Major ABO blood group mismatch increases the risk for graft failure after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Rituximab added to conditioning regimen significantly improves erythroid engraftment in major incompatible ABO-group hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

ABO-group major incompatibility hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) increases the risk of delayed red cell engraftment and other immunological complications. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of pre-transplant infusion of rituximab in patients with ABO-incompatibility in improving red blood cell engraftment after HSCT, measured by time to reach transfusion independence. We performed a retrospective, single-center study including 131 consecutive patients transplanted with major or bidirectional ABO-incompatible grafts between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2019. Fifty-one patients received an infusion of rituximab during the conditioning regimen, while 80 patients did not receive any additional preventive treatment. Time to transfusion independence was significantly reduced for patients treated with rituximab (1 month, 95% CI, 0.5-2) compared with the control group (3.2 months, 95% CI 1.5-3.2, p = 0.02). By multivariable analysis, rituximab use was associated with a faster red blood cell (RBC) engraftment (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.17-3.03, p = 0.009), while a pre-transplant anti-donor isohemagglutinins titer >1:128 was associated with delayed transfusion independence (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.99, p = 0.05). Although limited by the retrospective nature of the study, the results of this analysis suggest that rituximab added to conditioning regimens is feasible, safe, and able to improve post-transplant red blood cell engraftment.

Bidirectional ABO Mismatch Is Associated With Elevated Mortality in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Insights From a Single-Center Experience

Background Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a promising therapy for various disorders and provides new opportunities for patients. ABO incompatibility in allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) remains a topic of debate because of its potential impact on clinical outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the survival outcomes of patients who underwent ABO-incompatible HSCT and evaluate the occurrence of pure red cell aplasia. Methods This retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent ABO-incompatible HSCT. Data on patient characteristics, transplant details, and follow-ups were collected. Conditioning regimens and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategies were employed. Results Neutrophil and platelet engraftment durations did not differ significantly between major and bidirectional mismatches. Pure red cell aplasia occurred in 4 patients (20%) with major mismatches, all of whom responded well to bortezomib treatment. Patients with a bidirectional mismatch exhibited a 3.57-fold increase (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28; p<0.05) in the risk of mortality compared to those in the major mismatch group. Conclusion The results indicate that ABO mismatch, whether bidirectional or major, does not significantly affect neutrophil and platelet engraftment duration, suggesting that ABO incompatibility may not be a major factor influencing hematological recovery in allo-HSCT. Interestingly, patients with bidirectional mismatch exhibited a significantly higher mortality rate than those with major mismatch. This finding suggests that a bidirectional ABO mismatch may have an unfavorable prognosis in terms of overall survival in allo-HSCT patients.

Incidence and risk factors for secondary graft failure in uniformly treated patients with severe aplastic anemia receiving fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for conditioning and matched sibling bone marrow graft as stem cell source

BACKGROUND AIMS

Graft failure after allogeneic transplant for aplastic anemia is problematic. The risk of graft failure depends on multiple variables, including the preparative regimen, donor type, stem cell dose and source among other variables.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with aplastic anemia who underwent matched-sibling allogeneic transplant at a single center.

RESULTS

We identified 82 patients who fit the inclusion criteria. One had primary graft failure and was excluded from this analysis. The recipient median age was 22 years. The donor median age was 23 years. The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 1.6 months. The median number of red cell transfusions before transplant was nine. The median number of platelet transfusions before transplant was 18. Thirteen patients developed secondary graft failure, with a cumulative incidence at 5 years of 16% and median time to develop secondary graft failure of 129 days. All patients engrafted with a median time for neutrophil engraftment of 19 days and a median time for platelet engraftment of 22 days. The survival of patients with or without secondary graft failure was not different. Major or bidirectional ABO incompatibility and older recipient age were statistically significantly associated with greater risk of secondary graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary graft failure is a significant complication after allogeneic transplant for SAA. Identification of recipients at risk and mitigating the potential risks of this complication is warranted.

The Impact of ABO Incompatibility on the Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Study From Pakistan

Background and objective Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) provides curative treatment for several hematological illnesses. In this study, we evaluated the impact of ABO compatibility and incompatibility on outcomes and complications related to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) performed for various hematological disorders at our center. Methodology This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study in which patients were categorized according to the ABO match and mismatch status. The mismatch group was further subcategorized into major, minor, and bidirectional groups. Results A total of 117 patients underwent alloHSCT, out of which 82 (70.1%) were male and 35 (30%) were female. The median age of the patients was 9.5 years (range: 46 years). The most common indications for stem cell transplant were beta-thalassemia major (BTM; n=58, 49%) and aplastic anemia (AA; n=42, 35.8%). However, the outcomes in match and mismatch groups showed significant results for positive direct Coombs test (DCT), indicating the occurrence of hemolysis. Despite the increased need for blood transfusions, ABO blood group incompatibility (ABOi) had no negative impact on the clinical results. Conclusion Based on our findings, ABO incompatibility does not affect the outcomes in patients undergoing alloHSCT. Patient monitoring can aid in early detection and treatment, thereby minimizing the frequency of fatal events.

