1
|
Thakarar K, Nenninger K, Agmas W. Harm Reduction Services to Prevent and Treat Infectious Diseases in People Who Use Drugs. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2021; 34:605-620. [PMID: 32782104 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2020.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews the principles of harm reduction, evidence-based harm reduction strategies such as syringe service programs and supervised injection facilities, and provides approaches to integrating a harm reduction approach into clinical practice. As providers strive to increase capacity to treat underlying substance use disorder, we must also recognize that some people may continue to use drugs. In this setting, providers can still deliver nonjudgmental, individualized care, and advocate for the health and safety of people who inject drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinna Thakarar
- Infectious Disease and Addiction Medicine, Maine Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, 50 Foden Road, South Portland, ME 04106, USA.
| | - Katherine Nenninger
- Preventive Medicine, Maine Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102, USA
| | - Wollelaw Agmas
- Infectious Disease, Maine Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, 22 Bramhall Street, Portland, ME 04102, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jones NS, Comparin JH. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2020; 2:608-669. [PMID: 33385148 PMCID: PMC7770462 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in controlled substances from 2016 to 2019 as a part of the 19th Interpol International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. The review papers are also available at the Interpol website at: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14458/file/Interpol%20Review%20Papers%202019.pdf.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole S. Jones
- RTI International, Applied Justice Research Division, Center for Forensic Sciences, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC, 22709-2194, USA
| | - Jeffrey H. Comparin
- United States Drug Enforcement Administration, Special Testing and Research Laboratory, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Belackova V, Shanahan M, Ritter A. Mapping regulatory models for medicinal cannabis: a matrix of options. AUST HEALTH REV 2019; 42:403-411. [PMID: 28553995 DOI: 10.1071/ah16257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to develop a framework for assessing regulatory options for medicinal cannabis in Australia. Methods International regulatory regimes for medicinal cannabis were reviewed with a qualitative policy analysis approach and key policy features were synthesised, leading to a conceptual framework that facilitates decision making across multiple dimensions. Results Two central organising dimensions of medicinal cannabis regulation were identified: cannabis supply and patient authorisation (including patient access). A number of the different supply options can be matched with a number of different patient authorisation options, leading to a matrix of possible regulatory regimes. Conclusions The regulatory options, as used internationally, involve different forms of cannabis (synthetic and plant-based pharmaceutical preparations or herbal cannabis) and the varying extent to which patient authorisation policies and procedures are stringently or more loosely defined. The optimal combination of supply and patient authorisation options in any jurisdiction that chooses to make medicinal cannabis accessible will depend on policy goals. What is known about the topic? Internationally, regulation of medicinal cannabis has developed idiosyncratically, depending on formulations that were made available and local context. There has been no attempt to date in the scientific literature to systematically document the variety of regulatory possibilities for medicinal cannabis. What does this paper add? This paper presents a new conceptual schema for considering options for the regulation of medicinal cannabis, across both supply and patient authorisation aspects. What are the implications for practitioners? The design of regulatory systems in Australia, whether for pharmaceutical or herbal products, is a vital issue for policy makers right now as federal and state and territory governments grapple with the complexities of medicinal cannabis regulation. The conceptual schema presented herein provides a tool for more systematic thinking about the options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vendula Belackova
- Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, 22-32 King Street, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Marian Shanahan
- Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, 22-32 King Street, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Alison Ritter
- Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, 22-32 King Street, Randwick, NSW 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hughes CE, Barratt MJ, Ferris JA, Maier LJ, Winstock AR. Drug-related police encounters across the globe: How do they compare? THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2018; 56:197-207. [PMID: 29699837 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2017] [Revised: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug law enforcement subsumes the majority of drug policy expenditure across the globe. Fuelled by knowledge that much of this investment is ineffective or counter-productive there have been increasing calls for cross-national comparisons to identify where policing approaches differ and what types of approaches may be more effective. Yet, to date cross-national comparison of drug law enforcement has proven a methodologically hazardous affair. Using a new drug policing module added to the 2017 Global Drug Survey, this study seeks to provide the first cross-national comparison of the incidence, nature and intensity of illicit drug-related police encounters amongst people who use drugs. METHODS The Global Drug Survey was administered in late 2016. Across 26 countries including Australia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Switzerland, the UK and the USA a total of 45,942 people who had recently used drugs completed the drug policing module. Key variables assessed included the incidence and frequency of drug-related police encounters in the last 12 months that involved: a) being stopped and searched; b) encountering a drug detection dog; c) being given a caution or warning; d) being charged and arrested; and e) paying a bribe. Multi-level models were used to control for pre-existing national differences in drug use prevalence and non-drug specific policing (including the total number of police personnel in each country). RESULTS Drug-related police encounters were most commonly reported in Italy and Scotland. Conversely, police encounters were most likely to lead to arrest in Norway, Finland and Sweden. The type and locations of encounters further differed across countries, with for example stop and search most reported in Greece and Colombia, and encounters with drug detection dogs most reported in Scotland, Italy, UK and Australia. Multi-level models showed that the incidence of reported policing encounters continued to differ significantly across countries after controlling for pre-existing national differences in drug use prevalence and policing, and that drug policing encounters were 4 to 14 times more common in some nations than others. CONCLUSION The findings unearth significant cross-national differences in the incidence and nature of drug-related policing of people who use drugs. This suggests that there may be opportunities for countries to learn from each other about how and why they differ, and the potential benefits of switching to lower intensity modes of drug policing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin E Hughes
- Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Monica J Barratt
- Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; National Drug Research Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; Behaviours and Health Risks Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jason A Ferris
- Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Adam R Winstock
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, UK; Global Drug Survey Ltd, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singleton N, Cunningham A, Groshkova T, Royuela L, Sedefov R. Drug supply indicators: Pitfalls and possibilities for improvements to assist comparative analysis. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2018; 56:131-136. [PMID: 29510885 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Interventions to tackle the supply of drugs are seen as standard components of illicit drug policies. Therefore drug market-related administrative data, such as seizures, price, purity and drug-related offending, are used in most countries for policy monitoring and assessment of the drug situation. International agencies, such as the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and the UN Office of Drugs and Crime, also monitor and report on the drug situation cross-nationally and therefore seek to collect and make available key data in a uniform manner from the countries they cover. However, these data are not primarily collected for this purpose, which makes interpretation and comparative analysis difficult. Examples of limitations of these data sources include: the extent to which they reflect operational priorities rather than market changes; question marks over the robustness of and consistency in data collection methods, and issues around the timeliness of data availability. Such problems are compounded by cultural, social and contextual differences between countries. Making sense of such data is therefore challenging and extreme care needs to be taken using it. Nevertheless, these data provide an important window on a hidden area, so improving the quality of the data collected and expanding its scope should be a priority for those seeking to understand or monitor drug markets and supply reduction. In addition to highlighting some of the potential pitfalls in using supply indicators for comparative analysis, this paper presents a selection of options for improvements based on the current EMCDDA programme of work to improve their supply-related monitoring and analysis. The conceptual framework developed to steer this work may have wider application. Adopting this approach has the potential to provide a richer picture of drug markets, at both national and international levels, and make it easier to compare data between countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Singleton
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Andrew Cunningham
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Teodora Groshkova
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luis Royuela
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Roumen Sedefov
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Could cannabis liberalisation lead to wider changes in drug policies and outcomes? THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2018; 51:156-159. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2017] [Revised: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
7
|
