1
|
Matevski D, Foltran E, Lamersdorf N, Schuldt A. Introduction of non-native Douglas fir reduces leaf damage on beech saplings and mature trees in European beech forests. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2023; 33:e2786. [PMID: 36477972 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Recent ecological research suggests that, in general, mixtures are more resistant to insect herbivores and pathogens than monocultures. However, we know little about mixtures with non-native trees, where enemy release could lead to patterns that differ from commonly observed relationships among native species. This becomes particularly relevant when considering that adaptation strategies to climate change increasingly promote a larger share of non-native tree species, such as North American Douglas fir in Central Europe. We studied leaf damage on European beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings and mature trees across a wide range of site conditions in monocultures and mixtures with phylogenetically distant conifers native Norway spruce (Picea abies) and non-native Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). We analyzed leaf herbivory and pathogen damage in relation to tree diversity and composition effects, as well as effects of environmental factors and plant characteristics. We observed lower sapling herbivory and tree sucking damage on beech in non-native Douglas fir mixtures than in beech monocultures, probably due to a lower herbivore diversity on Douglas fir trees, and higher pathogen damage on beech saplings in Norway spruce than Douglas fir mixtures, possibly because of higher canopy openness. Our findings suggest that for low diversity gradients, tree diversity effects on leaf damage can strongly depend on tree species composition, in addition to modifications caused by feeding guild and tree ontogeny. Moreover, we found that nutrient capacity modulated the effects of tree diversity, composition, and environmental factors, with different responses in sites with low or high nutrient capacity. The existence of contrasting diversity effects based on tree species composition provides important information on our understanding of the relationships between tree diversity and plant-herbivore interactions in light of non-native tree species introductions. Especially with recent Norway spruce die-off, the planting of Douglas fir as replacement is likely to strongly increase in Central Europe. Our findings suggest that mixtures with Douglas fir could benefit the survival or growth rates of beech saplings and mature trees due to lower leaf damage, emphasizing the need to clearly identify and compare the potential benefits and ecological trade-offs of non-native tree species in forest management under ongoing environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dragan Matevski
- Forest Nature Conservation, Faculty of Forest Science and Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Estela Foltran
- Bordeaux-Sciences-Agro, INRAE, UMR ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon, France
- Büsgen-Institute, Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Norbert Lamersdorf
- Büsgen-Institute, Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schuldt
- Forest Nature Conservation, Faculty of Forest Science and Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valdés‐Correcher E, Popova A, Galmán A, Prinzing A, Selikhovkin AV, Howe AG, Mrazova A, Dulaurent A, Hampe A, Tack AJM, Bouget C, Lupaștean D, Harvey D, Musolin DL, Lövei GL, Centenaro G, Halder IV, Hagge J, Dobrosavljević J, Pitkänen J, Koricheva J, Sam K, Barbaro L, Branco M, Ferrante M, Faticov M, Tahadlová M, Gossner M, Cauchoix M, Bogdziewicz M, Duduman M, Kozlov MV, Bjoern MC, Mamaev NA, Fernandez‐Conradi P, Thomas RL, Wetherbee R, Green S, Milanović S, Moreira X, Mellerin Y, Kadiri Y, Castagneyrol B. Herbivory on the pedunculate oak along an urbanization gradient in Europe: Effects of impervious surface, local tree cover, and insect feeding guild. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e8709. [PMID: 35342614 PMCID: PMC8928871 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Urbanization is an important driver of the diversity and abundance of tree-associated insect herbivores, but its consequences for insect herbivory are poorly understood. A likely source of variability among studies is the insufficient consideration of intra-urban variability in forest cover. With the help of citizen scientists, we investigated the independent and interactive effects of local canopy cover and percentage of impervious surface on insect herbivory in the pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) throughout most of its geographic range in Europe. We found that the damage caused by chewing insect herbivores as well as the incidence of leaf-mining and gall-inducing herbivores consistently decreased with increasing impervious surface around focal oaks. Herbivory by chewing herbivores increased with increasing forest cover, regardless of impervious surface. In contrast, an increase in local canopy cover buffered the negative effect of impervious surface on leaf miners and strengthened its effect on gall inducers. These results show that-just like in non-urban areas-plant-herbivore interactions in cities are structured by a complex set of interacting factors. This highlights that local habitat characteristics within cities have the potential to attenuate or modify the effect of impervious surfaces on biotic interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Popova