Case report: Successful treatment with daratumumab for pure red cell aplasia in a patient with mixed lymphoid chimerism after ABO-mismatched stem cell transplant for sickle cell disease

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a serious complication after ABO-mismatched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Following HSCT, persistent anti-donor isohemagglutinins against donor ABO antigens are considered the immunological cause of PRCA. Patients with post-transplant PRCA are at risk for graft rejection and prolonged red blood cell transfusion dependency. No standard treatment exists. Recently however, the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab has been reported to be an effective treatment for post-transplant PRCA in patients with complete donor chimerism. Here, we describe the first case of PRCA in a patient with mixed lymphoid patient/donor chimerism that was successfully treated with daratumumab. This is also the first report of a transplant recipient with sickle cell disease who was treated with this relatively new approach. Fourteen months post-transplantation and twelve months after treatment with daratumumab, our patient has a normal complete blood count and the anti-donor isohemagglutinins remain undetectable despite mixed lymphoid chimerism. Mixed chimerism is a common manifestation in adult patients with sickle cell disease transplanted with non-myeloablative conditioning and a matched sibling donor. The application of non-myeloablative HSCT for patients with sickle cell disease is steadily increasing. Therefore, the incidence of PRCA in this setting might also increase. As the risk of graft rejection due to PRCA can be especially high in patients with mixed chimerism, clinicians should be aware that daratumumab can be an effective treatment in the setting of mixed chimerism.

Association of ABO mismatch with the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While many factors influence the outcomes of allo-HCT, the independent impact of donor-recipient ABO mismatching remains unclear. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with AML or ALL who underwent allo-HCT between 2008 and 2018. Our objectives were to analyze the outcomes of allo-HCT based on the donor-recipient ABO status (match, minor mismatch, major mismatch, bidirectional mismatch). Among 4946 eligible patients, 2741 patients (55.4%) were ABO matched, 1030 patients (20.8%) had a minor ABO mismatch, 899 patients (18.1%) had a major ABO mismatch, and 276 patients (5.6%) had a bidirectional ABO mismatch. In multivariable analyses, compared to ABO matched allo-HCT, the presence of a major ABO mismatch was associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.29; p = 0.005), inferior platelet engraftment (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p < 0.001), and higher primary graft failure (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.12-2.30, p = 0.01). Relapse, acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grades III-IV and chronic GVHD were not significantly associated with ABO status. While donor age was not significantly associated with outcomes, older recipient age was associated with worse survival and non-relapse mortality. Our study demonstrates that donor-recipient ABO status is independently associated with survival and other post-transplantation outcomes in acute leukemia. This underscores the importance of considering the ABO status in donor selection algorithms and its impact in acute leukemia.

Graft failure in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients: diagnosis and treatment

Graft failure is a group of complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which occurs according to different data up to 30%. The group of complications includes primary and secondary graft failure, primary, secondary and transient poor graft function and graft rejection. Diagnostic difficulties consist in the lack of unified diagnostic criteria accepted in the transplantation community and in the dual interpretation of these complications according to the foreign literature. The purpose of this literature review was to identify the most common criteria of different types of graft failure and determine the tactics of diagnosis and treatment. In this review we analyzed data from various literature sources, gave definitions of graft failure and poor graft function. We analyzed the literature data on the methods used to treat these conditions.

Outcomes with CD34-Selected Stem Cell Boost for Poor Graft Function after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Poor graft function (PGF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) characterized by multilineage cytopenia in the absence of mixed donor chimerism (<95% donor), relapse, or severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We present a systemic review and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the outcomes with CD34-selected stem cell boost (SCB) for PGF in adult allo-HSCT recipients. We screened a total of 1753 records identified from 4 databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, using the search terms "hematological malignancies," "hematopoietic stem cell transplantation," "CD34 antigen(s)," "graft failure," and "poor graft function," from the date of inception to January 2021. After excluding review, duplicate, and nonrelevant articles, we included 7 studies reporting outcomes following administration of CD34-selected SCB for PGF after allo-HSCT, including hematologic complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR), GVHD, and overall survival (OS). Quality evaluation was done using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. Pooled analysis was done using the R 'meta' package, and proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. The inter-study variance was calculated using the Der Simonian-Laird estimator. We identified 209 patients who received CD34-selected SCB for PGF after allo-HSCT. The median age was 49 years (range, 18 to 69 years), and 61% were men. Primary graft sources included peripheral blood stem cells (72%) and bone marrow (28%). Donor types were matched sibling (37%), matched unrelated (36%), mismatched unrelated (22%), and haploidentical donors (5%). The median time from allo-HSCT to SCB was 138 days (range, 113 to 450 days). The median SCB dose was 3.45 × 10⁶ CD34 cells/kg (range, 3.1 to 4.9 × 10⁶ cells/kg). CR and ORR were 72% (95% CI, 63% to 79%; I² = 26%) and 80% (95% CI, 74% to 85%; I² = 0%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 30 to 77 months), the actuarial survival rate was 54% (95% CI, 47% to 61%; I² = 0%). OS ranged from 80% at 1 year to 40% at 9 years. The incidences of acute and chronic GVHD after SCB were 17% (95% CI, 13% to 23%; I² = 0%) and 18% (95% CI, 8% to 34%; I² = 76%), respectively. Nonrelapse mortality was reported in 42 patients, with a pooled rate of 27% (95% CI, 17% to 40; I² = 59%), and death due to relapse was reported in 25 patients, with a pooled rate of 17% (95% CI, 11% to 23%; I² = 0%). Our data show that CD34-selected SCB improves outcomes after PGF post allo-HSCT with an acceptable toxicity profile. The literature lacks high-quality randomized evidence, and there remains an unmet need for prospective studies to address the optimal dosing and manipulation of SCB. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Incidence, Management, and Prognosis of Graft Failure and Autologous Reconstitution after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study presents outcomes of management in graft failure (GF) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and provides prognostic information including rare cases of autologous reconstitution (AR).

