Is There Still a Role for Irrigation and Debridement With Liner Exchange in Acute Periprosthetic Total Knee Infection?

Success rate of single versus multiple debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to compare outcomes between multiple and single debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures for early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in hip and knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Four databases were searched from inception till January 2024 for original studies investigating the outcomes of multiple DAIR in hip and knee PJI. The primary outcome was the success rate in eradicating joint infection. This review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 9 observational studies with 1104 participants were included, with a mean age and BMI of 58.37 years (95%CI: 25.77-90.98) and 31.43 kg/m2 (95%CI: 28.89-34.98), respectively. The mean follow-up period was 58.37 months (95%CI: 25.77-90.98), and the average MINORS score assigned to the review was 17.6 ± 3.46, indicating a low overall risk of bias. An equivalent success rate between single and double DAIR was observed, at 67% (95%CI: 64-71%) and 70% (95%CI: 48-86%), respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities (p = 0.740). Additionally, the success rate for triple DAIR ranged from 50 to 60%.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that double DAIR is a valid treatment option for acute PJI after TKA and THA, with a success rate comparable to single DAIR (70% vs. 67%, p = 0.740). Triple DAIR achieved success rates ranging from 50 to 60%. However, caution is warranted when interpreting these results due to heterogeneity in host comorbidity factors, DAIR protocols, and antibiotic regimens.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

Effects of Vancomycin/Tobramycin-Doped Ceramic Composite (Polyvinyl Alcohol Composite-Vancomycin/Tobramycin-Polymeric Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate) in a Rat Femur Model Implanted With Contaminated Porous Titanium Cylinders

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains common and problematic. We hypothesized that using a bioceramic that provided rapid release of the antibiotics (vancomycin [VAN] or VAN and tobramycin [VAN and TOB]) from a polyvinyl-alcohol-composite (PVA) combined with a delayed and sustained antibiotic release from polymeric-dicalcium-phosphate-dihydrate (PDCPD) ceramic would inhibit S. aureus-associated implant infections.

METHODS

A total of 50 male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into 5 groups-I: negative control; II: bacteria only; III: bacteria + saline wash; IV: bacteria + PVA-VAN-PDCPD, and V: bacteria + PVA-VAN-TOB-PDCPD. A porous titanium (Ti) implant was press-fit into the rat knee. S. aureus-containing broth was added into the joint space creating a PJI. After 1 week, the joints from groups III to V were washed with saline and the fluid collected for bacterial quantification. This was followed by saline irrigation treatment (groups III to V) and application of the antibiotic-loaded PVA-PDCPD bioceramic (groups IV and V). On day 21, joint fluid was collected, and the implants harvested for bacterial quantification.

RESULTS

No bacteria were isolated from the negative control (group I). The positive control (group II) was positive on both days 7 and 21. Bacteria were still present on day 21 in the fluid and implant in group III. Groups (IV and V) showed a decrease in the bacterial burden in the fluid and implant on day 21. There were significant differences in bacteria levels in the collected wash fluid and on the implant at day 21 between the saline wash (group III) and treatment groups (IV and V).

CONCLUSIONS

In this animal model of acute periprosthetic infection, treatment with PVA-VAN-PDCPD and PVA-VAN/TOB-PDCPD reduced bacterial load in the infected joint and the infected Ti implant. Application of PVA-VAN-PDCPD and/or PVA-VAN/TOB-PDCPD after saline irrigation could be used as an addition to the treatment of PJI.

Enhanced antibiofilm potential of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine in a rat model of periprosthetic joint infection

Aims

Although low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) combined with disinfectants has been shown to effectively eliminate portions of biofilm in vitro, its efficacy in vivo remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the antibiofilm potential and safety of LIPUS combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine (PI) in a rat debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) model of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

A total of 56 male Sprague-Dawley rats were established in acute PJI models by intra-articular injection of bacteria. The rats were divided into four groups: a Control group, a 0.35% PI group, a LIPUS and saline group, and a LIPUS and 0.35% PI group. All rats underwent DAIR, except for Control, which underwent a sham procedure. General status, serum biochemical markers, weightbearing analysis, radiographs, micro-CT analysis, scanning electron microscopy of the prostheses, microbiological analysis, macroscope, and histopathology evaluation were performed 14 days after DAIR.

Results

The group with LIPUS and 0.35% PI exhibited decreased levels of serum biochemical markers, improved weightbearing scores, reduced reactive bone changes, absence of viable bacteria, and decreased inflammation compared to the Control group. Despite the greater antibiofilm activity observed in the PI group compared to the LIPUS and saline group, none of the monotherapies were successful in preventing reactive bone changes or eliminating the infection.

Conclusion

In the rat model of PJI treated with DAIR, LIPUS combined with 0.35% PI demonstrated stronger antibiofilm potential than monotherapy, without impairing any local soft-tissue.

Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study

PURPOSE

Bacterial biofilms create a challenge in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and failure to eradicate biofilms is often implicated in the high rates of recurrence. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of a novel nanoparticle ultrasonication technology on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm eradication compared to commonly used orthopedic irrigation solutions.

METHODS

Twenty-four sterile, titanium alloy discs were inoculated with a standardized concentration of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and cultured for seven days to allow for biofilm formation. Discs were then treated with either ultrasonicated nanoparticle therapy or irrigation with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine or normal saline. The remaining bacteria on each surface was subsequently plated for colony-forming units of S. aureus. Bacterial eradication was reported as a decrease in CFUs relative to the control group. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare between groups.

RESULTS

Treatment with ultrasonicated nanoparticles resulted in a significant mean decrease in CFUs of 99.3% compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Irrigation with povidone-iodine also resulted in a significant 77.5% reduction in CFUs compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Comparisons between ultrasonicated nanoparticles and povidone-iodine demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in bacterial CFUs in the nanoparticle group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonicated nanoparticle were superior to commonly used bactericidal irrigation solutions in the eradication of S. aureus from a titanium surface. Future clinical studies are warranted to evaluate this ultrsonication technology in the treatment of PJI.

Current Status and Perspectives of Diagnosis and Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a catastrophic complication following joint replacement surgery, posing significant challenges to orthopedic surgeons. Due to the lack of a definitive diagnostic gold standard, timely treatment initiation is problematic, resulting in substantial economic burdens on patients and society. In this review, we thoroughly analyze the complexities of PJI and emphasize the importance of accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. The article specifically focuses on the advancements in diagnostic techniques, ranging from traditional pathogen culture to advanced molecular diagnostics, and discusses their role in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, we review the latest surgical management strategies, including everything from debridement to revision surgeries. Our summary aims to provide practical information for the diagnosis and treatment of PJI and encourages further research to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Application of the New Irrigation Protocol to Reduce Recurrence Rate in the Management Of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

OBJECTIVE

Irrigation is a conventional treatment for acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, there has been no unified standard for irrigation during surgery for PJI in the past, and the efficacy is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to create a new irrigation protocol to enhance the infection control rate and reduce the postoperative recurrence rate of PJI patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution retrospective review with a total of 56 patients who underwent revision total hip or knee arthroplasties due to PJI from January 2011 to January 2022. Conventional irrigation (CI) was used in 32 cases, and standard operating procedure of irrigation (SOPI) was used in 24. The CI protocol carries out an empirical irrigation after debridement, which is quite random. Our SOPI protocol clearly stipulates the soaking concentration and time of hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine. The irrigation is carried out three times, and tissue samples are taken from multiple parts before and after irrigation, which are sent for microbial culture. The important statistical indicators were the rate of positive microbiological culture and postoperative recurrence rate with an average follow-up of 24 average months.

