Reaching detection targets in familial hypercholesterolaemia: Comparison of identification strategies

Total Cholesterol Determination Accuracy in Dried Blood Spots

Background Detecting total cholesterol in dried blood spots could aid in identifying individuals with a high likelihood of familial hypercholesterolemia and could be used as a screening measure. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dried blood spots on Whatman 903 paper cards using a manual enzymatic technique. Methods: A total of 394 samples were collected as serum and dried blood spots were compared. Cholesterol was determined in serum using the automated reference method, while cholesterol on paper was measured using a manual enzymatic method. Within- and between-day diagnostic variability were analyzed. The correlation between both methods was assessed using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot. Internal validation of our correlation formula was performed on 149 samples, along with external validation of the formula proposed by Corso et al. Results: The within- and between-day coefficient of variation was found to be lower than 10.14% and 14.09%, respectively. Passing-Bablok regression indicated a precision of 0.803 and an accuracy of 0.96. Internal validation precision was measured at 0.716. The resulting positive and negative predicted values were 0.77 and 0.92, respectively, vs. 0.46 and 0.96 from the external formula. Conclusions: Total cholesterol analysis in dried blood spots demonstrates high precision and reproducibility. This method reliably enables the incorporation of this biological marker into neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolemia detection.

Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues

In many countries, some form of genetic screening is offered to all or part of the population, either in the form of well-organized screening programs or in a less formalized way. Screening can be offered at different phases of life, such as preconception, prenatal, neonatal and later in life. Screening should only be offered if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Technical innovations in testing and treatment are driving changes in the field of prenatal and neonatal screening, where many jurisdictions have organized population-based screening programs. As a result, a greater number and wider range of conditions are being added to the programs, which can benefit couples' reproductive autonomy (preconception and prenatal screening) and improve early diagnosis to prevent irreversible health damage in children (neonatal screening) and in adults (cancer and cascade screening). While many developments in screening are technology-driven, citizens may also express a demand for innovation in screening, as was the case with non-invasive prenatal testing. Relatively new emerging issues for genetic screening, especially if testing is performed using DNA sequencing, relate to organization, data storage and interpretation, benefit-harm ratio and distributive justice, information provision and follow-up, all connected to acceptability in current healthcare systems.

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Strategies for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: An Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically synthesise the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

METHODS

We searched seven databases from inception to 2 February , 2023, for eligible cost-effective analysis (CEA) that evaluated screening strategies for FH versus the standard care for FH detection. Independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction and quality evaluation. Cost results were adapted to 2022 US dollars (US$) to facilitate comparisons between studies using the same screening strategies. Cost-effectiveness thresholds were based on the original study criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies evaluating 62 strategies were included in this review, most of the studies (95%) adopted a healthcare perspective in the base case, and majority were set in high-income countries. Strategies analysed included cascade screening (23 strategies), opportunistic screening (13 strategies), systematic screening (11 strategies) and population-wide screening (15 strategies). Most of the strategies relied on genetic diagnosis for case ascertainment. The most common comparator was no screening, but some studies compared the proposed strategy versus current screening strategies or versus the best next alternative. Six studies evaluated screening in children while the remaining were targeted at adults. From a healthcare perspective, cascade screening was cost-effective in 78% of the studies [cost-adapted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from dominant to 2022 US$ 104,877], opportunistic screening in 85% (ICERs from US$4959 to US$41,705), systematic screening in 80% (ICERs from US$2763 to US$69,969) and population-wide screening in 60% (ICERs from US$1484 to US$223,240). The most common driver of ICER identified in the sensitivity analysis was the long-term cost of lipid-lowering treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on reported willingness to pay thresholds for each setting, most CEA studies concluded that screening for FH compared with no screening was cost-effective, regardless of the screening strategy. Cascade screening resulted in the largest health benefits per person tested.

