Intravenous buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine pharmacokinetics in humans

Salivary Therapeutic Monitoring of Buprenorphine in Neonates After Maternal Sublingual Dosing Guided by Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

BACKGROUND

Opioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy is associated with high mortality rates and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Buprenorphine, an opioid, is used to treat OUD and NOWS. Buprenorphine active metabolite (norbuprenorphine) can cross the placenta and cause neonatal respiratory depression (EC 50 = 35 ng/mL) at high brain extracellular fluid (bECF) levels. Neonatal therapeutic drug monitoring using saliva decreases the likelihood of distress and infections associated with frequent blood sampling.

METHODS

An adult physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine after intravenous and sublingual administration was constructed, vetted, and scaled to newborn and pregnant populations. The pregnancy model predicted that buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine doses would be transplacentally transferred to the newborns. The newborn physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was used to estimate the buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels in newborn plasma, bECF, and saliva after these doses.

RESULTS

After maternal sublingual administration of buprenorphine (4 mg/d), the estimated plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in newborns exceeded the toxicity thresholds for 8 and 24 hours, respectively. However, the norbuprenorphine bECF levels were lower than the respiratory depression threshold. Furthermore, the salivary buprenorphine threshold levels in newborns for buprenorphine analgesia, norbuprenorphine analgesia, and norbuprenorphine hypoventilation were observed to be 22, 2, and 162 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Using neonatal saliva for buprenorphine therapeutic drug monitoring can facilitate newborn safety during the maternal treatment of OUD using sublingual buprenorphine. Nevertheless, the suitability of using adult values of respiratory depression EC 50 for newborns must be confirmed.

Development and Verification of a Full Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Sublingual Buprenorphine in Healthy Adult Volunteers that Accounts for Nonlinear Bioavailability

Sublingual buprenorphine is used for opioid use disorder and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. The study aimed to develop a full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that can adequately describe dose- and formulation-dependent bioavailability of buprenorphine. Simcyp (v21.0) was used for model construction. Four linear regression models (i.e., untransformed or log transformed for dose or proportion sublingually absorbed) were explored to describe sublingual absorption of buprenorphine across dose. Published clinical trial data not used in model development were used for verification. The PBPK model's predictive performance was deemed adequate if the geometric means of ratios between predicted and observed (P/O) area under the curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) fell within the 1.25-fold prediction error range. Sublingual buprenorphine absorption was best described by a regression model with logarithmically transformed dose. By integrating this nonlinear absorption profile, the PBPK model adequately predicted buprenorphine pharmacokinetics (PK) following administration of sublingual tablets and solution across a dose range of 2-32 mg, with geometric mean (95% confidence interval) P/O ratios for AUC and Cmax equaling 0.99 (0.86-1.12) and 1.24 (1.09-1.40), respectively, and median (5th to 95th percentile) for Tmax equaling 1.11 (0.69-1.57). A verified PBPK model was developed that adequately predicts dose- and formulation-dependent buprenorphine PK following sublingual administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model developed in this study is the first to adequately predict dose- and formulation-dependent sublingual buprenorphine pharmacokinetics. Accurate prediction was facilitated by the incorporation of a novel nonlinear absorption model. The developed model will serve as the foundation for maternal-fetal PBPK modeling to predict maternal and fetal buprenorphine exposures to optimize buprenorphine treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

Nalmefene Hydrochloride: Potential Implications for Treating Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorder

Nalmefene hydrochloride was first discovered as an opioid antagonist derivative of naltrexone in 1975. It is among the most potent opioid antagonists currently on the market and is differentiated from naloxone and naltrexone by its partial agonist activity at the kappa-opioid receptor which may benefit in the treatment of alcohol use disorder. Oral nalmefene has been approved in the European Union for treatment of alcohol use disorder since 2013. As of 2023, nalmefene is available in the United States as an intranasal spray for reversal of opioid overdose but is not approved for alcohol or opioid use disorder as a maintenance treatment. The substantially longer half-life of nalmefene and 5-fold higher binding affinity to opioid receptors makes it a superior agent over naloxone in the reversal of high potency synthetic opioids like fentanyl and the emerging nitazenes. Nalmefene presents with a comparable side effect profile to other opioid antagonists and should be considered for further development as a maintenance treatment for opioid and other substance use disorders.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Supports Initiation Treatment and Bridging from Sublingual Buprenorphine to Subcutaneous Administration of a Buprenorphine Depot (CAM2038) in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In treating opioid use disorder (OUD), subcutaneous (SC) extended-release buprenorphine (BPN) depots, e.g., CAM2038, have been shown to provide smaller and less frequent fluctuations in BPN plasma concentrations and pharmacodynamic responses, improve outcomes, reduce treatment burden, and lower risks of misuse and diversion compared to daily sublingual (SL) BPN. This analysis characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) of BPN following intravenous and SL administration, and administration of SC CAM2038 weekly and monthly.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data from two Phase 1 and two Phase 2 trials in healthy participants and participants with OUD, respectively, were used to develop a population PK model using non-linear mixed effects modelling. The analysis included data from 252 participants and 10,658 BPN observations.

