Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and the Clinical Course in Patients With COPD

Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis and Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) and interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) are relatively new concepts in interstitial lung disease (ILD) imaging and clinical management. Recognition of signs of PPF, as well as identification and classification of ILA, are important tasks during chest high-resolution CT interpretation, to optimize management of patients with ILD and those at risk of developing ILD. However, following professional society guidance, the role of imaging surveillance remains unclear in stable patients with ILD, asymptomatic patients with ILA who are at risk of progression, and asymptomatic patients at risk of developing ILD without imaging abnormalities. In this AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding PPF and ILA and describe the range of clinical practice with respect to imaging patients with ILD, those with ILA, and those at risk of developing ILD. In addition, we offer suggestions to help guide surveillance imaging in areas with an absence of published guidelines, where such decisions are currently driven primarily by local pulmonologists' preference.

Longitudinal assessment of interstitial lung abnormalities on CT in patients with COPD using artificial intelligence-based segmentation: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) on CT may affect the clinical outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but their quantification remains unestablished. This study examined whether artificial intelligence (AI)-based segmentation could be applied to identify ILAs using two COPD cohorts.

METHODS

ILAs were diagnosed visually based on the Fleischner Society definition. Using an AI-based method, ground-glass opacities, reticulations, and honeycombing were segmented, and their volumes were summed to obtain the percentage ratio of interstitial lung disease-associated volume to total lung volume (ILDvol%). The optimal ILDvol% threshold for ILA detection was determined in cross-sectional data of the discovery and validation cohorts. The 5-year longitudinal changes in ILDvol% were calculated in discovery cohort patients who underwent baseline and follow-up CT scans.

RESULTS

ILAs were found in 32 (14%) and 15 (10%) patients with COPD in the discovery (n = 234) and validation (n = 153) cohorts, respectively. ILDvol% was higher in patients with ILAs than in those without ILA in both cohorts. The optimal ILDvol% threshold in the discovery cohort was 1.203%, and good sensitivity and specificity (93.3% and 76.3%) were confirmed in the validation cohort. 124 patients took follow-up CT scan during 5 ± 1 years. 8 out of 124 patients (7%) developed ILAs. In a multivariable model, an increase in ILDvol% was associated with ILA development after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and smoking exposure.

CONCLUSION

AI-based CT quantification of ILDvol% may be a reproducible method for identifying and monitoring ILAs in patients with COPD.

Pictorial Review of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease on High-Resolution CT Scan and Updated Classification

TOPIC IMPORTANCE

Given the recently expanded approval of antifibrotics for various fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), early and correct recognition of these diseases is imperative for physicians. Because high-resolution chest CT scan forms the backbone of diagnosis for ILD, this review will discuss evidence-based imaging findings of key fibrotic ILDs and an approach for differentiating these diseases.

REVIEW FINDINGS

(1) Imaging findings of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia may evolve over time and become indistinguishable from usual interstitial pneumonia. Therefore, if remote imaging can be reviewed, this would increase the likelihood of an accurate imaging diagnosis, particularly if findings appear to represent a usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the recent examination. (2) Given the difficulty and lack of objectivity in classifying patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis into acute, subacute, and chronic categories and that prognosis depends primarily on presence or absence of fibrosis, the new set of guidelines released in 2020 categorizes patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis as either nonfibrotic (purely inflammatory) or fibrotic (either purely fibrotic or mixed fibrotic/inflammatory) based on imaging and/or histologic findings, and the prior temporal terms are no longer used. (3) Interstitial lung abnormalities are incidental CT scan findings that may suggest early ILD in patients without clinical suspicion for ILD. Patients with high-risk features should undergo clinical evaluation for ILD and be actively monitored for disease progression.

SUMMARY

Fibrotic ILD on high-resolution chest CT scan is a complex topic, but with use of an evidence-based analysis and algorithm as provided in this article, the probability of a correct imaging diagnosis increases.

Interstitial lung abnormality evaluated by an automated quantification system: prevalence and progression rate

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of recognizing interstitial lung abnormalities, screening methods using computer-based quantitative analysis are not well developed, and studies on the subject with an Asian population are rare. We aimed to identify the prevalence and progression rate of interstitial lung abnormality evaluated by an automated quantification system in the Korean population.

METHODS

A total of 2,890 healthy participants in a health screening program (mean age: 49 years, men: 79.5%) with serial chest computed tomography images obtained at least 5 years apart were included. Quantitative lung fibrosis scores were measured on the chest images by an automated quantification system. Interstitial lung abnormalities were defined as a score ≥ 3, and progression as any score increased above baseline.

