Racial Bias in Pulse Oximetry Measurement Among Patients About to Undergo Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in 2019-2020: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Near-infrared diffuse optical characterization of human thyroid using ultrasound-guided hybrid time-domain and diffuse correlation spectroscopies

Thyroid vascularization and hemodynamics become altered in thyroid pathologies and could thus inform diagnostics, therapy planning, and follow-up. However, the current non-invasive monitoring methods available in clinics lack the necessary sensitivity and/or are impractical for large-scale deployment. As a step towards proposing a new modality, we applied the first platform, to our knowledge, designed to do simultaneous measurements of neck anatomy and thyroid microvascular hemodynamics and metabolism in a single probe placement, integrating state-of-the-art near-infrared spectroscopy techniques and clinical ultrasound. A rich dataset was formed with sixty-five subjects (forty-eight females), including eighteen healthy volunteers and forty-seven patients with thyroid nodules, characterizing thyroid tissue and the effects of demographic and anatomical variables while preserving the standard clinical workflow. We have found marked reductions with age and body mass index in thyroid total hemoglobin concentration (THC), tissue oxygen saturation (StO 2), and blood flow index (BFi), among others. Patients showed lower THC and BFi than healthy subjects, and the limited sample of malignant nodules showed a higher StO 2 than the benign. These findings support the need for personalized clinical approaches.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occult Hypoxemia Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is growing concern that pulse oximeters are routinely less accurate in hospitalized patients with darker skin pigmentation, in turn increasing risk of undetected (occult) hypoxemia and adverse clinical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence on racial and ethnic disparities in occult hypoxemia prevalence and clinical impacts of undetected hypoxemia.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles published through January 2024. Eligible studies must have been conducted among adults in inpatient or outpatient settings and report occult hypoxemia prevalence stratified by patient race or ethnicity, or clinical outcomes stratified by patient race or ethnicity and occult hypoxemia status. Screening for inclusion was conducted independently by two investigators. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one investigator then checked by a second. Outcome data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Fifteen primary studies met eligibility criteria and reported occult hypoxemia prevalence in 732,505 paired oximetry measurements from 207,464 hospitalized patients. Compared with White patients, occult hypoxemia is likely more common among Black patients (pooled prevalence ratio = 1.67, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.90) and among patients identifying as Asian, Latinx, Indigenous, multiracial, or other race or ethnicity (pooled prevalence ratio = 1.39, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.64). Findings from studies reporting clinical outcomes suggest that Black patients with undetected hypoxemia may experience poorer treatment delivery outcomes than White patients with undetected hypoxemia. No evidence was found from outpatient settings.

DISCUSSION

This review and included primary studies rely on self-identified race or ethnicity, which may obscure variability in occult hypoxemia risk. Findings underscore that clinicians should be aware of the risk of occult hypoxemia in hospitalized patients with darker skin pigmentation. Moreover, oximetry data from included studies suggests that the accuracy of pulse oximeters could vary substantially from patient to patient and even within individual patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ( CRD42023402152 ).

Utility of Skin Tone on Pulse Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Pulse oximetry, a ubiquitous vital sign in modern medicine, has inequitable accuracy that disproportionately affects minority Black and Hispanic patients, with associated increases in mortality, organ dysfunction, and oxygen therapy. Previous retrospective studies used self-reported race or ethnicity as a surrogate for skin tone which is believed to be the root cause of the disparity. Our objective was to determine the utility of skin tone in explaining pulse oximetry discrepancies.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Patients were eligible if they had pulse oximetry recorded up to 5 minutes before arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements. Skin tone was measured using administered visual scales, reflectance colorimetry, and reflectance spectrophotometry.

PARTICIPANTS

Admitted hospital patients at Duke University Hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sao2-Spo2 bias, variation of bias, and accuracy root mean square, comparing pulse oximetry, and ABG measurements. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to estimate Sao2-Spo2 bias while accounting for clinical confounders.One hundred twenty-eight patients (57 Black, 56 White) with 521 ABG-pulse oximetry pairs were recruited. Skin tone data were prospectively collected using six measurement methods, generating eight measurements. The collected skin tone measurements were shown to yield differences among each other and overlap with self-reported racial groups, suggesting that skin tone could potentially provide information beyond self-reported race. Among the eight skin tone measurements in this study, and compared with self-reported race, the Monk Scale had the best relationship with differences in pulse oximetry bias (point estimate: -2.40%; 95% CI, -4.32% to -0.48%; p = 0.01) when comparing patients with lighter and dark skin tones.

CONCLUSIONS

We found clinical performance differences in pulse oximetry, especially in darker skin tones. Additional studies are needed to determine the relative contributions of skin tone measures and other potential factors on pulse oximetry discrepancies.

Performance of pulse oximeters as a function of race compared to skin pigmentation: a single center retrospective study

Pulse oximetry (SpO2) is a critical monitor for assessing oxygenation status and guiding therapy in critically ill patients. Race has been identified as a potential source of SpO2 error, with consequent bias and inequities in healthcare. This study was designed to evaluate the incidence of occult hypoxemia and accuracy of pulse oximetry associated with the Massey-Martin scale and characterize the relationship between Massey scores and self-identified race. This retrospective single institute study utilized the Massey-Martin scale as a quantitative assessment of skin pigmentation. These values were recorded peri-operatively in patients enrolled in unrelated clinical trials. The electronic medical record was utilized to obtain demographics, arterial blood gas values, and time matched SpO2 values for each PaO2 ≤ 125 mmHg recorded throughout their hospitalizations. Differences between SaO2 and SpO2 were compared as a function of both Massey score and self-reported race. 4030 paired SaO2-SpO2 values were available from 579 patients. The average error (SaO2-SpO2) ± SD was 0.23 ± 2.6%. Statistically significant differences were observed within Massey scores and among races, with average errors that ranged from - 0.39 ± 2.3 to 0.53 ± 2.5 and - 0.55 ± 2.1 to 0.37 ± 2.7, respectively. Skin color varied widely within each self-identified race category. There was no clinically significant association between error rates and Massey-Martin scale grades and no clinically significant difference in accuracy observed between self-reported Black and White patients. In addition, self-reported race is not an appropriate surrogate for skin color.

ENCoDE - a skin tone and clinical dataset from a prospective trial on acute care patients

Background

Although hypothesized to be the root cause of the pulse oximetry disparities, skin tone and its use for improving medical therapies have yet to be extensively studied. Studies previously used self-reported race as a proxy variable for skin tone. However, this approach cannot account for skin tone variability within race groups and also risks the potential to be confounded by other non-biological factors when modeling data. Therefore, to better evaluate health disparities associated with pulse oximetry, this study aimed to create a unique baseline dataset that included skin tone and electronic health record (EHR) data.

Methods

Patients admitted to Duke University Hospital were eligible if they had at least one pulse oximetry value recorded within 5 minutes before an arterial blood gas (ABG) value. We collected skin tone data at 16 different body locations using multiple devices, including administered visual scales, colorimetric, spectrophotometric, and photography via mobile phone cameras. All patients' data were linked in Duke's Protected Analytics Computational Environment (PACE), converted into a common data model, and then de-identified before publication in PhysioNet.

Results

Skin tone data were collected from 128 patients. We assessed 167 features per skin location on each patient. We also collected over 2000 images from mobile phones measured in the same controlled environment. Skin tone data are linked with patients' EHR data, such as laboratory data, vital sign recordings, and demographic information.

Conclusions

Measuring different aspects of skin tone for each of the sixteen body locations and linking them with patients' EHR data could assist in the development of a more equitable AI model to combat disparities in healthcare associated with skin tone. A common data model format enables easy data federation with similar data from other sources, facilitating multicenter research on skin tone in healthcare.

Description

A prospectively collected EHR-linked skin tone measurements database in a common data model with emphasis on pulse oximetry disparities.

Evaluation of Automated Finger Compression for Capillary Refill Time Measurement in Pediatrics

OBJECTIVES

Early shock reversal is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Capillary refill time (CRT) is clinically important to identify and monitor shock in children but has issues with inconsistency. To minimize inconsistency, we evaluated a CRT monitoring system using an automated compression device. Our objective was to determine proper compression pressure in children.

