1
|
Bogor S, Niknam K, Less J, Andaya V, Swarup I. Automating Patient-reported Data Collection: Does it Work? J Pediatr Orthop 2024; 44:402-406. [PMID: 38606646 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are several electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) vendors that are being used at institutions to automate data collection. However, there is little known about their success in collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and it is unknown which patients are more likely to complete these surveys. In this study, we assessed rates of PRO completion, as well as determined factors that contributed to the completion of baseline and follow-up surveys. METHODS We queried our ePRO platform to assess rates of completion for baseline and follow-up surveys for patients from October 2019 to June 2022. All baseline surveys were administered before pediatric orthopaedic procedures, and follow-up surveys were sent at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery to patients with baseline data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess differences in patients who did and did not complete surveys. RESULTS This study included 1313 patients during the study period. Baseline surveys were completed by 66% of the cohort (n = 873 patients). There was a significant difference in race/ethnicity and language spoken in the patients who did and did not complete baseline surveys ( P < 0.01) with lower rates of completion in African American, Hispanic, and Spanish-speaking patients. At least one follow-up was obtained for 68% of patients with baseline surveys (n = 597 patients). There were significant differences in completion rates based on race/ethnicity ( P = 0.03) and language spoken ( P = 0.01). There were lower rates of baseline completion for patients with government insurance in our multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 0.6, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Baseline and follow-up PRO data can be obtained from the majority of patients using automated ePRO platforms. However, additional focus is needed on collecting data from traditionally underrepresented patient groups to better understand outcomes in these patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayah Bogor
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kian Niknam
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Justin Less
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Veronica Andaya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ishaan Swarup
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim SW, Lim JY, Kim S, Do JG, Lee JI, Hwang JH. Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Among Patients With Frozen Shoulder. Am J Occup Ther 2024; 78:7804205060. [PMID: 38917031 DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patient-reported outcome measures provide insights into intervention effects on patients. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) emphasizes identifying priorities in daily activity engagement and evaluating an individual's perception of changes over time. OBJECTIVE To assess the responsiveness of the COPM and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) among patients with frozen shoulders. DESIGN Prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING Two physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-four patients with frozen shoulders enrolled in a previous study. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Baseline and 3-mo evaluations of the COPM and other measures. Responsiveness was assessed using effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM). The MCID values were determined through a distribution-based approach, which used the 0.5 standard deviation and ES methods, and an anchor-based approach, which used the receiver operating characteristic curve method. RESULTS The ES and SRM results indicated that the COPM had high responsiveness. The distribution-based MCID values for COPM Performance and COPM Satisfaction were 1.17 and 1.44, respectively. The anchor-based MCID values were 2.5 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.64-0.91]) and 2.1 (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI [0.60-0.91]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that the COPM is a responsive outcome measure for patients with frozen shoulder. The established MCID values for the COPM can be valuable for interpreting changes in patient performance and satisfaction, thus aiding clinical interventions and research planning. Plain-Language Summary: This is the first study to review the effectiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to determine the success of occupational therapy interventions for people with a frozen shoulder. The findings suggest that the COPM is an effective and valuable tool for clients with a frozen shoulder to understand their experiences and treatment priorities and to detect meaningful changes in their performance and satisfaction after an occupational therapy intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Woo Kim
- Sun Woo Kim, MS, OT, is Researcher, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Young Lim
- Ji Young Lim, PhD, PT, is Research Professor, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seonghee Kim
- Seonghee Kim, BS, OT, is Researcher, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Geol Do
- Jong Geol Do, PhD, MD, is Professor, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong In Lee
- Jong In Lee, PhD, MD, is Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hye Hwang
- Ji Hye Hwang, PhD, MD, is Professor, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center; School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mont MA, Lin JH, Spitzer AI, Dasa V, Rivadeneyra A, Rogenmoser D, Concoff AL, Ng MK, DiGiorgi M, DySart S, Urban J, Mihalko WM. Improved Pain and Function With Triamcinolone Acetonide Extended-Release and Cryoneurolysis for Knee Osteoarthritis: Use of a New Real-World Registry. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00654-5. [PMID: 38936436 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knee osteoarthritis (OA) affects 19% of American adults aged more than 45 years and costs $27+ billion annually. A wide range of nonoperative treatment options are available. This study compared 6 treatments: cryoneurolysis with deep genicular nerve block (Cryo-Deep/Both), cryoneurolysis with superficial nerve block (Cryo-Superficial), intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) injections, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections (IA-NSAIDs), IA-corticosteroids (IA-CS) injections, or IA-triamcinolone extended release (IA-TA-ER) injections over 4 months for: (1) pain severity and analgesic use; and (2) physical function (from Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement). METHODS Patients who had unilateral knee OA and received nonoperative intervention were enrolled in the Innovations in Genicular Outcomes Research registry, a novel, multicenter real-world registry, between September 2021 and February 2024. A total of 480 patients were enrolled. Both pain and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, weekly, and monthly, which were analyzed by overall trend, magnitude changes pretreatment to post-treatment, and distribution-based minimally clinically important difference (MCID) score. Multivariate linear regressions with adjustments for 7 confounding factors were used to compare follow-up outcomes among 6 treatment groups. RESULTS Use of IA-TA-ER injections was associated with the lowest pain, greatest pain reduction, and highest prevalence of patients achieving MCID relative to other treatments (P < .001). Deep/Both-Cryo and IA-CS were associated with a higher prevalence of achieving MCID than IA-HA, IA-NSAIDs, and Cryo-Superficial (P ≤ .001). Use of IA-TA-ER was also associated with the greatest functional score, improvement from baseline, and highest prevalence of patients achieving MCID than other treatments (P ≤ .003). CONCLUSIONS The IA-TA-ER appears to outperform other treatments in terms of pain relief and functional improvement for up to 4 months following treatment. In addition, outcomes in the novel cryoneurolysis and conventional IA-CS were similar to one another and better than those in IA-HA and IA-NSAIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vinod Dasa
- Louisiana State University Health Services Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - David Rogenmoser
- Mid State Orthopaedic & Sports Medicine Center, Alexandria, Louisiana
| | | | | | | | | | | | - William M Mihalko
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Campbell Clinic Orthopaedics, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rau A, Yannitsos D, Grendarova P, Qi S, Watson L, Barbera L. High Symptom Burden in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Factors Associated with Being Offered an Intervention. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1253-1265. [PMID: 38534927 PMCID: PMC10969673 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient report outcomes are commonly collected during oncology visits to elicit symptom burden and guide management. We aimed to determine the frequency of intervention for patients undergoing radiotherapy with high symptom complexity scores and identify which factors are associated with being offered an intervention. A retrospective chart audit was completed of adult patients with cancer who had at least one radiotherapy appointment and were assigned a high symptom complexity. A total of 200 patients were included; 150 (75.0%) patients were offered an intervention for the main symptom. The most offered intervention was medications. Multivariable logistic regression showed factors associated with being offered an intervention were the following: symptom score of 9 (OR = 9.56, 95% CI 1.64-62.8) and 10 (OR = 7.90, 95% CI 1.69-38.2); palliative intent radiation (OR 3.87, 96% CI 1.46-11.1); and last review appointment (OR 6.22, 95% CI 1.84-23.3). Symptoms associated with being offered an intervention included pain (OR 22.6, 95% CI 6.47-91.1), nausea (OR 15.7, 95% CI 1.51-412), shortness of breath (OR 7.97, 95% CI 1.20-63.7), and anxiety (OR 6.69, 95% CI 1.58-31.6). This knowledge will help guide clinical practice to understand symptom burden and how we can improve our management of patients' symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Rau
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (A.R.); (D.Y.); (P.G.); (L.W.)
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Demetra Yannitsos
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (A.R.); (D.Y.); (P.G.); (L.W.)
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Petra Grendarova
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (A.R.); (D.Y.); (P.G.); (L.W.)
| | - Siwei Qi
- Cancer Care Alberta, Calgary, AB T4N 4E7, Canada;
| | - Linda Watson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (A.R.); (D.Y.); (P.G.); (L.W.)
- Cancer Care Alberta, Calgary, AB T4N 4E7, Canada;
| | - Lisa Barbera
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; (A.R.); (D.Y.); (P.G.); (L.W.)
