A simplified (modified) Duke Activity Status Index (M-DASI) to characterise functional capacity: a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) study

Criterion Validity of Screening Tools and Field-Based Tests for Health-Related Physical Fitness in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Monitoring health-related physical fitness (HRPF) may benefit proactive Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) management. However, knowledge regarding HRPF in patients with IBD is limited and gold standard tests are impractical for widespread use, necessitating simpler methods.

AIM

This study evaluated the criterion validity of screening tools and field-based tests compared to gold standard tests for HRPF in patients with IBD.

METHODS

Adult patients with IBD completed screening tools, field-based tests, and gold standard tests for HRPF. Criterion validity was examined through (intraclass) correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. Predictive capacity of the screening tools was examined with receiver operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

Among 53 included patients, screening tools demonstrated poor-to-moderate validity compared to the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for cardiorespiratory fitness. Very strong correlations were found for four-site skinfold thickness and multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis (BIA) with deuterium oxide dilution for body fat percentage (ICC = 0.90, ICC = 0.93), and between the steep ramp test and CPET (r = 0.95) for cardiorespiratory fitness. The steep ramp test also correlated strongly with isokinetic quadriceps (r > 0.75) and hamstring (r > 0.74) strength. Hand-held dynamometry and the sit-to-stand test showed strong correlations with hamstring strength (r > 0.80, r > 0.76). Negligible correlations were found for field-based tests compared to isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring endurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Four-site skinfold thickness and BIA showed good agreement with the gold standard for body fat measurement. The steep ramp test demonstrated strong correlations with the gold standard tests for cardiorespiratory fitness and quadriceps and hamstring strength, while hand-held dynamometry and the sit-to-stand test showed strong correlations with hamstring strength.

A Retrospective Cohort Study Examining the Validation of the Modified Duke Activity Status Index in the Non-cardiac Surgical Population

PURPOSE

We aimed to ascertain if the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and its simplified variants predict 30-day mortality and myocardial injury after major non-cardiac surgery in at-risk patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We included 4,199 patients to validate the DASI and its variants in predicting the same composite outcome in patients with risk factors for coronary artery disease. Additional outcomes included 30-day severe complications, 1-year survival, and the effect of the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) on the DASI score and subsequent outcomes.

FINDINGS

Patients were a median of 66 years old (interquartile range 57.0, 73.0), 47.9% were male, predominantly Caucasian (71.9%), with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or greater (80.7%) and a median National ADI of 54.0 (interquartile range 33.0 to 74.0). The 30-day composite outcome was predicted by the original DASI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82 [CI 0.73, 0.91], P < .001); modified 4-question DASI (AUC 0.82 [CI 0.73, 0.91], P < .048). The original DASI also predicted the 1-year composite outcome (hazard ratio 0.88 [CI 0.84, 0.93], P < .001), as did the modified 4-question DASI (hazard ratio 0.78 [CI 0.69, 0.89], P < .001), but not severe complications (P = .400 and P = .332 respectively). The ADI showed an inverse relationship with all versions of the DASI; there was a 0.8-point DASI decrease ([95% confidence interval -0.96 to -0.59], P < .001) for every 10-point increase in the National ADI.

CONCLUSIONS

The DASI is a reliable predictor of long-term postoperative outcomes.

Exercise capacity prior to major cancer surgery: A cross-sectional observational study of the validity of the 6-minute walk and 30-second sit-to-stand tests

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for measuring exercise capacity, however, it is resource intensive and has limited availability. This study aimed to determine: 1) the association between the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the 30-s sit-to-stand test (30STS) with CPET peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and anaerobic threshold (AT) and 2) 6MWT and 30STS cut points associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study, retrospectively analyzing data collected from a tertiary cancer center over a 23-month period. Measures included CPET VO2peak and AT, 6MWT and 30STS test. Correlations were used to characterize relationships between variables. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses determined 6MWT and 30STS cut points that aligned with CPET variable cut points.

RESULTS

Note that, 156 participants were included. The 6MWT and 30STS displayed moderate correlations with VO2peak, rho = 0.65, p = 0.01 and rho = 0.52, p < 0.005 respectively. Fair correlations were observed between AT and 6MWT (rho = 0.36, p = 0.01) and 30STS (rho = 0.41, p < 0.005). The optimal cut points to identify VO2peak < 15 mL/kg/min were 493.5 m on the 6MWT and 12.5 stands on the 30STS test and for AT < 11 mL/kg/min were 506.5 m on the 6MWT and 12.5 stands on the 30STS test.

