Determining the effectiveness of early intensive versus escalation approaches for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: The DELIVER-MS study protocol

Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey

Background and Objectives

Available disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are rapidly expanding; although escalation approaches aim to balance safety and efficacy, emerging evidence suggests superior outcomes for people with MS who are exposed to early high-efficacy therapies. We aimed to explore practice differences in prevailing management strategies for relapsing-remitting MS.

Methods

We used a worldwide electronic survey launched by the Practice Current section of Neurology® Clinical Practice. Questions pertained to a case of a 37-year-old woman presenting with optic neuritis. Respondents were asked to indicate their initial investigations, relapse management strategy, choice of disease-modifying therapy, and plan for follow-up imaging (contrast/noncontrast). Survey responses were stratified by key demographic variables along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results

We received 153 responses from 42 countries; 32.3% responders identified as MS specialists. There was a strong preference for intravenous delivery of high-dose corticosteroids (87.7%, 95% CI 80.7-92.5), and most of the responders (61.3%, 95% CI 52.6-69.4) indicated they would treat a nondisabling (mild sensory) MS relapse. When asked to select a single initial DMT, 56.6% (95% CI 47.6-65.1) selected a high-efficacy therapy (67.5% MS specialists vs 53.7% non-MS specialists). The most selected agents overall were fingolimod (14.7%), natalizumab (15.5%), and dimethyl fumarate (20.9%). Two-thirds of respondents indicated they would request contrast-enhanced surveillance MRI.

Discussion

Although there is a slight preference for initiating high-efficacy DMT at the time of initial MS diagnosis, opinions regarding the most appropriate treatment paradigm remain divided.

Factors associated with the initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying agents over moderate-efficacy disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

With multiple treatment options, choosing the initial disease-modifying agent (DMA) could be crucial to managing multiple sclerosis (MS). Common treatment strategies recommend starting patients with moderate-efficacy disease-modifying agents (meDMAs), while others advocate initiating high-efficacy disease-modifying agents (heDMAs). However, limited real-world evidence exists regarding the factors associated with utilizing differing treatment strategies in the MS.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the factors associated with the initiation of heDMAs in comparison to meDMAs among patients with MS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims Database. Adult (18-64 years) MS patients with ≥1 DMA prescription were identified from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified as incident heDMA or meDMA users based on their earliest DMA prescription, with a 12-month washout period. All covariates were measured during the 12-month baseline before the index DMA date. A multivariable logistic regression model, guided by the Andersen Behavioral Model, was applied to examine the predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with using heDMAs over meDMAs.

RESULTS

There were 10,003 eligible MS patients, with the majority of users being female (74.92 %), middle-aged adults (35-54 years, 58.97 %), and enrolled in the Preferred Provider Organization (PPO, 53.10 %) healthcare plan. Overall, 2293 (22.92 %) MS patients initiated heDMAs. The multivariable logistic regression model revealed that male patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.46, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.30-1.64) had higher odds of initiating heDMAs. Meanwhile, patients with bladder dysfunction medications (aOR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.21-1.61), fatigue medications (aOR: 1.77, 95 %CI: 1.44-2.17), and impaired walking (aOR: 1.62, 95 %CI: 1.42-1.86) were more likely to initiate treatment with heDMAs. In contrast, patients with higher Elixhauser comorbidities scores, sensory symptoms (aOR: 0.47, 95 %CI: 0.42-0.53), visual symptoms (aOR: 0.63, 95 %CI: 0.54-0.73), and brainstem symptoms (aOR: 0.81, 95 %CI: 0.67-0.97) were less likely to be prescribed with heDMAs.

CONCLUSION

The study found that approximately one in four MS patients initiated heDMAs. Both demographic and clinical factors influenced the selection of heDMA. More work is needed to understand the differential value of selecting heDMAs over meDMAs for personalizing DMA treatment.

Identification of alemtuzumab-suitable multiple sclerosis patients in Slovakia and sequencing of post-alemtuzumab immunomodulatory treatment

Background

Alemtuzumab (ALEM) is a humanised monoclonal antibody that depletes circulating lymphocytes by selectively targeting CD52, which is expressed in high levels on T- and B-lymphocytes. This depletion is followed by lymphocyte repopulation and a cytokine expression shift towards a lesser inflammatory profile, both of which may contribute to prolonged efficacy. National recommendations for enrolling and treating multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with ALEM have been established. However, there are no recommendations in place for the treatment of MS reactivation after the ALEM treatment.

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of ALEM and to analyse subsequent disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). A multidimensional prediction model was developed to make a patient-specific prognosis regarding the response to ALEM.

Design

A multicentre, prospective, non-controlled, non-interventional, observational cohort study.

Methods

Relapsing multiple sclerosis patients (RMSp) who received ⩾1 dose of ALEM were enrolled. In each treatment year, the following baseline and prospective data were collected: age, MS history, number, type and duration of previous disease-modifying treatment (PDMT), relapse rate (REL), expanded disability status scale (EDSS), magnetic resonance imaging and serious adverse events (AE). In cases of reactivation of MS, all data about the subsequent DMT were collected.

Results

A total of 142 RMSp from 10 MS Slovak Centres fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The average age was 35 years (standard error 8.56). The overall average EDSS was 3.87 (1.46) when ALEM was started. The average duration of PDMT was 6.0 (4.04) years, and the median number of PDMTs was 3 (0-5), while the patients were mostly treated with 2 or 3 DMTs (>65.00%). Post-ALEM treatment was needed in 39 cases (27.46%). The most frequent post-ALEM treatment indicated was ocrelizumab, followed by natalizumab (NAT), siponimod and cladribine. The ocrelizumab and NAT treatment bring little benefit to patients. Siponimod showed less EDSS increase in contrast to ocrelizumab and NAT. Another repopulation therapy, cladribine, may also be an effective option. Statistically significant predictors for the expected EDSS are age (p-value <0.0001), number of ALEM cycles (0.0066), high number of PDMT (0.0459) and the occurrence of relapses (<0.0001). There was no statistically significant effect on the patient's gender (0.6038), duration of disease-modifying treatment before alemtuzumab (0.4466), or the occurrence of AE (0.6668).