RESULTS

The drainage volume was lower in the SOPI group than in the CI group on postoperative day 3 (p < 0.01) and 7 (p = 0.016). In addition, the percentage of positive microbiological cultures after the third irrigation was less than that before (p < 0.01) and after (p < 0.01) the first irrigation. The most common causative organism was Staphylococcus aureus, which was detected in 25.0% and 12.5% of the SOPI and CI groups, respectively. The failure rate at the final follow-up was 8.3% and 31.3% (p = 0.039) for the SOPI and CI groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the traditional CI method, SOPI standardized the soaking time of hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine, increased the frequency of and irrigation, and proved that microorganisms were almost completely removed through the microbial culture of multiple tissues. SOPI has the potential to become a standardized irrigation process worthy of promotion, effectively reducing the postoperative recurrence rate of PJI patients.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of extended duration cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation for treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections

Effective treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections (IAIs) remains a clinical challenge. The in vitro and in vivo studies presented herein evaluated the antimicrobial effects of applying cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation (CVCES) to titanium implants inoculated with preformed bacterial biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The in vitro studies showed that combining vancomycin therapy (500 µg/mL) with application of CVCES at -1.75 V (all voltages are with respect to Ag/AgCl unless otherwise stated) for 24 h resulted in 99.98% reduction in the coupon-associated MRSA colony-forming units (CFUs) (3.38 × 103 vs. 2.14 × 107 CFU/mL, p < 0.001) and a 99.97% reduction in the planktonic CFU (4.04 × 104 vs. 1.26 × 108 CFU/mL, p < 0.001) as compared with the no treatment control samples. The in vivo studies utilized a rodent model of MRSA IAIs and showed a combination of vancomycin therapy (150 mg/kg twice daily) with CVCES of -1.75 V for 24 h had significant reductions in the implant associated CFU (1.42 × 101 vs. 1.2 × 106 CFU/mL, p < 0.003) and bone CFU (5.29 × 101 vs. 4.48 × 106 CFU/mL, p < 0.003) as compared with the untreated control animals. Importantly, the combined 24 h CVCES and antibiotic treatments resulted in no implant-associated MRSA CFU enumerated in 83% of the animals (five out of six animals) and no bone-associated MRSA CFU enumerated in 50% of the animals (three out of six animals). Overall, the outcomes of this study have shown that extended duration CVCES therapy is an effective adjunctive therapy to eradicate IAIs.

Early Staphylococcal Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) Treated with Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR): Inferior Outcomes in Patients with Staphylococci Resistant to Rifampicin

It is unknown how rifampicin resistance in staphylococci causing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) affects outcomes after debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). We thus aimed to compare the risk of relapse in DAIR-treated early PJI caused by staphylococci with or without rifampicin resistance. In total, 81 patients affected by early PJI were included, and all patients were treated surgically with DAIR. This was repeated if needed. The endpoint of relapse-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression models were fitted to assess the risk of infection relapse for patients infected with rifampicin-resistant bacteria, adjusted for age, sex, type of joint, and type of index surgery. In patients with rifampicin-resistant staphylococci, relapse was seen in 80% after one DAIR procedure and in 70% after two DAIR procedures. In patients with rifampicin-sensitive bacteria, 51% had an infection relapse after one DAIR procedure and 33% had an infection relapse after two DAIR procedures. Patients with rifampicin-resistant staphylococcal PJI thus had an increased adjusted risk of infection relapse of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1-3.6, p = 0.04) after one DAIR procedure compared to patients with rifampicin-sensitive bacteria and a 4.1-fold (95% CI: 1.2-14.1, p = 0.03) increase in risk of infection relapse after two DAIR procedures. Staphylococcal resistance to rifampicin is associated with inferior outcomes after DAIR. These findings suggest that DAIR may not be a useful strategy in early PJI caused by rifampicin-resistant staphylococci.

Outcomes in revision knee arthroplasty: Preventing reoperation for infection Keynote lecture - BASK annual congress 2023

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients have a lower survival rate and lower post-surgical outcomes compared to primary TKA patients. Infection and aseptic loosening are the most common reasons for revision and re-revision TKAs, with infection accounting for nearly half of re-revision cases. To prevent infection, patient optimization addressing obesity, diabetes, malnutrition, and smoking cessation is crucial. Advancements in irrigation solutions, antibiotic-impregnated bone fillers, bacteriophage therapy, and electrochemical therapy hold promise for preventing infection. Technical strategies such as obtaining sufficient component fixation, joint line restoration, and using robot assistance may improve revision TKA outcomes. As the burden of revision TKA continues to rise, substantial efforts remain for mitigating future revision TKAs and their associated complications.

Principles of mechanical and chemical debridement with implant retention

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most common causes of early revision for total hip and knee arthroplasty. Mechanical and chemical debridement typically referred to as debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) can be a successful technique to eradicate PJI in acute postoperative or acute hematogenous infections. This review will focus specifically on the indications, techniques, and outcomes of DAIR.

DISCUSSION

The success of mechanical and chemical debridement, or a DAIR operation, is reliant on a combination of appropriate patient selection and meticulous technique. There are many technical considerations to take into consideration. One of the most important factors in the success of the DAIR procedure is the adequacy of mechanical debridement. Techniques are surgeon-specific and perhaps contribute to the large variability in the literature on the success of DAIR. Factors that have been shown to be associated with success include the exchange of modular components, performing the procedure within seven days or less of symptom onset, and possibly adjunctive rifampin or fluoroquinolone therapy, though this remains controversial. Factors that have been associated with failure include rheumatoid arthritis, age greater than 80 years, male sex, chronic renal failure, liver cirrhosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

CONCLUSIONS

DAIR is an effective treatment option for the management of an acute postoperative or hematogenous PJI in the appropriately selected patient with well-fixed implants.

Pseudogout After Total Knee Arthroplasty Meeting Minor Criteria for Infection Treated by Polyethylene Exchange

Case

Pseudogout in a total joint arthroplasty is rare and can be difficult to distinguish from a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). In this unique case, we present a patient who developed her first episode of pseudogout 17 years after her primary total knee arthroplasty at age 75.

Conclusion

With similar clinical and laboratory findings, it is important to distinguish the presence of PJI and inflammatory arthropathy. The use of diagnostic tools available, consideration of patient co-morbidities, and timing of symptoms can help guide surgeons' treatment.

Empiric antibiotic therapy in early periprosthetic joint infection: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee or total hip arthroplasty (TKA/THA). Appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment, initiated directly after debridement and implant retention (DAIR), is suggested to contribute to treatment success. The aim of this study was to describe the microbiology and the antibiotic susceptibility in early PJI to guide future empiric treatment in a region with a low incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent DAIR within 3 months after primary unilateral TKA or THA between January 2011 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified from the hospital electronic health records. Data on causative pathogens, antimicrobial susceptibility and the number of post-operative days until cultures demonstrated bacterial growth were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven early PJIs were identified of which 65 (59%) were monomicrobial and 46 (41%) polymicrobial. Among all isolated pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus (n = 53; 29%) was the most commonly identified pathogen in early PJI without any involvement of MRSA. 72% of PJIs were susceptible to vancomycin which could be increased to around 90% by adding gram-negative coverage. On the 5th postoperative day, bacterial growth was observed in 98% of cases. All gram-negative bacteria demonstrated positive tissue cultures on the 4th postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin combined with ciprofloxacin or a third generation cephalosporin provided the highest antimicrobial coverage of all responsible pathogens identified in early PJI. Empiric treatment of gram-negative treatment can be safely terminated in the absence of gram-negative pathogens after 4 days of culturing in cases without preoperative antibiotic treatment.

Redo DAIR: The Game Is Seldom Worth the Candle

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) remains a commonly utilized technique in the treatment of acute prosthetic joint infections despite its inconsistent outcomes. The performance of a second DAIR after a failed first debridement is controversial as outcomes are uncertain and the final prognosis in the event of failure may be unfavorable. This study analyzes 84 cases of acute prosthetic (hip & knee) joint infection treated with DAIR between 2011 and 2020 at the same institution. In 12 failed cases, a second DAIR was performed, whose success rate was significantly lower than that of the first procedure (8% [95% CI, 0-38] vs. 57% [46-68]). Moreover, the ultimate outcome of the second failed DAIRs was unfavorable with eradication of the infection being achieved in none of the patients. Due to the high likelihood of failure and the potentially grim final prognosis following a second debridement, removal of the components should be considered.

