Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for T1-T2N0 Small Cell Carcinoma According to Addition of Chemotherapy and Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation: A Multicenter Analysis

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

Hyperfractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy based on hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) is the first-line recommended regimen for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is also regarded as an effective treatment for limited-stage (LS) SCLC, and the efficacy and safety of HART versus SBRT stay controversial.

METHODS

In this study, 188 LS-SCLC patients were retrospectively divided into two groups receiving chemotherapy combined with either HART or SBRT. In HART group, patients received 4500 cGy in 30 fractions, administered twice daily for 3 weeks. Whereas in the SBRT group, a total radiation dose of 4000-4500 cGy was delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. Thirty-three pairs of patients were finally included for next analysis.

RESULTS

The estimated objective response rates were 63.6 % (21/33) and 78.8 % (26/33) in HART group and SBRT group, respectively (P = 0.269). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between HART and SBRT groups in overall survival (26 months vs. 29 months, P = 0.362) and progression free survival (11 months vs. 15 months, P = 0.223). As for the adverse events, toxicity of both groups is similar and slight that no grade 4 event was observed. Grade 3 pneumonitis cases were all occurred in the HART group (9.1%, 3/33, P = 0.238), and grade 3 esophagitis cases were all occurred in the SBRT group (6.1%, 2/33, P = 0.492).

CONCLUSION

Compared with HART, SBRT could be another effective treatment with satisfactory safety for the concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with LS-SCLC.

SEOM-GECP Clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (2022)

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy comprising approximately 15% of lung cancers. Only one-third of patients are diagnosed at limited-stage (LS). Surgical resection can be curative in early stages, followed by platinum-etoposide adjuvant therapy, although only a minority of patients with SCLC qualify for surgery. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard of care for LS-SCLC that is not surgically resectable, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for patients without progression. For extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC, a combination of platinum and etoposide has historically been a mainstay of treatment. Recently, the efficacy of programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has become the new front-line standard of care for ES-SCLC. Emerging knowledge regarding SCLC biology, including genomic characterization and molecular subtyping, and new treatment approaches will potentially lead to advances in SCLC patient care.

Stereotactic body proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical indications and recommendations

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a standard treatment approach for early-stage lung cancer and intrathoracic oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. While local control is often excellent with this modality when delivered with photon therapy, toxicities for select patients can be significant. Proton therapy offers a unique opportunity to widen the therapeutic window when treating patients with thoracic malignancies requiring or benefitting from ultra-high doses per fraction. Thoracic proton SBRT may be particularly beneficial in cases requiring dose escalation, for tumors >5 cm, for central or ultra-central tumors, for reirradiation, in patients with interstitial lung diseases, and when combining radiation with immunotherapy. These clinical indications are detailed, along with supporting literature and clinical recommendations. Other considerations, future directions and potential benefits of proton SBRT, including sparing lymphocytes, when delivered as intensity-modulated proton therapy or as FLASH, and for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer or in patients with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, are also discussed.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Very Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (VLS-SCLC)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumour with metastatic propensity. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging therapeutic option for SCLC, despite limited supporting evidence. By evaluating the use of SBRT in very limited stage (VLS) SCLC at our institution, we aimed to contribute to the existing knowledge in this area while establishing a basis for further research. We performed a retrospective review of all cases of VLS-SCLC treated with SBRT between 2013 and 2020. Baseline demographics, diagnostic, and treatment information were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). We identified 46 patients with pathologically confirmed VLS-SCLC; 25 were treated with SBRT, and the remainder received either surgery, conventional radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or palliative-intent therapy. After a median follow-up of 23.7 months, 44% of the patients had died; the median OS was of 24.4 months for the SBRT cohort and 67.0 months for the curative intent non-SBRT cohort. The difference in disease recurrence and survival between cohorts was underpowered and not statistically significant. Higher baseline ECOG and comorbidity was noted in the SBRT cohort.

New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer

The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.

Radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer in current clinical practice guidelines

Several guidelines including radiotherapy recommendations exist worldwide for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To evaluate the differences in radiotherapy recommendations we conducted a systematic review. PubMed and the sites of medical societies were searched for SCLC guidelines published in either English, Chinese, or Dutch. This was limited to January 2018 till February 2021 to only include up-to-date recommendations. Data was extracted and compared regarding the guideline's development method and radiotherapy recommendations. Eleven guidelines were identified (PubMed n=4, societies n=7) from Spain (n=1), Canada (n=1), America (n=3), United Kingdom (n=1), the Netherlands (n=1), and China (n=3), respectively. Nine guidelines assessed the strength of evidence (SOE) and specified the strength of recommendation (SOR), although methods were different. The major radiotherapy recommendations are similar although differences exist in thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose, time, and volume. Controversial areas are TRT in resected stage I-IIA (pN1), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in resected as well as unresected stage I-IIA, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in unresected stage I-IIA, PCI time, and PCI versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance in stage IV. The existence of several overlapping guidelines for SCLC treatment indicates that guideline development is (unnecessarily) repeated by different organizations or societies. Improvement could be made by better international collaboration to avoid duplicating unnecessary work, which would spare a lot of time and resources. Efforts should be made to work together on controversial or unknown fields.

Wedge Resection vs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Whether wedge resection or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has better effectiveness in treatment of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unclear. Here we conducted the first meta-analysis to directly compare the survival outcomes of clinical stage I NSCLCs treated with wedge resection and SBRT.

Methods

We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Embase, and Corchrane Library up to October 1, 2021. Data for analysis mainly included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), which were obtained directly from the text results or calculated from the Kaplan–Meier survival curve. We used the standard random-effect model test (DerSimonian and Laird method) to analyze the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Q-test and I2-test were used to assess heterogeneity. The stability of pooled HRs was examined by sensitivity analysis.

Results

Six retrospective studies with a total of 11,813 clinical stage I NSCLCs who received wedge resection or SBRT were included. The results showed that patients receiving wedge resection had a significantly better OS (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = [1.07, 1.34], P = 0.002) than those with SBRT, but no significant difference of DFS (HR 1.53, 95% CI = [0.83–2.83], P = 0.17) was observed. There was no significant heterogeneity during our analysis, but there may be potential publication bias among these studies.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis showed that clinical stage I NSCLCs treated with wedge resection had superior OS than those treated with SBRT. However, more prospective clinical trials should be well-designed to evaluate the optimal treatment modality of early-stage NSCLCs.

Radiation and Systemic Therapy for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Progress in the overall treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has moved at a slower pace than non-small-cell lung cancer. In fact, the standard treatment regimen for limited stage SCLC has not appreciably shifted in more than 20 years, consisting of four to six cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for responsive disease. Nevertheless, long-term outcomes have improved with median survival approaching 25-30 months, and approximately one third of patients now survive 5 years. This is likely attributable in part to improvements in staging, including use of brain magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging, advances in radiation treatment planning, and supportive care. The CONVERT and CALGB 30610 phase III trials failed to demonstrate a survival advantage for high-dose, once-daily TRT compared with standard 45 Gy twice-daily TRT, although high-dose, once-daily TRT remains common in practice. A phase III comparison of high-dose 60 Gy twice-daily TRT versus 45 Gy twice-daily TRT aims to confirm the provocative outcomes reported with 60 Gy twice daily in the phase II setting. Efforts over time have shifted from intensifying PCI, to attempting to reduce treatment-related neurotoxicity, to more recently questioning whether careful magnetic resonance imaging surveillance may obviate the routine need for PCI. The addition of immunotherapy has resulted in mixed success in extensive-stage SCLC with modest benefit observed with programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors, and several ongoing trials assess programmed death-ligand 1 inhibition concurrent or adjuvant to chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage SCLC. Major advances in future treatment will likely depend on a better understanding and exploiting of molecular characteristics of SCLC with increasing personalization of therapy.

Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Progress and the Next Frontier

Limited-stage (LS) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is defined as disease confined to a tolerable radiation portal without extrathoracic metastases. Despite clinical research over two decades, the prognosis of LS-SCLC patients remains poor. The current standard of care for LS-SCLC patients is concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy (RT). Widespread heterogeneity on the optimal radiation dose and fractionation regimen among physicians highlights the logistical challenges of administering BID regimens. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended to patients following a good initial response to chemoradiation due to improved overall survival from historical trials and the propensity for LS-SCLC to recur with brain metastases. However, PCI utilization is being debated due to the greater availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and data in extensive-stage SCLC regarding close MRI surveillance in lieu of PCI while spurring novel RT techniques, such as hippocampal-avoidance PCI. Additionally, novel treatment combinations incorporating targeted small molecule therapies and immunotherapies with or following radiation for LS-SCLC have seen recent interest and some concepts are being investigated in clinical trials. Here, we review the landscape of progress, limitations, and challenges for LS-SCLC including current standard of care, novel radiation techniques, and the integration of novel therapeutic strategies for LS-SCLC.

Stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy for reirradiation of small volume head and neck cancers is associated with prolonged survival: Large, single-institution, modern cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recurrent head and neck cancer has poor prognosis. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may improve outcomes by delivering ablative radiation doses.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who received definitive-intent SBRT reirradiation at our institution from 2013 to 2020. Patterns of failure, overall survival (OS), and toxicities were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-seven patients were evaluated. The median OS was 44.3 months. The median SBRT dose was 45 Gy and median target volume 16.9 cc. The 1-year local, regional, and distant control was 78%, 66%, and 83%, respectively. Systemic therapy improved regional (p = 0.004) and distant control (p = 0.04) in nonmetastatic patients. Grade 3+ toxicities were more common at mucosal sites (p = 0.001) and with concurrent systemic therapy (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of SBRT reirradiation for recurrent, small volume head and neck cancers, a median OS of 44.3 months was observed. Systemic therapy improved regional and distant control. Toxicities were modulated by anatomic site and systemic therapy.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is used to treat inoperable early-stage, node-negative small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on SABR for T1-2N0M0 SCLC to summarize outcomes including local control (LC), overall survival (OS), recurrence rates, and toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE (inception to April 2021) was conducted. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extracted study-level data. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 3.6.2) at a significance threshold of 0.05.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were identified in the systematic review and seven (399 patients) were selected for meta-analysis. Inoperability was noted as the indication for SABR in 94% (75-100%) of patients. Median follow-up and tumor size were 19.5 months (11.9-32) and 24 mm (19-29), respectively. Chemotherapy and PCI use rates were 44.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-61.9%) and 13.8% (95% CI, 0.4-41.2%), respectively. Local control was 97.3% (95% CI, 92.3-99.8%) at 1 year and 95.7% (95% CI, 74.2-100.0%) at 2 years. Overall survival was 86.3% (95% CI, 74.4-94.9%) at 1 year and 63.7% (95% CI, 45.7-79.9%) at 2 years. Nodal and distant recurrence rates were 17.8% (95% CI, 7.5-31.2%) and 26.9% (95% CI, 7.4-53.0%), respectively. The rates of grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 toxicity (CTCAE) were 12.6% (95% CI, 6.7-19.9%), 6.7% (95% CI, 3.3-11.2%), and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.0-5.3%), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 events were observed across the studies.

CONCLUSION

SABR for inoperable early-stage, node-negative SCLC is locally effective with limited toxicity. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate the role of SABR for patients at higher risk of toxicity with surgery or combined chemoradiation.

The current role of surgery and SBRT in early stage of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Early stage small cell lung cancer (T1-2N0M0SCLC) represents 7% of all SCLC. The standard treatment in patients with intrathoracic SCLC disease is the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Nowadays, the recommended management of this highly selected group is surgical resection due to favorable survival outcomes. For medically inoperable patients or those who refuse surgery, there is an increasing interest in evaluating the role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1-2N0SCLC, transferring the favorable experience obtained on inoperable NSCLC (Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer). In the era of multimodality treatment, adjuvant systemic therapy plays an important role even in the management of early SCLC, increasing the disease-free survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The benefit of Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI), that currently has a Category I recommendation for localized stage SLCL, remains controversial in this selected subgroup of patients due to the lower risk of brain metastasis.

AIM

This review summarizes the most relevant data on the local management of T1-2N0M0SCLC (surgery and radiotherapy), and evaluates the relevance of adjuvant treatment.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Provides a critical evaluation of best current clinical management options for T1-2N0M0 SCLC.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria: Radiation Therapy for Limited-Stage SCLC 2020

INTRODUCTION

Combined modality therapy with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation has long been the standard of care for limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC). However, there is controversy over best combined modality practices for LS-SCLC. To address these controversies, the American Radium Society (ARS) Thoracic Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) Committee have developed updated consensus guidelines for the treatment of LS-SCLC.

METHODS

The ARS AUC are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guidelines include a review and analysis of current evidence with application of consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of treatments recommended by the panel for LS-SCLC. Agreement or consensus was defined as less than or equal to 3 rating points from the panel median. The consensus ratings and recommendations were then vetted by the ARS Executive Committee and subject to public comment before finalization.

