Surgical Repair of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Impella 5.5 support before, during, and after surgical ventricular septal defect repair: A bridge continuum

INTRODUCTION

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect formation remains a formidable mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction associated with increased morbidity and mortality.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of a 72-year-old male who was admitted with post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect and cardiogenic shock.

DISCUSSION

Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist as temporary left ventricular assist device provided sufficient support throughout multiple bridging episodes including failed percutaneous repair and subsequent definitive surgical repair. Contemporary management of post-infarction ventricular septal defect is discussed.

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support after Cardiac Surgery

Postcardiotomy shock in the cardiac surgical patient is a highly morbid condition characterized by profound myocardial impairment and decreased systemic perfusion inadequate to meet end-organ metabolic demand. Postcardiotomy shock is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Poor outcomes motivate the increased use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to restore perfusion in an effort to prevent multiorgan injury and improve patient survival. Despite growing acceptance and adoption of MCS for postcardiotomy shock, criteria for initiation, clinical management, and future areas of clinical investigation remain a topic of ongoing debate. This article seeks to (1) define critical cardiac dysfunction in the patient after cardiotomy, (2) provide an overview of commonly used MCS devices, and (3) summarize the relevant clinical experience for various MCS devices available in the literature, with additional recognition for the role of MCS as a part of a modified approach to the cardiac arrest algorithm in the cardiac surgical patient.

Effect of Delayed Surgery for Ventricular Septal Rupture on Postoperative Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after acute myocardial infarction remains poor; hence, surgical repair is essential. However, the appropriate timing for surgical intervention remains unclear. We aimed to compare the prognosis between early (<96 hours) and delayed (≥96 hours) surgery for VSR.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study used data from 49 patients who underwent VSR repair after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between 2007 and 2022 at our institution. In-hospital and one-, three-, and 10-year mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were compared between the early (group A) and delayed (group B) surgery after AMI.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the patients' backgrounds of the two groups. The in-hospital mortality rates were 37.5 and 16.0% for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.114). The overall survival rates estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis were 66.5 ± 6.9, 58.2 ± 7.5, and 28.8 ± 10.6% after one, three, and 10 years, respectively. The mortality rates in group B at three (hazard risk ratio: 2.691; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-7.097) and 10 (hazard risk ratio: 2.575; 95% confidence interval: 1.125-5.891) years were significantly better than those in group A. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly different between the two groups at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed that patients who underwent surgery for VSR 96 hours after AMI had better long-term survival than those who underwent surgery within 96 hours.

Lower extremity artery thromboembolism during removal of Impella after repair for ventricular septal rupture: A case report

Although the anticoagulant complications of Impella are well known, the timing of heparin administration when using Impella immediately after open heart surgery has not been established. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with Impella-assisted repair of a ventricular septal perforation after acute myocardial infarction who developed thromboembolism of the lower extremity arteries after removal of Impella.

Ventricular Septal Rupture After Myocardial Infarction: JACC Focus Seminar 3/5

Ventricular septal rupture remains a dreadful complication of acute myocardial infarction. Although less commonly observed than during the prethrombolytic era, the condition remains complex and is often associated with refractory cardiogenic shock and death. Corrective surgery, although superior to medical treatment, has been associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter closure techniques are less invasive to surgery and offer a valuable alternative, particularly in patients with cardiogenic shock. In these patients, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support represents a novel opportunity for immediate stabilization and preserved end-organ function. Multimodality imaging can identify favorable septal anatomy for the most appropriate type of repair. The heart team approach will define optimal timing for surgery vs percutaneous repair. Emerging concepts are proposed for a deferred treatment approach, including orthotropic heart transplantation in ideal candidates. Finally, for futile situations, palliative care experts and a medical ethics team will provide the best options for end-of-life clinical decision making.

Right Ventricular Myocardial Infarction-A Tale of Two Ventricles: JACC Focus Seminar 1/5

Right ventricular infarction (RVI) complicates 50% of cases of acute inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and is associated with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Ischemic right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction decreases left ventricular preload delivery, resulting in low-output hypotension with clear lungs, and disproportionate right heart failure. RV systolic performance is generated by left ventricular contractile contributions mediated by the septum. Augmented right atrial contraction optimizes RV performance, whereas very proximal occlusions induce right atrial ischemia exacerbating hemodynamic compromise. RVI is associated with vagal mediated bradyarrhythmias, both during acute occlusion and abruptly with reperfusion. The ischemic dilated RV is also prone to malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Nevertheless, RV is remarkably resistant to infarction. Reperfusion facilitates RV recovery, even after prolonged occlusion and in patients with severe shock. However, in some cases hemodynamic compromise persists, necessitating pharmacological and mechanical circulatory support with dedicated RV assist devices as a "bridge to recovery."

Successful repair of recurrent ventricular septal perforation after myocardial infarction using double patch technique via right ventriculotomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal perforation (VSP) is a rare but life-threatening complication. Surgical repair is challenging and carries significant risks, particularly in the context of recurrent VSPs. This case study presents a patient with recurrent VSP after initial surgical repair following myocardial infarction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old male were re-administered to our hospital due to recurrent VSP. He was during follow up after undergone emergency VSP closure surgery 2 months earlier, utilizing the bovine double patch technique via left ventriculostomy. The initial VSP was located in the apical part of the interventricular septum, while the recurrent VSP appeared in the upper middle portion of the interventricular septum (Fig. 1). As the previous patch remained intact, the second surgery employed the bovine double patch technique via right ventriculostomy. The patient's condition remained stable without the development of heart failure symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Repairing recurrent VSPs remains a challenge, necessitating the mastery of appropriate approaches to achieve optimal outcomes. Further research and guidelines are required to refine management strategies for recurrent VSPs.

Multicentre short- and medium-term report on the device closure of a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture - In search of risk factors for early mortality

BACKGROUND

Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare and severe complication of myocardial infarction. To find early mortality (<30 days) risk factors of device VSR closure and to evaluate its medium-term outcome.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective analysis on all 46 consecutive patients with percutaneous (n = 43) or hybrid (n = 3) VSR closure in 2000-2020 with various nitinol wire mesh occluders. Medical records, hemodynamic data, procedure results, short- and mid-term follow-up were analyzed (4.8 ± 3.7 years, range: 0.1-15, available in 61.7% of patients). Of the patients, 34.8% underwent VSR closure in acute phase (<21 days after VSR occurrence), 17.4% underwent device closure due to significant residual shunt after previous VSR surgery.

RESULTS

Success rate was 78.3%. More than moderate residual shunt, major complications, and early surgical reintervention affected 18.9%, 15.2% (including 2 intra-procedural deaths), and 21.7% of patients, respectively. Early mortality was 26.1% (13.9% in successful vs. 70% in unsuccessful closure; p < 0.001). Older age, need for intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, severe complications, and procedural failure were identified as risk factors for early mortality. Among patients who survived the early period, the 5-year survival rate was 57.1%. NYHA class improved in 88.2% patients at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure of VSR device closure demonstrates an acceptable technical success rate; however, the incidence of severe complications and early mortality is notably high. Older patients in poor hemodynamic condition and those with unsuccessful occluder deployment are particularly at a higher risk of a fatal outcome. The prognosis after early survival is promising.

