1
|
Zhang Y, Chu X, Wang L, Yang H. Global patterns in the epidemiology, cancer risk, and surgical implications of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2024; 12:goae053. [PMID: 38984068 PMCID: PMC11233070 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goae053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), mainly including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, imposes a huge medical and economic burden worldwide. Recently, the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of IBD have advanced rapidly, which has changed the epidemiology, cancer risk, and surgery risk of IBD. Here, we reviewed the recent literature on the epidemiology, IBD-related cancer, and IBD-related surgery. We created a choropleth map to show the worldwide incidence trend for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. We also found that the cancer risk and surgery risk of IBD are declining and discussed some risk factors associated with them. Based on the recent trend, we proposed several suggestions and hoped to reduce the global burden of IBD as far as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiming Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Xiaotian Chu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, P. R. China
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maspero M, Hull TL. State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:S1-S10. [PMID: 38441240 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ileoanal pouch with IPAA is the preferred method to restore intestinal continuity in patients who require a total proctocolectomy. Pouch surgery has evolved during the past decades thanks to increased experience and research, changes in the medical management of patients who require an ileal pouch, and technological innovations. OBJECTIVE To review the main changes in pouch surgery over the past 2 decades, with a focus on staging, minimally invasive and transanal approaches, pouch design, and anastomotic configuration. RESULTS The decision on the staging approach depends on the patient's conditions, their indication for surgery, and the risk of anastomotic leak. A minimally invasive approach should be performed whenever feasible, but open surgery still has a role in this technically demanding operation. Transanal IPAA may be performed in experienced centers and may reduce conversion to open surgery in the hostile pelvis. The J-pouch is the easiest, fastest, and most commonly performed design, but other designs may be used when a J-pouch is not feasible. A stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy can be safely performed in the majority of cases, with a low incidence of rectal cuff neoplasia and better functional outcomes than handsewn. Finally, Crohn's disease is not an absolute contraindication to an ileoanal pouch, but pouch failure may be higher compared to other indications. CONCLUSIONS Many technical nuances contribute to the success of an ileoanal pouch. The current standard of care is a laparoscopic J-pouch with double-stapled anastomosis, but this should not be seen as a dogma, and the optimal approach and design should be tailored to each patient. See video from symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deyrat J, Challine A, Voron T, O'Connell LV, Collard MK, Tzedakis S, Jaquet R, Lazzati A, Parc Y, Lefèvre JH. What is the rate of definitive stoma after subtotal colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease? A nationwide study of 1860 patients. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1203-1213. [PMID: 38757256 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
AIM Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require subtotal colectomy (STC) with ileostomy. The recent literature reports a significant number of patients who do not undergo subsequent surgery and are resigned to living with a definitive stoma. The aim of this work was to analyse the rate of definitive stoma and the cumulative incidence of secondary reconstructive surgery after STC for IBD in a large national cohort study. METHOD A national retrospective study (2013-2021) was conducted on prospectively collected data from the French Medical Information System Database (PMSI). All patients undergoing STC in France were included. The association between definitive stoma and potential risk factors was studied using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 1860 patients were included (age 45 ± 9 years; median follow-up 30 months). Of these, 77% (n = 1442) presented with ulcerative colitis. Mortality and morbidity at 90 days after STC were 5% (n = 100) and 47% (n = 868), respectively. Reconstructive surgery was identified in 1255 patients (67%) at a mean interval of 7 months from STC. Seveny-four per cent (n = 932) underwent a completion proctectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and 26% (n = 323) an ileorectal anastomosis. Six hundred and five (33%) patients with a definitive stoma had an abdominoperineal resection (n = 114; 19%) or did not have any further surgical procedure (n = 491; 81%). Independent risk factors for definitive stoma identified in multivariate analysis were older age, Crohn's disease, colorectal neoplasia, postoperative complication after STC, laparotomy and a low-volume hospital. CONCLUSION We found that 33% of patients undergoing STC with ileostomy for IBD had definitive stoma. Modifiable risk factors for definitive stoma were laparotomy and a low-volume hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Deyrat
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Challine
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- HeKA, Inria, Paris, France
| | - Thibault Voron
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Lauren V O'Connell
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Maxime K Collard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- HeKA, Inria, Paris, France
- Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Andrea Lazzati
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Bariatrique, Centre Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Jeremie H Lefèvre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shamsiddinova A, Burch J, Deputy M, Rao C, Worley G, Dean H, Thomas-Gibson S, Faiz O. Oncological outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing segmental colonic resection for colorectal cancer and dysplasia: systematic review. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae052. [PMID: 38822726 PMCID: PMC11143477 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Shamsiddinova
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jennie Burch
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Mohammed Deputy
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Rao
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK
| | - Guy Worley
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Harry Dean
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, St Mark’s Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ochoa B, McMahon L. Surgery for ulcerative colitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2024; 33:151404. [PMID: 38615424 DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2024.151404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brielle Ochoa
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Lisa McMahon
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Phoenix Children's, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang Y, Wang Y, Xin E, Zhang Z, Ma D, Liu T, Gao F, Bian T, Sun Y, Wang M, Wang Z, Yan X, Li Y. Network pharmacology and experimental verification reveal the mechanism of Hedysari Radix and Curcumae Rhizoma with the optimal compatibility ratio against colitis-associated colorectal cancer. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2024; 322:117555. [PMID: 38110130 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE The herb pair Astragali Radix (AR) and Curcumae Rhizoma (vinegar-processed, VPCR), derived from the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) text 'Yixuezhongzhongcanxilu', have long been used to treat gastrointestinal diseases, notably colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC). Hedysari Radix (HR), belonging to the same Leguminosae family as AR but from a different genus, is traditionally used as a substitute for AR when paired with VPCR in the treatment of CAC. However, the optimal compatibility ratio for HR-VPCR against CAC and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. AIM OF THE STUDY To investigate the optimal compatibility ratio and underlying mechanisms of HR-VPCR against CAC using a combination of comparative pharmacodynamics, network pharmacology, and experimental verification. MATERIALS AND METHODS The efficacy of different compatibility ratios of HR-VPCR against CAC was evaluated using various indicators, including the body weight, colon length, tumor count, survival rate, disease activity index (DAI) score, Haemotoxylin and Eosin (H&E) pathological sections, inflammation cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α), tumor markers (K-Ras, p53), and intestinal permeability proteins (claudin-1, E-cadherin, mucin-2). Then, the optimal compatibility ratio of HR-VPCR against CAC was determined based on the fuzzy matter-element analysis by integrating the above indicators. After high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis for the optimal compatibility ratio of HR-VPCR, potential active components of HR-VPCR were identified by TCMSP and the previous bibliographies. Swiss Targets and GeneCards were adopted to predict the targets of the active components and the targets of CAC, respectively. Then, the common targets of HR-VPCR against CAC were obtained by Venn analysis. PPI networks were constructed in STRING. GO and KEGG enrichments were visualized by the David database. Finally, the predicted pathway was experimentally validated via Western blot. RESULTS Various compatibility ratios of HR-VPCR demonstrated notable therapeutic effects to some extent, evidenced by improvements in body weight, colon length, tumor count, pathological symptoms (DAI score), colon and organ indexes, survival rate, and modulation of inflammation factors (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α), as well as tumor markers (K-Ras, p53), and down-regulation of intestinal permeability proteins (claudin-1, E-cadherin, mucin-2) in CAC mice. Among these ratios, the ratio 4:1 represents the optimal compatibility ratio by the fuzzy matter-element analysis. Thirty active components of HR-VPCR were carefully selected, targeting 553 specific genes. Simultaneously, 2022 targets associated with CAC were identified. 88 common targets were identified after generating a Venn plot. Following PPI network analysis, 29 core targets were established, with AKT1 ranking highest among them. Further analysis via GO and KEGG enrichment identified the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway as a potential mechanism. Experimental validation confirmed that HR-VPCR intervention effectively reversed the activated PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS The optimal compatibility ratio for the HR-VPCR herb pair in alleviating CAC is 4:1. HR-VPCR exerts its effects by alleviating intestinal inflammation, improving intestinal permeability, and regulating the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yugui Zhang
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Yanjun Wang
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Erdan Xin
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Zhuanhong Zhang
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Dingcai Ma
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Ting Liu
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Feiyun Gao
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Tiantian Bian
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Yujing Sun
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Scientific Research and Experimental Center, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Maomao Wang
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Zhe Wang
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Xingke Yan
- College of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| | - Yuefeng Li