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gong AJ, Bolsegui ML, Lee EE, Mathai SC, Weiss CR. Assessing the Psychometric Validity of the Epistaxis Severity Score: Internal Consistency and Test-Retest Reliability. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2024; 38:38-46. [PMID: 37822162 DOI: 10.1177/19458924231207137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS) is the gold-standard patient-reported outcome measure for evaluating nosebleed severity in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). To date, the ESS has been assessed only for content validity and concurrent validity. OBJECTIVE We evaluate the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the ESS. MATERIALS AND METHODS After receiving institutional review board approval, we sent an online survey battery, including the ESS survey, to 305 (39% male) English-speaking HHT patients ≥18 years old at a single center. Of those, 140 (46%) patients completed the battery, and 110/140 (79%) reported epistaxis. Cronbach's alpha and correlation analyses were used to evaluate internal consistency. For the test-retest reliability evaluation, we recruited 69 HHT patients during HHT clinic to complete 2 self-administered ESS surveys 2 weeks apart. Participants also completed a modified Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale with readministration of the ESS survey. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient in a 2-way mixed model with absolute agreement. RESULTS The ESS survey demonstrated low internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.495), suggesting that it measured multiple unrelated concepts. Factor analysis revealed 3 latent factors with moderate intercorrelation, suggesting the presence of 3 related but distinct constructs underlying the ESS. However, the ESS demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.955; 95% CI, 0.91-0.98). CONCLUSION Although the ESS demonstrates high test-retest reliability, it may not adequately assess different dimensions of nosebleed severity. Additional correlated survey questions and sub-scores may be needed to increase internal consistency to accurately measure each component of epistaxis severity. It is necessary to acknowledge epistaxis severity from different dimensions and to consider evaluating individual ESS items separately for a comprehensive understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna J Gong
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | - Marisabel Linares Bolsegui
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Stephen C Mathai
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Clifford R Weiss
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sloesen B, Young A, Forde K, Hodson N, Bentley S, Walsh O, Naujoks C, O'Brien P, Sharma G. Development and content validity assessment of the Dry Eye Disease Questionnaire in patients with dry eye disease, meibomian gland dysfunction, and Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:64. [PMID: 37405617 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00608-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dry eye disease (DED), Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and Sjögren's syndrome dry eye disease (SS-DED) are eye dryness conditions that show significant overlap in various symptoms of ocular discomfort. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the patient experience and evaluate content validity of the newly developed Dry Eye Disease Questionnaire (DED-Q). METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 61 US adults who reported experiencing ocular symptoms due to their physician-confirmed primary diagnosis of DED (n = 21), MGD (n = 20), or SS-DED (n = 20). The open-ended concept-elicitation phase was followed by cognitive debriefing (CD) of the DED-Q to evaluate participants' understanding and relevance of the instructions, items, response options, and recall periods. Interviews were also conducted with eight specialist healthcare professionals to assess clinical relevance of the concepts included. Verbatim interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis in ATLAS.ti v8 software. RESULTS A total of 29 symptoms and 14 impacts on quality of life were reported across participant interviews. Primary ocular symptoms reported included eye dryness (n = 61/61; 100%), eye irritation (n = 55/61; 90%), eye itch (n = 54/61; 89%), burning sensation (n = 52/61; 85%), and foreign body sensation (n = 51/61; 84%). The most impacted aspects of daily life were using digital screens (n = 46/61; 75%), driving (n = 45/61; 74%), working (n = 39/61; 64%), and reading (n = 37/61; 61%). CD findings showed most participants had good understanding of DED-Q items and confirmed most concepts were relevant to the lived experience of their condition. Aside from few minor changes to the items and examples to facilitate more accurate interpretation, the proposed instruction wording was modified for various symptom and impact modules to encourage participants to focus only on dry eye vision problems. CONCLUSIONS This research identified multiple prevalent symptoms and impacts of DED, MGD, and SS-DED, most of which were similar across the conditions. The DED-Q was confirmed to be a content-valid PRO measure suitable for use in clinical studies to assess the patient experience of DED, MGD, and SS-DED. Future work will focus on evaluating the psychometric properties of the DED-Q for use as an efficacy endpoint in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alyson Young
- Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Cheshire, UK
| | - Katie Forde
- Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Cheshire, UK
| | - Nicola Hodson
- Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Cheshire, UK
| | - Sarah Bentley
- Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Cheshire, UK
| | | | | | | | - Garima Sharma
- Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ter Wal N, van Ewijk L, Visser-Meily JMA, Volkmer A, Gerrits E, Terwee CB. Further development in measuring communicative participation: identifying items to extend the applicability of the communicative participation item bank. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:49. [PMID: 37237158 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00586-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ability to communicate is a prerequisite for participation in today's society. To measure participation in adults with communication disorders, the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) was developed in 2006. Since then, several new PROMs have been developed to measure communication and the impact of communication disorders on participation. Moreover, the CPIB items do not all appear to be relevant to certain populations with communication problems and context of communicative participation is changing rapidly, given the increased use of digital communication forms. The purpose of this study was to identify new PROMs developed since 2006 that aim to measure (aspects of) communication, in order to select items that are suitable for expanding the Communicative Participation Item Bank to make the item bank more widely applicable (e.g., to the hearing-impaired population) and tailored to the current societal context. METHODS Medline and Embase were used to search for PROMs that aim to measure (aspects of) communication. Each new PROM as well as the CPIB, was evaluated to determine to what extent it contains items that measure communicative participation and to what extent these items capture all communicative participation domains by linking each item to the ICF Activities and Participation domains. RESULTS This study identified 31 new PROMs, containing 391 items that were labelled as measuring communicative participation. The majority of the 391 items measure aspects of ICF Activities and Participation domain 'communication', followed by the domain 'interpersonal interactions and relationships'. The other ICF Activity and Participation domains were less often addressed. Analysis of the CPIB showed that items do not cover all domains of participation as defined in the ICF, such as the 'major life areas' domain. CONCLUSIONS We found a potential pool of 391 items measuring communicative participation that could be considered for extending the CPIB. We found items in domains that are already present in the CPIB, but also items that relate to new domains, such as an item on talking with customers or clients for the 'major life areas' domain. Inclusion of new items in other domains would benefit the comprehensiveness of the item bank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ter Wal
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, P.O. box 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands.
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lizet van Ewijk
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, P.O. box 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, University Medical Centre Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Department of Language and Cognition, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ellen Gerrits
- Research Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, P.O. box 12011, Utrecht, 3501 AA, The Netherlands
- Department of Languages, Literature and Communication, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nascimento BFD, Lima MBDR, Dias Júnior JM, Antunes Filho J, Campos TVDO, Mendes Júnior AF. Calculation of the Minimal Important Clinical Difference of the Lysholm and IKDC Scores After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Rev Bras Ortop 2023; 58:79-84. [PMID: 36969791 PMCID: PMC10038720 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To calculate the minimal important clinical difference (MICD) value for the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores in a sample of patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods Primary, observational, retrospective, analytical study of participants submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from March 2019 to December 2020 by the same surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, analysis of knee function in the pre- and postoperative period by the Lysholm and IKDC scores, and answer to an anchor question at 6 months postoperatively for the calculation of the MICD of each score. Results A total of 59 patients participated in the study, with a mean age of 27.1 ± 5.7 years old. In the comparison between pre- and postoperative scores of all groups, there was an increase in values with statistical significance after intervention. The MICD was 5.5 for the Lysholm score, and the MICD value for the IKDC score could not be determined. Conclusion For the Lysholm score, the calculation of the MICD value by the anchor question method in the sample evaluated was 5.5. It was not possible to determine the value of the MICD for the IKDC score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Fajardo do Nascimento
- Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
| | - Mariana Bandeira da Rocha Lima
- Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
| | - Jair Moreira Dias Júnior
- Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
| | | | | | - Adriano Fernando Mendes Júnior
- Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jensen M, Sehner S, Cheng B, Schlemm E, Quandt F, Barow E, Wegscheider K, Boutitie F, Ebinger M, Endres M, Fiebach JB, Thijs V, Lemmens R, Muir KW, Nighoghossian N, Pedraza S, Simonsen CZ, Thomalla G, Gerloff C. Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Intravenous Alteplase for Stroke in the WAKE-UP Trial. Neurology 2023; 100:e154-e162. [PMID: 36302662 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Intravenous alteplase improves functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke. However, little is known about the effects on self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS WAKE-UP was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRI-guided intravenous alteplase in stroke with unknown onset time. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 90 days, comprising the EQ-5D index and the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). Functional outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We calculated the effect of treatment on EQ-5D index and EQ VAS using multiple linear regression models. Mediation analysis was performed on stroke survivors to explore the extent to which the effect of alteplase on HRQoL was mediated by functional outcome. RESULTS Among 490 stroke survivors, the EQ-5D index was available for 452 (92.2%), of whom 226 (50%) were assigned to treatment with alteplase and 226 (50%) to placebo. At 90 days, mean EQ-5D index was higher, reflecting a better health state, in patients randomized to treatment with alteplase than with placebo (0.75 vs 0.67) with an adjusted mean difference of 0.07 (95% CI 0.02-0.12, p = 0.005). In addition, mean EQ VAS was higher with alteplase than with placebo (72.6 vs 64.9), with an adjusted mean difference of 7.6 (95% CI 3.9-11.8, p < 0.001). Eighty-five percent of the total treatment effect of alteplase on the EQ-5D index was mediated using the mRS score while there was no significant direct effect. By contrast, the treatment effect on the EQ VAS was mainly through the direct pathway (60%), whereas 40% was mediated by the mRS. DISCUSSION Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures reveals a potential benefit of intravenous alteplase for HRQoL beyond improvement of functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01525290; EudraCT number, 2011-005906-32.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Märit Jensen
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Susanne Sehner
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Bastian Cheng
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Eckhard Schlemm
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Fanny Quandt
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ewgenia Barow
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Karl Wegscheider
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Florent Boutitie
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Martin Ebinger
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Matthias Endres
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jochen B Fiebach
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Vincent Thijs
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Robin Lemmens
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Keith W Muir
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Norbert Nighoghossian
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Salvador Pedraza
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Claus Z Simonsen
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Götz Thomalla
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christian Gerloff
