The Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes for Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, computed tomography-derived body composition, systemic inflammation and survival after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPEX) is selectively used before intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Sarcopenia, a chronic condition defined by reduced skeletal muscle function and volume, can be assessed radiologically by computed tomography (CT)-derived body composition analysis (CT-BC), and is associated with systemic inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to describe the association between CT-BC, CPEX, inflammation and survival in patients undergoing elective intervention for AAA.

SETTING

Patients were recruited retrospectively from a single, secondary-care centre-operative database. Cases undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) between 31 March 2015 and 25 June 2020 were included.

PATIENTS

There were 176 patients (130 EVAR, 46 OSR) available for analysis in the final study; median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 60.5 [27] months, and all completed a minimum of 2 years follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative CPEX tests were recorded. CT sarcopenia score [CT-SS, range 0 to 2, calculated based on normal/low SMI (0/1) and normal/low SMD (0/1)] assessed radiological sarcopenia. Preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic score (mGPS) was used to assess systemic inflammation.

RESULTS

Mean [95% confidence interval (CI) survival in the CT-SS 0 vs. CT-SS 1 vs. CT-SS 2 subgroups was 80.1 (73.6 to 86.6) months vs. 70.3 (63.5 to 77.1) months vs. 63.8 (53.4 to 74.2) months] ( P  = 0.01). CT-SS was not associated with CPEX results ( P  > 0.05). Elevated CT-SS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83, 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.89, P  < 0.01] was independently associated with increased hazard of long-term mortality; however, CPEX results were not ( P  > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CPEX test results were not consistently associated with body composition and did not have significant prognostic value in patients undergoing elective treatment for AAA.

Body mass index and the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm presence and post-operative mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical data regarding the relationships between body mass index (BMI) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are inconsistent, especially for the obese and overweight patients. The aims of this study were to determine whether obesity is associated with the presence of AAA and to investigate the quantitative relationship between BMI and the risk of AAA presence and post-operative mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases were used to search for pertinent studies updated to December 2023. The pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated by conventional meta-analysis based on random effects model. Dose-response meta-analyses using robust-error meta-regression (REMR) model were conducted to quantify the associations between BMI and AAA outcome variables. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis were performed according to the characteristics of participants.

RESULTS

18 studies were included in our study. The meta-analysis showed a higher prevalence of AAA with a RR of 1.07 in patients with obesity. The dose-response meta-analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between BMI and the risk of AAA presence. A "U" shape curve reflecting the correlation between BMI and the risk of post-operative mortality in AAA patients was also uncovered, suggesting the "safest" BMI interval [28.55, 31.05] with the minimal RR.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is positively but nonlinearly correlated with the increased risk of AAA presence. BMI is related to AAA post-operative mortality in a "U" shaped curve, with the lowest RR observed among patients suffering from overweight and obesity. These findings offer a preventive strategy for AAA morbidity and provide guidance for improving the prognosis in patients undergone AAA surgical repair.

The open-first strategy is acceptable for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm even in the endovascular era

PURPOSE

To examine the surgical findings of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) based on the open-first strategy in the last decade, and to analyze the predictors of in-hospital mortality for RAAA in the endovascular era.

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 116 patients who underwent RAAA repair, for whom sufficient data were available [25% female, median age 76 (70-85) years]. Sixteen (13.8%) patients were managed with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and 100 patients (86.2%) were managed with open surgical repair (OSR).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified base excess (BE) (odds ratio [OR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.96; p = 0.006), and preoperative cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) [OR] 15.4; 95% [CI] 1.30-181; p = 0.030), BE (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.96; p = 0.006), shock index (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.01-5.94; p = 0.050), lactic acid (Lac) (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.02-1.36; p = 0.026), and blood sugar (BS) > 215 (OR 3.46; 95% CI 1.10-10.9; p = 0.034) as positive predictors of hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that a first-line strategy of OSR for ruptured AAAs is acceptable. Poor preoperative conditions, including a high shock index, CPA, low BE, high Lac, and a BS level > 215 mg/dl, were identified as predictors of hospital mortality, rather than the procedures themselves.

