Anti-phosphatidylethanolamine antibody, thromboembolic events and the antiphospholipid syndrome

Preconception Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Risk of Subsequent Early Pregnancy Loss: a Retrospective Study

The aim of this study was to investigate the subsequent early pregnancy outcomes in women positive for non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (NC-aPLs) before pregnancy. A total of 273 patients who had experienced sporadic or recurrent pregnancy loss and had been screened for 13 NC-aPLs at preconception were recruited in this study from September 2019 to February 2022. Serum levels of NC-aPLs were measured by ELISA using specific kits. The primary outcome was early pregnancy loss, and the secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy, clinically confirmed pregnancy loss, and ongoing pregnancy. Among these subjects, 56 patients had one previous pregnancy loss, and 217 had recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). The NC-aPLs (+) and NC-aPLs (-) groups had similar rates of early pregnancy loss (EPL) after adjustment, regardless of the number of positive NC-aPLs (aOR = 1.054, 95% CI 0.602-1.846). Other outcomes were comparable in both groups, including the rates of biochemical pregnancy (aOR = 1.344, 95% CI 0.427-4.236), clinically confirmed pregnancy loss (aOR = 0.744, 95% CI 0.236-2.344), and ongoing pregnancy (aOR = 0.949, 95% CI 0.542-1.660). Based on sensitivity analysis, the NC-aPLs (+) were not associated with adverse early pregnancy outcomes in women with RPL. Furthermore, the difference in gestational weeks of pregnancy loss between the two groups was also insignificant. This study found no evidence linking preconception NC-aPL positivity to early pregnancy outcomes but offers a reference for future research to clarify NC-aPLs' potential clinical impact.

Viewpoint: The value of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies

In 2006, at a meeting in Sydney, Australia, consensus was reached by an international group of specialists to establish a number of serological criteria that identify patients with a history of thrombosis or pregnancy complications as having antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These criteria were originally formulated for research purposes and to compare clinical trials in different centres. However, these same criteria are now generally used and accepted for the diagnosis and treatment of patients. The practice of using these criteria for direct patient care requires that these criteria are based on sound scientific evidence. Indeed, for all the autoantibodies that are officially included in the serological criteria, it has been shown that they induce thrombosis and fetal loss when infused into mice. There are also a number of additional autoantibodies that have been identified in these patients but for these antibodies there was not enough evidence to meet the official APS criteria in 2006. Seventeen years have now passed since the consensus meeting, therefore, this review examines whether additional studies performed with these 'non-criteria' autoantibodies have provided sufficient results to suggest the inclusion of these autoantibodies in the official serological criteria of APS.

Levels and avidities of antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies in patients with thrombotic events and immunologically-mediated diseases

AIMS

Antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies (aPE) represent one type of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) directed against the neutral phospholipids - phosphatidylethanolamines. The aim of this study was to evaluate levels and avidities of aPE in several groups of patients and compare them with conventional aPLs.

METHODS

aPE were analysed in a cohort consisting of 68 hospitalized patients. The other cohort comprised 22 patients with immunologically-mediated diseases. The control group consisted of 20 healthy persons. ELISA methods were used for determination of aPL. Avidities of aPE were tested by modified ELISA with urea as a chaotropic agent.

RESULTS

aPE IgG/IgM were significantly higher in the group of patients with venous thromboembolism than those with non-thrombotic internal disorders (P=0.02 for both Ig classes). aPE IgG/IgM elevated above cut-off values were found in 10.8% of patients with venous thromboembolism and as a single aPL in 6.5%. Levels of aPE IgG higher than our limit (>6 U/mL) were detected in 29% of patients with immunologically-mediated diseases with other positive aPL. Low-, intermediate- and high-avidity aPE IgG were found in patients of both cohorts. The avidities of aPE IgG differed from those of anticardiolipin antibodies IgG. Neither aPE IgG levels nor avidity dynamics significantly changed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

aPE may be related to venous thromboembolism and may be part of the repertoire of aPL in immunologically-mediated diseases. There are patients with thrombosis negative for conventional aPL but positive for aPE. aPE IgG may have different avidities.

Criteria and Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: How Strong Are They Correlated?