Conclusion

The study confirms the positive effect of ALEM on clinical and radiological outcomes. We need more data from long-term sequencing studies.

Beyond lines of treatment: embracing early high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis management

Recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) management have shifted perspectives on treatment strategies, advocating for the early initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs). This perspective review discusses the rationale, benefits, and challenges associated with early heDMT initiation, reflecting on the obsolescence of the traditional "first-line" and "second-line" treatment classifications. The article emerges from the last update of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of MS. During its development, there was a recognized need to further discuss the concept of treatment lines and the early use of heDMTs. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggests that early heDMT initiation leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced relapse rates, slowed disease progression, and decreased radiological activity, especially in younger patients or those in early disease stages. Despite the historical belief that heDMTs involve more risks and adverse events compared to moderate-efficacy DMTs (meDMTs), some studies have reported comparable safety profiles between early heDMTs and meDMTs, though long-term safety data are still lacking. The review also addresses the need for a personalized approach based on patient characteristics, prognostic factors, and preferences, explores the importance of therapeutic inertia, and highlights the evolving landscape of international and national guidelines that increasingly advocate for early intensive treatment approaches. The article also addresses the challenges of ensuring access to these therapies and the importance of further research to establish long-term safety and effectiveness of DMTs in MS.

Prognostic factors for worsening and improvement in multiple sclerosis using a multistate model

BACKGROUND

The long-term disease trajectory of people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) can be improved by initiating efficacious treatment early. More quantitative evidence is needed on factors that affect a patient's risk of disability worsening or possibility of improvement to inform timely treatment decisions.

METHODS

We developed a multistate model to quantify the influence of demographic, clinical, and imaging factors on disability worsening and disability improvement simultaneously across the disability spectrum as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We used clinical trial data from the Novartis-Oxford MS database including ~130,000 EDSS assessments from ~8000 patients, spanning all MS phenotypes.

RESULTS

Higher brain volume was positively associated with disability improvement at all disability levels (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.09-1.19; 95% credible interval (CI) = 1.02-1.27). Higher T2 lesion volume was negatively associated with disability improvement up to EDSS 6 (HR = 0.80-0.89; 95% CI = 0.75-0.94). Older age, time since first symptoms, and the number of relapses in the past year were confirmed as predictors of future disability worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain damage was identified as the most consistent factor limiting the patient's probability for improvements from the earliest stages and across the whole course of MS. Protecting brain integrity early in MS should have greater weight in clinical decision-making.

The Canadian Prospective Cohort Study to understand progression in multiple sclerosis: baseline characteristics

Background

Disease progression is observed across the spectrum of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and identification of effective treatment strategies to halt progression remains one of the greatest unmet clinical needs.

Objectives

The Canadian Prospective Cohort Study to Understand Progression in MS (CanProCo) was designed to evaluate a wide range of factors associated with the onset and rate of clinical disease progression in MS and to describe the interplay between these factors.

Design

A prospective cohort study.

Methods

CanProCo is a national, prospective, observational cohort study that has recruited 944 individuals from 5 large academic MS centers in Canada. Participants include people with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), early relapsing-remitting and primary progressive MS (RRMS, PPMS), and healthy controls (HCs). Annually, participants complete self-reported questionnaires, undergo clinical evaluation and, if clinically indicated, magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the brain and cervical spinal cord; in a subset of participants (n = 399), blood, and research MRIs of the brain and cervical spinal cord are collected. Linkages to health administrative databases are available at three sites.

Results

Overall, 944 participants were recruited (53 HCs, 63 RIS, 751 RRMS, 77 PPMS). RIS and MS participants had a mean age of 39.0 years and 70.5% female. The mean time since diagnosis was 2.7 years. There were differences observed in the Expanded Disability Status Scale score and components of the MS performance test (walking speed test, manual dexterity test, processing speed test, and low-contrast visual acuity) between RIS and MS subtypes. Questionnaires revealed more symptoms of depression and anxiety and impaired physical and mental quality of life in people with RIS/MS versus HCs and differences across RIS/MS subtypes.

Conclusion

Physical and mental neurological disability is prevalent even in the earliest stages of MS. Transdisciplinary approaches such as those used in CanProCo are needed to better characterize clinical progression in MS. Additional CanProCo results, including MRI, biological, and pharmaco-economic data will be forthcoming. Going forward, CanProCo's data sharing and collaborative vision will facilitate numerous global collaborations, which will inform the development and implementation of effective interventions for people with MS around the world.

Temporal and spatial patterns in the prescriptions of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. Results from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Register

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic scenario in multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved over recent years with the progressive introduction of new drugs focused to better balance efficacy, safety and management requirements. The objective of this study was to examine the prescribing patterns of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) over time and across different geographic areas, and the latency between disease onset, first Register center visit, disease diagnosis, and the start of treatment in a large cohort of persons with MS from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Register.

METHODS

Up to 2022, the Register collected data from 124 centers on more than 78,000 persons, of whom 56,872 received at least one DMT prescription. Beside baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, we focused on DMT according to their efficacy distinguishing between moderate-efficacy (ME), or high-efficacy (HE).

RESULTS

There was a higher probability of prescribing HE-DMT for increasing calendar years (multivariable odds ratio, OR=11.51 in 2021 or thereafter vs before 2000), in males (OR=1.08 vs females), patients with primary progressive with or without relapse (OR=3.00 vs clinically isolated syndrome), those with a higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score (OR=3.85 for >4 versus 0-1), and those from larger referral centers (OR=1.89 vs smaller ones). Conversely, higher age at onset was associated to a lower probability of prescribing HE-DMT (OR=0.74 at 40 or more vs <20 years). A trend to shorter times was observed in subsequent calendar years for disease onset, first center visit, diagnosis and first DMT prescription. No trend was detected based on the location of the geographic referral centers. The times between disease onset, first center visit, and diagnosis and the first DMT prescription showed significant decreases according to the year, while differences were less evident for the geographic areas.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights some factors influencing the choice of HE-DMT, including aspects of both healthcare and clinical phenotype. The absence of a geographic pattern may indicate some homogeneity in DMT prescriptions across different Italian MS centers.

