1
|
Perera M, Jibara G, Tin AL, Haywood S, Sjoberg DD, Benfante NE, Carlsson SV, Eastham JA, Laudone V, Touijer KA, Fine S, Scardino PT, Vickers AJ, Ehdaie B. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:662-668. [PMID: 36566100 PMCID: PMC10285029 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group," with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group," with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5-yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can be made regarding a more conservative approach in men with upgraded pathology on surveillance biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied men with low-risk prostate cancer who were initially eligible for active surveillance but presented with more aggressive cancer on confirmatory biopsy. We found that outcomes for these men were better than the outcomes for those diagnosed initially with more serious cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghalib Jibara
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Haywood
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole E Benfante
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samson Fine
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter T Scardino
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174161. [PMID: 36077698 PMCID: PMC9454661 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary AS is an option for the initial management of selected patients with intermediate-risk PC. The proper way to predict which men will have an aggressive clinical course or indolent PC who would benefit from AS has not been unveiled. Genetics and MRI can help in the decision-making, but it remains unclear which men would benefit from which tests. In addition, there are several differences between AS protocols in inclusion criteria, monitoring follow-up, and triggers for active treatment. Large series and a few RCTs are under investigation, and more research is needed to establish an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with intermediate-risk PC. This study summarizes the current data on patients with intermediate-risk PC under AS, recent findings, and discusses future directions. Abstract Active surveillance (AS) is a monitoring strategy to avoid or defer curative treatment, minimizing the side effects of radiotherapy and prostatectomy without compromising survival. AS in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) has increasingly become used. There is heterogeneity in intermediate-risk PC patients. Some of them have an aggressive clinical course and require active treatment, while others have indolent disease and may benefit from AS. However, intermediate-risk patients have an increased risk of metastasis, and the proper way to select the best candidates for AS is unknown. In addition, there are several differences between AS protocols in inclusion criteria, monitoring follow-up, and triggers for active treatment. A few large series and randomized trials are under investigation. Therefore, more research is needed to establish an optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with intermediate-risk disease. This study summarizes the current data on patients with intermediate-risk PC under AS, recent findings, and discusses future directions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Shill DK, Roobol MJ, Ehdaie B, Vickers AJ, Carlsson SV. Active surveillance for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2809-2819. [PMID: 34295763 PMCID: PMC8261451 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Many men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer can postpone definitive treatment without raising their risk of metastasis or death from disease. Active surveillance (AS) is a method of monitoring select men, with the option of switching to active treatment upon signs of progression, thereby avoiding the well-known side-effects of surgery and radiotherapy. This review analyzes the data from long-running AS cohorts to determine the safety and efficacy of AS. We conducted a narrative review of recently published data, including 14 articles from 13 AS cohorts. The cohorts used varying inclusion criteria, with reported differences in clinical T stage and Gleason Score (Grade Group), among other features. Some studies (n=5) limited their cohorts to low-risk patients, while others (n=8) also included intermediate-risk patients. The heterogeneity of the cohorts produced mixed results, with the risk of prostate cancer metastasis ranging from 0.1–1.0% at 10 years and the risk of prostate cancer mortality ranging from 0–1.9% at 10 years. However, the majority of studies reported risks of less than 0.5% at 10 years for both metastasis and death. For most cohorts, half of men remained untreated for 5–10 years, with estimates ranging from 37% receiving active treatment in the Toronto cohort to 73% in the Prostate Cancer Research International AS (PRIAS) study. Current data do not support the use of negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to avoid scheduled biopsy. Taken together, the data collected from these AS cohorts suggests that AS is a safe approach for men with low-grade prostate cancer and some men with intermediate risk disease. AS should be more broadly implemented for eligible patients to avoid the decreases in quality of life from undergoing active treatment. Studies expanding the inclusion criteria and further defining a subset of men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer who might safely benefit from AS are needed to assess the long-term outcomes of using AS in intermediate-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moon JH, Ryu CH, Cho SW, Choi JY, Chung EJ, Hah JH, Hwangbo Y, Jeong WJ, Jung YS, Kim JH, Kim MJ, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Lee CY, Lee EK, Lee JY, Lee KE, Lee YJ, Lee Y, Yu HW, Park DJ, Ryu J, Park YJ. Effect of Initial Treatment Choice on 2-year Quality of Life in Patients with Low-risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021; 106:724-735. [PMID: 33248442 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The long-term quality of life (QoL) in patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) underwent active surveillance (AS) and immediate surgery is unclear. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of initial treatment choice on 2-year QoL in patients with low-risk PTMC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed 2652 QoL surveys from 1055 subjects enrolled in ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study on active surveillance of PTMC, in which the median follow-up duration was 24.4 months. MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURE We evaluated QoL of patients with low-risk PTMC according to their treatment modality using generalized estimating equation. RESULTS Six hundred and seventy-four subjects (male = 161; mean age = 48.8 ± 11.9 years) with low-risk PTMC chose AS while 381 subjects (male = 75; mean age = 45.7 ± 10.4 years) chose immediate surgery, including lobectomy/isthmusectomy (L/I) and total thyroidectomy (TT). Among the 817 subjects who completed baseline QoL surveys, 2-year QoL was good in order of AS (n = 500), L/I (n = 238), and TT (n = 79) groups after adjustment for age, sex, baseline tumor size, and baseline QoL scores. Among the 101 subjects who changed their treatment from AS to surgery during the follow-up period, 35 subjects who changed treatment due to disease progression had better QoL than 66 subjects who had no disease progression. CONCLUSIONS This study identified QoL as a major issue in choosing an initial treatment of low-risk PTMC and highlighted the possibility of using AS as the primary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hoon Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Wook Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - June Young Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Jae Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hun Hah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yul Hwangbo
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Jin Jeong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuh-Seog Jung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Joo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Su-Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeo Koon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Yoon Lee
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Lee
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Ye Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - You Jin Lee
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yumi Lee
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeong Won Yu
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Joon Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Junsun Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
- Center for Thyroid Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Joo Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sabatello M, Jackson Scroggins M, Goto G, Santiago A, McCormick A, Morris KJ, Daulton CR, Easter CL, Darien G. Structural Racism in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moving Forward. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:56-74. [PMID: 33345745 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1851808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a substantial human, social and economic toll globally, but its impact on Black/African Americans, Latinx, and American Indian/Alaska Native communities in the U.S. is unconscionable. As the U.S. continues to combat the current COVID-19 cycle and prepares for future pandemics, it will be critical to learn from and rectify past and contemporary wrongs. Drawing on experiences in genomic research and intersecting areas in medical ethics, health disparities, and human rights, this article considers three key COVID-19-related issues: research to identify remedies; testing, contact tracing and surveillance; and lingering health needs and disability. It provides a pathway for the future: community engagement to develop culturally-sensitive responses to the myriad genomic/bioethical dilemmas that arise, and the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to transition the country from its contemporary state of segregation in healthcare and health outcomes into an equitable and prosperous society for all.