The place of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is still debatable. The aim of this research was to evaluate the correlations between the titres of non-criteria aPLs (anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), anti-phosphatidylserine (aPS), and anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies), and the ones of the already studied criteria aPLs (anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I-aβ2GPI antibodies). Altogether, 72 APS (30 primary and 42 secondary) patients were included in our study. High correlation coefficients (rs) were found between aPS IgM and aCL IgM, overall (0.77, p < 0.01), as well as in the primary (0.81, p < 0.01), and secondary (0.75, p < 0.01) APS subgroups. Low or statistically insignificant correlations were observed between IgG/IgM isotypes of aPT and aCL, or aβ2GPI, in the entire study population, and when evaluating the subgroups. Therefore, moderate correlations were mainly identified between the tested non-criteria antibodies and the criteria ones, suggesting little added value for the use of the tested non-criteria aPLs, with the exception of aPT, which seems to have different kinetics and might be a promising APS diagnostic tool.

Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies and pediatric rheumatic disease: a case series

BACKGROUND

Non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (NC-aPL) are a relatively undefined subgroup of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Knowledge about NC-aPL in adults is limited and even less is known in pediatric patients. Routine tests for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-a clinical state marked by the presence of aPL in association with vascular thrombosis-usually include lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and -beta-2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI). LAC is a functional screen for prothrombotic aPL, while the latter tests identify specific autoantibodies. Specific targets of NC-aPL include, but are not limited to, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, and prothrombin.

PRESENTATION OF CASES

We present single-center data from eight pediatric patients with NC-aPL identified during a three-year period. All patients had presenting features raising suspicion for APS. Most patients were female with a primary rheumatic disease. One patient had a stroke. Another patient had alveolar hemorrhage and pulmonary hypertension. Raynaud's phenomenon, rashes involving distal extremities, and headaches were common. Most patients had a positive LAC, yet their routine aPL tests were negative, prompting testing for NC-aPL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest NC-aPL are associated with typical signs and symptoms of APS in pediatric patients. Pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists should consider NC-aPL when clinical suspicion is high and routine aPL tests are negative, particularly when LAC is positive. While guidelines for NC-aPL do not yet exist for children or adults, these autoantibodies have pathogenic potential. Actionable items could include evaluation for the presence of other (primary) rheumatic diseases, and consultation with hematologists and/or obstetricians regarding anticoagulation/platelet inhibition and thrombosis education. Future guidelines regarding NC-aPL will only be generated by gathering more data, ideally prospectively.

Anti-phospholipid antibodies are elevated and functionally active in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Polyps from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) contain increased levels of autoreactive antibodies, B cells and fibrin deposition. Anti-phospholipid antibodies (APA) are autoantibodies known to cause thrombosis but have not been implicated in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare APA levels (anti-cardiolipin, anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (anti-PE), and anti-β2 -glycoprotein (anti-B2GP)) in nasal polyp (NP) tissue with tissue from control and CRS without nasal polyp (CRSsNP) patients, we tested whether NP antibodies affect coagulation, and correlate APAs with anti-dsDNA IgG and markers of coagulation.

METHODS

Patient specimens were assayed for APA IgG, anti-dsDNA IgG and thrombin-anti-thrombin (TaT) complex by ELISA. Antibodies from a subset of specimens were tested for modified activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) measured on an optical-mechanical coagulometer.

RESULTS

Anti-cardiolipin IgG in NP was 5-fold higher than control tissue (p < .0001). NP antibodies prolonged aPTT compared to control tissue antibodies at 400 µg/mL (36.7 s vs. 33.8 s, p = .024) and 600 µg/mL (40.9 s vs. 34.7 s, p = .0037). Anti-PE IgG antibodies were increased in NP (p = .027), but anti-B2GP IgG was not significantly higher (p = .084). All APAs correlated with anti-dsDNA IgG levels, which were also elevated (R = .77, .71 and .54, respectively, for anti-cardiolipin, anti-PE, and anti-B2GP; all p < .001), but only anti-cardiolipin (R = .50, p = .0185) and anti-PE (R = 0.45, p = .037) correlated with TaT complex levels.

CONCLUSIONS

APA IgG antibodies are increased in NP and correlate with autoreactive tissue antibodies. NP antibodies have in vitro anti-coagulant activity similar to those observed in anti-phospholipid syndrome, suggesting that they may have pro-coagulant effects in polyp tissue.