Early intensive versus escalation treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Austria

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of early intensive treatment (EIT) versus escalation treatment (ESC) in a nationwide observational cohort of almost 1000 people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The EIT cohort started with alemtuzumab (AZM), cladribine (CLAD), fingolimod (FTY), natalizumab (NTZ), ocrelizumab (OCR), or ozanimod (OZA); whereas, the ESC cohort was escalated from dimethylfumarate (DMF) or teriflunomide (TERI) to AZM, CLAD, FTY, NTZ, OCR, or OZA within the Austrian MS Treatment Registry. Patients had to stay on therapy for at least 3 months and up to 16 years. The EIT cohort included 743 and the ESC cohort 227 RRMS patients. We used multinomial propensity scores for inverse probability weighting in generalized linear (GLM) and Cox proportional hazards models to correct for the bias of this non-randomized registry study.

RESULTS

Estimated mean annualized relapse rates (ARR) were 0.09 for EIT and 0.4 for ESC patients. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) in the GLM model for relapses showed a decreased relapse probability of 78% for the EIT versus ESC cohort [IRR = 0.22, 95% CI (0.16-0.30), p < 0.001]. Analyzing the time to the first relapse by Cox regression, a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.17 [95% CI (0.13-0.22), p < 0.001] revealed a decreased risk of 83% for the EIT group. Regarding sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression for 12 weeks, a HR of 0.55 [95% CI (0.40-0.76), p < 0.001] showed a decreased probability of 45% for the EIT cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

ESC treatment after DMF and TERI revealed a higher relapse and EDSS progression probability compared to EIT in Austrian RRMS patients. Therefore, an early intensive treatment should be started in patients with an active or highly active disease course.

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

Radiologically isolated syndrome in the spectrum of multiple sclerosis

The radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) currently represents the earliest detectable preclinical phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). Remarkable advancements have been recently made, including the identification of risk factors for disease evolution, revisions to the existing 2009 RIS criteria, and our understanding of the impact of early disease-modifying therapy use in the prevention/delay of symptomatic MS from two randomized clinical trials. Here, we discuss RIS in the context of the spectrum of MS, implications in the clinical management of individuals, and provide insights into future opportunities and challenges given the anticipated inclusion of asymptomatic MS in the formal definition of MS.

Association Between Disease-Modifying Therapy and Information Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Processing speed (PS) is often affected, making it an ideal target for monitoring CI. This study aims to evaluate the association between disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use and intensity and longitudinal changes in Processing Speed Test (PST) scores for individuals with MS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of individual PST scores at a single MS center was conducted. Individuals with 2 or more PST assessments were included. Scores on the PST were compared longitudinally between those who had been on a DMT for 2 or more years and those who had been off a DMT for 2 or more years and between those on high-efficacy DMTs and those on low-/moderate-efficacy DMTs. A linear regression model was approximated to evaluate the rate of cognitive change over time. A propensity score adjustment was conducted using a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort was 642 individuals, 539 on DMT and 103 off DMT. Median age and disease duration was 49.7 (IQR 42.4-57.9) and 16.6 years (IQR 9.3-23.0) in the DMT group, and 58.9 (IQR 52.2-65.3) and 20.0 years (IQR 14.1-31.4) in the non-DMT group. Both cohorts were predominantly female (75% DMT, 79.6% non-DMT), with a mean of 4 assessments (IQR 3-5), and an average monitoring duration of 1.9 years (1.2-2.4) in the DMT group, and 1.8 years (1.4-2.4) in the non-DMT group. After adjusting for multiple factors, DMT status and intensity were not found to be significant predictors of longitudinal PST change.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither DMT status nor intensity was a significant predictor of cognitive processing speed over a period of approximately 2 years. Future prospective studies are needed to further support these findings.

Identification and management of subclinical disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a review

IMPORTANCE

Early treatment initiation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is crucial in preventing irreversible neurological damage and disability progression. The current assessment of disease activity relies on relapse rates and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, but inclusion of other early, often "hidden," indicators of disease activity may describe a more comprehensive picture of MS.

OBSERVATIONS

Early indicators of MS disease activity other than relapses and MRI activity, such as cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, and fatigue, are not typically captured by routine disease monitoring. Furthermore, silent progression (neurological decline not clearly captured by standard methods) may occur undetected by relapse and MRI lesion activity monitoring. Consequently, patients considered to have no disease activity actually may have worsening disease, suggesting a need to revise MS management strategies with respect to timely initiation and escalation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Traditionally, first-line MS treatment starts with low- or moderate-efficacy therapies, before escalating to high-efficacy therapies (HETs) after evidence of breakthrough disease activity. However, multiple observational studies have shown that early initiation of HETs can prevent or reduce disability progression. Ongoing randomized clinical trials are comparing escalation and early HET approaches.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There is an urgent need to reassess how MS disease activity and worsening are measured. A greater awareness of "hidden" indicators, potentially combined with biomarkers to reveal silent disease activity and neurodegeneration underlying MS, would provide a more complete picture of MS and allow for timely therapeutic intervention with HET or switching DMTs to address suboptimal treatment responses.

Investigating the Prevalence of Comorbidity in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trial Populations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Comorbidity is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) with the most prevalent conditions being depression, anxiety, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Limited information regarding the representation of comorbidity status is available from phase III clinical trials in MS leading to concern about the potential underrepresentation of individuals with comorbidity in clinical trials. The objective was to estimate the prevalence of comorbidities in MS clinical trial populations.