RESULTS

Interstitial lung abnormalities were identified in 251 participants (8.6%), who were older and had a higher body mass index. The prevalence increased with age. Quantification of the follow-up images (median interval: 6.5 years) showed that 23.5% (59/251) of participants initially diagnosed with interstitial lung abnormality exhibited progression, and 11% had developed abnormalities (290/2639). Older age, higher body mass index, and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate were independent risk factors for progression or development. The interstitial lung abnormality group had worse survival on follow-up (5-year mortality: 3.4% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial lung abnormality could be identified in one-tenth of the participants, and a quarter of them showed progression. Older age, higher body mass index and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate increased the risk of development or progression of interstitial lung abnormality.

Quantitative assessment of airway wall thickness in COPD patients with interstitial lung abnormalities

Background

Whether the airway is involved in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is not well understood. Also the impact of ILA on lung function in COPD patients remains controversial. We aimed to assess the quantitative CT measurements of airway wall thickness (AWT) and lung function according to ILA status in COPD patients.

Methods

157 COPD patients discharged from our hospital from August 1, 2019 through August 31, 2022 who underwent chest CT imagings and pulmonary function tests were retrospectively enrolled. Linear regression analysis and multiple models were used to analyze associations between quantitative assessment of airway wall changes and the presence of ILA.

Results

In 157 COPD patients, 23 patients (14.6%) had equivocal ILA, 42 patients (26.8%) had definite ILA. The definite ILA group had the highest measurements of Pi10 (square root of theoretical airway wall area with a lumen perimeter of 10 mm), segmental AWT and segmental WA% (percentage of wall area), whereas the no ILA group had the lowest measurements of Pi10, segmental AWT and segmental WA%. In the adjusted analyses (adjusted by age, sex, body mass index, smoking intensity, COPD GOLD stage, lung function, slice thickness and scanner type), compared to COPD patients without ILA, the measurements of Pi10, segmental AWT and segmental WA% were higher in definite ILA group with differences of 0.225 mm (p = 0.012), 0.152 mm (p < 0.001), 4.8% (p < 0.001) respectively. COPD patients with definite ILA tended to have higher FEV1% predicted, FVC% predicted and lower MMEF75/25% predicted, but there were no statistically differences among the three groups.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the higher AWT measures in COPD patients with ILA compared to the patients without ILA. These findings suggest that the airway may be involved in the pathogenesis of ILA.

Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema: A Narrative Review

Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) syndrome refers to co-occurrence of two disease processes in the lung that can be difficult to diagnose but is associated with high morbidity and mortality burden. Diagnosis of CPFE is challenging because the two diseases can counterbalance respective impairments resulting in deceivingly normal-appearing chest radiography and spirometry in a dyspneic patient. Although an international committee published the terminology and definitions of CPFE in 2022, consensus on exact diagnostic criteria and optimal management strategy is yet to be determined. Herein, we provide a narrative review summarizing the literature on CPFE from 1990 to 2022, including historical background, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging and pulmonary function findings, diagnosis, prognosis, complications, and treatment. Although CPFE was initially conceived as a variant presentation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, it has been recognized to occur in patients with a wide variety of interstitial lung diseases, including connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The affected patients have a heightened risk for pulmonary hypertension and lung cancer. Clinicians need to recognize the characteristic presenting features of CPFE along with prognostic implications of this entity.

Interstitial lung abnormality in COPD is associated with higher prevalence of antinuclear antibody

OBJECT

To investigate whether the prevalence of positive ANA was increased in COPD with interstitial lung abnormality (ILA).

METHODS

Patients with COPD from 1 September, 2019 to 31 August, 2022 were consecutively enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The characteristics, PFTs, visual assessment of ILA and emphysema on chest CT, and tests for ANA and CRP were recorded for analysis.

RESULTS

In the study period, 100 patients with COPD were enrolled, with 90 (90.0%) males, aging 69.4 ± 8.3 years. ILA was present in 42% (n = 42) of the patients, with subpleural non-fibrotic ILA being the most common pattern. In patients with ILA, the prevalence of positive ANA was higher (45.2%) as compared to those without ILA (13.3%); between whom the difference in DLCO was also significant. In patients with positive ANA, the scores of ILA were higher, while FEV1, DLCO, DLCO % predicted, FVC, total lung capacity (TLC), and TLC % predicted were significantly lower, as compared to those with negative ANA.

CONCLUSION

The presence of ILA in patients with COPD was associated with a higher prevalence of positive ANA. Patients with positive ANA tended to have lower FEV1, DLCO and lung volume.

Impact of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities on Disease Expression and Outcomes in COPD or Emphysema: A Systematic Review

Background

Both COPD and interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are conditions associated with smoking and age. The impact of coexistent ILAs on the manifestations and outcomes of COPD or emphysema awaits evaluation.