- From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie (M.J., B.C., E.S., F.Q., E.B., G.T., C.G.), Kopf- und Neurozentrum, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf; Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Epidemiologie (S.S., K.W.), Zentrum für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Hospices Civils de Lyon (F.B.), Service de Biostatistique; Université Lyon 1 (F.B.), Villeurbanne; and CNRS (F.B.), UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Villeurbanne, France; Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin (CSB) (M. Ebinger, M. Endres, J.F.) and Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie (M. Endres), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Neurologie (M. Ebinger), Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle; German Center for Neurodegenerative Disease (DZNE) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) (M. Endres), Partner Site Berlin; Excellence Cluster NeuroCure (M. Endres), Berlin, Germany; Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (V.T.), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria Department of Neurology (V.T.), Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurology (R.L.), University Hospitals Leuven; Department of Neurosciences (R.L.), KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Experimental Neurology; VIB (R.L.), Center for Brain & Disease Research, Laboratory of Neurobiology, Leuven, Belgium; School of Psychology & Neuroscience (K.M.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Stroke Medicine (N.N.), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CREATIS CNRS UMR 5220-INSERM U1206, INSA; Hospices Civils de Lyon (N.N.), France; Department of Radiology (S.P.), Institut de Diagnostic per la Image (IDI), Hospital Dr Josep Trueta, Institut dInvestigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; and Department of Neurology (C.Z.S.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Choi M, Park CG, Hong S. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of PROMIS self-efficacy for managing symptoms item bank: Item response theory. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2022; 16:S1976-1317(22)00047-0. [PMID: 36055632 DOI: 10.1016/j.anr.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) self-efficacy for managing symptoms of the version 1.0 item bank in Korean. METHODS This study consisted of two phases: first, developing the Korean version of the item bank following the translation guidelines; and second, performing a cross-sectional study to evaluate its psychometric properties using the item response theory. This study enrolled 323 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus between July and August 2020. Cronbach's α was used to assess the reliability of this item bank. Confirmatory factor analysis, using diagonally weighted least squares, was used to identify the assumptions of item response theory. Item parameter estimates including discrimination and thresholds were derived using the graded response model of the item response theory to reflect patient-reported outcomes as individualized responses. RESULTS The Korean version of the item bank demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α =.98) and its discrimination ranged from 1.82 to 4.93. The thresholds resulted in the establishment of a category response curve for each item. However, no overlap was observed among the category curves. Moreover, the differential item functioning was not significant for age, gender, and income variables. CONCLUSION The graded response model and differential item functioning provided qualitative evidence that demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties of symptom management self-efficacy among patients. This item bank is expected to provide adequate assessments of self-efficacy of symptom management for patients with a chronic disease, which can contribute to nursing research and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Choi
- Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Korea
| | - Chang Gi Park
- Research Assistant Professor College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago
| | - Soomin Hong
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, College of Nursing and and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cano D, Montiel E, Baladas M, Sanchez-Gavilan E, Paredes C, Rubiera M, Requena M, Muchada M, Olive Gadea M, Garcia-Tornel A, Molina CA, Ribo M. Patient-reported outcome measures after thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke: fine-tuning the modified Rankin Scale. J Neurointerv Surg 2022:neurintsurg-2022-018840. [PMID: 35508380 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT), long-term outcome is usually only evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) are standardized assessments that consider clinical outcomes from the perspective of the patient. We aimed to evaluate PROMs through a smartphone-based communication platform in patients with stroke who received EVT. METHODS Consecutive patients with stroke who underwent EVT were offered to participate in the PROMs-through-App program (NORA). A set of standardized PROMs were collected at 7, 30 and 90 days after discharge. Disability was determined by clinicians (mRS) at 90 days. To characterize the potential ceiling effect of mRS in the assessment of different domains, the rate of abnormal PROMs among patients with excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) was calculated. RESULTS From June 2020 to October 2021, 186 patients were included. The median PROMs collection rate per patient was 80% (50-100%). A correlation was consistently seen between disability measured by mRS and the different PROMs. The rate of abnormal PROMs ranged from 20.83% (HADS at 7 days) to 59.61% (Mental PROMIS at 7 days). At 90 days, among patients with an excellent outcome, the rate of abnormal PROMs ranged from 8.7% (HADS) to 47.83% (Physical PROMIS). CONCLUSIONS A specifically designed digital platform allows a high collection rate of PROMs among stroke patients who underwent EVT. The mRS score shows a ceiling effect and seems insufficient to fine-tune long-term clinical results. The use of PROMs may allow a better characterization of long-term outcome profiles after EVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cano
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Estefanía Montiel
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Baladas
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Sanchez-Gavilan
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolina Paredes
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Rubiera
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manuel Requena
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marian Muchada
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Olive Gadea
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alvaro Garcia-Tornel
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos A Molina
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marc Ribo
- Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Matts ST, Webber CM, Bocell FD, Caldwell B, Chen AL, Tarver ME. Inclusion of patient-reported outcome instruments in US FDA medical device marketing authorizations. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:38. [PMID: 35441987 PMCID: PMC9021347 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00444-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The U.S. Food and Drug Administration encourages the incorporation of the patient voice throughout the medical device total product lifecycle. This study examined the incorporation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in the evaluation of medical devices over a six-year period. PRO instruments used to inform study endpoints were extracted from the summary documents and clinical trial data of premarket authorizations posted on publicly available FDA databases between October 1, 2014—September 30, 2020. Results PROs were included in 53% of authorizations, with 34% using PROs as primary and secondary endpoints. This study found that PRO instruments were used in each type of marketing authorization and in all medical specialties examined in this study. Conclusions Expanding the current collaborative efforts to develop and modify PRO instruments may help to improve use of PROs in medical device evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia T Matts
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participation Program, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Christina M Webber
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - Fraser D Bocell
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - Brittany Caldwell
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - Allen L Chen
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA
| | - Michelle E Tarver
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ramazani F, Hamour A, Jeffery CC, Biron V, Alrajhi Y, O'Connell D, Côté DWJ. Development of a patient reported outcome instrument for chronic sialadenitis. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 51:4. [PMID: 35120574 PMCID: PMC8815140 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-022-00555-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sialendoscopy assisted treatments are a minimally invasive management modality for chronic sialadenitis. Clinicians report improved patient quality of life (QoL) following sialendoscopy assisted treatments, but there exist gaps in current literature about patient reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are outcome measures developed based on patient perceptions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to create a PRO instrument for chronic sialadenitis, to assess the efficacy of sialendoscopy assisted treatments in improve patients' QoL. DESIGN This four-phase qualitative study employed grounded theory methodology and a modified Delphi technique. In Phase I, ten patients were interviewed to identify the QoL domains impacted by chronic sialadenitis. In Phase II, these QoL domains were presented to a focus group of different chronic sialadenitis patients, who were asked to rank them by order of importance. A conceptual framework of QoL domains impacted by chronic sialadenitis was created based on patient consensus. Itemization of the PRO questionnaire was done by a focus group of four Otolaryngologists in phase III. Lastly, the questionnaire was completed in Phase IV by cognitive interviewing of five new chronic sialadenitis patients; ensuring ease of understanding and clarity. RESULTS Patients identified 15 domains of QoL impacted by chronic sialadenitis, divided into three sub-scales: physical symptoms, psychosocial symptoms, and activity restriction. These domains provided the basis for creation of a 22-item PRO questionnaire, with a Likert-type response scale. CONCLUSION Clinical application of the novel questionnaire produced by this study will allow for a patient-centered assessment of the patient reported effectiveness of sialendoscopy assisted therapies for management of chronic sialadenitis. Level of evidence Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Ramazani
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Amr Hamour
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Caroline C Jeffery
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Vincent Biron
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Yaser Alrajhi
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Daniel O'Connell
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - David W J Côté
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1E4 Walter C. MacKenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Chen G, Dalziel K, Devlin N, Ratcliffe J. International guidelines for self-report and proxy completion of paediatric health-related quality of life measures: a protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052049. [PMID: 34880018 PMCID: PMC8655531 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), accompanied by the values (or utilities) required to estimate quality-adjusted life-years, are crucial for determining health benefits within economic evaluation and health technology assessment. Several generic and condition-specific measures or instruments of HRQoL, accompanied by values, currently exist for application with child populations. However, there is a lack of a structured summary of guidelines and recommendations for applying these measures in practice. This protocol describes a systematic review of guidelines and recommendations for child and proxy completion of child-specific measures of HRQoL. The aims of the review are to (1) identify and summarise published guidelines and recommendations for existing child-specific measures of HRQoL, (2) determine whether the identified guidelines and recommendations differ by instrument and child characteristics, (3) identify current gaps in these guidelines and recommendations and (4) identify best practices for child self and proxy assessment in paediatric HRQoL measurement for economic evaluation and health technology assessment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The review will identify, collate and synthesise published guidelines and recommendations for existing child-specific utility measures of HRQoL. Electronic databases to be searched include the Cochrane Library, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EconLit, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase and Informit. The search will be extended to websites of (1) international organisations for health technology assessment, (2) regulation, health economics and HRQoL outcomes research and (3) instrument developers. Three reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis will describe the key features of the guidelines identified. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required as the proposed systematic review will not use primary data. A paper of the systematic review will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020207160.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, The University of Melbourne School of Population Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Health Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Health Economics Unit, The University of Melbourne School of Population Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marupuru S, Dahlmann-Noor A, Crescioni M, Slack M, Barnard S, Amerat I, Loveday A, Chauhan D, Adler P, Walker R, Warholak TL. Validity and Reliability of the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire-Revised Version in Myopic Children. Optom Vis Sci 2021; 98:1287-1294. [PMID: 34510152 DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000001804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Multiple vision-related quality of life (VRQol) instruments exist, but questionnaires designed specifically for myopic children that are appropriate for assessing the impact of refractive error are rare. PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire - Revised (SREEQ-R) in school-aged children with myopia in the United Kingdom. METHODS Community optometrists in the United Kingdom invited children up to the age of 18 years presenting for an eye examination with current or previous reported use of eyeglasses for myopia to complete the SREEQ-R, which consists of 20 specific items divided into two sections each with three response categories. The "without glasses" section relates to perceptions of uncorrected vision/not wearing glasses, and the "with glasses" relates to corrected vision/wearing glasses. Rasch analysis was used to explore the psychometric performance (content, construct validity, and reliability) of the questionnaire items and scale using Winsteps software (Winsteps.com. Portland, OR). RESULTS A total of 125 eligible children with a mean ± standard deviation age of 12.7 ± 2.9 years completed the SREEQ-R. All items fit the Rasch model and were retained, and the scale was found to be unidimensional. All children and item infit and outfit mean square statistics fell within the recommended fit criteria. As per the Rasch analysis, the person reliability coefficients were 0.84 and 0.91, whereas item reliabilities were 0.99 and 0.80 for the without glasses and with glasses sections, respectively. The internal consistency for the SREEQ-R was good; Cronbach α values were 0.84 for without glasses and 0.91 for with glasses. CONCLUSIONS The SREEQ-R had satisfactory validity and reliability evidence. Construct validity of the scale was supported to measure the impact of uncorrected and corrected refractive error on vision-related quality of life in myopic school-aged children in the United Kingdom. The SREEQ-R could be used in future studies to evaluate vision-related quality of life in children with myopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
- National Institute for Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mabel Crescioni
- Public Health Community, Environment and Policy Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Marion Slack
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Simon Barnard
- Department of Optometry and Visual Science, School of Health Sciences, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Adam Loveday
- Private Practice, Biggleswade, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - Paul Adler
- Private Practice, Stotfold, Hitchin, United Kingdom
| | | | - Terri L Warholak
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pevernagie D, Bauters FA, Hertegonne K. The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sleep Measurements. Sleep Med Clin 2021; 16:595-606. [PMID: 34711384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Several questionnaires aka patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed for specific use in sleep medicine. Some PROMS are "disease-specific," that is, related to a specific sleep disorder, whereas others are generic. These PROMS constitute a valuable add-on to the conventional history taking. They can be used in the areas of research, clinical practice, and quality of health care appraisal. Still, these instruments have inherent limitations, requiring proficient application in the various areas of interest. Disease-specificity includes a risk for nosologic bias that may confound diagnostic and therapeutic results. Future research should provide solutions for shortcomings of presently available questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Pevernagie
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium.
