Parenteral nutrition with standard solutions in paediatric intensive care patients

Parenteral nutrition customization in pediatrics: A descriptive cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to analyze the reasons for customizing parenteral nutrition (PN) in pediatric patients admitted to a quaternary hospital.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive cohort study on 264 hospitalized children receiving PN. Anthropometric, biochemical, and hospitalization data were collected from patient records. Unequivocal reasons for customizing PN were defined as situations precluding prescription of a standard adult/teenager PN and included renal and/or liver failure, energy-protein adequacy, and elevated mineral and triglyceride levels.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients, with a median age of 2.2 years (IQR: 0.3-9.0 years), comprising intensive care (n = 216; 81.8%) and malnourished (n = 91; 36.1%) patients, were evaluated. In the first 48 h, 87.9% (n = 232) of the sample required customized PN for energy-protein adequacy (210 of 232), maintained over subsequent days in most cases. Among patients requiring second individualization, mineral disturbance was the main reason observed, especially within the first 4 days of PN use (n = 21; 60%). Unequivocal reasons for customizing PN occurred in 97.4% (n = 226) of cases in the first 48 h; 96.2% (n = 177) of cases on the fourth day; and 90.1% (n = 92) of cases on the seventh day of PN use. An inverse correlation was found between weight/age z score and number of second individualizations (r = -0.222; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Customized PN proved essential, especially for younger, malnourished, and intensive care patients. Investment in training a Nutritional Multidisciplinary Therapy Team and acquiring a specific electronic system for prescribing PN is suggested.

Safe and efficient practice of parenteral nutrition in neonates and children aged 0-18 years - The role of licensed multi-chamber bags

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recognized as a complex high-risk therapy. Its practice is highly variable and frequently suboptimal in pediatric patients. Optimizing care requires evidence, consensus-based guidelines, audits of practice, and standardized strategies. Several pediatric scientific organizations, expert panels, and authorities have recently recommended that standardized PN should generally be used over individualized PN in the majority of pediatric patients including very low birth weight premature infants. In addition, PN admixtures produced and validated by a suitably qualified institution are recommended over locally produced PN. Licensed multi chamber bags are standardized PN bags that comply with Good Manufacturing Practice and high-quality standards for the finished product in the frame of their full manufacturing license. The purpose of this article is to review the practical aspects of PN and the evidence for using such multi-chamber bags in pediatric patients. It highlights the safety characteristics and the limitations of the different PN practices and provides some guidance for ensuring safe and efficient therapy in pediatric patients.

Parenteral nutrition in the hospital setting/short-term parenteral nutrition

PURPOSE

This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit concerning the acute care setting. Some European practices presented in this article do not conform with USP general chapter <797> requirements. Nevertheless, the purpose is to cover the challenges experienced in delivering high-quality PN within hospitals in the United States and Europe, in order to share best practices and experiences more widely.

SUMMARY

Core issues regarding the PN process within an acute care setting are largely the same everywhere: There are ongoing pressures for greater efficiency, optimization, and also concurrent commitments to make PN safer for patients. Within Europe, in recent years, the use of market-authorized multi-chamber bags (MCBs) has increased greatly, mainly for safety, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency purposes. However, in the US, hospitals with low PN volumes may face particular challenges, as automated compounding equipment is often unaffordable in this setting and the variety of available MCBs is limited. This can result in the need to operate several PN systems in parallel, adding to the complexity of the PN use process. Ongoing PN quality and safety initiatives from US institutions with various PN volumes are presented. In the future, the availability of a greater selection of MCBs in the US may increase, leading to a reduction in dependence on compounded PN, as has been seen in many European countries.

CONCLUSION

The examples presented may encourage improvements in the safety and quality of PN within the acute care setting worldwide.

Bowel Lengthening Procedures in Children with Short Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

 The aims of the study are to systematically assess and critically appraise the evidence concerning two surgical techniques to lengthen the bowel in children with short bowel syndrome (SBS), namely, the longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring (LILT) and serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP), and to identify patient characteristics associated with a favorable outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched from inception till December 2019. No language restriction was used.

