The pattern and outcome of acute severe colitis

Management of Severe Colitis and Toxic Megacolon

Severe colitis is a well-defined condition encompassing several etiologies but is most often caused by severe ulcerative colitis or Clostridioides difficile infection. Severe colitis can evolve into toxic colitis, or toxic megacolon when associated with bowel dilation and systemic manifestations, resulting in a life-threatening scenario where multidisciplinary management is often required. Medical management continues to play an important role in the initial treatment of toxic megacolon. However, timely surgical intervention can be lifesaving.

Intensified versus standard dose infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (PREDICT-UC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosing strategy for infliximab in steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unknown. We compared intensified and standard dose infliximab rescue strategies and explored maintenance therapies following infliximab induction in ASUC.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, patients aged 18 years or older from 13 Australian tertiary hospitals with intravenous steroid-refractory ASUC were randomly assigned (1:2) to receive a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab or 5 mg/kg infliximab (randomisation 1). Block randomisation was used and stratified by history of thiopurine exposure and study site, with allocation concealment maintained via computer-generated randomisation. Patients in the 10 mg/kg group (intensified induction strategy [IIS]) received a second dose at day 7 or earlier at the time of non-response; all patients in the 5 mg/kg group were re-randomised between day 3 and day 7 (1:1; randomisation 2) to a standard induction strategy (SIS) or accelerated induction strategy (AIS), resulting in three induction groups. Patients in the SIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, with an extra 5 mg/kg dose between day 3 and day 7 if no response. Patients in the AIS group received 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 1, and 3, with the week 1 dose increased to 10 mg/kg and given between day 3 and day 7 if no response. The primary outcome was clinical response by day 7 (reduction in Lichtiger score to <10 with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline, improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day). Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes to day 7 and exploratory outcomes compared induction regimens until month 3. From month 3, maintenance therapy was selected based on treatment experience, with use of thiopurine monotherapy, combination infliximab and thiopurine, or infliximab monotherapy, with follow-up as a cohort study up to month 12. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02770040, and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between July 20, 2016, and Sept 24, 2021, 138 patients were randomly assigned (63 [46%] female and 75 [54%] male); 46 received a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab and 92 received 5 mg/kg infliximab. After randomisation 1, we observed no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a clinical response by day 7 between the 10 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg groups (30 [65%] of 46 vs 56 [61%] of 92, p=0·62; risk ratio adjusted for thiopurine treatment history, 1·06 [95% CI 0·94-1·20], p=0·32). We found no significant differences in secondary endpoints including time to clinical response or change in Lichtiger score from baseline to day 7. Two patients who received 10 mg/kg infliximab underwent colectomy in the first 7 days compared with no patients in the 5 mg/kg group (p=0·21). Three serious adverse events occurred in three patients in both the 10 mg/kg group and 5 mg/kg group. After randomisation 2, the proportions of patients with clinical response at day 14 (34 [74%] of 46 in the IIS group, 35 [73%] of 48 in the AIS group, and 30 [68%] of 44 in the SIS group, p=0·81), clinical remission at month 3 (23 [50%], 25 [52%], 21 [48%], p=0·92), steroid-free remission at month 3 (19 [41%], 20 [42%], 18 [41%], p=1·0), endoscopic remission at month 3 (21 [46%], 22 [46%], 21 [48%], p=0·98), and colectomy at month 3 (three [7%] of 45, nine [19%] of 47, five [12%] of 43, p=0·20) were not significantly different between groups. Between day 8 and month 3, the proportion of patients with at least one infectious adverse event possibly related to infliximab was two (4%) of 46 in the IIS group, eight (17%) of 48 in the AIS group, and eight (18%) of 44 in the SIS group (p=0·082). No deaths occurred in the study.

INTERPRETATION

Infliximab is a safe and effective rescue therapy in ASUC. In steroid-refractory ASUC, a first dose of 10 mg/kg infliximab was not superior to 5 mg/kg infliximab in achieving clinical response by day 7. Intensified, accelerated, and standard induction regimens did not result in a significant difference in clinical response by day 14 or in remission or colectomy rates by month 3.

FUNDING

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Gastroenterology Society of Australia, Gandel Philanthropy, Australian Postgraduate Award, Janssen-Cilag.

Predicting Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (UC) (ASUC) requiring hospitalization affects up to 1 in 4 patients with UC. There is a paucity of prospective and multicenter clinical cohorts to study treatment trends and predictors of disease outcomes. Here, we conduct a US-based multicenter prospective clinical cohort of ASUC to study predictors of the need for medical rescue therapy and colectomy.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients hospitalized for ASUC were included across 5 academic centers from December 2018 to December 2021. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected throughout the hospitalization. Patients were followed up to 1-year post-hospitalization to identify predictors of the need for rescue therapy and colectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 21 (22.3%) patients required colectomy within 1 year of admission with 11 (12%) requiring colectomy during the index admission. On multivariate analyses, a BMI < 21.5 kg/m2 (OR = 6.16, P = .02), a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) greater than 8 (OR = 14.44, P = .01) and an albumin level at admission lower than 2.4 g/dL (OR = 10.61, P = .04) were significant predictors of inpatient colectomy after adjusting for sex, age, and duration of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective, multicenter cohort of patients hospitalized with ASUC, BMI, SCCAI, and albumin at admission were important determinants of colectomy risk during the index hospitalization and within 1 year of admission. Colectomy rates remain high-22.3% in this cohort across 5 academic, tertiary care centers-underscoring the need to identify the highest-risk patients, establish novel treatment and care paradigms, and examine opportunities to standardize care.

Histological scores are poor predictors of short term outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis: An observational study

BACKGROUND

The role of various histologic scores in predicting outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is unexplored.

METHODS

Consecutive patients of ASUC undergoing sigmoidoscopy and histological assessment by two independent pathologists for Simplified Geboes score (SGS), Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) and Nancy histological index (NHI)] were included. Primary outcome was the role of histology in predicting need for second-line therapy or colectomy.

RESULTS

Of 82 patients with ASUC (mean age: 36 years, males 47.5 %), non-response to steroids was observed in 27 (32.9 %) of cases. Sixteen patients required second-line drug therapy and 8 required colectomy. There was no significant association between the need for second-line therapy or colectomy and the baseline histological scores [NHI (p = 0.61), SGS (p = 0.116) and RHI (p = 0.109)]. All three scores performed poorly to predict the need for second-line treatment or colectomy within 28 days. There was no significant association between histological scores and steroid response (NHI (p = 0.796), SGS (p = 0.57) and RHI (p = 0.941)]. All three scores had a strong positive correlation observed between each other but not with endoscopic Mayo score.

CONCLUSION

The three histologic scores (SGS, RHI and NHI) performed poorly in prediction of need for second-line treatment or colectomy in ASUC. Future studies should study the impact of histologic assessment on long term outcomes in ASUC.

Monoclonal antibodies against pediatric ulcerative colitis: a review of clinical progress

INTRODUCTION

In children, ulcerative colitis (UC) is often more severe and extensive than in adults and hospitalization for acute exacerbations occurs in around a quarter of subjects. There is a need for effective drugs, which could avoid or reduce the use of corticosteroids which, especially in children, are burdened by a number of severe side effects. The introduction in therapy of monoclonal antibodies has completely changed the therapeutic scenario and the prognosis of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the use of the monoclonal antibodies directed against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α or other inflammatory targets for the treatment of pediatric UC will be discussed. A search of the literature was done using the keywords 'pediatric,' 'ulcerative colitis,' 'inflammatory bowel disease,' 'monoclonal antibodies;' 'infliximab,' 'adalimumab,' 'golimumab,' vedolizumab," 'ustekinumab' and 'risankizumab.'

