1
|
Meyerson BE, Agley J, Crosby RA, Bentele KG, Vadiei N, Linde-Krieger LB, Russell DR, Fine K, Eldridge LA. ASAP: A pharmacy-level intervention to increase nonprescription syringe sales to reduce bloodborne illnesses. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:778-785. [PMID: 38734511 PMCID: PMC11180557 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacy syringe sales are effective structural interventions to reduce bloodborne illnesses in populations, and are legal in all but two states. Yet evidence indicates reduced syringe sales in recent years. This study was designed as a feasibility test of an intervention to promote syringe sales by pharmacies in Arizona. METHODS A four-month pilot among three Arizona pharmacies measured feasibility and acceptability through monthly surveys to 18 enrolled pharmacy staff members. RESULTS Pharmacy staff reported increased ease of dispensing syringes across the study. Rankings of syringe dispensing as 'easiest' among 6 measured pharmacy practices increased from 38.9 % at baseline to 50.1 % post intervention module training, and to 83.3 % at pilot conclusion. The majority (72.2 %) of pharmacy staff agreed that intervention materials were easy to use. Over 70 % indicated that the intervention was influential in their "being more open to selling syringes without a prescription to someone who might use them for illicit drug use," and 61.1 % reported that in the future, they were highly likely to dispense syringes to customers who would use them to inject drugs. A vast majority (92 %) reported being likely to dispense subsidized naloxone if available to their pharmacy at no cost. CONCLUSIONS An education-based intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable to pharmacy staff and had an observed impact on perceptions of ease and likelihood of dispensing syringes without a prescription to people who may use them to inject drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - J Agley
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - R A Crosby
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - K G Bentele
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - N Vadiei
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Pharmacotherapy Division, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - L B Linde-Krieger
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Comprehensive Center for Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - D R Russell
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K Fine
- Arizona Pharmacy Association, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - L A Eldridge
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, University of Arizona, USA; Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karthikeyan N, Xia T, Nielsen S, Picco L. Stocking and supplying naloxone: Findings from a representative sample of community pharmacies in Victoria, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024; 43:1305-1312. [PMID: 38691509 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Naloxone is an opioid receptor antagonist, which can rapidly reverse the effects of an opioid overdose. Community pharmacists may experience several barriers to stocking and supplying naloxone including a lack of confidence or knowledge and time constraints. The current study aimed to examine the extent to which Victorian community pharmacies stock and supply naloxone and determine specific characteristics associated with stocking naloxone. METHODS A representative sample of community pharmacists (n = 558) in Victoria, Australia, were contacted between October and November 2020 and invited to participate in an online survey. Data related to pharmacy- and pharmacist-related characteristics, including stocking and frequency of supplying naloxone in the past year. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of various covariates on stocking naloxone. RESULTS The sample comprised 265 pharmacists (response rate 47%). Most pharmacies were located in Melbourne (the capital city of Victoria, 59.6%) and were part of a pharmacy chain (61.5%). In total, 100 (38%) pharmacies stocked naloxone, a third of whom did not supply it in the past year. Pharmacies that provided opioid agonist treatment had 2.4 times higher odds of stocking naloxone (95% confidence interval 1.425-4.136; p = 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Less than half of Victorian community pharmacies stock naloxone, with even fewer actually supplying it in the past year. Future efforts are needed to increase the number of pharmacies that stock naloxone and the frequency in which it is supplied, while also addressing possible barriers to stocking and supplying naloxone among community pharmacists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandini Karthikeyan
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ting Xia
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louisa Picco
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Floyd AS, Silcox J, Strickler G, Nong T, Blough M, Bolivar D, Rabin M, Bratberg J, Irwin AN, Hartung DM, Hansen RN, Bohler R, Green TC. Policies, adaptations, and ongoing challenges to naloxone, buprenorphine and nonprescription syringe access across four-states: Findings from an environmental scan and key informant interviews. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2024; 11:100243. [PMID: 38948428 PMCID: PMC11214408 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Background As the US opioid-involved morbidity and mortality increase, uptake and implementation of evidence-based interventions remain key policy responses. Respond to Prevent was a multi-component, randomized trial implemented in four states and two large pharmacy chains with the aim of improving the pharmacy's capacity to provide naloxone, dispense buprenorphine, and sell nonprescription syringes (NPS). We sought to provide context and assess how policies and organizational practices affect communities and pharmacies across the study states. Methods Using a multi-method approach we: 1) conducted an environmental scan of published literature and online materials spanning January 2015 to June 2021, 2) created timelines of key events pertaining to those policies and practices and 3) conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (key informants) at the state and local levels (N=36) to provide further context for the policies and practices we discovered. Results Key informants discussed state policies, pharmacy policies and local practices that facilitated access to naloxone, buprenorphine and NPSs. Interviewees from all states spoke about the impact of naloxone standing orders, active partnerships with community-based harm reduction organizations, and some federal and state policies like Medicaid coverage for naloxone and buprenorphine, and buprenorphine telehealth permissions as key facilitators. They also discussed patient stigma, access in rural settings, and high cost of medications as barriers. Conclusion Findings underscore the important role harm reduction-related policies play in boosting and institutionalizing interventions in communities and pharmacies while also identifying structural barriers where more focused state and local attention is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony S. Floyd
- Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph Silcox
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Gail Strickler
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Thuong Nong
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Malcolm Blough
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Derek Bolivar
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Megan Rabin
- Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberg
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston, RI, USA
| | | | | | - Ryan N. Hansen
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Bohler
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
- Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA
| | - Traci C. Green
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Russell DM, Meyerson BE, Mahoney AN, Garnett I, Ferrell C, Newgass K, Agley JD, Crosby RA, Bentele KG, Vadiei N, Frank D, Linde-Krieger LB. Come back when you're infected: pharmacy access to sterile syringes in an Arizona Secret Shopper Study, 2023. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:49. [PMID: 38388463 PMCID: PMC10885601 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00943-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacies are critical healthcare partners in community efforts to eliminate bloodborne illnesses. Pharmacy sale of sterile syringes is central to this effort. METHODS A mixed methods "secret shopper" syringe purchase study was conducted in the fall of 2022 with 38 community pharmacies in Maricopa and Pima Counties, Arizona. Pharmacies were geomapped to within 2 miles of areas identified as having a potentially high volume of illicit drug commerce. Daytime venue sampling was used whereby separate investigators with lived/living drug use experience attempted to purchase syringes without a prescription. Investigator response when prompted for purchase rationale was "to protect myself from HIV and hepatitis C." A 24-item instrument measured sales outcome, pharmacy staff interaction (hostile/neutral/friendly), and the buyer's subjective experience. RESULTS Only 24.6% (n = 28) of 114 purchase attempts across the 38 pharmacies resulted in syringe sale. Less than one quarter (21.1%) of pharmacies always sold, while 44.7% never sold. Independent and food store pharmacies tended not to sell syringes. There emerged distinct pharmacy staff interactions characterized by body language, customer query, normalization or othering response, response to purchase request and closure. Pharmacy discretion and pharmacy policy not to sell syringes without a prescription limited sterile syringe access. Investigators reported frequent and adverse emotional impact due to pharmacy staff negative and stigmatizing interactions. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacies miss opportunities to advance efforts to eliminate bloodborne infections by stringent no-sale policy and discretion about syringe sale. State regulatory policy facilitating pharmacy syringe sales, limiting pharmacist discretion for syringe sales, and targeting pharmacy-staff level education may help advance the achievement of public health goals to eliminate bloodborne infections in Arizona.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Russell
- Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Beth E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA.
- Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
- Center for Comprehensive Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Arlene N Mahoney
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Irene Garnett
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Center for Comprehensive Pain and Addiction, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Chris Ferrell
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- CAN Community Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kylee Newgass
- Southwest Recovery Alliance, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Drug Policy Research and Advocacy Board (DPRAB), University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jon D Agley
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Richard A Crosby
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Keith G Bentele
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Southwest Institute for Research On Women, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Nina Vadiei
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - David Frank
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Linnea B Linde-Krieger
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gionfriddo MR, Owens KM, Leist SE, Schrum LT, Covvey JR. Attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and practices for over-the-counter syringe sales in community pharmacies: A systematic review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1472-1489.e3. [PMID: 37429389 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacies are an important resource for people who inject drugs (PWID) to purchase over-the-counter (OTC) syringes. Access to sterile injection equipment can reduce the transmission of blood-borne illnesses. However, pharmacists and their staff ultimately use discretion over sales. OBJECTIVE To identify staff attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and practices in the sale of OTC syringes in community pharmacies. METHODS This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363040). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to September 2022. The review included peer-reviewed empirical studies regarding OTC syringe sales among community pharmacy staff (pharmacists, interns, and technicians). We screened records and extracted data using a predefined data extraction form. Findings were narratively synthesized, and critical appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS A total of 1895 potentially relevant articles were identified, and 35 were included. Most studies (23; 63.9%) were cross-sectional descriptive designs. All studies included pharmacists, with seven (19.4%) also including technicians, two (5.6%) including interns, and four (11.1%) including other staff. Studies found relatively high support among respondents for harm reduction-related services within community pharmacies, but less common reports of staff engaging in said services themselves. When studies investigated the perceived positive or negative impacts of OTC syringe sales, prevention of blood-borne illness was widely understood as a benefit, while improper syringe disposal and safety of the pharmacy and its staff commonly reported as concerns. Stigmatizing attitudes/beliefs toward PWID were prevalent across studies. CONCLUSION Community pharmacy staff report knowledge regarding the benefits of OTC syringes, but personal attitudes/beliefs heavily influence decisions to engage in sales. Despite support for various syringe-related harm reduction activities, offerings of services were less likely due to concerns around PWID.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chatterjee A, Bannister M, Hill LG, Davis CS. Prescribing Syringes to People Who Inject Drugs: Advancing Harm Reduction in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1980-1983. [PMID: 37020124 PMCID: PMC10271981 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08183-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Access to new syringes can reduce the risk of HIV and hepatitis C transmission, skin and soft tissue infections, and infectious endocarditis for people who inject drugs (PWID). Syringe service programs (SSPs) and other harm reduction programs are a good source of syringes. However, they are sometimes not accessible due to limited hours, geographic barriers, and other factors. In this perspective, we argue that when PWID faces barriers to syringes physicians and other providers should prescribe, and pharmacists should dispense, syringes to decrease health risks associated with syringe re-use. This strategy is endorsed by professional organizations and is legally permissible in most states. Such prescribing has numerous benefits, including insurance coverage of the cost of syringes and the sense of legitimacy conveyed by a prescription. We discuss these benefits as well as the legality of prescribing and dispensing syringes and address practical considerations such as type of syringe, quantity, and relevant diagnostic codes, if required. In the face of an unprecedented overdose crisis with many associated health harms, we also make the case for advocacy to change state and federal laws to make access to prescribed syringes uniform, smooth, and universal as part of a suite of harm reduction efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avik Chatterjee
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program, Boston, MA, USA.
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Lucas G Hill
- The University of Texas at Austin College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Corey S Davis
- Network for Public Health Law, Edina, MN, USA
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Burns CM, Endres K, Derrick C, Cooper A, Fabel P, Okeke NL, Ahuja D, Corneli A, McKellar MS. A survey of South Carolina pharmacists' readiness to prescribe human immunodeficiency virus pre-exposure prophylaxis. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2023; 6:329-338. [PMID: 37251085 PMCID: PMC10210504 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Introduction HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is largely underutilized in the Southern United States. Given their community presence, pharmacists are well positioned to provide PrEP within rural, Southern regions. However, pharmacists' readiness to prescribe PrEP in these communities remains unknown. Objective To determine the perceived feasibility and acceptability of prescribing PrEP by pharmacists in South Carolina (SC). Methods We distributed a 43-question online descriptive survey through the University of SC Kennedy Pharmacy Innovation Center's listerv of licensed SC pharmacists. We assessed pharmacists' comfort, knowledge, and readiness to provide PrEP. Results A total of 150 pharmacists responded to the survey. The majority were White (73%, n=110), female (62%, n=93), and non-Hispanic (83%, n=125). Pharmacists practiced in retail (25%, n=37), hospital (22%, n=33), independent (17%, n=25), community (13%, n=19), specialty (6%, n=9), and academic settings (3%, n=4); 11% (n=17) practiced in rural locales. Pharmacists viewed PrEP as both effective (97%, n=122/125) and beneficial (74% n=97/131) for their clients. Many pharmacists reported being ready (60% n=79/130) and willing (86% n=111/129) to prescribe PrEP, although over half (62% n=73/118) cited lack of PrEP knowledge as a barrier. Pharmacists described pharmacies as an appropriate location to prescribe PrEP (72% n=97/134). Conclusions Most SC pharmacists surveyed considered PrEP to be effective and beneficial for individuals who frequent their pharmacy and are willing to prescribe this therapy if statewide statutes allow. Many felt that pharmacies are an appropriate location to prescribe PrEP but lack a complete understanding of required protocols to manage these patients. Further investigation into facilitators and barriers of pharmacy-driven PrEP are needed to enhance utilization within communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M. Burns
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Kyle Endres
- Center for Social and Behavioral Research, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, United States of America
| | - Caroline Derrick
- School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of South Carolina, Prisma Health-Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Alexandra Cooper
- Duke Initiative on Survey Methodology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Patricia Fabel
- Kennedy Pharmacy Innovation Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Nwora Lance Okeke
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Divya Ahuja
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of South Carolina, Prisma Health-Midlands, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Amy Corneli
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Mehri S. McKellar
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Floyd AS, Silcox J, Cousin E, Irwin AN, Gray M, Bolivar D, Bratberg J, Arnold J, Al-Jammali Z, Hansen RN, Hartung DM, Green TC. Readiness of community pharmacies to implement an opioid safety intervention. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:275-283.e1. [PMID: 36496310 PMCID: PMC9870924 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report on efforts to measure readiness to adopt opioid safety initiatives in community pharmacies within 2 large chains. Previous studies identified lack of knowledge, confidence, or enthusiasm in addressing harm reduction efforts. We implemented an intervention that provided training to improve opioid safety. The goal was to increase naloxone prescribing and nonprescription syringe sales, reduce stigma, and decrease opioid overdoses among patients and customers. OBJECTIVES To assess pharmacy readiness for intervention delivery, by characterizing pharmacy culture around opioid safety; describing current practices and challenges interacting with patients and customers on naloxone, nonprescription syringe sales, and buprenorphine; and determining pharmacy defined goals for implementing the intervention. METHODS The sample included pharmacy managers and staff pharmacists from 2 large chains who completed a brief phone interview. Interviews consisted of Likert-scale and open-ended, theoretically driven questions. Questions focused on workplace culture, patient engagement, naloxone and buprenorphine prescribing, nonprescription syringe sales, and intervention goals. Coding categories for the open-ended questions were derived using a thematic review of responses. RESULTS A total of 163 respondents described both workplace culture and how they encourage patient opioid safety as including public health awareness, patient engagement, and naloxone prescribing. Sale of nonprescription syringes exhibited high variability: no sales barriers (53.9%), sales with barriers (21.5%), and no sales (20.9%). Half of pharmacists (50.3%) interacted with buprenorphine prescribers outside of medication fills. Most respondents (68.7%) endorsed being ready to promote the intervention. Pharmacists named goals in adopting the intervention of wanting more knowledge and educational materials, talking points with patients, and best practices for offering naloxone. CONCLUSION Community pharmacists, before implementation, described awareness of and receptiveness to opioid safety initiatives, with substantial barriers around nonprescription syringe sales. Assessed knowledge level, culture, and identified barriers that emerged in the readiness assessments can be used to tailor future pharmacy-specific programming.