RESULTS

 In all, 2,390 articles were found, of which 40 were included, discussing 782 patients. The median age of the patients at the primary bowel lengthening procedure was 16 months (range: 1-84 months). Meta-analysis could not be performed due to the incomparability of the groups, due to heterogeneous definitions and outcome reporting. After STEP, 46% of patients weaned off parenteral nutrition (PN) versus 52% after LILT. Mortality was 7% for STEP and 26% for LILT. Patient characteristics predictive for success (weaning or survival) were discussed in nine studies showing differing results. Quality of reporting was considered poor to fair.

CONCLUSION

 LILT and STEP are both valuable treatment strategies used in the management of pediatric SBS. However, currently it is not possible to advise surgeons on accurate patient selection and to predict the result of either intervention. Homogenous, prospective, outcome reporting is necessary, for which an international network is needed.

Could Commercial Formulations Replace Individualized Prescription in Pediatric Home Parenteral Nutrition?

OBJECTIVES

Standard parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions are safe and can meet the nutritional requirements of a significant number of pediatric patients. However, they may not always be adequate for those on long term PN. We aimed to compare the composition of individually tailored prescriptions in a pediatric population on home PN with that of available commercial PN formulations.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the individual prescriptions of metabolically stable pediatric patients on home PN over a 1-year period (March 2019 to March 2020). These were compared with commercially available solutions with electrolytes, and replacement was considered adequate if three successive criteria were met: non-protein calorie to volume ratio (maximum variation 15%); non-protein calorie to nitrogen ratio (NPC:N) (maximum variation either 20% for long term use or 35% for possible short term use); electrolyte concentration (maximum increase 20%).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were included (67% male; median age 7.5 years). The most common diagnosis was short bowel syndrome (58%). Replacement with a standard formulation was considered appropriate for possible short term use (maximum variation of 35% in NPC:N) in 16 (67%) patients and for long term use (maximum variation of 20% in NPC:N), the number of patients decreased to 10 (42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard PN solutions can be adequate for a significant proportion of pediatric patients on home PN. Their use in the short term may also be appropriate in holiday periods or in settings of limited resources or restricted access to hospital facilities, such as those imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Supplementation of vitamins, trace elements and electrolytes in the PEPaNIC Randomised Controlled Trial: Composition and preparation of the prescription

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Following the results of the paediatric early versus late parenteral nutrition in critical illness (PEPaNIC) multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, the new ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN and ESPNIC guidelines recommend to consider withholding parenteral macronutrients for 1 week, while providing micronutrients, in critically ill children if enteral nutrition is insufficient. Critically ill children are suspected to be vulnerable to micronutrient deficiencies due to inadequate enteral nutrition, increased body's demands and excessive losses. Hitherto, micronutrient requirements in PICU are estimated based on recommended daily intakes for healthy children and expert opinion. We aimed to provide an overview of the current practice of micronutrient administration and practical considerations in the three participating centres of the PEPaNIC study, and compare these therapies with the recommendations in the new ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines.

METHODS

We describe the current composition and preparation of the prescribed parenteral micronutrients (consisting of vitamins, trace elements and electrolytes) in the three centres (Leuven, Rotterdam and Edmonton) that participated in the PEPaNIC RCT, and compare this per micronutrient with the ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines recommendations.

RESULTS

The three centres use a different micronutrient supplementation protocol during the first week of critical illness in children, with substantial differences regarding the amounts administered. Leuven administers commercial vitamins, trace elements and electrolytes in separate infusions both in 4 h. Rotterdam provides commercial vitamins and trace elements simultaneously via 8-h infusion and electrolytes continuously over 24 h. Lastly, Edmonton administers commercial vitamins and institutionally prepared trace elements solutions in 1 h and electrolytes on demand. Comparison with the ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines yields in differences between the recommendations and the administered amounts, which are most substantial for vitamins.

