Benefits of LAMA in patients with asthma-COPD overlap: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Inhaled corticosteroids on mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on mortality in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of COVID-19 with ICS were reviewed. Studies were pooled to risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven RCTs (enrolling 5832 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in COVID-19-related death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38-2.04), all-cause death (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.49-2.23), and invasive ventilation (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.60-2.62) between the two groups. ICS was not associated with reduced mortality and invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19.

Asthma Management Considerations for the Otolaryngologist: Current Therapies

Asthma is frequently comorbid with chronic rhinosinusitis. First-line pharmacologic intervention for asthma includes combination-inhaled corticosteroids with a long-acting-β-agonist, preferably formoterol. Although short-acting-β-agonists have historically been used as sole rescue option, studies show that this approach can lead to more asthma-related exacerbations and greater mortality. Similarly, oral corticosteroids should be used sparingly due to their significant adverse effect profile. Nonpharmacological interventions for asthma include counseling on modifiable risk factors, such as smoking, physical activity, occupational exposures, and healthy diets. Management of patients with unified airway disease should incorporate a multidisciplinary team consisting of otolaryngologists and asthma specialists.

Long-term safety of macitentan in patients with pulmonary hypertension: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Macitentan has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), but its safety, especially for long-term use, needs to be further explored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety of long-term use of macitentan in patients with PH.

METHODS

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of PH with macitentan, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Estimated effects of included studies were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Six RCTs (enrolling 1003 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Anaemia (RR 3.86, 95% CI 2.05-7.30), headache (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.02-2.26) and bronchitis (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.30-3.87) were more frequent in the macitentan groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE), AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment, all-cause death, right ventricular failure (RVF) and peripheral oedema between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term use of macitentan is safe for patients with PH, although with a higher risk of anaemia, headache and bronchitis.

Benefits of ozone on mortality in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, and the death toll continues to surge. Ozone therapy has long been used in the treatment of a variety of infectious diseases, probably through its antioxidant properties and the supply of oxygen to hypoxic tissues. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of ozone on mortality in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Prospective controlled trials on treatment of COVID-19 with ozone, compared with placebo or blank, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eight trials (enrolling 371 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Ozone therapy showed significant effects on mortality (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.85; P = 0.02), length of hospital stay (WMD -1.63 days, 95% CI -3.05 to -0.22 days; P = 0.02), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.34; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ozone therapy significantly reduced mortality, PCR positivity, and length of stay in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Ozone therapy should be considered for COVID-19 patients.

Anakinra was not associated with lower mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, and the death toll continues to surge. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of anakinra on mortality in patients with COVID-19. A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials on treatment of COVID-19 with anakinra, compared with placebo or blank, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five Randomized controlled trials (enrolling 1859 participants) met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in 14-day mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.43-1.39; P = 0.40), 28-day mortality (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.89-1.26; P = 0.51), and 90-day mortality (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.73-1.39; P = 0.97) between the two groups. Sensitivity analyses further confirmed these results. Anakinra was not associated with reduced mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Anakinra probably should not be used routinely in COVID-19 patients.

Selexipag in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Despite the availability of treatments for all subgroups of pulmonary hypertension (PH), the prognosis for PH remains poor. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of selexipag in patients with PH. A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of PH with selexipag, compared with placebo or blank, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Selexipag was safe and significantly improved hospitalization for worsening of PH, WHO FC, mPAP, NT-proBNP, and cardiac index in patients with PH. Selexipag should be considered in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic PH.

Benefits of plasma exchange on mortality in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic continues, and the death toll continues to surge. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on mortality in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. Controlled clinical trials on treatment of COVID-19 with TPE, compared with standard of care, were reviewed. Studies were pooled according to risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of six trials (enrolling 343 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Therapeutic plasma exchange showed significant effect on mortality (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.69; P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSION

TPE significantly reduced mortality in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-critical COVID-19. Plasma exchange therapy should be considered for patients with COVID-19.

Pharmacologic Management Strategies of Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap

The best therapeutic approach to patients with asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) is unknown. Current treatment recommendations rely on expert opinions, roundtable discussions, and strategy documents, because patients with ACO have been excluded from most clinical studies in asthma and COPD. Because of the underlying asthma initial therapy, early use of inhaled corticosteroids along with a long-acting bronchodilator is recommended. If maintenance inhaler therapy is not effective, advanced therapies based on phenotyping and identification of treatable traits may be considered.