METHODS

Individual-level data from multiple sponsors were requested for a 2-stage meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials of MS disease-modifying therapies. To ensure consistency of our approach across trials, we followed the Maelstrom retrospective harmonization guidelines. Chronic comorbidities at clinical trial enrollment recommended by the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS were considered (depression, anxiety, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, migraine, diabetes, chronic lung disease). Additional comorbidities were also classified. Classification was based on medical history data. Individual comorbidities were summed and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3. We report the pooled prevalence (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of comorbidity. The pooled prevalence and prevalence ratios across age, sex, race, disability level, and treatment were also reported. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials involving 17,926 participants were included. Fourteen trials enrolled participants with relapsing MS (RMS) while 3 enrolled participants with progressive MS (PMS). The distributions of sex, age, and disability level were generally consistent within RMS and PMS trials. When pooled, almost half of trial participants (46.5%) had ≥1 comorbidity (1: 25.0%, 95% CI 23.0-27.0, I2 = 89.9; 2: 11.4% [9.3-14.0], I2 = 96.3; ≥3: 6.0% [4.2-8.4], I2 = 97.7). Depression (16.45% [12.96-20.88], I2 = 98.3) was the most prevalent comorbidity reported, followed by hypertension (10.16% [8.61-11.98], I2 = 93.2). Heterogeneity was high across trials. Older age and female participants were associated with increased number of comorbidities. Older individuals and male participants had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, while older individuals and female participants had a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety.

DISCUSSION

Individuals with comorbidities are included in clinical trials, although they may still be underrepresented compared with the general MS population. Given the comorbidity prevalence in the trial populations and studies suggesting an association of comorbidities with disease activity, comorbidity may influence outcomes in clinical trials.

Highly Effective Therapies as First-Line Treatment for Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis

Importance

Moderately effective therapies (METs) have been the main treatment in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) for years. Despite the expanding use of highly effective therapies (HETs), treatment strategies for POMS still lack consensus.

Objective

To assess the real-world association of HET as an index treatment compared with MET with disease activity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 1, 2010, to December 8, 2022, until the last recorded visit. The median follow-up was 5.8 years. A total of 36 French MS centers participated in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) cohort. Of the total participants in OFSEP, only treatment-naive children with relapsing-remitting POMS who received a first HET or MET before adulthood and at least 1 follow-up clinical visit were included in the study. All eligible participants were included in the study, and none declined to participate.

Exposure

HET or MET at treatment initiation.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the time to first relapse after treatment. Secondary outcomes were annualized relapse rate (ARR), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, tertiary education attainment, and treatment safety/tolerability. An adapted statistical method was used to model the logarithm of event rate by penalized splines of time, allowing adjustment for effects of covariates that is sensitive to nonlinearity and interactions.

Results

Of the 3841 children (5.2% of 74 367 total participants in OFSEP), 530 patients (mean [SD] age, 16.0 [1.8] years; 364 female [68.7%]) were included in the study. In study patients, both treatment strategies were associated with a reduced risk of first relapse within the first 2 years. HET dampened disease activity with a 54% reduction in first relapse risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.67; P < .001) sustained over 5 years, confirmed on MRI activity (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.66; P = .001), and with a better tolerability pattern than MET. The risk of discontinuation at 2 years was 6 times higher with MET (HR, 5.97; 95% CI, 2.92-12.20). The primary reasons for treatment discontinuation were lack of efficacy and intolerance. Index treatment was not associated with EDSS progression or tertiary education attainment (adjusted OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24-1.10; P = .09).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that compared with MET, initial HET in POMS was associated with a reduction in the risk of first relapse with an optimal outcome within the first 2 years and was associated with a lower rate of treatment switching and a better midterm tolerance in children. These findings suggest prioritizing initial HET in POMS, although long-term safety studies are needed.

Highly Effective Therapy Versus Escalation Approaches in Early Multiple Sclerosis: What Is the Future of Multiple Sclerosis Treatment?

Treatment options for patients newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) are expanding with the continuous development and approval of new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The optimal initial treatment strategy, however, remains unclear. The 2 main treatment paradigms currently employed are the escalation (ESC) approach and the early highly effective treatment (EHT) approach. The ESC approach consists of starting a lower- or moderate-efficacy DMT, which offers a potentially safer approach, while the EHT approach favors higher-efficacy treatment early in the disease course, despite a potential increase in risk. Randomized clinical trials aiming to directly compare these approaches in newly diagnosed MS patients are currently underway.

No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) as a Clinical Assessment Tool for Multiple Sclerosis: Clinician and Patient Perspectives [Narrative Review]

The emergence of high-efficacy therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), which target inflammation more effectively than traditional disease-modifying therapies, has led to a shift in MS management towards achieving the outcome assessment known as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). The most common NEDA definition, termed NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of disease activity: no clinical relapses, no disability progression, and no radiological activity. NEDA has been frequently used as a composite endpoint in clinical trials, but there is growing interest in its use as an assessment tool to help patients and healthcare professionals navigate treatment decisions in the clinic. Raising awareness about NEDA may therefore help patients and clinicians make more informed decisions around MS management and improve overall MS care. This review aims to explore the potential utility of NEDA as a clinical decision-making tool and treatment target by summarizing the literature on its current use in the context of the expanding treatment landscape. We identify current challenges to the use of NEDA in clinical practice and detail the proposed amendments, such as the inclusion of alternative outcomes and biomarkers, to broaden the clinical information captured by NEDA. These themes are further illustrated with the real-life perspectives and experiences of our two patient authors with MS. This review is intended to be an educational resource to support discussions between clinicians and patients on this evolving approach to MS-specialized care.