Collapse
|
6
|
Detti B, Ingrosso G, Becherini C, Lancia A, Olmetto E, Alì E, Marani S, Teriaca MA, Francolini G, Sardaro A, Aristei C, Filippi AR, Sanguineti G, Livi L. Management of prostate cancer radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A necessary paradigm change. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100331. [PMID: 33581491 PMCID: PMC7864785 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To adapt the management of prostate malignancy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS In according to the recommendations of the European Association of Urology, we have developed practical additional document on the treatment of prostate cancer. RESULTS Low-Risk Group Watchful Waiting should be offered to patients >75 years old, with a limited life expectancy and unfit for local treatment. In Active Surveillance (AS) patients re-biopsy, PSA evaluation and visits should be deferred for up to 6 months, preferring non-invasive multiparametric-MRI. The active treatment should be delayed for 6-12 months. Intermediate-Risk Group AS should be offered in favorable-risk patients. Short-course neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with ultra-hypo-fractionation radiotherapy should be used in unfavorable-risk patients. High-Risk Group Neoadjuvant ADT combined with moderate hypofractionation should be preferred. Whole-pelvis irradiation should be offered to patients with positive lymph nodes in locally advanced setting. ADT should be initiated if PSA doubling time is < 12 months in radio-recurrent patients, as well as in low priority/low volume of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. If radiotherapy cannot be delayed, hypo-fractionated regimens should be preferred. In high priority class metastatic disease, treatment with androgen receptor-targeted agents should be offered. When palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis is required, single fraction of 8 Gy should be offered. CONCLUSIONS In Covid-19 Era, the challenge should concern a correct management of the oncologic patient, reducing the risk of spreading the virus without worsening tumor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- RadiationOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- RadiationOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Emanuela Olmetto
- RadiationOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Simona Marani
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Giulio Francolini
- RadiationOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Angela Sardaro
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy Section, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- RadiationOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jibara G, Sjoberg DD, Stearns GL, Stabholz Y, Fathollahi A, Leddy LS, Benfante N, Ehdaie B, Coleman JA, Eastham JA, Sandhu JS. Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance. Urology 2021; 156:225-230. [PMID: 33539897 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of photoselective vaporization of the prostate in alleviating refractory lower urinary tract symptoms in prostate cancer patients who are managed with active surveillance and to explore the association of this procedure with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and cancer progression rates. METHODS Between 2008-2018, active surveillance patients who had refractory symptoms and needed surgery were studied. Perioperative functional variables were collected and analyzed. Disease progression was defined as an upgrade or upstage on surveillance biopsies or multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging. Mean postop scores were estimated using locally-weighted methods. The risk of progression was reported using Kaplan-Meier's method. RESULTS Seventy-one patients were included in the study. The median age was 68 years and the median surveillance time before surgery was 4 years. At 12 months, there were substantial improvements in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score (18-5.9), maximum flow rate (6.8-14 mL/s), postvoid residual (240-73mL), PSA (8.1-5.2 ng/mL), and prostate volume (85-57mL). At 30-days, only 2 patients with grade-III complications. Late consequences included tissue regrowth in 4 and urethral stricture (requiring a single dilation) in 3 patients. PSA levels decreased by 36% at 12 months postoperatively. With a median follow-up of 3.7 years, 7 men progressed and received radical treatment. At 3 years, the probability of remaining on surveillance was 93% (95% CI 87%- 100%). CONCLUSION Photoselective vaporization of the prostate offers substantial relief of symptoms in active surveillance patients with refractory symptoms, without adverse effects on disease progression rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghalib Jibara
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | | | - Yariv Stabholz
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Ali Fathollahi
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Laura S Leddy
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| | - Jaspreet S Sandhu
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yiannopoulou KG, Anastasiou AI, Kontoangelos K, Papageorgiou C, Anastasiou IP. Cognitive and Psychological Impacts of Different Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis. Curr Urol 2021; 14:169-177. [PMID: 33488334 DOI: 10.1159/000499242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Psychological morbidity as well as cognitive impairment are increasingly reported in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, despite growing numbers of PCa survivors and the well estimated negative impact of cognitive decline and emotional distress on survivors' quality of life, no study has assessed the whole range of cognitive and psychological sequelae as a response to treatment options for PCa. The objective of the present review was to systematically characterize the types and estimate the prevalence of the cognitive impairment and emotional burdens that were found in PCa survivors secondary to different treatment options. Methods Systematic, general reviews, meta-analysis, and overviews of review studies in English, that were published in PubMed during the last 10 years until l August 2019 and that reported psychological distress, anxiety, depression, cognitive decline, or dementia among individuals with PCa exposed to a particular treatment option were analyzed. Results A total of 21 articles were reviewed. Some of the studies described one or more cognitive or psychological consequences of only one therapeutic strategy while others compared the psychological impacts among different strategies. Most of these studies suggested that either radical prostatectomy or active surveillance and radiotherapy were well-tolerated treatments in terms of psychological modifications. However, many of these patients may require additional emotional support. There is also increasing evidence that androgen deprivation therapy may be associated with depression, while controversy surrounding the association between cognitive dysfunction, dementia, and androgen deprivation therapy remains ambivalent. Conclusion Emotional distress and cognitive decline may accompany every PCa treatment option to different degrees. Accurate information on the short- and long-term effect of treatments on cognitive and psychological aspects should be provided to patients during treatment decision-making. There is also a need to develop well-targeted psychological and neurological interventions that could help those experiencing ongoing post-treatment difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Konstantinos Kontoangelos
- 1st Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Charalambos Papageorgiou
- 1st Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis P Anastasiou
- 1st Urology Department, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wade J, Donovan J, Lane A, Davis M, Walsh E, Neal D, Turner E, Martin R, Metcalfe C, Peters T, Hamdy F, Kockelbergh R, Catto J, Paul A, Holding P, Rosario D, Kynaston H, Rowe E, Hughes O, Bollina P, Gillatt D, Doherty A, Gnanapragasam VJ, Paez E. Strategies adopted by men to deal with uncertainty and anxiety when following an active surveillance/monitoring protocol for localised prostate cancer and implications for care: a longitudinal qualitative study embedded within the ProtecT trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036024. [PMID: 32907896 PMCID: PMC7482454 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Active surveillance (AS) enables men with low risk, localised prostate cancer (PCa) to avoid radical treatment unless progression occurs; lack of reliable AS protocols to determine progression leaves uncertainties for men and clinicians. This study investigated men's strategies for coping with the uncertainties of active monitoring (AM, a surveillance strategy within the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment, ProtecT trial) over the longer term and implications for optimising supportive care. DESIGN Longitudinal serial in-depth qualitative interviews every 2-3 years for a median 7 (range 6-14) years following diagnosis. SETTING Four centres within the UK Protect trial. PARTICIPANTS Purposive sample of 20 men with localised PCa: median age at diagnosis 64 years (range 52-68); 15 (75%) had low-risk PCa; 12 randomly allocated to, 8 choosing AM. Eleven men continued with AM throughout the study period (median 7 years). Nine received radical treatment after a median 4 years (range 0.8-13.8 years). INTERVENTION AM: 3-monthly serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-level assessment (year 1), 6-12 monthly thereafter; increase in PSA ≥50% during previous 12 months or patient/clinician concern triggered review. MAIN OUTCOMES Thematic analysis of 73 interviews identified strategies to accommodate uncertainty and anxiety of living with untreated cancer; implications for patient care. RESULTS Men sought clarity, control or reassurance, with contextual factors mediating individual responses. Trust in the clinical team was critical for men in balancing anxiety and facilitating successful management change/continued monitoring. Only men from ProtecT were included; men outside ProtecT may have different experiences. CONCLUSION Men looked to clinicians for clarity, control and reassurance. Where provided, men felt comfortable continuing AM or having radical treatments when indicated. Clinicians build patient trust by clearly describing uncertainties, allowing patients control wherever possible and being aware of how context influences individual responses. Insights indicate need for supportive services to build trust and patient engagement over the long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN20141297; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Athene Lane
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eleanor Walsh
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - David Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma Turner
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Martin
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim Peters
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Freddie Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - James Catto
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - David Gillatt
