1
|
Akhgarandouz S, Moshiri M, Etemad L, Dadpour B, Khadem-Rezaiyan M, Vahdati-Mashhadian N. Effect of oral naloxone on opioid-induced constipation in methadone maintenance treatment patients, a double-blind, placebo-control, clinical trial. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:1807-1815. [PMID: 38502432 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03652-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most prevalent side effect of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). Naloxone could reduce the OIC. METHOD Fifty-six MMT cases (< 75 mg/day methadone, > 3 months) were entered randomly into four groups of a trial. They received placebo or naloxone tablets (0.5, 2, or 4 mg/day) once a day for 2 weeks. They continued their conventional laxative. Their constipation and opiate withdrawal (OWS) were evaluated by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (stool consistency and frequency), Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) questionnaire, Constipation Scoring System (CSS), and the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) before starting treatment and at the end of the first and second weeks. RESULTS The dose of 4 mg/day naloxone was excluded from the study due to severe OWS. The precipitants of groups had similar ages, methadone dose and duration, laxative use, and constipation scores at the start of the trial. However, 2 mg of naloxone could change the stool consistency (PV = 0.0052) and frequency (P = 0.0133), 0.5 mg/day dose only improved the stool consistency (P = 0.0016). The patients' CSS and PAC-SYM scores were reduced by naloxone after the 1st week of treatment. However, there was no significant difference in the mean score of SOWS at different assessment times and groups. Also, 3 and 4 cases of 0.5 and 2 mg/day groups, respectively, withdrew from the study due to OWS. CONCLUSION Oral naloxone at doses of 0.5 and 2 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo on OIC in MMT. However, the dose of 4 mg induced intolerable OWS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammad Moshiri
- Medical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Leila Etemad
- Medical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- Pharmaceutical Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Bita Dadpour
- Medical Toxicology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan
- Community medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Nasser Vahdati-Mashhadian
- Department of Pharmacodynamics and Toxicology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saito A, Alvi S, Valant C, Christopoulos A, Carbone SE, Poole DP. Therapeutic potential of allosteric modulators for the treatment of gastrointestinal motility disorders. Br J Pharmacol 2024; 181:2232-2246. [PMID: 36565295 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal motility is tightly regulated by the enteric nervous system (ENS). Disruption of coordinated enteric nervous system activity can result in dysmotility. Pharmacological treatment options for dysmotility include targeting of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed by neurons of the enteric nervous system. Current GPCR-targeting drugs for motility disorders bind to the highly conserved endogenous ligand-binding site and promote indiscriminate activation or inhibition of the target receptor throughout the body. This can be associated with significant side-effect liability and a loss of physiological tone. Allosteric modulators of GPCRs bind to a distinct site from the endogenous ligand, which is typically less conserved across multiple receptor subtypes and can modulate endogenous ligand signalling. Allosteric modulation of GPCRs that are important for enteric nervous system function may provide effective relief from motility disorders while limiting side-effects. This review will focus on how allosteric modulators of GPCRs may influence gastrointestinal motility, using 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), acetylcholine (ACh) and opioid receptors as examples. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: hot topics from the Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists 2021 Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.14/issuetoc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayame Saito
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sadia Alvi
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Celine Valant
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arthur Christopoulos
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simona E Carbone
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel P Poole
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Raschka M, Gahr K, Watson D, Lu M. Clinical Outcomes of Intravenous Methylnaltrexone in Children: A Single-Arm Retrospective Cohort Study. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2024; 29:292-298. [PMID: 38863861 PMCID: PMC11163904 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Constipation is a common adverse event of opioid use that is often difficult to treat. Methylnaltrexone is a therapeutic option for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) approved for oral and subcutaneous use in adults. These administration routes are not always feasible in the pediatric population. The primary objective of this research was to quantify the response rate of methylnaltrexone in pediatric patients when it was administered via the intravenous (IV) route. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated patients ages <18 years who received IV methylnaltrexone between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2020, for OIC. Efficacy was evaluated through documentation of bowel evacuation within 4 hours of methylnaltrexone administration. Adverse events observed within 24 hours of administration were attributed to methylnaltrexone. RESULTS Methylnaltrexone was administered to 134 unique patients during the study period. Of these, 46 met exclusion criteria, resulting in 88 patients being included in the study. Patients with an underlying hematology/oncology diagnosis consisted of 77% of the study population, and 23% of patients had an -underlying medical/surgical diagnosis. The response rate to IV methylnaltrexone was 25% (CI, 16-34). CONCLUSIONS The results of this retrospective chart review demonstrate the potential role of IV methylnaltrexone in the pediatric population. Despite the overall lower response rate relative to that reported in adults, IV methylnaltrexone possesses a unique mechanism of action that may serve as an alternative treatment option for patients unable to use the oral and subcutaneous administration routes. There were no significant adverse events seen in the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Raschka
- Department of Pharmacy (MR, KG, ML), Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Kayla Gahr
- Department of Pharmacy (MR, KG, ML), Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Dave Watson
- Research Institute (DW) Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Melisa Lu
- Department of Pharmacy (MR, KG, ML), Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kistemaker KRJ, Sijani F, Brinkman DJ, de Graeff A, Burchell GL, Steegers MAH, van Zuylen L. Pharmacological prevention and treatment of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 125:102704. [PMID: 38452708 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related pain often requires opioid treatment with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) as its most frequent gastrointestinal side-effect. Both for prevention and treatment of OIC osmotic (e.g. polyethylene glycol) and stimulant (e.g. bisacodyl) laxatives are widely used. Newer drugs such as the peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) and naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone have become available for the management of OIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to give an overview of the scientific evidence on pharmacological strategies for the prevention and treatment of OIC in cancer patients. METHODS A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was completed from inception up to 22 October 2022. Randomized and non-randomized studies were systematically selected. Bowel function and adverse drug events were assessed. RESULTS Twenty trials (prevention: five RCTs and three cohort studies; treatment: ten RCTs and two comparative cohort studies) were included in the review. Regarding the prevention of OIC, three RCTs compared laxatives with other laxatives, finding no clear differences in effectivity of the laxatives used. One cohort study showed a significant benefit of magnesium oxide compared with no laxative. One RCT found a significant benefit for the PAMORA naldemedine compared with magnesium oxide. Preventive use of oxycodone/naloxone did not show a significant difference in two out of three other studies compared to oxycodone or fentanyl. A meta-analysis was not possible. Regarding the treatment of OIC, two RCTs compared laxatives, of which one RCT found that polyethylene glycol was significantly more effective than sennosides. Seven studies compared an opioid antagonist (naloxone, methylnaltrexone or naldemedine) with placebo and three studies compared different dosages of opioid antagonists. These studies with opioid antagonists were used for the meta-analysis. Oxycodone/naloxone showed a significant improvement in Bowel Function Index compared to oxycodone with laxatives (MD -13.68; 95 % CI -18.38 to -8.98; I2 = 58 %). Adverse drug event rates were similar amongst both groups, except for nausea in favour of oxycodone/naloxone (RR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.31-0.83; I2 = 0 %). Naldemedine (NAL) and methylnaltrexone (MNTX) demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared to placebo (NAL: RR 2.07, 95 % CI 1.64-2.61, I2 = 0 %; MNTX: RR 3.83, 95 % CI 2.81-5.22, I2 = 0 %). With regard to adverse events, abdominal pain was more present in treatment with methylnaltrexone and diarrhea was significantly more present in treatment with naldemedine. Different dosages of methylnaltrexone were not significantly different with regard to both efficacy and adverse drug event rates. CONCLUSIONS Magnesium oxide and naldemedine are most likely effective for prevention of OIC in cancer patients. Naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone, naldemedine and methylnaltrexone effectively treat OIC in cancer patients with acceptable adverse events. However, their effect has not been compared to standard (osmotic and stimulant) laxatives. More studies comparing standard laxatives with each other and with opioid antagonists are necessary before recommendations for clinical practice can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R J Kistemaker
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - F Sijani
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Brinkman
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A de Graeff
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Academic Hospice Demeter, de Bilt, the Netherlands
| | - G L Burchell
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A H Steegers
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Anesthesiology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L van Zuylen
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Medical Oncology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wobbe B, Gerner M, Köhne CH. Naldemedine versus placebo in opioid-induced constipation: a meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e578-e584. [PMID: 36517204 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent adverse event among patients receiving chronic pain therapy that is requiring opioids. Naldemedine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat OIC and appears to be more efficient than any other peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist. This meta-analysis aimed at assessing the available data on naldemedine in terms of efficacy. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and ClinicalTrials on 24 May 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing naldemedine to placebo among patients reporting OIC. RESULTS Evaluation of 6 RCTs enrolling 2769 participants showed significantly greater respondence to treatment (OR=2.48; 95% CI: 2.02 to 3.06; p<0.00001), change in weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) (mean difference=1.45; 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.76; p<0.00001), complete SBMs (mean difference=0.89; 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.17; p<0.00001) and SBMs without straining (mean difference=0.89; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.17; p<0.00001) for patients treated with naldemedine. We found no difference in numeric pain rating scales after one (mean difference=0.05; 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.31; p=0.73) and two weeks of treatment (mean difference= -0.04; 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.22; p=0.75). Funding and clinical diversity were possible risks of bias. CONCLUSIONS Naldemedine improves a variety of bowel function parameters while preserving analgesia, confirming its efficacy for patients with OIC. However, head-to-head trials are needed to establish naldemedine as treatment of first choice for laxative-refractory OIC. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022281353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastian Wobbe
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Gerner
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claus-Henning Köhne
