Disease course and long-term outcome of juvenile localized scleroderma: Experience from a single pediatric rheumatology Centre and literature review

Interferon-Gamma-Inducible Protein-10 (IP-10) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) as Serological Predictors of Active Disease Status in Localized Scleroderma

We investigated the ability of a panel of immune-related cytokines and chemokines to predict the disease activity state in localized scleroderma (LS) subjects followed longitudinally. A total of 194 sera samples were obtained from 45 LS subjects with diverse types of LS (40% linear, 20% mixed, 16% craniofacial, 13% generalized, and 11% circumscribed) in our cohort. Cytokines/chemokines that were significantly elevated at the baseline active disease visit compared to the inactive disease state at follow-up were Interferon-Gamma-Inducible Protein (IP)-10 (p < 0.021) and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α (p < 0.033). Mixed effect logit modeling identified IP-10 (Odds Ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] = 2.1 [1.4, 3.2], p < 0.001), TNF-α (OR = 1.8 [1.1, 3.0], p = 0.016), and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1 (OR = 2.0 [1.1, 3.9], p = 0.034) as significant predictors of active disease status. These findings support earlier correlations between IP-10 and TNF-α with disease activity parameters in a cross-sectional Luminex™ serological study and may enhance clinical decision-making when disease activity is challenging to assess by clinical examination alone.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

Capturing the Range of Disease Involvement in Localized Scleroderma: The Localized Scleroderma Total Severity Scale

OBJECTIVE

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is a chronic autoimmune disease commonly associated with poor outcomes, including contractures, hemiatrophy, uveitis, and seizures. Despite improvements in treatment, >25% of patients with jLS have functional impairment. To improve patient evaluation, our workgroup developed the Localized scleroderma Total Severity Scale (LoTSS), an overall disease severity measure.

METHODS

LoTSS was developed as a weighted measure by a consensus process involving literature review, surveys, case vignettes, and multicriteria decision analysis. Feasibility was assessed in larger Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance groups. Construct validity with physician assessment and inter-rater reliability was assessed using case vignettes. Additional evaluation was performed in a prospective patient cohort initiating treatment.

RESULTS

LoTSS severity items were organized into modules that reflect jLS disease patterns, with modules for skin, extracutaneous, and craniofacial manifestations. Construct validity of LoTSS was supported by a strong positive correlation with the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of severity and damage and weak positive correlation with PGA-Activity, as expected. LoTSS was responsive, with a small effect size identified. Moderate-to-excellent inter-rater reliability was demonstrated. LoTSS was able to discriminate between patient subsets, with higher scores identified in those with greater disease burden and functional limitation.

CONCLUSION

We developed a new LS measure for assessing cutaneous and extracutaneous severity and have shown it to be reliable, valid, and responsive. LoTSS is the first measure that assesses and scores all the major extracutaneous manifestations in LS. Our findings suggest LoTSS could aid assessment and management of patients and facilitate outcome evaluation in treatment studies.

[Juvenile localized scleroderma]

Juvenile scleroderma, often referred to as juvenile localized scleroderma or "morphea", is a rare inflammatory disease of the skin and skin-related structures, accompanied by local sclerosis and tissue fibrosis. Depending on the clinical manifestation, four different subtypes can be defined: limited, generalized, linear, and mixed. To prevent possible sequelae of the disease, the diagnosis should be made as early as possible and therapy should be initiated at specialized centers in multiprofessional pediatric and dermatologic collaboration. In this review, we present the main clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic characteristics of juvenile localized scleroderma and summarize recommendations.

Remission rates and risk factors for relapse in pediatric morphea: a multicenter retrospective study of Pediatric Rheumatology Academy (PeRA)-Research Group (RG)

AIM

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, is an immune-mediated disease and the most common form of scleroderma in children. It is a localized sclerosing disease of the skin, but can also involve such adjacent tissues as the fascia, muscle, bone, and underlying tissues. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate Turkish pediatric morphea patients, regarding demographics, treatments, and response to treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed by the Pediatric Rheumatology Academy and included pediatric morphea patients from 6 Turkish pediatric rheumatology centers who were followed up for ≥6 months. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings and treatment modalities were analyzed. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to treatment response, as follows: group 1: topical treatment response, group 2: methotrexate response, and group 3: methotrexate resistance. Clinical findings were compared between the 3 groups.

RESULTS

The study included 76 patients, of which 53 (69.7%) were female. Mean age at diagnosis of morphea was 9.7 ± 4.3 years and mean duration of follow-up was 3.2 ± 2.9 years. Linear morphea was the most common form, accounting for 43.4% (n = 33) of the patients. Extracutaneous features were noted in 17 patients (22.4%) and anti-nuclear antibody positivity was noted in 32 (42.1%). In all, 14.4% of the patients received topical treatment only, whereas 86.6% received both topical and systemic treatment. The methotrexate response rate was 76.9% in the patients that received systemic immunosuppressive therapy. The overall relapse rate while under treatment was 19.7%.

CONCLUSION

In this study, most of the pediatric morphea patients responded well to methotrexate. Bilateral lesions were more common in the methotrexate-resistant group. Multiple involvement, and bilateral lesions, were more common in relapsed patients than in non-relapsed patients. Key points • Most of the pediatric morphea patients respond well to MTX. • Multiple involvement, and bilateral involvement, were more common in relapsed patients than in non-relapsed patients. • Presence of extracutaneous findings in patients increased relapse rate 5.7 times.