RESULTS

The ARS Thoracic AUC committee developed multiple consensus recommendations for LS-SCLC. There was strong consensus that patients with unresectable LS-SCLC should receive concurrent chemotherapy with radiation delivered either once or twice daily. For medically inoperable T1-T2N0 LS-SCLC, either concurrent chemoradiation or stereotactic body radiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is a reasonable treatment option. The panel continues to recommend whole-brain prophylactic cranial irradiation after response to chemoradiation for LS-SCLC. There was panel agreement that prophylactic cranial irradiation with hippocampal avoidance and programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1-directed immune therapy should not be routinely administered outside the context of clinical trials at this time.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARS Thoracic AUC Committee provide consensus recommendations for LS-SCLC that aim to provide a groundwork for multidisciplinary care and clinical trials.

Current and future strategies in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 13% of all lung tumors. The standard treatment in patients with limited-stage (LS) disease is thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with chemotherapy. In extensive-stage (ES) SCLC, the importance of consolidation TRT in patients with a good treatment response has become increasingly recognized. In both LS and ES disease, prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended in patients who respond to treatment. New therapeutic approaches such as immunotherapy are being increasingly incorporated into the treatment of SCLC, although more slowly than in non-small cell lung cancer. Diverse radiation dose and fractionation schemes, administered in varying combinations with these new drugs, are being investigated. In the present article, we review and update the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of SCLC. We also discuss the main clinical trials currently underway to identify future trends.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Radiotherapy is a critical component of multimodality treatment of SCLC. This article can help physicians to improve medical knowledge and find better ways to treat their SCLC patients.

Optimizing lung cancer radiation treatment worldwide in COVID-19 outbreak

•

Lung Cancer patients are at high risk for COVID-19 infection.

•

All steps should be taken to protect patients and the healthcare workforce.

•

Shortened RT overall treatment time is an important consideration during the COVID-19 pandemic.

•

Twelve recommendations in the use of RT are proposed by an international panel.

•

The proposed recommendations require urgent consideration during this pandemic.

COVID-19 has spread around the planet, sending billions of people into lockdown as health services struggle to cope. Meanwhile in Asia, where the disease began, the spread continues, in China it seems for now to have passed its peak. Italy, Spain, France, UK, and the US have been the countries more affected in terms of deaths. The coronavirus is more dangerous to the elderly and those with certain pre-existing medical conditions which is precisely the profile of lung cancer patients. Essential cancer services should be delivered but all steps should be taken to protect patients and the health workforce from infection with COVID-19. This presents a major challenge to radiotherapy (RT) departments worldwide. An international panel with expertise in the management of lung cancer in high-volume comprehensive centres has come together to share its experience on COVID-19 preparedness to deliver optimal care in such exceptional circumstances. A comprehensive systematic review of the literature through a PubMed search was undertaken. Twelve recommendations including, among others, the consideration of shorter courses, delays, and the omission of RT for lung cancer are proposed by the panel. In summary, we recommend the screening of every single person accessing the treatment room, the consideration of hypofractionation and to delay postoperative RT for non-small cell lung cancer, to avoid twice-daily treatments and delay or deliver prophylactic cranial irradiation during radio(chemo)therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer, review image guided RT images for suspicious image findings, and the use of single-fraction RT for the palliative treatment of stage IV lung cancer patients. Given that lung cancer is one of the most common and severe pathologies in radiation oncology departments, the following recommendations require particularly urgent consideration. The decision-making paths strongly depend on locally available resources, and a tailored approach should be used to attend lung cancer patients during this pandemic.

Radiation Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

Several sentinel phase III randomized trials have recently been published challenging traditional radiation therapy (RT) practices for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This American Society for Radiation Oncology guideline reviews the evidence for thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for both limited-stage (LS) and extensive-stage (ES) SCLC.

METHODS

The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on indications, dose fractionation, techniques and timing of thoracic RT for LS-SCLC, the role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) compared with conventional RT in stage I or II node negative SCLC, PCI for LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, and thoracic consolidation for ES-SCLC. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength.

