1
|
Li Wai Suen CFD, Seah D, Choy MC, De Cruz P. Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:1389-1405. [PMID: 37725044 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion. RESULTS Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined. CONCLUSIONS Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F D Li Wai Suen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dean Seah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Matthew C Choy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter De Cruz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rivière P, Li Wai Suen C, Chaparro M, De Cruz P, Spinelli A, Laharie D. Acute severe ulcerative colitis management: unanswered questions and latest insights. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:251-262. [PMID: 38340753 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00313-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a distinctive ulcerative colitis flare presentation characterised by the presence of systemic inflammation as well as bloody diarrhoea, and occurs at least once in 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their disease course. Each episode carries a risk of complications, need for colectomy, and mortality. Little is known about ASUC pathogenesis, although impaired host-microbiota crosstalk involving pathobionts is suspected. In this Review, we discuss unanswered questions and results from the latest research on the medical-first-line, second-line, and potential third-line therapies-and surgical management of ASUC. We detail promising options for management, such as the use of enteral nutrition in combination with intravenous steroids, the ability to predict early failure of first-line or second-line therapies, and the emerging role of JAK inhibitors. An optimal framework to personalise therapy on the basis of multiomics tools is yet to be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Rivière
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christopher Li Wai Suen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health and Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - María Chaparro
- Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Peter De Cruz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health and Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan Italy; Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - David Laharie
- CHU de Bordeaux, Centre Medico-Chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Gastroenterology Department, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laharie D, Bourreille A, Branche J, Allez M, Bouhnik Y, Filippi J, Zerbib F, Savoye G, Vuitton L, Moreau J, Amiot A, Beaugerie L, Ricart E, Dewit O, Lopez-Sanroman A, Fumery M, Carbonnel F, Buisson A, Coffin B, Roblin X, van Assche G, Esteve M, Farkkila M, Gisbert JP, Marteau P, Nahon S, de Vos M, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Mary JY. Evolution of Endoscopic Lesions in Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Responding to Infliximab or Cyclosporine. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1180-1188.e4. [PMID: 32777552 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Few data on the evolution of endoscopic findings are available in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). The aim of this study was to describe this evolution in a prospective cohort. METHODS Patients admitted for a steroid-refractory ASUC and included in a randomized trial comparing infliximab and cyclosporine were eligible if they achieved steroid-free clinical remission at day 98. Flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed at baseline, days 7, 42 and 98. Ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) and its sub-scores - vascular pattern, bleeding and ulceration/erosion - were post-hoc calculated. Global endoscopic remission was defined by a UCEIS of 0, and partial endoscopic remission by any UCEIS sub-score of 0. RESULTS Among the 55 patients analyzed (29 infliximab and 26 cyclosporine), 49 (83%) had UCEIS ≥6 at baseline at baseline. Partial endoscopic remission rates were higher for bleeding than for vascular pattern and for ulcerations/erosions at day 7 (20% vs. 4% and 5% (n = 55); p = .004 and p=.04), for bleeding and ulceration/erosion than for vascular pattern at day 42 [63% and 65% vs. 33% (n=54); p<.001 for both] and at day 98 [78% and 92% vs. 56% (n = 50); p = .007 and p < .001]. Global endoscopic remission rates at day 98 were higher in patients treated with infliximab than with cyclosporine [73% vs. 25% (n = 26 and 24); p < .001]. CONCLUSION In steroid-refractory ASUC patients responding to a second-line medical therapy, endoscopic remission process started with bleeding remission and was not achieved in half the patients at day 98 for vascular pattern. Infliximab provided a higher endoscopic remission rate than cyclosporine at day 98.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Laharie
- INSERM CIC 1401, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Arnaud Bourreille
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Julien Branche
- Service des maladies de l'appareil digestif-Endoscopie digestive, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Matthieu Allez
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII, Paris, France
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Gastroentérologie, MICI et Assistance Nutritive, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII, Clichy, France
| | - Jerome Filippi
- Service de Gastroentérologie et Nutrition Clinique, Hôpital de l'Archet 2, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Frank Zerbib
- INSERM CIC 1401, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive, Centre Medico-chirurgical Magellan, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Guillaume Savoye
- UMR 1073, Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, CHU de Rouen, Normandie Université-Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Lucine Vuitton
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Jacques Moreau
- Service de Gastro-entérologie et Nutrition, Hôpital Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Aurelien Amiot
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Laurent Beaugerie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Elena Ricart
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, Augus Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Dewit
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, UCL Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antonio Lopez-Sanroman
- Unidad de EII / IBD Unit, Servicio de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Peritox UMR I-01, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, CHU Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Franck Carbonnel
- Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Bicêtre, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Sud 11, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Anthony Buisson
- INSERM U1071, M2iSH, USC-INRA 2018, 3iHP, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Benoit Coffin
- Pôle Maladie Appareil Digestif, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VII, Colombes, France
| | - Xavier Roblin
- Service de Gastro-entérologie et Hépatologie, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Gert van Assche
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria Esteve
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Terrassa, Spain
| | - Martti Farkkila
- Clinic of Gastroenterology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Philippe Marteau
- Service Hépato-gastroentérologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Stephane Nahon
- Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, CHI Le Raincy Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France
| | - Martine de Vos
- Gastroenterology unit, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- INSERM U1256 NGERE, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Nancy, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mary
- INSERM UMR-S-1153, Equipe ECSTRA, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sparrow MP, Papamichael K, Ward MG, Riviere P, Laharie D, Paul S, Roblin X. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics During Induction to Prevent Primary Non-Response. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14:542-556. [PMID: 31549158 PMCID: PMC7392326 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Biologic therapies have revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], but primary and secondary non-responses occur in a significant proportion of patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] now has an established role in the treatment algorithm for managing secondary loss of response to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents during maintenance therapy. Data to support the use of TDM in the management of secondary loss of response to vedolizumab and ustekinumab are emerging. The potential to prevent primary non-response to biologic agents during induction is of equal, and potentially greater, clinical importance. Again, most data supporting the use of 'proactive' TDM during induction pertains to the use of anti-TNF agents, but signals of efficacy for the use of TDM during induction with other biologic classes are now appearing. This review aims to summarize data on the use of TDM during induction to prevent pharmacokinetic primary non-response to all three classes of biologic therapy currently available for the treatment of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles P Sparrow
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Konstantinos Papamichael
- Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark G Ward
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - David Laharie
- Gastroenterology Unit, Pessac University Hospital, France
| | - Stephane Paul
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Xavier Roblin
- Gastroenterology Unit, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|