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shanholtz G, Vergara FH, Amba KT, Ramos MD. Bowel Management Protocol: Impact on Care Transitions of Oncology Patients. Prof Case Manag 2024; 29:22-29. [PMID: 37983778 DOI: 10.1097/ncm.0000000000000669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF STUDY The project aimed to determine the impact of a standardized bowel regimen protocol for patients receiving opioids on the rate of stool softener prescription, occurrence of bowel movements of oncology patients, and improving the length of stay (LOS). PRIMARY PRACTICE OF SETTING Oncology unit in a community hospital. METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE A posttest design was utilized, and a prospective medical record review of patients was completed after 8 weeks of the pilot study. The study sample (N = 164) included oncology patients admitted to a community hospital in the Southeast. The χ2 test was used to determine the impact of implementing a bowel panel order on the rate of stool softener prescriptions, the occurrence of bowel movements, and the LOS. RESULTS Only 43% (n = 40) of the patients from the comparison group were ordered laxatives, and more patients from the intervention group (68%; n = 49) received the bowel regimen protocol, whereas 26% (n = 19) of the patients used a laxative or stool softener using providers' preference and demonstrated statistical significance (p = .001). In the intervention group, 93% of the patients (n = 67) reported having bowel movements compared with the comparison group, whereas only 32% (n = 32) demonstrated statistical significance (p = .001). The average LOS in the intervention group is less than 9 days compared with the comparison group, which was at 9 days (p = .001). IMPLICATIONS TO CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Case managers play a critical role in coordinating care, improving transitions of care, and reducing LOS. Case managers can have a significant impact by monitoring and reminding nurses to report the gastrointestinal movements of oncology patients and then escalate opioid-induced constipation with the providers immediately. Case managers can facilitate the implementation of bowel regimen protocols, which may reduce hospitalizations and enhance patient outcomes, by taking this action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayle Shanholtz
- Gayle Shanholtz, DNP, RN, PMH-BC, NEA-BC, was a doctorate student for this project and was a nurse educator for neurology and oncology specializing in performance improvement, education, and outcome reviews to improve patient care. The school of nursing and southern hospital-site IRBs approved this project. Currently, she is the chief of acute care nursing services at the Martinsburg Veterans Affairs Medical Center in West Virginia
- Franz Henryk Vergara, PhD, DNP, RN, CENP, CCM, ONC, was the doctoral capstone chairman and he was the supervising faculty of Dr. Shanholtz. Currently, Dr. Vergara is a principal consultant at Nurse Atbp LLC, Columbia, Maryland
- Katheryne Tifuh Amba, PhD, DNP, RN, ACNP-BC, CCRN, is nurse scientist at SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
- Mary Dioise Ramos, PhD, RN, is associate professor at WellStar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Franz Henryk Vergara
- Gayle Shanholtz, DNP, RN, PMH-BC, NEA-BC, was a doctorate student for this project and was a nurse educator for neurology and oncology specializing in performance improvement, education, and outcome reviews to improve patient care. The school of nursing and southern hospital-site IRBs approved this project. Currently, she is the chief of acute care nursing services at the Martinsburg Veterans Affairs Medical Center in West Virginia
- Franz Henryk Vergara, PhD, DNP, RN, CENP, CCM, ONC, was the doctoral capstone chairman and he was the supervising faculty of Dr. Shanholtz. Currently, Dr. Vergara is a principal consultant at Nurse Atbp LLC, Columbia, Maryland
- Katheryne Tifuh Amba, PhD, DNP, RN, ACNP-BC, CCRN, is nurse scientist at SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
- Mary Dioise Ramos, PhD, RN, is associate professor at WellStar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Katheryne Tifuh Amba
- Gayle Shanholtz, DNP, RN, PMH-BC, NEA-BC, was a doctorate student for this project and was a nurse educator for neurology and oncology specializing in performance improvement, education, and outcome reviews to improve patient care. The school of nursing and southern hospital-site IRBs approved this project. Currently, she is the chief of acute care nursing services at the Martinsburg Veterans Affairs Medical Center in West Virginia
- Franz Henryk Vergara, PhD, DNP, RN, CENP, CCM, ONC, was the doctoral capstone chairman and he was the supervising faculty of Dr. Shanholtz. Currently, Dr. Vergara is a principal consultant at Nurse Atbp LLC, Columbia, Maryland
- Katheryne Tifuh Amba, PhD, DNP, RN, ACNP-BC, CCRN, is nurse scientist at SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
- Mary Dioise Ramos, PhD, RN, is associate professor at WellStar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| | - Mary Dioise Ramos
- Gayle Shanholtz, DNP, RN, PMH-BC, NEA-BC, was a doctorate student for this project and was a nurse educator for neurology and oncology specializing in performance improvement, education, and outcome reviews to improve patient care. The school of nursing and southern hospital-site IRBs approved this project. Currently, she is the chief of acute care nursing services at the Martinsburg Veterans Affairs Medical Center in West Virginia
- Franz Henryk Vergara, PhD, DNP, RN, CENP, CCM, ONC, was the doctoral capstone chairman and he was the supervising faculty of Dr. Shanholtz. Currently, Dr. Vergara is a principal consultant at Nurse Atbp LLC, Columbia, Maryland
- Katheryne Tifuh Amba, PhD, DNP, RN, ACNP-BC, CCRN, is nurse scientist at SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri
- Mary Dioise Ramos, PhD, RN, is associate professor at WellStar College of Health and Human Services, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith WR, Valrie CR, Jaja C, Kenney MO. Precision, integrative medicine for pain management in sickle cell disease. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1279361. [PMID: 38028431 PMCID: PMC10666191 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1279361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a prevalent and complex inherited pain disorder that can manifest as acute vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) and/or chronic pain. Despite their known risks, opioids are often prescribed routinely and indiscriminately in managing SCD pain, because it is so often severe and debilitating. Integrative medicine strategies, particularly non-opioid therapies, hold promise in safe and effective management of SCD pain. However, the lack of evidence-based methods for managing SCD pain hinders the widespread implementation of non-opioid therapies. In this review, we acknowledge that implementing personalized pain treatment strategies in SCD, which is a guideline-recommended strategy, is currently fraught with limitations. The full implementation of pharmacological and biobehavioral pain approaches targeting mechanistic pain pathways faces challenges due to limited knowledge and limited financial and personnel support. We recommend personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and integrative medicine as aspirational strategies for improving pain care in SCD. As an organizing model that is a comprehensive framework for classifying pain subphenotypes and mechanisms in SCD, and for guiding selection of specific strategies, we present evidence updating pain research pioneer Richard Melzack's neuromatrix theory of pain. We advocate for using the updated neuromatrix model to subphenotype individuals with SCD, to better select personalized multimodal treatment strategies, and to identify research gaps fruitful for exploration. We present a fairly complete list of currently used pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic SCD pain therapies, classified by their mechanism of action and by their hypothesized targets in the updated neuromatrix model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wally R. Smith
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Cecelia R. Valrie
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Cheedy Jaja
- College of Nursing, University of South Florida School of Nursing, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Martha O. Kenney
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mehta N, Slatkin NE, Israel RJ, Stambler N, Shah ED. Impact of Patient Subgroups on the Efficacy and Safety of Methylnaltrexone for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Advanced Illness. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3529-3543. [PMID: 37881233 PMCID: PMC10595216 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s416307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the impact of baseline patient characteristics on safety and efficacy of methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced illness with opioid-induced constipation (OIC). Patients and Methods This analysis pooled data from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (study 302: NCT00402038; study 4000: NCT00672477) in patients with advanced illness, including cancer, and OIC. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous methylnaltrexone (study 302: 0.15 mg/kg; study 4000: 8 or 12 mg based on weight) or placebo every other day for 2 weeks. The proportions of patients achieving rescue-free laxation within 4 or 24 hours after the first dose of study drug were assessed in patient subgroups stratified by baseline age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, cancer status, laxative type, and opioid requirement. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated. Results Overall, 363 patients were included in this analysis (methylnaltrexone, 178; placebo, 185). Mean (SD) age was 66.3 (13.7) years and 48.5% were men overall. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving methylnaltrexone versus placebo achieved rescue-free laxation within 4 hours (111/178 [62.4%] vs 31/185 [16.8%]; P<0.0001) and 24 hours (135/178 [75.8%] vs 81/185 [43.8%]; P<0.0001) of the first dose. These trends were consistent across all subgroups. Most patients experienced ≥1 TEAE in the overall population (methylnaltrexone, 82.1%; placebo, 76.2%), which remained consistent when stratified by baseline characteristics. More than half of TEAEs were gastrointestinal in nature. Abdominal pain was more common in patients receiving methylnaltrexone than placebo across baseline characteristic subgroups. Conclusion Methylnaltrexone treatment was superior to placebo in achieving rescue-free laxation within 4 and 24 hours after the first dose, irrespective of patients' cancer status, baseline ECOG performance status, or baseline opioid or laxative use. The methylnaltrexone safety profile remained consistent across baseline characteristic subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neel Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal E Slatkin
- School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
- Medical Affairs, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Robert J Israel
- Clinical and Medical Affairs, Bausch Health US LLC, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Nancy Stambler
- Clinical Research, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, a Subsidiary of Lantheus Holdings Inc, North Billerica, MA, USA
| | - Eric D Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang JJ, Sun R, Guo S, Yang S. Incidence of constipation and associated factors in the period of lockdown during COVID-19 pandemic: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069614. [PMID: 37775294 PMCID: PMC10546134 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The lifestyle and habit changes that have emerged as a result of quarantine measures may have had a negative impact on defecation habits. However, there is a lack of data on combined estimates of its occurrence and prevalence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a systematic search for observational studies on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP China Science and Technology Journal database, Chinese Biomedical Databases and Wanfang Data. The search will include literature published from the inception of the databases to September 2022. Two authors will independently screen articles and extract data based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies will be evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Statistical analysis will be performed using Review Manager software V.5.4 and STATA V.16.0 software. Heterogeneity among studies will be assessed using the Q statistical test and I2 statistical tests. In case of significant heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses will also be performed to assess the reliability of the study findings. If feasible, a meta-analysis will be conducted. Otherwise, a descriptive synthesis will be performed using a best-evidence synthesis approach. The primary outcome of interest will be the prevalence of constipation. The secondary outcomes will involve examining the association of risk factors. To evaluate potential publication bias, we will use both the Begg funnel plot and Egger's weighted regression statistics. Furthermore, to accurately assess the quality of evidence for our primary outcome, we will employ the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This systematic review protocol will only consider published studies available in databases and will not include individual patient data. Therefore, ethical approval is not required, and the findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPER REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022366176.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Juan Zhang
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Ran Sun
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Sha Guo
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Sha Yang