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Key Laboratory of Standard and Quality of Chinese Medicine Research of Gansu, Engineering Research Center of Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process of Gansu, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China; Scientific Research and Experimental Center, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Posner H, Lombard R, Akiyama S, Cohen NA, Rubin DT, Dubinsky MC, Dalal S, Kayal M. Extensive Disease and Exposure to Multiple Biologics Precolectomy Is Associated with Endoscopic Cuffitis Post-Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024:izae029. [PMID: 38521548 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To better inform the risk of cuffitis in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), we aimed to identify its occurrence and associated precolectomy factors in a large multicenter cohort of patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals diagnosed with UC or indeterminate colitis who underwent RPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia at Mount Sinai Hospital or the University of Chicago followed by at least 1 pouchoscopy with report of the pouch-anal anastomosis. The primary outcome was cuffitis defined as ulceration of the cuff as reported in each pouchoscopy report. RESULTS The pouch-anal anastomosis was mentioned in the pouchoscopy reports of 674 patients, of whom 525 (77.9%) had a stapled anastomosis. Among these, cuffitis occurred in 313 (59.6%) patients a median of 1.51 (interquartile range 0.59-4.17) years after final surgical stage. On multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.02), extensive disease (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.78), exposure to biologics before colectomy (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.93-3.27), and exposure to at least 2 or more biologics before colectomy (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.40-3.39) were significantly associated with subsequent cuffitis. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter study of patients who underwent RPC with stapled IPAA and at least 1 follow-up pouchoscopy, cuffitis occurred in approximately 60% and was significantly associated with extensive disease and exposure to multiple biologics precolectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Posner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rachel Lombard
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shintaro Akiyama
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Nathaniel A Cohen
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Marla C Dubinsky
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sushila Dalal
- University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Maia Kayal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Urquhart SA, Comstock BP, Jin MF, Day CN, Eaton JE, Harmsen WS, Raffals LE, Loftus EV, Coelho-Prabhu N. The Incidence of Pouch Neoplasia Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:183-189. [PMID: 36812365 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard restorative procedure following proctocolectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who require colectomy. However, removal of the diseased colon does not eliminate the risk of pouch neoplasia. We aimed to assess the incidence of pouch neoplasia in IBD patients following IPAA. METHODS All patients at a large tertiary center with International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision/International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes for IBD who underwent IPAA and had subsequent pouchoscopy were identified using a clinical notes search from January 1981 to February 2020. Relevant demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were abstracted. RESULTS In total, 1319 patients were included (43.9% women). Most had ulcerative colitis (95.2%). Out of 1319 patients, 10 (0.8%) developed neoplasia following IPAA. Neoplasia of the pouch was seen in 4 cases with neoplasia of the cuff or rectum seen in 5 cases. One patient had neoplasia of the prepouch, pouch, and cuff. Types of neoplasia included low-grade dysplasia (n = 7), high-grade dysplasia (n = 1), colorectal cancer (n = 1), and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (n = 1). Presence of extensive colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, backwash ileitis, and rectal dysplasia at the time of IPAA were significantly associated with increased risk of pouch neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of pouch neoplasia in IBD patients who have undergone IPAA is relatively low. Extensive colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and backwash ileitis prior to IPAA and rectal dysplasia at the time of IPAA raise the risk of pouch neoplasia significantly. A limited surveillance program might be appropriate for patients with IPAA even with a history of colorectal neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siri A Urquhart
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bryce P Comstock
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mauricio F Jin
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John E Eaton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Edward V Loftus
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Islam B, Nguyen V. What Is the Risk? Epidemiology and Evidence for Surveillance Regimens. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:13-17. [PMID: 38188071 PMCID: PMC10769581 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1762558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The risk for CRC is positively correlated to the duration of disease, extent of colonic involvement, and severity of inflammation. After 8 to 10 years of IBD diagnosis, the risk for CRC rises substantially and screening colonoscopy is recommended. Surveillance colonoscopy interval ranges from 1 to 5 years depending on patient and disease-specific risk factors. IBD patients with high risk factors such as having concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis, moderate-to-severe inflammation, first-degree relative with CRC at early age, or history of invisible dysplasia or high-risk visible dysplasia should undergo surveillance colonoscopy in 1 year. Meanwhile, those with minimal colonic involvement or ≥2 consecutive unremarkable examinations while in continuous remission may consider extending the surveillance interval to 5 years. Advance in colonoscopy technique such as chromoendoscopy using dyes and/or image digital processing (virtual chromoendoscopy) may enhance dysplasia detection and is the preferred method for IBD surveillance. In the era of high-definition colonoscope, the practice of obtaining extensive biopsies throughout the colon remains controversial but is generally recommended to improve the detection rate of invisible dysplasia. Endoscopic surveillance in IBD has been shown to result in earlier detection of CRC and improved prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Islam
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vu Nguyen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maspero M, Otero A, Lavryk O, Holubar SD, Lipman J, Gorgun E, Liska D, Kessler H, Valente M, Steele SR, Hull T. Incidental Dysplasia During Total Proctocolectomy With Ileoanal Pouch: Is It Associated With Worse Outcomes? Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad263. [PMID: 37963567 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. In cases of invisible or nonendoscopically resectable dysplasia found at colonoscopy, total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis can be offered with good long-term outcomes; however, little is known regarding cancer-related outcomes when dysplasia is found incidentally after surgery on final pathology. METHODS Using our prospectively collected pouch registry, we identified patients who had preoperative colonic dysplasia or dysplasia found only after colectomy. Patients with cancer preoperatively or after colectomy were excluded. Included patients were divided into 3 groups: PRE (+preoperative biopsy, negative final pathology), BOTH (+preoperative biopsy and final pathology), and POST (negative preoperative biopsy, +final pathology). Long-term outcomes in the 3 groups were assessed. RESULTS In total, 517 patients were included: PRE = 125, BOTH = 254, POST = 137. After a median follow-up of 12 years (IQR 3-21), there were no differences in overall, disease-free, or pouch survival between groups. Cancer/dysplasia developed in 11 patients: 3 (2%) in the PRE, 5 (2%) in the BOTH, and 3 (2%) in the POST group. Only 1 cancer-related death occurred in the entire cohort (PRE group). Disease-free survival at 10 years was 98% for all groups (P = .97). Pouch survival at 10 years was 96% for PRE, 99% for BOTH, and 97% for POST (P = .24). CONCLUSIONS The incidental finding of dysplasia on final pathology after proctocolectomy was not associated with worsened outcomes compared with preoperatively diagnosed dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ana Otero
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Olga Lavryk
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeremy Lipman
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Hermann Kessler
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Valente
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Tracy Hull
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kabir M, Thomas-Gibson S, Tozer PJ, Warusavitarne J, Faiz O, Hart A, Allison L, Acheson AG, Atici SD, Avery P, Brar M, Carvello M, Choy MC, Dart RJ, Davies J, Dhar A, Din S, Hayee B, Kandiah K, Katsanos KH, Lamb CA, Limdi JK, Lovegrove RE, Myrelid P, Noor N, Papaconstantinou I, Petrova D, Pavlidis P, Pinkney T, Proud D, Radford S, Rao R, Sebastian S, Segal JP, Selinger C, Spinelli A, Thomas K, Wolthuis A, Wilson A. DECIDE: Delphi Expert Consensus Statement on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Dysplasia Shared Management Decision-Making. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1652-1671. [PMID: 37171140 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inflammatory bowel disease colitis-associated dysplasia is managed with either enhanced surveillance and endoscopic resection or prophylactic surgery. The rate of progression to cancer after a dysplasia diagnosis remains uncertain in many cases and patients have high thresholds for accepting proctocolectomy. Individualised discussion of management options is encouraged to take place between patients and their multidisciplinary teams for best outcomes. We aimed to develop a toolkit to support a structured, multidisciplinary and shared decision-making approach to discussions about dysplasia management options between clinicians and their patients. METHODS Evidence from systematic literature reviews, mixed-methods studies conducted with key stakeholders, and decision-making expert recommendations were consolidated to draft consensus statements by the DECIDE steering group. These were then subjected to an international, multidisciplinary modified electronic Delphi process until an a priori threshold of 80% agreement was achieved to establish consensus for each statement. RESULTS In all, 31 members [15 gastroenterologists, 14 colorectal surgeons and two nurse specialists] from nine countries formed the Delphi panel. We present the 18 consensus statements generated after two iterative rounds of anonymous voting. CONCLUSIONS By consolidating evidence for best practice using literature review and key stakeholder and decision-making expert consultation, we have developed international consensus recommendations to support health care professionals counselling patients on the management of high cancer risk colitis-associated dysplasia. The final toolkit includes clinician and patient decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha Kabir
- Division of GI Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Phil J Tozer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lisa Allison
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Austin G Acheson
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Semra Demirli Atici
- Department of Surgery, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Pearl Avery
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mantaj Brar
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michele Carvello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthew C Choy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Austin Academic Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robin J Dart
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Darlington Memorial Hospital, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Teesside University, UK, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kesavan Kandiah
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos H Katsanos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina School of Health Sciences, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Manchester , Manchester, UK
| | - Richard E Lovegrove
- Department of Surgery, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust , Worcester, UK
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nurulamin Noor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ioannis Papaconstantinou
- Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, A thens, Greece
| | - Dafina Petrova
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública [EASP], Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health [CIBERESP], Madrid, Spain
| | - Polychronis Pavlidis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Proud
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Shellie Radford
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rohit Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Hospital Epping, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christian Selinger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, The Netherlands
| | - Ana Wilson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Coelho-Prabhu N, Lewis JD. Update on Endoscopic Dysplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1748-1755. [PMID: 37543741 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
As medical management of inflammatory bowel disease makes great advances, most patients with inflammatory bowel disease will have long life expectancies without need for total colectomy. With prolonged disease duration, however, there is increased risk of dysplasia leading to colorectal cancer. Multiple consensus and guideline documents have been published over the last decade with recommendations to optimize early detection and management of dysplastic lesions. Endoscopic technology has improved tremendously, even over the past few years. Previously invisible dysplasia has become visible in most cases with advanced imaging technologies that now allow for much clearer and more detailed mucosal inspection. New tools to facilitate endoscopic resection of visible lesions have also enabled patients to avoid colectomy, with resulting need to continue colon surveillance. There are limited or conflicting data leading to inconsistent recommendations regarding the need for random biopsies, the preferred endoscopic imaging technique, and surveillance intervals after resection of dysplasia. Similarly, there remains significant variability in the application of guidelines into daily practice and availability of and training with advanced imaging technologies. Here, we present a narrative review of which patients are at highest risk for dysplasia, the current guidelines on surveillance colonoscopy, factors affecting optimal mucosal visualization, enhanced imaging techniques, standardized reporting terminologies for surveillance colonoscopy, endoscopic management of dysplasia, indications for colectomy, and briefly on future potential technologies to assist in dysplasia detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James D Lewis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boldovjakova D, El-Abbassy I, Alarcon I, El-Saify M, Chan JH, Harley M, Parnaby C, Watson A, Ramsay G. Management of the Rectal Stump after Subtotal Colectomy Operations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Immunologic Therapy: A Two-Centre Cohort Study. Dig Dis 2023; 41:872-878. [PMID: 37690444 DOI: 10.1159/000533267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires surgical resection, such as subtotal colectomy operations to alleviate symptoms. However, IBD also has an inherently increased risk of colorectal dysplasia and cancer. Despite the well-accepted surveillance guidelines for IBD patients with an intact colon, contemporaneous decision-making models on rectal stump surveillance is sparse. This study looks at the fate of rectal stumps in IBD patients following subtotal colectomy. METHODS This is a two-centre retrospective observational cohort study. Patients were identified from NHS Grampian and NHS Highland surgical IBD databases. Patients that had subtotal colectomy between January 01, 2010 and December 31, 2017 were included with the follow-up end date on April 1, 2021. Socio-demographics, diagnosis, medical and surgical management data were collected from electronic records. RESULTS Of 250 patients who had subtotal colectomy procedures, only one developed a cancer in their rectal stump (0.4%) over a median follow-up of 80 months. A higher than expected 72% of patients had ongoing symptoms from their rectal stumps. Surveillance was varied and inconsistent. However, no surveillance, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or MRI identified dysplastic or neoplastic disease. CONCLUSION Based on our results, we estimate that the prevalence of rectal cancer is lower than previously reported. Surveillance strategy of rectal stump varied as no current guidelines exist and hence is an important area for future study. Given the relatively low frequency of rectal cancer in these patients, and the low level of evidence available in this field, we would propose a registry-based approach to answering this important clinical question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Islam El-Abbassy
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbassia, Cairo, Egypt
- Department of General Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - Inari Alarcon
- Department of General Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - Mamoun El-Saify
- Department of General Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - Juen Hao Chan
- Department of General Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - Morag Harley
- Department of General Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - Craig Parnaby
- Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Angus Watson
- Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
- Department of General Surgery, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK
| | - George Ramsay
- Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Georganta I, McIntosh S, Boldovjakova D, Parnaby CN, Watson AJM, Ramsay G. The incidence of malignancy in the residual rectum of IBD patients after colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:699-712. [PMID: 36906886 PMCID: PMC10404177 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02762-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who have had a total colectomy remain with their rectum in situ, and are therefore at risk of rectal carcinoma. It is not clear how high the incidence of rectal cancer is in this cohort. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of rectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease who have undergone colectomy but have a residual rectum, and to identify the risk factors for its development. In doing so, we explore the current recommendations for screening processes for these patients. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed. Five databases (Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Scopus) were searched from inception to 29 October 2021, to identify studies adhering to the population, intervention, control and outcomes (PICO) criteria. The included studies were critically appraised, and the relevant data was extracted. Cancer incidence was estimated from the reported information. Risk stratification was analysed using RevMan. A narrative approach was undertaken for the exploration of the existing screening guidelines. RESULTS Data from 23 of the 24 identified studies was suitable for analysis. The pooled incidence of rectal carcinoma was calculated to be 1.3%. Subgroup analysis showed an incidence of 0.7% and 3.2% for patients with a de-functioned rectal stump and ileorectal anastomosis, respectively. Patients with a history of a colorectal carcinoma were more likely to have a subsequent diagnosis of rectal carcinoma (RR 7.2, 95% CI 2.4-21.1). Patients with previous colorectal dysplasia were also at higher risk (RR 5.1, 95% CI 3.1-8.2). No universal standardised guidance regarding screening for this cohort could be identified in the available literature. CONCLUSIONS The overall risk of malignancy was estimated to be 1.3%, which is lower than previously reported. There is a need for clear and standardised screening guidance for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Georganta
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, UK
| | - S McIntosh
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, UK
| | - D Boldovjakova
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, UK
| | - C N Parnaby
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, UK
| | - A J M Watson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, UK
| | - G Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB252ZD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sato Y, Tsujinaka S, Miura T, Kitamura Y, Suzuki H, Shibata C. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Etiology, Surveillance, and Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4154. [PMID: 37627182 PMCID: PMC10452690 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Although advancements in endoscopic imaging techniques, integrated surveillance programs, and improved medical therapies have contributed to a decreased incidence of CRC in patients with IBD, the rate of CRC remains higher in patients with IBD than in individuals without chronic colitis. Patients with IBD-related CRCs exhibit a poorer prognosis than those with sporadic CRCs, owing to their aggressive histological characteristics and lower curative resection rate. In this review, we present an updated overview of the epidemiology, etiology, risk factors, surveillance strategies, treatment recommendations, and prognosis of IBD-related CRCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shingo Tsujinaka
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Akimenko E, Bjerrum JT, Iversen AT, Allin KH, Jess T. Rectal Cancer Risk After Colectomy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Population-Based Danish Cohort Study 1978-2018. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2023; 2:853-859. [PMID: 39130114 PMCID: PMC11307601 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aims Selected patient groups with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Surveillance guidelines rarely cover patients after colectomy. We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study to estimate the risk of developing rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease after subtotal colectomy. Methods Through the Danish Civil Registration System, a source population of all individuals living in Denmark between 1978 and 2018 was retrieved. The risk of rectal cancer in patients with diverted rectum was assessed using Cox regression analyses with comparison to both the individuals with inflammatory bowel diseases without subtotal colectomy and the background population. Results Rectal cancer occurred in 42 of 4931 patients (0.9%) after subtotal colectomy and diverted rectum, compared to 209 of 49,251 (0.4%) in the matched inflammatory bowel diseases cohort without colectomy and 941 of 246,550 (0.4%) in the background population. The hazard ratio (HR) for rectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and diverted rectum vs patients without colectomy was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.28, 2.07) before 10 years and 7.56 (95% CI, 5.21, 10.86) 10 years after colectomy. The HR for patients with diverted rectum compared to the background population was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.31, 2.24) and 10.01 (95% CI, 7.20, 13.94) respectively. Conclusion In our nationwide population-based Danish cohort study, we found the risk of rectal cancer in the diverted rectum to be markedly increased 10 years postcolectomy. This calls for better long-term surveillance of colectomized patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Akimenko
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob Tveiten Bjerrum
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aske Thorn Iversen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PREDICT), Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristine H. Allin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PREDICT), Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Tine Jess
