Sight-threatening retinopathy is associated with lower mortality in type 2 diabetic subjects: a 10-year observation study

Synergistic effect of chronic kidney disease, neuropathy, and retinopathy on all-cause mortality in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a 21-year longitudinal study

Background

The prognostic value of common and frequently associated diabetic microvascular complications (MVC), namely chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN), peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and retinopathy (DR), is well established. However, the impact of their different combinations on long-term mortality has not been adequately assessed.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 21-year longitudinal data from 303 patients with long-standing type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D), who were thoroughly characterized at baseline for the presence of MVC using 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy, overnight urine collection, cardiovascular autonomic tests, monofilament testing, and dilated fundus oculi examination.

Results

After a 5,244 person-years follow-up, a total of 133 (43.9%) deaths occurred. The presence of CKD and CAN, regardless of other MVC, increased the adjusted all-cause mortality risk by 117% (HR 2.17 [1.45–3.26]) and 54% (HR 1.54 [1.01–2.36]), respectively. Concomitant CKD&CAN at baseline were associated with the highest mortality risk (HR 5.08 [2.52–10.26]), followed by CKD&DR (HR 2.95 [1.63–5.32]), and CAN&DR (HR 2.07 [1.11–3.85]). Compared with patients free from MVC, the mortality risk was only numerically higher in those with any isolated MVC (HR 1.52 [0.87–2.67]), while increased by 203% (HR 3.03 [1.62–5.68]) and 692% (HR 7.92 [2.93–21.37]) in patients with two and three concomitant MVC, respectively.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the long-term, synergistic, negative effects of single and concomitant diabetic MVC on all-cause mortality, which should encourage comprehensive screenings for MCV in both T1D and T2D to improve risk stratification and treatment.

Association of Diabetic Retinopathy With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The population-based studies conducted thus far do not provide conclusive evidence of the link between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and stroke. The aim of the present systematic review was to determine whether DR is specifically associated with stroke.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from their inception to July 31, 2020. All cohort studies that reported associations between the presence of DR and incident stroke were included. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs), pooled risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: The meta-analysis included 19 cohort studies involving 81,452 diabetic patients. The pooled effect size of any DR related to stroke was 1.25 for HR (95% CI: 1.12–1.39; P < 0.0001) and 1.96 for RR (95% CI: 1.60–2.39; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for the type of diabetes yielded pooled HR of 1.29 (95% CI: 1.10–1.50; P = 0.001) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The pooled RR was 2.29 (95% CI: 1.77–2.96; P < 0.0001) in patients with T2DM. Two studies addressed the DR-related stroke among type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. One study found a significant association between DR and stroke (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1–2.3; P < 0.01), while the other did not identify an association between these two conditions (RR: 1.40; 95% CI: 0.62–2.18; P = 0.178).

Conclusions: The presence of DR is associated with an increased risk of stroke in diabetic patients. This correlation is robust in T2DM patients but uncertain in T1DM patients. Our findings indicate that DR is an important biomarker for the prediction of stroke. To further validate the role of DR in stroke-risk stratification, additional research is required on the association between the stage of DR and stroke risk, and more studies including T1DM patients are necessary.

Diabetic retinopathy predicts cardiovascular mortality in diabetes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of diabetic retinopathy (DR) for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remained unclear. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to assess whether DR predicted CVD mortality in diabetic patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for cohort studies reporting the association of DR and CVD mortality. Then we pooled the data for analysis.

RESULTS

After screening the literature, 10 eligible studies with 11,239 diabetic subjects were finally included in quantitative synthesis. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of DR, mild DR, and severe DR for CVD mortality was 1.83 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42, 2.36; p < 0.001), 1.13 (95% CI 0.81, 1.59; p = 0.46), and 2.26 (1.31, 3.91; p = 0.003), respectively, compared to those without DR. In type 2 DM, the patients with DR had a significantly higher CVD mortality (RR: 1.69; 95% CI 1.27, 2.24; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis also showed a significantly higher CVD mortality in DR according to various regions, study design, data source, and follow-up period (all RR > 1; all P values < 0.05). Data from 2 studies showed no significant correlation of DR and CVD mortality in diabetic patients receiving cardiovascular surgery (RR: 2.40; 95% CI 0.63, 9.18; P = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

DR is a risk marker of cardiovascular death, and severe DR predicts a doubled mortality of CVD in diabetes. These findings indicate the importance of early identification and management of diabetic patients with DR to reduce the risk of death.

Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Subsequent Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome in the ELIXA: The Importance of Disease Duration

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the association of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy with increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events in 6068 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) enrolled in the Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ELIXA).

METHODS

History of retinopathy and neuropathy as well as duration of T2DM were self-reported at screening. Proportional hazards regression models were used to assess relationships between retinopathy, neuropathy, and recurrent CV events.

RESULTS

At screening, retinopathy and neuropathy were reported in 10.7% and 17.5% of patients, respectively, while 5.7% reported both. When adjusted for randomized treatment only, both retinopathy and neuropathy were associated with a primary composite outcome (CV death, nonfatal MI, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina) (retinopathy: HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.19-1.75; neuropathy: HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.12-1.57), CV composite (CV death, nonfatal MI, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HF)) (retinopathy: HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.31-1.88; neuropathy: HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.19-1.62), myocardial infarction (retinopathy: HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08-1.76; neuropathy: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.54), HF hospitalization (retinopathy: HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.48-2.78; neuropathy: HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.30-2.27), and all-cause mortality (retinopathy: HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.28-2.12; neuropathy: HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.14-1.78). When included in the same model, and adjusted for T2DM duration, there were no independent associations of either with CV outcomes, while T2DM duration remained strongly associated with all outcomes. Addition of demographic characteristics and CV risk factors did not further alter these relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2DM and recent ACS, a history of retinopathy and/or neuropathy and longer T2DM duration could be considered clinical markers for high risk of recurrent CV events. This trial is registered with the ELIXA (Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome), ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01147250.

Prediction of risk of diabetic retinopathy for all-cause mortality, stroke and heart failure: Evidence from epidemiological observational studies

To examine and quantify the potential relation between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and risk of all-cause mortality, stroke and heart failure (HF).The resources of meta-analysis of epidemiological observational studies were from Pub-med, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, conference, and proceedings.Random/fixed effects models were used to calculate pooled subgroup analysis stratified by different grades of DR was performed to explore the potential source of heterogeneity. Statistical manipulations were undertaken using program STATA.Of the included 25 studies, comprising 142,625 participants, 19 studies were concluded to find the relation of DR to all-cause mortality, 5 for stroke, and 3 for HF. Risk ratio (RR) for all-cause mortality with the presence of DR was 2.33 (95% CI 1.92-2.81) compared with diabetic individuals without DR. Evidences showed a higher risk of all-cause mortality associated with DR in patients with T2D or T1D (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.91-2.65. RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.34-5.36). According to different grades of DR in patients with T2D, RR for all-cause mortality varied, the risk of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) was 1.38 (1.11-1.70), while the risk of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) was 2.32 (1.75-3.06). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity (Cochran Q test P = 0.29 vs 0.26, I = 19.6% vs 22.6%, respectively). Data from 5 studies in relation to DR and the risk of stroke showed that DR was significantly associated with increased risk of stroke (RR = 1.74, 95%CI: 1.35-2.24), compared with patients without DR. Furthermore, DR (as compared with individuals without DR) was associated with a marginal increased risk of HF in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 3 studies; RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.98-5.14, P = 0.056).Our results showed that DR increased the risk of all-cause mortality, regardless of the different stages, compared with the diabetic individuals without DR. DR predicted increased risk of stroke and HF. Although only 3 studies about HF were available, the association between DR and HF should be careful.