EXPERT OPINION

The use of monoclonal antibodies has greatly increased in recent years in pediatric UC, both in patients who did not respond to conventional therapies, and, more often, as initial therapy. Thanks to therapeutic drug monitoring and to the availability of biologics with different targets, therapy has become more targeted and personalized, with a significant improvement in response, in quality of life, and with a good safety profile.

Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Infliximab-Experienced Patients

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis (UC) that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality, with a substantial number of patients needing colectomy. Infliximab (IFX) has been increasingly used as a rescue therapy for patients who have failed intravenous steroids and has been more frequently used as an induction and maintenance therapy in moderate-to-severe UC. Therefore, the number of patients admitted with ASUC previously exposed to IFX has been increasing, raising additional challenges in the medical management of these patients to avoid emergent colectomy. This narrative review intends to summarise the most recent evidence in the medical management of steroid-refractory ASUC patients previously exposed to IFX and to propose a treatment algorithm for approaching this difficult-to-treat group of patients.

Management of acute severe ulcerative colitis-an update for generalist and specialist clinicians

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency that occurs in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Although intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy, 30-40% of patients will not respond and need timely consideration of rescue therapy with (currently) either infliximab or ciclosporin or indeed colectomy, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care to ensure favourable outcomes for patients. We discuss the current evidence and present an approach to the management of ASUC for general and specialist clinicians caring for patients with ASUC.

SOURCES OF DATA

The information in this review is derived from data published in peer- reviewed academic journals and registered clinical trials.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Management of acute severe colitis requires a multidisciplinary approach with early initiation with steroids and timely escalation of treatment to either medical rescue therapy or surgery.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Balancing the risks of delayed surgery vs. optimizing medical therapy, including accelerated dosing schedules for biologics, remains ambiguous.

GROWING POINTS

The position on newer molecules like Janus Kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, is a growing area with early real-world data showing promise for steroid refractory ASUC.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Developing predictive biomarkers and clinical risk scores for personalized rescue therapy selection is an evolving area of research.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis trials: the past, the present and the future

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), characterised by bloody diarrhoea and systemic inflammation, is associated with a significant risk of colectomy and a small risk of mortality. The landmark trial of cortisone in 1955 was pivotal for two reasons: first, for establishing the efficacy of a drug that remains a first-line therapy today and, second, for producing the first set of disease severity criteria and clinical trial endpoints that shaped the subsequent ASUC trial landscape. Trials in the 1990s and at the turn of the millennium established the efficacy of infliximab and ciclosporin, but since then, there has been little progress in drug development for this high-risk population. This systematic review evaluates all interventional randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in patients hospitalised with severe UC. It provides an overview of the efficacy of treatments from past to present and assesses the evolution of trial characteristics with respect to study populations, eligibility criteria and study designs over time. This review details ongoing RCTs in this field and provides a perspective on the challenges for future clinical trial programmes and how these can be overcome to help deliver novel ASUC therapies.

Incidence of rectal cancer after colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia. A particular problem arises in patients who have undergone subtotal colectomy leaving a rectal remnant. The risk of future rectal cancer must be accurately estimated and weighed against the risks of further surgery or surveillance. The aim of this study was to estimate the 10-year cumulative incidence of rectal cancer in such patients.

METHODS

A nationwide study using England's hospital administrative data was performed. A cohort of patients undergoing subtotal colectomy between April 2002 and March 2014 was identified. A competing risks survival analysis was performed to calculate the cumulative incidence of rectal cancer. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on endoscopic surveillance was investigated using time-trend analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 8120 patients were included and 61 patients (0.8%) were diagnosed with cancer. The cumulative incidence of rectal cancer was 0.26% (95% c.i. 0.17% to 0.39%), 0.49% (95% c.i. 0.36% to 0.68%), and 0.77% (95% c.i. 0.57% to 1.02%) at 5, 10, and 15 years respectively. A previous diagnosis of colonic dysplasia (HR 3.34, 95% c.i. 1.01 to 10.97; P = 0.047), primary sclerosing cholangitis (HR 5.42, 95% c.i. 1.34 to 21.85; P = 0.018), and elective colectomy (HR 1.83, 95% c.i. 1.11 to 3.02; P = 0.018) was associated with an increased incidence of rectal cancer. Regarding endoscopic surveillance, there was a 43% decline in endoscopic procedures performed in 2020 (333 procedures) compared with 2019 (585 procedures).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of rectal cancer after subtotal colectomy is low. Asymptomatic patients without evidence of rectal dysplasia should be carefully counselled on the possible benefits and risks of prophylactic proctectomy.

Combined Advanced Targeted Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Extensive Update

This article discusses the rationale for and the current data on the efficacy and safety of combined advanced targeted therapy (CATT) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease.

Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.

Predicting Outcome after Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Contemporary Review and Areas for Future Research

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis relapse which requires hospitalization and intensive medical intervention to avoid colectomy. The timely recognition of patients at risk of corticosteroid failure and the early initiation of medical rescue therapy are paramount in the management of ASUC. The choice of medical rescue therapy is influenced by multiple factors, especially patient's prior treatment history. This decision should involve the patient and ideally a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, including gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons and enterostomal therapists. Although several predictive models have been developed to predict corticosteroid failure in ASUC, there is no single validated tool that is universally utilized. At present, infliximab and cyclosporine are the only agents systematically evaluated and recommended for medical rescue therapy, with recent reports of off-label utilization of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in small case series. The available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these oral small molecules for ASUC is insufficient to provide definitive recommendations. Early decision-making to assess the response to medical rescue therapy is essential, and the decision to pursue surgery in the case of treatment failure should not be delayed.

Clinical Utility of Disease Activity Indices in Predicting Short-Term Response to Biologics in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background: The Mayo Score [MS], endoscopic Mayo Score [eMS] and the Ulcerative Colitis Index of Severity [UCEIS] are employed in the assessment of ulcerative colitis [UC] severity. This study compared the aforementioned indices in terms of predictory value for response to remission induction treatment with anti-TNF and anti-integrin biologics. Methods: A total of 38 patients were retrospectively evaluated in the study, 23 male and 15 female, aged 18-74 years old who had undergone a total of 53 biological therapy courses with either infliximab [IFX] or vedolizumab [VDZ] at the Department of Gastroenterology of the Medical University of Łódź. The clinical and endoscopic activity of UC was assessed at the outset of biological therapy and the 14th week remission induction assessment juncture. Results: The study analyzed 19 IFX and 34 VDZ treatment courses. The response rate of patients receiving IFX reached 73.67% and the response rate was 58.82% for VDZ. The mean MS, eMS and UCEIS improved among all patient groups: 8.316 ± 1.974 to 4.158 ± 2.218 (p < 0.05), 2.632 ± 0.597 to 1.790 ± 0.713 (p < 0.05) and 4.790 ± 1.745 to 3.000 ± 1.453 (p < 0.05) for IFX, 7.088 ± 2.234 to 3.618 ± 2.412 (p < 0.05), 2.706 ± 0.524 to 1.677 ± 1.065 (p < 0.05) and 4.235 ± 1.350 to 2.735 ± 1.880 (p < 0.05) for VDZ. Conclusions: The outcome assessment in induction treatment of UC includes clinical data and endoscopic evaluation. Severity of inflammatory lesion activity according to the eMS and UCEIS indices correlates with the overall disease presentation as evaluated with MS. The UCEIS provides an overall better predictor for biological induction treatment when compared with the eMS in both patient groups, particularly in those receiving VDZ. It provides a promising alternative to the eMS and can be employed for both initial disease severity assessment as well as for treatment response monitoring.