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Wade J, Noble S, Garfield K, Young G, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Blazeby J, Bryant R, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Gnanapragasam V, Hughes O, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Paez E, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario D, Rowe E, Neal D. Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-176. [PMID: 32773013 PMCID: PMC7443739 DOI: 10.3310/hta24370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the UK. Prostate-specific antigen testing followed by biopsy leads to overdetection, overtreatment as well as undertreatment of the disease. Evidence of treatment effectiveness has lacked because of the paucity of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional treatments. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional treatments for localised prostate cancer (active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy) in men aged 50-69 years. DESIGN A prospective, multicentre prostate-specific antigen testing programme followed by a randomised trial of treatment, with a comprehensive cohort follow-up. SETTING Prostate-specific antigen testing in primary care and treatment in nine urology departments in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Between 2001 and 2009, 228,966 men aged 50-69 years received an invitation to attend an appointment for information about the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study and a prostate-specific antigen test; 82,429 men were tested, 2664 were diagnosed with localised prostate cancer, 1643 agreed to randomisation to active monitoring (n = 545), radical prostatectomy (n = 553) or radical radiotherapy (n = 545) and 997 chose a treatment. INTERVENTIONS The interventions were active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy. TRIAL PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Definite or probable disease-specific mortality at the 10-year median follow-up in randomised participants. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Overall mortality, metastases, disease progression, treatment complications, resource utilisation and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 17 prostate cancer-specific (p = 0.48) and 169 all-cause (p = 0.87) deaths. Eight men died of prostate cancer in the active monitoring group (1.5 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.0); five died of prostate cancer in the radical prostatectomy group (0.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.2 per 1000 person years) and four died of prostate cancer in the radical radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 2.0 per 1000 person years). More men developed metastases in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring, n = 33 (6.3 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 4.5 to 8.8); radical prostatectomy, n = 13 (2.4 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.2 per 1000 person years); and radical radiotherapy, n = 16 (3.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.9 per 1000 person-years; p = 0.004). There were higher rates of disease progression in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring (n = 112; 22.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 19.0 to 27.5 per 1000 person years); radical prostatectomy (n = 46; 8.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 11.9 per 1000 person-years); and radical radiotherapy (n = 46; 9.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 12.0 per 1000 person years; p < 0.001). Radical prostatectomy had the greatest impact on sexual function/urinary continence and remained worse than radical radiotherapy and active monitoring. Radical radiotherapy's impact on sexual function was greatest at 6 months, but recovered somewhat in the majority of participants. Sexual and urinary function gradually declined in the active monitoring group. Bowel function was worse with radical radiotherapy at 6 months, but it recovered with the exception of bloody stools. Urinary voiding and nocturia worsened in the radical radiotherapy group at 6 months but recovered. Condition-specific quality-of-life effects mirrored functional changes. No differences in anxiety/depression or generic or cancer-related quality of life were found. At the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probabilities that each arm was the most cost-effective option were 58% (radical radiotherapy), 32% (active monitoring) and 10% (radical prostatectomy). LIMITATIONS A single prostate-specific antigen test and transrectal ultrasound biopsies were used. There were very few non-white men in the trial. The majority of men had low- and intermediate-risk disease. Longer follow-up is needed. CONCLUSIONS At a median follow-up point of 10 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low, irrespective of the assigned treatment. Radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy reduced disease progression and metastases, but with side effects. Further work is needed to follow up participants at a median of 15 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 37. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- School of Medicine, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Holding
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sian Noble
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Grace Young
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Davis
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tim J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma L Turner
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jon Oxley
- Department of Cellular Pathology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mary Robinson
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Staffurth
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Eleanor Walsh
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prasad Bollina
- Department of Urology and Surgery, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andrew Doble
- Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alan Doherty
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gillatt
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Owen Hughes
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Roger Kockelbergh
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Howard Kynaston
- Department of Urology, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alan Paul
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Edgar Paez
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Philip Powell
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stephen Prescott
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Derek Rosario
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Edward Rowe
- Department of Urology, Southmead Hospital and Bristol Urological Institute, Bristol, UK
| | - David Neal
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Academic Urology Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sharpley CF, Christie DRH, Bitsika V. Depression and prostate cancer: implications for urologists and oncologists. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:571-585. [PMID: 32733038 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0354-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Many patients with prostate cancer experience severe levels of depression, which can negatively affect their treatment and disease course. Some prostate cancer treatments can increase the severity of a patient's depression, for example, by increasing anhedonia and erectile dysfunction. Depression is often thought of as a unitary phenomenon, but multiple subtypes can be distinguished. This variety of manifestations challenges the successful application of universal antidepressant treatment options and argues for a multi-symptom assessment process that considers a patient's disease burden and their particular form of depression. Inclusion of screening and detailed diagnosis of depression can be argued to be part of good practice, and clinicians are urged to consider when and how this might be accomplished within their urological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F Sharpley
- Brain-Behaviour Research Group, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - David R H Christie
- Brain-Behaviour Research Group, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.,Genesiscare, John Flynn Private Hospital, Tugun, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vicki Bitsika
- Brain-Behaviour Research Group, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, Dahm P, Bangma CH, Aben KK. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 6:CD006590. [PMID: 32495338 PMCID: PMC7270852 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006590.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a common cancer but is oftentimes slow growing. When confined to the prostate, radical prostatectomy (RP), which involves removal of the prostate, offers potential cure that may come at the price of adverse events. Deferred treatment, involving observation and palliative treatment only (watchful waiting (WW)) or close monitoring and delayed local treatment with curative intent as needed in the setting of disease progression (active monitoring (AM)/surveillance (AS)) might be an alternative. This is an update of a Cochrane Review previously published in 2010. OBJECTIVES To assess effects of RP compared with deferred treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library (including CDSR, CENTRAL, DARE, and HTA), MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, and OpenGrey. Additionally, we searched two trial registries and conference abstracts of three conferences (EAU, AUA, and ASCO) until 3 March 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared RP versus deferred treatment in patients with localised prostate cancer, defined as T1-2, N0, M0 prostate cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of references and extracted data from included studies. The primary outcome was time to death from any cause; secondary outcomes were: time to death from prostate cancer; time to disease progression; time to metastatic disease; quality of life, including urinary and sexual function; and adverse events. We assessed the certainty of evidence per outcome using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included four studies with 2635 participants (average age between 60 to 70 years). Three multicentre RCTs, from Europe and USA, compared RP with WW (n = 1537), and one compared RP with AM (n = 1098). Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting RP probably reduces the risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.90; 3 studies with 1537 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on overall mortality at 29 years, this corresponds to 764 deaths per 1000 men in the RP group compared to 839 deaths per 1000 men in the WW group. RP probably also lowers the risk of death from prostate cancer (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; 2 studies with 1426 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on prostate cancer-specific mortality at 29 years, this corresponds to 195 deaths from prostate cancer per 1000 men in the RP group compared with 316 deaths from prostate cancer per 1000 men in the WW group. RP may reduce the risk of progression (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35-0.54; 2 studies with 1426 participants; I² = 54%; low-certainty evidence); at 19.5 years, this corresponds to 391 progressions per 1000 men for the RP group compared with 684 progressions per 1000 men for the WW group) and probably reduces the risk of developing metastatic disease (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.70; 2 studies with 1426 participants; I² = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence); at 29 years, this corresponds to 271 metastatic diseases per 1000 men for RP compared with 431 metastatic diseases per 1000 men for WW. General quality of life at 12 years' follow-up is probably similar for both groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.0, 95% CI 0.85-1.16; low-certainty evidence), corresponding to 344 patients with high quality of life per 1000 men for the RP group compared with 344 patients with high quality of life per 1000 men for the WW group. Rates of urinary incontinence may be considerably higher (RR 3.97, 95% CI 2.34-6.74; low-certainty evidence), corresponding to 173 incontinent men per 1000 in the RP group compared with 44 incontinent men per 1000 in the WW group, as are rates of erectile dysfunction (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.63-4.38; low-certainty evidence), corresponding to 389 erectile dysfunction events per 1000 for the RP group compared with 146 erectile dysfunction events per 1000 for the WW group, both at 10 years' follow-up. Radical prostatectomy versus active monitoring Based on one study including 1098 participants with 10 years' follow-up, there are probably no differences between RP and AM in time to death from any cause (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65-1.33; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on overall mortality at 10 years, this corresponds to 101 deaths per 1000 men in the RP group compared with 108 deaths per 1000 men in the AM group. Similarly, risk of death from prostate cancer probably is not different between the two groups (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.21-1.89; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on prostate cancer-specific mortality at 10 years, this corresponds to nine prostate cancer deaths per 1000 men in the RP group compared with 15 prostate cancer deaths per 1000 men in the AM group. RP probably reduces the risk of progression (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.56; moderate-certainty evidence; at 10 years, this corresponds to 86 progressions per 1000 men for RP compared with 206 progressions per 1000 men for AM) and the risk of developing metastatic disease (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.73; moderate-certainty evidence; at 10 years, this corresponds to 24 metastatic diseases per 1000 men for the RP group compared with 61 metastatic diseases per 1000 men for the AM group).The general quality of life during follow-up was not different between the treatment groups. However, urinary function (mean difference (MD) 8.60 points lower, 95% CI 11.2-6.0 lower) and sexual function (MD 14.9 points lower, 95% CI 18.5-11.3 lower) on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) instrument, were worse in the RP group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on long-term follow-up, RP compared with WW probably results in substantially improved oncological outcomes in men with localised prostate cancer but also markedly increases rates of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. These findings are largely based on men diagnosed before widespread PSA screening, thereby limiting generalisability. Compared to AM, based on follow-up to 10 years, RP probably has similar outcomes with regard to overall and disease-specific survival yet probably reduces the risks of disease progression and metastatic disease. Urinary function and sexual function are probably decreased for the patients treated with RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Wm Vernooij
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Lancee
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Cleves
- Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff University Library Services, Cardiff, UK
| | - Philipp Dahm
- Urology Section, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Katja Kh Aben
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael A Calvo
- Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Richard M Ryan
- Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang H, Zheng X, Liu J, Gao M, Qian B. Active surveillance as a management strategy for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Cancer Biol Med 2020; 17:543-554. [PMID: 32944389 PMCID: PMC7476094 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2019.0470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) can be considered as a treatment strategy for low risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), with the absence of clinically apparent lymph nodes, extrathyroidal extensions, and distant metastasis. After reviewing the reports on AS of low risk PTMCs worldwide, we introduced AS, and discussed the selection criteria for active surveillance candidates based on different guidelines and the follow-up schedules. Moreover, the requirement of cytological diagnosis, progression evaluation methods, necessity of thyrotropin suppression, and medical costs were issues that both clinicians and patients considered. The usefulness of AS for low risk PTMC patients depended on accurate and confidential evaluation of patient risk. Clinicians may adopt measures like dynamic monitoring, risk stratification, and making personal follow-up schedules to minimize these potential risks. By appropriately selecting PTMC patients, AS can be an effective alternative treatment to immediate surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Zhang
- Cancer Prevention Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Xiangqian Zheng
- Department of Head and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Juntian Liu
- Cancer Prevention Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Ming Gao
- Department of Head and Neck Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Biyun Qian
- Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and Faculty of Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis. Surgery 2020; 167:46-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
16
|
Why men with a low-risk prostate cancer select and stay on active surveillance: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0225134. [PMID: 31747396 PMCID: PMC6867634 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly utilized strategy for monitoring men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) that allows them to defer active treatment (AT) in the absence of cancer progression. Studies have explored reasons for selecting AS and for then switching to AT, but less is known about men’s experiences being on AS. We interviewed men to determine the clinical and psychological factors associated with selecting and adhering to AS protocols. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with men with a low-risk PCa at two academic medical centers. Subjects had either been on AS for ≥ 1 year or had opted for AT after a period of AS. We used an iterative, content-driven approach to analyze the interviews and to identify themes. Results We enrolled 21 subjects, mean age 70.4 years, 3 racial/ethnic minorities, and 16 still on AS. Men recognized the favorable prognosis of their cancer (some had sought second opinions when initially offered AT), valued avoiding treatment complications, were reassured that close monitoring would identify progression early enough to be successfully treated, and trusted their urologists. Although men reported feeling anxious around the time of surveillance testing, those who switched to AT did so based only on evidence of cancer progression. Conclusions Our selected sample was comfortable being on AS because they understood and valued the rationale for this approach. However, this highlights the importance of ensuring that men newly diagnosed with a low-risk PCa are provided sufficient information about prognosis and treatment options to make informed decisions.
Collapse
|
17
|
McIntosh M, Opozda MJ, Evans H, Finlay A, Galvão DA, Chambers SK, Short CE. A systematic review of the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Psychooncology 2019; 28:2307-2322. [PMID: 31663180 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding the unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer may enable researchers and health professionals to better support men and prevent discontinuation when there is no evidence of disease progression. This review aimed to identify the specific unmet supportive care needs of men on active surveillance. METHODS A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Databases (Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched to identify qualitative and/or quantitative studies that reported unmet needs specific to men on active surveillance. Quality appraisals were conducted before results were narratively synthesised. RESULTS Of the 3613 unique records identified, only eight articles were eligible (five qualitative and three cross-sectional studies). Unmet Informational, Emotional/Psychological, Social, and "Other" needs were identified. Only three studies had a primary aim of investigating unmet supportive care needs. Small active surveillance samples, use of nonvalidated measures, and minimal reporting of author reflexivity in qualitative studies were the main quality issues identified. CONCLUSIONS The unmet needs of men on active surveillance is an underresearched area. Preliminary evidence suggests the information available and provided to men during active surveillance is perceived as inadequate and inconsistent. Men may also be experiencing unmet psychological/emotional, social, and other needs; however, further representative, high-quality research is required to understand the magnitude of this issue. Reporting results specific to treatment type and utilising relevant theories/models (such as the social ecological model [SEM]) is recommended to ensure factors that may facilitate unmet needs are appropriately considered and reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan McIntosh
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Melissa J Opozda
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Holly Evans
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Amy Finlay
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Daniel A Galvão
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Exercise Medicine Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Camille E Short
- Freemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences and Melbourne School of Health Sciences (jointly appointed), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ruane‐McAteer E, Porter S, O'Sullivan J, Dempster M, Prue G. Investigating the psychological impact of active surveillance or active treatment in newly diagnosed favorable‐risk prostate cancer patients: A 9‐month longitudinal study. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1743-1752. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Ruane‐McAteer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology CentreQueen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| | - Sam Porter
- Department of Social Sciences and Social WorkBournemouth University Bournemouth UK
| | - Joe O'Sullivan