Antiphospholipid Antibody Assays in 2021: Looking for a Predictive Value in Addition to a Diagnostic One

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are mandatory for the diagnosis but are also a risk factor for the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) clinical manifestations. Lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (β₂GPI) assays are the formal laboratory classification/diagnostic criteria. Additional nonclassification assays have been suggested; among them, antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) and antidomain 1 β₂GPI antibodies are the most promising ones although not yet formally accepted. aPL represent the example of a laboratory test that moved from dichotomous to quantitative results consistent with the idea that reporting quantitative data offers more diagnostic/prognostic information for both vascular and obstetric manifestations. Although the general rule is that the higher the aPL titer, the higher the test likelihood ratio, there is growing evidence that this is not the case for persistent low titers and obstetric events. LA displays the highest diagnostic/prognostic power, although some isolated LAs are apparently not associated with APS manifestations. Moreover, isotype characterization is also critical since IgG aPL are more diagnostic/prognostic than IgA or IgM. aPL are directed against two main autoantigens: β₂GPI and PT. However, anti-β₂GPI antibodies are more associated with the APS clinical spectrum. In addition, there is evidence that anti-β₂GPI domain 1 antibodies display a stronger diagnostic/prognostic value. This finding supports the view that antigen and even epitope characterization represents a further step for improving the assay value. The strategy to improve aPL laboratory characterization is a lesson that can be translated to other autoantibody assays in order to improve our diagnostic and prognostic power.

Non-criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies: a narrative review

SUMMARY The 2006 Revised Sapporo Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome included as laboratory criteria the tests for antiphospholipid antibodies whose accuracy was regarded as satisfactory according to the evidence available at that time. In practice, however, the sensitivity and specificity of these “criteria” of antiphospholipid antibodies are sometimes insufficient for identifying or ruling out antiphospholipid syndrome. It has been studied whether the accuracy of the laboratory diagnosis of the syndrome could be improved by testing for non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies. In this work, we review evidence on the clinical associations and diagnostic value of the most commonly studied non-criteria antibodies, namely: antiphosphatidylethanolamine, anti-annexin A5, anti-prothrombin, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex, IgA anticardiolipin, and IgG anti-domain I of the β2 glycoprotein antibodies.

Recommendations of the Spanish Rheumatology Society for Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part I: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS.

METHODS

A panel of four rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for drafting the document, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN] levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques).

RESULTS

46 recommendations were drawn up, addressing five main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the first 21, referring to the areas of: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of primary APS. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

An update of the SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to partI, related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A partII has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to obstetric SAF and special situations.

Clinical performance of non-criteria antibodies to phospholipids in Chinese patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests the role of non-criteria aPLs as important supplements to the current criteria aPLs in APS. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of a panel of non-criteria antibodies to phospholipid antigens, including, phosphatidylserine (aPS), phosphatidylinositol (aPI), sphingomyelin (aSM), phosphatidylcholine (aPC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) in a well-defined Chinese APS cohort.

METHODS

A total of 229 subjects were tested, including 86 patients with APS, 104 disease controls (DCs) and 39 healthy controls (HCs). Serum IgG/IgM aCL, IgG/IgM aβ2GP1, IgG/IgM aPS, IgG/IgM aPI, IgG/IgM aSM, IgG/IgM aPC, and IgG/IgM aPE were tested by ELISA.

RESULTS

The presence of aPE, aPS, aPI, aPC, and aSM in patients with APS and Disease Controls were 8.1% (7/86) and 1.0% (1/104), 37.2% (32/86) and 9.6% (10/104), 50.0% (43/86) and 8.7% (9/104), 23.3% (20/86) and 1.0% (1/104), and 18.6% (16/86) and 1.9% (2/104), respectively. In criteria aPLs, aCL IgG demonstrated the highest positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 35.75, followed by LA (LR+ of 13.51) and aCL IgM (LR+ of 11.64). In non-criteria aPLs, aPC IgG demonstrated the highest LR+ of 24.94 followed by aSM IgM (LR+ of 14.97). Importantly, the non-criteria aPLs were detected in 18.8% (3/16) of seronegative APS patients. The criteria aPLs, including LA, IgG aCL and IgG aβ2GPI, were significantly correlated with both arterial thrombosis and venous thrombosis, while the non-criteria aPLs, including IgG aPS, IgM aPS, IgG aPI and IgG aPC were significantly associated with arterial thrombosis but not venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our findings indicate that those non-criteria aPLs may be particularly helpful for patients in whom APS is highly suspected, but conventional aPLs are repeatedly negative as well as for predicting APS patients with arterial thrombosis.