METHODS

Clinician force for CRT was collected during manual CRT measurement as a reference for automated compression in a previous study (12.9 N, 95% confidence interval, 12.5-13.4; n = 454). An automated compression device with a soft inflation bladder was fitted with a force sensor. We evaluated the effectiveness of the automated pressure to eliminate pulsatile blood flow from the distal phalange. Median and variance of CRT analysis at each pressure was compared.

RESULTS

A comparison of pressures at 300 to 500 mm Hg on a simulated finger yielded a force of 5 to 10 N, and these pressures were subsequently used for automated compression for CRT. Automated compression was tested in 44 subjects (median age, 33 months; interquartile range [IQR], 14-56 months). At interim analysis of 17 subjects, there was significant difference in the waveform with residual pulsatile blood flow (9/50: 18% at 300 mm Hg, 5/50:10% at 400 mm Hg, 0/51: 0% at 500 mm Hg, P = 0.008). With subsequent enrollment of 27 subjects at 400 and 500 mm Hg, none had residual pulsatile blood flow. There was no difference in the CRT: median 1.8 (IQR, 1.06-2.875) in 400 mm Hg vs median 1.87 (IQR, 1.25-2.8325) in 500 mm Hg, P = 0.81. The variance of CRT was significantly larger in 400 mm Hg: 2.99 in 400 mm Hg vs. 1.35 in 500 mm Hg, P = 0.02, Levene's test. Intraclass correlation coefficient for automated CRT was 0.56 at 400 mm Hg and 0.78 at 500 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

Using clinician CRT measurement data, we determined either 400 or 500 mm Hg is an appropriate pressure for automated CRT, although 500 mm Hg demonstrates superior consistency.

Characterizing the Racial Discrepancy in Hypoxemia Detection in Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Analysis

PURPOSE

Skin pigmentation influences peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) compared to arterial saturation of oxygen (SaO2). Occult hypoxemia (SaO2 ≤ 88% with SpO2 ≥ 92%) is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in venovenous-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) patients. We hypothesized VV-ECMO cannulation, in addition to race/ethnicity, accentuates the SpO2-SaO2 discrepancy due to significant hemolysis.

METHODS

Adults (≥ 18 years) supported with VV-ECMO with concurrently measured SpO2 and SaO2 measurements from over 500 centers in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry (1/2018-5/2023) were included. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine whether race/ethnicity was associated with occult hypoxemia in pre-ECMO and on-ECMO SpO2-SaO2 calculations.

RESULTS

Of 13,171 VV-ECMO patients, there were 7772 (59%) White, 2114 (16%) Hispanic, 1777 (14%) Black, and 1508 (11%) Asian patients. The frequency of on-ECMO occult hypoxemia was 2.0% (N = 233). Occult hypoxemia was more common in Black and Hispanic patients versus White patients (3.1% versus 1.7%, P < 0.001 and 2.5% versus 1.7%, P = 0.025, respectively). In multivariable logistic regression, Black patients were at higher risk of pre-ECMO occult hypoxemia versus White patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-2.02, P = 0.001). For on-ECMO occult hypoxemia, Black patients (aOR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.16-2.75, P = 0.008) and Hispanic patients (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.15-2.55, P = 0.008) had higher risk versus White patients. Higher pump flow rates (aOR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.08-1.55, P = 0.005) and on-ECMO 24-h lactate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.10, P < 0.001) significantly increased the risk of on-ECMO occult hypoxemia.

CONCLUSION

SaO2 should be carefully monitored if using SpO2 during ECMO support for Black and Hispanic patients especially for those with high pump flow and lactate values at risk for occult hypoxemia.

Melanometry for objective evaluation of skin pigmentation in pulse oximetry studies

Pulse oximetry enables real-time, noninvasive monitoring of arterial blood oxygen levels. However, results can vary with skin color, thus detecting disparities during clinical validation studies requires an accurate measure of skin pigmentation. Recent clinical studies have used subjective methods such as self-reported color, race/ethnicity to categorize skin. Melanometers based on optical reflectance may offer a more effective, objective approach to assess pigmentation. Here, we review melanometry approaches and assess evidence supporting their use as clinical research tools. We compare performance data, including repeatability, robustness to confounders, and compare devices to each other, to subjective methods, and high-quality references. Finally, we propose best practices for evaluating melanometers and discuss alternate optical approaches that may improve accuracy. Whilst evidence indicates that melanometers can provide superior performance to subjective approaches, we encourage additional research and standardization efforts, as these are needed to ensure consistent and reliable results in clinical studies.

Does nurse use of a standardized flowsheet to document communication with advanced providers provide a mechanism to detect pulse oximetry failures? A retrospective study of electronic health record data

BACKGROUND

Pulse oximetry guides clinical decisions, yet does not uniformly identify hypoxemia. We hypothesized that nursing documentation of notifying providers, facilitated by a standardized flowsheet for documenting communication to providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants), may increase when hypoxemia is present, but undetected by the pulse oximeter, in events termed "occult hypoxemia."

OBJECTIVE

To compare nurse documentation of provider notification in the 4 h preceding cases of occult hypoxemia, normal oxygenation, and evident hypoxemia confirmed by an arterial blood gas reading.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study using electronic health record data from patients with COVID-19 at five hospitals in a healthcare system with paired SpO2 and SaO2 readings (measurements within 10 min of oxygen saturation levels in arterial blood, SaO2, and by pulse oximetry, SpO2). We applied multivariate logistic regression to assess if having any nursing documentation of provider notification in the 4 h prior to a paired reading confirming occult hypoxemia was more likely compared to a paired reading confirming normal oxygen status, adjusting for characteristics significantly associated with nursing documentation. We applied conditional logistic regression to assess if having any nursing documentation of provider notification was more likely in the 4-hour window preceding a paired reading compared to the 4-hour window 24 h earlier separately for occult hypoxemia, visible hypoxemia, and normal oxygenation.

RESULTS

There were data from 1910 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who had 44,972 paired readings and an average of 26.5 (34.5) nursing documentation of provider notification events. The mean age was 63.4 (16.2). Almost half (866/1910, 45.3 %) were White, 701 (36.7 %) were Black, and 239 (12.5 %) were Hispanic. Having any nursing documentation of provider notification was 46 % more common in the 4 h before an occult hypoxemia paired reading compared to a normal oxygen status paired reading (OR 1.46, 95 % CI: 1.28-1.67). Comparing the 4 h immediately before the reading to the 4 h one day preceding the paired reading, there was a higher likelihood of having any nursing documentation of provider notification for both evident (OR 1.45, 95 % CI 1.24-1.68) and occult paired readings (OR 1.26, 95 % CI 1.04-1.53).

CONCLUSION

This study finds that nursing documentation of provider notification significantly increases prior to confirmed occult hypoxemia, which has potential in proactively identifying occult hypoxemia and other clinical issues. There is potential value to encouraging standardized documentation of nurse concern, including communication to providers, to facilitate its inclusion in clinical decision-making.

Exploring the impact and influence of melanin on frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy measurements

Significance

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a non-invasive optical method that measures changes in hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation. The measured light intensity is susceptible to reduced signal quality due to the presence of melanin.

Aim

We quantify the influence of melanin concentration on NIRS measurements taken with a frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy system using 690 and 830 nm.

Approach

Using a forehead NIRS probe, we measured 35 healthy participants and investigated the correlation between melanin concentration indices, which were determined using a colorimeter, and several key metrics from the NIRS signal. These metrics include signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), two measurements of oxygen saturation (arterial oxygen saturation,SpO 2 , and tissue oxygen saturation,StO 2 ), and optical properties represented by the absorption coefficient (μ a ) and the reduced scattering coefficient (μ s ' ).

Results

We found a significant negative correlation between the melanin index and the SNR estimated in oxy-hemoglobin signals (r s = - 0.489 , p = 0.006 ) andSpO 2 levels (r s = - 0.413 , p = 0.023 ). However, no significant changes were observed in the optical properties andStO 2 (r s = - 0.146 , p = 0.44 ).

Conclusions

We found that estimated SNR andSpO 2 values show a significant decline and dependence on the melanin index, whereasStO 2 and optical properties do not show any correlation with the melanin index.

Development and characterization of silicone-based tissue phantoms for pulse oximeter performance testing

Significance

Pulse oximeter measurements are commonly relied upon for managing patient care and thus often require human testing before they can be legally marketed. Recent clinical studies have also identified disparities in their measurement of blood oxygen saturation by race or skin pigmentation.