Raised BMI is associated with fewer Type I endoleaks in patients treated with the Gore Excluder device: data from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT)

BACKGROUND

Obesity is increasing in prevalence globally and within the cohort of vascular surgical patients, leading to poorer outcomes. There are few data on endoleak as a complication of AAA surgery in obese patients. The aim of this study was to use large scale registry data from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT) to interrogate any relationship between obesity and endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a Gore Excluder device (W. L. Gore & Associates, Newark, DE, USA), in order to guide treatment recommendations in the future.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the GREAT Registry was carried out and patients who were recorded as having a postoperative endoleak requiring intervention were included. Patient demographics including Body Mass Index (BMI), aneurysm parameters and on- or off-instructions for use (IFU) were recorded. Ruptured AAA were excluded.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 3326 patients with an operation date between August 25, 2010 and September 22, 2019. Obese patients were significantly less likely to have a Type 1 endoleak (Fisher's Exact P value=0.006), and the association was maintained in a multiple logistic regression model which controlled for age, gender, neck angulation and off IFU device use (OR=0.33, P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Among AAA patients treated with a Gore Excluder device (W. L. Gore & Associates), a higher BMI category was associated with a lower risk of Type 1 endoleak requiring reintervention. Further work needs to be carried out to assess our findings in other patient cohorts.

Associations between body mass index and all-cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Fasting insulin and c-reactive protein confound the association between mortality and body mass index. An increase in fat mass may mediate the associations between hyperinsulinemia, hyperinflammation, and mortality. The objective of this study was to describe the "average" associations between body mass index and the risk of mortality and to explore how adjusting for fasting insulin and markers of inflammation might modify the association of BMI with mortality. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published in 2020. Studies with adult participants where BMI and vital status was assessed were included. BMI was required to be categorized into groups or parametrized as non-first order polynomials or splines. All-cause mortality was regressed against mean BMI squared within seven broad clinical populations. Study was modeled as a random intercept. β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals are reported along with estimates of mortality risk by BMIs of 20, 30, and 40 kg/m2 . Bubble plots with regression lines are drawn, showing the associations between mortality and BMI. Splines results were summarized. There were 154 included studies with 6,685,979 participants. Only five (3.2%) studies adjusted for a marker of inflammation, and no studies adjusted for fasting insulin. There were significant associations between higher BMIs and lower mortality risk in cardiovascular (unadjusted β -0.829 [95% CI -1.313, -0.345] and adjusted β -0.746 [95% CI -1.471, -0.021]), Covid-19 (unadjusted β -0.333 [95% CI -0.650, -0.015]), critically ill (adjusted β -0.550 [95% CI -1.091, -0.010]), and surgical (unadjusted β -0.415 [95% CI -0.824, -0.006]) populations. The associations for general, cancer, and non-communicable disease populations were not significant. Heterogeneity was very large (I2  ≥ 97%). The role of obesity as a driver of excess mortality should be critically re-examined, in parallel with increased efforts to determine the harms of hyperinsulinemia and chronic inflammation.

Quantifying the burden of survivorship associated with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Survivorship encompasses the physical, psychological, social, functional, and economic experience of a living with a chronic condition for both the patient and their caregiver. It is made up of nine distinct domains and remains understudied in nononcological pathologies, including infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysmal disease (AAA). This review aims to quantify the extent to which existing AAA literature addresses the burden of survivorship.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO databases were searched from 1989 through September 2022. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series were included. Eligible studies had to detail outcomes related to survivorship in patients with AAA. Owing to the heterogeneity between studies and outcomes, no meta-analysis was conducted. Study quality was assessed with specific risk of bias tools.