RESULTS

The disposition of BPN was best described by a three-compartment model with first-order elimination, and absorption of SL BPN and SC CAM2038 weekly and monthly by dual parallel absorption pathways. Model diagnostics indicated good predictive performance of BPN concentrations. Buprenorphine plasma concentration-time profiles were simulated for treatment initiation, switching from SL BPN to CAM2038 weekly and monthly, and tapering after interrupting treatment with CAM2038. Simulations predicted CAM2038 weekly and monthly doses that provided BPN plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) and trough concentration (Ctrough) values at steady state within those observed following SL BPN administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This population PK model supports the use of CAM2038 doses as individualized treatment for OUD across different treatment stages, including initiation, switching from SL BPN according to established dose conversion schedules, and tapering.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

ISRCTN41550730 (05/19/2014), ISRCTN24987553 (07/29/2014), NCT02611752 (11/23/2015), NCT02710526 (03/16/2016).

Low Dose Buprenorphine Initiation: A Guide for the Inpatient Clinician

Low dose buprenorphine initiation (LDBI) is a dosing strategy used to transition patients from full opioid agonists to buprenorphine. The purpose of LDBI is to circumvent obstacles associated with disruption in analgesia, precipitated withdrawal, and prerequisite opioid withdrawal prior to initiating buprenorphine, as not all patients are able to tolerate physical withdrawal symptoms recommended by national guidelines. No literature exists directly comparing traditional buprenorphine initiation to LDBI. Until information on long-term outcomes is available, these dosing strategies should be reserved for patients unable to tolerate traditional buprenorphine initiation. Available published research suggests LDBI strategies will allow some patients to successfully transition to buprenorphine with minimal or no symptoms of withdrawal. Ensuring access to pharmacotherapy during hospital admission is a crucial time for potential intervention and should be considered when appropriate. This narrative review discusses the background of LDBI strategies as well as practical clinical and operational considerations for the inpatient clinician.

In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation of Buprenorphine Transdermal Systems Under Normal and Elevated Skin Temperature

PURPOSE

Application of external heat using a heating pad over buprenorphine transdermal system, Butrans® has been shown to increase systemic levels of buprenorphine in human volunteers. The purpose of this study was to perform in vitro permeation studies at normal as well as elevated temperature conditions to evaluate the correlation of in vitro data with the existing in vivo data.

METHODS

In vitro permeation tests (IVPT) were performed on human skin from four donors. The IVPT study design was harmonized to a previously published clinical study design and skin temperature was maintained at either 32 ± 1 °C or 42 ± 1 °C to mimic normal and elevated skin temperature conditions, respectively.

RESULTS

IVPT studies on human skin were able to demonstrate heat induced enhancement in flux and cumulative amount of drug permeated from Butrans® which was reasonably consistent with the corresponding enhancement observed in vivo. Level A in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) was established using unit impulse response (UIR) based deconvolution method for both baseline and heat arms of the study. The percent prediction error (%PE) calculated for AUC and C_max values was less than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies indicated that IVPT studies performed under the same conditions as those of interest in vivo may be useful for comparative evaluation of the effect of external heat on transdermal delivery system (TDS). Further research may be warranted to evaluate factors, beyond cutaneous bioavailability (BA) assessed using an IVPT study, that can influence plasma exposure in vivo for a given drug product.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Investigate the Effect of Maturation on Buprenorphine Pharmacokinetics in Newborns with Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is a major public health concern whose incidence has paralleled the opioid epidemic in the United States. Sublingual buprenorphine is an emerging treatment for NOWS, but given concerns about long-term adverse effects of perinatal opioid exposure, precision dosing of buprenorphine is needed. Buprenorphine pharmacokinetics (PK) in newborns, however, is highly variable. To evaluate underlying sources of PK variability, a neonatal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of sublingual buprenorphine was developed using Simcyp (version 19.1). The PBPK model included metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2C8, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, UGT1A3, UGT2B7, and UGT2B17, with additional biliary excretion. Maturation of metabolizing enzymes was incorporated, and default CYP2C8 and UGT2B7 ontogeny profiles were updated according to recent literature. A biliary clearance developmental profile was outlined using clinical data from neonates receiving sublingual buprenorphine as NOWS treatment. Extensive PBPK model validation in adults demonstrated good predictability, with geometric mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) predicted/observed ratios (P/O ratios) of area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ), peak concentration (Cmax ), and time to reach peak concentration (Tmax ) equaling 1.00 (0.74-1.33), 1.04 (0.84-1.29), and 0.95 (0.72-1.26), respectively. In neonates, the geometric mean (95% CI) P/O ratio of whole blood concentrations was 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.87). PBPK modeling and simulation demonstrated that variability in biliary clearance, sublingual absorption, and CYP3A4 abundance are likely important drivers of buprenorphine PK variability in neonates. The PBPK model could be used to guide development of improved buprenorphine starting dose regimens for the treatment of NOWS.