Common Wound Irrigation Solutions Produce Different Responses in Infected vs Sterile Host Tissue: Murine Air Pouch Infection Model

Background

Despite desirable microbicidal actions of irrigation solutions in surgical site infection treatment, several studies demonstrate potential cytotoxic effects. This study investigated tissue damage caused by irrigation solutions in the presence or absence of infection.

Methods

Air pouches were created in 60 mice and evenly divided into 2 groups as infected with Staphylococcus aureus and control. Groups were then subdivided both by type of solution and by timing after irrigation. Solutions included control (0.9% saline), bacitracin (33 IU/ml), 0.2% sodium oxychlorosene, 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 0.013% benzalkonium chloride.

Results

Inflammation decreased in infected pouches compared to the sterile ones for all solutions except bacitracin on day 0 and for all on day 7. On day 0, infected pouches had increased necrosis with bacitracin (P = .006), chlorhexidine gluconate (P = .18), and benzalkonium chloride (P = .07); on day 7, there was decreased necrosis in infected pouches for all solutions (P < .05) except for sodium oxychlorosene (P = .18). Edema decreased in infected pouches on day 0 for all solutions. On day 7, infected pouches had decreased edema with 0.9% saline, bacitracin, and benzalkonium chloride (P < .05) and increased edema with chlorhexidine gluconate (P < .05) and sodium oxychlorosene (P = .069). Bacitracin allowed for more bacteria growth than sodium oxychlorosene (P = .024), chlorhexidine gluconate (P = .025), and benzalkonium chloride (P = .025).

Conclusions

The presence of bacteria led to less immediate tissue inflammation and edema, while tissue necrosis varied over time. The current study may guide surgeons on which solution to use and whether to irrigate a possibly sterile wound or joint.

Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance With Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

There is increased interest and utilization of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) following primary and revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The purpose of this study was to look for potential associations between EOAP and differential rates of antimicrobial resistance or epidemiology of organisms causing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary and aseptic revision THAs/TKAs.

Methods

Patients who developed PJI following a primary or aseptic revision TKA/THA at a single institution from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received at least 7 days of EOAP following the surgery were noted. Rates of antimicrobial resistance were compared between standard antibiotic prophylaxis and EOAP cohorts using the Fisher's exact test.

Results

One hundred twenty-eight cultures were obtained from 119 patients with PJI. Fourty-four cases (37%) developed PJI after EOAP. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated organism (30% of all cultures; 78% were methicillin-sensitive). Rates of antimicrobial resistance were similar between standard antibiotic prophylaxis and EOAP cohorts in all but 2 instances: Increased resistance to erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was observed in coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates in the EOAP cohort (89% vs 21%, P < .01; 44% vs 0%, P = .02). An increased frequency of gram-negative organisms was observed in the EOAP group (22% vs 8%, P = .03).

Conclusions

Rates of antimicrobial resistance were not significantly different between EOAP and standard antibiotic prophylaxis cohorts except in coagulase-negative Staphylococci. The increased frequency of gram-negative infections was present in the EOAP cohort. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to better understand the impact of EOAP on antimicrobial resistance and PJI epidemiology.

Level of Evidence

Level III; retrospective cohort study.

A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection remains a significant challenge for arthroplasty surgeons globally. Over the last few decades, there has been much advancement in terms of treatment and diagnosis, however, the fight rages on. As management of periprosthetic joint infections continues to evolve, it is critical to reflect back on current debridement practices to establish common ground as well as identify areas for future research and improvement. BODY: In order to understand the debridement techniques of periprosthetic joint infections, one must also understand how to diagnose a periprosthetic joint infection. Multiple definitions have been elucidated over the years with no single consensus established but rather sets of criteria. Once a diagnosis has been established the decision of debridement method becomes whether to proceed with single vs two-stage revision based on the probability of infection as well as individual patient factors. After much study, two-stage revision has emerged as the gold standard in the management of periprosthetic infections but single-stage remains prominent with further and further research.

CONCLUSION

Despite decades of data, there is no single treatment algorithm for periprosthetic joint infections and subsequent debridement technique. Our review touches on the goals of debridement while providing a perspective as to diagnosis and the particulars of how intraoperative factors such as intraarticular irrigation can play pivotal roles in infection eradication. By providing a perspective on current debridement practices, we hope to encourage future study and debate on how to address periprosthetic joint infections best.

Accuracy of a Novel Preoperative Failure Risk Model for Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) in Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection

Given the variable success of the debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in patients with acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI), an accurate selection of candidates is critical. In this study, we set about calculating the predictive value of a novel algorithm for predicting outcome following DAIR developed by Shohat et al. Sixty-four patients who underwent debridement for (early and late) acute PJI in a tertiary-level university hospital were selected, and the aforementioned algorithm was retrospectively applied. Patients with model scores of 40−50%, 50−60%, 60−70%, 70−80% and 80−90% displayed success rates of 33.34%, 41.18%, 57.9%, 78.27% and 100%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.69. The calibration intercept value was 0, and the calibration slope value was 1. Failure rates were significantly higher for the following variables: revision surgery (p = 0.012) index surgery for reasons other than osteoarthritis (p = 0.01), and C-reactive protein level >30 mg/L (p = 0.042). This analysis demonstrated that the Shohat algorithm is associated with an optimal calibration value and a moderate predictive value for failure of a DAIR procedure in patients with acute PJI. Its validation is recommended before it can be routinely applied in daily practice.

Effects of Knee Debridement with Flurbiprofen on Knee Function, Inflammatory Levels, and Bone Metabolism Activity in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Objective

The objective of this study is to explore the effects of knee debridement with flurbiprofen on the knee function, inflammatory levels, and bone metabolism activity in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

110 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent arthroscopic debridement in our hospital from 2020.01 to 2022.01 were selected for retrospective analysis. Based on whether or not flurbiprofen was used in combination during the perioperative phase, the patients were divided into the control group (only arthroscopic debridement of the knee) and the research group (flurbiprofen with arthroscopic debridement of the knee), with 55 cases in each group. The indexes such as knee function, inflammatory levels, and bone metabolism activity of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

According to hospital for special surgery (HSS) evaluation for knee function, most patients in the control group were assessed as “moderate,” while patients in the research group were mainly focused on “excellent” and “good,” and their excellent and good rates were remarkably higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant variations in bone metabolism indices such as osteoprotegerin levels (OPG), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide (β-CTX), and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) before treatment between both groups (P > 0.05), with higher OPG, IGF-1 levels, and remarkably lower β-CTX, RANKL levels in the research group than those in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable differences in pain between both groups before treatment (P > 0.05), while at 24 h and 48 h after surgery, the VAS scores in the research group were remarkably lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In terms of inflammatory factors, the levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in the research group were remarkably lower than those in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Arthroscopy coupled with flurbiprofen provides a good analgesic effect in the therapeutic treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis, which contributes to the recovery of knee function with definite results. Its mechanism may be associated with the control of inflammatory response and the regulation of bone metabolism disorder.

Mark Coventry Award: Efficacy of Saline Wash Plus Antibiotics Doped Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) Composite (PVA-VAN/TOB-P) in a Mouse Pouch Infection Model

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of saline irrigation for treatment of periprosthetic infection (PJI) is limited by the presence of contaminated medical devices. This study evaluated treatment efficacy of locally placed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/bioceramic composite doped with vancomycin (PVA-VAN-P) or vancomycin and tobramycin (PVA-VAN/TOB-P) after saline irrigation in a mouse pouch infection model.

METHODS

Sutures were implanted into air pouches of BALB/cJ mice, then inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus. Mice were randomized into 6 groups (n = 6 each): (1) no bacteria; (2) bacteria without saline wash; (3) saline wash only; (4) saline wash + PVA-P; (5) saline wash + PVA-VAN-P, and (6) saline wash + PVA-VAN/TOB-P. After 7 days, pouches were washed with saline alone or with additional injection of 0.2 mL of the composites. Sacrifice occurred 14 days after the washout. Histology was performed on the pouch tissues and bacteria cultures on the washout fluid.

