Clinical Relevance of Fluid Challenge in Patients Evaluated for Pulmonary Hypertension

Definition, classification and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a haemodynamic condition characterised by elevation of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg, assessed by right heart catheterisation. Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) distinguish pre-capillary PH (PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR >2 Wood Units (WU)), isolated post-capillary PH (PAWP >15 mmHg, PVR ≤2 WU) and combined post- and pre-capillary PH (PAWP >15 mmHg, PVR >2 WU). Exercise PH is a haemodynamic condition describing a normal mPAP at rest with an abnormal increase of mPAP during exercise, defined as a mPAP/cardiac output slope >3 mmHg/L/min between rest and exercise. The core structure of the clinical classification of PH has been retained, including the five major groups. However, some changes are presented herewith, such as the re-introduction of "long-term responders to calcium channel blockers" as a subgroup of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, the addition of subgroups in group 2 PH and the differentiation of group 3 PH subgroups based on pulmonary diseases instead of functional abnormalities. Mitomycin-C and carfilzomib have been added to the list of drugs with "definite association" with PAH. For diagnosis of PH, we propose a stepwise approach with the main aim of discerning those patients who need to be referred to a PH centre and who should undergo invasive haemodynamic assessment. In case of high probability of severe pulmonary vascular disease, especially if there are signs of right heart failure, a fast-track referral to a PH centre is recommended at any point during the clinical workup.

Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Hypertension: New Insights

Over the last decades, significant progress has been achieved in the pulmonary hypertension (PH) field. Pathophysiology of PH has been studied, leading to the classification of PH patients into five groups, while the hemodynamic definition has been recently revised. A diagnostic algorithm has been established and awareness has been raised in order to minimize diagnosis delay. The pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment strategy includes the established three pathways of endothelin, nitric oxide-phosphodiesterase inhibitor, and prostacyclin pathway, but new therapeutic options are now being tested. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing practice and to highlight the novelties in the field of PH.

Right Heart Reserve Function Assessed With Fluid Loading Predicts Late Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

A left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an effective therapeutic option for advanced heart failure. Late right heart failure (LRHF) is a complication after LVAD implantation that is associated with increasing morbidity and mortality; however, the assessment of right heart function, including right heart reserve function after LVAD implantation, has not been established. We focused on a fluid-loading test with right heart catheterization to evaluate right heart preload reserve function and investigate its impact on LRHF.

METHODS

Patients aged > 18 years who received a continuous-flow LVAD between November 2007 and December 2022 at our institution, and underwent right heart catheterization with saline loading (10 mL/kg for 15 minutes) 1 month after LVAD implantation, were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 cases of LRHF or death (right heart failure [RHF] group) occurred in 149 patients. In the RHF vs the non-RHF groups, the pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) at rest (1.8 ± 0.89 vs 2.5 ± 1.4, P = 0.02) and the right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWi) change ratio with saline loading (0.96 ± 0.32 vs 1.1 ± 0.20, P = 0.03) were significantly different. The PAPi at rest and the RVSWi change ratio with saline loading were identified as postoperative risks for LRHF and death. The cohort was divided into 3 groups based on whether the PAPi at rest and the RVSWi change ratio were low. The event-free curve differed significantly among the 3 groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodynamic assessment with saline loading can evaluate the right ventricular preload reserve function of patients with an LVAD. A low RVSWi change with saline loading was a risk factor for LRHF following LVAD implantation.

Nitroprusside Combined with Leg Raise at the Time of Right Heart Catheterization to Differentiate Precapillary from Other Hemodynamic Forms of Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single-Center Pilot Study

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) can arise from several distinct disease processes, with a percentage presenting with combined pre- and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (cpcPH). Patients with cpcPH are unsuitable candidates for PH-directed therapies due to elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWPs); however, the PCWP is dynamic and is affected by both preload and afterload. Many patients that are diagnosed with cpcPH are hypertensive at the time of right heart catheterization which has the potential to increase the PCWP and, therefore, mimic a more postcapillary-predominant phenotype. In this small pilot study, we examine the effect of nitroprusside combined with dynamic preload augmentation with a passive leg raise maneuver in hypertensive cpcPH patients at the time of right heart catheterization to identify a more precapillary-dominant PH phenotype. Patients that met the criteria of PCWP ≤ 15 mmHg with nitroprusside infusion and PCWP ≤ 18 mmHg with nitroprusside infusion and simultaneous leg raise were started on pulmonary vascular-targeted therapy. Long-term PH therapy was well tolerated, with increased six-minute walk distance, improved WHO functional class, decreased NT-proBNP, and improved REVEAL 2.0 Lite Risk Score in this precapillary-dominant PH phenotype. This small study highlights the importance of characterizing patient physiology beyond resting conditions at the time of right heart catheterization.

Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent global condition affecting approximately 50% of the HF population. With the aging of the worldwide population, its incidence and prevalence are expected to rise even further. Unfortunately, until recently, no effective medications were available to reduce the high mortality and hospitalization rates associated with HFpEF, making it a significant unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. Although HFpEF is commonly defined as HF with normal ejection fraction and elevated left ventricular filling pressure, performing invasive hemodynamic assessments on every individual suspected of having HFpEF is neither feasible nor practical. Consequently, several clinical criteria and diagnostic tools have been proposed to aid in diagnosing HFpEF. Overall, these criteria and tools are designed to assist healthcare professionals in identifying and evaluating patients who may have HFpEF based on a combination of signs, symptoms, biomarkers, and non-invasive imaging findings. By employing these non-invasive diagnostic approaches, clinicians can make informed decisions regarding the best pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies for individuals with suspected HFpEF. This literature review aims to provide an overview of all currently available methods for diagnosing and monitoring this disabling condition.