Respiratory effects of oral mitragynine and oxycodone in a rodent model

RATIONALE

Kratom derives from Mitragyna speciosa (Korth.), a tropical tree in the genus Mitragyna (Rubiaceae) that also includes the coffee tree. Kratom leaf powders, tea-like decoctions, and commercial extracts are taken orally, primarily for health and well-being by millions of people globally. Others take kratom to eliminate opioid use for analgesia and manage opioid withdrawal and use disorder. There is debate over the possible respiratory depressant overdose risk of the primary active alkaloid, mitragynine, a partial μ-opioid receptor agonist, that does not signal through ß-arrestin, the primary opioid respiratory depressant pathway.

OBJECTIVES

Compare the respiratory effects of oral mitragynine to oral oxycodone in rats with the study design previously published by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scientists for evaluating the respiratory effects of opioids (Xu et al., Toxicol Rep 7:188-197, 2020).

METHODS

Blood gases, observable signs, and mitragynine pharmacokinetics were assessed for 12 h after 20, 40, 80, 240, and 400 mg/kg oral mitragynine isolate and 6.75, 60, and 150 mg/kg oral oxycodone hydrochloride.

FINDINGS

Oxycodone administration produced significant dose-related respiratory depressant effects and pronounced sedation with one death each at 60 and 150 mg/kg. Mitragynine did not yield significant dose-related respiratory depressant or life-threatening effects. Sedative-like effects, milder than produced by oxycodone, were evident at the highest mitragynine dose. Maximum oxycodone and mitragynine plasma concentrations were dose related.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with mitragynine's pharmacology that includes partial µ-opioid receptor agonism with little recruitment of the respiratory depressant activating β-arrestin pathway, mitragynine produced no evidence of respiratory depression at doses many times higher than known to be taken by humans.

Transdermal buprenorphine for pain management in children

Pain is one of the main symptoms reported by sick children, particularly by those suffering from cancer. Opioids are very useful in controlling this symptom but they are burdened with significant side effects that limit their use in children. Buprenorphine is a strong opioid that, due to its particular pharmacological characteristics, ensures excellent pain relief with fewer side effects than other opioids. The transdermal formulation allows for good pain control associated with optimal compliance by patients and few limitations on daily life. Unfortunately, transdermal buprenorphine use remains off-label for the control of chronic pain in children; therefore, it is desirable that new studies can validate its use in the paediatric population. This review aims to analyse the clinical advantages of transdermal buprenorphine in the paediatric population and the possible side effects registered in daily clinical practice.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling in pregnancy: Model reproducibility and external validation

AIMS

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models have been previously developed for betamethasone and buprenorphine for pregnant women. The goal of this work was to replicate and reassess these models using data from recently completed studies.

METHODS

Betamethasone and buprenorphine PBPK models were developed in Simcyp V19 based on prior publications using V17 and V15. Ability to replicate models was verified by comparing predictions in V19 to those previously published. Once replication was verified, models were reassessed by comparing predictions to observed data from additional studies in pregnant women. Model performance was based upon visual inspection of concentration vs. time profiles, and comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters. Models were deemed reproducible if parameter estimates were within 10% of previously reported values. External validations were considered acceptable if the predicted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration fell within 2-fold of the observed.

RESULTS

The betamethasone model was successfully replicated using Simcyp V19, with ratios of reported (V17) to reproduced (V19) peak plasma concentration of 0.98-1.04 and AUC of 0.95-1.07. The model-predicted AUC ratios ranged from 0.98-1.79 compared to external data. The previously published buprenorphine PBPK model was not reproducible, as we predicted intravenous clearance of 70% that reported previously (both in Simcyp V15).

CONCLUSION

While high interstudy variability was observed in the newly available clinical data, the PBPK model sufficiently predicted changes in betamethasone exposure across gestation. Model reproducibility and reassessment with external data are important for the advancement of the discipline. PBPK modelling publications should contain sufficient detail and clarity to enable reproducibility.

MATERNAL AND FETAL BUPRENORPHINE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PREGNANT SHEEP DURING TRANSDERMAL PATCH DOSING: Buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in pregnant sheep

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is used in the opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependent patients, including pregnant women. Despite the wide use, limited data exists on buprenorphine pharmacokinetics and fetal exposure during pregnancy. The aim of our study was to determine the buprenorphine pharmacokinetics during transdermal patch dosing to pregnant sheep and, to determine the extent of transplacental transfer of buprenorphine to the fetus.