| | - Fré A Bauters
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium
| | - Katrien Hertegonne
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium; Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Gent 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nochaiwong S, Chuamanochan M, Ruengorn C, Awiphan R, Tovanabutra N, Chiewchanvit S, Hutton B, Thavorn K. Impact of Pharmacological Treatments for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with an Inadequate Response to H1-Antihistamines on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 10:297-308. [PMID: 34695599 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, pharmacological treatment options for H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria have increased dramatically; however, their effects on patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare the impact of these treatments on HRQOL among H1-antihistamine-refractory patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. METHODS We completed a comprehensive search of the available literature in the electronic databases, gray literature, and preprint reports up to April 19, 2021, with no language restrictions. The primary outcome for evaluation was a change in HRQOL from the baseline, and secondary outcomes included patient unacceptability and other patient-reported outcomes. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis and estimated differences in standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios with 95% CIs. Evidence-based synthesis was based on magnitudes of effect size, evidence certainty, ranking of treatment effects, and clinically meaningful improvement. RESULTS Twelve randomized controlled trials encompassing 1866 adolescent and adult patients were included. Our evidence synthesis analyses revealed that hydroxychloroquine (SMD, -1.00 [-1.61 to -0.39]), 72 mg ligelizumab (SMD, -0.66 [-0.96 to -0.35]), 240 mg ligelizumab (SMD, -0.67 [-0.98 to -0.37]), and 300 mg omalizumab (SMD, -0.53 [-0.67 to -0.39]) significantly improved HRQOL with a moderate beneficial effect. However, the use of hydroxychloroquine seems to be limited by a higher risk of patient unacceptability of treatment. Other secondary outcomes remain inconclusive based on the available evidence. CONCLUSIONS Both ligelizumab (72 or 240 mg) and 300 mg omalizumab appeared to be effective treatments for H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria, because they were closely associated with improved HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surapon Nochaiwong
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Mati Chuamanochan
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Chidchanok Ruengorn
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Ratanaporn Awiphan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Napatra Tovanabutra
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Siri Chiewchanvit
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Brian Hutton
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, ICES uOttawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kednapa Thavorn
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institute of Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, ICES uOttawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hasselgren A, Kralevska K, Gligoroski D, Faxvaag A. Medical Students' Perceptions of a Blockchain-Based Decentralized Work History and Credentials Portfolio: Qualitative Feasibility Study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e33113. [PMID: 34677137 PMCID: PMC8571681 DOI: 10.2196/33113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increased digitization of health care might challenge some of the trust functions that are established in a traditional health care system. We have, with the concept of VerifyMed, developed a decentralized service for work history and competence verification, as a means to increase trust in the virtual interaction between a patient and a caregiver, mitigate administrative burden, and provide patient-reported outcomes seamlessly for health professionals. Objective This research aimed to validate the use case of a decentralized credentials service for health care professionals in Norway. We also aimed to evaluate the proof-of-concept of VerifyMed, a blockchain-based credential service for health care professionals. Methods A qualitative approach was applied with data collection through 9 semistructured interviews and 2 focus groups (one with 4 participants and the other with 5 participants). The System Usability Scale (SUS) was used as a part of the interviews. Data were analyzed through the principles of systematic text condensation. The recruitment of participants ended when it was concluded that the data had reached saturation. Results The following 5 themes were identified from the interviews and focus groups: (1) the need for aggregated storage of work- and study-related verification, (2) trust in a virtual health care environment, (3) the potential use of patient feedback, (4) trust in blockchain technology, and (5) improvements of the VerifyMed concept. The SUS questionnaire gave a score of 69.7. Conclusions This study has validated the need for a decentralized system where health care professionals can control their credentials and, potentially, their reputation. Future work should update the VerifyMed system according to this input. We concluded that a decentralized system for the storage of work-related verifiable credentials could increase trust in a virtualized health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Hasselgren
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Katina Kralevska
- Department of Information Security and Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Danilo Gligoroski
- Department of Information Security and Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Arild Faxvaag
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guruparan Y, Navaratinaraja TS, Selvaratnam G, Gunawardena N, Sri Ranganathan S. Development and validation of a set of patient reported outcome measures to assess effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis. BMC Pulm Med 2021; 21:295. [PMID: 34535111 PMCID: PMC8449463 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01665-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the local setting, asthma control is assessed by symptoms and signs elicited by clinicians because of the limited availability of spirometry. Hence, we intended to develop a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) with more holistic interpretation that could also serve as a tool to measure the asthma control in resource limited settings. Therefore, this study was carried out in Northern Sri Lanka to develop and validate the Asthma Control PROM (AC-PROM) Tamil to measure the effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis based on symptoms, exacerbation and limitation of activity which could also serve as an easy measure of asthma control to the provider. METHODS The AC-PROM Tamil was developed in 3 steps: item generation, item reduction and psychometric evaluation. Items were generated through thematic analysis from focus group discussions among patients with asthma. Items were converted to an interviewer administered questionnaire in Tamil in the format of 5-point Likert scale. Item reduction was done by two rounds of online Delphi surveys among 10 experts and an exploratory factor analysis among 200 patients with asthma. The face and content validity were assessed by a panel of experts during Delphi survey and patients during the pre-test of the tool. Criterion validity of the tool was assessed against the forced expiratory volume in one second of 187 patients with asthma. The cut-off value to assess the asthma control was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve. Reliability was verified by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS From thematic analysis of focus group discussions 10 items were generated. One item was removed during Delphi survey. Exploratory factor analysis indicated removal of another item with 8 items categorised into two factors. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of factors 1 and 2 were 0.821 and 0.903 respectively, indicating good reliability. Observations made by experts and responses made by patients were incorporated to improve the clarity and relevance of the items. Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant correlation between the AC-PROM Tamil and forced expiratory volume in one second (r = 0.66, p = 0.001). The cut-off value of the AC-PROM Tamil to detect asthma control was 28.5 with 79% (95% CI 71.3-86.9) sensitivity and 71% (95% CI 61.9-79.6) specificity. The AC-PROM Tamil showed moderate accuracy (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.796; 95% CI 0.73-0.86). Response rate of the AC-PROM Tamil was 100% and time taken to complete was 3-4 min. CONCLUSION The AC-PROM Tamil is a simple, feasible and reasonably accurate tool to assesses the effectiveness of asthma prophylaxis, particularly in resource limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yalini Guruparan
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka.
| | | | - Gowry Selvaratnam
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Philipp R, Lebherz L, Thomalla G, Härter M, Appelbohm H, Frese M, Kriston L. Psychometric properties of a patient-reported outcome set in acute stroke patients. Brain Behav 2021; 11:e2249. [PMID: 34124861 PMCID: PMC8413767 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Impairments after stroke may affect multiple domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have proven valuable in measuring patients' well-being. We examine the psychometric properties of a standard set of PROMs assessing global health, anxiety, and depression, and functioning in a German health care setting. METHOD We included inpatients at the Department of Neurology at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, diagnosed with stroke. Following the stroke-specific standard set of the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement, we collected demographic and clinical information at baseline, and PROMs for global health (PROMIS-10), three items for self-reported functioning, anxiety, and depression (PHQ-4) at 90 days follow-up. We calculated confirmatory factor analyses to test factorial validity and correlation analyses to test construct validity. We further conducted item and reliability analyses. RESULTS In a sample of 487 patients (mean age, SD: 71.1, 12.6; 47% female) with mild and moderate symptoms, model fit for the PROMIS-10 was acceptable for the two-factor and single-factor models. Factor loadings ranged from 0.52 to 0.94. The postulated single-factor model for functioning was saturated with zero degrees of freedom. Factor loadings ranged from 0.90 to 0.96. For the PHQ-4, the two-factor model showed excellent model fit. Factor loadings ranged from 0.78 to 0.87. Internal consistency was acceptable to good. Construct validity was generally confirmed. CONCLUSIONS The PROMIS-10 is a valid and reliable instrument to measure HRQoL among German stroke patients. While the PHQ-4 was confirmed as a screening measure for mental disorders, further research is needed on items assessing self-reported functioning. Results are limited to patients showing minimal functional deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Philipp
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Lebherz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Götz Thomalla
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hannes Appelbohm
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Frese
- Office for Quality Management and Clinical Process Management, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Levente Kriston
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Beckmann EA, Jastrowski Mano KE. Advancing the Measurement of Executive Functioning in Pediatric Chronic Pain. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:630. [PMID: 34438521 PMCID: PMC8393994 DOI: 10.3390/children8080630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Youth with chronic pain often report executive functioning difficulties, many of which have been linked to poor treatment adherence and health-related quality of life in adults with chronic pain, as well as in other pediatric chronic health populations. Despite the extensive implications for functional impairment, executive functioning remains understudied in pediatric chronic pain. Measurement approaches have lacked clear theoretical guidance, resulting in only some domains of executive functioning being investigated. To date, the methods used to measure executive functioning have been inconsistent, ranging from self-report measures of everyday executive functioning in home and school contexts to standardized neuropsychological tests. We argue for enhanced measure validation efforts and increased clarity in the approaches chosen to measure executive functioning in pediatric chronic pain to better guide research efforts in this area, thus yielding clearer clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A. Beckmann
- Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rush AJ, South C, Jain S, Agha R, Zhang M, Shrestha S, Khan Z, Hassan M, Trivedi MH. Clinically Significant Changes in the 17- and 6-Item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A STAR*D Report. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2021; 17:2333-2345. [PMID: 34295161 PMCID: PMC8290193 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s305331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop clinically meaningful improvement thresholds in both the 17-item and the 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) total scores in depressed outpatients. METHODS The post-hoc analysis included all adult outpatients with non-psychotic major depressive disorder in the STAR*D trial who entered and exited the first treatment step (up to 14 weeks of citalopram) with a complete set of study measures at baseline and exit and at least one post-baseline measure. Within-patient change and linear regression anchor-based analyses were conducted to define meaningful and substantial changes in the HRSD17 and HRSD6 using three patient-reported outcomes [Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF); Mini-Q-LES-Q] obtained at baseline and exit from the first treatment step in STAR*D. RESULTS Linear regression analyses identified a meaningful change threshold for the HRSD17 as 3.9 [3.7-4.1] [lower, upper 95% CI] and a substantial change as 7.8 [7.4-8.3] with the WSAS. Analogous thresholds based on the Q-LES-Q-SF were 5.8 [5.5-6.1] and 11.6 [11.0-12.2], respectively, and 4.9 [4.7-5.2] and 9.9 [9.3-10.4] for the Mini-QLES-Q, respectively. For the HRSD6, linear regression analyses with the WSAS identified a meaningful change as 2.2 [2.1-2.4], while a substantial change was 4.5 [4.2-4.7]. Analogous figures based on the Q-LES-Q-SF were 3.2 [3.0-3.4] and 6.4 [6.1-6.8]. Similarly, based on the Mini-QLESQ, results were 2.8 [2.6-2.9] and 5.6 [5.3-5.9]. For both the HRSD17 and the HRSD6, within-patient analyses produced less precise estimates of the same change thresholds with substantial overlap between groups. Based on the WSAS, a clinically meaningful change in the HRSD17 total score was 9.6 (SD = 6.5), while a substantial change was 15.0 (SD = 6.7). Analogous change thresholds based on the Q-LESQ-SF were 12.9 (SD = 6.2) and 16.8 (SD = 6.4), respectively. For the Mini-Q-LES-Q, thresholds were 10.9 (SD = 6.5) and 16.1 (SD = 6.2). CONCLUSION A 4-6 point change in the HRSD17 is clinically meaningful; a 7-12 point change is clinically substantial. For the HRSD6, analogous estimates were 2-3 and 4-7 point changes, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augustus John Rush