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2024 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2023 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. The AHA strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional global data, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of different screening strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia

AIMS

Diagnosis rate of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remained less than 10 % globally and the economic evaluation results of different FH screening strategies varied. This study aimed to systematically review the methodology and results of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) of FH screening, which will provide evidence support for health-related decision-making.

METHODS

The Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) and CEA Registry databases were electronically searched to collect full economic evaluation from the establishment of the databases to June 30, 2022. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement 2022 (CHEERS 2022) checklist.

RESULTS

Among 232 retrieved studies, 18 economic evaluations were included and all of them are from developed countries, with an average quality score of 0.73. The decision tree model and/or Markov model were constructed by thirteen articles (72 %). Twelve studies (67 %) adopted the healthcare perspective and the lifetime horizon to compare the costs and health outcome of different screening strategies. The results of eight studies indicated that cascade screening was a cost-effective strategy compared with no screening, which was more pronounced in younger adults. Universal screening in young adults aged 16 years or 18-40 years (n=3) and in children aged 1-2 years combined with reverse cascade screening (n=3) are both cost-effective. The probability of being cost-effective for cascade screening (n=6) and universal screening (n=1) of young aged 18-40 years were greater than 95 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrated the economic advantages of cascade screening, universal screening of young adults, and universal screening of newborns combined with reverse cascade screening. Further health economic evaluation is needed in children and in low- and middle-income countries.

Prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in early childhood

Atherosclerotic lesions are present even in very young individuals and therefore, risk stratification for cardiovascular (CV) disease should be implemented in childhood to promote early prevention strategies. In this review we critically appraise clinical, biochemical and genetic biomarkers available for pediatric clinical practice, which might be integrated to build effective algorithms to identify children at risk of future CV events. The first critical issue is to characterize in children aged 2-5 years, those CV risk factors/clinical conditions associated with dramatically accelerated atherosclerosis. Presence of clinical conditions such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, Kawasaki disease, etc., or positive family history for premature CV disease should be evaluated. Subsequently, a complete lipid profile and Lipoprotein(a) determination are recommended for children with increased baseline CV risk. Individuals with altered lipid profile could then undergo genetic testing for monogenic dyslipidemias to identify children with high CV genetic risk, who will be directed to appropriate therapeutic options. In perspective, calculation of a polygenic risk score, based on the analysis of several common single-nucleotide polymorphisms, could be integrated for better risk assessment. We here emphasize the importance of a "holistic" strategy integrating biochemical, anamnestic and genetic data to stratify CV risk in early childhood.

Should Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Be Included in the UK Newborn Whole Genome Sequencing Programme?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The UK National Health Service (NHS) has recently announced a Newborn Genomes Programme (NGP) to identify infants with treatable inherited disorders using whole genome sequencing (WGS). Here, we address, for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), the four principles that must be met for the inclusion of a disorder in the NGP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Principle A: There is strong evidence that the genetic variants causing FH can be reliably detected. Principle B: A high proportion of individuals who carry an FH-causing variant are likely to develop early heart disease if left undiagnosed and not offered appropriate treatment. Principle C: Early intervention has been shown to lead to substantially improved outcomes in children with FH. Principle D: The recommended interventions are equitably accessible for all. FH meets all the Wilson and Jungner criteria for inclusion in a screening programme, and it also meets all four principles and therefore should be included in the Newborn Genomes Programme.

International Atherosclerosis Society guidance for implementing best practice in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia

This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.

Alternative cascade-testing protocols for identifying and managing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: systematic reviews, qualitative study and cost-effectiveness analysis

Background

Cascade testing the relatives of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia is an efficient approach to identifying familial hypercholesterolaemia. The cascade-testing protocol starts with identifying an index patient with familial hypercholesterolaemia, followed by one of three approaches to contact other relatives: indirect approach, whereby index patients contact their relatives; direct approach, whereby the specialist contacts the relatives; or a combination of both direct and indirect approaches. However, it is unclear which protocol may be most effective.

