Earlier tracheostomy is associated with an earlier return to walking, talking, and eating

Impact of Early Tracheostomy After Lung Transplantation: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prolonged mechanical ventilation is common among lung transplant recipients, affecting nearly one-third of patients. Tracheostomy has been shown as a beneficial alternative to endotracheal intubation, but delays in tracheostomy tube placement persist. To date, no large-scale study has investigated the effect of tracheostomy timing on posttransplant outcomes.

METHODS

All adults receiving tracheostomy after primary, isolated lung transplantation were identified in the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Early tracheostomy was defined as placement before postoperative day 8 based on exploratory cohort analysis. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association of early tracheostomy with in-hospital mortality, select posttransplant complications, and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 11,048 patients undergoing first-time lung transplantation, 1509 required a tracheostomy in the postoperative period, with 783 (51.9%) comprising the early cohort. After entropy balancing and risk adjustment, early tracheostomy placement was associated with reduced odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97) and posttransplant infection (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.82). Further, tracheostomy within 1 week of transplantation was associated with decreased length of stay (β-coefficient, -16.5 days; 95% CI, -25.3 to -7.6 days) and index hospitalization costs (β-coefficient, -$97,600; 95% CI, -$153,000 to -$42,100).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the safety of early tracheostomy among lung transplant recipients and highlights several potential benefits. Among appropriately selected patients, tracheostomy placement before postoperative day 8 may facilitate early discharge, lower costs, and reduced odds of posttransplant infection.

Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A US Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

One of the most critical issues in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) is protecting the airway and attempting to keep a secure airway. It is evident that tracheostomy in patients with TBI after 7-14 days can have favorable outcomes if the patient cannot be extubated; however, some clinicians have recommended early tracheostomy before 7 days.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of inpatient study participants was queried from the National Inpatient Sample to include patients with TBI between 2016 and 2020 undergoing tracheostomy and outcomes between the two groups of early tracheostomy (ET) (< 7 days from admission) and late tracheostomy (LT) (≥ 7 days from admission) were compared.

RESULTS

We reviewed 219,005 patients with TBI, out of whom 3.04% had a tracheostomy. Patients in the ET group were younger than those in the LT group (45.02 ± 19.38 years old vs. 48.68 ± 20.50 years old, respectively, p < 0.001), mainly men (76.64% vs. 73.73%, respectively, p = 0.01), and mainly White race (59.88% vs. 57.53%, respectively, p = 0.33). The patients in the ET group had a significantly shorter length of stay as compared with those in the LT group (27.78 ± 25.96 days vs. 36.32 ± 29.30 days, respectively, p < 0.001) and had a significantly lower hospital charge ($502,502.436 ± 427,060.81 vs. $642,739.302 ± 516,078.94 per patient, respectively, p < 0.001). The whole TBI cohort mortality was reported at 7.04%, which was higher within the ET group compared with the LT group (8.69% vs. 6.07%, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients in the LT had higher odds of developing any infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.43 [1.22-1.68], p < 0.001), emerging sepsis (OR 1.61 [1.39-1.87], p < 0.001), pneumonia (OR 1.52 [1.36-1.69], p < 0.001), and respiratory failure (OR 1.30 [1.09-1.55], p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ET can provide notable and significant benefits for patients with TBI. Future high-quality prospective studies should be performed to investigate and shed more light on the ideal timing of tracheostomy in patients with TBI.

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation, Weaning, and the Role of Tracheostomy

Depending on the definitional criteria used, approximately 5% to 10% of critical adults will require prolonged mechanical ventilation with longer-term outcomes that are worse than those ventilated for a shorter duration. Outcomes are affected by patient characteristics before critical illness and its severity but also by organizational characteristics and care models. Definitive trials of interventions to inform care activities, such as ventilator weaning, upper airway management, rehabilitation, and nutrition specific to the prolonged mechanical ventilation patient population, are lacking. A structured and individualized approach developed by the multiprofessional team in discussion with the patient and their family is warranted.

Communication functions of adult patients admitted to intensive care: A multicentre, binational point prevalence study

BACKGROUND

Patient communication is profoundly impacted during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. While the impacts of altered communication are recognised, there is a paucity of data on the prevalence of communication attempts as well as modes utilised by patients and unit practices to manage communication function.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to describe the prevalence and characteristics of observed communication attempts (nonverbal, verbal, and use of the staff call bell) in adult ICU patients and report on unit-level practices on communication management.

