ecological Effects Research Forum (CROSERF) created a standardized protocol for comparing the toxicity of physically dispersed oil versus chemically dispersed oil to address environmental concerns related to the proposed use of dispersants in the early 2000s. Since then, many revisions have been made to the original protocol to diversify the intended use of the data generated, incorporate emerging technologies, and to examine a wider range of oil types including non-conventional oils and fuels. Under the Multi-Partner Research Initiative (MPRI) for oil spill research under Canada's Oceans Protection Plan (OPP), a network of 45 participants from seven countries representing government, industry, non-profit, private, and academic sectors was established to identify the current state of the science and formulate a series of recommendations to modernize the oil toxicity testing framework. The participants formed a series of working groups, targeting specific aspects of oil toxicity testing, including: experimental conduct; media preparation; phototoxicity; analytical chemistry; reporting and communicating results; interpreting toxicity data; and appropriate integration of toxicity data to improve oil spill effects models. The network participants reached a consensus that a modernized protocol to assess the aquatic toxicity of oil should be sufficiently flexible to address a broad range of research questions in a 'fit-for-purpose' manner, where methods and approaches are driven by the need to generate scientifically-defensible data to address specific study objectives. Considering the many needs and varied objectives of aquatic toxicity tests currently being conducted to support and inform oil spill response decision making, it was also concluded that the development of a one size fits all approach would not be feasible.

Recommendations for advancing test protocols examining the photo-induced toxicity of petroleum and polycyclic aromatic compounds

Photo-induced toxicity of petroleum products and polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) is the enhanced toxicity caused by their interaction with ultraviolet radiation and occurs by two distinct mechanisms: photosensitization and photomodification. Laboratory approaches for designing, conducting, and reporting of photo-induced toxicity studies are reviewed and recommended to enhance the original Chemical Response to Oil Spills: Ecological Research Forum (CROSERF) protocols which did not address photo-induced toxicity. Guidance is provided on conducting photo-induced toxicity tests, including test species, endpoints, experimental design and dosing, light sources, irradiance measurement, chemical characterization, and data reporting. Because of distinct mechanisms, aspects of photosensitization (change in compound energy state) and photomodification (change in compound structure) are addressed separately, and practical applications in laboratory and field studies and advances in predictive modeling are discussed. One goal for developing standardized testing protocols is to support lab-to-field extrapolations, which in the case of petroleum substances often requires a modeling framework to account for differential physicochemical properties of the constituents. Recommendations are provided to promote greater standardization of laboratory studies on photo-induced toxicity, thus facilitating comparisons across studies and generating data needed to improve models used in oil spill science.

Adopting a toxic unit model paradigm in design, analysis and interpretation of oil toxicity testing

The lack of a conceptual understanding and unifying quantitative framework to guide conduct and interpretation of laboratory oil toxicity tests, has led investigators to divergent conclusions that can confuse stakeholders and impede sound decision-making. While a plethora of oil toxicity studies are available and continue to be published, due to differences in experimental design, results between studies often cannot be compared. Furthermore, much resulting data fails to advance quantitative effect models that are critically needed for oil spill risk and impact assessments. This paper discusses the challenges posed when evaluating oil toxicity test data based on traditional, total concentration-based exposure metrics and offers solutions for improving the state of practice by adopting a unifying toxic unit (TU) model framework. Key advantages of a TU framework is that differences in test oil composition, sensitivity of the test organism/endpoint, and toxicity test design (i.e., type of test) can be taken into quantitative account in predicting aquatic toxicity. This paradigm shift is intended to bridge the utility of laboratory oil toxicity tests with improved assessment of effects in the field. To illustrate these advantages, results from literature studies are reassessed and contrasted with conclusions obtained based on past practice. Using instructive examples, model results are presented to explain how dissolved oil composition and concentrations and resulting TUs vary in WAFs prepared using variable loading or dilution test designs and the important role that unmeasured oil components contribute to predicted oil toxicity. Model results are used to highlight how the TU framework can serve as a valuable aid in designing and interpreting empirical toxicity tests and provide the data required to validate/refine predictive toxicity models. To further promote consistent exposure and hazard assessment of physically and chemically dispersed oil toxicity tests recommendations for advancing the TU framework are presented.