Aim

The development of a reliable bench-top performance test method based on tissue-simulating phantoms has the potential to facilitate pre-market assessment and the development of more accurate and equitable devices. To generate phantoms capable of mimicking physical mechanisms and providing realistic results, customized tissue-mimicking materials (TMMs) are needed.

Approach

We focused on the development of channelized finger phantoms based on flexible silicone elastomers and their implementation in a pulsatile pressurized fluid network. Candidate TMMs were formulated to achieve a range of biologically relevant mechanical and optical properties by modifying components and curing protocols.

Results

Our final optimized TMM had a Shore OO hardness of 32 and an elastic modulus of 130 kPa. TMM samples with sub-millimeter diameter channels exhibited compliance-increase in channel diameter with internal fluid pressure, as measured by optical coherence tomography-that was linearly dependent on internal pressure. Phantoms implemented in the pressurized network with an absorber-doped fluid and measured by a photoplethysmographic (PPG) sensor displayed tunable modulation levels ranging from 0.6% to 18.1% at 940 nm. Finally, we demonstrated that the system could be used to generate measurements in several clinical pulse oximeters and variations in PPG waveform could be produced by varying the simulated epidermal melanin content.

Conclusions

Overall, we provide significant insights into potential best practices for creating silicone-based tissue phantom tools for pulse oximetry performance testing.

Racial and skin color mediated disparities in pulse oximetry in infants and young children

Race-based and skin pigmentation-related inaccuracies in pulse oximetry have recently been highlighted in several large electronic health record-based retrospective cohort studies across diverse patient populations and healthcare settings. Overestimation of oxygen saturation by pulse oximeters, particularly in hypoxic states, is disparately higher in Black compared to other racial groups. Compared to adult literature, pediatric studies are relatively few and mostly reliant on birth certificates or maternal race-based classification of comparison groups. Neonates, infants, and young children are particularly susceptible to the adverse life-long consequences of hypoxia and hyperoxia. Successful neonatal resuscitation, precise monitoring of preterm and term neonates with predominantly lung pathology, screening for congenital heart defects, and critical decisions on home oxygen, ventilator support and medication therapies, are only a few examples of situations that are highly reliant on the accuracy of pulse oximetry. Undetected hypoxia, especially if systematically different in certain racial groups may delay appropriate therapies and may further perpetuate health care disparities. The role of biological factors that may differ between racial groups, particularly skin pigmentation that may contribute to biased pulse oximeter readings needs further evaluation. Developmental and maturational changes in skin physiology and pigmentation, and its interaction with the operating principles of pulse oximetry need further study. Importantly, clinicians should recognize the limitations of pulse oximetry and use additional objective measures of oxygenation (like co-oximetry measured arterial oxygen saturation) where hypoxia is a concern.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Physiological Factors Influence Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Oxygen Saturation Discrepancies

BACKGROUND

Cannulation strategy, vasopressors, and hemolysis are important physiological factors that influence hemodynamics in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We hypothesized these factors influence the discrepancy between oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) and arterial blood gas (Sao2) in patients on ECMO.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed adults (aged ≥18 years) on venoarterial or venovenous ECMO at a tertiary academic ECMO center. Spo2-Sao2 pairs with oxygen saturation ≥70% and measured within 10 minutes were included. Occult hypoxemia was defined as Sao2 ≤88% with a time-matched Spo2 ≥92%. Adjusted linear mixed-effects modeling was used to assess the Spo2-Sao2 discrepancy with preselected demographics and time-matched laboratory variables. Vasopressor use was quantified by vasopressor dose equivalences.

RESULTS

Of 139 venoarterial-ECMO and 88 venovenous-ECMO patients, we examined 20,053 Spo2-Sao2 pairs. The Spo2-Sao2 discrepancy was greater in venovenous-ECMO (1.15%) vs venoarterial-ECMO (-0.35%, P < .001). Overall, 81 patients (35%) experienced occult hypoxemia during ECMO. Occult hypoxemia was more common in venovenous-ECMO (65%) than in venoarterial-ECMO (17%, P < .001). In linear mixed-effects modeling, Spo2 underestimated Sao2 by 9.48% in central vs peripheral venoarterial-ECMO (95% CI, -17.1% to -1.79%; P = .02). Higher vasopressor dose equivalences significantly worsened the Spo2-Sao2 discrepancy (P < .001). In linear mixed-effects modeling, Spo2 overestimated Sao2 by 25.43% in single lumen-cannulated vs double lumen-cannulated venovenous-ECMO (95% CI, 5.27%-45.6%; P = .03). Higher vasopressor dose equivalences and lactate dehydrogenase levels significantly worsened the Spo2-Sao2 discrepancy (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Venovenous-ECMO patients are at higher risk for occult hypoxemia compared with venoarterial-ECMO. A higher vasopressor requirement and different cannulation strategies (central venoarterial-ECMO; single-lumen venovenous-ECMO) were significant factors for clinically significant Spo2-Sao2 discrepancy in both ECMO modes.

Venous thromboembolism in Black COVID-19 patients in a minority context compared to White, Asian and other racialized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

COVID-19 has disproportionately affected racialized populations, with particular impact among individuals of Black individuals. However, it is unclear whether disparities in venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications exist between Black individuals and those belonging to other racial groups with confirmed SARS-CoV2 infections.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the prevalence and moderators associated with VTE among Black COVID-19 patients in minoritized settings, and to compare this to White and Asian COVID-19 patients according to sex, age, and comorbid health conditions (heart failure, cancer, obesity, hypertension).

DESIGN SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and CENTRAL for articles or reports published from inception to February 15, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Reports on VTE among Black individuals infected with SARS-CoV2, in countries where Black people are considered a minority population group.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study characteristics and results of eligible studies were independently extracted by 2 pairs of reviewers. VTE prevalence was extracted, and risk of bias was assessed. Prevalence estimates of VTE prevalence among Black individuals with COVID19 in each study were pooled. Where studies provided race-stratified VTE prevalence among COVID19 patients, odds ratios were generated using a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalence of VTE, comprising of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 66,185 Black individuals reporting the prevalence of COVID-19 associated VTE were included. Weighted median age of included studies was 47.60. Pooled prevalence of COVID-19 associated VTE was 7.2 % (95 % CI, 3.8 % - 11.5 %) among Black individuals. Among individuals with SARS-CoV2 infections, Black population had higher risks of VTE compared to their White (OR = 1.79, [95 % CI 1.28-2.53], p < .001) or Asian (OR = 2.01, [95 % CI, 1.14-3.60], p = .017) counterparts, or patients with other racial identities (OR = 2.01, [95 % CI, 1.39, 2.92]; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Black individuals with COVID-19 had substantially higher risk of VTE compared to White or Asian individuals. Given racial disparities in thrombotic disease burden related to COVID-19, medical education, research, and health policy interventions are direly needed to ensure adequate disease awareness among Black individuals, to facilitate appropriate diagnosis and treatment among Black patients with suspected and confirmed VTE, and to advocate for culturally safe VTE prevention strategies, including pre-existing inequalities to the COVID-19 pandemic that persist after the crisis.

Effect of skin tone on the accuracy of the estimation of arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pulse oximetry-derived oxygen saturation (SpO2) is an estimate of true arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2). The aim of this review was to evaluate available evidence determining the effect of skin tone on the ability of pulse oximeters to accurately estimate SaO2.

METHODS

Published literature was screened to identify clinical and non-clinical studies enrolling adults and children when SpO2 was compared with a paired co-oximetry SaO2 value. We searched literature databases from their inception to March 20, 2023. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Certainty of assessment was evaluated using the GRADE tool.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were selected reporting on at least 222 644 participants (6121 of whom were children) and 733 722 paired SpO2-SaO2 measurements. Methodologies included laboratory studies, prospective clinical, and retrospective clinical studies. A high RoB was detected in 64% of studies and there was considerable heterogeneity in study design, data analysis, and reporting metrics. Only 11 (25%) studies measured skin tone in 2353 (1.1%) participants; the remainder reported participant ethnicity: 68 930 (31.0%) participants were of non-White ethnicity or had non-light skin tones. The majority of studies reported overestimation of SaO2 by pulse oximetry in participants with darker skin tones or from ethnicities assumed to have darker skin tones. Several studies reported no inaccuracy related to skin tone. Meta-analysis of the data was not possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulse oximetry can overestimate true SaO2 in people with darker skin tones. The clinical relevance of this bias remains unclear, but its magnitude is likely to be greater when SaO2 is lower.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42023390723.

