A randomized double-blind trial of hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Effect of Hydroxychloroquine Treatment on Kidney Allograft Rejection and Graft Failure

Kidney allograft rejection is a major issue because it causes graft failure and because immunosuppressive treatments used for its prevention increase the risk of infections and cancers. In systemic lupus patients, hydroxychloroquine is used to prevent immune flares with decreased doses of immunosuppressants. Hydroxychloroquine can be safely used in kidney transplant recipients when indicated for autoimmune disease, but its effect on allograft rejection is unknown. We hypothesized that it may prevent kidney allograft rejection. We conducted a nationwide retrospective propensity-matched study on kidney transplantations of patients treated with hydroxychloroquine in France between 2008 and 2018. We analyzed the incidence of allograft rejection or failure within the first year after transplantation. The rates of rejection or allograft failure were not different between the 188 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine at the time of transplantation and their propensity matched controls. Hydroxychloroquine treatment in association with standard immunosuppressive treatment does not prevent rejection in kidney allograft recipients.

Autophagy differentially regulates tissue tolerance of distinct target organs in graft-versus-host disease models

Tissue-intrinsic mechanisms that regulate severity of systemic pathogenic immune-mediated diseases, such as acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), remain poorly understood. Following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, autophagy, a cellular stress protective response, is induced in host nonhematopoietic cells. To systematically address the role of autophagy in various host nonhematopoietic tissues, both specific classical target organs of acute GVHD (intestines, liver, and skin) and organs conventionally not known to be targets of GVHD (kidneys and heart), we generated mice with organ-specific knockout of autophagy related 5 (ATG5) to specifically and exclusively inhibit autophagy in the specific organs. When compared with wild-type recipients, animals that lacked ATG5 in the gastrointestinal tract or liver showed significantly greater tissue injury and mortality, while autophagy deficiency in the skin, kidneys, or heart did not affect mortality. Treatment with the systemic autophagy inducer sirolimus only partially mitigated GVHD mortality in intestine-specific autophagy-deficient hosts. Deficiency of autophagy increased MHC class I on the target intestinal epithelial cells, resulting in greater susceptibility to damage by alloreactive T cells. Thus, autophagy is a critical cell-intrinsic protective response that promotes tissue tolerance and regulates GVHD severity.

A Novel JAK1 Inhibitor SHR0302 Combined With Prednisone for First-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Phase I Clinical Trial

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a potentially life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Standard steroid first-line treatment could not satisfy therapeutic needs due to limited efficacy. As a highly selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, SHR0302 exhibits a reduced inhibition effect on JAK2 and might have less effect on hematopoiesis. This phase I clinical trial investigated the tolerability and safety of SHR0302 in combination with prednisone, and its early efficacy evidence as a potential first-line treatment to moderate/severe cGVHD. The standard 3 + 3 dose escalation was implemented to find the optimal dose of SHR0302. And prednisone was concurrently administrated with a dose of 1 mg/kg/d and then gradually tapered after 2 weeks. Eighteen patients were enrolled into the study. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 38.9% of patients. Only one patient developed DLT (grade ≥ 3 hypercholesterolemia) in the highest dose-level group who had pre-existing hypercholesterolemia. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. No patient discontinued treatment due to AEs. Sixteen out of 18 patients were evaluable for responses, the ORR at week 4 and week 24 were 94.4 and 87.5%, respectively. Overall, the treatment of SHR0302 combined with prednisone was safe and well-tolerated, preliminary clinical results presented a high response for previously untreated cGVHD and a significant reduction in prednisone use in this study. A phase II trial will be conducted to further investigate its therapeutic effects clinically.

In vitro effect of hydroxychloroquine on pluripotent stem cells and their cardiomyocytes derivatives

Introduction: Hydroxychloroquine (HDQ) is an antimalarial drug that has also shown its effectiveness in autoimmune diseases. Despite having side effects such as retinopathy, neuromyopathy and controversial cardiac toxicity, HDQ has been presented and now intensively studied for the treatment and prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent works revealed both beneficial and toxic effects during HDQ treatment. The cardiotoxic profile of HDQ remains unclear and identifying risk factors is challenging. Methods: Here, we used well-established cell-cultured to study the cytotoxic effect of HDQ, mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSC) and their cardiomyocytes (CMs) derivatives were exposed to different concentrations of HDQ. Cell colony morphology was assessed by microscopy whereas cell viability was measured by flow cytometry and impedance-based methods. The effect of HDQ on beating activity of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived CMs (miPSC-CMs and hiPSC-CMs, respectively) and mouse embryonic stem cell-derived CMs (mESC-CMs) were captured by the xCELLigence RTCA and microelectrode array (MEA) systems. Results and discussion: Our results revealed that 20 µM of HDQ promotes proliferation of stem cells used suggesting that if appropriately monitored, HDQ may have a cardioprotective effect and may also represent a possible candidate for tissue repair. In addition, the field potential signals revealed that higher doses of this medication caused bradycardia that could be reversed with a higher concentration of ß-adrenergic agonist, Isoproterenol (Iso). On the contrary, HDQ caused an increase in the beating rate of hiPSC-CMs, which was further helped upon application of Isoproterenol (Iso) suggesting that HDQ and Iso may also work synergistically. These results indicate that HDQ is potentially toxic at high concentrations and can modulate the beating activity of cardiomyocytes. Moreover, HDQ could have a synergistic inotropic effect with isoproterenol on cardiac cells.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine from randomized controlled trials on malarial and non-malarial conditions