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (PREDICT), Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Post-endoscopy colorectal cancer after colectomy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a population-based register study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 35:288-293. [PMID: 36708300 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) colitis is an indication for endoscopic surveillance. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC), cancer detected after a negative colonoscopy, is a quality indicator for colonoscopy. In analogy with PCCRC, we aimed to assess postendoscopy CRC (PECRC) in individuals with IBD who had undergone colectomy. METHODS This register study included Swedish adults with an IBD diagnosis who had undergone colectomy and later were examined by either colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy during 2001-2012. The final study population had a CRC diagnosis within 36 months of the index examination. Poisson regression was used to assess the relative risks (RR) of PECRC. RESULTS A total of 33 individuals, 12 with an ileorectal anastomosis and 21 with a rectal remnant, had a CRC diagnosis within 36 months of the index endoscopy. Eleven cancers were detected as CRCs, and 22 (67%) were PECRCs. Compared with individuals aged >70 years, individuals aged <30 years had an RR of 3.1 (P = 0.054) and individuals aged 30-50 years had a RR of 2.6 (P = 0.030). A longer interval between colectomy and index endoscopy (>10 vs. <10 years) was associated with a lower risk of PCCRC (RR = 0.5; P = 0.007). There was no significant difference between the risk for Crohn's disease vs. ulcerative colitis, or between ileorectal anastomosis and rectal remnant risks. CONCLUSIONS Continuous surveillance of IBD patients after colectomy is important. In the postcolectomy context, PECRC may be used as a quality indicator.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kennel KB, Burmeister J, Radhakrishnan P, Giese NA, Giese T, Salfenmoser M, Gebhardt JM, Strowitzki MJ, Taylor CT, Wielockx B, Schneider M, Harnoss JM. The HIF-prolyl hydroxylases have distinct and nonredundant roles in colitis-associated cancer. JCI Insight 2022; 7:153337. [PMID: 36509284 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.153337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC) is a severe complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). HIF-prolyl hydroxylases (PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3) control cellular adaptation to hypoxia and are considered promising therapeutic targets in IBD. However, their relevance in the pathogenesis of CAC remains elusive. We induced CAC in Phd1-/-, Phd2+/-, Phd3-/-, and WT mice with azoxymethane (AOM) and dextran sodium sulfate (DSS). Phd1-/- mice were protected against chronic colitis and displayed diminished CAC growth compared with WT mice. In Phd3-/- mice, colitis activity and CAC growth remained unaltered. In Phd2+/- mice, colitis activity was unaffected, but CAC growth was aggravated. Mechanistically, Phd2 deficiency (i) increased the number of tumor-associated macrophages in AOM/DSS-induced tumors, (ii) promoted the expression of EGFR ligand epiregulin in macrophages, and (iii) augmented the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling, which at least in part contributed to aggravated tumor cell proliferation in colitis-associated tumors. Consistently, Phd2 deficiency in hematopoietic (Vav:Cre-Phd2fl/fl) but not in intestinal epithelial cells (Villin:Cre-Phd2fl/fl) increased CAC growth. In conclusion, the 3 different PHD isoenzymes have distinct and nonredundant effects, promoting (PHD1), diminishing (PHD2), or neutral (PHD3), on CAC growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian B Kennel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery and
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Giese
- Institute of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Cormac T Taylor
- School of Medicine, Systems Biology Ireland, and the Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ben Wielockx
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shore BM, Kochar B, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Current Perspectives on Indications for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Older Patients. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2022; 15:163-170. [PMID: 36176671 PMCID: PMC9514131 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s340338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The population of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is expected to continue to increase in the coming decades, which necessitates and improved understanding of the critical issues faced by patients in this population. Although restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA remains the surgical procedure of choice for the majority of patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and UC-related dysplasia, the evidence surrounding surgery for older patients UC remains sparse. In particular, comparisons of outcomes among older and younger patients undergoing IPAA and comparisons between older patients undergoing IPAA and those undergoing proctocolectomy with end ileostomy remain an understudied and important issue, as evidence in this area will be used to guide patient-centered surgical choices among older patients who require colectomy for UC. In this narrative review, we review the available literature regarding IPAA for older patients, as well as the pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors that may influence outcomes in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Shore
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bharati Kochar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,The Mongan Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Barrett CM, Long MD, Grimm I, Herfarth HH, Barnes EL. Off the Cuff Markers: Surveillance and Endoscopic Approaches for Dysplasia After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:4666-4670. [PMID: 36064824 PMCID: PMC10559102 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07669-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Barrett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Millie D Long
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ian Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Campus Box #7080, 130 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA.
- Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kiran RP, Kochhar GS, Kariv R, Rex DK, Sugita A, Rubin DT, Navaneethan U, Hull TL, Ko HM, Liu X, Kachnic LA, Strong S, Iacucci M, Bemelman W, Fleshner P, Safyan RA, Kotze PG, D'Hoore A, Faiz O, Lo S, Ashburn JH, Spinelli A, Bernstein CN, Kane SV, Cross RK, Schairer J, McCormick JT, Farraye FA, Chang S, Scherl EJ, Schwartz DA, Bruining DH, Philpott J, Bentley-Hibbert S, Tarabar D, El-Hachem S, Sandborn WJ, Silverberg MS, Pardi DS, Church JM, Shen B. Management of pouch neoplasia: consensus guidelines from the International Ileal Pouch Consortium. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:871-893. [PMID: 35798022 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00039-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Surveillance pouchoscopy is recommended for patients with restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, with the surveillance interval depending on the risk of neoplasia. Neoplasia in patients with ileal pouches mainly have a glandular source and less often are of squamous cell origin. Various grades of neoplasia can occur in the prepouch ileum, pouch body, rectal cuff, anal transition zone, anus, or perianal skin. The main treatment modalities are endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic ablation, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgical local excision, surgical circumferential resection and re-anastomosis, and pouch excision. The choice of the treatment modality is determined by the grade, location, size, and features of neoplastic lesions, along with patients' risk of neoplasia and comorbidities, and local endoscopic and surgical expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi P Kiran
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gursimran S Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Akira Sugita
- Department of Clinical Research and Department of inflammatory Bowel Disease, Yokohama Municipal Citizens Hospital Yokohama, Japan
| | - David T Rubin
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- IBD Center and IBD Interventional Unit, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Tracy L Hull
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Huaibin Mabel Ko
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott Strong
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Willem Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Philip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rachael A Safyan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- IBD Outpatients Clinic, Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - André D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow and Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Lo
- Pancreatic and Biliary Disease Program, Digestive Diseases, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jean H Ashburn
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University and IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Charles N Bernstein
- University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine, MD, USA
| | - Jason Schairer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - James T McCormick
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Shannon Chang
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellen J Scherl
- Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - David A Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stuart Bentley-Hibbert
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dino Tarabar
- IBD Clinical Center, University Hospital Center Dr Dragiša Mišović, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Sandra El-Hachem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - William J Sandborn
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mark S Silverberg
- Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James M Church
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bo Shen
- Center for Interventional Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chemically Induced Colitis-Associated Cancer Models in Rodents for Pharmacological Modulation: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102739. [PMID: 35628865 PMCID: PMC9146029 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Animal models for colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CACC) represent an important tool to explore the mechanistic basis of cancer-related inflammation, providing important evidence that several inflammatory mediators play specific roles in the initiation and perpetuation of colitis and CACC. Although several original articles have been published describing the CACC model in rodents, there is no consensus about the induction method. This review aims to identify, summarize, compare, and discuss the chemical methods for the induction of CACC through the PRISMA methodology. METHODS We searched MEDLINE via the Pubmed platform for studies published through March 2021, using a highly sensitive search expression. The inclusion criteria were only original articles, articles where a chemically-induced animal model of CACC is described, preclinical studies in vivo with rodents, and articles published in English. RESULTS Chemically inducible models typically begin with the administration of a carcinogenic compound (as azoxymethane (AOM) or 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH)), and inflammation is caused by repeated cycles of colitis-inducing agents (such as 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) or dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)). The strains mostly used are C57BL/6 and Balb/c with 5-6 weeks. To characterize the preclinical model, the parameters more used include body weight, stool consistency and morbidity, inflammatory biomarkers such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1β, angiogenesis markers such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), marker of proliferation Ki-67, and caspase 3, the presence of ulcers, thickness or hyperemia in the colon, and histological evaluation of inflammation. CONCLUSION The AOM administration seems to be important to the CACC induction method, since the carcinogenic effect is achieved with just one administration. DSS has been the more used inflammatory agent; however, the TNBS contribution should be more studied, since it allows a reliable, robust, and a highly reproducible animal model of intestinal inflammation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Shah SC, Itzkowitz SH. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Management. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:715-730.e3. [PMID: 34757143 PMCID: PMC9003896 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 237] [Impact Index Per Article: 118.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), despite decreases in CRC incidence in recent years. Chronic inflammation is the driver of neoplastic progression, resulting in dysplastic precursor lesions that may arise in multiple areas of the colon through a process of field cancerization. Colitis-associated CRC shares many molecular similarities with sporadic CRC, and preclinical investigations have demonstrated a potential role for the microbiome in concert with the host immune system in the development of colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC). Some unique molecular differences occur in CAC, but their role in the pathogenesis and behavior of inflammation-associated cancers remains to be elucidated. Nonconventional types of dysplasia have been increasingly recognized, but their natural history is not well defined, and they have not been incorporated into surveillance algorithms. The concept of cumulative inflammatory burden highlights the importance of considering histologic inflammation over time as an important risk factor for CAC. Dysplasia is arguably the most important risk factor for developing CAC, and advances have been made in the endoscopic detection and removal of precancerous lesions, thereby deferring or avoiding surgical resection. Some of the agents used to treat IBD are chemopreventive. It is hoped that by gaining better control of the underlying inflammation with newer medications and better endoscopic detection and management, a more sophisticated appreciation of clinicopathologic risk factors, and growing awareness of the genetic, immunologic, and environmental causes of colitis- associated neoplasia, that colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia will become even more predictable and manageable in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailja C Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; GI Section, VA San Diego Healthcare Center, San Diego, California