Clinical Characteristics Associated with Musculoskeletal Extracutaneous Manifestations in Pediatric and Adult Morphea: A Prospective, Cohort Study

Morphea is an autoimmune condition of the skin associated with functional sequelae resulting from musculoskeletal involvement. Systematic investigation of risk for musculoskeletal involvement is limited, particularly in adults. This knowledge gap impairs patient care because practitioners are unable to risk stratify patients. To address this gap, we determined the frequency, distribution, and type of musculoskeletal (MSK) extracutaneous manifestations affecting joint and bone with overlying morphea lesions using cross-sectional analysis of 1,058 participants enrolled in two prospective cohort registries (Morphea in Children and Adults Cohort [n = 750] and National Registry for Childhood Onset Scleroderma [n = 308]). Additional analysis included the identification of clinical features associated with MSK extracutaneous manifestations. MSK extracutaneous manifestations occurred in 274 of 1,058 participants (26% overall, 32% pediatric, and 21% adults). Children had a limited range of motion of larger joints (i.e., knees/hips/shoulders), whereas the involvement of smaller joints (i.e., toes/temporomandibular joint) was more common in adults. Multivariable logistic regression showed that deep tissue involvement had the strongest association with musculoskeletal features, with a lack of deep tissue involvement having a negative predictive value of 90% for MSK extracutaneous manifestations. Our results underscore the need to evaluate MSK involvement in adult and pediatric patients and the utility of using depth of involvement in addition to anatomic distribution to risk stratify patients.

Long-Term Exposure to Road Traffic Noise and Incident Heart Failure: Evidence From UK Biobank

BACKGROUND

Evidence on road traffic noise and heart failure (HF) is limited, and little is known on the potential mediation roles of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertension, or diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of long-term road traffic noise exposure on the risk of incident HF considering air pollution, and explore the mediations of the previously mentioned diseases.

METHODS

This prospective study included 424,767 participants without HF at baseline in UK Biobank. The residential-level noise and air pollution exposure was estimated, and the incident HF was identified through linkages with medical records. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate HRs. Furthermore, time-dependent mediation was performed.

RESULTS

During a median 12.5 years of follow-up, 12,817 incident HF were ascertained. The HRs were 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00-1.16) per 10 dB[A] increase in weighted average 24-hour road traffic noise level (Lden), and 1.15 (95% CI: 1.02-1.31) for exposure to Lden >65 dB[A] compared with the reference category (Lden ≤55 dB[A]), respectively. Furthermore, the strongest combined effects were found in those with both high exposures to road traffic noise and air pollution including fine particles and nitrogen dioxide. Prior AMI before HF within 2 years' time interval mediated 12.5% of the association of road traffic noise with HF.

CONCLUSIONS

More attention should be paid and a preventive strategy should be considered to alleviate the disease burden of HF related to road traffic noise exposure, especially in participants who survived AMI and developed HF within 2 years.

Barriers to care in juvenile localized and systemic scleroderma: an exploratory survey study of caregivers' perspectives

BACKGROUND

Juvenile localized scleroderma (LS) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) are rare pediatric conditions often associated with severe morbidities. Delays in diagnosis are common, increasing the risk for permanent damage and worse outcomes. This study explored caregiver perspectives on barriers they encountered while navigating diagnosis and care for their child's scleroderma.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, caregivers of juvenile LS or SSc patients were recruited from a virtual family scleroderma educational conference and a juvenile scleroderma online interest group. The survey queried respondents about their child's condition and factors affecting diagnosis and treatment.

RESULTS

The response rate was 61% (73/120), with 38 parents of LS patients and 31 parents of SSc patients. Most patients were female (80%) and over half were non-Hispanic white (55%). Most families had at least one person with a college education or higher (87%), traveled ≤ 2 h to see their rheumatologist (83%), and had private insurance (75%). Almost half had an annual household income ≥ $100,000 (46%). Families identified the following factors as barriers to care: lack of knowledge about scleroderma in the medical community, finding reliable information about pediatric scleroderma, long wait times/distances for a rheumatology/specialist appointment, balance of school/work and child's healthcare needs, medication side effects, and identifying effective medications. The barrier most identified as a major problem was the lack of knowledge about juvenile scleroderma in the medical community. Public insurance, household income less than $100,000, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with specific barriers to care. Lower socioeconomic status was associated with longer travel times to see the rheumatologist/specialist. Diagnosis and systemic treatment initiation occurred at greater than one year from initial presentation for approximately 28% and 36% of patients, respectively. Families of LS patients were commonly given erroneous information about the disease, including on the need and importance of treating active disease with systemic immunosuppressants in patients with deep tissue or rapidly progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers of children with LS or SSc reported numerous common barriers to the diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care of juvenile scleroderma. The major problem highlighted was the lack of knowledge of scleroderma within the general medical community. Given that most of the caregiver respondents to the survey had relatively high socioeconomic status, additional studies are needed to reach a broader audience, including caregivers with limited English proficiency, geographical limitations, and financial constraints, to determine if the identified problems are generalizable. Identifying key care barriers will help direct efforts to address needs, reduce disparities in care, and improve patient outcomes.