- School of Acupuncture and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Key Laboratory of Acupuncture for Senile Disease (Chengdu University of TCM), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Naya N, Oka H, Hashimoto S, Morioka Y, Kizawa Y. Real-World Evidence for the Safety and Effectiveness of Naldemedine in the Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer Pain: Post-hoc Subgroup Analysis of Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan. Cureus 2023; 15:e46090. [PMID: 37900431 PMCID: PMC10611588 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation is common and greatly affects the quality of life but is often under-recognised and undertreated. This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation with cancer pain according to specific subgroups of clinical interest. METHODS In this exploratory post-hoc subgroup analysis of post-marketing surveillance from Japan (UMIN: 000042851), data were investigated by the subgroups: age (≥75, <75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS 0-2, 3-4), constipation severity (mild, moderate, severe), brain metastasis (yes, no), anticancer drug treatment (yes, no), opioid at naldemedine initiation (fentanyl only, only strong opioids other than fentanyl, weak opioids only, other), and prior or concomitant use of laxative (only osmotic/saline laxatives, only stimulant laxatives, other, none). Enrolled patients (n = 1184) received naldemedine (0.2 mg once daily) orally for up to 12 weeks. Regarding safety endpoints, the incidence of adverse drug reactions, including diarrhoea, was determined within each subgroup. Regarding effectiveness endpoints, improvement rates in the frequency and condition of bowel movements were investigated by subgroups. RESULTS The incidence of adverse drug reactions, including diarrhoea, among subgroups ranged from 7.74% to 16.08% (diarrhoea: 5.95% to 13.19%), compared to 11.30% (diarrhoea: 9.09%) in the total population. Through week two to week 12, improvement rates in the frequency and condition of bowel movement among subgroups ranged from 63.6% to 89.7% and 67.6% to 94.9%, compared to 75.0% to 83.2% and 80.0% to 88.0% in the total population, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Naldemedine was well tolerated and effective in patients with opioid-induced constipation and cancer pain regardless of the subgroups investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyuki Naya
- Medical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, JPN
| | - Hiroaki Oka
- Pharmacovigilance Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, JPN
| | - Sayo Hashimoto
- Pharmacovigilance Department, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Osaka, JPN
| | | | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mousavi T, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. An update on the use of pharmacotherapy for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:359-375. [PMID: 36548911 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2161883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the growing rate of aging and the incidence of chronic diseases, there has been an upsurge in opioid prescription and abuse worldwide. This has been associated with increased reports of opioid-related adverse events, particularly opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD), calling for a rational clinical management strategy. AREAS COVERED Through searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, English literature was gathered as of 1 January 2017. Furthermore, the USFDA, EMA, TGA, Clinicaltrials.Gov, WHO-ICTRP databases, and the latest guidelines were reviewed to extract ongoing clinical studies and provide an evidence-based expert opinion with detailed information on efficacy, safety, approval status, and pharmacokinetics of the currently used medications. EXPERT OPINION Despite the significant burden of OIBD, the clinical development of agents lags behind disease progress. Although in most places, management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is initiated by lifestyle modifications followed by laxatives, opioid antagonists, and secretagogue agents, there are still major conflicts among global guidelines. The fundamental reason is the lack of head-to-head clinical trials providing inter- and intragroup comparisons between PAMORAs, laxatives, and secretagogue agents. These investigations must be accompanied by further valid biopharmaceutical and economic evaluations, paving the way for rational clinical judgment in each context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taraneh Mousavi
- Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran, Iran.,Toxicology and Diseases Group, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran, Iran.,Personalized Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abdollahi
- Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran, Iran.,Toxicology and Diseases Group, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Almehmadi M, Halawi M, Kamal M, Jawaid T, Asif M. Laxative Effects and Phytochemical Analysis of Perilla frutescens Seed Oil by Using Gas Chromatography: A Good Source of Omega Fatty Acids. Pharm Chem J 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s11094-022-02781-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
13
|
Andresen V, Becker G, Frieling T, Goebel-Stengel M, Gundling F, Herold A, Karaus M, Keller J, Kim M, Klose P, Krammer H, Kreis ME, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Langhorst J, Layer P, Lenzen-Großimlinghaus R, Madisch A, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Rubin D, Schemann M, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Stengel A, Storr M, van der Voort I, Voderholzer W, Wedel T, Wirz S, Witzigmann H, Pehl C. Aktualisierte S2k-Leitlinie chronische Obstipation der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie & Motilität (DGNM) – April 2022 – AWMF-Registriernummer: 021–019. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:1528-1572. [PMID: 36223785 DOI: 10.1055/a-1880-1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V Andresen
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - G Becker
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - T Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Helios-Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | | | - F Gundling
- Medizinische Klinik II (Gastroenterologie, Gastroenterologische Onkologie, Hepatologie, Diabetologie, Stoffwechsel, Infektiologie), Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Herold
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg, End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - M Karaus
- Abt. Innere Medizin, Evang. Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - J Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M Kim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) des Universitätsklinikums, Zentrum Operative Medizin (ZOM), Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - P Klose
- Universität Duisburg-Essen, Medizinische Fakultät, Essen, Deutschland
| | - H Krammer
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg, End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - M E Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - J Langhorst
- Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Essen, Deutschland
| | - P Layer
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | | | - A Madisch
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, interventionelle Endoskopie und Diabetologie, Klinikum Siloah-Oststadt-Heidehaus, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - H Mönnikes
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - D Rubin
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland.,Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Spandau, Deutschland
| | - M Schemann
- Lehrstuhl für Humanbiologie, TU München, Freising, Deutschland
| | - J Schwille-Kiuntke
- Innere Medizin VI Psychosomat. Medizin u. Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.,Institut für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Stengel
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Storr
- Zentrum für Endoskopie, Starnberg, Deutschland
| | - I van der Voort
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Gastroenterologie und Diabetologie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - T Wedel
- Anatomisches Institut, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - S Wirz
- Cura Krankenhaus Bad Honnef, Bad Honnef, Deutschland
| | - H Witzigmann
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - C Pehl
- Medizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus Vilsbiburg, Vilsbiburg, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195628. [PMID: 36233497 PMCID: PMC9572852 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.
Collapse
|
15
|
Candy B, Jones L, Vickerstaff V, Larkin PJ, Stone P. Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD006332. [PMID: 36106667 PMCID: PMC9476137 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006332.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) is characterised by constipation, incomplete evacuation, bloating, and gastric reflux. It is one of the major adverse events (AEs) of treatment for pain in cancer and palliative care, resulting in increased morbidity and reduced quality of life. This review is a partial update of a 2008 review, and critiques as previous update (2018) trials only for people with cancer and people receiving palliative care. OBJECTIVES To assess for OIBD in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care the effectiveness and safety of mu-opioid antagonists (MOAs) versus different doses of MOAs, alternative pharmacological/non-pharmacological interventions, placebo, or no treatment. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science (December 2021), clinical trial registries and regulatory websites. We sought contact with MOA manufacturers for further data. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness and safety of MOAs for OIBD in people with cancer and people at a palliative stage irrespective of the type of terminal disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors assessed risk of bias and extracted data. The appropriateness of combining data from the trials depended upon sufficient homogeneity across trials. Our primary outcomes were laxation response, effect on analgesia, and AEs. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE and created summary of findings tables. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 studies (two new trials) randomising in-total 1343 adults with cancer irrespective of stage, or at palliative care stage of any disease. The MOAs were oral naldemedine and naloxone (alone or in combination with oxycodone), and subcutaneous methylnaltrexone. The trials compared MOAs with placebo, MOAs at different doses, or in combination with other drugs. Two trials of naldemedine and three of naloxone with oxycodone were in people with cancer irrespective of disease stage. The trial on naloxone alone was in people with advanced cancer. Four trials on methylnaltrexone were in palliative care where most participants had advanced cancer. All trials were vulnerable to biases; most commonly, blinding of the outcome assessor was not reported. Oral naldemedine versus placebo Risk (i.e. chance) of spontaneous laxations in the medium term (over two weeks) for naldemedine was over threefold greater risk ratio (RR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 2.52, 2 trials, 418 participants, I² = 0%. Number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 3 to 4; moderate-certainty evidence). Earlier risk of spontaneous laxations and patient assessment of bowel change was not reported. Very low-certainty evidence showed naldemedine had little to no effect on opioid withdrawal symptoms. There was little to no difference in the risk of serious (non-fatal) AEs (RR 3.34, 95% CI 0.85 to 13.15: low-certainty evidence). Over double the risk of AEs (non-serious) reported with naldemedine (moderate-certainty evidence). Low-dose oral naldemedine versus higher dose Risk of spontaneous laxations was lower for the lower dose (medium term, 0.1 mg versus 0.4 mg: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.89, 1 trial, 111 participants (low-certainty evidence)). Earlier risk of spontaneous laxations and patient assessment of bowel change not reported. Low-certainty evidence showed little to no difference on opioid withdrawal symptoms (0.1 mg versus 0.4 mg mean difference (MD) -0.30, 95% CI -0.85 to 0.25), and occurrences of serious AEs (0.1 mg versus 0.4 mg RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.17). Low-certainty evidence showed little to no difference on non-serious AEs. Oral naloxone versus placebo Risk of spontaneous laxations and AEs not reported. Little to no difference in pain intensity (very low-certainty evidence). Full data not given. The trial reported that no serious AEs occurred. Oral naloxone + oxycodone versus oxycodone Risk of spontaneous laxations within 24 hours and in the medium term not reported. Low-certainty evidence showed naloxone with oxycodone reduced the risk of opioid withdrawal symptoms. There was little to no difference in the risk of serious (non-fatal) AEs (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.06), 3 trials, 362 participants, I² = 55%: very low-certainty evidence). There was little to no difference in risk of AEs (low-certainty evidence). Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone versus placebo Risk of spontaneous laxations within 24 hours with methylnaltrexone was fourfold greater than placebo (RR 2.97, 95% CI 2.13 to 4.13. 2 trials, 287 participants, I² = 31%. NNTB 3, 95% CI 2 to 3; low-certainty evidence). Risk of spontaneous laxations in the medium term was over tenfold greater with methylnaltrexone (RR 8.15, 95% CI 4.76 to 13.95, 2 trials, 305 participants, I² = 47%. NNTB 2, 95% CI 2 to 2; moderate-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence showed methylnaltrexone reduced the risk of opioid withdrawal symptoms, and did not increase risk of a serious AE (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.93. I² = 0%; 2 trials, 364 participants). The risk of AEs was higher for methylnaltrexone (low-certainty evidence). Lower-dose subcutaneous methylnaltrexone versus higher dose There was little to no difference in risk of spontaneous laxations in the medium-term (1 mg versus 5 mg or greater: RR 2.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 10.39; 1 trial, 26 participants very low-certainty evidence), or in patient assessment of improvement in bowel status (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.35, 1 trial, 102 participants; low-certainty evidence). Medium-term assessment of spontaneous laxations and serious AEs not reported. There was little to no difference in symptoms of opioid withdrawal (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.84 to 0.34, 1 trial, 102 participants) or occurrence of AEs (low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This update's findings for naldemedine and naloxone with oxycodone have been strengthened with two new trials, but conclusions have not changed. Moderate-certainty evidence for oral naldemedine on risk of spontaneous laxations and non-serious AEs suggests in people with cancer that naldemedine may improve bowel function over two weeks and increase the risk of AEs. There was low-certainty evidence on serious AEs. Moderate-certainty evidence for methylnaltrexone on spontaneous laxations over two weeks suggests subcutaneous methylnaltrexone may improve bowel function in people receiving palliative care, but certainty of evidence for AEs was low. More trials are needed, more evaluation of AEs, outcomes patients rate as important, and in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Candy