Neuroimaging to monitor worsening of multiple sclerosis: advances supported by the grant for multiple sclerosis innovation

Key unmet needs in multiple sclerosis (MS) include detection of early pathology, disability worsening independent of relapses, and accurate monitoring of treatment response. Collaborative approaches to address these unmet needs have been driven in part by industry-academic networks and initiatives such as the Grant for Multiple Sclerosis Innovation (GMSI) and Multiple Sclerosis Leadership and Innovation Network (MS-LINK™) programs. We review the application of recent advances, supported by the GMSI and MS-LINK™ programs, in neuroimaging technology to quantify pathology related to central pathology and disease worsening, and potential for their translation into clinical practice/trials. GMSI-supported advances in neuroimaging methods and biomarkers include developments in magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ocular imaging, and machine learning. However, longitudinal studies are required to facilitate translation of these measures to the clinic and to justify their inclusion as endpoints in clinical trials of new therapeutics for MS. Novel neuroimaging measures and other biomarkers, combined with artificial intelligence, may enable accurate prediction and monitoring of MS worsening in the clinic, and may also be used as endpoints in clinical trials of new therapies for MS targeting relapse-independent disease pathology.

Multiple Sclerosis Pathogenesis and Updates in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we provide a comprehensive update on current scientific advances and emerging therapeutic approaches in the field of multiple sclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common disorder characterized by inflammation and degeneration within the central nervous system (CNS). MS is the leading cause of non-traumatic disability in the young adult population. Through ongoing research, an improved understanding of the disease underlying mechanisms and contributing factors has been achieved. As a result, therapeutic advancements and interventions have been developed specifically targeting the inflammatory components that influence disease outcome. Recently, a new type of immunomodulatory treatment, known as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, has surfaced as a promising tool to combat disease outcomes. Additionally, there is a renewed interested in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) as a major potentiator of MS. Current research efforts are focused on addressing the gaps in our understanding of the pathogenesis of MS, particularly with respect to non-inflammatory drivers. Significant and compelling evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of MS is complex and requires a comprehensive, multilevel intervention strategy. This review aims to provide an overview of MS pathophysiology and highlights the most recent advances in disease-modifying therapies and other therapeutic interventions.

Enhancing involvement of people with multiple sclerosis in clinical trial design

BACKGROUND

Although often overlooked, patient and public involvement (PPI) is vital when considering the design and delivery of complex and adaptive clinical trial designs for chronic health conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

We conducted a rapid review to assess current status of PPI in the design and conduct of clinical trials in MS over the last 5 years. We provide a case study describing PPI in the development of a platform clinical trial in progressive MS.

RESULTS

We identified only eight unique clinical trials that described PPI as part of articles or protocols; nearly, all were linked with funders who encourage or mandate PPI in health research. The OCTOPUS trial was co-designed with people affected by MS. They were central to every aspect from forming part of a governance group shaping the direction and strategy, to the working groups for treatment selection, trial design and delivery. They led the PPI strategy which enabled a more accessible, acceptable and inclusive design.

CONCLUSION

Active, meaningful PPI in clinical trial design increases the quality and relevance of studies and the likelihood of impact for the patient community. We offer recommendations for enhancing PPI in future MS clinical trials.

Improving the efficiency of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Phase 3 clinical trials for disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) have utilized a limited number of conventional designs with a high degree of success. However, these designs limit the types of questions that can be addressed, and the time and cost required. Moreover, trials involving people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have been less successful.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to discuss complex innovative trial designs, intermediate and composite outcomes and to improve the efficiency of trial design in MS and broaden questions that can be addressed, particularly as applied to progressive MS.

METHODS

We held an international workshop with experts in clinical trial design.

RESULTS

Recommendations include increasing the use of complex innovative designs, developing biomarkers to enrich progressive MS trial populations, prioritize intermediate outcomes for further development that target therapeutic mechanisms of action other than peripherally mediated inflammation, investigate acceptability to people with MS of data linkage for studying long-term outcomes of clinical trials, use Bayesian designs to potentially reduce sample sizes required for pediatric trials, and provide sustained funding for platform trials and registries that can support pragmatic trials.

CONCLUSION

Novel trial designs and further development of intermediate outcomes may improve clinical trial efficiency in MS and address novel therapeutic questions.

The benefits and risks of escalation versus early highly effective treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, demyelinating, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system that affects over 2 million people worldwide. Considerable advances have been made in the availability of disease modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis since their introduction in the 1990s. This has led to debate regarding the optimal first-line treatment approach: a strategy of escalation versus early highly effective treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review defines the strategies of escalation and early highly effective treatment, outlines the pros and cons of each, and provides an analysis of both the current literature and expected future directions of the field.

EXPERT OPINION

There is growing support for using early highly effective treatment as the initial therapeutic approach in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, much of this support stems from observational real-world studies that use historic data and lack safety outcomes or randomized control trials that compare individual high versus low-moderate efficacy therapies, instead of the approaches themselves. Randomized control trials (DELIVER-MS, TREAT-MS) are needed to systemically and prospectively compare contemporary escalation versus early highly effective treatment approaches.

High-efficacy therapies reduce clinical and radiological events more effectively than traditional treatments in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

People with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (pwNMOSD) experience debilitating neurological attacks, resulting in permanent disability.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if high-efficacy treatment was better than traditional agents at preventing disease advancement in pwNMOSD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of pwNMOSD at one academic center was performed. Timelines were created for treatments subjects were exposed to along with clinical/radiological events related to disease worsening. High-efficacy treatments included eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab, tocilizumab, and sarilumab while therapies such as azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil were classified as traditional agents. Poisson regression and mixed effects logistics models were constructed, and a subject-specific random intercept was used for intrasubject correlation.

RESULTS

Of 189 pwNMOSD identified, 161 were aquaporin-4 IgG positive (AQP4 +) with 92 (77 female; median disease duration (MDD) (range) of 6.6 years (y) (1.2-18.6)) exposed only to high-efficacy therapy, 33 (28 female; 10.4 y (0.8-32.7)) only to traditional therapy, and 64 (54 female; 10.8 y (0.7-20.2)) to both. High-efficacy treatments reduced the rate of MRI advancement by 62.4% (95% CrI = [- 86.9%, - 16.8%]), relapses by 99.8% (95% CrI = [- 99.9%, - 99.6%]), and hospitalizations by 99.3% (95% CrI = [- 99.6%, - 98.8%]) when compared to traditional treatments. For AQP4 + subjects, a 655.7-fold increase in the odds of new spinal cord lesion development (95% CrI = [+ 37.4-fold, + 3239.5-fold]) was observed with traditional agents (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

High-efficacy treatments maximize opportunity for preventing disease advancement in newly diagnosed and established pwNMOSD.