Metabolites Associated With the Risk of Incident Venous Thromboembolism: A Metabolomic Analysis

Background Venous thromboembolism ( VTE ) is a complex thrombotic disorder that constitutes a major source of mortality and morbidity. To improve understanding of the cause of VTE , we conducted a metabolomic analysis in a case-control study including 240 incident VTE cases and 6963 controls nested within 3 large prospective population-based cohorts, the Nurses' Health Study, the Nurses' Health Study II , and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Methods and Results For each individual, we measured 211 metabolites and collected detailed information on lifestyle factors. We performed logistic regression and enrichment analysis to identify metabolites and biological categories associated with incident VTE risk, accounting for key confounders, such as age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and comorbid diseases (eg, cancers). We performed analyses of all VTEs and separate analyses of pulmonary embolism. Using the basic model controlling for age, sex, and primary disease, we identified 60 nominally significant VTE - or pulmonary embolism-associated metabolites ( P<0.05). These metabolites were enriched for diacylglycerols ( P_permutation<0.05). However, after controlling for multiple testing, only 1 metabolite (C5 carnitine; odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.41; P_corrected=0.03) remained significantly associated with VTE . After further adjustment for body mass index, no metabolites were significantly associated with disease after accounting for multiple testing, and no metabolite classes were enriched for nominally significant associations. Conclusions Although our findings suggest that circulating metabolites may influence the risk of incident VTE , the associations we observed were confounded by body mass index. Larger studies involving additional individuals and with broader metabolomics coverage are needed to confirm our findings.

Antiphosphatidylethanolamine Antibodies and Deep Vein Thrombosis in Lupus Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Backgroud. Which factors determine venous thrombotic events in some antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients and arterial thrombosis or conditions related to pregnancy in others has not been established yet. Purpose. The aim of this study was to search the antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) correlates in regard to deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and APS. Methods. Twenty-nine patients fulfilling the criteria of both SLE and APS were included. Complete anamnesis and clinical examination was performed on inclusion. Also, for all patients, disease activity was assessed by the SLEDAI score. An extended APLAs profile, ten Abs, was searched. Results. The titers of IgG anticardiolipin (aCL), IgG anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI), IgG antiphosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), and also of IgG antiprothrombin (aPT) were significant higher in patients with DVT history. After analysis by ROC curve and univariate logistic regression, the strongest association was found for IgG aPE. Also, in multivariate analysis, SLEDAI score correlated with the DVT antecedents. Conclusions. IgG aPE might be involved in DVT pathogenic pathways in patients with SLE and APS as their titers remain significantly higher in patients with previous DVT. Lupus patients with DVT events represent a subgroup of patients with more severe underlying pathology.

Clinical Risk Assessment in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Current Landscape and Emerging Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laboratory criteria for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome include the detection of a lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. However, the majority of patients who test positive in these assays do not have thrombosis. Current risk-stratification tools are largely limited to the antiphospholipid antibody profile and traditional thrombotic risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel biomarkers that correlate with disease activity and potentially provide insight into future clinical events include domain 1 specific anti-β₂GPI antibodies, antibodies to other phospholipids or phospholipid/protein antigens (such as anti-PS/PT), and functional/biological assays such as thrombin generation, complement activation, levels of circulating microparticles, and annexin A5 resistance. Clinical risk scores may also have value in predicting clinical events. Biomarkers that predict thrombosis risk in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies have been long sought, and several biomarkers have been proposed. Ultimately, integration of biomarkers with established assays and clinical characteristics may offer the best chance of identifying patients at highest risk of APS-related complications.

Early endosome as a pathogenic target for antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies

Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) is a major phospholipid species with important roles in membrane trafficking and reorganization. Accumulating clinical data indicate that the presence of circulating antibodies against PE is positively correlated with the symptoms of antiphospholipid syndromes (APS), including thrombosis and repeated pregnancy loss. However, PE is generally sequestered inside a normal resting cell, and the mechanism by which circulating anti-PE antibodies access cellular PE remains unknown. The studies presented here were conducted with synthetic PE-binding agents, plasma samples from patients with anti-PE autoimmunity, and purified anti-PE antibodies. The results suggest that the cellular vulnerability to anti-PE antibodies may be mediated by the binding of PE molecules in the membrane of the early endosome. Endosomal PE binding led to functional changes in endothelial cells, including declines in proliferation and increases in the production of reactive oxygen species, as well as the expression of inflammatory molecules. Collectively, our findings provide insight into the etiology of anti-PE autoimmunity and, because endosomes are of central importance in almost all types of cells, could have important implications for a wide range of biological processes.