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philip J Larkin
- UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems and Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, UCD College of Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patrick Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang H, Gu X, Xu M, Yang G, Rao Y, Gao L, Gong G, He S. Preventing nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopic surgery by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with a naloxone admixture: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29584. [PMID: 35866767 PMCID: PMC9302326 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting are common side effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). This study aimed to explore the inhibitory effect of a naloxone admixture on the incidence of sufentanil-induced postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). METHODS A total of 132 Uyghur American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients scheduled to undergo elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were recruited; among these, 120 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into 4 groups: patients receiving PCIA but no naloxone were included in the control group (group A); patients receiving PCIA with a low-dose naloxone admixture at 0.2 μg·kg-1·h-1 were included in group B; patients receiving PCIA with naloxone admixture at 0.4 μg·kg-1·h-1 were included in group C; patients receiving PCIA with naloxone admixture at 0.6 μg·kg-1·h-1 were included in group D. All patients were administered sufentanil at 0.04 kg-1·h-1, butorphanol at 2 kg-1·h-1, and dexmedetomidine at 0.08 kg-1·h-1 using a PCIA device within 2 days of surgery. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting, visual analogue scores for pain intensity, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, pruritus, lethargy, respiratory depression, etc, was recorded at 2, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS There was a significant difference in the PONV scores between the groups at 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.01). At 8 and 12 hours, the score of group C/D was significantly lower than that of group A/B (P < 0.01). At 24 hours after surgery, the PONV score of group B/C/D was significantly lower than that of group A (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the general data and visual analogue scores for postoperative pain between the 4 groups. CONCLUSION Naloxone admixture administered at 0.4 to 0.6 μg·kg-1·h-1 can exert an effective inhibitory effect on the incidence and intensity of PONV in gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haihong Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, No. 950 Hospital of PLA, Yecheng, China
| | - Xuedong Gu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China
| | - Meiling Xu
- Department of Geriatrics, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China
| | - Guan Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China
| | - Yunju Rao
- School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Sichuan, China
| | - Liang Gao
- Military Prevention and Treatment Center for Mountain Sickness, No. 950 Hospital of PLA, Yecheng, China
| | - Gu Gong
- Department of Anesthesiology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China
| | - Siyi He
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, China
- * Correspondence: Siyi He, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Rongdu Avenue No. 270, Jinniu District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province 610083, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alvaro D, Coluzzi F, Gianni W, Lugoboni F, Marinangeli F, Massazza G, Pinto C, Varrassi G. Opioid-Induced Constipation in Real-World Practice: A Physician Survey, 1 Year Later. Pain Ther 2022; 11:477-491. [PMID: 35122615 PMCID: PMC9098716 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00354-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common adverse effect of opioid therapy, but it is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Last year, a survey among Italian healthcare providers revealed important differences in the clinical management of OIC across physician specialties, the need of standardization of diagnosis and treatment, and the urgency of further education. Herein, we submitted an updated version of the survey to the same cohort of experts to evaluate potential progress. METHODS The online survey included 15 questions about OIC. Responses were analyzed descriptively and aggregated by physician specialty. RESULTS A total of 190 physicians completed the survey. Most respondents (65%) did not feel adequately educated about OIC despite general consensus regarding interest in the topic and acknowledgement of OIC impact on patients' QoL and adherence to opioid therapy. Overall, 55-77% of physicians regularly evaluated intestinal function or OIC symptoms in patients receiving opioid therapy, with one-third of respondents implementing it in the past year. Even though the most common method for assessment was still patient diary, the use of specific scales underwent a small but significant increase compared to the previous year, with major implementation in the use of Rome IV criteria. As regards first-line treatment, most respondents (49%) preferred macrogol prophylaxis followed by macrogol plus another laxative. For second-line treatment, we revealed a growth in the prescription of peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), with 46% of all the respondents having increased their use during the past year. CONCLUSIONS Despite some limitations, our study demonstrated a slow but important step closer to standardization of diagnosis and treatment of OIC. Further educational and training efforts should be put in place to favor best evidence-based clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Alvaro
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Flaminia Coluzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, SAPIENZA University of Rome, Polo Pontino, Latina, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100, Latina, LT, Italy.
- Unit of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, RM, Italy.
| | - Walter Gianni
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatry, University Hospital Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, RM, Italy
| | - Fabio Lugoboni
- Department of Medicine, Addiction Unit, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, VR, Italy
| | - Franco Marinangeli
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine, and Palliative Care, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, AQ, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Massazza
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and "Città della Salute e della Scienza" University Hospital, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Carmine Pinto
- Medical Oncology Unit, Clinical Cancer Center, AUSL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang W, Wang X, Liu Y, Sun Y, Liu X, Yan Y, Liu Z. Effects of Electroacupuncture on Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:818258. [PMID: 35492306 PMCID: PMC9043766 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.818258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most prevalent adverse events associated with cancer patients who receive opioid analgesics for moderate to severe pain. Acupuncture may be an effective treatment for OIC. We designed this trial to assess the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture for OIC in cancer patients. Methods This is a multicenter, sham-controlled, parallel-group, subject- and assessor-blinded randomized trial. A total of 100 cancer patients with OIC will be randomly assigned to either the electroacupuncture group or the sham electroacupuncture group at a ratio of 1:1. Patients in each group will receive a total of 24-session treatment over 8 weeks, three sessions a week and 30 min each session. Thereafter, patients will be followed up for another 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be the proportion of responders, defined as a patient who has ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/wk and ≥ increase of 1 SBM from baseline simultaneously for at least 6 out of 8 weeks of the treatment period. The secondary outcomes will include the mean weekly SBMs and complete spontaneous bowel movements, the mean Bristol Stool Form Scale score for stool consistency, the mean score for straining of SBM, the total and subscale scores of Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptom questionnaires, and the total and subscale scores of Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life questionnaire. Patients' global assessment of treatment effectiveness, patients' expectation toward the effectiveness of acupuncture and safety of acupuncture will also be assessed. All efficacy analyses will be performed in the intention-to-treat population. Discussion To improve the adherence to intervention protocols, the majority of the participants will be recruited from an inpatient setting. The results will help to determine the clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture for the treatment of OIC among patients with cancer. Clinical Trial Registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03797586, registered on 4 January 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03797586.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiming Wang
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xinlu Wang
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanjie Sun
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoxu Liu
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Yan
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhishun Liu
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
BouSaba J, Sannaa W, Camilleri M. Update on the role of naldemedine in opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221078638. [PMID: 35509419 PMCID: PMC9058332 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221078638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) affects up to 20% of adults and can interfere with activities of daily living. Up to 4% of adults in the United States receive chronic opioid therapy and up to 57% of patients on long-term opioids for CNCP report opioid-induced constipation (OIC). OIC is essentially constipation occurring after starting opioid treatment. While laxatives are traditionally the first-line therapy for OIC, 81% of patients taking daily laxatives and opioids still reported OIC and considered that it negatively affected their quality of life. Naldemedine is a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORA) approved for the treatment of OIC in patients with CNCP. This article reviews the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of naldemedine in CNCP patients. Naldemedine improves OIC in patients with CNCP by acting as an opioid receptor antagonist in the gastrointestinal tract. It does not interfere with the analgesic properties of opioids or cause withdrawal symptoms since these effects are centrally mediated, and naldemedine does not cross the blood brain barrier. Naldemedine showed significant and sustained improvement in frequency of bowel movements, quality of life, and constipation-related symptoms. It is generally well tolerated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events of mild or moderate severity such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, or vomiting compared to placebo. While there are no randomized, controlled trials that compare head-to-head pharmacological therapies used for treatment of OIC, network meta-analysis shows that naldemedine has an overall good benefit-risk profile compared to the other approved medications.
Collapse
|
20
|
Moschen AR, Sammy Y, Marjenberg Z, Heptinstall AB, Pooley N, Marczewska AM. The Underestimated and Overlooked Burden of Diarrhea and Constipation in Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:861-874. [PMID: 35325401 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01267-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to summarize and discuss the diverse causes of two major gastrointestinal dysfunction symptoms, diarrhea and constipation, in cancer patients. We also discuss short- and long-term clinical, economic, and humanistic consequences, including the impact on cancer treatment regimens and patient quality of life, highlighting the limitations of the literature. RECENT FINDINGS Diarrhea and constipation as a result of cancer and its treatment can risk the success of anti-cancer therapies by requiring treatment delay or withdrawal, and imposes a substantial humanistic burden in patients with cancer. Despite its importance and frequency, gastrointestinal side effects may be overlooked due to the focus on cancer treatment, and the impact on patients may be underestimated. Additionally, the burden reported may not fully reflect current cancer management, particularly the true impact of economic consequences. A full understanding of the burden of diarrhea and constipation in patients with cancer is required, including broad evaluation of clinical considerations, the patient experience, and an updated assessment of economic burden. This would improve caregivers' appreciation of the impact of gastrointestinal dysfunction and aid the prioritization of future research efforts.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Opioid-related constipation encompasses constipation directly caused by opioid use (opioid-induced constipation [OIC]) as well as pre-existing constipation worsened by opioid use (opioid-exacerbated constipation [OEC]). Over-the-counter laxatives should be used as first-line agents for both OIC and OEC, given their efficacy, low cost, and high safety profiles. Symptoms of OIC and responses to therapy can be assessed with the Bowel Function Index. Individuals with OIC refractory to laxatives may be responsive to peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists. Although data supporting the superiority of one prescription agent over another is lacking, all have proven effective for the treatment of OIC.
