1
|
Heidari O, Meyer D, Lowensen K, Patil A, O'Conor KJ, LaRicci J, Hunt D, Bocek AP, Cargill V, Farley JE. Colocating Syringe Services, COVID-19 Vaccination, And Infectious Disease Testing: Baltimore's Experience. Health Aff (Millwood) 2024; 43:883-891. [PMID: 38830163 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
People who inject drugs face many challenges that contribute to poor health outcomes, including drug overdose, HIV, and hepatitis C infections. These conditions require high-quality prevention and treatment services. Syringe services programs are evidence-based harm reduction programs, and they have established track records with people who inject drugs, earning them deep trust within this population. In Baltimore, Maryland, although many syringe support services were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, the health department's syringe services programs remained operational, allowing for the continuation of harm reduction services, including naloxone distribution. This evaluation describes a collaborative effort to colocate infectious disease testing and COVID-19 vaccination with a syringe services program. Our evaluation demonstrated that colocation of important services with trusted community partners can facilitate engagement and is essential for service uptake. Maintaining adequate and consistent funding for these services is central to program success. Colocation of other services within syringe services programs, such as medications for opioid use disorder, wound care, and infectious disease treatment, would further expand health care access for people who inject drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omeid Heidari
- Omeid Heidari , University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Diane Meyer
- Diane Meyer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | - Derrick Hunt
- Derrick Hunt, Baltimore City Health Department, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zovich B, Freeland C, Moore H, Sapp K, Qureshi A, Holbert R, Zambrano J, Bhangoo D, Cohen C, Hass RW, Jessop A. Dismantling Barriers to Hepatitis B and Delta Screening, Prevention, and Linkage to Care among the PWUD Community in Philadelphia. Viruses 2024; 16:628. [PMID: 38675969 PMCID: PMC11054430 DOI: 10.3390/v16040628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of hepatitis B and delta viruses (HBV/HDV) among people who use drugs (PWUD) remains largely unknown. In the context of one Philadelphia-based harm reduction organization (HRO), this study aimed to assess HBV/HDV prevalence and facilitate linkage to care. Participants completed a demographic HBV/HDV risk factor survey and were screened for HBV and reflexively for HDV if positive for HBV surface antigen or isolated core antibody. Fisher's exact tests and regression were used to understand relationships between risks and HBV blood markers. Of the 498 participants, 126 (25.3%) did not have hepatitis B immunity, 52.6% had been vaccinated against HBV, and 17.9% had recovered from a past infection. Eleven (2.2%) participants tested positive for isolated HBV core antibody, 10 (2.0%) for HBV surface antigen, and one (0.2%) for HDV antibody. History of incarceration was associated with current HBV infection, while transactional sex and experience of homelessness were predictive of previous exposure. This study found high rates of current and past HBV infection, and a 10% HBV/HDV co-infection rate. Despite availability of vaccine, one quarter of participants remained vulnerable to infection. Findings demonstrate the need to improve low-threshold HBV/HDV screening, vaccination, and linkage to care among PWUD. The study also identified gaps in the HBV/HDV care cascade, including lack of point-of-care diagnostics and lack of support for HROs to provide HBV services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Holly Moore
- Hepatitis B Foundation, Doylestown, PA 18902, USA
| | - Kara Sapp
- Hepatitis B Foundation, Doylestown, PA 18902, USA
| | | | - Rachel Holbert
- HepTREC at Prevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19134, USA
| | | | - Daljinder Bhangoo
- Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Chari Cohen
- Hepatitis B Foundation, Doylestown, PA 18902, USA
| | - Richard W. Hass
- Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Amy Jessop
- HepTREC at Prevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19134, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang J, Lo NC, Dankwa EA, Donnelly CA, Gupta R, Montgomery MP, Weng MK, Martin NK. Determining Herd Immunity Thresholds for Hepatitis A Virus Transmission to Inform Vaccination Strategies Among People Who Inject Drugs in 16 US States. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:976-982. [PMID: 37738564 PMCID: PMC11006109 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Widespread outbreaks of person-to-person transmitted hepatitis A virus (HAV), particularly among people who inject drugs (PWID), continue across the United States and globally. However, the herd immunity threshold and vaccination coverage required to prevent outbreaks are unknown. We used surveillance data and dynamic modeling to estimate herd immunity thresholds among PWID in 16 US states. METHODS We used a previously published dynamic model of HAV transmission calibrated to surveillance data from outbreaks involving PWID in 16 states. Using state-level calibrated models, we estimated the basic reproduction number (R0) and herd immunity threshold for PWID in each state. We performed a meta-analysis of herd immunity thresholds to determine the critical vaccination coverage required to prevent most HAV outbreaks among PWID. RESULTS Estimates of R0 for HAV infection ranged from 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.5) for North Carolina to 5.0 (95% CI, 4.5-5.6) for West Virginia. Corresponding herd immunity thresholds ranged from 55% (95% CI, 47%-61%) for North Carolina to 80% (95% CI, 78%-82%) for West Virginia. Based on the meta-analysis, we estimated a pooled herd immunity threshold of 64% (95% CI, 61%-68%; 90% prediction interval, 52%-76%) among PWID. Using the prediction interval upper bound (76%) and assuming 95% vaccine efficacy, we estimated that vaccination coverage of 80% could prevent most HAV outbreaks. CONCLUSIONS Hepatitis A vaccination programs in the United States may need to achieve vaccination coverage of at least 80% among PWID in order to prevent most HAV outbreaks among this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Yang