Development and Validation of the Morphea Activity Measure in Patients With Pediatric Morphea

Importance

Morphea is an insidious inflammatory disorder of the skin and deeper tissues. Determining disease activity is challenging yet important to medical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Objective

To develop and validate a scoring tool, the Morphea Activity Measure (MAM), to evaluate morphea disease activity of any type or severity that is easy to use in clinical and research settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This pilot diagnostic study was conducted from September 9, 2019, to March 6, 2020, in 2 phases: development and validation. During the development phase, 14 morphea experts (dermatologists and pediatric dermatologists) used a Delphi consensus method to determine items that would be included in the MAM. The validation phase included 8 investigators who evaluated the tool in collaboration with 14 patients with pediatric morphea (recruited from a referral center [Medical College of Wisconsin]) during a 1-day in-person meeting on March 6, 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

During the development phase, online survey items were evaluated by experts in morphea using a Likert scale (score range, 0-10, with 0 indicating not important and 10 indicating very important); agreement was defined as a median score of 7.0 or higher, disagreement as a median score of 3.9 or lower, and no consensus as a median score of 4.0 to 6.9. During the validation phase, reliability (interrater and intrarater agreement using intraclass correlation coefficients), validity (using the content validity index and κ statistics as well as correlations with the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity using Spearman ρ coefficients), and viability (using qualitative interviews of investigators who used the MAM tool) were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used for quantitative variables. Data on race and ethnicity categories were collected but not analyzed because skin color was more relevant for the purposes of this study.

Results

Among 14 survey respondents during the development phase, 9 (64.3%) were pediatric dermatologists and 5 (35.7%) were dermatologists. After 2 rounds, a final tool was developed comprising 10 items that experts agreed were indicative of morphea activity (new lesion in the past 3 months, enlarging lesion in the past 3 months, linear lesion developing progressive atrophy in the past 3 months, erythema, violaceous rim or color, warmth to the touch, induration, white-yellow or waxy appearance, shiny white wrinkling, and body surface area). The validation phase was conducted with 14 patients (median age, 14.5 years [range, 8.0-18.0 years]; 8 [57.1%] female), 2 dermatologists, and 6 pediatric dermatologists. Interrater and intrarater agreement for MAM total scores was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.844 (95% CI, 0.681-0.942) for interrater agreement and 0.856 (95% CI, 0.791-0.901) for intrarater agreement. Correlations between the MAM and the modified Localized Scleroderma Severity Index (Spearman ρ = 0.747; P < .001) and the MAM and the Physician Global Assessment of Activity (Spearman ρ = 0.729; P < .001) were moderately strong. In qualitative interviews, evaluators agreed that the tool was easy to use, measured morphea disease activity at a single time point, and should be responsive to changes in morphea disease activity over multiple time points.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, the MAM was found to be a reliable, valid, and viable tool to measure pediatric morphea activity. Further testing to assess validity in adults and responsiveness to change is needed.

Morphea: The 2023 update

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, is a chronic inflammatory connective tissue disorder with variable clinical presentations, that affects both adults and children. It is characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and underlying soft tissue, in certain cases even of the surrounding structures such as fascia, muscle, bone and central nervous system. While the etiology is still unknown, many factors may contribute to disease development, including genetic predisposition, vascular dysregulation, T_H1/T_H2 imbalance with chemokines and cytokines associated with interferon-γ and profibrotic pathways as well as certain environmental factors. Since the disease may progress to permanent cosmetic and functional sequelae, it is crucial to properly assess the disease activity and to initiate promptly the adequate treatment, thus preventing subsequent damage. The mainstay of treatment is based on corticosteroids and methotrexate. These, however, are limited by their toxicity, especially if applied long-term. Furthermore, corticosteroids and methotrexate often do not sufficiently control the disease and/or the frequent relapses of morphea. This review presents the current understanding of morphea by discussing its epidemiology, diagnosis, management and prognosis. In addition, it will describe recent pathogenetic findings, thus proposing potential novel targets for therapeutic development in morphea.

Treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma: current recommendations, response factors, and potential alternative treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is a chronic autoimmune and fibrosing disease associated with a high risk for functional impairment. Antifibrotic options are limited, so current treatment strategies are focused on disease activity control. Pediatric rheumatologists are in consensus on the need to treat with systemic immunosuppressants, in particular, methotrexate. However, more than 30% of patients fail initial methotrexate treatment. This review provides an update on current management and reviews reports on potential alternative treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

An overview of current treatment recommendations and its efficacy are discussed. Recent studies have identified several factors associated with likelihood of treatment response. These include time to initiation of treatment, certain subtypes, and extracutaneous involvement. Findings from recent reports of alternative systemic immunomodulators, including biologic medications, will be summarized.

SUMMARY

Methotrexate treatment has greatly improved outcome for most jLS patients but a substantial portion have refractory cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease. Treatment response factors are being identified, which could lead to improved management strategies. Recent studies provide further support on mycophenolate mofetil as an alternative treatment. Data on biologic therapies is encouraging, with data suggesting efficacy for many extracutaneous manifestations but more studies are needed to evaluate these and other options for jLS.

Narrow-band reflectance spectrophotometry and infrared thermography for assessment of skin lesions in localized scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Infrared thermography (IRT) is a useful method to detect activity/inflammation in localized scleroderma (LoS), however inactive skin lesions with a severe degree of dermal and subcutaneous atrophy may show false positive results. Narrow-band reflectance spectrophotometry (NBRS) is an objective, noninvasive technique of measuring erythema and hyperpigmentation severity, yet has not been extensively studied in LoS.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research was to compare the spectrophotometric results with thermographic examination of LoS lesions.