- The Northern Ireland Cancer CentreBelfast City Hospital Belfast UK
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| | | | - Gillian Prue
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology CentreQueen's University Belfast Belfast UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Matheson L, Wilding S, Wagland R, Nayoan J, Rivas C, Downing A, Wright P, Brett J, Kearney T, Cross W, Glaser A, Gavin A, Watson E. The psychological impact of being on a monitoring pathway for localised prostate cancer: A UK-wide mixed methods study. Psychooncology 2019; 28:1567-1575. [PMID: 31132801 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To address concerns over the psychological impact of being on a monitoring pathway following prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, this study compared the psychological status of men on active surveillance (AS) or watchful waiting (WW) with men on active treatment (AT) and explored psychological adjustment in men on AS/WW. METHODS Cross-sectional survey of UK men diagnosed with PCa 18 to 42 months previously (n = 16 726, localised disease at diagnosis) and telephone interviews with 24 men on AS/WW. Psychological outcomes were measured using two validated scales (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale [SWEMWBS] and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale). Univariable and multivariable analyses compared outcomes between men on AS/WW and AT. Thematic analysis of interviews was undertaken, informed by a previously developed theory of adjustment to cancer. RESULTS A total of 3986 (23.8%) respondents were on AS/WW. Overall, psychological outcomes were similar or better in men on AS/WW compared with those receiving AT (SWEMWBS: Poor well-being; 12.3% AS/WW vs 13.9% AT, adjusted OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; K6: severe psychological distress; 4.6% vs 5.4%, adjusted OR = 0.90, 95% CI, 0.74-1.08). Interviews indicated that most men on AS/WW had adjusted positively. Men with poorer well-being were less able to accept, reframe positively and normalise their diagnosis, described receiving insufficient information and support, and reported a lack of confidence in their health care professionals. CONCLUSIONS Most men on AS/WW cope well psychologically. Men making treatment decisions should be given this information. Psychological health should be assessed to determine suitability for AS/WW, and at monitoring appointments. A clear action plan and support from health care professionals is important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Matheson
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Wilding
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Johana Nayoan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Carol Rivas
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jo Brett
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Therese Kearney
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Adam Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shiff B, Patel P, Trpkov K, Gotto GT. Changes in risk-group stratification of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology over time. Res Rep Urol 2019; 11:69-75. [PMID: 30937290 PMCID: PMC6430990 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s188966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men, but overall mortality rates remain low, due to the preponderance of low-risk disease. Over the last decade, there has been a shift toward more conservative management in low-risk prostate cancer, in order to minimize unnecessary intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the number of low-risk radical prostatectomies (RPs) being performed at the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology over a 10-year period. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent RP from 2005 to 2014 at our institution. Patients were stratified by D’Amico risk classification and grade group based on 12-core transrectal ultrasound–guided biopsy (TRUS-bx) results. RP findings are reported from February 2005 to October 2014 to describe concordance between TRUS-bx and RPs. Basic descriptive analyses were used for this study. Results Over the study period, 2,310 RPs were performed in our institution. Overall, 35.2% of these were performed on men with low-risk prostate cancer. From 2005 to 2014, the proportion of RPs performed for low-risk prostate cancer dropped from 54.0% to 8.9%, and 49.8% of patients who underwent RP for low-risk disease experienced pathologic upgrading, though only 3.8% were upgraded to grade group 3 or greater. Other adverse pathological findings were uniformly low among the low-risk group. Conclusion The proportion of patients undergoing RP at our center for low-risk prostate cancer decreased significantly over the 10 years evaluated in this study, reflecting current global trends toward active surveillance in the management of low-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Shiff
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada,
| | - Premal Patel
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada,
| | - Kiril Trpkov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Geoffrey T Gotto
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wagland R, Nayoan J, Matheson L, Rivas C, Brett J, Downing A, Wilding S, Butcher H, Gavin A, Glaser AW, Watson E. 'Very difficult for an ordinary guy': Factors influencing the quality of treatment decision-making amongst men diagnosed with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: Findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:797-803. [PMID: 30527732 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore experiences of treatment decision-making (TDM) amongst men diagnosed with stage 1-3 prostate cancer. METHODS Mixed-methods study incorporating UK-wide cross-sectional postal survey of men 18-42 months post-diagnosis and semi-structured interviews with a subsample (n = 97), including men who received both radical treatments and active surveillance. Interview data was analysed using a Framework approach. RESULTS Within the context of TDM, 'drivers' included men's intra-personal preferences for decision-making responsibility or clinical direction, relative treatment intrusiveness or desire for excision, and work, personal and social life priorities; 'facilitators' were inter-personal mechanisms such as information and communication with clinicians to enact, but also sometimes challenge drivers. Drivers and facilitators can conflict, challenging patient empowerment. Men frequently undertook greater TDM responsibility than desired, without clinical recommendations; others received conflicting recommendations. Information on potential side-effects was often reportedly inadequate. Unchallenged preferences, absence of clinical recommendations and inadequate preparation for side-effects sometimes led to decision regret. CONCLUSIONS Men are not empowered when expected to take more TDM responsibility than desired, when provided with conflicting recommendations, or when their potentially inappropriate preferences are unchallenged. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS TDM should involve men exercising preferences and priorities in discussion with clinicians. Clinicians should ensure patients do not receive conflicting recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Johana Nayoan
- Health Psychology Research Group, University College London, UK
| | - Lauren Matheson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Carol Rivas
- Social Science Research Unit, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Jo Brett
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Wilding
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hugh Butcher
- Yorkshire Cancer Patient Forum, c/o Strategic Clinical Network and Senate, Yorkshire and The Humber, Harrogate, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wei Y, Liu L, Li X, Song W, Zhong D, Cao X, Yuan D, Ming S, Zhang P, Wen Y. Current Treatment for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in China: A National Network Survey. J Cancer 2019; 10:1496-1502. [PMID: 31031859 PMCID: PMC6485215 DOI: 10.7150/jca.29595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the current treatment for low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) in China. Methods: A national questionnaire survey titled “A survey of current treatment of LRPC” was designed and released nationally through the network from July 16 to August 3, 2017. Results: A total of 1,116 valid questionnaires were recovered. The percentages of preferred treatment by active surveillance (AS) or radical prostatectomy (RP) were 29.21% and 45.61%, respectively. A correspondence analysis showed that the physician in charge was more inclined to choose AS than RP. Respondents from different institution types, hospitals with different annual numbers of newly admitted patients with prostate cancer, and with different familiarity with the LRPC definition presented a significant difference in the preferred treatments (p < 0.05). Urologists chose AS or not for the following reasons: tumor progression (52.51%), potential medical disputes (42.56%) (i.e., medical disputes from patients or their relatives when urologists choose AS to treat patients with LRPC and the patient has a poor outcome), fear of cancer (41.94%), and surgical risk (39.07%). These reasons were ubiquitous, and there was no significant difference among urologists for these concerns (p > 0.05). Personal skills, surgical risk, and tumor progression were the most common factors that influenced whether AS or RP was preferred (p < 0.05). Concern about the medical disputes brought about by AS was a key factor for not choosing AS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: LRPC is still dominated by RP in China, followed by AS. Personal skills, surgical risk, and concern about tumor progression were the common factors influencing whether AS or RP was preferred. In addition, medical disputes brought by AS are another key factor for not choosing AS. There will be more Chinese data in the future to guide treatment of LRPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongbao Wei
- Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.,Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, No.134 Dong Street, Fuzhou 350001, China
| | - Longfei Liu
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410000
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Urology, the 118th Hospital of PLA, Wenzhou, 325000
| | - Wei Song
- Department of Urology, the Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha 410005
| | - Dewen Zhong
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Longyan, 364000
| | - Xiande Cao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272000
| | - Daozhang Yuan
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510095
| | - Shaoxiong Ming
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071
| | - Yanlin Wen
- Department of Urology,Nanchong Central Hosipital, Nanchong, 637000