RESULTS

A total of 158 studies were included. Of these, only five (treatment complications, physical functioning, comorbidities, caregivers, and mental health) of the nine domains of survivorship have been studied previously. The available evidence is of variable quality; most studies display a moderate to high risk of bias, are of an observational study design, are based within a limited number of countries, and consist of an insufficient follow-up period. The most frequent complication after EVAR was endoleak. EVAR is associated with poorer long-term outcomes compared with open surgical repair in most studies retrieved. EVAR showed better outcomes in regard to physical functioning in the short term, but this advantage was lost in the long term. The most common comorbidity studied was obesity. No significant differences were found between open surgical repair and EVAR in terms of impact on caregivers. Depression is associated with various comorbidities and increased the risk of a nonhospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the absence of robust evidence regarding survivorship in AAA. As a result, contemporary treatment guidelines rely on historic quality-of-life data that are narrow in scope and nonrepresentative of contemporary clinical practice. As such, there is an urgent need to reevaluate the aims and methodology associated with traditional quality-of-life research moving forward.

Evaluation of the prognostic value of computed tomography-derived body composition in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the most common mode of repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in the UK. EVAR ranges from standard infrarenal repair to complex fenestrated and branched EVAR (F/B-EVAR). Sarcopenia is defined by lower muscle mass and function, which is associated with inferior perioperative outcomes. Computed tomography-derived body composition analysis offers prognostic value in patients with cancer. Several authors have evaluated the role of body composition analysis in predicting outcomes in patients undergoing EVAR; however, the evidence base is limited by heterogeneous methodology.

METHODS

Six hundred seventy-four consecutive patients (58 (8.6%) female, mean (SD) age 74.4 (6.8) years) undergoing EVAR and F/B-EVAR at three large tertiary centres were retrospectively recruited. Subcutaneous and visceral fat indices (SFI and VFI), psoas and skeletal muscle indices, and skeletal muscle density were measured at the L3 vertebral level from pre-operative computed tomographies. The maximally selected rank statistic technique was used to define optimal thresholds to predict mortality.

RESULTS

There were 191 deaths during the median follow-up period of 60.0 months. Mean (95% CI) survival in the low SMI versus high SMI subgroups was 62.6 (58.5-66.7) versus 82.0 (78.7-85.3) months (P < 0.001). Mean (95% CI) survival in the low SFI versus high SFI subgroups was 56.4 (48.2-64.7) versus 77.1 (74.2-80.1) months (P < 0.001). One-year mortality in the low SMI versus high SMI subgroups was 10% versus 3% (P < 0.001). Low SMI was associated with increased odds of one-year mortality (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.60-6.34, P < 0.001). Five-year mortality in the low SMI versus high SMI subgroups was 55% versus 28% (P < 0.001). Low SMI was associated with increased odds of five-year mortality (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.11-2.14, P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis of all patients, low SFI (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.30-2.76, P < 0.001) and low SMI (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.34-2.63, P < 0.001) were associated with poorer survival. On multivariate analysis of asymptomatic AAA patients, low SFI (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.35, P < 0.05) and low SMI (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.20-2.42, P < 0.01) were associated with poorer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Low SMI and SFI are associated with poorer long-term survival following EVAR and F/B-EVAR. The relationship between body composition and prognosis requires further evaluation, and external validation of the thresholds proposed in patients with AAA is required.

Prognostic Value of Nutritional Markers for Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Repair

Objective: The relationship between nutritional status and morbidity and death in a number of diseases and disorders has garnered considerable attension. In patients having endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), we assessed the prognostic value of nutritional markers of albumin (ALB), body mass index (BMI), and geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for long-term mortality. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data analysis was done on patients who had undergone elective EVAR for AAA more than 5 years earlier. Results: A total of 176 patients underwent EVAR for AAA between March 2012 and April 2016. The optimal cutoff value of ALB, BMI, and GNRI for predicting long-term mortality was calculated as 3.75 g/dL (area under the curve [AUC] 0.64), 21.4 kg/m2 (AUC 0.65), and 101.4 (AUC 0.70), respectively. Low ALB, low BMI, and low GNRI as well as age ≥75 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and active cancer were independent risk factors for long-term mortality. Conclusion: Malnutrition, which is measured by ALB, BMI, and GNRI, is an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in patients receiving EVAR for AAA. Of the nutritional markers, the GNRI can be the most reliable nutritional indicator to identify a potentially high-risk group of mortality after EVAR.