[Communication interventriculaire compliquant un infarctus de myocarde antérieur : un cas de fermeture percutanée]

INTRODUCTION

Post-infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is one of the most serious mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Over the last decade, percutaneous closure is increasingly undertaken, with results similar to cardiac surgery. We present a case of ST-elevated anterior AMI, complicated by apical PIVSD successfully treated with transcatheter closure.

CASE REPORT

An 83-year-old man was hospitalized for chest pain occurred 18 hours before, during the night time. He was an active smoker. Clinical examination revealed normal heart sounds and pulmonary bibasilar crackles. ST-segment elevation with deep T waves inversion in anterior leads were detected on the electrocardiogram. A mildly-reduced ejection fraction (40%) was found by transthoracic echocardiogram. The patient underwent emergency coronary angiography, which revealed a subocclusive stenosis of the mid left anterior descending artery with a TIMI 2 flow, treated by balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent. Four days after revascularization, the patient developed an acute deterioration with signs of decompensated heart failure and a new holosystolic murmur with large irradiation. Inotropic agents' administration was required to maintain a precarious hemodynamic condition. A bedside Echo revealed an apical VSD, measuring 15 × 10 mm, with left-to-right shunting, and pulmonary hypertension. The patient was scheduled for transcatheter PIVSD closure. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic guide. Two vascular access sites were placed, femoral arterial and right internal jugular vein. Through the right internal jugular vein, a 24-mm Amplatzer atrial septal occluder on a 9 French Amplatzer TREVISIO™ intravascular delivery system was advanced via right ventricle into the PIVSD. Contrast fluoroscopy was used to assess apposition and the degree of shunt reduction before release. Echocardiographic evaluation performed 48 hours later confirmed a correct apposition of the device with insignificant residual shunt. At 6 months follow-up, he was asymptomatic, with unchanged prosthetic findings.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous closure has been emerged as a valid cost-effective alternative to surgery and should be advised. However, debate remains on the optimal preprocedural optimization, timing of repair and modality of treatment.

Delayed surgical repair via right ventricular approach with Impella and extracorporeal life support in post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is a life-threatening mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Delayed elective surgical repair can be considered in patients who respond well to aggressive heart failure therapy. Impella has been reported as a bridge to allow the deferment of surgery for PIVSD.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This report describes our case of a 62-year-old male with PIVSD and cardiogenic shock. Impella was placed to ensure hemodynamic stability. Subsequently, right heart failure was suspected to be caused by insufficient circulatory support from Impella alone. Emergency surgery was considered, but it was high risk and only a few days had passed since the onset. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was implanted to treat right heart failure and delay surgical repair as long as possible. Six days after Impella implantation, the patient underwent a successful surgical repair via the right ventricle without associated adverse events.

DISCUSSION

Impella support can be insufficient for critically ill patients such as those with a larger ventricular septal defect and involvement of right ventricular function. VA-ECMO was implanted to support circulation, reduce the preload in the right ventricle, and avoid shunt inversion induced by increasing Impella flow. The patient was able to undergo a successful delayed repair with VA-ECMO at least one week after the onset of the AMI with hemodynamic stability and no associated adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Additional VA-ECMO could help patients who fail to bridge to surgery with Impella to avoid emergency surgery, leading to successful delayed surgical repair.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support & enhancing recovery after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the integration of enhanced recovery principles with temporary mechanical circulatory support associated with adult cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced recovery elements and efforts have been associated with improvements in quality and value. Temporary mechanical circulatory support technologies have been successfully employed, improved, and the value of their proactive use to maintain hemodynamic goals and preserve long-term myocardial function is accruing.

SUMMARY

Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices promise to enhance recovery by mitigating the risk of complications, such as postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, organ dysfunction, and death, associated with adult cardiac surgery.

A case of ECPELLA-supported treatment for post-infarction cardiac rupture

The efficacy and risk of a combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), an approach known as ECPELLA, for post-infarction cardiac rupture is unclear. We describe the case of a 72-year-old man who presented with acute myocardial infarction. The patient was managed with ECPELLA because of hemodynamic compromise. One week later, there was a sudden increase in venous oxygen saturation. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed ventricular septal rupture, and free wall rupture. Intraventricular thrombus was also observed despite standard anticoagulation therapy. Even with double cardiac rupture, ECPELLA could facilitate left ventricular unloading and sustain hemodynamics. However, because of the risk of device failure due to thrombus aspiration into the Impella, the patient underwent repair surgery. Postoperatively, the patient was temporarily weaned off ECPELLA, and his hemodynamics deteriorated again, and he finally died.

Learning objectives

ECPELLA can effectively stabilize the hemodynamics in cases of post-infarction cardiac rupture. However, there are still challenges to address, such as determining optimal ventricular reloading and ECPELLA management for intraventricular thrombus prevention. When using ECPELLA to delay surgery for post-infarction cardiac rupture, it is crucial to strike a balance between hemodynamic stabilization and avoiding potential serious complications.

Perioperative Challenges and Outcome After Surgical Correction of Post-myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Retrospective Single Center Study

BACKGROUND

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but grave complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is a mechanical complication of myocardial infarction where patients may present either in a compensated state or in cardiogenic shock. The aim of the study is to determine the in-hospital mortality. The study also aims to identify the predictors of outcomes (in-hospital mortality, vasoactive inotrope score (VIS), duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation in the postoperative period) and compare the clinical and surgical parameters between survivors and non-survivors.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. The data of 90 patients was collected from the medical records and the data comprising of 13 patients who underwent VSR closure by single patch technique, or septal occluder, and those who expired before receiving the treatment, was excluded. The data of 77 patients diagnosed with post-AMI VSR and who underwent surgical closure of VSR by double patch technique was included in this study. Clinical findings and echocardiography parameters were recorded from the perioperative period. The statistical software used was SPSS version 27. The primary outcome was determining the in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was identifying the clinical parameters that are significantly more in the non-survivors, and the factors predicting the in-hopsital mortality and morbidity (increased duration of ICU stay, and of mechanical ventilation, postoperative requirement of high doses of vasopressors and inotropes). Subgroup analysis was done to identify the relation of various clinical parameters with the postoperative complications. The factors predicting the in-hospital mortality were illustrated by a forest plot.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 60.35 (±9.9) years, 56 (72.7%) were males, and 21 (27.3%) were females. Requirement of mechanical ventilation preoperatively (OR 3.92 [CI 2.91-6.96]), cardiogenic shock at presentation (OR 4 [CI 2.33 - 6.85]), requirement of IABP (OR 2.05 [CI 1.38-3.94]), were predictors of mortality. The apical location of VSR had been favorable for survival. The EUROScore II at presentation correlated with the postoperative VIS (level of significance [LS] 0.0011, R 0.36. The in-hospital mortality in this study was 33.76%.

CONCLUSION

The in-hospital mortality of VSR is 33.76%. Cardiogenic shock at presentation, non-apical site of VSR, preoperative requirement of mechanical ventilation, high VIS preoperatively, perioperative utilization of IABP, prolonged CPB time, postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation, and high postoperative VIS were the factors associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality.