- A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
| | - Andrea Galmán
- Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical GardenMartin Luther University Halle‐WittenbergHalleGermany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Andreas Prinzing
- Research Unit ECOBIO (Ecosystems, Biodiversity, Evolution)UMR 6553University of Rennes/Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueRennesFrance
| | - Andrey V. Selikhovkin
- Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game ManagementSaint Petersburg State Forest Technical UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
| | - Andy G. Howe
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
- Forest Industries Research CentreUniversity of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsAustralia
| | - Anna Mrazova
- Biology Centre of Czech Academy of SciencesEntomology InstituteCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
- Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
| | | | | | | | - Christophe Bouget
- Forest Ecosystems' Research UnitBiodiversity Team Domaine des BarresINRAENogent‐sur‐VernissonFrance
| | - Daniela Lupaștean
- Applied Ecology LabForestry Faculty“Ștefan cel Mare” University of SuceavaSuceavaRomania
| | - Deborah Harvey
- Department of Biological SciencesRoyal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamUK
| | - Dmitry L. Musolin
- Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game ManagementSaint Petersburg State Forest Technical UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
| | - Gábor L. Lövei
- Department of AgroecologyFlakkebjerg Research CentreAarhus UniversitySlagelseDenmark
| | - Giada Centenaro
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | | | - Jonas Hagge
- Forest Nature ConservationNorthwest German Forest Research InstituteHann. MündenGermany
- Forest Nature ConservationGeorg‐August‐University GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Jovan Dobrosavljević
- Department of Forest ProtectionFaculty of ForestryUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
| | - Juha‐Matti Pitkänen
- Forest Health and BiodiversityNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)HelsinkiFinland
- Spatial Foodweb Ecology GroupDepartment of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Julia Koricheva
- Department of Biological SciencesRoyal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamUK
| | - Katerina Sam
- Biology Centre of Czech Academy of SciencesEntomology InstituteCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
- Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
| | - Luc Barbaro
- DynaforUniv. ToulouseINRAECastanet‐TolosanFrance
- CESCO, Museum national d'Histoire naturelleCNRSSorbonne‐Univ.ParisFrance
| | - Manuela Branco
- Centro de Estudos FlorestaisInstituto Superior de AgronomiaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal
| | - Marco Ferrante
- Department of AgroecologyFlakkebjerg Research CentreAarhus UniversitySlagelseDenmark
- Azorean Biodiversity GroupcE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental ChangesUniversity of the AzoresAzoresPortugal
| | - Maria Faticov
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | - Markéta Tahadlová
- Biology Centre of Czech Academy of SciencesEntomology InstituteCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
- Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
| | - Martin Gossner
- Forest EntomologySwiss Federal Research Institute WSLBirmensdorfSwitzerland
- Department of Environmental Systems ScienceInstitute of Terrestrial EcosystemsETH ZürichZürichSwitzerland
| | - Maxime Cauchoix
- Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Expérimentale du CNRSMoulisFrance
| | - Michał Bogdziewicz
- Department of Systematic ZoologyFaculty of BiologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland
- Laboratoire EcoSystèmes et Sociétés En MontagneINRAE Univ Grenoble AlpesSaint‐Martin‐d'Hères cedexFrance
| | - Mihai‐Leonard Duduman
- Applied Ecology LabForestry Faculty“Ștefan cel Mare” University of SuceavaSuceavaRomania
| | | | - Mona C. Bjoern
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
| | - Nikita A. Mamaev
- Department of Forest Protection, Wood Science and Game ManagementSaint Petersburg State Forest Technical UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
| | | | - Rebecca L. Thomas
- Department of Biological SciencesRoyal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamUK
| | - Ross Wetherbee
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life SciencesAasNorway
| | - Samantha Green