Colombian experience with the use of tofacitinib in severe acute ulcerative colitis: A case series study

INTRODUCTION

Tofacitinib is indicated in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC); however, given its rapid onset of action, it may constitute an alternative in patients with hospitalized severe acute UC. There are few data on this indication in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the management of patients with hospitalized UC, as well as its clinical characteristics and other treatment patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Descriptive observational study of adults and children with CUAG treated with tofacitinib between June 2019 and December 2022 in Colombia. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected, therapeutic response was evaluated in different periods of time and descriptive analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables was performed.

RESULTS

Six patients (five adults and one pediatric), mean age 33.2 (SD: 8.5) years, with CUAG. Symptom remission was obtained in 100% of patients at day 7 after tofacitinib initiation. In three patients information was obtained beyond 6 months, with 100% clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission and without requiring colectomy. In the case of the pediatric patient, symptom remission was achieved one week after starting tofacitinib, remaining in clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission beyond 6 months. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib represents a rescue therapeutic alternative in CUAG, with rapid clinical response, adequate tolerance and less need for colectomy, being sustained for periods beyond 6 months.

Indications, modalities, and outcomes of surgery for ulcerative colitis in 2024

Treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been revolutionized by the arrival of biotherapies and technical progress in interventional endoscopy and surgery. (Sub)total emergency colectomy is required in the event of complicated severe acute colitis: colectasis, perforation, hemorrhage, organ failure. Corticosteroid therapy is the reference treatment for uncomplicated severe acute colitis, while infliximab and ciclosporin are 2nd-line treatments. At each step, before and after each line of treatment failure, surgery should be considered as an option. In cases refractory to medical treatment, the choice between surgery and change in medication must weigh the chronic symptoms associated with the disease against the risks of postoperative complications and functional sequelae inherent to surgery. Detection of dysplastic lesions necessitates chromoendoscopic imaging with multiple biopsies and anatomopathological verification. Endoscopic treatment of these lesions remains reserved for selected patients. These different indications call for multidisciplinary medical-surgical discussion. Total coloproctectomy with ileo-anal anastomosis (TCP-IAA) is the standard surgery, and it holds out hope for healing. Modalities depend on patient characteristics, previous emergency colectomy, and presence of dysplasia. It may be carried out in one, in two modified, or in three phases. The main complications are anastomotic fistula, short-term pouch-related fistula, ileo-anal pouch syndrome, pouchitis and long-term digestive and sexual disorders. For selected cases, an alternative can consist in total colectomy with ileo-rectal anastomosis or permanent terminal ileostomy. The objective of this update is to clarify the indications, modalities, and results of surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis in accordance with the most recent data in the literature.

Effects of prednisolone tapering on effectiveness of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis: data from a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The influence of concomitant prednisolone on clinical outcomes and safety in infliximab-treated ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is unknown.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES

A retrospective cohort study was performed, including 147 UC patients treated with infliximab at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centre. Primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR) at week 14 and week 52. Patients were grouped according to prednisolone tapering regimens: standard (≤5 mg/week), fast (>5 mg/week), direct discontinuation or no prednisolone. Patients intolerant to corticosteroids and patients stopping corticosteroids in preparation for surgery including colectomy during their initial admission were excluded.

RESULTS

There was no overall association between prednisolone exposure or no exposure and CFCR at weeks 14 or 52 of infliximab. The proportion of patients with C reactive protein ≤5 mg/L was higher in the standard tapering at week 14 as compared with faster regimens or no prednisolone. In subgroup analyses, the standard tapering was associated with a higher rate of CFCR at week 14 compared with the fast-tapering regimen in patients receiving ≥40 mg prednisolone at initiation of infliximab (64.3% vs 26.3%, p=0.04) and among patients admitted with acute severe UC (66.6% vs 23.5%, p<0.05). Similar data were seen at week 52. Prednisolone did not affect infliximab trough levels but increased infection rates (10/77 vs 2/70, p=0.03), in particular C. difficile infection.

CONCLUSION

In UC patients with limited disease burden, prednisolone did not affect effectiveness of infliximab. However, patients with increased disease burden seem to benefit from corticosteroid combination therapy.

Contemporary perioperative outcomes after total abdominal colectomy for ulcerative colitis in a tertiary referral centre

OBJECTIVE

Colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) is common despite therapeutic advances. Post-operative morbidity and mortality demonstrate an association between hospital volumes and outcomes. This single-centre retrospective study examines outcomes after emergency colectomy for UC.

METHODS

Patient demographics, perioperative variables and outcomes were collected in Beaumont Hospital between 2010 and 2023. Univariant analysis was used to assess relationships between perioperative variables and morbidity and length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients underwent total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy for UC, 8.7 (±3.8) per annum. Indications were refractory acute severe colitis (88.7%), toxic megacolon (6.1%), perforation (4.3%), or obstruction (0.9%). Over 80% of cases were performed laparoscopically. Pre-operative steroid (93%) and biologic (77.4%) use was common. Median post-operative LOS was 8 days (interquartile range 6-12). There were no 30-day mortalities, and 30-day post-operative morbidity was 38.3%. There was no association between time to colectomy ( P  = 0.85) or biologic use ( P  = 0.24) and morbidity. Increasing age was associated with prolonged LOS ( P  = 0.01). Laparoscopic approach (7 vs. 12 days P  =0.01, 36.8% vs. 45% P  = 0.66) was associated with reduced LOS and morbidity.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights contemporary outcomes after emergency colectomy for UC at a specialist high-volume, tertiary referral centre, and superior outcomes after laparoscopic surgery in the biologic era.

Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Mediates Beneficial Gut Microbiome Enrichment in Acute Severe Colitis

BACKGROUND

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) supplementation of the standard of care (SOC) augments steroid responsiveness in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). EEN is known to alter gut microbial composition. The present study investigates EEN-driven gut microbial alterations in patients with ASUC and examines their correlations with clinical parameters.

METHODS

Stool samples from patients with ASUC (n = 44) who received either EEN-supplemented SOC (EEN group; n = 20) or SOC alone (SOC group; n = 24) for 7 days were collected at baseline (day 0) and postintervention (day 7). Microbiome analysis was carried out using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing followed by data processing using QIIME2 and R packages.

RESULTS

Seven-day EEN-conjugated corticosteroid therapy in patients with ASUC enhanced the abundances of beneficial bacterial genera Faecalibacterium and Veillonella and reduced the abundance of Sphingomonas (generalized linear model fitted with Lasso regularization with robustness of 100%), while no such improvements in gut microbiota were observed in the SOC group. The EEN-associated taxa correlated with the patient's clinical parameters (serum albumin and C-reactive protein levels). Unlike the SOC group, which retained its preintervention core microbiota, EEN contributed Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a beneficial gut bacterial taxon, to the gut microbial core. EEN responders showed enhancement of Ligilactobacillus and Veillonella and reduction in Prevotella and Granulicatella. Analysis of baseline gut microbiota showed relative enhancement of certain microbial genera being associated with corticosteroid response and baseline clinical parameters and that this signature could conceivably be used as a predictive tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of clinical response by EEN-conjugated corticosteroid therapy is accompanied by beneficial gut microbial changes in patients with ASUC.

