Dynamic control of the DNA replication initiation protein DnaA by Soj/ParA

Three factors ParA, TipN, and DnaA-mediated chromosome replication initiation are contributors of centromere segregation in Caulobacter crescentus

The ability of bacteria to maintain chromosomal integrity throughout their life cycle is crucial for survival. In Caulobacter crescentus, the polar factor TipN has been proposed to be involved with the partitioning system ParABS. Cells with tipN knocked out display subtle segregation defects of the centromere-like region parS. We hypothesized that TipN's role with parS segregation is obscured by other forces that are ParABS-independent. To test our hypothesis, we removed one of those forces - chromosome replication - and analyzed the role of TipN with ParA. We first confirm that ParA retains its ability to transport the centromeric region parS from the stalked pole to the opposite pole in the absence of chromosome replication. Our data revealed that in the absence of chromosome replication, TipN becomes essential for ParA's ability to transport parS. Furthermore, we identify a potential connection between the replication initiator DnaA and TipN. Although TipN is not essential for viability, tipN knockout cells lose viability when the regulation of DnaA levels is altered. Our data suggest that the DnaA-dependent susceptibility of tipN knockout cells is connected to parS segregation. Collectively, this work provides insights into the complex regulation involved in the coordination of chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria.

Connecting the dots: key insights on ParB for chromosome segregation from single-molecule studies

Bacterial cells require DNA segregation machinery to properly distribute a genome to both daughter cells upon division. The most common system involved in chromosome and plasmid segregation in bacteria is the ParABS system. A core protein of this system - partition protein B (ParB) - regulates chromosome organization and chromosome segregation during the bacterial cell cycle. Over the past decades, research has greatly advanced our knowledge of the ParABS system. However, many intricate details of the mechanism of ParB proteins were only recently uncovered using in vitro single-molecule techniques. These approaches allowed the exploration of ParB proteins in precisely controlled environments, free from the complexities of the cellular milieu. This review covers the early developments of this field but emphasizes recent advances in our knowledge of the mechanistic understanding of ParB proteins as revealed by in vitro single-molecule methods. Furthermore, we provide an outlook on future endeavors in investigating ParB, ParB-like proteins, and their interaction partners.

TipN's involvement with centromere segregation in Caulobacter crescentus

Bacteria's ability to maintain chromosomal integrity throughout their life cycle is crucial for their survival. In Caulobacter crescentus, the polar factor TipN has been proposed to be involved with the partitioning system ParABS. However, cells with tipN knocked out display subtle parS segregation defects. We hypothesized that TipN's role with parS segregation is obscured by other forces that are ParABS-independent. To test our hypothesis, we removed one of those forces - chromosome replication - and analyzed the role of TipN with ParA. We first demonstrate that ParA retains its ability to transport the centromeric region parS from the stalked pole to the opposite pole in the absence of chromosome replication. Our data revealed that in the absence of chromosome replication, TipN becomes essential for ParA's ability to transport parS. Furthermore, we identify a potential connection between the replication initiator DnaA and TipN. Although TipN is not essential for viability, tipN knockout cells lose viability when the regulation of DnaA levels is altered. Our data suggest that the DnaA-dependent susceptibility of tipN knockout cells is connected to parS segregation. Collectively, this work provides insights into the complex regulation involved in the coordination of chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria.

Cell cycle-coordinated maintenance of the Vibrio bipartite genome

To preserve the integrity of their genome, bacteria rely on several genome maintenance mechanisms that are co-ordinated with the cell cycle. All members of the Vibrio family have a bipartite genome consisting of a primary chromosome (Chr1) homologous to the single chromosome of other bacteria such as Escherichia coli and a secondary chromosome (Chr2) acquired by a common ancestor as a plasmid. In this review, we present our current understanding of genome maintenance in Vibrio cholerae, which is the best-studied model for bacteria with multi-partite genomes. After a brief overview on the diversity of Vibrio genomic architecture, we describe the specific, common, and co-ordinated mechanisms that control the replication and segregation of the two chromosomes of V. cholerae. Particular attention is given to the unique checkpoint mechanism that synchronizes Chr1 and Chr2 replication.

To let go or not to let go: how ParA can impact the release of the chromosomal anchoring in Caulobacter crescentus

Chromosomal maintenance is vital for the survival of bacteria. In Caulobacter crescentus, chromosome replication initiates at ori and segregation is delayed until the nearby centromere-like region parS is replicated. Our understanding of how this sequence of events is regulated remains limited. The segregation of parS has been shown to involve multiple steps including polar release from anchoring protein PopZ, slow movement and fast ParA-dependent movement to the opposite cell pole. In this study, we demonstrate that ParA's competing attractions from PopZ and from DNA are critical for segregation of parS. Interfering with this balance of attractions-by expressing a variant ParA-R195E unable to bind DNA and thus favoring interactions exclusively between ParA-PopZ-results in cell death. Our data revealed that ParA-R195E's sole interactions with PopZ obstruct PopZ's ability to release the polar anchoring of parS, resulting in cells with multiple parS loci fixed at one cell pole. We show that the inability to separate and segregate multiple parS loci from the pole is specifically dependent on the interaction between ParA and PopZ. Collectively, our results reveal that the initial steps in chromosome segregation are highly regulated.

Kinetic principles of ParA2-ATP cycling guide dynamic subcellular localizations in Vibrio cholerae

Dynamic protein gradients are exploited for the spatial organization and segregation of replicated chromosomes. However, mechanisms of protein gradient formation and how that spatially organizes chromosomes remain poorly understood. Here, we have determined the kinetic principles of subcellular localizations of ParA2 ATPase, an essential spatial regulator of chromosome 2 segregation in the multichromosome bacterium, Vibrio cholerae. We found that ParA2 gradients self-organize in V. cholerae cells into dynamic pole-to-pole oscillations. We examined the ParA2 ATPase cycle and ParA2 interactions with ParB2 and DNA. In vitro, ParA2-ATP dimers undergo a rate-limiting conformational switch, catalysed by DNA to achieve DNA-binding competence. This active ParA2 state loads onto DNA cooperatively as higher order oligomers. Our results indicate that the midcell localization of ParB2-parS2 complexes stimulate ATP hydrolysis and ParA2 release from the nucleoid, generating an asymmetric ParA2 gradient with maximal concentration toward the poles. This rapid dissociation coupled with slow nucleotide exchange and conformational switch provides for a temporal lag that allows the redistribution of ParA2 to the opposite pole for nucleoid reattachment. Based on our data, we propose a 'Tug-of-war' model that uses dynamic oscillations of ParA2 to spatially regulate symmetric segregation and positioning of bacterial chromosomes.

The DNA replication initiation protein DnaD recognises a specific strand of the Bacillus subtilis chromosome origin

Genome replication is a fundamental biological activity shared by all organisms. Chromosomal replication proceeds bidirectionally from origins, requiring the loading of two helicases, one for each replisome. However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning helicase loading at bacterial chromosome origins (oriC) are unclear. Here we investigated the essential DNA replication initiation protein DnaD in the model organism Bacillus subtilis. A set of DnaD residues required for ssDNA binding was identified, and photo-crosslinking revealed that this ssDNA binding region interacts preferentially with one strand of oriC. Biochemical and genetic data support the model that DnaD recognizes a new single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) motif located in oriC, the DnaD Recognition Element (DRE). Considered with single particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) imaging of DnaD, we propose that the location of the DRE within oriC orchestrates strand-specific recruitment of helicase during DNA replication initiation. These findings significantly advance our mechanistic understanding of bidirectional replication from a bacterial chromosome origin.