Impact of COVID-19 on incidence and outcomes of post-infarction mechanical complications in Europe

OBJECTIVES

Post-acute myocardial infarction mechanical complications (post-AMI MCs) represent rare but life-threatening conditions, including free-wall rupture, ventricular septal rupture and papillary muscle rupture. During the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, an overwhelming pressure on healthcare systems led to delayed and potentially suboptimal treatments for time-dependent conditions. As AMI-related hospitalizations decreased, limited information is available whether higher rates of post-AMI MCs and related deaths occurred in this setting. This study was aimed to assess how COVID-19 in Europe has impacted the incidence, treatment and outcome of MCs.

METHODS

The CAUTION-COVID19 study is a multicentre retrospective study collecting 175 patients with post-AMI MCs in 18 centres from 6 European countries, aimed to compare the incidence of such events, related patients' characteristics, and outcomes, between the first year of pandemic and the 2 previous years.

RESULTS

A non-significant increase in MCs was observed [odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.57; P = 0.364], with stronger growth in ventricular septal rupture diagnoses (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.95-2.18; P = 0.090). No significant differences in treatment types and mortality were found between the 2 periods. In-hospital mortality was 50.9% and was higher for conservatively managed cases (90.9%) and lower for surgical patients (44.0%). Patients admitted during COVID-19 more frequently had late-presenting infarction (OR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.24-4.92; P = 0.010), more stable conditions (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.27-5.35; P = 0.009) and higher EuroSCORE II (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

A non-significant increase in MCs incidence occurred during the first year of COVID-19, characterized by a significantly higher rate of late-presenting infarction, stable conditions and EuroSCORE-II if compared to pre-pandemic data, without affecting treatment and mortality.

Role of ECLS in Managing Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after myocardial infarction (MI) and the preoperative use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) as a bridge to surgery.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing surgery for VSR from January 2009 until June 2021 from two centers in Germany. Patients were separated into two groups, those with and without ECLS, before surgery. Pre- and intraoperative data, outcome, and survival during follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 consecutive patients were included. Twenty-five patients were in the ECLS group, and 22 were in the group without ECLS. All the ECLS-group patients were in cardiogenic shock preoperatively. Most patients in the ECLS group were transferred from another hospital [n = 21 (84%) vs. no-ECLS (n = 12 (57.1%), p = 0.05]. We observed a higher number of postoperative bleeding complications favoring the group without ECLS [n = 6 (28.6%) vs. n = 16 (64%), p < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the persistence of residual ventricular septal defect (VSD) between groups [ECLS n = 4 (16.7%) and no-ECLS n = 3 (13.6%)], p = 1.0. Total in-hospital mortality was 38.3%. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality [n = 6 (27.3%) vs. n = 12 (48%), p = 0.11] and survival at last follow-up between the groups (p = 0.50).

CONCLUSION

We detected no statistical difference in the in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients who received ECLS as supportive therapy after MI-induced VSR compared to those without ECLS. ECLS could be an effective procedure applied as a bridge to surgery in patients with VSR and cardiogenic shock.

Delayed Ventricular Septal Rupture Repair After Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Review

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but serious complication that can occur after myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal management approach for VSR remains a topic of debate, with considerations including early versus delayed surgery, risk stratification, pharmacological interventions, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering. The pathophysiology of VSR involves myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and enzymatic degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), particularly mediated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These processes lead to structural weakening and subsequent rupture of the ventricular septum. Hemodynamically, VSR results in left-to-right shunting, increased pulmonary blood flow, and potentially hemodynamic instability. The early surgical repair offers the advantages of immediate closure of the defect, prevention of complications, and potentially improved outcomes. However, it is associated with higher surgical risk and limited myocardial recovery potential during the waiting period. In contrast, delayed surgery allows for a period of myocardial recovery, risk stratification, and optimization of surgical outcomes. However, it carries the risk of ongoing complications and progression of ventricular remodeling. Risk stratification plays a crucial role in determining the optimal timing for surgery and tailoring treatment plans. Various clinical factors, imaging assessments, scoring systems, biomarkers, and hemodynamic parameters aid in risk assessment and guide decision-making. Pharmacological interventions, including vasopressors, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, and antiarrhythmic drugs, are employed to stabilize hemodynamics, prevent complications, promote myocardial healing, and improve outcomes in VSR patients. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques, such as percutaneous device closure, and tissue engineering hold promise for less invasive interventions and better outcomes. These approaches aim to minimize surgical morbidity, optimize healing, and enhance patient recovery. In conclusion, the management of VSR after MI requires a multidimensional approach that considers various aspects, including risk stratification, surgical timing, pharmacological interventions, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering.

Hybrid Closure of Postinfarction Apical Ventricular Septal Defect Using Septal Occluder Device and Right Ventricular Free Wall: The Apical BASSINET Concept

BACKGROUND

Postinfarction ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a catastrophic complication of myocardial infarction. Surgical repair still has poor outcomes. This report describes clinical outcomes after a novel hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair in patients with apical VSD.

METHODS

Seven patients with postmyocardial infarction apical VSD underwent hybrid transcatheter repair via subxiphoid surgical access. A transcatheter occluder (Amplatzer Septal Occluder) with a trailing premounted suture was deployed through the right ventricular wall and through the ventricular septum into the left ventricular apex. The trailing suture was used to connect an anchor external to the right ventricular wall. Tension on the suture then collapses the right ventricular free wall against the septum and left ventricular occluder, thereby obliterating the VSD. Outcomes were compared with 9 patients who underwent surgical repair using either patch or primary suture closure.

RESULTS

All patients had significant left-to-right shunt (Qp:Qs 2.5:1; interquartile range [IQR, 2.1-2.6] hybrid repair versus 2.0:1 [IQR, 2.0-2.5] surgical repair), and elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (62 [IQR, 46-71] versus 49 [IQR, 43-54] mm Hg, respectively). All had severely depressed stroke volume index (22 versus 21 mL/m2) with ≈45% in each group requiring mechanical support preprocedurally. The procedure was done 15 (IQR, 10-50) versus 24 (IQR, 10-134) days postmyocardial infarction, respectively. Both groups of patients underwent repair with technical success and without intraprocedural death. One patient in the hybrid group and 4 in the surgical group developed multiorgan failure. The hybrid group had a higher survival at discharge (86% versus 56%) and at 30 days (71% versus 56%), but similar at 1 year (57% versus 56%). During follow-up, 1 patient in each group required reintervention for residual VSD (hybrid: 9 months versus surgical: 5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Early intervention with a hybrid transcatheter/surgical repair may be a viable alternative to traditional surgery for postinfarction apical VSD.

A Case of Post-Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicated by Postoperative Septal Rupture

We present the case of a 60-year-old man who presented with a post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture caused by a delayed presentation of myocardial infarction. Despite revascularization, hemodynamic stability, and a 10-day delay until operative management to allow for tissue healing, the patient experienced a fatal recurrent postoperative ventricular septal rupture. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

The current clinical practice for management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture: a European survey

Aims

Many historical and recent reports showed that post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a life-threatening condition and the strategy to optimally manage it remains undefined. Therefore, disparate treatment policies among different centres with variable results are often described. We analysed data from European centres to capture the current clinical practice in VSR management.