Surgery for ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more severe presentation and rapid progression in pediatric patients, resulting in a greater need for surgical intervention compared to adults. Though medical management of UC has advanced with new biologic therapies, surgery continues to play an important role when disease progresses in the form of worsened or persistent symptoms, hemodynamic instability, or sepsis. The goals of surgical management are to restore intestinal continuity with a functional pouch when possible. While the literature has been growing regarding studies of pediatric patients with UC, high level of evidence studies are limited and most recommendations are based on adult studies. Similar to adults, pediatric patients who have ileal pouches created require surveillance for recurrent disease and cancer surveillance. Unique issues for pediatric patients include monitoring of growth and appropriate transition to adult care after adolescence. This review includes indications for surgical management, overview of staged surgical approaches, and the technical details of the three-stage approach.

Post-hospitalization Short Versus Long Steroid Taper Strategies in Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory colon disease characterized by relapsing flares and remission episodes. However, the optimal steroid tapering strategy in patients hospitalized for acute severe UC (ASUC) remains relatively unknown. We aim to examine the clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for ASUC regarding variable prednisone taper regimens upon discharge.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients admitted to our facility with ASUC between 2000 and 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the duration of steroid taper on discharge (< 6 and > 6 weeks). Patients who had colectomy at index admission were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome was rehospitalization for ASUC within 6 months of index admission. Secondary outcomes included the need for colectomy, worsening endoscopic disease extent and/or severity during the follow-up period (6 months), and a composite outcome as a surrogate of worsening disease (defined as a combination of all products above). Two-sample t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests were used to compare the means of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for rehospitalization with ASUC.

Results

A total of 215 patients (short steroid taper = 91 and long steroid taper = 124) were analyzed. A higher number of patients in the long steroid taper group had a longer disease duration since diagnosis and moderate-severe endoscopic disease activity (63.8 vs. 25.6 months, p < 0.0001, 46.8% vs. 23.1%, P = ≤ .05, respectively). Both groups had similar disease extent, prior biologic therapy, and the need for inpatient rescue therapy. At the 6-month follow-up, rates of rehospitalization with a flare of UC were comparable between the 2 groups (68.3% vs. 68.5%, P = .723). On univariate and multivariate logistic regression, escalation of steroid dose within four weeks of discharge (aOR 6.09, 95% CI: 1.82-20.3, P  = .003) was noted to be the only independent predictor for rehospitalization with ASUC.

Conclusions

This is the first study comparing clinical outcomes between post-discharge steroid tapering regimens in hospitalized patients for ASUC. Both examined steroid taper regimens upon discharge showed comparable clinical results. Hence, we suggest a short steroid taper as a standard post-hospitalization strategy in patients following ASUC encounters. It is likely to enhance patient tolerability and reduce steroid-related adverse effects without adversely affecting outcomes.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis management: unanswered questions and latest insights

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a distinctive ulcerative colitis flare presentation characterised by the presence of systemic inflammation as well as bloody diarrhoea, and occurs at least once in 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. Each episode carries a risk of complications, need for colectomy, and mortality. Little is known about ASUC pathogenesis, although impaired host-microbiota crosstalk involving pathobionts is suspected. In this Review, we discuss unanswered questions and results from the latest research on the medical-first-line, second-line, and potential third-line therapies-and surgical management of ASUC. We detail promising options for management, such as the use of enteral nutrition in combination with intravenous steroids, the ability to predict early failure of first-line or second-line therapies, and the emerging role of JAK inhibitors. An optimal framework to personalise therapy on the basis of multiomics tools is yet to be developed.

Modern practical management of acute severe colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is one of life-threatening complications that occur in one-fifth of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with significant morbidity and an estimated mortality rate up to 1%. There are no validated clinical scoring systems for ASUC. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone for the management of ASUC patients However, one-third of patients are steroid refractory and require colectomy in the pre-biologic era or salvage therapy in the post-biologic era. The currently available predictors of non-response to steroids and salvages therapy are sub-optimal. Furthermore, there is a need for the development of clear outcome measures for ASUC patients. Although infliximab and cyclosporin are both effective as salvage therapy, they still carry a rate of treatment failure. Hence, there is an unmet need to explore alternative therapeutic options before colectomy particularly in prior infliximab-exposed patients. This may include the introduction of small molecules with rapid onset of action as a salvage or sequential therapy and the use of slow-onset other biological therapy after "bridging" with cyclosporine. In this article, we explore the current best evidence-based practice and detail the gaps in knowledge in the management of ASUC.

Letter: 'No first among equals'-Authors' reply

This article is linked to Kayal et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17731 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17792

Long-term outcomes of cyclosporin induction and ustekinumab maintenance combination therapy in patients with steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis

Background

Effective management of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a major challenge and there remains a paucity of available maintenance treatment options after efficacious cyclosporin induction therapy.

Objectives

We investigated the long-term effectiveness and safety of cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy in patients with steroid refractory ASUC.

Design

Monocentric, prospective study.

Methods

We included patients with steroid refractory ASUC with multiple failed prior advanced therapies, who were treated with cyclosporin and ustekinumab combination therapy.

Results

Among the 11 included patients, 10 had prior failure to infliximab and 8 failed at least three previous biological therapies. The mean baseline Mayo and Lichtiger scores were 10.9 (9-12) and 13.3 (11-14), respectively. Ustekinumab was initiated 3.2 weeks (1-8) after initiation of cyclosporin treatment and combination therapy was continued for a mean of 11.5 (4-20) weeks. Clinical response was achieved in six patients at week 16 and clinical steroid-free clinical remission in five patients at week 48. Endoscopic remission was achieved in five patients at week 16 and together with histological remission in five patients at week 52. Intestinal ultrasound demonstrated mean bowel wall thickening in the sigmoid colon of 5.5 mm at baseline and 3.5 mm at week 52, respectively. Two patients had to undergo colectomy (mean 4.5 months, range 3-6) and three stopped ustekinumab therapy due to ineffectiveness. Overall, combination therapy was well tolerated.

Conclusion

Combination of cyclosporin and ustekinumab therapy allowed nearly half of ASUC patients to reach clinical and endoscopic remission after 52 weeks, warranting further studies.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Upadacitinib Salvage Therapy for Infliximab-Experienced Patients with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] is a medical emergency treated with intravenous steroids followed by infliximab or cyclosporin in the case of steroid failure with emergent colectomy required in refractory or severe cases. Case series have reported on the effectiveness of tofacitinib for refractory disease, but data regarding the effectiveness of upadacitinib in this setting have not been previously reported. We describe the use of upadacitinib therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC in patients with prior loss of response to infliximab.

METHODS

Six patients who received upadacitinib for steroid-refractory ASUC were identified at two Australian tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres. Patients were followed for up to 16 weeks after discharge with clinical, biochemical and intestinal ultrasound [IUS] outcomes.