Collapse
|
22
|
Keller J, Wedel T, Seidl H, Kreis ME, van der Voort I, Gebhard M, Langhorst J, Lynen Jansen P, Schwandner O, Storr M, van Leeuwen P, Andresen V, Preiß JC, Layer P, Allescher H, Andus T, Bischoff SC, Buderus S, Claßen M, Ehlert U, Elsenbruch S, Engel M, Enninger A, Fischbach W, Freitag M, Frieling T, Gillessen A, Goebel-Stengel M, Gschossmann J, Gundling F, Haag S, Häuser W, Helwig U, Hollerbach S, Holtmann G, Karaus M, Katschinski M, Krammer H, Kruis W, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Lynen Jansen P, Madisch A, Matthes H, Miehlke S, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Niesler B, Pehl C, Pohl D, Posovszky C, Raithel M, Röhrig-Herzog G, Schäfert R, Schemann M, Schmidt-Choudhury A, Schmiedel S, Schweinlin A, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Stengel A, Tesarz J, Voderholzer W, von Boyen G, von Schönfeld J. Update S3-Leitlinie Intestinale Motilitätsstörungen: Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie. Gemeinsame Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:192-218. [PMID: 35148561 DOI: 10.1055/a-1646-1279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jutta Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus in Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Thilo Wedel
- Institut für Anatomie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Holger Seidl
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Gastroenterologische Onkologie, Isarklinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Ivo van der Voort
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie und Diabetologie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Jost Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - Petra Lynen Jansen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Schwandner
- Abteilung für Proktologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg
| | - Martin Storr
- Zentrum für Endoskopie, Gesundheitszentrum Starnberger See, Starnberg
| | - Pia van Leeuwen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Viola Andresen
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus in Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Jan C Preiß
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Hepatologie, Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin
| | - Peter Layer
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus in Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gorur A, Patiño M, Shi T, Corrales G, Takahashi H, Rangel R, Gleber-Netto FO, Pickering C, Myers JN, Cata JP. Low doses of methylnaltrexone inhibits head and neck squamous cell carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo by acting on the mu-opioid receptor. J Cell Physiol 2021; 236:7698-7710. [PMID: 34038587 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.30421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The Mu-opioid receptor (MOR) has been implicated in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Methylnaltrexone (MNTX), an antagonist of MOR, has shown to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in lung cancer cell lines. The effect of MNTX on other cell lines such as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has not been investigated. We measured the expression and activity of the receptor in different HNSCC cell lines. Then, we evaluated the impact of modulating the expression MOR and the effect of MNTX on the proliferation, clonogenic activity, invasion, and migration of two HNSCC (FaDu and MDA686Tu) cell lines expressing MOR and one cell line (UMSCC47) not expressing the receptor. We also evaluated the impact of MNTX on tumor growth and metastasis formation in vivo. Activation of the receptor with [d-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol] (DAMGO) caused a significant reduction in cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels in FaDu cells. Knockdown of MOR inhibited in vitro aggressive cell behaviors on FaDu and MDA686Tu cells and correlated with a reduction in markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. In vitro studies showed that MNTX strongly inhibited the proliferation, clonogenic activity, invasion, and migration of FaDu and MDA686Tu cells but has no effect on UMSCC47 cells. In vivo experiments demonstrated that MNTX suppresses tumor growth in HNSCC cell tumor-bearing mice. Our studies indicate that MOR could be considered as a therapeutic target to treat HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aysegul Gorur
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Miguel Patiño
- Department of Anesthesiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ted Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - German Corrales
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hideaki Takahashi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roberto Rangel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Frederico O Gleber-Netto
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Curtis Pickering
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chamberlain BH, Rhiner M, Slatkin NE, Stambler N, Israel RJ. Subcutaneous Methylnaltrexone for Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Cancer versus Noncancer Patients: An Analysis of Efficacy and Safety Variables from Two Studies. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2687-2697. [PMID: 34512008 PMCID: PMC8420564 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s312731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methylnaltrexone inhibits opioid-induced constipation (OIC) by binding to peripheral µ-opioid receptors without impacting central opioid receptor mediated analgesia. This analysis compared methylnaltrexone efficacy and safety among advanced illness patients with and without active cancer and OIC. Patients and Methods This post hoc analysis included two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in adults with advanced illness and OIC who received subcutaneous methylnaltrexone. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving rescue-free laxation (RFL), time to RFL, weekly laxations within 24 hours after dosing, rescue laxative use, and pain scores. Adverse events were monitored for safety. Results After pooling, 178 patients received methylnaltrexone (n = 116 with cancer) and 185 received placebo (n = 114 with cancer). Median baseline daily opioid morphine equivalents (mg/d) were higher in cancer (methylnaltrexone: 180; placebo: 188) versus noncancer patients (methylnaltrexone: 120; placebo: 80). The proportions of patients achieving RFL within 4 hours after ≥2 of the first 4 doses were significantly greater with methylnaltrexone (cancer: 56.9%; noncancer: 58.1%) versus placebo (cancer: 5.3%; noncancer: 11.3%; P < 0.0001). The median time to laxation within 24 hours after the first methylnaltrexone dose was significantly shorter in cancer and noncancer patients versus placebo (cancer: 0.96 vs 22.53 hours, P < 0.0001; noncancer: 1.25 vs >24 hours, P = 0.0002). The mean number of weekly laxations within 24 hours after dosing by week 2 was significantly higher in methylnaltrexone- vs placebo-treated cancer and noncancer patients (cancer: 7.9 vs 4.9, P < 0.0001; noncancer: 8.4 vs 5.0, P < 0.0001). Methylnaltrexone reduced rescue laxative use without impacting pain scores. Consistent with previous data, methylnaltrexone was well tolerated in cancer and noncancer patients, and the AE profile did not suggest symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Conclusion Methylnaltrexone reduced RFL time in advanced-illness patients with and without active cancer, while maintaining pain control with opioid treatment despite higher baseline opioid use among cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Rhiner
- Loma Linda University Health, Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Neal E Slatkin
- University of California Riverside, School of Medicine, Riverside, CA, USA.,Salix Pharmaceuticals, Medical Affairs, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | - Nancy Stambler
- Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Lantheus Holdings Inc., Clinical Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Israel
- Bausch Health US, LLC, Clinical and Medical Affairs, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Camilleri M, Hale M, Morlion B, Tack J, Webster L, Wild J. Naldemedine Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in the COMPOSE Phase 3 Studies. J Pain Res 2021; 14:2179-2189. [PMID: 34295186 PMCID: PMC8291809 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s282738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Opioid-induced constipation is among the most common side effects associated with opioid use in patients with chronic non-cancer pain, and it can have a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life (QOL). This analysis evaluated the effect of naldemedine 0.2 mg on patient-reported outcomes in three phase 3 clinical studies. Methods COMPOSE-1 and COMPOSE-2 were identical randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of 12 weeks’ duration, allowing data to be integrated (n=1095). COMPOSE-3 was similar in design, but of 52 weeks’ duration (n=1241). Patients were adults with chronic non-cancer pain who had been treated with opioid analgesics for ≥3 months and experiencing opioid-induced constipation. Patient-reported outcomes included Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM; 12 questions assessed on a 5-point Likert scale), PAC-QOL (28 questions assessed on a 5-point Likert scale), and Subject Global Satisfaction (measured on a 7-point Likert scale). The proportion of patients achieving a ≥1.5 improvement in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL was calculated. The correlation between change in PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL scores and frequency of bowel movements was also explored. Results The proportion of PAC-SYM and PAC-QOL responders was significantly higher for naldemedine than for placebo at all assessed time points in COMPOSE-1/COMPOSE-2 (p<0.005 for both) and COMPOSE-3 (p<0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively). There was a statistically significant correlation between improvement in PAC-SYM/PAC-QOL and frequency of bowel movements at all time points (p≤0.0002). The majority of patients treated with naldemedine reported markedly or moderately improved satisfaction with constipation and abdominal symptoms on the Subject Global Satisfaction questionnaire. Discussion Naldemedine treatment was associated with a rapid and sustained clinically relevant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, indicating improvement in opioid-induced constipation-related symptoms and QOL. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT01965158, NCT01993940, NCT01965652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martin Hale
- Gold Coast Research, LLC, Plantation, FL, USA
| | - Bart Morlion
- Leuven Center for Algology and Pain Management, University Hospital Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - James Wild
- Upstate Clinical Research Associates, Williamsville, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rekatsina M, Paladini A, Drewes AM, Ayob F, Viswanath O, Urits I, Corli O, Pergolizzi J, Varrassi G. Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist (PAMORAs) for the Management of Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021; 13:e16201. [PMID: 34367804 PMCID: PMC8339109 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In treating chronic and acute pain, opioids are widely used. Although they do provide analgesia, their usage does come with adverse events (AEs). One of the most burdensome is opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, and more specifically opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The pathogenesis of these AEs is well known as the consequence of the action of opioids on m-receptors in the enteric nervous system. In recent years, medicines counteracting this specific action at the receptors have been registered for clinical use: the peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). The knowledge of their comparative efficacy and tolerability is very important for physicians and patients in opioid therapy. This systematic review of the existing literature on PAMORAs aimed to study the relative clinical advantages and disadvantages. The most important data banks, including "PubMed," "Embase," "CT.gov," "ICTRP" and "CINAHL" were used to find the published material on PAMORAs. The selected publications were examined to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of the four existing PAMORAs. All of the medications are superior to placebo in reducing OIC. There are few published data on alvimopan used to treat OIC, and it is only indicated for the treatment of post-abdominal surgery ileus. Methylnaltrexone is studied mainly in its subcutaneous (SC) formulation. When used in its oral formulation, it seems more rapid than naloxegol and placebo in the reduction of OIC. Naldemedine is able to produce more spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) when compared to alvimopan and naloxegol. Tolerability was found to be similar for all of them. In particular, they affect the gastrointestinal tract (GI), with flatulence and diarrhea, especially at high dosages. For some of them, nasopharyngitis and abdominal pain were observed as treatment adverse effects (TEAs). Several cardiovascular TEAs were reported after methylnaltrexone use, but it is not clear whether they were consequences of the drug or related to the general conditions of the patients. Considering the existing data, naloxegol and naldemedine seem to be the best choices, with a higher number of spontaneous bowel movements following naldemedine administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Rekatsina
- Pain Management, Whipps Cross Hospital Barts Health NHS, London, GBR
| | - Antonella Paladini
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health and Life Science (MESVA), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, ITA
| | - Asbjørn M Drewes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, DNK
| | | | - Omar Viswanath
- Pain Management, Valley Pain Consultants - Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, USA
| | - Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Oscar Corli
- Pain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Mario Negri Institute IRCCS, Milano, ITA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hong JT. Current Opinion on Prucalopride in Gastroparesis and Chronic Constipation Treatment: A Focus on Patient Selection and Safety. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2021; 17:601-615. [PMID: 34135588 PMCID: PMC8197617 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s269330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Prucalopride is a third-generation, highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 (5-HT4) receptor agonist. Many recent studies indicate prucalopride may play an important role in various motility disorders. The aim of this study was to investigate safety and patient selection considerations when using prucalopride as gastroparesis and chronic constipation treatment. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register and ClinicalTrials.gov, and we reviewed all studies that evaluated prucalopride for the treatment of gastroparesis and chronic idiopathic constipation in adults. Prucalopride is an effective and safe option based on all the studies currently conducted. Thus, it may be the first-line treatment in the future. Prucalopride has the potential to be useful in the treatment of functional constipation and other forms of gastrointestinal diseases (eg, gastroparesis). Through the research on this potential, prucalopride is expected to be a useful and versatile option for treating gastrointestinal diseases in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Taek Hong
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang YY, Zhou R, Gu WJ. Efficacy and Safety of Methylnaltrexone for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Ther 2021; 10:165-179. [PMID: 33575953 PMCID: PMC8119523 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00237-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a distressing side effect during opioid analgesia and is mainly mediated by gastrointestinal μ-opioid receptors. Methylnaltrexone, a peripheral μ-opioid receptor antagonist with restricted ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, may alleviate OIC without reversing analgesia. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of methylnaltrexone for the treatment of OIC. METHODS This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020187290). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials that compared methylnaltrexone with placebo for the treatment of OIC. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS Eight trials with 2034 participants were included. Compared with placebo, methylnaltrexone significantly increased rescue-free bowel movement (RFBM) within 4 h after the first dose (eight trials; 1833 participants; RR 3.74, 95% CI 3.02-4.62; high-certainty evidence), RFBM within 24 h after the first dose (two trials; 614 participants; RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.52-2.58; moderate-certainty evidence), and RFBM ≥ 3 times per week (three trials; 1,396 participants; RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; moderate-certainty evidence) and decreased need to take rescue laxatives (three trials; 807 participants; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85; moderate-certainty evidence). For safety outcomes, there was no difference in any adverse events between the two groups (eight trials; 2034 participants; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.99-1.23; moderate-certainty evidence), including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and flatulence; but for the most commonly reported adverse events, the abdominal pain was higher in methylnaltrexone group than that in placebo group (six trials; 1813 participants; RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.29-4.08; moderate-certainty evidence). CONCLUSION Methylnaltrexone is an effective and safe drug for the treatment of OIC, but the safety of abdominal pain should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Ying Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Rong Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, China
| | - Wan-Jie Gu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer: a "real-world," multicentre, observational study of diagnostic criteria and clinical features. Pain 2021; 162:309-318. [PMID: 32701649 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in a large cohort of "real-world" patients with cancer; the objectives were to determine the prevalence of OIC, the utility of a simple screening question, the accuracy of the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, the clinical features of OIC (physical and psychological), and the impact of OIC (quality of life). One thousand patients with cancer were enrolled in the study, which involved completion of the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for OIC, the Bowel Function Index, the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire, and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form. Participants also underwent a thorough clinical assessment by an experienced clinician (ie, "gold-standard" assessment of OIC). Fifty-nine percent of patients were clinically assessed as having OIC, 2.5% as having another cause of constipation, and 19% as not having constipation but were taking regular laxatives. The simple screening question produced a number of false-negative results (19% of patients), whereas the Rome IV diagnostic criteria had an accuracy of 81.9%. Patients with OIC had more symptoms overall, higher Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form subscale scores (and total score), and higher Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire subscale scores (and the overall score). Opioid-induced constipation was not associated with demographic factors, cancer diagnosis, performance status, or opioid equivalent dosage: OIC was associated with opioid analgesic, with patients receiving tramadol and transdermal buprenorphine having less constipation. The study confirms that OIC is common among patients with cancer pain and is associated with a spectrum of physical symptoms, a range of psychological symptoms, and an overall deterioration in the quality of life.