METHODS

We analyzed risk factors and outcomes of primary and secondary GF, and occurrence of AR in 1,630 HCT recipients transplanted over period of 18 years (January 2000-September 2017) at our center.

RESULTS

Primary and secondary GF occurred in 13 (0.80%), and 69 patients (10-year cumulative incidence, 4.5%) respectively. No peri-transplant variables predicted primary GF, whereas reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen (relative risk [RR], 0.97-28.0, P < 0.001) and lower CD34⁺ cell dose (RR, 2.44-2.84, P = 0.002) were associated with higher risk of secondary GF in multivariate analysis. Primary GF demonstrated 100% mortality, in the secondary GF group, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 28.8%, relapse ensued in 18.8%, and AR was observed in 11.6% (n = 8). In survival analysis, diagnosis of aplastic anemia (AA), chronic myeloid leukemia and use of RIC had a positive impact. There were 8 patients who experienced AR, which was rarely reported after transplantation for acute leukemia. Patient shared common characteristics such as young age (median 25 years), use of RIC regimen, absence of profound neutropenia, and had advantageous survival rate of 100% during follow period without relapse.

CONCLUSION

Primary GF exhibited high mortality rate. Secondary GF had 4.5% 10-year cumulative incidence, median onset of 3 months after HCT, and showed 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival of 28.8%. Diagnosis of severe AA and use of RIC was both associated with higher incidence and better survival rate in secondary GF group. AR occurred in 11.6% in secondary GF, exhibited excellent prognosis.

Second haploidentical stem cell transplantation for primary graft failure

We report the outcome of 19 patients who experienced primary graft failure (PrGF) after a haploidentical (HAPLO), unmanipulated bone marrow transplant. The median age of patients was 52 years; the conditioning regimen of the first HAPLO transplant was either full dose total body irradiation (TBI) or fludarabine, busulfan, and thiotepa (TBF); PTCY was given to all patients together with cyclosporine and mycophenolate. All 19 patients with PrGF received a second HAPLO graft, at a median interval of 42 days (34-82) after HSCT, using the Baltimore protocol and G-CSF mobilized PB from the same (n = 13) or another HAPLO family donor (n = 6). GvHD prophylaxis was again PTCY-based; 14/19 patients had trilineage recovery (74%) and 1-year survival was 66%. Engraftment at second HAPLO was seen in 7/8 patient with, and in 5/7 patients without donor-specific antibodies (DSA). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis on the original group of 503 patients, there was a trend for a reduced dose of busulfan, to increase the risk of PrGF (p = 0.1). In conclusion, patients with PrGF following a HAPLO transplant, can be rescued with a second early HAPLO transplant, using the same or a different donor.

[Graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Definition and risk factors]

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative therapy for numerous malignant and non-malignant haematological diseases. A sustained engraftment of the donor stem cells is essential for transplant success and overall outcome. Graft failure is a rare but severe event after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. While different risk factors such as underlying disease, graft source or HLA matching have been found to be consistently associated with graft failure, other factors such as ABO mismatch graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis or infections, particularly viral reactivations, are more controversial. In this article, we review the different factors associated with graft failure.

Comparable Outcomes of First-Line Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Unrelated and Matched Sibling Donors in Adult Patients with Aplastic Anemia: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

To explore the feasibility of upfront unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the treatment of adult aplastic anemia (AA), we conducted a retrospective, single-center study and compared the outcomes of adult patients who underwent first-line URD HSCT or matched sibling donor (MSD) HSCT between August 2012 and June 2018. In all, 23 URD HSCT recipients had an increased cumulative incidence of grade II acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (21.7% versus 3.4%; P =.007), but similar rates of secondary graft failure (8.7 ± 6.0% versus 6.9 ± 3.4%; P = .764), chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (18.2% versus 8.8%; P = .285), extensive cGVHD (9.1% versus 3.5%; P = .328), 5-year estimated overall survival (87.0% versus 94.2%; P = .501), and 5-year estimated failure-free survival (82.0% versus 89.3%; P = .404) compared with 58 MSD HSCT recipients treated during the same period. After using propensity score matching to reduce the influence of potential confounders, the 2 groups were well balanced in terms of pretransplantation clinical factors. The median survival time was similar, and no significant differences in the aforementioned outcomes were observed between the 2 groups. Our results suggest that URD HSCT may be an effective and feasible option for first-line therapy in adult AA patients who lack an MSD.