Methods and results

Thirty-nine centres belonging to eight European countries participated in a survey, filling a digital form of 38 questions from April to October 2022, to collect information about all the aspects of VSR treatment. Most centres encounter 1-5 VSR cases/year. Surgery remains the treatment of choice over percutaneous closure (71.8% vs. 28.2%). A delayed repair represents the preferred approach (87.2%). Haemodynamic conditions influence the management in almost all centres, although some try to achieve patients stabilization and delayed surgery even in cardiogenic shock. Although 33.3% of centres do not perform coronarography in unstable patients, revascularization approaches are widely variable. Most centres adopt mechanical circulatory support (MCS), mostly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, especially pre-operatively to stabilize patients and achieve delayed repair. Post-operatively, such MCS are more often adopted in patients with ventricular dysfunction.

Conclusion

In real-life, delayed surgery, regardless of the haemodynamic conditions, is the preferred strategy for VSR management in Europe. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is becoming the most frequently adopted MCS as bridge-to-operation. This survey provides a useful background to develop dedicated, prospective studies to strengthen the current evidence on VSR treatment and to help improving its currently unsatisfactory outcomes.

Transcatheter closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Background

Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are one of the mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Because of the high risks of mortality and postoperative complications, a new alternative method is needed. With the development of interventional medicine, transcatheter closure has been increasingly performed for postmyocardial infarction ventricular septal defects (PMIVSDs). The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of PMIVSDs by meta-analysis.

Methods

The included studies were mainly single-arm studies of transcatheter closure of PMIVSDs. We compared VSD size, device size, preoperative risk factors and interventions among PMIVSD patients. We analysed the transcatheter closure success rate, the 30-day mortality rate, and the incidence of residual shunts.

Results

A total of 12 single-arm articles (284 patients) were included. The combined incidences of preoperative hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and diabetes were 66% [95% CI 0.56-0.75], 54% [95% CI 0.40-0.68], and 33% [95% CI] 0.21-0.46], respectively. Multiple studies reported the combined incidences of preoperative PCI, IABP, and CABG, which were 46% [95% CI 0.15-0.80], 60% [95% CI 0.44-0.75], and 8% [95% CI 0.02-0.18]. Eleven studies reported the number of successful closures and the 30-day mortality rate; the success rate was 90% [95% CI 0.86-0.94], and the 30-day mortality rate reached 27% [95% CI 0.86-0.94].

Conclusion

For patients with PMIVSD, transcatheter closure in the acute phase can be used as a rescue measure, while in the chronic phase, it is more effective and has a lower mortality rate, but the effect of selection bias should be considered. Residual shunts are a long-term complication that have a high incidence and long-lasting effects on patients. More large, multicentre, randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to confirm the safety and reliability of transcatheter closure of PMIVSDs.

Impella Support for Surgical Ventricular Septal Defect Repair

Acute postinfarct ventricular septal defect (VSD) is associated with high mortality due to a combination of cardiogenic shock and a complex repair in recently infarcted fragile myocardium. 1 Although the Impella heart pump is established as support for cardiogenic shock, it is relatively contraindicated in postinfarct VSD because of potential right-to-left shunt or stroke due to VSD tissue-related embolus. On autopsy, early repair is technically difficult due to tissue friability and as a result, 38% of surgically repaired patients have evidence of recurrent interventricular septal rupture. 2 Delayed surgical repair (>7 days) is associated with superior survival-54% after 7 days versus 18% prior-but hemodynamic instability may prevent delay. 3 Case reports have shown successful early left ventricular unloading with Impella patients with acute postinfarct VSD before surgical repair. 4,5 We discuss our algorithm for pre-repair Impella support in which we stratify pre-repair support based on the Qp/Qs ratio. For VSD with Qp/Qs >2.5, we use a preoperative Impella heart pump and have not demonstrated reversal in the left-to-right shunt on echocardiography and/or stroke. Our findings are consistent with theoretical models of unloading as demonstrated by shifts in pressure-volume loops. 6.

Early surgical outcomes of a modified infarct exclusion technique in acute post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture: a single-centre experience

Introduction

Operative mortality in an acute post-myocardial infarction (AMI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is high. In addition to ventricular dysfunction, friable myocardium adds to the technical difficulty of the operation. In a modified infarct exclusion technique, the right ventricle is left undisturbed and the free edge of the pericardial patch is incorporated in the sutures while closing the left ventriculotomy. This simplifies the procedure and decreases the chances of right ventricular dysfunction, any residual defect, and bleeding.

Methods

Study design

A retrospective analysis of patients with VSR following AMI operated in our institute from January 2018 to June 2021 was done.

Results

Over the last 3 years, 16 patients with AMI VSR were treated with a modified infarct exclusion technique. Eight patients presented in cardiogenic shock preoperatively and were put on intra-aortic balloon pump support. All patients could be weaned successfully from the cardiopulmonary bypass, no patient had any residual defect, and none of the patients required re-exploration for bleeding. Postoperatively, 5 patients died within the first week and 2 more patients subsequently died due to intractable arrhythmias over the next 30 days.

Conclusions

In our centre, the mortality following repair of VSR after AMI was 43%. The modified infarct exclusion technique is a good technique with less chances of postoperative re-exploration and residual defect.

Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and outcomes of ventricular septal rupture in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but devastating complication in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This was a retrospective single-center observational study which aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of VSR patients and identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality of VSR patients in the era of percutaneous intervention. Patients with VSR after AMI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2016 to December 2020 were enrolled. Among 5395 consecutive patients with AMI, 42 patients (0.78%) were diagnosed with VSR. Left anterior descending coronary artery was the culprit vessel in most cases (84.4%, 27/32). In the multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio (OR): 14.043, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.396-141.283, p = 0.025) and lower platelet count on admission (OR: 0.979; 95% CI: 0.963-0.995; p = 0.009) were significant risk factors of in-hospital death in VSR patients. In all, 11 patients (26.2%) underwent surgical repair, and the rest were treated medically. The 1-year mortality was lower in the surgical group (36.4%, 4/11) than that in the conservative group (74.2%, 23/31) (p = 0.034). During the follow-up, VSR patients treated surgically tended to have a higher long-term survival rate than those treated medically (log rank χ² = 5.005, p = 0.025). The prognosis of patients with VSR remained poor in this study. Female sex and lower platelet count were independent risk factors of in-hospital death in VSR patients. The long-term survival rate of patients treated with surgical repair was significantly better than that of patients treated conservatively.

Incidence, management, and prognosis of post-ischaemic ventricular septal defect: Insights from a 12-year tertiary centre experience

Background

Among mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction, ventricular septal defect (VSD) is uncommon but still serious. The evolution of emergency coronary revascularisation paradoxically decreased our knowledge of this disease, making it even rarer.

Aim

To describe ischaemic VSD incidence, management, and associated in-hospital and 1-year outcomes over a 12-years period.

Methods

A retrospective single-centre register of patients managed for ischaemic VSD between January 2009 and December 2020.