The prognosis of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes since 1996-1998: the Skaraborg Diabetes Register

Diabetes mellitus is the main reason for visual impairment among patients of working ages. The aim of this paper was to investigate the prognosis of eye complications in patients with diabetes during 10 years of follow-up and contributing risk factors. Data from ophthalmological records (occurrence of retinopathy and laser treatment and visual acuity), and clinical data (blood pressure, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), and antihypertensive treatment) from the Skaraborg Diabetes Register were retrieved in the Skaraborg Screening Program of 1,258 patients diagnosed during 1996-1998. Kaplan Meyer survival analysis and Log Rank test were used to analyze eye complications in 773 patients with type 2 diabetes and ≤70 years at diagnosis. Visual acuity was above the limit for driving license in 96 % of 548 patients and only nineteen patients were treated by laser. At diagnosis of diabetes, mean HbA1c was 6.7 ± 1.7 % (59 ± 7.1 mmol/mol), and systolic blood pressure was 142.9 ± 0.7 mmHg; neither changed significantly during follow-up. Retinopathy appeared about 1 year, and maculopathy 2 years earlier, if HbA1c ≥ 7 % (63 mmol/mol) at diagnosis (p < 0.001 and p < 0.006). Antihypertensive treatment, higher BMI, and higher age at diagnosis were associated with less retinopathy during follow-up. Most patients with diabetes develop little retinopathy for the first 10 years after diagnosis. High HbA1c at baseline was associated with retinopathy and maculopathy during follow-up. Antihypertensive treatment, probably a proxy for regular controls and early detection of diabetes, was associated with less retinopathy.

Cost-effectiveness of treatment of diabetic macular edema

BACKGROUND

Macular edema is the most common cause of vision loss among patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of different treatments of diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Markov model.

DATA SOURCES

Published literature and expert opinion.

TARGET POPULATION

Patients with clinically significant DME.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

INTERVENTION

Laser treatment, intraocular injections of triamcinolone or a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, or a combination of both.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Discounted costs, gains in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

All treatments except laser monotherapy substantially reduced costs, and all treatments except triamcinolone monotherapy increased QALYs. Laser treatment plus a VEGF inhibitor achieved the greatest benefit, gaining 0.56 QALYs at a cost of $6975 for an ICER of $12 410 per QALY compared with laser treatment plus triamcinolone. Monotherapy with a VEGF inhibitor achieved similar outcomes to combination therapy with laser treatment plus a VEGF inhibitor. Laser monotherapy and triamcinolone monotherapy were less effective and more costly than combination therapy.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

VEGF inhibitor monotherapy was sometimes preferred over laser treatment plus a VEGF inhibitor, depending on the reduction in quality of life with loss of visual acuity. When the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab was as effective as ranibizumab, it was preferable because of its lower cost.

LIMITATION

Long-term outcome data for treated and untreated diseases are limited.

CONCLUSION

The most effective treatment of DME is VEGF inhibitor injections with or without laser treatment. This therapy compares favorably with cost-effective interventions for other conditions.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Retinopathy and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and anemia

OBJECTIVE

Retinopathy is an established microvascular complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but its independent relationship with macrovascular and other microvascular complications is less well defined across the spectrum of kidney disease in T2DM. We examined the prognostic value of retinopathy in assessing the risk of developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular morbidity or death among patients in the Trial to Reduce cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT).

DESIGN

TREAT enrolled 4038 patients with T2DM, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and moderate anemia. Patients were grouped by baseline history of retinopathy. Proportional hazards regression models were utilized to assess the association between retinopathy and subsequent ESRD, cardiovascular morbidity or death over an average of 2.4 years.

RESULTS

Although younger, the 1895 (47%) patients with retinopathy had longer duration of diabetes, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, more proteinuria, and more microvascular complications. In univariate analysis, retinopathy was associated with a higher rate of ESRD, but not with cardiovascular events or mortality. After adjustment, retinopathy was no longer statistically significant for the prediction of ESRD or any clinical endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with T2DM, CKD, and anemia, retinopathy was common but not independently associated with a higher risk of renal or cardiovascular morbidity or death.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00093015.

