Challenging 2019 ESC guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes

Preoperative Patient Evaluation: Newer Hypoglycemic Agents

New medications in the treatment of diabetes are an active area of research and drug development. Although many hypoglycemic therapies have been in use for decades, new evidence continues to emerge highlighting benefits of these medications for other indications. In this article, the authors review the classes of newer hypoglycemic agents and summarize medications currently in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. The literature to support specific recommendations for perioperative management is scant, however, where it exists, we have included it. In other instances, the authors have noted a reasonable approach based on pharmacokinetics and principles of perioperative medication management.

Clinical pharmacology of antidiabetic drugs: What can be expected of their use?

The pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has markedly evolved in the last two decades. Classical antidiabetic agents (sulphonylureas, metformin, insulin) are now in competition with new glucose-lowering medications. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and thiazolidinediones (glitazones) were not able to replace older agents, because of insufficient efficacy and/or poor tolerability/safety. In contrast, incretin-based therapies, both dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is or gliptins, oral agents) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs, subcutaneous injections) are a major breakthrough in the management of T2DM. Because they are not associated with hypoglycaemia and weight gain, DPP-4is tend to replace sulphonylureas as add-on to metformin while GLP-1RAs tend to replace basal insulin therapy after failure of oral therapies. Furthermore, placebo-controlled cardiovascular outcome trials demonstrated neutrality for DPP-4is, but cardiovascular protection for GLP-1RAs in patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk. More recently sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is or gliflozins, oral agents) also showed cardiovascular protection, especially a reduction in hospitalization for heart failure, as well as a renal protection in patients with and without T2DM, at high cardiovascular risk, with established heart failure and/or with chronic kidney disease. Thus, GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is are now considered as preferred drugs in T2DM patients with or at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease whereas SGLT2is are more specifically recommended in patients with or at risk of heart failure and renal (albuminuric) disease. The management of T2DM is moving from a glucocentric approach to a broader strategy focusing on all risk factors, including overweight/obesity, and to an organ-disease targeted personalized approach.

Pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes: An update and future directions

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a widely prevalent disease with substantial economic and social impact for which multiple conventional and novel pharmacotherapies are currently available; however, the landscape of T2D treatment is constantly changing as new therapies emerge and the understanding of currently available agents deepens. This review aims to provide an updated summary of the pharmacotherapeutic approach to T2D. Each class of agents is presented by mechanism of action, details of administration, side effect profile, cost, and use in certain populations including heart failure, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, chronic kidney disease, and older individuals. We also review targets of novel therapeutic T2D agent development. Finally, we outline an up-to-date treatment approach that starts with identification of an individualized goal for glycemic control then selection, initiation, and further intensification of a personalized therapeutic plan for T2D.

Challenges in hyperglycemia management in critically ill patients with COVID-19

Hyperglycemia is commonly associated with adverse outcomes especially in patients requiring intensive care unit stay. Data from the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic indicates that individuals with diabetes appear to be at similar risk for COVID-19 infection to those without diabetes but are more likely to experience increased morbidity and mortality. The proposed hypothesis for hyperglycemia in COVID-19 include insulin resistance, critical illness hyperglycemia (stress- induced hyperglycemia) secondary to high levels of hormones like cortisol and catecholamines that counteract insulin action, acute cytokine storm and pancreatic cell dysfunction. Diabetic patients are more likely to have severe hyperglycemic complications including diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state. Management of hyperglycemia in COVID-19 is often complicated by use of steroids, prolonged total parenteral or enteral nutrition, frequent acute hyperglycemic events, and restrictions with fluid management due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. While managing hyperglycemia special attention should be paid to mode of insulin delivery, frequency of glucose monitoring based on patient and caregiver safety thereby minimizing exposure and conserving personal protective equipment. In this article we describe the pathophysiology of hyperglycemia, challenges encountered in managing hyperglycemia, and review some potential solutions to address them.