RESULTS

Bacterial culture (optical density) showed that infection persisted after saline irrigation (0.10 ± 0.14) but was effectively eradicated by the addition of PVA-VAN-P (0.05 ± 0.09) and PVA-VAN/TOB-P (0.002 ± 0.003, P < .05). These effects were confirmed by histology. Importantly, no residues of the PVA-P were detected in either the pouch washouts or pouch tissues.

CONCLUSION

PJI is common and problematic, and few innovations have changed clinical practice and/or outcome. Our data confirmed that the effect of saline irrigation was very limited in the presence of contaminated sutures. PVA-VAN/TOB-P was biodegradable, biocompatible, and effective in eradicating bacterial retention after saline irrigation. Application of PVA-VAN/TOB-P after saline irrigation could be an option for treatment of PJI and should be evaluated in future PJI animal models.

Outcomes of Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in a High-Volume Arthroplasty Centre

PURPOSE

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a devastating diagnosis. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is a preferred treatment modality for acute PJI. A retrospective analysis of infected primary arthroplasties to evaluate the success of DAIR and factors influencing its outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent DAIR for PJI at our unit between 2010 and 2018. Patients who underwent revision surgery as an index procedure, arthroscopic washout and those with less than two years of follow-up were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as revision arthroplasty for recurrence of infection within 2 years of the index procedure. Chi-square and Fischer's exact test were used to compare between patient factors and DAIR outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to analyse implant survivorship following DAIR.

RESULTS

Of the sixty patients (40 knees, 20 hips) who underwent DAIR, eighteen (13 knees, 5 hips) required revision arthroplasty within 2 years accounting for a success rate of 70%. Predictive factors for revision were American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) score of greater than 2 (p = 0.021), BMI > 35 (p = 0.046), C Reactive protein (CRP) > 200 mg/L (p = 0.007) and Staphylococcus aureus growth (p = 0.012). The five-year survival rate for DAIR was 70%, which remained constant after two years from DAIR.

CONCLUSION

Success rate of DAIR in PJI was 70% which was comparable to similar studies in the literature. ASA > 2, BMI > 35, CRP > 200 and staphylococcus aureus growth were predictors for DAIR failure. Implant survival rate and duration were better following DAIR in early-onset PJI.

[Septic revision arthroplasty: how to confirm diagnosis, plan surgery and manage follow-up treatment]

BACKGROUND

Septic revision arthroplasty represents an interdisciplinary challenge in terms of diagnosis as well as surgical and follow-up treatment.

DIAGNOSIS

The implementation of a standardized diagnostic algorithm including anamnesis, clinic, imaging, blood sampling and joint aspiration is essential. Depending on the duration of the symptoms acute (< 3 weeks) and chronic (> 3 weeks) infections are distinguished.

THERAPY

While acute infections show an immature biofilm and can usually be addressed surgically via debridement and changing the mobile parts, chronic infections almost always require a complete change of the implant. This can be done in one or two stages, depending on the general condition of the patient, the pathogen, its resistances as well as the wound conditions. The surgical revision is always followed by a resistance-based antibiotic treatment.

What Is the Optimal Irrigation Solution in the Management of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

BACKGROUND

Thorough irrigation and debridement using an irrigation solution is a well-established treatment for both acute and chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). In the absence of concrete data, identifying the optimal irrigation agent and protocol remains challenging.

METHODS

A thorough review of the current literature on the various forms of irrigations and their additives was performed to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of each solution as pertaining to pathogen eradication in the treatment of PJI. As there is an overall paucity of high-quality literature comparing irrigation additives to each other and to any control, no meta-analyses could be performed. The literature was therefore summarized in this review article to give readers concise information on current irrigation options and their known risks and benefits.

RESULTS

Antiseptic solutions include povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid, and preformulated commercially available combination solutions. The current literature suggests that intraoperative use of antiseptic irrigants may play a role in treating PJI, but definitive clinical studies comparing antiseptic to no antiseptic irrigation are lacking. Furthermore, no clinical head-to-head comparisons of different antiseptic irrigants have identified an optimal irrigation solution.

CONCLUSION

Further high-quality studies on the optimal irrigation additive and protocol for the management of PJI are warranted to guide future evidence-based decisions.

Direct-Contact Low-Frequency Ultrasound and Pulse Lavage Eradicates Biofilms on Implant Materials In Vitro

Pulse lavage (PL) debridement and ultrasound are both known to be the treatment of biofilm-related periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the efficacy of these in combination is unknown in eradicating biofilm from the orthopaedic metal implant surface. This study was conducted to understand the efficacy of PL and ultrasound in combination in eradicating bacterial biofilms on titanium alloy in vitro. Biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus strains were grown on titanium alloy coupons for 24 h. Then, the coupons were taken to each treatment group: (i) debrided with PL, (ii) exposed to ultrasound, or (iii) exposed to both. An untreated biofilm was set as a control group. Viable plate count and confocal microscopy using live/dead staining was used to measure the amount of biofilm. Viable plate count showed an approximate two-log reduction in CFU/cm² in PL alone, from an initial cell count on the mental surface of approximately 10⁹ CFU/cm². The ultrasound caused an approximate seven-log reduction, and the combination group eradicated viable biofilm bacteria completely. Confocal imaging corroborated the CFU data. Our results indicate that PL and ultrasound both are remarkably in eradicating biofilm, and the combination of PL and ultrasound is more effective than alone in reducing biofilm.

Results of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for periprosthetic knee joint infection supplemented with the use of intraosseous antibiotics

AIMS

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) remains one option for the treatment of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) despite imperfect success rates. Intraosseous (IO) administration of vancomycin results in significantly increased local bone and tissue concentrations compared to systemic antibiotics alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the addition of a single dose of IO regional antibiotics to our protocol at the time of DAIR would improve outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of 35 PJI TKA patients, with a median age of 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) 61 to 75), who underwent DAIR combined with IO vancomycin (500 mg), was performed with minimum 12 months' follow-up. A total of 26 patients with primary implants were treated for acute perioperative or acute haematogenous infections. Additionally, nine patients were treated for chronic infections with components that were considered unresectable. Primary outcome was defined by no reoperations for infection, nor clinical signs or symptoms of PJI.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up for acute infection was 16.5 months (12.1 to 24.2) and 15.8 months (12 to 24.8) for chronic infections with unresectable components. Overall non-recurrence rates for acute infection was 92.3% (24/26) but only 44.4% (4/9) for chronic infections with unresectable components. The majority of patients remained on suppressive oral antibiotics. Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) host grade was a significant indicator of failure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The addition of IO vancomycin at the time of DAIR was shown to be safe with improved results compared to current literature using standard DAIR without IO antibiotic administration. Use of this technique in chronic infections should be applied with caution. While these results are encouraging, this technique requires longer follow-up before widespread adoption. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):185-190.

Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections

Irrigation and debridement in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) serve an integral role in the eradication of bacterial burden and subsequent re-infection rates. Identifying the optimal irrigation agent, however, remains challenging, as there is limited data on superiority. Direct comparison of different irrigation solutions remains difficult because of variability in treatment protocols. While basic science studies assist in the selection of irrigation fluids, in vitro results do not directly translate into clinical significance once implemented in vivo. Dilute povidone iodine, hydrogen peroxide, chlorhexidine gluconate, acetic acid, sodium hypochlorite, hypochlorous acid, and preformed combination solutions all have potential against a broad spectrum of PJI pathogens with their own unique advantages and disadvantages. Future clinical studies are needed to identify ideal irrigation solutions with optimal bactericidal properties and low cytotoxicity for PJI treatment.