Contemporary Evidence and Practice on Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Acute or Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) has a global prevalence of 1-2%, and the incidence around the world is growing. The prevalence increases with age, from around 1% for those aged <55 years to >10% for those aged 70 years or over. Based on studies in hospitalized patients, about 50% of patients have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and 50% have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HF is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and HF-related hospitalizations are common, costly, and impact both quality of life and prognosis. More than 5-10% of patients deteriorate into advanced HF (AdHF) with worse outcomes, up to cardiogenic shock (CS) condition. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is essential to assess hemodynamics in the diagnosis and care of patients with HF. The aim of this article is to review the evidence on RHC in various clinical scenarios of patients with HF.

Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Left Heart Disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of diseases affecting the left heart, mostly found in patients suffering from heart failure, with or without preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Initially driven by a passive increase in left atrial pressure (postcapillary PH), several mechanisms may lead in a subset of patient to significant structural changes of the pulmonary vessels or a precapillary component. In addition, the right ventricle may be independently affected, which results in right ventricular to pulmonary artery uncoupling and right ventricular failure, all being associated with a worse outcome. The differential diagnosis of PH associated with left heart disease versus pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is especially challenging in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and/or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A stepwise approach to diagnosis is proposed, starting with a proper clinical multidimensional phenotyping to identify patients in whom hemodynamic confirmation is deemed necessary. Provocative testing (exercise testing, fluid loading, or simple leg raising) is useful in the cath laboratory to identify patients with abnormal response who are more likely to suffer from HFpEF. In contrast with group 1 PH, management of PH associated with left heart disease must focus on the treatment of the underlying condition. Some PAH-approved targets have been unsuccessfully tried in clinical studies in a heterogeneous group of patients, some even leading to an increase in adverse events. There is currently no approved therapy for PH associated with left heart disease.

[Diagnostic Algorithm and Screening of Pulmonary Hypertension]

The new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension include a new diagnostic algorithm and provide specific recommendations for the required diagnostic procedures, including screening methods. These recommendations are commented on by national experts under the auspices of the DACH. These comments provide additional decision support and background information, serving as a further guide for the complex diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

Lung Ultrasound, Echocardiography, and Fluid Challenge for the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The differential diagnosis between pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is sometimes difficult despite guidelines-derived standardized step-by-step diagnostic algorithms. We therefore explored the added value of lung ultrasound to a previously validated echocardiographic score of right heart catheterization measurements.

METHODS

Patients referred for PH underwent a right heart catheterization, echocardiography, and lung ultrasound before and after rapid infusion of 7 mL/kg of saline. A 7-point echocardiographic score based on cardiac chamber dimensions and estimates of filling pressures was implemented for the prediction of precapillary PH. Pulmonary congestion was identified by lung ultrasound B lines.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 70 patients with PAH and 77 patients with HFpEF. The PAH patients had a higher echocardiographic score (3.5 ± 1.8 vs 1.6 ± 1.5; P < .001). The HFpEF patients had more B lines both before (8.1 ± 4.2 vs 5.1 ± 3.0; P < .001) and after fluid challenge (14.6 ± 5.4 vs 7.6 ± 3.5; P < .001) and a more important increase (Δ) of B lines after fluid challenge (6.5 ± 2.9 vs 2.5 ± 1.6; P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of the echocardiographic score (cutoff ≥2) alone for PAH were 0.91 and 0.49, respectively (area under the curve of 0.78). The best diagnostic improvement was observed with addition of ΔB lines + E/e' post-fluid challenge to the echocardiographic score, with a significant increase of the area under the curve (0.98) and (with a cutoff given by the presence of echo score ≥2, ΔB lines <4 and E/e' post < 11) a sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83; 0.97) and specificity of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76; 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung ultrasound combined with echocardiography at baseline and after fluid challenge has an incremental value for the differential diagnosis between PAH and PH-HFpEF.

[Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (group 2)]

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) corresponds to group two of pulmonary hypertension according to clinical classification. Haemodynamically, this group includes isolated post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (IpcPH) and combined post- and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (CpcPH). PH-LHD is defined by an mPAP > 20 mmHg and a PAWP > 15 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with a cut-off value of 2 Wood Units (WU) is used to differentiate between IpcPH and CpcPH. A PVR greater than 5 WU indicates a dominant precapillary component. PH-LHD is the most common form of pulmonary hypertension, the leading cause being left heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, HFrEF), valvular heart disease and, less commonly, congenital heart disease. The presence of pulmonary hypertension is associated with increased symptom burden and poorer outcome across the spectrum of left heart disease. Differentiating between group 1 pulmonary hypertension with cardiac comorbidities and PH-LHD, especially due to HFpEF, is a particular challenge. Therapeutically, no general recommendation for the use of PDE5 inhibitors in HFpEF-associated CpcPH can be made at this time. There is currently no reliable rationale for the use of PAH drugs in IpcPH, nor is therapy with endothelin receptor antagonists or prostacyclin analogues recommended for all forms of PH-LHD.