The use of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonist in the cardiology practice

The presence of type 2 diabetes confronts the patient with an elevated risk to develop atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Glucose control in itself does not prevent these complications in their entirety. More recently several agents within the class of Sodium-Glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I) and Glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) have emerged as preferred agents to tackle the residual risk of ASCVD, HF, and CKD in patients with type 2 diabetes. Despite compelling trial data and professional society endorsement, the uptake of these agents in clinical practice is low. Especially GLP-1RA is only used in 8% of eligible candidates with type 2 diabetes and <5% of these prescriptions are attributed to cardiologists. This low uptake amongst cardiologists is related to the unfamiliarity with this class, its initiation, and titration, hesitation regarding simultaneous adjustment of other glucose-lowering agents, the unaccustomedness to prescribing injectable agents, and differential medical priorities. This review aims to offer cardiologists a practical tool for the optimal use of a GLP-1RA in their suitable patients and is focussed on the Belgian field of practice.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Properties and Clinical Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Non-Asian and Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease is a prevalent complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have a unique mode of action targeting the kidney. As their glucose-lowering potency declines with the reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate, their clinical use in patients with T2DM with chronic kidney disease has been submitted to restriction. However, recent observations demonstrated that SGLT2is reduce the progression of renal impairment in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease, with or without albuminuria. Furthermore, SGLT2is reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM at high cardiovascular risk, independently of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Thus, recent guidelines recommend the prescription of SGLT2is in patients with T2DM with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate between ≥ 30 and < 90 mL/min/1.73 m² and/or albuminuria. The present comprehensive review describes the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of SGLT2is commercialised worldwide and in Japan in patients with T2DM with mild, moderate and severe chronic kidney disease. Drug exposure increases when the estimated glomerular filtration rate declines but without a clear-cut relationship with the severity of chronic kidney disease and in a rather moderate amplitude that most often does not require a dose reduction in the presence of mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease. The urinary glucose excretion steadily declines with the reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate. This may explain a lower effect on glucose control, yet the positive effects on body weight and blood pressure still remain. The efficacy and safety of these SGLT2is are analysed among patients with stages 3a and 3b chronic kidney disease in placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials, with almost similar results in Asian and non-Asian individuals with T2DM. In summary, there is no reason not to prescribe SGLT2is in patients with T2DM with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease, especially if the aim is to benefit from cardiovascular and/or renal protection.

Does background metformin therapy influence the cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes?

Metformin has been recommended as a first-line antidiabetic drug (ADD) for all patients with type 2 diabetes even in the presence of high cardiovascular (CV) risk by American Diabetes Association. In contrast, European Society of Cardiology recommends either a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) or a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as a first-line ADD, in presence of high CV risk. While this discordant recommendation has created a debate, we sought to find whether background metformin therapy influences the CV outcomes with SGLT-2i. We pooled the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of three-point composite major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) of 3 CV outcome trials (CVOTs) from the subgroup analysis based on outcomes with or without background metformin therapy. Subsequently, we conducted a meta-analysis by applying the inverse variance-weighted averages of pooled logarithmic hazard ratio, using a random-effects analysis. While this meta-analysis found a significant reduction in 3P-MACE with SGLT-2i without background metformin therapy (N = 7,233; HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90; p < 0.01; I² = 0.0%), no significant reduction in 3P-MACE was observed with SGLT-2i in presence of background metformin therapy (N = 27,081; HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.02; p = 0.13; I² = 0.0%) with a significant P_heterogenity of 0.03 between the two groups. Similar finding was observed from the pooled results from 4 CVOTs. This may suggest that background metformin therapy may undermine the 3P-MACE benefit of SGLT-2i. However, no such interaction was observed in a recent meta-analysis of SGLT-2i, with or without background metformin therapy. Future research is warranted to understand the CV interaction of metformin with SGLT-2i.

Could metformin modulate cardiovascular outcomes differently with DPP-4 inhibitors compared with SGLT2 inhibitors?

AIMS

Preliminary data have suggested that metformin might potentiate cardiovascular (CV) protection by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), but reduce CV protection by sodium-glucose cotransporter type-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at high CV-related risk. For this reason, the present meta-analyses aimed to compare metformin moderation of the CV effects of the two pharmacological classes.

METHODS

Major adverse CV events (3-point MACEs) were counted in high-risk patients with T2DM treated with or without metformin as background therapy in five CV outcome trials with DPP-4is (SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, TECOS, CARMELINA, CAROLINA) involving 24,821 patients (17,870 with and 6951 without metformin) and 2550 events (1696 with and 854 without metformin), and four trials with SGLT2is (EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, VERTIS CV) involving 24,563 patients (19,090 with and 5473 without metformin) and 1829 events (1300 with and 529 without metformin).