CONCLUSION

The practice of intravenous micronutrient administration differs substantially between the three PEPaNIC centres and in comparison with the current guideline recommendations. This deviation is at least partially explained by the inability to provide all recommended amounts with the currently available commercial products and by the lack of strong evidence supporting these recommendations.

Standardized and Individualized Parenteral Nutrition Mixtures in a Pediatric Home Parenteral Nutrition Population

OBJECTIVES

Studies evaluating efficacy or safety of standardized parenteral nutrition (PN) versus individualized PN are lacking. We aimed to assess effects on growth and safety of standardized PN compared with individualized PN in our Home PN group.

METHODS

Descriptive cohort study in Dutch children on Home PN, in which standardized PN was compared with individualized PN. Both groups received similar micronutrient-supplementation. Primary outcome was growth over 2 years, secondary outcomes were electrolyte disturbances and biochemical abnormalities. Additionally, patients were matched for age to control for potential confounding characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (50% girls, median age 6.5 years) were included, 16 (32%) received standardized PN mixtures. Age (11 vs 5 years), gestational age (39.2 vs 36.2 weeks) and PN duration (97 vs 39 months) were significantly higher in the group receiving standardized PN (P: ≤0.001; 0.027; 0.013 respectively). The standardized PN group showed an increase in weight-for-age (WFA), compared with a decrease in the individualized PN group (+0.38 SD vs -0.55 SD, P: 0.003). Electrolyte disturbances and biochemical abnormalities did not differ. After matching for age, resulting in comparable groups, no significant differences were demonstrated in WFA, height-for-age, or weight-for-height SD change.

CONCLUSIONS

In children with chronic IF, over 2,5 years of age, standardized PN mixtures show a comparable effect on weight, height, and weight for height when compared with individualized PN mixtures. Also, standardized PN mixtures (with added micronutrients) seem noninferior to individualized PN mixtures in terms of electrolyte disturbances and basic biochemical abnormalities. Larger studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Academical Medical Center medical ethics committee number W18_079 #18.103.

Quality and safety of parenteral nutrition for newborn and preterm infants as an on-ward preparation

BACKGROUND

For newborn and preterm infants, standardised and individual parenteral nutrition (PN) is used. PN preparation is at risk for contamination and dosing errors. The quality of PN is crucial for infants and has a direct impact on their health status and safety.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the physicochemical and microbial quality of PN for newborn and preterm infants prepared on a neonatal ward.

METHODS

Sampling of various individual PN prepared by nurses on a neonatal ward was performed. Formulations included maximal four electrolytes, variable dextrose and amino acid concentrations. Depending on the sample volume, up to three quality analyses were performed: (1) test for bacterial endotoxins by kinetic-chromogenic method, (2) sterility according to the European and US Pharmacopoeia, and (3) quantification of electrolytes by capillary electrophoresis and of dextrose by ultraviolet detection after enzymatic reaction of hexokinase. The concentrations obtained were evaluated based on the US and Swiss Pharmacopoeia specifications for compounded preparations and compared to the widened pharmacy specifications.

RESULTS

The composition of 86% of the 110 analysed PN prepared by nurses on the neonatal ward corresponded to their medical prescription. 14% were out of the acceptable widened pharmacy ranges. We found no microbial contamination in the samples. All PN were free from endotoxins.

CONCLUSION

Component concentrations of PN prepared on wards by nurses differed frequently and significantly from their medical prescription, and the deviation can be critical depending on the component and its mode of action. The sample size is too small to evaluate the microbial contamination.

Physicochemical stable standard all-in-one parenteral nutrition admixtures for infants and children in accordance with the ESPGHAN/ESPEN guidelines

OBJECTIVE

Because there are almost no standard all-in-one parenteral nutrition admixtures available for infants and children, the aim was to develop standard two-compartment parenteral nutrition bags for different weight categories based on the ESPGHAN/ESPEN (European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition/European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism) guidelines. The 1 g/kg/d lipid version for the 3 to 10 kg weight category (PED1) was assessed for short- and long-term physicochemical stability with the ability to add additional electrolytes (PED1+E).