Risk Scores and Machine Learning to Identify Patients With Acute Periprosthetic Joints Infections That Will Likely Fail Classical Irrigation and Debridement

The most preferred treatment for acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is surgical debridement, antibiotics and retention of the implant (DAIR). The reported success of DAIR varies greatly and depends on a complex interplay of several host-related factors, duration of symptoms, the microorganism(s) causing the infection, its susceptibility to antibiotics and many others. Thus, there is a great clinical need to predict failure of the "classical" DAIR procedure so that this surgical option is offered to those most likely to succeed, but also to identify those patients who may benefit from more intensified antibiotic treatment regimens or new and innovative treatment strategies. In this review article, the current recommendations for DAIR will be discussed, a summary of independent risk factors for DAIR failure will be provided and the advantages and limitations of the clinical use of preoperative risk scores in early acute (post-surgical) and late acute (hematogenous) PJIs will be presented. In addition, the potential of implementing machine learning (artificial intelligence) in identifying patients who are at highest risk for failure of DAIR will be addressed. The ultimate goal is to maximally tailor and individualize treatment strategies and to avoid treatment generalization.

Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Is a Viable Treatment Option for Early Periprosthetic Joint Infection Presenting More Than 4 Weeks After Index Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The success of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) in early periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) largely depends on the presence of a mature biofilm. At what time point DAIR should be disrecommended is unknown. This multicenter study evaluated the outcome of DAIR in relation to the time after index arthroplasty.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated PJIs occurring within 90 days after surgery and treated with DAIR. Patients with bacteremia, arthroscopic debridements, and a follow-up <1 year were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as (1) any further surgical procedure related to infection; (2) PJI-related death; or (3) use of long-term suppressive antibiotics.

RESULTS

We included 769 patients. Treatment failure occurred in 294 patients (38%) and was similar between time intervals from index arthroplasty to DAIR: the failure rate for Week 1-2 was 42% (95/226), the rate for Week 3-4 was 38% (143/378), the rate for Week 5-6 was 29% (29/100), and the rate for Week 7-12 was 42% (27/65). An exchange of modular components was performed to a lesser extent in the early post-surgical course compared with the late course (41% vs 63%, respectively; P < .001). The causative microorganisms, comorbidities, and durations of symptoms were comparable between time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

DAIR is a viable option in patients with early PJI presenting more than 4 weeks after index surgery, as long as DAIR is performed within at least 1 week after the onset of symptoms and modular components can be exchanged.

Does Early Debridement, Antibiotic Therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) have a Role in Managing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Knee in Indian Scenario: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes

PURPOSE

To report outcomes of Debridement, Antibiotic therapy and Implant Retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic knee joint infections (PJI) in the Indian population and to study factors influencing outcomes.

METHODS

This was a Retrospective study of 80 cases of acute PJI after total knee arthroplasty who were treated by DAIR, within 2 weeks of onset of infection. A standardised institutional management protocol was applied to all cases. Patients were followed up for a minimum 1 year. Outcomes of DAIR were classified as successful or unsuccessful based on resolution or persistence of infection, and subsequent requirement of revision surgery. Influence of factors, like comorbidities, culture status and microbiological characteristics of causative organism, on outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall 55 patients (68.75%) had successful eradication of infection after DAIR. 27 (33.7%) patients were culture negative and 53 (66.2%) patients grew organisms on culture. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes (p = 0.082) between culture-positive cases (69.8% success rate) and (66.7% success rate) in culture negative cases. Furthermore, no difference in outcomes was observed in culture-positive patients between those who grew Gram-positive organisms versus Gram-negative organisms (p = 0.398) Similarly, patient comorbidities did not significantly alter the outcomes after DAIR (p = 0.732).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that early DAIR within 2 weeks of onset of infection using a standard protocol during surgery and postoperatively can result in good outcomes. Patient comorbidities, culture status (positive versus negative), Gram staining characteristics of organisms and the identity of pathogenic bacteria did not influence outcomes of DAIR for acute PJI.

Synergistic Effects of Pulsed Lavage and Antimicrobial Therapy Against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in an in-vitro Model

Background: Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are difficult to treat complications of joint arthroplasty. Debridement with implant retention is a common treatment strategy and frequently involves the use of pulsed lavage (PL). However, PL effects on biofilms and antibiotic activity have been scarcely studied in-vitro. We report the effects of PL, vancomycin or flucloxacillin used independently or in combination against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Methods: Biofilms of 3 methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and of 3 methicillin-resistant (MRSA) S. aureus were grown on Ti6Al4V coupons in TGN (TSB + 1%glucose + 2%NaCl). After 24 h, PL was applied to half of the samples (50 mL saline from 5 cm). Samples were either reincubated for 24 h in TGN or TGN + flucloxacillin or vancomycin. Analyses included CFUs counts, biomass assays or fluorescence microscopy. Results: PL transiently reduced bacterial counts by 3-4 Log₁₀ CFU/coupon, but bacterial regrowth to baseline levels was seen after 24 h. At 20 mg/L, flucloxacillin reduced both the CFU counts (3 Log₁₀ CFU/coupon) and biomass (-70%) in one MSSA only, while vancomycin had no effects against MRSA. PL combined with a 24 h reincubation with vancomycin or flucloxacillin at 20 mg/L was synergistic (-5 to 6.5 Log₁₀ CFU/coupon; 81-100% biomass reduction). Fluorescence microscopy confirmed that PL removed most of the biofilm and that subsequent antibiotic treatment partially killed bacteria. Conclusions: While PL only transiently reduces the bacterial load and antibiotics at clinically relevant concentrations show no or limited activity on biofilms, their combination is synergistic against MRSA and MSSA biofilms. These results highlight the need for thorough PL before antibiotic administration in PJI.

Utilization of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty Over a Decade in the United States

BACKGROUND

Reported clinical outcomes have varied for debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and little is known regarding trends in utilization. We sought to evaluate the rate of DAIR utilization for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) over a decade and clinical factors associated with these trends.

METHODS

A retrospective study of primary TKAs and THAs was performed using Medicare data from 2005 to 2014 using the PearlDiver database platform. Current Procedural Technology and International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition codes identified patients who underwent a surgical revision for PJI, whether revision was a DAIR, as well as associated clinical factors including timing from index arthroplasty.

RESULTS

The proportion of revision TKAs and THAs performed using DAIR was 27% and 12% across all years, respectively. This proportion varied by year for TKAs and THAs with a linear trend toward increasing relative use of DAIR estimated at 1.4% and 0.9% per year (P < .001; P < .001). DAIR for TKA and THA performed within 90 days increased at a faster rate, 3.4% and 2.1% per year (P < .001; P < .001). Trends over time in TKA DAIRs showed an association with Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), 0-5 group increasing at 2.0% per year (P = .03) and patients >85 years (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of revision arthroplasty cases for PJI managed with DAIR has been increasing over time in the United States, with the most substantial increase seen <90 days from index arthroplasty. Age, gender, and ECI had a minimal association with this trend, except in the TKA population >85 years and in those with a very low ECI score.

Improved treatment strategies can result in better outcomes following one-stage exchange surgery for MRSA periprosthetic joint infection

Introduction. Periprosthetic joint infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA-PJIs) are rare, with only a few studies reporting the treatment outcomes and even fewer reporting outcomes with one-stage exchange.Aim. This study aims to analyse the outcomes of one-stage exchange in the management of MRSA-PJIs.Methodology. Patients with MRSA-PJI of the hip and knee, who were treated with a one-stage exchange between 2001 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. The final cohort comprised of 29 patients, which included 23 hips and six knees. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years (1-9 years). Reinfection and complications rates after the one-stage exchange were analysed.Results. Overall infection control could be achieved in 93.1 % (27 out of 29 patients). The overall revision rate was 31.0% (9 patients), with three patients requiring an in-hospital revision (10.3 %). Six patients had to be revised after hospital discharge (20.7 %). Of the two reinfections, one had a growth of MRSA while the other was of methicillin-sensitive Staphyloccocus epidermidis.Conclusion. One-stage exchange surgery using current techniques could improve surgical outcomes with excellent results in the management of MRSA-PJIs.