To let go or not to let go: how ParA can impact the release of the chromosomal anchoring in Caulobacter crescentus

Chromosomal maintenance is vital for the survival of bacteria. In Caulobacter crescentus, chromosome replication initiates at ori and segregation is delayed until the nearby centromere-like region parS is replicated. Our understanding of how this sequence of events is regulated remains limited. The segregation of parS has been shown to involve multiple steps including polar release from anchoring protein PopZ, slow movement, and fast ParA-dependent movement to opposite cell pole. In this study, we demonstrate that ParA's competing attractions from PopZ and from DNA are critical for segregation of parS. Interfering with this balance of attractions - by expressing a variant ParA-R195E unable to bind DNA and thus favoring interactions exclusively between ParA-PopZ - results in cell death. Our data revealed that ParA-R195E's sole interactions with PopZ obstruct PopZ's ability to release the polar anchoring of parS resulting in cells with multiple parS loci fixed at one cell pole. We show that the inability to separate and segregate multiple parS loci from the pole is specifically dependent on the interaction between ParA and PopZ. Interfering with interactions between PopZ and the partitioning protein ParB, which is the interaction that anchors parS at the cell pole, does not rescue the ability of cells to separate the fixed parS loci when expressing parA-R195E. Thus, ParA and PopZ appear to have a distinct conversation from ParB yet can impact the release of ParB-parS from the anchoring at the cell pole. Collectively, our results reveal that the initial steps in chromosome segregation are highly regulated.

Rapid profiling of DNA replication dynamics using mass spectrometry-based analysis of nascent DNA

The primary method for probing DNA replication dynamics is DNA fiber analysis, which utilizes thymidine analog incorporation into nascent DNA, followed by immunofluorescent microscopy of DNA fibers. Besides being time-consuming and prone to experimenter bias, it is not suitable for studying DNA replication dynamics in mitochondria or bacteria, nor is it adaptable for higher-throughput analysis. Here, we present mass spectrometry-based analysis of nascent DNA (MS-BAND) as a rapid, unbiased, quantitative alternative to DNA fiber analysis. In this method, incorporation of thymidine analogs is quantified from DNA using triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. MS-BAND accurately detects DNA replication alterations in both the nucleus and mitochondria of human cells, as well as bacteria. The high-throughput capability of MS-BAND captured replication alterations in an E. coli DNA damage-inducing gene library. Therefore, MS-BAND may serve as an alternative to the DNA fiber technique, with potential for high-throughput analysis of replication dynamics in diverse model systems.

ParA's Impact beyond Chromosome Segregation in Caulobacter crescentus

Maintaining proper chromosome inheritance after the completion of each cell cycle is paramount for bacterial survival. Mechanistic details remain incomplete for how bacteria manage to retain complete chromosomes after each cell cycle. In this study, we examined the potential roles of the partitioning protein ParA on chromosomal maintenance that go beyond triggering the onset of chromosome segregation in Caulobacter crescentus. Our data revealed that increasing the levels of ParA result in cells with multiple origins of replication in a DnaA-ATP-dependent manner. This ori supernumerary is retained even when expressing variants of ParA that are deficient in promoting chromosome segregation. Our data suggest that in Caulobacter ParA's impact on replication initiation is likely indirect, possibly through the effect of other cell cycle events. Overall, our data provide new insights into the highly interconnected network that drives the forward progression of the bacterial cell cycle. IMPORTANCE The successful generation of a daughter cell containing a complete copy of the chromosome requires the exquisite coordination of major cell cycle events. Any mistake in this coordination can be lethal, making these processes ideal targets for novel antibiotics. In this study, we focused on the coordination between the onset of chromosome replication, and the partitioning protein ParA. We demonstrate that altering the cellular levels of ParA causes cells to accumulate multiple origins of replication in Caulobacter crescentus. Our work provides important insights into the complex regulation involved in the coordination of the bacterial cell cycle.

A new role for monomeric ParA/Soj in chromosome dynamics in Bacillus subtilis

ParABS (Soj-Spo0J) systems were initially implicated in plasmid and chromosome segregation in bacteria. However, it is now increasingly understood that they play multiple roles in cell cycle events in Bacillus subtilis, and possibly other bacteria. In a recent study, monomeric forms of ParA/Soj have been implicated in regulating aspects of chromosome dynamics during B. subtilis sporulation. In this commentary, I will discuss the known roles of ParABS systems, explore why sporulation is a valuable model for studying these proteins, and the new insights into the role of monomeric ParA/Soj. Finally, I will touch upon some of the future work that remains.

Prophage-encoded small protein YqaH counteracts the activities of the replication initiator DnaA in Bacillus subtilis

Bacterial genomes harbour cryptic prophages that are mostly transcriptionally silent with many unannotated genes. Still, cryptic prophages may contribute to their host fitness and phenotypes. In Bacillus subtilis, the yqaF-yqaN operon belongs to the prophage element skin, and is tightly repressed by the Xre-like repressor SknR. This operon contains several small ORFs (smORFs) potentially encoding small-sized proteins. The smORF-encoded peptide YqaH was previously reported to bind to the replication initiator DnaA. Here, using a yeast two-hybrid assay, we found that YqaH binds to the DNA binding domain IV of DnaA and interacts with Spo0A, a master regulator of sporulation. We isolated single amino acid substitutions in YqaH that abolished the interaction with DnaA but not with Spo0A. Then, using a plasmid-based inducible system to overexpress yqaH WT and mutant derivatives, we studied in B. subtilis the phenotypes associated with the specific loss-of-interaction with DnaA (DnaA_LOI). We found that expression of yqaH carrying DnaA_LOI mutations abolished the deleterious effects of yqaH WT expression on chromosome segregation, replication initiation and DnaA-regulated transcription. When YqaH was induced after vegetative growth, DnaA_LOI mutations abolished the drastic effects of YqaH WT on sporulation and biofilm formation. Thus, YqaH inhibits replication, sporulation and biofilm formation mainly by antagonizing DnaA in a manner that is independent of the cell cycle checkpoint Sda.

Chromosome remodelling by SMC/Condensin in B. subtilis is regulated by monomeric Soj/ParA during growth and sporulation

SMC complexes, loaded at ParB-parS sites, are key mediators of chromosome organization in bacteria. ParA/Soj proteins interact with ParB/Spo0J in a pathway involving adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent dimerization and DNA binding, facilitating chromosome segregation in bacteria. In Bacillus subtilis, ParA/Soj also regulates DNA replication initiation and along with ParB/Spo0J is involved in cell cycle changes during endospore formation. The first morphological stage in sporulation is the formation of an elongated chromosome structure called an axial filament. Here, we show that a major redistribution of SMC complexes drives axial filament formation in a process regulated by ParA/Soj. Furthermore, and unexpectedly, this regulation is dependent on monomeric forms of ParA/Soj that cannot bind DNA or hydrolyze ATP. These results reveal additional roles for ParA/Soj proteins in the regulation of SMC dynamics in bacteria and yet further complexity in the web of interactions involving chromosome replication, segregation and organization, controlled by ParAB and SMC.