Collapse
|
9
|
Eldridge LA, Meyerson BE, Agley J. Pilot implementation of the PharmNet naloxone program in an independent pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:374-382.e12. [PMID: 36209035 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. overdose epidemic has continued to escalate with more than 100,000 deaths per year in the past several years, most of which involve opioids. Widespread availability of naloxone is part of a national solution to the crisis, and community pharmacies are well-poised to facilitate such distribution and provide additional harm reduction services. OBJECTIVES The primary objectives of this study were to (a) examine the usability of each of the separate intervention components prepared for PharmNet, (b) observe intervention fidelity through regularly scheduled site visits, and (c) explore the association between PharmNet implementation and the volume of naloxone sales and distribution in the pilot site. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION Here, we describe a carefully designed and tailored pharmacy harm reduction intervention called PharmNet that is designed to maximize harm reduction impact while minimizing utilization of pharmacist resources. It is a pragmatic awareness, service provision, and referral program that was developed through careful, iterative feasibility studies with pharmacists. PRACTICE INNOVATION PharmNet procedures include tools and steps to create awareness (e.g., yard signs and messaging for patients, reminder tools for pharmacists), facilitation of naloxone delivery from nonprofits, and provision of referral cards featuring local resources. EVALUATION METHODS Evaluation included direct data collection and randomly scheduled fidelity site visits. RESULTS The intervention was associated with an increase of 3.33 naloxone doses/mo being dispensed at cost (34.4% relative increase) and an overall increase of 9.33 naloxone doses/mo being dispensed via any mechanism (96.48% relative increase). Around 2.85 referral cards were issued to patients daily. Intervention fidelity was moderate, and the study provides valuable information for how to modify the study prior to a randomized trial. CONCLUSION With modifications informed by this pilot study, the PharmNet intervention merits a randomized trial to determine whether it causes increased naloxone dispensing in independent community pharmacies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Eldridge LA, Agley J, Meyerson BE, Golzarri-Arroyo L. The PharmNet Harm Reduction Intervention for Community Pharmacies: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e42373. [PMID: 36279161 PMCID: PMC9641511 DOI: 10.2196/42373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The overdose epidemic in the United States has continued to worsen despite substantial efforts to mitigate its harms. The opioid antagonist naloxone has been identified as a key means of reducing the prevalence of fatal overdoses. An important evidence-based approach to optimizing naloxone’s impact is to seed it throughout the community, because bystanders are often able to reverse overdoses more quickly than first responders and sometimes are the only possible means of overdose reversal. As part of a multipronged approach to distributing naloxone nationwide, community pharmacies have been identified as ideal venues for naloxone dispensing, especially under standing orders. However, dispensing rates remain surprisingly low, and there is a need to understand how best to engage community pharmacies in naloxone-based harm reduction services. Objective The objective of this trial is to determine whether a tailored, pragmatic pharmacy intervention (PharmNet) results in greater naloxone dispensing relative to baseline (the prior 3 months) compared to a control condition. This pilot trial is intended to determine whether it is appropriate to invest the substantial resources that would be required to conduct a full-scale, randomized controlled study of PharmNet. Methods We will conduct a 3-month randomized controlled pilot trial consisting of 2 parallel groups with a 4:3 allocation ratio. A group of 7 independent pharmacies from rural areas in Indiana will be randomly assigned to either the PharmNet intervention arm (n=4) or the control arm (n=3). The primary outcome will be overall naloxone dispensing (both at cost and free), and secondary outcomes will include the distribution of referral cards and multiple variables at the level of individual staff members. Dispensing data will be collected for the 3 months prior to the intervention and the 3 months of the intervention, and all other data will be collected using a pretest-posttest design. The primary analysis will be a generalized linear mixed model with a Poisson distribution with fixed effects for group, time, and their interaction and a random effect for pharmacy ID to account for repeated measures within pharmacies. Results This study was approved by the Indiana University institutional review board in 2 phases (August 2, 2021, and April 26, 2022) and was funded by the Indiana University Grand Challenge: Responding to the Addictions Crisis. Conclusions If this study produces evidence that the PharmNet intervention results in increased naloxone dispensing relative to control pharmacies, it will be both appropriate and important to study it in a large, full-scale randomized controlled trial. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/42373
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jon Agley
- Prevention Insights, Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States
| | - Beth E Meyerson
- Harm Reduction Research Lab, Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
- Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo
- Biostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health Bloomington, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siddig A, Elhassan M, Ali MM, Farah A, Elkhalifa M, Elawad EH, Hassan I, Haboura O, Digna MF, Mohamedalhadi Alamin Alkhalifamohamed H. Non-prescription pharmacy syringes sales to people who inject drugs (PWID) in Khartoum, Sudan: policy, practice, and perceptions. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2022; 48:328-333. [PMID: 35130448 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2021.2024559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk of contracting blood-borne infections. Many developed countries started a needle exchange program to provide PWID with sterile syringes. In Sudan, healthcare professionals are exposed to legal liability if they cooperate with people who use drugs; therefore, the accessibility to sterile syringes without prescription depends heavily on pharmacists' knowledge and attitude toward PWID.Objectives: Assessing policy, practice, and perceptions of pharmacists toward selling sterile syringes to PWID in Khartoum, Sudan.Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was given to 157 pharmacists (57 male, 100 female).Results: Out of 157 participating pharmacists, 86.6% reported selling syringes without a medical prescription, 53.5% inquired about the reason for buying syringes, and 87.9% refused to sell the syringes to a PWID. 43.3% of participating pharmacists were uncertain about the presence of law to regulate selling syringes without prescriptions. Although 47.7% of the participants agreed that selling empty syringes without a medical prescription to PWID will reduce harm, 68.5% will not sell them to PWID without a medical prescription even if it is encouraged by law due to their religious or moral beliefs.Conclusion: Pharmacists are the main providers of clean syringes for PWID in Khartoum, Sudan. With the majority of them reporting refusal to provide syringes to PWID, this may put PWID at higher risk of contracting blood-borne infections due syringe sharing. This is a challenge to overcome in planning for effective harm reduction programs in Khartoum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Elhassan
- Daoud Research Group, Khartoum, Sudan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Mazin M Ali
- Intensive Care Unit, Jafar Ibn Auf Specialized Hospital for Children, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Abduraheem Farah
- Department of Anatomy, St. George's University, Grenada, West Indies