METHODS

The lipid compartment A and the all-in-one admixture of A + B + vitamins + trace elements were assessed physically by visual inspection, Sudan red test, pH measurement, and lipid droplet size distribution. Chemical stability for compartment A was evaluated by quantitative analyses of non-esterified fatty acids and peroxide content. The glucose-amino acid-electrolyte compartment B was evaluated physically by visual inspection, measuring particle contamination and pH. Chemical stability was assessed by discoloration, quantitative analyses of glucose, and the amino acids L-cysteine, L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan.

RESULTS

No phase separation or coalescence occurred, and the mean droplet size diameter did not exceed 0.5 µm. Peroxide content and non-esterified fatty acids concentration of compartment A remained well below the limit of acceptation. No precipitation was detected for compartment B; only a slight yellow discoloration was noted at 80 d. Concentrations of glucose, L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan remained stable; only L-cysteine decreased significantly from its initial concentration.

CONCLUSION

The two-compartment PED1 and PED1+E admixtures are stable up to 80 d 2° to 8°C + 24 h room temperature (RT) with an additional 7 d 2° to 8°C + 48 h RT after mixing and addition of vitamins and trace elements.

Safety of parenteral nutrition in newborns: Results from a nationwide prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Limited or delayed availability of parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions, as well as difficulties in ordering are often identified as reasons for non-compliance with international guidelines in newborns. This study aims at assessing the modality of use and safety of premixed standardized PN solutions in a nationwide prospective cohort of newborns treated in clinical practice.

METHODS

Two premixed fixed formulations with respective osmolarity of 715 and 790 mOsm/L specifically designed for neonates were made available throughout the country for clinical use from birth onwards. Descriptive data and modality of use were prospectively collected in a case report form, whereas all related and unrelated adverse events were recorded on a separate adverse event form.

RESULTS

A total of 14,167 infants were prospectively included and 16,640 parenteral nutrition periods were analyzed. Mean age was 33 weeks of gestation, and mean weight was 2086 g. The majority of infants (81%) started the parenteral nutrition the first day of life or the day after. The route of parenteral nutrition delivery was peripheral in 47% of the parenteral nutrition periods. During the whole study, a total of 72 adverse events occurring in 68 infants were reported. Of these adverse events, 59 (0.37% of the nutrition periods), among which 19 serious adverse events, were reported as related to the parenteral nutrition solutions. The events related to parenteral nutrition solutions were general disorders and administration site conditions (n = 42 including 9 cases of cutaneous necrosis), and nutrition and metabolism disorders (n = 17). There was no case of thrombophlebitis. Six of the 19 serious events related to the parenteral nutrition solutions (32%) were due to the misuse of the infusion bag.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the concept that ready-to-use parenteral nutrition formulations can safely provide parenteral nutrition from birth onwards. They further support that parenteral solutions with an osmolarity up to 800 mOsm/L are well-tolerated when infused on a peripheral vein. Considering the potential risk of errors and misuses, this study also highlights the need for nutrition practice care guidelines for neonates and for regular campaigns providing information and strategies for a safe use of parenteral nutrition solutions.

A.S.P.E.N. Statement on Parenteral Nutrition Standardization

In response to questions regarding use of standardized parenteral nutrition (PN) formulations, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) developed a Task Force to address some of these issues. A.S.P.E.N. envisions standardized PN as a broader issue rather than simply using a standardized, commercially available PN product. A standardized process for PN must be explored in order to improve patient safety and clinical appropriateness, and to maximize resource efficiency. A standardized process may include use of standardized PN formulations (including standardized, commercial PN products) but also includes aspects of ordering, labeling, screening, compounding, and administration of PN. A safe PN system must exist which minimizes procedural incidents and maximizes the ability to meet individual patient requirements. Using clinicians with nutrition support therapy expertise will contribute to that safe PN system. The purpose of this statement is to present the published literature associated with standardized PN formulations, to provide recommendations, and to identify areas in need of future research.