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang Y, Lu T, Meng Y, Maisiyiti A, Dong Y, Li S, Chen Y, Yin J, Chen JDZ. Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation Improves Constipation by Enhancing Colon Motility via the Central-Vagal Efferent Pathway in Opioid-Induced Constipated Rats. Neuromodulation 2021; 24:1258-1268. [PMID: 33887080 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Constipation and opioid-induced constipation (OIC) are common with limited treatment options. We investigated whether a noninvasive method of auricular vagal nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be used for treating OIC and explored its potential mechanisms and neural pathways in a rodent model of OIC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sprague-Dawley were chronically implanted with one pair of auricular electrodes for aVNS. Sixteen rats were treated with loperamide for a week while another 16 rats received bilateral vagotomy, then randomly treated with aVNS or sham-aVNS for a week. In addition, eight normal rats were implanted with a polyethylene catheter in the proximal colon for assessing whole colon transit. RESULTS 1) The number of fecal pellets and water content in feces increased after aVNS, compared with sham-aVNS. 2) aVNS accelerated colon transit and whole gut transit, compared with sham-aVNS. 3) In colon tissues, aVNS increased the protein expression of choline acetyltransferase, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and the c-kit expression in myenteric interstitial cells of Cajal but decreased the protein expression of neural nitric oxide synthase (p < 0.05 for all, vs. sham-VNS). 4) The prokinetic effects of aVNS were abolished by both subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and atropine. 5) aVNS increased the c-fos expression in both nucleus tractus solitarius and dorsal motor nucleus of vagus, and increased vagal efferent activity (p < 0.05, vs. sham-VNS). CONCLUSIONS aVNS improves OIC by enhancing colon motility and restoring enteric neural functions mediated via the central and vagal efferent pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiling Zhang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Lu
- School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Meng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alimujiang Maisiyiti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yan Dong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Shiying Li
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yan Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jieyun Yin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jiande D Z Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Angoa-Pérez M, Kuhn DM. Evidence for Modulation of Substance Use Disorders by the Gut Microbiome: Hidden in Plain Sight. Pharmacol Rev 2021; 73:571-596. [PMID: 33597276 PMCID: PMC7896134 DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiome modulates neurochemical function and behavior and has been implicated in numerous central nervous system (CNS) diseases, including developmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders. Substance use disorders (SUDs) remain a serious threat to the public well-being, yet gut microbiome involvement in drug abuse has received very little attention. Studies of the mechanisms underlying SUDs have naturally focused on CNS reward circuits. However, a significant body of research has accumulated over the past decade that has unwittingly provided strong support for gut microbiome participation in drug reward. β-Lactam antibiotics have been employed to increase glutamate transporter expression to reverse relapse-induced release of glutamate. Sodium butyrate has been used as a histone deacetylase inhibitor to prevent drug-induced epigenetic alterations. High-fat diets have been used to alter drug reward because of the extensive overlap of the circuitry mediating them. This review article casts these approaches in a different light and makes a compelling case for gut microbiome modulation of SUDs. Few factors alter the structure and composition of the gut microbiome more than antibiotics and a high-fat diet, and butyrate is an endogenous product of bacterial fermentation. Drugs such as cocaine, alcohol, opiates, and psychostimulants also modify the gut microbiome. Therefore, their effects must be viewed on a complex background of cotreatment-induced dysbiosis. Consideration of the gut microbiome in SUDs should have the beneficial effects of expanding the understanding of SUDs and aiding in the design of new therapies based on opposing the effects of abused drugs on the host's commensal bacterial community. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Proposed mechanisms underlying substance use disorders fail to acknowledge the impact of drugs of abuse on the gut microbiome. β-Lactam antibiotics, sodium butyrate, and high-fat diets are used to modify drug seeking and reward, overlooking the notable capacity of these treatments to alter the gut microbiome. This review aims to stimulate research on substance abuse-gut microbiome interactions by illustrating how drugs of abuse share with antibiotics, sodium butyrate, and fat-laden diets the ability to modify the host microbial community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Angoa-Pérez
- Research and Development Service, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Donald M Kuhn
- Research and Development Service, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sarrió RG, Calsina-Berna A, García AG, Esparza-Miñana JM, Ferrer EF, Porta-Sales J. Delphi consensus on strategies in the management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:1. [PMID: 33388041 PMCID: PMC7778791 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00693-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and bothersome adverse event related with opioid therapy in cancer patients. Despite the high prevalence, medical management of OIC is often uncertain. The current project aimed to investigate expert opinion on OIC management and provide practical recommendations to improve the clinical approach of OIC in cancer patient. METHODS A modified Delphi method was conducted involving 46 different physicians experts in OIC. Using a structured questionnaire of 67 items this project intended to seek consensus on aspects related to diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life of cancer patients suffering with OIC. RESULTS After two rounds, a consensus was reached in 91% of the items proposed, all in agreement. Agreement was obtained on OIC definition (95.7%). Objective and patient-reported outcomes included in that definition should be assessed routinely in clinical practice. Responsive to symptom changes and easy-to-use assessment tools were recommended (87.2%). Successful diagnosis of OIC requires increase clinicians awareness of OIC and proactivity to discuss symptoms with their patients (100%). Successful management of OIC requires individualization of the treatment (100%), regular revaluation once is established, and keeping it for the duration of opioid treatment (91.5%). Oral Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists (PAMORAs), were considered good alternatives for the treatment of OIC in cancer patients (97.9%). This drugs and laxatives can be co-prescribed if OIC coexist with functional constipation. CONCLUSIONS The panelists, based on their expert clinical practice, presented a set of recommendations for the management of OIC in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Gironés Sarrió
- grid.84393.350000 0001 0360 9602Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Avinguda Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Agnès Calsina-Berna
- Department of palliative care, Institut Català d’Oncologia-Badalona (ICO-Badalona), Badalona, Spain
| | - Adoración Gozalvo García
- grid.411289.70000 0004 1770 9825Responsable de la Unidad de Hospitalización Domiciliaria, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - José Miguel Esparza-Miñana
- grid.440831.a0000 0004 1804 6963Escuela de Doctorado, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir. Hospital de Manises, Valencia, Spain ,grid.84393.350000 0001 0360 9602Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Treatment. Research Group in Perioperative Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Esther Falcó Ferrer
- grid.413457.0Medical Oncology Department. Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma, Mallorca Spain
| | | | - Josep Porta-Sales
- Department of palliative care, Institut Català d’Oncologia-Girona (ICO-Girona), Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lucak S, Lunsford TN, Harris LA. Evaluation and Treatment of Constipation in the Geriatric Population. Clin Geriatr Med 2020; 37:85-102. [PMID: 33213776 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2020.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chronic constipation affects one-third of the US population and occurs disproportionately in the elderly and female individuals, increasing in older individuals who are institutionalized. This condition has a significant impact on health care costs and quality of life. Clinicians need to consider primary as well as secondary causes of constipation in elderly individuals because the cause is often multifactorial. Diagnostic algorithms should eliminate red-flag symptoms that may indicate a malignancy but also consider pelvic floor dysfunction, which is more common in this age group. An appropriate treatment plan is tailored to the severity of the patient's symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Lucak
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center
| | - Tisha N Lunsford
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Lucinda A Harris
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Biggerstaff A, Kivell B, Smith JL, Mian MY, Golani LK, Rashid F, Sharmin D, Knutson DE, Cerne R, Cook JM, Witkin JM. The α2,3-selective potentiators of GABA A receptors, KRM-II-81 and MP-III-80, produce anxiolytic-like effects and block chemotherapy-induced hyperalgesia in mice without tolerance development. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2020; 196:172996. [PMID: 32668266 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Opiate analgesics are one of the treatment options for severe chronic pain, including late-stage cancer, chronic back pain and other disorders. The recent resurgence in opioid overdose has highlighted the serious need for alternative medicines for pain management. While a role for potentiators of α2/3-containing GABAA receptors in the modulation of pain has been known for several years, advancements in this area required data from selective compounds. KRM-II-81(5-(8-ethynyl-6-(pyridin-2-yl)-4H-benzo[f]imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]diazepin-3- yl)oxazole) and analogs selectively potentiate GABAA receptors containing α2/3 subunits and have recently been shown to attenuate pain behaviors in several acute and chronic pain models in rodents. The present study was designed to ascertain whether KRM-II-81 and the structural analog MP-III-80 (3-ethyl-5-(8-ethynyl-6-(pyridin-2-yl)-4H-benzo[f]imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]diazepin-3-yl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole) would block chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel-induced pain in male, C57BL/6 mice. Both compounds significantly inhibited pain behaviors evoked by cold and tactile stimulation in paclitaxel-treated mice as did the neuropathic pain drug gabapentin. Subchronic dosing for 22 days with KRM-II-81 and MP-III-80 demonstrated enduring analgesic efficacy without tolerance development, while the effects of gabapentin showed evidence of tolerance development. KRM-II-81 and MP-III-80 also decreased marble-burying behavior in this mouse strain as did the anxiolytic drug chlordiazepoxide. In contrast to KRM-II-81 and MP-III-80, chlordiazepoxide had motor-impairing effects at anxiolytic-like doses. The data add to the literature documenting that these selective potentiators of α2/3-containing GABAA receptors are effective in a host of animal models used to detect novel analgesic drugs. The anxiolytic-like efficacy of these compounds fits well with the comorbidity of anxiety in patients with chronic pain and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Biggerstaff
- School of Biological Sciences, Centre for Biodiscovery, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - B Kivell
- School of Biological Sciences, Centre for Biodiscovery, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - J L Smith
- Laboratory of Antiepileptic Drug Discovery, Peyton Manning Hospital for Children, Ascension St. Vincent, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Md Y Mian
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - L K Golani
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - F Rashid
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - D Sharmin
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - D E Knutson
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - R Cerne
- Laboratory of Antiepileptic Drug Discovery, Peyton Manning Hospital for Children, Ascension St. Vincent, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Institute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 4, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - J M Cook
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - J M Witkin