The impact of obesity on perioperative and postoperative outcomes after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a common and growing health problem in vascular surgery patients, as it is in all patient groups. Evidence regarding body mass index (BMI) on endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes is not clear in the literature. We aimed to determine the impact of obesity on perioperative and midterm outcomes of elective EVAR between obese and non-obese patients.

METHODS

Under a retrospective study design, a total of 120 patients (109 males, 11 females, mean age: 74.45 ± 8.59 (53-92 years)) undergoing elective EVAR between June 2012 and May 2020 were reviewed. Patients were stratified into two groups: obese (defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²) and non-obese (mean BMI < 30 kg/m² (32.25 ± 1.07 kg/m² vs 25.85 ± 2.69 kg/m²)).

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients included in the study, 81 (67.5%) were defined as "nonobese," while 39 (32.5%) were obese. The mean BMI of the study group was 27.93 ± 3.78 kg/m². In obese patients, the procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and dose area product (DAP) values were longer than those of non-obese patients: 89.74 ± 20.54 vs 79.69 ± 28.77 min (p = 0.035), 33.23 ± 10.14 vs 38.17 ± 8.61 min (p = 0.01) and 133.69 ± 58.17 vs 232.56 ± 51.87 Gy.cm² (p < 0.001). Although there was no difference in sac shrinkage at 12-month follow-up, there was a significant decrease at 6-month follow-up in both groups (p = 0.017). Endoleak occurred in 17.9% (n = 7) of the obese group versus 11.1% (n = 9) of the non-obese group (p = 0.302). Iliac branch occlusion developed in four patients, 3 (3.7%) in the non-obese group and 1 (2.6%) in the obese group (p = 0.608). The all-cause mortality rate was slightly higher in the obese group; however, it did not differ between the groups (p = 0.463).

CONCLUSION

In addition to the longer procedure times, fluoroscopy times, and DAP values in obese patients, regardless of obesity, significant sac shrinkage in the first 6 months of follow-up was observed in both groups. No difference was documented with regards to mortality or morbidity following EVAR.

Association Between Obesity and Outcomes Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Obesity is prevalent in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). There is an association between increasing body mass index (BMI) and increased overall cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. This study aims to assess the difference in mortality and complication rates between normal weight (NW), overweight (OW), and obese patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal AAA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing EVAR for AAA between January 1998 and December 2019. Weight classes were defined as: BMI<18.5 kg/m², underweight; BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m², NW; BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m², OW; BMI 30.0-39.9 kg/m², obese; BMI>39.9 kg/m² morbidly obese. Primary outcomes were long-term all-cause mortality and freedom from reintervention. Secondary outcome was aneurysm sac regression (defined as a reduction in sac diameter of 5 mm or more). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and mixed model analysis of variance were used.

RESULTS

The study included 515 patients (83% males, mean age 77 ± 8 years) with a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 2.8 years. In terms of weight class, 2.1% (n = 11) were underweight, 32.4% (167) were NW, 41.6% (n = 214) were OW, 21.2% (n = 109) were obese, and 2.7% (n = 14) were morbidly obese. Obese patients were younger (mean difference -5.0 years) but had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (33.3% vs. 10.6% for NW) and dyslipidemia (82.4% vs. 60.9% for NW). Obese patients had similar freedom from all-cause mortality (88%) compared to OW (78%) and NW (81%) patients. The same findings were evident for freedom from reintervention where obese (79%) was similar to OW (76%) and NW (79%). At a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 0.4 years, sac regression was observed similarly across weight classes at 49.6%, 50.6%, and 51.8% for NW, OW, and obese, respectively (P = 0.501). There was a significant difference in mean AAA diameter pre- and post-EVAR [F(2,318) = 24.37, P < 0.001] across weight classes. NW [mean reduction 4.8 mm (2.0-7.6 mm, P < 0.001)], OW [mean reduction 3.9 mm (1.5-6.3 mm, P < 0.001)], and obese [mean reduction 5.7 mm (2.3-9.1 mm, P < 0.001)] achieved similar reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity was not associated with increased mortality or reintervention in patients undergoing EVAR. Obese patients achieved similar rates of sac regression on imaging follow-up.