RESULTS

The task force strongly recommends definitive thoracic RT administered once or twice daily early in the course of treatment for LS-SCLC. Adjuvant RT is conditionally recommended in surgically resected patients with positive margins or nodal metastases. Involved field RT delivered using conformal advanced treatment modalities to postchemotherapy volumes is also strongly recommended. For patients with stage I or II node negative disease, SBRT or conventional fractionation is strongly recommended, and chemotherapy should be delivered before or after SBRT. In LS-SCLC, PCI is strongly recommended for stage II or III patients who responded to chemoradiation, conditionally not recommended for stage I patients, and should be a shared decision for patients at higher risk of neurocognitive toxicities. In ES-SCLC, radiation oncologist consultation for consideration of PCI versus magnetic resonance surveillance is strongly recommended. Lastly, the use of thoracic RT is strongly recommended in select patients with ES-SCLC after chemotherapy treatment, including a conditional recommendation in those responding to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

RT plays a vital role in both LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC. These guidelines inform best clinical practices for local therapy in SCLC.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (2019)

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15% of lung cancers. Only one-third of patients are diagnosed at limited stage. The median survival remains to be around 15–20 months without significative changes in the strategies of treatment for many years. In stage I and IIA, the standard treatment is the surgery followed by adjuvant therapy with platinum–etoposide. In stage IIB–IIIC, the recommended treatment is early concurrent chemotherapy with platinum–etoposide plus thoracic radiotherapy followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients without progression. However, in the extensive stage, significant advances have been observed adding immunotherapy to platinum–etoposide chemotherapy to obtain a significant increase in overall survival, constituting the new recommended standard of care. In the second-line treatment, topotecan remains as the standard treatment. Reinduction with platinum–etoposide is the recommended regimen in patients with sensitive relapse (≥ 3 months) and new drugs such as lurbinectedin and immunotherapy are new treatment options. New biomarkers and new clinical trials designed according to the new classification of SCLC subtypes defined by distinct gene expression profiles are necessary.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for early-stage small cell lung cancer

Purpose

This study was designed to compare survival outcomes for non-surgically managed T1-T2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

Methods

The was queried between 2004-2015 for patients with T1-T2N0M0 SCLC. Patients must have been treated with curative intent SBRT or CFRT (delivered daily or twice daily, 45-70 Gy) with or without chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). A subset analysis of patient receiving chemotherapy was also performed. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to compare OS among patients who received chemotherapy.

Results

We evaluated 1378 patients in the general cohort. Multivariable Cox regression analysis(MVA) in the general cohort revealed that SBRT was significantly associated with improved survival (HR 0.68, p<0.001) along with receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.63, p <0.001). SBRT patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy compared to CFRT patients (p<0.01). In the chemotherapy subset, of 1096 patients, on MVA, there was a trend in favor of the SBRT group (HR 0.73; p=0.06). A 3:1 PSM analysis on the chemotherapy subset found similar results on MVA with a trend in favor of SBRT (p=0.06).

Conclusion

Patients with T1-2N0M0 SCLC treated with SBRT regimens incorporating chemotherapy had comparable outcomes to concurrent chemoradiotherapy using standard fractionation. Treatment paradigms for T1-2N0M0 SCLC incorporating SBRT warrant further exploration and should incorporate chemotherapy.

Empiric Radiotherapy for Lung Cancer Collaborative Group multi-institutional evidence-based guidelines for the use of empiric stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer without pathologic confirmation

The standard of care for managing early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is definitive surgical resection. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard treatment for patient who are medically inoperable, and it is increasingly being considered as an option in operable patients. With the growing use of screening thoracic CT scans for patients with a history of heavy smoking, as well as improved imaging capabilities, the discovery of small lung nodes has become a common dilemma. As a result, clinicians are increasingly faced with managing lung nodules in patients in whom diagnostic biopsy is not safe or feasible. Herein, we describe the scope of the problem, tools available for predicting the probability that a lung nodule is a malignancy, staging procedures, benefits of pathology-proven and empiric SBRT, considerations of safety based on location of the lesion of concern, and overall efficacy of SBRT.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for stage I small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recently revised recommendations for inoperable stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC), having added stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)/chemotherapy to the historical paradigm of concurrent conventionally-fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT)/chemotherapy. Despite the conformality, convenience, and cost-effectiveness of SABR, the NCCN continues to recommend both CFRT/chemotherapy and SABR/chemotherapy primarily because these approaches have not been comparatively analyzed to date.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for histologically-confirmed T1-2N0M0 SCLC; all patients received chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with SABR/chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival (OS); multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling examined factors associated with OS. Survival was also calculated following propensity matching.