Diabetic retinopathy predicts all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in both type 1 and 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic significance of diabetic retinopathy (DR) for death and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes is debated. We investigated the association of DR with all-cause mortality and CV events in patients with diabetes by a systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The electronic databases Medline and Embase were searched for cohort studies that evaluated DR in type 2 or type 1 diabetic patients and reported total mortality and/or fatal and nonfatal CV events, including myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft, ischemic changes on a conventional 12-lead electrocardiogram, transient ischemic attack, nonfatal stroke, or lower leg amputation. Data extraction was performed by two reviewers independently. Pooled effect estimates were obtained by using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 20 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, providing data from 19,234 patients. In patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 14,896), the presence of any degree of DR increased the chance for all-cause mortality and/or CV events by 2.34 (95% CI 1.96-2.80) compared with patients without DR. In patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 4,438), the corresponding odds ratio was 4.10 (1.50-11.18). These associations remained after adjusting for traditional CV risk factors. DR was also predictive of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 2.41 [1.87-3.10]) and type 1 diabetes (3.65 [1.05-12.66]).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of DR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and CV events in both type 2 and type 1 diabetic patients.

Tamm-Horsfall protein gene is associated with distal tubular dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The first changes in the diabetic kidney are glycogen deposits in the epithelial cells of the thick ascending limb of Henle, which leads to decreased production of Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP). The production of THP is also influenced by nitric oxide (NO). The aims of this study were to investigate whether low excretion of THP, a sign of distal tubular dysfunction, in patients with type 1 diabetes was associated with polymorphisms in the THP gene and the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) gene.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Urine was collected from 301 patients with type 1 diabetes, 164 with normoalbuminuria, 91 with microalbuminuria and 46 with macroalbuminuria. Urinary THP concentration below median (3.12 mg/l) was defined as tubular dysfunction. Representative polymorphisms were analysed in the THP and eNOS genes.

RESULTS

Patients with tubular dysfunction had longer diabetes duration and higher blood pressure than patients without tubular dysfunction. Tubular dysfunction was common in patients with macroalbuminuria (70% of patients) and it was associated with the AA+AT genotypes of rs12444268 in the THP gene [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.8], and the GG genotype of rs1799983 in the eNOS gene (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.03-2.6). When adjusting for other associated factors, diabetes duration, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), mean arterial pressure and albuminuria, the THP rs12444268 and macroalbuminuria were independently associated with tubular dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Distal tubular dysfunction was associated with the THP gene and macroalbuminuria in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Eye disease and the older diabetic

Elderly diabetic persons are 1.5 times more likely than age-matched nondiabetic persons to develop vision loss and blindness. Annually, between 12,000 and 24,000 diabetic patients in the United States become legally blind because of complications caused by diabetic retinopathy. Even more diabetic persons experience vision loss caused by comorbid ocular and periocular conditions such as dry eye syndrome, cataracts, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. This article discusses the synergy between these conditions and diabetes. Standards of care that slow the progression of vision loss and exciting new research on new strategies of care that may reverse vision loss are presented.

Clinically significant macular edema and survival in type 1 and type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and long-term survival in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

METHODS

The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) is an ongoing prospective population-based cohort study initiated from August 21, 1980 through July 30, 1982 of individuals with diabetes diagnosed at either younger than 30 years of age (younger-onset group; n = 996) or 30 years of age or older (older-onset group; n = 1,370). Stereoscopic color retinal photographs were graded for retinopathy using the modified Airlie House classification scheme. CSME was defined by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria.

RESULTS

Prevalence of CSME was 5.9% and 7.5% for the younger- and older-onset groups, respectively. After 20 years of follow-up, 276 younger-onset and 1,197 older-onset persons died. When adjusting for age and gender, CSME was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 2.07; P = .08) or ischemic heart disease mortality (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.12; P = .68) in the younger-onset group. In the older-onset group, there was increased all-cause and ischemic heart disease mortality when CSME was present (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.92; P < .01; and HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.13; P < .01, respectively), when adjusting for age and gender. After controlling for other risk factors, the association remained significant for ischemic heart disease (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.35; P = .02) among those taking insulin. CSME was not significantly associated with stroke mortality in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

CSME seems to be a risk indicator for decreased survival in persons with older-onset diabetes mellitus. The presence of CSME may identify individuals who should be receiving care for detection and treatment of cardiovascular disease.