Inherent Bias in Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review of Sources of Bias

Objectives

1.1Biases inherent in electronic health records (EHRs), and therefore in medical artificial intelligence (AI) models may significantly exacerbate health inequities and challenge the adoption of ethical and responsible AI in healthcare. Biases arise from multiple sources, some of which are not as documented in the literature. Biases are encoded in how the data has been collected and labeled, by implicit and unconscious biases of clinicians, or by the tools used for data processing. These biases and their encoding in healthcare records undermine the reliability of such data and bias clinical judgments and medical outcomes. Moreover, when healthcare records are used to build data-driven solutions, the biases are further exacerbated, resulting in systems that perpetuate biases and induce healthcare disparities. This literature scoping review aims to categorize the main sources of biases inherent in EHRs.

Methods

1.2We queried PubMed and Web of Science on January 19th, 2023, for peer-reviewed sources in English, published between 2016 and 2023, using the PRISMA approach to stepwise scoping of the literature. To select the papers that empirically analyze bias in EHR, from the initial yield of 430 papers, 27 duplicates were removed, and 403 studies were screened for eligibility. 196 articles were removed after the title and abstract screening, and 96 articles were excluded after the full-text review resulting in a final selection of 116 articles.

Results

1.3Systematic categorizations of diverse sources of bias are scarce in the literature, while the effects of separate studies are often convoluted and methodologically contestable. Our categorization of published empirical evidence identified the six main sources of bias: a) bias arising from past clinical trials; b) data-related biases arising from missing, incomplete information or poor labeling of data; human-related bias induced by c) implicit clinician bias, d) referral and admission bias; e) diagnosis or risk disparities bias and finally, (f) biases in machinery and algorithms.

Conclusions

1.4Machine learning and data-driven solutions can potentially transform healthcare delivery, but not without limitations. The core inputs in the systems (data and human factors) currently contain several sources of bias that are poorly documented and analyzed for remedies. The current evidence heavily focuses on data-related biases, while other sources are less often analyzed or anecdotal. However, these different sources of biases add to one another exponentially. Therefore, to understand the issues holistically we need to explore these diverse sources of bias. While racial biases in EHR have been often documented, other sources of biases have been less frequently investigated and documented (e.g. gender-related biases, sexual orientation discrimination, socially induced biases, and implicit, often unconscious, human-related cognitive biases). Moreover, some existing studies lack causal evidence, illustrating the different prevalences of disease across groups, which does not per se prove the causality. Our review shows that data-, human- and machine biases are prevalent in healthcare and they significantly impact healthcare outcomes and judgments and exacerbate disparities and differential treatment. Understanding how diverse biases affect AI systems and recommendations is critical. We suggest that researchers and medical personnel should develop safeguards and adopt data-driven solutions with a "bias-in-mind" approach. More empirical evidence is needed to tease out the effects of different sources of bias on health outcomes.

Racial effects on masimo pulse oximetry: impact of low perfusion index

PURPOSE

 Evaluate the SpO2-SaO2 difference between Black and White volunteer subjects having a low perfusion index (Pi) compared to those having a normal Pi.

METHODS

 The Pi data were abstracted from electronic files collected on 7183 paired SpO2-SaO2 samples (3201 Black and 3982 White) from a recently reported desaturation study of 75 subjects (39 Black and 36 White) where SaO2 values were sequentially decreased from 100 to 70%. The Pi values from that dataset were divided into two groups (Pi ≤ 1 or Pi > 1) for analysis. A Pi value ≤ 1 was considered "low perfusion" and a Pi value > 1 was considered "normal perfusion". Statistical calculations included values of bias (mean difference of SpO2-SaO2), precision (standard deviation of the difference), and accuracy (root-mean-square error [ARMS]). During conditions of low perfusion (Pi ≤ 1, range [0.1 to 1]), overall bias and precision were + 0.48% ± 1.59%, while bias and precision were + 0.19 ± 1.53%, and + 0.91 ± 1.57%, for Black and White subjects, respectively.

RESULTS

 During normal perfusion (Pi > 1, range [1 to 12]), overall bias and precision were + 0.18% ± 1.34%, while bias and precision were -0.26 ± 1.37%, and - 0.12 ± 1.31%, for Black and White subjects, respectively. ARMS was 1.37% in all subjects with normal perfusion and 1.64% in all subjects with low perfusion.

CONCLUSION

 Masimo SET® pulse oximeters with RD SET® sensors are accurate for individuals of both Black and White races when Pi is normal, as well as during conditions when Pi is low. The ARMS for all conditions studied is well within FDA standards. This study was conducted in healthy volunteers during well-controlled laboratory desaturations, and results could vary under certain challenging clinical conditions.

Clinical factors associated with racial differences in the prevalence of occult hypoxemia: a retrospective case-control study

Background

Recent studies showed that Black patients more often have falsely normal oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry compared to White patients. However, whether the racial differences in occult hypoxemia are mediated by other clinical differences is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective case-control study utilizing two large ICU databases (eICU and MIMIC-IV). We defined occult hypoxemia as oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry within 92-98% despite oxygen saturation on arterial blood gas below 90%. We assessed associations of commonly measured clinical factors with occult hypoxemia using multivariable logistic regression and conducted mediation analysis of the racial effect.

Results

Among 24,641 patients, there were 1,855 occult hypoxemia cases and 23,786 controls. In both datasets, Black patients were more likely to have occult hypoxemia (unadjusted odds ratio 1.66 [95%-CI: 1.41-1.95] in eICU and 2.00 [95%-CI: 1.22-3.14] in MIMIC-IV). In multivariable models, higher respiratory rate, PaCO2 and creatinine as well as lower hemoglobin were associated with increased odds of occult hypoxemia. Differences in the commonly measured clinical markers accounted for 9.2% and 44.4% of the racial effect on occult hypoxemia in eICU and MIMIC-IV, respectively.

Conclusion

Clinical differences, in addition to skin tone, might mediate some of the racial differences in occult hypoxemia.

Utility of skin tone on pulse oximetry in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study

Importance

Pulse oximetry, a ubiquitous vital sign in modern medicine, has inequitable accuracy that disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic patients, with associated increases in mortality, organ dysfunction, and oxygen therapy. Although the root cause of these clinical performance discrepancies is believed to be skin tone, previous retrospective studies used self-reported race or ethnicity as a surrogate for skin tone.

Objective

To determine the utility of objectively measured skin tone in explaining pulse oximetry discrepancies.

Design Setting and Participants

Admitted hospital patients at Duke University Hospital were eligible for this prospective cohort study if they had pulse oximetry recorded up to 5 minutes prior to arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements. Skin tone was measured across sixteen body locations using administered visual scales (Fitzpatrick Skin Type, Monk Skin Tone, and Von Luschan), reflectance colorimetry (Delfin SkinColorCatch [L*, individual typology angle {ITA}, Melanin Index {MI}]), and reflectance spectrophotometry (Konica Minolta CM-700D [L*], Variable Spectro 1 [L*]).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Mean directional bias, variability of bias, and accuracy root mean square (ARMS), comparing pulse oximetry and ABG measurements. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to estimate mean directional bias while accounting for clinical confounders.

Results

128 patients (57 Black, 56 White) with 521 ABG-pulse oximetry pairs were recruited, none with hidden hypoxemia. Skin tone data was prospectively collected using 6 measurement methods, generating 8 measurements. The collected skin tone measurements were shown to yield differences among each other and overlap with self-reported racial groups, suggesting that skin tone could potentially provide information beyond self-reported race. Among the eight skin tone measurements in this study, and compared to self-reported race, the Monk Scale had the best relationship with differences in pulse oximetry bias (point estimate: -2.40%; 95% CI: -4.32%, -0.48%; p=0.01) when comparing patients with lighter and dark skin tones.

Conclusions and relevance

We found clinical performance differences in pulse oximetry, especially in darker skin tones. Additional studies are needed to determine the relative contributions of skin tone measures and other potential factors on pulse oximetry discrepancies.