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Menichetti J, De Luca L, Dordoni P, Donegani S, Marenghi C, Valdagni R, Bellardita L. Making Active Surveillance a path towards health promotion: A qualitative study on prostate cancer patients' perceptions of health promotion during Active Surveillance. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13014. [PMID: 30761643 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health promotion is a key aspect for health outcomes of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, it has been poorly explored among patients following monitoring programmes, for example Active Surveillance (AS). This study aimed to explore PCa patients' perceptions of health promotion during AS. METHODS An explorative qualitative research design was adopted. Four focus groups were used to collected data from 24 men enrolled in the Prostate Cancer Research International: AS (PRIAS) protocol. A thematic analysis with an inductive approach was performed. RESULTS Participants described promoting health during AS as challenged by mental, age-related, informational and organisational issues. It was reported as an effort to stay in the present with a positive outlook, despite the worries for the future ("the mental theme"). It was perceived as impacted by being older and having to manage physical and mental struggles related to age ("the life-course theme"). It depended, in their accounts, on obtaining reliable information and personalised education ("the educational theme"). Finally, it was related on taking responsibility on the care process ("the organisational theme"). CONCLUSION This study suggested ways of promoting health during AS that can help healthcare professionals and organisations building a "health-promoting AS," able to improve overall health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Menichetti
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Letizia De Luca
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Paola Dordoni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Simona Donegani
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Cristina Marenghi
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Lara Bellardita
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sureda A, Fumadó L, Ferrer M, Garín O, Bonet X, Castells M, Mir MC, Abascal JM, Vigués F, Cecchini L, Suárez JF. Health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy, external-beam radiotherapy, prostate brachytherapy and reference population: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:11. [PMID: 30642340 PMCID: PMC6332524 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1082-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to describe Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of localized prostate cancer patients in an Active Surveillance (AS) program, and to compare them with those undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), external-beam radiotherapy (XRT) and brachytherapy (BT). Methods Multi-institutional pooled cross-sectional analysis on patients in an AS protocol: < 75 years old; pathologically confirmed LPC (maximum of three positive cylinders); Gleason score < 3 + 4; clinical stage T1a-T2b; and PSA < 15 ng/ml. Exclusion criteria for this study were: less than 6 months in AS, termination of AS protocol, or incomplete data. Patients in AS were matched with those treated with RP, XRT or BT from the ‘Spanish Multicentric Study of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer’ cohort according to risk group, time from treatment selection to HRQoL survey, and age. Prostate-specific (EPIC) and generic (SF-36) HRQoL instruments were completed. Analysis was stratified by HRQoL survey moment (>or < 2.5 years from treatment selection), and age (>or < 70 years old). Results Median of time from treatment selection to HRQoL survey in the total 396 patients (99 per treatment group) was 2.4 years (range 0.5–8.3). Patients in AS presented higher (better) urinary incontinence scores than RP ones in both stratus of time from treatment selection to HRQoL survey (92.6 vs 67.0 and 81.4 vs 64.4, p < 0.01). Patients in AS for < 2.5 years presented greater sexual scores than any active treatment (p < 0.01), but only statistically higher than RP for those in AS for longer than 2.5 years. The magnitude of the differences between AS and RP groups in both EPIC domains ranged from moderate (0.7 SD) to large (1.0 SD). Regardless of treatment applied, patients presented similar and slightly increased SF-36 scores than US general population reference norms. Nonetheless, patients in AS for < 2.5 years reported worse outcomes than other treatment groups on physical health domains, especially in bodily pain (0.5–0.6 SD), and vitality (0.6–0.8 SD). Conclusions Considering patients’ well-being, AS can be a good therapeutic option due to the low impact caused on urinary continence and sexual function. However, longitudinal studies are required to take into account HRQoL evolution over time. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1082-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sureda
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Fumadó
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - M Ferrer
- Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain
| | - O Garín
- IMIM (Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, CIBERESP, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - X Bonet
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Castells
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M C Mir
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Abascal
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Vigués
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Cecchini
- Urology Department, Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J F Suárez
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D, Brown C, Bill-Axelson A, Bratt O, Carlsson S, Van Hemelrijck M. Factors Influencing Men's Choice of and Adherence to Active Surveillance for Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Mixed-method Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2018; 74:261-280. [PMID: 29598981 PMCID: PMC6198662 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite support for active surveillance (AS) as a first treatment choice for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PC), this strategy is largely underutilised. OBJECTIVE To systematically review barriers and facilitators to selecting and adhering to AS for low-risk PC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PsychINFO, PubMed, Medline 2000-now, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases between 2002 and 2017 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings and Significance (PREFS) and Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) quality criteria were applied. Forty-seven studies were identified. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Key themes emerged as factors influencing both choice and adherence to AS: (1) patient and tumour factors (age, comorbidities, knowledge, education, socioeconomic status, family history, grade, tumour volume, and fear of progression/side effects); (2) family and social support; (3) provider (speciality, communication, and attitudes); (4) healthcare organisation (geography and type of practice); and (5) health policy (guidelines, year, and awareness). CONCLUSIONS Many factors influence men's choice and adherence to AS on multiple levels. It is important to learn from the experience of other chronic health conditions as well as from institutions/countries that are making significant headway in appropriately recruiting men to AS protocols, through standardised patient information, clinician education, and nationally agreed guidelines, to ultimately decrease heterogeneity in AS practice. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the scientific literature for factors affecting men's choice and adherence to active surveillance (AS) for low-risk prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that the use of AS could be increased by addressing a variety of factors such as information, psychosocial support, clinician education, and standardised guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netty Kinsella
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Declan Cahill
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Anna Bill-Axelson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden
| | - Sigrid Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Martin E, Persaud S, Corr J, Casey R, Pillai R. Nurse-led active surveillance for prostate cancer is safe, effective and associated with high rates of patient satisfaction-results of an audit in the East of England. Ecancermedicalscience 2018; 12:854. [PMID: 30093916 PMCID: PMC6070368 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Active surveillance (AS) is an option in the management of men with low-stage, low-risk prostate cancer. These patients, who often require prolonged follow-up, can put a strain on outpatient resources. Nurses are ideally placed to develop advanced roles to help meet this increased demand—a model we have utilised since 2014. We set about to comprehensively evaluate our nurse-led AS (NLAS) programme. Patients and methods An audit of patient notes was carried out to assess compliance with trust and national guidelines. A questionnaire was designed to capture patients’ experiences of NLAS. This was piloted and then distributed to all patients in our NLAS programme. A second questionnaire was designed to assess the views of stakeholders within the department. Results Compliance with various aspects of local guidelines ranged from 88.8% to 100%. 143 patients are currently in the programme with a mean duration of AS of 37.03 months. 104 questionnaires were returned. Most of the patients were aware of the role of the nurse prior to their visit, and all were happy to meet with a nurse. All of the patients indicated their confidence in the nurse monitoring their prostate-specific antigen. Among those requiring further investigations, 85.3% were happy with the information they received prior to their tests. Overall, 96.2% were either very satisfied or satisfied with NLAS. All stakeholders held positive views about NLAS. Conclusions NLAS is safe and effective. Patients and stakeholders alike held positive views of the programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estelle Martin
- Department of Urology, Colchester General Hospital, Essex CO4 5JL, UK.,Department of Urology, Broomfield Hospital, Essex CM1 7ET, UK
| | - Satyendra Persaud
- Department of Urology, Colchester General Hospital, Essex CO4 5JL, UK.,Department of Urology, Broomfield Hospital, Essex CM1 7ET, UK
| | - John Corr
- Department of Urology, Colchester General Hospital, Essex CO4 5JL, UK.,Department of Urology, Broomfield Hospital, Essex CM1 7ET, UK
| | - Rowan Casey
- Department of Urology, Colchester General Hospital, Essex CO4 5JL, UK.,Department of Urology, Broomfield Hospital, Essex CM1 7ET, UK
| | - Rajiv Pillai
- Department of Urology, Colchester General Hospital, Essex CO4 5JL, UK.,Department of Urology, Broomfield Hospital, Essex CM1 7ET, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Long-term Psychological and Quality-of-life Effects of Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting After Diagnosis of Low-risk Localised Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2018; 73:859-867. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
28
|