| | - Steven H Itzkowitz
- The Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Burns L, Kelly ME, Whelan M, O'Riordan J, Neary P, Kavanagh DO. A contemporary series of surgical outcomes following subtotal colectomy and/or completion proctectomy for management of inflammatory bowel disease. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 191:2705-2710. [PMID: 35037158 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02907-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main indications for emergency subtotal colectomy (SC) include management of toxic colitis, refractory haemorrhage and/or perforation. Alternatively, elective surgery is performed for those refractory to medical therapy or with evidence of multifocal dysplasia. Overall, the annual incidence of SC has fallen since the introduction of biologic therapies and we aimed to review our current practices. METHODS A retrospective review of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients undergoing subtotal colectomy between 2013 and 2020 was performed. Medical records, operative notes, discharge summaries, histopathology reports and other supporting documents were reviewed. Indication for surgery, management of the rectum (i.e. maintenance of rectal stump, progression to completion proctectomy or IPAA formation) associated morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification) and length of hospital stay were examined. RESULTS Fifty-six IBD patients underwent a subtotal colectomy. Twenty-five patients (UC 14, Crohn's 11) had an elective procedure, and 31 patients (UC 19 Crohn's 12) had an emergency/semi-urgent procedure. Interestingly, 80% (n = 25) of the emergency cohort and 68% (n = 17) of the elective cohort had a laparoscopic resection. Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo > 2) was higher among the emergency group (39% vs. 24%). Deep surgical site infection was the commonest morbidity (13%) in the emergency group, while superficial surgical site infection was commonest in the elective cohort (20%). Overall, there was no difference in surgical re-intervention rate (13% vs 12%), and there were no perioperative mortalities. Median post-operative length of stay was shorter in the elective cohort (9 versus 13 days). CONCLUSION A significant proportion of IBD patients still require semi-urgent/emergency colectomy, which is associated with considerable length of stay and morbidity. The results of our study provide real-world outcomes to help counsel patients on expected outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Burns
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
| | - Michael E Kelly
- Department of Surgery, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Maria Whelan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
| | - James O'Riordan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
| | - Paul Neary
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
| | - Dara O Kavanagh
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Increased Colorectal Neoplasia Risk in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Serrated Polyps with Dysplasia. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:5647-5656. [PMID: 35380348 PMCID: PMC9652229 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07485-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of serrated polyps on the advanced colorectal neoplasia (CRN) risk in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is unknown. Serrated polyps are histologically categorized as hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). AIMS We aimed (1) to characterize the serrated polyps in IBD patients, (2) to identify factors associated with the presence of serrated polyps in IBD, and (3) to assess the CRN risk in IBD patients with serrated polyps. METHODS We established a retrospective cohort of IBD patients with and without colonic serrated polyps. Cox-regression analysis with time-dependent variables was used to compare advanced CRN risk in IBD patients with and without serrated polyps. RESULTS Of the 621 enrolled IBD patients, 198 had a serrated polyp (92 HPs, 88 SSLs without dysplasia, 13 SSLs with dysplasia, and 5 TSAs). Independent factors associated with serrated polyps were ulcerative colitis (UC) (odds ratio (OR) 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-2.62, p = 0.005), male gender (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11-2.40, p = 0.013), and older age (per year increase, OR 1.06, 95%CI 1.05-1.08, p < 0.001). TSAs and SSLs with dysplasia were risk factors for subsequent advanced CRN (HR 13.51, 95% CI 3.11-58.68, p < 0.001), while HPs (HR 1.98, 95% CI 0.46-8.60, p = 0.36) and SSLs without dysplasia (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.11-6.88, p-0.89) did not impact the subsequent advanced CRN risk. CONCLUSIONS UC, male gender and older age were associated with the presence of serrated polyps. The majority of serrated polyps (91%) were HPs and SSL without dysplasia and did not affect the CRC risk. However TSAs and SSLs with dysplasia, representing a small subgroup of serrated polyps (9%), were associated with subsequent advanced CRN.
Collapse
|
26
|
Wetwittayakhlang P, Lakatos PL. Comforting Data on the Incidence of Rectal Cancer After Subtotal Colectomy in IBD: The Risk Is Low, Yet Surveillance Matters! J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1783-1784. [PMID: 34096579 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Panu Wetwittayakhlang
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.,1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brar MS, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Baxter NN. Rectal Cancer Incidence is Low Following Rectal Diversion or Subtotal Colectomy for IBD: Results of a Population-based Study. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1787-1798. [PMID: 34165532 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Following subtotal colectomy or diversion for medically refractory inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], completion proctectomy has been recommended to reduce the risk of rectal cancer. However, this recommendation is based on low-quality evidence. Our objectives were to estimate the cumulative incidence of rectal cancer and evaluate if surveillance endoscopy reduces the risk of rectal cancer. METHODS We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, of all patients undergoing either subtotal colectomy or diversion for medically refractory IBD over 1991-2015. We excluded patients with a previous history of colorectal cancer or previous rectal resection, and those with <1 year of observation. We calculated the rate of incident rectal cancer using a competing risks model, and evaluated the effect of surveillance endoscopy on the rate of rectal cancer. RESULTS In all, 3700 patients were included with a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Of this cohort, 47% underwent rectal resection or restoration of gastrointestinal [GI] continuity during the observation period; 40 patients were diagnosed with rectal cancer, with a cumulative incidence of rectal cancer of 0.81% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53%, 1.20%) and 1.86% [95% CI 1.29%, 2.61%] at 10 and 20 years, respectively. Surveillance endoscopy was associated with a lower rate of rectal cancer (subhazard ratio [sHR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.16, 0.82, p = 0.014]. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a retained rectum following surgery for IBD, the risk of rectal cancer is low and appears to be lower when surveillance endoscopy is performed. Expectant management with surveillance endoscopy may be a reasonable alternative to completion proctectomy in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mantaj S Brar
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Murthy SK, Feuerstein JD, Nguyen GC, Velayos FS. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Surveillance and Management of Colorectal Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1043-1051.e4. [PMID: 34416977 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Improvements in disease management, as well as endoscopic technology and quality, have dramatically changed the way in which we conceptualize and manage inflammatory bowel disease-related dysplasia over the past 20 years. Based on evolving literature, we propose a conceptual model and best practice advice statements for the prevention, detection, and management of colorectal dysplasia in people with inflammatory bowel disease. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the American Gastroenterological Association Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the American Gastroenterological Association membership. It underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay K Murthy
- The Ottawa Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph D Feuerstein
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Beth Israel Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Geoffrey C Nguyen
- Mount Sinai Hospital Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fernando S Velayos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Syal G, Fleshner PR, Melmed GY. Endoscopic evaluation after surgery in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:690-691. [PMID: 34391521 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00225-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Syal
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Phillip R Fleshner
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Barnes EL, Holubar SD, Herfarth HH. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes After Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2021; 15:1272-1278. [PMID: 33544128 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal restorative surgical management of patients with concomitant diagnoses of primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis [PSC-UC] who require colectomy is controversial, given that patients may have an increased risk for pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]. We aimed to compare rates of pouchitis and pouch failure among patients with and without PSC by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic search performed through August 18, 2020, identified 12 studies that compared the rates of pouchitis [n = 11] and/or pouch failure [n = 6] among patients with PSC-UC and UC alone. We then performed a meta-analysis using random effects modelling to estimate the odds of developing any episodes of pouchitis or pouch failure. RESULTS A total of 4108 patients underwent an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after proctocolectomy for UC. Of these, 3799 [92%] were performed for UC alone and 309 [8%] were performed for PSC-UC. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies, patients with PSC-UC compared with UC alone were significantly more likely to develop any pouchitis (63% vs 30%, odds ratio [OR] 4.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.86-6.18), chronic pouchitis [47% vs 15%, OR 6.37, 95% CI 3.41-11.9], and pouch failure [10% vs 7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.08-3.17]. CONCLUSIONS Patients with PSC-UC were more likely to experience pouchitis and pouch failure than patients with UC alone. The risks of inflammatory complications after IPAA must be weighed against the potential complications with other surgical procedures, and future studies comparing outcomes among these procedures may inform decision making in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Holubar SD, Lightner AL, Poylin V, Vogel JD, Gaertner W, Davis B, Davis KG, Mahadevan U, Shah SA, Kane SV, Steele SR, Paquette IM, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:783-804. [PMID: 33853087 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vitaliy Poylin