METHODS

The lesions were assessed using the Localized Scleroderma Assessment Tool (LoSCAT), Dyspigmentation, Induration, Erythema, and Telangiectasias (DIET) score, NBRS and IRT. The difference of the erythema index (ΔEI), melanin index (ΔMI) and average temperature Tavg (ΔTavg) were calculated between each lesion and its normal control.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with 49 active and 64 inactive LoS lesions were examined. The ΔEI strongly correlated with the erythema (r_s =0.62, p <0.0000002) and DIET score (r_s = 0.66, p <0.0000001) and moderately correlated with the telangiectasias score (r_s =0.58, p <0.00001). ΔMI showed strong correlation with the dyspigmentation score (r_s =0.65, p <0.0000001). There was a strong correlation between the ΔTavg and the erythema score (r_s =0.7, p <0.000001). A moderate correlation between the Δ EI and ΔTavg was found in active LoS lesions (r_s =0.53 p <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

NBRS may be a complementary method for determining erythema in LoS active lesions, although this technique remains inferior to IRT, because is unable to distinct between active and inactive lesions. However, NBRS enables to evaluate the severity of hyperpigmentation and telangiectasias, and it can be useful for the assessment of disease severity which is poorly evaluated by IRT.

Juvenile Localized Scleroderma: Updates and Differences from Adult-Onset Disease

Children and adolescents with localized scleroderma (LS) are at high risk for extracutaneous-related functional impairment including hemiatrophy, arthropathy, seizures, and vision impairment. Compared with adult-onset LS, pediatric disease has a higher likelihood for poor outcome, with extracutaneous involvement twice as prevalent in linear scleroderma, disease relapses more common, and disease duration more than double. Consensus among pediatric rheumatologists on treating patients at risk for significant morbidity with systemic immunosuppressants has led to major improvements in outcome. This review discusses recent progress in assessment and treatment strategies and in our understanding of key disease pathways.

Controversy around the morphea

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, is a chronic, autoimmune disease of connective tissue. It is characterized by a typical clinical feature. In morphea, there is no Raynaud's phenomenon, no sclerodactyly or no ulcerations on the fingertips. Although morphea and systemic sclerosis have been perceived as separate disease entities for years, they are still confused both by patients (which is a source of unnecessary stress) and doctors. This may be due to, in part, misunderstood terminology. The controversy around morphea also concerns the division of this disease entity, including its less common subtypes, such as eosinophilic fasciitis. Discussions also revolve around the diagnostic aspects and possible treatment options. The paper attempts to present the debatable aspects regarding nomenclature, classification, diagnosis and treatment of morphea.

Pediatric morphea state-of-the-art literature review: Reframing morphea as a systemic disease

Pediatric morphea is an inflammatory, fibrosing dermatologic disorder. Although morphea may be localized to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, differentiating it from systemic sclerosis, there is increasing evidence that morphea is a manifestation of a systemic inflammatory process, with the potential to involve many organ systems. Given the potential risk for irreversible sequelae, pediatric morphea should be treated early and aggressively. Long-term disease monitoring is essential.

Predictors of family impact of juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVE

To measure the impact juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) has on family quality of life and to identify predictors of family impact in this population which may inform the development of tailored resources to enhance family functioning for patients with jLS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with jLS and their families was conducted. Five questionnaires were administered at each visit: Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Family Impact Module (PedsQL-FIM), PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQL-Generic), PedsQL Rheumatology Module (PedsQL-RM), Child Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), and Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). Linear mixed models with random intercepts for each patient were used to find relationships between family impact scores and clinically relevant variables over time. Variables of interest included disease activity status, methotrexate use, jLS distribution, and scores for PedsQL-Generic and PedsQL-RM.

RESULTS

The median baseline PedsQL-FIM total score was 80.9 (IQR = 76.6-97.4). Adjusting for age and sex, the most significant predictors of family impact were PedsQL-Generic scores and four of five PedsQL-RM dimensions (all P < .001); methotrexate use had borderline significance (P = .06). Family impact increased more significantly over time in older patients. In multivariable modeling, PedsQL-Generic total score and jLS "other" distribution were significant for predicting an increased PedsQL-FIM score (P = .003 and P = .03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

JLS has a moderate family impact. Family impact is predicted by patients' general and disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) and their jLS subtype. There is a trend toward increased family impact with methotrexate treatment. This study emphasizes the importance of family-centered care in jLS.

Mycophenolate mofetil for methotrexate-resistant juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate safety and efficacy of MMF in patients with severe or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma.

METHODS

Consecutive juvenile localized scleroderma patients undergoing systemic treatment were included in a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated with MMF because they were refractory or intolerant to MTX (MMF-group) were compared with responders to MTX (MTX-group). Disease activity was assessed by Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool and thermography. Disease course was established on the number of relapses and treatment changes. Relapse-free survival was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

MMF and MTX groups included 22 and 47 patients, respectively. No significant difference in demographics, follow-up duration and treatment before diagnosis was observed between groups. The most represented clinical subtypes in the MMF-group were pansclerotic morphea and mixed subtype (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively), and linear scleroderma of the face in the MTX-group (P = 0.048). MMF was started because of MTX resistance (18 patients), relapse during MTX tapering/withdrawal (3 patients) and anaphylaxis to MTX (1 patient). After mean 9.4 years of follow-up, 90.9% of patients on MMF and 100% of those on MTX had inactive disease. No significant difference in relapse-free survival between the groups was found (P = 0.066, log-rank test), although MMF likely induced more persistent remission. MMF was well tolerated and combination of MMF and MTX did not increase its efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The present study adds strong evidence on the efficacy and tolerance of MMF in severe and/or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. Further controlled studies are needed to prove its efficacy as first line treatment.