CONCLUSION

Both the 6MWT and 30STS test could be used as alternative tools for measuring exercise capacity preoperatively in the cancer setting where CPET is not available. A range of 6MWT and 30STS cut points, according to sensitivity and specificity levels, may be used to evaluate risk of postoperative outcomes.

Multimodal Prehabilitation for Patients with Crohn's Disease Scheduled for Major Surgery: A Narrative Review

Approximately 15-50% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) will require surgery within ten years following the diagnosis. The management of modifiable risk factors before surgery is essential to reduce postoperative complications and to promote a better postoperative recovery. Preoperative malnutrition reduced functional capacity, sarcopenia, immunosuppressive medications, anemia, and psychological distress are frequently present in CD patients. Multimodal prehabilitation consists of nutritional, functional, medical, and psychological interventions implemented before surgery, aiming at optimizing preoperative status and improve postoperative recovery. Currently, studies evaluating the effect of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes specifically in CD are lacking. Some studies have investigated the effect of a single prehabilitation intervention, of which nutritional optimization is the most investigated. The aim of this narrative review is to present the physiologic rationale supporting multimodal surgical prehabilitation in CD patients waiting for surgery, and to describe its main components to facilitate their adoption in the preoperative standard of care.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) to Sinhala language

BACKGROUND

Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a widely used tool to assess functional capacity among patients, but there is no Sinhala version validated for patients in Sri Lanka. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt and test the validity and reliability of the Sinhala version of DASI (DASI-S).

METHODS

The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the DASI questionnaire were conducted following the standard guidelines. It was pre-tested on ten pre-operative patients and further modified. The construct validity and reliability of DASI-S were evaluated by administering the modified final DASI-S, which comprised 12 items, along with the physical functioning sub-scale of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), consisting of 10 items to eighty-one patients who were awaiting non-cardiac surgeries at university surgical wards, National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL), and Colombo North Teaching Hospital (CNTH), Sri Lanka. Reliability was assessed through Cronbach alpha, while the validity was evaluated using factor analysis and Spearman's correlation. The ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 46.2 (± 16.6) years and the majority were females (54.3%). The mean height, weight, and body mass index of the sample were 160.5 (± 9.6) cm, 60.3 (± 11.9) kg, and 23.4 (± 4.5) kgm-2 respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the internal consistency of DASI-S was 0.861. The concurrent validity of DASI-S was substantiated by positively correlating (p < 0.01, rs = 0.466) with the physical sub-scale of SF-36. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) in the total score of DASI-S between the two age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinhala version of the DASI appears to be a valid, reliable and easy-to-administer tool to assess functional capacity among patients who are awaiting non-cardiac surgeries.

Prehabilitation: Who can benefit?

Prehabilitation is an intervention that occurs between cancer diagnosis and the start of an acute treatment. It involves physical, nutritional, and psychological assessments to establish a baseline functional level and provide targeted interventions to improve a person's health and prevent future impairments. Prehabilitation has been applied to surgical oncology and has shown positive results at improving functional capacity, reducing hospital stay, decreasing complications, and enhancing health-related quality of life. The importance of collaboration between various healthcare professionals and the implementation of multimodal interventions, including exercise training, nutrition optimization, and emotional support is discussed in this manuscript. The need for screening and assessment of conditions such as sarcopenia, frailty, or low functional status in order to identify patients who would benefit the most from prehabilitation is vital and should be a part of all prehabilitation programs. Exercise and nutrition play complementary roles in prehabilitation, enhancing anabolism and performance. However, in the presence of malnutrition and sarcopenia, exercise-related energy expenditure without sufficient protein intake can lead to muscle wasting and further deterioration of functional capacity, thus special emphasis on nutrition and protein intake should be made in these cases. Finally, the challenges and the need for a paradigm shift in perioperative care are discussed to effectively implement personalized prehabilitation programs.

