Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: A single center prospective follow-up study

Rheumatoid arthritis extra-articular lung disease: new insights on pathogenesis and experimental drugs

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary involvement is one of the most common extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a systemic inflammatory disease characterized by joint swelling and tenderness. All lung compartments can be interested in the course of RA, including parenchyma, airways, and, more rarely, pleura and vasculature.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to review the main RA lung manifestations, focusing on pathogenesis, clinical and therapeutic issues of RA-related interstitial lung disease (ILD). Despite an increasing number of studies in the last years, pathogenesis of RA-ILD remains largely debated and the treatment of RA patients with lung involvement is still challenging in these patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of RA-ILD is largely based on expert-opinion. Due to the broad clinical manifestations, including both joints and pulmonary involvement, multidisciplinary discussion, including rheumatologist and pulmonologist, is essential, not only for diagnosis, but also to evaluate the best therapeutic approach and follow-up. In fact, the coexistence of different lung manifestations may influence the treatment response and safety. The identification of biomarkers and risk-factors for an early identification of RA patients at risk of developing ILD remains a need that still needs to be fulfilled, and that will require further investigation in the next years.

[The concept of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF)]

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of respiratory diseases often related to connective tissue diseases. Some patients will develop an ILD with autoimmune features without reaching the recommended criteria for autoimmune diseases. Their management is difficult because they have both features for idiopathic and connective tissue disease. To better identify these patients, the concept of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has been created. The diagnosis relies on ILD without identified cause and the presence of at least one defined criterion among 2 of the 3 following domains: clinic, serologic, and morphologic. The mean age at diagnosis is 60, a sex ratio of 1/1, and depending on the authors close to 20% of patients with IPAF will develop a connective tissue disease according to the international criterion. Their prognosis is better than for patients with idiopathic ILD and with an average 5-year survival of 70%. Older age at diagnosis, a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, and an impaired diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide have been identified as poor prognosis factors. The treatment relies on usual care for chronic respiratory diseases and is often associated with immunosuppressive and/or antifibrotic therapies. The objective of this classification is to better characterize these patients and improve their management.

The Pattern and Progression of "Usual" Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: Comparison with Patients with Classic Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

We proposed the term "UIPAF" to define patients with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) associated with only one domain of the classification called "Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features" (IPAF). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical presentation and prognosis of UIPAF patients, compared with two cohorts, composed of IPAF and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients, respectively.

METHODS

The patients were enrolled as IPAF, UIPAF, or IPF based on clinical, serological, and radiological data and evaluated by a multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

We enrolled 110 patients with IPF, 69 UIPAF, and 123 IPAF subjects. UIPAF patients were similar to IPAF regarding autoimmune features, except for the prevalence of Rheumatoid Factor in UIPAF and anti-SSA in IPAF. A similar proportion of the two cohorts progressed toward a specific autoimmune disease (SAD), with differences in the kind of SAD developed. The real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF patients proved to be almost identical to IPF.

CONCLUSIONS

UIPAF shared with IPAF similar autoimmune features, suggesting the opportunity to be considered IPAF, excluding the morphological domain by the classification. However, the real-life management and prognosis of UIPAF are similar to IPF. These data suggest a possible modification in the therapeutic management of UIPAF.

Characteristics and risk factors of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features

BACKGROUND

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has features of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), but without meeting criteria for a specific CTD. We compared baseline characteristics, survival, and response to treatment of IPAF to both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD.

METHODS

Measurements were extracted from a prospective registry. Baseline features and survival were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD. Linear trajectory of lung function decline (%-predicted forced vital capacity [FVC%] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO%]) before and after initiation of mycophenolate or azathioprine were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Compared to CTD-ILD (n = 1240), patients with IPAF (n = 128) were older, more frequently male, and had greater smoking history. Compared to unclassifiable ILD (n = 665), patients with IPAF were younger, more frequently female, and had worse baseline lung function. IPAF had higher mortality compared to CTD-ILD and similar risk of mortality compared to unclassifiable ILD. Mycophenolate initiation was associated with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% in patients with IPAF, and azathioprine initiation with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% decline in IPAF and DLCO% decline in CTD-ILD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IPAF had worse survival compared to those with CTD-ILD and similar mortality to unclassifiable ILD, with treatment being associated with stabilization in lung function in all three ILDs. It is uncertain whether IPAF should be considered a distinct ILD diagnostic subgroup.

Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease and autoimmunity: Towards IPAF in children?

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has been defined for adults with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and autoimmunity who do not meet the criteria for a specific connective tissue disease (CTD). We aimed to determine whether IPAF criteria could apply to children.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with ILD and autoimmunity followed at Necker Hospital between 2008 and 2019. Children were classified according to specific CTD and IPAF criteria. The epidemiology and course of the disease were studied according to the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 27 patients, 6 fulfilled the criteria for IPAF and represented 4.5% of all patients with ILD during the study period. Other diagnoses included juvenile dermatomyositis (30%), overlap syndromes (19%), systemic lupus erythematosus (15%), systemic sclerosis (7%), mixed CTD (4%), and rheumatoid arthritis (4%). IPAF patients were more frequently boys versus CTD-ILD patients (67% vs. 14%, p = .02). Two patients had severe respiratory distress that led to death for one of them. The course was favorable for the others, with a good response to steroids. The course tended to be more favorable for IPAF patients than for those with CTD-ILD (0% lung fibrosis in the IPAF group vs. 43% in the CTD-ILD group, p = .07).

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the existence of IPAF in children. Its prevalence was lower than in adults but comparable to that found for other pediatric series. Boys were more highly represented than in CTD-ILD. The course was favorable for most cases. Larger and more prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Nailfold capillaroscopy findings of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and compared it with that of patients with connective tissue disease-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed as ILD were evaluated using NFC. Baseline demographic, clinical, serological, and high-resolution CT findings were collected. NFC was semi-quantitatively scored with six domains ranging from 0 to 18. In addition, the overall patterns (scleroderma/non-scleroderma patterns) were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients (31 with CTD-ILD, 18 with IPAF, and 32 with IIP) were included. The non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern was the most common ILD pattern in the CTD-ILD and IPAF groups, whereas the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern was the most common in the IIP group. The semi-quantitative score of the CTD-ILD group was higher than that of the IPAF or IIP groups (5.8 vs 4.2 vs 3.0, p < 0.001, respectively). Giant capillaries and haemorrhages were more frequently present in the CTD-ILD and IPAF groups than in the IIP group. A scleroderma pattern was present in 27.8% of the IPAF group, whereas none of the IIP patients showed a scleroderma pattern.

CONCLUSION

NFC findings may be useful in classifying patients with ILD into CTD-ILD/IPAF/IIP.

[Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: monocentric prospective study]

AIM

To study demographic, clinical, serological and morphological features of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), compare survival in IPAF and interstitial lung disease in connective tissue diseases (CTD-ILD), and identify predictors of mortality and transformation to CTD in the IPAF group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The IPAF group included 48 patients (75.0% women, median age 57.5 years), CTD-ILD - 49 patients (79.6% women, median age 60.0 years). The analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory and instrumental data was performed, as well as comparison of survival with the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test in the IPAF and CTD-ILD groups. In the IPAF group, predictors of mortality and the development of CTD were studied with multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Duration of observation period did not differ significantly in the IPAF and CTD-ILD groups (40.0 and 37.0 months, respectively). Clinical criteria of IPAF were observed in 25 (52.1%) patients, serological - in 44 (91.7%), morphological - in 44 (91.7%). Mortality in the IPAF group was significantly higher than in the CTD-ILD group (29.2 and 6.1%, respectively; p=0.023). The presence of diabetes mellitus, CT-pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, and an initial low forced vital capacity value were independent predictors of mortality in the IPAF group. During the observation period, the development of CTD was noted in 4 (8.3%) patients with IPAF. The independent predictor of the CTD development was the increased C-reactive protein level.