The outcome of ELISA for antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies is dependent on the composition of phosphatidylethanolamine

OBJECTIVE

The presence of circulating autoantibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) has been shown to be positively associated with symptoms of antiphospholipid syndromes (APS). However, the current ELISA-based tests for antiphosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) antibodies remain inconsistent and controversial. The term PE refers to a collection of phospholipids that have phosphorylethanolamine head group as a common structural feature, but can vary in fatty acids with diverse physicochemical properties. The present study was to investigate, using synthetic positionally symmetrical PE species as a model system, the impact of PE structural variations on aPE ELISA.

METHODS

Single and combinations of synthetic PE species, including 16:0 (fatty acid length:degree of unsaturation), 18:0, 18:1, 20:4 and 22:6, were screened with ELISA using serum samples from aPE patients and compared with chicken egg PE. There were a total of 37 aPE patient serum samples, including 11 cofactor-independent IgM, 14 ABP-independent IgG and 12 ABP-dependent aPE serum samples (3 IgM, 8 IgG and 1 IgA). The ELISA conditions were investigated for different isotypes and cofactor dependence. Based on the initial screening, adjustments in phospholipid compositions were made for achieving optimal OD readings. Finally, we isolated total IgG from aPE sera to validate different antigenic preferences.

RESULTS

The antigenic preference was different among immunoglobulin isotypes and between cofactor-dependent versus cofactor-independent aPE antibodies. More specifically, 18:1 PE was a preferred antigen for cofactor-dependent aPE, whereas 20:4 PE was the preferred antigen for cofactor-independent IgG aPE. In contrast, cofactor-independent IgM aPE appeared to have a general preference for a more complex PE combination with longer fatty acids and a higher degree of unsaturation.

CONCLUSION

The present data indicated that the outcome of aPE ELISA was dependent on the composition and physicochemical properties of PE antigens. The discovery that aPE antibodies may have different antigenic preferences could shed light on the nature of their binding interactions.

Thrombotic risk assessment in antiphospholipid syndrome: the role of new antibody specificities and thrombin generation assay

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune condition characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in subjects presenting with thrombosis and/or pregnancy loss. The currently used classification criteria were updated in the international consensus held in Sidney in 2005. Vascular events seem to result of local procoagulative alterations upon triggers influence (the so called “second-hit theory”), while placental thrombosis and complement activation seem to lead to pregnancy morbidity. The laboratory tests suggested by the current classification criteria include lupus anticoagulant, a functional coagulation assay, and anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibodies, generally detected by solid phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The real challenge for treating physicians is understanding what is the actual weight of aPL in provoking clinical manifestations in each case. As thrombosis has a multi-factorial cause, each patient needs a risk-stratified approach. In this review we discuss the role of thrombotic risk assessment in primary and secondary prevention of venous and arterial thromboembolic disease in patients with APS, focusing on new antibody specificities, available risk scoring models and new coagulation assays.

Influence of Phosphatidylethanolamine Concentration and Composition on the Detection of Antiphosphatidylethanolamine Antibodies by ELISA

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence supports a positive correlation between the presence of antiphosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) autoantibodies and clinical symptoms of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, there is a lack of standardized ELISA-based method for detecting aPE. The current study was conducted to investigate the dependence of aPE ELISA on lipid concentration and composition of PE antigens.

METHODS

A range of ELISA conditions were examined by varying the concentrations of egg PE and by substituting egg PE with combinations of synthetic DOPE and DSPE. The physical properties of the synthetic PE species were also characterized.

RESULTS

Our data indicated that there are different optimal PE concentrations for conducting ELISA assays for cofactor-dependent and cofactor-independent aPEs. In addition, using a two-component synthetic lipid system, we demonstrated aPE ELISA readouts can be modulated to approach the performance level of egg PE, which is currently the most commonly used PE antigen.

CONCLUSION

These data raised the possibility of ultimately replacing natural PE antigens with a blend of defined synthetic lipid species, thus overcoming a known variable factor in aPE detection. The outcome of this study will help pave the way to developing a standardized aPE test.