RESULTS

DPP-4is failed to reduce 3-point MACEs in both metformin users (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03) and non-users (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.95-1.16), with no heterogeneity between trials and no significant between-subgroup differences (P = 0.4074), whereas SGLT2is significantly reduced 3-point MACEs in both patients with (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98) and without (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.91) metformin, but again with no heterogeneity between trials and no significant between-subgroup differences (P = 0.2977). Overall, metformin non-users had a poorer risk profile than metformin users.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analyses involving a larger number of trials than before have revealed that background metformin therapy has no significant influence on either the neutral impact of DPP-4is or the positive impact of SGLT2is on CV events (3-point MACEs) in T2DM patients at high CV risk.

COVID-19-associated euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient with type 2 diabetes on SGLT2 inhibitor: a case report

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients are at high risk for the development of severe COVID-19. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (eu-DKA) is a rare life-threatening complication associated with the use of SGLT2 inhibitor that may be unnoticed, particularly in a pandemic setting, due to the absence of significant hyperglycemia, delaying its treatment. In this report, we describe a case of a 56-year-old patient who presented an elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis during a SARS-CoV-2 infection and was diagnosed with SGLT2-associated euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. COVID-19 may increase patients’ insulin demand, present gastrointestinal symptoms, and increase the production of ketone bodies. This situation can be worsened in susceptible diabetic patients on SLGT2 inhibitors, due to the persistent glycosuria, which can cause volume depletion. Recently some authors recommended that insulin-deficient patients or those using SGLT2 inhibitors should monitor for ketosis using available home testing kits in case of infections and should discontinue the medication in case of COVID-19. Given the increased use of this drug class in the management of type 2 DM patients due to its reduction of cardiovascular risk, we set out to emphasize the importance for the medical community to consider the possibility of eu-DKA on SARS-CoV-2-infected patients using SLGT2 inhibitors, so physicians can provide these patients with appropriate therapy promptly.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

The management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is becoming increasingly complex. Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are the newest antidiabetic agents for T2DM. By targeting the kidney, they have a unique mechanism of action, which results in enhanced glucosuria, osmotic diuresis and natriuresis, thereby improving glucose control with a limited risk of hypoglycaemia and exerting additional positive effects such as weight loss and the lowering of blood pressure. Several outcome studies with canagliflozin, dapagliflozin or empagliflozin reported a statistically significant reduction in major cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure and progression to advanced renal disease in patients with T2DM who have established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, several cardiovascular risk factors, albuminuric mild to moderate chronic kidney disease or heart failure. Current guidelines proposed a new paradigm in the management of T2DM, with a preferential place for SGLT2is, after metformin, in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure and progressive kidney disease. Ongoing trials might extend the therapeutic potential of SGLT2is in patients with, but also without, T2DM. This Review provides an update of the current knowledge on SGLT2is, moving from their use as glucose-lowering medications to their new positioning as cardiovascular and renal protective agents.

Metformin: An old drug against old age and associated morbidities

Metformin represents a striking example of a "historical nemesis" of a drug. About 40 years after its marketing in Europe, once demonstrated its efficacy and safety, metformin was registered also in the U.S. A few years later, it has become a mainstay in T2DM treatment, according to all international Scientific Societies guidelines. Today, despite the advent of new innovative drugs, metformin still persists as a first-choice drug in T2DM. This success is largely justified. In fact, over the years, also positive effects on health increased. In particular, evidence has been accumulated on a beneficial impact against many other aging-related morbidities (obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, cancer, cognitive decline and mortality). This literature review describes preclinical and clinical evidence favoring the "anti-aging" therapeutic potential of metformin outside of T2DM. The rationale to the use of metformin as part of a combined therapy in a variety of clinical settings, allowing for a reduction of the chemotherapy dose in cancer patients, has also been discussed. In particular, the focus was on metformin action on RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway. In the end, the real challenge for metformin could be to fully demonstrate beneficial effects on health even in non-diabetic subjects.