Updates and advances in multiple sclerosis neurotherapeutics

The multiple sclerosis (MS) neurotherapeutic landscape is rapidly evolving. New disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with improved efficacy and safety, in addition to an expanding pipeline of agents with novel mechanisms, provide more options for patients with MS. While treatment of MS neuroinflammation is well tailored in the existing DMT armamentarium, concerted efforts are currently underway for identifying neuropathological targets and drug discovery for progressive MS. There is also ongoing research to develop agents for remyelination and neuroprotection. Further insights are needed to guide DMT initiation and sequencing as well as to determine the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsing and progressive MS. This review provides a summary of these updates.

The Place of Immune Reconstitution Therapy in the Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in France: An Expert Consensus

The treatment strategy in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) is a complex decision requiring individualization of treatment sequences to maximize clinical outcomes. Current local and international guidelines do not provide specific recommendation on the use of immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) as alternative to continuous immunosuppression in the management of RMS. The objective of the program was to provide consensus-based expert opinion on the optimal use of IRT in the management of RMS. A Delphi method was performed from May 2022 to July 2022. Nineteen clinical assertions were developed by a scientific committee and sent to 14 French clinical experts in MS alongside published literature. Two consecutive reproducible anonymous votes were conducted. Consensus on recommendations was achieved when more than 75% of the respondents agreed or disagreed with the clinical assertions. After the second round, consensus was achieved amongst 16 out of 19 propositions: 13 clinical assertions had a 100% consensus, 3 clinical assertions a consensus above 75% and 3 without consensus. Expert-agreed consensus is provided on topics related to the benefit of the early use of IRT from immunological and clinical perspectives, profiles of patients who may benefit most from the IRT strategy (e.g. patients with family planning, patient preference and lifestyle requirements). These French expert consensuses provide up-to-date relevant guidance on the use of IRT in clinical practice. The current program reflects status of knowledge in 2022 and should be updated in timely manner when further clinical data in IRT become available.

High-Efficacy Therapies for Treatment-Naïve Individuals with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

There are > 18 distinct disease-modifying therapy (DMT) options covering 10 mechanisms of action currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Given the multitude of available treatment options, and recent international consensus guidelines offering differing recommendations, there is broad heterogeneity in how the DMTs are used in clinical practice. Choosing a DMT for newly diagnosed patients with MS is currently a topic of significant debate in MS care. Historically, an escalation approach to DMT was used for newly diagnosed patients with RRMS. However, the evidence for clinical benefits of early treatment with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) in this population is emerging. In this review, we provide an overview of the DMT options and MS treatment strategies, and discuss the clinical benefits of HETs (including ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and cladribine) in the early stages of MS, along with safety concerns associated with these DMTs. By minimizing the accumulation of neurological damage early in the disease course, early treatment with HETs may enhance long-term clinical outcomes over the lifetime of the patient.

Benefits of early treatment with natalizumab: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

The impact of early versus later high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is uncertain. This study reported the association of early versus later natalizumab treatment with real-world clinical outcomes in MS patients.

METHODS

The study included 661 participants diagnosed with MS in 1994 or later from 7 US centers participating in the MS Partners Advancing Technology for Health Solutions (MS PATHS) network. Time to natalizumab treatment between diagnosis and first infusion (TTNT) was determined from the Tysabri Outreach: Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH) registry. Clinical outcomes were defined using neuroperformance tests included in the Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test. Associations were tested using TTNT as a categorical and continuous variable. Linear mixed models addressed within-subject and within-site clustering.

RESULTS

TTNT varied from 0.1 to 19.8 years (median [interquartile range] 4.2 [1.8, 9.0] years). A significant association between later natalizumab use and worse outcomes was demonstrated for walking speed (p < 0.001), processing speed (p < 0.001), manual dexterity (p < 0.001), brain atrophy (p = 0.001), and T2 lesion volume (p = 0.02). Covariate-adjusted modelling of a sensitivity population diagnosed with MS in 2006 or later (n = 424) demonstrated significant associations between longer TTNT and worse walking speed (p < 0.05), processing speed (p < 0.001), and manual dexterity (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Later initiation of natalizumab was associated with worse clinical and radiologic imaging outcomes. Thus, high-efficacy DMT may have greater benefit when started earlier in MS patients. These results provide a rationale for randomized controlled trials to further assess the impact of early highly-effective DMT use versus later escalation of therapy.

Interrogating large multiple sclerosis registries and databases: what information can be gained?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although substantial progress has been made in understanding the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS) and the development of new therapies, many questions concerning disease behavior and therapeutics remain to be answered. Data generated from real-world observational studies, based on large MS registries and databases and analyzed with advanced statistical methods, are offering the scientific community answers to some of these questions that are otherwise difficult or impossible to address. This review focuses on observational studies published in the last 2 years designed to compare the effectiveness of escalation vs. induction treatment strategies, to assess the effectiveness of treatment in pediatric-onset and late-onset MS, and to identify the clinical phenotype of secondary progressive (SP)MS.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main findings originating from real-world studies suggest that MS patients who will qualify for high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) should be offered these as early as possible to prevent irreversible accumulation of neurological disability. Especially pediatric patients derive substantial benefits from early treatment. In patients with late-onset MS, sustained exposure to DMTs may result in more favorable outcomes. Data-driven definitions are more accurate in defining transition to SPMS than diagnosis based solely on neurologists' judgment.

SUMMARY

Patients, physicians, industry, and policy-makers have all benefited from real-world evidence based on registry data, in answering questions of diagnostics, choice of treatment, and timing of treatment decisions.