Results

Ninety-seven patients were included representing 8 patients/ years and an incidence of 0.44% of ACS managed. The majority of the patients were 73-years-old males (n = 54, 56%) with STEMI presentation (n = 75, 79%) and already presented with Q necrosis on ECG (n = 70, 74%). Forty-nine (51%) patients underwent PCI, 60 (62%) inotrope/vasopressors infusion, and 70 (72%) acute mechanical circulatory support (IABP 62%, ECMO 13%, and Impella® 3%). VSD surgical repair was performed for 44 patients (45%) and 1 patient was transplanted. In-hospital mortality was 71%, and 86% at 1 year, without significant improvement over the decade. Surgery appears to be a protective factor [0.51 (0.28-0.94) p = 0.003], whereas age [1.06 (1.03-1.09), p < 0.001] and lactate [1.16 (1.09-1.23), p < 0.001] were linked to higher 1-year mortality. None of the patients that were managed medically survived 1 year.

Conclusion

Post-ischaemic VSD is a rare but serious complication still associated with high mortality. Corrective surgery is associated with better survival, however, timing, patient selection, and a place for mechanical circulatory support need to be defined.

The combination of Euroscore II with a new variable "Nongraftable coronary artery lesions" improves the discriminating power of the test in surgical patients with postinfarction ventricular septal defect and ventricular aneurysm

BACKGROUND

We aimed to establish whether Euroscore II can be used for the prediction of hospital mortality in surgical patients with postinfarction intraventricular septal defect (PIVSD) and ventricular aneurysm (VA), and coexisting coronary artery lesions (CALs), and identify perioperative mortality risk factors to improve the discriminating power of Euroscore II.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. The inclusion criterion was PIVSD. Exclusion criteria were previous CABG, conservative treatment, percutaneous transcatheter closure of PIVSDs, and PIVSDs with normal coronary arteries on coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Among 53 patients with PIVSDs and VAs who met eligibility criteria, 12 (22.6%) patients died in the hospital. Logistic regression demonstrated that Euroscore II was associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.23; p = .006), well-calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² (8) = 9.75; p = .283), and had fair discriminating power, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 77% (95% CI: 58%-96%). A newly identified variable "Nongraftable CALs" was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 6.65; 95% CI: 1.24-35.53; p = .027), and had a fair discriminating power, AUC = 70% (95% CI: 54%-85%). When Euroscore II and Nongraftable CALs were combined, the discriminating power of the test increased to 83% (95% CI: 71%-95%), p = .036.

CONCLUSION

Euroscore II has adequate discriminating power and good calibration in predicting in-hospital mortality of surgical patients with PIVSDs and VAs. The combination of Euroscore II with a new variable "Nongraftable CALs" significantly improves the performance of the model.

Ventricular septal defect complicating myocardial infarction: A case of delayed percutaneous transcatheter closure

A 57-year-old man suffered chest pain during the COVID-19 pandemic, but he delayed medical treatment due to fear of infection. After 4 months, symptoms of chest tightness and shortness of breath appeared. Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed old myocardial infarction; color sonography and myocardial computed tomography revealed apical myocardial defect. He refused surgery and percutaneous transcatheter closure, and follow-up observation. After 22 months, the symptoms of chest tightness and shortness of breath aggravated. He recovered after percutaneous transcatheter closure, and was discharged. This case shows delayed closure is one of the possible options for patients without severe organ dysfunction or hemodynamic disturbance.

Analysis of influencing factors for prognosis of patients with ventricular septal perforation: A single-center retrospective study

Background

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a type of cardiac rupture, usually complicated by acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with a high mortality rate and often poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to investigate the factors influencing the long-term prognosis of patients with VSR from different aspects, comparing the evaluation performance of the Gensini score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and European Heart Surgery Risk Assessment System II (EuroSCORE II) score systems.

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled 188 patients with VSR between Dec 9, 2011 and Nov 21, 2021at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. All patients were followed up until Jan 27, 2022 for clinical data, angiographic characteristics, echocardiogram outcomes, intraoperative, postoperative characteristics and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (30-day mortality, cardiac readmission). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to explore the predictors of long-term mortality.

Results

The median age of 188 VSR patients was 66.2 ± 9.1 years and 97 (51.6%) were males, and there were 103 (54.8%) patients in the medication group, 34 (18.1%) patients in the percutaneous transcatheter closure (TCC) group, and 51 (27.1%) patients in the surgical repair group. The average follow-up time was 857.4 days. The long-term mortality of the medically managed group, the percutaneous TCC group, and the surgical repair group was 94.2, 32.4, and 35.3%, respectively. Whether combined with cardiogenic shock (OR 0.023, 95% CI 0.001-0.054, P = 0.019), NT-pro BNP level (OR 0.027, 95% CI 0.002-0.34, P = 0.005), EuroSCORE II (OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.305-0.918, P = 0.024) and therapy group (OR 3.518, 95% CI 1.079-11.463, P = 0.037) were independently associated with long-term mortality in patients with VSR, and this seems to be independent of the therapy group. The mortality rate of surgical repair after 2 weeks of VSR was much lower than within 2 weeks (P = 0.025). The cut-off point of EuroSCORE II was determined to be 14, and there were statistically significant differences between the EuroSCORE II < 14 group and EuroSCORE II≥14 group (HR = 0.2596, 95%CI: 0.1800-0.3744, Logrank P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients with AMI combined with VSR have a poor prognosis if not treated surgically, surgical repair after 2 weeks of VSR is a better time. In addition, EuroSCORE II can be used as a scoring system to assess the prognosis of patients with VSR.

Mechanical Circulatory Support in Delayed Surgery of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock-A Review

Post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a serious complication of myocardial infarction, which, in its natural course or treated medically, is related to high mortality rate. Surgical intervention remains the treatment of choice. Recent studies have shown that delayed surgery is related to better outcomes in comparison with urgent surgery; however, in many studies the impact of the patients' initial hemodynamic status on the treatment outcomes often remains unclear. In this review, we analyze the outcomes of delayed surgical treatment of patients in cardiogenic shock in the course of post-infarction ventricular septal defect stabilized with preoperative use of mechanical circulatory support. We evaluate the importance of various types of mechanical circulatory devices (MCD), such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Tandem Heart, Impella, and intra-aortic baloon pump (IABP) in preoperative stabilization of patients, and the most suitable time for surgery, and we also present the features of ideal MCD for patients with VSR. A search of Pubmed to identify studies concerning the use of MCD in patients in cardiogenic shock in the course of VSR qualified for delayed surgery was conducted in January 2022. A total of 16 articles with three or more patients described were analyzed in this study. The preoperative use of MCD in patients in cardiogenic shock and delayed surgery as a main part of treatment seems to be a promising direction, however, it requires further research.

Survival and risk factors associated with surgical repair of ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction: A single-center experience

Objective

To analyze the survival and risk factors associated with the surgical treatment of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 45 consecutive patients with VSR after AMI whose procedures were performed in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command between January 2012 and December 2021. Relevant clinical data, surgery-related conditions, and follow-up data of all patients were summarized. Patients were divided into the survival group and the death group. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to determine the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for all-cause mortality.