[Effects of CD34(+) selected stem cells for the treatment of poor graft function after allogeneic stem cell transplantation]

目的

观察输注纯化供者CD34⁺细胞治疗单倍型造血干细胞移植后移植物功能不良的疗效和安全性。

方法

对2014年1月至2018年3月期间接受供者纯化CD34⁺细胞治疗的12例单倍型造血干细胞移植后移植物功能不良患者进行回顾性分析。

结果

12例患者中男9例、女3例，中位年龄26（14~54）岁；急性淋巴细胞白血病4例，急性髓系白血病5例，慢性髓性白血病2例，慢性粒-单核细胞白血病1例。分选产物CD34⁺细胞纯度为92.0%（44.0%~97.0%），回收率为55.0%（45.0%~96.7%），回输CD34⁺细胞的中位数为1.9（0.9~4.4）×10⁶/kg，CD3⁺细胞中位数为0.6（0.3~2.0）×10⁴/kg。中性粒细胞恢复中位时间为18（14~39）d，血小板恢复中位时间为29（16~153）d，红细胞恢复中位时间为60（9~124）d。12例患者输注过程中未发生严重不良反应，10例获得完全缓解，1例患者获得部分缓解，1例患者无效，未发生重症感染和重度GVHD。

结论

回输供者纯化CD34⁺细胞是单倍型造血干细胞移植后植入功能不良的一种安全、有效治疗方法。

Principles of alemtuzumab immunoablation in hematopoietic cell transplantation for non-malignant diseases in children: A review

Alemtuzumab is a humanized mAb targeted to CD52. Alemtuzumab is highly immunosuppressive with the ability to deplete T and B cells (in addition to other immune cell lines). A growing understanding of the PKs, dosing, and timing of administration of alemtuzumab has allowed for the study of its use as a conditioning agent for allogeneic HCT. The highly immunosuppressive properties of the drug are particularly appealing in the setting of non-malignant HCT, where GVHD provides no clinical benefit and relapse of malignancy is not applicable. In addition, the degree of immune suppression achieved with alemtuzumab has allowed for a reduction in the intensity of myeloablative cytotoxic agents included in some HCT conditioning regimens, allowing for fewer acute and late toxicities. This review paper will provide a comprehensive summary of the mechanism of action, PKs, dosing, and timing of alemtuzumab, a brief description of its use in various allogeneic HCT protocols for non-malignant conditions and a summary of the data regarding its use for GVHD therapy. The goal of this review was to provide an understanding as to how alemtuzumab might be safely incorporated into HCT conditioning regimens for children with non-malignant disease, allowing for expanded access to curative HCT therapy.

[Risk-factor analysis of poor graft function after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe aplastic anemia]

Objective: To investigate the risk factors of poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) . Methods: Clinical data from 111 SAA patients who received allo-HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. Factors including age, gender, interval to transplantation, the level of serum ferritin before transplantation were analyzed by Cox multivariate regression analysis. Results: Among the 111 patients who underwent allo-HSCT, 16 developed PGF (14.4%) . Multivariate analysis showed donor type (HR=2.656, 95%CI 1.204-5.858, P= 0.016) and the level of serum ferritin before tansplantation (HR=3.170, 95%CI 1.400-7.180, P=0.006) were significant risk factors for PGF. Conclusion: Unrelated donor transplantation and the high level of serum ferritin before transplantation are risk factors for PGF.

Impact of Graft-Recipient ABO Compatibility on Outcomes after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant for Nonmalignant Disease

Existing literature shows mixed conclusions regarding the impact of ABO incompatibility on outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because the future for umbilical cord blood (UCB) expansion technologies is bright, we assessed whether this typically overlooked graft characteristic impacted various outcomes after UCB transplantation (UCBT) for nonmalignant disorders (NMDs). A prospectively maintained institutional blood and marrow transplant program database was queried for all patients undergoing first UCBT for NMDs. UCB and recipient ABO compatibility was considered as matched, major mismatched, minor mismatched, or bidirectional mismatched. The impact of ABO incompatibility was assessed on overall survival, graft failure, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, day 0 to day 100 RBC transfusion burden, and donor hematopoietic chimerism. Through December 2014, 270 patients have undergone first UCBT for various NMDs. In both univariable and multivariable analyses, ABO compatibility status did not appear to impact any outcomes assessed, although a trend toward increased grades III to IV acute GVHD was seen in recipients of major mismatched units. When considering UCBT for treatment of NMDs, ABO compatibility between the donor unit and intended recipient does not appear to be an important consideration in the UCB unit choice.

ABO blood group antigen mismatch has an impact on outcome after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

ABO blood group antigen incompatibility (ABO mismatch) is not an obstacle to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). However, the impact on clinical outcome after allo-SCT remains controversial. We analyzed 512 patients after allogeneic peripheral blood SCT (allo-PBSCT) for an association of ABO mismatch with transfusion requirements, myeloid and platelet engraftment, the incidence of GvHD, relapse, transplant-related mortality (TRM), and overall survival (OS). A total of 260 patients underwent ABO-mismatched transplantation and the control group consisted of 252 patients with ABO-matched allo-PBSCT. We found a significant association between major-0 ABO mismatch (group 0 recipient/group A, B, or AB donor) and increased red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion requirements (both P<.001) as well as delayed platelet engraftment (P<.001). Minor-A (group A recipient/group 0 donor) and minor-AB (group AB recipient/group 0, A, or B donor) ABO mismatch was significantly associated with an increased TRM after allo-PBSCT (P=.001 and P=.02). In multivariate analysis performed using Cox regression, minor ABO mismatch appeared as independent risk factor for TRM after allo-PBSCT. No association was found for ABO mismatch with the incidence of GvHD, relapse, and OS. Our results suggest that ABO blood group mismatch has a significant impact on the outcome and that minor-A and minor-AB ABO mismatch represents a risk factor for increased TRM after allo-PBSCT.