RESULTS

All six patients demonstrated clinical response to upadacitinib induction during their inpatient admission. Four patients achieved corticosteroid-free clinical remission by week 8, including complete resolution of rectal bleeding and transmural healing assessed by IUS, and sustained clinical remission at week 16. One patient proceeded to colectomy at week 15 due to refractory disease. No adverse events directly attributable to upadacitinib were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Upadacitinib may have a role as a safe and effective salvage therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC in patients who have previously failed to respond to infliximab therapy. Prospective studies are required to determine the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib use in this setting before routine use can be recommended.

Leaving behind the Mucosa: Advances and Future Directions of Intestinal Ultrasound in Ulcerative Colitis

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), mainly Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD), are disorders characterized by chronic inflammation with severe morbidity and long-term disabling quality of life outcomes. UC mainly affects the mucosal and sub-mucosal layers of the colon, without embracing the peri-intestinal structures. Considering the predominant mucosal location of UC inflammation, the implementation of transmural evaluation by cross-sectional imaging techniques, mainly Intestinal Ultrasound (IUS), has been left behind for ages, especially if compared to CD. Nevertheless, studies analyzing intestinal ultrasound parameters accuracy in disease activity detection reported a good-to-optimal correlation of IUS markers with colonic inflammation, suggesting comparable feasibility of IUS monitoring in UC as in CD. The easy-to-use, costless and point-of-care available status of IUS is therefore crucial in order to improve the diagnostic process and, according to the recent literature, to monitor the response to treatment leading to speeding up decision making and therapy adjustments. Recent studies have demonstrated the correlation between transmural healing in UC with favorable outcomes even in the long term. An evidence gap still exists in the assessment of the rectum, with trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS) a potential answer to reach a more precise evaluation of rectal inflammation. Eventually, IUS is also increasingly showing promises in emergent or post-surgical UC settings, considering various efforts put in line to demonstrate its feasibility in predicting response to salvage therapy for surgery avoidance and in studying inflammation relapse after procto-colectomy with ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) creation.

Real-world efficacy and safety of advanced therapies in hospitalized patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

This multicenter observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the utilization and short-term efficacy of advanced therapy (AT) in hospitalized patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC).

METHODS

In total, 221 patients with ASUC were enrolled between August 2020 and July 2021. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (CR, defined as a patient-reported outcome score < 2 with no blood in the stool) rate on Day 7 and 14 in hospitalized patients who received corticosteroids (CS) and AT.

RESULTS

Among patients with ASUC, 120 and 101 patients received CS or any AT as first-line treatment, respectively. The CR rates on Day 7 and 14 were 22.5% and 35.0%, respectively, in hospitalized patients who received CS as first-line treatment. Most patients who used ATs had CS-dependent or frequent recurrences. Eight different ATs (apheresis, tacrolimus, infliximab, golimumab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and cyclosporine) were used as first-line treatment in patients with ASUC, and the CR rates on Day 7 and 14 were 16.8% and 29.7%, respectively. Twenty-five patients received the second ATs after hospitalizations, and the CR rates on Day 7 and 14 were 0% and 12%, respectively. The CR rates on Day 14 were significantly higher in patients who changed to AT than in those whose dose of CS increased (34.0% vs 10.7%, p = 0.020) among patients who had already used CS before hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Most first-use ATs were effective for patients with ASUC, while second-use ATs might have had limited benefits in inducing CR. These findings may contribute to considerations for the management of hospitalized patients.

Systematic Review: Outcome Prediction in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Background and Aims

Approximately 1 in 4 patients with ulcerative colitis experiences a severe exacerbation of disease requiring hospitalization, termed acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). These episodes pose a major burden on patients with ulcerative colitis and early prediction of their outcomes based on clinical data is crucial to optimize therapy.

Methods

A systematic review was performed using Embase and Medline for articles between 2000 and 2023. Studies obtained from the databases were uploaded on Covidence for screening by 2 independent reviewers. Quality appraisal for each study was done using the Critical Appraisals Skills Program depending on study design.

Results

A total of 48 eligible studies were included in the review. The key predictors of ASUC identified in this review included clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic biomarkers, which were summarized. The main outcomes assessed in the studies were intravenous corticosteroid failure, need for rescue therapy, and need for colectomy. Score-based predictions and some novel markers were also included in the results.

Conclusion

Utilization of evidence-based predictors of outcome in ASUC could serve as a powerful tool in customizing therapeutic measures and a step forward toward personalized patient care. Despite promising candidates, there remains a significant opportunity to identify and test additional clinical and laboratory-based predictors, especially early in the hospitalization and as the clinical practice and medical therapies evolve.

Safety and efficacy of multimatrix mesalamine in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind study

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated the tolerability and efficacy of multimatrix mesalamine in inducing and maintaining remission in adults with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of low-dose and high-dose once-daily multimatrix mesalamine in children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate UC or those in remission.

Methods

This prospective, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 study (8-week double-blind acute [DBA] phase; 26-week double-blind maintenance [DBM] phase; and an additional 8-week, open-label acute [OLA] phase) was conducted in 33 sites across North America, Europe, and the Middle East between December 12, 2014, and November 28, 2018. Eligible patients aged 5-17 years and weighing 18-90 kg were randomised 1:1 to either low (900-2400 mg) or high (1800-4800 mg) oral doses of multimatrix mesalamine once daily, stratified by body weight. Interactive response technology was used for randomisation. The primary efficacy outcome was to estimate the clinical response of multimatrix mesalamine (two doses) in different weight groups. Efficacy and safety analyses were conducted in the safety analysis set (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02093663; Study completed).

Findings

Overall, 107 patients were randomised into the DBA (n = 54) or DBM phase (n = 88; directly or after completing the double-blind or OLA phases); the overall safety analysis set included 105 patients. In the DBA phase, the high-dose group (n = 17; 65.4%) achieved a higher clinical response rate than the low-dose (n = 10; 37.0%) group; difference 28.3% (95% CI: 2.5-54.2; p = 0.039), odds ratio (OR) 3.21 (95% CI: 1.04-9.88). In the DBM phase at Week 26, similar proportions of patients maintained clinical response in the low-dose (n = 23; 54.8%) and high-dose (n = 24; 53.3%) groups: OR 0.99 (0.42-2.34); p = 0.981. Overall, 246 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 73 patients (69.5%); 23 TEAEs in 14 patients (13.3%) were considered related to the study drug. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Interpretation

Our findings suggested that the benefit-risk ratio of once-daily multimatrix mesalamine in paediatric patients was favourable and comparable with that reported in adults with mild-to-moderate UC.

Funding

Shire Development LLC, a Takeda company.

Systematic review: Scores used to predict outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Predictive scores for ASUC outcomes according to time of application.

Infliximab Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Severe Colitis

INTRODUCTION

Clinical remission has been achieved with infliximab in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there is conflicting data regarding its effectiveness as rescue therapy in adult acute severe colitis. Furthermore, pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with more severe disease that may be less amenable to attempted rescue. We reviewed our experience and outcomes with pediatric severe colitis after attempted inpatient rescue with infliximab.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of pediatric patients with UC or indeterminate colitis who received inpatient rescue infliximab therapy from 1/2000 to 1/2019. Rescue infliximab therapy was considered if a child failed non-biologic therapy or progressed to fulminant or toxic colitis. Primary outcome was failed therapy resulting in colectomy. A p-value of <0.05 determined significance.