CONCLUSION

IPAF is characterized by a lower survival rate compared to CTD-ILD, and a relatively low risk of CTD transformation.

Clinical Characterization and Predictive Factors for Progression in a Cohort of Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease and Features of Autoimmunity: The Need for a Revision of IPAF Classification Criteria

Background and Objectives: The "interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features" (IPAF) criteria have been criticized because of the exclusion of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patients with a single clinical or serological feature. To classify these patients, the term UIPAF was proposed. This study aims to describe clinical characteristics and predictive factors for progression of a cohort of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with at least one feature of autoimmunity, applying criteria for IPAF, specific connective tissue diseases (CTD), and a definition of UIPAF when possible. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data on 133 consecutive patients with ILD at onset associated with at least one feature of autoimmunity, referred by pulmonologists to rheumatologists from March 2009 to March 2020. Patients received 33 (16.5-69.5) months of follow-up. Results: Among the 101 ILD patients included, 37 were diagnosed with IPAF, 53 with ILD-onset CTD, and 11 with UIPAF. IPAF patients had a lower prevalence of UIP pattern compared to CTD-ILD and UIPAF patients (10.8% vs. 32.1% vs. 100%, p < 0.01). During the follow-up, 4 IPAF (10.8%) and 2 UIPAF (18.2%) patients evolved into CTD-ILD. IPAF patients presented features not included in IPAF criteria, such as sicca syndrome (8.1%), and were more frequently affected by systemic hypertension (p < 0.01). Over one year, ILD progression (greater extent of fibrosis on HRCT and/or decline in PFTs) was less frequent in the IPAF group compared to CTD-ILD and UIPAF (32.3% vs. 58.8% vs. 72.7, p = 0.02). A UIP pattern and an IPAF predicted a faster (OR: 3.80, p = 0.01) and a slower (OR: 0.28, p = 0.02) ILD progression, respectively. Conclusions: IPAF criteria help identify patients who might develop a CTD-ILD, even though a single clinical or serological feature is respected. Future revisions of IPAF criteria should include sicca syndrome and separate UIP-pattern into a different definition (UIPAF), given its association with a different prognosis, independently from ILD classification.

Recurrent Exacerbations and Evolution into Polymyositis in a Patient with Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: A Case Report and Literature Review

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) is a new disease entity proposed in 2015. Numerous questions regarding IPAF require clarification, including diagnostic criteria, standard managements for stable disease and exacerbation, and prognosis. We report a case of a 67-year-old Asian woman who presented with progressive dyspnea. Chest computed tomography (CT) scans revealed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Serologic testing indicated positive anti-Jo-1 without presence of extrathoracic manifestations. An IPAF diagnosis was made after a multidisciplinary discussion. The patient experienced a severe exacerbation requiring mechanical ventilation, and she was successfully salvaged with methylprednisolone pulse therapy and single-dose cyclophosphamide. During the one-year follow-up, she reported bilateral leg muscle weakness with noticeably elevated serum creatine kinase, suggesting polymyositis. The development of malignancy was also noted 15 months after the initial presentation, and the patient eventually died. This report demonstrated successful salvage treatment with glucocorticoid pulse therapy for IPAF with acute exacerbation. However, the maintenance therapy failed to control disease progression. The treatment strategies for exacerbation and stable disease in IPAF remain unknown and need further studies. Given the high risk of evolution into a defined connective tissue disease (CTD), regular evaluation of the clinical features and biomarkers of CTDs is essential for patients with IPAF.

Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: What the Rheumatologist Needs to Know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review will focus on the role of the rheumatologist in evaluating patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) without a defined rheumatic disease and will outline the current classification criteria for interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) and describe what is known regarding IPAF pathobiology, natural history, prognosis, and treatment. Lastly, knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research will be discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

IPAF is a recently defined classification of ILD patients who have features suggesting an autoimmune-mediated process, but do not fulfill current rheumatic disease criteria. The goal of the IPAF criteria is to provide a uniform case definition for the study of autoimmune ILD patients who do not currently fit within standard ILD diagnostic categories, ultimately improving diagnosis and therapy. Many of these patients are referred for rheumatologic evaluation to aid the diagnostic process. The care of the IPAF patient is complex and is multidisciplinary with pulmonology, rheumatology, pathology, radiology, physical therapy, primary care, pulmonary transplant providers all serving vital roles. The rheumatologist has several roles which include classification, disease monitoring, and management.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: Evaluation of connective tissue disease incidence during follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Among interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) patients, identifying those at risk to develop a connective tissue disease (CTD) during the disease course is a key issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of definite CTD diagnosis in IPAF patients during follow-up.

METHODS

We performed a multicentric cohort study of interstitial lung disease (ILD) from 2010 to 2017 in pneumology and immunology departments of tertiary care centers. Patients with a known cause of ILD (including established CTD) at diagnosis were excluded. Among patients with idiopathic ILD and at least three years of follow-up, two groups (IPAF and non-IPAF) were retrospectively analyzed at time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients with ILD were enrolled, including 70 IPAF and 179 non-IPAF patients. After a mean follow-up time of 77 ± 44 months, 18/70 IPAF patients (26%) had a CTD diagnosis - 9 antisynthetase syndrome, 8 systemic sclerosis and 1 overlap myositis - compared with 4/179 non-IPAF patients (2%). IPAF patients were at higher risk of CTD occurrence at 3 years of follow-up compared to non-IPAF patients (HR 10.1, 95% CI 3.1-33.1, p < 0. 01). IPAF patients progressing to CTD tended to be younger, more often female and have more frequently puffy fingers, capillaroscopy abnormalities and antisynthetase antibodies at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that a significant proportion of IPAF patients had associated CTD diagnosis during follow-up. Prospective studies are needed to confirm baseline predictive factors of CTD occurrence in IPAF patients.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: challenges and controversies

The presence of clinical, serological and/or radiological features suggestive, but not confirmatory, of a defined connective tissue disease in patients with interstitial lung disease is a relatively frequent occurrence. In 2015, the European Respiratory Society and the American Thoracic Society proposed classification criteria for the interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) research entity to capture such patients in a standardised manner, with the intention of nurturing clinical research. This initiative resulted in the publication of several series of IPAF patients, with significant variation between cohorts in clinical characteristics, outcome and the application of IPAF criteria in patient selection. From this increasing body of published work, it has become apparent that revision of IPAF criteria is now required in order to justify the eventual designation of IPAF as a standalone diagnostic term, as opposed to a provisional entity put forward as a basis for clinical research. This review covers the current state of IPAF, conclusions that can and cannot be drawn from the IPAF evidence base, and ongoing uncertainties that require further expert group consideration.

Natural history and screening of interstitial lung disease in systemic autoimmune rheumatic disorders

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a relatively frequent manifestation of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disorders (SARDs), including systemic sclerosis (SSc), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has been proposed to describe patients with ILD who have clinical or serological findings compatible with SARDs but they are not sufficient for a definite diagnosis. ILD may present with different patterns among patients with SARDs, but most commonly as nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), with the exception of RA and ANCA vasculitis that more often present with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). The natural history of ILD is quite variable, even among patients with the same SARD. It may present with subclinical features following a slow progressively course or with acute manifestations and clinically significant rapid progression leading to severe deterioration of pulmonary function and respiratory failure. The radiographic pattern of ILD, the extent of the disease, the baseline pulmonary function, the pulmonary function deterioration rate over time and clinical variables related to the primary SARD, such as age, sex and the clinical phenotype, are considered prognostic factors for SARDs-ILD associated with adverse outcomes and increased mortality. Different modalities can be employed for ILD detection including clinical evaluation, pulmonary function tests, high resolution computed tomography and novel techniques such as lung ultrasound and serum biomarkers. ILD may determine the clinical outcome of SARDs, since it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and therefore screening of patients with SARDs for ILD is of great clinical importance.