Should pediatric parenteral nutrition be individualized?

INTRODUCTION: Parenteral nutrition (PN) formulations are commonly individualized, since their standardization appears inadequate for the pediatric population. This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional state and the reasons for PN individualization in pediatric patients using PN, hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Campinas, São Paulo.METHODS: This longitudinal study comprised patients using PN followed by up to 67 days. Nutritional status was classified according to the criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) (2006) and WHO (2007). The levels of the following elements in blood were analyzed: sodium, potassium, ionized calcium, chloride, magnesium, inorganic phosphorus, and triglycerides (TGL). Among the criteria for individualization, the following were considered undeniable: significant reduction in blood levels of potassium (<3mEq/L), sodium (<125mEq/L), magnesium (<1mEq/L), phosphorus (<1.5mEq/L), ionic calcium (<1mmol), and chloride (<90mEq/L), or any value above the references.RESULTS: Twelve pediatric patients aged 1 month to 15 years were studied (49 individualizations). Most patients were classified as malnourished. It was observed that 74/254 (29.2%) of examinations demanded individualized PN for indubitable reasons.CONCLUSION: The nutritional state of patients was considered critical in most cases. Thus, the individualization performed in the beginning of PN for energy protein adequacy was indispensable. In addition, the individualized PN was indispensable in at least 29.2% of PN for correction of alterations found in biochemical parameters.

A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: parenteral nutrition ordering, order review, compounding, labeling, and dispensing

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a high-alert medication available for patient care within a complex clinical process. Beyond application of best practice recommendations to guide safe use and optimize clinical outcome, several issues are better addressed through evidence-based policies, procedures, and practices. This document provides evidence-based guidance for clinical practices involving PN prescribing, order review, and preparation.

METHOD

A systematic review of the best available evidence was used by an expert work group to answer a series of questions about PN prescribing, order review, compounding, labeling, and dispensing. Concepts from the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) format were applied as appropriate. The specific clinical guideline recommendations were developed using consensus prior to review and approval by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. The following questions were addressed: (1) Does education of prescribers improve PN ordering? (2) What is the maximum safe osmolarity of PN admixtures intended for peripheral vein administration? (3) What are the appropriate calcium intake and calcium-phosphate ratios in PN for optimal neonatal bone mineralization? (4) What are the clinical advantages or disadvantages of commercially available premade ("premixed") multichambered PN formulations compared with traditional/customized PN formulations? (5) What are the clinical (infection, catheter occlusion) advantages or disadvantages of 2-in-1 compared with 3-in-1 PN admixtures? (6) What macronutrient dosing limits are expected to provide for the most stable 3-in-1 admixtures? (7) What are the most appropriate recommendations for optimizing calcium (gluconate) and (Na- or K-) phosphate compatibility in PN admixtures? (8) What micronutrient contamination is present in parenteral stock solutions currently used to compound PN admixtures? (9) Is it safe to use the PN admixture as a vehicle for non-nutrient medication delivery? (10) Should heparin be included in the PN admixture to reduce the risk of central vein thrombosis? (11) What methods of repackaging intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE) into smaller patient-specific volumes are safe? (12) What beyond-use date should be used for (a) IVFE dispensed for separate infusion in the original container and (b) repackaged IVFE?

Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis in children

Respiratory syncytial virus is a highly infectious virus that commonly causes bronchiolitis and leads to high morbidity and a low, but important, incidence of mortality. Supportive therapy is the foundation of management. Hydration/nutrition and respiratory support are important evidence-based interventions. For children with severe disease, continuous positive airway pressure or mechanical ventilation may be necessary. Ribavirin may be used for treatment of patients with severe disease. Palivizumab provides important ongoing immunoprophylaxis during epidemic months for high-risk infants. Caregiver education and incorporating an explanation of all therapies and anticipatory guidance, including strategies for reducing the risk of infection, are vital.

