Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Long-term colchicine for the prevention of vascular recurrent events in non-cardioembolic stroke (CONVINCE): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anti-inflammatory therapy with long-term colchicine prevented vascular recurrence in coronary disease. Unlike coronary disease, which is typically caused by atherosclerosis, ischaemic stroke is caused by diverse mechanisms including atherosclerosis and small vessel disease or is frequently due to an unknown cause. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that long-term colchicine would reduce recurrent events after ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

We did a randomised, parallel-group, open-label, blinded endpoint assessed trial comparing long-term colchicine (0·5 mg orally per day) plus guideline-based usual care with usual care only. Hospital-based patients with non-severe, non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or high-risk transient ischaemic attack were eligible. The primary endpoint was a composite of first fatal or non-fatal recurrent ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or hospitalisation (defined as an admission to an inpatient unit or a visit to an emergency department that resulted in at least a 24 h stay [or a change in calendar date if the hospital admission or discharge times were not available]) for unstable angina. The p value for significance was 0·048 to adjust for two prespecified interim analyses conducted by the data monitoring committee, for which the steering committee and trial investigators remained blinded. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02898610) and is completed.

FINDINGS

3154 patients were randomly assigned between Dec 19, 2016, and Nov 21, 2022, with the last follow-up on Jan 31, 2024. The trial finished before the anticipated number of outcomes was accrued (367 outcomes planned) due to budget constraints attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ten patients withdrew consent for analysis of their data, leaving 3144 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis: 1569 (colchicine and usual care) and 1575 (usual care alone). A primary endpoint occurred in 338 patients, 153 (9·8%) of 1569 patients allocated to colchicine and usual care and 185 (11·7%) of 1575 patients allocated to usual care alone (incidence rates 3·32 vs 3·92 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio 0·84; 95% CI 0·68-1·05, p=0·12). Although no between-group difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) was observed at baseline, patients treated with colchicine had lower CRP at 28 days and at 1, 2, and 3 years (p<0·05 for all timepoints). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in both groups.

INTERPRETATION

Although no statistically significant benefit was observed on the primary intention-to-treat analysis, the findings provide new evidence supporting the rationale for anti-inflammatory therapy in further randomised trials.

FUNDING

Health Research Board Ireland, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation), and Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (Research Foundation Flanders), Belgium.

The impact of colchicine on patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease

Inflammation plays a central role in coronary artery disease (CAD), and recent data have shown that anti-inflammatory drugs have the potential to reduce ischemic events in CAD patients. Colchicine is an ancient anti-inflammatory drug that targets neutrophil and inflammasome activities. It has been prescribed for decades for different rheumatological conditions. Given the important role of inflammation in the development of cardiovascular disease, there has been considerable interest in studying colchicine's potential to limit the progression of atherosclerosis among afflicted patients. In fact, there is a growing body of randomized data suggesting that use of low-dose colchicine reduces the risk of ischemic events in patients with CAD, particularly repeated revascularizations, new myocardial infarctions and strokes. This review article summarizes background information-including possible side effects and contraindications-as well as the current evidence backing up the use of colchicine in patients with established CAD.

A cloud-based medical device for predicting cardiac risk in suspected coronary artery disease: a rapid review and conceptual economic model

Background

The CaRi-Heart® device estimates risk of 8-year cardiac death, using a prognostic model, which includes perivascular fat attenuation index, atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical risk factors.

Objectives

To provide an Early Value Assessment of the potential of CaRi-Heart Risk to be an effective and cost-effective adjunctive investigation for assessment of cardiac risk, in people with stable chest pain/suspected coronary artery disease, undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography. This assessment includes conceptual modelling which explores the structure and evidence about parameters required for model development, but not development of a full executable cost-effectiveness model.

Data sources

Twenty-four databases, including MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and EMBASE, were searched from inception to October 2022.

Methods

Review methods followed published guidelines. Study quality was assessed using Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Results were summarised by research question: prognostic performance; prevalence of risk categories; clinical effects; costs of CaRi-Heart. Exploratory searches were conducted to inform conceptual cost-effectiveness modelling.

Results

The only included study indicated that CaRi-Heart Risk may be predictive of 8 years cardiac death. The hazard ratio, per unit increase in CaRi-Heart Risk, adjusted for smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, Duke index, presence of high-risk plaque features and epicardial adipose tissue volume, was 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.06) in the model validation cohort. Based on Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool, this study was rated as having high risk of bias and high concerns regarding its applicability to the decision problem specified for this Early Value Assessment. We did not identify any studies that reported information about the clinical effects or costs of using CaRi-Heart to assess cardiac risk. Exploratory searches, conducted to inform the conceptual cost-effectiveness modelling, indicated that there is a deficiency with respect to evidence about the effects of changing existing treatments or introducing new treatments, based on assessment of cardiac risk (by any method), or on measures of vascular inflammation (e.g. fat attenuation index). A de novo conceptual decision-analytic model that could be used to inform an early assessment of the cost effectiveness of CaRi-Heart is described. A combination of a short-term diagnostic model component and a long-term model component that evaluates the downstream consequences is anticipated to capture the diagnosis and the progression of coronary artery disease.

Limitations

The rapid review methods and pragmatic additional searches used to inform this Early Value Assessment mean that, although areas of potential uncertainty have been described, we cannot definitively state where there are evidence gaps.

Conclusions

The evidence about the clinical utility of CaRi-Heart Risk is underdeveloped and has considerable limitations, both in terms of risk of bias and applicability to United Kingdom clinical practice. There is some evidence that CaRi-Heart Risk may be predictive of 8-year risk of cardiac death, for patients undergoing computed tomography coronary angiography for suspected coronary artery disease. However, whether and to what extent CaRi-Heart represents an improvement relative to current standard of care remains uncertain. The evaluation of the CaRi-Heart device is ongoing and currently available data are insufficient to fully inform the cost-effectiveness modelling.

Future work

A large (n = 15,000) ongoing study, NCT05169333, the Oxford risk factors and non-invasive imaging study, with an estimated completion date of February 2030, may address some of the uncertainties identified in this Early Value Assessment.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42022366496.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135672) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 31. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Emerging insights into the role of IL-1 inhibitors and colchicine for inflammation control in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a prevalent chronic metabolic disorder, is closely linked to persistent low-grade inflammation, significantly contributing to its development and progression. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the inflammatory mechanisms underlying T2DM, focusing on the role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in mediating inflammatory responses. We discuss the therapeutic potential of IL-1 inhibitors and colchicine, highlighting their mechanisms in inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome and reducing IL-1β production. Recent studies indicate that these agents could effectively mitigate inflammation, offering promising avenues for the prevention and management of T2DM. By exploring the intricate connections between metabolic disturbances and chronic inflammation, this review underscores the need for novel anti-inflammatory strategies to address T2DM and its complications.