| | - Mohammed Elkhalifa
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Emeirii H Elawad
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Israa Hassan
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Ta'if, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omnia Haboura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Almoa'lem Medical City, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Mutaz F Digna
- Daoud Research Group, Khartoum, Sudan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fadanelli M, Cooper HLF, Freeman PR, Ballard AM, Ibragimov U, Young AM. A qualitative study on pharmacy policies toward over-the-counter syringe sales in a rural epicenter of US drug-related epidemics. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:1. [PMID: 34996466 PMCID: PMC8742380 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00569-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Expanding access to sterile syringes in rural areas is vital, as injection-related epidemics expand beyond metropolitan areas globally. While pharmacies have potential to be an easily accessible source of sterile syringes, research in cities has identified moral, legal and ethical barriers that preclude over-the-counter (OTC) sales to people who inject drugs (PWID). The current study builds on prior urban-based research by elucidating (1) pharmacy OTC policies and (2) pharmacists’ rationale for, and barriers and facilitators to, OTC syringe sales in a US rural area hard hit by drug-related epidemics. Methods We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with pharmacists recruited from two Eastern Kentucky health districts. Interview domains included experiences with, and attitudes toward, selling OTC syringes to PWID. Constructivist grounded theory methods were used to analyze verbatim transcripts. Results Most pharmacists operated “restrictive OTC” pharmacies (n = 8), where patients were required to have a prescription or proof of medical need to purchase a syringe. The remainder (n = 6) operated “open OTC” pharmacies, which allowed OTC syringe sales to most patients. Both groups believed their pharmacy policies protected their community and pharmacy from further drug-related harm, but diverging policies emerged because of stigma toward PWID, perceptions of Kentucky law, and belief OTC syringe sales were harmful rather than protective to the community. Conclusion Our results suggest that restrictive OTC pharmacy policies are rooted in stigmatizing views of PWID. Anti-stigma education about substance use disorder (SUD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and Hepatitis C (HCV) is likely needed to truly shift restrictive pharmacy policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Fadanelli
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | | | - April M Ballard
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Umed Ibragimov
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - April M Young
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hayes BT, Favaro J, Coello D, Behrends CN, Jakubowski A, Fox AD. Participants of a mail delivery syringe services program are underserved by other safe sources for sterile injection supplies. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 99:103474. [PMID: 34619446 PMCID: PMC8755579 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, accessing sterile injection supplies remains challenging for many people who inject drugs (PWID). Although women are less likely to inject drugs than men, women who do inject are disproportionately affected by IDU-related complications. Needle Exchange Technology (NEXT), the first formal online accessed mail delivery syringe services program (SSP) in the US, may overcome access barriers. We evaluated whether NEXT was reaching women participants and people without access to other safe sources of sterile injection supplies. METHODS This cross-sectional study examined NEXT participants who enrolled in the mail-delivery SSP from February 2018 through March 2021. All NEXT participants completed an online questionnaire during enrollment, which included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and injection-related risk factors (including prior sources of sterile injection supplies). Multivariable logistic regression (MVR) was used to examine associations between gender and prior use of safe sources of injection supplies (i.e., SSPs or pharmacies). RESULTS 1,032 participants received injection supplies. Median age was 34 and participants were mostly cis-gendered women (55%) and white (93%). 34% reported infection with HCV; women were more likely to report HCV infection than men (38% vs 28%; p < 0.01). 68% of participants acquired injection supplies from less safe sources. Few participants exclusively used safe sources for injection supplies (26%). In adjusted MVR analysis, women participants had significantly lower odds than men of having exclusively used safe sources for injection supplies (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52, 0.98). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that NEXT services are utilized by women and people without prior access to sterile injection supplies. Women participants were less likely than men to have exclusively used safe sources for sterile injection supplies. Future research should explore women's preference for mail-delivery over in-person SSPs and determine whether online accessed mail delivery services can reach other underserved populations of PWID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin T Hayes
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical
Center, Bronx, NY, USA,Corresponding author at: Montefiore Medical
Center, 3300 Kossuth Ave., Bronx, NY, 10467 United States. Tel.: +1
718-920-7102; fax: +1 718-561-5165.
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Jakubowski
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical
Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Aaron D. Fox
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Montefiore Medical
Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Trull G, Major E, Harless C, Zule W, Ostrach B, Carpenter D. Rural community pharmacist willingness to dispense Suboxone® - A secret shopper investigation in South-Central Appalachia. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2021; 4:100082. [PMID: 35479845 PMCID: PMC9031434 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Buprenorphine access is limited for patients with opioid use disorder, especially in rural areas. Telephone audits have identified pharmacist limitations to the dispensing of buprenorphine particularly in independent pharmacies in comparison to chain pharmacies and in rural areas. The objective of this study was to assess rural community pharmacists' stated willingness to dispense buprenorphine-naloxone, and document potential bias and or stigma that the shopper experiences when asking about buprenorphine- naloxone. Methods To assess pharmacist willingness, a telephone audit of 15 rural Appalachian North Carolina pharmacies was conducted. Three secret shopper scenarios were utilized including one shopper posing as a new patient, one shopper posing as an out of state patient, and one shopper first asking about buying syringes. Encounters were noted by willingness to dispense buprenorphine, and shoppers were to note any potential stigma and or bias that they experienced while asking for Suboxone®. Results Overall, 60% of pharmacies audited indicated willingness to dispense buprenorphine without reservation, and 31% indicated willingness to dispense only under certain circumstances. Pharmacies tended to add more conditions to dispensing to the out of state patient (46%), such as only dispensing if the practitioner was from in state in comparison to the other shopper scenarios. Potential stigma and bias were encountered in 40% of the 45 encounters. Conclusion Although pharmacies overall seemed willing to dispense, nuances regarding who pharmacies are most likely to dispense are felt in rural areas. Buprenorphine access limitations were more common in independent pharmacies and more often placed on patients from out of state. Pharmacy- directed education is necessary to reduce stigma and bias and increase patient access to buprenorphine.