Objectives

The objectives were to determine the yield of cases from different cascade-testing protocols, treatment patterns, and short- and long-term outcomes for people with familial hypercholesterolaemia; to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative protocols for familial hypercholesterolaemia cascade testing; and to qualitatively assess the acceptability of different cascade-testing protocols to individuals and families with familial hypercholesterolaemia, and to health-care providers.

Design and methods

This study comprised systematic reviews and analysis of three data sets: PASS (PASS Software, Rijswijk, the Netherlands) hospital familial hypercholesterolaemia databases, the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)-Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) linked primary-secondary care data set, and a specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register. Cost-effectiveness modelling, incorporating preceding analyses, was undertaken. Acceptability was examined in interviews with patients, relatives and health-care professionals.

Result

Systematic review of protocols: based on data from 4 of the 24 studies, the combined approach led to a slightly higher yield of relatives tested [40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37% to 42%] than the direct (33%, 95% CI 28% to 39%) or indirect approaches alone (34%, 95% CI 30% to 37%). The PASS databases identified that those contacted directly were more likely to complete cascade testing (p < 0.01); the CPRD-HES data set indicated that 70% did not achieve target treatment levels, and demonstrated increased cardiovascular disease risk among these individuals, compared with controls (hazard ratio 9.14, 95% CI 8.55 to 9.76). The specialist familial hypercholesterolaemia register confirmed excessive cardiovascular morbidity (standardised morbidity ratio 7.17, 95% CI 6.79 to 7.56). Cost-effectiveness modelling found a net health gain from diagnosis of -0.27 to 2.51 quality-adjusted life-years at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £15,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. The cost-effective protocols cascaded from genetically confirmed index cases by contacting first- and second-degree relatives simultaneously and directly. Interviews found a service-led direct-contact approach was more reliable, but combining direct and indirect approaches, guided by index patients and family relationships, may be more acceptable.

Limitations

Systematic reviews were not used in the economic analysis, as relevant studies were lacking or of poor quality. As only a proportion of those with primary care-coded familial hypercholesterolaemia are likely to actually have familial hypercholesterolaemia, CPRD analyses are likely to underestimate the true effect. The cost-effectiveness analysis required assumptions related to the long-term cardiovascular disease risk, the effect of treatment on cholesterol and the generalisability of estimates from the data sets. Interview recruitment was limited to white English-speaking participants.

Conclusions

Based on limited evidence, most cost-effective cascade-testing protocols, diagnosing most relatives, select index cases by genetic testing, with services directly contacting relatives, and contacting second-degree relatives even if first-degree relatives have not been tested. Combined approaches to contact relatives may be more suitable for some families.

Future work

Establish a long-term familial hypercholesterolaemia cohort, measuring cholesterol levels, treatment and cardiovascular outcomes. Conduct a randomised study comparing different approaches to contact relatives.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018117445 and CRD42019125775.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 16. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Cholesterol Screening in Children: Is a Universal Approach Working?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ample evidence supports that an individual's lifetime risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease correlates to long-term, cumulative exposure to circulating cholesterol levels, beginning in childhood. Selective screening strategies based on family history fail to identify many children with hypercholesterolemia. Universal cholesterol screening in childhood is a worthwhile goal. However, cholesterol screening rates through childhood remain low.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mounting evidence clarifies the barriers to cholesterol screening in children. Specific strategies to foster universal screening in childhood have been proposed.

SUMMARY

We present an overview of the present state of childhood cholesterol screening, summarizing historical and contemporary guidelines and collating evidence of low adherence to current guidelines. We contend that novel approaches to universal cholesterol screening in childhood are warranted, and we present potential opportunities for improvement. We call for new and universal pediatric cholesterol screening guidelines.

Screening for Lipid Disorders in Children and Adolescents: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

Importance

Lipid screening in childhood and adolescence can lead to early dyslipidemia diagnosis. The long-term benefits of lipid screening and subsequent treatment in this population are uncertain.

Objective

To review benefits and harms of screening and treatment of pediatric dyslipidemia due to familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and multifactorial dyslipidemia.