RESULTS

Thirty patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at administration of rescue infliximab treatment was 14 years [IQR 13,17]. Rescue therapy with infliximab was successful in 33% (n = 10), while 67% (n = 20) underwent colectomy. Children on maintenance steroids were less likely to be successfully rescued with infliximab and require colectomy (p = 0.03). Children requiring colectomy had a longer hospital stay (p = 0.03), more abdominal radiographs (p = 0.01), and were on a longer duration of antibiotics (p = <0.01) compared to children who were successfully rescued with infliximab. There was no difference in baseline vital signs or laboratory abnormalities between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In severe acute ulcerative or indeterminate colitis cases where infliximab has not been previously used, rescue infliximab can be used to avoid colectomy but has a high failure rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study.

Tofacitinib for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tofacitinib has emerged as a new potential treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC]. We conducted a systematic review to assess efficacy, safety and integration in ASUC algorithms.

METHODS

Systematic searching was done in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov until August 17, 2022, including all studies reporting original observations on tofacitinib for ASUC, preferably defined according to Truelove and Witts criteria. The primary outcome was colectomy-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 1072 publications identified, 21 studies were included of which three were ongoing clinical trials. The remaining comprised a pooled cohort originating from 15 case publications [n = 42], a GETAID cohort study [n = 55], a case-control study [n = 40 cases] and a paediatric cohort [n = 11]. Of these 148 reported cases, tofacitinib was used as second-line treatment after steroid failure in previous infliximab failures or third-line after sequential steroid and infliximab or cyclosporine failure, 69 [47%] were female, median age range was 17-34 years and disease duration was 0.7-10 years. Overall, 30-day colectomy-free survival was 85% [n = 123 of 145; n = 3 without colectomy had follow-up <30 days], 90-day 86% [n = 113 of 132; n = 16 follow-up <90 days] and 180-day 69% [n = 77 of 112; n = 36 follow-up <180 days]. Tofacitinib persistence at follow-up was 68-91%, clinical remission 35-69% and endoscopic remission 55%. Adverse events occurred in 22 patients, predominantly being infectious complications other than herpes zoster [n = 13], and resulted in tofacitinib discontinuation in seven patients.

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib appears promising for treatment of ASUC with high short-term colectomy-free survival among refractory patients who are otherwise deemed to require colectomy. However, large high-quality studies are needed.

Ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is a lifelong inflammatory disease affecting the rectum and colon to a variable extent. In 2023, the prevalence of ulcerative colitis was estimated to be 5 million cases around the world, and the incidence is increasing worldwide. Ulcerative colitis is thought to occur in people with a genetic predisposition following environmental exposures; gut epithelial barrier defects, the microbiota, and a dysregulated immune response are strongly implicated. Patients usually present with bloody diarrhoea, and the diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, biological, endoscopic, and histological findings. The aim of medical management is, first, to induce a rapid clinical response and normalise biomarkers and, second, to maintain clinical remission and reach endoscopic normalisation to prevent long-term disability. Treatments for inducing remission include 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs and corticosteroids. Maintenance treatments include 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs, thiopurines, biologics (eg, anti-cytokines and anti-integrins), and small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators). Although the therapeutic options are expanding, 10-20% of patients still require proctocolectomy for medically refractory disease. The keys to breaking through this therapeutic ceiling might be the combination of therapeutics with precision and personalised medicine.

Revolutionizing Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Innovative Dietary Strategies and Future Directions

This comprehensive narrative review delves into the intricate interplay between diet and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), shedding light on the potential impact of dietary interventions in disease management. By analyzing nutritional interventions, risks, challenges, and future perspectives, this review serves as a vital resource for clinicians, researchers, and patients alike. The amalgamation of evidence underscores the significance of customizing dietary strategies for individual patients, considering disease phenotype and cultural factors. Through an exploration of dietary components' effects on IBD, including exclusive enteral nutrition and omega-3 fatty acids, this review offers pragmatic implementation advice and outlines avenues for further research. Bridging the gap between research findings and clinical applications, the review facilitates informed decision-making and patient-centric care. In the face of escalating IBD prevalence, this review emerges as an indispensable guide for healthcare professionals, empowering them to navigate the complexities of dietary management while enabling patients to actively participate in their care trajectory. Ultimately, this narrative review advances the understanding of diet's pivotal role in IBD management, fostering a more integrated approach to patient care and paving the way for improved research and policy initiatives in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Outcomes out to 12 months after sequential use of high-dose tofacitinib following infliximab in acute severe ulcerative colitis

Acute severe colitis (ASUC) remains a significant cause of morbidity in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. We present the outcomes out to 12 months following the use of high-dose tofacitinib, 10 mg three times daily (TDS), in patients with steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. A total of 11 patients with ASUC who were treated with high-dose tofacitinib after failing sequential infliximab therapy between 2019 and 2021 were identified at an Australian tertiary centre. Ten of 11 patients demonstrated clinical and biochemical response to treatment during admission. Two of 11 patients required colectomy, one during the index admission and the other during re-admission 10 days after the index presentation. Nine of the initial responders had a median Mayo score of 1 (IQR 0-4) at both 6 and 12 months, and all remained colectomy-free out to 12 months. Neither venous thromboembolic events nor major infective complications were observed. Tofacitinib may be a safe and effective induction and maintenance agent in the treatment of steroid and infliximab refractory ASUC. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are required to explore the use of tofacitinib in ASUC before it can be routinely recommended as salvage therapy.

Association between body fat composition and disease duration, clinical activity, and intravenous corticosteroid-induced response in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Body fat composition is believed to be associated with the progression, medical response, and prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Hence, we conducted this study to explore if fat metrics were associated with the disease activity of severe IBD and the response to intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS).

METHODS

We included 69 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 72 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who had previously received IVCS during hospitalization. We quantified individual fat distribution using abdominal computed tomography slices. The correlations between fat parameters and disease activity were available with Spearman correlation analysis. The prediction model was developed using independent risk factors derived from multivariable logistic regression analysis. Model discrimination was evaluated leveraging the receiver operating characteristic curve. 1000 bootstrap resamples internally validated the model's prediction performance.

RESULTS

Notable differences in age, nutritional status, serum cytomegalovirus replication, stool condition, and extraintestinal involvement between UC and CD patients were observed. UC subjects who responded to IVCS had higher subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), visceral adipose tissue index (VATI), and mesorectal adipose tissue index (MATI) than non-responders. IVCS-responding CD individuals had lower VATI and mesenteric fat index (MFI) than non-responders. CD patients with a prolonged disease duration had a decreased SATI and an elevated MFI. VATI and MATI were reduced as UC clinically progressed, while more prominent clinical activity in CD correlated with increased VATI, MATI, and MFI. A high SATI indicated that patients with UC were more prone to be IVCS responders. For patients with CD, levels of VATI and MFI were negatively associated with effective IVCS treatment. The established models showed a discriminative accuracy of 0.834 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.740-0.928] in the UC cohort and 0.871 (95% CI 0.793-0.949) in the CD cohort. Repeated samples supported the reliability of the developed models (AUC_UC = 0.836, 95% CI 0.735-0.919; AUC_CD = 0.876, 95% CI 0.785-0.946).

CONCLUSION

Human fat indexes represent novel imaging biomarkers for identifying IBD patients who respond to IVCS, thus building accelerated therapy regimens and avoiding the adverse effects of ineffective IVCS.