- Laboratory of Antiepileptic Drug Discovery, Peyton Manning Hospital for Children, Ascension St. Vincent, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Departments of Neuroscience and Trauma Research, Ascension St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vijayvargiya P, Camilleri M, Vijayvargiya P, Erwin P, Murad MH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of treatments for opioid-induced constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:37-53. [PMID: 32462777 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When opioid-induced constipation is treated with centrally acting opioid antagonists, there may be opioid withdrawal or aggravation of pain due to inhibition of μ-opioid analgesia. This led to the development of peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). AIM To evaluate the efficacy of available PAMORAs and other approved or experimental treatments for relieving constipation in patients with opioid-induced constipation, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and EBM Reviews Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was completed in July 2019 for randomised trials compared to placebo. FDA approved doses or highest studied dose was evaluated. Efficacy was based on diverse endpoints, including continuous variables (the bowel function index, number of spontaneous bowel movements and stool consistency based on Bristol Stool Form Scale), or responder analysis (combination of >3 spontaneous bowel movements or complete spontaneous bowel movements plus 1 spontaneous bowel movement or complete spontaneous bowel movements, respectively, over baseline [so-called FDA endpoints]). Adverse effects evaluated included central opioid withdrawal, serious adverse events, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. RESULTS We included 35 trials at low risk of bias enrolling 13 566 patients. All PAMORAs demonstrated efficacy on diverse patient response endpoints. There was greater efficacy with approved doses of the PAMORAs (methylnaltrexone, naloxegol and naldemidine), with lower efficacy or lower efficacy and greater adverse effects with combination oxycodone with naloxone, lubiprostone and linaclotide. CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic response in opioid-induced constipation is best achieved with the PAMORAs, methylnaltrexone, naloxegol and naldemidine, which are associated with low risk of serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Vijayvargiya
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Patricia Erwin
- Division of Library Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Evidence Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Liu JJ, Quinton SE, Brenner DM. Naldemedine for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Pain Manag 2020; 10:301-306. [PMID: 32552565 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aims to summarize the efficacy data for naldemedine, a member of the novel peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), which gained US FDA approval for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain-related syndromes in 2017. In Phase III trials, patients receiving naldemedine were significantly more likely to meet the primary end point ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements/week and an increase of ≥1 spontaneous bowel movement/week from baseline for at least 9/12 weeks compared to placebo (p < 0.0001). The most frequent adverse events were abdominal pain (8%) and diarrhea (7%). Based on available data, naldemedine appears to be an effective and safe first-line therapy for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy J Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Sarah E Quinton
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Darren M Brenner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sugimoto M, Murata M, Mizuno H. Differences in efficacy and safety of lubiprostone used for idiopathic vs opioid-induced constipation: meta-analysis of East Asian and Western populations. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2020; 66:184-192. [PMID: 32523244 PMCID: PMC7263933 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.19-118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Several secretagogues, such as lubiprostone, have been developed for the treatment of constipation in the last 10 years. It is unclear whether the efficacy of lubiprostone for spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) and the adverse events are similar between idiopathic and opioid-induced constipation and between East-Asian and Western populations. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in two populations with idiopathic vs opioid-induced constipation. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety that were published in English up to March 2019. Compared with the placebo groups in idiopathic and opioid-induced constipation, the lubiprostone groups significantly improved in 24-h SBM frequency [relative risk: 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.49, and 1.23, 1.14-1.32] and weekly frequency >3 SBM/week (1.68, 1.41-2.01, and 1.43, 1.01-2.04), respectively. Although the incidence of adverse events was similar between idiopathic and opioid-induced constipation, the incidence of nausea in Western populations with idiopathic constipation was significantly higher (29.2%) than that in East-Asian populations (10.0%, p<0.001). In conclusion, lubiprostone effectively improved SBM frequency, irrespective of the etiology of constipation and population. The incidence of nausea was significantly higher in Western populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsushige Sugimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1, Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan
- Division of Digestive Endoscopy, Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga 520-2192, Japan
| | - Masaki Murata
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto 612-8555, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, Seta Tsukinowa-cho, Otsu, Shiga 520-2192, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dunn LK, Thiele RH, Lin MC, Nemergut EC, Durieux ME, Tsang S, Shaffrey ME, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Naik BI. The Impact of Alvimopan on Return of Bowel Function After Major Spine Surgery - A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Neurosurgery 2020; 85:E233-E239. [PMID: 30951602 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management following major spine surgery requires high doses of opioids and is associated with a risk of opioid-induced constipation. Peripheral mu-receptor antagonists decrease the gastrointestinal complications of perioperative systemic opioid administration without antagonizing the analgesic benefits of these drugs. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of alvimopan in opioid-naive patients undergoing major spine surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing >3 levels of thoracic and/or lumbar spine surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study to receive either alvimopan or placebo prior to and following surgery. Opioid consumption; pain scores; and time of first oral intake, flatus, and bowel movement were recorded. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were assigned to the active group and 25 were assigned to the placebo group. There was no significant difference in demographics between the groups. Postoperatively, the alvimopan group reported earlier time to first solid intake [median (range): alvimopan: 15 h (3-25) vs placebo: 17 h (3-46), P < .001], passing of flatus [median (range): alvimopan: 22 h (7-63) vs placebo: 28 h (10-58), P < .001], and first bowel movement [median (range): alvimopan: 50 h (22-80) vs placebo: 64 h (40-114), P < .001]. The alvimopan group had higher pain scores (maximum, minimum, and median); however, there was no significant difference between the groups with postoperative opioid use. CONCLUSION This study shows that the perioperative use of alvimopan significantly reduced the time to return of bowel function with no increase in postoperative opioid use despite a slight increase in pain scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren K Dunn
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Robert H Thiele
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Michelle C Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Edward C Nemergut
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Marcel E Durieux
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Siny Tsang
- Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington
| | - Mark E Shaffrey
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Bhiken I Naik
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chamberlain BH, Rhiner M, Slatkin NE, Stambler N, Israel RJ. Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in advanced-illness patients with or without active cancer. Pain Manag 2020; 10:73-84. [DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2019-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with and without cancer. Methods: This post hoc analysis comprises two Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, randomized studies of advanced-illness patients who received methylnaltrexone subcutaneous injection or placebo. Results: Significantly more patients treated with methylnaltrexone than placebo experienced laxation within 4 (cancer = 55.5 vs 15.5%; noncancer = 55.6 vs 12.8%) and 24 (cancer = 64.7 vs 29.8%; noncancer = 64.4 vs 30.8%) h after the first dose (p < 0.01 vs placebo). Regardless of cancer status, methylnaltrexone reduced median time to laxation and improved constipation relief without impacting opioid analgesia or withdrawal symptoms. Conclusion: Methylnaltrexone provided significant improvements in opioid-induced constipation over placebo in advanced-illness patients with and without cancer. Clinical trial registration numbers: study 301: NCT00401362; study 302: NCT00402038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Rhiner
- Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
| | - Neal E Slatkin
- School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
- Salix Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA
| | - Nancy Stambler
- Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New York, NY 10006, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Snyder J, Wang CM, Zhang AQ, Li Y, Luchan J, Hosic S, Koppes R, Carrier RL, Koppes A. Materials and Microenvironments for Engineering the Intestinal Epithelium. Ann Biomed Eng 2020; 48:1916-1940. [DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02470-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
41
|
Tessema MY, Wubneh ZB, Asrie AB. Laxative Activities of 80% Methanolic Extract of the Leaves of Grewia ferruginea Hochst Ex A Rich in Mice. J Evid Based Integr Med 2020; 25:2515690X20926922. [PMID: 32489108 PMCID: PMC7271677 DOI: 10.1177/2515690x20926922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are numerous medicinal plants including the leaves of Grewia ferruginea used as traditional medicine for the treatment of constipation. This study was conducted to evaluate the laxative activity of the leaves of G ferruginea. METHODS The laxative activity of the leaves of G ferruginea was tested using 3 models: laxative activity, gastrointestinal motility, and gastrointestinal secretion tests. The effect of the plant extract on mean number of feces, fecal water content, ratio of intestinal distance traveled by the charcoal meal and intestinal fluid accumulation were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS Significant increase was observed in the mean weight of wet fecal matter at 200 (1.00 ± 0.03 g, P < .05) and 400 mg/kg (1.01 ± 0.02 g, P < .01), relative to loperamide constipated negative control group. Similarly, percent fecal water content was significantly improved in extract treated groups at 100 mg/kg (52.10% ± 2.04%, P < .05), 200 mg/kg (54.02% ± 2.15%, P < .01), and 400 mg/kg (54.25% ± 2.50%, P < .01) compared with the negative control group. The gastroinestinal transit ratio was also significantly increased with 200 mg/kg (P < .01) and 400 mg/kg (P < .001) of the extract relative to the constipated negative control. The crude extract showed significant increase in intestinal fluid accumulation at 200 mg/kg (0.48 ± 0.07 g, P < .05) and 400 mg/kg (0.51 ± 0.08 g, P < .01) compared with the negative control. CONCLUSION The results of the present study indicated that 80% methanol extract of the leaves of G ferruginea possessed significant laxative activity. As such, this study corroborates the traditional claim of using G ferruginea in the treatment of constipation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zewdu Birhanu Wubneh
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences,
University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Assefa Belay Asrie
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences,
University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mesía R, Virizuela Echaburu JA, Gómez J, Sauri T, Serrano G, Pujol E. Opioid-Induced Constipation in Oncological Patients: New Strategies of Management. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2019; 20:91. [PMID: 31853656 PMCID: PMC6920224 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0686-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Cancer-associated pain has traditionally been treated with opioid analgesics, often in escalating doses. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common problem associated with chronic use of opioid analgesics. Typical treatment strategies to alleviate constipation are based on dietary changes, exercise, and laxatives. However, laxatives have a nonspecific action and do not target underlying mechanisms of OIC. This article will review prevalent, clinical presentation and recommendations for the treatment of OIC. An independent literature search was carried out by the authors. We reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials that studied the efficacy of laxatives, naloxone, and naloxegol in treating OIC. Newer strategies addressing the causal pathophysiology of OIC are needed for a more effective assessment and management of OIC. Finally, traditional recommended therapies are appraised and compared with the latest pharmacological developments. Future research should address whether naloxegol is more efficacious by its comparison directly with first-line treatments, including laxatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricard Mesía