Diastolic exercise stress testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The DEST-HF study

AIMS

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PAWP) ≥25 mmHg during bicycle ergometry is recommended to uncover occult heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We hypothesized that PAWP increase would differ in available diastolic stress tests and that the margin of PAWP ≥25 mmHg would only be reliably achieved through ergometry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a prospective, single-arm study in patients with an intermediate risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to the ESC HFA-PEFF score. A total of 19 patients underwent four stress test modalities in randomized order: leg raise, fluid challenge, handgrip, and bicycle ergometry. The primary outcome was the difference (Δ) between resting and exercise PAWP in each modality. Secondary outcomes were differences (Δ) in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), cardiac output (CO), as well as the ratios between mPAP and PAWP to CO. Compared to resting values, passive leg raise (Δ7.7 ± 8.0 mmHg, p = 0.030), fluid challenge (Δ9.2 ± 6.4 mmHg, p = 0.003), dynamic handgrip (Δ9.6 ± 7.5 mmHg, p = 0.002), and bicycle ergometry (Δ22.3 ± 5.0 mmHg, p < 0.001) uncovered increased PAWP during exercise. Amongst these, bicycle ergometry also demonstrated the highest ΔmPAP (27.2 ± 7.1 mmHg, p < 0.001), ΔCO (3.3 ± 2.6 L/min, p < 0.001), ΔmPAP/CO ratio (2.3 ± 2.0 mmHg/L/min, p < 0.001), and ΔPAWP/CO ratio (2.2 ± 1.4 mmHg/L/min, p < 0.001) compared to other modalities. PAWP ≥25 mmHg was only reliably achieved in bicycle ergometry (31.1 ± 3.9 mmHg). In all other modalities only 10.5% of patients achieved PAWP ≥25 mmHg (handgrip 18.4 ± 6.6 mmHg, fluid 18.1 ± 5.6 mmHg, leg raise 16.5 ± 7.0 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that bicycle ergometry exhibits a distinct haemodynamic response with higher increase of PAWP compared to other modalities. This finding needs to be considered for valid detection of exercise PAWP ≥25 mmHg when non-bicycle tests remain inconclusive.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Elderly: Peculiar Features and Challenges for a Proper Phenotyping Approach

(1) Introduction. Although pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) usually affects young people with a low cardiovascular risk profile, progressive epidemiologic changes have been providing a codified phenotype of elderly subjects with PAH and increased risk predictors for left heart disease. We therefore conducted a systematic review to describe the current knowledge and characteristics of elderly individuals with PAH and further insights concerning their prognostic outcomes and therapeutic response. (2) Methods. A search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for publications evaluating the epidemiology, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of PAH in elderly subjects. (3) Among the 74 publications initially retrieved, 16 full-text articles were selected for the present systematic review. Compared to their younger counterparts, elderly individuals with PAH showed greater clinical deterioration, reduced exercise capacity, and worse prognostic outcomes, as well as less response to PAH-targeted therapy and higher rates of PAH drug discontinuation. (4) Conclusions. Demographic changes over time contributed to define a peculiar PAH phenotype in elderly patients, with an increased burden of cardiovascular comorbidities and distinctive features compared to young patients. Further investigations are needed in order to better clarify the nosologic criteria, and management in this subset population.

Machine learning to differentiate pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease from pulmonary arterial hypertension

Background and aims

Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) is the most frequent form of PH. As differential diagnosis with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has therapeutic implications, it is important to accurately and noninvasively differentiate PH-LHD from PAH before referral to PH centres. The aim was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to improve prediction of PH-LHD in a population of PAH and PH-LHD patients.

Methods

Noninvasive PH-LHD predictors from 172 PAH and 172 PH-LHD patients from the PH centre database at the University Hospitals of Leuven (Leuven, Belgium) were used to develop an ML model. The Jacobs score was used as performance benchmark. The dataset was split into a training and test set (70:30) and the best model was selected after 10-fold cross-validation on the training dataset (n=240). The final model was externally validated using 165 patients (91 PAH, 74 PH-LHD) from Erasme Hospital (Brussels, Belgium).

Results

In the internal test dataset (n=104), a random forest-based model correctly diagnosed 70% of PH-LHD patients (sensitivity: n=35/50), with 100% positive predicted value, 78% negative predicted value and 100% specificity. The model outperformed the Jacobs score, which identified 18% (n=9/50) of the patients with PH-LHD without false positives. In external validation, the model had 64% sensitivity at 100% specificity, while the Jacobs score had a sensitivity of 3% for no false positives.

Conclusions

ML significantly improves the sensitivity of PH-LHD prediction at 100% specificity. Such a model may substantially reduce the number of patients referred for invasive diagnostics without missing PAH diagnoses.

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: recent progress and a look to the future

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe but treatable form of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension caused by pulmonary vascular remodelling. As a result of basic science discoveries, randomised controlled trials, studies of real-world data, and the development of clinical practice guidelines, considerable progress has been made in the treatment options and outcomes for patients with PAH, underscoring the importance of seamless translation of information from bench to bedside and, ultimately, to patients. However, PAH still carries a high mortality rate, which emphasises the urgent need for transformative innovations in the field. In this Series paper, written by a group of clinicians, researchers, and a patient with PAH, we review therapeutic approaches and treatment options for PAH. We summarise current knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of PAH, with an emphasis on emerging treatable pathways and optimisation of current management strategies. In considering future directions for the field, our ambition is to identify therapies with the potential to stall or reverse pulmonary vascular remodelling. We highlight novel therapeutic approaches, the important role of patients as partners in research, and innovative approaches to PAH clinical trials.