Frontal Linear Scleroderma (en coup de sabre): A Case Report

En coup de sabre is an unusual variant of localized scleroderma characterized by its distinct location involving the frontoparietal region of the forehead and scalp. The authors describe a rare case of en coup de sabre in a 3-year-old boy whose disease onset was at 12 months of age. This article presents the clinical manifestations of continuous changes in the lesion photographed over time. The clinical presentation, laboratory results, and radiological findings together with a brief discussion of the management of the disease are discussed.

Diagnosis and management of morphoea in children: an overview

Paediatric morphoea (localized scleroderma) is an inflammatory sclerosing disorder of the skin and subcutis associated with tissue atrophy. It is thought that the disease develops on the background of genetic predisposition (e.g. mosaicism for the common linear variant) initiated by various trigger factors, and that detected autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines represent secondary epiphenomena. In contrast to the common belief that morphoea is a benign self-limiting disorder, long-term data indicate that its chronicity, relapsing nature and extracutaneous complications lead to significant morbidity, particularly when the disease starts in early childhood. Early recognition may be challenging, and the most important clinical clues are band-like distribution, atrophy of underlying tissue, skin sclerosis, and localized loss of body/scalp hair, eyelashes or eyebrows. Extracutaneous manifestations occur in up to 20% of patients, with arthritis/arthralgia and neurological symptoms being most frequently observed, followed by ophthalmological complications such as uveitis. Corticosteroids and methotrexate are highly effective as first-line therapy in morphoea, leading to partial reversal of skin manifestations. However, the development of atrophy is not sufficiently prevented by standard therapy. There is a relapse rate of 25%-48% within the first years after stopping treatment, thus long-term follow-up is warranted. Mycophenolate mofetil seems to be a beneficial second-line therapy, and a new drug, abatacept, also seems to be a promising and well-tolerated second-line treatment option. Additionally, autologous fat injections are beneficial and may be used as an adjunct to ongoing therapy.

Morphea: progress to date and the road ahead

Morphea is a rare autoimmune condition causing inflammation and sclerosis of the skin and underlying soft tissue. It is characterized by periods of activity (inflammation admixed with fibrosis), ultimately resulting in permanent damage (pigment change and tissue loss). Damage resulting from unchecked activity can lead to devastating, permanent cosmetic and functional sequelae including hair loss; cutaneous, soft tissue and bony atrophy; joint contractures; and growth restriction of the affected body site in children. This makes the early identification of activity and initiation of appropriate treatment crucial to limiting damage in morphea. To this end, recent investigative work has focused on validation of clinical, biomarker, imaging, and histologic outcomes aimed at accurately quantifying activity and damage. Despite promising results, further work is needed to better validate these measures before they can be used in the clinic and research settings. Although there has been recent approval of less toxic, targeted therapies for many inflammatory skin conditions, none have been systematically investigated in morphea. The mainstays of treatment for active morphea are corticosteroids and methotrexate. These are often limited by substantial toxicity. The paucity of new treatments for morphea is the result of a lack of studies examining its pathogenesis, with many reviews extrapolating from research in systemic sclerosis. Recent studies have demonstrated the role of dysregulated immune and fibrotic pathways in the pathogenesis of morphea, particularly interferon (IFN) gamma related pathways. Active morphea lesions have been found to display an inflammatory morphea signature with CXCR3 receptor ligands, as well as a distinct fibrotic signature reflecting fibroblast activation and collagen production. CXCL9 and 10 have been associated with increased measures of disease activity. While immune dysfunction is thought to play the primary role in morphea pathogenesis, there are other factors that may also contribute, including genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and vascular dysregulation. There remains an essential need for further research to elucidate the pathogenesis of morphea and the mode of action of dysregulated upstream and downstream immune and fibrotic pathways. These studies will allow for the discovery of novel biomarkers and targets for therapeutic development.

Changes in Disease Activity and Damage Over Time in Patients With Morphea

Importance

Prospective studies of the disease course in patients with morphea are lacking, particularly those comparing adults and children.

Objective

To investigate the disease course in patients with morphea treated with standard-of-care therapy using validated clinical outcome measures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prospective cohort study of 130 adults and children from the Morphea in Adults and Children cohort with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up and Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool scores recorded at each study visit. Study patients were seen at a tertiary referral center (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas) from November 1, 2008, through April 1, 2016. The dates of analysis were May 2016 through July 2019.

Exposures

All patients received standard-of-care therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patterns in disease activity and recurrence were examined. The time to recurrence of morphea disease activity from the first visit with inactive disease was assessed using survival analysis with the log-rank test to compare differences between morphea subtypes.

Results

In total, 130 adults and children (663 study visits) were included in this study. The mean (SD) age of patients was 34.4 (23.8) years, and 101 of 130 (78%) were female. The mean (SD) follow-up was 4.3 (1.7) years. Fifty patients had at least 5 years of follow-up. Most patients were white individuals (96 of 130 [74%]) and had linear subtype (72 of 130 [55%]) or generalized subtype (40 of 130 [31%]). Overall, 13 of 30 (43%) with generalized subtype had recurrence of disease activity compared with 14 of 66 (21%) with linear subtype (hazard ratio, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.38-7.79). The median (interquartile range) time to first recurrence of disease activity after initial resolution of disease activity was 1.1 (0.8-1.9) years for generalized subtype and 2.3 (1.0-3.3) years for linear subtype. Of the 50 patients followed up for at least 5 years, 18 (36%) had recurrence of disease activity.