Frequency and Risk Factors Associated with Cord Graft Failure after Transplant with Single-Unit Umbilical Cord Cells Supplemented by Haploidentical Cells with Reduced-Intensity Conditioning

Delayed engraftment and cord graft failure (CGF) are serious complications after unrelated cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), particularly when using low-cell-dose UCB units. The haplo-cord HSCT approach allows the use of a lower dose single UCB unit by co-infusion of a CD34(+) selected haploidentical graft, which provides early transient engraftment while awaiting durable UCB engraftment. We describe the frequency, complications, and risk factors of CGF after reduced-intensity conditioning haplo-cord HSCT. Among 107 patients who underwent haplo-cord HSCT, 94 were assessable for CGF, defined as <5% cord blood chimerism at day 60 in the myeloid and CD3 compartments, irrespective of neutrophil and platelet counts. CGF occurred in 14 of 94 assessable patients (15%). Median survival after CGF was 12.7 months with haploidentical or mixed haploidentical-autologous hematopoiesis persisting in the 7 surviving. Median progression-free survival after CGF was 7.7 months and was not statistically different from those without CGF (10.47 months; P = .18). In univariate analyses, no UCB factors were associated with CGF, including cell dose, cell viability, recipient major ABO mismatch against the UCB unit, or degree of HLA match. We also found no association of CGF with recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus, haploidentical donor age, or day 30 haploidentical chimerism. However, higher haploidentical total nucleated and CD34(+) cell doses and day 30 UCB chimerism < 5% in either the myeloid or CD3 compartments were associated with greater risk of CGF. We conclude that assessing chimerism at day 30 may foretell impending CGF, and avoidance of high haploidentical cell doses may reduce risk of CGF after haplo-cord HSCT. However, long-term survival is possible after CGF because of predominant haploidentical or mixed chimerism and hematopoietic function.

ABO-Mismatched Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option for a variety of malignant and non-malignant hematological and congenital diseases. Due to the fact that the human leukocyte antigen system is inherited independently of the blood group system, approximately 40-50% of all HSCTs are performed across the ABO blood group barrier. The expected immune-hematological consequences after transplantation of an ABO-mismatched stem cell graft are immediate and delayed hemolytic complications due to presence of isohemagglutinins or passenger lymphocyte syndrome. The risks of these complications can partially be prevented by graft manipulation and appropriate transfusion support. Dependent on the kind of ABO mismatch, different effects on engraftment have been observed, e.g. delayed red blood cell recovery and pure red cell aplasia. Data on incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality, relapse, and overall survival are inconsistent as most studies include limited patient numbers, various graft sources, and different conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens. This makes it difficult to detect a consistent effect of ABO-mismatched transplantation in the literature. However, knowledge of expectable complications and close monitoring of patients helps to detect problems early and to treat patients efficiently, thus reducing the number of fatal or life-threatening events caused by ABO-mismatched HSCT.

ABO mismatch is associated with increased nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

We evaluated ABO associated outcomes in 1737 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) at Stanford University between January 1986 and July 2011. Grafts were 61% ABO matched, 18% major mismatched (MM), 17% minor MM, and 4% bidirectional MM. Median follow-up was 6 years. In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was inferior in minor MM hematopoietic cell transplantations (median 2.1 versus 6.3 years; hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 2.05; P = .001) in comparison with ABO-matched grafts. ABO minor MM was associated with an increase in early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (18% versus 13%; HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.06; P = .02). In an independent Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) analysis of 435 lymphoma patients receiving mobilized peripheral blood grafts, impairment of OS (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.25; P = .021) and increased NRM (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.68; P = .03) were observed in recipients of ABO minor-MM grafts. A second independent analysis of a CIBMTR data set including 5179 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome identified a nonsignificant trend toward decreased OS in recipients of ABO minor-MM grafts and also found ABO major MM to be significantly associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.31; P < .001) and increased NRM (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.4; P = .002). ABO minor and major MM are risk factors for worse transplantation outcomes, although the associated hazards may not be uniform across different transplantation populations. Further study is warranted to determine which patient populations are at greatest risk, and whether this risk can be modified by anti-B cell therapy or other peri-transplantation treatments.

Primary graft failure after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

Clinical outcomes after primary graft failure (PGF) remain poor. Here we present a large retrospective analysis (n=23,272) which investigates means to prevent PGF and early detection of patients at high risk. In patients with hematologic malignancies, who underwent their first myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, PGF was reported in 1,278 (5.5%), and there was a marked difference in PGFs using peripheral blood stem cell compared to bone marrow grafts (2.5 vs. 7.3%; P<0.001). A 4-fold increase of PGF was observed in myeloproliferative disorders compared to acute leukemia (P<0.001). Other risk factors for PGF included recipient age below 30, HLA-mismatch, male recipients of female donor grafts, ABO-incompatibility, busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning, and cryopreservation. In bone marrow transplants, total nucleated cell doses ≤2.4 × 10⁸/kg were associated with PGF (OR 1.39; P<0.001). The use of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were associated with decreased PGF risk. These data, allow clinicians to do more informed choices with respect to graft source, donor selection, conditioning and immunosuppressive regimens to reduce the risk of PGF. Moreover, a novel risk score determined on day 21 post-transplant may provide the rationale for an early request for additional hematopoietic stem cells.