Colchicine for the treatment of the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases: current evidence and ongoing perspectives

Colchicine is one of the oldest drugs in medicine. Traditionally used to treat and prevent gouty attacks, it has been introduced into cardiovascular medicine for the treatment and prevention of pericarditis, starting from the positive experience in the treatment and prevention of polyserositis in familial mediterranean fever. Colchicine is a lipophilic drug that enters the cells and is eliminated by glycoprotein P. As granulocytes are lacking in this protein, colchicine is able to concentrate in these cells, exerting a substantial anti-inflammatory action, even with low oral doses. As these cells may trigger acute cardiovascular events, colchicine has been shown to be efficacious and safe to prevent acute coronary syndromes and ischemic stroke with an efficacy comparable to more established treatments, such as antiplatelet agents and statins. On this basis, colchicine seems a promising, efficacious, well tolerated, and cheap option for the prevention of several cardiovascular events, and it may become an additional pillar in the pharmacologic treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Identification of necroptosis-related diagnostic biomarkers in coronary heart disease

Background

The implication of necroptosis in cardiovascular disease was already recognized. However, the molecular mechanism of necroptosis has not been extensively studied in coronary heart disease (CHD).

Methods

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CHD and control samples were acquired in the GSE20681 dataset downloaded from the GEO database. Key necroptosis-related DEGs were captured and ascertained by bioinformatics analysis techniques, including weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and two machine learning algorithms, while single-gene gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed their molecular mechanisms. The diagnostic biomarkers were selected via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Moreover, an analysis of immune elements infiltration degree was carried out. Authentication of pivotal gene expression at the mRNA level was investigated in vitro utilizing quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).

Results

A total of 94 DE-NRGs were recognized here, among which, FAM166B, NEFL, POLDIP3, PRSS37, and ZNF594 were authenticated as necroptosis-related biomarkers, and the linear regression model based on them presented an acceptable ability to different sample types. Following regulatory analysis, the ascertained biomarkers were markedly abundant in functions pertinent to blood circulation, calcium ion homeostasis, and the MAPK/cAMP/Ras signaling pathway. Single-sample GSEA exhibited that APC co-stimulation and CCR were more abundant, and aDCs and B cells were relatively scarce in CHD patients. Consistent findings from bioinformatics and qRT-PCR analyses confirmed the upregulation of NEFL and the downregulation of FAM166B, POLDIP3, and PRSS37 in CHD.

Conclusion

Our current investigation identified 5 necroptosis-related genes that could be diagnostic markers for CHD and brought a novel comprehension of the latent molecular mechanisms of necroptosis in CHD.

Low-dose colchicine for atherosclerosis: long-term safety

Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg daily) is now FDA-approved for secondary prevention in patients with coronary disease and will be increasingly prescribed in clinical practice. In this State-of-the-Art Review, data were collated from contemporary systemic reviews of case reports, drug registries, and placebo-controlled trials that assessed specific issues of safety related to the continuous use of colchicine in a range of clinical settings to inform physicians, pharmacists, and patients of the absolute risks of continuous use of low-dose colchicine, including among individuals taking statin therapy. Based upon these collective data, it is concluded that aside mild diarrhoea on initiation of colchicine that typically subsides in the vast majority of patients within a week of therapy, continuous use of low-dose colchicine is well tolerated and very safe. It does not affect renal, liver, or cognitive function, has no adverse effects on bleeding, wound healing, fertility, or pregnancy, and does not increase risks of cancer, serious infection, or cause-specific mortality. When appropriately prescribed to patients without significant renal or hepatic impairment, reports of myelosuppression, myotoxicity, and serious drug-drug interactions are rare and no more frequent than placebo, including in patients taking statin therapy. Physicians, pharmacists, and patients can be reassured that in the absence of significant renal or hepatic impairment continuous use of low-dose colchicine can be used safely in patients with atherosclerosis for the purpose of reducing cardiovascular risk.

Colchicine for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Potential Global Implementation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Targeting traditional cardiovascular risk factors is effective in reducing recurrent cardiovascular events, yet the presence of residual cardiovascular risk due to underlying systemic inflammation is a largely unaddressed opportunity. This review aims to comprehensively assess the evolving role of colchicine as a therapeutic approach targeting residual inflammatory risk in the context of those with coronary artery disease (CAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Inflammation plays a significant role in promoting atherosclerosis, and targeting anti-inflammatory pathways has the potential to decrease cardiovascular events. Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg/day orally), when added to guideline-directed medical care for CAD, safely decreases major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 31% in stable atherosclerosis patients and 23% in those after recent myocardial infarctions. Meta-analyses of recent randomized control trials further support both the efficacy and safety of colchicine, particularly when added to other standard cardiovascular therapies, including statin therapy. The European Society of Cardiology and other national guidelines endorse the use of low-dose colchicine in patients across the spectrum of CAD. Recently, colchicine was FDA-approved in the United States as the first anti-inflammatory therapy for the reduction of cardiovascular events. In a period of a rising incidence of CAD across the globe, colchicine represents a unique opportunity to decrease MACE due to its large magnitude of benefits and general affordability. However, challenges with drug interactions must be addressed, especially in those regions where HIV, hepatitis, and tuberculosis are prevalent. Colchicine is safe and effective at reducing cardiovascular events across a broad spectrum of coronary syndromes. The ability to simultaneously target traditional risk factors and mitigate residual inflammatory risk marks a substantial advancement in cardiovascular prevention strategies, heralding a new era in the global battle against CAD.

SEA 2024 Standards for Global Control of Vascular Risk

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to the knowledge, prevention and treatment of vascular diseases, which are the leading cause of death in Spain and entail a high degree of disability and health expenditure. Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the associated risk factors. This document summarises the current evidence and includes recommendations for patients with established vascular disease or at high vascular risk: it reviews the symptoms and signs to evaluate, the laboratory and imaging procedures to request routinely or in special situations, and includes the estimation of vascular risk, diagnostic criteria for entities that are vascular risk factors, and general and specific recommendations for their treatment. Finally, it presents aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organisation of a vascular risk consultation.