Conclusions and Relevance

Disease activity appeared to improve in most patients with morphea over 6 to 12 months using previously published treatment plans, underscoring their effectiveness. Sclerosis improved more slowly (over 2-5 years), often after discontinuation of treatment, but atrophy increased slightly as sclerosis subsided. Standard-of-care therapy appears to improve disease activity, which allows sclerosis to improve, and provides relative stability of other features of disease damage. A substantial number of patients, particularly those with generalized subtype, have a relapsing-remitting course over many years. Patients with morphea should be monitored for recurrent disease activity over extended periods.

A retrospective study on clinical subtypes and management of morphea in 10 Italian Dermatological Units

BACKGROUND

There are still few dermatological studies on morphea. We evaluated the epidemiological and clinical features and management of pediatric morphea, reporting dermatologists experience.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective observational study was carried out on the epidemiological and clinical features and management of the disease between 01/01/2009 and 01/10/2014 in 10 Italian Dermatological Units.

RESULTS

We collected the data of 69 children affected by: circumscribed morphea (39.1%); linear morphea of trunk and limbs (14.5%); en coupe de sabre morphea (ECDS) (14.5%); progressive facial hemiatrophy (8.7%); generalized form (18.8%); mixed morphea (4.4%). The mean age at onset was 6.86±3.21 years, mainly between 2 and 8 years, but is statistically significantly lower for ECDS (4.5±3.03). Localizations were: head/neck (30.4%), limbs (26.1%), trunk (14.5%), 2 or more sites (29%), most often the trunk plus limbs. Extracutaneous manifestations were observed in 26.1% patients. 10 patients presented a second autoimmune disorder. Treatments were topical in 26.1% cases and systemic (alone or associated with topical treatments) in 68.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a lack of uniformity in the management of patients and an increasing awareness of dermatologists on the use of systemic therapies, in particular of methotrexate, which is no longer exclusive to rheumatologists. Methotrexate causes stabilization and improvement of the clinical signs, but topical creams are still considered adjuvant or maintenance therapies during/after the use of systemic drugs.

Paediatric morphoea: a holistic review. Part 2: diagnosis, measures of disease activity, management and natural history

Paediatric morphoea is a debilitating fibrosing disorder of uncertain aetiology, affecting the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Defining optimum management strategies in paediatric morphoea remains an ongoing challenge, owing to the varied presentations and a relative paucity of paediatric-specific studies. We performed a literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar, using keywords such as 'pediatric morphea', 'juvenile localised scleroderma' and 'juvenile systemic sclerosis'. Relevant studies, including randomized trials, reviews of standard current guidelines and original research articles, were selected and results analysed before summarizing them. In Part 1 of this review, we described the epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis and clinical classification; in this part, we discuss the diagnosis, markers of disease activity, management and natural history in paediatric morphoea.

Methotrexate in Linear Scleroderma: Long-Term Efficacy in Fifty Children From a Single Pediatric Rheumatology Center

OBJECTIVE

To study disease course and long-term outcome in children with linear scleroderma (SSc) treated with methotrexate (MTX) since diagnosis.

METHODS

The present study was retrospective and cross-sectional and included consecutive children with linear SSc who were treated with MTX for >1 year and were followed up for at least 2 years. Disease course was analyzed by the number of relapses and treatment changes. Relapse-free survival was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis, comparing patients with linear SSc and those with other juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) disease subtypes. Disease activity and damage were assessed by the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool and thermography.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with a mean follow-up duration of 7.8 years and a mean MTX treatment duration of 3.1 years were included. Sixteen percent of patients did not respond to the first course of MTX, and 16% had at least 1 flare. Complete remission was observed in 18.2% of patients who were followed up for 2-5 years, in 80.0% of patients followed up for 10 years, and in 87.5% of patients followed up for >10 years. No significant difference in relapse-free survival between patients with linear SSc and in 17 patients with other JLS disease subtypes was observed. Tissue damage was mild in 42% of patients, moderate in 32%, and severe in 26%. The correlations between severity of tissue damage and linear SSc subtype, disease duration, relapses, and remission were not significant. The relationships between treatment duration and disease relapses (P < 0.05) and severity of tissue damage (P < 0.005) were significant.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with linear SSc who are treated with MTX achieve complete and long-lasting remission. Overall aesthetic and functional sequelae are moderate, most likely because tissue damage is established early and treatment likely stabilizes the damage. Early diagnosis and MTX treatment, as well as long-term monitoring, are crucial to improve outcome and promptly identify flares.