Outcomes after Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Have Improved Over Time in Patients on Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have demonstrated poor perioperative and long-term survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis who undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAAR). However, survival in dialysis patients overall has improved over time. We hypothesize that the contemporary rates of perioperative and long-term survival following AAAR in ESKD patients are also improving.

METHODS

Data on AAAR procedures in dialysis patients were collected from the United States Renal Data System between 2008 and 2017. Endovascular (EVAR) and open AAA repair (OAR) were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients with a functioning renal transplant, a ruptured aneurysm, and insurance other than Medicare were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and long-term outcomes were collected. Standard statistical methods were used.

RESULTS

We identified 3,374 patients who underwent EVAR (86%, 2,914/3,374) and OAR (14%, 460/3,374). The utilization of OAR decreased significantly from 2008 to 2017 (17.34% vs. 7.43%, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in 5-year survival between OAR and EVAR (24% vs. 17%, P = 0.1, Wilcoxon-Breslow test), but open repair was associated with increased long-term survival (Hazards ratio 0.994, confidence interval 0.990-0.999, P = 0.017) in an adjusted Cox regression model. The cohort was then divided based on the year of AAAR, group 1: 2008-2010 (1,269/3,374), group 2: 2011-2013 (1,071/3,374), and group 3: 2014-2017 (1,034/3,374). Compared to groups 1 and 2, Group 3 was less likely to have coronary artery device, peripheral vascular disease, recent pneumonia, be nonambulatory, live in a nursing facility, or undergo an OAR and more likely to be younger and dialyze through an arteriovenous fistula/arteriovenous graft at the time of AAA repair. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was significantly lower in group 3 compared to groups 1 and 2 (5.4% [56/1,034] vs. 10.3% [131/1,269]/7.3% [78/1,071], P < 0.031). One-year survival by Kaplan-Meier estimate was significantly higher in group 3 (77.7% [803/1,034]) versus groups 1 and 2 (56.7% [719/1,269], 66.9% [716/1,071], P < 0.001, log-rank test). Five-year survival was also significantly higher in group 3 (27.3%) compared to groups 1 and 2 (14.2% and 16.5%, P < 0.001, log-rank test). In a Cox regression model of long-term mortality adjusted for variables significant on a univariate testing, more recent procedure year was associated with increased survival (Hazards ratio 0.81, [0.77, 0.85], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative and long-term survival following AAA repair have increased over time in ESKD patients on dialysis. This increased survival persists after accounting for differences in patient demographics and type of procedure over time. Elective AAA repair should be considered in carefully selected good-risk patients on dialysis.

New Measures, Old Conclusions: Obesity Does Not Worsen Outcomes after Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background  The “obesity paradox,” whereby the body mass index (BMI) mortality curve is “U-shaped,” is a well-studied phenomenon in vascular surgery. However, there has been an overreliance on BMI as the measure of obesity, which has shown to poorly correlate with clinical outcomes. Robust measures such as waist-hip ratio (WHR) have been suggested as a more accurate marker reflecting central obesity.

Objectives  The objectives of this study were to evaluate the correlation between BMI and WHR on postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

Methods  Data were collected from the Leeds Vascular Institute between January 2006 and December 2016. The primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and all-cause readmission. Binary logistic regression, linear regression, and correlation analysis were used to identify associations between BMI and WHR in relation to outcome measures.