Results

The average postoperative follow-up time was 42.1 ± 34.1 months. The overall mortality rate was 20% (9/45 patients) and the operative mortality rate was 8.9% (4/45 patients). Logistic analysis showed that the death group had higher serum creatinine (127.32 ± 47.82 vs. 82.61 ± 27.80 μmol/L, respectively; P = 0.0238) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) [8,654.00 pg/mL (6,197.00–11,949.00 pg/mL) vs. 4,268.96 pg/mL (1,800.00–7,894.00 pg/mL), respectively; P = 0.0134] levels than the survival group. The cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB) was longer in the death group than in the survival group [131.00 min (121.00–184.00 min) vs. 119.00 min (103.00–151.50 min), respectively; P = 0.0454]. Significantly more red blood cells were transfused in the death group than in the survival group [11.60 units (6.10–16.50) vs. 3.75 units (0.00–7.00 units), respectively; P = 0.0025]. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation (P = 0.016) and ventilation time (P = 0.0022) were risk factors for mortality. A 1-month landmark analysis showed that compared with patients with VSR to surgical time &gt;14 days, patients who underwent surgery within 14 days had a higher rate of all-cause mortality (25.00 vs. 3.33%; log-rank P = 0.023). Patients with VSR within 14 days also had a higher rate of residual shunts that were higher than moderate. Multivariate analysis showed that transfusion of red blood cells and NT-proBNP level were risk factors for all-cause mortality, as well as major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.

Conclusions

Surgical repair resulted in good outcomes for patients with VSR after AMI. Patients with VSR to surgical time &gt;14 days had a lower rate of all-cause mortality. Treatment strategies for VSR should be based on the patient's condition and comprehensively determined through real-time evaluation and monitoring.

Inferior ST-Segment Elevation Can Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Ventricular Septal Rupture

Background

Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings in patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by ventricular septal rupture (VSR) have rarely been studied.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study among patients with anterior MI complicated by VSR over the past ten years. The presence of ST-segment elevation (STE) in inferior leads and new onset of complete right bundle branch block (RBBB) on ECG were studied for the prediction of in-hospital mortality.

Results

Among the 85 patients enrolled, 45 (52.9%) were male, with a median age of 70 years. Sixty-five patients (76.5%) died in the hospital, and the remaining 20 patients (23.5%) had improved conditions and were discharged. Inferior STE was present in 35 patients (41.2%), including 32 patients in the death group and 3 patients in the survival group (P = 0.005). New-onset RBBB was present in 25 patients (29.4%), with 22 patients in the death group and 3 patients in the survival group (P = 0.103). Multivariate logistic regression showed that inferior STE was an independent predictor of in-hospital death in patients with anterior MI and VSR (OR: 14.488; 95% CI: 1.708-122.887; P = 0.014).

Conclusions

In patients with anterior MI complicated by VSR, inferior STE was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Complete anatomic surgical myocardial revascularisation during postinfarction ventricular septal defect and ventricular aneurysm repair is associated with improved short- and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended during acute postinfarction ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) repair, but clinical benefits of surgical revascularization in patients with subacute PIVSD have not been established. We aimed to evaluate the association of primary complete anatomic surgical myocardial revascularization (CASMR) during PIVSD and ventricular aneurysm (VA) repair on patients' short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study. The inclusion criterion was PIVSD. Patients with previous CABG and those with PIVSD due to vasospasm and normal coronary arteries on angiography were excluded.

RESULTS

From March 2002 to April 2021, 53 patients met the eligibility criteria. The median patient age was 65 years, and 28 (53%) were male. Compared to the non-CABG group, CABG patients had higher values of the median postoperative left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, 100 ml, and 128.5 ml, respectively (p = .012), and the mean LV stroke volume, 49 ml, and 61 ml, respectively (p = .048). The mortality rates in the CABG and non-CABG groups were 3.6/100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-8.6/100 person-years) and 16.3/100 person-years (95% CI: 8.5-31.3/100 person-years), respectively. Cox regression adjusted for between groups imbalances demonstrated a 4-fold greater mortality risk (hazard ratio = 4.3; 95% CI: 1.1-16.7; p = .036) among the non-CABG patients than in the CABG patients. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis yielded a poorer overall survival of the non-CABG patients (p = .011).

CONCLUSION

Primary CASMR during PIVSD and VA repair is associated with improved postoperative cardiac function, lower hospital mortality, and better long-term survival. We recommend CASMR during PIVSD and VA repair.

Benefits and Risks of Delayed Surgery for Ventricular Septal Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction

The timing of surgery for ventricular septal rupture (VSR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. This study investigated the benefits and risks of delayed surgery for post-AMI VSR and examined differences in echocardiographic findings between early and delay groups.A total of 38 consecutive patients with post-AMI VSR who underwent surgery at our hospital between May 2003 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Our strategy was to delay surgery until 2 weeks after AMI. If patients demonstrated organ dysfunction, we considered early surgery. Patients were divided into early (n = 20; 53%) and delay (n = 18; 47%) groups. Risks and benefits were investigated based on echocardiographic findings during the waiting period. The delay group had more preoperative intravenous catheter infections (P = 0.008) but fewer reoperations (P = 0.02) and lower operative mortality (P = 0.04) than the early group. The VSR defect diameter and total pulmonary blood flow to total systemic blood flow (Qp/Qs) increased in both groups while waiting. Nevertheless, the early group had a significantly higher Qp/Qs change rate than the delay group (P = 0.05). The 30 day and hospital mortality rates were 5.3% and 13.2%, respectively.The VSR defect diameter and Qp/Qs in both groups increased with time and can therefore become risk factors. Nonetheless, the benefit of waiting exceeded the risk because our outcomes were better than those previously reported.

The evaluation of levosimendan in patients with acute myocardial infarction related ventricular septal rupture undergoing cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohort study with propensity score analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of levosimendan in patients with acute myocardial infarction related ventricular septal rupture (AMI-VSR) underwent cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study with propensity score analysis.

PATIENTS

There were 261 patients with AMI-VSR in our study. After 1:1 propensity matching, 106 patients (53 levosimendan and 53 control) were selected in the matched cohort.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients who received levosimendan were assigned to the levosimendan group (n = 164). The patients who were not received were levosimendan assigned to the control group (n = 97). The levosimendan was initiated immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass. Then, it has been maintained during the postoperative 3 days. The poor outcomes were identified as follows: death and postoperative complications (postoperative stroke, low cardiac output syndromeneeded mechanical circulatory support after surgery, acute kidney injury (≥ stage III), postoperative infection or septic shock, new developed atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias).

MAIN RESULTS

Before matching, the control group had more length of ICU stay (6.69 ± 3.90 d vs. 5.20 ± 2.24 d, p < 0.001) and longer mechanical ventilation time (23 h, IQR: 16-53 h vs. 16 h, IQR: 11-23 h, p < 0.001). Other postoperative outcomes have not shown significant differences between two groups. After matching, no significant difference was found between both groups for all postoperative outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier survivul estimate and log-rank test showed that the 90-day survival had no significant differences between two groups before and after matching.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that a low-dose infusion of levosimendan in AMI-VSR patients underwent surgical repair did not associated with positively affect to postoperative outcomes.