Regulation of DNA replication initiation by ParA is independent of parS location in Bacillus subtilis

Replication and segregation of the genetic information is necessary for a cell to proliferate. In Bacillus subtilis, the Par system (ParA/Soj, ParB/Spo0J and parS) is required for segregation of the chromosome origin (oriC) region and for proper control of DNA replication initiation. ParB binds parS sites clustered near the origin of replication and assembles into sliding clamps that interact with ParA to drive origin segregation through a diffusion-ratchet mechanism. As part of this dynamic process, ParB stimulates ParA ATPase activity to trigger its switch from an ATP-bound dimer to an ADP-bound monomer. In addition to its conserved role in DNA segregation, ParA is also a regulator of the master DNA replication initiation protein DnaA. We hypothesized that in B. subtilis the location of the Par system proximal to oriC would be necessary for ParA to properly regulate DnaA. To test this model, we constructed a range of genetically modified strains with altered numbers and locations of parS sites, many of which perturbed chromosome origin segregation as expected. Contrary to our hypothesis, the results show that regulation of DNA replication initiation by ParA is maintained when a parS site is separated from oriC. Because a single parS site is sufficient for proper control of ParA, the results are consistent with a model where ParA is efficiently regulated by ParB sliding clamps following loading at parS.

Multiple mechanisms for overcoming lethal over-initiation of DNA replication

DNA replication is highly regulated and primarily controlled at the step of initiation. In bacteria, the replication initiator DnaA and the origin of replication oriC are the primary targets of regulation. Perturbations that increase or decrease replication initiation can cause a decrease in cell fitness. We found that multiple mechanisms, including an increase in replication elongation and a decrease in replication initiation, can compensate for lethal over-initiation. We found that in Bacillus subtilis, under conditions of rapid growth, loss of yabA, a negative regulator of replication initiation, caused a synthetic lethal phenotype when combined with the dnaA1 mutation that also causes replication over-initiation. We isolated several classes of suppressors that restored viability to dnaA1 ∆yabA double mutants. Some suppressors (relA, nrdR) stimulated replication elongation. Others (dnaC, cshA) caused a decrease in replication initiation. One class of suppressors decreased replication initiation in the dnaA1 ∆yabA mutant by causing a decrease in the amount of the replicative helicase, DnaC. We found that decreased levels of helicase in otherwise wild-type cells were sufficient to decrease replication initiation during rapid growth, indicating that the replicative helicase is limiting for replication initiation. Our results highlight the multiple mechanisms cells use to regulate DNA replication.

A joint-ParB interface promotes Smc DNA recruitment

Chromosomes readily unlink and segregate to daughter cells during cell division, highlighting a remarkable ability of cells to organize long DNA molecules. SMC complexes promote DNA organization by loop extrusion. In most bacteria, chromosome folding initiates at dedicated start sites marked by the ParB/parS partition complexes. Whether SMC complexes recognize a specific DNA structure in the partition complex or a protein component is unclear. By replacing genes in Bacillus subtilis with orthologous sequences from Streptococcus pneumoniae, we show that the three subunits of the bacterial Smc complex together with the ParB protein form a functional module that can organize and segregate foreign chromosomes. Using chimeric proteins and chemical cross-linking, we find that ParB directly binds the Smc subunit. We map an interface to the Smc joint and the ParB CTP-binding domain. Structure prediction indicates how the ParB clamp presents DNA to the Smc complex, presumably to initiate DNA loop extrusion.

Vibrio cholerae Chromosome Partitioning without Polar Anchoring by HubP

Partition systems are widespread among bacterial chromosomes. They are composed of two effectors, ParA and ParB, and cis acting sites, parS, located close to the replication origin of the chromosome (oriC). ParABS participate in chromosome segregation, at least in part because they serve to properly position sister copies of oriC. A fourth element, located at cell poles, is also involved in some cases, such as HubP for the ParABS1 system of Vibrio cholerae chromosome 1 (ch1). The polar anchoring of oriC of ch1 (oriC1) is lost when HubP or ParABS1 are inactivated. Here, we report that in the absence of HubP, ParABS1 actively maintains oriC1 at mid-cell, leading to the subcellular separation of the two ch1 replication arms. We further show that parS1 sites ectopically inserted in chromosome 2 (ch2) stabilize the inheritance of this replicon in the absence of its endogenous partition system, even without HubP. We also observe the positioning interference between oriC1 and oriC of ch2 regions when their positionings are both driven by ParABS1. Altogether, these data indicate that ParABS1 remains functional in the absence of HubP, which raises questions about the role of the polar anchoring of oriC1 in the cell cycle.

Centromere Interactions Promote the Maintenance of the Multipartite Genome in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Many pathogens or symbionts of animals and plants contain multiple replicons, a configuration called a multipartite genome. Multipartite genomes enable those species to replicate their genomes faster and better adapt to new niches. Despite their prevalence, the mechanisms by which multipartite genomes are stably maintained are poorly understood. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen that contains four replicons: a circular chromosome (Ch1), a linear chromosome (Ch2), and two large plasmids. Recent work indicates that their replication origins are clustered at the cell poles in a manner that depends on their ParB family centromeric proteins: ParB1 for Ch1 and individual RepB paralogs for Ch2 and the plasmids. However, understanding of these interactions and how they contribute to genome maintenance is limited. By combining genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) assays, chromatin-immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), and live cell fluorescence microscopy, we provide evidence here that centromeric clustering is mediated by interactions between these centromeric proteins. We further show that the disruption of centromere clustering results in the loss of replicons. Our data establish the role of centromeric clustering in multipartite genome stability. IMPORTANCE About 10% of sequenced bacteria have multiple replicons, also known as multipartite genomes. How these multipartite genomes are maintained is still poorly understood. Here, we use Agrobacterium tumefaciens as a model and show that the replication origins of the four replicons are clustered through direct interactions between the centromeric proteins; disruption of origin clustering leads to the loss of replicons. Thus, our study provided evidence that centromeric clustering is important for maintaining multipartite genomes.

Conformation and dynamic interactions of the multipartite genome in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

How bacteria with multipartite genomes organize and segregate their DNA is poorly understood. Here, we investigate a prototypical multipartite genome in the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens. We identify previously unappreciated interreplicon interactions: the four replicons cluster through interactions at their centromeres, and the two chromosomes, one circular and one linear, interact along their replication arms. Our data suggest that these interreplicon contacts play critical roles in the organization and maintenance of multipartite genomes.

Bacterial species from diverse phyla contain multiple replicons, yet how these multipartite genomes are organized and segregated during the cell cycle remains poorly understood. Agrobacterium tumefaciens has a 2.8-Mb circular chromosome (Ch1), a 2.1-Mb linear chromosome (Ch2), and two large plasmids (pAt and pTi). We used this alpha proteobacterium as a model to investigate the global organization and temporal segregation of a multipartite genome. Using chromosome conformation capture assays, we demonstrate that both the circular and the linear chromosomes, but neither of the plasmids, have their left and right arms juxtaposed from their origins to their termini, generating interarm interactions that require the broadly conserved structural maintenance of chromosomes complex. Moreover, our study revealed two types of interreplicon interactions: “ori-ori clustering” in which the replication origins of all four replicons interact, and “Ch1-Ch2 alignment” in which the arms of Ch1 and Ch2 interact linearly along their lengths. We show that the centromeric proteins (ParB1 for Ch1 and RepB^Ch2 for Ch2) are required for both types of interreplicon contacts. Finally, using fluorescence microscopy, we validated the clustering of the origins and observed their frequent colocalization during segregation. Altogether, our findings provide a high-resolution view of the conformation of a multipartite genome. We hypothesize that intercentromeric contacts promote the organization and maintenance of diverse replicons.