Developing and implementing all-in-one standard paediatric parenteral nutrition

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is a feeding mode suitable for children that do not achieve requirements via the enteral route. For this intervention to be successful, healthcare professionals require: knowledge on nutrient requirements; access to an aseptic compounding facility; and a system that ensures adequate and safe delivery of PN. Previously, it was thought that individualised PN was the "gold standard" for delivering nutrients to children; however, studies have highlighted concerns regarding inadequate delivery of nutrients, prescribing and compounding errors. We, therefore, set out to develop and implement all-in-one (AIO) paediatric PN solutions. Through a systematic approach, four AIO PN solutions were developed: birth-two months of age (Ped 1); two months-10 kg (Ped 2); 11-15 kg (Ped 3); and 16-30 kg (Ped 4). We implemented them with the help of a teaching pack, over a one month time period, and reviewed usage at six months. At that time, five children initially received standard PN without electrolyte changes; but after a few days, electrolytes needed amendments, and three required individualised PN. A change to AIO PN is feasible and safe; however, some may require electrolyte changes, and there will always be those that will require individualised PN.

Automated compounding of parenteral nutrition for pediatric patients: characterization of workload and costs

OBJECTIVES

Parenteral nutrition (PN) compounding in large hospital centers is now largely automated using volumetric pump systems. No study has examined the pharmacy workload and costs associated with this process. This study was designed to characterize these elements at our center and to identify areas for potential improvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all PN orders compounded from May 19, 2007, to June 25, 2010. Patients were divided into groups according to the ward where PN was initiated.

RESULTS

The age and weight of patients at initiation of PN were similar throughout the study, except in neonatology, where initiation now occurs earlier in life (age 1.3 ± 2.7 days in 2010 vs. 3.4 ± 9.4 in 2007; p=0.003). An average of 894 orders per month were compounded. A total of 59% of orders were for neonatal patients. The average cost of source solutions per PN order increased from Can$23.27 in 2007 to Can$37.78 in 2010. Partially used source solutions discarded at the end of the day represented between 7.7% and 9.2% of total source solution cost. Amino acids in 3-L bags were responsible for the largest waste, with Can$953 to Can$1048 wasted monthly.

CONCLUSIONS

PN compounding at our center represents an important workload and increasing costs. A reduction in source solution waste, for example, by reducing the use of large source solution containers, would be beneficial.

Neonatology/Paediatrics - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 13

There are special challenges in implementing parenteral nutrition (PN) in paediatric patients, which arises from the wide range of patients, ranging from extremely premature infants up to teenagers weighing up to and over 100 kg, and their varying substrate requirements. Age and maturity-related changes of the metabolism and fluid and nutrient requirements must be taken into consideration along with the clinical situation during which PN is applied. The indication, the procedure as well as the intake of fluid and substrates are very different to that known in PN-practice in adult patients, e.g. the fluid, nutrient and energy needs of premature infants and newborns per kg body weight are markedly higher than of older paediatric and adult patients. Premature infants <35 weeks of pregnancy and most sick term infants usually require full or partial PN. In neonates the actual amount of PN administered must be calculated (not estimated). Enteral nutrition should be gradually introduced and should replace PN as quickly as possible in order to minimise any side-effects from exposure to PN. Inadequate substrate intake in early infancy can cause long-term detrimental effects in terms of metabolic programming of the risk of illness in later life. If energy and nutrient demands in children and adolescents cannot be met through enteral nutrition, partial or total PN should be considered within 7 days or less depending on the nutritional state and clinical conditions.

Parenteral nutrition objectives for very low birth weight infants: results of a national survey

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate parenteral nutrition objectives for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), and to compare nutritional protocol differences according to levels of care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A national survey was conducted in France through a questionnaire sent to 296 French neonatal departments to determine each team leader's nutritional objectives for parenteral nutrition of VLBW infants.