- McGaw Medical Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Colorectal Surgery Section, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wolfgang Gaertner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Bradley Davis
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Uma Mahadevan
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Samir A Shah
- Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Deputy M, Segal J, Reza L, Worley G, Costello S, Burns E, Faiz O, Clark S, Hart A. The pouch behaving badly: management of morbidity after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1193-1204. [PMID: 33523546 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
AIM Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), or a 'pouch', allows restoration of intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Most patients have a good long-term outcome after IPAA, but in a significant proportion the functional outcome and quality of life are unsatisfactory. We term this outcome 'the pouch behaving badly'. Managing this, especially one is when unfamiliar with the possible underlying pathologies, is a challenge for both patient and clinician. We aim to outline the clinical approach to the pouch behaving badly, highlighting key aspects of investigation and management. METHOD This is a narrative review of the literature covering the investigation and management of postoperative complications and morbidity after IPAA. RESULTS Management of the pouch behaving badly requires a careful clinical assessment. The patient may present with multiple symptoms and a clear picture of the symptomatology and past history should be constructed before thorough examination and specialist investigation. We divide the pathology that underlies this clinical scenario into surgical, inflammatory, mechanical, functional and dysplastic causes and outline the investigation and management of each one. CONCLUSION The pouch behaving badly is a challenging problem for both patient and clinician. A detailed clinical assessment with careful specialist investigation is key to diagnosing the underlying pathology. We stress the importance of patient-centred care - the aim is to improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Deputy
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Segal
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lillian Reza
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Guy Worley
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Costello
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia
| | - Elaine Burns
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Susan Clark
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing total colectomy for IBD may develop cancer in the rectal remnant, but the association is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to examine the risk and prognosis of rectal cancer after total colectomy for IBD. DESIGN This is a nationwide population-based study. SETTING Treatment of the patients took place in Denmark from 1977 to 2013. PATIENTS Patients with IBD undergoing total colectomy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We examined the incidence of rectal cancer among patients with IBD and total colectomy and compared cancer stage to that of other patients with rectal cancer in Denmark. We used Kaplan-Meier methodology to estimate survival and Cox regression to estimate adjusted mortality rate ratios following a rectal cancer diagnosis, comparing patients with and without IBD and a rectal remnant. RESULTS We identified 4703 patients with IBD (1026 Crohn's disease; 3677 ulcerative colitis) who underwent total colectomy with a rectal remnant. During 29,725 years of follow-up, 30 rectal cancers were observed, compared with 8 rectal cancers expected (standardized incidence ratio = 3.6 (95% CI, 2.4-5.1)). Cancer stage distributions were similar. Risk of rectal cancer 35 years after total colectomy was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.9%). Five years after rectal cancer diagnosis, survival was 28% (95% CI, 12%-47%) and 38% (95% CI, 37%-38%) for patients with and without IBD and a rectal remnant. The adjusted mortality rate ratio 1 to 5 years after a rectal cancer diagnosis was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.6-3.9). Median time from last recorded nondiagnostic proctoscopy to rectal cancer diagnosis for patients with IBD and total colectomy was 1.1 years. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by the few outcomes and the use of administrative and not clinical data. CONCLUSION Long-term risk of rectal cancer following total colectomy for IBD was low. Survival following a diagnosis of rectal cancer was poorer for patients with IBD and total colectomy than for patients who had rectal cancer without IBD and total colectomy. Endoscopic surveillance, as it appeared to be practiced in this cohort, may be inadequate. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B497. RIESGO DE CÁNCER DE RECTO Y SUPERVIVENCIA DESPUÉS DE UNA COLECTOMÍA TOTAL POR ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL: UN ESTUDIO POBLACIONAL: Los pacientes sometidos a colectomía total por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) pueden desarrollar cáncer en el remanente rectal, pero la asociación es poco conocida.Examinar el riesgo y el pronóstico del cáncer de recto después de una colectomía total para la EII.Estudio poblacional a nivel nacional.Dinamarca 1977-2013.Pacientes con EII sometidos a colectomía total.Examinamos la incidencia de cáncer de recto entre pacientes con EII y colectomía total y comparamos el estadio del cáncer con el de otros pacientes con cáncer de recto en Dinamarca. Utilizamos la metodología de Kaplan-Meier para estimar la supervivencia y la regresión de Cox para estimar las tasas de mortalidad ajustadas (aMRR) después de un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto, comparando pacientes con y sin EII y un remanente rectal.Identificamos 4.703 pacientes con EII (1.026 enfermedad de Crohn; 3.677 colitis ulcerosa) que se sometieron a colectomía total con remanente rectal. Durante 29,725 años de seguimiento, se observaron 30 cánceres de recto, en comparación con los 8 esperados [razón de incidencia estandarizada (SIR) = 3.6, (intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%: 2.4-5.1)]. Las distribuciones de las etapas del cáncer fueron similares. El riesgo de cáncer de recto 35 años después de la colectomía total fue del 1,9% (IC del 95%: 1,1% -2,9%). Cinco años después del diagnóstico de cáncer de recto, la supervivencia fue del 28% (IC del 95%: 12% -47%) y del 38% (IC del 95%: 37% -38%) para los pacientes con y sin EII y un remanente rectal, respectivamente. La aMRR 1-5 años después de un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto fue de 2,5 (IC del 95%: 1,6-3,9). La mediana de tiempo desde la última proctoscopia no diagnóstica registrada hasta el diagnóstico de cáncer de recto en pacientes con EII y colectomía total fue de 1,1 años.Pocos resultados, uso de datos administrativos y no clínicos.El riesgo a largo plazo de cáncer de recto después de una colectomía total para la EII fue bajo. La supervivencia después de un diagnóstico de cáncer de recto fue más pobre para los pacientes con EII y colectomía total que para los pacientes con cáncer de recto sin EII y colectomía total. La vigilancia endoscópica, como parecía practicarse en esta cohorte, puede ser inadecuada. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B497. (Traducción-Dr. Adrian Ortega).
Collapse
|
34
|
Hennessy O, Egan L, Joyce M. Subtotal colectomy in ulcerative colitis—long term considerations for the rectal stump. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:198-209. [PMID: 33643539 PMCID: PMC7898189 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i2.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The initial operation of choice in many patients presenting as an emergency with ulcerative colitis is a subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy. A percentage of patients do not proceed to completion proctectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis.
AIM To review the existing literature in relation to the significant long-term complic-ations associated with the rectal stump, to provide an overview of options for the surgical management of remnant rectum and anal canal and to form a consolidated guideline on endoscopic screening recommendations in this cohort.
METHODS A systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for papers containing recommendations for endoscopy surveillance in rectal remnants in ulcerative colitis. A secondary narrative review was carried out exploring the medical and surgical management options for the retained rectum.
RESULTS For rectal stump surveillance guidelines, 20% recommended an interval of 6 mo to a year, 50% recommended yearly surveillance 10% recommended 2 yearly surveillance and the remaining 30% recommended risk stratification of patients and different screening intervals based on this. All studies agreed surveillance should be carried out via endoscopy and biopsy. Increased vigilance is needed in endoscopy in these patients. Literature review revealed a number of options for surgical management of the remnant rectum.
CONCLUSION The retained rectal stump needs to be surveyed endoscopically according to risk stratification. Great care must be taken to avoid rectal perforation and pelvic sepsis at time of endoscopy. If completion proctectomy is indicated the authors favour removal of the anal canal using an intersphincteric dissection technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orla Hennessy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Galway University Hospital, Galway H91RR2N, Ireland
| | - Laurence Egan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Galway University Hospital, Galway H91RR2N, Ireland
| | - Myles Joyce
- Department of Gastroenterology, Galway University Hospital, Galway H91RR2N, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Challenges in Crohn's Disease Management after Gastrointestinal Cancer Diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030574. [PMID: 33540674 PMCID: PMC7867285 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease affecting both young and elderly patients, involving the entire gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to anus. The chronic transmural inflammation can lead to several complications, among which gastrointestinal cancers represent one of the most life-threatening, with a higher risk of onset as compared to the general population. Moreover, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in this subset of patients still represent a significant challenge for physicians. Thus, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence for an adequate diagnostic pathway and medical and surgical management of CD patients after gastrointestinal cancer onset. Abstract Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with a progressive course, potentially affecting the entire gastrointestinal tract from mouth to anus. Several studies have shown an increased risk of both intestinal and extra-intestinal cancer in patients with CD, due to long-standing transmural inflammation and damage accumulation. The similarity of symptoms among CD, its related complications and the de novo onset of gastrointestinal cancer raises difficulties in the differential diagnosis. In addition, once a cancer diagnosis in CD patients is made, selecting the appropriate treatment can be particularly challenging. Indeed, both surgical and oncological treatments are not always the same as that of the general population, due to the inflammatory context of the gastrointestinal tract and the potential exacerbation of gastrointestinal symptoms of patients with CD; moreover, the overlap of the neoplastic disease could lead to adjustments in the pharmacological treatment of the underlying CD, especially with regard to immunosuppressive drugs. For these reasons, a case-by-case analysis in a multidisciplinary approach is often appropriate for the best diagnostic and therapeutic evaluation of patients with CD after gastrointestinal cancer onset.