Relief of ParB autoinhibition by parS DNA catalysis and recycling of ParB by CTP hydrolysis promote bacterial centromere assembly

Three-component ParABS systems are widely distributed factors for plasmid partitioning and chromosome segregation in bacteria. ParB acts as adaptor protein between the 16–base pair centromeric parS DNA sequences and the DNA segregation proteins ParA and Smc (structural maintenance of chromosomes). Upon cytidine triphosphate (CTP) and parS DNA binding, ParB dimers form DNA clamps that spread onto parS-flanking DNA by sliding, thus assembling the so-called partition complex. We show here that CTP hydrolysis is essential for efficient chromosome segregation by ParABS but largely dispensable for Smc recruitment. Our results suggest that CTP hydrolysis contributes to partition complex assembly via two mechanisms. It promotes ParB unloading from DNA to limit the extent of ParB spreading, and it recycles off-target ParB clamps to allow for parS retargeting, together superconcentrating ParB near parS. We also propose a model for clamp closure involving a steric clash when binding ParB protomers to opposing parS half sites.

Temporal compartmentalization of viral infection in bacterial cells

Virus infection causes major rearrangements in the subcellular architecture of eukaryotes, but its impact in prokaryotic cells was much less characterized. Here, we show that infection of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis by bacteriophage SPP1 leads to a hijacking of host replication proteins to assemble hybrid viral-bacterial replisomes for SPP1 genome replication. Their biosynthetic activity doubles the cell total DNA content within 15 min. Replisomes operate at several independent locations within a single viral DNA focus positioned asymmetrically in the cell. This large nucleoprotein complex is a self-contained compartment whose boundaries are delimited neither by a membrane nor by a protein cage. Later during infection, SPP1 procapsids localize at the periphery of the viral DNA compartment for genome packaging. The resulting DNA-filled capsids do not remain associated to the DNA transactions compartment. They bind to phage tails to build infectious particles that are stored in warehouse compartments spatially independent from the viral DNA. Free SPP1 structural proteins are recruited to the dynamic phage-induced compartments following an order that recapitulates the viral particle assembly pathway. These findings show that bacteriophages restructure the crowded host cytoplasm to confine at different cellular locations the sequential processes that are essential for their multiplication.

Conjugative plasmid-encoded toxin-antitoxin system PrpT/PrpA directly controls plasmid copy number

Since conjugative plasmids are usually large and may carry genes encoding functions that are detrimental to the bacterial host, minimizing plasmid copy number is critical for reducing the host burden. Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems are one of the conserved modules on conjugative plasmids. Here, we demonstrate the functional significance of a large group of antitoxins on conjugative plasmids: the antitoxin acts as an unexpected player in the negative control of plasmid replication. For the plasmid-encoded PrpT/PrpA TA system, the antitoxin can control toxin production by binding to PrpT and by reducing plasmid copy number. This work shows that the antitoxin can directly regulate plasmid replication, expanding our understanding of the physiological role of TA systems.

Toxin–antitoxin (TA) loci were initially identified on conjugative plasmids, and one function of plasmid-encoded TA systems is to stabilize plasmids or increase plasmid competition via postsegregational killing. Here, we discovered that the type II TA system, Pseudoalteromonas rubra plasmid toxin–antitoxin PrpT/PrpA, on a low-copy-number conjugative plasmid, directly controls plasmid replication. Toxin PrpT resembles ParE of plasmid RK2 while antitoxin PrpA (PF03693) shares no similarity with previously characterized antitoxins. Surprisingly, deleting this prpA-prpT operon from the plasmid does not result in plasmid segregational loss, but greatly increases plasmid copy number. Mechanistically, the antitoxin PrpA functions as a negative regulator of plasmid replication, by binding to the iterons in the plasmid origin that inhibits the binding of the replication initiator to the iterons. We also demonstrated that PrpA is produced at a higher level than PrpT to prevent the plasmid from overreplicating, while partial or complete degradation of labile PrpA derepresses plasmid replication. Importantly, the PrpT/PrpA TA system is conserved and is widespread on many conjugative plasmids. Altogether, we discovered a function of a plasmid-encoded TA system that provides new insights into the physiological significance of TA systems.

Genome-wide association studies reveal candidate genes associated to bacteraemia caused by ST93-IV CA-MRSA

BACKGROUND

The global emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has seen the dominance of specific clones in different regions around the world with the PVL-positive ST93-IV as the predominant CA-MRSA clone in Australia. In this study we applied a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach on a collection of Australian ST93-IV MRSA genomes to screen for genetic traits that might have assisted the ongoing transmission of ST93-IV in Australia. We also compared the genomes of ST93-IV bacteraemia and non-bacteraemia isolates to search for potential virulence genes associated with bacteraemia.

RESULTS

Based on single nucleotide polymorphism phylogenetics we revealed two distinct ST93-IV clades circulating concurrently in Australia. One of the clades contained isolates primarily isolated in the northern regions of Australia whilst isolates in the second clade were distributed across the country. Analyses of the ST93-IV genome plasticity over a 15-year period (2002-2017) revealed an observed gain in accessory genes amongst the clone's population. GWAS analysis on the bacteraemia isolates identified two gene candidates that have previously been associated to this kind of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this hypothesis was not tested here, it is possible that the emergence of a ST93-IV clade containing additional virulence genes might be related to the high prevalence of ST93-IV infections amongst the indigenous population living in the northern regions of Australia. More importantly, our data also demonstrated that GWAS can reveal candidate genes for further investigations on the pathogenesis and evolution of MRSA strains within a same lineage.

Induction of proteome changes involved in biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis in response to gentamicin

BACKGROUND

Enterococcus faecalis is a significant cause of nosocomial infections and other diseases, including endocarditis, bacteremia, and urinary tract infections. This microorganism forms biofilms to overcome difficult environmental conditions, such as lack of oxygen, lack of water, and the presence of antimicrobials. These biofilms make diseases difficult by changing their proteome contents, protecting the bacterium, and increasing their pathogenicity. This study aimed to evaluate gentamicin's effect on proteome changes and biofilm formation in E. faecalis.

METHOD

Twenty-five clinical isolates and one standard isolate were selected for the experiments. A label-free/gel-free proteomic and microtiter plate techniques were used to study proteome changes and biofilm formation, respectively.

RESULTS

Gentamicin significantly increased the biofilm formation in 62% of isolates and the rest of the isolates; no significant change was observed. The abundance of lactate utilization protein C, ribosomal RNA small subunit methyltransferase H, and protein translocase subunit SecA were increased. However, the abundances of proteins effective in cell division and metabolism, such as replication initiation protein and segregation and condensation protein A, were decreased.

CONCLUSION

The present study's findings exhibited that antibiotics might have adverse effects on treatment and increase microorganisms' pathogenicity. It was observed in gentamicin as induction of biofilm formation through different mechanisms, particularly changes in the expression of specific proteins in E. faecalis.

Molecular insights into replication initiation in a multipartite genome harboring bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans

Deinococcus radiodurans harbors a multipartite ploid genome system consisting of two chromosomes and two plasmids present in multiple copies. How these discrete genome elements are maintained and inherited is not well understood. PprA, a pleiotropic protein involved in radioresistance, has been characterized for its roles in DNA repair, genome segregation, and cell division in this bacterium. Here, we show that PprA regulates ploidy of chromosome I and II and inhibits the activity of drDnaA, the initiator protein in D. radiodurans. We found that pprA deletion resulted in an increased genomic content and ploidy of both the chromosomal elements. Expression of PprA in trans rescued the phenotypes of the pprA mutant. To understand the molecular mechanism underlying these phenotypes, we characterized drDnaA and drDnaB. As expected for an initiator protein, recombinant drDnaA showed sequence-specific interactions with the putative oriC sequence in chromosome I (oriCI). Both drDnaA and drDnaB showed ATPase activity, also typical of initiator proteins, but only drDnaB exhibited 5'→3' dsDNA helicase activity in vitro. drDnaA and drDnaB showed homotypic and heterotypic interactions with each other, which were perturbed by PprA. Interestingly, PprA has inhibited the ATPase activity of drDnaA but showed no effect on the activity of drDnaB. Regulation of chromosome copy number and inhibition of the initiator protein functions by PprA strongly suggest that it plays a role as a checkpoint regulator of the DNA replication initiation in D. radiodurans perhaps through its interaction with the replication initiation machinery.