Recognition of Connective Tissue Disease-Related Interstitial Pneumonia Based on Histological Score-A Validation Study of an Online Diagnostic Decision Support Tool

Objectives: to evaluate the number of cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) that included histological features of connective tissue disease (CTD) and to check whether they demonstrated the clinical features of CTD, using a previously reported CTD-interstitial pneumonia (IP) index that histologically differentiates CTD-associated and idiopathic IP. Methods: patients diagnosed with IPF following video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy through multidisciplinary team diagnosis between 2014 and 2017 were selected. Pathological observation was made by four pathologists who scored eight observational items needed for the CTD-IP index. Cases determined as CTD, by the CTD-IP index, were extracted, and their clinical features were compared. Results: a total of 94 cases of IPF were identified, of which 20 were classified into the CTD group using the CTD-IP index with reasonable interobserver agreement (k = 0.76). Cases pathologically classified into the CTD group were significantly associated with female sex, non-smoking history, autoantibody positivity, and CTD symptoms (p = 0.01, 0.03, 0.01, and 0.04, respectively). Conclusions: patients with IPF with pathological findings of CTD showed clinical characteristics similar to those of patients with CTD.

Prospective nationwide multicentre cohort study of the clinical significance of autoimmune features in idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

BACKGROUND

Some patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) show autoimmune features. Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) was recently proposed as a research concept in these patients. However, retrospective studies reported conflicting results of its prognosis. Therefore, this study was conducted to prospectively evaluate the clinical significance of autoimmune features in patients with IIP.

METHODS

This nationwide multicentre study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with IIP. At the diagnosis, we systematically evaluated 63 features suggestive of connective tissue diseases using a checklist including symptoms/signs and autoantibodies, which contained most items of the IPAF criteria and followed up with the patients. Clinical phenotypes were included in a cluster analysis.

RESULTS

In 376 patients with IIP enrolled, 70 patients (18.6%) met the IPAF criteria. The proportion of patients with IPAF was significantly lower in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than in non-IPF (6.0% vs 24.3%, respectively). During a median observation period of 35 months, patients with IPAF more frequently developed systemic autoimmune diseases and had less frequent acute exacerbation of IIPs than patients with non-IPAF. IPAF diagnosis was significantly associated with better survival and was an independent positive prognostic factor in total and patients with non-IPF. Cluster analysis by similarity of clinical phenotypes identified a cluster in which there was a higher number of women, and patients had more autoimmune features and a better prognosis than other clusters.

INTERPRETATION

These observations suggest that some patients with IIP show autoimmune features with distinct characteristics and favourable prognosis. However, we were not able to determine the appropriate therapies for these patients.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: from research classification to diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The term interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) was first proposed by an international task force in 2015 as a research classification to standardise nomenclature regarding patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and features of connective tissue disease. However, how the use of this term and its proposed definition translates to clinical practice remains uncertain. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of studies of IPAF cohorts to date, discuss the consideration of IPAF as a distinct diagnostic entity and outline a suggested approach to patient management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Considerable heterogeneity exists between published IPAF cohorts, with some cohorts exhibiting similarities to those with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), and others more similar to idiopathic interstitial pneumonias including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Little data exist to inform the management of patients who fulfil the IPAF criteria. Preliminary data supports pragmatic management of these patients as having a working clinical diagnosis of either idiopathic interstitial pneumonia or CTD-ILD. Future research studies into this approach are required.

SUMMARY

The term IPAF, and its definition, have been of fundamental benefit to facilitating research in this diverse patient group. However, to date, there remain many unanswered questions regarding their natural histories and response to treatment.