Plasma ADAMTS13, von Willebrand Factor (VWF), and VWF Propeptide Profiles in Patients With Connective Tissue Diseases and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) frequently develops in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs). ADAMTS13 and von Willebrand factor (VWF) are closely related to the onset of TTP. We investigated the roles of ADAMTS13 and VWF in thrombotic events of patients with CTD. ADAMTS13 activity and VWF and VWF propeptide (VWFpp) levels in CTD, primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (pAPS), and controls were measured to examine their relationship with thrombosis. ADAMTS13 activity levels were significantly low in the patients with CTD but not in the patients with pAPS. No significant difference in the ADAMTS13 activity levels among the various CTD subgroups was found. The levels of VWF and VWFpp were significantly elevated in the patients with pAPS and CTD compared with that of control groups. Eleven patients with CTD developed TTP, and their ADAMTS13 activity levels were significantly lower than patients having CTD without TTP. However, the ADAMTS13 activity levels showed no difference between the patients having CTD with and without thrombotic events. The VWF antigen levels were significantly high in the patients having CTD with TTP. There were no significant differences in the VWF levels of the patients having CTD with TTP and thrombosis. The VWFpp levels were significantly high in the patients having CTD with TTP and thrombosis. The VWF and VWFpp levels were significantly high in the patients with pAPS. Decreased ADAMTS13 activity and elevated VWF and VWFpp levels were observed in patients with CTD. These abnormalities in patients with CTD may represent the increased risk of thrombosis in CTD.

Presence of Antiphospholipid Antibodies as a Risk Factor for Thrombotic Events in Patients with Connective Tissue Diseases and Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a well-known complication of habitual abortion and/or thrombosis and is frequently associated with autoimmune diseases.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the relationships between the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and the incidence of thrombotic events (THEs) in 147 patients with various connective tissue diseases (CTD) suspected of having APS and 86 patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). THEs were observed in 41 patients, including 14 cases of venous thrombosis, 21 cases of arterial thrombosis and eight cases of complications of pregnancy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of THE was significantly high in the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients compared with the other CTD patients and ITP patients. The frequency of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL)-β2-glycoprotein (GPI) complex IgG and aPL was significantly high in the SLE patients compared with the ITP patients. Subsequently, the rate of development of THE was significantly high in the patients with aPLs. In particular, the incidence of THE was significantly high in the SLE or ITP patients with LA, aCL-β2GPI IgG or aPL. The optimal cut-off values for LA, aCL IgG and aCL-β2GPI complex IgG for the risk of THEs were higher in the SLE patients in comparison to the values obtained when using the kit provided by the manufacturer.

CONCLUSION

Although aPLs is frequently associated with SLE and is a causative factor for thrombosis, the optimal cut-off value for aPL for predicting the occurrence of THEs varies among different underlying diseases.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: a recent classification for an old defined disorder

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is now being recognized as a distinct entity from vascular APS. Pregnancy morbidity includes >3 consecutive and spontaneous early miscarriages before 10weeks of gestation; at least one unexplained fetal death after the 10th week of gestation of a morphologically normal fetus; a premature birth before the 34th week of gestation of a normal neonate due to eclampsia or severe pre-eclampsia or placental insufficiency. It is not well understood how antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), beyond their diagnostic and prognostic role, contribute to pregnancy manifestations. Indeed aPL-mediated thrombotic events cannot explain the obstetric manifestations and additional pathogenic mechanisms, such as a placental aPL mediated complement activation and a direct effect of aPLs on placental development, have been reported. Still debated is the possible association between aPLs and infertility and the effect of maternal autoantibodies on non-vascular manifestations in the babies. Combination of low dose aspirin and unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin is the effective treatment in most of the cases. However, pregnancy complications, in spite of this therapy, can occur in up to 20% of the patients. Novel alternative therapies able to abrogate the aPL pathogenic action either by interfering with aPL binding at the placental level or by inhibiting the aPL-mediated detrimental effect are under active investigation.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in localized scleroderma: the potential role of screening tests for the detection of antiphospholipid syndrome

Introduction

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) is associated with infections, drugs and autoimmune disorders. Those antibodies are also detected in approximately 5–20% of the healthy population. The presence of aPL can lead to the occurrence of thrombotic events or abortion, which define the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Aim

To evaluate the potential role of aPL in diagnosing APS in patients with localized scleroderma (LoS).

Material and methods

Serum samples from 45 patients with various forms of LoS were examined. They were screened with the commercially-available immunodot assay Anti-Phospholipid 10 Dot (GA Generic Assays GmbH, Dahlewitz, Germany). A number of clinical and laboratory parameters, especially APS symptoms, were assessed in patients with positive aPL: arterial and venous thrombotic events, obstetric complications, thrombocytopenia and neurological symptoms.