Data Sources

MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through May 16, 2022; literature surveillance through March 24, 2023.

Study Selection

English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of lipid screening; recent, large US cohort studies reporting diagnostic yield or screen positivity; and RCTs of lipid-lowering interventions.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Single extraction, verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative synthesis using random-effects meta-analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Health outcomes, diagnostic yield, intermediate outcomes, behavioral outcomes, and harms.

Results

Forty-three studies were included (n = 491 516). No RCTs directly addressed screening effectiveness and harms. Three US studies (n = 395 465) reported prevalence of phenotypically defined FH of 0.2% to 0.4% (1:250 to 1:500). Five studies (n = 142 257) reported multifactorial dyslipidemia prevalence; the prevalence of elevated total cholesterol level (≥200 mg/dL) was 7.1% to 9.4% and of any lipid abnormality was 19.2%. Ten RCTs in children and adolescents with FH (n = 1230) demonstrated that statins were associated with an 81- to 82-mg/dL greater mean reduction in levels of total cholesterol and LDL-C compared with placebo at up to 2 years. Nonstatin-drug trials showed statistically significant lowering of lipid levels in FH populations, but few studies were available for any single drug. Observational studies suggest that statin treatment for FH starting in childhood or adolescence reduces long-term cardiovascular disease risk. Two multifactorial dyslipidemia behavioral counseling trials (n = 934) demonstrated 3- to 6-mg/dL greater reductions in total cholesterol levels compared with the control group, but findings did not persist at longest follow-up. Harms reported in the short-term drug trials were similar in the intervention and control groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

No direct evidence on the benefits or harms of pediatric lipid screening was identified. While multifactorial dyslipidemia is common, no evidence was found that treatment is effective for this condition. In contrast, FH is relatively rare; evidence shows that statins reduce lipid levels in children with FH, and observational studies suggest that such treatment has long-term benefit for this condition.

Risk factors for cardiovascular events in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (heFH) is the most common monogenic cause of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The precise diagnosis of heFH is established by genetic testing. This systematic review will investigate the risk factors that predict cardiovascular events in patients with a genetic diagnosis of heFH.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our literature search will cover publications from database inception until June 2023. We will undertake a search of CINAHL (trial), clinicalKey, Cochrane Library, DynaMed, Embase, Espacenet, Experiments (trial), Fisterra, ÍnDICEs CSIC, LILACS, LISTA, Medline, Micromedex, NEJM Resident 360, OpenDissertations, PEDro, Trip Database, PubPsych, Scopus, TESEO, UpToDate, Web of Science and the grey literature for eligible studies. We will screen the title, abstract and full-text papers for potential inclusion and assess the risk of bias. We will employ the Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials and non-randomised clinical studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the risk of bias in observational studies. We will include full-text peer-reviewed publications, reports of a cohort/registry, case-control and cross-sectional studies, case report/series and surveys related to adults (≥18 years of age) with a genetic diagnostic heFH. The language of the searched studies will be restricted to English or Spanish. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. Based on the data available, the authors will determine whether the data can be pooled in meta-analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022304273.

Direct LDL-C estimation in preschoolers: Practicable first step for FH screening

BACKGROUND

Individuals with FH develop cardiovascular disease due to lifelong cumulative exposure to elevated LDL-C. Effective screening for FH is not yet established.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the practicability of a FH screening by measuring directly the LDL-C in preschoolers.

METHODS

LDL-C measurement through capillary blood sampling during the compulsory routine check-ups by the pediatrician in children aged 2 to 6 years including information on family history as dyslipidemia and/or premature cardiovascular disease in first and second grade of pedigrees.