BACKGROUND

Despite the expectations regarding the effectiveness of chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) management, concerns about their adverse events have remained.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety of CQ and HCQ from malarial and non-malarial randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The primary outcomes were the frequencies of serious adverse events (SAEs), retinopathy, and cardiac complications. Search strategies were applied to MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Trip databases. We used a random-effects model to pool results across studies and Peto's one-step odds ratio (OR) for event rates below 1%. Both-armed zero-event studies were excluded from the meta-analyses. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

One hundred and six RCTs were included. We found no significant difference between CQ/HCQ and control (placebo or non-CQ/HCQ) in the frequency of SAEs (OR: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.26, 33 trials, 15,942 participants, moderate certainty of evidence). However, there was a moderate certainty of evidence that CQ/HCQ increases the incidence of cardiac complications (RR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.10-2.38, 16 trials, 9908 participants). No clear relationship was observed between CQ/HCQ and retinopathy (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: - 0.4-6.57, 5 trials, 344 participants, very low certainty of evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

CQ and HCQ probably do not increase SAEs, with low frequency of these adverse events on malarial and non-malarial conditions. However, they may increase cardiac complications especially in patients with COVID-19. No clear effect of their use on the incidence of retinopathy was observed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020177818.

Safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 and other diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 53 randomized trials

INTRODUCTION

Many concerns still exist regarding the safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19 and other diseases by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the safety of HCQ in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were retrieved starting from the establishment of the database till June 5, 2020. Literature screening, data extraction, and assessment of risk bias were performed independently by two reviewers.

RESULTS

We identified 53 eligible studies involving 5496 patients. The meta-analysis indicated that the risk of adverse effects (AEs) in the HCQ group was significantly increased compared with that in the control group (RD 0.05, 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.07, P = 0.0002), and the difference was also statistically significant in the COVID-19 subgroup (RD 0.15, 95%CI, 0.07 to 0.23, P = 0.0002) as well as in the subgroup for other diseases (RD 0.03, 95%CI, 0.01 to 0.04, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

HCQ is associated with a high total risk of AEs compared with the placebo or no intervention in the overall population. Given the small number of COVID-19 participants included, we should be cautious regarding the conclusion stating that HCQ is linked with an increase incidence of AEs in patients with COVID-19, which we hope to confirm in the future through well-designed and larger sample size studies.

Assessment of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine Safety Profiles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chloroquine (CQ) and its derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have recently emerged as potential antiviral and immunomodulatory options for the treatment of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To examine the safety profiles of these medications, we systematically evaluated the adverse events (AEs) of these medications from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the ClinicalTrials.gov for all the RCTs comparing CQ or HCQ with placebo or other active agents, published before June 20, 2020. The random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to pool the risk estimates relative ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 23 and 19 studies for CQ and HCQ, respectively, that satisfied our inclusion criteria. Of these studies, we performed meta-analysis on 6 studies for CQ and 18 studies for HCQ. We did not limit our analysis to published records involving viral treatment alone; data also included the usage of either CQ or HCQ for the treatment of other diseases. The trials for the CQ consisted of a total of 2,137 participants (n = 1,077 CQ, n = 1,060 placebo), while the trials for HCQ involved 2,675 participants (n = 1,345 HCQ and n = 1,330 control). The overall mild and total AEs were significantly higher in CQ-treated non-COVID-19 patients, HCQ-treated non-COVID-19 patients, and HCQ-treated COVID-19 patients. The AEs were further categorized into four groups and analyses revealed that neurologic, gastrointestinal (GI), dermatologic, and sensory AEs were higher in participants taking CQ compared to placebo, while GI, dermatologic, sensory, and cardiovascular AEs were higher in HCQ-treated COVID-19 patients compared to control patients. Moreover, subgroup analysis suggested higher AEs with respect to dosage and duration in HCQ group. Data were acquired from studies with perceived low risk of bias, so plausible bias is unlikely to seriously affect the main findings of the current study.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, we found that participants taking either CQ or HCQ exhibited more AEs than participants taking placebo or control. Precautionary measures should be taken when using these drugs to treat COVID-19. The meta-analysis was registered on OSF (https://osf.io/jm3d9).