Update on the Role of Colchicine in Cardiovascular Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the use of colchicine to target inflammation to prevent cardiovascular events among those at-risk for or with established coronary artery disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory drug that reduces cardiovascular events through its effect on the IL-1β/IL-6/CRP pathway, which promotes the progression and rupture of atherosclerotic plaques. Clinical trials have demonstrated that colchicine reduces cardiovascular events by 31% among those with chronic coronary disease, and by 23% among those with recent myocardial infarction. Its ability to dampen inflammation during an acute injury may broaden its scope of use in patients at risk for cardiovascular events after major non-cardiac surgery. Colchicine is an effective anti-inflammatory therapy in the prevention of acute coronary syndrome. Ongoing studies aim to assess when, and in whom, colchicine is most effective to prevent cardiovascular events in patients at-risk for or with established coronary artery disease.

Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Background

Colchicine has shown potential cardioprotective effects owing to its broad anti-inflammatory properties. We performed a meta-analysis to assess its safety and efficacy in secondary prevention in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

We searched Ovid Healthstar, MEDLINE, and Embase (inception to May 2022) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the cardiovascular effects of colchicine compared with placebo or usual care in patients with CAD. Study-level data on efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled using the Peto method. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke.

Results

A total of 8 RCTs were included with a follow-up duration of ≥1 month, comprising a total of 12,151 patients. Compared with placebo or usual care, colchicine was associated with a significant risk reduction in the primary outcome (odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.83, P < 0.0001; I2 = 52%). Risks of MI (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91, P = 0.003; I2 = 33%), stroke (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74, P = 0.001; I2 = 0%), and unplanned coronary revascularization (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.82, P = 0.0001; I2 = 58%) were all reduced in the colchicine group. Rates of CV and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups, but there was an increase in noncardiac deaths with colchicine (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.15, P = 0.01; I2 = 51%). The occurrence of all other adverse events was similar between the two groups, including GI reactions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.20, P = 0.35; I2 = 42%) and infections (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.74; I2 = 53%).

Conclusions

Colchicine therapy may reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events in patients with established CAD; however, there remains a concern about non-CV mortality. Further trials are underway that will shed light on non-CV mortality and colchicine NCT03048825, and NCT02898610.

The role of aspirin, statins, colchicine, and IL-1 inhibitors in prevention of cardiovascular events: a systematic integrative review

CONTEXT

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. As such, an unmet need exists in the primary and secondary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events (CVEs). Specifically, identifying drugs that can reduce the progression of CVD and serious adverse events is much needed. Drugs that work by reducing platelet aggregation, blocking cholesterol formation (3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A [HMG-CoA] reductase inhibitors), and/or blocking inflammation pathways (mainly interleukin-1b [IL-1b]) have been linked to preventing adverse CVEs, including acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin), statins, colchicine, and IL-1 inhibitors (interleukin-1 receptor antagonists). This systematic review aims to provide insight into utilizing these four agents for the primary and/or secondary prevention of CVD.

OBJECTIVES

In this systematic review, we opted to review the efficacy of aspirin, statins, colchicine, and IL-1 inhibitors in the primary and secondary prevention of CVE to provide clinical practitioners with evidence-based practice approaches and determine any unmet needs in their utilization.

METHODS

Between October 1 and 12, 2021, a search was conducted and completed on five databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Biomedical Reference Collection: Comprehensive. A total of 13 researchers (V.A., A.H., S.B., V.G., D.C., C.C., C.B., C.A., S.K., J.H., A.K., S.F., and S.E.) were involved in the search and screening of the articles. Search terms included "aspirin, statins, colchicine, IL-1 inhibitors, and primary, secondary, myocardial infarction (MI)." Inclusion criteria included clinical study design, English language articles, all genders older than 50 years old, and established patient history of CVD, including MI. In addition, articles were excluded if they were animal models, in vitro studies, pharmacokinetic studies, systematic reviews, literature reviews, and studies exploring therapies other than those listed in the inclusion criteria. First, five individuals independently sorted through abstracts or articles based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then, a team of 13 individuals sorted through full-text articles of selected abstracts based on the same criteria. A separate researcher resolved conflicts between the team.

RESULTS

A total of 725 articles were identified from all databases, from which 256 duplicated articles were removed. Thus, a total of 469 articles abstracts were screened, of which 425 articles either did not meet the inclusion criteria or met the exclusion criteria. A total of 42 articles were retrieved and assessed for full-text review, from which 15 articles were retrieved for analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins may prevent primary CVEs based on their role in preventing cholesterol formation. Aspirin, canakinumab, and colchicine may be helpful in the secondary prevention of CVEs due to their blocking of various steps in the inflammation pathway leading to CVD. Future research should primarily focus on the use of canakinumab and colchicine in preventing CVD due to the limited number of studies on these drugs.

Pathogenic pathways and therapeutic targets of inflammation in heart diseases: A focus on Interleukin-1

BACKGROUND

An exuberant and dysregulated inflammatory response contributes to the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

METHODS

This narrative review includes original articles and reviews published over the past 20 years and found through PubMed. The following search terms (or combination of terms) were considered: "acute pericarditis," "recurrent pericarditis," "myocarditis," "cardiac sarcoidosis," "atherosclerosis," "acute myocardial infarction," "inflammation," "NLRP3 inflammasome," "Interleukin-1" and "treatment."

RESULTS

Recent evidence supports the role of inflammation across a wide spectrum of CVDs including myocarditis, pericarditis, inflammatory cardiomyopathies (i.e. cardiac sarcoidosis) as well as atherosclerotic CVD and heart failure. Interleukins (ILs) are the signalling mediators of the inflammatory response. The NACHT, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin-domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome play a key role in producing IL-1β, the prototypical pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in CVDs. Other pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. tumour necrosis factor) have been implicated in cardiac sarcoidosis. As a proof of this, IL-1 blockade has been proven efficacious in pericarditis and chronic coronary syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Tailored strategies aiming at quenching the inflammatory response have emerged as promising to treat CVDs. In this review article, we summarize recent evidence regarding the role of inflammation across a broad spectrum of CVDs. We also review novel evidence regarding targeted therapeutic strategies.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential: implications for the cardiologists

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis, are characterized by somatic gene mutations in bone marrow stem cells, which trigger an inflammatory response influencing the development of associated cardiovascular complications. In recent years, the same mutations were found in individuals with cardiovascular diseases even in the absence of hematological alterations. These genetic events allow the identification of a new entity called 'clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential' (CHIP), as it was uncertain whether it could evolve toward hematological malignancies. CHIP is age-related and, remarkably, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure were frequently reported in these individuals and attributed to systemic chronic inflammation driven by the genetic mutation. We reviewed the connection between clonal hematopoiesis, inflammation, and cardiovascular diseases, with a practical approach to improve clinical practice and highlight the current unmet needs in this area of knowledge.