Characterization of ori and parS-like functions in secondary genome replicons in Deinococcus radiodurans

The mechanisms underlying multipartite genome maintenance and its functional significance in extraordinary radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans are not well understood. The sequences upstream to parAB operons in chrII (cisII) and MP (cisMP) could stabilize an otherwise, non-replicative colE1 plasmid, in D. radiodurans DnaA and cognate ParB proteins bound specifically with cisII and cisMP elements. The ΔcisII and ΔcisMP cells showed the reduced copy number of cognate replicons and radioresistance as compared with wild type. Fluorescent reporter-operator system inserted in chrI, chrII, and MP in wild type and cisII mutants showed the presence of all three replicons in wild-type cells. Although chrI was present in all the ΔcisII and ΔcisMP cells, nearly half of these cells had chrII and MP, respectively, and the other half had the reduced number of foci representing these replications. These results suggested that cisII and cisMP elements contain both origin of replication and parS-like functions and the secondary genome replicons (chrII and MP) are maintained independent of chrI and have roles in radioresistance of D. radiodurans.

Bacterial chromosome segregation by the ParABS system

Proper chromosome segregation during cell division is essential in all domains of life. In the majority of bacterial species, faithful chromosome segregation is mediated by the tripartite ParABS system, consisting of an ATPase protein ParA, a CTPase and DNA-binding protein ParB, and a centromere-like parS site. The parS site is most often located near the origin of replication and is segregated first after chromosome replication. ParB nucleates on parS before binding to adjacent non-specific DNA to form a multimeric nucleoprotein complex. ParA interacts with ParB to drive the higher-order ParB–DNA complex, and hence the replicating chromosomes, to each daughter cell. Here, we review the various models for the formation of the ParABS complex and describe its role in segregating the origin-proximal region of the chromosome. Additionally, we discuss outstanding questions and challenges in understanding bacterial chromosome segregation.

Chromosome Segregation Proteins as Coordinators of Cell Cycle in Response to Environmental Conditions

Chromosome segregation is a crucial stage of the cell cycle. In general, proteins involved in this process are DNA-binding proteins, and in most bacteria, ParA and ParB are the main players; however, some bacteria manage this process by employing other proteins, such as condensins. The dynamic interaction between ParA and ParB drives movement and exerts positioning of the chromosomal origin of replication (oriC) within the cell. In addition, both ParA and ParB were shown to interact with the other proteins, including those involved in cell division or cell elongation. The significance of these interactions for the progression of the cell cycle is currently under investigation. Remarkably, DNA binding by ParA and ParB as well as their interactions with protein partners conceivably may be modulated by intra- and extracellular conditions. This notion provokes the question of whether chromosome segregation can be regarded as a regulatory stage of the cell cycle. To address this question, we discuss how environmental conditions affect chromosome segregation and how segregation proteins influence other cell cycle processes.

Rules and Exceptions: The Role of Chromosomal ParB in DNA Segregation and Other Cellular Processes

The segregation of newly replicated chromosomes in bacterial cells is a highly coordinated spatiotemporal process. In the majority of bacterial species, a tripartite ParAB-parS system, composed of an ATPase (ParA), a DNA-binding protein (ParB), and its target(s) parS sequence(s), facilitates the initial steps of chromosome partitioning. ParB nucleates around parS(s) located in the vicinity of newly replicated oriCs to form large nucleoprotein complexes, which are subsequently relocated by ParA to distal cellular compartments. In this review, we describe the role of ParB in various processes within bacterial cells, pointing out interspecies differences. We outline recent progress in understanding the ParB nucleoprotein complex formation and its role in DNA segregation, including ori positioning and anchoring, DNA condensation, and loading of the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins. The auxiliary roles of ParBs in the control of chromosome replication initiation and cell division, as well as the regulation of gene expression, are discussed. Moreover, we catalog ParB interacting proteins. Overall, this work highlights how different bacterial species adapt the DNA partitioning ParAB-parS system to meet their specific requirements.

Overexpression of the Chromosome Partitioning Gene parA in Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 Alters the Bacteroid Morphotype in Sesbania rostrata Stem Nodules

Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 is a diazotroph that forms N2-fixing nodules on the roots and stems of the tropical legume Sesbania rostrata. Deletion of the parA gene of this bacterium results in cell cycle defects, pleiomorphic cell shape, and formation of immature stem nodules on its host plant. In this study, we constructed a parA overexpression mutant (PnptII-parA) to complement a previous study and provide new insights into bacteroid formation. We found that overproduction of ParA did not affect growth, cell morphology, chromosome partitioning, or vegetative nitrogen fixation in the free-living state. Under symbiosis, however, distinctive features, such as a single swollen bacteroid in one symbiosome, relatively narrow symbiosome space, and polyploid cells were observed. The morphotype of the PnptII-parA bacteroid is reminiscent of terminal differentiation in some IRLC indeterminate nodules, but S. rostrata is not thought to produce the NCR peptides that induce terminal differentiation in rhizobia. In addition, the transcript patterns of many symbiosis-related genes elicited by PnptII-parA were different from those elicited by the wild type. Accordingly, we propose that the particular symbiosome formation in PnptII-parA stem-nodules is due to cell cycle disruption caused by excess ParA protein in the symbiotic cells during nodulation.

A novel system of bacterial cell division arrest implicated in horizontal transmission of an integrative and conjugative element

Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) are widespread mobile DNA elements in the prokaryotic world. ICEs are usually retained within the bacterial chromosome, but can be excised and transferred from a donor to a new recipient cell, even of another species. Horizontal transmission of ICEclc, a prevalent ICE in proteobacteria, only occurs from developed specialized transfer competent (tc) cells in the donor population. tc cells become entirely dedicated to the ICE transmission at the cost of cell proliferation. The cell growth impairment is mediated by two ICEclc located genes, parA and shi, but the mechanistic and dynamic details of this process are unknown. To better understand the function of ParA and Shi, we followed their intracellular behavior from fluorescent protein fusions, and studied host cell division at single-cell level. Superresolution imaging revealed that ParA-mCherry colocalized with the host nucleoid while Shi-GFP was enriched at the membrane during the growth impairment. Despite being enriched at different cellular locations, the two proteins showed in vivo interactions, and mutations in the Walker A motif of ParA dislocalized both ParA and Shi. In addition, ParA mutations in the ATPase motif abolished the growth arrest on the host cell. Time-lapse microscopy revealed that ParA and Shi initially delay cell division, suggesting an extension of the S phase of cells, but eventually completely inhibit cell elongation. The parA-shi locus is highly conserved in other ICEclc-related elements, and expressing ParA-Shi from ICEclc in other proteobacterial species caused similar growth arrest, suggesting that the system functions similarly across hosts. The results of our study provide mechanistic insight into the novel and unique system on ICEs and help to understand such epistatic interaction between ICE genes and host physiology that entails efficient horizontal gene transfer.