RESULTS

15,009 children (52.2% males, median age 3.9 years [IQR 3.0-5.1]) participated in the study. Positive family history for hyperlipidemia was stated in 40.9% cases, in 12.0% also in at least one 1st degree relative. In the total cohort, median LDL-C was 93 mg/dL [IQR 79-109 mg/dL]. Boys had significantly higher LDL-C levels than girls (p < 0.0001), whereas there was no difference regarding their age (p = 0.757). Children from families with a positive history for hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia had significantly higher LDL-C levels (p < 0.001) and were more frequently among those with LDL-C values above 135 mg/dL (3.5 mmol/L, 96^th percentile; 53.2% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.001) and those with LDL-C levels above 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L, 99^th percentile; 45.3% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001) than children without positive family history.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct measurement of LDL-C levels in children at ages 2-6 years during the compulsory routine check-ups as well as at any voluntary visits to the pediatrician's office is practicable and delivers reliable information, which can be used for a FH screening strategy in the general population.

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The American Heart Association, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2023 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2022 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. The American Heart Association strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) publications, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

A comparison of the Netherlands, Norway and UK familial hypercholesterolemia screening programmes with implications for target setting and the UK's NHS long term plan

We sought to determine the most efficacious and cost-effective strategy to follow when developing a national screening programme by comparing and contrasting the national screening programmes of Norway, the Netherlands and the UK. Comparing the detection rates and screening profiles between the Netherlands, Norway, the UK and constituent nations (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) it is clear that maximising the number of relatives screened per index case leads to identification of the greatest proportion of an FH population. The UK has stated targets to detect 25% of the population of England with FH across the 5 years to 2024 with the NHS Long Term Plan. However, this is grossly unrealistic and, based on pre-pandemic rates, will only be reached in the year 2096. We also modelled the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two screening strategies: 1) Universal screening of 1-2-year-olds, 2) electronic healthcare record screening, in both cases coupled to reverse cascade screening. We found that index case detection from electronic healthcare records was 56% more efficacious than universal screening and, depending on the cascade screening rate of success, 36%-43% more cost-effective per FH case detected. The UK is currently trialling universal screening of 1-2-year-olds to contribute to national FH detection targets. Our modelling suggests that this is not the most efficacious or cost-effective strategy to follow. For countries looking to develop national FH programmes, screening of electronic healthcare records, coupled to successful cascade screening to blood relatives is likely to be a preferable strategy to follow.

[Advantages of Universal Early Childhood Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Germany]

Hintergrund Kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse sind die wichtigste Mortalitätsursache in der westlichen Welt. Die familiäre Hypercholesterinämie (FH) zeichnet sich durch erhöhte low-density Lipoprotein-Cholesterin- und Gesamtcholesterin-Spiegel im peripheren Blut aus. Die FH beruht zumeist auf einer genetischen Veränderung im LDL-Rezeptorgen und gehört zu den häufigsten monogenen Erkrankungen. Bei der homozygoten Form ist die Mortalität aufgrund kardiovaskulärer Ereignisse im Kindes- und Jugendalter extrem hoch. Auch die heterozygote Form der FH führt unbehandelt früh zu kardiovaskulären Ereignissen und sollte frühzeitig diagnostiziert und behandelt werden, um eine Atherosklerose zu vermeiden. Die präventive und sichere Anwendung einer medikamentösen Lipidsenkung konnte für Kinder gezeigt werden.

Methode Literatursuche in Cochrane library, Medline, NCBI databases.

Ergebnisse Anders als in europäischen Nachbarländern wurde in Deutschland im Kindesalter kein universelles Screening auf diese häufige Erkrankung etabliert, obwohl dies in den Leitlinien gefordert wird. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird die Literatur untersucht hinsichtlich der Kausalität der Erkrankung, der Therapie im Kindesalter sowie hinsichtlich des Zutreffens klassischer und modifizierter Kriterien für das Durchführen eines vorgeschlagenen universellen FH-Screenings zum 5. Geburtstag mit anschließendem reversen Kaskadenscreening bei Verwandten.