Desensitization for solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Desensitization protocols are being used worldwide to enable kidney transplantation across immunologic barriers, i.e. antibody to donor HLA or ABO antigens, which were once thought to be absolute contraindications to transplantation. Desensitization protocols are also being applied to permit transplantation of HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cells to patients with antibody to donor HLA, to enhance the opportunity for transplantation of non-renal organs, and to treat antibody-mediated rejection. Although desensitization for organ transplantation carries an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, ultimately these transplants extend and enhance the quality of life for solid organ recipients, and desensitization that permits transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells is life saving for patients with limited donor options. Complex patient factors and variability in treatment protocols have made it difficult to identify, precisely, the mechanisms underlying the downregulation of donor-specific antibodies. The mechanisms underlying desensitization may differ among the various protocols in use, although there are likely to be some common features. However, it is likely that desensitization achieves a sort of immune detente by first reducing the immunologic barrier and then by creating an environment in which an autoregulatory process restricts the immune response to the allograft.

Analysis of risk factors of cord blood transplantation for children

BACKGROUND

As cord blood (CB) is being used frequently as a source for heamtopoetic stem cell transplantation defining risk factors for transplantation outcome is an important issue.

PROCEDURE

The data of all single unit CB transplantation preformed in Israel from 1992 to 2011 were collected. The risk factors for myeloid engraftment, event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied in 87 children.

RESULTS

There were 49 children with hematological malignancies and 38 with non-malignant diseases. Cumulative rate of neutrophil recovery was 78.3%, while median time to myeloid recovery was 26 days. The incidence of platelet engraftment at 150 days was 53%, and the median time to platelet recovery was 36 days. ABO blood group matching between CB unit and recipient was associated with superior myeloid engraftment. Acute graft versus host disease of grades II-IV occurred in 33% of the patients. Chronic graft versus host disease occurred in 16% of patients. Probabilities of EFS and OS at 1 year were 45% and 57%, respectively. Factors associated with inferior OS were Rh major mismatch versus matched Rh and transplantation from unrelated donor versus related donor.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that matching of ABO blood groups is an important factor that affects engraftment, and also that Rh matching seem to have an impact on OS, which was not previously described in the setting of CB transplantation.

Analysis of donor and recipient ABO incompatibility and antibody-associated complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be performed across the ABO blood group barrier. The impact of ABO incompatibility on clinical outcome is controversial. A retrospective analysis of 310 patients who underwent HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning between 1998 and 2011 was performed to investigate the frequency and clinical implications of anti-RBC antibodies in passenger lymphocyte syndrome (PLS) after minor ABO mismatch (mm), persistent or recurring recipient type ABO antibodies (PRABO) after major ABO mm HSCT, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). Transplantation characteristics and clinical outcome were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis for groups with or without anti-RBC antibodies. ABO blood group incompatibility did not affect clinical outcome despite an increased requirement of blood transfusion. Twelve patients with AIHA, 6 patients with PLS, and 12 patients with PRABO post-HSCT were identified. AIHA did not affect overall survival (OS) or transplant-related mortality (TRM), but patients with AIHA had a lower incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .05). OS in the PLS group was 0% compared with 61% in the whole group receiving minor ABO mm transplants (P < .001). Comparing PRABO patients with those receiving a major ABO mm HSCT, the OS was 17% versus 73% (P = .002) and TRM was 50% versus 21% (P = .03). At our center, PLS after minor ABO mm and PRABO antibodies after major ABO mm HSCT are significant risk factors for decreased OS and TRM. Our results suggest that occurrence of unexpected ABO antibodies after HSCT warrant a wider investigation individual to find the underlying cause.

Graft failure in the modern era of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

Graft failure may contribute to increased morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). Here, we present risk factors for graft failure in all first allo-HSCTs performed at our center from 1995 to mid-2010 (n=967). Graft failure was defined as >95% recipient cells any time after engraftment with no signs of relapse, or re-transplantation because of primary or secondary neutropenia (<0.5 × 10(9)/L) and/or thrombocytopenia (<30 × 10(9)/L). Fifty-four patients (5.6%) experienced graft failure. The majority were because of autologous reconstitution (n=43), and only a few patients underwent re-transplantation because of primary (n=6) or secondary (n=5) graft failures. In non-malignant disorders, graft failure had no effect on survival, whereas in malignant disease graft failure was associated with reduced 5-year survival (22 vs 53%, P<0.01). In multivariate analysis, ex vivo T-cell depletion (relative risk (RR) 8.82, P<0.001), HLA-mismatched grafts (RR 7.64, P<0.001), non-malignant disorders (RR 3.32, P<0.01) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RR 2.58, P<0.01) increased the risk for graft failure, whereas graft failures were prevented by total nucleated cell doses of ≥ 2.5 × 10(8)/kg (RR 0.36, P<0.01). In conclusion, graft failure was only associated with inferior survival in malignant disease. Non-malignant disorders, HLA match, conditioning intensity, immunosuppression regimen and cell dose all influenced graft failure risk.