Assessment of skin pigmentation-related bias in pulse oximetry readings among adults

PURPOSE

Recent reports that pulse oximeters may overestimate oxygen saturation in individuals with darker skin pigmentation have prompted concerns from regulatory authorities regarding racial bias. We investigated the performance of TruSignal SpO2 sensors (GE Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland) in adults with varying skin pigmentation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using a set of pooled assessments of SpO2/SaO2 measurements from nine studies to assess bias, accuracy (Arms), and precision of TruSignal sensors in healthy adults under induced hypoxia. Subgroup analyses were performed based on oxygen saturation levels (band 1, ≥ 70 and ≤ 80%; band 2, > 80 and ≤ 90%; band 3, > 90 and ≤ 100%).

RESULTS

Of the 10,800 data points from 131 individuals, 8,202 (75.9%) and 2,598 (24.1%) were assigned to the light and dark pigment groups, respectively. Bias was 0.14% overall and less than 1% across oxygenation bands. The difference in bias between dark and light pigment groups was statistically significant at the low oxygenation band with SpO2 ≥ 70 and ≤ 80% (+ 0.58% and + 0.30% respectively; p = 0.0035). Throughout the saturation range, Arms was 1.64% in the light and 1.71% in the dark pigment group, within device specifications and regulatory requirements. Oxygenation was the dominating factor in stepwise ANOVA modeling. The mixed model also showed that bias was strongly affected by the oxygenation range.

CONCLUSION

TruSignal sensors demonstrated higher bias at lower oxygen saturation, with less than 0.5% difference between pigment groups. These findings raise new questions, such as ways to improve pulse oximetry measurements during challenging clinical conditions, including low perfusion.

Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society

The critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest is burdened by a lack of high-quality clinical studies and the resultant lack of high-certainty evidence. This results in limited practice guideline recommendations, which may lead to uncertainty and variability in management. Critical care management is crucial in patients after cardiac arrest and affects outcome. Although guidelines address some relevant topics (including temperature control and neurological prognostication of comatose survivors, 2 topics for which there are more robust clinical studies), many important subject areas have limited or nonexistent clinical studies, leading to the absence of guidelines or low-certainty evidence. The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Neurocritical Care Society collaborated to address this gap by organizing an expert consensus panel and conference. Twenty-four experienced practitioners (including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and a respiratory therapist) from multiple medical specialties, levels, institutions, and countries made up the panel. Topics were identified and prioritized by the panel and arranged by organ system to facilitate discussion, debate, and consensus building. Statements related to postarrest management were generated, and 80% agreement was required to approve a statement. Voting was anonymous and web based. Topics addressed include neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, infectious, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and general critical care management. Areas of uncertainty, areas for which no consensus was reached, and future research directions are also included. Until high-quality studies that inform practice guidelines in these areas are available, the expert panel consensus statements that are provided can advise clinicians on the critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest.

Association between Patient Race and Ethnicity and Use of Invasive Ventilation in the United States

Rationale: Outcomes for people with respiratory failure in the United States vary by patient race and ethnicity. Invasive ventilation is an important treatment initiated based on expert opinion. It is unknown whether the use of invasive ventilation varies by patient race and ethnicity. Objectives: To measure 1) the association between patient race and ethnicity and the use of invasive ventilation; and 2) the change in 28-day mortality mediated by any association. Methods: We performed a multicenter cohort study of nonintubated adults receiving oxygen within 24 hours of intensive care admission using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, 2008-2019) and Phillips eICU (eICU, 2014-2015) databases from the United States. We modeled the association between patient race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and invasive ventilation rate using a Bayesian multistate model that adjusted for baseline and time-varying covariates, calculated hazard ratios (HRs), and estimated 28-day hospital mortality changes mediated by differential invasive ventilation use. We reported posterior means and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: We studied 38,258 patients, 52% (20,032) from MIMIC-IV and 48% (18,226) from eICU: 2% Asian (892), 11% Black (4,289), 5% Hispanic (1,964), and 81% White (31,113). Invasive ventilation occurred in 9.2% (3,511), and 7.5% (2,869) died. The adjusted rate of invasive ventilation was lower in Asian (HR, 0.82; CrI, 0.70-0.95), Black (HR, 0.78; CrI, 0.71-0.86), and Hispanic (HR, 0.70; CrI, 0.61-0.79) patients compared with White patients. For the average patient, lower rates of invasive ventilation did not mediate differences in 28-day mortality. For a patient on high-flow nasal cannula with inspired oxygen fraction of 1.0, the odds ratios for mortality if invasive ventilation rates were equal to the rate for White patients were 0.97 (CrI, 0.91-1.03) for Asian patients, 0.96 (CrI, 0.91-1.03) for Black patients, and 0.94 (CrI, 0.89-1.01) for Hispanic patients. Conclusions: Asian, Black, and Hispanic patients had lower rates of invasive ventilation than White patients. These decreases did not mediate harm for the average patient, but we could not rule out harm for patients with more severe hypoxemia.

Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society

The critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest is burdened by a lack of high-quality clinical studies and the resultant lack of high-certainty evidence. This results in limited practice guideline recommendations, which may lead to uncertainty and variability in management. Critical care management is crucial in patients after cardiac arrest and affects outcome. Although guidelines address some relevant topics (including temperature control and neurological prognostication of comatose survivors, 2 topics for which there are more robust clinical studies), many important subject areas have limited or nonexistent clinical studies, leading to the absence of guidelines or low-certainty evidence. The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Neurocritical Care Society collaborated to address this gap by organizing an expert consensus panel and conference. Twenty-four experienced practitioners (including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and a respiratory therapist) from multiple medical specialties, levels, institutions, and countries made up the panel. Topics were identified and prioritized by the panel and arranged by organ system to facilitate discussion, debate, and consensus building. Statements related to postarrest management were generated, and 80% agreement was required to approve a statement. Voting was anonymous and web based. Topics addressed include neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, infectious, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and general critical care management. Areas of uncertainty, areas for which no consensus was reached, and future research directions are also included. Until high-quality studies that inform practice guidelines in these areas are available, the expert panel consensus statements that are provided can advise clinicians on the critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest.

State of the art: Monitoring of the respiratory system during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Monitoring the patient receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is challenging due to the complex physiological interplay between native and membrane lung. Understanding these interactions is essential to understand the utility and limitations of different approaches to respiratory monitoring during ECMO. We present a summary of the underlying physiology of native and membrane lung gas exchange and describe different tools for titrating and monitoring gas exchange during ECMO. However, the most important role of VV ECMO in severe respiratory failure is as a means of avoiding further ergotrauma. Although optimal respiratory management during ECMO has not been defined, over the last decade there have been advances in multimodal respiratory assessment which have the potential to guide care. We describe a combination of imaging, ventilator-derived or invasive lung mechanic assessments as a means to individualise management during ECMO.

Adult Highlights From the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry: 2017-2022

The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry captures clinical data and outcomes on patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support across the globe at participating centers. It provides a very unique opportunity to benchmark outcomes and analyze the clinical course to help identify ways of improving patient outcomes. In this review, we summarize select adult ECMO articles published using the ELSO registry over the past 5 years. These articles highlight innovative utilization of the registry data in generating hypotheses for future clinical trials. Members of the ELSO Scientific Oversight Committee can be found here: https://www.elso.org/registry/socmembers.aspx .

A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Background: Since publication of the 2012 Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), several developments have supported the need for an expansion of the definition, including the use of high-flow nasal oxygen, the expansion of the use of pulse oximetry in place of arterial blood gases, the use of ultrasound for chest imaging, and the need for applicability in resource-limited settings. Methods: A consensus conference of 32 critical care ARDS experts was convened, had six virtual meetings (June 2021 to March 2022), and subsequently obtained input from members of several critical care societies. The goal was to develop a definition that would 1) identify patients with the currently accepted conceptual framework for ARDS, 2) facilitate rapid ARDS diagnosis for clinical care and research, 3) be applicable in resource-limited settings, 4) be useful for testing specific therapies, and 5) be practical for communication to patients and caregivers. Results: The committee made four main recommendations: 1) include high-flow nasal oxygen with a minimum flow rate of ⩾30 L/min; 2) use PaO2:FiO2 ⩽ 300 mm Hg or oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry SpO2:FiO2 ⩽ 315 (if oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry is ⩽97%) to identify hypoxemia; 3) retain bilateral opacities for imaging criteria but add ultrasound as an imaging modality, especially in resource-limited areas; and 4) in resource-limited settings, do not require positive end-expiratory pressure, oxygen flow rate, or specific respiratory support devices. Conclusions: We propose a new global definition of ARDS that builds on the Berlin definition. The recommendations also identify areas for future research, including the need for prospective assessments of the feasibility, reliability, and prognostic validity of the proposed global definition.