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Professor Emeritus, Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Charles South
- Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shailesh Jain
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
| | - Raafae Agha
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
| | - Mingxu Zhang
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
| | - Shristi Shrestha
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
| | - Zershana Khan
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
| | - Mudasar Hassan
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Midland, TX, USA
| | - Madhukar H Trivedi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sisodia RC, Rodriguez JA, Sequist TD. Digital Disparities: Lessons learned from a Patient Reported Outcomes Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2265-2268. [PMID: 34244760 PMCID: PMC8344913 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The collection of patient reported outcomes (PROs) allows us to incorporate the patient's voice within their care in a quantifiable, validated manner. Large scale collection of PROs is facilitated by the electronic health record (EHR) and its portal, though historically patients have eschewed the portal and completed patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in clinic via tablet. Furthermore, access to and use of the portal is associated with known racial inequities. Our institution oversees the largest clinical PRO program in the world, and has a long history of racially equitable PRO completion rates via tablet. However, when the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to remove tablets from clinics and rely exclusively on portal use for PRO completion, profound racial disparities resulted immediately. Our experience quantifiably demonstrates the magnitude of inequity that the portal, in its current configuration, generates and serves as a cautionary tale to other health care systems and EHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Sisodia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Boston MA, 02114.,Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, MA, 02145
| | | | - Thomas D Sequist
- Mass General Brigham, 399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, MA, 02145.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Stormoen DR, Baeksted C, Taarnhøj GA, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient reported outcomes interfering with daily activities in prostate cancer patients receiving antineoplastic treatment. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:419-425. [PMID: 33641578 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1881818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) can give information to caregivers and doctors about adverse effects and give real-world data on symptom burden for patients during treatment. We here report PROs from patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving oncological treatment. Our findings are compared with adverse events from published findings in relevant registration studies and we discuss possible applications by looking at the level of interference with usual or daily activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS An electronic PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (ePRO-CTCAE) questionnaire, with 41 items corresponding to 22 symptoms/adverse events associated with the treatment regimens commonly used for mCRPC, were collected from 54 patients with mCRPC receiving medical oncological treatment. Eleven symptoms attributing interference with usual or daily living were selected and stratified by antineoplastic treatment administered. The responses were pooled and compared with data from relevant registration studies for docetaxel, cabazitaxel, radium-223 and abiraterone. RESULTS 168 questionnaires were completed, and among responses from patients receiving docetaxel, 89% of responses shows that fatigue interfered with their usual or daily activities to some degree and 22% to a high or very high degree. In the registration study for docetaxel fatigue is reported with 53% for all grades and 5% for grade 3 or above. For cabazitaxel, radium-223 and abiraterone the percentage of responses with interference of daily activities from fatigue range from 58% to 82%. Between four and six of the eleven chosen PRO-CTCAE symptoms are not reported in the registration studies as common side effects. CONCLUSION PRO may help inform caregivers about symptoms not previously reported, interfering with usual or daily activities but also point to the use of this information to inform new patients. This may help clinicians and patients decide a treatment plan with an acceptable benefit-to-harm ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dag Rune Stormoen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Gry Assam Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ionov MV, Zhukova OV, Zvartau NE, Konradi AO. [Blood pressure telemonitoring and remote counseling in uncontrolled hypertension]. TERAPEVT ARKH 2021; 93:30-40. [PMID: 33720623 DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2021.01.200590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Telehealth is a useful adjunct in hypertension (HTN) management. Despite obvious short-term clinical benefit, long-term social impact and cost-effectiveness have not been fully investigated. AIM Predictive modeling of long-term clinical and social outcomes and the cost-effectiveness analysis of blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring and remote counseling (BPTM) in patients with HTN. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Markov cohort-based (1000 patients in each study arm) model was developed and adopted a 10-year time horizon with 12-month time cycles. Cost and outcome data collected from the three-month study of 240 patients (160 in BPTM group and 80 controls, 48 y.o.). All patients started at a non-complicated HTN well state with a certain possibility of disease progression in a number of health states over a discrete time period. BPTM was compared with usual care in terms of 10-year healthcare costs, quality adjusted life years (QALY) using a Ministry of Health of Russian Federation perspective. RESULTS In the long-term run when compared with usual care BPTM was more effective in terms mortality (67 versus 91 patients lost and 9.6 versus 9.71 life years gained) and costs (cost of illness 102 508 000 RUR versus 145 237 700 RUR). Taking quality of life measures into account, the effect of BPTM was also more pronounced (8.31 versus 7.82 QALYs gained). The resultant incremental cost-utility ratio for BPTM was 275 178.98 RUR/1 QALY gained/1 patient (134 837.70 RUR/0.49 QALY/1 patient). CONCLUSION According to the results of predictive modeling, implementation of BPTM into clinical practice is likely lead to reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a cost-effective way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M V Ionov
- Almazov National Medical Research Centre.,National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
| | | | - N E Zvartau
- Almazov National Medical Research Centre.,National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
| | - A O Konradi
- Almazov National Medical Research Centre.,National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sutherland JM, Albanese CM, Crump T, Liu G, Karimuddin A. The minimally important difference of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index for symptomatic gallstone surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:6938-6948. [PMID: 33398564 PMCID: PMC8599231 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08205-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GQLI) is used to measure domains of health and symptoms among people with gastrointestinal disorders. The objective of this study is to calculate the smallest change in the GQLI that is perceived by patients as meaningful among a sample of English-speaking adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study is based on retrospective analyses of a sample of participants completing the GQLI and the EQ-5D(3L) preoperatively and six months postoperatively in Vancouver, Canada. Patients are excluded if they are less than 19 years of age, cannot communicate in English, or reside in a long-term care facility. The MID is calculated for the GQLI's domains using distribution and anchor-based methods. RESULTS Among eligible patients, the participation rate was 51%. The estimated MID for the overall GQLI value ranged between 4.32 and 11.44. There were no statistically significant differences in the GQLI's MID values between sexes or age subgroups. There were statistically significant differences in the GQLI's MID values by baseline health status. DISCUSSION This study should provide some comfort that the MID values used in discussing change in health and symptoms with elective cholecystectomy patients are robust to sex. Although the sample size may have been inadequate for age-based analyses, the study found large differences in MID values between age subgroups. Statistically significant differences in MID values based on preoperative health supports reporting MID values separately by baseline value. Further research should explore whether age-based differences in MID values exist using larger samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 201-2206 East Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Carmela Melina Albanese
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 201-2206 East Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Trafford Crump
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Guiping Liu
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 201-2206 East Mall, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ahmer Karimuddin
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rabiee A, Ximenes RO, Nikayin S, Hickner A, Juthani P, Rosen RH, Garcia-Tsao G. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review. Liver Int 2021; 41:6-15. [PMID: 32998172 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cirrhosis have a poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recognizing factors that affect HRQoL is key in delivering patient-centred care. AIM To identify factors most commonly associated with a poor HRQoL in adults with cirrhosis in a systematic review of the literature. METHODS Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PsycINFO) were searched from inception to March 2020, using terms related to patient-reported outcomes plus cirrhosis. Studies that analysed an association between at least one factor and HRQoL in adult patients with cirrhosis were included. Abstract and full-text screening was performed by two reviewers. Data were collected on factors evaluated in each study and the significance of their association with HRQoL. RESULTS A total of 10647 citations were reviewed, of which 109 met eligibility criteria. 76% of the studies used a generic instrument while only 45% used liver-specific instruments. Among identified factors, demographic factors and cirrhosis aetiology were not generally associated with poor HRQoL except for poor social support. Depression, poor sleep and muscle cramps affected HRQoL in all the studies that evaluated them. Among comorbidities, frailty, falls, malnutrition and cognitive impairment were also associated with poor HRQoL in the majority of studies. Among cirrhosis-specific decompensating events, only hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was consistently associated with impairment in HRQoL (75% of studies). CONCLUSION Many factors impact poor HRQoL in patients with cirrhosis such as depression, muscle cramps, poor sleep, falls, frailty and malnutrition. Among cirrhosis decompensating events, HE was the complication most commonly associated with a poor HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Rabiee
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rafael O Ximenes
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sina Nikayin
- Department of Psychiatry, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Andy Hickner
- Interprofessional Health Sciences Library, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine and VA-CT Healthcare System, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Singh SA, Bakshi N, Mahajan P, Morris CR. What is the future of patient-reported outcomes in sickle-cell disease? Expert Rev Hematol 2020; 13:1165-1173. [PMID: 33034214 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1830370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a complex, chronic disease caused by abnormal polymerization of hemoglobin, which leads to severe pain episodes, fatigue, and end-organ damage. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a critical tool for measuring SCD disease severity and response to treatment. AREAS COVERED Authors review the key issues involved when deciding to use a PRO in a clinical trial. We describe the most highly recommended generic and disease-specific PRO tools in SCD and discuss the challenges of incorporating them in clinical practice. EXPERT OPINION PRO measures are essential to incorporate into SCD clinical trials either as primary or secondary outcomes. The use of PRO measures in SCD facilitates a patient-centered approach, which is likely to lead to improved outcomes. Significant challenges remain in adapting PRO tools to routine clinical use and in developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon A Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nitya Bakshi
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta , Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Prashant Mahajan
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Claudia R Morris
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta , Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine , Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Muñoz-Leyva F, El-Boghdadly K, Chan V. Is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in acute pain a good measure of analgesic efficacy in regional anesthesia? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:1000-1005. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Revised: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In the field of acute pain medicine research, we believe there is an unmet need to incorporate patient related outcome measures that move beyond reporting pain scores and opioid consumption. The term “minimal clinically important difference” (MCID) defines the clinical benefit of an intervention as perceived by the patient, as opposed to a mathematically determined statistically significant difference that may not necessarily be clinically significant. The present article reviews the concept of MCID in acute postoperative pain research, addresses potential pitfalls in MCID determination and questions the clinical validity of extrapolating MCID determined from chronic pain and non-surgical pain studies to the acute postoperative pain setting. We further suggest the concepts of minimal clinically important improvement, substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptom state should also represent aspirational outcomes for future research in acute postoperative pain management.