METHODS

Pregnant sheep in late gestation (n=50) received 20, 25 or 40 µg/h of buprenorphine as a 7-day extended-release transdermal patch. Plasma samples were collected from the ewe and the fetus on days 1 - 6, and buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were determined. During the exposure period the sheep had a surgical procedure on the second day, a recovery phase, and an experimental procedure on the sixth day. In the experiment, hypoxia was induced under anesthesia for 18 sheep to investigate if decreased fetal pH would cause ion-trapping of buprenorphine in the fetus. The fetal/maternal plasma concentration ratio was determined on the second and on the sixth exposure day at baseline and during hypoxia. Maternal pharmacokinetics were modelled with a population pharmacokinetic method using the data from this study and our previous intravenous administration study.

RESULTS

The transdermal patch provided an extended release of buprenorphine throughout the exposure period, but the release rate declined approximately 20 h after patch placement. The median fetal/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 13 - 27 % throughout the exposure period at baseline. A ratio over 100 % was observed for four sheep on the sixth exposure day (102 - 269 %). A minor increase was seen in the median fetal/maternal-ratios during maternal hypoxia. Norbuprenorphine was undetected in all plasma samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The low transplacental passage of less than one fourth of the ewe's exposure supports buprenorphine as an alternative to methadone in opioid maintenance therapy during pregnancy.

Buprenorphine-Related Deaths in North Carolina from 2010-2018

Buprenorphine is a commonly prescribed medication for the treatment of opioid-use disorder. As prescriptions increase in North Carolina, buprenorphine is more frequently encountered statewide in routine postmortem casework. Between 2010 and 2018, there were 131 select cases investigated by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner where buprenorphine was detected in peripheral blood and considered a primary cause of death, with no other opioids present and no other non-opioid substances found in the lethal range. The decedents ranged in age from 14 to 64 years, with 67% male. The mean/median peripheral blood concentrations were 4.1/2.1 ng/mL for buprenorphine and 7.8/3.4 ng/mL for the metabolite, norbuprenorphine. These postmortem blood concentrations overlap antemortem therapeutic concentrations in plasma reported in the literature for opioid-dependent subjects receiving sublingual maintenance therapy. The pathologist considered scene findings, prescription history, autopsy findings, toxicological analysis, and decedent behavior prior to death to conclude a drug-related cause of death. Many of the deaths were complicated by the presence of other central nervous system depressants along with contributory underlying cardiovascular and respiratory disease. The three most prevalent additive substances were alprazolam, ethanol, and gabapentin, found in 67, 36, and 32 cases out of 131, respectively. Interpreting buprenorphine involvement in a death is complex, and instances may be under-estimated in epidemiological data because of the lack of a defined toxic or lethal range in postmortem blood along with its good safety profile. As expansion to access of opioid-use disorder treatment becomes a priority, awareness of the challenges of postmortem interpretation is needed as increased use and diversion of buprenorphine are inevitable.

Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended-Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route

Buprenorphine extended‐release (BUP‐XR) formulation is a once‐monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug‐drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorphine. Sublingual buprenorphine is subject to first‐pass extraction, as a significant proportion of the dose is swallowed. Because subcutaneous administration avoids first‐pass extraction, the DDI with CYP3A4 inhibitors is expected to be less than the 2‐fold increase reported for the sublingual route. The objective of this analysis was to predict the magnitude of DDI following coadministration of BUP‐XR with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Models were developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed data for buprenorphine following intravenous and sublingual dosing. Comparison of predicted and observed pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PK parameters demonstrated acceptable predictive performance of the models (within 1.5‐fold). Buprenorphine plasma concentrations following administration of a single dose of BUP‐XR (300 mg) were simulated using a series of intravenous infusions. Daily coadministration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors with BUP‐XR predicted mild increases in buprenorphine exposures (AUC, 33%‐44%; C_max, 17‐28%). Daily coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer was also associated with mild decreases in buprenorphine AUC (28%) and C_max (22%). In addition, the model predicted minimal increases in buprenorphine AUC (8%‐11%) under clinical conditions of 2 weeks’ treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors administered after initiation of BUP‐XR. In conclusion, the PBPK predictions indicate that coadministration of BUP‐XR with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers would not result in clinically meaningful interactions.

Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in pregnant sheep after intravenous injection

Buprenorphine is a semi‐synthetic opioid, widely used in the maintenance treatment for opioid‐dependent pregnant women. Limited data exist on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in pregnancy. We conducted a pharmacokinetic study to determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous buprenorphine in pregnant sheep. Fourteen pregnant sheep in late gestation received 10 µg/kg of buprenorphine as an intravenous bolus injection. Plasma samples were collected up to 48 h after administration. Buprenorphine and its metabolite, norbuprenorphine, were quantified from plasma using a LC/MS/MS method, with lower limits of quantification of 0.01 µg/L and 0.04 µg/L for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. The pharmacokinetic parameters, median (minimum−maximum), were C_max 4.31 µg/L (1.93–15.5), AUC_inf 2.89 h*µg/L (1.72–40.2), CL 3.39 L/h/kg (0.25–6.02), terminal t½ 1.75 h (1.07–31.0), V_ss 8.04 L/kg (1.05–49.3). Norbuprenorphine was undetected in all plasma samples. The median clearance in pregnant sheep was higher than previously reported for nonpregnant sheep and human (male) subjects. Our sensitive analytical method was able to detect long terminal half‐lives for six subjects, and a wide between‐subject variability in the study population.