Collapse
|
15
|
Community pharmacist engagement in HIV and HCV prevention: Current practices and potential for service uptake. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2021; 4:100088. [PMID: 35479840 PMCID: PMC9029914 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Objective Methods Results Conclusions Pharmacists are largely willing to help people who need HIV/HCV prevention services. Perception of HIV/HCV prevention fit with pharmacist professional identity varies. Cognitive HIV/HCV prevention services are preferred over hands-on clinical services. Pharmacists often engage in gatekeeping to limit sales of non-prescription syringes. Willingness to sell syringes potentially hinges on minimal contact with requestors.
Collapse
|
16
|
Marotta PL, Stringer K, Beletsky L, West BS, Goddard-Eckrich D, Gilbert L, Hunt T, Wu E, El-Bassel N. Assessing the relationship between syringe exchange, pharmacy, and street sources of accessing syringes and injection drug use behavior in a pooled nationally representative sample of people who inject drugs in the United States from 2002 to 2019. Harm Reduct J 2021; 18:115. [PMID: 34789270 PMCID: PMC8600731 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00565-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Provision of sterile syringes is an evidence-based strategy of reducing syringe sharing and reusing and yet, access to sterile syringes through pharmacies and syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in the United States remains inadequate. This nationally representative study examined associations between obtaining syringes from pharmacies, SEPs, and sterilizing syringes with bleach and risk of syringe borrowing, lending and reusing syringes in a pooled cross-sectional dataset of 1737 PWID from the 2002-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Logistic regression was used to produce odds ratios (OR) of the odds of injection drug behaviors after adjusting for obtaining syringes from SEPs, pharmacies, the street, and other sources and potential confounders of race, ethnicity, sex, education, and insurance coverage. Obtaining syringes through SEPs was associated with lower odds of borrowing (OR = .4, CI95% = .2, .9, p = .022) and reusing syringes (OR = .3, CI95% = .2, .6, < .001) compared to obtaining syringes on the street. Obtaining syringes from pharmacies was associated with lower odds of borrowing (OR = .5, CI95% = .3, .9, p = .037) and lending (OR = .5 CI95% = .3, .9, p = .020) syringes. Using bleach to clean syringes was associated with increased odds of borrowing (OR = 2.0, CI95% = 1.3, 3.0, p = .002), lending (OR = 2.0, CI95% = 1.3, 3.0, p = .002) and reusing syringes (OR = 2.4, CI95% = 1.6, 3.6, p < .001). Our findings support provision of syringes through pharmacies and SEPs as a gold-standard strategy of reducing sharing and reuse of syringes in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip L Marotta
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Kristi Stringer
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Leo Beletsky
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Brooke S West
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Dawn Goddard-Eckrich
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Louisa Gilbert
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Tim Hunt
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Elwin Wu
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Nabila El-Bassel
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Broz D, Carnes N, Chapin-Bardales J, Des Jarlais DC, Handanagic S, Jones CM, McClung RP, Asher AK. Syringe Services Programs' Role in Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S.: Why We Cannot Do It Without Them. Am J Prev Med 2021; 61:S118-S129. [PMID: 34686281 PMCID: PMC11334402 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Diagnoses of HIV among people who inject drugs have increased in the U.S. during 2014-2018 for the first time in 2 decades, and multiple HIV outbreaks have been detected among people who inject drugs since 2015. These epidemiologic trends pose a significant concern for achieving goals of the federal initiative for Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. Syringe services programs are cost effective, safe, and highly effective in reducing HIV transmission and are an essential component of a comprehensive, integrated approach to addressing these concerns. Yet, geographic coverage of these programs remains limited in the U.S., and many jurisdictions continue to have laws and policies that limit or disallow syringe services programs. An in-depth literature review was conducted on the role of syringe services programs in the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. Empirical and model-based evidence consistently shows that syringe services programs have the highest impact in HIV prevention when combined with access to medications for substance use disorder and antiretroviral therapy. Their effectiveness is further maximized when they provide services without restrictions and include proven and innovative strategies to expand access to harm-reduction and clinical services (e.g., peer outreach, telehealth). Increasing geographic and service coverage of syringe services programs requires strong and sustainable policy, funding, and community support and will need to address new challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Syringe services programs have a key role in all 4 Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative strategies-Prevent, Diagnose, Treat, and Respond-and thus are instrumental to its success in preventing disease and saving lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dita Broz
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Neal Carnes
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Johanna Chapin-Bardales
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Don C Des Jarlais
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Global Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Senad Handanagic
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christopher M Jones
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - R Paul McClung
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Alice K Asher
- Office of Policy, Planning and Partnerships, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Agley J, Meyerson BE, Eldridge LA, Crosby RA, Bentele KG, Jun M, Vadiei N, Kennedy A, Anderson K. Exploration of pharmacist comfort with harm reduction behaviors: Cross-sectional latent class analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2021; 62:432-440. [PMID: 34742654 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacists are positioned to play important roles in implementing evidence-based prevention and harm reduction approaches for opioid misuse and related health care outcomes such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C. More research is needed to understand how best to facilitate harm reduction practices among pharmacists. OBJECTIVES This hypothesis-generating study investigated (1) whether subgroups (latent classes) were observable among pharmacists based on self-reported comfort with specific harm reduction behaviors, (2) whether having reported expertise in key content areas was associated with any latent classes that might be identified, and (3) whether comfort and training were associated with actually having dispensed syringes for likely nonprescription drug use. METHODS This was a statewide census of community managing pharmacists in Arizona conducted from December 2018 to May 2019. Participants reported their degree of comfort with 10 harm reduction behaviors, their expertise (e.g., recent continuing pharmacy education or specialization) in selected content areas, and their syringe dispensing behavior. Additional sociodemographic information was also collected. Subgroups related to harm reduction were computed using latent class analysis, and associations between study variables were assessed using the Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Data suggested the existence of 4 latent, comfort-based harm reduction classes: high comfort, moderate comfort, and clinical comfort, and opioid prevention only. Reported expertise in pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV was likely associated with harm reduction class. However, class membership was not associated with reporting having dispensed nonprescription syringes, although the single comfort item for syringe dispensing, by itself, was associated therewith. CONCLUSION Comfort with harm reduction likely clusters, so pharmacists may be broadly comfortable with topics or methods of harm reduction; however, comfort with a specific harm reduction pharmacy practice may be a better predictor of engaging in that behavior than harm reduction comfort class. In contrast, strategies to improve comfort, such as intervention development, might successfully be informed by pharmacists' latent class.