Algorithm for donor selection in 2011

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The timing represents a relevant prognostic factor of outcome for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT). In this review, the most recent studies and own transplant center policy on the donor search will be summarized in order to design an algorithm of donor identification driving towards a timely ASCT.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nowadays, volunteer-unrelated, umbilical cord blood and haploidentical-related donors represent the three alternative sources of hematopoietic stem cells for patients who lack a human leukocyte antigen identical sibling, so that an alternative donor can potentially be found for about all patients eligible for an ASCT. To date, all retrospective studies comparing transplants from these alternative donors have shown no substantial differences in terms of final outcome of patients grafted for hematological malignancies. The policy of a widespread search for an alternative donor has been progressively increasing in the past years.

SUMMARY

All patients with hematological malignancy for whom the intention to treatment includes an allogeneic transplant should proceed with a well timed ASCT, whatever the stem cell source. The therapeutic policy following the concept of 'donor versus no donor' should presently be changed according to the concept of 'transplant versus no transplant'.

Menstrual blood cells display stem cell-like phenotypic markers and exert neuroprotection following transplantation in experimental stroke

Cell therapy remains an experimental treatment for neurological disorders. A major obstacle in pursuing the clinical application of this therapy is finding the optimal cell type that will allow benefit to a large patient population with minimal complications. A cell type that is a complete match of the transplant recipient appears as an optimal scenario. Here, we report that menstrual blood may be an important source of autologous stem cells. Immunocytochemical assays of cultured menstrual blood reveal that they express embryonic-like stem cell phenotypic markers (Oct4, SSEA, Nanog), and when grown in appropriate conditioned media, express neuronal phenotypic markers (Nestin, MAP2). In order to test the therapeutic potential of these cells, we used the in vitro stroke model of oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) and found that OGD-exposed primary rat neurons that were co-cultured with menstrual blood-derived stem cells or exposed to the media collected from cultured menstrual blood exhibited significantly reduced cell death. Trophic factors, such as VEGF, BDNF, and NT-3, were up-regulated in the media of OGD-exposed cultured menstrual blood-derived stem cells. Transplantation of menstrual blood-derived stem cells, either intracerebrally or intravenously and without immunosuppression, after experimentally induced ischemic stroke in adult rats also significantly reduced behavioral and histological impairments compared to vehicle-infused rats. Menstrual blood-derived cells exemplify a source of "individually tailored" donor cells that completely match the transplant recipient, at least in women. The present neurostructural and behavioral benefits afforded by transplanted menstrual blood-derived cells support their use as a stem cell source for cell therapy in stroke.

Impact of ABO-incompatible donor on early and late outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

ABO incompatibility is not a barrier to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the impact of an ABO mismatch on the outcome of the HSCT remains controversial. We analyzed whether ABO incompatibility leads to an increased risk of early/late complications, mortality, or increased transfusion requirements. The 147 consecutive allogeneic HSCTs includes 80 ABO-identical and 25 major, 30 minor, and 12 bidirectional ABO-mismatched grafts. The four groups were balanced with respect to disease status at transplantation. Transplantation-related mortality was significantly greater (P < .01) and overall survival significantly shorter (P = 0.2) among HSCT recipients with minor ABO-mismatched grafts. The relapse rate, progression-free survival, and transfusion requirements until discharge were not different between ABO-identical and ABO-mismatched groups. Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA); (P < .0001) and delayed red blood cell (RBC) engraftment (P < .001) were more frequent in HSCT recipients with major mismatched donors. Delayed RBC engraftment was associated with posttransplantation hyperferritininemia and increased mortality risk (P = .05). The greater frequency of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients with minor mismatched transplants, did not show statistical significance. In contrast severe GVHD was significantly more frequent among minor mismatched patients (P = .04). ABO-mismatched HSCT might have an unfavorable impact on transplant outcomes. Selection of ABO-compatible donors when possible, strategies to prevent and treat PRCA, modifications in transfusion practice, and effective iron chelation are among the measures that can improve transplant outcomes.

The impact of donor type and ABO incompatibility on transfusion requirements after nonmyeloablative haematopoietic cell transplantation

We retrospectively analyzed transfusion requirements within the first 100 d among allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients with haematological malignancies given either myeloablative (n = 1353) or nonmyeloablative conditioning (n = 503). We confirmed that myeloablative recipients required more platelet and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions than nonmyeloablative recipients (P < 0.0001 for both). Myeloablative patients given peripheral blood stem cells required less platelet transfusions (P < 0.0001) than those given marrow while RBC transfusion requirements did not differ significantly. Subsequent analyses were restricted to nonmyeloablative recipients. Platelet and RBC transfusions were less frequent among related compared to unrelated recipients (P < 0.0001 for both), with comparable median numbers of transfused units. Major/bidirectionally ABO-mismatched recipients required more RBC transfusions than ABO-matched recipients (P = 0.006). Rates of graft rejection/failure, grades II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), 2-year relapse, 3-year survivals and non-relapse mortality were comparable among ABO-matched, minor-mismatched, and major/bidirectionally mismatched recipients (P = 0.93, 0.72, 0.57, 0.36, 0.17 and 0.79, respectively). Times to disappearance of anti-donor IgG and IgM isohemagglutinins among major/bidirectionally ABO-mismatched recipients were affected by magnitude of pre-HCT titres (P < 0.001 for both) but not GVHD (P = 0.71 and 0.78, respectively). In conclusion, nonmyeloablative recipients required fewer platelet and RBC transfusions and among them, both unrelated and major/bidirectionally ABO-mismatched recipients required more RBC transfusions. ABO incompatibility did not affect nonmyeloablative HCT outcomes.

Graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Graft failure is a significant complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). It may result from rejection caused by recipient T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, or antibodies. It is increased in HLA-mismatched grafts, unrelated grafts, T cell-replete transplants, sensitized patients, and in patients treated with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). In recipients of unrelated grafts, graft failure is increased in patients receiving major AB0 blood group mismatched transplants (P = .008). Recent data also suggest that donor-specific antibodies to CD34(+)/VEGFR-2(+) cells may be involved in graft failure after alloHCT. Graft failure may be overcome by more intensified conditioning, increased cell dose, or more effective immunosuppression. With more frequent use of RIC, cord blood grafts and other HLA-mismatched transplants, graft failure is an increasing problem after alloHCT.

Impact of ABO mismatching on the outcomes of allogeneic related and unrelated blood and marrow stem cell transplantations for hematologic malignancies: IPD-based meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND

The impact of donor-recipient ABO matching on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation has been a matter of controversy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Individual patient data-based meta-analysis was conducted with a pooled data set provided through six published and one unpublished cohorts. Outcomes in recipients of peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies were evaluated. A multivariate Cox model was used to adjust differences in outcomes of patients receiving ABO-matched grafts with those receiving major, minor, or bidirectional mismatched grafts. Considering multiple testing, p values of less than 0.05 and 0.001 were considered significant for the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

RESULTS

In all, 1208 cases, including 697 ABO-matched and 202 major, 228 minor, and 81 bidirectional mismatched transplants, were analyzed. Overall, adverse impact of ABO matching on overall survival (OS), as a primary endpoint, was not observed (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]: major, 1.03 [0.82-1.30], p = 0.81; minor, 1.19 [0.97-1.47], p = 0.10; bidirectional, 1.25 [0.91-1.72], p = 0.17). Among related stem cell recipients, ABO matching had no significant influence on OS, while the minor and bidirectional mismatched groups among unrelated stem cell recipients exhibited lower OS with marginal significance, especially in patients with acute leukemia, patients who received transplants after 1998, and patients who underwent transplants at Asian centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrates no adverse association between any ABO mismatching and survival. However, marginally lower OS found in recipients of minor or bidirectional mismatched grafts from unrelated donors suggested the need for larger studies focusing on unrelated transplants.

Palifermin mediates immunoregulatory effects in addition to its cytoprotective effects in mice with acute graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Treating recipient mice with palifermin (recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor) prevents the development of acute, lethal, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This is due, at least in part, to the ability of palifermin to protect epithelial cells from injury. Using the C57BL/6-->(C57BL/6 x DBA/2)F(1)-hybrid model, we previously showed that the protective effect of palifermin was also associated with redirection of the cytokine profile from Th1 to Th2.

DISCUSSION

To study this immunoregulatory effect more directly, we induced acute GVH reactions in which we treated the donors rather than the recipients with palifermin. The recipient mice were protected from GVHD-associated morbidity, and their cytokine profile was predominantly Th2. The palifermin-treated donor mice alone showed a similar Th2 cytokine profile, and we observed elevated levels of thymic stromal lymphopoietin mRNA in the thymus. We further demonstrated that treating the donor mice with palifermin protects against GVHD-associated morbidity, even if the donors are deficient in Valpha14i natural killer T cells. Our findings clearly show that palifermin mediates immunoregulatory effects in addition to its cytoprotective effects and that both are likely to be involved in the mechanism through which palifermin provides protection from acute murine GVHD.

A review of transfusion practice before, during, and after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation

The increased use of hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation has implications and consequences for transfusion services: not only in hospitals where HPC transplantations are performed, but also in hospitals that do not perform HPC transplantations but manage patients before or after transplantation. Candidates for HPC transplantation have specific and specialized transfusion requirements before, during, and after transplantation that are necessary to avert the adverse consequences of alloimmunization to human leukocyte antigens, immunohematologic consequences of ABO-mismatched transplantations, or immunosuppression. Decisions concerning blood transfusions during any of these times may compromise the outcome of an otherwise successful transplantation. Years after an HPC transplantation, and even during clinical remission, recipients may continue to be immunosuppressed and may have critically important, special transfusion requirements. Without a thorough understanding of these special requirements, provision of compatible blood components may be delayed and often urgent transfusion needs prohibit appropriate consultation with the patient's transplantation specialist. To optimize the relevance of issues and communication between clinical hematologists, transplantation physicians, and transfusion medicine physicians, the data and opinions presented in this review are organized by sequence of patient presentation, namely, before, during, and after transplantation.