The controversial role of beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Beta-blocker (BB) therapy is a main pillar in treating patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and has shown a prognostic benefit. However, evidence for application of BB in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially in the absence of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or arterial hypertension, is scarce. HFpEF is characterized by elevations in left atrial pressure and reduced compliance of the left ventricle leading to a hampered increase of cardiac output (CO) during exercise, which results in exertional dyspnea. This may be due to either a limited increase in stroke volume or reduced chronotropy during physical activity. We critically discuss the pathophysiological background of HFpEF, current data on BB in heart failure therapy, as well as the potential benefits and harms of BB therapy in HFpEF. Furthermore, we argue that non-cardio selective BB with peripheral activity to reduce afterload may be more suitable in this population than cardio-selective BB. Although preliminary data on BB in HFpEF are available, multicenter prospective trials to assess a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity are warranted. Future trials need to focus on phenotyping HFpEF patients and assess who may benefit most from tailored BB therapy.

Elucidating the Clinical Implications and Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Call to Action: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association

This science advisory focuses on the need to better understand the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This clinical phenotype is important because it is common, is strongly associated with adverse outcomes, and lacks evidence-based therapies. Our goal is to clarify key knowledge gaps in pulmonary hypertension attributable to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and to suggest specific, actionable scientific directions for addressing such gaps. Areas in need of additional investigation include refined disease definitions and interpretation of hemodynamics, as well as greater insights into noncardiac contributors to pulmonary hypertension risk, optimized animal models, and further molecular studies in patients with combined precapillary and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension. We highlight translational approaches that may provide important biological insight into pathophysiology and reveal new therapeutic targets. Last, we discuss the current and future landscape of potential therapies for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary vascular dysfunction, including considerations of precision medicine, novel trial design, and device-based therapies, among other considerations. This science advisory provides a synthesis of important knowledge gaps, culminating in a collection of specific research priorities that we argue warrant investment from the scientific community.

Hemodynamic Response to Acute Volume Load and Endomyocardial NO-synthase Gene Expression in Heart Transplant Recipients

A pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >18 mm Hg following volume load has been proposed as a partition value for the detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. As hemodynamic changes in filling pressures (FP) have been attributed to a nitric oxide (NO)-mediated rightward shift of the pressure-volume relationship, we investigated the hemodynamic response to volume load in heart transplant recipients (HTx) and examined the role of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) gene expression on diastolic function changes.

Predicting Group II pulmonary hypertension: diagnostic accuracy of the H2FPEF and OPTICS scores in Scotland

OBJECTIVE

Group II pulmonary hypertension (PH) can be challenging to distinguish from Group I PH without proceeding to right heart catheterisation (RHC). The diagnostic accuracy of the H2FPEF and OPTICS scores was investigated in Scotland.

METHODS

Patients were included in the study if they were referred to the Scottish Pulmonary Vascular Unit between 2016 and 2020 and subsequently diagnosed with Group II PH or Group I PH which was either idiopathic, heritable or pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. The established cut offs for the H2FPEF and for the OPTICS scores were applied retrospectively to predict the presence of Group II PH. The diagnosis from the scores were compared with the MDT consensus diagnosis following RHC.

RESULTS

107 patients with Group I PH and 86 patients with Group II PH were included. Retrospective application of the OPTICS score demonstrated that pretest scoring would detect 28% of cases with Group II PH yet at the cost of misdiagnosing 4% of patients with Group I as Group II PH (specificity 0.96). The H2FPEF score had a far greater sensitivity (0.70) yet reduced specificity (0.91), leading to misdiagnosis of 9% of Group I PH cases.

CONCLUSION

While the specificity of these scores was high, the lack of perfect specificity limits their utility as it results in missed patients with Group I PH. As a consequence, they cannot replace RHC as the means of diagnosing the aetiology of PH in their current form. The scores may still be used to support clinical judgement or to indicate the advisability for further provocative testing at RHC.

High prevalence of occult left ventricular diastolic dysfunction detected by exercise stress test in systemic sclerosis

Despite the poor prognosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) due to the co-occurrence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), presence of occult LVDD has not been sufficiently investigated. This retrospective study aimed to reveal the prevalence and determinants of occult LVDD in patients with SSc by exercise stress test. Forty-five SSc patients (age, 63 ± 13 years; men/women, 6/39) with normal pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) at rest underwent a symptom-limited exercise test with right heart catheterization using a supine cycle ergometer; haemodynamic parameters at rest, leg raise and during exercise were evaluated. Occult LVDD defined PAWP ≥ 25 mmHg during exercise was seen in 13 patients (29%). Higher PAWP, lower pulmonary vascular resistance and diastolic pulmonary pressure gradient, larger left atrium at rest, and higher PAWP during leg raise (15 ± 4 vs 10 ± 4 mmHg in non-LVDD group, p < 0.001) were observed in the occult LVDD group. The area under the ROC curve for PAWP after leg raise was largest at 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70–0.95, p = 0.001). About one-third (29%) of SSc patients with normal haemodynamics at rest showed occult LVDD. A higher PAWP after leg raise could be useful for detecting occult LVDD.