RESULTS

Of 2,107 patients, 7.1% underwent SABR/chemotherapy, and 92.9% received CFRT/chemotherapy. The median (interquartile range) dose of SABR was 50 (48-54) Gy in 4 (3-5) fractions, and 55.8 (45-60) Gy in 30 (30-33) fractions for CFRT. Patients receiving SABR/chemotherapy were more often older, had T1 disease, treated at academic/integrated network facilities, and managed in more recent years (p < 0.05 for all). Respective median survival figures were 29.2 versus 31.2 months (p = 0.77), which persisted following propensity matching (25.4 versus 34.3 months, p = 0.85). On multivariable analysis, radiotherapeutic technique was not associated with OS (p = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

For stage I SCLC, SABR/chemotherapy affords statistically equivalent outcomes to CFRT/chemotherapy. Because randomized studies addressing this uncommon scenario would almost certainly suffer from inadequate accrual, these retrospective data should be strongly considered in efforts to institute SABR/chemotherapy as the preferred option for this population.

Is prophylactic cranial irradiation necessary in individuals suffering from surgically resected pT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer?

Adjuvant chemotherapeutics and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) are both recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for treating individuals suffering from surgically resected pT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Whether adjuvant chemotherapy combined with PCI is superior to adjuvant chemotherapy alone in these patients is largely unknown. PCI may therefore be with uncertain effects in surgically resected pT1-2N0M0 SCLC.

Exploratory analysis using machine learning to predict for chest wall pain in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background and purpose

Chest wall toxicity is observed after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for peripherally located lung tumors. We utilize machine learning algorithms to identify toxicity predictors to develop dose–volume constraints.

Materials and methods

Twenty‐five patient, tumor, and dosimetric features were recorded for 197 consecutive patients with Stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT, 11 of whom (5.6%) developed CTCAEv4 grade ≥2 chest wall pain. Decision tree modeling was used to determine chest wall syndrome (CWS) thresholds for individual features. Significant features were determined using independent multivariate methods. These methods incorporate out‐of‐bag estimation using Random forests (RF) and bootstrapping (100 iterations) using decision trees.

Results

Univariate analysis identified rib dose to 1 cc < 4000 cGy (P = 0.01), chest wall dose to 30 cc < 1900 cGy (P = 0.035), rib Dmax < 5100 cGy (P = 0.05) and lung dose to 1000 cc < 70 cGy (P = 0.039) to be statistically significant thresholds for avoiding CWS. Subsequent multivariate analysis confirmed the importance of rib dose to 1 cc, chest wall dose to 30 cc, and rib Dmax. Using learning‐curve experiments, the dataset proved to be self‐consistent and provides a realistic model for CWS analysis.

Conclusions

Using machine learning algorithms in this first of its kind study, we identify robust features and cutoffs predictive for the rare clinical event of CWS. Additional data in planned subsequent multicenter studies will help increase the accuracy of multivariate analysis.

The role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in surgically resected combined small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) is defined as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) combined with any of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histological types, such as large cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma. Since C-SCLC is an increasingly recognized subtype of small cell carcinoma, we conducted a retrospective study in our institution to explore the value of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with C-SCLC treated by surgery.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2014, the records of all consecutive patients with pathologically diagnosed C-SCLC after surgery in our institution were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and brain metastasis free survival (BMFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Survival differences were evaluated by log-rank test, while multivariate analysis was performed by a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of the total 91 patients included in this analysis, 11 patients (12.1%) were in PCI group and 80 (87.9%) in non-PCI group. The 5-year cumulative incidence of brain metastasis in the whole group was 22.2% (26.3% in non-PCI group vs. 0% in PCI group), and 5-year OS rate was 44.1%. Patients treated with PCI had significantly longer OS (P=0.011) and DFS (P=0.013), also had the trend to live a longer BMFS with marginal significance (P=0.092) than non-PCI-treated patients. The multivariate analysis showed that PCI [hazard ratio (HR) =0.102, P=0.024] was one of independent prognostic factors of the OS in surgery-treated C-SCLC patients.

Conclusions

C-SCLC patients have a relative high risk of developing brain metastases based on our study. These data showed that PCI could improve OS and DFS, as well as tend to decrease brain metastases in surgically resected C-SCLC. However, whether PCI could be part of comprehensive treatment modalities in C-SCLC should be assessed in prospective studies.