Collapse
|
30
|
Buller LT, McLawhorn AS, Lee YY, Cross M, Haas S, Lyman S. The Short Form KOOS, JR Is Valid for Revision Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:2543-2549. [PMID: 32376166 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey, Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) is a reliable, responsive, and validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of knee health in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The validity of the KOOS, JR for revision TKA remains unknown. METHODS We identified 314 patients who underwent revision TKA and had completed preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMs. Validation included assessment of local dependence, unidimensionality, internal consistency, external construct validity, responsiveness, and floor effects preoperatively and ceiling effects at 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS Among patients undergoing revision TKA, the KOOS, JR demonstrated an absence of residual item correlation, adequate unidimensionality, high internal consistency (Person Separation Index: 0.897), and high external construct validity with existing validated PROMs, including KOOS Pain (Spearman's correlation coefficient 0.89) and KOOS activities of daily living (0.90) domains. The KOOS, JR was more responsive (standardized response means: 1.14) to revision TKA than other common knee PROMs. Three percent of revision TKA patients were at the floor (lowest score) preoperatively and 9% reached the ceiling (highest possible score) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS KOOS, JR performs well in revision TKA patients with regard to internal consistency, external validity, responsiveness, and floor and ceiling effects. Our results support extending its use to revision TKA in both clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard T Buller
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Fishers, IN
| | | | - Yuo-Yu Lee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Michael Cross
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Steven Haas
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Stephen Lyman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Radiation Oncology Clinical Trials. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:87. [PMID: 32862317 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00782-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The importance of assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is now well recognized as an essential measure when evaluating the effectiveness of new cancer therapies. Quality of life measures provide for a multi-dimensional understanding of the impact of cancer treatment on measures ranging from functional, psychological, and social aspects of a patient's health. Patient-reported outcomes provide for an assessment of physical and functional symptoms that are directly elicited from patients. Collection of PROs and HRQoL data has been shown to not only be feasible but also provide for reliable measures that correlate with established outcomes measures better than clinician-scored toxicities. The importance of HRQoL measures has been emphasized by both patients and clinicians, as well as policy makers and regulatory bodies. Given the benefits associated with measuring HRQoL and PROs in oncology clinical trials, it is increasingly important to establish methods to effectively incorporate PROs and HRQoL measures into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
32
|
When Evidence Goes "Missing in Action": Implications for Patient Management in Cardiac Surgery. THE JOURNAL OF EXTRA-CORPOREAL TECHNOLOGY 2020; 52:126-134. [PMID: 32669739 DOI: 10.1182/ject-2000020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Best-practice clinical decision-making for patient blood management (PBM) and transfusion in cardiac surgery requires high-quality, timely information. However, evidence will be misleading if published information lags too far behind evolving practice, or if trial results are biased, incomplete, or unreported. The result is that providers are deprived of accurate data, and patients will not receive best possible care. Publicly accessible trial registries provide information for structured audits of reporting compliance, and appraisal of evidence attrition and distortion. Trials related to blood management and transfusion in cardiac surgery and those registered in ClinicalTrials.gov were evaluated for relevance, reliability, transparency, timeliness, and prevalence of unreported trial results. Evidence was considered to have "disappeared" if no results were posted to the registry and no related PUBMED publications were available by July 2019. Data were summarized by descriptive statistics. A total of 181 registered trials were surveyed; 52% were prospectively registered. Most commonly reported primary outcomes were laboratory surrogate measures (34%). Patient- and practice-relevant outcomes-mortality/major morbidity (7%), transfusion (27%), and major bleeding (28%)-were less common. Only seven studies posted results to the registry within the mandated 12 months from study completion; median time to posting was 17 (interquartile range [IQR] 13, 37) months. Trial results for 58% were unreported 3-9 years after trial completion. A staggering amount of clinical trial evidence for PBM in cardiac surgery is missing from publicly accessible records and the literature. Investigators must be incentivized to promptly and completely report all results. Penalties for noncompliance are already in place and should be enforced. Simplified information linkage, centralized and routine audit cycles, and prioritization of robust "living" reviews may be more positive motivators. Implementation will require a sea change in the prevailing culture of research reporting, plus coordinated efforts of clinicians, applied statisticians, information technology specialists, and research librarians.
Collapse
|
33
|
Gottfried T, Kamer I, Salant I, Urban D, Lawrence YR, Onn A, Bar J. Self-reported sleep quality as prognostic for survival in lung cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:313-321. [PMID: 32021445 PMCID: PMC6970259 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s234523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Sleep is essential for life, as well as having a major impact on quality of life. Not much attention has been given to this important factor in the care of lung cancer patients. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 404 lung cancer patients treated in our institute between 2010 and 2018. Data about sleep quality, distress and pain were self-reported by questionnaires administered to patients at their first clinic visit to the Institute of Oncology. Sex, age, histology, stage, smoking and marital status were extracted from the patients’ charts. Uni- and multi-variate analyses were carried out to evaluate the correlation of these factors with survival. Results Most patients reported some level of distress and pain. Sleep abnormalities were reported by 58.7% of patients. Distress, pain and bad sleep were correlated with shorter survival in univariate analyses; however, only sleep remained associated with survival in multivariate analysis. Patients reporting bad sleep had a median survival of 16 months, compared to 27 months for patients reporting good sleep (hazard ratio 1.83, 95% C.I. 1.27–2.65). Frequent arousals at night were more tightly correlated with survival than difficulty falling asleep. Conclusion Sleep quality, as reported by lung cancer patients, is highly correlated with survival. Further studies are required to comprehend whether poor sleep quality is directly impacting survival or is a result of the cancer aggressiveness and patients’ conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodor Gottfried
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Institute of Oncology, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Iris Kamer
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Institute of Oncology, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Iris Salant
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Institute of Oncology, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Damien Urban
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Institute of Oncology, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Yaacov R Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Onn
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Pulmonology Institute, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - Jair Bar
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Institute of Oncology, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wickramasinghe DP, Dayasena P, Seneviratne S, Samarasekera DN. Translation and Validation of the Sinhala Version of the EORTC-QLQ-CR29 Questionnaire. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2020; 21:31-36. [PMID: 31983160 PMCID: PMC7294016 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2020.21.1.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To validate the Sinhalese version of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer. Method: We translated and pilot-tested (n=10) the questionnaire in Sri Lanka. We then assessed the reliability, factor structure and construct validity according to the EORTC guidelines. The testing was done in two tertiary care hospitals in Sri Lanka. Results: Of 110 participants, 103 (93%) returned the questionnaire, and 15 out of 20 (75%) returned the repeat-test questionnaire within a period of two weeks. Out of the original four scales three had better reliability than the original scales: urinary frequency (Cronbach α - 0.82), blood and mucus in stools (α-0.85), defaecation problems (α-0.76). The body image scale showed low reliability (α – 0.33). However, when one of the 3 items in the scale was omitted, it showed sufficient reliability (α – 0.74). Factor analysis showed good reliability for overall assessment of the two item scale for stool frequency (α – 0.82) and six item scale for defaecation problems (α – 0.76). Correlations between the subscales of CR29 and C30 questionnaires were below 0.40, except for body image, which correlated moderately (r-0.44) with emotional functioning. This confirmed satisfactory overall construct validity Conclusion: The scales for urinary frequency, blood and mucus in stools and defaecation problems which were reliable and had good validity. Body image scale failed to show sufficient reliability with the three-item scale and we suggest omitting one of the items to improve the overall reliability of the questionnaire. Construct validity was comparable to published data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Praveen Dayasena
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
[Concepts and assessment methods in lower urinary tract symptoms: From symptom score to Patient-Reported Outcomes and Outcomes (PRO)]. Prog Urol 2019; 30:181-189. [PMID: 31744687 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The evaluation of pelvic perineal treatments has changed significantly in recent years. Initially focused on the assessment of symptoms, quality of life or patient satisfaction, it has gradually turned to new concepts, such as Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) and Goal Attainment (GA). OBJECTIVE To describe the different concepts and methods of assessment available, in recent years, in the context of urinary functional pathologies such as bladder overactivity or urinary incontinence. METHODS We conducted a non-systematic literature review to identify the main questionnaires and tools available to evaluate treatment outcomes. Oncology and pediatrics questionnaire has been excluded. RESULTS In functional pathology (overactive bladder or incontinence), the objective of treatment is to meet the expectations of patients and it is important to be able to assess the feelings of patients. In this context, new specific questionnaires have been developed to evaluate the PROs. For about ten years, these subjective criteria, are more and more widespread in the evaluation of treatments. A new field then appeared, namely Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) and Self Appreciation Goal Attainment (SAGA), allowing to determine with the patient, the expected objectives of the treatment. CONCLUSION These concepts of PRO and GAS open up a new domain in the evaluation of treatments, with a subjective view of the results. They deserve to be integrated into the usual, objective evaluations, in order to adapt the treatment of the patients, according to the real impact of the treatment.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rimmele DL, Lebherz L, Frese M, Appelbohm H, Bartz HJ, Kriston L, Gerloff C, Härter M, Thomalla G. Outcome evaluation by patient reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice (EPOS) protocol for a prospective observation and implementation study. Neurol Res Pract 2019; 1:28. [PMID: 33324894 PMCID: PMC7650080 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-019-0034-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The impact of stroke-related impairment on activities of daily living may vary between patients, and can only be estimated by applying patient-reported outcome measures. The International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement has developed a standard set of instruments that combine clinical and longitudinal patient-reported outcome measures for stroke. The present study was designed (1) to implement and evaluate the feasibility of the use of it as a consistent outcome measure in clinical routine at the stroke center of a German university hospital, (2) to characterize impairment in everyday life caused by stroke, and (3) to identify predictive factors associated with patient-relevant outcomes. Methods We plan to enroll 1040 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or intracerebral hemorrhage in a prospective observational study. Demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and living situation are assessed at inpatient surveillance. At 90 days and 12 months after inclusion, follow-up assessments take place including the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10-Question Short Form (PROMIS-10), the Patient- Health Questionnaire-4, and the simplified modified Ranking Scale questionnaire. The acceptance and feasibility (1) will be assessed by a process evaluation through qualitative semi-structured interviews with clinical staff and patients and quantitative analyses of the data quality evaluating practicability, acceptance, adoption, and fidelity to protocol. The primary outcome of objective 2 and 3 is health-related quality of life measured with the PROMIS-10. Additional outcomes are depressive and anxiety symptoms and patient participation in their social roles. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed in their longitudinal course using (generalized) mixed regressions. Exploratory descriptive and inference statistical analyses will be used to find patterns of patient characteristics and predictive factors of the outcome domains. Perspective The results will describe and further establish the evaluation of stroke patients of a stroke center by standardized PROMs in everyday life. Trial registration The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03795948). Approval of the local ethics committee (Ethik-Kommission der Ärztekammer Hamburg) has been obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Leander Rimmele