REGISTRATION

The meta-analysis was registered on OSF (https://osf.io/jm3d9).

Assessment of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Safety Profiles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, chloroquine (CQ) and its derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have emerged as potential antiviral and immunomodulatory options for the treatment of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To examine the safety profiles of these medications, we systematically evaluated the adverse events (AEs) of these medications from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, and the ClinicalTrials.gov for all the RCTs comparing CQ or HCQ with placebo or other active agents, published before March 31, 2020. The random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to pool the risk estimates relative ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 23 and 17 studies for CQ and HCQ, respectively, that satisfied our inclusion criteria. Of these studies, we performed meta-analysis on the ones that were placebo-controlled, which included 6 studies for CQ and 14 studies for HCQ. We did not limit our analysis to published reports involving viral treatment alone; data also included the usage of either CQ or HCQ for the treatment of other diseases. The trials for the CQ consisted of a total of 2,137 participants (n=1,077 CQ, n=1,060 placebo), while the trials for HCQ involved 1,096 participants (n=558 HCQ and n=538 placebo). The overall mild or total AEs were statistically higher comparing CQ or HCQ to placebo. The AEs were further categorized into four groups and analyses revealed that neurologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and ophthalmic AEs were higher in participants taking CQ compared to placebo. Although this was not evident in HCQ treated groups, further analyses suggested that there were more AEs attributed to other organ system that were not included in the categorized meta-analyses. Additionally, meta-regression analyses revealed that total AEs was affected by dosage for the CQ group.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, we found that participants taking either CQ or HCQ have more AEs than participants taking placebo. Precautionary measures should be taken when using these drugs to treat COVID-19.

Higher levels of free plasma mitochondrial DNA are associated with the onset of chronic GvHD

Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9) responsive B cells have previously been associated with the onset of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD). We hypothesized that the onset of cGvHD associated with a higher level of plasma-free mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), a putative TLR9 agonist. Plasma cell-free mtDNA levels were measured in 39 adult patients post-HSCT with and without cGvHD. mtDNA was isolated from plasma and quantified by Q-PCR amplification. We correlated B cell responsiveness to CpG-DNA, a prototypical TLR9 agonist, and previously identified cGVHD biomarkers with mtDNA levels. Free plasma mtDNA were elevated in patients post-HSCT without cGvHD compared to normal non-HSCT adults. There was a significantly higher level of free plasma mtDNA associated with the onset of cGvHD (3080 ± 1586 versus 1834 ± 1435 copies/μL; p = 0.02) compared to 6 months post-HSCT controls. Free mtDNA levels post-HSCT correlated with B cell responsiveness to CpG-DNA and known cGvHD biomarkers: CXCL10 (p = 0.003), ICAM-1 (p = 0.007), CXCL9 (p = 0.03), sCD25 (p = 0.05) and sBAFF (p = 0.05), and percentage of CD21^low B cells. Plasma levels of free mtDNA are increased in cGvHD and may represent an endogenous inflammatory stimulus for TLR9 expressing B cells.

Retinal toxicity of high-dose hydroxychloroquine in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate retinal toxicity in patients treated with high-dose hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) (Plaquenil, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals) for chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients with chronic GVHD treated with 800 mg/day HCQ between June 2005 and December 2010.

METHODS

Patients in this study underwent ophthalmologic examination yearly and ancillary studies including colour vision, Amsler grid, fundus photographs, Humphrey 10-2 automated perimetry, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Evidence of HCQ toxicity was determined by the presence of scotomas in the Amsler grid and Humphrey 10-2 automated perimetry, and confirmed by at least 1 objective test including SD-OCT or mfERG.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients, 7 were male and 5 were female. Mean age was 49 years. Mean best corrected visual acuity at baseline was 20/25 and remained 20/25 at final follow-up. Median duration of HCQ treatment was 22.8 months. Median adjusted daily dosage was 11.5 mg/kg/day. Seven patients developed vortex keratopathy. No signs of pigmentary retinopathy or bull's-eye maculopathy were found in any of the patients. Three patients developed retinal toxicity with scotomas in the Amsler grid and Humphrey 10-2 automated perimetry, as well as abnormal mfERG. Retinal structure measured by SD-OCT was abnormal in 2 of the 3 patients with retinal toxicity. Colour vision measured by Ishihara plates, as well as by 100 Hue colour test, was abnormal in 2 of the 3 patients with retinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose HCQ in patients with GVHD was associated with higher incidence and earlier development of retinal toxicity.