Interstitial Lung Disease and Anti-Myeloperoxidase Antibodies: Not a Simple Association

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), mainly anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO) antibodies, have been frequently identified in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, their role remains unclear, and only 7–23% of these patients develops clinically overt vasculitis. We aimed to investigate the clinical, serological, and radiological features and prognosis of anti-MPO-positive interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. Fifty-eight consecutive patients firstly referred for idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and showing serological positivity of anti-MPO antibodies were retrospectively enrolled. For each patient, clinical data, lung function testing, chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern, and survival were recorded. Thirteen patients developed a rheumatic disease during a median follow-up of 39 months. Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) was the most frequent ILD pattern, significantly influencing the patients’ survival. In fact, while the 52-week survival of the overall population was 71.4 ± 7.5%, significantly higher than IPF, survivals of anti-MPO patients with UIP pattern and IPF were similar. Forced vital capacity and diffusion lung capacity for CO significantly declined in 37.7 and 41.5% of cases, respectively, while disease progression at chest HRCT was observed in 45.2%. A careful clinical history and evaluation should always be performed in ILD patients with anti-MPO antibodies to quickly identify patients who are developing a systemic rheumatic disease.

Clinical, radiologic and serologic profile of patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: a cross-sectional study

The current study aimed to characterize patients from a rheumatology referral center in north India, who satisfied the definition of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) as given by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) consensus committee in 2015. Thirty-five adult patients aged 18 years and above, fulfilling the 2015 ATS/ERS criteria for IPAF were included in the study. The clinical and immunological profile, and radiologic findings on high-resolution computerized tomography thorax were noted. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence at 1:320 titer and myositis-specific antibody (MSA) assays were performed. Non-parametric tests were used to compare variables between groups. The study cohort included predominantly female patients with a mean age of 50.6 ± 13 years and mean duration of disease of 38.8 ± 28.4 months. Majority of patients (49%) fulfilled the morphologic and serologic domains as per the IPAF consensus criteria and 31% patients had features in all three domains. Non-specific interstitial pneumonia was the most common pattern observed in 77% patients. Raynaud’s phenomenon and inflammatory arthritis were the predominant autoimmune features. Pulmonary arterial hypertension was documented in 60% of patients on echocardiography. Positive ANA at 1:320 dilution was present in all 26 patients tested, whereas extractable nuclear antigen and MSA assays detected autoantibodies in 49% and 51% of patients respectively. IPAF predominantly affected females in the age group of 50 years and above, with varied autoimmune manifestations and autoantibody profile.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features: the perspective of rheumatologists

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune feature (IPAF) is a recently established disease entity that is comprised of interstitial lung diseases with evidence of autoimmune features but that does not fulfill the criteria for definite autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The classification criteria for IPAF were defined by the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society in 2015. However, further studies to establish IPAF subgroups and treatment modalities for each subgroup are still needed. In this review, we discuss recent advances regarding IPAF and raise critical points for the diagnosis and management of patients with IPAF from the perspective of rheumatologists.

Labial salivary gland assessment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with sicca symptoms

OBJECTIVE

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) commonly present with sicca symptoms. This study aimed to assess labial minor salivary glands (LMSGs) in those patients to rule out Sjögren's syndrome (SS), in which sicca symptoms are the clinical hallmark.

STUDY DESIGN

Cases of patients with IPF with sicca symptoms referred to the oral medicine clinic at the University of Florida within the last 13 years were selected with institutional review board approval. Demographic characteristics, clinical findings, laboratory results, and histomorphologic parameters were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (9 men and 3 women, ages 55-76 years) were identified. History of exposure to asbestos or chemicals, smoking, and medication information was obtained. All patients reported sicca symptoms with 57% of those exhibiting objective or borderline dryness. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La were positive in 25% and 8% of the cases, respectively. Microscopically, 1 out of 12 patients was biopsy positive in the absence of anti-SSA/Ro, fulfilling the 2016 SS criteria with positive sialometry.