Frail Patients Undergoing Optimization Before Surgery: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 10% or more of patients older than 65 years are affected by frailty, a mental and physical state of vulnerability to adverse surgical outcomes. Frailty can be assessed using the Edmonton Frailty Scale: a reliable and convenient multidimensional assessment before surgery. The correlation between frailty score, presurgical optimization, and surgical outcomes was investigated in this preliminary pilot study.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed on patients referred to the surgical optimization clinic and assessed for frailty from September 2020 to May 2023. Patients received presurgical optimization for reasons including diabetes, smoking cessation, prehabilitation and nutrition, and/or cardiopulmonary issues. Outcomes were evaluated whether they proceeded to surgery, were referred to the High-Risk Surgical Committee, surgical case canceled, or not scheduled. For those who proceeded to surgery, infection rates, complications, and 30-day emergency department (ED) and readmission rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 143 unique patients, 138 (men = 61, women = 77) were evaluated for this study. The average Edmonton frailty score for patients who proceeded to surgery was 7.013 (n = 78) vs 9.389 with cancelation and 9.600 for not scheduled or not optimized for surgery. Postoperative infection rates were <3%. However, 30-day ED and readmission rate was 21% (16 of 78).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower average Edmonton frailty scores were more likely to proceed to surgery, whereas those with higher average Edmonton frailty scores were more likely to have surgery canceled or delayed. Frail patients cleared for surgery were found to have a high 30-day ED and readmission rate.

Prehabilitation: a narrative review focused on exercise therapy for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications following lung resection

Extensive preventive strategies in the perioperative period are popular worldwide. Novel "prehabilitation" approaches are being defined for every individual surgical discipline. With intention to reduce perioperative morbidity, "prehabilitation" was developed to increase "physical wellness" considering exercise capacity, nutritional status, and psychological support. Thus, prehabilitation could be well-suited for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Theoretically, improving physical condition may increase the chances of having a better post-operative course, especially among frail patients. In this review, we describe the concept of prehabilitation with possible benefits, its role in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, and its potential for the future.

Long-Term Consequences of COVID-19 in Predominantly Immunonaive Patients: A Canadian Prospective Population-Based Study

Background: Lingering symptoms are frequently reported after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, a condition known as post-COVID-19 condition (PCC). The duration and severity of PCC in immunologically naïve persons remain unclear. Furthermore, the long-term consequences of these chronic symptoms on work and mental health are poorly documented. Objective: To determine the outcome, the risk factors, and the impact on work and mental health associated with post-COVID-19 symptoms. Methods: This prospective population-based study assessed acute COVID-19 symptoms and their evolution for up to nine months following infection. Individuals aged 18 years and older with COVID-19 in three Canadian regions between 1 November 2020 and 31 May 2021 were recruited. Participants completed a questionnaire that was either administered by trained student investigators over the phone or self-administered online. Results: A total of 1349 participants with a mean age of 46.6 ± 16.0 years completed the questionnaire. Participants were mostly unvaccinated at the time of their COVID-19 episode (86.9%). Six hundred and twenty-two participants (48.0%) exhibited one symptom or more, at least three months post-COVID-19. Among participants with PCC, 23.0% to 37.8% experienced fatigue at the time of survey. Moreover, 6.1% expressed psychological distress. Risk factors for PCC and fatigue included female sex (OR = 1.996), higher number of symptoms (OR = 1.292), higher severity of episode (OR = 3.831), and having a mental health condition prior to the COVID-19 episode (OR = 5.155). Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort study, almost half (47%) of the participants reported persistent symptoms >3 months after acute infection. Baseline risk factors for PCC include female sex, number and severity of symptoms during acute infection, and a previous diagnosis of mental health disorder. Having PCC negatively impacted health-related quality of life and these patients were more likely to exhibit psychological distress, as well as fatigue.

Preoperative Evaluation in the 21st Century

This review aims to provide a conceptual framework for preoperative evaluation and to highlight the clinical evidence available to support perioperative decision-making.