METHODS

A prospective, binational, cross-sectional point-prevalence study was conducted across 44 Australia and New Zealand adult ICUs. Data on communication attempts, modes, ICU-level guidelines, training, and resources were collected in June 2019.

RESULTS

Across 44 ICUs, 470 of 623 (75%) participants, including ventilated and nonventilated patients, were attempting to communicate on the study day. Of those invasively ventilated via an endotracheal tube for the entire study day, 42 of 172 (24%) were attempting to communicate and 39 of 45 (87%) patients with a tracheostomy were attempting to communicate. Across the cohort, the primary mode of communication was verbal communication, with 395 of 470 (84%) patients using speech; of those 371 of 395 (94%) spoke English and 24 of 395 (6%) spoke a language other than English. Participants attempting to communicate on the study day had a shorter length of stay (LOS), a mean difference of 3.8 days (95% confidence interval: 0.2; 5.1) shorter LOS in the ICU than those not attempting to communicate, and a mean difference 7.9 days (95% confidence interval: 3.1; 12.6) shorter LOS in hospital overall. Unit-level practices and supports were collected. Six of 44 (14%) ICUs had a protocol for communication management, training was available in 11 of 44 (25%) ICUs, and communication resources were available in 37 of 44 (84%) ICUs.

CONCLUSION

Three-quarters of patients admitted to the ICU were attempting to communicate on the study day, with multiple methods used to support verbal and nonverbal communication regardless of ventilation status. Guidance and training were absent from the majority of ICUs, indicating a need for development and implementation of policies, training, and resources.

Tracheostomy clinical practices and patient outcomes in three tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Australia

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature in Australia on patient-focused tracheostomy outcomes and process outcomes. Exploration of processes of care enables teams to identify and address existing barriers that may prevent earlier therapeutic interventions that could improve patient outcomes following critical care survival.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to examine and provide baseline data and associations between tracheostomy clinical practices and patient outcomes across three large metropolitan hospitals.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multisite observational study in three tertiary metropolitan Australian health services who are members of the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative. Deidentified data were entered into the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative database from Jan 2016 to Dec 2019. Descriptive statistics were used for the reported outcomes of length of stay, mortality, tracheostomy-related adverse events and complications, tracheostomy insertion, airway, mechanical ventilation, communication, swallowing, nutrition, length of cannulation, and decannulation. Pearson's correlation coefficient and one-way analyses of variance were performed to examine associations between variables.

RESULTS

The total cohort was 380 patients. The in-hospital mortality of the study cohort was 13%. Overall median hospital length of stay was 46 days (interquartile range: 31-74). Length of cannulation was shorter in patients who did not experience any tracheostomy-related adverse events (p= 0.036) and who utilised nonverbal communication methods (p = 0.041). Few patients (8%) utilised verbal communication methods while mechanically ventilated, compared with 80% who utilised a one-way speaking valve while off the ventilator. Oral intake was commenced in 20% of patients prior to decannulation. Patient nutritional intake varied prior to and at the time of decannulation. Decannulation occurred in 83% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides baseline data for tracheostomy outcomes across three large metropolitan Australian hospitals. Most outcomes were comparable with previous international and local studies. Future research is warranted to explore the impact of earlier nonverbal communication and interventions targeting the reduction in tracheostomy-related adverse events.

Patient-Centred Outcomes Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care

INTRODUCTION

Around 20% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo tracheostomy insertion and expect high-quality care concentrating on patient-centered outcomes including communication, oral intake, and mobilization. The majority of data has focused on timing, mortality, and resource utilization, with a paucity of information on quality of life following tracheostomy.

METHODS

Single center retrospective study including all patients requiring tracheostomy from 2017 to 2019. Information collected on demographics, severity of illness, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, discharge disposition, sedation, time to vocalization, swallow and mobilization. Outcomes were compared for early versus late tracheostomy (early = <day 10) and age category (≤ 65 vs ≥ 66 years).