CONCLUSIONS

A LMSG biopsy is critical to identify SS in patients with diagnosed IPF and present sicca symptoms, especially those with negative serology, as revealed in our study.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of rheumatic disease-related interstitial lung disease: a narrative review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an antimetabolite with a potent inhibitory effect on proliferation of T and B lymphocytes used since the early 1990s for the prevention of acute allograft rejection after organ transplant. MMF is also widely used for the treatment of a variety of rheumatic diseases (RDs) and their pulmonary involvement. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a heterogeneous group of progressive fibrotic diseases of the lung, which is often secondary to RD and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality. MMF is considered the main alternative to cyclophosphamide as a first-line agent to treat RD-related ILD or as possible maintenance therapy after cyclophosphamide, with a lower rate of side-effects. However, as for other immunosuppressive agents, the use of MMF in RD-ILD is supported by poor scientific evidence. In this narrative review, we describe the available data and recent advances on the effectiveness and safety of MMF for the treatment of ILD related to RD, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, primary Sjögren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, undifferentiated connective tissue disease, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features: Why Rheumatologist-Pulmonologist Collaboration Is Essential

In 2015 the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) “Task Force on Undifferentiated Forms of Connective Tissue Disease-associated Interstitial Lung Disease” proposed classification criteria for a new research category defined as “Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features” (IPAF), to uniformly define patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and features of autoimmunity, without a definite connective tissue disease. These classification criteria were based on a variable combination of features obtained from three domains: a clinical domain consisting of extra-thoracic features, a serologic domain with specific autoantibodies, and a morphologic domain with imaging patterns, histopathological findings, or multicompartment involvement. Features suggesting a systemic vasculitis were excluded. Since publication of ERS/ATS IPAF research criteria, various retrospective studies have been published focusing on prevalence; clinical, morphological, and serological features; and prognosis of these patients showing a broad heterogeneity in the results. Recently, two prospective, cohort studies were performed, confirming the existence of some peculiarities for this clinical entity and the possible progression of IPAF to a defined connective tissue disease (CTD) in about 15% of cases. Moreover, a non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern, an anti-nuclear antibody positivity, and a Raynaud phenomenon were the most common findings. In comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), IPAF patients showed a better performance in pulmonary function tests and less necessity of oxygen delivery. However, at this stage of our knowledge, we believe that further prospective studies, possibly derived from multicenter cohorts and through randomized control trials, to further validate the proposed classification criteria are needed.

Serum SP-A and KL-6 levels can predict the improvement and deterioration of patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features

BACKGROUND

Some patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) showed a progressive course despite therapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether serial changes in the serum levels of surfactant protein-A (SP-A) and Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) can predict disease progression.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with IPAF and 41 patients with non-fibrotic lung disease (non-FLD) were examined. Based on long-term changes in lung function, 36 IPAF patients who were followed up for more than 3 months were divided into a progressive group (n = 9), an improvement group (n = 13), and a stable group (n = 14). Serum KL-6 and SP-A levels were measured. The sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value, and area under the curve (AUC) value for each of the indices were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The expression differences in these biomarkers and their correlation with disease severity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with non-FLD patients, serum SP-A and KL-6 levels in IPAF patients were increased significantly [SP-A: (p < 0.001); KL-6: (p < 0.001)] and negatively correlated with DLCO (SP-A: r_S = - 0.323, p = 0.018; KL-6: r_S = - 0.348, p = 0.0011). In patients with progressive disease, the posttreatment serum SP-A and KL-6 levels were increased significantly compared with pretreatment levels [SP-A: (p = 0.021); KL-6: (p = 0.008)]. In patients showing improvement, the levels were decreased significantly [SP-A (p = 0.007) and KL-6 (p = 0.002)]. Changes in serum biomarkers (Delta SP-A and Delta KL-6) were significantly negatively correlated with changes in lung function (Delta FVC, Delta DLCO and Delta FEV1) (r_S = 0.482, p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between Delta SP-A and Delta KL-6 (r_S = 0.482, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum SP-A and KL-6 offer high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of IPAF. The decrease in serum SP-A and/or KL-6 levels in patients with IPAF is related to the improvement in pulmonary function. SP-A and KL-6 may be important biomarkers for predicting disease progression in patients with IPAF.

Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features (IPAF): A Single-Centre, Prospective Study

Objectives

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) refers to patients with interstitial lung disease and autoimmune features not fulfilling the classification criteria for a specific connective tissue disease. We sought to study the characteristics, disease progression, response to treatment and complications of patients with IPAF in 1-year follow-up period.

Methods

Clinical and laboratory findings, comorbidities, medications, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), chest HRCT and complications during the one-year follow-up period were documented for each of the 39 enrolled patients with IPAF.

Results

The mean age at the time of IPAF diagnosis was 63.2 (±11) years, and 62% of patients were female. The most common clinical features were arthritis (82%) and rash (54%-not included in the IPAF criteria). Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (59%) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP-61.5%) were the most prevalent autoantibodies and radiological pattern respectively. PFTs at 12 months from baseline stabilized or improved in 79.5% of patients (p> 0.05). Infections were observed in 23.1% of patients during the first and in 12.8% during the second semester of follow-up. Two patients (5.1%) required hospitalization. All infections occurred in patients with non-usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (p=0.02).

Conclusions

Arthritis and rash are among the most common features in IPAF suggesting rash could be included into IPAF criteria. Almost 80% of patients had stable/improved PFTs at the end of follow-up. Infections occurred mainly in the first semester of treatment and in patients with non-UIP radiological pattern probably due to higher doses of corticosteroids used in these patients.

The Spectrum of Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Autoimmune Diseases: Data of a 3.6-Year Prospective Study from a Referral Center of Interstitial Lung Disease and Lung Transplantation

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) may occur in patients with a rheumatic autoimmune disease (AD), increasing their risk of morbidity and mortality. However, little is known about the prevalence of AD in patients diagnosed with an ILD. In this prospective study, we determined the spectrum of ILD associated with AD (AD-ILD) among patients sent for assessment to a single clinic of ILD and lung transplantation from a referral center between May 2016 and December 2019. ILD diagnosis was made by pneumologists based on clinical and radiological findings and pulmonary function test abnormalities. All patients with ILD were also assessed by experienced rheumatologists. During the period of assessment, 338 patients were diagnosed with ILD. Among them, 32.8% fulfilled definitions for an AD. Most cases with AD-ILD had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (27.0%), systemic sclerosis (26.1%) or anti-synthetase syndrome (17.1%). Interestingly, 18% of the patients with AD-ILD were diagnosed as having an interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features. Antinuclear antibodies and non-specific interstitial pneumonia were the most frequent positive autoantibodies and radiological pattern found in AD-ILD patients, respectively. In conclusion, our study indicates that a high number of ILD patients have a related AD. Consequently, close collaboration among rheumatologists and pneumologists is needed.

Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease Secondary to Autoimmune Diseases: How to Recognize Them?

The diagnostic assessment of patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) can be challenging due to the large number of possible causes. Moreover, the diagnostic approach can be limited by the severity of the disease, which may not allow invasive exams. To overcome this issue, the referral centers for ILD organized Multidisciplinary Teams (MDTs), including physicians and experts in complementary discipline, to discuss the management of doubtful cases of ILD. MDT is currently considered the gold standard for ILD diagnosis, but it is not often simple to organize and, furthermore, rheumatologists are still not always included. In fact, even if rheumatologic conditions represent a common cause of ILD, they are sometimes difficult to recognize, considering the variegated clinical features and their association with all possible radiographic patterns of ILD. The first objective of this review is to describe the clinical, laboratory, and instrumental tests that can drive a diagnosis toward a possible rheumatic disease. The secondary objective is to propose a set of first-line tests to perform in all patients in order to recognize any possible rheumatic conditions underlying ILD.