Prognosis of β-adrenergic blockade therapy on septic shock and sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Association of beta blockers and mortality in adults with septic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Septic shock still entails significant morbidity and mortality, with the heart being affected due to catecholamine overexpression and direct injury from sepsis. Therefore, the effect of β-blocking the receptors to improve performance is promising when attempting to reverse tachycardia and reduce mortality.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases for studies published up to 28 January 2024, using a PICO strategy. Ten studies were identified for quantitative analysis and included in our meta-analysis.

Results

Our meta-analysis evaluated 28-day in-hospital mortality risk across nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,121 adults with septic shock. We found an association between β-blocker use and reduced overall mortality (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34-0.98; I 2: 56%). This effect was significant in the esmolol subgroup (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26-0.82; I 2: 32%), but not in the landiolol subgroup (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.0-1,284.5; I 2: 72%). Additionally, the intervention group shows a significant reduction in HR and lactate levels, as well as an increase in stroke volume index (SVI).

Conclusion

In adults with septic shock, β-blockers are associated with a reduction in 28-day in-hospital mortality, a benefit primarily observed with esmolol rather than landiolol. Furthermore, improvements in heart rate (HR) control, lactate levels, and SVI were noted. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality RCTs comparing different β-blockers are necessary to better elucidate these effects.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024513610.

Impact of beta-blocker usage on delirium in patients with sepsis in ICU: a cross-sectional study

Introduction

Delirium in patients with sepsis can be life-threatening. This study aims to investigate the impact of the use of beta-blockers on the occurrence of delirium in patients with sepsis in the ICU by utilizing a comprehensive dataset.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted using the data obtained from a single ICU in the USA. Patients diagnosed with sepsis and receiving beta-blockers were compared with those not receiving beta-blockers. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multiple regression analysis were employed to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

Among the 19,660 patients hospitalized for sepsis, the beta-blocker and non-user groups comprised 13,119 (66.73%) and 6,541 (33.27%) patients, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models revealed a significant reduction of 60% in 7-day delirium for beta-blocker users (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.37-0.43, p < 0.001), for 30-day delirium (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.29-0.35, p < 0.001), and for 90-day delirium (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.30-0.35, p < 0.001). The PSM results further strengthen the validity of these findings. An analysis of safety issues demonstrated that beta-blockers may have an impact on the risk of acute kidney injury. However, following PSM, the results are not considered robust. Furthermore, there was no discernible change in the odds of renal replacement therapy and the length of ICU stays.

Discussion

Our findings suggest a potential protective effect of beta-blockers against delirium in patients with sepsis. Nevertheless, the observational design limits causal inference, necessitating future randomized controlled trials to validate these findings.

The role of esmolol in sepsis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with a high incidence and mortality and poses a significant challenge to the treatment. Although esmolol has shown promise in sepsis treatment, its efficacy and safety remain contentious. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the role of esmolol in sepsis management.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched and references of relevant reviews and meta-analysis were also screened for appropriate studies. Keywords and free words of 'sepsis', 'esmolol' and 'randomized controlled trials' were used for search. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 1100 patients were included. Compared with the control group, patients receiving esmolol exhibited significantly decreased 28-day mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.81; P < 0.0001), heart rate (HR) (SMD, -1.15; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.96; P < 0.0001), cardiac troponin I levels (cTnI) (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.64; P < 0.0001), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.3; P < 0.0001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.09; P = 0.004) and significantly increased central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88; P < 0.0001).While, esmolol had no significant influence on norepinephrine dosage (SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.29; P = 0.46), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.4; P = 0.16), central venous pressure (CVP) (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.35; P = 0.11) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.7; P = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Esmolol reduces 28-day mortality, length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in sepsis patients. Furthermore, esmolol improves oxygen metabolism, mitigates myocardial injury and decreases heart rate without significantly affecting hemodynamic parameters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on the PROSPERO website (registration number: CRD42023484884).

Effectiveness of β-blockers in improving 28-day mortality in septic shock: insights from subgroup analysis and retrospective observational study

Background

In recent years, septic shock remains a common fatal disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). After sufficient fluid resuscitation, some patients still experience tachycardia, which may lead to adverse effects on cardiac function. However, the use of β-blockers in the treatment of septic shock remains controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of β-blockers in the treatment of patients with septic shock and explore the most appropriate patient subgroups for this treatment.