RESULTS

In total, 304 patients were included and 71% male, median age 59, APACHE II score 17. Median ICU and hospital LOS 16 and 56 days, respectively. ICU and hospital mortality 9.9% and 22.4%. Median time to tracheostomy 8 days, 8.55% open. Following tracheostomy, median days of sedation was 0, time to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) 1 day (94% of patients achieving this), ventilator-free breathing (VFB) 5 days (72%), speaking valve 7 days (60%), dynamic sitting 5 days (64%), and swallow assessment 16 days (73%). Early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS (13 vs 26 days, P < .0001), reduced sedation (6 vs 12 days, P < .0001), faster transition to level 2 care (6 vs 10 days, P < .003), NIV (1 vs 2 days, P < .003), and VFB (4 vs 7 days, P < .005). Older patients received less sedation, had higher APACHE II scores and mortality (36.1%) and 18.5% were discharged home. Median time to VFB was 6 days (63.9%), speaking valve 7 days (64.7%), swallow assessment 20.5 days (66.7%), and dynamic sitting 5 days (62.2%).

CONCLUSION

Patient-centered outcomes are a worthy goal to consider when selecting patients for tracheostomy in addition to mortality or timing alone, including in older patients.

Association of APACHE-II Scores With 30-Day Mortality After Tracheostomy: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess whether the Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) score is a reliable predictor of 30-day mortality in the setting of adult patients with ventilator-dependent respiratory failure (VDRF) who undergo tracheostomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-institution study. Potential subjects were identified using the current procedural terminology codes for the tracheostomy procedure and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes for VDRF. APACHE-II scores were retrospectively calculated. Tracheostomies were performed in our population over an 18-month period (November 2018 through April 2020). Our study population did not include patients with novel coronavirus. The primary outcome was mortality at 30 days after tracheostomy.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients with VDRF who had a tracheostomy were included in this study. Twenty-eight (11.8%) patients died within 30 days of tracheostomy. The mean (standard deviation) APACHE-II score was 22.5 (10.2) for patients who died within 30 days of tracheostomy and 19.8 (7.4) for patients living within 30 days of tracheostomy (p = 0.30). Patients with APACHE-II scores greater than or equal to 30 showed higher odds of death within 30 days of tracheostomy (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.14-7.89, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

An APACHE-II score of 30 and above is associated with mortality within 30 days of tracheostomy in patients with VDRF. APACHE-II scores may be a promising tool for assessing risk of mortality in patients with VDRF after tracheostomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:273-278, 2023.

Sepsis, critical illness, communication, swallowing and Sustainable Development Goals 3, 4, 10

PURPOSE

Sepsis is a major global health problem with an estimated 49 million cases globally each year causing as many as 11 million deaths. The primary objective of this commentary is to describe the impacts of sepsis and critical illness on communication and swallowing function, and to discuss management strategies considering the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

RESULT

Communication and swallowing disabilities can occur with sepsis and critical illness. A holistic framework to optimise function, recovery, and future research priorities across the lifespan can be developed through the SDGs.

CONCLUSION

Communication and swallowing disabilities following critical illness associated with sepsis have global impacts. Early multidisciplinary engagement is key to optimising individuals' function. Collaborative research, education, and public awareness is urgently needed to increase equity in health outcomes across populations. This commentary paper supports progress towards good health and well-being (SDG 3), quality education (SDG 4) and reduced inequalities (SDG 10).

Tracheostomies of Patients With COVID-19: A Survey of Infection Reported by Health Care Professionals

BACKGROUND

Health care professionals (HCPs) performing tracheostomies in patients with COVID-19 may be at increased risk of infection.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors underlying HCPs' COVID-19 infection and determine whether tracheostomy providers report increased rates of infection.

METHODS

An anonymous international survey examining factors associated with COVID-19 infection was made available November 2020 through July 2021 to HCPs at a convenience sample of hospitals, universities, and professional organizations. Infections reported were compared between HCPs involved in tracheostomy on patients with COVID-19 and HCPs who were not involved.

RESULTS

Of the 361 respondents (from 33 countries), 50% (n = 179) had performed tracheostomies on patients with COVID-19. Performing tracheostomies on patients with COVID-19 was not associated with increased infection in either univariable (P = .06) or multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.90-2.46; P = .13). Working in a low- or middle-income country (LMIC) was associated with increased infection in both univariable (P < .001) and multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 2.88; CI, 1.50-5.53; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing tracheostomy was not associated with COVID-19 infection, suggesting that tracheostomies can be safely performed in infected patients with appropriate precautions. However, HCPs in LMICs may face increased infection risk.

Tracheostomy outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19, which analysed the effect of tracheostomy timing and technique (surgical vs percutaneous) on mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS), decannulation from tracheostomy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and complications.