Safety of colchicine and NSAID prophylaxis when initiating urate-lowering therapy for gout: propensity score-matched cohort studies in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk of adverse events associated with colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prophylaxis when initiating allopurinol for gout.

METHODS

We conducted two matched retrospective cohort studies in linked UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics datasets. Adults initiating allopurinol for gout with (1) colchicine or (2) NSAID prophylaxis were compared with those initiating without prophylaxis, individually matched by age, sex and propensity to receive the relevant prophylaxis. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models investigated associations between colchicine/NSAID and specified adverse events.

RESULTS

13 945 individuals prescribed colchicine were matched to 13 945 with no prophylaxis and 25 980 prescribed NSAID to 25 980 with no prophylaxis. Adverse event incidence rates were <200/10 000 patient-years except diarrhoea (784.4; 95% CI 694.0 to 886.5) and nausea (208.1; 95% CI 165.4 to 261.7) for colchicine and angina for NSAID (466.6; 95% CI 417.2 to 521.8). Diarrhoea (HR 2.22; 95% CI 1.83 to 2.69), myocardial infarction (MI) (1.55; 95% CI 1.10, 2.17), neuropathy (4.75; 95% CI 1.20 to 18.76), myalgia (2.64; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.81), bone marrow suppression (3.29; 95% CI 1.43 to 7.58) and any adverse event (1.91, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.20) were more common with colchicine than no prophylaxis, but not nausea/vomiting (1.34; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.85). Angina (1.60; 95% CI 1.37 to 1.86), acute kidney injury (1.56; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.03), MI (1.89; 95% CI 1.44 to 2.48), peptic ulcer disease (1.67; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.44) and any adverse event (1.63; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.85) were more common with NSAID than without.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events were more common when allopurinol was initiated with prophylaxis, particularly diarrhoea with colchicine. Other events were uncommon, providing reassurance for patients and clinicians to enable shared decision-making.

Colchicine in atrial fibrillation: are old trees in bloom?

Colchicine is a widely used drug that was originally used to treat gout and rheumatic diseases. In recent years, colchicine has shown high potential in the cardiovascular field. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiovascular disease with a high incidence. One of the most frequent complications following cardiovascular surgery is postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), which affects patient health and disease burden. This article reviews the research status of colchicine in AF and summarizes the relevant progress.

Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Among statin-treated patients, inflammation assessed by means of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is a more powerful determinant of cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality than low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Several therapies that target residual inflammatory risk significantly reduce vascular event rates. For coronary artery disease patients already taking guideline-directed medical care, including statins, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg/d orally) has been shown to safely lower major adverse cardiovascular events by 31% among those with stable atherosclerosis and by 23% after recent myocardial infarction. These magnitudes of benefit are larger than those seen in contemporary secondary prevention trials of adjunctive lipid-lowering agents. Low-dose colchicine is contraindicated in patients with significant renal or liver dysfunction and should be temporarily discontinued when taking concomitant agents such as clarithromycin, ketoconazole, and cyclosporine that share metabolism pathways. Lipid lowering and inflammation inhibition are not in conflict but are synergistic. In the future, combined use of aggressive LDL-C-lowering and inflammation-inhibiting therapies may become standard of care for most atherosclerosis patients. In June 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of low-dose colchicine to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and cardiovascular death in adult patients with established atherosclerotic disease or with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Early long-term low-dosage colchicine and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Current evidence on the efficacy and safety of colchicine after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. This study aims to clarify early low-dose long-term colchicine's exact efficacy and safety in AMI patients via more studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of colchicine on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in recent AMI patients from inception to January 29, 2023, without any restriction. Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses to assess the impact of early (≤3 days) long-term (≥1 year) low-dosage (0.5 mg/d) colchicine. Summary estimates were computed using Mantel-Haenszel and reported as risk ratios (RRs) or standard mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Review Manager software was used for the meta-analysis.

Results

Eight studies identified from 564 screened records were analyzed, with 5,872 patients after AMI. The length of follow-up varied from five days to 22.7 months, and 0.5-1.0 mg colchicine was administered daily. In summary, compared to the control group, colchicine reduced the occurrence of MACE (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48-0.67) with 2.99-fold gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with recent AMI. Moreover, the relation referred to a gradual decrease in the occurrence of MACE with a longer follow-up duration (≥1 year) and lower dosage (0.5 mg/d) without leading more gastrointestinal adverse events. Colchicine decreased the follow-up levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD -0.66, 95% CI, -0.98- -0.35) and neutrophils (SMD -0.22, 95% CI, -0.39- -0.55) when the follow-up period was 30 days.

Conclusion

Early long-term low-dose colchicine decreases the risk of MACE via anti-inflammation without leading more gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with AMI.

Novel Anti-Inflammatory Therapies in Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes

Evidence suggests that inflammation plays an important role in atherosclerosis and the consequent clinical presentation, including stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The most essential elements are cytokines, proteins with hormone-like properties that are produced by the immune cells, endothelial cells, platelets, fibroblasts, and some stromal cells. Interleukins (IL-1β and IL-6), chemokines, interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) are the cytokines commonly associated with endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and atherosclerosis. These molecules can be targeted by commonly used therapeutic substances or selective molecules that exert targeted anti-inflammatory actions. The most significant anti-inflammatory therapies are aspirin, statins, colchicine, IL-1β inhibitors, and IL-6 inhibitors, along with novel therapies such as TNF-α inhibitors and IL-1 receptor antagonists. Aspirin and statins are well-established therapies for atherosclerosis and CAD and their pleiotropic and anti-inflammatory actions contribute to their efficacy and favorable profile. Colchicine may also be considered in high-risk patients if recurrent ACS episodes occur when on optimal medical therapy according to the most recent guidelines. Recent randomized studies have also shown that therapies specifically targeting inflammatory interleukins and inflammation can reduce the risk for cardiovascular events, but these therapies are yet to be fully implemented in clinical practice. Preclinical research is also intense, targeting various inflammatory mediators that are believed to be implicated in CAD, namely repeated transfers of the soluble mutant of IFN-γ receptors, NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors, IL-10 delivery by nanocarriers, chemokine modulatory treatments, and reacting oxygen species (ROS) targeting nanoparticles. Such approaches, although intriguing and promising, ought to be tested in clinical settings before safe conclusions can be drawn. Although the link between inflammation and atherosclerosis is significant, further studies are needed in order to elucidate this association and improve outcomes in patients with CAD.