Results  After exclusions, 432 elective AAA repairs (281 open surgical repair [OSR] and 151 endovascular aneurysm repairs [EVARs]) were identified to be eligible for the study. The combined 30-day and 4-year mortality was 1.2 and 20.1%, respectively. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.9% and the average LOS was 7.33 (standard deviation 18.5) days. BMI data was recorded for 275 patients (63.7%) and WHR for 355 patients (82.2%). Logistic regression analysis highlighted no association between BMI and WHR with mortality, readmission, or LOS following OSR or EVAR.

Conclusion  The results of this study suggest patients should not be denied treatment for AAA based on obesity alone.

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of obesity on outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the impact of obesity on perioperative mortality and complication rates in patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

A systematic review of all studies reporting AAA treatment perioperative (30 day) outcomes in obese patients (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²). The primary outcome was 30 day mortality. Secondary outcomes included: cardiac complications, respiratory complications, wound complication, renal complications, and neurological complications at 30 days. These outcomes were pooled for meta-analysis. Analysis first compared obese versus nonobese patients undergoing EVAR and OSR then compared EVAR to OSR in obese patients.

RESULTS

We identified 7 observational studies with 14,971 patients (11,743 EVAR, 3228 OSR). Obese patients undergoing EVAR had lower 30 day mortality (1.5%) compared to nonobese patients (2.2%) (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.96; p=0.03; I²= 0%; Grade of evidence: low). In OSR, obese patients (5.0%) had similar 30 day mortality to nonobese patients (5.7%) (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.70-1.20; p=0.54; I²=0%; Grade of evidence: low). Wound complications were higher in obese patients undergoing OSR (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.74-3.06; p<0.001; I²=0%; Grade of evidence: low). EVAR was associated with a lower 30 day mortality (1.5%) compared to OSR (5.0%) in obese patients (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.12-0.46; p<0.001; I²= 38%; Grade of evidence: low). Cardiac, respiratory, wound, renal and neurological complications were also reduced in EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients have lower 30 day mortality in EVAR compared to nonobese patients. In OSR, obese patients had similar 30 day mortality but higher wound complications compared to nonobese patients. Obese patients otherwise have similar cardiopulmonary complication rates compared to nonobese patients in both EVAR and OSR. EVAR offers lower 30 day mortality and morbidity compared to OSR in obese patients. This study suggests that EVAR is superior to OSR in obese patients.

Outcomes after endovascular reintervention for aortic interventions

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular reinterventions are often performed after previous open or endovascular aortic procedures. We used the GREAT (Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment) database to compare the outcomes between these groups. We also compared reintervention of any type with a group of patients who had undergone primary endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

All patients enrolled in GREAT were grouped according to a previous EVAR or open abdominal aortic procedure (OAP). Univariate analysis was performed using the χ², Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact tests. Cox proportional analysis was used to test the predictors for all-cause and aorta-related mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 3974 subjects who had undergone EVAR with follow-up data available were included in the GREAT. Of the 3974 procedures, 196 (4.9%) were reinterventions (49 after OAP and 147 after previous EVAR). Reintervention after previous EVAR showed a trend toward a greater endoleak rate through 2 years (13.6% vs 4.1%; P = .07), although no difference was found in the occurrence of the intervention (12.2% vs 17.7%; P = .37). Reintervention after OAP resulted in higher all-cause mortality through 2 years of follow-up (32.7% vs 17.7%; P = .0.03). The predictors of mortality included prior OAP, renal insufficiency, and the use of cutdown for access. Compared with the patients who had undergone primary endovascular repair, patients in the reintervention cohort were older (75.3 years vs 73.3 years; P = .0005), had had only femoral artery access used (95.8% vs 90.3%; P < .0001), and were more likely to have undergone aortic branch vessel procedures (32.3% vs 13.3%; P < .0001). Both all-cause and aorta-related mortality through 2 years was higher in the reintervention group than in the primary EVAR group (21.4% vs 12.5% [P = .0003; and 4.6% vs 1% [P < .0001], respectively). On multivariate analysis, the predictors of aortic-related mortality included reintervention, renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, underweight body mass index, increasing aortic diameter, and the use of brachial artery or other arterial access sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular reintervention for aortic pathology was associated with higher mortality than was primary EVAR. Reinterventions after prior OAPs were associated with higher mortality than were prior EVARs.