Proton therapy for small cell lung cancer

The prognosis of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) continues to improve and is now roughly comparable to that of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This shift, taken together with the decreased toxicities of modern radiotherapy (RT) for LS-SCLC compared with those reported in historical trials, necessitates further evaluation of whether proton beam therapy (PBT) could further reduce both acute and late toxicities for patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LS-SCLC. These notions are discussed theoretically, with an emphasis on cardiac events. This is followed by a review of the published evidence to date demonstrating improved dosimetry with PBT over intensity-modulated RT and encouraging safety and efficacy profiles seen in early clinical reports. In addition to covering technical aspects of PBT for LS-SCLC such as intensity-modulated PBT, image-guidance for PBT, and adaptive planning, this review also discusses the need for increased data on intensity-modulated PBT for LS-SCLC, economic and quality of life analyses for future PBT SCLC studies, careful categorization of cardiac events in these patients, and the role for immunotherapy combined with photon- or proton-based RT for LS-SCLC.

The Road Less Traveled: Should We Omit Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer?

New randomized data from Japan have raised questions regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer but without detectable brain metastases on magnetic resonance imaging. In the present focused review, we examine the general role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the management of small-cell lung cancer and present relevant controversies from both sides of the discussion. Future directions for clinical investigation and research are also highlighted. Strategies for neurocognitive protection, including memantine use and hippocampal sparing using modulated radiotherapy techniques, are also presented.

Utilization of radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for renal cell cancer in the USA

AIM

This study evaluated national practice patterns of cT1N0M0 renal cell cancer, with a focus on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilization.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2013) for patients with newly-diagnosed cT1a/bN0M0 renal cell cancer that received definitive treatment. Temporal trends in utilization were tabulated.

RESULTS

Altogether, 138,495 patients met inclusion criteria; 13,725 (9.9%) patients received ablative therapy, 57,924 (41.8%) partial nephrectomy, 67,168 (48.5%) radical nephrectomy and 308 (0.2%) external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The proportion of EBRT that was SBRT increased substantially from 25% in 2004 to 95.4% in 2013, with a sharp inflection point from 2005 to 2006.

CONCLUSION

SBRT utilization has sharply risen over time; in most recent years, the vast majority of EBRT is delivered in the form of SBRT.

Approaches to stereotactic body radiation therapy for large (≥5 centimeter) non-small cell lung cancer

Although larger (≥5 cm) node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions are altogether uncommon, their incidence may increase following the implementation of lung cancer screening. A rigorous assessment of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for these challenging cases is imperative not only owing to concerns of increased risks when delivering ablative doses to large volumes, but also due to lack of prospective data, as these patients were excluded from seminal phase II SBRT trials. In addition to appraising the available institutional or multi-institutional experiences, multiple strategies to reduce toxicities are discussed. These include exploration of several different dose/fractionation schemes and regimens, as well as specialized techniques for SBRT treatment planning and delivery. Because these lesions have a higher rate of occult lymphatic or distant spread, the role of systemic therapies (including chemotherapy and immunotherapy) are also discussed. Altogether, the publication of several key reports, entirely over the last few years, has created a more solid foundation with which to utilize evidence-based management for this unique patient population.

Prognosis of patients with primary malignant main stem bronchial tumors: 7,418 cases based on the SEER database

Background

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for patients with malignant main stem bronchial tumors (MBTs) and to develop a nomogram for predicting prognosis in those patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Method

A process was used for case screening from the SEER database. The effect of prognostic factors on survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, a competing risk model, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model. A nomogram was established for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with MBTs.

Results

A total of 7,418 cases were included in this study. Age, gender, pathologic grade, histologic type, tumor size, involvement of lymph nodes, tumor extension, chemotherapy, and surgery were identified as independent risk factors by univariate and multivariate analyses. A nomogram was established based on the results of the Cox model, which was validated by a C-index of 0.672 (95% CI, 0.664–0.680), and a group of calibration plots.

Conclusion

Age, gender, pathologic grade, histologic type, tumor size, involvement of lymph nodes, tumor extension, chemotherapy, and surgery were independent risk factors for OS of patients with MBTs. A nomogram was formulated to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in patients with MBTs based on individual clinical characteristics.