RESULTS

A total of 172 of the 296 French neonatal departments responded to the questionnaire. Protein administration was not started during the first day of life in half of the responding units. Furthermore, half of the units initiated protein administration with less than 1 g x kg(-1) x day(-1). The day of introduction of lipid emulsions varied considerably from one unit to another, but more than half of the units started the lipid emulsions after the third day of life. Twenty percent of the units reported a target energy intake of 100 kcal x kg(-1) x day(-1), whereas 14% reported a target intake above or equal to 130 kcal x kg(-1) x day(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with recent guidelines for parenteral nutrition for VLBW infants, the results indicate that the majority of the departments are familiar with target macronutrient and energy intakes, but the time of introduction and the rate of progression of macronutrients, particularly proteins and lipids, are frequently lower than those defined by the guidelines. The large-scale publication of new nutritional guidelines for the parenteral nutrition of neonates and preterm infants as well as regular, specific training in the parenteral nutrition of preterm infants are needed.

Cost analysis of two approaches to parenteral nutrition in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

In pediatric intensive care, two approaches to parenteral nutrition are available: individualized admixtures or commercial standard solutions. Even though individualized admixtures can be tailored to sometimes highly intricate requirements, standard solutions are able to meet the demands of the majority of pediatric patients. To address the growing importance of costs in intensive care, we investigated whether relevant differences between individualized admixtures and standard solutions in terms of costs can be found.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

University-affiliated intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Fifty consecutively admitted pediatric patients requiring parenteral nutrition.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Comparison of actual costs of individualized admixtures and theoretical costs of standard solutions. Mean actual costs of individualized admixtures of Euro 81.78 (+/- 16.33) per patient and day were significantly higher than the theoretical costs of standard solutions of Euro 61.21 (+/- 6.55). Cost differences increased with patients' body weights.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral nutrition with standard solutions offers the potential of a relevant cost reduction compared with individualized admixtures in critically ill children.

Avaliação da eficiência da nutrição parenteral quanto à oferta de energia em pacientes oncológicos pediátricos

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficiência da nutrição parenteral administrada a pacientes oncológicos pediátricos quanto à oferta de energia, indicações e principais dificuldades no procedimento. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional descritivo, realizado entre julho de 2003 e julho de 2004 no Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica da Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Critérios de inclusão: pacientes com câncer recebendo nutrição parenteral nas unidades de internação. A análise da adequação energética foi efetuada usando-se equações preditivas para o cálculo do gasto energético basal ajustado para a progressão inicial. RESULTADOS: Foram 41 episódios de nutrição parenteral de, 1.016, internações (4%): 54% do sexo masculino, com mediana de uso de 10 dias (1-51). Demonstrou-se que em 56% dos episódios não se atingiu o gasto energético basal ajustado; 26% ficaram entre 100% e 120% e 18% acima de 120%. A média do gasto energético basal ajustado foi 106%, com desvio-padrão de 38% e a mediana 96%. Os motivos associados às dificuldades para atingir o gasto energético basal foram intolerância metabólica, via de nutrição parenteral não exclusiva, suspensão ou interrupção da sua administração, prescrição sem discussão com nutricionista e uso de via periférica. A principal indicação foi por toxicidade gastrintestinal. O volume desprezado de nutrição parenteral demonstrou-se superior a 10% em 17 de 35 episódios (49%). Proteção contra luz ambiente (capa), avaliada em 19 pacientes durante os dias da administração, detectou ausência em 37 de 315 dias (12%). CONCLUSÃO: A oferta de energia não contemplou as necessidades de alta porcentagem de pacientes, principalmente devido à gravidade do quadro clínico, às interrupções e ao uso de via não exclusiva, reduzindo o período disponível para administração da nutrição. A eficiência dos procedimentos por atuação de equipe multidisciplinar poderia reduzir o prejuízo, garantindo uma oferta mais adequada, aumentando os benefícios da nutrição parenteral.