- Centre for Agroecology, Water and ResilienceCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
| | - Slobodan Milanović
- Department of Forest ProtectionFaculty of ForestryUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
- Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife ManagementFaculty of Forestry and Wood TechnologyMendel University in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hertzog LR, Vandegehuchte ML, Dekeukeleire D, Dekoninck W, Smedt P, Schrojenstein Lantman I, Proesmans W, Baeten L, Bonte D, Martel A, Verheyen K, Lens L. Mixing of tree species is especially beneficial for biodiversity in fragmented landscapes, without compromising forest functioning. J Appl Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel R. Hertzog
- Terrestrial Ecology Unit Department of Biology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
- Thünen Institute of Biodiversity Braunschweig Germany
| | - Martijn L. Vandegehuchte
- Terrestrial Ecology Unit Department of Biology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
- Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
| | - Daan Dekeukeleire
- Terrestrial Ecology Unit Department of Biology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
| | | | - Pallieter Smedt
- Forest & Nature Lab Department Forest and Water Management Ghent University Gontrode Belgium
| | | | - Willem Proesmans
- Forest & Nature Lab Department Forest and Water Management Ghent University Gontrode Belgium
| | - Lander Baeten
- Forest & Nature Lab Department Forest and Water Management Ghent University Gontrode Belgium
| | - Dries Bonte
- Terrestrial Ecology Unit Department of Biology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
| | - An Martel
- Department Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases Ghent University Merelbeke Belgium
| | - Kris Verheyen
- Forest & Nature Lab Department Forest and Water Management Ghent University Gontrode Belgium
| | - Luc Lens
- Terrestrial Ecology Unit Department of Biology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valdés-Correcher E, Bourdin A, González-Martínez SC, Moreira X, Galmán A, Castagneyrol B, Hampe A. Leaf chemical defences and insect herbivory in oak: accounting for canopy position unravels marked genetic relatedness effects. ANNALS OF BOTANY 2020; 126:865-872. [PMID: 32463869 PMCID: PMC7539359 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Highly controlled experiments document that plant genetic diversity and relatedness can shape herbivore communities and patterns of herbivory. Evidence from the field is, however, scarce and inconsistent. We assessed whether a genetic signal underlying herbivory can be detected in oak woodlands when accounting for variation at smaller (within-tree) and larger (among-stand) scales. METHODS We tested relationships between tree genetic relatedness, leaf chemical defences and insect herbivory for different canopy layers in 240 trees from 15 pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) forest stands. We partitioned sources of variability in herbivory and defences among stands, individuals and branches. KEY RESULTS Leaf defences, insect herbivory and their relationship differed systematically between the upper and the lower tree canopy. When accounting for this canopy effect, the variation explained by tree genetic relatedness rose from 2.8 to 34.1 % for herbivory and from 7.1 to 13.8 % for leaf defences. The effect was driven by markedly stronger relationships in the upper canopy. CONCLUSIONS Our findings illustrate that considerable effects of the host plant genotype on levels of leaf chemical defences and associated insect herbivory can be detected in natural tree populations when within-individual variation is properly accounted for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xoaquín Moreira
- Misión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain
| | - Andrea Galmán
- Misión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain
| | | | - Arndt Hampe
- INRAE, Univ. Bordeaux, BIOGECO, Cestas, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guyot V, Jactel H, Imbaud B, Burnel L, Castagneyrol B, Heinz W, Deconchat M, Vialatte A. Tree diversity drives associational resistance to herbivory at both forest edge and interior. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:9040-9051. [PMID: 31463002 PMCID: PMC6706233 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Tree diversity is increasingly acknowledged as an important driver of insect herbivory. However, there is still a debate about the direction of associational effects that can range from associational resistance (i.e., less damage in mixed stands than in monocultures) to the opposite, associational susceptibility. Discrepancies among published studies may be due to the overlooked effect of spatially dependent processes such as tree location within forests. We addressed this issue by measuring crown defoliation and leaf damage made by different guilds of insect herbivores on oaks growing among conspecific versus heterospecific neighbors at forest