Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from patients with SLE maintain an interferon signature during in vitro culture

Mesenchymal stem cells in autoimmune disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies

Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are of interest in the clinic because of their immunomodulation capabilities, capacity to act upstream of inflammation, and ability to sense metabolic environments. In standard physiologic conditions, they play a role in maintaining the homeostasis of tissues and organs; however, there is evidence that they can contribute to some autoimmune diseases. Gaining a deeper understanding of the factors that transition MSCs from their physiological function to a pathological role in their native environment, and elucidating mechanisms that reduce their therapeutic relevance in regenerative medicine, is essential. We conducted a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of human MSCs in preclinical studies of autoimmune disease, evaluating 60 studies that included 845 patient samples and 571 control samples. MSCs from any tissue source were included, and the study was limited to four autoimmune diseases: multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, and lupus. We developed a novel Risk of Bias tool to determine study quality for in vitro studies. Using the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy's criteria to define an MSC, most studies reported no difference in morphology, adhesion, cell surface markers, or differentiation into bone, fat, or cartilage when comparing control and autoimmune MSCs. However, there were reported differences in proliferation. Additionally, 308 biomolecules were differentially expressed, and the abilities to migrate, invade, and form capillaries were decreased. The findings from this study could help to explain the pathogenic mechanisms of autoimmune disease and potentially lead to improved MSC-based therapeutic applications.

Mechanisms of Stem Cells and Their Secreted Exosomes in the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases

Stem cells play a therapeutic role in many diseases by virtue of their strong self-renewal and differentiation abilities, especially in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. At present, the mechanism of the stem cell treatment of autoimmune diseases mainly relies on their immune regulation ability, regulating the number and function of auxiliary cells, anti-inflammatory factors and proinflammatory factors in patients to reduce inflammation. On the other hand, the stem cell- derived secretory body has weak immunogenicity and low molecular weight, can target the site of injury, and can extend the length of its active time in the patient after combining it with the composite material. Therefore, the role of secretory bodies in the stem cell treatment of autoimmune diseases is increasingly important.

Transcriptional profiling upon T cell stimulation reveals down-regulation of inflammatory pathways in T and B cells in SLE versus Sjögren's syndrome

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) share clinical as well as pathogenic similarities. Although previous studies suggest various abnormalities in different immune cell compartments, dedicated cell-type specific transcriptomic signatures are often masked by patient heterogeneity. Here, we performed transcriptional profiling of isolated CD4, CD8, CD16 and CD19 lymphocytes from pSS and SLE patients upon T cell stimulation, in addition to a steady-state condition directly after blood drawing, in total comprising 581 sequencing samples. T cell stimulation, which induced a pronounced inflammatory response in all four cell types, gave rise to substantial re-modulation of lymphocyte subsets in the two autoimmune diseases compared to healthy controls, far exceeding the transcriptomic differences detected at steady-state. In particular, we detected cell-type and disease-specific down-regulation of a range of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine pathways. Such differences between SLE and pSS patients are instrumental for selective immune targeting by future therapies.

Association between type I interferon pathway activation and clinical outcomes in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

BACKGROUND

Type I interferons (IFN-I) contribute to a broad range of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Compelling evidence suggests that the measurement of IFN-I pathway activation may have clinical value. Although several IFN-I pathway assays have been proposed, the exact clinical applications are unclear. We summarise the evidence on the potential clinical utility of assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted across three databases to evaluate the use of IFN-I assays in diagnosis and monitor disease activity, prognosis, response to treatment and responsiveness to change in several RMDs.

RESULTS

Of 366 screened, 276 studies were selected that reported the use of assays reflecting IFN-I pathway activation for disease diagnosis (n=188), assessment of disease activity (n=122), prognosis (n=20), response to treatment (n=23) and assay responsiveness (n=59). Immunoassays, quantitative PCR (qPCR) and microarrays were reported most frequently, while systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, myositis, systemic sclerosis and primary Sjögren's syndrome were the most studied RMDs. The literature demonstrated significant heterogeneity in techniques, analytical conditions, risk of bias and application in diseases. Inadequate study designs and technical heterogeneity were the main limitations. IFN-I pathway activation was associated with disease activity and flare occurrence in SLE, but their incremental value was uncertain. IFN-I pathway activation may predict response to IFN-I targeting therapies and may predict response to different treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates potential clinical value of assays measuring IFN-I pathway activation in several RMDs, but assay harmonisation and clinical validation are urged. This review informs the EULAR points to consider for the measurement and reporting of IFN-I pathway assays.

Identification of Novel Immune Cell-Relevant Therapeutic Targets and Validation of Roles of TK1 in BMSCs of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) displays the characteristics of abnormal activity of the immune system, contributing to diverse clinical symptoms. Herein, this study was conducted for discovering novel immune cell-relevant therapeutic targets.