The tele-liver frailty index (TeLeFI): development of a novel frailty tool in patients with cirrhosis via telemedicine

Frailty is a critical determinant of outcomes in cirrhosis patients. The increasing use of telemedicine has created an unmet need for virtual frailty assessment. We aimed to develop a telemedicine-enabled frailty tool (tele-liver frailty index). Adults with cirrhosis in the liver transplant setting underwent ambulatory frailty testing with the liver frailty index (LFI) in-person, then virtual administration of (1) validated surveys (eg, SARC-F and Duke Activity Status Index [DASI]), (2) chair stands, and (3) balance. Two models were selected and internally validated for predicting LFI ≥4.4 using: (1) Bayesian information criterion (BIC), (2) C-statistics, and (3) ease of use. Of 145 patients, the median (interquartile range) LFI was 3.7 (3.3-4.2); 15% were frail. Frail (vs not frail) patients reported significantly greater impairment on all virtually assessed instruments. We selected 2 parsimonious models: (1) DASI + chair/bed transfer (SARC-F) (BIC 255, C-statistics 0.78), and (2) DASI + chair/bed transfer (SARC-F) + virtually assessed chair stands (BIC 244, C-statistics 0.79). Both models had high C-statistics (0.76-0.78) for predicting frailty. In conclusion, the tele-liver frailty index is a novel tool to screen frailty in liver transplant patients via telemedicine pragmatically and may be used to identify patients who require in-person frailty assessment, more frequent follow-up, or frailty intervention.

Cardiovascular risk management in the peri-operative setting

Peri-operative cardiovascular events occur in up to 3% of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Accurate cardiovascular risk assessment is important in the peri-operative setting, as it allows informed and shared decisions regarding the appropriateness of proceeding with surgery, guides surgical and anaesthetic approaches, and may influence the use of preventive medications and post-operative cardiac monitoring. Quantitative risk assessment may also inform a reconsideration of choosing a more limited lower risk type of surgery, or conservative management. Pre-operative cardiovascular risk assessment starts with clinical assessment and should include an estimate of functional capacity. Specialised cardiac investigations are rarely indicated specifically to assess pre-operative cardiovascular risk. The decision regarding cardiac investigations is influenced by the nature, extent and urgency of surgery. The strategy of performing pre-operative revascularisation to improve post-operative outcomes is not evidence-based and recent international guidelines recommend against this.

Prognostic Value of Self-Reported Subjective Exercise Capacity in Patients With Acute Dyspnea

Background

Self-reported exercise capacity is a well-established prognostic measure in stable ambulatory patients with cardiac and pulmonary disease.

Objectives

The authors aimed to directly compare the prognostic accuracy of quantified self-reported exercise capacity using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) with the established objective disease-severity marker B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department.

Methods

The DASI was obtained in a prospective multicenter diagnostic study recruiting unselected patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department. The prognostic accuracy of DASI and BNP for 90-day and 720-day all-cause mortality was evaluated using C-index.

Results

Among 1,019 patients eligible for this analysis, 75 (7%) and 297 (29%) patients died within 90 and 720 days after presentation, respectively. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for 90- and 720-day mortality increased continuously from the fourth (best self-reported exercise capacity) to the first DASI quartile (worst self-reported exercise capacity). For 720-day mortality the HR of the first quartile vs the fourth was 9.1 (95% CI, 5.5-14.9) vs (aHR: 6.1, 95% CI: 3.7-10.1), of the second quartile 6.4 (95% CI: 3.9-10.6) vs (aHR: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.6-7.3), while of the third quartile the HR was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.9-5.5) vs (aHR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4-4.0). The prognostic accuracy of the DASI score was high, and higher than that of BNP concentrations (720-day mortality C-index: 0.67 vs 0.62; P = 0.024).

Conclusions

Quantification of self-reported subjective exercise capacity using the DASI provides high prognostic accuracy and may aid physicians in risk stratification. (Basics in Acute Shortness of Breath EvaLuation [BASEL V] Study [BASEL V]; NCT01831115).

Assessment and Correction of the Cardiac Complications Risk in Non-cardiac Operations – What's New?

Cardiovascular complications after non-cardiac surgery are the leading cause of 30-day mortality. The need for surgical interventions is approximately 5,000 procedures per 100,000 population, according to experts, the risks of non-cardiac surgical interventions are markedly higher in the elderly. It should be borne in mind that the aging of the population and the increased possibilities of medicine inevitably lead to an increase in surgical interventions in older people. Recent years have been characterized by the appearance of national and international guidelines with various algorithms for assessing and correcting cardiac risk, as well as publications on the validation of these algorithms. The purpose of this review was to provide new information about the assessment and correction of the risk of cardiac complications in non-cardiac operations. Despite the proposed new risk assessment scales, the RCRI scale remains the most commonly used, although for certain categories of patients (with oncopathology, in older age groups) the possibility of using specific questionnaires has been shown. In assessing the functional state, it is proposed to use not only a subjective assessment, but also the DASI questionnaire, 6-minute walking test and cardiopulmonary exercise test). At the next stage, it is proposed to evaluate biomarkers, primarily BNP or NT-proBNP, with a normal level – surgery, with an increased level – either an additional examination by a cardiologist or perioperative troponin screening. Currently, the prevailing opinion is that there is no need to examine patients to detect hidden lesions of the coronary arteries (non-invasive tests, coronary angiography), since this leads to excessive examination of patients, delaying the implementation of non-cardiac surgery. The extent to which this approach has an advantage over the previously used one remains to be studied.