Early use of high-efficacy disease‑modifying therapies makes the difference in people with multiple sclerosis: an expert opinion

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and progressive neurological disease that is characterized by neuroinflammation, demyelination and neurodegeneration occurring from the earliest phases of the disease and that may be underestimated. MS patients accumulate disability through relapse-associated worsening or progression independent of relapse activity. Early intervention with high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE-DMTs) may represent the best window of opportunity to delay irreversible central nervous system damage and MS-related disability progression by hindering underlying heterogeneous pathophysiological processes contributing to disability progression. In line with this, growing evidence suggests that early use of HE-DMTs is associated with a significant greater reduction not only of inflammatory activity (clinical relapses and new lesion formation at magnetic resonance imaging) but also of disease progression, in terms of accumulation of irreversible clinical disability and neurodegeneration compared to delayed HE-DMT use or escalation strategy. These beneficial effects seem to be associated with acceptable long-term safety risks, thus configuring this treatment approach as that with the most positive benefit/risk profile. Accordingly, it should be mandatory to treat people with MS early with HE-DMTs in case of prognostic factors suggestive of aggressive disease, and it may be advisable to offer an HE-DMT to MS patients early after diagnosis, taking into account drug safety profile, disease severity, clinical and/or radiological activity, and patient-related factors, including possible comorbidities, family planning, and patients’ preference in agreement with the EAN/ECTRIMS and AAN guidelines. Barriers for an early use of HE-DMTs include concerns for long-term safety, challenges in the management of treatment initiation and monitoring, negative MS patients’ preferences, restricted access to HE-DMTs according to guidelines and regulatory rules, and sustainability. However, these barriers do not apply to each HE-DMT and none of these appear insuperable.

How to choose initial treatment in multiple sclerosis patients: a case-based approach

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy dramatically changed the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS), which was classically associated with severe disability. Treatment strategies advocate that early control of disease activity is crucial to avoid progressive disability, and the use of high efficacy drugs may be beneficial, but safety is a concern. Choosing the disease-modifying therapy is challenging in clinical practice and should be further discussed.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the state of art of selecting the initial therapy for relapsing MS patients.

METHODS

We used a case-based approach followed by clinical discussion, exploring therapeutic options in different MS settings.

RESULTS

We presented clinical cases profile compatible with the use of MS therapies, classified into moderate and high efficacy. In the moderate efficacy group, we discussed interferons, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate, while in the high efficacy group we discussed fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab and ofatumumab.

CONCLUSION

Advances in MS treatment are remarkable. Strong evidence supports the use of early high efficacy therapy. However, biomarkers, clinical and radiologic prognostic factors, as well as patients' individual issues, should be valued and considered for a personalized treatment decision.

The need for a strategic therapeutic approach: multiple sclerosis in check

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common chronic autoimmune neurological disease. Its therapeutic management has drastically evolved in the recent years with the development of specific disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Together with the established injectables, oral and intravenous alternatives are now available for MS patients with significant benefits to modulate the disease course. Certain drugs present with a higher efficacy than the others, profiles and frequencies of adverse events differentiate as well. Thus due to the several and different treatment alternatives, the therapeutic approach adopted by neurologists requires a tactical focus for a targeted, timed, and meaningful treatment decision. An integration of rational and emotional control with proper communication skills is necessary for shared decision-making with patients. In this perspective paper, we reinforce the necessary concept of strategic MS treatment approach using all available therapies based on scientific evidence and current experience. We apply a didactic analogy to the strategic game chess. The opening with oriented attack (i.e. already in early disease stages as clinical isolated syndrome), a correct choice of chess pieces to move (i.e. among the several DMTs), a re-assessment reaction to different scenarios (e.g. sustained disease activity, adverse events, and family planning) and the advantage of real-world data are discussed to try the best approach to ultimately successfully approach the best personalized MS treatment.

Health Economic Impact of Software-Assisted Brain MRI on Therapeutic Decision-Making and Outcomes of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients-A Microsimulation Study

Aim: To develop a microsimulation model to assess the potential health economic impact of software-assisted MRI in detecting disease activity or progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. Methods: We develop a simulated decision analytical model based on a hypothetical cohort of RRMS patients to compare a baseline decision-making strategy in which only clinical evolution (relapses and disability progression) factors are used for therapy decisions in MS follow-up, with decision-making strategies involving MRI. In this context, we include comparisons with a visual radiologic assessment of lesion evolution, software-assisted lesion detection, and software-assisted brain volume loss estimation. The model simulates clinical (EDSS transitions, number of relapses) and subclinical (new lesions and brain volume loss) disease progression and activity, modulated by the efficacy profiles of different disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The simulated decision-making process includes the possibility to escalate from a low efficacy DMT to a high efficacy DMT or to switch between high efficacy DMTs when disease activity is detected. We also consider potential error factors that may occur during decision making, such as incomplete detection of new lesions, or inexact computation of brain volume loss. Finally, differences between strategies in terms of the time spent on treatment while having undetected disease progression/activity, the impact on the patient’s quality of life, and costs associated with health status from a US perspective, are reported. Results: The average time with undetected disease progression while on low efficacy treatment is shortened significantly when using MRI, from around 3 years based on clinical criteria alone, to 2 when adding visual examination of MRI, and down to only 1 year with assistive software. Hence, faster escalation to a high efficacy DMT can be performed when MRI software is added to the radiological reading, which has positive effects in terms of health outcomes. The incremental utility shows average gains of 0.23 to 0.37 QALYs over 10 and 15 years, respectively, when using software-assisted MRI compared to clinical parameters only. Due to long-term health benefits, the average annual costs associated with health status are lower by $1500–$2200 per patient when employing MRI and assistive software. Conclusions: The health economic burden of MS is high. Using assistive MRI software to detect and quantify lesions and/or brain atrophy has a significant impact on the detection of disease activity, treatment decisions, health outcomes, utilities, and costs in patients with MS.

Prediction in treatment outcomes in multiple sclerosis: challenges and recent advances

INTRODUCTION

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system with a course dependent on early treatment response. Increasing evidence also suggests that despite eliminating disease activity (relapses and lesions), many patients continue to accrue disability, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive definition of treatment success. Optimizing disability outcome measures, as well as continuously improving our understanding of neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative biomarkers is required.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the challenges inherent in classifying and monitoring disease phenotype in MS. The review also provides an assessment of clinical, radiological, and blood biomarker tools for current and future practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Emerging MRI techniques and standardized patient outcome assessments will increase the accuracy of initial diagnosis and understanding of disease progression.