Methods

We searched PubMed and Embase using Medical Subject Headings terms in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Eleven studies were included in the review. The sample size of the studies ranged from 30 to 9579. ILAs were reported in 6.5% to 25.7% of the patients with COPD/emphysema, higher than that reported in the general populations. COPD/emphysema patients with ILAs were older, mostly male, and had a higher smoking index than those without ILAs. Hospital admission and mortality were increased in COPD patients with ILAs compared to those without ILAs, whereas the frequency of COPD exacerbations was discrepant in 2 of the studies. The FEV₁ and FEV₁% predicted tended to be higher in the group with ILAs, but not significantly in most of the studies.

Conclusion

ILAs were more frequent in subjects with COPD/emphysema than in the general population. ILAs may have a negative impact on hospital admission and mortality of COPD/emphysema. The impact of ILAs on lung functions and exacerbations of COPD/emphysema was discrepant in these studies. Further prospective studies are warranted to provide high-quality evidence of the association and interaction between COPD/emphysema and ILAs.

Incidental discovery of interstitial lung disease: diagnostic approach, surveillance and perspectives

The incidental discovery of pre-clinical interstitial lung disease (ILD) has led to the designation of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), a radiological entity defined as the incidental finding of computed tomography (CT) abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. Two recent documents have redefined the borders of this entity and made the recommendation to monitor patients with ILA at risk of progression. In this narrative review, we will focus on some of the limits of the current approach, underlying the potential for progression to full-blown ILD of some patients with ILA and the numerous links between subpleural fibrotic ILA and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Considering the large prevalence of ILA in the general population (7%), restricting monitoring only to cases considered at risk of progression appears a reasonable approach. However, this suggestion should not prevent pulmonary physicians from pursuing an early diagnosis of ILD and timely treatment where appropriate. In cases of suspected ILD, whether found incidentally or not, the pulmonary physician is still required to make a correct ILD diagnosis according to current guidelines, and eventually treat the patient accordingly.

In patients with interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), monitoring of those at risk of progression is currently recommended, and pulmonary physicians should pursue an early diagnosis when ILA become clinically significant to facilitate timely treatment https://bit.ly/3HKOQc8

Interstitial lung abnormalities and interstitial lung diseases associated with cigarette smoking in a rural cohort undergoing surgical resection

Background

Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Investigation defining the relationships between ILAs/ILDs and clinical, radiographic, and pathologic findings in smokers have been incomplete. Employing a cohort undergoing surgical resection for lung nodules/masses, we (1) define the prevalence of ILAs/ILDs, (2) delineate their clinical, radiographic and pathologic predictors, and (3) determine their associations with mortality.

Methods

Patients undergoing resection of lung nodules/masses between 2017 and 2020 at a rural Appalachian, tertiary medical center were retrospectively investigated. Predictors for ILAs/ILDs and mortality were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

In the total study cohort of 352 patients, radiographic ILAs and ILDs were observed in 35.2% and 17.6%, respectively. Among ILA patterns, subpleural reticular changes (14.8%), non-emphysematous cysts, centrilobular (CL) ground glass opacities (GGOs) (8% each), and mixed CL-GGO and subpleural reticular changes (7.4%) were common. ILD patterns included combined pulmonary fibrosis emphysema (CPFE) (3.1%), respiratory bronchiolitis (RB)-ILD (3.1%), organizing pneumonitis (2.8%) and unclassifiable (4.8%). The group with radiographic ILAs/ILDs had a significantly higher proportion of ever smokers (49% vs. 39.9%), pack years of smoking (44.57 ± 36.21 vs. 34.96 ± 26.22), clinical comorbidities of COPD (35% vs. 26.5%) and mildly reduced diffusion capacity (% predicated 66.29 ± 20.55 vs. 71.84 ± 23). Radiographic centrilobular and paraseptal emphysema (40% vs. 22.2% and 17.6% vs. 9.6%, respectively) and isolated traction bronchiectasis (10.2% vs. 4.2%) were associated with ILAs/ILDs. Pathological variables of emphysema (34.9% vs. 18.5%), any fibrosis (15.9% vs. 4.6%), peribronchiolar metaplasia (PBM, 8% vs. 1.1%), RB (10.3% vs. 2.5%), and anthracosis (21.6% vs. 14.5%) were associated with ILAs/ILDs. Histologic emphysema showed positive correlations with any fibrosis, RB, anthracosis and ≥ 30 pack year of smoking. The group with ILAs/ILDs had significantly higher mortality (9.1% vs. 2.2%, OR 4.13, [95% CI of 1.84–9.25]).