In-hospital management of inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is complex. Despite considerable therapeutic advancements in outpatient ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease management, the in-hospital management continues to lag with suboptimal outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview of our approach to managing patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and Crohn's disease-related complications, followed by a summary of emerging evidence for new management approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

ASUC has seen the emergence of well validated prognostic models for colectomy as well as the development of novel treatment strategies such as accelerated infliximab dosing, Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, and sequential therapy, yet the rate of colectomy for steroid-refractory ASUC has not meaningfully improved. Crohn's disease has seen the development of better diagnostic tools, early Crohn's disease-related complication stratification and identification, as well as better surgical techniques, yet the rates of hospitalization and development of Crohn's disease-related complications remain high.

SUMMARY

Significant progress has been made in the in-hospital IBD management; however, both the management of ASUC and hospitalized Crohn's disease remain a challenge with suboptimal outcomes. Critical knowledge gaps still exist, and dedicated studies in hospitalized patients with IBD are needed to address them.

Factors associated with long-term healthcare expense and steroid exposure in patients admitted with acute severe ulcerative colitis

Background and Aim

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a significant cause of morbidity and healthcare utilization. This study aimed to characterize the total healthcare costs of ASUC, explore factors associated with significant cost over the 12 months following an index admission, and document outcomes including corticosteroid exposure.

Methods

Patients admitted from January 2016 until January 2021 for ASUC to a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center in Australia were identified via retrospective chart review. Costs were calculated over a 12-month period following index admission.

Results

Seventy-two patients (30 [42%] female, median age 39 [IQR 27-54] years) were included. The median length of stay of index admission was 6 days (IQR 5-10 days). The median cost of index admission was 7829 AUD, which was driven by the initial length of stay (P < 0.01) and requirement for colectomy (P < 0.01). Median total healthcare cost over the first 12 months was 13 873 AUD (IQR 9684-19 936 AUD), again predominately driven by the length of stay (P < 0.01) and requirement for colectomy (P < 0.01). Median cumulative corticosteroid use over 12 months inclusive of index hospitalization was 1760 mg (IQR 1560-2350 mg). Requirement for inpatient medical salvage therapy with infliximab was associated with increased corticosteroid requirement (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Healthcare expense related to ASUC remains high, driven predominantly by the length of stay during initial hospitalization and need for colectomy. From a healthcare cost perspective, novel methods to reduce inpatient hospital stay as well as need for colectomy may help reduce the economic and steroid burden of ASUC.

Early Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Improves Clinical Outcomes in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Objectives

Guidelines recommend performing a flexible sigmoidoscopy in patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). However, it is unclear if time to sigmoidoscopy affects relevant clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the impact of early sigmoidoscopy on clinical outcomes using a well-characterized cohort of patients with ASUC.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective study of all patients hospitalized with ASUC from January 1, 2012 to November 1, 2021. Early sigmoidoscopy was defined as occurring within 72 hours of admission while delayed sigmoidoscopy was defined as occurring >72 hours after admission. Primary outcomes were cumulative days of intravenous (IV) corticosteroid (CS) use, length of hospital stay, and colectomy rates. Secondary outcomes were time to infliximab (IFX) rescue and inpatient opioid medication use.

Results

A total of 112 patients hospitalized with ASUC who underwent sigmoidoscopy were included in the analysis. Eighty-seven patients (78%) had early sigmoidoscopy and 25 (22%) had delayed sigmoidoscopy. Patients in the early sigmoidoscopy group were exposed to significantly fewer days of IV CS (4.5 vs 9.2 days; P < .001), had shorter hospital stays (6.4 vs 19.3 days; P < .001), and shorter time to IFX rescue (3.5 vs 6.4 days; P = .004). Rates of colectomy in the early and delayed sigmoidoscopy groups were 17% versus 28%, respectively (P = .23). Longer time to sigmoidoscopy was associated with a 16% increased risk of colectomy (HR = 1.16, P = .002).

Conclusions

In this well-characterized cohort, early sigmoidoscopy in ASUC was associated with favorable clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the benefits of early sigmoidoscopy in patients with ASUC. Larger prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a useful strategy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Nearly a quarter of UC patients will experience acute severe UC (ASUC) in their lifetime, including 30% who will fail first-line corticosteroid therapy. Steroid-refractory ASUC patients require salvage therapy with infliximab, cyclosporine, or colectomy. Fewer data are available for the use of TDM of infliximab in ASUC. The pharmacokinetics of ASUC make TDM in this population more complex. High inflammatory burden is associated with increased infliximab clearance, which is associated with lower infliximab drug concentrations. Observational data support the association between increased serum infliximab concentrations, lower clearance, and favorable clinical and endoscopic outcomes, as well as decreased rates of colectomy. Data regarding the benefit of accelerated or intensified dosing strategies of infliximab-as well as target drug concentration thresholds-in ASUC patients remain more equivocal, though limited by their observational nature. Studies are underway to further evaluate optimal dosing and TDM targets in this population. This review examines the evidence for TDM in patients with ASUC, with a focus on infliximab.

An Extremes of Phenotype Approach Confirms Significant Genetic Heterogeneity in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Ulcerative colitis [UC] is a major form of inflammatory bowel disease globally. Phenotypic heterogeneity is defined by several variables including age of onset and disease extent. The genetics of disease severity remains poorly understood. To further investigate this, we performed a genome wide association [GWA] study using an extremes of phenotype strategy.

METHODS

We conducted GWA analyses in 311 patients with medically refractory UC [MRUC], 287 with non-medically refractory UC [non-MRUC] and 583 controls. Odds ratios [ORs] were calculated for known risk variants comparing MRUC and non-MRUC, and controls.

RESULTS

MRUC-control analysis had the greatest yield of genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] [2018], including lead SNP = rs111838972 [OR = 1.82, p = 6.28 × 10-9] near MMEL1 and a locus in the human leukocyte antigen [HLA] region [lead SNP = rs144717024, OR = 12.23, p = 1.7 × 10-19]. ORs for the lead SNPs were significantly higher in MRUC compared to non-MRUC [p < 9.0 × 10-6]. No SNPs reached significance in the non-MRUC-control analysis (top SNP, rs7680780 [OR 2.70, p = 5.56 × 10-8). We replicate findings for rs4151651 in the Complement Factor B [CFB] gene and demonstrate significant changes in CFB gene expression in active UC. Detailed HLA analyses support the strong associations with MHC II genes, particularly HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 and HLA-DRB1 in MRUC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our MRUC subgroup replicates multiple known UC risk variants in contrast to non-MRUC and demonstrates significant differences in effect sizes compared to those published. Non-MRUC cases demonstrate lower ORs similar to those published. Additional risk and prognostic loci may be identified by targeted recruitment of individuals with severe disease.

Infliximab versus ciclosporin in steroid resistant acute severe ulcerative colitis: a model-based cost-utility analysis of data from CONSTRUCT pragmatic trial

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence in the literature on the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC). The study aimed to perform decision analytic model-based long-term cost-utility analysis (CUA) of infliximab versus ciclosporin for steroid-resistant ASUC investigated in CONSTRUCT pragmatic trial.

METHODS

A decision tree (DT) model was developed using two-year health effect, resource use and costs data from CONSTRUCT trial to estimate relative cost-effectiveness of two competing drugs from the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Services (NHS) perspective. Using short-term trial data, a Markov model (MM) was then developed and evaluated over further 18 years. Both DT and MM were combined to investigate cost-effectiveness of infliximab versus ciclosporin for ASUC patients over 20-year time horizon, with a rigorous multiple deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to address uncertainty in results.