Collapse
|
19
|
Parry RA, Zule WA, Hurt CB, Evon DM, Rhea SK, Carpenter DM. Pharmacist attitudes and provision of harm reduction services in North Carolina: an exploratory study. Harm Reduct J 2021; 18:70. [PMID: 34238306 PMCID: PMC8265050 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00517-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacists are among the most accessible healthcare providers in the United States and uniquely positioned to provide harm reduction services. The availability of pharmacy-based harm reduction services and pharmacist attitudes toward delivering these services have been understudied to date. We examine North Carolina (NC) pharmacists' experiences with and attitudes about harm reduction services and explore differences between rural and urban pharmacists. METHODS A convenience sample of NC pharmacists participated in an anonymous, online survey regarding harm reduction services: non-prescription syringe sales; naloxone dispensing; and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening. Urban-rural differences were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Three hundred pharmacists responded to the survey; 68 (23%) practiced in rural counties. Dispensing non-prescription syringes and naloxone at least occasionally was reported by 77% (n = 231) and 88% (n = 263) pharmacists, respectively. Pharmacy-delivered HIV or HCV screening was rare. Urban pharmacists dispensed naloxone more frequently than rural pharmacies (p = 0.04). Only 52% of pharmacists agreed that persons who inject drugs should always be allowed to buy non-prescription syringes. Rural pharmacists' attitudes toward harm reduction services for persons who inject drugs were statistically, though marginally, less supportive when compared to urban pharmacists' attitudes. The most common barrier to non-prescription syringe access was requiring patients to provide proof of prescription injection medication use, which 21% of pharmacists reported was required by their pharmacy's policy on non-prescription syringe sales. CONCLUSIONS Although most pharmacies distributed naloxone and sold non-prescription syringes, pharmacy store policies and personal beliefs inhibited naloxone and non-prescription syringe dispensing. NC community pharmacies infrequently offer HIV and HCV screening. Paired with disseminating the evidence of the positive impact of harm reduction on individual and public health outcomes to NC pharmacists, institutional and systems changes to practice and policy may be important to promote harm reduction service availability, particularly for rural NC residents. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Parry
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 201 Pharmacy Lane, CB 7355, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7355, USA.
| | - William A Zule
- RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | - Christopher B Hurt
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 130 Mason Farm Rd, CB#7030, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7030, USA
| | - Donna M Evon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sarah K Rhea
- RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Rd., PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | - Delesha M Carpenter
- UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, 201 Pharmacy Lane, CB 7355, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7355, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vadiei N, Eldridge LA, Meyerson BE, Agley J. "The gatekeepers in prevention": Community pharmacist perceptions of their role in the opioid epidemic. Subst Abus 2021; 43:319-327. [PMID: 34214407 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1941516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacists are at the frontline of patient care, yet their role in the opioid epidemic remains unclear. This qualitative study examines the perception of community pharmacists about their role in the opioid epidemic and challenges to fulfilling this role. Methods: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data from an Indiana census of community managing pharmacists was conducted. Qualitative data were coded using a priori and emergent themes. A priori categories included the perceived role of pharmacists in the opioid epidemic and perception of practice barriers. Results: A total of 215 Indiana community managing pharmacists participated in this study. Pharmacists understood themselves as gatekeepers in preventing opioid misuse and overdose. Reported pharmacy practices included providing patient education and communicating with prescribers. Challenges to fulfilling this role included pharmacy structure and operation, lack of patient and provider clarity about pharmacist scope of practice, and pharmacist perception that that there is no available discretionary time to support additional services. Conclusion: Pharmacists believe they have a vital role in combatting opioid misuse and overdose but are hampered by structural aspects of pharmacy practice and lack of recognition of their role. Pharmacy associations and policy partners are encouraged to identify opportunities to address these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Vadiei
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Lori Ann Eldridge
- Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.,Prevention Insights, Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Beth E Meyerson
- Southwest Institute for Research on Women, College of Social & Behavioral Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Family & Community Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jon Agley
- Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.,Prevention Insights, Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University School of Public Health - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barnett BS, Wakeman SE, Davis CS, Favaro J, Rich JD. Expanding Mail-Based Distribution of Drug-Related Harm Reduction Supplies Amid COVID-19 and Beyond. Am J Public Health 2021; 111:1013-1017. [PMID: 33950718 PMCID: PMC8101586 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2021.306228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian S Barnett
- Brian S. Barnett is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Sarah E. Wakeman is with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Corey S. Davis is with The Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles, CA. Jamie Favaro is with NEXT Distro, New York, NY. Josiah D. Rich is with the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University, and the Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Sarah E Wakeman
- Brian S. Barnett is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Sarah E. Wakeman is with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Corey S. Davis is with The Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles, CA. Jamie Favaro is with NEXT Distro, New York, NY. Josiah D. Rich is with the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University, and the Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Corey S Davis
- Brian S. Barnett is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Sarah E. Wakeman is with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Corey S. Davis is with The Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles, CA. Jamie Favaro is with NEXT Distro, New York, NY. Josiah D. Rich is with the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University, and the Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Jamie Favaro
- Brian S. Barnett is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Sarah E. Wakeman is with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Corey S. Davis is with The Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles, CA. Jamie Favaro is with NEXT Distro, New York, NY. Josiah D. Rich is with the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University, and the Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Josiah D Rich
- Brian S. Barnett is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Sarah E. Wakeman is with the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. Corey S. Davis is with The Network for Public Health Law, Los Angeles, CA. Jamie Favaro is with NEXT Distro, New York, NY. Josiah D. Rich is with the Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown University, and the Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Crawford ND, Myers S, Young H, Klepser D, Tung E. The Role of Pharmacies in the HIV Prevention and Care Continuums: A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav 2021; 25:1819-1828. [PMID: 33386509 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-03111-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The role of pharmacists in the treatment of HIV has expanded beyond medication dispensing to include a host of cost-effective, evidence-based strategies across the HIV prevention and care continuums. However, wide-scale adoption of pharmacy-based HIV prevention and treatment interventions has been slow. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the role of pharmacists across the HIV prevention and care continuums. Thirty-two studies were identified, most of which provided evidence of feasibility of HIV testing and efficacy of non-prescription syringe sale services in pharmacies. However, only two studies implemented an experimental design to rigorously test pharmacy-based strategies. Notably, no pharmacy-based strategies have specifically targeted the highest HIV risk populations such as black and Latinx men who have sex with men, women, or trans populations. Efficacy trials and effectiveness studies should rigorously test existing pharmacy-based strategies to build greater support for wide-scale adoption and implementation. Moreover, in order to integrate pharmacies into the strategy to end the HIV epidemic, studies are needed to ensure that pharmacy-based HIV prevention and treatment services can reach the highest risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie D Crawford
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Sky Myers
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Henry Young
- College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Donald Klepser
- College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Elyse Tung
- Kelley-Ross Pharmacy, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hagemeier NE, Dowling-McClay K, Baladezaei M, Curtis SJ, Spence M. Pharmacists' nonprescription syringe dispensing perceptions and behaviors: A three-state descriptive analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 221:108597. [PMID: 33631542 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One approach to increasing the reach of syringe programs in rural areas could be through provision of syringes at community pharmacies. This study evaluated relationships between state-specific syringe policies, pharmacy, and pharmacist characteristics and pharmacists' nonprescription syringe dispensing behaviors in a 3- state Appalachian region at high risk for HIV and HCV transmission. METHODS We conducted a telephone census of community pharmacies in the Appalachian counties of North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia from April-June 2018. Behaviors studied included having ever sold syringes without a prescription, quantity of individuals to whom nonprescription syringes were dispensed in the past 30 days, having ever denied a request for nonprescription syringes, and past 30-day denial of nonprescription syringe requests. Behavioral intention and perceptions of legality were elicited. RESULTS A response rate of 52.3 % was achieved (N = 391). North Carolina pharmacists reported increased past 30-day dispensing, less denial of nonprescription syringe requests, and decreased justification for syringe dispensing (proof of medical need) as compared to Tennessee and Virginia pharmacists. Behavioral intention to dispense did not vary by state but did vary by political affiliation. Perceptions of syringe dispensing legality in NC were significantly different from those in TN and VA. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences in pharmacists' perceptions and behaviors were noted across state lines with North Carolina pharmacists reporting more engagement in syringe dispensing as compared to pharmacists in Tennessee and Virginia. Policy allowing pharmacists to dispense syringes to people who inject drugs appears to foster some but not all pharmacist engagement in this harm reduction intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas E Hagemeier
- East Tennessee State University Gatton College of Pharmacy, Box 70657, City, TN, 37614, United States.