edges versus interior, in two closed sites in SW France forests. Overall, oaks were significantly less defoliated among heterospecific neighbors (i.e., associational resistance), at both forest edge and interior. At the leaf level, guild diversity and leaf miner herbivory significantly increased with tree diversity regardless of oak location within stands. Other guilds showed no clear response to tree diversity or oak location. We showed that herbivore response to tree diversity varied among insect feeding guilds but not between forest edges and interior, with inconsistent patterns between sites. Importantly, we show that oaks were more defoliated in pure oak plots than in mixed plots at both edge and forest interior and that, on average, defoliation decreased with increasing tree diversity from one to seven species. We conclude that edge conditions could be interacting with tree diversity to regulate insect defoliation, but future investigations are needed to integrate them into the management of temperate forests, notably by better understanding the role of the landscape context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Guyot
- DYNAFOR, INRA, Université de ToulouseCastanet TolosanFrance
- BIOGECO, INRA, Univ. BordeauxCestasFrance
- LTSER Zone Atelier «PYRÉNÉES GARONNE»Auzeville‐TolosaneFrance
| | | | | | - Laurent Burnel
- DYNAFOR, INRA, Université de ToulouseCastanet TolosanFrance
- LTSER Zone Atelier «PYRÉNÉES GARONNE»Auzeville‐TolosaneFrance
| | | | - Wilfried Heinz
- DYNAFOR, INRA, Université de ToulouseCastanet TolosanFrance
- LTSER Zone Atelier «PYRÉNÉES GARONNE»Auzeville‐TolosaneFrance
| | - Marc Deconchat
- DYNAFOR, INRA, Université de ToulouseCastanet TolosanFrance
- LTSER Zone Atelier «PYRÉNÉES GARONNE»Auzeville‐TolosaneFrance
| | - Aude Vialatte
- DYNAFOR, INRA, Université de ToulouseCastanet TolosanFrance
- LTSER Zone Atelier «PYRÉNÉES GARONNE»Auzeville‐TolosaneFrance
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Plas F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2019; 94:1220-1245. [PMID: 30724447 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 25 years ago, ecologists became increasingly interested in the question of whether ongoing biodiversity loss matters for the functioning of ecosystems. As such, a new ecological subfield on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning (BEF) was born. This subfield was initially dominated by theoretical studies and by experiments in which biodiversity was manipulated, and responses of ecosystem functions such as biomass production, decomposition rates, carbon sequestration, trophic interactions and pollination were assessed. More recently, an increasing number of studies have investigated BEF relationships in non-manipulated ecosystems, but reviews synthesizing our knowledge on the importance of real-world biodiversity are still largely missing. I performed a systematic review in order to assess how biodiversity drives ecosystem functioning in both terrestrial and aquatic, naturally assembled communities, and on how important biodiversity is compared to other factors, including other aspects of community composition and abiotic conditions. The outcomes of 258 published studies, which reported 726 BEF relationships, revealed that in many cases, biodiversity promotes average biomass production and its temporal stability, and pollination success. For decomposition rates and ecosystem multifunctionality, positive effects of biodiversity outnumbered negative effects, but neutral relationships were even more common. Similarly, negative effects of prey biodiversity on pathogen and herbivore damage outnumbered positive effects, but were less common than neutral relationships. Finally, there was no evidence that biodiversity is related to soil carbon storage. Most BEF studies focused on the effects of taxonomic diversity, however, metrics of functional diversity were generally stronger predictors of ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, in most studies, abiotic factors and functional composition (e.g. the presence of a certain functional group) were stronger drivers of ecosystem functioning than biodiversity per se. While experiments suggest that positive biodiversity effects become stronger at larger spatial scales, in naturally assembled communities this idea is too poorly studied to draw general conclusions. In summary, a high biodiversity in naturally assembled communities positively drives various ecosystem functions. At the same time, the strength and direction of these effects vary highly among studies, and factors other than biodiversity can be even more important in driving ecosystem functioning. Thus, to promote those ecosystem functions that underpin human well-being, conservation should not only promote biodiversity per se, but also the abiotic conditions favouring species with suitable trait combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fons van der Plas
- Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Johannisallee 21-23, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|