RESULTS

The decision tree mirrored trial-based results. Beyond 2-year trial follow-up, Markov model predicted a decrease in colectomy rate, but it remained slightly higher for ciclosporin. NHS costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) over base-case 20 year time horizon were £26,793 and 9.816 for ciclosporin and £34,185 and 9.106 for infliximab, suggesting ciclosporin dominates infliximab. Ciclosporin had 95% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold value up to £20,000.

CONCLUSION

Using data from a pragmatic RCT, the cost-effectiveness models produced incremental net health benefit in favour of ciclosporin relative to infliximab. Results from long-term modelling indicated that ciclosporin remains dominant compared with infliximab for the treatment of NHS ASUC patients, however, these need to be interpreted cautiously.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CONSTRUCT Trial registration number ISRCTN22663589; EudraCT number: 2008- 001968-36 (Date 27/08/2008).

Ulcerative colitis (K51), adults

.

Early management of acute severe UC in the biologics era: development and international validation of a prognostic clinical index to predict steroid response

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine whether changes in acute severe colitis (ASC) management have translated to improved outcomes and to develop a simple model predicting steroid non-response on admission.

DESIGN

Outcomes of 131 adult ASC admissions (117 patients) in Oxford, UK between 2015 and 2019 were compared with data from 1992 to 1993. All patients received standard treatment with intravenous corticosteroids and endoscopic disease activity scoring (Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS)). Steroid non-response was defined as receiving medical rescue therapy or surgery. A predictive model developed in the Oxford cohort was validated in Australia and India (Gold Coast University Hospital 2015-2020, n=110; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 2018-2020, n=62).

RESULTS

In the 2015-2019 Oxford cohort, 15% required colectomy during admission vs 29% in 1992-1993 (p=0.033), while 71 (54%) patients received medical rescue therapy (27% ciclosporin, 27% anti-tumour necrosis factor, compared with 27% ciclosporin in 1992-1993 (p=0.0015). Admission C reactive protein (CRP) (false discovery rate, p=0.00066), albumin (0.0066) and UCEIS scores (0.015) predicted steroid non-response. A four-point model was developed involving CRP of ≥100 mg/L (one point), albumin of ≤25 g/L (one point), and UCEIS score of ≥4 (1 point) or ≥7 (2 points). Patients scoring 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the validation cohorts had steroid response rates of 100, 75.0%, 54.9%, 18.2% and 0%, respectively. Scoring of ≥3 was 84% (95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) predictive of steroid failure (OR 11.9, 95% CI 10.8 to 13.0). Colectomy rates in the validation cohorts were were 8%-11%.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency colectomy rates for ASC have halved in 25 years to 8%-15% worldwide. Patients who will not respond to corticosteroids are readily identified on admission and may be prioritised for early intensification of therapy.

The urotensin-II receptor: A marker for staging and steroid outcome prediction in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Urotensin-II receptor- (UTR) related pathway exerts a key-role in promoting inflammation. The aim was to assess the relationship between UTR expression and clinical, endoscopic and biochemical severity of ulcerative colitis (UC), exploring its predictivity of intravenous (iv) steroid administration therapeutic outcome.

METHODS

One-hundred patients with first diagnosis of UC and 44 healthy subjects were enrolled. UTR expression was assessed by qPCR, Western Blot (WB) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Clinical, endoscopic and histological activity of UC were evaluated by using Truelove and Witts (T&W) severity index, Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), and Truelove and Richards Index (TRI). The partial and full Mayo scores (PMS and FMS) were assessed to stage the disease.

RESULTS

The UTR expression, resulted higher in the lesioned mucosa of UC patients in comparison to healthy subjects (p < .0001 all). Direct relationship between UTR (mRNA and protein) expression and disease severity assessment (T&W, PMS, MES and TRI) was highlighted (p < .0001 all). UTR expression resulted also higher in the 72 patients requiring iv steroids administration compared to those who underwent alternative medications, (p < .0001). The 32 steroid-non-responders showed an increased UTR expression (WB, IHC and qPCR from lesioned mucosa), compared to 40 steroid-responders (p: .0002, .0001, p < .0001 respectively). The predictive role of UTR expression (p < .05) on the negative iv steroids administration therapeutic outcome was highlighted and ROC curves identified the thresholds expressing the better predictive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

UTR represents a promising inflammatory marker related to clinical, endoscopic, and histological disease activity as well as a predictive marker of steroid administration therapeutic outcome in the UC context.

Transcriptomic analyses of treatment-naïve pediatric ulcerative colitis patients and exploration of underlying disease pathogenesis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a form of chronic inflammatory bowel disease of nonspecific origin. This study used an RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) approach to evaluate the transcriptomic landscape of a well-stratified treatment-naïve pediatric UC patient population by comparing them with healthy control children. The data were analyzed to evaluate the mechanisms driving UC-related intestinal inflammation and fibrosis.

METHODS

Intestinal mucosal samples from five pediatric UC patients and five healthy controls were analyzed by RNA-Seq, and results were verified by qPCR. A CRISPR/Cas9 approach was used to knock out the expression of HLA-DRB5, and molecular biology techniques were used for additional mechanistic studies.

RESULTS

In these analyses, 2290 genes were found to be differentially expressed between the UC and control samples, of which 1258 and 1032 were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. Gene Ontology analysis showed that these genes were enriched in extracellular matrix (ECM)-related processes and that 7 of 8 differentially expressed genes of interest (PIK3CD, IL1β, IL1α, TIMP1, MMP1, MMP12, COL6A3, and HLADRB5) were upregulated and involved in ECM-receptor interaction and inflammatory bowel disease-related pathways. Increased HLA-DRB5 expression driven by intestinal bacteria was found to promote IL-1α secretion, leading to intestinal inflammation and fibrosis, suggesting a possible target for the treatment of UC.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that intestinal inflammation is present in pediatric UC patients for extended periods before the onset of symptoms, and intestinal fibrosis begins even during the early stages of UC. Intestinal bacteria were also found to trigger intestinal inflammation and fibrosis, with HLA-DRB5 playing a central role in this process.

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Optimal Strategies for Drug Therapy

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity (30% to 40%). Patients with ASUC require hospitalization for prompt medical treatment, and colectomy is considered if medical therapy fails. Corticosteroids remain the primary initial therapy, although one-third of patients do not respond to treatment. Clinical data have indicated that cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and infliximab can be used to treat patients with ASUC who do not respond to intravenous corticosteroids. The effectiveness and safety of sequential therapy have recently been reported; however, the data are not convincing. Importantly, timely decision-making with rescue therapy or surgical treatment is critical to manage ASUC without compromising the health or safety of the patients. In addition, risk stratification and the use of predictive clinical parameters have improved the clinical outcome.of ASUC. Multidisciplinary teams that include inflammatory bowel disease experts, colorectal surgeons, and other medical staff contribute to the better management of patients with ASUC. In this review, we introduce current evidence and present a clinical approach to manage ASUC.

Medical Treatment Options for Ulcerative Colitis

The landscape of management of ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease, continues to change with advancement in pharmaceutical options as well as clinical treatment targets. Ulcerative colitis primarily involves the superficial layers of the large bowel, and cause active inflammation that can affect the colon from the rectum to the cecum in a relapsing and a remitting course. In this review, we provide evidence-based guidance on the selection of appropriate medical therapies based on individual patient and disease characteristics, with a focus on biologics and small molecules. We also review the role of surgery and management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.