Arredondo J, Strathdee SA, Cepeda J, Abramovitz D, Artamonova I, Clairgue E, Bustamante E, Mittal ML, Rocha T, Bañuelos A, Olivarria HO, Morales M, Rangel G, Magis C, Beletsky L. Measuring improvement in knowledge of drug policy reforms following a police education program in Tijuana, Mexico. Harm Reduct J 2017; 14:72. [PMID: 29117858 PMCID: PMC5678566 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-017-0198-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mexico’s 2009 “narcomenudeo reform” decriminalized small amounts of drugs, shifting some drug law enforcement to the states and mandating drug treatment diversion instead of incarceration. Data from Tijuana suggested limited implementation of this harm reduction-oriented policy. We studied whether a police education program (PEP) improved officers’ drug and syringe policy knowledge, and aimed to identify participant characteristics associated with improvement of drug policy knowledge. Methods Pre- and post-training surveys were self-administered by municipal police officers to measure legal knowledge. Training impact was assessed through matched paired nominal data using McNemar’s tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of improved legal knowledge, as measured by officers’ ability to identify conceptual legal provisions related to syringe possession and thresholds of drugs covered under the reform. Results Of 1750 respondents comparing pre- versus post training, officers reported significant improvement (p < 0.001) in their technical understanding of syringe possession (56 to 91%) and drug amounts decriminalized, including marijuana (9 to 52%), heroin (8 to 71%), and methamphetamine (7 to 70%). The training was associated with even greater success in improving conceptual legal knowledge for syringe possession (67 to 96%) (p < 0.001), marijuana (16 to 91%), heroin (11 to 91%), and methamphetamine (11 to 89%). In multivariable modeling, those with at least a high school education were more likely to exhibit improvement of conceptual legal knowledge of syringe possession (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.4–3.2) and decriminalization for heroin (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3–4.3), methamphetamine (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4–3.2), and marijuana (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6–4). Conclusions Drug policy reform is often necessary, but not sufficient to achieve public health goals because of gaps in translating formal laws to policing practice. To close such gaps, PEP initiatives bundling occupational safety information with relevant legal content demonstrate clear promise. Our findings underscore additional efforts needed to raise technical knowledge of the law among personnel tasked with its enforcement. Police professionalization, including minimum educational standards, appear critical for aligning policing with harm reduction goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Arredondo
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA. .,San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - S A Strathdee
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
| | - J Cepeda
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
| | - D Abramovitz
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
| | - I Artamonova
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
| | - E Clairgue
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
| | - E Bustamante
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA
| | - M L Mittal
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA.,Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Xochicalco, Tijuana, Mexico
| | - T Rocha
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA.,San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - A Bañuelos
- Secretaría de Seguridad Pública Municipal, Dirección de Planeación y Proyectos Estratégicos, Tijuana, Mexico
| | - H O Olivarria
- Secretaría de Seguridad Pública Municipal, Instituto de Capacitación y Adiestramiento Profesional (ICAP), Tijuana, Mexico
| | - M Morales
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA.,San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - G Rangel
- Comisión de Salud Fronteriza, México-Estados Unidos, Tijuana, Mexico
| | - C Magis
- Centro Nacional para la Prevención y el Control del VIH y el SIDA (Censida), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - L Beletsky
- Division of Global Public Health, UC San Diego - School of Medicine, Third Floor, CRSF, La Jolla, San Diego, USA.,School of Law and Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wiessing L, Ferri M, Běláčková V, Carrieri P, Friedman SR, Folch C, Dolan K, Galvin B, Vickerman P, Lazarus JV, Mravčík V, Kretzschmar M, Sypsa V, Sarasa-Renedo A, Uusküla A, Paraskevis D, Mendão L, Rossi D, van Gelder N, Mitcheson L, Paoli L, Gomez CD, Milhet M, Dascalu N, Knight J, Hay G, Kalamara E, Simon R, Comiskey C, Rossi C, Griffiths P. Monitoring quality and coverage of harm reduction services for people who use drugs: a consensus study. Harm Reduct J 2017; 14:19. [PMID: 28431584 PMCID: PMC5401609 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-017-0141-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite advances in our knowledge of effective services for people who use drugs over the last decades globally, coverage remains poor in most countries, while quality is often unknown. This paper aims to discuss the historical development of successful epidemiological indicators and to present a framework for extending them with additional indicators of coverage and quality of harm reduction services, for monitoring and evaluation at international, national or subnational levels. The ultimate aim is to improve these services in order to reduce health and social problems