PRehabIlitatiOn with pReoperatIve exercise and educaTion for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgerY: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled TRIAL (PRIORITY TRIAL)

Background

Radical surgery is the mainstream treatment for patients presenting with advanced primary or recurrent gastrointestinal cancers; however, the rate of postoperative complications is exceptionally high. The current evidence suggests that improving patients’ fitness during the preoperative period may enhance postoperative recovery. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to establish the effectiveness of prehabilitation with a progressive, individualised, preoperative exercise and education program compared to usual care alone in reducing the proportion of patients with postoperative in-hospital complications. The secondary aims are to investigate the effectiveness of the preoperative intervention on reducing the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, improving quality of life and morbidity, and reducing costs.

Methods

This is a multi-centre, assessor-blinded, pragmatic, comparative, randomised controlled trial. A total of 172 patients undergoing pelvic exenteration, cytoreductive surgery, oesophagectomy, hepatectomy, gastrectomy or pancreatectomy will be recruited. Participants will be randomly allocated to prehabilitation with a preoperative exercise and education program (intervention group), delivered over 4 to 8 weeks before surgery by community physiotherapists/exercise physiologists, or usual care alone (control group). The intervention will comprise 12 to 24 individualised, progressive exercise sessions (including aerobic/anaerobic, resistance, and respiratory exercises), recommendations of home exercises (16 to 32 sessions), and daily incidental physical activity advice. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline, the week prior to surgery, during the hospital stay, and on the day of discharge from hospital, and 1 month and 1 months postoperatively. The primary outcome will be the development of in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes include the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, quality of life, postoperative morbidity and costs.

Discussion

The successful completion of this trial will provide robust and high-quality evidence on the efficacy of a preoperative community- and home-based exercise and education intervention on important postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing major gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Trial registration

This trial was registered prospectively with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000617864) on 24th May 2021.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing and Other Tests of Functional Capacity

Purpose of Review

Assessment of functional capacity is a cornerstone of preoperative risk assessment. While subjective clinician assessment of functional capacity is poorly predictive of postoperative outcomes, other objective functional assessment measures may provide more useful information.

Recent Findings

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is generally accepted as the gold standard for functional capacity assessment. However, CPET is resource-intensive and not universally available. Simpler objective tests of functional capacity such as the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and the 6-min walk test (6MWT) are cheap and efficient. In addition, they predict important postoperative outcomes including death, disability, and myocardial infarction.

Summary

Simple preoperative tests such as the DASI may be useful for routine preoperative assessment. CPET may be helpful to investigate further patients with functional status limitation, and to guide prehabilitation and perioperative shared decision-making in high-risk patients.

Quantification of metabolic equivalents (METs) by the MET-REPAIR questionnaire: A validation study in patients with a high cardiovascular burden

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Quantifying functional capacity is a core component of preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment. Lower metabolic equivalents (METs) are associated with higher morbidity/mortality in non-surgical and surgical populations. However, actually measuring METs preoperatively is rare. We sought to determine the correlation of self-reported METs using the questionnaire of the MET: REevaluation for Perioperative cArdIac Risk (MET-REPAIR) study and objectively measured METs by gold-standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET).

DESIGN

Single-center prospective validation study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

We enrolled adult patients aged ≥45 undergoing out-patient cardiac rehabilitation.

INTERVENTION

Patients completed the MET-REPAIR Questionnaire and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), had blood samples drawn, and underwent undergoing routine CPET.

MEASUREMENTS

We compared measured METs by CPET to 1) self-reported METs (the MET-REPAIR Questionnaire), 2) the DASI score, 3) stand-alone questions, and 4) N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations.