Discordance Between Invasive and NonInvasive Oxygen Saturation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate discordance in oxy-hemoglobin saturation measured both by pulse oximetry (SpO2) and arterial blood gas (ABG, SaO2) among critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19(+)) patients compared to COVID-19(-) patients.

METHODS

Paired SpO2 and SaO2 readings were collected retrospectively from consecutive adult admissions to four critical care units in the United States between March and May 2020. The primary outcome was the rate of discordance (|SaO2-SpO2|>4%) in COVID-19(+) versus COVID-19(-) patients. The odds each cohort could have been incorrectly categorized as having a PaO2/FiO2 above or below 150 by their SpO2: Fractional inhaled oxygen ratio (pulse oximetry-derived oxyhemoglobin saturation:fraction of inspired oxygen ratio [SF]) was examined. A multivariate regression analysis assessed confounding by clinical differences between cohorts including pH, body temperature, renal replacement therapy at time of blood draw, and self-identified race.

RESULTS

There were 263 patients (173 COVID-19(+)) included. The rate of saturation discordance between SaO2 and SpO2 in COVID-19(+) patients was higher than in COVID-19(-) patients (27.9% vs 16.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11 to 2.27). The average difference between SaO2 and SpO2 for COVID-19(+) patients was -1.24% (limits of agreement, -13.6 to 11.1) versus -0.11 [-10.3 to 10.1] for COVID-19(-) patients. COVID-19(+) patients had higher odds (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.14-5.98) of having an SF that misclassified that patient as having a PaO2:FiO2 ratio above or below 150. There was not an association between discordance and the confounders of pH, body temperature, or renal replacement therapy at time of blood draw. After controlling for self-identified race, the association between COVID-19 status and discordance was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulse oximetry was discordant with ABG more often in critically ill COVID-19(+) than COVID-19(-) patients. However, these findings appear to be driven by racial differences between cohorts.

Skin Pigmentation and Pulse Oximeter Accuracy in the Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Prospective Study

Rationale

Despite multiple reports of pulse oximeter inaccuracy among hospitalized Black individuals, regulatory testing of pulse oximeters is performed on healthy volunteers.

Objective

Evaluate pulse oximeter accuracy among intensive care unit patients with diverse skin pigmentation.

Methods

Skin pigmentation was measured using a chromameter in 12 patients and individual typology angle (ITA), a measure of constitutive pigmentation, calculated. Arterial blood gas (ABG) arterial oxygen saturation (SaO 2 ) sampling was precisely matched to pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ) using arterial line waveforms analysis. Error (SpO 2 -SaO 2 ), bias, and average root mean square error (A RMS ) were calculated. Multivariable linear mixed effects models evaluated the association of SpO 2 -SaO 2 with skin pigmentation.

Measurements and Main Results

Sampling time was determined for 350 ABGs. Five participants (N=96 ABGs) were darkly pigmented (forehead ITA<-30°), and 7 lighter pigmented (N=254 ABGs). Darkly pigmented individuals had 1.05% bias and 4.15% A RMS compared to 0.34% bias and 1.97% A RMS among lighter pigmented individuals. After adjusting for SaO 2 , pH, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure, SpO 2 -SaO 2 was falsely elevated by 1.00% more among darkly pigmented individuals (95% confidence interval: 0.25-1.76%). SpO 2 significantly overestimated SaO 2 for dark, brown, and tan forehead or forearm pigmentation and brown and tan finger pad pigmentation compared to intermediate/light pigmentation.

Conclusions

The pulse oximeter in clinical use at an academic medical center performed worse in darkly pigmented critically ill patients than established criteria for FDA clearance. Pulse oximeter testing in ICU settings is feasible, and could be required by regulators to ensure equivalent device performance by skin pigmentation among patients.

Characterizing the Racial Discrepancy in Hypoxemia Detection in VV-ECMO: An ELSO Registry Analysis

Importance

Skin pigmentation influences peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry compared to the arterial saturation of oxygen (SaO2) measured via arterial blood gas analysis. However, data on SpO2-SaO2 discrepancy are limited in venovenous-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) patients.

Objective

To determine whether there is racial/ethnical discrepancy between SpO2 and SaO2 in patients receiving VV-ECMO. We hypothesized VV-ECMO cannulation, in addition to race/ethnicity, accentuates the SpO2-SaO2 discrepancy due to significant hemolysis.

Design

Retrospective cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry from 1/2018-5/2023.

Setting

International, multicenter registry study including over 500 ECMO centers.

Participants

Adults (≥ 18 years) supported with VV-ECMO with concurrently measured SpO2 and SaO2 measurements.

Exposure

Race/ethnicity and ECMO cannulation.

Main outcomes and measures

Occult hypoxemia (SaO2 ≤ 88% with SpO2 ≥ 92%) was our primary outcome. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine whether race/ethnicity was associated with occult hypoxemia in pre-ECMO and on-ECMO SpO2-SaO2 calculations. Covariates included age, sex, temporary mechanical circulatory support, pre-vasopressors, and pre-inotropes for pre-ECMO analysis, plus single-lumen versus double-lumen cannulation, hemolysis, hyperbilirubinemia, ECMO pump flow rate, and on-ECMO 24h lactate for on-ECMO analysis.

Results

Of 13,171 VV-ECMO patients (median age = 48.6 years, 66% male), there were 7,772 (59%) White, 2,114 (16%) Hispanic, 1,777 (14%) Black, and 1,508 (11%) Asian patients. The frequency of on-ECMO occult hypoxemia was 2.0% (N = 233). Occult hypoxemia was more common in Black and Hispanic versus White patients (3.1% versus 1.7%, P < 0.001 and 2.5% versus 1.7%, P = 0.025, respectively).In multivariable logistic regression, Black patients were at higher risk of pre-ECMO occult hypoxemia versus White patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-2.02, P = 0.001). For on-ECMO occult hypoxemia, Black patients (aOR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.16-2.75, P = 0.008) and Hispanic patients (aOR = 1.71, 95%CI = 1.15-2.55, P = 0.008) had higher risk versus White patients. Furthermore, higher pump flow rate (aOR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.08-1.55, P = 0.005) and higher on-ECMO 24h lactate (aOR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.03-1.10, P < 0.001) significantly increased the risk of on-ECMO occult hypoxemia.

Conclusions and Relevance

Hispanic and Black VV-ECMO patients experienced occult hypoxemia more than White patients. SaO2 should be carefully monitored during ECMO support for Black and Hispanic patients especially for those with high pump flow and lactate values at risk for occult hypoxemia.

Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry for Long-Term Oxygen Therapy Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Landmark studies of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) used arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) to define severe hypoxemia; however, oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) is commonly used instead. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines recommend evaluation with arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis if SpO2 is ⩽92%. This recommendation has not been evaluated in stable outpatients with COPD undergoing testing for LTOT. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of SpO2 compared with ABG analysis of PaO2 and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) to detect severe resting hypoxemia in patients with COPD. Methods: Retrospective analysis of paired SpO2 and ABG values from stable outpatients with COPD who underwent LTOT assessment in a single center. We calculated false negatives (FNs) as an SpO2 >88% or >89% in the presence of pulmonary hypertension with a PaO2 ⩽55 mm Hg or ⩽59 mm Hg in the presence of pulmonary hypertension. Test performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), test bias, precision, and accuracy root-mean-square (Arms). An adjusted multivariate analysis was used to evaluate factors affecting SpO2 bias. Results: Of 518 patients, the prevalence of severe resting hypoxemia was 74 (14.3%), with 52 missed by SpO2 (FN, 10%), including 13 (2.5%) with an SpO2 > 92% (occult hypoxemia). FNs and occult hypoxemia in Black patients were 9% and 1.5%, respectively, and were 13% and 5%, respectively, among active smokers. The correlation between SpO2 and SaO2 was acceptable (ICC = 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.81); and the bias of SpO2 was 0.45%, with a precision of 2.6 (-4.65 to +5.55%) and Arms of 2.59. These measurements were similar in Black patients, but in active smokers, correlation was lower and bias showed greater overestimation of SpO2. ROC analysis suggests that the optimal SpO2 cutoff to warrant LTOT evaluation by ABG analysis is ⩽94%. Conclusions: SpO2 as the only measure of oxygenation carries a high FN rate in detecting severe resting hypoxemia in patients with COPD undergoing evaluation for LTOT. Reflex measurement of PaO2 by ABG analysis should be used as recommended by GOLD, ideally at a cutoff higher than an SpO2 ⩽92%, especially in active smokers.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion at the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health