Methods

This retrospective observational study enrolled septic shock patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance some baseline differences between patients with and without β-blockers treatment. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital, and the degree of support for organs such as circulatory, respiratory and renal systems were also assessed. Subgroup analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the relationship between β-blockers therapy and 28-day mortality in different patient groups.

Results

A total of 4,860 septic shock patients were enrolled in this study and 619 pairs were finally matched after PSM. Our analysis revealed that β-blocker therapy was associated with a significant improvement in 28-day mortality (21.5% vs. 27.1%; P = 0.020) and led to a prolonged LOS in both the ICU and hospital. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was an interaction between cardiovascular diseases and β-blocker therapy in patients with septic shock. Patients with pre-existing heart disease or atrial arrhythmias were more likely to derive benefits from β-blocker treatment.

Conclusion

We found β-blockers therapy was effective to improve 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Patients in the subgroup with cardiovascular diseases were more likely to benefit from β-blockers in mortality.

Efficacy of β-Blockers in Decreasing Mortality in Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Systematic Review

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition leading to various organ dysfunction due to an underlying infection. Despite providing appropriate treatment, it is still one of the most common causes of death among patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). So, multiple studies have been conducted to identify the potential benefits of various drugs in decreasing mortality in sepsis apart from its traditional treatment options. This study aims to identify whether β-blockers play a role in decreasing mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients because of their potential benefits on several organ systems. Medical databases such as Google Scholar, Summon, PubMed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) were systematically searched for relevant publications. The identified articles were assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 11 research articles were finalized, for which quality appraisal was done using appropriate appraisal tools. β-blockers significantly lowered the in-hospital mortality in sepsis and septic shock patients, and they were also associated with better patient outcomes. As there are limited studies, further research needs to be done to explore the role of β-blockers in decreasing mortality in critically ill populations such as sepsis and septic shock patients.

Melatonin: A potential protective multifaceted force for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition manifested by organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Lung, brain, liver, kidney, and heart are among the affected organs. Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is a common cause of death among septic patients. Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is characterized by an acute and reversible significant decline in biventricular both systolic and diastolic function. This is accompanied by left ventricular dilatation. The pathogenesis underlying sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is multifactorial. Hence, targeting an individual pathway may not be effective in halting the extensive dysregulated immune response. Despite major advances in sepsis management strategies, no effective pharmacological strategies have been shown to treat or even reverse sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Melatonin, namely, N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine, is synthesized in the pineal gland of mammals and can also be produced in many cells and tissues. Melatonin has cardioprotective, neuroprotective, and anti-tumor activity. Several literature reviews have explored the role of melatonin in preventing sepsis-induced organ failure. Melatonin was found to act on different pathways that are involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Through its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activity, it offers a potential role in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Its antioxidant activity is through free radical scavenging against reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and modulating the expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes. Melatonin anti-inflammatory activities control the overactive immune system and mitigate cytokine storm. Also, it mitigates mitochondrial dysfunction, a major mechanism involved in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, and thus controls apoptosis. Therefore, this review discusses melatonin as a promising drug for the management of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.

The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Septic shock is associated with systemic inflammatory response, hemodynamic instability, impaired sympathetic control, and the development of multiorgan dysfunction that requires vasopressor or inotropic support. The regulation of immune function in sepsis is complex and varies over time. However, activating Beta-2 receptors and blocking Beta-1 receptors reduces the proinflammatory response by influencing cytokine production. Evidence that supports the concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with inotropes and vasopressors in patients with septic shock is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultra short beta-blockers and its impact on the ICU related outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, heart rate control, shock resolution, and vasopressors/inotropes requirements.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including critically ill patients with septic shock who received inotropes and vasopressors. Patients who received either epinephrine or norepinephrine without beta-blockers "control group" were compared to patients who received ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine "Intervention group". MEDLINE and Embase databases were utilized to systematically search for studies investigating the use of ultra short beta-blockers in critically ill patients on either epinephrine or norepinephrine from inception to October 10, 2023. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. While, length of stay, heart rate control, and inotropes/ vasopressors requirements were considered secondary outcomes.