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, Badalona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Constipation is a common symptom that may be primary (idiopathic or functional) or associated with a number of disorders or medications. Although most constipation is self-managed by patients, 22% seek health care, mostly to primary care physicians (>50%) and gastroenterologists (14%), resulting in large expenditures for diagnostic testing and treatments. There is strong evidence that stimulant and osmotic laxatives, intestinal secretagogues, and peripherally restricted μ-opiate antagonists are effective and safe; the lattermost drugs are a major advance for managing opioid-induced constipation. Constipation that is refractory to available laxatives should be evaluated for defecatory disorders and slow-transit constipation using studies of anorectal function and colonic transit. Defecatory disorders are often responsive to biofeedback therapies, whereas slow-transit constipation may require surgical intervention in selected patients. Both efficacy and cost should guide the choice of treatment for functional constipation and opiate-induced constipation. Currently, no studies have compared inexpensive laxatives with newer drugs that work by other mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E. Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arnold Wald
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Davies A, Leach C, Caponero R, Dickman A, Fuchs D, Paice J, Emmanuel A. MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:23-33. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05016-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
45
|
Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, Are M, Bruce JY, Buga S, Chwistek M, Cleeland C, Craig D, Gafford E, Greenlee H, Hansen E, Kamal AH, Kamdar MM, LeGrand S, Mackey S, McDowell MR, Moryl N, Nabell LM, Nesbit S, O'Connor N, Rabow MW, Rickerson E, Shatsky R, Sindt J, Urba SG, Youngwerth JM, Hammond LJ, Gurski LA. Adult Cancer Pain, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 17:977-1007. [PMID: 31390582 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Adult Cancer Pain have undergone substantial revisions focusing on the appropriate and safe prescription of opioid analgesics, optimization of nonopioid analgesics and adjuvant medications, and integration of nonpharmacologic methods of cancer pain management. This selection highlights some of these changes, covering topics on management of adult cancer pain including pharmacologic interventions, nonpharmacologic interventions, and treatment of specific cancer pain syndromes. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Adult Cancer Pain addresses additional aspects of this topic, including pathophysiologic classification of cancer pain syndromes, comprehensive pain assessment, management of pain crisis, ongoing care for cancer pain, pain in cancer survivors, and specialty consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Swarm
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Judith A Paice
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Doralina L Anghelescu
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ellin Gafford
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Heather Greenlee
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Susan LeGrand
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | -
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Nina O'Connor
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Jill Sindt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Osaka I, Ishiki H, Yokota T, Tada Y, Sato H, Okamoto M, Satomi E. Safety and efficacy of naldemedine in cancer patients with opioid-induced constipation: a pooled, subgroup analysis of two randomised controlled studies. ESMO Open 2019; 4:e000527. [PMID: 31423335 PMCID: PMC6677965 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This post hoc, pooled, subgroup analysis of two randomised studies evaluated baseline characteristics that may influence the efficacy and safety of naldemedine in patients with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and cancer. Methods Data for patients who received 0.2 mg naldemedine or placebo were pooled from randomised, placebo-controlled, phase IIb and phase III studies. Proportions of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders and patients with diarrhoea were assessed for each treatment group. For the patient subgroups with or without possible blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruptions, changes in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores were assessed. Results A total of 307 patients were included in this analysis (naldemedine: n=155; placebo: n=152). The pooled proportion of SBM responders was 73.5% with naldemedine versus 35.5% with placebo. There was a significant increase in the proportion of SBM responders with naldemedine versus placebo (38.0% (95% CI 27.6% to 48.4%); p<0.0001). Greater proportions of SBM responders and patients who experienced diarrhoea were observed with naldemedine versus placebo in all subgroups. Changes from baseline in NRS and COWS scores were similar with naldemedine or placebo in patients with or without brain metastases. Conclusions Although not powered to detect statistically significant differences in treatment effect among subgroups, this study demonstrated that naldemedine appeared to benefit patients with OIC and cancer, irrespective of baseline characteristics, and did not seem to affect analgesia or withdrawal–even in patients with potential BBB disruptions. Baseline characteristics did not appear to affect the incidence of diarrhoea in patients who received naldemedine. Trial registration numbers JapicCTI-111510 and JapicCTI-132340.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwao Osaka
- Department of Palliative Care, HITO Medical Center, Shikokuchuo City, Ehime, Japan
| | - Hiroto Ishiki
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Yokota
- Department of Global Development, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yukio Tada
- Department of Global Development, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Sato
- Department of Medical Affairs, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Eriko Satomi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nishie K, Yamamoto S, Yamaga T, Horigome N, Hanaoka M. Peripherally acting μ-opioid antagonist for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34:818-829. [PMID: 30597600 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Revised: 12/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent adverse event (AE) that impairs patients' quality of life (QOL). Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) have been recognized as a treatment option for OIC, but the effect consistent across the studies has not been evaluated. METHODS We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of PAMORA for OIC (registered with PROSPERO: CRD42018085298). We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Medline, Embase, and Central databases. Change from baseline in spontaneous bowel movements, pooled proportion of responders, QOL, and AEs were calculated and compared with results in placebo cases. RESULTS We included 31 RCTs with 7849 patients. A meta-analysis revealed that patients under PAMORA therapy had considerably improved spontaneous bowel movement from baseline compared with those given placebo (20 RCTs; mean difference, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.68; n = 5622) and more responded (21 RCTs; risk ratio [RR], 1.81; 95% CI, 1.55-2.12; n = 4821). Moreover, QOL of patients receiving PAMORA was significantly better (8 RCTs; mean difference, -0.22; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.17; n = 2884). AEs were increased significantly in the PAMORA group (26 RCTs; RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.15; n = 7715), especially in gastrointestinal disorders, whereas serious AEs were not significant (17 RCTs; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85-1.28; n = 5890). CONCLUSION Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist has been shown to be effective and durable for patients with OIC and is the only drug with confirmed evidence in meta-analysis. The possibility of publication bias was the limitation of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Nishie
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Iida Municipal Hospital, Iida, Nagano, Japan.,The First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Shuhei Yamamoto
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Takayoshi Yamaga
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Health Science University, Fujikawaguchikomachi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Naoto Horigome
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Iida Municipal Hospital, Iida, Nagano, Japan
| | - Masayuki Hanaoka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Vomiting is not only unpleasant for both children and families, but can lead to frequent hospital admission. The persistent vomiting hampers oral intake and increases the risk of dehydration, so the proper use of antiemetic drugs can be useful. The pharmacological treatment of vomiting in children remains a challenge for the pediatrician because several antiemetics are prescribed as "off-label," outside their authorized drug label. Domperidone and ondansetron are the most commonly known antiemetic drugs. A single oral dose of ondansetron has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent vomiting, the need for intravenous fluids, and hospital admissions in children with acute gastroenteritis. There is enough evidence to support ondansetron administration in children, so the clinical use can be defined as "off-label/on evidence." This review aims to provide an overview of therapeutic use, safety, and main pharmacological properties of antiemetic drugs in children. A comprehensive search of published literature using the PubMed MEDLINE database was carried out to identify all articles published in English from 1998 to February 2018. At present time, the "off-label/on-evidence" use of some antiemetics could improve the success rate of oral rehydration therapy in pediatric emergency settings and to change the management of vomiting with the prevention of the complications.
Collapse
|
49
|
Tessier C, Pitaud JP, Thorin C, Touzot-Jourde G. Systemic morphine administration causes gastric distention and hyperphagia in healthy horses. Equine Vet J 2019; 51:653-657. [PMID: 30835841 DOI: 10.1111/evj.13090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are no data investigating the effect of systemic morphine on the size of the stomach or the food consumption in horses. OBJECTIVES To evaluate gastrointestinal side effects of morphine administered systemically in healthy horses by the means of clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations. STUDY DESIGN In vivo experiment. METHODS On day 1 of the experiment, six healthy French Trotter mares were evaluated clinically and an abdominal ultrasonography was performed three times 4 h apart to record the size of the stomach, the number of contractions per minute of the duodenum, jejunum, caecum, left and right ventral colons. On Day 2, morphine was administered three times 4 h apart at the dose of 0.1 mg/kg i.v. and the same ultrasonographic examinations performed. On Day 3, only clinical and ultrasonographic examinations were performed as on Day 1. Amounts of hay and water ingested, frequency and weight of faeces were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS Number of contractions of the duodenum, caecum, left and right ventral colons were significantly decreased after morphine administration. Size of the stomach was increased significantly with a cumulative effect of repeated doses of morphine. Hay (+0.4 kg/h, P<0.001) and water (+1.1 L/h, P<0.001) consumption were significantly increased. MAIN LIMITATIONS The study was performed in healthy horses. CONCLUSIONS Systemic morphine administration causes gastrointestinal depression, gastric distention and hyperphagia in horses. Clinical and ultrasonographical examinations are valuable tools to identify side effects of morphine administration in horses. Further studies are needed to assess side effects and monitoring in clinically painful cases. Horses receiving systemic morphine administration should be closely monitored for signs of gastric distention and, specifically, the amount of food given while receiving treatment should be controlled to avoid complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Tessier
- ONIRIS-Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, Equine Hospital, Nantes Cedex, France
| | - J-P Pitaud
- Clinique Vétérinaire des Faluns, Saint Grégoire, France
| | - C Thorin
- Department of Animal Physiopathology and Physiology, ONIRIS-Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, Nantes Cedex, France
| | - G Touzot-Jourde
- Department of Anesthesia and Analgesia, ONIRIS-Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, Nantes Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bassotti G, Usai Satta P, Bellini M. Prucalopride for the treatment of constipation: a view from 2015 and beyond. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 13:257-262. [PMID: 30791758 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1568238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Prucalopride is a prokinetic drug, that has been commercially available in recent years for the treatment of chronically constipated patients. In this update of a previous 2016 article, we reviewed the more recent data supporting its role in the treatment of constipation and constipation-associated conditions. Areas covered: We carried out an extensive literature review on the effects of prucalopride for the years 2012-2018 by means of scientific databases and manual research. More evidence was found on its possible therapeutic role in conditions in which constipation plays a role as an associated symptom, such as opioid-induced constipation, constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, post-operative ileus, colonic diverticular disease, drug-related constipation, and chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Expert opinion: Based on the added literature evidence, we feel that prucalopride is an effective, although expensive, drug for the treatment of primary and secondary forms of constipation, and of other clinical conditions associated with constipation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrio Bassotti
- a Gastroenterology & Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine , University of Perugia Medical School , Perugia , Italy
| | - Paolo Usai Satta
- b Gastrointestinal Unit , "G. Brotzu" Hospital , Cagliari , Italy
| | - Massimo Bellini
- c Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| |
Collapse
|