Results

The following profile of aPL IgG or IgM was obtained from patients with LoS: cardiolipin 15/45, phosphatidic acid 41/45, phosphatidyl-choline 0/45, -ethanolamine 6/45, -glycerole 1/45 (patient with Lyme disease), -inositol 7/45, -serine 14/45, annexin V 34/45, β2GPI 21/45, prothrombin 30/45. Antiphospholipid antibodies profile screening in these individuals revealed two cases of suspected secondary laboratory APS. However, no such clinical and laboratory parameters were found in other LoS patients with positive aPL. Similarly, no association was found between the presence of aPL and either thrombotic events or other APS symptoms.

Conclusions

Antiphospholipid antibodies are commonly found in patients with LoS but the exact role of these antibodies remains unclear. Clinical manifestations of APS are not frequently seen during LoS.

The current standing of diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome associated with systemic lupus erythematosus

The antiphospholipid syndrome was first described in the early 1980s. The term was first coined to describe patients presenting with recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis or pregnancy complications. Antiphospholipid syndrome was first reported in systemic lupus erythematosus patients, but later on it became obvious that systemic lupus erythematosus is not a necessary condition for its occurrence. It has been shown that antibodies to phospholipids are the main causative agents of the disease, hence its name. The diagnosis of the disease has witnessed a remarkable evolution over the course of the past 25 years. With the observation that clinical parameters would not be enough to accurately diagnose the disease, antiphospholipid antibodies were recognized to play a central role in this regard. The main hindrance to an accurate diagnosis was the lack of standardization between different laboratory parameters that tested for the antiphospholipid antibodies. Lately, a combination of tests has been acknowledged to play a crucial role in diagnosis.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in 2014: more clinical manifestations, novel pathogenic players and emerging biomarkers

The clinical spectrum of the anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is not limited to vascular thrombosis or miscarriages but includes additional manifestations that cannot be explained solely by a thrombophilic state. Anti-cardiolipin, anti-beta₂ glycoprotein I (anti-β₂GPI) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) assays are not only the formal diagnostic and classification laboratory tools but also parameters to stratify the risk to develop the clinical manifestations of the syndrome. In particular, anti-β₂GPI antibodies reacting with an immunodominant epitope on domain I of the molecule were reported as the prevalent specificity in APS patients, correlating with a more aggressive clinical picture. Several laboratory assays to improve the diagnostic and predictive power of the standard tests have been proposed. Plates coated with the phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex for detecting antibodies represent a promising laboratory tool correlating with LA and with clinical manifestations. Anti-phospholipid antibodies can be found in patients with full-blown APS, in those with thrombotic events or obstetric complications only or in asymptomatic carriers. An inflammatory second hit is required to increase the presence of β₂GPI in vascular tissues, eventually triggering thrombosis. Post-transcriptional modifications of circulating β₂GPI, different epitope specificities or diverse anti-β₂GPI antibody-induced cell signaling have all been suggested to affect the clinical manifestations and/or to modulate their occurrence.

Efficacy of aspirin for the primary prevention of thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: an international and collaborative meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether aspirin has a significant protective effect on risk of first thrombosis among patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL+). Observational and interventional studies identified from the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were selected if they assessed the incidence of first thrombosis in aPL+ patients treated with aspirin versus those without. Pooled effect estimates were obtained using a random-effects model. Of 1211 citation retrieved, 11 primary studies (10 observational and 1 interventional) met inclusion criteria, including a total of 1208 patients and 139 thrombotic events. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the risk of first thrombosis in patients treated with aspirin (n=601) was 0.50 (95%CI: 0.27 to 0.93) compared to those without aspirin (n=607), with significant heterogeneity across studies (I(2)=46%, p=0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a protective effect of aspirin against arterial (OR: 0.48 [95%CI: 0.28-0.82]) but not venous (OR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.32-1.06]) thrombosis, as well as in retrospective (OR: 0.23 [0.13-0.42]) but not prospective studies (OR: 0.91 [0.52-1.59]). Subgroup analysis according to underlying disease revealed a significant protective effect of aspirin for asymptomatic aPL+ individuals (OR: 0.50 [0.25-0.99]), for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (OR: 0.55 [0.31-0.98]) and obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (OR: 0.25 [0.10-0.62]). This meta-analysis shows that the risk of first thrombotic event is significantly decreased by low dose aspirin among asymptomatic aPL individuals, patients with SLE or obstetrical APS. Importantly, no significant risk reduction was observed when considering only prospective studies or those with the best methodological quality.