Colchicine enhances β adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilation in men with essential hypertension

AIMS

The aim of this study is to examine whether colchicine improves β adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilation in humans by conducting a double-blinded, placebo-controlled intervention study. Colchicine treatment has known beneficial effects on cardiovascular health and reduces the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Studies in isolated rodent arteries have shown that colchicine can enhance β adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilation, but this has not been determined in humans.

METHODS

Middle-aged men with essential hypertension were randomly assigned firstly to acute treatment with either 0.5 mg colchicine (n = 19) or placebo (n = 12). They were subsequently re-randomized for 3 weeks of treatment with either colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15) followed by a washout period of 48-72 h. The vasodilator responses to isoprenaline, acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were determined as well as arterial pressure, arterial compliance and plasma inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Acute colchicine treatment increased isoprenaline (by 38% for the highest dose) as well as sodium nitroprusside (by 29% main effect) -induced vasodilation but had no effect on the response to acetylcholine. The 3-week colchicine treatment followed by a washout period did not induce an accumulated or sustained effect on the β adrenoceptor response, and there was no effect on arterial pressure, arterial compliance or the level of measured inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

Colchicine acutely enhances β adrenoceptor- and nitric oxide-mediated changes in vascular conductance in humans, supporting that the mechanism previously demonstrated in rodents, translates to humans. The results provide novel translational evidence for a transient enhancing effect of colchicine on β adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilation in humans with essential hypertension.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Preclinical studies in isolated rodent arteries have shown that colchicine can enhance β adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilation. Here we show that this effect of colchicine can be translated to humans. Acute colchicine treatment was found to increase both isoprenaline- and sodium nitroprusside-induced vasodilation. The study provides the first translational evidence for a transient β adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilatory effect of colchicine in humans. The finding of an acute effect suggests that it may be clinically important to maintain an adequate bioavailability of colchicine.

Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Regimens of Colchicine in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Network Meta-analysis of 15 Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Several meta-analyses have investigated the effects of different doses of colchicine in treating coronary artery disease, but all dosing regimens were never compared in a single study. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 3 dosing regimens of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were searched for randomized controlled trials involving different colchicine doses. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs), discontinuation, and hospitalization were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 randomized controlled trial involving 13,539 patients were included. Pooled results calculated with STATA 14.0 showed that low-dose colchicine significantly reduced MACE (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.83), recurrent MI (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.89), stroke (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.23-1.00), and hospitalization (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.85), whereas high and loading doses significantly increased gastrointestinal AEs (RR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.26-6.24) and discontinuation (RR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.07-6.93), respectively. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that 3 dosing regimens did not reduce all-cause and cardiovascular mortality but significantly increased the gastrointestinal AEs, and high dose significantly increased AEs-related discontinuation; loading dose resulted in more discontinuation than low dose. Although differences between 3 dosing regimens of colchicine are not significant, low dose is more effective in reducing MACE, recurrent MI, stroke, and hospitalization than the control, whereas high and loading doses increase gastrointestinal AEs and discontinuation, respectively.

Chalcone: A potential scaffold for NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors

Overactivated NLRP3 inflammasome has been shown to associate with an increasing number of disease conditions. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome results in caspase-1-catalyzed formation of active pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-18) resulting in pyroptosis. The multi-protein composition of the NLRP3 inflammasome and its sensitivity to several damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) make this extensively studied inflammasome an attractive target to treat chronic conditions. However, none of the known NLRP3 inhibitors has been approved for clinical use. Sulfonylurea and covalent inhibitors with electrophilic warhead (Michael acceptor) are among the prominent classes of compounds explored for their NLRP3 inhibitory effects. Chalcone, a small molecule with α, β unsaturated carbonyl group (Michael acceptor), has also been studied as a promising scaffold for the development of NLRP3 inhibitors. Low molecular weight, easy to manipulate lipophilicity and cost-effectiveness have attracted many to use chalcone scaffold for drug development. In this review, we highlight chalcone derivatives with NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitory activities. Recent developments and potential new directions summarized here will, hopefully, serve as valuable perspectives for investigators including medicinal chemists and drug discovery researchers to utilize chalcone as a scaffold for developing novel NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors.

Inflammatory signalling in atrial cardiomyocytes: a novel unifying principle in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology

Inflammation has been implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF), a very common and clinically significant cardiac rhythm disturbance, but its precise role remains poorly understood. Work performed over the past 5 years suggests that atrial cardiomyocytes have inflammatory signalling machinery - in particular, components of the NLRP3 (NACHT-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing 3) inflammasome - that is activated in animal models and patients with AF. Furthermore, work in animal models suggests that NLRP3 inflammasome activation in atrial cardiomyocytes might be a sufficient and necessary condition for AF occurrence. In this Review, we evaluate the evidence for the role and pathophysiological significance of cardiomyocyte NLRP3 signalling in AF. We first summarize the evidence for a role of inflammation in AF and review the biochemical properties of the NLRP3 inflammasome, as defined primarily in studies of classic inflammation. We then briefly consider the broader evidence for a role of inflammatory signalling in heart disease, particularly conditions that predispose individuals to develop AF. We provide a detailed discussion of the available information about atrial cardiomyocyte NLRP3 inflammasome signalling in AF and related conditions and evaluate the possibility that similar signalling might be important in non-myocyte cardiac cells. We then review the evidence on the role of active resolution of inflammation and its potential importance in suppressing AF-related inflammatory signalling. Finally, we consider the therapeutic potential and broader implications of this new knowledge and highlight crucial questions to be addressed in future research.

Advances in the available pharmacotherapy for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

INTRODUCTION

Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), including non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina, represent a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with important socio-economic consequences. NSTEMI accounts for the majority of acute coronary syndromes and usually develops on the background of a nonocclusive thrombus. We searched for relevant literature in the field in PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov as of July 2022.

AREAS COVERED

A number of pharmacotherapies are currently available for treatment and secondary prevention, mainly including antithrombotic, lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs. Pretreatment with aspirin, anticoagulant and statin therapy is of key importance in the preprocedural phase, while pretreating with an oral P2Y12 inhibitor is not routinely indicated in patients undergoing early invasive management. For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, pharmacotherapy essentially consists of antithrombotic drugs, which should be carefully selected. Finally, antithrombotic, lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs are important components of long-term secondary prevention after a NSTE-ACS.