Treatment and Outcome of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a devastating but poorly understood complication, with a paucity of published data regarding treatment and outcomes. This study analyzes the largest cohort of UKA PJIs to date comparing treatment outcome, septic and aseptic reoperation rates, and risk factors for treatment failure.

METHODS

Twenty-one UKAs in 21 patients treated for PJI, as defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. Minimum and mean follow-up was 1 and 3.5 years, respectively. Fourteen (67%) patients had acute postoperative PJIs. Surgical treatment included 16 debridement, antibiotics, and implant retentions (DAIRs) (76%), 4 two-stage revisions (19%), and 1 one-stage revision (5%). Twenty (95%) PJIs were culture positive with Staphylococcus species identified in 15 cases (71%).

RESULTS

Survivorship free from reoperation for infection at 1 year was 76% (95% confidence interval, 58%-93%). Overall survival from all-cause reoperation was 57% (95% confidence interval, 27%-87%) at 5 years. Two additional patients (10%) underwent aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty for lateral compartment degeneration 1 year after DAIR and tibial aseptic loosening 2.5 years after 2-stage revision. All patients who initially failed PJI UKA treatment presented with acute postoperative PJIs (5 of 14; 36%).

CONCLUSION

Survivorship free from persistent PJI at 1 year is low at 76% but is consistent with similar reports of DAIRs for total knee arthroplasties. Furthermore, there is low survivorship free from all-cause reoperation of 71% and 57% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Surgeons should be aware of these poorer outcomes and consider treating UKA PJI early and aggressively.

Lower Success Rate of Débridement and Implant Retention in Late Acute versus Early Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Staphylococcus spp. Results from a Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Surgical débridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is currently recommended by international guidelines for both early acute (postsurgical) and late acute (hematogenous) periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, due to a different pathogenesis of infection, a different treatment strategy may be needed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Compared with early acute PJIs, are late acute PJIs associated with a higher risk of DAIR failure? (2) When stratified by microorganism, is the higher risk of failure in late acute PJI associated with Staphylocococcus aureus infection? (3) When analyzing patients with S. aureus infection, what factors are independently associated with DAIR failure?

METHODS

In this multicenter observational study, early acute and late acute PJIs treated with DAIR were retrospectively evaluated and matched according to treating center, year of diagnosis, and infection-causing microorganism. If multiple matches were available, the early acute PJI diagnosed closest to the late acute PJI was selected. A total of 132 pairs were included. Treatment success was defined as a retained implant during follow-up without the need for antibiotic suppressive therapy.

RESULTS

Late acute PJIs had a lower treatment success (46% [60 of 132]) compared with early acute PJIs (76% [100 of 132]), OR 3.9 [95% CI 2.3 to 6.6]; p < 0.001), but the lower treatment success of late acute PJIs was only observed when caused by Staphylococcus spp (S. aureus: 34% versus 75%; p < 0.001; coagulase-negative staphylococci: 46% versus 88%; p = 0.013, respectively). On multivariable analysis, late acute PJI was the only independent factor associated with an unsuccessful DAIR when caused by S. aureus (OR 4.52 [95% CI 1.79 to 11.41]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although DAIR seems to be a successful therapeutic strategy in the management of early acute PJI, its use in late acute PJI should be reconsidered when caused by Staphylococcus spp. Our results advocate the importance of isolating the causative microorganism before surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Increased antibiotic duration improves survival of irrigation and debridement after revision total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate reoperation-free survival following I&D with modular component exchange of revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

Of revision TJAs from 2004 to 2012 (n = 4,166), 30 were I&D with modular component exchange after index revision for aseptic indications. Patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 18) reoperation for infection recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Reoperation-free survival (60% at mean 4.8 year follow-up) improved with increased duration of antibiotic therapy (p = 0.0185), with maximum benefit at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

At least 2 years of antibiotic therapy should be administered after I&D with modular component exchange for acutely infected revision TJA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention for periprosthetic knee infections: a pooling analysis of 1266 cases

Background

The debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure is an established therapeutic option for periprosthetic knee infections (PKI). However, the efficacy and the indication for this procedure are still controversial.

Methods

All the relevant literatures were systematically reviewed and analyzed. The present study aimed to assess the success rate of DAIR in the management of PKI, identify the factors associated with prognosis of DAIR, and establish a simple algorithm for predicting a high success rate of DAIR.

Results

Totally, 33 studies with 1266 cases were included. The overall success rate following DAIR in the management of PKI was 57.11%. In the subgroup analyses, the factors of “the time from symptoms to debridement was < 3 weeks” and “the bacterial species other than methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus” significantly improved the success rate of DAIR and thus were defined as the major criteria. The statistically insignificant factors of “the open debridement and liner exchange” and “the comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis” were set as the minor criteria. The success rate of DAIR for PKI meeting all the major criteria and no less than one minor criterion was 80.98%, which was significantly higher than the overall success rate of DAIR (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

PKI cases meeting two major criteria and no less than one minor criterion may confer a high success rate of DAIR. This simple algorithm may contribute to identifying the appropriate PKI patient for DAIR treatment and predicting the prognosis of DAIR.

Irrigation and Debridement, Modular Exchange, and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty

The role of irrigation and debridement, modular exchange, and implant retention for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The proposed benefits of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, often referred to as DAIR, include reduced economic cost and morbidity of 2-stage reimplantation¹. The primary disadvantage of this approach is a higher rate of failure and infection recurrence^2,3. Furthermore, several authors have demonstrated inferior outcomes of 2-stage exchange revision arthroplasty after a failed attempt at limited debridement with implant retention^4-6. Because of study heterogeneity, the outcomes of acute PJI treatment with irrigation and debridement and implant retention have been variable in the literature, with reported success rates ranging from 16% to 100%; overall, the success rate is around 50%^3,7,8. Recently, studies evaluating outcomes of DAIR have indicated that host factors, organism type, the timing of intervention, and the duration of symptoms can influence the likelihood of success with this approach^7,9-12. DAIR may be considered for all patients with early postoperative PJI or an acute hematogenous infection in the context of well-fixed implants and a healthy soft-tissue envelope. Chronic PJI should be considered an absolute contraindication to DAIR¹³. The patient's health status, comorbidities, and immune status also should be considered. Caution should be exercised when considering DAIR for a patient in whom preoperative cultures demonstrate a drug-resistant or highly virulent organism, because of a higher risk of failure^1,9,14,15. With careful patient selection and meticulous surgical technique, it is possible to achieve success with this treatment strategy. The surgical procedure begins with a medial parapatellar approach and arthrotomy. A complete synovectomy is then performed, and remaining synovial tissue is aggressively debrided. Multiple culture samples should be obtained, and aseptic technique should be utilized to decrease contamination. The implant is interrogated to ensure stable fixation. Following adequate debridement, high-volume irrigation is performed; in cases involving irrigation and debridement with implant retention, we recommend incorporation of an antiseptic solution such as povidone-iodine. We recommend switching to a clean setup to facilitate sterile, uncontaminated closure of the wound, which is performed in a standard fashion. Meticulous attention should be paid to layered closure, and, if there is concern about delayed skin-healing, incisional negative-pressure wound therapy may be utilized.

Use of gentamicin-impregnated beads or sponges in the treatment of early acute periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score analysis

Objectives

Early acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) have failure rates ranging from 10% to 60%. We determined the efficacy of applying local gentamicin-impregnated beads and/or sponges during debridement in early PJI.

Methods

Patients with early acute PJI, defined as less than 21 days of symptoms and treated with DAIR within 90 days after index surgery, were retrospectively evaluated. Early failure was defined as PJI-related death, the need for implant removal or a second DAIR or antibiotic suppressive therapy owing to persistent signs of infection, all within 60 days after initial debridement. Overall failure was defined as implant removal at any timepoint during follow-up. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to correct for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 386 patients were included. Local gentamicin was applied in 293 patients (75.9%) and was withheld in 93 patients (24.1%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of local gentamicin was independently associated with early failure (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.12-3.48). After propensity matching, early failure was 40.3% in the gentamicin group versus 26.0% in the control group (P = 0.06) and overall failure was 5.2% in the gentamicin group versus 2.6% in the control group (P = 0.40). These numbers remained when solely analysing the application of gentamicin-impregnated sponges.