Triple patch technique to repair ventricular septal rupture

Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) remains an important and life-threatening complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Although several techniques have improved surgical outcomes of postinfarction VSR, the treatment is still challenging with a high mortality rate. In addition, it is well known that a postoperative residual shunt after VSR repair is associated with poor outcomes; however, late outcomes involving patients with a residual shunt after VSR repair are lacking. This paper presents the early and late outcomes of patients who underwent the triple patch technique to repair a VSR and the usefulness in reducing a postoperative residual shunt. The main process of this technique is that the patch is gently placed on the myocardium with over and over suture and is firmly attached using glue. Therefore, the triple patch technique is simple and easy to perform, and is designed to minimize residual shunt and exclude infarcted myocardium. In the present keynote lecture, we describe our surgical technique and the results of VSR repair.

Surgical management for mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Mechanical complications following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), though rare, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical management remains a mainstay of therapy for these complications. The purpose of this review is to evaluate long-term outcomes data of surgical management for postinfarction free wall rupture, ventricular septal defect, papillary muscle rupture, and pseudoaneurysm.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed to identify original studies reporting long-term outcomes data of surgical management of one of the four mechanical complications following AMI. Studies were considered to have long-term outcomes if they at minimum included survival or mortality data up to one year.

RESULTS

A total of 285 studies were identified from the literature search. Of these, 29 studies with long-term survival data on surgically managed mechanical complications of AMI are included in the review. The majority of these are retrospective cohort studies or single-center case series. Five studies are included on free wall rupture, 18 on ventricular septal defect, 4 on papillary muscle rupture, and 2 on pseudoaneurysm. Detailed results are tabulated according to complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term surgical outcomes of postinfarction mechanical complications remain understudied. Outcomes for ventricular septal defect repair are better represented in the literature than are outcomes for other mechanical complications, though available studies are still limited by small sample sizes and retrospective design. Further research is warranted, particularly for outcomes of acute pseudoaneurysm repair.

Transapical ischemic ventricular septal defect repair with simultaneous centrifugal left ventricular assist device placement: A case report

Introduction and importance

Post-infarct ventricular septal defect (PIVSD) is an often-fatal complication of myocardial infarction despite the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old male presented with myocardial infarction complicated by PIVSD. Clinical course was characterized by declining systolic function and hemodynamic instability. To provide hemodynamic support, a ventricular assist device was placed at surgical repair of the defect. The patient successfully recovered with no complications 21 months post-repair. He has undergone evaluation for heart transplantation.

Clinical discussion

Mortality among patients with PIVSD is high. For patients with cardiogenic shock at the time of defect repair, concomitant ventricular assist device therapy shows promise to decrease morbidity through durable hemodynamic support following surgery.

Conclusion

Placement of a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at the time of PIVSD repair through a single ventriculotomy may be an effective strategy for this lethal condition.

•

Post-infarct ventricular septal defect (VSD) remains a highly morbid condition.

•

Ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy is an established treatment for shock.

•

VSD repair with concomitant VAD therapy is a safe and feasible operation.

•

This strategy may reduce morbidity through ventricular decompression and durable hemodynamic support.

ECMO and Impella Support Strategies as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture

Background and Objectives: Post-infarct ventricular septal rupture (PIVSR) continues to have significant morbidity and mortality, despite decreased prevalence. Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have been proposed as strategies to correct hemodynamic derangements and bridge patients to delayed operative repair when success rates are higher. This review places VA-ECMO and Impella support strategies in the context of bridging patients to successful PIVSR repair, with an additional case report of successful bridging with the Impella device. Materials and Methods: We report a case of PIVSR repair utilizing 14 days of Impella support. We additionally conducted a systematic review of contemporary literature to describe the application of VA-ECMO and Impella devices in the pre-operative period prior to surgical PIVSR correction. Expert commentary on the advantages and disadvantages of each of these techniques is provided. Results: We identified 19 studies with 72 patients undergoing VA-ECMO as a bridge to PIVSR repair and 6 studies with 11 patients utilizing an Impella device as a bridge to PIVSR repair. Overall, outcomes in both groups were better than expected from patients who were historically managed with medicine and balloon pump therapy, however there was a significant heterogeneity between studies. Impella provided for excellent left ventricular unloading, but did result in some concerns for reversal of shunting. VA-ECMO resulted in improved end-organ perfusion, but carried increased risks of device-related complications and requirement for additional ventricular unloading. Conclusions: Patients presenting with PIVSR in cardiogenic shock requiring a MCS bridge to definitive surgical repair continue to pose a challenge to the multidisciplinary cardiovascular team as the diverse presentation and management issues require individualized care plans. Both VA-ECMO and the Impella family of devices play a role in the contemporary management of PIVSR and offer distinct advantages and disadvantages depending on the clinical scenario. The limited case numbers reported demonstrate feasibility, safety, and recommendations for optimal management.

Outcomes of surgical repair of anterior or posterior ventricular septal rupture after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare and fatal complication of myocardial infarction. Surgery is the main treatment for the condition. It is currently believed that surgery is less effective for posterior VSR than for anterior VSR. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for myocardial infarction combined with an anterior or posterior VSR.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational, cohort study. Clinical data of 68 patients with myocardial infarction combined with VSR were retrospectively analyzed. According to the site of the VSR, patients were divided into the anterior (43 cases) and posterior (25 cases) VSR groups, and the general clinical data, preoperative examination results, surgery, and follow-up results were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the anterior VSR group, the operative time in the posterior VSR group was longer {300 [240, 360] vs. 360 [300, 400] min; P=0.003}, and the cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer (142.0±52.2 vs. 180.2±52.3 min; P=0.005), and the aortic clamp time was longer (84.0±32.5 vs. 115.9±39.8 min; P=0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of perioperative complications, including bleeding, low cardiac output, pulmonary, and cerebrovascular complications, and the incidence of perioperative death between the two groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up for 1.0-10.5 (median, 4.2) years. There were no significant differences in the survival rate and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) including myocardial infarction, heart failure, revascularization, and cerebrovascular events between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative risks and medium- and long-term outcomes of the surgical repair of anterior or posterior VSR after myocardial infarction were similar.

Treatment Strategies for Ventricular Septal Rupture After Myocardial Infarction: A Single-Center Experience

Objective

To analyze treatment strategies, prognosis, and related risk factors of patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture, as well as the impact of timing of surgical intervention.

Methods

A total of 23 patients diagnosed with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture who were non-selectively admitted to Shanxi Provincial Cardiovascular Hospital between October 2017 and August 2021 were included in this study. The relevant clinical data, operation-related conditions, and follow-up data were summarized for all patients. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the cumulative incidence of unadjusted mortality in patients with different treatment methods. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for in-hospital patient mortality.

Results

The mean age of the study patients was 64.43 ± 7.54 years, 12(52.2%) were females. There was a significant difference in terms of postoperative residual shunt between the surgical and interventional closure groups (5.9 vs. 100%, respectively; P < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 21.7%; however, even though the surgical group had a lower mortality rate than the interventional closure group (17.6 vs. 33%, respectively), this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.576). Univariate analysis showed that in-hospital survival group patients were significantly younger than in-hospital death group patients (62.50 ± 6.53 vs. 71.40 ± 7.37 years, respectively; P = 0.016), and that women had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate than men (P = 0.037). The average postoperative follow-up time was 18.11 ± 13.92 months; as of the end of the study all 14 patients in the surgical group were alive, Two out of four patients survived and two patients died after interventional closure. Univariate analysis showed that interventional closure was a risk factor for long-term death (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Surgical operation is the most effective treatment for patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture; however, the best timing of the operation should be based on the patient's condition and comprehensively determined through real-time evaluation and monitoring. We believe that delaying the operation time as much as possible when the patient's condition permits can reduce postoperative mortality. Interventional closure can be used as a supplementary or bridge treatment for surgical procedures.