EXPERT OPINION

This article reviews the evidence supporting recommendation on pharmacotherapy in patients presenting with a NSTE-ACS. Several randomized clinical trials are still ongoing and are expected to further inform scientific knowledge and clinical practice, with the final aim to improve the treatment of NSTE-ACS patients.

Intravital Imaging Reveals the Ameliorating Effect of Colchicine in a Photothrombotic Stroke Model via Inhibition of Neutrophil Recruitment

Although post-stroke neutrophil recruitment is known to be deleterious to neural tissues in the peri-infarct area, the precise behavior of recruited neutrophils remains elusive. In this study, potential therapeutic agents for modifying neutrophil behavior in the peri-infarct area were explored through intravital imaging of an experimental stroke mouse model. By applying in vivo 2-photon imaging to study a tightly controlled photothrombotic stroke mouse model, we established a highly sensitive and reproducible method for investigating the temporal dynamics of ischemic brain lesions. Taking advantage of this system, we revealed that neutrophil depletion by a neutrophil-specific antibody ameliorated the expansion of the infarct area, confirming the deleterious effect of neutrophils in the peri-infarct cortex. To identify neutrophil-targeted therapeutic approaches, we screened various agents and found that colchicine and an anti-P-selectin antibody were the most effective in inhibiting neutrophil attachment to the vessel wall in the early phase (6 h post-infarction). Interestingly, further investigation in the later phase (16 h post-infarction) revealed that colchicine potently inhibited neutrophil infiltration into the peri-infarct cortex; however, the anti-P-selectin antibody did not. Subsequent analysis revealed that the effect of the anti-P-selectin antibody against neutrophil attachment to the vessel wall was transient and thus insufficient for mitigating neutrophil infiltration. Finally, we revealed that colchicine treatment effectively ameliorated infarct expansion. In conclusion, we have established an intravital strategy to directly investigate pathophysiology in the ischemic border zone, and found that colchicine administration in the acute phase of ischemic stroke is a potential novel therapeutic strategy.

Drivers of mortality in patients with chronic coronary disease in the low-dose colchicine 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Low-dose colchicine significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary disease. An increase of non-cardiovascular death raised concerns about its safety. This study reports cause-specific mortality and baseline predictors of mortality in the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial.

METHODS

Patients with chronic coronary disease were randomly allocated to colchicine 0.5 mg once daily or placebo on a background of optimal medical therapy. Cause-specific mortality data were analysed, stratified by treatment status. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine the predictors of mortality as well as cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

After a median 28.6 months follow-up, 133 out of 5522 participants (2.4%) died. Forty-five deaths were cardiovascular (colchicine versus placebo: 20 [0.7%] versus 25 [0.9%], HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.44-1.44), while eighty-eight deaths were non-cardiovascular (53 [1.9%] versus 35 [1.3%]; HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.99-2.31). Forty-eight deaths were due to cancer (26 [0.9%] versus 22 [0.8%]), thirteen end-stage pulmonary disease (9 [0.3%] versus 4 [0.1%]), eight infection (4 [0.1%] versus 4 [0.1%]), five dementia (4 [0.1%] versus 1 [0.0%]) and five related multiple organ failure (3 [0.1%] versus 2 [0.1%]). Multivariable analysis demonstrated age > 65 years was the only independent baseline characteristic associated with non-cardiovascular death (HR, 3.65; 95% CI, 2.06-6.47).

CONCLUSIONS

During the LoDoCo2 trial, assignment to colchicine was not associated with an adverse effect on any specific causes of death. Most deaths were related to non-cardiovascular causes, underscoring the importance of comorbidities as drivers of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic coronary disease.

Rationale and design of COLchicine On-admission to Reduce inflammation in Acute Coronary Syndrome (COLOR-ACS) study

AIMS

The aim of the colchicine on-admission to reduce inflammation in acute coronary syndrome (COLOR-ACS) study is to evaluate the effects of the addition of short-term, low-dose colchicine to high-dose atorvastatin in limiting levels of inflammatory markers, such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

METHODS

The COLOR-ACS study is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arm trial. Statin-naive patients with NSTE-ACS, scheduled for an early invasive strategy, are randomized on admission to receive standard treatment of atorvastatin 80 mg or standard treatment plus colchicine (1 mg loading dose followed by 0.5 mg/day until discharge). The main exclusion criteria are prior statin and/or colchicine treatment, current treatment with potent inhibitors of CYP3A4, P-glycoprotein or immunosuppressive drugs, known active malignancy, severe kidney, cardiac, liver disease. There is clinical and biochemical follow-up at 30 days after discharge and telephone interview at 6 months. The primary end point is the change in hs-CRP from admission to discharge. Secondary end points include: incidence of acute kidney injury; MB fraction of creatine kinase peak value; glomerular filtration rate change from baseline to 30 days; persistence of hs-CRP ≥2 mg/dl at 30 days; adverse clinical events within 30 days; tolerance to colchicine.

CONCLUSION

The COLOR-ACS study will provide evidence on the efficacy of early short-term treatment with colchicine in addition to high-dose atorvastatin compared to atorvastatin alone in ACS patients. The potential anti-inflammatory action of colchicine plus atorvastatin is expected to limit hs-CRP increase with resultant clinical benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT05250596.

Potential of immune-related genes as promising biomarkers for premature coronary heart disease through high throughput sequencing and integrated bioinformatics analysis

Background

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common progressive disease that is difficult to diagnose and predict in the young asymptomatic period. Our study explored a mechanistic understanding of the genetic effects of premature CHD (PCHD) and provided potential biomarkers and treatment targets for further research through high throughput sequencing and integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Methods

High throughput sequencing was performed among recruited patients with PCHD and young healthy individuals, and CHD-related microarray datasets were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by using R software. Enrichment analysis and CIBERSORT were performed to explore the enriched pathways of DEGs and the characteristics of infiltrating immune cells. Hub genes identified by protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks were used to construct the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks. Potential drugs were predicted by using the Drug Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb).

Results

A total of 35 DEGs were identified from the sequencing dataset and GEO database by the Venn Diagram. Enrichment analysis indicated that DEGs are mostly enriched in excessive immune activation pathways and signal transduction. CIBERSORT exhibited that resting memory CD4 T cells and neutrophils were more abundant, and M2 macrophages, CD8 T cells, and naïve CD4 T cells were relatively scarce in patients with PCHD. After the identification of 10 hub gens, three ceRNA networks of CD83, CXCL8, and NR4A2 were constructed by data retrieval and validation. In addition, CXCL8 might interact most with multiple chemical compounds mainly consisting of anti-inflammatory drugs.