METHODS

Four databases were screened between January 1, 2020 and January 10, 2022 (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane). Papers were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the Population or Problem, Intervention or exposure, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) guidelines. Meta-analysis and meta-regression for main outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

The search yielded 9024 potentially relevant studies, of which 47 (n=5268 patients) were included. High levels of between-study heterogeneity were observed across study outcomes. The pooled mean tracheostomy timing was 16.5 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.7-18.4; I2=99.6%). Pooled mortality was 22.1% (95% CI: 18.7-25.5; I2=89.0%). Meta-regression did not show significant associations between mortality and tracheostomy timing, mechanical ventilation duration, time to decannulation, and tracheostomy technique. Pooled mean estimates for ICU and hospital LOS were 29.6 (95% CI: 24.0-35.2; I2=98.6%) and 38.8 (95% CI: 32.1-45.6; I2=95.7%) days, both associated with mechanical ventilation duration (coefficient 0.8 [95% CI: 0.2-1.4], P=0.02 and 0.9 [95% CI: 0.4-1.4], P=0.01, respectively) but not tracheostomy timing. Data were insufficient to assess tracheostomy technique on LOS. Duration of mechanical ventilation was 23.4 days (95% CI: 19.2-27.7; I2=99.3%), not associated with tracheostomy timing. Data were insufficient to assess the effect of tracheostomy technique on mechanical ventilation duration. Time to decannulation was 23.8 days (95% CI: 19.7-27.8; I2=98.7%), not influenced by tracheostomy timing or technique. The most common complications were stoma infection, ulcers or necrosis, and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with COVID-19 requiring tracheostomy, the timing and technique of tracheostomy did not clearly impact on patient outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO CRD42021272220.

Impact of Tracheostomy Timing on Outcomes After Cardiovascular Surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether tracheostomy timing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery had an impact on outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single-center university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients requiring tracheostomy among a total of 961 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery via a median sternotomy from January 2014 to March 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Early versus late tracheostomy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

During the study period, tracheostomy was performed in 28 patients (2.9%). According to tracheostomy timing, postoperative day seven was chosen as the cutoff to define early (≤seven days) and late (>seven days) tracheostomy. Patients in the early-tracheostomy group had a significantly shorter ventilation time after tracheostomy compared with the late-tracheostomy group (p = 0.039), and early tracheostomy resulted in a reduction in total ventilation time (p = 0.001). The incidence of pressure ulcers was significantly lower in the early-tracheostomy group compared with the late- tracheostomy group. There was a higher tracheal tube removal rate in the early-tracheostomy group compared with the late-tracheostomy group (p = 0.0007). The one-year survival rate in the early- and late-tracheostomy groups was 65% and 31%, respectively. The long-term mortality rate was significantly lower in the early-tracheostomy group compared with the late- tracheostomy group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Early tracheostomy (<seven days) may provide better clinical outcomes, with lower mortality and morbidity rates, when patients are judged to require at least seven days of ventilation after cardiovascular surgery.

Usefulness of Respiratory Mechanics and Laboratory Parameter Trends as Markers of Early Treatment Success in Mechanically Ventilated Severe Coronavirus Disease: A Single-Center Pilot Study

Whether a patient with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will be successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation (MV) early is important in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to characterize the time course of parameters and outcomes of severe COVID-19 in relation to the timing of liberation from MV. This retrospective, single-center, observational study was performed using data from mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU between 1 March 2020 and 15 December 2020. Early liberation from ventilation (EL group) was defined as successful extubation within 10 days of MV. The trends of respiratory mechanics and laboratory data were visualized and compared between the EL and prolonged MV (PMV) groups using smoothing spline and linear mixed effect models. Of 52 admitted patients, 31 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were included (EL group, 20 (69%); PMV group, 11 (31%)). The patients’ median age was 71 years. While in-hospital mortality was low (6%), activities of daily living (ADL) at the time of hospital discharge were significantly impaired in the PMV group compared to the EL group (mean Barthel index (range): 30 (7.5–95) versus 2.5 (0–22.5), p = 0.048). The trends in respiratory compliance were different between patients in the EL and PMV groups. An increasing trend in the ventilatory ratio during MV until approximately 2 weeks was observed in both groups. The interaction between daily change and earlier liberation was significant in the trajectory of the thrombin–antithrombin complex, antithrombin 3, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values. The indicator of physiological dead space increases during MV. The trajectory of markers of the hypercoagulation status, inflammation, and PEEP were significantly different depending on the timing of liberation from MV. These findings may provide insight into the pathophysiology of COVID-19 during treatment in the critical care setting.