Conclusions

Even after propensity score matching, failure rates remained higher if local gentamicin-impregnated beads and/or sponges were administered in early acute PJI. Based on these results, their use should be discouraged.

One-Stage Periprosthetic Joint Infection Reimbursement-Is It Worth The Effort?

BACKGROUND

One-stage protocols for the management of periprosthetic infection take an extended period of time requiring two separate preps and sets of instruments to ensure optimal sterility. While intraoperative service time is one part of the reimbursement algorithm, reimbursement has lagged behind for single-stage treatment with respect to the time and resources necessary to perform these complex treatment regimens. If one-stage results are shown to be acceptable, but not reimbursed appropriately, surgeons will be discouraged from managing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a one-stage fashion.

METHODS

The reimbursement and operative time for 50 PJI procedures were compared with 250 primary total hips and 250 primary total knees by the same 4 surgeons.

RESULTS

The average reimbursement for a one-stage knee procedure was $2,597.08, with an average intraoperative service time of 259 minutes ($601.60/h). The average reimbursement for a primary total knee was $2,435.00, with an average intraoperative service time of 100 minutes ($1,461/h). The average reimbursement for a one-stage hip procedure was $2,826.17, with an average intraoperative service time of 311 minutes ($545.24/h). The average reimbursement for a primary total hip was $2,754.71 with an average intraoperative service time of 104 minutes ($1,589.26/h).

CONCLUSION

One-stage procedures for PJI are reimbursed at approximately 1/3 the hourly rate of a primary procedure, which may discourage surgeons from selecting this treatment alternative even if recent studies confirm efficacy. Payers should be encouraged to reimburse physicians commensurate with the intraoperative service time needed to perform a one-stage procedure as adoption will decrease morbidity and save the healthcare system financially.

Negative impact of prior debridement on functional outcome of subsequent two-stage revision for early knee periprosthetic infection

PURPOSE

To compare the functional outcome of two-stage revision (2SR) in patients without a prior debridement, antibiotics and implant retention with those patients who underwent 2SR after a failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for early periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Negative impact of prior failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention on the functional outcome of subsequent 2SR was hypothesized.

METHODS

Case-control study of 49 patients initially treated with 2SR (group A) and 43 treated with 2SR after a prior failed debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (group B). Functional outcome was assessed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire. Range of motion (ROM) of the knee was also measured.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 4.1 (range 3-7) years. At final follow-up, KSS-knee (p = 0.001), KSS-function (p = 0.002), WOMAC-function (p = 0.022) and ROM (p = 0.002) were significantly better in the group A as compared to the group B. There was no significant difference between groups in the WOMAC-pain score (p = 0.597). In multivariate analysis, BMI < 30 (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.7-4.9, p = 0.026), non- Staphylococcus causative microorganism (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-5.9, p = 0.037), and 2SR procedure (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-5.2, p = 0.018) were significant predictors of successful functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A prior debridement, antibiotics and implant retention has been shown to have a negative impact on the functional outcome of a subsequent 2SR. These findings suggest that treatment with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention for early periprosthetic infection should only be used in selected patients, and the first option in those patients with Staphylococcus organisms should be 2SR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes of Superficial and Deep Irrigation and Debridement in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Following total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty, wound-related problems and deep periprosthetic joint infection may present in a similar fashion. Irrigation and debridement (I&D) has a great role in management of patients with early infection. The question that often arises is how to tell the difference between superficial and deep infection. This study evaluated the role and outcomes of both superficial and deep I&D in patients with wound-related issues and/or suspected periprosthetic joint infection.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted evaluating patients who underwent I&D within 28 days of total joint arthroplasty. A total of 176 cases with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were identified, and clinical records were reviewed in detail. Reoperations included superficial (fascia not opened) or deep (fascia opened) I&D. Failure was defined as the need for further surgical intervention within 1 year of initial I&D.

RESULTS

The overall success for superficial I&D was 84.28% vs 68.86% for deep I&D. The success of both deep and superficial I&D was higher if the I&D was performed closer to the index surgery. Superficial I&D in patients with a positive joint aspiration or evidence of intraoperative purulence or those in whom had no subcutaneous fluid had higher failure rates.

CONCLUSION

Superficial I&D is a viable option in patients with wound-related issues as long as joint aspiration is performed to rule out infection involving the prosthesis. If there are findings of no fluid or purulence, fascia may need to be opened and the deeper tissues explored.

Two-Stage Debridement With Prosthesis Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections

BACKGROUND

Historically, infection control rates with debridement and component retention have been poor in the management of acute prosthetic joint infections. We previously described a 2-stage debridement with prosthesis retention protocol for acute periprosthetic joint infection and reported a 90% success rate in a sample of 20 patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 83 patients who underwent a 2-stage debridement with implant retention with a minimum 1-year follow-up was performed. Patient data were primarily analyzed to determine infection control rates. Infections were considered controlled when patients had not undergone a reoperation for infection, and demonstrated lack of any clinical signs or symptoms of infection (a well healed wound, diminishing swelling and warmth, absence of erythema, improvement in baseline pain symptoms) A secondary goal of this study was to examine the effects of symptom duration on infection control rate.

RESULTS

Average patient follow-up was 41.8 months (range 12-171) for all patients. The overall protocol success rate was 86.7% (72/83): 82.9% in hips and 89.6% in knees. Additionally, protocol success was observed in 45 of 48 primary joints (93.8%) and 27 of 35 (77.1%) revision joints (P = .046). Average time from onset of symptoms to surgery was 6.2 days for successfully treated patients (range 0-27 days) compared to 10.7 days for those who failed treatment (range 1-28 days, P = .070).

CONCLUSION

This 2-stage retention protocol resulted in a higher likelihood of infection control compared to prior reports of single stage debridement and modular part exchange.

The Benefice of Mobile Parts' Exchange in the Management of Infected Total Joint Arthroplasties with Prosthesis Retention (DAIR Procedure)

Background: The management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) with debridement and retention of the implant (DAIR) has its rules. Some authors claim that lacking the exchange of mobile prosthetic parts is doomed to failure, while others regard it as optional. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort in PJIs treated with DAIR. Results: We included 112 PJIs (69 total hip arthroplasties, 9 medullary hip prostheses, 41 total knee arthroplasties, and 1 total shoulder arthroplasty) in 112 patients (median age 75 years, 52 females (46%), 31 (28%) immune-suppressed) and performed a DAIR procedure in all cases-48 (43%) with exchange of mobile parts and 64 without. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 94 patients (84%) remained in remission. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, remission was unrelated to PJI localization, pathogens, number of surgical lavages, duration of total antibiotic treatment or intravenous therapy, choice of antibiotic agents, immune-suppression, or age. In contrast, the exchange of mobile parts was protective (hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2⁻2.9). Conclusions: In our retrospective single-center cohort, changing mobile parts of PJI during the DAIR approach almost doubled the probability for long-term remission.

Does Suture Type Influence Bacterial Retention and Biofilm Formation After Irrigation in a Mouse Model?

BACKGROUND

Irrigation and débridement are frequently utilized in the management of surgical infections, but even with aggressive débridement, it is difficult to remove all the suture material from the tissues and retained suture material may harbor bacteria and/or biofilm. The degree to which barbed or braided sutures may differentially influence the risk of infection has not been defined in a well-controlled animal model.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared braided and barbed monofilament sutures after irrigation of an infected mouse air pouch model to determine whether the suture type influenced the effectiveness of the irrigation. After irrigation of infected pouches, sutures were compared for (1) bacterial adherence and bacterial retention; (2) qualitative and quantitative pouch thickness and cellular density; and (3) quantitative biofilm formation.