Early predictors of conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to estimated the time of conversion from relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) to SPMS and its early predictor factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, demographic, clinical, and imaging data from MS patients at diagnosis were extracted. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between various baseline characteristics and conversion to SPMS. We also assessed the association brtween escalation and early intensive therapy approaches with transition to progressive phase.

RESULTS

Out of 1903 patients with RRMS at baseline, 293 (15.4%) patients progressed to SPMS during follow-up. The estimated number of patients converted to SPMS was 10% at 10-years, 50% at 20-years, and 93% at 30-years. On multivariate Cox regression analysis older age at onset (HR: 1.067, 95%CI: 1.048-1.085, p < 0.001), smoking (HR: 2.120, 95%CI: 1.203-3.736, p = 0.009), higher EDSS at onset (HR: 1.199, 95%CI: 1.109-1.295, p < 0.001), motor dysfunction (HR: 2.470, 95%CI: 1.605-3.800, p < 0.001), cerebellar dysfunction (HR: 3.096, 95%CI: 1.840-5.211, p < 0.001), and presence of lesions in spinal cord (HR: 0.573, 95%CI: 0.297-0.989, p = 0.042) increased the risk of conversion from RRMS to SPMS. No significant difference between escalation and EIT groups in the risk of transition to progressive phase (weighted HR = 1.438; 95% CI: 0.963, 2.147; p = 0.076) was found.

CONCLUSION

Our data support previous observations that smoking is a modifiable risk factor for secondary progressive MS and confirms that spinal cord involvement, age, and more severe disease at onset are prognostic factors for converting to secondary progressive MS.

Initial treatment strategy and clinical outcomes in Finnish MS patients: a propensity-matched study

Background

The optimal treatment strategy with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) remains uncertain.

Objective

To compare outcomes of initial treatment with infusion therapies and starting therapy with medium efficacy therapy in a propensity-matched cohort of Finnish RRMS patients.

Methods

A total of 154 RRMS patients initiating natalizumab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab or rituximab as first DMT (high efficacy DMT, heDMT group) and 1771 patients initially treated with injectable therapies, teriflunomide or dimethylfumarate and escalated based on disease activity (moderate efficacy DMT, meDMT group) were identified from the Finnish MS registry. Nearest neighbor propensity matching (1:1, caliper 0.1) was performed for age, sex, baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), annual relapse rate (ARR) one year prior DMT and time since MS symptom onset. Primary outcome was time to 6-month confirmed EDSS progression and the secondary outcome time to first relapse.

Results

In the propensity-matched group comparisons, the probability of 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) at 5 years after DMT start was 28.4% (95% CI 15.7–39.3) in the heDMT group (n = 66) and 47.0% (95% CI 33.1–58.1) in meDMT group (n = 66), p = 0.013. Probability of relapse at 5 years was 34.6% (95% CI 24.1–43.6) for heDMT (n = 105) and 47.2% (95% CI 36.6–56.1) for meDMT (n = 105), p = 0.019.

Conclusions

Initiating MS-therapy with heDMT significantly reduced the risk of 5-year disability progression and relapse compared to using meDMT as first DMT choice in propensity-matched groups of Finnish MS-patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10673-9.

Highly effective disease-modifying treatment as initial MS therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Using highly effective (HE) compounds right from the beginning of disease-modifying immunotherapy (DMT) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) has gained popularity among clinicians and pwMS alike. We discuss the most recent evidence supporting this approach, and whether any of the associated risks should stop us adopting it as a default strategy.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the addition of injectable ofatumumab, and the two oral sphingosine one phosphate modulators siponimod and ozanimod, ten HE DMTs are now available for pwMS, though variation in licensing status and cost may limit their use in some healthcare environments. Real World evidence based on large MS registry data suggests the superiority of early HE DMT over a slow treatment escalation approach; delaying HE DMT leads to more rapid and often irreversible disability accrual. Mechanistically, B-cell depletion, particularly memory B-cell suppression, is a common denominator closely associated with DMT efficacy.

SUMMARY

The concept that HE DMTs are necessarily associated with a high risk of adverse effects, is no longer supported by the evidence. The rather predictable and manageable risk profile of most HE DMTs should lower the threshold for clinicians to discuss such treatment with pwMS as a first line approach.

Interferons and Multiple Sclerosis: Lessons from 25 Years of Clinical and Real-World Experience with Intramuscular Interferon Beta-1a (Avonex)

Recombinant interferon (IFN) β-1b was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as the first disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) in 1993. Since that time, clinical trials and real-world observational studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of IFN therapies. The pivotal intramuscular IFN β-1a phase III trial published in 1996 was the first to demonstrate that a DMT could reduce accumulation of sustained disability in MS. Patient adherence to treatment is higher with intramuscular IFN β-1a, given once weekly, than with subcutaneous formulations requiring multiple injections per week. Moreover, subcutaneous IFN β-1a is associated with an increased incidence of injection-site reactions and neutralizing antibodies compared with intramuscular administration. In recent years, revisions to MS diagnostic criteria have improved clinicians' ability to identify patients with MS and have promoted the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis and disease monitoring. MRI studies show that treatment with IFN β-1a, relative to placebo, reduces T2 and gadolinium-enhancing lesions and gray matter atrophy. Since the approval of intramuscular IFN β-1a, a number of high-efficacy therapies have been approved for MS, though the benefit of these high-efficacy therapies should be balanced against the increased risk of serious adverse events associated with their long-term use. For some subpopulations of patients, including pregnant women, the safety profile of IFN β formulations may provide a particular benefit. In addition, the antiviral properties of IFNs may indicate potential therapeutic opportunities for IFN β in reducing the risk of viral infections such as COVID-19.