Significance statement: Buprenorphine is widely used for the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy. However, limited data exist on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine during pregnancy. As this type of study cannot be done in humans due to ethical reasons, we conducted a study in pregnant sheep. This study provides pharmacokinetic data on buprenorphine in pregnant sheep and helps us to understand the pharmacokinetics of the drug in humans.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Buprenorphine in Adults, Children and Preterm Neonates

Buprenorphine plays a crucial role in the therapeutic management of pain in adults, adolescents and pediatric subpopulations. However, only few pharmacokinetic studies of buprenorphine in children, particularly neonates, are available as conducting clinical trials in this population is especially challenging. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling allows the prediction of drug exposure in pediatrics based on age-related physiological differences. The aim of this study was to predict the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in pediatrics with PBPK modeling. Moreover, the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of buprenorphine with CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein perpetrator drugs should be elucidated. A PBPK model of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in adults has been developed and scaled to children and preterm neonates, accounting for age-related changes. One-hundred-percent of the predicted AUC_last values in adults (geometric mean fold error (GMFE): 1.22), 90% of individual AUC_last predictions in children (GMFE: 1.54) and 75% in preterm neonates (GMFE: 1.57) met the 2-fold acceptance criterion. Moreover, the adult model was used to simulate DDI scenarios with clarithromycin, itraconazole and rifampicin. We demonstrate the applicability of scaling adult PBPK models to pediatrics for the prediction of individual plasma profiles. The novel PBPK models could be helpful to further investigate buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in various populations, particularly pediatric subgroups.

Scalable in silico Simulation of Transdermal Drug Permeability: Application of BIOiSIM Platform

INTRODUCTION

Transdermal drug delivery is gaining popularity as an alternative to traditional routes of administration. It can increase patient compliance because of its painless and noninvasive nature, aid compounds in bypassing presystemic metabolic effects, and reduce the likelihood of adverse effects through decreased systemic exposure. In silico physiological modeling is critical to predicting dermal exposure for a therapeutic and assessing the impact of different formulations on transdermal disposition.

METHODS

The present study aimed at developing a physiologically based transdermal platform, "BIOiSIM", that could be globally applied to a wide variety of compounds to predict their transdermal disposition. The platform integrates a 16-compartment model of compound pharmacokinetics and was used to simulate and predict drug exposure of three chemically and biologically distinct drug-like compounds. Machine learning optimization was composed of two components: exhaustive search algorithm (coarse-tuning) and descent (fine-tuning) integrated with the platform used to quantitatively determine parameters influencing pharmacokinetics (eg permeability, kperm) of test compounds.

RESULTS

The model successfully predicted drug exposure (AUC, Cmax and Tmax) following transdermal application of morphine, buprenorphine and nicotine in human subjects, mostly with less than two-fold absolute average fold error (AAFE). The model was further able to successfully characterize the relationship between observed systemic exposure and intended pharmacological effect. The predicted systemic concentration of morphine and plasma levels of endogenous pain biomarkers were used to estimate the effectiveness of a given therapeutic regimen.

CONCLUSION

BIOiSIM marks a novel approach to in silico prediction that will enable leveraging of machine learning technology in the pharmaceutical space. The approach to model development outlined results in scalable, accurate models and enables the generation of large parameter/coefficient datasets from in vivo clinical data that can be used in future work to train quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting likelihood of compound utility as a transdermally administered therapeutic.

A Narrative Pharmacological Review of Buprenorphine: A Unique Opioid for the Treatment of Chronic Pain

Buprenorphine is a Schedule III opioid analgesic with unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties that may be preferable to those of Schedule II full μ-opioid receptor agonists. The structure of buprenorphine allows for multimechanistic interactions with opioid receptors μ, δ, κ, and opioid receptor-like 1. Buprenorphine is considered a partial agonist with very high binding affinity for the μ-opioid receptor, an antagonist with high binding affinity for the δ- and κ-opioid receptors, and an agonist with low binding affinity for the opioid receptor-like 1 receptor. Partial agonism at the μ-opioid receptor does not provide partial analgesia, but rather analgesia equivalent to that of full μ-opioid receptor agonists. In addition, unlike full μ-opioid receptor agonists, buprenorphine may have a unique role in mediating analgesic signaling at spinal opioid receptors while having less of an effect on brain receptors, potentially limiting classic opioid-related adverse events such as euphoria, addiction, or respiratory depression. The pharmacokinetic properties of buprenorphine are also advantageous in a clinical setting, where metabolic and excretory pathways allow for use in patients requiring concomitant medications, the elderly, and those with renal or hepatic impairment. The unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of buprenorphine translate to an effective analgesic with a potentially favorable safety profile compared with that of full μ-opioid receptor agonists for the treatment of chronic pain.