A lack of diversity in genomics for health continues to hinder equitable leadership and access to precision medicine approaches for underrepresented populations. To avoid perpetuating biases within the genomics workforce and genomic data collection practices, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) must be addressed. This paper documents the journey taken by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (a genomics-based standard-setting and policy-framing organization) to create a more equitable, diverse, and inclusive environment for its standards and members. Initial steps include the creation of two groups: the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Advisory Group and the Regulatory and Ethics Diversity Group. Following a framework that we call "Reflected in our Teams, Reflected in our Standards," both groups address EDI at different stages in their policy development process.

Disparities among patients with respiratory failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disparities are common within healthcare, and critical illness is no exception. This review summarizes recent literature on health disparities within respiratory failure, focusing on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and sex.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence indicates that Black patients have higher incidence of respiratory failure, while the relationships among race, ethnicity, and mortality remains unclear. There has been renewed interest in medical device bias, specifically pulse oximetry, for which data demonstrate patients with darker skin tones may be at risk for undetected hypoxemia and worse outcomes. Lower socioeconomic status is associated with higher mortality, and respiratory failure can potentiate socioeconomic inequities via illness-related financial toxicity. Literature on sex-based disparities is limited; however, evidence suggests males receive more invasive care, including mechanical ventilation.

SUMMARY

Most studies focused on disparities in incidence and mortality associated with respiratory failure, but few relied on granular clinical data of patients from diverse backgrounds. Future studies should evaluate processes of care for respiratory failure that may mechanistically contribute to disparities in order to develop interventions that improve outcomes.

Improving pulse oximetry accuracy in dark-skinned patients: technical aspects and current regulations

Recent concerns regarding the clinical accuracy of pulse oximetry in dark-skinned patients, specifically in detecting occult hypoxaemia, have motivated research on this topic and recently reported in this journal. We provide an overview of the technical aspects of the issue, the sources of inaccuracy, and the current regulations and limitations. These insights offer perspectives on how pulse oximetry can be improved to address these potential limitations.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Overestimation of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19

Importance

Many pulse oximeters have been shown to overestimate oxygen saturation in persons of color, and this phenomenon has potential clinical implications. The relationship between overestimation of oxygen saturation with timing of COVID-19 medication delivery and clinical outcomes remains unknown.

Objective

To investigate the association between overestimation of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry and delay in administration of COVID-19 therapy, hospital length of stay, risk of hospital readmission, and in-hospital mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at 186 acute care facilities in the US with at least 1 functional arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measurement between March 2020 and October 2021. A subset of patients were admitted after July 1, 2020, without immediate need for COVID-19 therapy based on pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2 levels of 94% or higher without supplemental oxygen).

Exposures

Self-reported race and ethnicity, difference between concurrent SaO2 and pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) within 10 minutes, and initially unrecognized need for COVID-19 therapy (first SaO2 reading below 94% despite SpO2 levels of 94% or above).

Main Outcome and Measures

The association of race and ethnicity with degree of pulse oximeter measurement error (SpO2 - SaO2) and odds of unrecognized need for COVID-19 therapy were determined using linear mixed-effects models. Associations of initially unrecognized need for treatment with time to receipt of therapy (remdesivir or dexamethasone), in-hospital mortality, 30-day hospital readmission, and length of stay were evaluated using mixed-effects models. All models accounted for demographics, clinical characteristics, and hospital site. Effect modification by race and ethnicity was evaluated using interaction terms.

Results

Among 24 504 patients with concurrent SpO2 and SaO2 measurements (mean [SD] age, 63.9 [15.8] years; 10 263 female [41.9%]; 3922 Black [16.0%], 7895 Hispanic [32.2%], 2554 Asian, Native American or Alaskan Native, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or another race or ethnicity [10.4%], and 10 133 White [41.4%]), pulse oximetry overestimated SaO2 for Black (adjusted mean difference, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.74-1.12] percentage points), Hispanic (0.49 [95% CI, 0.34-0.63] percentage points), and other (0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.72] percentage points) patients compared with White patients. In a subset of 8635 patients with a concurrent SpO2 - SaO2 pair without immediate need for COVID-19 therapy, Black patients were significantly more likely to have pulse oximetry values that masked an indication for COVID-19 therapy compared with White patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33-2.03). Patients with an unrecognized need for COVID-19 therapy were 10% less likely to receive COVID-19 therapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97) and higher odds of readmission (aOR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.39-4.18) regardless of race (P for interaction = .45 and P = .14, respectively). There was no association of unrecognized need for COVID-19 therapy with in-hospital mortality (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-1.01) or length of stay (mean difference, -1.4 days; 95% CI, -3.1 to 0.2 days).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, overestimation of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry led to delayed delivery of COVID-19 therapy and higher probability of readmission regardless of race. Black patients were more likely to have unrecognized need for therapy with potential implications for population-level health disparities.

Pulse oximetry values from 33,080 participants in the Apple Heart & Movement Study

Wearable devices that include pulse oximetry (SpO₂) sensing afford the opportunity to capture oxygen saturation measurements from large cohorts under naturalistic conditions. We report here a cross-sectional analysis of 72 million SpO₂ values collected from 33,080 individual participants in the Apple Heart and Movement Study, stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), home altitude, and other demographic variables. Measurements aggregated by hour of day into 24-h SpO₂ profiles exhibit similar circadian patterns for all demographic groups, being approximately sinusoidal with nadir near midnight local time, zenith near noon local time, and mean 0.8% lower saturation during overnight hours. Using SpO₂ measurements averaged for each subject into mean nocturnal and daytime SpO₂ values, we employ multivariate ordinary least squares regression to quantify population-level trends according to demographic factors. For the full cohort, regression coefficients obtained from models fit to daytime SpO₂ are in close quantitative agreement with the corresponding values from published reference models for awake arterial oxygen saturation measured under controlled laboratory conditions. Regression models stratified by sex reveal significantly different age- and BMI-dependent SpO₂ trends for females compared with males, although constant terms and regression coefficients for altitude do not differ between sexes. Incorporating categorical variables encoding self-reported race/ethnicity into the full-cohort regression models identifies small but statistically significant differences in daytime SpO₂ (largest coefficient corresponding to 0.13% lower SpO₂, for Hispanic study participants compared to White participants), but no significant differences between groups for nocturnal SpO₂. Additional stratified analysis comparing regression models fit independently to subjects in each race/ethnicity group is suggestive of small differences in age- and sex-dependent trends, but indicates no significant difference in constant terms between any race/ethnicity groups for either daytime or nocturnal SpO₂. The large diverse study population and study design employing automated background SpO₂ measurements spanning the full 24-h circadian cycle enables the establishment of healthy population reference trends outside of clinical settings.

The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing and associated risk factors in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure in Mozambique

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in patients with congestive heart failure and has important implications regarding symptoms and prognosis. However, the burden of SDB on those with heart failure has not been well characterized in developing countries, including Mozambique in sub-Saharan Africa. Diagnosing SDB in individuals with congestive heart failure is important because treatment of SDB may improve outcomes.

METHODS

Between September 2014 and April 2017, patients hospitalized in a specialized cardiology unit in Maputo, Mozambique with decompensated congestive heart failure were recruited using convenience sampling. We determined the prevalence of SDB and associated risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were recruited, of which 145 had evaluable sleep study data. The overall prevalence of SDB in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure was 72%, and of these 46% had Cheyne-Stokes respirations. Male sex, higher body mass index, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction were all associated with a higher likelihood of SDB and more severe SDB. Cheyne-Stokes respirations were associated with male sex, lower ejection fraction, and larger left atrial size.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that in sub-Saharan Africa SDB is common in decompensated congestive heart failure and strongly predicted by demographic and echocardiographic parameters. This study highlights the need for the development of diagnostic tools and management strategies for patients with severe heart failure in resource-limited settings.