Schlussfolgerung Die Autoren plädieren für die Einführung eines universellen FH-Screenings in Deutschland zur Vorsorgeuntersuchung U9 mit 5 Jahren. Eine Analyse anhand des Goldstandards klassischer Kriterien nach Wilson und Jungner sowie anhand im zeitlichen Kontext angepasster Kriterien zeigt die Vorteile eines universellen frühkindlichen FH-Screening. Dieses kann präventiv das kardiovaskuläre Risiko absenken, das Fortschreiten der Atherosklerose verlangsamen und zu niedrigeren Inzidenzen von Schlaganfall und Herzinfarkt im Erwachsenenalter beitragen. Neben den diagnostizierten FH-Kindern können auch deren betroffene Verwandte erkannt werden.

The Detection, Evaluation, and Management of Dyslipidemia in Children and Adolescents: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association Clinical Practice Update

Atherosclerosis begins in youth and is directly linked with the presence and severity of cardiovascular risk factors, including dyslipidemia. Thus, the timely identification and management of dyslipidemia in childhood might slow atherosclerotic progression and decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood. This is particularly true for children with genetic disorders resulting in marked dyslipidemia, including familial hypercholesterolemia, which remains frequently undiagnosed. Universal and cascade screening strategies can effectively identify cases of pediatric dyslipidemia. In the clinical evaluation of children with dyslipidemia, evaluating for secondary causes of dyslipidemia, including medications and systemic disorders is essential. The first line therapy generally centres around lifestyle modifications, with dietary changes specific to the dyslipidemia phenotype. Indications for medication depend on the severity of dyslipidemia and an individualized assessment of cardiovascular risk. Despite an expanding evidence base supporting the detection and timely management of pediatric dyslipidemia, numerous knowledge gaps remain, including a sufficient evidence base to support more widespread screening, thresholds for initiation of pharmacotherapy, and treatment targets. Further studies on the most appropriate age for statin initiation and long-term safety studies of statin use in youth are also required. The most pressing matter, however, is the development of knowledge translation strategies to improve the screening and detection of lipid disorders in Canadian youth.

Universal screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in 2 populations

PURPOSE

In Europe, >2 million individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are currently undiagnosed. Effective screening strategies for FH diagnosis in childhood are urgently needed. We assessed the overall performances of 2 different FH screening programs in children: universal screening program with opt-out and opt-in type participation.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from 2 independent populations based on >166,000 individuals screened for hypercholesterolemia. Genetic analyses of FH-related genes were finalized in 945 children and 99 parents.

RESULTS

A total of 305 (32.3%) children were genotyped as positive or with a variant of uncertain significance in FH-related genes. For low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of 3.5 mmol L (135.3 mg/dL), the overall sensitivity and specificity for confirming FH were 90.5% and 55.3%, respectively. As part of child-parent screening, in >90% of the families, the parent with reported higher cholesterol levels was positive for the familial genetic variant. The cohort-based prevalence of FH from the opt-out universal screening program was estimated to be 1 in 431 individuals (95% CI = 1/391-1/472).

CONCLUSION

Universal 3-step FH screening approach in children enabled detection of most children and their parents in every generation screened at reasonable costs. Opt-out screening strategy might be preferable over opt-in screening strategy.

Recent Advances on Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Children and Adolescents

Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common autosomal hereditary disorder characterized by elevated concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the development of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Early diagnosis, as well as prompt and aggressive treatment, are fundamental steps to prevent cardiovascular complications and a high rate of premature mortality in children and adolescents. Clinics and genetics are the two main aspects on which diagnosis is based. Widespread screening programs are a respectable option for the early detection of familial hypercholesterolemia. Different types of screening have been proposed so far; however, the optimal screening program has not yet been found. The treatment approach for both heterozygous and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in the pediatric population is multidisciplinary, including lifestyle modifications, standard lipid-lowering medications, and novel pharmacological agents. The latter show promising results, especially for patients who experience intolerance to other treatment or present with more severe conditions. Our purpose is to focus on the importance of the early detection of familial hypercholesterolemia, and to highlight the best therapeutic strategies, including the recent approaches based on current clinical evidence, that need to be adopted from the earliest stages of life.