Chromosome Dynamics in Bacteria: Triggering Replication at the Opposite Location and Segregation in the Opposite Direction

Maintaining the integrity of the genome is essential to cell survival. In the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus, the single circular chromosome exhibits a specific orientation in the cell, with the replication origin (ori) residing at the pole of the cell bearing a stalk. Upon initiation of replication, the duplicated centromere-like region parS and ori move rapidly to the opposite pole where parS is captured by a microdomain hosting a unique set of proteins that contribute to the identity of progeny cells. Many questions remain as to how this organization is maintained. In this study, we constructed strains of Caulobacter in which ori and the parS centromere can be induced to move to the opposite cell pole in the absence of chromosome replication, allowing us to ask whether once these chromosomal foci were positioned at the wrong pole, replication initiation and chromosome segregation can proceed in the opposite orientation. Our data reveal that DnaA can initiate replication and ParA can orchestrate segregation from either cell pole. The cell reconstructs the organization of its ParA gradient in the opposite orientation to segregate one replicated centromere from the new pole toward the stalked pole (i.e., opposite direction), while displaying no detectable viability defects. Thus, the unique polar microdomains exhibit remarkable flexibility in serving as a platform for directional chromosome segregation along the long axis of the cell.IMPORTANCE Bacteria can accomplish surprising levels of organization in the absence of membrane organelles by constructing subcellular asymmetric protein gradients. These gradients are composed of regulators that can either trigger or inhibit cell cycle events from distinct cell poles. In Caulobacter crescentus, the onset of chromosome replication and segregation from the stalked pole are regulated by asymmetric protein gradients. We show that the activators of chromosome replication and segregation are not restricted to the stalked pole and that their organization and directionality can be flipped in orientation. Our results also indicate that the subcellular location of key chromosomal loci play important roles in the establishment of the asymmetric organization of cell cycle regulators.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa partitioning protein ParB acts as a nucleoid-associated protein binding to multiple copies of a parS-related motif

ParA and ParB homologs are involved in accurate chromosome segregation in bacteria. ParBs participate in the separation of ori domains by binding to parS palindromes, mainly localized close to oriC. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa neither ParB deficiency nor modification of all 10 parSs is lethal. However, such mutants show not only defects in chromosome segregation but also growth retardation and motility dysfunctions. Moreover, a lack of parB alters expression of over 1000 genes, suggesting that ParB could interact with the chromosome outside its canonical parS targets. Here, we show that indeed ParB binds specifically to hundreds of sites in the genome. ChIP-seq analysis revealed 420 ParB-associated regions in wild-type strain and around 1000 in a ParB-overproducing strain and in various parS mutants. The vast majority of the ParB-enriched loci contained a heptanucleotide motif corresponding to one arm of the parS palindrome. All previously postulated parSs, except parS5, interacted with ParB in vivo. Whereas the ParB binding to the four parS sites closest to oriC, parS1-4, is involved in chromosome segregation, its genome-wide interactions with hundreds of parS half-sites could affect chromosome topology, compaction and gene expression, thus allowing P. aeruginosa ParB to be classified as a nucleoid-associated protein.

The ParB homologs, Spo0J and Noc, together prevent premature midcell Z ring assembly when the early stages of replication are blocked in Bacillus subtilis

Precise cell division in coordination with DNA replication and segregation is of utmost importance for all organisms. The earliest stage of cell division is the assembly of a division protein FtsZ into a ring, known as the Z ring, at midcell. What still eludes us, however, is how bacteria precisely position the Z ring at midcell. Work in B. subtilis over the last two decades has identified a link between the early stages of DNA replication and cell division. A recent model proposed that the progression of the early stages of DNA replication leads to an increased ability for the Z ring to form at midcell. This model arose through studies examining Z ring position in mutants blocked at different steps of the early stages of DNA replication. Here, we show that this model is unlikely to be correct and the mutants previously studied generate nucleoids with different capacity for blocking midcell Z ring assembly. Importantly, our data suggest that two proteins of the widespread ParB family, Noc and Spo0J are required to prevent Z ring assembly over the bacterial nucleoid and help fine tune the assembly of the Z ring at midcell during the cell cycle.

Random Chromosome Partitioning in the Polyploid Bacterium Thermus thermophilus HB27

Little is known about chromosome segregation in polyploid prokaryotes. In this study, whether stringent or variable chromosome segregation occurs in polyploid thermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus was analyzed. A stable heterozygous strain (HL01) containing two antibiotic resistance markers at one gene locus was generated. The inheritance of the two alleles in the progeny of the heterozygous strain was then followed. During incubation without selection pressure, the fraction of heterozygous cells decreased and that of homozygous cells increased, while the relative abundance of each allele in the whole population remained constant, suggesting chromosome segregation had experienced random event. Consistently, in comparison with Bacillus subtilis in which the sister chromosomes were segregated equally, the ratios of DNA content in two daughter cells of T. thermophilus had a broader distribution and a larger standard deviation, indicating that the DNA content in the two daughter cells was not always identical. Further, the protein homologs (i.e., ParA and MreB) which have been suggested to be involved in bacterial chromosome partitioning did not actively participate in the chromosome segregation in T. thermophilus. Therefore, it seems that protein-based chromosome segregation machineries are less critical for the polyploid T. thermophilus, and chromosome segregation in this bacterium are not stringently controlled but tend to be variable, and random segregation can occur.

ParA proteins of secondary genome elements cross-talk and regulate radioresistance through genome copy number reduction in Deinococcus radiodurans

Deinococcus radiodurans, an extremely radioresistant bacterium has a multipartite genome system and ploidy. Mechanisms underlying such types of bacterial genome maintenance and its role in extraordinary radioresistance are not known in this bacterium. Chromosome I (Chr I), chromosome II (Chr II) and megaplasmid (Mp) encode its own set of genome partitioning proteins. Here, we have characterized P-loop ATPases of Chr II (ParA2) and Mp (ParA3) and their roles in the maintenance of genome copies and extraordinary radioresistance. Purified ParA2 and ParA3 showed nearly similar polymerization kinetics and interaction patterns with DNA. Electron microscopic examination of purified proteins incubated with DNA showed polymerization on nicked circular dsDNA. ParA2 and ParA3 showed both homotypic and heterotypic interactions to each other, but not with ParA1 (ParA of Chr I). Similarly, ParA2 and ParA3 interacted with ParB2 and ParB3 but not with ParB1 in vivo. ParB2 and ParB3 interaction with cis-elements located upstream to the corresponding parAB operon was found to be sequence-specific. Unlike single mutant of parA2 and parA3, their double mutant (ΔparA2ΔParA3) affected copy number of cognate genome elements and resistance to γ-radiation as well as hydrogen peroxide in this bacterium. These results suggested that ParA2 and ParA3 are DNA-binding ATPases producing higher order polymers on DNA and are functionally redundant in the maintenance of secondary genome elements in D. radiodurans. The findings also suggest the involvement of secondary genome elements such as Chr II and Mp in the extraordinary radioresistance of D. radiodurans.