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome

APS is an autoimmune disease that leads to arterial and/or venous thrombosis, recurrent pregnancy loss and persistently positive aPLs. Patients with clinical manifestations highly suggestive of APS but persistently negative conventional aPLs are classified as having seronegative APS. Ongoing research has revealed the existence of non-criteria antibodies proposed to be relevant to APS and that can be potentially included in the disease's classification criteria. We present a literature review on the most promising antibodies of this heterogeneous aPL family, which includes antibodies to a zwitterionic phospholipid, namely phosphatidylethanolamine, phospholipid-binding plasma proteins, phospholipid-protein complexes and anionic phospholipids other than cardiolipin. Although these molecules can increase the diagnostic yield of APS, their clinical relevance is still debatable and needs to be confirmed by interlaboratory efforts toward standardizing diagnostic tools, in addition to experimental data and larger longitudinal studies.

Cerebral venous thrombosis revealing primary sjögren syndrome: report of 2 cases

Sjögren syndrome (SS) is an autoimmune disease of the exocrine glands, characterized by focal lymphocytic infiltration and destruction of these glands. Neurologic complications are quite common, mainly involving the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The most common central nervous system (CNS) manifestations are myelopathy and microcirculation vasculitis. However, specific diagnostic criteria for CNS SS are still lacking. We report two cases of primary SS in which the revealing symptom was cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) in the absence of genetic or acquired thrombophilias.

Presence of antiphospholipid antibody is a risk factor in thrombotic events in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome or relevant diseases

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) including lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) IgG and aCL-β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) complex IG are causative factors for thrombotic event (THE). We retrospectively investigated relationships between aPLs and THE in 458 patients suspected of having antiphospholipid syndrome. THEs were observed in 232 of 458 patients, including 148 cases of venous thrombosis, 59 of arterial thrombosis, 18 of microthrombosis, and 20 of complications of pregnancy. The frequency of THE was significantly high in patients positive for LA and/or aPL. In patients with autoimmune disease (AID), the frequency of THE was significantly high in patients with any types of aPLs. Additionally, risk of THE was significantly increased in patients with more than two types of aPLs. Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time indicated a high risk for THE. However, neither thrombocytopenia nor AID was a risk for THE. In conclusion, the presence of aPL is an indicator for high risk of THE in patients in whom THE was suspected. However, the risk of THE in aPL-positive patients varied among patients with different underlying diseases.

Correct laboratory approach to APS diagnosis and monitoring

Triple positivity (positive Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti β2-glycoptrotein I antibodies) identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (anti Domain I of β2-glycoptroteinI) that is present in patients with definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is supported by the fact that aβ2GPI antibodies obtained by affinity purification in these patients possess LA activity. Moreover, patients and carriers of this profile carry a much higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss than APS patients with positivity for only one of the tests. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as among carriers of aPL. Clinical studies and interventional trials should first take these high risk subjects into consideration.

Presence of autoantibody against two placental proteins, peroxiredoxin 3 and peroxiredoxin 4, in sera of recurrent pregnancy loss patients

PROBLEM

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as two or more consecutive abortion before the 20th week of gestation. Autoimmune diseases increase the risk and accounts for at least 20% of RPL. Placenta is a pregnancy unique tissue, and proper formation of placenta is key phenomenal for success of a pregnancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the placental proteins that may act as antibody targets in RPL patients.

METHOD OF STUDY

Total placental proteins were extracted and separated using 2D-PAGE technique. Separated protein spots were transferred on PVDF membrane and blotted with sera from 20 RPL patients and compared with the protein spots that membrane blotted with sera from 20 normal women. Differentially blotted spots were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry mass spectrometry technique. The results of the mass analysis also were confirmed by western blot using mAb and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction technique.

RESULTS

The results indicated that RPL women may produce antibody against Peroxiredoxin 3 (Prx3) and Peroxiredoxin 4 (Prx4).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that two placental proteins, Prx3 and Prx4, may act as new placental immune targets. Considering the role of antioxidant defense in the protection of placenta from oxidative stress, production of antibodies against peroxiredoxins 3 and 4 may introduce a new autoimmune hypothesis in RPL, which is needed to be tested in the future works.