Collapse
|
36
|
Naidu K, Ackermann T, Serrao-Brown H, Fadia M, Davis I. Colonic adenocarcinoma following total colectomy and abdomino-perineal resection for ulcerative colitis. ANZ J Surg 2020; 91:1313-1315. [PMID: 33098360 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Krishanth Naidu
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Travis Ackermann
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Hazel Serrao-Brown
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Mitali Fadia
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Ian Davis
- Department of General Surgery, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Xu W, Ding W, Gu Y, Cui L, Zhong J, Du P. Risk Factors of Colorectal Stricture Associated with Developing High-Grade Dysplasia or Cancer in Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Long-term Follow-up Study. Gut Liver 2020. [PMID: 31816674 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19229[publishedonlinefirst:2019/12/10]] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The risk factors of colorectal stricture associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) carcinogenesis in the long-term disease duration remain unclear. METHODS This study included all UC patients registered from a prospectively maintained database between June 1986 to July 2018. The demographic data, clinical features, and outcomes in patients with dysplasia and stricture were assessed using univariable analysis and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS A total of 246 eligible patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 13.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 9.0 to 16.0). There were 35 cases (14.2%) of colorectal stricture. Patients with stricture had worse clinical outcomes. Stricture formation (odds ratio [OR], 9.350; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.842 to 30.762), inflammatory polyps (OR, 5.464; 95% CI, 1.692 to 17.638), disease duration of more than 10 years (OR, 3.223; 95% CI, 1.040 to 9.985), and age >40 years at diagnosis (OR, 8.499; 95% CI, 1.903 to 37.956) were significantly associated with high-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer. In addition, disease duration of more than 5 years (OR, 3.211; 95% CI, 1.168 to 8.881), moderated anemia (OR, 3.373; 95% CI, 1.472 to 7.731), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (OR, 5,842; 95% CI, 1.395 to 24.468) were contributing factors for the development of colorectal stricture. CONCLUSIONS Colorectal stricture had the highest risk for malignant transformation. Earlier initiation of colonoscopic surveillance in UC patients with risk factors for stricture should be considered to prevent stricture formation and further malignant transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weimin Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjun Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yubei Gu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rui Jin Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Long Cui
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Zhong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rui Jin Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Du
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Xu W, Ding W, Gu Y, Cui L, Zhong J, Du P. Risk Factors of Colorectal Stricture Associated with Developing High-Grade Dysplasia or Cancer in Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Long-term Follow-up Study. Gut Liver 2020; 14:601-610. [PMID: 31816674 PMCID: PMC7492503 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The risk factors of colorectal stricture associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) carcinogenesis in the long-term disease duration remain unclear. Methods This study included all UC patients registered from a prospectively maintained database between June 1986 to July 2018. The demographic data, clinical features, and outcomes in patients with dysplasia and stricture were assessed using univariable analysis and multivariate logistic regression models. Results A total of 246 eligible patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up time was 13.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 9.0 to 16.0). There were 35 cases (14.2%) of colorectal stricture. Patients with stricture had worse clinical outcomes. Stricture formation (odds ratio [OR], 9.350; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.842 to 30.762), inflammatory polyps (OR, 5.464; 95% CI, 1.692 to 17.638), disease duration of more than 10 years (OR, 3.223; 95% CI, 1.040 to 9.985), and age >40 years at diagnosis (OR, 8.499; 95% CI, 1.903 to 37.956) were significantly associated with high-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer. In addition, disease duration of more than 5 years (OR, 3.211; 95% CI, 1.168 to 8.881), moderated anemia (OR, 3.373; 95% CI, 1.472 to 7.731), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (OR, 5,842; 95% CI, 1.395 to 24.468) were contributing factors for the development of colorectal stricture. Conclusions Colorectal stricture had the highest risk for malignant transformation. Earlier initiation of colonoscopic surveillance in UC patients with risk factors for stricture should be considered to prevent stricture formation and further malignant transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weimin Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjun Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yubei Gu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rui Jin Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Long Cui
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Zhong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rui Jin Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Du
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
de Jong ME, Gillis VELM, Derikx LAAP, Hoentjen F. No Increased Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Postinflammatory Polyps. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020; 26:1383-1389. [PMID: 31677385 PMCID: PMC7441099 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who have postinflammatory polyps (PIPs) may have an increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. Current guidelines recommend an intensified surveillance strategy in these patients, although the evidence for this recommendation is conflicting. The aim of our study was to assess whether IBD patients with PIPs are at increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. METHODS We established a retrospective cohort in a tertiary IBD center with IBD patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance in the current era. We compared cumulative incidences of colorectal neoplasia since IBD diagnosis between patients with and without PIPs and corrected for confounders. Second, we compared the risk of receiving a colectomy. RESULTS In our cohort with >22 years of median follow-up, 154 of 519 patients had PIPs. PIPs were associated with extensive disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-4.42; P < 0.001) and with more severe inflammation at colonoscopy (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.28-5.50; P < 0.001). After correction for confounders, the presence of PIPs was not associated with development of colorectal neoplasia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% CI, 0.85-1.93; P = 0.24) or with development of advanced neoplasia (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.52-3.68; P = 0.52). There was a higher risk of colectomy in patients with PIPs (HR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.55-7.54; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION In this cohort, PIPs were associated with disease extent, inflammation, and higher rates of colectomy. However, the presence of PIPs was not associated with the development of neoplasia. These findings suggest that patients with PIPs may not need an intensified surveillance strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel E de Jong
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,Address correspondence to: Michiel E. de Jong, MD, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, code 455, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands ()
| | - Veerle E L M Gillis
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lauranne A A P Derikx
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Crohn's Disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1028-1052. [PMID: 32692069 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
41
|
Lightner AL, Vaidya P, Vogler S, McMichael J, Jia X, Regueiro M, Qazi T, Steele SR, Church J. Surveillance pouchoscopy for dysplasia: Cleveland Clinic Ileoanal Pouch Anastomosis Database. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1826-1831. [PMID: 32687623 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No formal guidelines exist for surveillance pouchoscopy following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. METHODS All adults who had previously had IPAA for ulcerative colitis, and underwent a pouchoscopy between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020, were included. RESULTS A total of 9398 pouchoscopy procedures were performed in 3672 patients. The majority of the examinations were diagnostic (8082, 86·0 per cent; 3260 patients) and the remainder were for routine surveillance (1316, 14·0 per cent; 412 patients). Thirteen patients (0·14 per cent of procedures) were found to have biopsy-proven neoplasia at the time of pouchoscopy; seven had low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (0·07 per cent; all located in the anal transition zone), none had high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and six (0·06 per cent) had invasive adenocarcinoma (4 in anal transition zone and 6 in pouch). Of the six patients with adenocarcinoma, four had neoplasia at the time of proctocolectomy (2 adenocarcinoma, 1 LGD, 1 HGD); all six were symptomatic with anal bleeding or pelvic pain at the time of pouchoscopy, had a negative surveillance pouchoscopy examination within 2 years of diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, had palpable masses on digital rectal examination, and had visible lesions at the time of pouchoscopy. CONCLUSION Surveillance pouchoscopy is not recommended in asymptomatic patients because significant neoplasia following IPAA for ulcerative colitis is rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Lightner
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - P Vaidya
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - S Vogler
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - X Jia
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - M Regueiro
- Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Surgical Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - T Qazi
- Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Surgical Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - S R Steele
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - J Church
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nebbia M, Yassin NA, Spinelli A. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2020; 33:305-317. [PMID: 32968366 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk for developing colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the incidence has declined over the past 30 years, which is probably attributed to raise awareness, successful CRC surveillance programs and improved control of mucosal inflammation through chemoprevention. The risk factors for IBD-related CRC include more severe disease (as reflected by the extent of disease and the duration of poorly controlled disease), family history of CRC, pseudo polyps, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and male sex. The molecular pathogenesis of inflammatory epithelium might play a critical role in the development of CRC. IBD-related CRC is characterized by fewer rectal tumors, more synchronous and poorly differentiated tumors compared with sporadic cancers. There is no significant difference in sex distribution, stage at presentation, or survival. Surveillance is vital for the detection and subsequently management of dysplasia. Most guidelines recommend initiation of surveillance colonoscopy at 8 to 10 years after IBD diagnosis, followed by subsequent surveillance of 1 to 2 yearly intervals. Traditionally, surveillance colonoscopies with random colonic biopsies were used. However, recent data suggest that high definition and chromoendoscopy are better methods of surveillance by improving sensitivity to previously "invisible" flat dysplastic lesions. Management of dysplasia, timing of surveillance, chemoprevention, and the surgical approaches are all areas that stimulate various discussions. The aim of this review is to provide an up-to-date focus on CRC in IBD, from laboratory to bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Nebbia
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Nuha A Yassin
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.,Deparment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Risk of Development of More-advanced Lesions in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Dysplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1528-1536.e5. [PMID: 31202983 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have increased risks of dysplasia and colitis-associated cancer (CAC). We evaluated the risk of development of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or CAC after diagnosis of dysplasia using data from a national cohort of patients with IBD. METHODS We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of data collected from 7 tertiary referral regional or academic centers in Belgium. In searches of IBD pathology databases, we identified 813 lesions (616 low-grade dysplasias [LGDs], 64 high-grade dysplasias [HGDs], and 133 CACs) in 410 patients with IBD: 299 had dysplasia (73%) and 111 had CAC (27%). The primary aim was to determine the risk of more-advanced lesions after diagnosis of LGD or HGD. RESULTS Of the 287 patients with LGD, 21 (7%) developed more-advanced lesions (HGD or CAC) after a median time period of 86 months (interquartile range, 34-214). Of the 28 patients with HGD, 4 (14%) developed CAC after a median time period of 180 months (interquartile range, 23-444). The overall cumulative incidence of CAC at 10 years after an initial diagnosis of HGD was 24.3% and after an initial diagnosis of LGD was 8.5% (P < .05). Metachronous lesions, non-polypoid lesions, and colonic stricture were associated with risk of occurrence of more-advanced lesions after LGD (P < .05). Of the 630 dysplastic lesions identified during endoscopy, 545 (86%) were removed during the same procedure or during a follow-up endoscopy or by surgery. Of 111 patients with CAC, 95 (86%) did not have prior detection of dysplasia and 64 of these 95 patients (67%) developed CAC outside of the screening or surveillance period recommended by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of pathology data from 7 medical centers in Belgium, we found a low rate of detection of more-advanced lesions following detection of LGD or HGD-taking into account that most of the lesions were removed. Main risk factors for development of more-advanced lesions after LGD were metachronous lesions, non-polypoid lesions, and colon strictures.