Dispersive solid-phase extraction of buprenorphine from biological fluids using metal-organic frameworks and its determination by ultra-performance liquid chromatography

In this work, various types of metal-organic frameworks were synthesized, and their affinities toward buprenorphine were evaluated using dispersive solid-phase extraction. The extracted buprenorphine was determined by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection system. The highest extraction recovery was observed by employing zeolitic imidazole framework-67. Then, a facile and fast extraction method was designed for the extraction and purification of the target drug. Optimization of the extraction method was carried out by the design of experiment approach. A linearity range of 1-1000 μg/L with the limit of detection of 0.15 μg/L and relative standard deviations (50 μg/L, n = 5) of 3.4% was obtained for standard sample analysis. Under optimized experimental and instrumental conditions, the relative recoveries were in the range of 95 to 111%. Eventually, zeolitic imidazole framework-67 was successfully employed for the extraction and determination of buprenorphine in the biological fluids with satisfactory results.

Buprenorphine to reverse respiratory depression from methadone overdose in opioid-dependent patients: a prospective randomized trial

Background

Naloxone is the usual drug used in opioid-induced respiratory depression but it has a short half-life, precipitates withdrawal in dependent patients, and thus for persistent reversal of long-acting opioids has to be given by titrated doses and infusions. The partial agonist buprenorphine has a much longer duration of action and causes less severe withdrawal, but still should largely reverse respiratory depression induced by full agonist opioids. We aimed to compare the efficacy/safety of buprenorphine and naloxone in reversing respiratory depression in methadone-poisoned opioid-dependent patients.

Methods

Patients with methadone-induced respiratory depression were randomized to receive naloxone (titrated doses), or lower or higher doses of buprenorphine (10 μg/kg or 15 μg/kg). The primary outcome was immediate reversal of respiratory depression. We also recorded acute opioid withdrawal, need for intubation/recurrent apnea, repeated doses of opioid antagonists, length of hospital stay, other morbidity, and mortality. The study was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Trial ID: 18265; Approval code: IRCT2015011020624N1).

Results

Eighty-five patients were randomized; 55/56 patients who received buprenorphine had rapid reversal of respiratory depression, which persisted for at least 12 h. Naloxone was effective in 28/29 patients, but often required very high titrated doses (thus delaying time to respond) and prolonged infusions. Intubation (8/29 vs 5/56) and opioid withdrawal (15/29 vs 7/56) were less common with buprenorphine. There were no serious complications or deaths in those receiving buprenorphine. The 15-μg/kg buprenorphine dose appeared to provide a longer duration of action, but precipitated withdrawal more frequently than the 10-μg/kg dose.

Conclusion

Buprenorphine appears to be a safe and effective substitute for naloxone in overdosed opioid-dependent patients. Further studies are warranted to explore the optimal dosing strategy for buprenorphine to consistently maintain reversal of respiratory depression but not precipitate withdrawal.

Trial registration number

IRCT2015011020624N1. Registered 30 September 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-020-2740-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bupenorphine in Wisconsin Drivers: Concerns for Impairment?

Opinions vary on whether buprenorphine can cause impairment in drivers. Relatively little information on the observed effects of buprenorphine, outside a laboratory or a controlled driving course, exist in the literature. The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene monitored the detection of buprenorphine and its pharmacologically active metabolite, norbuprenorphine (NBUP), in Wisconsin drivers over a 2-year period. A total of 204 individuals (78 females and 126 males) were driving under the influence of buprenorphine and/or NBUP. Concentrations in whole blood (ng/mL) ranged (mean) from 0.6 to 14 (2.0) and 0.5 to 20 (2.1) for buprenorphine and NBUP, respectively. Poly-substance use is extremely prevalent in Wisconsin operating while intoxicated casework, so prevalent that only four of the previously described cases had buprenorphine and/or NBUP as the only drug(s) detected. This paper summarizes and highlights the case histories and observed impairments of those four cases. Law enforcement (LE) made contact with three of the four subjects due to either a crash or poor/reckless driving. Police reports and observations made by LE, including drug recognition expert (DRE) evaluations, were collected. Physical and behavioral observations made by LE varied and included a combination of narcotic analgesic, central nervous system depressant- and stimulant-like effects. Impaired balance and lack of coordination during the administration of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests were documented by the arresting officers and/or the DRE. While the number of buprenorphine-only cases reported here is limited, the results demonstrate the complex paradigm associated with forensic interpretation of buprenorphine in driving under the influence of drugs casework and the frequency of poly-substance administration in Wisconsin drivers.