Conclusions

In a rural cohort undergoing surgical resection, radiographic subclinical ILAs/ILDs patterns were highly prevalent and associated with ever smoking and intensity of smoking. The presence of radiographic ILA/ILD patterns and isolated honeycomb changes were associated with increased mortality. Subclinical ILAs/ILDs and histologic fibrosis correlated with clinical COPD as well as radiographic and pathologic emphysema emphasizing the co-existence of these pulmonary injuries in a heavily smoking population.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-01961-9.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk assessment tools: is one better than the others?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Risk assessment tools are essential in COPD care to help clinicians identify patients at higher risk of accelerated lung function decline, respiratory exacerbations, hospitalizations, and death.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional methods of assessing risk have focused on spirometry, patient-reported symptoms, functional status, and a combination of these tools in composite indices. More recently, qualitatively and quantitatively assessed chest imaging findings, such as emphysema, large and small airways disease, and pulmonary vascular abnormalities have been associated with poor long-term outcomes in COPD patients. Although several blood and sputum biomarkers have been investigated for risk assessment in COPD, most still warrant further validation. Finally, novel remote digital monitoring technologies may be valuable to predict exacerbations but their large-scale performance, ease of implementation, and cost effectiveness remain to be determined.

SUMMARY

Given the complex heterogeneity of COPD, any single metric is unlikely to fully capture the risk of poor long-term outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should review all available clinical data, including spirometry, symptom severity, functional status, chest imaging, and bloodwork, to guide personalized preventive care of COPD patients. The potential of machine learning tools and remote monitoring technologies to refine COPD risk assessment is promising but remains largely untapped pending further investigation.

Interstitial lung abnormalities: new insights between theory and clinical practice

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) represent radiologic abnormalities incidentally detected on chest computed tomography (CT) examination, potentially related to interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Numerous studies have demonstrated that ILAs are associated with increased risk of progression toward pulmonary fibrosis and mortality. Some radiological patterns have been proven to be at a higher risk of progression. In this setting, the role of radiologists in reporting these interstitial abnormalities is critical. This review aims to discuss the most recent advancements in understanding this radiological entity and the open issues that still prevent the translation from theory to practice, emphasizing the importance of ILA recognition and adequately reporting in clinical practice.

Interstitial lung abnormalities - current knowledge and future directions

Efforts to grasp the significance of radiologic changes similar to interstitial lung disease (ILD) in undiagnosed individuals have intensified in the recent decade. The term interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is an emerging definition of such changes, defined by visual examination of computed tomography scans. Substantial insights have been made in the origins and clinical consequences of these changes, as well as automated measures of early lung fibrosis, which will likely lead to increased recognition of early fibrotic lung changes among clinicians and researchers alike.

Interstitial lung abnormalities have an estimated prevalence of 7–10% in elderly populations. They correlate with many ILD risk factors, both epidemiologic and genetic. Additionally, histopathological similarities with IPF exist in those with ILA. While no established blood biomarker of ILA exists, several have been suggested. Distinct imaging patterns indicating advanced fibrosis correlate with worse clinical outcomes. ILA are also linked with adverse clinical outcomes such as increased mortality and risk of lung cancer.

Progression of ILA has been noted in a significant portion of those with ILA and is associated with many of the same features as ILD, including advanced fibrosis. Those with ILA progression are at risk of accelerated FVC decline and increased mortality. Radiologic changes resembling ILD have also been attained by automated measures. Such measures associate with some, but not all the same factors as ILA.

ILA and similar radiologic changes are in many ways analogous to ILD and likely represent a precursor of ILD in some cases. While warranting an evaluation for ILD, they are associated with poor clinical outcomes beyond possible ILD development and thus are by themselves a significant finding. Among the present objectives of this field are the stratification of patients with regards to progression and the discovery of biomarkers with predictive value for clinical outcomes.

Interstitial lung abnormalities: What do we know and how do we manage?

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs), which refer to mild or subtle nongravity-dependent interstitial changes, may be neglected by some clinicians due to many reasons, such as lack of diagnostic criteria for ILAs and absence of available treatments and surveillance strategies. However, without intervention, some ILAs may progress to interstitial lung disease (ILD). This review summarizes our current knowledge of this condition and ways of diagnosing it together with current management. We hope that this will lead to better recognition of ILAs.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the literature on PubMed between 2008 and 2020 focusing on prevalence, etiology, symptoms, diagnostic biomarkers, clinical associations, and management of ILAs.

EXPERT OPINION

Timely diagnosis with close monitoring of ILAs and appropriate intervention should be recognized as the management approach to ILAs. Research into ILAs should continue to improve its management.