Future perspective in diabetic patients with pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a clinical syndrome that may include multiple clinical conditions and can complicate the majority of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease is the prevalent clinical condition and accounts for two-thirds of all cases. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, which affects about 422 million adults worldwide, has emerged as an independent risk factor for the development of pulmonary hypertension in patients with left heart failure. While a correct diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease requires invasive hemodynamic evaluation through right heart catheterization, several scores integrating clinical and echocardiographic parameters have been proposed to discriminate pre- and post-capillary types of pulmonary hypertension. Despite new emerging evidence on the pathophysiological mechanisms behind the effects of diabetes in patients with pre- and/or post-capillary pulmonary hypertension, no specific drug has been yet approved for this group of patients. In the last few years, the attention has been focused on the role of antidiabetic drugs in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart failure, both in animal models and in clinical trials. The aim of the present review is to highlight the links emerged in the recent years between diabetes and pre- and/or post-capillary pulmonary hypertension and new perspectives for antidiabetic drugs in this setting.

Unmasking right ventricular-arterial uncoupling during fluid challenge in pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) frequently show preserved right ventricular (RV) function at rest. However, volume challenge may uncover pending RV dysfunction. We aimed to assess the physiological and prognostic impact of RV-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) uncoupling during volume challenge in patients with precapillary PH.

METHODS

We prospectively assessed 32 patients with PH (pulmonary arterial hypertension, n = 27; inoperable chronic thromboembolic disease, n = 5) and 4 controls using invasive pressure-volume (PV) catheterization. PV loops were recorded during preload reduction (balloon occlusion of inferior vena cava; baseline) and acute volume loading (200 ml saline in 20 s). Contractility (multi-beat end-systolic elastance [Ees]), arterial elastance (Ea), and RV-PA coupling (Ees/Ea) were obtained at baseline and at maximum volume loading (MVL).

RESULTS

Median [interquartile range] time to MVL was 19 [18-22] s. Ees/Ea significantly declined from baseline (0.89 [0.69-1.23]) to MVL (0.16 [0.12-0.34]; p < 0.001) in patients with PH but remained stable in controls (baseline: 1.08 [0.94-1.80]; MVL: 1.01 [0.80-2.49]; p = 0.715). The same pattern was observed for Ees, while Ea remained unchanged. The percent decline of RV-PA coupling (ΔEes/Ea) during fluid challenge was significantly associated with pulmonary resting hemodynamics, RV ejection fraction (RVEF), and RV end-diastolic volume. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with PH who had a smaller ΔEes/Ea (<-65%) had a significantly better prognosis (log-rank p = 0.0389). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, clinical worsening was predicted by ΔEes/Ea (hazard ratio: 0.96 [95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.00]) and RVEF (hazard ratio: 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.92-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of PV loops during fluid challenge uncovers exhausted RV coupling reserve with severely reduced contractility in PH. RV-PA uncoupling during volume challenge can be predicted by pulmonary resting hemodynamics and RVEF. RV-PA uncoupling during fluid challenge and RVEF (as a noninvasive correlate) are predictors of clinical worsening.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03403868 (January 19, 2018).

The Role of Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure on the Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Tachycardias in Patients With Isolated Pre-capillary Pulmonary Hypertens

Atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardias (AF/AT) have been reported as a common condition in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). As yet, limited data exists about the significance of the borderline post-capillary pressure component on the occurrence of AF / AT in patients with isolated pre-capillary PH. We retrospectively studied the prevalence of AF / AT in 333 patients (mean age 61 ± 15 years, 44% males) with pre-capillary idiopathic / familiar pulmonary arterial hypertension, and inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The prevalence of AF / AT was analyzed in different categories of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). In the study population overall, the mean PAWP was 10.5 ± 3 mmHg, median of 11 mmHg, range 2-15 mmHg. AF / AT was diagnosed in 79 patients (24%). The proportion of AF / AT among patients with PAWP below the median (?11 mmHg) was lower than in subjects with PAWP between 12 and 15 mmHg, 30 (16%) vs. 46 (35%), p = 0.0001. Compared to the patients with PAWP?11 mmHg, subjects with PAWP between 12 and 15 mmHg were older (65 ± 13 years vs. 58 ± 16), with more prevalent arterial hyperte\nsion [100 (70%) vs. 106 (55%)] and diabetes mellitus [50 (35%) vs. 48 (25%)], showed larger size of the left atrium (42 ± 7 vs. 40 ± 6 mm), and higher values of right atrium pressure (12 ± 5 vs. 8 ± 5 mm Hg), p < 0.05 in all comparisons. The prevalence of AF / AT in the group studied increased with the growing post-capillary component.

Fluid challenge and balloon occlusion testing in patients with atrial septal defects

INTRODUCTION

Careful, stepwise assessment is required in all patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) to exclude pulmonary vascular or left ventricular (LV) disease. Fluid challenge and balloon occlusion may unmask LV disease and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension, but their role in the evaluation of patients with 'operable' ASDs is not well established.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study in three Italian specialist centres between 2018 and 2020. Patients selected for percutaneous ASD closure underwent assessment at baseline and after fluid challenge, balloon occlusion and both.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (46 (38.2, 57.8) years, 72% female) were included. All had a shunt fraction >1.5, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <5 Wood Units (WU) and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) <15 mm Hg. Individuals with a PVR ≥2 WU at baseline (higher PVR group) were older, more symptomatic, with a higher baseline systemic vascular resistance (SVR) than the lower PVR group (all p<0.0001). Individuals with a higher PVR experienced smaller increases in pulmonary blood flow following fluid challenge (0.3 (0.1, 0.5) vs 2.0 (1.5, 2.8) L/min, p<0.0001). Balloon occlusion led to a more marked fall in SVR (p<0.0001) and a larger increase in systemic blood flow (p=0.024) in the higher PVR group. No difference was observed in PAWP following fluid challenge and/or balloon occlusion between groups; four (8%) patients reached a PAWP ≥18 mm Hg following the addition of fluid challenge to balloon occlusion testing.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with ASD without overt LV disease, even small rises in PVR may have significant implications on cardiovascular haemodynamics. Fluid challenge may provide additional information to balloon occlusion in this setting.