Conclusions

The immune dysfunction mainly contributes to the pathogenesis of PCHD, and three ceRNA networks of CD83, CXCL8, and NR4A2 may be potential candidate biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment targets of PCHD.

The Role of Colchicine in Atherosclerosis: From Bench to Bedside

Inflammation is a key feature of atherosclerosis. The inflammatory process is involved in all stages of disease progression, from the early formation of plaque to its instability and disruption, leading to clinical events. This strongly suggests that the use of anti-inflammatory agents might improve both atherosclerosis progression and cardiovascular outcomes. Colchicine, an alkaloid derived from the flower Colchicum autumnale, has been used for years in the treatment of inflammatory pathologies, including Gout, Mediterranean Fever, and Pericarditis. Colchicine is known to act over microtubules, inducing depolymerization, and over the NLRP3 inflammasome, which might explain its known anti-inflammatory properties. Recent evidence has shown the therapeutic potential of colchicine in the management of atherosclerosis and its complications, with limited adverse effects. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge regarding colchicine mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics, as well as the available evidence on the use of colchicine for the treatment of coronary artery disease, covering basic, translational, and clinical studies.

Targeting Microtubules for the Treatment of Heart Disease

Heart disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. With the advancement of modern technology, the role(s) of microtubules in the pathogenesis of heart disease has become increasingly apparent, though currently there are limited treatments targeting microtubule-relevant mechanisms. Here, we review the functions of microtubules in the cardiovascular system and their specific adaptive and pathological phenotypes in cardiac disorders. We further explore the use of microtubule-targeting drugs and highlight promising druggable therapeutic targets for the future treatment of heart diseases.

SEA 2022 Standards for Global Control of Cardiovascular Risk

One of the objectives of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis is to contribute to better knowledge of vascular disease, its prevention and treatment. It is well known that cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in our country and entail a high degree of disability and health care costs. Arteriosclerosis is a multifactorial disease and therefore its prevention requires a global approach that takes into account the different risk factors with which it is associated. Therefore, this document summarizes the current level of knowledge and includes recommendations and procedures to be followed in patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high vascular risk. Specifically, this document reviews the main symptoms and signs to be evaluated during the clinical visit, the laboratory and imaging procedures to be routinely requested or requested for those in special situations. It also includes vascular risk estimation, the diagnostic criteria of the different entities that are cardiovascular risk factors, and makes general and specific recommendations for the treatment of the different cardiovascular risk factors and their final objectives. Finally, the document includes aspects that are not usually referenced in the literature, such as the organization of a vascular risk consultation.

Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Colchicine has become prominent as an anti-inflammatory therapy for secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine in patients with CAD.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between patients with CAD randomised to colchicine versus placebo (or no colchicine) were included. Random effect risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 12,071 patients in seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo or no colchicine, colchicine was associated with a significantly lower incidence of MACEs (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80, p<0.01). The reduction in MACEs in the colchicine group was driven by statistically significant reductions in the incidence of myocardial ischaemia (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95, p=0.02), coronary revascularisation (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p=0.01), and stroke (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.83, p=0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference for cardiovascular death (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.22, p=0.33). All-cause and non-cardiovascular mortality, gastrointestinal events, infection, and cancer were not significantly different between the colchicine and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine is a reasonably efficacious and safe drug that could be successfully utilised for the secondary prevention of CAD.

Inflammation as a mechanism and therapeutic target in peripheral artery disease

Peripheral artery disease is one of three major clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis, the other two being coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease. Despite progress in surgery, antithrombotic therapy and therapies that modify conventional risk factors (lipid-, blood pressure-, and glucose-lowering interventions), patients with peripheral artery disease have unacceptably high risk of vascular complications. Additional strategies to reduce this residual risk are needed. The accumulated evidence that inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis has spurred recent efforts to evaluate anti-inflammatory agents as an additional therapeutic approach for atherothrombosis prevention and treatment. In this review, we examine the evidence supporting the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis, review recent trials evaluating anti-inflammatory approaches to reduce cardiovascular complications, and offer insights into the opportunities for novel anti-inflammatory strategies to reduce the burden of cardiovascular and limb complications in patients with peripheral artery disease.

A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Colchicine Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Evidence from recent studies has shown the benefits of colchicine for patients with coronary artery disease. The aim was to assess the effect of colchicine treatment on cardiovascular events, with an estimation of the risk of discontinuation and net clinical benefit.

Methods and Results: Fourteen trials with a total of 13,186 patients were selected through a systematic search. Colchicine therapy significantly reduced the relative risk of primary endpoint by about 30% [RR 0.70 (95%CI:0.56–0.88)]. Compared with placebo, colchicine significantly reduced the risk of ischemia-driven revascularization [RR 0.57 (95%CI 0.41–0.80)], ischemia-driven revascularization and resuscitation [RR 0.50 (95%CI 0.34–0.73)], myocardial infarction [RR 0.73 (95%CI 0.57–0.95)], and stroke [RR 0.49 (95%CI 0.30–0.7)]. Patients treated with colchicine in comparison with placebo have a significant increase in the risk of treatment cessation (RR 1.60 95%CI 1.06–2.42). However, in the analysis which excluded studies without placebo, the relative risk of discontinuation was smaller (RR 1.34 95%CI 0.97–1.84) and in the three largest studies, the risk of discontinuation was lower and insignificant [RR 1.26 (95%CI 0.87–1.83)]. The net clinical benefit was 17.8/1,000 patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In coronary artery disease, low-dose colchicine significantly reduces the risk of the primary composite endpoint by about 30%. The drug should be considered as part of the preventive treatment in patients with good tolerance.

Emerging Anti-Atherosclerotic Therapies

Cardiovascular disease (CAD) is the main cause of morbidity and deaths in the western world. The development of atherosclerosis underlying CAD development begins early in human life. There are numerous genetic and environmental risk factors accelerating its progression which then leads to the occurrence of acute events. Despite considerable progress in determining risk factors, there is still a lot of work ahead since identified determinants are responsible only for a part of overall CAD risk. Current therapies are insufficient to successfully reduce the risk of atherosclerosis development. Therefore, there is a need for effective preventive measures of clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis since the currently available drugs cannot prevent the occurrence of even 70% of clinical events. The shift of the target from lipid metabolism has opened the door to many new therapeutic targets. Currently, the majority of known targets for anti-atherosclerotic drugs focus also on inflammation (a common mediator of many risk factors), mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity in atherosclerosis, molecule scavengers, etc. The therapeutic potential of cyclodextrins, protein kinase inhibitors, colchicine, inhibitors of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), lipid dicarbonyl scavengers, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1β, and P-selectin inhibitors is still not fully confirmed and requires confirmation in large clinical trials. The preliminary results look promising.