Update on Management of Morphea (Localized Scleroderma) in Children

Juvenile localized scleroderma (morphea) is the predominant scleroderma in childhood which affects the skin and may extend to the underlying fascia, muscle, joints and bone. The assessment of activity and damage can be done with a validated instrument like LoSCAT. Disease classified as “low severity” which includes superficial plaque morphea can be treated with topical mid potent- potent steroids, tacrolimus, calcipotriol or imiquimod in combination with phototherapy. Methotrexate is recommended for linear, deep and generalized morphea. Steroids are effective in the early inflammatory stage and used in combination with methotrexate. Methotrexate is continued for at least 12 months after adequate response is achieved. Mycophenolate mofetil is given in cases where methotrexate is contraindicated or for those who do not respond to methotrexate. There are also reports of improvement of disease with ciclosporine and hydroxychloroquine. In severe cases, recalcitrant to standard therapy there may be a role for biologics, JAK inhibitors, and IVIG. Supportive measures like physiotherapy and psychiatric counseling are also important in the management of morphea. Orthopedic surgery and other measures like autologous fat transfer may be advocated once the disease is inactive.

A novel patient-reported outcome for paediatric localized scleroderma: a qualitative assessment of content validity

BACKGROUND

According to current standards, no existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have high-quality validity evidence for use with individuals diagnosed with paediatric localized scleroderma (LS). This severely hinders patient-centred LS-focused research, including much needed clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a valid health-related quality of life measure for individuals with paediatric LS and to qualitatively evaluate its content validity using a patient-centred approach.

METHODS

Previously collected qualitative data from youth with LS and their caregivers was used to develop items. The resulting item set was administered in a clinical setting to participants aged 8-18 years old. Cognitive interviews were used to evaluate time to survey completion, readability/understanding of the items, appropriateness of the recall period and construct representation.

RESULTS

Seventeen children and adolescents with LS participated in the study. Interviews supported readability, understanding of the items and appropriateness of the recall period in individuals > 10 years old. Revisions were made to simplify the instructions and to be more inclusive of different subtypes of LS. Three items were added to improve content representation.

CONCLUSIONS

Content validity was supported by the patient-centred development process of the outcome measure and via direct feedback from individuals with LS and their families. Although an important first step, the resulting PRO, termed the Localized Scleroderma Quality of Life Instrument, should be further evaluated in a larger sample before being implemented. What's already known about this topic? No current health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures have been created using direct input from children and adolescents with localized scleroderma (LS). When compared with qualitative reports of HRQoL impact in youth with all LS subtypes, no existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have appropriate content validity for individuals with paediatric LS. What does this study add? This study proposes a novel LS-specific PRO and is the first qualitative assessment of content validity for any PRO measure in this population. Results from cognitive interviews with children and adolescents support the content validity of the newly developed item set and its ability to capture HRQoL impact in a clinical context. What are the clinical implications of this work? Incorporating a content-valid PRO of HRQoL impact into clinical practice would allow for the valid, ongoing capture of patient experience in LS. Although content validity is an important and necessary step in the process of evaluating validity, items within this novel measure will undergo additional psychometric evaluation before implementation in research and clinical settings.

Linear Scleroderma of the Head - Updates in management of Parry Romberg Syndrome and En coup de sabre: A rapid scoping review across subspecialties

To provide an update on the current management, including evaluation and treatment, and the available diagnostic tools for linear scleroderma of the head, i.e., Parry-Romberg Syndrome and en coup de sabre (PRS/ECDS). A rapid scoping review of the literature was conducted to include manuscripts published in English between 2010 and 2019. Literature searches were performed in PubMed and EMBASE databases. The were analyzed for descriptive statistic reporting. This study reviewed 215 manuscripts reporting these 1430 patients. Surgical reports comprised the majority of the reviewed literature. Most PRS/ECDS did not appear to receive comprehensive multisubspecialty evaluation for extracutaneous manifestations; 21% of cases noted neurological screening, 4% noted dental screening, and 3% noted ophthalmologic screening. Methotrexate and glucocorticoids remain the most frequent choice for immunosuppressive treatment, though fewer than 7% of patients reported receiving systemic medical therapies. Surgical procedures for cosmetic or functional improvement were common (59%) among the reported patients. Autologous fat grafting was the most frequently utilized cosmetic treatment (50% of procedures) followed by free flap transfers (24% of procedures). There is ongoing need for standardized evaluation, monitoring, and treatment to prevent morbidity in PRS/ECDS, especially in children. When these patients are managed by rheumatologists, methotrexate, and steroids remain the first-line treatment, but a review of the published literature reflects that this may be a minority. Most PRS/ECDS patients are not evaluated in a multidisciplinary fashion. We propose comprehensive evaluations across subspecialties at the baseline and follow-up levels to monitor disease activity and record extracutaneous manifestations, treatment algorithms, and surgical intervention considerations.

Overview of Juvenile localized scleroderma and its management

BACKGROUND

Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare pediatric disease characterized by inflammation and skin thickening. JLS is associated with deep tissue and extracutaneous involvement that often results in functional impairment and growth disturbances. This article provides an overview of the disease with a focus on active features and treatment.

DATA SOURCES

We searched databases including PubMed, Elsevier and MedLine and Wanfang, reviewing publications from 2013 to 2019. Selected earlier publications were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Linear scleroderma is the most common JLS subtype. Several lines of evidence suggest that JLS is an autoimmune disease. Extracutaneous involvement is common and can present before the onset of skin disease. Multiple skin features are associated with disease activity, and activity can also manifest as arthritis, myositis, uveitis, seizures, and growth impairment. Systemic immunosuppressive treatment, commonly methotrexate with or without glucocorticoids, greatly improves outcome and is recommended for treating JLS patients with active disease and moderate or higher severity. Long term monitoring is needed because of the disease's chronicity and the high frequency of relapses off of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

JLS is associated with a risk for disabling and disfiguring morbidity for the growing child. Identifying active disease is important for guiding treatment, but often difficult because of the paucity of markers and lack of a universal skin activity feature. More studies of JLS pathophysiology are needed to allow the identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Comparative effectiveness treatment studies are also needed to work towards optimizing care and outcome.