Results

Among 47 potentially relevant studies, nine were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality risk was lower in patients with septic shock who used ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine compared with the control group (RR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.53, 0.89), I2=26%; P=0.24). In addition, heart rate was statistically significantly lower with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -22.39 (95% CI: -24.71, -20.06) among the beta-blockers group than the control group. The SMD for hospital length of stay and the inotropes requirement were not statistically different between the two groups (SMD (95%CI): -0.57 (-2.77, 1.64), and SMD (95%CI): 0.08 (-0.02, 0.19), respectively).

Conclusion

The use of ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine in critically ill patients with septic shock was associated with better heart rate control and survival benefits without increment in the inotropes and vasopressors requirement.

Esmolol increases the fecal abundance of Lactobacillus in a rat model of sepsis

BACKGROUND

Disorders of the gut microbiome could be responsible for the progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In this study, we examined the effect of esmolol on the gut microbiome in a rat model of sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP).

METHODS

The animals (n = 32) were randomly divided into 3 groups: Sham group (sham operation + normal saline treatment, n = 8), CLP group (cecal ligation and puncture + normal saline treatment, n = 12), and CLP + ESM group (cecal ligation and puncture + esmolol treatment, n = 12). After 24 h, feces in the colon were collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing and nitric oxide analysis. In addition, colon was removed for immunohistochemical staining of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS).

RESULTS

Four rats in the CLP group and two rats in the CLP + ESM group died. The abundance of Lactobacillus in the CLP + ESM group was higher than CLP group (P = 0.048). In the linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis, Norank f Muribaculaceae, Escherichia-Shigella and Lactobacillus were the predominant bacteria in the Sham group, CLP group and CLP + ESM group, respectively. The iNOS expression in colonocytes stained by brown in the CLP group were much more than Sham group (P = 0.001). Compared to CLP group, the iNOS expression in colonocytes reduced after esmolol treatment (P = 0.013). The concentration of nitric oxide in colon feces was different in Sham group, CLP group and CLP + ESM group (1.31 ± 0.15μmmol/l vs. 1.98 ± 0.27μmmol/l vs. 1.51 ± 0.14μmmol/l, P = 0.001). In addition, the concentration of nitric oxide in CLP group was higher than Sham group (P = 0.001) or CLP + ESM group (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol increased the fecal abundance of Lactobacillus in a rat model of sepsis. Moreover, esmolol reduced the iNOS expression of colonocytes and the nitric oxide concentration of colon feces.

Role of aspirin, beta-blocker, statins, and heparin therapy in septic patients under mechanical ventilation: a narrative review

Sepsis is the main cause of death among patients admitted to intensive care units. Management of sepsis includes fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, intravenous antimicrobials, source control, mechanical ventilation, and others. New insights into the potential benefits of non-antimicrobial drugs in sepsis have evolved based on the pathophysiology of the disease and the mechanism of action of some drugs, but the findings are still controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, and heparin as adjunctive treatments in septic patients under mechanical ventilation with non-cardiovascular diseases and their effect on mortality. We searched PubMed with relevant keywords (beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, or heparin, and critically ill or sepsis) for the last 10 years and some personal collection of relevant articles, and then we assessed studies according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our results show that beta-blockers, aspirin, and heparin may have promising feedback on reducing mortality. However, new well-controlled, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to confirm that, and multiple issues regarding their usage need to be addressed. On the other hand, the feedback regarding the effectiveness of statins was not as strong as that of the other drugs studied, and we suggest that further research is needed to confirm these results.

Inflammatory mechanisms and intervention strategies for sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction

Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction (SIMD) is the leading cause of death in patients with sepsis in the intensive care units. The main manifestations of SIMD are systolic and diastolic dysfunctions of the myocardium. Despite our initial understanding of the SIMD over the past three decades, the incidence and mortality of SIMD remain high. This may be attributed to the large degree of heterogeneity among the initiating factors, disease processes, and host states involved in SIMD. Previously, organ dysfunction caused by sepsis was thought to be an impairment brought about by an excessive inflammatory response. However, many recent studies have shown that SIMD is a consequence of a combination of factors shaped by the inflammatory responses between the pathogen and the host. In this article, we review the mechanisms of the inflammatory responses and potential novel therapeutic strategies in SIMD.