Safety and Efficacy of Colchicine in Patients with Stable CAD and ACS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence from recent trials has shown conflicting results in terms of the utility of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

Multiple databases were queried to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the merits of colchicine in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable CAD. The pooled relative risk ratio (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), its components, and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events were computed using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs comprising a total of 12,761 patients were identified. At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was a significantly lower risk of MACE [RR 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-96], ACS (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.96), ischemic stroke (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81), and need for revascularization (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-90) in patients receiving colchicine compared with placebo. A subgroup analysis based on the clinical presentation showed that the significantly lower incidence of MACE and stroke were driven by the patients presenting with ACS. The use of colchicine in patients with stable CAD did not reduce the incidence of MACE (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-1.09), ACS (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.25-1.08), or stroke (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.33-1.13). There was no significant difference in the relative risk of cardiac arrest, ACS, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality between the two groups in both ACS and stable CAD populations. The risk of GI adverse events was significantly higher in patients receiving colchicine (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.12-3.95).

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with ACS, low-dose colchicine might reduce the incidence of MACE, stroke, and the need for revascularization at long follow-up durations. Colchicine might offer no benefits in reducing the risk of ischemic events in patients with stable angina.

Persistent inflammatory residual risk despite aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapy: what is next?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To briefly summarize recently published evidence on the possible therapeutic modulation of inflammatory processes in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), focusing on the rationale for an additional randomized clinical trial, targeting both persistently elevated cholesterol and inflammatory residual risk and critically discuss still open issues and future perspectives with regard to treatment allocation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several large-scale clinical trials over the past few years have advanced our understanding of the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis, demonstrating that targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome and the IL-1β pathway indeed represent a new avenue to reduce residual risk in patients with ASCVD. However, despite optimal lipid-lowering therapy and novel options to modulate residual inflammatory risk, there are still a large number of individuals, being at high risk for recurrent ASCVD events.

SUMMARY

The integration of a dual target strategy aimed at lowering the inflammatory burden in combination with aggressive lipid-modifying for those at high/very high ASCVD risk may hold potential to significantly improve patient care. However, a number of questions related to the design of such 2 × 2 factorial trial still needs to be answered.

Relationship of serial hsCRP changes to long-term clinical outcomes in stabilized post myocardial infarction patients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the association between serial hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) measurements and long-term outcomes in post-myocardial infarction(MI) patients. We aimed to investigate the usefulness of serial hsCRP measurements for risk stratification in stabilized post-MI patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 1,018 patients who had hsCRP values at both baseline and 1 year following MI were included. High inflammatory status was defined as an hsCRP>2 mg/L. Patients were classified into four groups: persistently low, falling (first high then low hsCRP), rising (first low then high hsCRP), or persistently high hsCRP. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: a composite of all-cause of death, MI, and cerebrovascular accident) within 4 years after the second hsCRP measurement.

RESULTS

At 1 year after MI, the number of patients in the persistently low, falling, rising, and persistently high hsCRP groups was 394(38.7%),358(35.2%),69(6.8%), and 197(19.4%), respectively. The incidence of MACCE was progressively elevated from the persistently low to the falling, rising, and persistently high hsCRP groups.(respectively,4.8%,8.1%,10.1%, and 13.2%; p=0.004). Persistently high hsCRP was an independent predictor of MACCE (adjusted hazard ratio:2.55; 95% confidence interval:1.35 to 4.81; p=0.004) and provided incremental prognostic value beyond that of the baseline clinical risk model (NRI=0.397, IDI=0.025, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among stabilized post-MI patients who underwent PCI, persistently high hsCRP was frequently seen 1 year after MI and was strongly associated with long-term adverse clinical outcomes. Serial measurements of hsCRP during clinical follow-up after MI may help to identify patients at higher risk for mortality and morbidity.

Repurposing Colchicine for Heart Disease

Colchicine is one of the most ancient medications still prescribed. It is extracted from the Colchicum autumnale plant and is routinely used because of its broad anti-inflammatory properties to treat gout and familial Mediterranean fever. Colchicine has shown efficacy in various clinical settings in which inflammation is a key component, and it has become first-line therapy for acute and recurrent pericarditis. Two landmark clinical trials have recently shown that colchicine significantly improves cardiovascular outcomes on background statin and antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease, supporting its role for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. Favorable results have also emerged in atrial fibrillation. We herein briefly review the most recent data related to the multiple cardiovascular conditions for which colchicine has been successfully repurposed. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Volume 62 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Colchicine Use and Risks of Stroke Recurrence in Acute Non-Cardiogenic Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: The objective is to study whether the cardiovascular protective effects of colchicines could be applied to non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke (IS) patients. Patients and Methods: Non-cardiogenic IS patients were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Eligible patients were divided into chronic and non-chronic use categories based on their long-term status of colchicine use. The non-chronic use category was subdivided into (1) non-user and (2) new user groups while the chronic use category was divided into (3) former user and (4) long-term user groups according to the patient's recent status of colchicine use. Inverse probability of treatment weights for propensity scores was used to balance the baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was recurrent IS, which was compared within the non-chronic use and chronic use categories. Results: In the non-chronic use category, the number of patients was 355,498 and 912 in the non-user and new user groups, respectively. In the chronic use category, the number of patients was 4737 and 4354 in the former user and long-term user groups, respectively. In the non-chronic use category, patients in the new user group had a marginally lower risk of recurrent IS at 6-months (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.97) and 2-years (SHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.91-0.93) follow up. In the chronic use category, patients in the long-term user group also had a marginally lower risk of recurrent IS at 6-months (SHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88) and 2-years (SHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88) follow up. The effect of colchicine on the reduced risk of recurrent IS was more favorable in patients who also used statins. Conclusions: Recent colchicine use in acute non-cardiogenic IS patients is associated with marginal fewer incidences of recurrent IS. Patients with concurrent statin use may have more profound protective effects.

Antirheumatic drugs for cardiovascular disease prevention: the case for colchicine

We summarised four pivotal Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) with antirheumatic drugs on the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. The favourable effects of canakinumab and colchicine confirm (low-grade) inflammation as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. While colchicine might be the first drug in the clinic, we expect that this is only the first in a future series of anti-inflammatory drugs used in secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.