MAIN RESULTS

140 patients were recruited. Measured METs by CPET correlated with 1) self-reported METs by the MET-REPAIR Questionnaire (ρ = 0.489, "fair"), 2) self-reported physical activity by the DASI (ρ = 0.487, "fair"), 3) the self-reported continual stair climbing ability (one of the stand-alone questions; ρ = 0.587, "fair") and 4) NT-proBNP concentrations (ρ = -0.353, "poor"). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the ability to perform more than 4 METs were: highest for flights of stairs (0.841 [95%CI 0.735-0.948], p < 0.05 to rest, optimum: 3 flights), not significantly different between MET-REPAIR Questionnaire and DASI (0.666 [95%CI 0.551-0.781], optimum: 6 METs vs. 0.704 [95%CI 0.578-0.829], optimum: 32.2 points or 6.7 METs, p = 0.405), and not significant for NT-proBNP: (0.623 [95%CI 0.483-0.763]).

CONCLUSIONS

The MET-REPAIR Questionnaire correlates with measured METs; all utilized forms of self-reported physical activity overestimate measured METs. NT-proBNP correlates poorly with measured METs.

Prognostic value of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Complications are common after colorectal surgery and remain a target for quality improvement. Lower preoperative physical functioning is associated with poor postoperative outcomes, but assessment often relies on subjective judgment or resource-intensive tests. Recent literature suggests that self-reported functional capacity, measured using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), is a strong predictor of postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which DASI predicts 30-day complications after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

In this observational study, 100 patients undergoing colorectal resection [median age 63, 57% men, 81% laparoscopic, 37% rectal surgery] responded to DASI two weeks preoperatively. Complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo and quantified using the comprehensive complication index (CCI). Our primary analysis targeted the relationship between preoperative DASI and odds of complications. Secondary analyses focused on 30-day severe complications, CCI, readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We also explored the predictive ability of DASI with scores dichotomized based on a previously validated threshold (≤ 34).

RESULTS

Mean preoperative DASI was 48 ± 12. Forty-six patients (46%) experienced 30-day complications (8% severe, CCI 9.6 ± 15). Lower DASI scores were associated with higher odds of complications (OR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.14; p = 0.001). Preoperative DASI was also an independent predictor of severe complications, CCI, and readmissions. The predictive ability was supported when scores were dichotomized at ≤ 34.

CONCLUSION

DASI is a significant predictor of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery. This questionnaire can be easily implemented in clinical practice to identify patients with low preoperative functional capacity and target interventions to those at higher risk.

Usefulness of the Duke Activity Status Index to Select an Optimal Cardiovascular Exercise Stress Test Protocol

Exercise testing represents the preferred stress modality for individuals undergoing evaluation of suspected myocardial ischemia. Patients with limited functional status may be unable to achieve an adequate exercise stress, thus influencing the diagnostic sensitivity of the results. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a clinically applicable tool to estimate exercise capacity. The purpose of the current study was to assess the utility of the DASI to identify patients unable to achieve an adequate exercise stress result. Patients referred for exercise stress testing were administered the DASI pre-exercise. Baseline characteristics and exercise variables were evaluated including DASI-metabolic equivalents (DASI-METs), peak METs, exercise time (ET), and %-predicted maximal heart rate (%PMHR). Criteria for determining adequate exercise stress was defined as ≥85%PMHR or ≥ 5-METs at peak exercise. In 608 cardiovascular stress tests performed during the study period; 314 were exercise stress. The median DASI-METs (8.4 [interquartile range; 6.7 to 9.9]) was associated with estimated peak exercise METs (R=0.50, p <0.001), ET (R=0.29, p <0.001), and %PMHR (R=0.19, p = 0.003). DASI-METs were different between those with < or ≥85%PMHR (7.9 [6.6-9.0] vs. 8.9 [7.1-9.9], P=0.025) and those with < or ≥5-METs (5.8 [4.6 to 6.6] versus 8.9 [7.3-9.9], p <0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a DASI-MET threshold of ≤/>7.4 to optimally predict adequate exercise stress (sensitivity=93%, specificity=71%). In conclusion, the DASI correlates with peak METs, ET, and %PMHR among patients referred for exercise testing and can be used to identify patients with an increased likelihood of an inadequate stress test result.