Graft-versus-host disease: why have we not made more progress?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is potentially curative for a number of hematologic malignancies, its use is limited by the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This potentially fatal complication occurs in approximately 50% of allo-SCT recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The pathogenesis of acute and chronic GVHD remains poorly understood, methods to prevent it are largely unchanged over the last two decades, and response to front-line treatment with corticosteroids is suboptimal. For patients with steroid-refractory disease, response to second-line treatment is dismal. The prospective clinical studies evaluating new agents for GVHD have been hampered by the inconsistencies in design, making generalization difficult, and few multicenter studies have been conducted.

SUMMARY

Advances have been made over the last decade in grading both acute and chronic GVHD, with the development of biomarkers that provide improved prognostic information in acute GVHD and National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria for improved grading of chronic GVHD. This, along with the broad understanding of the need to conduct prospective studies with uniform inclusion criteria and endpoints leading to multicenter studies, will hopefully lead to advancements in the prevention of GVHD in the near future.

Are we making progress in GVHD prophylaxis and treatment?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is an effective immunotherapy for human cancer. More than 20 000 allo-HCTs are performed each year worldwide, primarily for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Several technical innovations implemented in allo-HCT over past 2 decades have reduced NRM by 50% and improved overall survival. The allo-HCT practice has changed with the introduction of peripheral blood, cord blood, and haploidentical transplantations and reduced-intensity conditioning, and the patient population is also different regarding age and diagnosis. However, both acute and chronic GVHD remain serious barriers to successful allo-HCT and it is not clear that a major improvement has occurred in our ability to prevent or treat GVHD. Nevertheless, there is an increasing knowledge of the biology and clinical manifestations and the field is getting better organized. These advances will almost certainly lead to major progress in the near future. As the long list of new potential targets and respective drugs are developed, systems need to be developed for rapid testing of them in clinical practice. The current reality is that no single agent has yet to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for GVHD prevention or therapy. Although a primary goal of these efforts is to develop better therapies for GVHD, the ultimate goal is to develop treatments that lead to effective prevention or preemption of life-threatening and disabling GVHD manifestations while harnessing the desirable graft-versus-tumor effects.

Hydroxychloroquine: from malaria to autoimmunity

Quinine was first recognized as a potent antimalarial agent hundreds of years ago. Since then, the beneficial effects of quinine and its more advanced synthetic forms, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, have been increasingly recognized in a myriad of other diseases in addition to malaria. In recent years, antimalarials were shown to have various immunomodulatory effects, and currently have an established role in the management of rheumatic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis, skin diseases, and in the treatment of chronic Q fever. Lately, additional metabolic, cardiovascular, antithrombotic, and antineoplastic effects of antimalarials were shown. In this review, we discuss the known various immunomodulatory mechanisms of antimalarials and the current evidence for their beneficial effects in various diseases and in potential novel applications.

Inhibition of cathepsin S reduces allogeneic T cell priming but not graft-versus-host disease against minor histocompatibility antigens

Cathepsin (Cathepsin) S, L, and B proteases mediate antigen presentation on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II by degrading the invariant chain Ii, which blocks peptide loading. The ability of the Cathepsin S inhibitor LHVS (morpholinurea-leucine-homophenylalanine-vinylsulfone phenyl) to impede antigen presentation has led its development as a therapy for autoimmune diseases. There is substantial evidence that donor T cell recognition of host minor histocompatibility antigens (miHA) and subsequent destruction of host tissue mediates graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We hypothesized that enzymes involved in antigen presentation may play a role in the development of GVHD. Using the C57BL/6 → BALB.B minor mismatch acute GVHD (aGVHD) model, we found that the cathepsin S activity of spleens from allogenetically transplanted mice were significantly increased 1 week after transplantation compared with syngeneic mice. Although LHVS decreased T cell priming responses against both single OVA antigen and miHA in vitro, LHVS did not reduce the severity of aGVHD. In fact, LHVS exacerbated a CD4(+)-T cell-dependent model of GVHD similar to chronic GVHD. This suggests that cytokines rather than T cells may mediate much of the damage in the aGVHD model and that therapeutics based on inhibition of antigen presentation for GVHD must be approached with caution.

Have we made progress in the management of chronic graft-vs-host disease?

Chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is a common long-term complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant that is associated with very high morbidity and mortality. In order to understand whether we have made progress in the management of chronic GVHD, it is helpful to first propose a definition of meaningful "progress". The following can be considered to be indicators of improved management of chronic GVHD: a decrease in the incidence or severity of chronic GVHD, better efficacy or decreased toxicity of therapies, better quality of life despite chronic GVHD, and improved overall and disease-free survival rates. However, to date, real progress has not been made in these areas, though there are promising new preventive strategies and treatments. Furthermore, a consensus has been reached in the research community about many different issues surrounding chronic GVHD definitions, management, and the conduct of clinical trials. These consensus documents will help to standardize efforts and data collection so that true comparisons can be made in the future and real clinical progress achieved.