Effect of obesity on radiation exposure, quality of life scores, and outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of obesity on procedural metrics, radiation exposure, quality of life (QOL), and clinical outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data from 334 patients (236 men; mean age, 75 ± 8 years) enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate FB-EVAR from 2013 to 2019. The patients were classified using the body mass index (BMI) as obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) or nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m²). QOL questionnaires (short-form 36-item questionnaire) and imaging studies were obtained preoperatively and at 2 months and 6 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The procedures were performed using two different fixed imaging systems. The end points included procedural metrics (ie, total operative time, fluoroscopic time, contrast volume), radiation exposure, technical success, 30-day mortality, and major adverse events, QOL changes, freedom from target vessel instability, freedom from reintervention, and patient survival.

RESULTS

The aneurysm extent was a pararenal aortic aneurysm in 117 patients (35%) and a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in 217 patients (65%). Both groups had similar demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and aneurysm extent, except for a greater incidence of hyperlipidemia and diabetes among the obese patients (P < .05). No significant differences were found in the procedural metrics or intraprocedural complications between the groups, except that the obese patients had greater radiation exposure than the nonobese patients (mean, 2.5 vs 1.6 Gy; P < .001), with the highest radiation exposure in those obese patients who had undergone the procedure using system 1 (fusion alone) instead of system 2 (fusion and digital zoom; mean, 4.1 vs 1.5 Gy; P < .001). Three patients had died within 30 days (0.8%), with no difference in mortality or major adverse events between the groups. The mental QOL scores had improved in the obese group at 2 and 12 months compared with the nonobese patients, with persistently higher scores up to 3 years. At 3 years, the obese and nonobese patients had a similar incidence of freedom from target vessel instability (74% ± 6% vs 80% ± 3%; P = .99, log-rank test), freedom from reintervention (66% ± 6% vs 73% ± 4%; P = .77, log-rank test), and patient survival (83% ± 5% vs 75% ± 4%; P = .16, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

FB-EVAR was performed with high technical success and low mortality and morbidity, with no significant differences between the obese and nonobese patients. The procedural metrics and outcomes were similar, with the exception of greater radiation exposure among obese patients, especially for the procedures performed using system 1 with fusion alone compared with system 2 (fusion and digital zoom). Obese patients had higher QOL mental scores at 2 and 12 months, with a similar reintervention rate, target vessel outcomes, and survival compared with nonobese patients.

Nutritional status and outcomes of superficial femoral artery stenting due to intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis is still not clear. The aim of this study was to determine the nutritional status of patients with lower limb ischemia and the risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting.

METHODS

Numerous parameters of nutritional status assessment were compared between 70 patients undergoing SFA endovascular intervention with a self-expandable plane stent due to life-limiting intermittent claudication and 40 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). All subjects were followed up for at least 1 year in relation to outcomes such as clinically driven TLR occurrence.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing SFA stenting had a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity than those who underwent CAS (51.43% vs. 72.50%; P=0.031). An increase in Ankle-Brachial Index of >0.15 after SFA stenting (early end-point) was positively associated with greater handgrip strength (HGS), fat-free mass, skeletal muscle mass and waist-to-hip ratio. Freedom from TLR (late end-point) was significantly related to a higher waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), HGS and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) Score. The 1-year risk of TLR for patients with a WHtR of ≥61.39 amounted to odds ratio; 95% confidence interval: 0.21; 0.05-0.25; P=0.021.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters of nutritional status assessment were associated with early and late outcomes of SFA stenting in patients with intermittent claudication. Abdominal fat distribution and higher HGS and GNRI scores lowered the 1-year risk of TLR. Further study is needed to determine the pathomechanism of the obesity paradox, sarcopenia and undernutrition in relation to outcomes of endovascular interventions.