Evaluating the effects of Esmolol on cardiac function in patients with Septic cardiomyopathy by Speck-tracking echocardiography-a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Esmolol as one treatment of sepsis induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is still controversial. The objective of this study is to evaluate cardiac function after reducing heart rate by Esmolol in patients with SIC using speck-tracking echocardiography.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, prospective, and randomized controlled study. A total of 100 SIC patients with a heart rate more than 100/min, admitted to the Intensive Care Department of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021, were selected as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into the Esmolol group (Group E) and the conventional treatment group (Group C), each with 50 cases. The target heart rate of patients in Group E was controlled between 80/min and 100/min. Speck-tracking echocardiography (STE) and pulse indicating continuous cardiac output monitoring (PICCO) were performed in both groups at 1 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 7 d after admission, with data concerning left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global ejection fraction (GEF), left ventricular systolic force index (dP/dtmx) were obtained, respectively. Hemodynamics and other safety indicators were monitored throughout the whole process. These subjects were followed up to 90 d, with their mortality recorded at Day 28 and Day 90, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.

RESULTS

With 24 h of Esmolol, all patients in Group E achieved the target heart rate, and there was no deterioration of GLS, or adverse events. However, compared with those in Group C, their GLS, GEF and dP/dtmx were increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared with patients in Group C, those in Group E had lower short-term mortality, and logistic regression analysis also suggested that Esmolol improved patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In SIC patients, the application of Esmolol to lower heart rate decreased their short-term mortality while not making any impairment on the myocardial contractility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100047513. Registered June 20, 2021- Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx . The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines.

Association between Pre-Existing Long-Term β-Blocker Therapy and the Outcomes of Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Previous studies have suggested that long-term β-blocker therapy before sepsis is associated with reduced mortality. Sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC) remains a common complication in patients with sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Adrenergic pathways are involved in the regulation of the coagulation system. Pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy may have potentially beneficial effects on SAC and has yet to be well characterized. We aimed to assess the potential association between pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy and the outcomes of patients with SAC. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively screened the clinical data of adult patients with SAC admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and respiratory ICU between May 2020 and October 2022. Patients with SAC who took any β-blocker for at least one year were considered pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy. All enrolled patients were followed up for 28 days or until death. Results: Among the 228 SAC patients, 48 received long-term β-blocker therapy before septic episodes. Pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy was associated with reduced vasopressor requirements and a decreased 28-day mortality (log-rank test: p = 0.041). In particular, long-term β-blocker therapy was related to substantially lower D-dimer levels and a trend of improved activated partial thromboplastin time in patients with SAC during initial ICU admission. Multivariable regression analysis showed that long-term β-blocker therapy was significantly and independently associated with a 28-day mortality among patients with SAC (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, (0.32-0.94); p = 0.030). Conclusions: Pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy might be associated with reduced vasopressor requirements and a decreased 28-day mortality among patients with SAC, providing evidence for the protective effect of β-blockers against SAC in managing sepsis.

Benefits of esmolol in adults with sepsis and septic shock: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis affects millions of patients annually, resulting in substantial health and economic burdens globally. The role of esmolol potentially plays in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in adult patients remains controversial.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from their inception to May 12, 2022, for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of esmolol for sepsis and septic shock. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Two investigators independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

Eight studies from 7 randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis of 503 patients with sepsis and/or septic shock. Compared with standard treatment, esmolol significantly decreased 28-day mortality (risk ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.88; P = .004), heart rate (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.83, 95% CI -2.95 to -0.70, P = .001), tumor necrosis factor-a (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.02, P = .04), and the troponin I level (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.16, P = .008) 24 hours after treatment. No significant effect was found in terms of length of intensive care unit stay; mean arterial pressure, lactic acid, central venous pressure, or central venous oxygen saturation, interleukin 6, or white blood cell levels; stroke volume index; or the PaO2/FiO2 ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol treatment may be safe and effective in decreasing 28-day mortality, controlling heart rate, and providing cardioprotective function, but has no effect on lung injury in patients with sepsis or septic shock after early fluid resuscitation. Improvement in cardiac function may be related to changes in serum inflammatory mediators. No significant adverse effects on tissue perfusion and oxygen utilization were observed.