Under Pressure: Right Heart Catheterization and Provocative Testing for Diagnosing Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a heterogenous disorder involving multiple pathophysiological processes that ultimately affect the vasculature within the lungs. Right heart catheterization (RHC) continues to be the benchmark for diagnosing PH. The use of provocation techniques during RHC can help sub-characterize the type of PH and thus assist in developing appropriate treatment strategies for the management of each PH subtype. This review examines proven and novel approaches for evaluating the pulmonary vasculature during RHC and aspires to provide an accurate, clinically relevant framework for using RHC to diagnose and manage PH. Further improvement in standardized protocols will help optimize the application of RHC in patients with PH.

Elevated Pulmonary Pressure Noted on Echocardiogram: A Simplified Approach to Next Steps

An elevated right ventricular/pulmonary artery systolic pressure suggestive of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common finding noted on echocardiography and is considered a marker for poor clinical outcomes, regardless of the cause. Even mild elevation of pulmonary pressure can be considered a modifiable risk factor, informing the trajectory of patients' clinical outcome. Although guidelines have been published detailing diagnostic and management algorithms, this echocardiographic finding is often underappreciated or not acted upon. Hence, patients with PH are often diagnosed in clinical practice when hemodynamic abnormalities are already moderate or severe. This results in delayed initiation of potentially effective therapies, referral to PH centers, and greater patient morbidity and mortality. This mini-review presents a succinct, simplified case-based approach to the "next steps" in the work-up of PH, once elevated pulmonary pressures have been noted on an echocardiogram. Our goal is for clinicians to develop a good overview of diagnostic approach to PH and recognition of high-risk features that may require early referral.

Invasive Hemodynamic and Metabolic Evaluation of HFpEF

Purpose of review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex and heterogeneous condition of multiple causes, characterized by a clinical syndrome resulting from elevated left ventricular filling pressures, with an apparently unimpaired left ventricular systolic function. Although HFpEF has been long recognized as a distinct entity with significant morbidity for patients, its diagnosis remains challenging to this day. In recent years, few diagnostic algorithms have been postulated to aid in the identification of this condition. Invasive hemodynamic and metabolic evaluation is often warranted for the conclusive diagnosis and risk stratification of HFpEF, in patients presenting with undifferentiated DOE.

Recent findings

Rest and provoked hemodynamics remain the golden-standard diagnostic tool to unequivocally confirm the diagnosis of both established and incipient HFpEF, respectively. Cycle exercise hemodynamics is the paramount provocative maneuver to unveil this condition. Rapid saline loading does not offer a significant benefit over that of cycle exercise. Vasoactive agents can also uncover and confirm incipient HFpEF disease. The role of metabolic evaluation in patients presenting with idiopathic dyspnea on exertion (DOE) is of unparalleled value for those who have expertise in cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) interpretation; however, the average clinician who focuses solely on oxygen consumption will find it underwhelming. Invasive CPET stands alone as the ultimate diagnostic tool to discriminate between pulmonary, cardiovascular, and skeletal muscle disorders, and their respective contribution to DOE and exercise intolerance.

Summary

Several hemodynamic and metabolic parameters have demonstrated not only strong diagnostic value, but also predictive power in HFpEF. Additionally, these diagnostic methods have given rise to several therapeutic interventions that are now part of our clinical armamentarium. Regrettably, due to the heterogeneity and multicausality of HFpEF, none of the targeted interventions have been so far successful in decreasing the mortality burden of this prevalent condition.

Contrasting haemodynamic effects of exercise and saline infusion in older adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension

In this study, among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, exercise was more potent in eliciting pulmonary vascular abnormalities and demonstrated paradoxical increase in RC-time https://bit.ly/35Mb0dv.

Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamics in Pulmonary Hypertension and Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an independent risk factor for adverse clinical outcome, particularly in left heart disease (LHD) patients. Recent advances have clarified the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) range that is above normal and is associated with clinical events, including mortality. This progress has for the first time resulted in a new clinical definition of PH that is evidenced-based, is inclusive of mPAP >20 mm Hg, and emphasizes early diagnosis. Additionally, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 2.2 to 3.0 WU, considered previously to be normal, appears to associate with elevated clinical risk. A revised approach to classifying PH patients as pre-capillary, isolated post-capillary, or combined pre-/post-capillary PH now guides point-of-care diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment. Exercise hemodynamic or confrontational fluid challenge studies may also aid decision-making for patients with PH-LHD or otherwise unexplained dyspnea. This collective progress in pulmonary vascular and heart failure medicine reinforces the critical importance of accurate hemodynamic assessment.

The prevalence and clinical outcome of supraventricular tachycardia in different etiologies of pulmonary hypertension

Purpose

Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) frequently suffer from supraventricular tachycardias (SVT). The main purpose of our study was to identify the cumulative incidence of SVT in patients with different etiologies of PH. The secondary objective was to analyse the clinical impact of SVT.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the prevalence of SVT and the clinical outcome in 755 patients (41% males; 60 ± 15 years; mean follow-up 3.8 ± 2.8 years) with PH of different etiologies. The prevalence of SVT was analysed separately in isolated pre-capillary PH (Ipc-PH) and in patients with combined post- and pre-capillary PH (Cpc-PH).