| | - KariLynn Dowling-McClay
- East Tennessee State University Gatton College of Pharmacy, Box 70657, City, TN, 37614, United States
| | - Mahnaz Baladezaei
- East Tennessee State University Gatton College of Pharmacy, Box 70657, City, TN, 37614, United States
| | - Sabrina J Curtis
- East Tennessee State University Gatton College of Pharmacy, Box 70657, City, TN, 37614, United States
| | - Matthew Spence
- East Tennessee State University Gatton College of Pharmacy, Box 70657, City, TN, 37614, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Affiliation(s)
- Brian S Barnett
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Center for Behavioral Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nathaniel P Morris
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pollini RA, Ozga JE, Blanchard D, Syvertsen JL. Consider the Source: Associations between Syringe Sources and Risky Injection Behaviors in California's Central Valley. Subst Use Misuse 2021; 56:2007-2016. [PMID: 34379030 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1963987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sterile syringe access is critical to prevent serious viral and bacterial infections among people who inject drugs (PWID) but many areas across the United States lack sufficient access. Although California law allows nonprescription pharmacy syringe sales and syringe services programs (SSPs), access gaps remain in the largely rural Central Valley. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine syringe access and related injection behaviors among PWID in Fresno, California. METHODS We used respondent driven sampling to recruit 494 individuals for a survey about syringe access and injection behaviors between April and September 2016. Participants were ≥18 years old and injected at least twice in the past 30 days. Descriptive statistics examined syringe access and logistic regression determined if discrete syringe source categories were significantly associated with syringe sharing and/or reuse. RESULTS A majority (67%) obtained syringes from an authorized source; SSPs were most common (59%), while few reported pharmacy purchase (14%). Unauthorized sources were even more common (79%), primarily friends (64%) or someone on the street (37%). Compared to PWID who used only authorized sources, those using only unauthorized sources had a higher odds of syringe sharing (AOR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.66, 6.95) and syringe reuse (AOR = 6.22; 95% CI: 2.24, 17.29), as did those who reported mixed sources (AOR = 3.78; 95% CI: 1.90, 7.54 and AOR = 4.64; 95% CI: 2.08, 10.35). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate a need to expand syringe access in nonurban California to prevent the syringe sharing and reuse that contributes to serious viral and bacterial infections among PWID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Pollini
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland, USA.,Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Jenny E Ozga
- Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | | | - Jennifer L Syvertsen
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Varisco TJ, Downs CG, Rathburn KR, Fleming ML, Thornton JD. Applying the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior model to identify opportunities to increase pharmacist comfort dispensing naloxone in Texas: A structural equation modeling approach. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 83:102827. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
27
|
Estimated effect of US state syringe sale policy on source of last-used injection equipment. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2019; 76:102625. [PMID: 31838243 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people who inject drugs (PWID) lack access to a new sterile syringe each time they inject, with increased risk of injection-related harms, including spread of communicable diseases. In the United States (US), restricted access is largely due to state laws and policies regulating syringe access. Our aim in this US-focused study is to estimate variations in syringe acquisition behavior in relation to state-level syringe sale policies, drawing upon self-identified PWID in a nationally representative sample survey. METHODS Estimates were obtained on the source of the last used syringe from participants of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) years 2002-2011. States were classified as having restricted syringe policies if they had any restriction on the sale of syringes during the study period (e.g., required a prescription or limited the number being sold). RESULTS In states with unrestricted syringe sale policies, PWID were more likely to have obtained their most recently used syringe from a safe source (Difference (%) = 9.8, 95% CI: 1.9, 17.7). This difference was largely driven by a larger percent of injectors obtaining syringes from a pharmacy in unrestricted states (Difference = 20.4, 95% CI: 12.2, 28.6) but was partially offset by fewer injectors obtaining syringes from syringe exchange programs (Difference = -10.7, 95% CI: -16.1, -5.3). CONCLUSION These new findings, taken with other evidence, should help promote removal of policy barriers that now thwart syringe acquisition from a safe source. We hope this additional evidence will provoke policy discussions and may influence regulations that promote public health and reduce the spread of communicable diseases.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Across all care environments, pharmacists play an essential role in the care of people who use and misuse psychoactive substances, including those diagnosed with substance use disorders. To optimize, sustain, and expand these independent and collaborative roles, the Association for Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Substance Use and Addiction (AMERSA) has developed core competencies for pharmacists to address substance use in the 21st century. Key concepts, skills, and attitudes are outlined, with links to entrustable professional activities to assist with integration into a variety of ideally interdisciplinary curricular activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Bratberg
- Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kurian S, Baloy B, Baird J, Burstein D, Xuan Z, Bratberg J, Tapper A, Walley A, Green TC. Attitudes and perceptions of naloxone dispensing among a sample of Massachusetts community pharmacy technicians. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2019; 59:824-831. [PMID: 31582224 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is limited research on the attitudes of pharmacy technicians toward pharmacy naloxone provision, despite their widespread role in the pharmacy. We examined attitudes and perceptions of pharmacy technicians in the provision of naloxone in a sample of Massachusetts pharmacies. DESIGN Thirty-nine community retail pharmacies from 1 U.S. chain were purposely sampled in 13 municipalities across Massachusetts. Pharmacies were divided into high-risk municipalities (HRMs) versus low-risk municipalities (LRMs) based on the state average opioid-related death rate from 2011 to 2015. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS A pharmacy technician working in each pharmacy was administered an in-person survey. Survey topics included technician beliefs about current naloxone provision practices; patient groups at greater risk of overdose; whether individuals filling prescriptions would benefit from naloxone; and whether individuals purchasing syringes would benefit from naloxone. OUTCOME MEASURES Closed-ended responses were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U, Fisher exact, and chi-square tests. Open-ended responses were summarized for themes and then contrasted by municipality risk status. RESULTS Technician participation was 100% (n = 39). Technicians in both groups believed they could identify patient groups at risk of overdose in their practice, but HRM technicians recognized the need for naloxone for more of their at-risk patients (81% in HRM vs. 33% in LRM believed > 25% of patients need naloxone, P < 0.01). A willingness to provide naloxone was high (> 89%) in both groups. Open-ended responses revealed commonalities between groups, including the belief that patients need lower-cost naloxone, and a lack of patient and technician awareness that naloxone could prevent overdose in individuals at risk through use of prescription opioids not just through use of illicit drugs. CONCLUSION Pharmacy technicians would benefit from overdose prevention training and are well positioned to recognize overdose risk and offer preventive interventions, such as naloxone. Among technicians, there is a high willingness to be involved in implementing broader naloxone access in pharmacies.