Biosensor-based kinetic and thermodynamic characterization of opioids interaction with human μ-opioid receptor

Development of opioid analgesics with minimal side effects requires substantial knowledge on structure-kinetic and -thermodynamic relationship of opioid-receptor interactions. Here, combined kinetics and thermodynamics of opioid agonist binding to human μ-opioid receptor (h-μOR) was investigated using real-time label-free surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based method. The N-terminal end truncated and C-terminal 6His-tagged h-μOR was constructed and expressed in E. coli. Receptor was purified, detergent-solubilized and characterized by circular dichroism. The uniform immobilization of h-μOR on Ni-NTA chips was achieved using hybrid capture-coupling approach followed by reconstitution in lipid bilayer. Thermodynamic equilibrium affinities of opioids were in narrow nanomolar range and in near quantitative agreement with their K_i values. However, they did not correlate with their in vitro EC₅₀ values, indicating that they might not have thermodynamic selectivity. Contrary, on and off rates exhibited much larger dispersion and well correlated with EC₅₀ values, indicating that opioids might exhibit kinetic-selectivity towards their target. Temperature-dependent SPR assays provided access to rate and equilibrium thermodynamic data, which demonstrated binding of morphine and naloxone to μOR was exothermic and essentially enthalpy driven. This work suggests that kinetic-based structure-activity of opioids in drug design and incorporation into the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics predictions may have more value than thermodynamic equilibrium constants alone.

Gestational changes in buprenorphine exposure: A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic analysis

AIMS

Buprenorphine (BUP) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of opioid addiction. The current dosing regimen of BUP in pregnant women is based on recommendations designed for nonpregnant adults. However, physiological changes during pregnancy may alter BUP exposure and efficacy. The objectives of this study were to develop a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for BUP in pregnant women, to predict changes in BUP exposure at different stages of pregnancy, and to demonstrate the utility of PBPK modelling in optimizing BUP pharmacotherapy during pregnancy.

METHODS

A full PBPK model for BUP was initially built and validated in healthy subjects. A fetoplacental compartment was included as a combined compartment in this model to simulate pregnancy induced anatomical and physiological changes. Further, gestational changes in physiological parameters were incorporated in this model. The PBPK model predictions of BUP exposure in pregnancy and during the postpartum period were compared to published data from a prospective clinical study.

RESULTS

The predicted BUP plasma concentration-time profiles in the virtual pregnant populations are consistent with the observed data in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, and the postpartum period. The differences in the predicted means of dose normalized area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve up to 12 h, average concentration and maximum concentration were within ±25% of the corresponding observed means with the exception of average concentration in the 3rd trimester (-26.3%).

CONCLUSION

PBPK model-based simulation may be a useful tool to optimize BUP pharmacotherapy during pregnancy, obviating the need to perform pharmacokinetic studies in each trimester and the postpartum period that normally require intensive blood sampling.

Voriconazole greatly increases the exposure to oral buprenorphine

PURPOSE

Buprenorphine has low oral bioavailability. Regardless of sublingual administration, a notable part of buprenorphine is exposed to extensive first-pass metabolism by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. As drug interaction studies with buprenorphine are limited, we wanted to investigate the effect of voriconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral buprenorphine.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers were given either placebo or voriconazole (orally, 400 mg twice on day 1 and 200 mg twice on days 2-5) for 5 days in a randomized, cross-over study. On day 5, they ingested 0.2 mg (3.6 mg during placebo phase) oral buprenorphine. We measured plasma and urine concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine and monitored their pharmacological effects. Pharmacokinetic parameters were normalized for a buprenorphine dose of 1.0 mg.

RESULTS

Voriconazole greatly increased the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC_0-18) of buprenorphine (4.3-fold, P < 0.001), its peak concentration (C_max) (3.9-fold), half-life (P < 0.05), and excretion into urine (A_e; P < 0.001). Voriconazole also markedly enhanced the C_max (P < 0.001), AUC_0-18 (P < 0.001), and A_e (P < 0.05) of unconjugated norbuprenorphine but decreased its renal clearance (P < 0.001). Mild dizziness and nausea occurred during both study phases.

CONCLUSIONS

Voriconazole greatly increases exposure to oral buprenorphine, mainly by inhibiting intestinal and liver CYP3A4. Effect on some transporters may explain elevated norbuprenorphine concentrations. Although oral buprenorphine is not commonly used, this interaction may become relevant in patients receiving sublingual buprenorphine together with voriconazole or other CYP3A4 or transporter inhibitors.