Methods: The abundance of diverse immune cells was estimated in PBMCs of SLE and healthy controls from the GSE50772 dataset with CIBERSORT approach. Immune cell-relevant co-expression modules were screened with WGCNA and relevant characteristic genes were determined with LASSO algorithm. Inflammatory chemokines were measured in serum of twenty SLE patients and twenty controls through ELISA. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were isolated and TK1 expression was measured in BMSCs through RT-qPCR and western blotting. TK1-overexpressed and TK-1-silenced BMSCs of SLE were conducted and apoptosis and cell cycle were measured with flow cytometry. Apoptosis-, cell cycle- and senescence-relevant proteins were tested with western blotting.

Results: We determined three co-expression modules strongly linked to immune cells. Five characteristic genes (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL8, CXCR1 and TK1) were screened and ROC curves proved the excellent diagnostic performance of this LASSO model. Inflammatory chemokines presented widespread up-regulations in serum of Systemic lupus erythematosus patients, demonstrating the activation of inflammatory response. TK1 expression was remarkably elevated in SLE BMSCs than controls. TK1 overexpression enhanced IL-1β expression, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and senescent phenotypes of SLE BMSCs and the opposite results were proved in TK1-silenced SLE BMSCs.

Conclusion: Collectively, our findings demonstrate that silencing TK1 alleviates inflammation, growth arrest and senescence in BMSCs of SLE, which highlights TK1 as a promising therapeutic target against SLE.

Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Other Cellular Therapeutics in Rheumatic Diseases in 2022: A review of what we know so far

Although there are a number of new immunosuppressives and biologics approved for treating various autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases, there remain a substantial number of patients who have no clinical response or limited clinical response to these available treatments. Use of cellular therapies is a novel approach for the treatment of autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases with perhaps enhanced efficacy and less toxicity than current therapies. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants were the first foray into cellular therapies with proven efficacy in scleroderma and multiple sclerosis. Newer yet unproven cellular therapies include allogenic mesenchymal stromal cells, shown effective in graft vs host disease and in healing of Crohn's fistulas. CAR-T cells are effective in various malignancies with possible usage in rheumatic diseases, as shown in preclinical studies in murine lupus and recently in human lupus. T regulatory cells are one of the master controllers of the immune response and are decreased in number and/or effectiveness in specific autoimmune diseases. Expansion of autologous T regulatory cells is an attractive approach to controlling autoimmunity. There are a number of other regulatory cells in the immune system including regulatory B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and other T cell types that are early in development. In this review, the current evidence for efficacy and mechanisms of actions of cellular therapies already in use or in clinical trials in human autoimmune diseases will be discussed including limitations of these therapies and potential side effects.

Immunomodulatory Effect of MSCs and MSCs-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common autoimmune connective tissue disease with unclear etiology and pathogenesis. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and MSC derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) play important roles in regulating innate and adaptive immunity, which are involved in many physiological and pathological processes and contribute to the immune homeostasis in SLE. The effects of MSCs and EVs on SLE have been drawing more and more attention during the past few years. This article reviews the immunomodulatory effects and underlying mechanisms of MSC/MSC-EVs in SLE, which provides novel insight into understanding SLE pathogenesis and guiding the biological therapy.

Type I interferon in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus

Type I interferon (IFN) is a primary pathogenic factor in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Gain-of-function genetic variants in the type I IFN pathway have been associated with risk of disease. Common polygenic as well as rare monogenic influences on type I IFN have been demonstrated, supporting a complex genetic basis for high IFN in many SLE patients. Both SLE-associated autoantibodies and high type I IFN can be observed in the pre-disease state. Patients with SLE and evidence of high type I IFN have more active disease and a greater propensity to nephritis and other severe manifestations. Despite the well-established association between type I IFN and SLE, the specific triggers of type I IFN production, the mechanisms by which IFNs help perpetuate the cycle of autoreactive cells and autoantibody production are not completely clear. This review provides an updated overview of type I IFN in SLE pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and current therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway.

Type I interferon antagonists in clinical development for lupus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe chronic and incurable autoimmune disease. Treatment includes glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants which typically result in partial responses, and hence there is a great need for new therapies. The type I interferon (IFN) pathway is activated in more than 50% of SLE patients, and it is strongly implicated as a pathogenic factor in SLE.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the literature using 'SLE and interferon antagonists' as search terms. This identified a number of therapeutics that have entered clinical development targeting type I IFN in SLE. These include monoclonal antibodies against type I IFN cytokines and a kinoid vaccination strategy to induce anti-IFN antibodies.

EXPERT OPINION

Type I IFN antagonists have had some success, but many molecules have not progressed to phase III. These varied results are likely attributed to the multiple concurrent cytokine abnormalities present in SLE, the imprecise nature of the IFN signature as a readout for type I IFN and difficulties with clinical trials such as background medication use and diffuse composite disease activity measures. Despite these challenges, it seems likely that a type I IFN antagonist will come to clinical utility for SLE given the large unmet need and the recent phase III success with anifrolumab.