Collapse
|
30
|
I could take the judgment if you could just provide the service: non-prescription syringe purchase experience at Arizona pharmacies, 2018. Harm Reduct J 2019; 16:57. [PMID: 31533730 PMCID: PMC6751644 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-019-0327-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Community pharmacies are important for health access by rural populations and those who do not have optimum access to the health system, because they provide myriad health services and are found in most communities. This includes the sale of non-prescription syringes, a practice that is legal in the USA in all but two states. However, people who inject drugs (PWID) face significant barriers accessing sterile syringes, particularly in states without laws allowing syringe services programming. To our knowledge, no recent studies of pharmacy-based syringe purchase experience have been conducted in communities that are both rural and urban, and none in the Southwestern US. This study seeks to understand the experience of retail pharmacy syringe purchase in Arizona by PWID. Methods An interview study was conducted between August and December 2018 with 37 people living in 3 rural and 2 urban Arizona counties who identified as current or former users of injection drugs. Coding was both a priori and emergent, focusing on syringe access through pharmacies, pharmacy experiences generally, experiences of stigma, and recommendations for harm reduction services delivered by pharmacies. Results All participants reported being refused syringe purchase at pharmacies. Six themes emerged about syringe purchase: (1) experience of stigma and judgment by pharmacy staff, (2) feelings of internalized stigma, (3) inconsistent sales outcomes at the same pharmacy or pharmacy chain, (4) pharmacies as last resort for syringes, (5) fear of arrest for syringe possession, and (6) health risks resulting from syringe refusal. Conclusions Non-prescription syringe sales in community pharmacies are a missed opportunity to improve the health of PWID by reducing syringe sharing and reuse. Yet, current pharmacy syringe sales refusal and stigmatization by staff suggest that pharmacy-level interventions will be necessary to impact pharmacy practice. Lack of access to sterile syringes reinforces health risk behaviors among PWID. Retail syringe sales at pharmacies remain an important, yet barrier-laden, element of a comprehensive public health response to reduce HIV and hepatitis C among PWID. Future studies should test multilevel evidence-based interventions to decrease staff discrimination and stigma and increase syringe sales.
Collapse
|
31
|
Meyerson BE, Agley JD, Jayawardene W, Eldridge LA, Arora P, Smith C, Vadiei N, Kennedy A, Moehling T. Feasibility and acceptability of a proposed pharmacy-based harm reduction intervention to reduce opioid overdose, HIV and hepatitis C. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019; 16:699-709. [PMID: 31611071 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based harm reduction intervention components which might benefit pharmacy patients have not been integrated and studied. OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of a proposed pharmacy-based harm reduction intervention to reduce opioid overdose, HIV and hepatitis C called PharmNet. METHODS Indiana managing pharmacists were surveyed in 2018 to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention for opioid misuse screening, brief intervention, syringe and naloxone dispensing, and referrals provision. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed the survey development and analysis. RESULTS The sample included 303 (30.8%) pharmacists; 215 (70.9%) provided detailed written comments. Intervention Characteristics: 83.3% believed PharmNet would benefit patients, and that staff could deliver the intervention with adequate training (70.0%). Inner Setting: While 77.2% believed their pharmacy culture supported practice change, 57.5% of chain pharmacists believed their pharmacies would not have time for PharmNet. Outer Setting: 73.3% believed additional addiction and overdose screening is needed in their community, and pharmacies should offer new services to help reduce opioid overdose and addiction among their patients (79.5%). A vast majority (97.7%) were asked by patients in the past 2 years about syringe related issues; 67.7% were asked about syringes for non-prescription injection drug use. Individuals Involved: While 62.4% believed PharmNet was within pharmacy scope of practice and 90.1% were comfortable consulting about syringe use, pharmacists reported that they had limited control over the implementation environment. PROCESS 38.0% of pharmacists indicated interest in advising the development of PharmNet. CONCLUSIONS An implementation trial of a modified version of PharmNet is likely feasible; yet will be challenged by structural pressures particularly in chain pharmacies. Successful implementation will involve the development of resources and policy components to manage outer and inner setting characteristics and align the intervention to the implementation environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B E Meyerson
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA; Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA; Southwest Institute for Research on Women, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - J D Agley
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA; Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - W Jayawardene
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA; Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - L A Eldridge
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA; Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - P Arora
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Butler University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - C Smith
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Butler University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - N Vadiei
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - A Kennedy
- College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - T Moehling
- Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Public Health Graduate Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | -
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meyerson BE, Dinh PC, Agley JD, Hill BJ, Motley DN, Carter GA, Jayawardene W, Ryder PT. Predicting Pharmacist Dispensing Practices and Comfort Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention (PrEP). AIDS Behav 2019; 23:1925-1938. [PMID: 30607758 PMCID: PMC8274484 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-018-02383-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
To identify factors associated with pharmacist dispensing practice and comfort counseling patients about pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP). Cross-sectional 2016 census of Indiana managing pharmacists measured PrEP awareness, comfort dispensing and counseling patients. Modified Poisson models with robust error variance estimated relative risks and confidence intervals. 15.8% of 284 pharmacists had dispensed PrEP and 11.6% had consulted about it. Dispensing and comfort counseling were associated with confidence in knowledge about PrEP medication adherence and adverse effects of PrEP medication; awareness about PrEP before the survey, number of full time pharmacists in their pharmacy, and increases in new HIV cases from 2015 to 2016 in communities served. Comfort counseling about PrEP was associated with the belief that pharmacists can be an important resource for HIV and HCV treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B E Meyerson
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
- Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - P C Dinh
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
- Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - J D Agley
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
- Indiana Prevention Research Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
| | - B J Hill
- Center for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ci3), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - D N Motley
- Center for Interdisciplinary Inquiry and Innovation in Sexual and Reproductive Health (Ci3), The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - G A Carter
- Indiana University School of Nursing, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - W Jayawardene
- Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, 1025 E. 7th street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
- Indiana Prevention Research Center, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
- Institute for Research on Addictive Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
| | - P T Ryder
- Larkin University College of Pharmacy, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Just the fax, please: Updating electronic/hybrid methods for surveying pharmacists. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019; 15:226-227. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|