Buprenorphine in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Infants exposed in utero to opioids will demonstrate a withdrawal syndrome known as neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Buprenorphine is a long-acting opioid with therapeutic use in medication-assisted treatment of opioid dependency in adults and adolescents. Emerging data from clinical trials and treatment cohorts demonstrate the efficacy and safety of sublingual buprenorphine for those infants with NAS who require pharmacologic treatment. Pharmacometric modeling will assist in defining the exposure-response relationships and facilitate dose optimization.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling approach to predict buprenorphine pharmacokinetics following intravenous and sublingual administration

AIMS

Opioid dependence is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Buprenorphine (BUP) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat opioid dependence. There is a lack of clear consensus on the appropriate dosing of BUP due to interpatient physiological differences in absorption/disposition, subjective response assessment and other patient comorbidities. The objective of the present study was to build and validate robust physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for intravenous (IV) and sublingual (SL) BUP as a first step to optimizing BUP pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

BUP-PBPK modelling and simulations were performed using SimCyp® by incorporating the physiochemical properties of BUP, establishing intersystem extrapolation factors-based in vitro-in-vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) methods to extrapolate in vitro enzyme activity data, and using tissue-specific plasma partition coefficient estimations. Published data on IV and SL-BUP in opioid-dependent and non-opioid-dependent patients were used to build the models. Fourteen model-naïve BUP-PK datasets were used for inter- and intrastudy validations.

RESULTS

The IV and SL-BUP-PBPK models developed were robust in predicting the multicompartment disposition of BUP over a dosing range of 0.3-32 mg. Predicted plasma concentration-time profiles in virtual patients were consistent with reported data across five single-dose IV, five single-dose SL and four multiple dose SL studies. All PK parameter predictions were within 75-137% of the corresponding observed data. The model developed predicted the brain exposure of BUP to be about four times higher than that of BUP in plasma.

CONCLUSION

The validated PBPK models will be used in future studies to predict BUP plasma and brain concentrations based on the varying demographic, physiological and pathological characteristics of patients.

Buprenorphine - an attractive opioid with underutilized potential in treatment of chronic pain

Despite proven clinical utility, buprenorphine has not been used widely for the treatment of chronic pain. Questions about “ceiling effect” or bell-shaped curve observed for analgesia in preclinical studies and potential withdrawal issues on combining with marketed μ-agonists continue to hinder progress in expanding full potential of buprenorphine in the treatment of cancer and noncancer pain. Mounting evidence from clinical studies and conclusions drawn by a panel of experts strongly support superior safety and efficacy profile of buprenorphine vs marketed opioids. No ceiling on analgesic effect has been reported in clinical studies. The receptor pharmacology and pharmacokinetics profile of buprenorphine is complex but unique and contributes to its distinct safety and efficacy. The buprenorphine pharmacology also allows it to be combined with other μ-receptor opioids for additivity in efficacy. Transdermal delivery products of buprenorphine have been preferred choices for the management of pain but new delivery options are under investigation for the treatment of both opioid dependence and chronic pain.

Abuse potential of intranasal buprenorphine versus buprenorphine/naloxone in buprenorphine-maintained heroin users

In spite of the clinical utility of buprenorphine, parenteral abuse of this medication has been reported in several laboratory investigations and in the real world. Studies have demonstrated lower abuse liability of the buprenorphine/naloxone combination relative to buprenorphine alone. However, clinical research has not yet examined the utility of the combined formulation to deter intranasal use in a buprenorphine-maintained population. Heroin-using volunteers (n = 12) lived in the hospital for 8-9 weeks and were maintained on each of three sublingual buprenorphine doses (2, 8, 24 mg). Under each maintenance dose, participants completed laboratory sessions during which the reinforcing and subjective effects of intranasal doses of buprenorphine (8, 16 mg), buprenorphine/naloxone (8/2, 8/8, 8/16, 16/4 mg) and controls (placebo, heroin 100 mg, naloxone 4 mg) were assessed. Intranasal buprenorphine alone typically produced increases in positive subjective effects and the 8 mg dose was self-administered above the level of placebo. The addition of naloxone dose dependently reduced positive subjective effects and increased aversive effects. No buprenorphine/naloxone combination dose was self-administered significantly more than placebo. These data suggest that within a buprenorphine-dependent population, intranasal buprenorphine/naloxone has reduced abuse potential in comparison to buprenorphine alone. These data strongly argue in favor of buprenorphine/naloxone rather than buprenorphine alone as the more reasonable option for managing the risk of buprenorphine misuse.

High-sensitivity analysis of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

A new method using ultra-fast liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (UFLC-MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine and the metabolites norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-3β-glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine-3β-glucuronide in plasma and urine. Sample handling, sample preparation and solid-phase extraction procedures were optimized for maximum analyte recovery. All four analytes of interest were quantified by positive ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry after solid-phase microextraction. The lower limits of quantification in plasma were 1pg/mL for buprenorphine and buprenorphine glucuronide, and 10pg/mL for norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine glucuronide. The lower limits of quantitation in urine were 10pg/mL for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and their glucuronides. Overall extraction recoveries ranged from 68-100% in both matrices. Interassay precision and accuracy was within 10% for all four analytes in plasma and within 15% in urine. The method was applicable to pharmacokinetic studies of low-dose buprenorphine.