among people who use drugs, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, crime and legal problems, overdose (death) and other morbidity and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS The framework was developed collaboratively using consensus methods involving nominal group meetings, review of existing quality standards, repeated email commenting rounds and qualitative analysis of opinions/experiences from a broad range of professionals/experts, including members of civil society and organisations representing people who use drugs. Twelve priority candidate indicators are proposed for opioid agonist therapy (OAT), needle and syringe programmes (NSP) and generic cross-cutting aspects of harm reduction (and potentially other drug) services. Under the specific OAT indicators, priority indicators included 'coverage', 'waiting list time', 'dosage' and 'availability in prisons'. For the specific NSP indicators, the priority indicators included 'coverage', 'number of needles/syringes distributed/collected', 'provision of other drug use paraphernalia' and 'availability in prisons'. Among the generic or cross-cutting indicators the priority indicators were 'infectious diseases counselling and care', 'take away naloxone', 'information on safe use/sex' and 'condoms'. We discuss conditions for the successful development of the suggested indicators and constraints (e.g. funding, ideology). We propose conducting a pilot study to test the feasibility and applicability of the proposed indicators before their scaling up and routine implementation, to evaluate their effectiveness in comparing service coverage and quality across countries. CONCLUSIONS The establishment of an improved set of validated and internationally agreed upon best practice indicators for monitoring harm reduction service will provide a structural basis for public health and epidemiological studies and support evidence and human rights-based health policies, services and interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Wiessing
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marica Ferri
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vendula Běláčková
- Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- National Institute for Mental Health, Prague, Czech Republic
- Uniting Medically Supervised Injecting Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Patrizia Carrieri
- Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
- ORS PACA, Marseille, France
| | - Samuel R. Friedman
- Institute of Infectious Disease Research, National Development and Research Institutes, New York, USA
| | - Cinta Folch
- Centre d’Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Agència de Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPC), Barcelona, Spain
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Kate Dolan
- Program of International Research and Training, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, The University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Peter Vickerman
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeffrey V. Lazarus
- CHIP, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Viktor Mravčík
- Department of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- National Institute for Mental Health, Prague, Czech Republic
- National Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Addiction, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mirjam Kretzschmar
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Vana Sypsa
- Department of Hygiene Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ana Sarasa-Renedo
- Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Spanish Field Epidemiology Training Program (PEAC), National Centre of Epidemiology, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anneli Uusküla
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Dimitrios Paraskevis
- Department of Hygiene Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Luis Mendão
- Group of Activists on Treatments (GAT), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Diana Rossi
- Intercambios Civil Association and University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nadine van Gelder
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luke Mitcheson
- Alcohol, Drug, and Tobacco Division, Health and Wellbeing Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Letizia Paoli
- Leuven Institute of Criminology (LINC), Faculty of Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Centre for Global Governance Studies (GSS), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cristina Diaz Gomez
- French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (OFDT), Saint-Denis, France
| | - Maitena Milhet
- French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (OFDT), Saint-Denis, France
| | - Nicoleta Dascalu
- The Romanian Association Against AIDS (ARAS), Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Gordon Hay
- Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eleni Kalamara
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Roland Simon
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Carla Rossi
- Centro Studi Statistici e Sociali CE3S, Rome, Italy
| | - Paul Griffiths
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Praça Europa 1, Cais do Sodré, 1249-289 Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ritter A, Stevens A. Improving knowledge on law enforcement in drug policy. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2017; 41:89-90. [PMID: 28257909 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Ritter
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Australia
| | - Alex Stevens
- School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Australia
| |
Collapse
|