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Nathan C Lo
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Emmanuelle A Dankwa
- Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christl A Donnelly
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Medical Research Council Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ribhav Gupta
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Martha P Montgomery
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mark K Weng
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Natasha K Martin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California–San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baker P, Cepeda JA, Schluth C, Astemborski J, Feder KA, Rudolph J, Sun J, Kirk GD, Mehta SH, Genberg BL. Time-to-completion of COVID-19 vaccination primary series varies by HIV viral load status among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, Maryland. Prev Med Rep 2023; 36:102448. [PMID: 37840593 PMCID: PMC10570701 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
People who inject drugs (PWID) may have diminished access to essential preventive services like COVID-19 vaccination given structural and substance use barriers. We aimed to assess the role of HIV on COVID-19 vaccination uptake among adult PWID participating in the ALIVE cohort study in Baltimore, Maryland who were alive as of April 2021. We abstracted COVID-19 vaccination data from electronic medical records via the regional health information exchange. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate time from universal vaccine eligibility (April 6, 2021) to completion of the COVID-19 vaccination primary series (1 dose J&J or 2 doses mRNA) by HIV viral load status (uninfected, PWH [HIV-RNA < 400 copies/mL], PWH [HIV-RNA ≥ 400 copies/mL]) and Cox Proportional Hazards regression to adjust for potential confounders. Our sample (N = 960) was primarily black (77%) and male (65%) with 31% reporting recent injection drug use. Among 265 (27%) people living with HIV (PWH) in our sample, 84% were virally suppressed. As of February 22, 2022, 539 (56%) completed the primary series, 131 (14%) received a single dose of mRNA vaccine and 290 (30%) remained unvaccinated. Compared to PWID without HIV, virally suppressed PWH were more likely to complete the primary series (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR]:1.23,95% Confidence Interval [95 %CI]:1.07,1.50), while PWH who were not virally suppressed were less likely (aHR:0.72,95 %CI:0.45,1.16), although this was not statistically significant. We conclude that among PWID, HIV infection and viral suppression is associated with quicker vaccination uptake, likely due to HIV care engagement. Targeted improvements along the HIV care continuum may bolster vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Baker
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States
| | - Javier A Cepeda
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Catherine Schluth
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Jacquie Astemborski
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Kenneth A. Feder
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Jacqueline Rudolph
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Gregory D. Kirk
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Shruti H. Mehta
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Becky L. Genberg
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strathdee SA, Abramovitz D, Harvey-Vera AY, Stamos-Buesig T, Vera CF, Artamonova I, Logan J, Patterson TL, Servin AE, Bazzi AR. A Brief Peer-Led Intervention to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among People Who Inject Drugs in San Diego County: Results From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad392. [PMID: 37547856 PMCID: PMC10404005 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We evaluated the impact of a brief peer-led intervention on COVID-19 vaccination among people who inject drugs (PWID) presenting at syringe services program (SSP) locations in San Diego County, California. Methods Between March and July 2022, PWID aged ≥18 years without recent voluntary COVID-19 testing who were not up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations received a single-session motivational interviewing intervention (LinkUP) or an attention-matched didactic control condition from trained peer counselors at SSP sites randomized by week. Following either 30-minute session, counselors offered referrals to local vaccination services. Multivariable log binomial regression via generalized estimating equations assessed LinkUP effects on (1) acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination referrals immediately postintervention and (2) COVID-19 vaccine uptake at 6-month follow-up. Results COVID-19 vaccination outcomes were obtained on 135 (90.6%) of 149 participants. In multivariable analysis, participants receiving LinkUP had greater acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination referrals than controls (adjusted relative risk, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.01-12.2) and were marginally more likely to report receiving a new COVID-19 vaccine dose (adjusted relative risk, 1.57; 95% CI, .99-2.48). After 6 months, 20% reported receiving a new vaccine dose; however, if COVID-19 vaccine had been available at SSPs, this proportion could have been as high as 34.3% (45.3% LinkUP vs 24.3% control; P = .01). Conclusions A brief peer-led SSP-based intervention significantly improved COVID-19 vaccination among PWID. Further improvements could likely be obtained by supporting SSPs to offer COVID-19 vaccination on-site instead of relying on referrals. Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05181657.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Abramovitz
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alicia Y Harvey-Vera
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Xochicalco, Tijuana, Mexico
- United States–Mexico Border Health Commission, Tijuana, Mexico