Crosstalk Regulation Between Bacterial Chromosome Replication and Chromosome Partitioning

Despite much effort, the bacterial cell cycle has proved difficult to study and understand. Bacteria do not conform to the standard eukaryotic model of sequential cell-cycle phases. Instead, for example, bacteria overlap their phases of chromosome replication and chromosome partitioning. In “eukaryotic terms,” bacteria simultaneously perform “S-phase” and “mitosis” whose coordination is absolutely required for rapid growth and survival. In this review, we focus on the signaling “crosstalk,” meaning the signaling mechanisms that advantageously commit bacteria to start both chromosome replication and chromosome partitioning. After briefly reviewing the molecular mechanisms of replication and partitioning, we highlight the crosstalk research from Bacillus subtilis, Vibrio cholerae, and Caulobacter crescentus. As the initiator of chromosome replication, DnaA also mediates crosstalk in each of these model bacteria but not always in the same way. We next focus on the C. crescentus cell cycle and describe how it is revealing novel crosstalk mechanisms. Recent experiments show that the novel nucleoid associated protein GapR has a special role(s) in starting and separating the replicating chromosomes, so that upon asymmetric cell division, the new chromosomes acquire different fates in C. crescentus’s distinct replicating and non-replicating cell types. The C. crescentus PopZ protein forms a special cell-pole organizing matrix that anchors the chromosomes through their centromere-like DNA sequences near the origin of replication. We also describe how PopZ anchors and interacts with several key cell-cycle regulators, thereby providing an organized subcellular environment for more novel crosstalk mechanisms.

In Vivo Imaging of the Segregation of the 2 Chromosomes and the Cell Division Proteins of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reveals an Unexpected Role for MipZ

Cell division has to be coordinated with chromosome segregation to ensure the stable inheritance of genetic information. We investigated this coordination in the multichromosome bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. By examining the origin and terminus regions of the two chromosomes, the ParA-like ATPase MipZ and FtsZ, we showed that chromosome 1 appears to be the “master” chromosome connecting DNA segregation and cell division, with MipZ being critical for coordination. MipZ shows an unexpected localization pattern, with MipZ monomers interacting with ParB of the chromosome 1 at the cell poles whereas MipZ dimers colocalize with FtsZ at midcell during constriction, both forming dynamic rings. These data suggest that MipZ has roles in R. sphaeroides in both controlling septation and coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division.

Coordinating chromosome duplication and segregation with cell division is clearly critical for bacterial species with one chromosome. The precise choreography required is even more complex in species with more than one chromosome. The alpha subgroup of bacteria contains not only one of the best-studied bacterial species, Caulobacter crescentus, but also several species with more than one chromosome. Rhodobacter sphaeroides is an alphaproteobacterium with two chromosomes, but, unlike C. crescentus, it divides symmetrically rather than buds and lacks the complex CtrA-dependent control mechanism. By examining the Ori and Ter regions of both chromosomes and associated ParA and ParB proteins relative to cell division proteins FtsZ and MipZ, we have identified a different pattern of chromosome segregation and cell division. The pattern of chromosome duplication and segregation resembles that of Vibrio cholerae, not that of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, with duplication of the origin and terminus regions of chromosome 2 controlled by chromosome 1. Key proteins are localized to different sites compared to C. crescentus. OriC1 and ParB1 are localized to the old pole, while MipZ and FtsZ localize to the new pole. Movement of ParB1 to the new pole following chromosome duplication releases FtsZ, which forms a ring at midcell, but, unlike reports for other species, MipZ monomers do not form a gradient but oscillate between poles, with the nucleotide-bound monomer and the dimer localizing to midcell. MipZ dimers form a single ring (with a smaller diameter) close to the FtsZ ring at midcell and constrict with the FtsZ ring. Overproduction of the dimer form results in filamentation, suggesting that MipZ dimers are regulating FtsZ activity and thus septation. This is an unexpected role for MipZ and provides a new model for the integration of chromosome segregation and cell division.

A conserved mechanism drives partition complex assembly on bacterial chromosomes and plasmids

Chromosome and plasmid segregation in bacteria are mostly driven by ParABS systems. These DNA partitioning machineries rely on large nucleoprotein complexes assembled on centromere sites (parS). However, the mechanism of how a few parS-bound ParB proteins nucleate the formation of highly concentrated ParB clusters remains unclear despite several proposed physico-mathematical models. We discriminated between these different models by varying some key parameters in vivo using the F plasmid partition system. We found that "Nucleation & caging" is the only coherent model recapitulating in vivo data. We also showed that the stochastic self-assembly of partition complexes (i) is a robust mechanism, (ii) does not directly involve ParA ATPase, (iii) results in a dynamic structure of discrete size independent of ParB concentration, and (iv) is not perturbed by active transcription but is by protein complexes. We refined the "Nucleation & caging" model and successfully applied it to the chromosomally encoded Par system of Vibrio cholerae, indicating that this stochastic self-assembly mechanism is widely conserved from plasmids to chromosomes.

Competition between DivIVA and the nucleoid for ParA binding promotes segrosome separation and modulates mycobacterial cell elongation

Although mycobacteria are rod shaped and divide by simple binary fission, their cell cycle exhibits unusual features: unequal cell division producing daughter cells that elongate with different velocities, as well as asymmetric chromosome segregation and positioning throughout the cell cycle. As in other bacteria, mycobacterial chromosomes are segregated by pair of proteins, ParA and ParB. ParA is an ATPase that interacts with nucleoprotein ParB complexes – segrosomes and non‐specifically binds the nucleoid. Uniquely in mycobacteria, ParA interacts with a polar protein DivIVA (Wag31), responsible for asymmetric cell elongation, however the biological role of this interaction remained unknown. We hypothesised that this interaction plays a critical role in coordinating chromosome segregation with cell elongation. Using a set of ParA mutants, we determined that disruption of ParA‐DNA binding enhanced the interaction between ParA and DivIVA, indicating a competition between the nucleoid and DivIVA for ParA binding. Having identified the ParA mutation that disrupts its recruitment to DivIVA, we found that it led to inefficient segrosomes separation and increased the cell elongation rate. Our results suggest that ParA modulates DivIVA activity. Thus, we demonstrate that the ParA‐DivIVA interaction facilitates chromosome segregation and modulates cell elongation.

Replicate Once Per Cell Cycle: Replication Control of Secondary Chromosomes

Faithful vertical transmission of genetic information, especially of essential core genes, is a prerequisite for bacterial survival. Hence, replication of all the replicons is tightly controlled to ensure that all daughter cells get the same genome copy as their mother cell. Essential core genes are very often carried by the main chromosome. However they can occasionally be found on secondary chromosomes, recently renamed chromids. Chromids have evolved from non-essential megaplasmids, and further acquired essential core genes and a genomic signature closed to that of the main chromosome. All chromids carry a plasmidic replication origin, belonging so far to either the iterons or repABC type. Based on these differences, two categories of chromids have been distinguished. In this review, we focus on the replication initiation controls of these two types of chromids. We show that the sophisticated mechanisms controlling their replication evolved from their plasmid counterparts to allow a timely controlled replication, occurring once per cell cycle.

SMC Progressively Aligns Chromosomal Arms in Caulobacter crescentus but Is Antagonized by Convergent Transcription

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex plays an important role in chromosome organization and segregation in most living organisms. In Caulobacter crescentus, SMC is required to align the left and the right arms of the chromosome that run in parallel down the long axis of the cell. However, the mechanism of SMC-mediated alignment of chromosomal arms remains elusive. Here, using genome-wide methods and microscopy of single cells, we show that Caulobacter SMC is recruited to the centromeric parS site and that SMC-mediated arm alignment depends on the chromosome-partitioning protein ParB. We provide evidence that SMC likely tethers the parS-proximal regions of the chromosomal arms together, promoting arm alignment. Furthermore, we show that highly transcribed genes near parS that are oriented against SMC translocation disrupt arm alignment, suggesting that head-on transcription interferes with SMC translocation. Our results demonstrate a tight interdependence of bacterial chromosome organization and global patterns of transcription.