Diagnosis and management of linear scleroderma in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Linear scleroderma is the most common subtype of localized scleroderma (LoS) in children. It can be associated with extracutaneous manifestations and long-term sequelae. Thus, appropriate diagnosis and management are key to improve the prognosis. In this review, we summarize the most relevant recent publications for the diagnosis, evaluation of disease activity and adequate management of patients with linear scleroderma.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are specific clinical features that indicate activity in LoS; dermoscopy and Wood's lamp may be useful. Summarizing, scoring methods seem to provide the most adequate assessment of LoS; but several biomarkers that correlate with activity have been studied: E-selectin and IL-2 receptor, CD34+ dermal dendritic cells and Th/Th1 immunophenotype with decreased T helper (Th2), T regulatory (Tregs), B and natural killer (NK) cells. Recent studies propose hydroxychloroquine monotherapy and tocilizumab as potential therapeutic options.

SUMMARY

Clinical evaluation, both physical exam and history, is the most important aspect in diagnosing and assessing activity of linear scleroderma. Clinical scoring methods may be most useful for evaluation of activity; eventually, other biomarkers could be relevant in clinical practice. For most patients with linear scleroderma, the first choice of treatment is methotrexate, but physical therapy, plastic surgery and/or orthopedic management are key to improve residual limitations and quality of life. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/MOP/A35.

Immunopathogenesis of Pediatric Localized Scleroderma

Localized scleroderma (LS) is a complex disease characterized by a mixture of inflammation and fibrosis of the skin that, especially in the pediatric population, also affects extracutaneous tissues ranging from muscle to the central nervous system. Although developmental origins have been hypothesized, evidence points to LS as a systemic autoimmune disorder, as there is a strong correlation to family history of autoimmune disease, the presence of shared HLA types with rheumatoid arthritis, high frequency of auto-antibodies, and elevated circulating chemokines and cytokines associated with T-helper cell, IFNγ, and other inflammatory pathways. This inflammatory phenotype of the peripheral blood is reflected in the skin via microarray, RNA Sequencing and tissue staining. Research is underway to identify the key players in the pathogenesis of LS, but close approximation of inflammatory lymphocytic and macrophage infiltrate with collagen and fibroblasts deposition supports the notion that LS is a disease of inflammatory driven fibrosis. The immune system is dynamic and undergoes changes during childhood, and we speculate on how the unique features of the immune system in childhood could potentially contribute to some of the differences in LS between children and adults. Interestingly, the immune phenotype in pediatric LS resembles to some extent the healthy adult cellular phenotype, possibly supporting accelerated maturation of the immune system in LS. We discuss future directions in better understanding the pathophysiology of and how to better treat pediatric LS.

Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile localised scleroderma

In 2012, a European initiative called Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) was launched to optimise and disseminate diagnostic and management regimens in Europe for children and young adults with rheumatic diseases. Juvenile localised scleroderma (JLS) is a rare disease within the group of paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD) and can lead to significant morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines are sparse and management is mostly based on physicians' experience. This study aims to provide recommendations for assessment and treatment of JLS. Recommendations were developed by an evidence-informed consensus process using the European League Against Rheumatism standard operating procedures. A committee was formed, mainly from Europe, and consisted of 15 experienced paediatric rheumatologists and two young fellows. Recommendations derived from a validated systematic literature review were evaluated by an online survey and subsequently discussed at two consensus meetings using a nominal group technique. Recommendations were accepted if ≥80% agreement was reached. In total, 1 overarching principle, 10 recommendations on assessment and 6 recommendations on therapy were accepted with ≥80% agreement among experts. Topics covered include assessment of skin and extracutaneous involvement and suggested treatment pathways. The SHARE initiative aims to identify best practices for treatment of patients suffering from PRDs. Within this remit, recommendations for the assessment and treatment of JLS have been formulated by an evidence-informed consensus process to produce a standard of care for patients with JLS throughout Europe.

Prediction of disease relapse in a cohort of paediatric patients with localized scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Localized scleroderma (LS) is an autoimmune condition of the skin and underlying tissue. Active or recurring disease can lead to cumulative tissue damage, especially in paediatric-onset disease.

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the rate of relapse of LS activity in a cohort of paediatric patients and to evaluate for potential clinical and laboratory predictors of disease relapse.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data were gathered prospectively. Patients were categorized as experiencing relapse or not, and clinical and laboratory parameters were compared. A logistic regression was fit to predict odds of relapse while controlling for multiple predictors. A subgroup of patients was also evaluated to determine the average time from treatment completion to relapse.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were followed for the identified study duration of > 2 years and had achieved disease remission, with 35 (45%) experiencing LS relapse. Patients who were older at disease onset, antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive and without an extracutaneous manifestation (ECM) were more likely to relapse. All three variables remained significant in the multivariable logistic regression model. Results of the subgroup mirrored the larger sample. The average time between treatment completion and relapse was 21 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of patients with LS experiencing a relapse of disease activity has shown older age of initial LS onset and ANA positivity to be potential markers for risk of relapse. Patients meeting these parameters may require greater clinical vigilance. The presence of one or more ECM may be protective. Clinicians treating patients with LS should provide significant long-term follow-up to monitor for relapse.