Surgical treatment for post-infarction papillary muscle rupture: a multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

Papillary muscle rupture (PMR) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to analyse the patient characteristics and early outcomes of the surgical management of post-infarction PMR from an international multicentre registry.

METHODS

Patients underwent surgery for post-infarction PMR between 2001 through 2019 were retrieved from database of the CAUTION study. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients were included with a mean age of 66.9 (standard deviation: 10.5) years. The posteromedial papillary muscle was the most frequent rupture location (71.9%); the rupture was complete in 67.3% of patients. Mitral valve replacement was performed in 82.7% of cases. One hundred twenty-two patients (57%) had concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. In-hospital mortality was 24.8%. Temporal trends revealed no apparent improvement in in-hospital mortality during the study period. Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative chronic kidney disfunction [odds ratio (OR): 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-6.45, P = 0.036], cardiac arrest (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.02-15.61, P = 0.046) and cardiopulmonary bypass duration (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P = 0.04) were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death, whereas concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was identified as an independent predictor of early survival (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.92, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment for post-infarction PMR carries a high in-hospital mortality rate, which did not improve during the study period. Because concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting confers a survival benefit, this additional procedure should be performed, whenever possible, in an attempt to improve the outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03848429.

Surgical Treatment of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture

IMPORTANCE

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but life-threatening mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction associated with high mortality despite prompt treatment. Surgery represents the standard of care; however, only small single-center series or national registries are usually available in literature, whereas international multicenter investigations have been poorly carried out, therefore limiting the evidence on this topic.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical characteristics and early outcomes for patients who received surgery for postinfarction VSR and to identify factors independently associated with mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The Mechanical Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction: an International Multicenter Cohort (CAUTION) Study is a retrospective multicenter international cohort study that includes patients who were treated surgically for mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction. The study was conducted from January 2001 to December 2019 at 26 different centers worldwide among 475 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for postinfarction VSR.

EXPOSURES

Surgical treatment of postinfarction VSR, independent of the technique, alone or combined with other procedures (eg, coronary artery bypass grafting).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was early mortality; secondary outcomes were postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of the 475 patients included in the study, 290 (61.1%) were men, with a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (10.1) years. Cardiogenic shock was present in 213 patients (44.8%). Emergent or salvage surgery was performed in 212 cases (44.6%). The early mortality rate was 40.4% (192 patients), and it did not improve during the nearly 20 years considered for the study (median [IQR] yearly mortality, 41.7% [32.6%-50.0%]). Low cardiac output syndrome and multiorgan failure were the most common causes of death (low cardiac output syndrome, 70 [36.5%]; multiorgan failure, 53 [27.6%]). Recurrent VSR occurred in 59 participants (12.4%) but was not associated with mortality. Cardiogenic shock (survived: 95 [33.6%]; died, 118 [61.5%]; P < .001) and early surgery (time to surgery ≥7 days, survived: 105 [57.4%]; died, 47 [35.1%]; P < .001) were associated with lower survival. At multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P = .001), preoperative cardiac arrest (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.18-6.27; P = .02) and percutaneous revascularization (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.003-2.65; P = .048), and postoperative need for intra-aortic balloon pump (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.46-6.09; P = .003) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.30-7.38; P = .01) were independently associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, surgical repair of postinfarction VSR was associated with a high risk of early mortality; this risk has remained unchanged during the last 2 decades. Delayed surgery seemed associated with better survival. Age, preoperative cardiac arrest and percutaneous revascularization, and postoperative need for intra-aortic balloon pump and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were independently associated with early mortality. Further prospective studies addressing preoperative and perioperative patient management are warranted to hopefully improve the currently suboptimal outcome.

Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: Transcatheter intervention or surgical repair?

Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture is an infrequent but potentially fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction. The 30-day mortality rate with the transcatheter approach when performed in the acute phase (<2 weeks) was 25.3% compared to 50% when surgery is performed in the acute phase (within 3 weeks). There is no correlation between defect size and mortality. New York Heart Association class IV and time to ventricular septal defect closure are risk predictors for transcatheter closure for a 30-day mortality rate of 31.5%.

Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Definitive Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a devastating complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI) and is often associated with cardiogenic shock. Although considered to be very rare in the reperfusion era, recent reports have demonstrated an increased frequency of post-MI VSR cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite advances in surgical repair and management strategies over the past decades, mortality rate has remained high, especially in hemodynamically unstable patients. In VSR patients with cardiogenic shock, the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) could be used as a bridge to surgical intervention. We report a patient with VSR complicated by cardiogenic shock secondary to late presenting MI, managed successfully with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a bridge to surgical intervention.

Left ventricular free wall rupture: A real nightmare

Left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) is a rarest but often lethal mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The mortality rate for LVFWR is described from 75% to 90% and it is the cause for 20% of in-hospital deaths after AMI. Death results essentially from the limited time available for emergent intervention after onset of symptoms. Emergency surgery is indicated and normally the rupture site is easily identified, but it may not be apparent macroscopically, corresponding to transmyocardial or subepicardial dissection with an external rupture far from the infarction site, or already thrombosed and contained. Repair of the ventricular wall is usually achieved either by suturing the edges of the tear or closing it with patches of artificial material or biological tissues, usually using some kind of biological glue. However, several cases of successful conservative management have been described. In this Editorial, I comment on the metanalysis conducted by Matteucci et al, published in this issue of the Journal, including 11 nonrandomized studies and enrolling a total of 363 patients, which brings a great deal of new knowledge that can help not only in the prevention but also in the management of this dreadful complication of AMI.

Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Definitive Treatment in Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) represents a rare complication of acute myocardial infarction, often presenting with cardiogenic shock and associated with high in-hospital mortality despite prompt intervention. Although immediate surgery is recommended for patients who cannot be effectively stabilized, the ideal timing of intervention remains controversial. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may allow hemodynamic stabilization and delay definitive treatment even in critical patients. However, the interactions between MCS and VSR pathophysiology as well as potentially related adverse effects remain unclear. A systematic review was performed, from 2000 onward, to identify reports describing MCS types, effects, complications, and outcomes in the pre-operative VSR-related setting. One hundred eleven studies (2,440 patients) were included. Most patients had well-known negative predictors (e.g., cardiogenic shock, inferior infarction). Almost all patients had intra-aortic balloon pumps, with additional MCS adopted in 129 patients (77.5% being venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Mean MCS bridging time was 6 days (range: 0 to 23 days). In-hospital mortality was 50.4%, with the lowest mortality rate in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group (29.2%). MCS may enhance hemodynamic stabilization and delayed VSR treatment. However, the actual effects and interaction of the MCS-VSR association should be carefully assessed to avoid further complications or incorrect MCS-VSR coupling.