•

Caulobacter SMC aligns the two chromosomal arms progressively from ori to ter

•

SMC is loaded at parS, and ParB is essential for SMC-mediated arm alignment

•

SMC likely functions as a tether to cohese parS-proximal DNA together

•

Head-on transcription interferes with SMC translocation from parS

The Conserved DNA Binding Protein WhiA Influences Chromosome Segregation in Bacillus subtilis

The DNA binding protein WhiA is conserved in Gram-positive bacteria and is present in the genetically simple cell wall-lacking mycoplasmas. The protein shows homology to eukaryotic homing endonucleases but lacks nuclease activity. WhiA was first characterized in streptomycetes, where it regulates the expression of key differentiation genes, including the cell division gene ftsZ, which is essential for sporulation. For Bacillus subtilis, it was shown that WhiA is essential when certain cell division genes are deleted. However, in B. subtilis, WhiA is not required for sporulation, and it does not seem to function as a transcription factor, despite its DNA binding activity. The exact function of B. subtilis WhiA remains elusive. We noticed that whiA mutants show an increased space between their nucleoids, and here, we describe the results of fluorescence microscopy, genetic, and transcriptional experiments to further investigate this phenomenon. It appeared that the deletion of whiA is synthetic lethal when either the DNA replication and segregation regulator ParB or the DNA replication inhibitor YabA is absent. However, WhiA does not seem to affect replication initiation. We found that a ΔwhiA mutant is highly sensitive for DNA-damaging agents. Further tests revealed that the deletion of parAB induces the SOS response, including the cell division inhibitor YneA. When yneA was inactivated, the viability of the synthetic lethal ΔwhiA ΔparAB mutant was restored. However, the nucleoid segregation phenotype remained. These findings underline the importance of WhiA for cell division and indicate that the protein also plays a role in DNA segregation.IMPORTANCE The conserved WhiA protein family can be found in most Gram-positive bacteria, including the genetically simple cell wall-lacking mycoplasmas, and these proteins play a role in cell division. WhiA has some homology with eukaryotic homing endonucleases but lacks nuclease activity. Because of its DNA binding activity, it is assumed that the protein functions as a transcription factor, but this is not the case in the model system B. subtilis The function of this protein in B. subtilis remains unclear. We noticed that a whiA mutant has a mild chromosome segregation defect. Further studies of this phenomenon provided new support for a functional role of WhiA in cell division and indicated that the protein is required for normal chromosome segregation.

DNA gyrase activity regulates DnaA-dependent replication initiation in Bacillus subtilis

In bacteria, initiation of DNA replication requires the DnaA protein. Regulation of DnaA association and activity at the origin of replication, oriC, is the predominant mechanism of replication initiation control. One key feature known to be generally important for replication is DNA topology. Although there have been some suggestions that topology may impact replication initiation, whether this mechanism regulates DnaA-mediated replication initiation is unclear. We found that the essential topoisomerase, DNA gyrase, is required for both proper binding of DnaA to oriC as well as control of initiation frequency in Bacillus subtilis. Furthermore, we found that the regulatory activity of gyrase in initiation is specific to DnaA and oriC. Cells initiating replication from a DnaA-independent origin, oriN, are largely resistant to gyrase inhibition by novobiocin, even at concentrations that compromise survival by up to four orders of magnitude in oriC cells. Furthermore, inhibition of gyrase does not impact initiation frequency in oriN cells. Additionally, deletion or overexpression of the DnaA regulator, YabA, significantly modulates sensitivity to gyrase inhibition, but only in oriC and not oriN cells. We propose that gyrase is a negative regulator of DnaA-dependent replication initiation from oriC, and that this regulatory mechanism is required for cell survival.

A novel nucleoid-associated protein coordinates chromosome replication and chromosome partition

We searched for regulators of chromosome replication in the cell cycle model Caulobacter crescentus and found a novel DNA-binding protein (GapR) that selectively aids the initiation of chromosome replication and the initial steps of chromosome partitioning. The protein binds the chromosome origin of replication (Cori) and has higher-affinity binding to mutated Cori-DNA that increases Cori-plasmid replication in vivo. gapR gene expression is essential for normal rapid growth and sufficient GapR levels are required for the correct timing of chromosome replication. Whole genome ChIP-seq identified dynamic DNA-binding distributions for GapR, with the strongest associations at the partitioning (parABS) locus near Cori. Using molecular-genetic and fluorescence microscopy experiments, we showed that GapR also promotes the first steps of chromosome partitioning, the initial separation of the duplicated parS loci following replication from Cori. This separation occurs before the parABS-dependent partitioning phase. Therefore, this early separation, whose mechanisms is not known, coincides with the poorly defined mechanism(s) that establishes chromosome asymmetry: C. crescentus chromosomes are partitioned to distinct cell-poles which develop into replicating and non-replicating cell-types. We propose that GapR coordinates chromosome replication with asymmetry-establishing chromosome separation, noting that both roles are consistent with the phylogenetic restriction of GapR to asymmetrically dividing bacteria.

A matter of hierarchy: activation of orfamide production by the post-transcriptional Gac-Rsm cascade of Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 through expression upregulation of the two dedicated transcriptional regulators

In this work, we surveyed the genome of P. protegens CHA0 in order to identify novel mRNAs possibly under the control of the Gac-Rsm cascade that might, for their part, serve to elucidate as-yet-unknown functions involved in the biocontrol of plant pathogens and/or in cellular processes required for fitness in natural environments. In view of the experimental evidence from former studies on the Gac-Rsm cascade, we developed a computational screen supported by a combination of sequence, structural and evolutionary constraints that led to a dataset of 43 potential novel mRNA targets. We then confirmed several mRNA targets experimentally and next focused on two of the respective genes that are physically linked to the orfamide biosynthetic gene cluster and whose predicted open-reading frames resembled cognate LuxR-type transcriptional regulators of cyclic lipopeptide clusters in related pseudomonads. In this report, we demonstrate that in strain CHA0, orfamide production is stringently dependent on a functional Gac-Rsm cascade and that both mRNAs encoding transcriptional regulatory proteins are under direct translational control of the RsmA/E proteins. Our results have thus revealed a hierarchical control over the expression of orfamide biosynthetic genes with the final transcriptional control subordinated to the global Gac-Rsm post-transcriptional regulatory system.

Increased ParB level affects expression of stress response, adaptation and virulence operons and potentiates repression of promoters adjacent to the high affinity binding sites parS3 and parS4 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Similarly to its homologs in other bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa partitioning protein ParB facilitates segregation of newly replicated chromosomes. Lack of ParB is not lethal but results in increased frequency of anucleate cells production, longer division time, cell elongation, altered colony morphology and defective swarming and swimming motility. Unlike in other bacteria, inactivation of parB leads to major changes of the transcriptome, suggesting that, directly or indirectly, ParB plays a role in regulation of gene expression in this organism. ParB overproduction affects growth rate, cell division and motility in a similar way as ParB deficiency. To identify primary ParB targets, here we analysed the impact of a slight increase in ParB level on P. aeruginosa transcriptome. ParB excess, which does not cause changes in growth rate and chromosome segregation, significantly alters the expression of 176 loci. Most notably, the mRNA level of genes adjacent to high affinity ParB binding sites parS1-4 close to oriC is reduced. Conversely, in cells lacking either parB or functional parS sequences the orfs adjacent to parS3 and parS4 are upregulated, indicating that direct ParB- parS3/parS4 interactions repress the transcription in this region. In addition, increased ParB level brings about repression or activation of numerous genes including several transcriptional regulators involved in SOS response, virulence and adaptation. Overall, our data support the role of partitioning protein ParB as a transcriptional regulator in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.