Results

The prevalence of SVT in the Ipc-PH group (n = 641) was 25% (n = 162). The most prevalent arrhythmias were atrial fibrillation followed by a typical atrial flutter (17% and 4.4% of all Icp-PH patients). An excessive prevalence of SVT was found in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (35%, p = 0.01). Out of the overall study population, Cpc-PH was present in 114 (15%) patients. Patients with Cpc-PH manifested a higher prevalence of SVT than subjects with Ipc-PH (58; 51% vs. 162; 25%; p <0.0001) and were more likely to have persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation (38; 29% vs. 61; 10%; p <0.0001). Parameters significantly associated with mortality in a multivariate analysis included age, male gender, functional exercise capacity and right atrial diameter (p < 0.05). Neither diagnosis of SVT nor type of arrhythmia predicted mortality.

Conclusions

The study detected a significant prevalence of SVT in the population of PH of different origins. Different spectrum and prevalence of arrhythmia might be expected in different etiologies of PH. Patients with an elevated post-capillary pressure showed a higher arrhythmia prevalence, predominantly due to an excessive number of atrial fibrillations. The diagnosis of SVT was not associated with mortality.

Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease-A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to left heart disease (LHD) is a frequent complication of heart failure (HF) and is associated with exercise intolerance, poor quality of life, increased risk of hospitalisations, and reduced overall survival. Since the recent Sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension in 2018, there have been significant changes in the hemodynamic definitions and clinical classification of PH-LHD. PH-LHD can be subdivided into (1) isolated postcapillary PH (IpcPH) and (2) combined precapillary and postcapillary PH (CpcPH). This categorisation of PH-LHD is important because CpcPH shares certain pathophysiologic, clinical, and hemodynamic characteristics with pulmonary arterial hypertension and is associated with worse outcomes compared with IpcPH. A systematic approach using clinical history and noninvasive investigations is required in the diagnosis of PH-LHD. Right heart catheterisation with and without provocative testing is performed in expert centres and is indicated in selected individuals. Although the definition of IpcPH and CpcPH is based on measurements made with right heart catheterisation, distinguishing between these two entities is not always necessary. Despite strong evidence for medical therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, those options have limited benefit in PH-LHD. Expert PH centres in Canada have been established to provide ongoing care for the more complex patient subgroups.

Impact of a volume challenge on haemodynamics and prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Aims

A volume challenge can unmask pulmonary hypertension (PH) and its mechanism. We evaluated the impact of a volume challenge on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure (mPAWP) and its prognostic implications in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods and results

In 285 patients with severe AS (indexed aortic valve area 0.41 ± 0.13 cm²/m²), mPAP and mPAWP were measured before and after administration of 150 ± 58 mL of low‐osmolal or iso‐osmolal contrast. Following contrast, mPAP and mPAWP rose from 25 ± 10 and 16 ± 8 mmHg by 5 ± 4 and 4 ± 4 mmHg to 30 ± 11 and 20 ± 8 mmHg. There were 112 (39%) patients with pre‐contrast PH and 70 (40% of those without pre‐contrast PH) patients with post‐contrast PH only. Post‐contrast PH patients were intermediate between pre‐contrast PH and no PH in terms of AS severity, cardiac dysfunction, and haemodynamics. After a median follow‐up of 43 months post‐AVR, pre‐contrast PH patients had numerically the highest mortality driven by those with pre‐contrast combined pre‐capillary and post‐capillary PH (n = 35), while post‐contrast changes in mPAP and mPAWP were not related to mortality. Patients with any post‐contrast mPAWP > 18 mmHg had significantly higher mortality than those with post‐contrast mPAWP ≤ 18 mmHg,

Conclusions

In severe AS, a contrast challenge leads to post‐contrast PH in ~40% of patients without pre‐contrast PH. However, post‐contrast haemodynamic changes do not adversely affect outcomes in patients undergoing AVR. Post‐contrast PH represents an intermediate stage of ‘cardiac damage’, which may be attenuated or reversible after AVR.

A Fluid Challenge Test for the Diagnosis of Occult Heart Failure

A right heart catheterization with measurements of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) may be necessary for the diagnosis of left heart failure as a cause of pulmonary hypertension or unexplained dyspnea. Diagnostic cutoff values are a PAWP of ≥ 15 mm Hg at rest or a PAWP of ≥ 25 mm Hg during exercise. However, accurate measurement of PAWP can be challenging and heart failure may be occult. Left heart catheterization, with measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, may also be indecisive. Measurements are then best repeated in stress conditions. Exercise is an option, but the equipment is not universally available, and interpretation can be difficult in patients with wide respiratory pressure swings. An alternative is offered by a fluid challenge. Studies have gathered data supporting infusion of 500 mL or 7 mL/kg saline and a PAWP of 18 mm Hg as a diagnostic cutoff. The procedure is simple and does not take much catheterization laboratory time. Combining echocardiography with invasive measurements may increase the diagnostic accuracy of diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac output after a fluid challenge may be of prognostic relevance.

Noninvasive Prediction of Elevated Wedge Pressure in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients Without Clear Signs of Left-Sided Heart Disease: External Validation of the OPTICS Risk Score

Background

Although most newly presenting patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) have elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure, identification of so‐called postcapillary PH can be challenging. A noninvasive tool predicting elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure in patients with incident PH may help avoid unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.