Collapse
|
44
|
de Jong ME, Kanne H, Nissen LHC, Drenth JPH, Derikx LAAP, Hoentjen F. Increased risk of high-grade dysplasia and colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease patients with recurrent low-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:1334-1342.e1. [PMID: 31923409 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The impact of recurrent low-grade dysplasia (LGD) on the risk of advanced neoplasia (high-grade dysplasia and colorectal cancer) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is unknown. In addition, it is unclear how a neoplasia-free period after index LGD impacts this risk. We aimed to determine whether recurrent LGD is a risk factor for advanced neoplasia development and to evaluate the impact of a neoplasia-free time period after initial LGD diagnosis on the advanced neoplasia risk. METHODS This is a nationwide cohort study using data from the Dutch National Pathology Registry to identify all IBD patients with LGD and ≥1 follow-up colonoscopy between 1991 and 2010 in the Netherlands. Follow-up data were collected until January 2016. We compared the cumulative advanced neoplasia incidence between patients with and without recurrent LGD at first follow-up colonoscopy using log-rank analysis. We subsequently studied the impact of a neoplasia-free period after initial LGD on the advanced neoplasia incidence. RESULTS We identified 4284 IBD patients with colonic LGD with a median follow-up of 6.4 years. Recurrent LGD was a risk factor for advanced neoplasia (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.25; P = .001). A neoplasia-free period of at least 3 years after LGD protected against advanced neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent LGD at follow-up colonoscopy after initial LGD was a risk factor for advanced neoplasia. A neoplasia-free period of at least 3 years after initial LGD was associated with a reduced subsequent risk of advanced neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel E de Jong
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Heleen Kanne
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Loes H C Nissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauranne A A P Derikx
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Barnes EL, Lightner AL, Regueiro M. Perioperative and Postoperative Management of Patients With Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1356-1366. [PMID: 31589972 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although the number of available therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD) continues to expand, a significant portion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease will require surgical intervention. Surgery remains an integral part of the treatment algorithm for patients with ulcerative colitis and CD, and thus multidisciplinary approaches to the perioperative and postoperative management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease are critical to improving outcomes during these periods. New mechanisms of biologic therapies are emerging and new treatment strategies focused on earlier and potentially more aggressive use of immunosuppressive therapies are advocated in the current treatment era. In this review, we outline multidisciplinary strategies for the preoperative management of immunosuppressive therapies, including a discussion of the most recent evidence regarding the safety of biologic therapy in the preoperative period. We also discuss the postoperative medical management of patients undergoing intestinal resection for CD, with a particular focus on risk stratification and appropriate therapy selection in the immediate postoperative setting. Finally, we review potential postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and their management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Miguel Regueiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Pier C. and Renee A. Borra Family Endowed Chair in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Angriman I, Carvello M, Celentano V, Colombo F, Di Candido F, Laureti S, Luglio G, Poggioli G, Rottoli M, Scaringi S, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Sofo L, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): Crohn's disease. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:421-448. [PMID: 32172396 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02183-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a position statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of Crohn's disease management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of Crohn's disease. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - I Angriman
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - F Di Candido
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - S Laureti
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Luglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - G Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Scaringi
- Surgical Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Firenze, Florence, Italy
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - S Leone
- CEO, Associazione nazionale per le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Carvello M, Celentano V, Coco C, Colombo F, Geccherle A, Luglio G, Rottoli M, Scarpa M, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Sofo L, Zinicola R, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:397-419. [PMID: 32124113 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of ulcerative colitis management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve the quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - C Coco
- UOC Chirurgia Generale 2, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Geccherle
- IBD Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - G Luglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - M Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Scarpa
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Zinicola
- Department of Emergency Surgery, University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - S Leone
- Associazione Nazionale Per Le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
De Jong ME, Van Tilburg SB, Nissen LHC, Kievit W, Nagtegaal ID, Horjus CS, Römkens TEH, Drenth JPH, Hoentjen F, Derikx LAAP. Long-term Risk of Advanced Neoplasia After Colonic Low-grade Dysplasia in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:1485-1491. [PMID: 31175827 PMCID: PMC6903794 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The long-term risk of high-grade dysplasia [HGD] and colorectal cancer [CRC] following low-grade dysplasia [LGD] in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients is relatively unknown. We aimed to determine the long-term cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia [HGD and/or CRC], and to identify risk factors for advanced neoplasia in a nationwide IBD cohort with a history of LGD. METHODS This is a nationwide cohort study using data from the Dutch National Pathology Registry [PALGA] to identify all IBD patients with LGD between 1991 and 2010 in the Netherlands. Follow-up data were collected until January 2016. We determined the cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia and identified risk factors via multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS We identified 4284 patients with colonic LGD with a median follow-up of 6.4 years after initial LGD diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of subsequent advanced neoplasia was 3.6, 8.5, 14.4 and 21.7%, after 1, 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. The median time to develop advanced neoplasia after LGD was 3.6 years. Older age [≥ 55 years] at moment of LGD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-2.06), male sex [HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.60], and follow-up at an academic [vs non-academic] medical centre [HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07-1.76] were independent risk factors for advanced neoplasia following LGD. CONCLUSIONS In a large nationwide cohort with long-term follow-up of IBD patients with LGD, the cumulative incidence of advanced neoplasia was 21.7% after 15 years. Older age at LGD [≥55 years], male sex and follow-up by a tertiary IBD referral centre were independent risk factors for advanced neoplasia development after initial LGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel E De Jong
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Corresponding author: Michiel E. de Jong, MD, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, code 455, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel: 31 621980519; Fax: 31 243540103;
| | - Sanne B Van Tilburg
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Loes H C Nissen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carmen S Horjus
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lauranne A A P Derikx
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Quinn KP, Lightner AL, Faubion WA, Raffals LE. A Comprehensive Approach to Pouch Disorders. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25:460-471. [PMID: 30124882 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izy267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) or indeterminate colitis, UC with colonic dysplasia or neoplasia, and familial adenomatous polyposis. In general, patients experience good function outcomes and quality of life with an IPAA. Although pouchitis is the most well-recognized and frequent complication after IPAA, a number of additional inflammatory, postsurgical, structural, neoplastic, and functional complications may occur, resulting in pouch dysfunction. We herein provide a comprehensive review of pouch function and an approach to diagnosis and management of pouch complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin P Quinn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William A Faubion
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Laura E Raffals
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Landerholm K, Wood C, Bloemendaal A, Buchs N, George B, Guy R. The rectal remnant after total colectomy for colitis - intra-operative,post-operative and longer-term considerations. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53:1443-1452. [PMID: 30451043 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1529195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acute severe colitis requires surgery in around 30% of the cases. Total colectomy with ileostomy is the standard procedure with distinct advantages to a laparoscopic approach. Less agreement exists regarding the formation or configuration of the retained rectal stump and its short-term and long-term management. In this review, aspects of management of the rectal remnant, including perioperative considerations, potential complications, medical treatment, surveillance and implications for proctectomy and reconstructive surgery are explored. METHODS A thorough literature review exploring the PubMed and EMBASE databases was undertaken to clarify the evidence base surrounding areas of controversy in the surgical approach to acute severe colitis. In particular, focus was given to evidence surrounding management of the rectal remnant. RESULTS There is a paucity of high quality evidence for optimal management of the rectal stump following colectomy, and randomised trials are lacking. Establishment of laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with distinct advantages as well as the emergence of unique considerations, including those specific to rectal remnant management. CONCLUSIONS Early surgical involvement and a multidisciplinary approach to the management of acute severe colitis are advocated. Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy and ileostomy should be the operation of choice, with division of the rectum at the pelvic brim leaving a closed intraperitoneal remnant. If the rectum is severely inflamed, a mucus fistula may be useful, and an indwelling rectal catheter is probably advantageous to reduce the complications associated with stump dehiscence. Patients electing not to proceed to proctectomy should undergo surveillance for dysplasia of the rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalle Landerholm
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Christopher Wood
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Alexander Bloemendaal
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Nicolas Buchs
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Bruce George
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| | - Richard Guy
- a Department of Colorectal Surgery , Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford , UK
| |
Collapse
|