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2022 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year's edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population and an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, and the global burden of cardiovascular disease and healthy life expectancy.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Pilot study of universal screening of children and child-parent cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia in Australia

AIM

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common and treatable cause of premature coronary artery disease. However, the majority of individuals with FH remain undiagnosed. This study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of screening children aged 1-2 years for FH at the time of an immunisation.

METHODS

Children 1-2 years of age were offered screening for FH with a point-of-care total cholesterol (TC) test by capillary-collected blood sample at the time of an immunisation. An additional blood sample was taken to allow genetic testing if the TC level was above the 95th percentile (>5.3 mmol/L). Parents of children diagnosed with FH were offered testing. Following detection of the affected parent, cascade testing of their first-degree blood relatives was performed.

RESULTS

We screened 448 children with 32 (7.1%) having a TC ≥ 5.3 mmol/L. The FH diagnosis was confirmed in three children (1:150 screened). Reverse cascade testing of other family members identified a further five individuals with FH; hence, eight new cases of FH were diagnosed from screening 448 children (1:56 screened). Ninety-six percent of parents would screen future children for FH. The approach was cost-effective, at $3979 per quality-adjusted life year gained.

CONCLUSION

In Western Australia, universal screening of children aged 1-2 years for FH, undertaken at the time of an immunisation, was a feasible and effective approach to detect children, parents and other blood relatives with FH. The approach was acceptable to parents and is potentially a highly cost-effective detection strategy for families at risk of FH.

Population genomic screening of young adults for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a cost-effectiveness analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of offering population genomic screening to all young adults in Australia to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We designed a decision analytic Markov model to compare the current standard of care for heterozygous FH diagnosis in Australia (opportunistic cholesterol screening and genetic cascade testing) with the alternate strategy of population genomic screening of adults aged 18-40 years to detect pathogenic variants in the LDLR/APOB/PCSK9 genes. We used a validated cost-adaptation method to adapt findings to eight high-income countries. The model captured coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity/mortality over a lifetime horizon, from healthcare and societal perspectives. Risk of CHD, treatment effects, prevalence, and healthcare costs were estimated from published studies. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), discounted 5% annually. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore the impact of key input parameters on the robustness of the model. Over the lifetime of the population (4 167 768 men; 4 129 961 women), the model estimated a gain of 33 488years of life lived and 51 790 QALYs due to CHD prevention. Population genomic screening for FH would be cost-effective from a healthcare perspective if the per-test cost was ≤AU$250, yielding an ICER of <AU$28 000 per QALY gained. From a societal perspective, population genomic screening would be cost-saving. ICERs from societal perspective remained cost-saving after adaptation to other countries.

CONCLUSION

Based on our model, offering population genomic screening to all young adults for FH could be cost-effective, at testing costs that are feasible.

Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia-past, present, and future

In the early 1980s, the Nobel Prize winning cellular and molecular work of Mike Brown and Joe Goldstein led to the identification of the LDL receptor gene as the first gene where mutations cause the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) phenotype. We now know that autosomal dominant monogenic FH can be caused by pathogenic variants of three additional genes (APOB/PCSK9/APOE) and that the plasma LDL-C concentration and risk of premature coronary heart disease differs according to the specific locus and associated molecular cause. It is now possible to use next-generation sequencing to sequence all exons of all four genes, processing 96 patient samples in one sequencing run, increasing the speed of test results, and reducing costs. This has resulted in the identification of not only many novel FH-causing variants but also some variants of unknown significance, which require further evidence to classify as pathogenic or benign. The identification of the FH-causing variant in an index case can be used as an unambiguous and rapid test for other family members. An FH-causing variant can be found in 20-40% of patients with the FH phenotype, and we now appreciate that in the majority of patients without a monogenic cause, a polygenic etiology for their phenotype is highly likely. Compared with those with a monogenic cause, these patients have significantly lower risk of future coronary heart disease. The use of these molecular genetic diagnostic methods in the characterization of FH is a prime example of the utility of precision or personalized medicine.

Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia through centralized analytical data. HF HUELVA DETECTA Program

BACKGROUND

Familial Hypercholesterolemia is the most frequent genetic cause of premature coronary heart disease. The delay in the diagnosis prevents the correct early treatment. There are no effective screening strategies at the national level that ensure a correct diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the capacity of a centralized laboratory for the diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia through the creation of a health program for population screening in the province of Huelva.

METHOD

Active search of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia through the blood tests carried out in the reference laboratories with results of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol greater than 200 mg/dl and assessment in the Lipid Unit of Huelva to identify index cases, with subsequent family cascade screening.

RESULTS

37,440 laboratory tests with lipid profile were examined. After screening, 846 individuals were seen in the Lipid Unit, of which they were diagnosed according to criteria of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network as possible 654 and probable/definitive 192 individuals, representing 1.74% and 0.51% of the general population examined respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The point prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in patients submitted to laboratory lipid profile tests was 1:195, higher compared to the prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the general population (based on 1 in 200-300). The opportunistic search strategy of the index case through a laboratory alert and centralized screening is an efficient strategy to implement a national screening for the diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Massive data screening is a second opportunity to improve the management of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia phenotype

INTRODUCTION

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disease with an estimated prevalence between 1/200-250. It is under-treated and underdiagnosed. Massive data screening can increase the detection of patients with FH.

METHODS

Study population: Residents in the health coverage area (N: 195.000 inhabitants) and with at least one determination of cholesterol linked to low-density lipoproteins (LDL-C) carried out between January 1, 2010 and December 30, 2019. The highest LDL-C values were selected.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

nephrotic syndrome, hypothyroidism, Hypothyroid treatment or triglycerides> 400 mg / dL. Seven algorithms suggestive of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phenotype (HF-P) were analyzed, selecting the most efficient algorithm that could easily be translated into clinical practice.

RESULTS

Based on 6.264.877 assistances and 288.475 patients, after applying the inclusion-exclusion criteria, 504.316 tests were included, corresponding to 106.382 adults and 10.509 <18 years. The selected algorithm presented a prevalence of 0.62%. 840 patients with HF-P were detected, 55.8% being women and 178 <18 years old, 9.3% had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 16.4% had died. 65% of the patients in primary prevention had LDL-C values> 130 mg / dL and 83% in secondary prevention values> 70mg / dL. A ratio of 7.64 (1-18) patients with HF-P per analytical requesting physician was obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Massive data screening and patient profiling are effective tools and easily applicable in clinical practice for the detection of patients with FH.

Advances, gaps and opportunities in the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia: overview of current and future screening and detection methods

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies reaffirm that familial hypercholesterolemia is more prevalent than initially considered, with a population frequency of approximately one in 300. The majority of patients remains unidentified. This warrants critical evaluation of existing screening methods and exploration of novel methods of detection.

RECENT FINDINGS

New public policy recommendations on the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia have been made by a global community of experts and advocates. Phenotypic tools for diagnosing index cases remain inaccurate. Genetic testing is the gold standard for familial hypercholesterolemia and a new international position statement has been published. Correction of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) for the cholesterol content of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may increase the precision of the phenotypic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Cascade cotesting for familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated Lp(a) levels provides a new opportunity to stratify risk in families. Digital technology and machine learning methods, coupled with clinical alert and decision support systems, lead the way in more efficient approaches for detecting and managing index cases. Universal screening of children, combined with child-parent cascade testing, appears to be the most effective method for underpinning a population strategy for maximizing the detection of familial hypercholesterolemia.

SUMMARY

Detection of familial hypercholesterolemia can be enhanced by optimizing current diagnostic algorithms, probing electronic health records with novel information technologies and integrating universal screening of children with cascade testing of parents and other relatives.