Kim TY, Shong YK. Active Surveillance of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Mini-Review from Korea. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017; 32:399-406. [PMID: 29271613 PMCID: PMC5745193 DOI: 10.3803/enm.2017.32.4.399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In Korea, the incidence of thyroid cancer increased explosively in the early 2000s, and reached a plateau in the early 2010s. Most cases of newly diagnosed thyroid cancer are small indolent microcarcinoma and could be good candidates for active surveillance (AS) instead of immediate surgery. Many considerations must be taken into account for establishing selection criteria for candidates for AS of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), including the characteristics of the tumor, the patient, and the medical team. If possible, AS of PTMC should be a part of a prospective clinical trial to ensure long-term safety and to identify clinical and/or molecular markers of the progression of PTMC. In this review, we discuss lessons regarding surgical interventions for PTMC, and then describe the concept, application, caveats, unanswered questions, and future perspectives of AS of PTMC. For appropriately selected patients with PTMC, AS can be a good alternative to immediate surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Yong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Young Kee Shong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sebakk KS, Haug ES, Gullan D, Grov EK. Health-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients' - treatment comparisons. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karin S. Sebakk
- Vestfold Hospital Trust, Department of Surgery, Section of Urology; Tønsberg Norway
| | - Erik S. Haug
- Vestfold Hospital Trust, Department of Surgery, Section of Urology; Tønsberg Norway
| | - Dag Gullan
- Vestfold Hospital Trust, Department of Surgery, Section of Urology; Tønsberg Norway
| | - Ellen K. Grov
- Proffesor EK Grov, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences; Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Banerji JS, Hurwitz LM, Cullen J, Wolff EM, Levie KE, Rosner IL, Brand TC, LʼEsperance JO, Sterbis JR, Porter CR. A prospective study of health-related quality-of-life outcomes for patients with low-risk prostate cancer managed by active surveillance or radiation therapy. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:234-242. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Revised: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
31
|
Lehto US, Tenhola H, Taari K, Aromaa A. Patients' perceptions of the negative effects following different prostate cancer treatments and the impact on psychological well-being: a nationwide survey. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:864-873. [PMID: 28222069 PMCID: PMC5379142 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Although the prognosis of localised prostate cancer is good, the negative effects of prostate cancer treatment often impair patient quality of life. A growing number of men experience these negative effects over a longer time because of the increased incidence of and prolonged survival in prostate cancer, and the ageing of the population. Only a few studies have investigated the adverse effects of different prostate cancer treatments using large population-based samples. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey (n=1239) to collect detailed information regarding the negative effects (i.e., the occurrence, perceived level and perceived bother since the beginning of the treatment) of prostate cancer treatments: radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, hormone therapy and surveillance. Furthermore, we measured patient satisfaction with the outcome of the treatment and their psychological well-being (i.e., psychological symptoms and satisfaction with life) 5 years after diagnosis. The negative effects between the treatments were compared, and the determinants of satisfaction and psychological well-being were investigated. Results: The negative effects of all types of active prostate cancer treatments were common and persistent (33–48% reported symptoms at 5 years) and showed the known differences between the treatments. Prostatectomy and the radiotherapies caused urinary leakage; radiotherapy also caused symptoms of urinary irritation; and external radiation also caused bowel dysfunction. Most symptoms were considered highly bothersome. Most respondents (81−93%) reported that their treatment negatively affected their sex lives; 70–92% reported sexual dysfunction; and 20–58% reported that their sex lives with their spouses had ended. Urinary symptoms were especially associated with poorer psychological outcomes. The perception of symptom level and bother had a greater effect on patient satisfaction and well-being than the symptoms per se. Conclusion: Multiple and persistent negative effects follow active prostate cancer treatment, and these effects predict long-term patient satisfaction and psychological well-being. The harms and benefits associated with prostate cancer treatments should be considered when selecting whether and how to actively treat prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulla-Sisko Lehto
- National Institute for Health and Welfare THL, Health Monitoring Unit, Helsinki FI00271, Finland
| | - Heli Tenhola
- National Institute for Health and Welfare THL, Health Monitoring Unit, Helsinki FI00271, Finland.,University of Helsinki, Division of Social Pharmacy; DRA Consulting Oy, Helsinki FI01510, Finland
| | - Kimmo Taari
- University of Helsinki; Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Urology, Helsinki FI00029, Finland
| | - Arpo Aromaa
- National Institute for Health and Welfare THL, Health Monitoring Unit, Helsinki FI00271, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ruane-McAteer E, Porter S, O'Sullivan JM, Santin O, Prue G. Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: Is there a greater psychological impact than previously thought? A systematic, mixed studies literature review. Psychooncology 2016; 26:1411-1421. [PMID: 27862602 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Revised: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Active surveillance (AS) allows men with favorable-risk prostate cancer to avoid or postpone active treatment and hence spares potential adverse effects for a significant proportion of these patients. Active surveillance may create an additional emotional burden for these patients. The aim of the review was to determine the psychological impact of AS to inform future study in this area and to provide recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS Studies were identified through database searching from inception to September 2015. Quantitative or qualitative noninterventional studies published in English that assessed the psychological impact of AS were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological quality. RESULTS Twenty-three papers were included (20 quantitative and 3 qualitative). Quantitatively, the majority of patients do not report psychological difficulties; however, when appropriateness of study design is considered, the conclusion that AS has minimal impact on well-being may not be accurate. This is due to small sample sizes, inappropriately timed baseline, and inappropriate/lack of comparison groups. In addition, a mismatch in outcome was noted between the outcome of quantitative and qualitative studies in uncertainty, with qualitative studies indicating a greater psychological impact. CONCLUSIONS Because of methodological concerns, many quantitative studies may not provide a true account of the burden of AS. Further mixed-methods studies are necessary to address the limitations highlighted and to provide clarity on the impact of AS. Practitioners should be aware that despite findings of previous reviews, patients may require additional emotional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Ruane-McAteer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Sam Porter
- Department of Social Sciences and Social Work, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology (CCRCB), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.,The Northern Ireland Cancer Centre (NICC), Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Olinda Santin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Gillian Prue
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Villa S, Kendel F, Venderbos L, Rancati T, Bangma C, Carroll P, Denis L, Klotz L, Korfage IJ, Lane AJ, Magnani T, Mastris K, Rannikko A, Roobol M, Trock B, Van den Bergh R, Van Poppel H, Valdagni R, Bellardita L. Setting an Agenda for Assessment of Health-related Quality of Life Among Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: A Consensus Paper from a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 2016; 71:274-280. [PMID: 27720532 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS) shows a need for methodological guidance regarding HRQoL issues and how to address them. OBJECTIVE The European School of Oncology Task Force (ESO TF) aimed to identify a core set of research questions and related measures to include in AS HRQoL studies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A modified Delphi study was used to reach consensus on AS HRQoL research topics and tools between 2014 and 2015. Data were collected by engaging a multidisciplinary team of 15 experts. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS An open-ended questionnaire was used to collect information from ESO TF members regarding issues in AS HRQoL research. Then a structured questionnaire was used to collect ratings on the usefulness/importance of different AS HRQoL aspects. Items that ≥80% of ESO TF members rated as useful/important were retained. Items with a 50-80% rating were discussed to reach final agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Six main research questions concerning the selection of outcome measures, measurement tools, and comparison groups were identified as relevant. The core set of measures identified were related to individual characteristics, psychological dimensions; decision-making-related issues, and physical functioning. The multidisciplinary expertise of ESO TF members was a significant asset, even if bringing different backgrounds to the discussion table represented a challenge. CONCLUSIONS HRQoL measures have to be sensitive to the specific needs of men on AS. The definition of HRQoL outcomes will enhance a broader understanding of the HRQoL of men on AS and sustain patient-centered medicine. PATIENT SUMMARY An international panel agreed on a set of health-related quality-of-life aspects to be assessed among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Valid relevant questionnaires were identified. The experts' indications lay a foundation for future research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Villa
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Tiziana Rancati
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chris Bangma
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Carroll
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Louis Denis
- Europa Uomo, Oncology Centre Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Ida J Korfage
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Athene J Lane
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tiziana Magnani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ken Mastris
- Europa Uomo, Oncology Centre Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Monique Roobol
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bruce Trock
- Division of Epidemiology, Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lara Bellardita