| | - Tara Stamos-Buesig
- OnPoint, Harm Reduction Coalition of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Carlos F Vera
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Irina Artamonova
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jenna Logan
- OnPoint, Harm Reduction Coalition of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Thomas L Patterson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Argentina E Servin
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Angela R Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Price O, Maher L, Dietze PM, Bruno R, Crawford S, Sutherland R, Salom C, Dore GJ, Peacock A. COVID-19 vaccine attitudes and facilitators among people in Australia who inject drugs. Drug Alcohol Rev 2023. [PMID: 36802338 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to describe COVID-19 vaccination attitudes and identify potential facilitators for vaccine uptake among people who inject drugs. METHODS People who inject drugs were recruited from all eight Australian capital cities (N = 884; 65% male, mean age 44 years) and interviewed face-to-face or via telephone in June-July 2021. COVID-19 and broader vaccination attitudes were used to model latent classes. Correlates of class membership were assessed through multinomial logistic regression. Probability of endorsing potential vaccination facilitators were reported by class. RESULTS Three classes of participants were identified: 'vaccine acceptant' (39%), 'vaccine hesitant' (34%) and 'vaccine resistant' (27%). Those in the hesitant and resistant groups were younger, more likely to be unstably housed and less likely to have received the current season influenza vaccine than the acceptant group. In addition, hesitant participants were less likely to report a chronic medical condition than acceptant participants. Compared to vaccine acceptant and hesitant participants, vaccine-resistant participants were more likely to predominantly inject methamphetamine and to inject drugs more frequently in the past month. Both vaccine-hesitant and resistant participants endorsed financial incentives for vaccination and hesitant participants also endorsed facilitators related to vaccine trust. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION People who inject drugs who are unstably housed or predominantly inject methamphetamine are subgroups that require targeted interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake. Vaccine-hesitant people may benefit from interventions that build trust in vaccine safety and utility. Financial incentives may improve vaccine uptake among both hesitant and resistant people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Price
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa Maher
- Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul M Dietze
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Behaviours and Health Risks Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,National Drug Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Raimondo Bruno
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,School of Psychological Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | | | - Rachel Sutherland
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Caroline Salom
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Amy Peacock
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,School of Psychological Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Britton TR, Clague MR, Zagorski CM, Hill LG, Loera LJ. A wound care and immunization needs assessment for participants of a mobile syringe services program in Austin, TX. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:361-365.e1. [PMID: 36549930 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) are subject to injection-related harm, including skin and soft tissue infections. Syringe services programs (SSPs) provide sterile syringes, disposal of used syringes, and other supportive services. Given their contact and credibility with PWID, SSPs could facilitate triage and treatment of wounds and access to immunizations for communicable diseases. OBJECTIVE This work aimed to assess wound care and immunization needs among participants accessing mobile SSP services in Austin, TX. METHODS A 21-item mixed-methods survey was created to assess frequency and severity of wounds, wound care approaches, and vaccination status. Participants were included if they reported injection drug use and experienced a related wound in the previous 6 months. Interview sections included screening, demographics, wound care, and immunization status. RESULTS A total of 21 participants completed the semistructured interview. A majority identified as male (n = 13, 61.9%), white (n = 12, 57.1%), and were unhoused (n = 12, 57.1%). The primary drug of injection was heroin alone (n = 14, 66.7%). Many avoided seeking wound care from health care providers (n = 16, 76.2%) owing to stigmatization (n = 13, 61.9%) and previous negative experiences (n = 7, 33.3%). Self-treatment of wounds included over-the-counter medications (n = 10, 47.6%), over-the-counter supplies (n = 10, 47.6%), and antibiotics (n = 9, 42.8%). In the past 5 years, few had received vaccination for hepatitis A and B (n = 3, 14.3%) or tetanus (n = 7, 33.3%), and many expressed interest in receiving vaccinations through the SSP. Interest for other expanded services included access to antibiotics, an on-site provider, wound care supplies, and education. CONCLUSIONS PWID may avoid professional health care for wound care or immunizations owing to perceived stigma. Expanding availability of wound care services and immunizations directly through mobile SSPs is desired by participants and could positively affect public health.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bazzi AR, Harvey-Vera A, Buesig-Stamos T, Abramovitz D, Vera CF, Artamonova I, Patterson TL, Strathdee SA. Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial to increase COVID-19 testing and vaccination among people who inject drugs in San Diego County. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:48. [PMID: 36064745 PMCID: PMC9444113 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-022-00328-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) have low rates of COVID-19 testing and vaccination and are vulnerable to severe disease. We partnered with a local, community-based syringe service program (SSP) in San Diego County, CA, to develop the single-session theory- and evidence-informed "LinkUP" intervention to increase COVID-19 testing and vaccination. This paper details the protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the LinkUP intervention. METHODS With significant community input into study design considerations, including through our Community and Scientific Advisory Board, the LinkUP pilot RCT leverages an ongoing cohort study with adult (≥ 18 years) PWID in San Diego County to recruit participants who have not recently undergone voluntary COVID-19 testing and are unvaccinated. Eligible participants are referred to SSP locations randomized to offer the active intervention (involving tailored education, motivational interviewing, and problem-solving strategies) or a didactic attention-control condition (information sharing only). Both conditions are delivered by trained peer counselors hired by the SSP and were designed to be delivered at mobile (outdoor) SSP sites in ~ 30 min. Intake data assesses COVID-19 testing and vaccination history, health status, and harm reduction needs (to facilitate SSP referrals). At the end of either intervention condition, peer counselors offer onsite rapid COVID-19 antigen testing and COVID-19 vaccination referrals. Out-take and follow-up data (via SSP and state health department record linkages) confirms whether participants received the intervention, COVID-19 testing (and results) onsite or within six months, and vaccination referrals (and uptake) within six months. Planned analyses, which are not powered to assess efficacy, will provide adequate precision for effect size estimates for primary (COVID-19 testing) and secondary (vaccination) intervention outcomes. Findings will be disseminated widely including to local health authorities, collaborating agencies, and community members. DISCUSSION Lessons from this community-based pilot study include the importance of gathering community input into study design, cultivating research-community partnerships based on mutual respect and trust, and maintaining frequent communication regarding unexpected events (e.g., police sweeps, neighborhood opposition). Findings may support the adoption of COVID-19 testing and vaccination initiatives implemented through SSPs and other community-based organizations serving vulnerable populations of people impacted by substance use and addiction. Trial registration This trial was registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT05181657).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela R Bazzi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0631, USA
- Department of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alicia Harvey-Vera
- School of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0507, USA
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Xochicalco, Rampa Yumalinda 4850, Chapultepec Alamar, 22110, Tijuana, B.C, Mexico
- United States-Mexico Border Health Commission, Paseo del Centenario 10851, Zona Urbana Rio Tijuana, 22320, Tijuana, B.C, Mexico
| | - Tara Buesig-Stamos
- OnPoint, Harm Reduction Coalition of San Diego, 1389 Windmill Road, El Cajon, CA, USA
| | - Daniela Abramovitz
- School of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0507, USA
| | - Carlos F Vera
- School of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0507, USA
| | - Irina Artamonova
- School of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0507, USA
| | - Thomas L Patterson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0680, USA
| | - Steffanie A Strathdee
- School of Medicine, University of California, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, MC0507, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Supporting syringe services programs in the initiation and scale-up of vaccine administration: findings from in-depth interviews. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:100. [PMID: 36050735 PMCID: PMC9435406 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00681-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccine-hesitant persons who inject drugs are at increased risk for several vaccine-preventable diseases. However, vaccination rates among this population remain low. While syringe services programs (SSPs) are places where persons who inject drugs feel comfortable accessing services, few offer vaccination services. This study describes facilitators and barriers to vaccination at SSPs.
Methods We used convenience sampling to conduct semi-structured, qualitative in-depth interviews with 21 SSPs in the USA from June to August 2021. Interview questions asked SSPs about their perceptions, priorities, barriers, facilitators, and the effects of partnerships and policies on vaccine administration. We used deductive thematic analysis to identify the main themes. Results Eight (n = 8) SSPs offered vaccinations, and thirteen (n = 13) did not offer vaccinations. Most SSPs believed offering vaccination services was important, although addressing SSP participants’ immediate needs often took precedence. Staffing, physical space, and logistical issues were the most common barriers to vaccine administration reported by SSPs, followed by SSP participant-related barriers. Facilitators of vaccine administration included access to a tracking system, partnering with agencies or other organizations providing vaccines, and having a licensed vaccination provider on-site. Partnerships provided SSPs opportunities to expand capacity but could also restrict how SSPs operate. Recommended policy changes to facilitate vaccine administration included subsidizing the cost of vaccinations and addressing restrictions around who could administer vaccinations. Conclusions Increasing the availability of vaccination services at SSPs requires addressing the varying capacity needs of SSPs, such as tracking systems, licensed vaccinators, and free or low-cost vaccination supplies. While these needs can be met through partnerships and supportive policies, both must consider and reflect cultural competence around the lived experiences of persons who inject drugs.
Collapse
|