Beta-blockers in septic shock: What is new?

The use of beta(β)-blockers during septic shock aimed at countering peripheral adrenergic stress may be justified by the early reduction in deleterious effects resulting from sympathetic overactivation, and could improve the prognosis of patients in septic shock. Animal studies have demonstrated either a maintenance or increase in cardiac output (CO) despite the decrease in heart rate (HR) associated with improved myocardial performance. The mechanism by which β-blockers alter hemodynamics in septic shock is debated; however, preclinical and clinical data show that β-blockers are safe when started at a low dose. Recent publications (2019-2021) on adrenergic β1 receptor antagonists used in septic shock indicate that esmolol and landiolol should not be used in the early phase. While there is no optimal timing for their administration, a minimum of 12 h after the initiation of vasopressor therapy in stabilized euvolemic patients is a reasonable option. Patients should have a normal cardiac function, although a slight depression is compatible with landiolol use under hemodynamic monitoring. Slow titration in patients who remain tachycardic is preferable to rapid titration. When used to decrease HR, landiolol is also effective in reducing the incidence of new arrhythmias. Results of a well-performed and well-powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating a positive effect on survival - or at least on hard surrogates such as the incidence/duration of organ failure - are pending.

Levosimendan in intensive care and emergency medicine: literature update and expert recommendations for optimal efficacy and safety

The inodilator levosimendan, in clinical use for over two decades, has been the subject of extensive clinical and experimental evaluation in various clinical settings beyond its principal indication in the management of acutely decompensated chronic heart failure. Critical care and emergency medicine applications for levosimendan have included postoperative settings, septic shock, and cardiogenic shock. As the experience in these areas continues to expand, an international task force of experts from 15 countries (Austria, Belgium, China, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the USA) reviewed and appraised the latest additions to the database of levosimendan use in critical care, considering all the clinical studies, meta-analyses, and guidelines published from September 2019 to November 2021. Overall, the authors of this opinion paper give levosimendan a "should be considered" recommendation in critical care and emergency medicine settings, with different levels of evidence in postoperative settings, septic shock, weaning from mechanical ventilation, weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cardiogenic shock, and Takotsubo syndrome, in all cases when an inodilator is needed to restore acute severely reduced left or right ventricular ejection fraction and overall haemodynamic balance, and also in the presence of renal dysfunction/failure.

Hypertension and COVID-19: Potential use of beta-blockers and a call for randomized evidence

Hypertension is one of the most common morbidities in COVID-19. Previous studies demonstrated that hypertension increases composite poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Beta-blockers is widely used as one of the most common antihypertensive agents. Beta-blockers may hold potential benefits in COVID-19 treatment, with current evidence of the potential mechanism of beta-blockers remains scarce. However, several mechanisms were suggested, including decreasing RAAS pathway activity and lowering the ACE2 levels, reducing cytokine storms, and may be beneficial in reducing mortality in ARDS related COVID-19. Further large-scale randomized clinical trials should be conducted before a definite recommendation can be drawn.

The Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose: The meta-analysis aims to identify whether septic shock patients can benefit from esmolol.

Materials and Methods: The relevant studies from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase were searched by two independent investigators using a variety of keywords. Stata software (version 12.0, Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, United States)was used for statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 14 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. For overall analysis, the treatment of esmolol was associated with decreased 28-day mortality (RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.56–0.77, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, our analysis found that, esmolol could decrease HR (SMD: −1.70; 95% CI: [−2.24−(−1.17)], cTnI (SMD: −1.61; 95% CI: [−2.06−(−1.16)] compared with standard treatment. No significant differences between the two groups were found in MAP, Lac, CI, and SVI.

Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis intend to demonstrate that septic shock patients with high heart beats rate might be benefit from esmolol treatment despite enough fluid resuscitation. While, dependent on the study published, with the further development of septic shock, the positive impact of esmolol varies. The appropriate heart rate change interval cannot be confirmed, further high-quality and large-scale RCTs should be performed to verify it and screening more suitable heart rate levels.

Systematic Review Registration: CRD42021239513