METHODS

Soft tissue air pouches were created on the backs of 60 female, mature 10-week-old BALB/cJ mice by sequentially introducing air into the subcutaneous tissue and allowing the pouch to mature. The pouches were inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and braided or barbed monofilament sutures were implanted. Pouch irrigation was performed Day 7 after suture implantation. Suture segments were collected before and after irrigation. After euthanasia on Day 14, pouch tissues with residual suture segments were collected for analysis: microbiologic analysis done using optical density as a measure of the concentration of bacteria in the culture (the larger concentration indicates higher number of bacteria) and histologic evaluation of the pouch tissues were semiquantitative, whereas environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) and confocal analyses of the biofilm and bacteria on the sutures were qualitative.

RESULTS

Histologic evaluation of pouch tissue showed all groups had inflammatory responses. Quantitatively microbiology showed no difference in bacterial number calculated from the optical density (OD) values between the two suture materials at any time point in the irrigation group. In the no-irrigation group, for the Day 7 time point, mean (± SD) OD was greater in the barbed than the OD in the braided sutures (0.52 ± 0.12 versus 0.37 ± 0.16, mean difference 0.43 [95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.13]; p = 0.007). Qualitatively, ESEM showed more bacterial retention by braided sutures before and after irrigation. Confocal imaging of the sutures demonstrated penetration of biofilm into the interstices of braided sutures and less adhesion in barbed monofilament sutures. The quantification of the biomass showed no differences between groups at all time points (before-irrigation biomass was 11.2 ± 9.3 for braided versus 5.2 ± 4.7 for barbed sutures, p = 0.196; and after-irrigation biomass was 7.2 ± 7.5 for braided versus 3.3 ± 4.3 for barbed suture, p = 0.259).

CONCLUSIONS

All sutures can retain bacteria and biofilm, but it is rarely possible to remove all suture material at the time of irrigation to treat infection. After an irrigation procedure, qualitatively braided sutures appeared to harbor more bacteria and to retain more biofilm than barbed monofilaments.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When saline irrigation was used to simulate infection treatment in an infected mouse air pouch model, bacteria/biofilm was not completely eliminated from either braided or barbed monofilament sutures. The irrigation appeared to clear more bacteria and biofilm from the monofilament despite having barbs. Unfortunately, current technologies do not allow direct quantitative comparisons of biofilm retention. Clinicians should be aware that in the face of infection, any retained sutures may harbor bacteria despite irrigation.

Factors affecting failure of irrigation and debridement with liner exchange in total knee arthroplasty infection

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine if reoperation-free survival following irrigation and debridement with polyethylene liner exchange of acutely infected primary TKA is affected by: 1) postoperative antibiotic duration; 2) patient characteristics or surgical factors; 3) infecting organism; or 4) whether infection was acute postoperative versus hematogenous.

METHODS

Of revision TKAs from 2004 to 2012 (n = 1735), 76 underwent irrigation and debridement (I&D) with liner exchange after primary TKA with mean 3.5-year follow-up. We analyzed those requiring reoperation for infection (n = 21) versus those who did not (n = 55).

RESULTS

Increased duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy (p = 0.0163) decreased reoperation for infection. Atrial fibrillation (p = 0.0053), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p = 0.0122), more than 15 cells per high powered field (HPF) (p = 0.0124), or higher preoperative C-reactive protein (p = 0.0025) increased reoperation for infection. Incidence of infection recurrence was highest with Methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and lowest with Gram negative organisms. There was no difference in reoperation-free survival between acute postoperative and hematogenous infections.

CONCLUSION

Reoperation-free survival following I&D with polyethylene liner exchange of acutely infected primary TKA: 1) improves with increased postoperative antibiotic therapy duration so chronic antibiotic suppression should be considered following TKA I&D with liner exchange; 2) is worse with atrial fibrillation, COPD, >15 cells/HPF, preoperative C-reactive protein >500 mg/L, or MRSA so two-stage revision may be favored in these patients; and 3) is equivalent in acute postoperative and hematogenous infections.

Predicting Failure in Early Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: External Validation of the KLIC Score

BACKGROUND

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a widely used treatment modality for early acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A preoperative risk score was previously designed for predicting DAIR failure, consisting of chronic renal failure (K), liver cirrhosis (L), index surgery (I), cemented prosthesis (C), and C-reactive protein >115 mg/L (KLIC). The aim of this study was to validate the KLIC score in an external cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with early acute PJI treated with DAIR between 2006 and 2016 in 3 Dutch hospitals. Early acute PJI was defined as <21 days of symptoms and DAIR performed within 90 days after index surgery. Failure was defined as the need for (1) second DAIR, (2) implant removal, (3) suppressive antimicrobial treatment, or (4) infection-related death within 60 days after debridement.

RESULTS

A total of 386 patients were included. Failure occurred in 148 patients (38.3%). Patients with KLIC scores of ≤2, 2.5-3.5, 4-5, 5.5-6.5, and ≥7 had failure rates of 27.9%, 37.1%, 49.3%, 54.5%, and 85.7%, respectively (P < .001). The receiver-operating characteristic curve showed an area under the curve of 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.69). A KLIC score higher than 6 points showed a specificity of 97.9%.

CONCLUSION

The KLIC score is a relatively good preoperative risk score for DAIR failure in patients with early acute PJI and appears to be most useful in clinical practice for patients with low or high KLIC scores.

Prognostic Factors for Success After Irrigation and Debridement With Modular Component Exchange for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Irrigation and debridement with modular component exchange (IDMCE) can treat prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Compared to 2-stage revision, IDMCE is associated with lower morbidity but may carry higher infection recurrence rates. We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with successful IDMCE in patients with PJI.

METHODS

We identified 99 consecutive patients who underwent IDMCE following TKA PJI at a tertiary academic medical center from November 2009 through January 2016. Examined variables included age, gender, symptom duration, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, total protein, albumin, hemoglobin A1c, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, gram stain results, final cultures, and use of long-term antibiotic suppression. Success was defined as no further operation on the ipsilateral knee. We used t tests and chi-square analyses to determine whether each preoperative factor was associated with IDMCE reoperation.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of 2.6 years, 64 patients who underwent IDMCE were defined as successful. Thirty-five patients required one or more additional procedures for recurrent infection; of these, 20 patients underwent 2-stage revision. Patients with symptom duration of less than 2 days avoided additional surgery in 88% of cases. Elevated ESR >47 mm/h was the only variable associated with reoperation (P = .005). There were no associations among the other examined variables.

CONCLUSION

Using IDMCE for PJI after TKA required reoperation in 35% of cases. Elevated preoperative ESR laboratory values and duration of symptoms >2 days were associated with reoperation.

Vancomycin Povidone-Iodine Protocol Improves Survivorship of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Irrigation and Debridement

BACKGROUND

Irrigation and debridement with modular component and liner exchange (IDLE) is a low morbidity procedure for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with reported failure rates exceeding 50%. Dilute povidone-iodine lavage has been shown to be safe and effective in decreasing acute PJI in primary total joint arthroplasty. Vancomycin powder has also shown to be effective in preventing infection in spine surgery. We hypothesize that a vancomycin povidone-iodine protocol (VIP) used in conjunction with IDLE can increase infection-free survivorship after acute PJI.

METHODS

This is a single institution retrospective review of all PJIs treated with IDLE and VIP since March 2014. A consecutive matched control group of patients treated with IDLE for PJI for 2 years prior to March 2014 was also included for analysis. Primary outcome was failure, defined as return to operating room for an infection-related problem. Secondary outcome was chronic suppression with antibiotics at final follow-up. Minimum follow-up was 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients in the VIP group and 38 patients in control group were identified. In the VIP group, 16.7% (6/36) failed at final follow-up compared to 37% failure rate (14/38) in the control group (P < .05). Three patients in the VIP group were on chronic antibiotic suppression at final follow-up. There were no medical complications secondary to the VIP.

CONCLUSIONS

The VIP group demonstrated a significant reduction in reinfection and failure rate following IDLE. The authors believe that a VIP is an effective adjunct for treating PJI with irrigation and debridement.