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ruane-McAteer E, O’Sullivan J, Porter S, Venderbos L, Prue G. An exploration of men's experiences of undergoing active surveillance for favourable-risk prostate cancer: A mixed methods study protocol. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:586. [PMID: 27484002 PMCID: PMC4971725 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2605-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is one of the most common male cancers worldwide. Active Surveillance (AS) has been developed to allow men with lower risk disease to postpone or avoid the adverse side effects associated with curative treatments until the disease progresses. Despite the medical benefits of AS, it is reported that living with untreated cancer can create a significant emotional burden for patients. METHODS/DESIGN The aim of this study is to gain insight into the experiences of men eligible to undergo AS for favourable-risk PCa. This study has a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design consisting of two phases: quantitative followed by qualitative. Phase 1 has a multiple point, prospective, longitudinal exploratory design. Ninety men diagnosed with favourable-risk prostate cancer will be assessed immediately post-diagnosis (baseline) and followed over a period of 12 months, in intervals of 3 month. Ninety age-matched men with no cancer diagnosis will also be recruited using peer nomination and followed up in the same 3 month intervals. Following completion of Phase 1, 10-15 AS participants who have reported both the best and worst psychological functioning will be invited to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Phase 2 will facilitate further exploration of the quantitative results and obtain a richer understanding of participants' personal interpretations of their illness and psychological wellbeing. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilise early baseline measures; include a healthy comparison group; calculate sample size through power calculations; and use a mixed methods approach to gain a deeper more holistic insight into the experiences of men diagnosed with favourable-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Ruane-McAteer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL Northern Ireland
| | - Joe O’Sullivan
- The Northern Ireland Cancer Centre (NICC), Belfast City Hospital, 51 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AB Northern Ireland
| | - Sam Porter
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL Northern Ireland
| | - Lionne Venderbos
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gillian Prue
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen’s University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fosså SD, Bengtsson T, Borre M, Ahlgren G, Rannikko A, Dahl AA. Reduction of quality of life in prostate cancer patients: experience among 6200 men in the Nordic countries. Scand J Urol 2016; 50:330-7. [PMID: 27398736 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1201859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although many studies have dealt with adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, the quantification of the patients' perspective on AE-related reduction in QoL has been less studied. This study describes the impact of self-reported local (erectile, bowel, urinary dysfunction) or systemic (mental distress, fatigue, virility loss) AEs on QoL reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nordic PCa patients completed a questionnaire containing 84 multiple-choice questions. The main outcome variable of the survey was patient-reported PCa-induced QoL reduction, assessed by descriptive and regression analyses. The level of significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS Among 6200 patients, 39% described their QoL as reduced owing to the PCa trajectory: radical prostatectomy group (RPGroup): 42%, radiotherapy without hormones (RADGroup): 27%, hormones (HormGroup): 47% and no treatment (NoTrtGroup): 19%. Except for the NoTrtGroup, urinary leakage and fatigue doubled the risk of QoL reduction, while virility loss and erectile dysfunction tripled the risk. Significant intergroup differences emerged for the age-adjusted odds of QoL reduction: RPGroup (0.66), RADGroup (0.40), HormGroup (0.95) and NoTrtGroup (0.22). CONCLUSIONS After RP, RAD or hormone treatment of PCa, systemic AEs, in particular loss of virility, significantly reduce PCa patients' QoL similarly to or more than local AEs. The probability of reduced QoL is highest during hormone treatment and lowest in patients without anticancer therapy, and seems lower in patients treated with RAD without hormones than after RP. The treatment-related risk of reduced QoL due to systemic AEs should become a part of the pretreatment counselling of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie D Fosså
- a National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment , Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital , Oslo , Norway
| | - Thomas Bengtsson
- b StatMind Statistical & Mathematical Modelling Innovation & Design AB , Lund , Sweden
| | - Michael Borre
- c Department of Urology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Göran Ahlgren
- d Department of Urology , SUS Malmö , Region Skåne, Malmö , Sweden
| | - Antti Rannikko
- e Department of Urology , Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki , Finland
| | - Alv A Dahl
- a National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment , Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital , Oslo , Norway ;,f Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Victorson D, Hankin V, Burns J, Weiland R, Maletich C, Sufrin N, Schuette S, Gutierrez B, Brendler C. Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary psychological benefits of mindfulness meditation training in a sample of men diagnosed with prostate cancer on active surveillance: results from a randomized controlled pilot trial. Psychooncology 2016; 26:1155-1163. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David Victorson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Medicine at Northwestern; Northwestern Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | - Vered Hankin
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | - James Burns
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | - Rebecca Weiland
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | - Carly Maletich
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | | | - Stephanie Schuette
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
- Osher Center for Integrative Medicine at Northwestern; Northwestern Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | - Bruriah Gutierrez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago IL USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Haser GC, Tuttle RM, Su HK, Alon EE, Bergman D, Bernet V, Brett E, Cobin R, Dewey EH, Doherty G, Dos Reis LL, Harris J, Klopper J, Lee SL, Levine RA, Lepore SJ, Likhterov I, Lupo MA, Machac J, Mechanick JI, Mehra S, Milas M, Orloff LA, Randolph G, Revenson TA, Roberts KJ, Ross DS, Rowe ME, Smallridge RC, Terris D, Tufano RP, Urken ML. ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PAPILLARY THYROID MICROCARCINOMA: NEW CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. Endocr Pract 2016; 22:602-11. [PMID: 26799628 DOI: 10.4158/ep151065.ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The dramatic increase in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is primarily a result of early diagnosis of small cancers. Active surveillance is a promising management strategy for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs). However, as this management strategy gains traction in the U.S., it is imperative that patients and clinicians be properly educated, patients be followed for life, and appropriate tools be identified to implement the strategy. METHODS We review previous active surveillance studies and the parameters used to identify patients who are good candidates for active surveillance. We also review some of the challenges to implementing active surveillance protocols in the U.S. and discuss how these might be addressed. RESULTS Trials of active surveillance support nonsurgical management as a viable and safe management strategy. However, numerous challenges exist, including the need for adherence to protocols, education of patients and physicians, and awareness of the impact of this strategy on patient psychology and quality of life. The Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC) is a portable record keeping system that can manage a mobile patient population undergoing active surveillance. CONCLUSION With proper patient selection, organization, and patient support, active surveillance has the potential to be a long-term management strategy for select patients with PTMC. In order to address the challenges and opportunities for this approach to be successfully implemented in the U.S., it will be necessary to consider psychological and quality of life, cultural differences, and the patient's clinical status.
Collapse
|
38
|
Li B, Thrasher JB, Terranova P. Glycogen synthase kinase-3: a potential preventive target for prostate cancer management. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:456-63. [PMID: 26051358 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Revised: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prostate cancers are the frequently diagnosed cancers in men, and patients with metastatic disease only have 28% chance for 5-year survival. Patients with low-risk tumors are subjected to active surveillance, whereas high-risk cases are actively treated. Unfortunately, there is no cure for patients with late-stage disease. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3, α and β) is a protein serine/threonine kinase and has diverse cellular functions and numerous substrates. We sought to summarize all the studies done with GSK-3 in prostate cancers and to provide a prospective direction for future work. METHODS AND MATERIALS A comprehensive search of the literature on the electronic databases PubMed was conducted for the subject terms of GSK-3 and prostate cancer. Gene mutation and expression information was extracted from Oncomine and COSMIC databases. Case reports were not included. RESULTS Accumulating evidence indicates that GSK-3α is mainly expressed in low-risk prostate cancers and is related to hormone-dependent androgen receptor (AR)-mediated gene expression, whereas GSK-3β is mainly expressed in high-risk prostate cancers and is related to hormone-independent AR-mediated gene expression. GSK-3 has been demonstrated as a positive regulator in AR transactivation and prostate cancer growth independent of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Different types of GSK-3inhibitors including lithium show promising results in suppressing tumor growth in different animal models of prostate cancer. Importantly, clinical use of lithium is associated with reduced cancer incidence in psychiatric patients. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, GSK-3 inhibition might be implicated in prostate cancer management as a preventive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benyi Li
- Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
| | | | - Paul Terranova
- Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| |
Collapse
|