CITATION

Lo S, Mbanze I, Orr JE, et al. The prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing and associated risk factors in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure in Mozambique. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(6):1103-1110.

Racial and ethnical discrepancy in hypoxemia detection in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Objective

To determine whether there is racial/ethnical discrepancy between pulse oximetry (SpO2) and oxygen saturation (SaO2) in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study at a tertiary academic ECMO center with adults (>18 years) on venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) ECMO. Datapoints were excluded if oxygen saturation ≤70% or SpO2-SaO2 pairs were not measured within 10 minutes. The primary outcome was the presence of a SpO2-SaO2 discrepancy between different races/ethnicities. Bland-Altman analyses and linear mixed-effects modeling, adjusting for prespecified covariates, were used to assess the SpO2-SaO2 discrepancy between races/ethnicities. Occult hypoxemia was defined as SaO2 <88% with a time-matched SpO2 ≥92%.

Results

Of 139 patients receiving VA-ECMO and 57 patients receiving VV-ECMO, we examined 16,252 SpO2-SaO2 pairs. The SpO2-SaO2 discrepancy was greater in VV-ECMO (1.4%) versus VA-ECMO (0.15%). In VA-ECMO, SpO2 overestimated SaO2 in Asian (0.2%), Black (0.94%), and Hispanic (0.03%) patients and underestimated SaO2 in White (-0.06%) and nonspecified race (-0.80%) patients. The proportion of SpO2-SaO2 measurements considered occult hypoxemia was 70% from Black compared to 27% from White patients (P < .0001). In VV-ECMO, SpO2 overestimated SaO2 in Asian (1.0%), Black (2.9%), Hispanic (1.1%), and White (0.50%) patients and underestimated SaO2 in nonspecified race patients (-0.53%). In linear mixed-effects modeling, SpO2 overestimated SaO2 by 0.19% in Black patients (95% confidence interval, 0.045%-0.33%, P = .023). The proportion of SpO2-SaO2 measurements considered occult hypoxemia was 66% from Black compared with 16% from White patients (P < .0001).

Conclusions

SpO2 overestimates SaO2 in Asian, Black, and Hispanic versus White patients, and this discrepancy was greater in VV-ECMO versus VA-ECMO, suggesting the need for physiological studies.

Origins of Racial and Ethnic Bias in Pulmonary Technologies

Understanding how biases originate in medical technologies and developing safeguards to identify, mitigate, and remove their harms are essential to ensuring equal performance in all individuals. Drawing upon examples from pulmonary medicine, this article describes how bias can be introduced in the physical aspects of the technology design, via unrepresentative data, or by conflation of biological with social determinants of health. It then can be perpetuated by inadequate evaluation and regulatory standards. Research demonstrates that pulse oximeters perform differently depending on patient race and ethnicity. Pulmonary function testing and algorithms used to predict healthcare needs are two additional examples of medical technologies with racial and ethnic biases that may perpetuate health disparities.

Overt and Occult Hypoxemia in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19

Progressive hypoxemia is the predominant mode of deterioration in COVID-19. Among hypoxemia measures, the ratio of the Pao2 to the Fio2 (P/F ratio) has optimal construct validity but poor availability because it requires arterial blood sampling. Pulse oximetry reports oxygenation continuously (ratio of the Spo2 to the Fio2 [S/F ratio]), but it is affected by skin color and occult hypoxemia can occur in Black patients. Oxygen dissociation curves allow noninvasive estimation of P/F ratios (ePFRs) but remain unproven.

OBJECTIVES

Measure overt and occult hypoxemia using ePFR.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively studied COVID-19 hospital encounters (n = 5,319) at two academic centers (University of Virginia [UVA] and Emory University).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We measured primary outcomes (death or ICU transfer within 24 hr), ePFR, conventional hypoxemia measures, baseline predictors (age, sex, race, comorbidity), and acute predictors (National Early Warning Score [NEWS] and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA]). We updated predictors every 15 minutes. We assessed predictive validity using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). We quantified disparities (Black vs non-Black) in empirical cumulative distributions using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) two-sample test.

RESULTS

Overt hypoxemia (low ePFR) predicted bad outcomes (AOR for a 100-point ePFR drop: 2.7 [UVA]; 1.7 [Emory]; p < 0.01) with better discrimination (AUROC: 0.76 [UVA]; 0.71 [Emory]) than NEWS (0.70 [both sites]) or SOFA (0.68 [UVA]; 0.65 [Emory]) and similar to S/F ratio (0.76 [UVA]; 0.70 [Emory]). We found racial differences consistent with occult hypoxemia. Black patients had better apparent oxygenation (K-S distance: 0.17 [both sites]; p < 0.01) but, for comparable ePFRs, worse outcomes than other patients (AOR: 2.2 [UVA]; 1.2 [Emory]; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The ePFR was a valid measure of overt hypoxemia. In COVID-19, it may outperform multi-organ dysfunction models. By accounting for biased oximetry as well as clinicians' real-time responses to it (supplemental oxygen adjustment), ePFRs may reveal racial disparities attributable to occult hypoxemia.

Racial Disparity in Oxygen Saturation Measurements by Pulse Oximetry: Evidence and Implications

The pulse oximeter is a ubiquitous clinical tool used to estimate blood oxygen concentrations. However, decreased accuracy of pulse oximetry in patients with dark skin tones has been demonstrated since as early as 1985. Most commonly, pulse oximeters may overestimate the true oxygen saturation in individuals with dark skin tones, leading to higher rates of occult hypoxemia (i.e., clinically unrecognized low blood oxygen saturation). Overestimation of oxygen saturation in patients with dark skin tones has serious clinical implications, as these patients may receive insufficiently rigorous medical care when pulse oximeter measurements suggest that their oxygen saturation is higher than the true value. Recent studies have linked pulse oximeter inaccuracy to worse clinical outcomes, suggesting that pulse oximeter inaccuracy contributes to known racial health disparities. The magnitude of device inaccuracy varies by pulse oximeter manufacturer, sensor type, and arterial oxygen saturation. The underlying reasons for decreased pulse oximeter accuracy for individuals with dark skin tones may be related to failure to control for increased absorption of red light by melanin during device development and insufficient inclusion of individuals with dark skin tones during device calibration. Inadequate regulatory standards for device approval may also play a role in decreased accuracy. Awareness of potential pulse oximeter limitations is an important step for providers and may encourage the consideration of additional clinical information for management decisions. Ultimately, stricter regulatory requirements for oximeter approval and increased manufacturer transparency regarding device performance are required to mitigate this racial bias.

Racial effects on Masimo pulse oximetry: a laboratory study

Recent publications have suggested that pulse oximeters exhibit reduced accuracy in dark-skinned patients during periods of hypoxemia. Masimo SET® (Signal Extraction Technology®) has been designed, calibrated, and validated using nearly equal numbers of dark and light skinned subjects, with the goal of eliminating differences between pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) values due to skin pigmentation. The accuracy concerns reported in dark-skinned patients led us to perform a retrospective analysis of healthy Black and White volunteers. Seventy-five subjects who self-identified as being racially Black or White underwent a desaturation protocol where SaO2 values were decreased from 100 to 70%, while simultaneous SpO2 values were recorded using Masimo RD SET® sensors. Statistical bias (mean difference) and precision (standard deviation of difference) were − 0.20 ± 1.40% for Black and − 0.05 ± 1.35% for White subjects. Plots of SpO2 versus SaO2 show no significant visible differences between races throughout the saturation range from 70 to 100%. Box plots grouped in 1% saturation bins, from 89–96%, and plotted against concomitant SaO2 values, show that occult hypoxemia (SaO2 < 88% when SpO2 = 92–96%) occurred in only 0.2% of White subject data pairs, but not in any Black subjects. There were no clinically significant differences in bias (mean difference of SpO2-SaO2) found between healthy Black and White subjects. Occult hypoxemia was rare and did not occur in Black subjects. Masimo RD SET® can be used with equal assurance in people with dark or light skin. These laboratory results were obtained in well-controlled experimental conditions in healthy volunteers—not reflecting actual clinical conditions/patients.