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Lebherz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Frese
- Office for Quality Management and Clinical Process Management, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hannes Appelbohm
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Bartz
- Office for Quality Management and Clinical Process Management, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Levente Kriston
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gerloff
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Götz Thomalla
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Oude Voshaar MAH, van de Laar MAFJ. Taking the patient and the patient's perspective into account to improve outcomes of care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2019; 33:101436. [PMID: 31703794 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The present review provides an overview of historic and recent developments, including core set recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. The evidence supporting commonly used patient-reported outcomes measures is reviewed. Furthermore, various methodological approaches that can be utilized to evaluate validity and measurement precision of patient reported outcomes are introduced. Commonly used methods based on the classical test theory as well as modern approaches based on item response theory will be discussed. The review finally describes the increasing use of item response theory-based approaches used in patient-reported outcomes assessment in the musculoskeletal diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, the Netherlands; Transparency in Healthcare, University of Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, the Netherlands; Transparency in Healthcare, University of Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cho SK, Sung YK. A paradigm shift in studies based on rheumatoid arthritis clinical registries. Korean J Intern Med 2019; 34:974-981. [PMID: 30759964 PMCID: PMC6718765 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2018.440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical research is the study of aspects of patient health or illness that are closely related to clinical practice. In the late 20th and early 21th century, outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved dramatically due to breakthroughs in new drugs. Patient-reported outcome measures now play a significant role in the drug development process as study endpoints in clinical trials of new therapies, and this has led to increased interest in the patient's perspective, drug safety and treatment outcomes in clinical practice. In accordance with these needs, many prospective cohorts for RA patients and registries of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been actively conducted in the United States and European and Asian countries. A gradual shift is taking place in the major outcomes of clinical research using these prospective cohorts and registries. This article will introduce representative registries for RA in each country set up in the early 2000s and will discuss future perspectives in clinical research on RA patients using such clinical registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Kyung Cho
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence to Yoon-Kyoung Sung, M.D. Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea Tel: +82-2-2290-9250 Fax: +82-2-2298-8231 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barr RD, Feeny DA. Health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer - Including a focus on economic evaluation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27808. [PMID: 31081602 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an amalgam of three elements - the opportunities that a person's health status affords, the constraints that it places upon the person and the value that a person places on his/her health status. HRQL measures are specific, for example for a disease, or generic with broad applicability. The latter include preference-based measures that can be used to generate quality-adjusted life years and so contribute to economic evaluation. Measures of HRQL in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer may fail to capture some important dimensions, for example sexual health. However, the use of HRQL measures in this population has identified burdens of morbidity according to disease, treatment status and duration of follow-up. There are few economic evaluations of the treatment of cancer in AYAs but preliminary evidence suggests that this is a cost-effective undertaking. Opportunities abound to include measurement of HRQL in routine clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald D Barr
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David A Feeny
- Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Health Utilities Incorporated, Dundas, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hong YD, Villalonga-Olives E, Perfetto EM. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Orphan Drug Labels Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:925-930. [PMID: 31426934 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the need to assess treatment benefit from the patient's perspective. The extent of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data included in labeling for rare disease treatment is largely unknown. The objective of this study was to review trends over time for PRO-based labeling granted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for orphan drugs. STUDY DESIGN Review of FDA package inserts. METHODS Products included in this analysis were all new molecular entities (NMEs) and biologic license applications (BLAs) with orphan designations approved by the FDA from 2002 through 2017. For identified products, package inserts were reviewed to determine the number and type of PRO claim(s) granted, endpoint status, and PRO measure named. Two trends were analyzed: (1) over all years 2002 to 2017 and (2) 2002 to 2017 stratified into 3 periods (before draft FDA PRO guidance [2006], between draft and final guidance release, and after final guidance [2009] release. RESULTS A total of 156 NMEs and BLAs with orphan designations were approved between 2002 and 2017. Of these, 13 products (8.3%) had PRO-based labeling, and 7 of 13 were symptom-related. The percent of orphan drugs approved with PRO-based labeling between 2002 and 2005, 2006 and 2008, and 2009 and 2017 was 0, 10.5, and 9.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In FDA-approved labeling for orphan therapies, PRO measures used as primary and secondary endpoints increased after draft FDA PRO guidance release but remained relatively low thereafter. It is important to understand barriers to PRO measure use to ensure that treatments capture perspectives of patients with rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Duk Hong
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Ester Villalonga-Olives
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eleanor M Perfetto
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA; National Health Council, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sedaghat AR. Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161:551-560. [PMID: 31159641 DOI: 10.1177/0194599819852604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) represents a threshold value of change in PROM score deemed to have an implication in clinical management. The MCID is frequently used to interpret the significance of results from clinical studies that use PROMs. However, an understanding of the many caveats of the MCID, as well as its strengths and limitations, is necessary. The objective of this article is to provide a review of the calculation, interpretation, and caveats of MCID. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and PubMed Central. REVIEW METHODS Literature search-including primary studies, review articles, and consensus statements-pertinent to the objectives of this review using PubMed. CONCLUSIONS The MCID of a PROM may vary depending on the patients and clinical context in which the PROM is given. The primary approaches for calculating MCID are distribution-based and anchor-based methods. Each methodology has strengths and limitations, and the ideal determination of a PROM MCID includes synthesis of results from both approaches. The MCID of a PROM is also not perfect in detecting patients experiencing a clinically important improvement, and this is reflected in its accuracy (eg, sensitivity and specificity). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Interpretation or application of MCID requires consideration of all caveats underlying the MCID, including the patients in whom it was derived, the limitations of the methodologies used to calculate it, and its accuracy for identifying patients who have experienced clinically significant improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Neijenhuis MK, Wijnands TFM, Kievit W, Ronot M, Gevers TJG, Drenth JPH. Symptom relief and not cyst reduction determines treatment success in aspiration sclerotherapy of hepatic cysts. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:3062-3068. [PMID: 30542749 PMCID: PMC6510865 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5851-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 09/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether quantitative assessment of symptom reduction is a better outcome parameter than cyst volume reduction for treatment success in patients treated by aspiration sclerotherapy. METHODS We included patients with symptomatic, large (> 5 cm), hepatic cysts from a randomized controlled trial (NCT02048319). At baseline and 6 months after treatment, symptoms were assessed with the polycystic liver disease questionnaire (PLD-Q) and we measured cyst volume using ultrasonography. Patient-reported change in health was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (much worse to much better) after 6 months. We tested whether PLD-Q scores and cyst volumes changed after aspiration sclerotherapy (responsiveness). Changes in PLD-Q scores and cyst volume were compared with change in health as a measure of treatment success (discriminative ability). As secondary analysis, we compared baseline characteristics between responders (improved) and non-responders (not improved). RESULTS We included 32 patients. Six months after treatment, 23 patients (72%) improved. Both PLD-Q score and cyst volume significantly decreased (median 38 to 18 points, p < 0.001, and 479 to 68 mL, p < 0.001). Larger improvement in PLD-Q score was associated with a positive change in health (p = 0.001), while larger proportional reduction in cyst volume was not significantly associated with health improvement after treatment (p = 0.136). Responders had larger baseline cyst volumes compared to non-responders (median 624 mL [IQR 343-1023] vs. 322 mL [IQR 157-423] p = 0.008). CONCLUSION Cyst diameter reduction does not reflect treatment success in aspiration sclerotherapy from patients' perspective, while symptoms measured with the PLD-Q can be used as a reliable outcome measure. KEY POINTS • Cyst diameter reduction poorly reflects treatment success in aspiration sclerotherapy. • Symptoms measured by the polycystic liver disease questionnaire (PLD-Q) is a better outcome measure than cyst volume reduction for treatment success after aspiration sclerotherapy. • Particularly patients with larger cysts (≥ 529 mL) benefit from aspiration sclerotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrte K Neijenhuis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Titus F M Wijnands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, Beaujon University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine, Clichy, France
| | - Tom J G Gevers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The goal of the treatment of a disease has moved from treating organs and diseases through symptoms, biological parameters and imaging towards treating a human being as a whole. The treatments should deliver benefits that patients can personally perceive. However, the patient's perspective does not always match the one of those surrounding them. Illustratively, patients' symptom assessments are more predictable for daily health status, whereas clinicians' symptom measurements are more related to clinical outcomes. The term, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), includes any data that are reported directly by the patient without an intermediary, such as a family member or a healthcare professional. The use of PROs in oncology trials is increasing and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has published guidelines on the review and evaluation of PROs. However, while PROs are increasingly used in clinical trials, they are rarely used in daily clinical practice. Further, healthcare payers are concerned with issues related to relevance, quality, and interpretability of these outcomes.