Methods and Results

A combination of clinical data, ECG, and echocardiographic parameters was used to refine a previously developed left heart failure risk score in a retrospective cohort of pre‐ and postcapillary PH patients. This updated score (renamed the OPTICS risk score) was externally validated in a prospective cohort of patients from 12 Dutch nonreferral centers the OPTICS network. Using the updated OPTICS risk score, the presence of postcapillary PH could be predicted on the basis of body mass index ≥30, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, dyslipidemia, history of valvular surgery, sum of SV1 (deflection in V1 in millimeters) and RV6 (deflection in V6 in millimeters) on ECG, and left atrial dilation. The external validation cohort included 81 postcapillary PH patients and 66 precapillary PH patients. Using a predefined cutoff of >104, the OPTICS score had 100% specificity for postcapillary PH (sensitivity, 22%). In addition, we investigated whether a high probability of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, assessed by the H₂FPEF score (obesity, atrial fibrillation, age >60 yrs, ≥2 antihypertensives, E/e' >9, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure by echo >35 mmHg), similarly predicted the presence of elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure. High probability of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (H₂FPEF score ≥6) was less specific for postcapillary PH.

Conclusions

In a community setting, the OPTICS risk score can predict elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure in PH patients without clear signs of left‐sided heart disease. The OPTICS risk score may be used to tailor the decision to perform invasive diagnostic testing.

Atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with pulmonary endarterectomy

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT) are frequently observed in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who were treated with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Their prevalence and impact on prognosis of patients are not known. We analysed the prevalence of AF/AT and the clinical outcome in 197 patients with CTEPH treated with PEA (median age 62; interquartile range 53–68 years; 62% males). The prevalence of AF/AT was 29% (57 patients). Compared to patients without arrhythmia, the subjects with AF/AT were older [60 (50–67) vs. 62 (57–70) years], manifested an increased size of the left atrium [39 (35–44) vs. 45 (40–50) mm], had a reduced 6-min walking distance [411 (321–506) vs. 340 (254–460) m], and higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure after PEA [38 (30–47) vs. 45 (38–71) mmHg], all results with P-value <0.05. During the follow-up with a median 4.2 (1.6–6.3) years, 45 (23%) patients died. In a multivariate Cox regression model only the male gender [hazard ratio (HR) 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–4.50], a reduced 6-min walking distance (HR 3.67, 95% CI 1.74–7.73), and an increased New York Heart Association class (HR 8.56, 95% CI 4.17–17.60) were associated with mortality (P < 0.05). The prevalence of AF/AT in patients with CTEPH treated with PEA is high. Arrhythmias are associated with reduced functional capacity but not with mortality.

Exercise and fluid challenge during right heart catheterisation for evaluation of dyspnoea

This prospective study compared exercise test and intravenous fluid challenge in a single right heart catheter procedure to detect latent diastolic heart failure in patients with echocardiographic heart failure with preserved ejection function. We included 49 patients (73% female) with heart failure with preserved ejection function and pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg. A subgroup of 26 patients had precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Invasive haemodynamic and gas exchange parameters were measured at rest, 45° upright position, during exercise, after complete haemodynamic and respiratory recovery in lying position, and after rapid infusion of 500 mL isotonic solution. Most haemodynamic parameters increased at both exercise and intravenous fluid challenge, with the higher increase at exercise. Pulmonary vascular resistance decreased by –0.21 wood units at exercise and –0.56 wood units at intravenous fluid challenge (p = 0.3); 20% (10 of 49) of patients had an increase in pulmonary artery wedge pressure above the upper limit of 20 mmHg at exercise, and 20% above the respective limit of 18 mmHg after intravenous fluid challenge. However, only three patients exceeded the upper limit of pulmonary artery wedge pressure in both tests, i.e. seven patients only at exercise and seven other patients only after intravenous fluid challenge. In the subgroup of pulmonary hypertension patients, only two patients exceeded pulmonary artery wedge pressure limits in both tests, further five patients at exercise and four patients after intravenous fluid challenge. A sequential protocol in the same patient showed a significantly higher increase in haemodynamic parameters at exercise compared to intravenous fluid challenge. Both methods can unmask diastolic dysfunction at right heart catheter procedure, but in different patient groups.

Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to left heart disease (LHD) is the most common type of PH and is defined as mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure of >20 mm Hg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >15 mm Hg during right heart catheterization. LHD may lead to elevated left atrial pressure alone, which in the absence of intrinsic pulmonary vascular disease will result in PH without changes in pulmonary vascular resistance. Persistent elevation in left atrial pressure may, however, also be associated with subsequent pulmonary vascular remodeling, vasoconstriction, and an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance. Hence, there are 2 subgroups of PH due to LHD, isolated postcapillary PH and combined post- and precapillary PH, with these groups have differing clinical implications. Differentiation of pulmonary arterial hypertension and PH due to LHD is critical to guide management planning; however, this may be challenging. Older patients, patients with metabolic syndrome, and patients with imaging and clinical features consistent with left ventricular dysfunction are suggestive of LHD etiology rather than pulmonary arterial hypertension. Hemodynamic measures such as diastolic pressure gradient, transpulmonary gradient, and pulmonary vascular resistance may assist to differentiate pre- from postcapillary PH and offer prognostic insights. However, these are influenced by fluid status and heart failure treatment. Pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies have been trialed in the treatment with concerning results reflecting disease heterogeneity, variation in inclusion criteria, and mixed end point criteria. The aim of this review is to provide an updated definition, discuss possible pathophysiology, clinical aspects, and the available treatment options for PH due to LHD.