Collapse
|
44
|
How should we assess patient-reported outcomes in the onco-hematology clinic? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2018; 12:522-529. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Gass JD, Semrau K, Sana F, Mankar A, Singh VP, Fisher-Bowman J, Neal BJ, Tuller DE, Kumar B, Lipsitz S, Sharma N, Kodkany B, Kumar V, Gawande A, Hirschhorn LR. Evaluation of a call center to assess post-discharge maternal and early neonatal outcomes of facility-based childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0207987. [PMID: 30481209 PMCID: PMC6258538 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Maternal and neonatal outcomes in the immediate post-delivery period are critical indicators of quality of care. Data on childbirth outcomes in low-income settings usually require home visits, which can be constrained by cost and access. We report on the use of a call center to measure post-discharge outcomes within a multi-site improvement study of facility-based childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India. Methods Of women delivering at study sites eligible for inclusion, 97.9% (n = 157,689) consented to follow-up. All consenting women delivering at study facilities were eligible to receive a phone call between days eight and 42 post-partum to obtain outcomes for the seven-day period after birth. Women unable to be contacted via phone were visited at home. Outcomes, including maternal and early neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity, were ascertained using a standardized script developed from validated survey questions. Data Quality Assurance (DQA) included accuracy (double coding of calls) and validity (consistency between two calls to the same household). Regression models were used to identify factors associated with inconsistency. Findings Over 23 months, outcomes were obtained by the call center for 98.0% (154,494/157,689) consenting women and their neonates. 87.9% of call center-obtained outcomes were captured by phone call alone and 12.1% required the assistance of a field worker. An additional 1.7% were obtained only by a field worker, 0.3% were lost-to-follow-up, and only 0.1% retracted consent. The call center captured outcomes with a median of 1 call (IQR 1–2). DQA found 98.0% accuracy; data validation demonstrated 93.7% consistency between the first and second call. In a regression model, significant predictors of inconsistency included cases with adverse outcomes (p<0.001), and different respondents on the first and validation call (p<0.001). Conclusions In areas with widespread mobile cell phone access and coverage, a call center is a viable and efficient approach for measurement of post-discharge childbirth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathon D. Gass
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Katherine Semrau
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Fatima Sana
- Population Services International- India, New Delhi, India
| | - Anup Mankar
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | | | - Jennifer Fisher-Bowman
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Brandon J. Neal
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Danielle E. Tuller
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Bharath Kumar
- Population Services International- India, New Delhi, India
| | - Stuart Lipsitz
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | | | - Bhala Kodkany
- Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
| | | | - Atul Gawande
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Lisa R. Hirschhorn
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ahn C, Fang X, Silverman P, Zhang Z. A quantitative method for measuring the relationship between an objective endpoint and patient reported outcome measures. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0205845. [PMID: 30359417 PMCID: PMC6201893 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) become increasingly important for assessing the effectiveness of a drug or medical device. In order for a PROM to be claimed in labeling, the PROM has to be valid, reliable and able to detect a change if the targeted disease status changes. One approach to assess the quality of a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) is to investigate the association between the PROM and an objective clinical endpoint measuring the status of a disease/condition. However, methods assessing the association between continuous and discrete variables are limited, especially for correlated measurements. In this paper, we propose a method to assess such association with any type of samples with or without correlation. The method involves estimating the probability revealing the status of a subject’s disease/condition (called truth thereafter) through the subject’s reported outcomes. The probability is a conditional probability revealing truth given the relative location of the subject’s objective outcome compared to the subject-specific latent threshold in the objective endpoint. A consistent estimator for the probability is derived. The operating characteristics of the consistent estimator are illustrated using simulation. Our method is applied to hypothetical clinical trial data generated for an ophthalmic device as an illustration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chul Ahn
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Xin Fang
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Phyllis Silverman
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Zhiwei Zhang
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Singh I, Aithal S. Selecting best-suited "patient-related outcomes" in older people admitted to an acute geriatric or emergency frailty unit and applying quality improvement research to improve patient care. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2018; 9:309-320. [PMID: 30288133 PMCID: PMC6163022 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s160519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The population is aging worldwide, and hospitals are admitting a higher proportion of acutely unwell older people. Population-specific factors such as multimorbidity and frailty in older people compounded by deficient expertise contribute to longer lengths of stay, higher readmission rates, and increased rates of institutionalization. A wide range of acute geriatric care models are currently providing acute care to frail older people and these have been shown to provide a cost-effective high-quality service. In this review, population-specific factors, service models, and a wide range of patient-related outcomes of "at risk" older people admitted to an acute geriatric care unit are explored. In addition, we also discuss data measurements and a quality improvement methodology to improve the delivery of care based on the patient outcome data. We hope, in addition to ensuring effectiveness and sustainability of our current services, this may also enhance academic research. Regular monitoring and evaluation of patient-related clinical outcomes not only improve the patient care and reduce the caregiver burden but also help in implementing quality initiatives to develop existing services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inderpal Singh
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Ystrad Mynach, UK,
| | - Shridhar Aithal
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ysbyty Ystrad Fawr, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Ystrad Mynach, UK,
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2018; 2:40. [PMID: 30238085 PMCID: PMC6127068 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this literature review was to examine the existing patient-reported outcome measurement literature to understand the empirical evidence supporting response scale selection in pain measurement for the adult population. Methods The search strategy involved a comprehensive, structured, literature review with multiple search objectives and search terms. Results The searched yielded 6918 abstracts which were reviewed against study criteria for eligibility across the adult pain objective. The review included 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles providing insights into optimal response scale selection for pain assessment in the adult population. Based on the extensive and varied literature on pain assessments, the adult pain studies typically use simple response scales with single-item measures of pain—a numeric rating scale, visual analog scale, or verbal rating scale. Across 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles, the NRS response scale was most often recommended in these guidance documents. When reviewing the empirical basis for these recommendations, we found that the NRS had slightly superior measurement properties (e.g., reliability, validity, responsiveness) across a wide variety of contexts of use as compared to other response scales. Conclusions Both empirical studies and review articles provide evidence that the 11-point NRS is likely the optimal response scale to evaluate pain among adult patients without cognitive impairment.
Collapse
|
49
|
Usage of glaucoma-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the Singapore context: a qualitative scoping exercise. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18:197. [PMID: 30107834 PMCID: PMC6092864 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0803-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the increasing emphasis on the role of glaucoma-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as relevant outcome measures for the impact of glaucoma and its intervention on patients' daily lives, the feasibility of implementing PROMs in the routine clinical setting in Singapore remains undefined. We aim to evaluate the comprehensibility, acceptability, and relevance of four glaucoma-specific PROMs at healthcare professionals' and patients' level in a Singapore context. Methods Sixteen ophthalmic healthcare professionals and 24 glaucoma patients, with average age 60 years (SD = 15), were invited from a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore participants’ perceptions on the content and administration of four glaucoma-specific PROMs - the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15, Glaucoma Symptom Identifier, Independent Mobility Questionnaire and Treatment Satisfaction Survey of Intra-ocular Pressure. Semi-structured interviews were hand transcribed, and analysed thematically. Each participant filled out a feasibility survey at the end of interview. Results 79% of glaucoma patients and 94% of glaucoma healthcare professionals felt selected PROMs relevant to patients. 63% of glaucoma patients and 50% of healthcare professionals felt that selected PROMs were sufficiently comprehensive for clinical use. 46% of glaucoma patients and 56% of healthcare professionals felt selected PROMs were user-friendly. Conclusions Using PROMs in the Singapore clinical setting receives promising support from both healthcare professionals and patients. The identified potential barriers tailored to Singapore clinical setting will help successful implementation of PROMs into routine clinical care.
Collapse
|
50
|
Svedsater H, Jones R, Bosanquet N, Jacques L, Lay-Flurrie J, Leather DA, Vestbo J, Collier S, Woodcock A. Patient-reported outcomes with initiation of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus continuing usual care in the Asthma Salford Lung Study. Respir Med 2018; 141:198-206. [PMID: 30053967 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Asthma Salford Lung Study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of initiating once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus continuing usual care (UC) in asthma patients in UK primary care [1]. Here, we report a detailed analysis of patient-reported outcome (PRO) endpoints. METHODS Adults with symptomatic asthma maintained on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) ± long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) were randomized 1:1 to initiate FF/VI (100 [200]/25 μg) or continue UC. PROs were measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ [S]), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: asthma questionnaire, and EQ-5D-3L (EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Levels) questionnaire, at timepoints across the 12-month study period. RESULTS The individual components of ACT response (total score ≥20 or improvement from baseline ≥3) both contributed to the composite primary effectiveness endpoint at Week 24, with odds ratios favoring FF/VI over UC in both cases. Patients initiating FF/VI versus continuing UC were more likely to maintain/improve asthma control, regardless of baseline control status. The odds of patients being responders on AQLQ (S) total score and on individual AQLQ domains at Week 52 were significantly higher for FF/VI versus UC (all p < .001). FF/VI was associated with significantly greater reductions in overall work and activity impairment due to asthma (both p < .001), and a significantly greater change from baseline in EQ visual analogue scale score (p = .007), versus UC at Week 52. PRO findings were consistent across baseline ICS and ICS/LABA subsets. CONCLUSIONS Initiation of FF/VI versus continuing UC was associated with consistent improvements in PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rupert Jones
- Clinical Trials & Health Research, Peninsula School of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Jørgen Vestbo
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Susan Collier
- Respiratory Research and Development, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
| | - Ashley Woodcock
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|